Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Rhumb line

A rhumb line, also known as a loxodrome, is a curve on the surface of a sphere that intersects all meridians of longitude at a constant angle, representing a path followed by maintaining a fixed compass bearing during navigation.^[1]^[2] This path appears as a straight line on a Mercator projection map, which preserves angles and facilitates plotting constant-direction courses.^[2]^[3] Introduced mathematically by Portuguese navigator Pedro Nunes in 1537 as a line of constant bearing, the rhumb line became practically viable with Gerardus Mercator's 1569 world map projection, which transformed these curves into straight lines for easier maritime use.^[3] Prior to this, early portolan charts from around 1300 incorporated rhumb line networks—spiderweb-like patterns of lines radiating in 32 or 16 directions from compass roses—to aid coastal and regional sailing by approximating constant headings.^[4] In navigation, rhumb lines were preferred for their simplicity, allowing sailors to steer a steady course without frequent adjustments, though they are longer than the shortest geodesic paths known as great circles.^[1]^[5] For instance, a rhumb line from London to Seattle measures approximately 5,486 miles, compared to 4,791 miles along the great circle route.^[3] Mathematically, a rhumb line on a sphere follows an equation derived from spherical coordinates, where the azimuth angle \alpha remains constant: \frac{d\theta}{d\phi} = \frac{\tan \alpha}{\cos \phi}, with \phi as latitude and \theta as longitude, resulting in a logarithmic spiral that asymptotically approaches the poles unless the bearing is due east-west (along a parallel) or north-south (along a meridian).^[1]^[6] The distance along a rhumb line can be calculated using the formula D = \Delta\phi \cdot R / \cos \alpha for meridional components adjusted by longitude difference, where R is the Earth's radius, though practical navigation often employs approximations like departure = difference in longitude × cos(mean latitude).^[5]^[3] Until the 19th century, when steamships and precise chronometers enabled great circle sailing, rhumb lines dominated ocean voyages, leveraging prevailing winds and fixed headings for routes like those of Columbus in 1492 or Portuguese explorers under Prince Henry the Navigator.^[7]^[3] Today, rhumb lines remain relevant in aviation, GIS mapping, and short-distance marine navigation under 600 nautical miles, where constant bearing simplifies operations despite the longer path.^[5]^[6]

Fundamentals

Definition

A rhumb line, also known as a loxodrome, is a curve on the surface of a sphere—such as a model of the Earth—that crosses all meridians of longitude at a constant angle, thereby maintaining a fixed bearing or azimuth relative to true north.^[8]^[9] This property enables ships or aircraft to follow a steady compass direction without frequent adjustments, making it a fundamental path in practical navigation.^[10] The key invariant of a rhumb line is its constant bearing, which distinguishes it from other spherical curves; for instance, meridional rhumb lines align with meridians at bearings of 0° (north) or 180° (south), while zonal rhumb lines follow the equator or parallels at 90° (east) or 270° (west).^[11] In contrast, transverse or oblique rhumb lines—those at angles other than cardinal directions—form spirals that progressively approach the poles without reaching them, creating a loxodromic spiral path on the sphere.^[11]^[12] This constant-bearing characteristic positions rhumb lines as a convenient approximation to geodesics (great circles), the true shortest paths on the sphere, particularly for mid-latitude voyages where the difference in length is minimal and ease of steering outweighs the slight increase in distance.^[8] The geometric nature of rhumb lines was first mathematically described by Portuguese cosmographer Pedro Nunes in 1537.^[3]

Etymology and History

The term "rhumb line" derives from the Portuguese word rumo, meaning "direction" or "course," which entered English in the 16th century.^[13]^[14] The word "rhumb" itself also relates to the divisions of the traditional compass rose into 32 points, each representing a fixed direction for navigation. The concept of the rhumb line, known mathematically as a loxodrome—a term from the Greek loxós (oblique) and drómos (path or running)—was first rigorously described by the Portuguese mathematician Pedro Nunes in his 1537 work Tratado da Sphera.^[15]^[16] Nunes, serving as chief cosmographer to the Portuguese crown, identified the rhumb line as the path a ship follows when maintaining a constant compass bearing, distinguishing it from the shorter great circle route.^[17] Prior to this formalization, rhumb lines appeared practically in medieval portolan charts, which originated in the Mediterranean around the late 13th century and featured networks of radiating lines from compass roses to guide coastal and short-sea navigation between harbors.^[18] During the Age of Exploration in the 15th and 16th centuries, rhumb lines gained prominence for transoceanic voyages, as sailors relied on dead reckoning and constant headings to cross open oceans without precise longitude determination.^[17] This practical utility was enhanced by Flemish cartographer Gerardus Mercator, who in 1569 introduced his cylindrical map projection, designed specifically to represent rhumb lines as straight lines, thereby simplifying course plotting for navigators.^[19]^[20] By the 19th century, however, the rhumb line's dominance waned with the widespread adoption of marine chronometers, which enabled accurate longitude fixes, and the development of computational methods for great circle sailing, allowing shorter routes on long voyages.^[21]

Mathematical Description

Properties on the Sphere

On a sphere, a rhumb line, also known as a loxodrome, is a curve that maintains a constant azimuth α relative to true north, thereby intersecting all meridians at the same angle α.^[22] This path forms a spherical spiral, appearing as a logarithmic spiral in stereographic projection from the pole and as an unbounded spiral in polar projection.^[23] For non-cardinal directions (α ≠ 0°, 90°, 180°, 270°), the rhumb line approaches the poles asymptotically without reaching them, spiraling infinitely around each pole and encircling it an infinite number of times as the latitude tends to ±90°.^[23] In cardinal directions, the rhumb line coincides with a meridian (for α = 0° or 180°) or a parallel of latitude (for α = 90° or 270°), resulting in finite, non-spiraling paths.^[24] The parametric relation between latitude φ and longitude λ for a rhumb line of constant azimuth α, starting at initial latitude φ₀ and longitude λ₀, is derived from the isometric latitude ψ = \ln \left( \tan\left(\frac{\pi}{4} + \frac{\phi}{2}\right) \right). The change in longitude is given by

\Delta \lambda = \lambda - \lambda_0 = \tan \alpha \left[ \psi - \psi_0 \right] = \tan \alpha \left[ \ln \left( \tan\left(\frac{\pi}{4} + \frac{\phi}{2}\right) \right) - \ln \left( \tan\left(\frac{\pi}{4} + \frac{\phi_0}{2}\right) \right) \right],

where φ and φ₀ are in radians.^[25] This equation reflects the exponential relationship inherent to the spherical geometry, leading to the spiraling behavior. This relation arises from the differential geometry of the sphere. The azimuth α satisfies \tan \alpha = \frac{\cos \phi , d\lambda}{d\phi}, so d\lambda = \frac{\tan \alpha , d\phi}{\cos \phi}. Integrating yields the parametric form above, as \int \sec \phi , d\phi = \ln \left| \tan\left(\frac{\pi}{4} + \frac{\phi}{2}\right) \right|.^[23] Equivalently, in terms of the differential equation, \frac{d\phi}{d\lambda} = \frac{\cos \phi}{\tan \alpha}.^[3] Additional properties include the rhumb line's orthogonality to meridians only when α = 90° (or 270°), where it aligns with parallels, and its intersection with every meridian at exactly angle α otherwise.^[22] For non-cardinal rhumb lines, the total longitude change diverges as the path nears a pole, resulting in infinite pole-encircling without closure, unlike great circles.^[24] The arc length L of a rhumb line segment between latitudes φ₁ and φ₂ (with |φ₂ - φ₁| < π/2) on a sphere of radius R is

L = R \sec \alpha \, |\phi_2 - \phi_1|,

where φ₁, φ₂, and α are in radians; this holds for α ≠ ±90° and simplifies to the meridian length R |φ₂ - φ₁| when α = 0°.^[24] For paths approaching a pole, L becomes infinite due to the asymptotic spiraling. For α = ±90°, the length reduces to the parallel arc R \cos \phi , |\Delta \lambda|. This formula emerges from the metric ds = R \sqrt{d\phi^2 + \cos^2 \phi , d\lambda^2} and substitution of d\lambda = \tan \alpha , \sec \phi , d\phi, yielding ds = R \sec \alpha , |d\phi|.^[3]

Connection to Mercator Projection

The Mercator projection is a conformal cylindrical map projection that represents meridians as equally spaced vertical lines and parallels of latitude as horizontal lines, with the scale factor increasing poleward according to \sec \phi, where \phi is the latitude. This design ensures that local angles are preserved, making it suitable for navigation where direction is critical. The projection's mathematical formulation places the coordinates as x = R \lambda for longitude \lambda (in radians) and y = R \ln \left( \tan \left( \frac{\pi}{4} + \frac{\phi}{2} \right) \right) for latitude \phi, where R is the Earth's radius, transforming the spherical geometry into a plane where infinitesimal changes in direction align with Cartesian slopes.^[26] The key connection between rhumb lines and the Mercator projection lies in how constant bearing paths on the sphere map to straight lines on the chart: a rhumb line's fixed azimuth \alpha relative to north corresponds to a constant slope \tan \alpha in the projection's (x, y) coordinates, since the relation \Delta \lambda = \tan \alpha \, \Delta \psi (with \psi = y/R) implies \Delta x / \Delta y = \tan \alpha. This property arises directly from the projection's conformality and the specific stretching of parallels, ensuring that the angle between a rhumb line and a meridian remains uniform across latitudes when unrolled. In 1569, Gerardus Mercator introduced this projection explicitly to linearize rhumb lines for maritime navigation, solving the challenge of plotting constant compass courses on flat paper without recalculation at each latitude.^[27]^[28] The implications for cartography are profound: navigators can draw straight lines between ports on a Mercator chart to represent rhumb line routes, overlay compass roses for direct bearing readout, and maintain angular accuracy for steering adjustments, though the increasing scale distorts areas and distances progressively toward the poles, rendering high-latitude regions exaggerated in size. Conversely, given a straight line on the Mercator map connecting two points with coordinate differences \Delta x and \Delta y, the corresponding rhumb line bearing \alpha is recovered via \alpha = \atan2(\Delta x, \Delta y), or approximately \tan \alpha = \Delta x / \Delta y for the constant direction. This bidirectional mapping revolutionized 16th-century sailing charts, enabling reliable course plotting despite the projection's areal distortions.^[29]^[25]

Traditional Uses

In maritime navigation during the Age of Sail (16th to 19th centuries), rhumb lines formed the core method for sailing ships, permitting vessels to hold a steady compass bearing across open seas without repeated course corrections.^[30] This approach was integral to dead reckoning, where navigators estimated positions by tracking speed, direction, and elapsed time from a known latitude fix, often obtained via sextant observations of celestial bodies.^[31] By maintaining constant azimuth, crews could focus on sail management rather than constant recalibration, essential for long transoceanic passages.^[32] Rhumb lines were prominently featured on portolan charts, medieval and early modern maps overlaid with wind rose networks of radiating lines for plotting routes along the Mediterranean and Atlantic coasts.^[33] These charts enabled practical course-setting by aligning ship headings with the 32 principal wind directions, facilitating trade and exploration.^[34] A notable example is Christopher Columbus's 1492 transatlantic voyage, during which his fleet approximated rhumb lines through dead reckoning to sustain westerly bearings from the Canary Islands toward the Indies.^[35] Early 20th-century aviation extended rhumb line usage to aerial navigation, with pilots employing constant-bearing tracks for overwater flights in the absence of radio beacons or other aids.^[36] Transoceanic pioneers, such as those in the 1919 first nonstop Atlantic crossing attempts, relied on these paths to simplify compass work amid limited instrumentation, estimating progress via airspeed and heading logs.^[37] The key advantage of rhumb lines lay in their ease for manual operation, as a fixed heading allowed helmsmen and pilots to avoid the complexities of varying bearings on curved routes.^[38] In sailing contexts, navigators selected rhumb lines to align with prevailing winds and currents, optimizing sail trim and drift compensation for sustained progress.^[39] However, these paths inherently traced longer arcs on the Earth's surface compared to direct geodesics, contributing to increased fuel demands and voyage durations over extended distances.^[3] On Mercator charts, rhumb lines appeared as straight lines, aiding visual plotting in traditional practice.^[40]

Comparison to Great Circles

A great circle represents the shortest path between two points on the surface of a sphere, formed by the intersection of the sphere with a plane passing through its center, and typically involves a varying bearing throughout the journey.^[41] In contrast, rhumb lines maintain a constant bearing relative to true north, making them spirals on the sphere except along the equator or meridians, where they coincide with great circles; this constant heading simplifies manual navigation but results in longer paths for most routes, while great circles demand frequent course adjustments that can amount to a 180° change near the poles.^[42]^[43] Efficiency comparisons reveal that rhumb lines exceed great circle distances, with the discrepancy growing based on latitude span, bearing angle, and overall length; for instance, the rhumb line from London (51.5° N, 0° W) to Seattle (47.6° N, 122.3° W) measures 5,485.6 miles, approximately 14.5% longer than the great circle's 4,791.27 miles, while for a continental U.S. route like Baltimore to Los Angeles (about 2,017 nautical miles great circle), the rhumb line can be up to 6.25% longer at maximum deviation.^[3]^[43] Transatlantic flights show smaller differences around 1.5-2%, but longer polar or high-latitude routes amplify the excess, emphasizing fuel and time savings via great circles.^[44] Rhumb lines are favored for short or intermediate distances, or scenarios prioritizing steady headings without advanced aids like GPS, as their simplicity aids dead reckoning; great circles dominate long-haul aviation and shipping where automated systems handle bearing changes for optimal efficiency.^[45] The 20th century marked a shift toward great circles, enabled by inertial navigation systems developed from the 1940s onward, which provided precise attitude and position data for automated course corrections in aircraft and vessels, reducing reliance on constant-bearing methods.^[46] In modern sailing, hybrid approaches combine great circle segments—approximated by multiple rhumb line legs—to balance optimality with practical steerage.^[47]

Generalizations

On the Riemann Sphere

The Riemann sphere, also known as the extended complex plane \hat{\mathbb{C}} = \mathbb{C} \cup \{\infty\}, models the unit sphere in three-dimensional space by augmenting the complex plane with a point at infinity, corresponding to the north pole.^[48] Stereographic projection provides a conformal bijection between the sphere (excluding the north pole) and the complex plane, typically from the north pole onto the equatorial plane, given by z = \frac{X + iY}{1 - Z} for sphere coordinates (X, Y, Z) with X^2 + Y^2 + Z^2 = 1, where the south pole maps to the origin and meridians become rays from the origin.^[48] This projection equips the Riemann sphere with complex analytic structure, enabling the study of geometric objects like curves through holomorphic functions.^[49] On the Riemann sphere, a rhumb line, or loxodrome, generalizes to a curve maintaining constant angle with meridians, which under stereographic projection maps to a logarithmic spiral in the complex plane.^[49] In complex Mercator coordinates, derived from the projection where longitude \lambda corresponds to \arg(z) and latitude \phi to \ln|\tan(\pi/4 + \phi/2)| \approx \ln|z|, the rhumb line appears as a straight line of constant slope \cot \alpha, with \alpha the bearing angle.^[49] The parametric equation in the complex plane is z = z_1 \exp((\cot \alpha + i)(\lambda - \lambda_1)), or equivalently, \arg(z) = k \ln|z| + c for constant k = \tan \alpha, describing an equiangular spiral that intersects rays from the origin at fixed angle \alpha.^[49] This form arises because the Mercator transformation aligns with the complex logarithm, straightening the spiral path.^[50] Analytically, these spirals on the Riemann sphere exhibit constant argument growth proportional to the logarithmic radius, preserving the loxodromic property under conformal maps.^[49] The family of rhumb lines is invariant under Möbius transformations, which preserve angles and map generalized circles (including lines) to themselves, thereby transforming spirals to similar spirals while maintaining the constant bearing relative to meridians.^[49] A differential equation in complex form captures this: \frac{dz}{z} = e^{i\alpha} \, d(\ln |z|), reflecting the infinitesimal change in direction along the curve, where the right-hand side encodes the fixed angle \alpha with respect to radial lines.^[49] In theoretical geography, this complex representation facilitates precise computation of rhumb line distances and intersections on the sphere, such as via D = 2 \sec \alpha \tan^{-1} \left( \frac{|z_2| - |z_1|}{1 + |z_1||z_2|} \right).^[49] For complex function visualization, the mapping highlights asymptotic behavior, where rhumb lines spiral infinitely toward the poles—as the origin or infinity in the plane—approaching the point at infinity on the Riemann sphere without reaching it in finite arc length.^[50] This pole-asymptote property underscores the non-closed nature of rhumb lines except for equatorial cases, aiding in artistic and computational renderings like those in M.C. Escher's works.^[50]

On Spheroids

The Earth is modeled as an oblate spheroid, flattened at the poles due to its rotation, with an equatorial radius of approximately 6378 km and a polar radius of about 6357 km, as defined by reference ellipsoids such as WGS84 (semi-major axis a = 6378.137 km, flattening f = 1/298.257223563).^[51] This shape introduces eccentricity (e^2 = 2f - f^2 \approx 0.006694), deviating from the perfect sphere used in classical rhumb line theory.^[51] While the spherical idealization suffices for many low-precision applications, ellipsoidal models are essential for accurate global navigation.^[3] Adapting rhumb lines—curves of constant azimuth—to an oblate spheroid presents challenges, as no exact analytical paths maintain a fixed bearing relative to geographic north exist on the ellipsoid surface.^[52] Instead, these paths are approximated by solving differential equations in geodetic coordinates (latitude and longitude), accounting for the varying curvature and meridian convergence.^[51] Common methods include numerical integration using predictor-corrector algorithms, which propagate latitude-longitude pairs iteratively while holding azimuth constant, achieving errors below a few meters over 1000 km distances.^[51] Series expansions provide faster approximations with rapid convergence, and modifications to Vincenty's inverse formulae enable computation of rhumb line parameters by adapting the longitude difference for constant heading.^[51] Deviations from spherical rhumb lines arise primarily from the ellipsoid's oblateness, leading to length differences on the order of 10 meters over 1000 km at 60° latitude, with errors scaling as f \cdot d (where d is distance).^[51] These discrepancies, though small (typically under 0.5% in total length for mid-latitude routes), become significant in high-latitude navigation, such as Arctic shipping lanes, where polar flattening amplifies path distortions and affects fuel efficiency or search-and-rescue operations.^[3] In modern applications, ellipsoidal rhumb line computations are integrated into geographic information systems (GIS) and navigation software, such as libraries in GeographicLib that solve for rhumb line lengths and azimuths on the WGS84 ellipsoid with high precision.^[53] Tools like these support accurate mapping and routing in aviation, maritime, and geospatial analysis, ensuring constant-bearing paths align with real-world geodetic datums.^[52]

References

[1]
Rhumb line | McGraw Hill's AccessScience
A rhumb line, or loxodrome, is a line on the Earth of constant compass bearing. A navigator following a rhumb line between two points on the Earth would ...
[2]
2. The rhumb line - AMS :: Feature Column from the AMS
The most convenient way to set a course from one point to another is along the rhumb line. The two points are located on a Mercator projection map.
[3]
[PDF] A Comparative Analysis of Rhumb Lines and Great Circles
May 13, 2016 · The map enabled navigators to draw a straight line, measure the bearing they wanted to travel in and then sail away. The invention of a magnetic ...
[4]
Maps, Wayfinding, and the Discovery of Longitude | The New York ...
Jun 18, 2021 · Rhumb Lines. Dating as far back as the year 1300, medieval portolan charts were regional sailing charts compiled from written sailing directions ...
[5]
The Rhumb Line - Astro Navigation Demystified
Such a line on the Earth's surface is called a rhumb line. When the rhumb line cuts all meridians at 90 o , it will coincide with either a parallel of latitude ...
[6]
Rhumb Line Definition | GIS Dictionary - Esri Support
A complex curve on the earth's surface that crosses every meridian at the same oblique angle. A rhumb line path follows a single compass bearing.
[7]
Rhumb line | Definition, Loxodrome, & Navigation | Britannica
A rhumb line, or loxodrome, is a curve cutting the meridians of a sphere at a constant non-right angle. It may be seen as the path of a ship sailing always ...
[8]
[PDF] Paths Between Points on Earth: Great Circles, Geodesics, and ...
A rhumb line is a line of constant bearing or azimuth. This is not the shortest distance on a long trip, but it is very easy to follow. You just have to know ...
[9]
[PDF] Appendix F - Addition of Waypoints Along the Route - navcen
Rhumb lines are not technically straight lines, but rather slightly curved arcs along the earth's surface that follow an unchanging bearing. Most nautical ...
[10]
Aviation Formulary V1.47
Rhumb lines or loxodromes are tracks of constant true course. With the exception of meridians and the equator, they are not the same as great circles. They are ...
[11]
[PDF] Survival - Lat & Long in American Practical Navigator - NGA - 2017
sidered special cases of the rhumb line. Any other rhumb line spirals toward the pole, forming a loxodromic curve or loxodrome. See Figure 106a below for ...
[12]
[PDF] Distance Between Two Cities - Terry Bahill
Aug 24, 2019 · In contrast, a rhumb line route is a curved line on the surface of the earth. It has a constant bearing relative to true or magnetic north, ...
[13]
rhumb - Wiktionary, the free dictionary
Etymology. Borrowed from Spanish rumbo or Portuguese rumo, from Latin rhombus, from Ancient Greek ῥόμβος (rhómbos). Doublet of rhomb and rhombus.
[14]
rhumb, n. meanings, etymology and more - Oxford English Dictionary
rhumb is of multiple origins. A borrowing from Spanish. Perhaps also partly a borrowing from Portuguese. Etymons: Spanish rumbo; Portuguese rumo. See etymology ...
[15]
Pedro Nunes' Discovery of the Loxodromic Curve (1537). How ...
Pedro Nunes' Discovery of the Loxodromic Curve (1537). How Portuguese Sailors in the Early Sixteenth Century, Navigating with Globes, had Failed to Solve ...
[16]
Pedro Nunes (1502 - 1578) - Biography - MacTutor
The first of Nunes books to be published was Tratado da Sphera in 1537. ... It was Willebrord Snell who named Nunes' rhumb line the loxodrome. In 1566 ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[17]
Globes, Rhumb Tables, and the Pre-History of the Mercator Projection
This is argued by examining in some detail the development of the concept of a rhumb line from its initial articulation by Pedro Nunes in 1537 to its advanced ...
[18]
https://www.press.uchicago.edu/books/hoc/HOC_V1/HOC_VOLUME1_chapter19.pdf
[19]
Mercator's Projection - UBC Math
This is his famous world map of 1569. A modern ... Lines of constant compass heading (called rhumb lines by sailors) are straight lines on this map.
[20]
Geometry of the Mercator projection from 1569 - Iris Publishers
May 16, 2024 · In this article it was shown that Gerhard Mercator's projection of 1569 can be constructed geometrically with high accuracy without using π and without ...
[21]
Bowditch3 - esauboeck
Nineteenth century writers of navigational texts recommended the use of great-circle sailing, and toward the close of that century such sailing became ...
[22]
Loxodrome -- from Wolfram MathWorld
If the surface is a sphere, the loxodrome is a spherical spiral. The loxodrome is the path taken when a compass is kept pointing in a constant direction.
[23]
Rhumb line of the sphere - MATHCURVE.COM
The rhumb lines of the sphere, associated to a given axis, are the curves that form a constant angle with the parallel (or the meridians). Do not mistake the ...
[24]
[PDF] Long and short-range air navigation on spherical Earth
Jan 1, 2017 · Rhumb-line or Loxodrome-arc distance of constant course angle α on spherical Earth is calculated as (Appendix E):. (. ) [. ] (. ) [. ] α. ϕ. ϕ α.
[25]
Calculate distance and bearing between two Latitude/Longitude ...
A rhumb line is a straight line on a Mercator projection, with an angle on the projection equal to the compass bearing. Formula: Δψ = ln( tan(π/4 + φ2/2) ...
[26]
Mercator Projection -- from Wolfram MathWorld
equations place the x-axis of the projection on the equator and the y-axis at longitude lambda_0, where lambda is the longitude and phi is the latitude. x ...
[27]
[PDF] Mapping the sphere - Rice Math Department
A rhumb line. The second important type of curve is the rhumb line or loxodrome. A rhumb line is a curve which intersects all of the meridians of longitude ...
[28]
(PDF) How Mercator did it in 1569: From Tables of Rhumbs to a ...
Mercator's 1569 projection adapted navigation by making rhumb lines straight and angles true. The projection ensures equal spacing of meridians and ...
[29]
[PDF] History of the Integral of the Secant
Mercator wished to map the sphere onto the plane so that both angles and distances are preserved, but he realized this was impossible. He opted for a conformal ...
[30]
[PDF] 20 • Navigation Techniques and Practice in the Renaissance
Then, with a pair of dividers, he could use the rhumb lines and distance scale contained within the ... Navigation by dead reckoning, for which traditional por-.
[31]
Dead Reckoning - Time and Navigation
A navigator used simple but reliable tools to track three things: The ship's compass heading, The ship's speed, The time spent on each heading and at each ...
[32]
Dead reckoning, longitude, and time | Navigation - Oxford Academic
Seeking to follow a rhumb line was a simple and practical ambition, but it did not offer the shortest distance between two locations on the Earth. The great- ...Missing: decline | Show results with:decline
[33]
[PDF] Portolan Charts from the Late Thirteenth Century to 1500
Portolan charts are fundamental, precise documents with accurate Mediterranean outlines, place names, and the first to use a linear scale.
[34]
How Were Portolans Used? · Portolan Charts - Gallery
The assumption is that the navigator would align the keel of his ship along the rhumb line that led most directly to his destination, in order to make the best ...
[35]
The Navigation of Columbus | Proceedings - April 1926 Vol. 52/4/278
Columbus' ability to navigate has been differently judged by different authors. One thing stands out; the routes chosen by him, both outward and homeward bound, ...
[36]
The Importance of Dead Reckoning in Aerial Navigation
The dead reckoning error between two positions as close together as one hour frequently amounts to two miles or more, due to slight errors in steering, coupled ...
[37]
Before GPS: How Did Pilots Navigate in the Early Days of Aviation?
Apr 12, 2024 · Before GPS, pilots used several navigation methods. These include pilotage, dead reckoning, the beacon station system, radio ranges, radar, ...
[38]
The shortest distance between two points | Bodleian Map Room Blog
May 16, 2018 · Navigational charts are traditionally drawn on the Mercator projection. This has the great advantage of showing a line of constant bearing ( ...
[39]
Pro navigator's tips on how to use the ocean's currents
Jun 5, 2018 · Top Australian navigator Adrienne Cahalan shares some expert tips on using currents on bluewater passages and ocean races.Missing: ships | Show results with:ships
[40]
Understanding Rhumb Lines: Straight Paths on a Curved Earth
A rhumb line, also known as a loxodrome, creates a unique path across the Earth's surface by maintaining a constant angle with all meridians of longitude.
[41]
Why Are Great Circles the Shortest Flight Path? - GIS Geography
For short distances the difference between the rhumb line and great circle route is negligible. For aviation the distance is more critical since it directly ...
[42]
Comparison of Rhumb Lines and Great Circles - MATLAB & Simulink
A rhumb line, also known as a loxodrome, is a curve with a constant azimuth. An azimuth is the angle a line makes with a meridian, measured clockwise from north ...
[43]
[PDF] path discrepancies between great circle and rhumb line
A simulation of a mathematical model to compute path discrepancies between great circle and rhumb line flight paths is presented. The model illustrates that the ...Missing: stuurman rumb
[44]
Great Circle or Rhumb Line for long cruises??? | SailNet Community
Dec 3, 2007 · The distance from Cape Race Light to Bishop Rock is 1,842 miles by the great circle route, compared with 1,871 for the rhumb line route. At one ...
[45]
The 2 Basic Types of Aircraft Navigation Routes - Me gusta volar
Apr 19, 2023 · There are two basic route types in air navigation, the “great circle” and the “rhumb line” – what's the difference between the two?
[46]
Inertial Guidance: A Brief History & Overview | Advanced Navigation
Jan 4, 2023 · The history of inertial guidance dates back centuries ago, but the modern developments started in the 1920s with Prof. Robert Goddard.
[47]
Analysis and Selection of Shipping Route in Ocean - IOP Science
There are three kinds of ocean routes in common use: great circle route, rhumb line route and mixed route.The great circle route is usually used when ships are ...
[48]
[PDF] Riemann sphere
Oct 22, 2012 · The Riemann sphere has many uses in physics. In quantum mechanics, points on the complex projective line are natural values for photon ...
[49]
https://doi.org/10.1017/S0373463316000886
[50]
https://scholarship.claremont.edu/jhm/vol4/iss2/4
[51]
[PDF] Practical Sailing Formulas for Rhumb-Line Tracks on an Oblate Earth
These formulas are based on the assumption that the vessel is sailing a rhumb line, or loxodrome; that is, the vessel's track maintains a constant azimuth.
[52]
[PDF] Navigation on the spheroidal earth Ed Williams March 21, 2002 ...
Mar 21, 2002 · Compared to a sphere, an oblate spheroid is flattened at the poles ... Along a parallel, which is an E-W rhumb line, Eqns. (8) and (11) ...
[53]
RhumbSolve(1) - GeographicLib
The path with constant heading between two points on the ellipsoid at (lat1, lon1) and (lat2, lon2) is called the rhumb line or loxodrome. Its length is s12 and ...