Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

S-II

The S-II was the second stage of the Saturn V launch vehicle, a super heavy-lift rocket developed by NASA to support the Apollo program's crewed lunar missions.^[1] Measuring 81.5 feet in length and 33 feet in diameter, it was powered by five J-2 engines that burned liquid hydrogen (LH₂) as fuel and liquid oxygen (LOX) as oxidizer to generate a total thrust of approximately 1,150,000 pounds-force (5.1 MN).^[1] The stage had a dry weight of about 80,220 pounds (36,400 kg) and a fully loaded gross weight exceeding 1,060,000 pounds (480,000 kg), with a burn duration of roughly 6 minutes to accelerate the vehicle from the end of first-stage flight to near-orbital velocity.^[1] Manufactured by North American Aviation (later Rockwell International) at facilities in Seal Beach, California, and tested at the Mississippi Test Facility (now Stennis Space Center), the S-II was designed to operate in the upper atmosphere and vacuum of space, where its cryogenic propellants provided high specific impulse for efficient performance.^[1] Each J-2 engine, developed by Rocketdyne, produced up to 232,000 pounds-force (1.03 MN) of thrust in vacuum, enabling the stage to propel the remaining Saturn V stack—including the third stage, instrument unit, and Apollo spacecraft—to altitudes of around 115 statute miles (185 km) and speeds of 15,500 miles per hour (25,000 km/h) during nominal missions.^[1]^[2] The S-II's common bulkhead design separated the LH₂ and LOX tanks to minimize weight and structural complexity, while ullage rockets or pre-pressurization systems ensured propellant settling before ignition to prevent cavitation in the turbopumps.^[1] The S-II flew successfully on all 13 Saturn V launches between 1967 and 1973, including Apollo 4 through 17, Skylab 1, and the Apollo-Soyuz Test Project, without any mission failures attributed to the stage itself.^[2] It ignited shortly after separation from the S-IC first stage, typically around T+2 minutes 43 seconds, and was jettisoned at T+9 minutes, falling into the Atlantic Ocean downrange from Cape Kennedy (now Cape Canaveral).^[1] Challenges during development included pogo oscillations—longitudinal vibrations that were mitigated by center engine cutoff timing and damping systems—and cryogenic insulation to maintain propellant temperatures during ground operations.^[3] Post-Apollo, surplus S-II stages were repurposed for structural testing and display, underscoring their engineering significance in achieving humanity's first lunar landings.^[4]

Development

Origins and Contracts

The development of the S-II stage originated in December 1959 as part of NASA's Saturn C-2 vehicle concept, which built upon earlier proposals for the Saturn launch family. On December 15, 1959, the Saturn Vehicle Team recommended initiating design studies for the S-II, a liquid hydrogen-liquid oxygen second stage with four engines each producing 150,000 to 200,000 pounds of thrust, to enhance the capabilities of the baseline C-1 configuration.^[5] This evolution addressed the need for greater payload capacity to support advanced orbital and lunar missions, transitioning from the Centaur-based upper stages of initial Saturn designs.^[5] Key to the S-II's propulsion was the J-2 engine, with NASA awarding the development contract to Rocketdyne in September 1960. The J-2 was specified to deliver approximately 200,000 pounds of thrust at sea level and 230,000 pounds in vacuum, enabling the S-II to provide the total impulse required for trans-lunar injection when clustered in groups of five on the Saturn V.^[6] This contract marked a pivotal step in integrating high-performance, restartable upper-stage engines into the Saturn architecture.^[6] On September 11, 1961, NASA formally awarded the contract for the S-II stage to North American Aviation's Space and Information Systems Division, encompassing design, development, testing, and initial production of 15 flight stages.^[7] The company selected Seal Beach, California, as the primary manufacturing site, leveraging its existing facilities for large-scale assembly.^[7] Funding for the program drew from NASA's early 1960s budgets, prioritized under the Apollo initiative with significant allocations for research, development, and overtime to meet aggressive timelines.^[7] Overall production planning called for 25 S-II stages, designated S-II-1 through S-II-25, to support the full Saturn V flight manifest including Apollo and Skylab missions.^[7] Cost estimates for each stage hovered around $50 million in 1960s dollars, reflecting the complexity of cryogenic tankage and engine integration.^[7]

Design Evolution

The design of the S-II stage underwent significant evolution following NASA's announcement of the Saturn C-5 configuration on January 10, 1962, which laid the groundwork for what became the Saturn V. Initially conceived under the earlier Saturn C-2 concept with a second-stage diameter of 21.6 feet (6.6 meters) to match the upper stages' scale, the S-II was upsized to a 33-foot (10-meter) diameter to align with the larger S-IC first stage and accommodate expanded liquid hydrogen and liquid oxygen propellant tanks capable of holding approximately 383,000 US gallons (1,450 m³) combined. This change, driven by requirements for greater payload capacity to low Earth orbit and lunar missions, more than doubled the stage's propellant volume while maintaining structural integrity through scaled-up aluminum alloy barrel sections.^[8] In 1963, North American Aviation, the prime contractor for the S-II, adopted a common bulkhead design separating the liquid oxygen and liquid hydrogen tanks, which eliminated the need for a separate inter-tank structure and shortened the overall stage length by about 10 feet (3 meters). Constructed as an adhesive-bonded sandwich panel with 2014-T6 aluminum alloy face sheets and a fiberglass-phenolic honeycomb core, this innovation reduced the stage's dry mass by nearly 10,000 pounds (4,500 kilograms) compared to separate bulkhead configurations, enhancing propellant efficiency without compromising cryogenic insulation or pressure containment. The design was rigorously tested in subscale models, confirming its ability to withstand differential thermal stresses between the propellants.^[9]^[10] The arrangement of the five J-2 engines evolved to a quincunx pattern, with four outer engines gimbaled for thrust vector control and a central engine fixed to simplify plumbing and reduce mass. This configuration, finalized in early design reviews, optimized center-of-gravity alignment during ascent and minimized structural loads on the thrust frame, allowing for more efficient hydrogen feed lines from the forward tank. The J-2 engines served as the core propulsion elements, providing a combined vacuum thrust of approximately 1,160,000 pounds-force (5.16 MN).^[10] To facilitate separation from the S-IC stage, engineers integrated an aft interstage skirt, a lightweight aluminum structure that enclosed the S-II's engine nozzles during launch and protected them from aerodynamic heating. The skirt featured eight pyrotechnic bolts and linear shaped charges for rapid detachment, initiating a dual-plane separation sequence approximately 2 minutes after liftoff at S-IC burnout, followed by interstage jettison 30 seconds later to reduce drag and mass during second-stage ignition. This system ensured clean separation without recontact, as validated in dynamic tests.^[11]^[12] Early ground tests in 1964 revealed concerns with structural vibrations and pogo oscillations—longitudinal instabilities coupled between the structure, propellant feed lines, and engines—potentially amplified by the stage's slender profile and cryogenic propellants. By 1965, these issues prompted the addition of damping systems, including a liquid oxygen accumulator in the feed lines to absorb pressure fluctuations and tuned mass dampers in the thrust structure, which suppressed oscillations to below 1 g levels during full-duration firings. These modifications, informed by subscale vibration analyses, were critical for flight safety and incorporated into production stages starting with S-II-1.^[13]^[1]

Design and Configuration

Structural Features

The S-II stage featured a cylindrical structure measuring 81 feet 7 inches (24.9 m) in height and 33 feet (10 m) in diameter, optimized for lightweight construction to handle the demands of cryogenic propellants while minimizing overall vehicle mass.^[14] The stage's dry mass was approximately 80,220 pounds (36,380 kg), with a gross mass of approximately 1,060,000 pounds (480,000 kg), including about 980,000 pounds (444,000 kg) of propellant, achieving a high propellant mass fraction essential for upper-stage performance.^[14]^[1] This design emphasized structural efficiency, using semimonocoque construction with stiffened aluminum panels to support the loads during ascent.^[14] The propellant tanks consisted of a forward liquid hydrogen (LH2) tank with a capacity of 260,000 US gallons (984 m³) and an aft liquid oxygen (LOX) tank with a capacity of 83,000 US gallons (314 m³), separated by an insulated common bulkhead to save volume and weight.^[14] The tanks were fabricated from welded 2014 aluminum alloy, selected for its strength at cryogenic temperatures and weldability, while the body shells and skirts utilized 7075 aluminum alloy for enhanced rigidity.^[14] To minimize propellant boil-off during ground operations and flight, the LH2 tank was insulated with layers of polyurethane foam bonded directly to the aluminum surface via epoxy adhesive, providing thermal protection without adding excessive mass.^[3] The common bulkhead incorporated a fiberglass-phenolic honeycomb core sandwiched between 2014 aluminum facesheets, further reducing weight while maintaining structural integrity under differential pressure.^[14] At the aft end, a 33-foot (10 m) diameter skirt served as the interstage for mating to the S-IC first stage, featuring attachment points with pyrotechnic devices for separation and eight retro-rockets to ensure safe staging.^[14] This interstage, weighing about 10,650 pounds (4,830 kg), was jettisoned shortly after S-IC cutoff to optimize mass for the S-II burn.^[14] The thrust structure, integrated at the base to support the five J-2 engines, consisted of a truncated cone of 7075 aluminum alloy, distributing loads efficiently across the cryogenic tankage.^[14]

Propulsion System

The S-II stage was propelled by five Rocketdyne J-2 liquid-propellant rocket engines, which utilized cryogenic propellants to achieve high-efficiency performance in the near-vacuum conditions following first-stage burnout. These engines operated on liquid hydrogen (LH₂) as fuel, stored at approximately -423°F (-253°C), and liquid oxygen (LOX) as oxidizer, maintained at -297°F (-183°C), with a nominal oxidizer-to-fuel mixture ratio of 5.5:1 by mass to optimize combustion efficiency.^[11] Each J-2 engine delivered a vacuum thrust of 230,000 lbf (1,023 kN) and a sea-level thrust of 200,000 lbf (890 kN), yielding a combined vacuum thrust of 1,150,000 lbf (5,115 kN) for the stage. The engines provided a nominal burn time of 367 seconds, achieving a vacuum specific impulse of 421 seconds and contributing a velocity increment of approximately 6,200 m/s (22,000 km/h; 14,000 mph) to the vehicle's trajectory.^[11] The propulsion system employed a turbopump-fed design powered by a single-shaft turbopump rotating at 32,000 rpm, driven by a hydrogen-rich gas generator cycle that exhausted excess propellant to sustain pump operation. Thrust vector control was accomplished via hydraulic gimballing of the four outer engines, each with a ±7-degree range in pitch and yaw, while the center engine remained fixed.^[11]^[15] Engine startup commenced with ignition of the center J-2 for aerodynamic stability during the initial ignition phase, followed by the outer engines 1.5 seconds later to minimize structural loads; shutdown proceeded in reverse order, with the center engine terminating first to manage thrust decay. The quincunx arrangement of the engines facilitated balanced thrust distribution and supported the stage's role in upper-stage acceleration.^[11]

Production

Manufacturing Process

The S-II stages were manufactured by North American Aviation's Space and Information Systems Division, with primary assembly occurring at a government-owned facility in Seal Beach, California, adjacent to the Seal Beach Naval Weapons Station. Key structural components, including the interstage, aft skirt, thrust structure, and forward skirt, were fabricated at North American's plant in Tulsa, Oklahoma. This distributed approach addressed the scale of production, leveraging specialized tooling for large-diameter tankage and vertical assembly to maintain structural integrity during integration. The assembly sequence began with tank fabrication, where cylindrical sections of the liquid oxygen (LOX) and liquid hydrogen (LH₂) tanks—constructed from 2014-T6 and 7075 aluminum alloys—were formed using explosively formed gores for the domed ends and welded together. Circumferential and longitudinal welds, often exceeding 100 feet in length, were performed using automated tungsten inert gas (TIG) welding machines on skate tracks to ensure precision, with tolerances as tight as 0.011 inches for the common bulkhead separating the LOX and LH₂ tanks. Following tank welding, the five J-2 engines, supplied by Rocketdyne, were integrated into the thrust structure in a vertical orientation to facilitate alignment and systems checkout, including propellant feed lines and pneumatic systems. The entire process emphasized cleanliness, with clean-room protocols to prevent contamination in the cryogenic environment.^[10] Quality assurance was integral to the man-rated design, incorporating non-destructive testing such as X-ray radiography for weld inspections and dye penetrant checks to detect surface flaws, with ultrasonic testing verifying bond integrity in honeycomb panels. Hydrostatic proof pressure tests were conducted at 105% of design pressure using water to simulate loads, while cryogenic proof tests verified tank integrity at operational temperatures up to 1.25 times the expected pressure, identifying and requiring rework for defects like porosity or misalignment exceeding 0.028 inches. These measures addressed early production challenges, such as weld distortions in initial stages, through iterative improvements in tooling and operator training. Production involved a peak workforce of several thousand employees across the Seal Beach and Tulsa facilities, coordinated with NASA Marshall Space Flight Center oversight to resolve technical hurdles. Each S-II stage required approximately 6-8 months to complete, from component fabrication to final assembly, amid a program timeline that saw hardware production ramp up from May 1963, with the first flight-qualified stage, S-II-1, shipped in July 1966. Although only 13 flight stages were ultimately qualified and used, with two additional stages partially or fully built as backups against initial plans for up to 25, the process highlighted industrial-scale challenges in scaling cryogenic rocket manufacturing. The supply chain included aluminum alloys and propellant lines sourced from specialized vendors, with electronics and guidance interfaces provided by contractors like IBM.^[16]

Stages Built

A total of 13 flight-qualified S-II stages were produced, designated S-II-1 through S-II-13, to support the operational Saturn V launches from Apollo 4 through Skylab. These stages were constructed by North American Aviation at its facility in Seal Beach, California, with production spanning from 1965 to 1972.^[16] The build chronology began with S-II-1 in 1965, which underwent static testing at the Mississippi Test Facility (now NASA Stennis Space Center) after a 4,000-mile barge journey from California via the Panama Canal, arriving on August 13, 1966.^[16] Subsequent stages followed a similar pattern, with transportation by barge—such as the USNS Point Loma—for testing in Mississippi before final assembly at Kennedy Space Center in Florida; the final stage, S-II-13 for the Skylab mission, was completed in 1972.^[17] In addition to the flight stages, two non-flight test articles were built: S-II-T, the all-systems test vehicle assembled between 1963 and 1965 for propulsion and vibration testing, which experienced a fire during a May 28, 1966, engine start at the Mississippi Test Facility but contributed to design validations; and S-II-F, the facilities integration stage initially used for ground support simulations and later repurposed as S-II-F/D for dynamic vibration testing at Marshall Space Flight Center in combination with the S-IC-T first-stage test article.^[10] A third test article, S-II-D, was planned for dedicated dynamic testing but was canceled in mid-1965 to reallocate resources.^[1] Production of S-II-14 for the canceled Apollo 18 mission (SA-514) was halted due to 1970 budget cuts by Congress that ended further Apollo lunar missions, while S-II-15 was completed as a Skylab backup (from SA-515) but not flown. Components from the partially completed S-II-14, including structural elements, were either scrapped or repurposed for modifications to existing hardware, such as enhancements to the Skylab S-II-13 stage.^[18]^[19]

Testing

Ground Tests

Ground testing of the S-II stage encompassed a series of component, stage, and environmental simulations to verify structural integrity, propulsion performance, and operational reliability prior to flight qualification. These efforts were essential for mitigating risks in the cryogenic upper stage environment and ensuring compatibility with the Saturn V launch sequence. Component-level testing focused on the five J-2 engines, conducted at Rocketdyne's Santa Susana Field Laboratory in California. Each engine underwent rigorous firings to validate thrust, stability, and durability, with individual units accumulating over 1,000 seconds of total burn time across multiple runs.^[20] For instance, one J-2 designated for the S-II Battleship program completed 63 tests totaling 1,089 seconds.^[20] Stage-level static firings occurred at the NASA Mississippi Test Facility (now Stennis Space Center), beginning with the pathfinder vehicle S-II-T on April 23, 1966, for initial short-duration evaluations of the five-engine cluster.^[16] This was followed by a full-duration burn of 354.5 seconds on May 20, 1966, confirming propulsion system performance under simulated flight conditions.^[16] Subsequent flight stages, including S-II-1, achieved nominal 367-second burns in late 1966, accumulating over 7,000 seconds across 27 tests for the series.^[21] Dynamic and vibration tests utilized the S-II-T stage to simulate launch acoustics and structural loads, exposing it to noise levels up to 140 dB and conducting modal surveys to replicate ascent vibrations.^[22] These evaluations identified resonance frequencies and ensured the common bulkhead design withstood coupled fluid-structure interactions. Cryogenic simulations involved loading the S-II with liquid oxygen (LOX) and liquid hydrogen (LH2) to detect leaks and assess tank pressurization, including cycles up to 50 psi on the common bulkhead.^[23] Such tests validated propellant management systems under thermal contraction and pressure differentials. Early ground tests in 1964 revealed propellant slosh instabilities during LOX/LH2 shifts, which were resolved by installing ring-type baffles inside the tanks to dampen fluid motion.^[10] These modifications, informed by subscale simulations, prevented potential control disruptions and were incorporated into production stages. These ground tests collectively qualified the S-II for integration in the Apollo 4 mission, the first full Saturn V launch.^[16]

Flight Qualification

The flight qualification of the S-II stage occurred through two uncrewed Saturn V missions, Apollo 4 and Apollo 6, which certified its performance for human-rated operations in the full launch vehicle stack. On November 9, 1967, Apollo 4 marked the debut of the S-II stage (designated S-II-1), with its five J-2 engines igniting nominally at approximately 150 seconds after launch and burning for 367 seconds to propel the vehicle through the upper atmosphere.^[24] Despite minor guidance system transients that did not impact overall trajectory, the stage achieved its planned velocity increment of approximately 10,000 m/s, demonstrating reliable integrated performance with the S-IC first stage and S-IVB third stage, including successful interstage separation at around 68 km altitude captured by onboard cameras.^[25]^[26] The subsequent Apollo 6 mission on April 4, 1968, utilized S-II-2 and encountered challenges during ascent, including pogo oscillations that propagated from the S-IC stage into the S-II burn phase, leading to vibrations in the liquid oxygen (LOX) feedlines.^[27] Approximately four minutes into the planned 367-second burn, two outboard J-2 engines shut down prematurely, traced to these feedline vibrations, though the remaining engines compensated by extending their operation without causing structural damage or mission failure.^[28] Post-flight analysis confirmed no lasting harm to the stage, validating its robustness under dynamic flight conditions. In response to the Apollo 6 anomalies, engineers implemented qualification fixes by installing pulsation suppression devices, such as accumulators and surge tanks in the LOX feedlines, to dampen vibrations and prevent recurrence of pogo effects; these modifications were rigorously validated through ground re-tests at the Marshall Space Flight Center.^[29] The integrated stack testing during these qualification flights affirmed the S-II's compatibility within the complete Saturn V configuration, encompassing propulsion sequencing, structural loads, and separation dynamics. Overall, the two missions met NASA's success criteria of achieving greater than 99% reliability for the launch vehicle, paving the way for crewed operations starting with Apollo 7.^[29]

Operational History

Apollo Program Missions

The S-II stage powered the second burn of the Saturn V launch vehicle during all 12 Apollo program missions that used Saturn V, comprising the two uncrewed test flights (Apollo 4 and Apollo 6) and the ten crewed flights from Apollo 8 to Apollo 17 (December 1968–December 1972), utilizing stages S-II-1 through S-II-12.^[30] These missions marked the operational debut, testing, and maturation of the S-II, which ignited shortly after S-IC separation around T+165 seconds, providing the primary acceleration through the upper atmosphere to near-orbital velocity. The stage's five J-2 engines delivered a nominal thrust of approximately 5.1 MN (1,150,000 lbf), enabling consistent insertion of the S-IVB upper stage and Apollo spacecraft stack into a low Earth parking orbit at roughly 185 km altitude, setting the stage for subsequent translunar injection.^[31] Across these flights, the S-II demonstrated exceptional reliability, with no mission failures attributed to the stage, contributing directly to the success of six lunar landings.^[32] The uncrewed Apollo 4 mission on November 9, 1967 (SA-501), utilized S-II-1 and achieved nominal S-II performance, validating the stage's design in the first full-up Saturn V test flight. The subsequent uncrewed Apollo 6 on April 4, 1968 (SA-502), with S-II-2, encountered severe pogo oscillations during the S-II burn starting around T+200 seconds, leading to automatic shutdown of all five engines after 206 seconds (versus nominal ~367 seconds). The S-IVB stage compensated with an extended burn to achieve orbit, and post-flight analysis led to design modifications, including propellant feed restrictions and damping systems, preventing recurrence in crewed flights.^[29] For the crewed missions, stage assignments followed sequential progression aligned with production and testing timelines, beginning with S-II-3 for Apollo 8 (SA-503), the first crewed Saturn V flight that orbited the Moon, and ending with S-II-12 for Apollo 17 (SA-512), the final lunar mission featuring the extended Lunar Roving Vehicle.^[30] Among the Earth-orbital tests, S-II-4 powered Apollo 9 (SA-504) for Lunar Module qualification, while S-II-5 supported Apollo 10 (SA-505), a lunar dress rehearsal. For the lunar missions, intermediate examples include S-II-6 on Apollo 11 (SA-506), which supported the historic first Moon landing, S-II-10 on Apollo 15 (SA-510), enabling the mission's high-inclination trajectory for detailed lunar mapping, and S-II-11 on Apollo 16 (SA-511), powering ascent to a parking orbit that facilitated deployment toward the Descartes Highlands.^[31] Separation from the S-IC occurred at T+150 to 160 seconds, with S-II cutoff typically at T+515 to 535 seconds, after burns lasting about 367 seconds.^[33] Performance metrics remained highly uniform across the missions, with each S-II burn delivering a total impulse of approximately 1.8 × 10^9 N·s, propelling the vehicle to speeds exceeding 7 km/s and altitudes over 180 km by cutoff.^[34] This consistency ensured the S-IVB stage achieved parking orbit insertion with velocities within 20 m/s of planned values, supporting orbital circularization burns that varied only slightly by mission azimuth (typically 72° to 108°).^[35] For instance, Apollo 9's S-II-4 burn resulted in an orbit at 191 km apogee, closely matching targets and validating Earth-orbital operations for the first time with a full Apollo stack.^[30] Minor roll control adjustments were routine, using the stage's auxiliary thrusters to maintain attitude stability during ascent, but these never impacted overall trajectory.^[36] The most notable anomaly in crewed flights occurred during Apollo 13's S-II-8 burn on April 11, 1970, when the center J-2 engine shut down automatically about two minutes early due to pogo oscillations, a low-frequency structural vibration.^[32] The outer four engines compensated by extending their burn by 34 seconds, achieving full nominal duration and inserting the S-IVB into a 185 km circular orbit with only slight liquid oxygen depletion and no loss of mission capability.^[37] Post-flight analysis confirmed the event stemmed from propellant feed dynamics but affirmed the stage's redundant design, as subsequent missions incorporated damping modifications without further incidents.^[32] Orbital insertion accuracy across all flights stayed within 1 km of targeted perigees and apogees, underpinning the precision required for translunar injections that enabled all Apollo objectives.^[35]

Skylab Mission

The Skylab 1 mission on May 14, 1973, marked the final flight of a Saturn V vehicle, utilizing the S-II-13 stage following the cancellation of remaining Apollo lunar missions.^[38] The launch from Kennedy Space Center's Launch Complex 39A successfully deployed the Orbital Workshop, though it encountered significant anomalies early in ascent. At approximately 63 seconds after liftoff, severe aerodynamic vibrations caused the meteoroid shield—part of the payload fairing—to rip away prematurely, with debris damaging the S-IC/S-II interstage ordnance and leading to partial failure in its jettison sequence.^[39] This resulted in the S-II engines igniting within the partially retained interstage, elevating temperatures around the engines to near-critical levels but without catastrophic failure due to the stage's performance margins.^[39]^[38] Despite the vibrations and interstage issues, the S-II-13 executed a nominal burn lasting 428.38 seconds, achieving a total thrust of 1,164,965 lbf and specific impulse of 422.0 lbf-s/lbm, closely aligning with predictions.^[39] The stage inserted the Skylab stack into a planned near-circular orbit of approximately 435 km altitude and 50° inclination at 591.1 seconds after launch, though a subsequent failure in the S-II/Skylab interstage linear shaped charge prevented full jettison of the adapter.^[39]^[38] Consequently, the S-II was not fully separated from the upper stack as intended and was retained in orbit as a potential backup propulsion resource, though its J-2 engines remained unused amid the workshop's primary issues with solar array deployment and thermal control.^[39] Post-separation, non-propulsive venting systems dumped residual propellants—approximately 16,616 lbm of LOX and 5,878 lbm of LH2—along with pressurized helium, reducing the stage's mass to about 36,160 kg while preventing structural hazards from boil-off.^[39]^[38] Prior to the mission, the S-II-13 underwent specific modifications, including reinforced venting in the forward skirt (increased by ~108 in² for pressure regulation), addition of non-propulsive overboard lines for propellant safing, 2,400 lbm of lead ballast for dynamic stability, and enhanced electrical circuits for orbital operations, all to support its potential extended stay in low Earth orbit without active control systems.^[39] The stage's initial orbit decayed gradually due to atmospheric drag, with tracking showing an apogee of 386 km and perigee of 324 km by the sixth revolution.^[39] After 606 days in space, the uncontrolled S-II-13 reentered Earth's atmosphere on January 11, 1975, over the Indian Ocean, where most of its structure burned up, resulting in minimal recoverable debris and no reported ground impacts.^[40]^[39] This mission highlighted the S-II's structural integrity and passive stability in orbit, providing valuable data on long-duration exposure for large cryogenic stages that informed subsequent designs for reusable upper stages and space station propulsion elements in post-Apollo programs.^[39]

References

[1]
[PDF] Saturn V Step-by-Step | NASA
Jan 5, 2025 · S-IC The first stage of the Saturn V. (Pronounced “ess-one-see”.) S-II The second stage of the Saturn V. (Pronounced “ess-two”.)
[2]
Saturn V - Stage 2 - NASA Science
May 13, 2025 · The second stage performed for 6-112 minutes, reaching a height of 115 statute miles, 935 miles downrange, and a speed of 15,500 miles-per-hour ...
[3]
Apollo Flight Journal - S-II Insulation - NASA
Jun 20, 2016 · The Saturn V's second stage, the S-II, was a very large liquid hydrogen (LH2) powered stage. Liquid hydrogen has a temperature of about 20 ...<|separator|>
[4]
Rocket, Second Stage, S-II-F/D Dynamic Test Vehicle, Saturn V
The S-II-F/D is the second stage of the Saturn V, used for ground tests, not for flight, and was important in the Apollo program. It is not on display.
[5]
None
### Summary of Early Design Initiation of S-II Stage (December 1959)
[6]
[PDF] Remembering the Giants: Apollo Rocket Propulsion Development
The Air Force contracted Rocketdyne to study how to make a rocket engine that had a million pounds of thrust. The highest thing going at the time had 150,000 ...
[7]
[PDF] Stages to Saturn
Mar 1, 1997 · desirability of the S-II stage as part of the C-2. The C-l vehicle did not have the capabilities NASA needed for the long term. "The Saturn.
[8]
https://www.astronautix.com/s/saturnc-2.html
[9]
The Common Bulkhead for the Saturn S-II Vehicle - heroicrelics.org
Each of the two bulkheads are fabricated out of 2014 T6 aluminum alloy and are 33 feet in diameter and 12 feet high. After welding and hydrostat, the ...Missing: 1963 lithium
[10]
Rocket Propulsion Evolution: 8.20 - S-II Stage
Jun 1, 2021 · The Saturn V S-II stage boosted the vehicle from an altitude of about 40 miles and a speed of about 6,000 mph to an altitude of about 115 miles ...Missing: C- | Show results with:C-
[11]
[PDF] Saturn V Flight Manual, SA 504 - Ibiblio
A delayed dual plane separation is employed between the. S-IC and S-II stages, while a single plane separation is adequate between the S-II and S-IVB stages.
[12]
S-II Overview - heroicrelics.org
The S-II, the second stage of the Saturn V rocket, was the largest liquid hydrogen stage produced in the 1960s. Equipped with five J-2 rocket engines.
[13]
[PDF] NASA Experience with Pogo in Human Spaceflight Vehicles
Thus, the near failure of the S-II stage on Apollo 13 due to pogo instability has colored the NASA attitude toward pogo ever since, and pogo has subsequently ...
[14]
[PDF] P R E S S K I T - NASA Technical Reports Server (NTRS)
The stage is 58 feet, 5 inches long and 21 feet, 8 inches in dia-eter. from the second stage its weight will be 29,170 pounds exclusive of the liquid hydrogen ...
[15]
[PDF] saturn v flight manual | nasa
This minion ! :eludes a suborbital start of the third stage. (S-IVB) engine for final boost into earth orbit and subsequent reignition to provide sufficient ...
[16]
[PDF] ALTITUDE DEVELOPMENTAL TESTING OF THE J-2 ROCKET ...
The engine uses liquid oxygen and liquid hydrogen as propellants and has a thrust rating of 230, 000 lbf at an oxidizer-to-fuel mixture ratio of 5. 5. An S-IVB ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[17]
55 Years Ago: First Saturn V Stage Tested in Mississippi Facility
Apr 26, 2021 · The first Saturn V stage was tested at the Mississippi Test Facility (MTF) on April 23, 1966, with a 15-second firing of S-II-T/D.
[18]
Spacecraft transit the Panama Canal - Phys.org
Apr 10, 2015 · The S-II stage was off-loaded at the Michoud Assembly Facility in New Orleans. From there, it made its way to the Mississippi Test Facility via ...Missing: chronology | Show results with:chronology
[19]
[PDF] Saturn V Launch Vehicle_02/04/2003 - THC Atlas
2nd Stage S-II--15. (From Skylab backup. SA-515). 3rd Stage ... Contracts to build these stages were awarded to North American, Douglas and Boeing during 1961.
[20]
Apollo 18
Finally NASA cancelled Apollo 18 and 19 on 2 September 1970 because of congressional cuts in FY 1971 NASA appropriations.
[21]
Rocket Engine, Liquid Fuel, J-2 | National Air and Space Museum
The J-2 engine powered the Saturn V's second and third stages, using liquid hydrogen and oxygen, producing 200,000-230,000 pounds of thrust. It is not on ...
[22]
[PDF] Stennis Space Center - NASA Technical Reports Server
Nov 9, 2001 · In all, twenty-seven S-II static firings were conducted for a cumulative duration of approximately 7,106 sec. 1.3.3 Space Shuttle Main Engines.
[23]
[PDF] Comparison of Direct Acoustic Impingement of Avionics Equipment ...
• 6 OASPL test cases: 140 dB, 143 dB, 147 dB, 150 dB, 153 ... • Test data showed base shake vibration response envelopes acoustic induced vibration response.Missing: II- | Show results with:II-
[24]
[PDF] NcA"\E - NASA Technical Reports Server (NTRS)
Jan 4, 2021 · 1 LOX and LH2 Fill and Drain Valves ............ . 22. 3.2.2 Oxidizer ... 2 Propulsion Leak and Functional Check (1B71877 C). . 229. 4.3 ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[25]
55 Years Ago: Apollo 4, the First Flight of the Saturn V - NASA
Nov 9, 2022 · Meanwhile, the second stage's five J-2 engines ignited, burning for six minutes to raise Apollo 4's altitude to 120 miles and its speed to ...
[26]
Apollo 4: The First Flight of the Saturn V | Drew Ex Machina
Nov 11, 2017 · With all engines on the S-II stage powered up, Apollo 4 continued to accelerate towards orbit. At 187.1 seconds after launch, Apollo's LES was ...
[27]
Did the Saturn V interstage ring burn up in the atmosphere?
Apr 29, 2018 · Stage separation occurs at about 2400 m/s and 67km altitude. That's fast enough for re-entry scorching, certainly, but not enough to burn up ...
[28]
55 Years Ago: The Flight of Apollo 6 - NASA
Apr 4, 2023 · Middle left: The S-II second stage for Apollo 6 at right, as workers ... oscillations known as “pogo effect,” that not only caused about 27 ...
[29]
The Day the Saturn V Almost Failed: 50 Years Since Apollo 6
Apr 1, 2018 · Next came the turn of the S-II. Four minutes into a six-minute “burn”, two of the five J-2 engines shut down, requiring the others to fire ...
[30]
50 Years Ago: Solving the Pogo Effect - NASA
Jul 16, 2018 · On July 18, 1968, NASA announced that engineers had found a solution to the problem that occurred near the end of the Saturn V rocket's first stage.
[31]
[PDF] Apollo by the Numbers - NASA
... Stages To Saturn: A Technological History of Saturn/Apoll Launch Vehicles (SP-4206); and the Saturn V Flight. Evaluation Report for each mission. 6 Altitude ...Missing: serial | Show results with:serial
[32]
Apollo 11 Flight Journal - Day 1, part 1: Launch - NASA
Oct 3, 2022 · These two videos, kindly donated by Stephen Slater, show the separation of Apollo 4's S-IC stage from its S-II across both planes. They were ...
[33]
[PDF] APOLLO 13 MISSION REPORT SEPTEMBER 1970 - NASA
During S-II stage boost, an automatic shutdown of the center engine occurred ... S-II performance after that t ime was smooth with no not i ce able ...
[34]
[PDF] APOLLO-11(AS-506)
The 343,600 gallon capacity. LOX tank is the strucLural link between the forward and intertank sections. ... . During powered flight of S-II Stage, the LOX tank ...
[35]
Apollo 15 Flight Journal - Launch and Reaching Earth Orbit - NASA
Oct 27, 2023 · The second, or S-II, stage of Apollo 15's Saturn V vehicle is 24.9 metres tall and is powered by the combustion of LH2 (liquid hydrogen) and LOX ...
[36]
[PDF] SATURN V LAUNCH VEHICLE FLIGHT EVALUATION REPORT-AS ...
The S-IC stage powered flight is approximately. 162 seconds; the S-II stage provides powered flight for approximately. 395 seconds. The S-IVB stage first burn ...
[37]
Apollo 14 Flight Journal - Technical background information - NASA
Feb 17, 2017 · The second, or S-II, stage of the Saturn V vehicle is 24.8 metres tall and is powered by the combustion of LH2 (liquid hydrogen) and LOX in a ...
[38]
Apollo 13: Mission Details - NASA
Jul 8, 2009 · Then the center engine of the S-II stage shut down two minutes early. ... 2 oxygen tank, serial number 10024X-TA0009, had been previously ...
[39]
50 Years Ago: The Launch of Skylab, America's First Space Station
May 14, 2023 · The S-II second stage engines ignited into the partially enclosed space, raising temperatures around the engines to near catastrophic levels.
[40]
[PDF] SATURN V LAUNCH VEHICLE FL'GHT EVALUATION REPORT
Aug 1, 1973 · The S-IC stage powered flight lasts approximately 158 seconds. The S-II stage provides powered flight for approximately 430 seconds ...
[41]
45 Years Ago: Skylab Reenters Earth's Atmosphere - NASA
Jul 11, 2024 · On July 11, 1979, Skylab reentered, with debris landing over the Indian Ocean and Australia. Lessons learned from deorbiting large spacecraft like Skylab and ...
[42]
[PDF] The J-2X Upper Stage Engine: From Design to Hardware
This paper will provide an overview of the J-2X design background, progress to date in design, testing, and manufacturing. The Ares I crew launch vehicle will ...Missing: S- | Show results with:S-
[43]
[PDF] development of the j-2x engine for the ares icrew launch vehicle and ...
The J-2X engine, based on the Apollo J-2, powers Ares I and V upper stages. It uses LOX/LH2, and will be used for trans-lunar injection. Development includes ...Missing: quincunx pattern
[44]
[PDF] testing for the j-2x upper stage engine
The subject of this paper is testing plans; hardware, and operations to support development of a new upper stage engine for NASA's Ares I and Ares V launch ...
[45]
[PDF] Materials for Launch Vehicle Structures
A drawback of this design is the need for the common bulkhead to control heat flow ... current application to propellant tanks is the aluminum-lithium (Al-Li).
[46]
[PDF] Space Shuttle Program - NASA Technical Reports Server (NTRS)
Jun 25, 1971 · ... is identical to the current. S-II. The common bulkhead is defined as a part of the LO2 tank and is discussed in the L0 2 tank assessment ...
[47]
[PDF] Design Process of Flight Vehicle Structures for a Common Bulkhead ...
The second structure is the Ares I common bulkhead (CB) (figure 2), it is an interior barrier within a launch vehicle tank assembly that physically separates ...
[48]
[PDF] EXPERIMENTAL INVESTIGATION LI SLOSHING IN A SCALE ...
... Centaur slosh-baffle configuration when compared with the flat- ring baffle is attributed mainly to the radial clearance which existed between the Centaur.Missing: S- II management
[49]
[PDF] S D72-SA-0157-2 INSULATION COMMONALITY
Feb 1, 1973 · This report documents the work performance by North. American Rockwell Corporation through its Space Division.
[50]
[PDF] Liquid-Propellant Rocket Engine Throttling: A Comprehensive Review
Liquid-Propellant Rocket Engines (LREs) are capable of on-command variable thrust or thrust modulation, an operability advantage that has been studied ...Missing: quincunx | Show results with:quincunx
[51]
[PDF] RL10 Engine Ability to Transition From Atlas to Shuttle/Centaur ...
Jul 28, 2014 · The Shuttle/Centaur Program transitioned the Centaur to launch from the Space Shuttle, requiring the RL10 engine to adapt to new conditions. ...
[52]
[PDF] Propellant Sloshing Parameter Extraction from CFD Analysis
Propellant sloshing is a disturbance critical to launch vehicle stability, driven by lateral disturbance, oscillatory thrust, or angular rotation. It occurs ...Missing: issues | Show results with:issues
[53]
Full Coverage: Johnson Space Center Saturn V Restoration
Apr 22, 2006 · "So what we have is the best surviving example of Saturn V hardware that there is. ... The second stage (S-II-15) was meant as a backup to launch ...
[54]
Saturn V S-II (Second) Stage (Rocket Park) - heroicrelics.org
The Saturn V's S-II stage was located in the museum's Rocket Park from June 28, 1969 (the day it was transferred from Marshall Space Flight Center) until July ...Missing: clusters | Show results with:clusters
[55]
The Saturn V thread - NASA Spaceflight Forum
Dec 25, 2007 · It consists of S-IC-14, S-II-15, S-IVB-513, and CSM-115A. The Saturn V at KSC is not entirely flight-rated; its first stage was a test stage and ...Missing: serial numbers total
[56]
NASA History Office
They manage archival collections holding a variety of textual records, photographic prints, oral histories, and more. The NASA History Office publishes a ...Missing: II | Show results with:II
[57]
List of largest satellite reentries
... 2 Saturn S-II-13 (Skylab rocket) 45.1 1975 Jan 11 Atlantic Ocean (w of Madeira) 34N 19W 3 DOS 6 space station/TKS-M module (Salyut-7/Kosmos-1686) 39.0? 1991 ...