Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Spheroid

A spheroid is a surface formed by rotating an about one of its principal axes, resulting in a with two equal semi-axes and one distinct semi-axis, distinguishing it from a general with three unequal axes. This approximates a but exhibits elongation or flattening depending on the axis of rotation. Spheroids are classified into two primary types: and prolate. An spheroid arises from rotating an about its minor axis, producing a flattened at the poles with an equatorial radius greater than the polar radius. In contrast, a prolate spheroid results from rotation about the major axis, yielding an elongated form where the polar radius exceeds the equatorial radius. In and , the spheroid serves as a fundamental model for Earth's shape, accounting for the planet's due to rotational forces, with the equatorial radius approximately 21 kilometers larger than the polar radius. This approximation underpins reference ellipsoids used in global positioning systems (GPS) and cartographic projections, enabling precise mapping and navigation. Prolate spheroids, while less common in natural contexts, appear in models of certain asteroids and in for symmetric potentials.

Fundamentals

Definition

A spheroid is a quadric surface formed by rotating an ellipse about one of its principal axes, generating a surface of revolution that extends the two-dimensional ellipse into three dimensions. This rotation preserves the elliptical cross-sections while creating a symmetric shape around the axis of rotation, distinguishing it from a general , which has three unequal axes, as a spheroid specifically has two equal semi-axes. Visually, a spheroid resembles a sphere that has been stretched or compressed along one direction, resulting in a more flattened or elongated profile depending on the axis of rotation. For instance, rotating an ellipse about its minor axis produces a shape widened at the equator and narrowed at the poles, akin to spinning a flattened circle to form a disc-like solid. The key dimensions are the equatorial radius a, which measures the distance from the center to the equator along the plane perpendicular to the rotation axis, and the polar radius c, which measures along the rotation axis itself. Spheroids are classified into two types based on the relative sizes of these radii: an spheroid occurs when the equatorial radius exceeds the polar radius (a > c), creating a flattened appearance at the poles, while a prolate spheroid has a longer polar radius than equatorial (a < c), resulting in an elongated, rugby-ball-like form. A sphere represents the special case of a spheroid where the equatorial and polar radii are equal (a = c).

Historical Context

The concept of the Earth's shape as a sphere was recognized by ancient Greek philosophers as early as the 5th century BCE, with Aristotle providing empirical evidence around 330 BCE through observations of lunar eclipses and the varying positions of stars, establishing a qualitative understanding of a rounded planet. However, the notion of a spheroid—an ellipsoid of revolution deviated from a perfect sphere—emerged much later, with formal mathematical modeling beginning in the 17th century amid advances in mechanics and astronomy. In his Philosophiæ Naturalis Principia Mathematica published in 1687, Isaac Newton theorized that the Earth's rotation would cause centrifugal forces to flatten it at the poles and bulge it at the equator, predicting an oblate spheroid shape for a rotating fluid body in equilibrium. This marked a pivotal shift from qualitative descriptions to quantitative predictions based on universal gravitation, influencing subsequent geodetic inquiries. During the 18th century, mathematicians refined Newton's model for practical geodetic applications. Colin Maclaurin provided a rigorous proof in 1740 for the equilibrium figure of a homogeneous rotating fluid, deriving the oblate spheroid as the stable form and enabling calculations of gravitational variations. Independently, Alexis-Claude Clairaut developed a more general theory in his 1743 work Théorie de la figure de la Terre, accounting for density variations and confirming the oblate shape through differential equations that linked ellipticity to rotational effects, which supported expeditions measuring meridional arcs. Advancements in the 19th and 20th centuries focused on precise ellipsoid approximations for global mapping and surveying, transitioning from theoretical models to standardized reference surfaces. Efforts culminated in the development of reference ellipsoids, such as the (WGS84), adopted for international consistency in positioning and adopted by organizations like the U.S. Department of Defense. This evolution in astronomy and geodesy progressed from Newton's qualitative insights to quantitative frameworks essential for accurate planetary modeling.

Mathematical Formulation

Cartesian Equation

The Cartesian equation of a spheroid, which describes its surface in three-dimensional Cartesian coordinates, is \frac{x^2 + y^2}{a^2} + \frac{z^2}{c^2} = 1, where a denotes the semi-axis length in the equatorial plane (spanned by the x- and y-axes) and c denotes the semi-axis length along the polar z-axis. This equation represents the canonical form for a spheroid aligned with the coordinate axes, distinguishing it as a special case of a quadric surface defined by a second-degree polynomial equation in x, y, and z./04%3A_Coordinate_Geometry_in_Three_Dimensions/4.03%3A_The_Ellipsoid) This form arises from the rotation of a two-dimensional ellipse about its symmetry axis. Consider the ellipse equation in the x z-plane given by \frac{x^2}{a^2} + \frac{z^2}{c^2} = 1; rotating this curve about the z-axis generates the spheroid, replacing x^2 with x^2 + y^2 to account for the circular symmetry in the equatorial plane./04%3A_Coordinate_Geometry_in_Three_Dimensions/4.03%3A_The_Ellipsoid) The resulting surface is oblate if a > c (flattened at the poles, like Earth) or prolate if a < c (elongated along the polar axis, like a rugby ball). In this convention, a is the equatorial semi-axis, reflecting the radius of the circular cross-section in the xy-plane at z = 0, while c is the polar semi-axis, corresponding to the extent along the axis of rotation. This alignment ensures the equation captures the spheroid's rotational symmetry without loss of generality for axisymmetric cases.

Parametric Equations

The parametric equations provide an explicit representation of points on the surface of a spheroid, facilitating computations and visualizations in three-dimensional space. For a spheroid aligned with the z-axis, where a is the equatorial semi-axis and c is the polar semi-axis, the coordinates are given by \begin{align*} x &= a \sin \theta \cos \phi, \\ y &= a \sin \theta \sin \phi, \\ z &= c \cos \theta, \end{align*} with the polar angle \theta ranging from 0 to \pi and the azimuthal angle \phi ranging from 0 to $2\pi. These parameters \theta and \phi parameterize the surface in a manner analogous to spherical coordinates for a sphere, but adjusted for the spheroid's : \theta measures the colatitude from the positive z-pole, while \phi describes the longitude around the axis of rotation, ensuring full coverage of the surface without overlap except at the poles. The equations derive from rotating a parametric ellipse in the xz-plane around the z-axis. The ellipse (x/a)^2 + (z/c)^2 = 1 is parameterized as x = a \sin \theta, z = c \cos \theta for \theta \in [0, \pi], and rotation by angle \phi yields the x and y components via the cylindrical transformation x' = x \cos \phi, y' = x \sin \phi, with z unchanged. This parameterization offers advantages in numerical methods, such as generating surface plots by evaluating at discrete \theta and \phi grids, or performing surface integrals by leveraging the metric tensor derived from partial derivatives with respect to \theta and \phi.

Geometric Properties

Surface Area

The surface area of a spheroid is obtained by evaluating the surface integral over its parametric representation. The parametric equations are given by \mathbf{r}(\theta, \phi) = (a \sin \theta \cos \phi, a \sin \theta \sin \phi, c \cos \theta), where a is the equatorial semi-axis, c is the polar semi-axis, $0 \leq \theta \leq \pi, and $0 \leq \phi < 2\pi. The partial derivatives are \mathbf{r}_\theta = (a \cos \theta \cos \phi, a \cos \theta \sin \phi, -c \sin \theta) and \mathbf{r}_\phi = (-a \sin \theta \sin \phi, a \sin \theta \cos \phi, 0). The magnitude of their cross product is ||\mathbf{r}_\theta \times \mathbf{r}_\phi|| = a \sin \theta \sqrt{a^2 \cos^2 \theta + c^2 \sin^2 \theta}. Thus, the surface area S is S = \int_0^{2\pi} \int_0^\pi a \sin \theta \sqrt{a^2 \cos^2 \theta + c^2 \sin^2 \theta} \, d\theta \, d\phi = 2\pi a \int_0^\pi \sin \theta \sqrt{a^2 \cos^2 \theta + c^2 \sin^2 \theta} \, d\theta. This integral evaluates to distinct closed-form expressions for oblate and prolate spheroids, derived by substitution u = \cos \theta and recognizing the resulting form as solvable via hyperbolic or trigonometric functions, equivalent to certain elliptic integrals that simplify for the axisymmetric case. For an oblate spheroid (a > c), the eccentricity is e = \sqrt{1 - (c/a)^2}. The exact surface area is S = 2\pi a^2 \left[ 1 + \frac{1 - e^2}{e} \tanh^{-1} e \right] = 2\pi a^2 + \frac{\pi c^2}{e} \ln \left( \frac{1 + e}{1 - e} \right), where \tanh^{-1} e = \frac{1}{2} \ln \left( \frac{1 + e}{1 - e} \right). This can also be expressed using the complete elliptic integral of the second kind E(e) = \int_0^{\pi/2} \sqrt{1 - e^2 \sin^2 \psi} \, d\psi, though the elementary form is preferred for computation. For a prolate spheroid (c > a), the is e = \sqrt{1 - (a/c)^2}. The exact surface area is S = 2\pi a^2 \left[ 1 + \frac{1}{e} \sqrt{1 - e^2} \sin^{-1} e \right] = 2\pi a^2 + \frac{2\pi a c}{e} \sin^{-1} e. As with the oblate case, this arises from evaluating the parametric integral, reducing the elliptic form to elementary functions. For small eccentricity (e \ll 1), applicable to near-spherical spheroids like Earth's oblate shape, the surface area approximates that of a of radius a with corrections: S \approx 4\pi a^2 \left( 1 - \frac{1}{3} e^2 - \frac{1}{30} e^4 \right). Higher-order terms include -\frac{1}{840} e^6, but the e^2 term provides the primary deviation from . A similar expansion holds for prolate spheroids.

Volume

The volume V of a spheroid, defined by the equation \frac{x^2 + y^2}{a^2} + \frac{z^2}{c^2} = 1 where a is the equatorial semi-axis and c is the polar semi-axis, is given by the formula V = \frac{4}{3} \pi a^2 c. This expression arises as a special case of the general volume V = \frac{4}{3} \pi a b c when the intermediate axis equals the equatorial axis (b = a). A direct derivation can be obtained using the disk method, integrating the cross-sectional areas perpendicular to the polar (z) axis. At a fixed height z between -c and c, the cross-section is a disk with radius r(z) = a \sqrt{1 - \frac{z^2}{c^2}}, so the area is \pi [r(z)]^2 = \pi a^2 \left(1 - \frac{z^2}{c^2}\right). The volume is then the integral V = \int_{-c}^{c} \pi a^2 \left(1 - \frac{z^2}{c^2}\right) \, dz = 2 \pi a^2 \int_{0}^{c} \left(1 - \frac{z^2}{c^2}\right) \, dz = 2 \pi a^2 \left[ z - \frac{z^3}{3 c^2} \right]_{0}^{c} = 2 \pi a^2 \left( c - \frac{c}{3} \right) = \frac{4}{3} \pi a^2 c. This approach works identically for both oblate (c < a) and prolate (c > a) spheroids. An alternative derivation employs triple integration in cylindrical coordinates or a change of variables scaling from the unit ball, yielding the same closed-form result. When a = c = r, the spheroid degenerates to a , and the volume simplifies to the familiar V = \frac{4}{3} \pi r^3. For a non-spherical spheroid, (deviation of c from a) scales the volume relative to a of equivalent "" radius by the factor \frac{a^2 c}{r^3}, reducing it for forms and increasing it for prolate ones compared to a of radius a or c. Unlike the surface area, which requires elliptic integrals, the volume formula is elementary and does not involve .

Circumference

The equatorial circumference of a spheroid, which lies in the plane perpendicular to the of , forms a of a, the semi-major . Thus, its is given by C_e = 2\pi a. This expression follows directly from the geometry of a circle and applies to both oblate and prolate spheroids, where a is the equatorial . The meridional circumference traces a closed meridian ellipse in a plane containing the axis of rotation, with semi-axes a (equatorial) and c (polar). Its total length is the perimeter of this ellipse. For an oblate spheroid (a > c), it is expressed as C_m = 4a E(e), where e = \sqrt{1 - (c/a)^2} is the eccentricity and E(e) denotes the complete elliptic integral of the second kind, defined by E(e) = \int_0^{\pi/2} \sqrt{1 - e^2 \sin^2 \theta} \, d\theta. For a prolate spheroid (c > a), C_m = 4c E(e'), where e' = \sqrt{1 - (a/c)^2}.
This integral arises in geodesy for computing distances on ellipsoidal models of Earth.
To derive the meridional circumference for the oblate case, consider the parametric equations of the meridian in the x-z plane: x(\theta) = a \cos \theta, z(\theta) = c \sin \theta, where \theta is the ranging from 0 to $2\pi. The arc length element is ds = \sqrt{(dx/d\theta)^2 + (dz/d\theta)^2} \, d\theta = \sqrt{a^2 \sin^2 \theta + c^2 \cos^2 \theta} \, d\theta. The quarter arc from to ( \theta = 0 to \pi/2 ) is a E(e), so the full is four times this value. This formulation holds for the reference ellipsoid in coordinate systems like WGS84. Circumferences of parallels at other latitudes \phi (measured from the equator) are circles parallel to the equator, with radius \nu(\phi) \cos \phi, where \nu(\phi) = a / \sqrt{1 - e^2 \sin^2 \phi} is the prime vertical radius of curvature for oblate spheroids. The length is thus C(\phi) = 2\pi \frac{a \cos \phi}{\sqrt{1 - e^2 \sin^2 \phi}}. For prolate spheroids, the formula requires adjustment using prolate coordinates. Unlike the meridian, this does not involve elliptic integrals, as each parallel is a true circle. For an oblate spheroid like Earth's, C(\phi) decreases from the equator toward the poles.

Curvature

The curvature of a spheroid surface deviates from the uniform positive of a , varying with position due to the induced by the differing semi-axes. For an spheroid with equatorial semi-axis a and polar semi-axis c < a, and e = \sqrt{1 - (c/a)^2}, the K is computed using the first and second fundamental forms of the parametrized surface \mathbf{r}(\phi, \theta) = (a \cos \phi \cos \theta, a \cos \phi \sin \theta, c \sin \phi), where \phi \in [-\pi/2, \pi/2] is the latitude parameter and \theta \in [0, 2\pi) is the azimuthal angle. The first fundamental form coefficients are E = a^2 (1 - e^2 \cos^2 \phi), F = 0, and G = a^2 \cos^2 \phi. The second fundamental form yields the principal curvatures, leading to K = \frac{1 - e^2}{a^2 (1 - e^2 \cos^2 \phi)^2}. This expression highlights the positional variation: at the (\phi = 0), K = 1/c^2 > 1/a^2, exceeding the spherical value, while at the poles (\phi = \pm \pi/2), K = c^2 / a^4 = (1 - e^2)/a^2 < 1/a^2, showing a negative deviation from spherical uniformity. For a prolate spheroid (c > a), the adjusts with e = \sqrt{1 - (a/c)^2} and interchanged roles, yielding higher curvature at the poles and lower at the . The remains positive everywhere, confirming the spheroid as an elliptic point surface, but the deviation scales with e, which depends on the c/a. The mean curvature H, defined as the average of the principal curvatures, is H = \frac{c (a^2 + E)}{2 a E^{3/2}}, where E = a^2 (1 - e^2 \cos^2 \phi). At the poles, H = c / a^2, smaller than the spherical $1/a for oblate cases. At the equator, H = (a^2 + c^2)/(2 a c^2), which is larger than $1/a. These values reflect the surface's embedding in space, with oblate spheroids exhibiting relatively flatter poles (lower H) and sharper equatorial bending compared to a sphere of radius a. The derivation via fundamental forms ensures intrinsic consistency, as Gaussian curvature is independent of embedding, while mean curvature captures extrinsic bending.

Structural Characteristics

Aspect Ratio

In the context of spheroids, the serves as a key parameter to describe the shape's deviation from perfect , primarily through the factor f, which measures the relative difference between the equatorial semi-axis a and the polar semi-axis c. For an spheroid, where a > c, the is defined as f = \frac{a - c}{a}, with $0 < f < 1 indicating the degree of polar compression. This formulation arises from the geometry of the ellipse rotated about its minor axis, where f = 0 corresponds to a sphere and increasing f reflects greater oblateness. For a prolate spheroid, where c > a, the aspect ratio is often expressed as the form \frac{c}{a} > 1, quantifying the along the polar axis instead of . This approach maintains consistency in describing the of the distinct axes, adapting the concept to highlight extension rather than contraction. The f is closely related to the spheroid's e, a measure of how much the generating deviates from a . For an spheroid, e = \sqrt{1 - \left( \frac{c}{a} \right)^2 } = \sqrt{1 - (1 - f)^2 }, linking the two parameters such that small f yields small e, both approaching zero for near-spherical shapes. This relationship underscores how f and e interchangeably characterize the same geometric distortion, with e emphasizing the angular spread and f the linear . The parameter f (or its reciprocal for prolate cases) plays a crucial role in classifying spheroids by their elongation or oblateness relative to a . For instance, Earth's oblate spheroid has f \approx \frac{1}{298.257}, a very small value indicating minimal deviation from due to rotational forces. In contrast, values of f closer to 1 denote highly oblate forms approaching a disk-like , while reciprocals substantially greater than 1 identify highly elongated prolate structures. This classification aids in distinguishing nearly spherical bodies from those with pronounced asymmetry, informing applications in and physics where influences properties like and surface area.

Axes and Radii

In a spheroid, the principal axes are defined by two distinct semi-axes lengths: the equatorial semi-axis a, which measures the in the to the of (or ), and the polar semi-axis c, which extends along the of from to the . These axes represent the semi-major and semi-minor dimensions of the that serves as the generating curve for the spheroid, formed by revolving this about one of its principal . The equatorial a thus governs the width across the , while the polar c sets the height along the rotational . The relative measurements of these axes distinguish the two primary types of spheroids and dictate their geometric form. In an spheroid, the polar semi-axis c is shorter than the equatorial semi-axis a (c < a), yielding a compressed, disk-like shape analogous to a squashed sphere. This configuration arises from rotating an ellipse about its minor axis, emphasizing the equatorial bulge. By contrast, a prolate spheroid features a longer polar semi-axis c than equatorial semi-axis a (c > a), creating an extended, rugby-ball-like profile generated by about the ellipse's major axis. Collectively, the values of a and c establish the spheroid's overall dimensions and morphological characteristics, with equal lengths (a = c) reducing it to a and increasing disparities amplifying the ellipsoidal deviation. The , simply the proportion c/a, provides a dimensionless measure of this elongation or .

Types

Spheroid

An is a surface formed by rotating an about its , producing a shape that is compressed along the polar and expanded at the . This configuration arises in rotating fluid bodies, where centrifugal forces cause material to migrate outward along the equatorial plane, resulting in an equatorial radius a greater than the polar radius c. The resulting form is characteristic of self-gravitating, rotating masses in , such as planets and with sufficient spin rates. The mathematical distinction of an oblate spheroid from a or prolate form lies in its , defined as e = \sqrt{1 - (c/a)^2}, where e > 0 indicates the deviation from due to a > c. This parameter quantifies the degree of polar , with the ratio f = (a - c)/a providing a related measure of oblateness. Key properties include a larger equatorial cross-section and about the polar axis, making oblate spheroids suitable models for bodies where rotation dominates over other deformational forces. Prominent examples include , which exhibits a modest oblateness with f \approx 1/298.257, attributable to its diurnal over 24 hours. displays a more pronounced , with f \approx 0.065, driven by its rapid of approximately 10 hours, which amplifies centrifugal effects relative to its gravitational binding. These cases illustrate how rotational dynamics shape oblate spheroids in natural systems.

Prolate Spheroid

A prolate spheroid is formed by rotating an about its , where the semi-major length c exceeds the semi-minor length a, leading to an elongated shape along the polar direction. This rotation generates a characterized by polar extension, with the equatorial radius equal to a and the polar radius equal to c > a. The resulting geometry resembles a , featuring tapered ends and a reduced equatorial cross-section compared to a of equivalent . Mathematically, it is distinguished from an oblate spheroid by its positive squared, defined as e^2 = 1 - (a/c)^2 > 0, which quantifies the degree of elongation. Prolate spheroids occur in various natural contexts, such as rotating liquid drops of lower within a denser medium, where centrifugal forces stabilize the elongated form. Certain asteroids, like (1620) Geographos, are approximated as prolate spheroids due to their irregular, elongated profiles derived from rotational dynamics and collisional evolution. In , columnar epithelial cells lining the and intestines adopt a prolate spheroidal shape under structural constraints, facilitating directional functions like .

Applications and Occurrences

In Geodesy and Earth Modeling

In , spheroids serve as mathematical approximations of Earth's shape, enabling precise calculations for , , and by defining reference surfaces for coordinates. Unlike spherical models, which assume uniform radius and introduce errors up to about 0.3% in polar-equatorial distances, oblate spheroids account for the planet's , providing a closer fit to the irregular —the true surface of —thus improving accuracy in geodetic computations by reducing distortions in positional data. This approximation is essential for transforming three-dimensional coordinates into usable two-dimensional representations, with errors minimized to sub-meter levels in modern systems. The historical evolution in shifted from simplistic models, prevalent in early 19th-century surveys for their computational ease, to spheroid references as measurements confirmed Earth's . A pivotal advancement was the Clarke 1866 ellipsoid, developed for 1927 (NAD27), with a semi-major axis a = 6,378,206.4 m and inverse $1/f = 294.978698214, which better matched regional observations but was locally oriented rather than geocentric. Subsequent global refinements included the (GRS80), adopted by the International Union of and , featuring a = 6,378,137 m and $1/f = 298.257222101, designed for worldwide consistency based on and gravimetric data. The 1984 (WGS84), nearly identical to GRS80 with a = 6,378,137 m and $1/f = 298.257223563, became the standard for international applications, reflecting a to geocentric models aligned with Earth's . Spheroids underpin map projections and global systems by serving as the baseline for coordinate transformations. In projections like the Mercator, which preserves angles for , the spheroid's parameters determine scale factors and distortions, ensuring rhumb lines project as straight lines with minimal angular error on nautical charts. For GPS and satellite-based positioning, WGS84 defines the , allowing receivers to compute positions relative to this reference surface, with calculated via geodetic formulas that incorporate to yield accuracies better than 1 meter under ideal conditions. This integration facilitates seamless interoperability in , , and terrestrial , where spherical approximations would inflate errors in high-latitude regions by up to 21 km in radius mismatch.

In Astronomy and Physics

In astronomy, spheroids play a key role in modeling the shapes of rotating celestial bodies, where rotational forces distort gravitational equilibrium from sphericity. spheroids are prevalent among , particularly gas giants, due to centrifugal effects counteracting self-gravity. Saturn exemplifies this, with an equatorial of 60,268 km and a polar of 54,364 km, yielding a factor f \approx 0.0986, or roughly 1/10. This pronounced oblateness arises from Saturn's rapid period of approximately 10.7 hours combined with its low mean of 0.687 g/cm³, which amplifies the equatorial bulge relative to polar compression. shows a milder case with f \approx 0.0649, reflecting its slower (9.9 hours) and higher (1.326 g/cm³). These forms influence planetary atmospheres, ring systems, and magnetic fields, as observed by missions like Cassini. Prolate spheroids, elongated along the rotation axis, occur in specific stellar and binary contexts where magnetic or tidal forces dominate over uniform rotation. In rotating stars, strong internal magnetic fields, such as toroidal configurations, can counteract centrifugal flattening and induce prolate shapes. Theoretical models confirm that prolate spheroids form in uniformly dense stars with non-uniform density profiles or magnetic support, affecting epicyclic frequencies around such bodies and resembling prograde orbits in Kerr metrics without a marginally stable orbit. In binary star systems, tidal deformations often result in prolate configurations; close binaries are modeled as pairs of prolate ellipsoids in synchronous , where mutual gravitational pull elongates each component along the line connecting their centers, influencing orbital dynamics and light curves. Examples include systems like , where Roche lobe overflow and produce such elongated shapes. Spheroids extend to for describing non-spherical gravitational fields, particularly for rotating masses where the deviates from Schwarzschild . The Quevedo-Mashhoon generates exact solutions for spinning or prolate spheroids by generalizing the Zipoy-Voorhees , enabling computation of the and effects outside such bodies. These incorporate multipole expansions that account for mass and current moments, crucial for modeling the exterior fields of rapidly rotating stars or companions with asphericity. For instance, in systems involving compact objects, prolate distortions alter the gravitational , as seen in post-Newtonian approximations where higher-order spheroidal harmonics contribute to the . In , spheroidal models describe the equilibrium and evolution of self-gravitating bodies, balancing hydrostatic pressure, gravity, and rotation. The Maclaurin spheroid provides a foundational for a uniformly dense, rotating incompressible , forming an shape where the \omega relates to the via \omega^2 / (2\pi [G](/page/G) \rho) = (3-2e^2) \sqrt{1-e^2} / e^3 - 3(1-e^2)/e^2 \arcsin e, with e the and \rho the ; this sequence bifurcates to Jacobi ellipsoids at higher rotations. Advanced applications use nonspherical Boussinesq approximations for stably stratified, self-gravitating s, constructing models that capture and baroclinic instabilities in planetary interiors or stellar cores without assuming spherical symmetry. These frameworks, often solved via , predict the onset of instabilities in rapidly rotating spheroids, relevant to the cores of Jupiter-like .

Dynamical Properties

Spheroids exhibit distinct dynamical properties when subjected to rotational forces, particularly in the context of self-gravitating fluids. For a uniformly rotating, constant-density body in Newtonian , the equilibrium configuration is an spheroid known as the Maclaurin spheroid, where the arises to balance gravitational and centrifugal forces. This form represents a stable for angular velocities below a critical value, beyond which the spheroid becomes unstable and may bifurcate into more complex shapes like Jacobi ellipsoids. The rotational of these spheroids is governed by the interplay between the body's self-gravity and the centrifugal potential, ensuring that perturbations do not grow uncontrollably for sufficiently slow rotations. The moments of inertia for a uniform-density oblate spheroid differ from those of a due to the asymmetry along the polar . For an oblate spheroid with equatorial radius a and polar radius c < a, the principal moments are I_{xx} = I_{yy} = \frac{1}{5} M (a^2 + c^2) about the equatorial axes and I_{zz} = \frac{2}{5} M a^2 about the polar axis, where M is the mass. In contrast, a has all moments equal to \frac{2}{5} M a^2. This difference in I_{zz} and the equatorial moments leads to torque-free motion characterized by precession and nutation when the spheroid rotates about a non-principal axis. For Earth, modeled as an spheroid, this manifests as the Chandler wobble, a free nutation with a period of approximately 433 days, resulting from the slight misalignment between the rotation axis and the principal axis of maximum . The shape of a rotating spheroid evolves to achieve under the combined influence of and centrifugal forces. The governing equation is the condition in the rotating frame: \frac{1}{\rho} \nabla P = -\nabla \Phi + \Omega^2 \mathbf{s}, where \rho is , P is , \Phi is the , \Omega is the , and \mathbf{s} is the cylindrical radius vector perpendicular to the rotation axis representing the centrifugal acceleration. For small rotations, this leads to an shape where the \epsilon = (a - c)/a is proportional to \Omega^2, as derived in the Maclaurin sequence. In radial coordinates, the balances the effective : \frac{\partial P}{\partial r} = -\rho \left( g - \Omega^2 r \sin^2 \theta \right), with g the and \theta the , ensuring the surfaces of constant align with the spheroidal equipotentials.

References

  1. [1]
    Spheroid -- from Wolfram MathWorld
    A spheroid is an ellipsoid having two axes of equal length, making it a surface of revolution. By convention, the two distinct axis lengths are denoted a and c.
  2. [2]
    Spheroid: Definition, Properties, Shapes & Uses in Maths - Vedantu
    Rating 4.2 (373,000) A spheroid shape, or ellipsoid of revolution, refers to a quadric surface obtained by rotating an ellipse about one of its principal axes.
  3. [3]
    Oblate Spheroid - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
    An oblate spheroid is defined as a geometrical shape that results when a sphere is flattened at the poles, creating a shape that is wider at the equator, ...
  4. [4]
    Prolate Spheroid -- from Wolfram MathWorld
    A prolate spheroid is a spheroid that is pointy instead of squashed, ie, one for which the polar radius c is greater than the equatorial radius a.
  5. [5]
    The Geopotential Surface - National Geodetic Survey - NOAA
    The Earth's shape can be described in simple mathematical form as an ellipsoid, or an oblate spheroid, with a radius at the equator larger than at the poles.
  6. [6]
    Spheroids and spheres - ArcMap Resources for ArcGIS Desktop
    A spheroid, or ellipsoid, is a sphere flattened at the poles. The shape of an ellipse is defined by two radii. The longer radius is called the semimajor axis, ...
  7. [7]
    User Manual 3.3 Spheroids - Patrius - CNES
    Definition. A spheroid, or ellipsoid of revolution is a quadric surface obtained by rotating an ellipse about one of its principal axes; in other words, ...
  8. [8]
    Spheroids - Geometry - TechnologyUK
    Jun 30, 2012 · A spheroid is a three-dimensional shape that can look like either a stretched or a flattened sphere.Missing: definition | Show results with:definition
  9. [9]
    The History of Geodes: Global Positioning Tutorial
    Aug 12, 2024 · By 500 B.C. most scholars thought the Earth was completely spherical. The Greek philosopher Aristotle (384-322 B.C.) is credited as the first ...
  10. [10]
    How Newton Derived Shape of Earth | American Physical Society
    Oct 13, 2022 · He concluded that Earth, modeled as a homogeneous spheroid that rotates with uniform angular velocity, must have polar and equatorial axes with ...
  11. [11]
    Chapter 5. Gravity surveying and the 'Figure of the Earth' from ...
    Newton described in Book III of the Principia the expected shape of a rotating planet assumed to have a uniform internal density distribution: The equal ...
  12. [12]
    Alexis Clairaut (1713 - Biography - MacTutor History of Mathematics
    It built on foundations due to Newton and Huygens who had put forward the theory that the Earth was an oblate spheroid, and also on Maclaurin's work on tides ...Missing: 18th | Show results with:18th
  13. [13]
    World Geodetic System 1984 (WGS 84) - NGA - Office of Geomatics
    WGS 84 is a 3-dimensional coordinate reference frame for establishing latitude, longitude and heights for navigation, positioning and targeting.
  14. [14]
    [PDF] 1 CHAPTER 3 Ellipsoids and Hyperboloids (Central Quadrics) 3.1 ...
    formed by rotating an ellipse about its minor axis. If cba. = >. , it is a prolate spheroid (like a rugger ball), formed by rotating an ellipse about its ...
  15. [15]
    Oblate Spheroid -- from Wolfram MathWorld
    ... spheroid. For a spheroid with z-axis as the symmetry axis, the Cartesian equation is. (x^2+y^2)/(a^2)+. (1). The eccentricity of an oblate spheroid is defined ...
  16. [16]
    [PDF] Surface Area of an Ellipsoid - MIT OpenCourseWare
    Surface Area of an Ellipsoid. Next we'll find the surface area of the surface formed by revolving our elliptical curve: x = 2 sin t.
  17. [17]
    [PDF] Integrals and Series Related to the Surface Area of Arbitrary Ellipsoids
    Nine integrals derived and evaluated in this study, as expressed in their general form, are expected to have application beyond that of the surface area of ...
  18. [18]
    Surface Area of an Ellipsoid - Scalene Ellipsoid - Numericana
    Surface Area of an Ellipsoid ; Weighing function f (j) for an oblate spheroid of eccentricity e. f (j) = ( b 2/ 2 ) [ atanh (e sin j) / e + sin j / (1 - e2 sin2 ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  19. [19]
    Ellipsoid -- from Wolfram MathWorld
    The general ellipsoid, also called a triaxial ellipsoid, is a quadratic surface which is given in Cartesian coordinates by (x^2)/(a^2)+(y^2)/(b^2)+(z^2)/(c
  20. [20]
    17.2 Volume of an Ellipsoid: the Disk Method
    We get the volume of the ellipsoid by filling it with a very large number of very thin disks, that is by integrating dV from x = -2 to x = 2. Volume of th ...
  21. [21]
    volume of ellipsoid - PlanetMath
    Mar 22, 2013 · By the volume formula of the parent entry (http://planetmath.org/VolumeAsIntegral) we can calculate the volume of the ellipsoid as. V=∫a−a ...
  22. [22]
    6.2 Determining Volumes by Slicing - Calculus Volume 1 | OpenStax
    Mar 30, 2016 · Rotate the ellipse ( x 2 / a 2 ) + ( y 2 / b 2 ) = 1 ( x 2 / a 2 ) + ( y 2 / b 2 ) = 1 around the x-axis to approximate the volume of a football ...
  23. [23]
    [PDF] Map projections--a working manual - USGS Publications Warehouse
    Nov 12, 1987 · This manual describes map projections, useful for those interested in their philosophy, history, or mathematics, and includes non-mathematical ...
  24. [24]
    [1104.5145] Surface Area and Curvature of the general Ellipsoid
    Apr 27, 2011 · This paper derives the surface of a tri-axial ellipsoid using elliptic integrals, and expressions for mean and Gaussian curvature. At umbilic ...
  25. [25]
    Flattening -- from Wolfram MathWorld
    The (first) flattening f of a spheroid, also called oblateness or ellipticity, is defined as where c is the polar radius and a is the equatorial radius.
  26. [26]
    Convert between ellipse eccentricity, flattening, aspect ratio
    Oct 14, 2022 · There are at least three common ways to describe the shape of an ellipse: eccentricity e, flattening f, and aspect ratio r. Each is a number between 0 and 1.
  27. [27]
    oblateSpheroid - Oblate ellipsoid of revolution - MATLAB - MathWorks
    An oblate spheroid is symmetric about its polar axis and flattened at the poles, and includes the perfect sphere as a special case.
  28. [28]
    Rotational flattening
    In other words, the Earth's rotational flattening satisfies Equation (6.43) extremely accurately. This confirms that although the Earth is not a uniform ...
  29. [29]
    Oblateness - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
    The shape of the Earth can be approximated by an oblate spheroid, as would be formed by a rotating fluid, with smaller deviations from this oblate shape.
  30. [30]
    axial_precession_physics.html - UNLV Physics
    The Earth is actually NOT exactly round: it is a slightly oblate spheroid ... The flattening ratio is. f = (a-b)/a = 0.0033528 = 1/298.257222101 ,. where a ...
  31. [31]
    4.3: The Ellipsoid - Physics LibreTexts
    Sep 16, 2022 · 2) x 2 a 2 + y 2 a 2 + z 2 c 2 = 1. If the ellipse. is rotated through about its major ( -) axis, the figure so obtained is called a prolate ...
  32. [32]
    (PDF) On the Stability of Rotating Drops - ResearchGate
    Aug 6, 2025 · Prolate spheroidal shapes occur if a drop of lower density rotates within a denser medium; these drops appear to be linearly stable. This work ...
  33. [33]
    Minor planets and related objects. XV. Asteroid (1620) Geographos
    First, for a prolate spheroid of uniform reflectivity rotating about its axis of maximum moment of inertia, the maximum area of cross section is independent of ...
  34. [34]
    Application of Mie theory to determine the structure of spheroidal ...
    2b ], found in the respiratory tract, and columnar cells [Fig. 2c ], which line the stomach and intestines, are prolate spheroids. Squamous and cuboidal cell ...
  35. [35]
    Shape of a slowly rotating star measured by asteroseismology
    Nov 16, 2016 · The snlm values are positive for prolate spheroids and negative for oblate spheroids. Latitudinal variations in the wave speed may result ...
  36. [36]
    Epicyclic frequencies of spheroidal stars with non-uniform density
    On the contrary, orbits around a prolate spheroid resemble prograde Kerr orbits, but the marginally stable orbit does not exist for prolate-shaped stars. The ...
  37. [37]
    Close Binary Stars Modeled by Two Prolate Ellipsoids ... - IOP Science
    Dec 19, 2023 · The present paper aims to simply address an astronomy problem, studying the relative movement of close binaries disturbed by their mutual deformation.
  38. [38]
    On relativistic multipole moments of stationary space–times - Journals
    Jul 18, 2018 · The HKX method was employed by Quevedo and Mashhoon (QM) to find new stationary solutions from the Erez–Rosen space–time as seed metric [6–8].
  39. [39]
    None
    Nothing is retrieved...<|control11|><|separator|>
  40. [40]
    Orbital and epicyclic frequencies of Maclaurin spheroids
    MACLAURIN SPHEROIDS. The Maclaurin spheroid is an oblate axisymmetric figure of equilibrium of a uniformly rotating constant-density body in Newtonian gravity.Maclaurin Spheroids · Maclaurin-Spheroid... · Conclusions
  41. [41]
    On the Stability of a Maclaurin Spheroid of Small Viscosity.
    From equation (1) it follows that the Maclaurin spheroid is indeed unstable beyond the point of bifurcation when viscosity is present. I. INTRODUCTION It is ...
  42. [42]
    [PDF] Moment of Inertia and Strain January 5, 2003 1
    Jan 5, 2003 · From the moment of inertia matrix that follows eq. (26), for a uniform- density, oblate spheroid (Еy =╧{ ),. Ixx =1. 5M(. 4{ 2. 9 c2) =1. 5M(.
  43. [43]
    Wobble and nutation of the Earth - Oxford Academic
    Elastic-gravitational normal mode theory is used to study theoretically the free wobble and free nutation of a suite of geophysically plausible rotating ...
  44. [44]
    First Detection of a Built-In Wobble on Another Planet - Eos.org
    Jan 4, 2021 · The Chandler wobble arises when a rotating body isn't a perfect sphere. This imbalance affects its spin. The result is a wiggle resembling that ...
  45. [45]
    2-dimensional models of rapidly rotating stars - II. Hydrostatic and ...
    The hydrostatic structure for Ω=Ω(r, θ). The equations governing the hydrostatic structure of a rotating star are. ∇P ρ. = −∇Φ+Ω2. (1). ∇2Φ = 4πGρ. (2) where ...Missing: spheroid | Show results with:spheroid
  46. [46]
    Maclaurin Spheroids - Richard Fitzpatrick
    (2.120). This famous result was first obtained by Colin Maclaurin (1698-1746) in 1742. Finally, in order to calculate the potential energy, (2.116), we need to ...Missing: geodetic 18th century