Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Reverse curve

A reverse curve is a configuration in the horizontal of highways, , and other consisting of two consecutive circular curves that deflect in opposite directions, typically joined by a common segment to facilitate a smooth change in direction. In highway design, reverse curves are utilized to adapt to topographic constraints and minimize while maintaining efficient , but they demand precise to manage superelevation transitions and prevent adverse effects on vehicle handling. Design standards from state departments of transportation, such as those from and , recommend avoiding true reverse curves without intervening tangents on new alignments except in cases of unusual or right-of-way limitations, and require minimum tangent lengths, such as at least 15 times the design speed in feet according to TxDOT guidelines, to allow for superelevation runoff and runout without overlap. For instance, the maximum superelevation rate is capped at 8% in many guidelines, with curve radii determined by design speed to ensure and passenger comfort. Reverse curves also appear in , where they must incorporate rail cant (superelevation) to counteract centrifugal forces and avoid derailments, particularly in high-speed corridors like California's project. Safety measures for reverse curves in roadways include the use of , such as the Reverse Curve (W1-4) sign from on Uniform Traffic Control Devices, placed in advance of the first curve when the tangent between curves is less than 600 feet, often supplemented by advisory speed plaques or chevrons if the speed differential exceeds 10 mph. These elements collectively ensure that reverse curves balance geometric efficiency with operational across applications.

Definition and Geometry

Definition

In , horizontal alignment refers to the layout of a roadway or railway in the plan view, determining how the path curves or straightens to follow the intended route while considering and . A reverse curve is a type of horizontal alignment consisting of two consecutive circular arcs that curve in opposite directions, such as left followed by right, typically forming an S-shape and connected by a short segment or directly at a point of tangency. This configuration allows the alignment to navigate changes in direction efficiently over limited distances. Unlike a compound curve, which involves multiple arcs curving in the same direction with varying radii, or a curve, which is a single continuous arc, a reverse curve distinctly reverses the direction of without requiring an extended section between the arcs. This reversal can introduce unique challenges in sight distance and , setting it apart from other curve types in design practice.

Geometric Elements

A reverse curve consists of two circular arcs curving in opposite directions, forming the core of its geometric structure. The key points defining its layout include the point of curvature (PC), where the first arc begins from the initial ; the point of reverse curvature (PRC), the junction where the first arc ends and the second begins without a straight section in direct configurations; and the point of tangency (PT), where the second arc transitions back to the final . A common tangent line spans from the initial straight approach to the final departure, providing the baseline reference for the curve's alignment. These elements ensure the curve reverses direction smoothly in . The arcs are defined by their radii, denoted as R_1 for the first arc and R_2 for the second, which may be equal or unequal depending on design needs. The centers of curvature for these arcs are positioned on opposite sides of the common tangent, creating the reversal effect. The degree of curvature D, a measure of the curve's sharpness based on the central angle subtended by a 100-foot arc, is given by the formula D = \frac{5729.58}{R} where R is the radius in feet and D is expressed in degrees; this applies to each arc individually. Standard formulas govern the dimensions of these elements. The tangent length T, the straight-line distance from the PC to the point of intersection (PI) of the tangents or from the PI to the PT, is calculated as T = R \tan\left(\frac{\Delta}{2}\right) where \Delta is the deflection of the curve in degrees. The L for each curve, measured along the circular path from PC to PT (or equivalent for the second arc), is L = 2 \pi R \left( \frac{I}{360} \right) where I is the in degrees; the total length of the reverse curve is the sum of the two individual arc lengths. Reverse curves appear in two primary configurations: equal-radius setups where R_1 = R_2, resulting in a symmetric S-curve for balanced deflection; or unequal-radius designs where R_1 \neq R_2, allowing adaptation to varying . They can connect directly at the PRC for compactness or include a separating between the PT of the first arc and the PC of the second to ease the reversal. Visually, the arcs form an S-shaped path, with the PRC serving as the pivot between opposing curvatures; the arcs' theoretical extensions intersect the tangent lines at virtual points beyond the PC and PT on opposite ends, highlighting the directional shift without physical overlap.

Design Considerations

Transition Curves

Transition curves, also known as spiral curves, are essential components in the design of reverse curves to ensure a gradual introduction of from straight sections to the circular . Their primary purpose is to provide a smooth variation in the , which allows for the progressive development of superelevation and minimizes sudden changes in lateral acceleration experienced by vehicles. This reduction in abrupt shifts enhances vehicle stability, passenger comfort, and track or roadway longevity by limiting wear from dynamic loads. The most commonly employed types of transition curves are the clothoid, or Euler spiral, and the cubic parabola. In a clothoid, the curvature increases linearly with the arc length, following the parametric equations involving Fresnel integrals, which results in a constant rate of change of radial acceleration along the curve. The cubic parabola, on the other hand, uses a polynomial approximation where curvature k \approx \frac{x}{R L}, where R is the radius of the circular arc, x is the distance along the curve, and L is the transition length; this provides a near-linear increase in curvature, offering computational simplicity while approximating the clothoid's behavior. In reverse curve applications, special considerations are required at the point of curvature reversal to prevent "throw-over," a hazardous condition where superelevation abruptly reverses direction, potentially leading to loss of traction. This is managed by incorporating sufficient tangent length between opposing arcs or employing S-shaped universal transition curves that maintain gradual superelevation runoff without sudden cant changes. The length of the transition curve L_s is calculated using the empirical formula L_s = \frac{V^3}{46.7 R C}, where V is the design speed in km/h, R is the radius of the circular arc in meters, and C is the comfortable rate of change of radial acceleration (typically 0.3 to 0.6 m/s³). Additional parameters include the offset (perpendicular distance from the tangent to the spiral's end) and shift (adjustment to align the spiral with the circular arc), which ensure precise geometric fitting. Historically, the development of transition curves began in the mid-19th century amid rising railway speeds, with early proposals like the 1868 cosine curve attempting to address abrupt curvature changes. However, the , first mathematically described by Leonhard Euler in 1744 and later adapted for in the late 1800s by figures such as Arthur Talbot, emerged as the preferred standard due to its linear curvature progression and minimal jerk (rate of change of acceleration). Modern standards, including those from AASHTO and railway authorities, predominantly specify clothoids for their superior dynamic performance in both highway and rail contexts.

Superelevation and Cant

Superelevation in refers to the banking of the roadway surface on s to counteract s acting on vehicles, thereby reducing reliance on for lateral . The required superelevation rate e is calculated using the [formula e](/page/Formula_E) = \frac{V^2}{127 R}, where V is the design speed in km/h and R is the in meters; this represents the balanced condition where superelevation alone offsets the , though in practice, it is combined with side f as e + f = \frac{V^2}{127 R}. In , the equivalent is cant, which elevates the outer rail relative to the inner rail to balance lateral forces on the wheels, preventing excessive contact and uneven wheel loading. The equilibrium cant E (in inches) is given by E = 0.0007 V^2 D, where V is the speed in mph and D is the . In reverse curves, where the direction of reverses at the point of reverse curvature (PRC), a key challenge arises from the need to reverse the banking direction, as the superelevation or cant applied to the first curve becomes adverse to the second. This reversal requires run-off and run-on transitions to gradually adjust the cross-slope, avoiding sudden changes that could cause instability, passenger discomfort, or increased lateral forces. For instance, without proper transitions, the outer or lane in the second curve may experience adverse cant or superelevation, leading to higher loading on the outer wheels and potential or wear. These transitions are implemented over lengths that align with spiral changes for smooth progression. Design formulas incorporate maximum limits to ensure safety and constructability; for roads, the American Association of and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) specifies a maximum superelevation rate of 0.12 (12%) for rural highways without icy conditions. In , adverse cant is limited to prevent excessive outer wheel loading, with standards emphasizing cant deficiency or excess not exceeding certain thresholds, such as 3 inches in many systems. Key factors influencing these designs include design speed, curve radius, and friction coefficient (typically up to 0.15 for roads at higher speeds), as tighter reverse curves with high speeds may necessitate adverse superelevation in sections, amplifying centrifugal effects if not mitigated. Standards require gradual rotation of the superelevation or cant over the length to synchronize with the easing or sharpening of via curves, ensuring the rate of change remains consistent for comfort and stability. For roads, AASHTO guidelines recommend sufficient length between reverse curves—often at least the superelevation runoff distance—to complete these adjustments without overlap issues. Similarly, the Railway Engineering and Maintenance-of-Way (AREMA) mandates minimum segments between reverse curves, such as 60 feet for curves of 12–13 degrees, to accommodate cant and avoid abrupt reversals.

Applications

Highway Engineering

In highway engineering, reverse curves are employed to navigate challenging terrain such as hills, valleys, or obstacles, while minimizing earthwork and adapting to constrained spaces in or mountainous environments. These configurations allow alignments to follow natural more closely, reducing the need for extensive cuts or fills compared to longer sections or simple curves. For instance, in areas with limited right-of-way, reverse curves enable shorter overall routes that conform to site-specific conditions without excessive land acquisition. The primary advantages of reverse curves in highway include providing a more fluid aesthetic to the roadway and shortening travel distances, which can improve efficiency in fitting into tight corridors. However, they introduce disadvantages such as increased construction complexity due to the need for precise curve transitions and potential if are too short, leading to a perceived "kink" in the that affects handling. To mitigate this, designers prioritize sufficient lengths between reverse curves, with AASHTO-influenced guidelines recommending distances that accommodate superelevation runoff; for example, suggests a minimum of at least 15 times the speed in feet for high-speed facilities to ensure smooth directional changes. Speed-based minimum radii are also critical, typically starting at 1,000 feet for 50 speeds and increasing for higher velocities to maintain comfort and . Calculations for reverse curves in roads emphasize side friction demand to balance centrifugal forces, particularly where superelevation alone is insufficient. The AASHTO formula for side f is derived from the condition: f = \frac{V^2}{15R} - \frac{e}{100}, where V is the design speed in mph, R is the in feet, and e is the superelevation in percent; this ensures lateral acceleration does not exceed driver comfort limits, typically capping f at 0.10-0.16 depending on speed. Short tangents are avoided to prevent abrupt shifts in demand, which could heighten the "kink" sensation and require excessive input. In practice, these computations guide selection to keep demand below values, promoting vehicle-road unique to automobile travel. Modern leverages GPS and satellite-based technologies for precise reverse curve layout, enabling accurate staking of points of curvature and tangency in during . These tools integrate with software to model alignments, verify radii, and adjust for variations, reducing errors in superelevation application and ensuring with guidelines. For example, systems achieve sub-inch accuracy, facilitating efficient implementation in complex sites where traditional would be labor-intensive.

Railway Engineering

In railway engineering, reverse curves are employed in track design for sidings, classification yards, and mainline alignments to navigate around obstacles such as terrain features or infrastructure, as well as in zig-zag configurations to manage steep grades in mountainous regions. These arrangements allow trains to ascend or descend inclines without excessive gradients, differing from highway applications by relying on fixed rail guidance rather than vehicle steering, which emphasizes long-term track durability over flexible path adjustments. Historically, such adaptations appeared in early 19th-century lines, exemplified by the Zig Zag Railway in New South Wales, Australia, constructed in 1869 to traverse the Blue Mountains via a series of reverse curves and switchbacks. Rail-specific challenges in reverse curves arise from the abrupt shift in direction, often with minimal segments, leading to elevated wheel-rail contact forces and lateral accelerations that accelerate differential wear on wheel flanges and rail gauge faces. Unlike roadways, where vehicles can adjust dynamically, railway vehicles experience amplified forces and potential flange-to-rail impacts, particularly on the leading wheels of the outer rail, increasing risks of rolling contact fatigue and uneven profile degradation over repeated passages. To mitigate these, designs limit curvature reversal without a full tangent runout, ensuring smoother transitions to reduce concentrations at the wheel-rail interface. AREMA guidelines recommend minimum tangent lengths between reverse curves in yard tracks ranging from 0 feet for curves of 6° or less to 60 feet for 12°–13° curves without spirals or superelevation, while mainline applications prioritize longer s—ideally at least the length of the longest car—to accommodate superelevation runoffs. Minimum curve radii for mainlines typically range from 573 feet (10°) to larger values depending on speed and traffic, with yards allowing down to 459 feet (12°30') for low-speed operations. Cant deficiency is limited to 3 inches for freight trains and up to 6 inches for passenger services to control unbalanced superelevation, preventing excessive lateral forces. Equilibrium speed for superelevation on curves, which informs reverse curve transitions, is calculated using the AREMA for E in inches: E = 0.0007 V^2 D, where V is speed in mph and D is the , ensuring the cant balances at design velocity. In reverse curves, unbalanced superelevation occurs due to shortened runoffs on the intervening , requiring careful spiral easing to distribute the and maintain , as superelevation principles from general curve design apply but demand tighter control to avoid dynamic imbalances.

Safety and Standards

Hazards and Risks

Reverse curves in pose significant risks due to the abrupt change in direction, which can induce oversteer or understeer in vehicles, particularly when drivers enter at high speeds without sufficient anticipation. This sudden shift often leads to loss of control, increasing the likelihood of rollover accidents, especially for heavy vehicles or those with high centers of gravity on sharp reverses. Studies indicate that rates on curves, including reverses, are approximately three times higher than on sections, with reverse configurations specifically elevating fatal and serious injury es by about 6% compared to simple curves. In , reverse curves heighten risks through excessive lateral forces acting on wheels and rails, potentially causing wheel climb where flanges ascend the railhead. These forces are amplified at the point of reverse , where the from one to the opposing one generates peak lateral interactions. are further exacerbated by conditions such as wet rails, which reduce and allow wheels to slide laterally, or overloaded trains that increase wheel-rail contact pressures. Key contributing factors include short lengths between curves, which create a "surprise effect" for operators unprepared for the directional reversal, thereby heightening instability. Adverse superelevation—where the banking from the first curve opposes the needs of the second—further promotes vehicle or sway and reduced traction during the . Quantitatively, lateral in reverse curves peaks according to the a = \frac{V^2}{R}, where V is speed and R is , demanding coefficients that often exceed safe limits of 0.15–0.20 under speeds. Mean lateral demand observed in reverse curve evaluations reaches 0.14 g, approaching or surpassing American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) thresholds, which signals elevated skidding potential. Environmental conditions like or intensify these risks by further diminishing surface , promoting slips and uncontrolled slides through reverse curves on both roads and rails.

Mitigation and Regulatory Standards

In , key mitigation strategies for reverse curves focus on alerting drivers and encouraging appropriate speeds to counteract hazards such as abrupt lateral forces. The Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) specifies the use of diamond-shaped W1-4 Reverse Curve warning signs, placed in advance of the change to notify drivers of the impending reverse turn or curve. alignment signs (W1-8 series) are installed along the outside of the curve to visually delineate the path, improving driver guidance through the section. or centerline rumble strips provide tactile feedback to prevent run-off-road departures, particularly effective on rural highways with reverse . Vertical modifications, including sag or crest curves, can induce natural speed reductions by altering sight distance and driver perception in reverse horizontal curve areas. For railway applications, emphasizes controlled operations and structural reinforcements to manage dynamic loads in reverse curves. Speed restrictions are enforced through reverse sections to prevent excessive unbalanced superelevation and shift. bracing, such as enhanced configurations like the MME type, increases lateral resistance and stability against centrifugal forces in curved alignments. Accelerometer-based monitoring systems installed on locomotives or vehicles detect anomalies by recording vertical and lateral accelerations, enabling proactive in reverse curve zones. Regulatory standards provide clear criteria to minimize risks. The AASHTO Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets () advises against reverse curves on high-speed roads like interstates; state departments of transportation recommend minimum tangent lengths between them—such as at least 15 times the design speed in feet per TXDOT guidelines—to facilitate superelevation runoff and reduce abrupt changes. In railways, the (FRA) under 49 CFR 213.57 limits curve elevations, while the American Railway Engineering and Maintenance-of-Way Association (AREMA) Manual for Railway Engineering provides guidelines on superelevation transitions to ensure gradual cant adjustments. Best practices prioritize design avoidance and enhancements for safety. Reverse curves should be eliminated on high-speed corridors where possible, opting instead for compound curves or realignments to maintain consistent geometry. Longer spiral transitions are recommended to smooth changes, distributing superelevation more evenly. Post-2020 guidelines for , informed by studies, advocate reduced reliance on reverse curves to improve reliability and path prediction in automated systems. These measures have proven effective in reducing incidents. Research indicates that proper deployment of and chevrons can achieve 20-40% reductions in roadway departure crashes at treated sites.

Notable Examples

Iconic Roadways

One prominent example of reverse curves in challenging mountainous terrain is the in Glacier National Park, , USA, completed in 1932 as an marvel of the era. This 50-mile, two-lane highway features a series of tight reverse curves, particularly in sections like the Garden Wall, where the road clings to sheer cliffs with grades up to 6% to navigate the rugged alpine landscape. Designed by engineer Thomas Vint and constructed over eight years, these reverses allow the route to ascend dramatically while preserving the natural scenery, making it a pioneering example of roadway . In urban settings, Lombard Street in , , exemplifies an extreme application of reverse curves for safety on steep inclines. Built in 1922 following a proposal by property owner Carl Henry, this one-block section incorporates eight hairpin turns—essentially a sequence of sharp reverses—to reduce the natural 27% downhill grade to a manageable 16%, preventing vehicles from gaining excessive speed. The design prioritizes pedestrian and driver safety in the hilly Russian Hill neighborhood, transforming a hazardous into a navigable path lined with hydrangeas for added visual appeal. The Tail of the Dragon, a segment of US Highway 129 along the Tennessee-North Carolina border, showcases reverse curves in a high-speed, scenic context, drawing enthusiasts for its thrilling layout. This 11-mile stretch contains 318 curves, including numerous S-shaped reverses and switchbacks, engineered in to follow the contours of the without intersections. The combination of tight reverses, some with radii under 100 feet, creates an adrenaline-fueled ride that emphasizes the road's rugged beauty and historical role as a remote passage. Historically, remnants of 19th-century land surveys are evident in the S-curves of old State Road 84 (now part of Alligator Alley) in , USA. Originating in the mid-1800s from U.S. government surveyors dividing land into one-mile sections, these reverses were incorporated to bypass low-lying sloughs and wetlands, avoiding straight-line section corners in flood-prone areas. Though later realigned for modern interstate standards, these curves preserve traces of early practices that influenced Florida's rural road network. In these iconic roadways, engineering constraints often result in minimum curve radii as low as 50 feet in dense urban or constrained environments, such as Lombard Street, to accommodate topography while meeting low-speed design criteria. The impact is profound, with attractions like the Tail of the Dragon generating millions in annual economic activity through motorcycle and sports car visitors, while draws over 1 million park entrants yearly, underscoring reverse curves' role in blending functionality with experiential appeal.

Railway Installations

In , reverse curves have been employed in challenging terrains to achieve necessary elevation changes without extensive tunneling or excessive gradients, particularly in 19th- and early 20th-century constructions. One prominent example is the in , where zig-zag alignments featuring multiple reverse curves were implemented to ascend the steep western escarpment. The western zig-zag at Lithgow, engineered by John Whitton and opened in 1869, utilized reverse curves with grades up to 1 in 33 to gain over 1,000 feet in elevation across a short distance, allowing the line to navigate the rugged Blue Mountains without spirals or deep cuttings. This alignment operated until 1910, when it was replaced by a deviation with tunnels to reduce travel time. Similar techniques appear in Scotland's Dalmunzie Railway near Spittal of Glenshee, a narrow-gauge line built around 1920 to serve remote Highland estates. This 2-foot-6-inch gauge railway incorporated reverse curves and a zig-zag configuration to climb approximately 500 feet through steep, heathery in Glen Lochsie, facilitating the transport of quarried stone and shooting parties to Glenlochsie Lodge. The line, powered by an oil-driven engine, operated until the late 1970s, when safety regulations led to its closure. The in exemplifies reverse curve usage on a narrow- system in mountainous regions. Constructed between 1879 and 1881 on a 2-foot , this 88-kilometer line features six reverses and three loops, including S-shaped curves that constitute 73% of the alignment, to ascend from the plains near New Jalpaiguri to at an elevation of 2,258 meters. The sharpest reverse occurs between Sukna and Rongtong with a 120-degree angle and gradients up to 1 in 18, enabling navigation of the Himalayan foothills without modern tunneling. Recognized as a in 1999 for its innovative engineering, the railway continues to operate with original steam locomotives. In modern , such as Japan's network, reverse curves are largely avoided to maintain typically 2,500 meters or more on high-speed sections, with newer lines using 4,000 meters or larger, which support speeds exceeding 300 km/h while minimizing centrifugal forces. This design philosophy contrasts with historical lines, prioritizing straight alignments and gentle superelevation over reverses. However, reverse curves persist in legacy freight yards, where space limitations require tight S-curves with radii typically between 200 and 500 feet and cant up to 6 inches to handle heavy loads on shared trackage.

References

  1. [1]
    4.7 Horizontal Alignment - Texas Department of Transportation
    Reverse curves (two adjacent curves in opposite directions) on high-speed facilities should include a tangent section of sufficient length to provide adequate ...Missing: civil | Show results with:civil
  2. [2]
    [PDF] Chapter 6 Elements of Design
    Elements of Design. Page 15. 2023. 6.3.4.3 Reverse Curves. Two consecutive circular curves constitute a reverse curve if they join at a point of tangency where ...
  3. [3]
    [PDF] Alignment Design Standards - California High Speed Rail
    Reverse Curves: If there is insufficient distance between curves to provide the minimum required length tangent segment, the spirals shall be extended to ...
  4. [4]
    CHAPTER 4. SIGNS | FHWA - Department of Transportation
    For sections with more than one curve in close proximity, use one of these three warning signs in advance of the first curve: Reverse Turn (W1-3). Reverse Curve ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  5. [5]
    [PDF] Chapter 3 - Horizontal Alignment
    For these situations, the use of reverse curves, compound curves, and/or circular curves with 7-percent or greater superelevation may help the design team match ...
  6. [6]
    PDDG Chapter 4 - Horizontal and Vertical Alignment - Mass.gov
    This chapter discusses design considerations and criteria for incorporating horizontal and vertical curves in a roadway's alignment.
  7. [7]
    [PDF] Chapter 11 Geometrics - Highway Surveying Manual (M 22-97)
    Jan 1, 2005 · Point of reverse curve - Point common to two curves in opposite directions and with the same or different radii. L. Total length of any ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  8. [8]
    [PDF] 202-9
    R. = R a d i u s. , f t . SUPERELEVATION RATES FOR. HORIZONTAL CURVES ON LOW-SPEED. Dc = 5729.58 / R. 3. crown and superelevate the roadway at a uniform slope ...
  9. [9]
    [PPT] Horizontal curves
    The arc definition is commonly used in highways, chord definition is commonly used in railroads. In arc definition, D = 5729.58. R. In chord definition, D = 50.
  10. [10]
    Railway Transition Curves: A Review of the State-of-the-Art and ...
    In the late 19th century a railway transition spiral with linear curvature, in relation to arc length, was derived independently by multiple engineers, who ...
  11. [11]
    Track transition curves - Dynamics
    The equation for a spiral with linear curvature variation was first derived by the Swiss mathematician Leonard Euler in 1744, hence the name Euler spiral for ...
  12. [12]
    (PDF) Design considerations for highway reverse curves
    Aug 6, 2025 · Authors of these papers express the opinion that reverse curves give the possibility of shaping the using so-called S-shaped transition curves ...
  13. [13]
    (PDF) Railway Transition Curves: A Review of the State-of-the-Art ...
    May 15, 2020 · Transition curves are a useful tool for lateral alignment of railway segments. Their design is important to ensure safe and comfortable ...
  14. [14]
    [PDF] Dr. Duraid M Abd Civil Engineering 2021 42 1.6.3 Superelevation ...
    ... e = emax and f = fmax. R= V. 2. 127(e+f) ………………………………………………………………27. If Va > V then the design is adequate otherwise apply speed control measures. AASHTO ...
  15. [15]
    [PDF] CHAPTER 5 TRACK - RailTEC
    Mar 5, 2020 · Reverse Curves and Tangent Length . ... String lining of curves may be used to supplement the engineer's survey or the alignment system of.
  16. [16]
    None
    ### Summary of Reverse Curves and Superelevation from https://www.in.gov/dot/div/contracts/standards/dm-Archived/08%20Metric/Part5Vol1/Ch43/DCh43.pdf
  17. [17]
    [PDF] Chapter 10 SUPERELEVATION
    Jan 2, 2023 · This chapter covers the creation and modification of Superelevation, which requires a mainline Corridor to be created first.
  18. [18]
    [PDF] Design Considerations for Highway - Reverse Curves
    For reverse vertical curves the available sight distance is related to the parameters of the crest and sag arcs, the length of the common tangent, the locations.
  19. [19]
    CALCULATING INFERRED DESIGN SPEED FROM HORIZONTAL ...
    0.1 e plus f equals V squared over 15 R. where: e = rate of superelevation, percent; f = side friction (demand factor); V = vehicle speed, mph;
  20. [20]
    [PDF] Amtrak Track Design Specification 63
    The weight and size of cars and locomotives and requirements for satisfactory negotia- tion of curves, reverse curves, crossovers, ladder tracks and side track ...
  21. [21]
    Railway Reverses (Zig Zags) - International Steam
    Some of the biggest challenges faced by railway builders through the years have been presented by hills and mountains. Splitting trains, multiple locomotives, ...
  22. [22]
    Zig Zag Railway, Lithgow, NSW - Pocket Oz Guide to Australia
    From the time of construction and for much of the railway's use in the 19th century there were no trees on the Zig Zag. As rock was blasted away on each ...
  23. [23]
  24. [24]
    [PDF] The Reduction of Wheel/Rail Curving Forces on
    Wheel-flange wear and rail gage-face wear result the l-ateral wheel,/rai1 forces produced as a truck negotiates a curve. The causes of these forces have.
  25. [25]
    Rolling Contact Fatigue and Wear of Rails and Wheels - MDPI
    Rolling contact fatigue (RCF) and wear are the primary types of damage found in rails and wheels, and these often compete with each other.
  26. [26]
    [PDF] NS-Standards-for-Industry-Tracks-9.28.23.pdf - Norfolk Southern
    Tracks for rail cars with coupler to coupler length exceeding 73 feet should be designed based on maximum degree of curvature of 10 Degrees (R = 573.69 feet).
  27. [27]
    [PDF] Track and Rail and Infrastructure Integrity Compliance Manual
    Oct 21, 2009 · above 5 inches of cant deficiency on curves. These limits include tighter 62-foot mid-chord offset (MCO) track surface and 31-foot MCO ...
  28. [28]
    Which curves are dangerous? A network-wide analysis of traffic ...
    Jan 8, 2019 · The most hazardous curve was 45 m long and contained 8.7 traffic crashes per year. Its hazard rate accounted for 37.4.
  29. [29]
    SafeCurves Interventions Primer - Abley
    In the United States, over 25% of all fatal crashes occur on horizontal curves. The average crash rate on horizontal curves is approximately three times ...Missing: hazards | Show results with:hazards
  30. [30]
    20.4 Highway Features - Texas Department of Transportation
    The placement of reverse curves resulted in more crashes than at locations without reverse curvature. This observation reversed the findings from the 2017 ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  31. [31]
    On the problems of lateral force effects of railway vehicles in S-curves
    This paper deals with the lateral force effects of conventional four-axle railway vehicles in conditions of S-shape curves.
  32. [32]
    [PDF] Derailment Mechanisms | The PWI
    Curves: lateral forces are high, stressing the rail, fastenings and sleepers. ... • Not directly a derailment risk as lateral and vertical forces are in-phase and ...
  33. [33]
    Horizontal Alignment in Road Design: Principles and Best Practices ...
    Two curves of the same direction, separated by a short tangent. ... Without adequate separation, reverse curves reduce driver comfort and increase crash risk.
  34. [34]
    [PDF] Alignment and Superelevation
    Compound curves are most commonly used for turning roadways where it is necessary to fit the curve to the inside edge of the design vehicle's swept path. When ...
  35. [35]
    Evaluation of reverse curves focusing on the lateral friction demand ...
    According to the Federal Highway Administration [3], horizontal curves contribute to more than 25% of the fatal crashes. Due to design limitations, the number ...
  36. [36]
    2009 Edition Chapter 2C. Warning Signs And Object Markers
    04 A Winding Road (W1-5) sign may be used instead of multiple Turn (W1-1) or Curve (W1-2) signs where there are three or more changes in roadway alignment each ...Figure 2C-1 · Fhwa - mutcd · Figure 2C-9 · Figure 2C-6
  37. [37]
    [PDF] TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICE GUIDELINES FOR CURVES
    The crash-based study was conducted to identify how curve TCDs impact crash rates at curves. Analyses that produced crash modification factors indicate that ...
  38. [38]
    [PDF] UFC 4-860-03 Railroad Track Maintenance and Safety Standards
    Apr 1, 1991 · A track restriction shall require the operational speed to be less than posted speed, but not more than 10 mph. (2). Notification of Track ...
  39. [39]
    Structural Health Monitoring of Railway Curves. Analysis of ... - SSRN
    Mar 22, 2023 · Abstract. In order to increase the lateral resistance of the track in curves, the "MME" sleeper was developed.Missing: bracing accelerometers
  40. [40]
    Accelerometers in Monitoring Systems for Rail Vehicle Applications
    This document comprehensively analyses the literature on accelerometers used in monitoring systems designed for rail vehicle applications.Missing: reverse | Show results with:reverse
  41. [41]
    49 CFR 213.57 -- Curves; elevation and speed limitations. - eCFR
    (a) The maximum elevation of the outside rail of a curve may not be more than 8 inches on track Classes 1 and 2, and 7 inches on track Classes 3 through 5.
  42. [42]
    [PDF] ROADWAY DESIGN GUIDELINES
    Jan 1, 2021 · 203.7 - Reverse Curves. Reverse curves should be avoided. If used, reverse simple curves should have a tangent between them which allows the ...
  43. [43]
    [PDF] Optimization of geometric road design for autonomous vehicle
    Reverse curves are not recommended in normal situations ... optimized crest vertical curve had a reduction in earthwork volume for an autonomous vehicle.Missing: mitigation | Show results with:mitigation<|control11|><|separator|>
  44. [44]
    Going-to-the-Sun Road: A Model of Landscape Engineering ...
    Mar 30, 2023 · This lesson is based on the National Historic Landmark documentation form "Going-to-the-Sun Road, Glacier National Park, Montana" (with photographs)
  45. [45]
    Going-to-the-Sun Road - ASCE
    The two-lane Going-To-The-Sun Road through Glacier National Park was the first major road to be constructed directly over high mountain terrain.
  46. [46]
    [PDF] Going-to-the-Sun Road Fact Sheet - Federal Highway Administration
    Going-to-the-Sun Road was one of the first National Park Service (NPS) roadways specifically intended to accommodate the automobile tourist.
  47. [47]
    Lombard Street | San Francisco Travel
    It wasn't until the 1960s, 30 years after the hairpin turns were added that it started showing up on postcards. ... The name Lombard actually has no link to San ...Missing: reverse | Show results with:reverse
  48. [48]
    Tail of The Dragon: Home
    Tail of the Dragon—famous for its 318 curves in just 11 miles—is America's most thrilling destination for motorcycle riders and sports car enthusiasts.How to Ride and Drive the Tail... · Events · Contact Us · History
  49. [49]
    Tennessee's most dangerous drive: 'Tail of the Dragon' things to know
    Oct 10, 2018 · With hundreds of cambered, blind curves and crests, a moment spent looking the wrong way could lead to catastrophic consequences. A car burns on ...
  50. [50]
    In the Know: Can you straighten out the S-curve issue on old SR 84?
    Apr 8, 2012 · 'The S-curve in Alligator Alley had its beginning in the mid-1800s when the original U.S. government surveyors surveyed the lands of South ...
  51. [51]
    [PDF] Railway Routes - ARHS NSW
    case of the Blue Mountains, the history is about the use of mountain ridges to provide the rail corridor.2. When the line opened to Glenbrook in 1867, Whitton.
  52. [52]
    Dalmunzie Railway - RAILSCOT
    This 2 foot 6 inch gauge private railway was built for carrying quarried stone and for carrying shooting parties. The line closed in 1978/79 due to new safety ...
  53. [53]
    [PDF] Darjeeling Railway (India) No 944 - UNESCO World Heritage Centre
    Jul 3, 1998 · Because it passes through a mountainous region, 73% of the total length of the line consists of curves, the sharpest of which is that between ...
  54. [54]
    [PDF] Mountain Railways of India - UNESCO World Heritage Centre
    The Darjeeling Himalayan Railway is a UNESCO site due to its innovative design, social impact, and unique construction, including the 2nd highest station.
  55. [55]
    [PDF] Technical Regulatory Standards on Japanese Railways
    And, the radius of a curve incidental to a turnout shall not be less than. 40m. ③ Curve radius of Shinkansen shall not be less than 400m. (the radius of a curve ...
  56. [56]
    [PDF] Railway Curves - iricen
    cant diagram for the reverse and compound curves shall be as follows: (Figure 1.21 and 1.22). Fig 1.21: Cant and Versine diagram for Reverse curve. (No ...<|separator|>