Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

S-IVB

The S-IVB was the upper stage of the Saturn IB (as its second stage) and Saturn V (as its third stage) launch vehicles, designed by NASA to provide the final velocity increments needed for Earth orbital insertion and translunar injection during the Apollo program and related missions. The S-IVB was produced in two main variants: the 200-series for Saturn IB and the 500-series for Saturn V, with minor differences in pressurization and interstage design. Powered by a single Rocketdyne J-2 engine using liquid hydrogen (LH₂) and liquid oxygen (LOX) propellants, it featured a restart capability that enabled two distinct burns: the first to achieve low Earth orbit after separation from lower stages, and the second to accelerate the Apollo spacecraft toward the Moon. Measuring 17.8 meters (58 feet) in length and 6.6 meters (21.7 feet) in diameter, the S-IVB had a gross mass of approximately 119,000 kilograms (262,000 pounds) at ignition for the 200-series, including 105,000 kilograms (231,000 pounds) of cryogenic propellants stored in insulated tanks separated by a common bulkhead to minimize weight and length. Developed from the earlier S-IV stage used on the rocket, the S-IVB represented a significant advancement in cryogenic , incorporating lightweight aluminum-lithium structures, advanced to manage extreme temperature differentials (LH₂ at -253°C and at -183°C), and an auxiliary system for attitude control during coast phases. The (later McDonnell Douglas) was contracted in 1961 to manufacture the stage, with production occurring primarily at facilities in , and ; over 20 flight-qualified units were built between 1964 and 1975, alongside test articles. The J-2 engine, qualified for vacuum operation with a of 1,033 kilonewtons (232,000 pounds-force) and a of 421 seconds, was gimbaled for thrust vector control and marked the first large-scale use of a restartable engine in American spaceflight. In its operational role, the S-IVB was pivotal to NASA's lunar landing efforts, successfully flying on all 13 missions ( through 17) and 9 missions ( through , , –4, and ASTP), with 22 launches and only one partial failure ( restart anomaly). For lunar missions, after , it separated from the Apollo stack; S-IVBs from and 14–17 were directed to impact the for seismic experiments, while others were placed in orbits to avoid interference. The stage's reliability was exemplary, though early development faced challenges like propellant slosh, insulation , and issues due to its dual-vehicle . Post-Apollo proposals explored spent S-IVB stages as orbital habitats or depots, influencing concepts like the Lunar Application of a Spent S-IVB (LASS), but none advanced beyond studies. Its legacy endures as a cornerstone of human , demonstrating scalable cryogenic rocketry that informed subsequent programs.

Development

Origins and Early Design

The S-IVB stage evolved directly from the , the liquid hydrogen-fueled second stage of the vehicle, which had begun developing under a contract awarded on May 26, 1960. While the S-IV relied on multiple engines for orbital insertion, the S-IVB incorporated significant modifications, including the addition of restart capability to enable a second burn in space and an overall larger configuration to accommodate the demands of more ambitious missions. These changes built on the S-IV's proven cryogenic but addressed the need for greater versatility in upper-stage operations beyond initial . Initial design requirements for the high-performance upper stage were established by in 1960, emphasizing the use of and propellants to achieve superior for efficient delivery to and beyond. The S-IVB program itself was formally initiated in December 1961, shortly after the configuration was defined, to serve as a versatile stage capable of both orbital insertion for Earth-circling missions and for lunar voyages. Key design goals centered on single-engine reliability to minimize complexity and failure risks, ensuring the stage could perform its critical propulsion tasks with high precision during the Apollo program's demanding profiles. NASA's , in collaboration with Douglas Aircraft, conducted extensive studies in the early 1960s to refine upper-stage concepts for the evolving Saturn family, including the C-1 (early designation for ) and C-1B (uprated for manned orbital flights) vehicles. These efforts integrated lessons from prior liquid hydrogen programs like and Thor, with Douglas leading the adaptation of S-IV hardware into the restartable S-IVB design. As part of this, selected the J-2 engine in 1960 as the S-IVB's primary propulsion system to meet the restart and performance needs.

Contracts and Testing

The initial contract for the S-IVB stage was awarded to the on December 21, 1961, tasking the firm with modifying the existing stage design into the S-IVB configuration featuring a single J-2 engine for use as the third stage of the advanced Saturn C-5 vehicle. This award followed preliminary studies evolving from the stage used on earlier launches. In August 1962, expanded the agreement with a $141.1 million contract to Douglas for producing 11 S-IVB stages, comprising five for ground testing and six for flight qualification on Saturn C-5 missions. Subsequent contracts supported the integration of the S-IVB into both and configurations. In July 1964, amended the original agreement, adding $21 million for to accommodate -specific requirements, including enhanced capacity at Douglas's Huntington facility. Further expansions occurred in October 1967, when awarded McDonnell Douglas (following the company's merger) a $146.5 million for nine additional S-IVB stages to meet the full needs, with deliveries scheduled through May 1970. However, in August 1968, amid budget constraints and post- reductions, cancelled outstanding orders for additional S-IVB stages, halting for that variant after the required total of 28 units, with 12 for (200-series) and 16 for (500-series); continued until 1970. Ground testing for the S-IVB was conducted primarily at Douglas's Sacramento Test Site (SACTO), beginning in early 1964 following the installation of the first battleship test article in December 1963. The program encompassed full-duration static firings, such as the 415-second burn of the battleship stage on December 23, 1964, along with rigorous vibration, acoustic, and environmental simulations to certify structural integrity and propulsion reliability. A notable incident occurred on January 20, 1967, when the S-IVB-503 test stage exploded during ground testing at Sacramento, prompting design modifications and renumbering of later stages. Three dedicated test stages, known as S-IVB-T articles, were employed for comprehensive qualification, supplemented by battleship models for subsystem validation. Key milestones included the assembly of the first S-IVB development hardware in mid-1964, with delivery of initial test components to NASA's on July 11, 1964. Qualification testing progressed rapidly, culminating in the successful verification firings of the S-IVB-501 stage in 1965, confirming the design's readiness for flight integration. These efforts ensured the S-IVB met performance standards prior to its debut on missions.

Design and Configuration

200-Series Specifications

The 200-series S-IVB stage was the upper stage configuration developed for the launch vehicle, providing the necessary velocity increment for orbital insertion missions. This variant featured a height of 17.8 (58 ) and a of 6.6 (21.7 ), maintaining a compact cylindrical form to interface with the smaller stack. The stage had a dry mass of 11,500 kg (25,400 lb) and carried a load of 107,000 kg (236,000 lb) consisting of (LH₂) and (LOX). Propulsion was provided by a J-2 engine mounted at the aft end, delivering 230,000 lbf (1,020 kN) of vacuum thrust and achieving a of 421 s. The 's turbopumps were centrifugal in design, drawing propellants from the tanks to support in the thrust chamber. The tanks utilized a single compartment design with a common bulkhead separating the LOX and LH₂ sections, eliminating the need for an intertank structure and allowing for efficient internal insulation and pressurization systems. Pressurization for the LH₂ tank relied on gaseous hydrogen boil-off, while the LOX tank used heated , ensuring stable flow during engine operation. For integration with the Saturn IB, the S-IVB-200 connected via a cylindrical interstage adapter to the S-IB first stage, facilitating separation and settling with three auxiliary motors. Guidance and control were managed by the Instrument Unit (IU) mounted atop the stage, which housed the Launch Vehicle Digital Computer and inertial measurement systems for trajectory corrections.

500-Series Specifications

The 500-series S-IVB stage was the variant developed for integration as the third stage of the launch vehicle, with modifications to support the increased delta-v requirements for and insertion. Retaining the same basic dimensions as the 200-series—a of 17.8 meters and of 6.6 meters—this configuration featured the same dry mass of 11,500 kg (25,400 lb) and propellant capacity of 107,000 kg (236,000 lb) of and . Central to the 500-series enhancements was the main propulsion system, powered by a single J-2 engine optimized for vacuum operation with a of 230,000 lbf (1,020 kN) and a of 421 seconds. Unlike the 200-series, which primarily supported orbital insertion, the J-2 in the 500-series included a robust restart capability, allowing a second ignition after a coast period in to perform (TLI). This restart mechanism relied on auxiliary systems for propellant settling and precise attitude control to ensure reliable ignition in microgravity. The auxiliary propulsion system (APS) incorporated two modules, each with three 150 lbf thrusters for three-axis and one 70 lbf for settling prior to main engine burns. These hypergolic thrusters, fueled by and nitrogen tetroxide, ensured stability without relying on the main engine's gimbaling alone. The 500-series used a conical and two rockets, differing from the cylindrical interstage and three rockets of the 200-series. Guidance and control for the 500-series were tightly integrated with the Saturn V's Instrument Unit (IU), mounted atop the stage, which housed the Launch Vehicle Digital Computer (LVDC) and for real-time trajectory corrections. This setup facilitated transmission for translunar navigation, including mid-course adjustments via the APS, distinguishing it from the simpler orbital guidance of the 200-series. The IU's role extended to commanding the S-IVB's restart sequence, ensuring precise alignment for TLI while monitoring stage performance throughout the mission.

Operational History

Saturn IB Missions

The S-IVB served as the second stage of the launch vehicle, igniting after separation from the S-IB first stage to provide the primary velocity increment for orbital insertion or suborbital trajectories during development flights. Powered by a single J-2 engine, it integrated with the (CSM) or (LM) test articles, demonstrating compatibility, guidance accuracy, and reliability in Earth-orbital environments. These missions validated the stage's for crewed operations, achieving precise and separation essential for subsequent Apollo objectives. The first uncrewed flight, on February 26, 1966, marked the inaugural S-IVB launch, conducting a suborbital test to verify structural integrity, launch loads, stage separation, and subsystem operations. The stage ignited at 149.35 seconds after liftoff, burning for approximately 464 seconds to cutoff at 612.99 seconds and achieving a of 6,940 m/s, 17.5 m/s above nominal despite a 1.63% lower average from cold-start conditions. All objectives were met, with the J-2 and auxiliary maintaining within limits, confirming the stage's readiness for flight. AS-203 on July 5, 1966, was an orbital mission dedicated to propellant tank behavior in low gravity, simulating Saturn V restart conditions with 19,100 lb of liquid hydrogen and 5,000 lb of liquid oxygen. Inserted into a 100-nautical-mile at 432.7 seconds, the S-IVB conducted venting, depressurization, and chilldown experiments, maintaining 20 psia tank and confirming baffle effectiveness against 3-inch liquid slosh amplitudes. Fluid velocities reached 1.0–1.5 ft/s during coast, with successful sensor responses; the stage met all objectives before inadvertent destruction during a post-flight differential test. AS-202, launched on August 25, 1966, focused on suborbital reentry testing for the Block I heat shield and service propulsion system under lunar-return-like conditions. The S-IVB boosted the stack to an apogee of 617 nautical miles, cutting off at 588.5 seconds with an insertion velocity of 22,310 ft/s (6.8 km/s), 1.97% above predicted enabling a successful separation 10.2 seconds later. Guidance errors were minimal (e.g., -4.69 m/s on the X-axis), and the stage supported CSM maneuvers, validating integration for Earth-orbital missions despite a mixture ratio shift causing early . The first crewed mission, on October 11, 1968, utilized the S-IVB-205 stage to insert the into a 123 by 153 , cutting off at 616.8 seconds with a velocity of 25,526 ft/s (7.78 km/s), only 1.3 ft/s below nominal. The performed , manual attitude control tests, and a simulated with the separated stage, achieving residuals under 0.1 ft/s after circularization. Integration with the enabled 11 days of Earth-orbital operations, testing and propulsion critical for Apollo. Across nine missions through the Apollo era, the S-IVB achieved a 100% success rate, providing a typical velocity increment of approximately 4.5 for insertion while demonstrating reliable single-burn performance distinct from the restart requirements of applications. Later flights supported crew launches in 1973–1974, though primary stage modifications occurred under post-Apollo uses.

Saturn V Missions

The S-IVB stage underwent initial testing on two uncrewed Saturn V flights to verify its performance in achieving and demonstrating restart capability for (TLI). On , launched on November 9, 1967, the stage's first burn lasted approximately 146 seconds, inserting the vehicle into a near-circular at 190 by 186 kilometers altitude, while the second burn of 289.7 seconds simulated TLI conditions, achieving a of approximately 11.1 kilometers per second and reentry conditions for the command module. The J-2 engine ignited and restarted nominally, with thrust and within 1% of predictions, confirming the 500-series enhancements for deep-space operations. Apollo 6, launched on April 4, 1968, encountered issues during its restart attempt. The first burn performed adequately despite prior pogo oscillations in the S-II stage, but the second burn failed due to a probable leak in the augmented spark igniter fuel supply line, preventing main chamber ignition. This led to liquid oxygen (LOX) cavitation in the hydraulic pumps, freezing fluid in the suction lines and halting pressurization. The mission achieved a suborbital trajectory instead of full TLI simulation, marking the only partial failure among Saturn V S-IVB flights. From Apollo 8 through Apollo 17, spanning December 1968 to December 1972, the S-IVB successfully executed TLI burns on all ten crewed lunar missions, propelling the Apollo spacecraft stack from low Earth orbit to a translunar trajectory approximately 3 hours after launch. Each burn, powered by the single J-2 engine, delivered a delta-v of up to 3.1 kilometers per second, enabling precise insertion onto lunar paths with trajectories often described as "nearly perfect." Apollo 13, launched on April 11, 1970, exemplified this reliability; despite a later service module oxygen tank explosion that aborted the landing, the S-IVB's TLI burn proceeded nominally, allowing the crew's safe return. Overall, the stage achieved 11 successes out of 12 Saturn V launches, with its restart capability distinguishing Saturn V operations from simpler orbital insertions on Saturn IB. Key anomalies beyond Apollo 6 were minimal in crewed flights, though post-TLI procedures included collision avoidance. After command and service module separation, the S-IVB executed evasive maneuvers using its auxiliary propulsion system, typically a 3-meter-per-second retrograde burn to ensure safe distancing from the spacecraft and prevent recontact. This was confirmed successful on missions like , where the stage then targeted lunar impact for seismic experiments.

Skylab and Post-Apollo Uses

The S-IVB stage found significant application beyond its primary role in lunar missions through its adaptation for the program, NASA's first . The S-IVB-212 stage from the vehicle SA-513 was modified into the Orbital Workshop (OWS), the core habitable module of , by engineers at McDonnell Douglas in . Modifications included removing the aft interstage and J-2 engine assembly to create internal volume for living quarters, installing multi-layered insulation, scientific airlocks, and systems, as well as adding deployable solar arrays and a shield on the exterior. Launched on May 14, 1973, atop the final rocket from Kennedy Space Center's Pad 39A, the OWS achieved despite the loss of its micrometeoroid shield and one solar array during ascent. hosted three crewed missions (SL-2, SL-3, and SL-4) from 1973 to 1974, supporting experiments in microgravity, solar observation, and Earth resources, before being deorbited on July 11, 1979, with debris scattering over the and . In Apollo lunar missions, expended S-IVB stages were repurposed for scientific experiments after separation from the Command and Service Module (CSM), particularly through deliberate impacts on the Moon to generate seismic data. Starting with Apollo 13 in April 1970, the S-IVB was targeted for controlled crashes to excite the lunar seismometers deployed by prior Apollo landings, allowing analysis of the Moon's internal structure and natural seismic activity. The Apollo 13 impact, occurring at 77 hours and 56 minutes mission elapsed time near Mare Cognitum, was detected 135 km west of the Apollo 12 landing site by the Passive Seismic Experiment (PSE), producing vibrations that lasted over three hours and revealed insights into lunar composition. Subsequent impacts followed for Apollo 14 (February 4, 1971), Apollo 15 (July 31, 1971, detected by Apollo 12 and 14 PSEs about 146 km from target), Apollo 16 (April 19, 1972), and Apollo 17 (December 18, 1972), each contributing data on moonquakes and regolith properties without risking crewed hardware. For earlier Apollo missions lacking seismic instruments, S-IVB stages were directed into heliocentric orbits to avoid Earth reentry hazards. The stages from Apollo 8, 10, 11, and 12 were injected into solar orbits following translunar injection, with the Apollo 12 S-IVB (launched November 14, 1969) entering a 43-day heliocentric path after a lunar flyby. In 2002, this stage was rediscovered as the temporary Earth satellite J002E3 by amateur astronomer Bill Yeung on September 3, exhibiting a chaotic orbit captured from solar space near the L1 Lagrange point; spectral analysis confirmed its aluminum composition and Apollo-era paint, matching the S-IVB-507 serial number. J002E3 escaped Earth's gravity again in 2003 and continues in heliocentric orbit, highlighting long-term space debris dynamics. The S-IVB's operational history concluded with the Apollo-Soyuz Test Project (ASTP) on July 15, 1975, the final Saturn IB launch using S-IVB-210, which successfully placed the Apollo into for the historic U.S.-Soviet docking before controlled deorbit. Across 21 flights from 1966 to 1975, the S-IVB achieved a success rate of 20 out of 21, with the sole anomaly occurring during in 1968 due to a restart failure from pogo oscillations, though the stage still met primary objectives.

Production and Legacy

Stages Manufactured

The S-IVB stages were manufactured by the McDonnell Douglas Astronautics Company (formerly ) at its facility, where production emphasized cleanroom assembly techniques to minimize contamination risks during construction of the cryogenic upper stage. A total of 12 200-series stages were built for use as the second stage on vehicles, designated SA-201 through SA-212, with fabrication spanning from 1964 to 1973 to support early testing, manned Apollo missions, crewed flights, and the Apollo-Soyuz Test Project. These stages featured three auxiliary propulsion system () modules for enhanced attitude control suited to the Saturn IB's operational profile. In addition, three dedicated test stages, designated S-IVB-D, S-IVB-F, and S-IVB-S, were produced to validate structural, dynamic, and systems performance prior to flight certification, including the S-IVB-S for static firing tests, S-IVB-F for facilities , and S-IVB-D for dynamic testing. For the Saturn V, 16 500-series stages were manufactured, designated SA-501 through SA-515 along with one spare, with production occurring from 1965 to 1969 to meet the demands of unmanned tests, lunar missions, and 's orbital workshop conversion. These stages incorporated two modules and modifications for , such as increased helium storage capacity. Key examples include S-IVB-501, assigned to the earth-orbital qualification flight in November 1967, which demonstrated the stage's restart capability in vacuum simulation. Another notable assignment was S-IVB-212 from the 200-series, refurbished as the core Orbital Workshop for and launched atop SA-513 in May 1973. Production quantities for the 500-series were impacted by fiscal constraints; in , NASA's budget reductions led to the cancellation of an initial order for up to 25 stages, limiting completion to 16 to align with the approved Apollo and post-Apollo flight .

Derivatives and Preservation

Several proposed derivative designs for the S-IVB stage were conceptualized for post-Apollo programs but ultimately remained unbuilt. In the 1970s, explored the MS-IVB, a modified version of the S-IVB with stretched tanks to support a manned Mars flyby mission using multiple stages for trans-Mars injection. This concept, part of early planetary exploration studies, was never developed due to shifting priorities and budget constraints. During the 2000s , the S-IVB influenced upper stage designs through its J-2 engine heritage. The upper stage incorporated a new LOX/LH2 structure powered by the engine, an evolved version of the S-IVB's J-2, emphasizing restart capability and efficiency for crewed launches; however, the program and its stages were canceled in 2010. Similarly, the (EDS) for missions was planned with a single engine derived from S-IVB technology to propel the crew exploration vehicle beyond , but it too was canceled alongside Constellation. A small number of S-IVB stages have been preserved as historical artifacts. S-IVB-211, originally intended for a Saturn IB mission, is displayed as part of a full vehicle at the U.S. Space & Rocket Center in . S-IVB-514, built for the canceled Apollo 19, forms the upper stage of the on exhibit at the in . The S-IVB-S test article, a structural used for early development and displayed at the Alabama Welcome Center, was scrapped in the 2020s due to structural deterioration. The S-IVB's legacy endures in modern upper stage design, particularly as a pioneer of restartable cryogenic propulsion systems using LOX/LH2 propellants, which informed subsequent vehicles like the and upper stages. Its single-engine architecture and in-space restart capability set standards for efficiency in and orbital maneuvering. Regarding environmental impact, disposed S-IVB stages from Apollo missions were directed to lunar impacts for seismic experiments or heliocentric orbits to minimize orbital debris; for instance, Apollo 13's S-IVB intentionally struck the , while Apollo 12's entered orbit, contributing to deep-space debris catalogs but avoiding long-term clutter. As of 2025, no active S-IVB derivatives exist, and the Space Launch System's employs unrelated engines rather than J-2 lineage.

References

  1. [1]
    None
    Below is a merged summary of the S-IVB stage from "Stages to Saturn" (NASA SP-4206), consolidating all information from the provided segments into a comprehensive response. To handle the detailed and repetitive specifications efficiently, I’ve included a table in CSV format for key specifications, followed by a narrative summary covering description, manufacturer, development history, role, and key facts. This approach ensures all information is retained while maintaining clarity and density.
  2. [2]
    Rocket Propulsion Evolution: 8.30 - S-IVB Stage
    Aug 1, 2021 · The S-IVBs single J-2 engine boosted the Apollo spacecraft into a circular earth orbit on the first burn, then boost the spacecraft to lunar ...
  3. [3]
    [PDF] Date ---------.. Doc. No. - Ibiblio
    The S-I1 program was initiated in September 1961; the S-IVB program was initiated in December 1961 - lagging engine development by a year.Missing: origins | Show results with:origins
  4. [4]
    [PDF] SATURN ILLUSTRATED CHRONOLOGY
    On April 21 Douglas reported to MSFC that the major problem in S-IV stage development was disposal of hydrogen gas generated during engine chilldown. On April.
  5. [5]
    Saturn Vehicle History
    NASA studied many Saturn booster concepts, but the agency only developed three during the 1960s. They were Saturn 1, Saturn 1B, and Saturn 5. SATURN 5.<|control11|><|separator|>
  6. [6]
    [PDF] February 5 , 1964 - NASA Technical Reports Server
    Saturn IB Configuration: ;\At SACTO, Douglas installed the S-IVB Battleship Stage in Beta Test Stand 1 on December 18, 1963.Missing: initial | Show results with:initial
  7. [7]
    The Saturn V Rocket: A New Review of Manufacturing, Testing and ...
    The All-Systems Test stage, S-IVB-T, was cancelled early in 1964 and the qualification of the propulsion system achieved via two Battleship models. One was ...
  8. [8]
    1st S-IVB Test Hardware Delivered to Marshall – July 11, 1964 - NASA
    Jul 10, 2019 · This week in 1964, the first Saturn V S-IVB, or third stage test hardware was delivered to NASA's Marshall Space Flight Center from Long Beach, ...
  9. [9]
    Apollo 14 Flight Journal - Technical background information - NASA
    Feb 17, 2017 · Thus two version of the S-IVB emerged; the -200 series for the Saturn IB and the -500 series for the Saturn V. The two main distinguishing ...
  10. [10]
    Apollo 7 Flight Journal - Day 1, part 1: Launch and Ascent to Earth ...
    Oct 8, 2023 · "The S-IVB stage is 58.4 feet (17.8 metres) long and 21.7 feet (6.6 metres) in diameter. The stage is made up of propulsion and hydraulic ...
  11. [11]
    [PDF] Saturn V Step-by-Step | NASA
    Jan 5, 2025 · The S-IVB (the Saturn V third stage) and the Instrument. Unit are stacked on top of the second stage. The umbilicals are connected from the ...
  12. [12]
    [PDF] Saturn V Launch Vehicle Program
    For the S-IVB, the Douglas Aircraft test area in. Sacramento will be utilized for development testing. 83. Page 2. The S-IVB stage is a common item for both the.
  13. [13]
    [PDF] The Basic Mathematics of Rocket Engines - I - Space Math @ NASA
    The new J-2X rocket engines being designed and tested by NASA have an Isp=421 seconds and a thrust of T = 1,310,000 Newtons. At what rate is mass leaving the ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  14. [14]
    [PDF] SATURN S-IVB-506N STAGE FLIGHT EVALUATION REPORT
    This report presents the evaluation results of the prelaunch countdown, powered flight, and orbital phases of the S-IVB-505N stage which was launched 18 May ...
  15. [15]
    [PDF] TECHNICAL INFORMATION SUMMARY APOLLO-l0 (AS-505) - NASA
    AS-50S, Apollo 10, Mission F, is described as a Lunar Mission Development. Flight whicb has been designed to demonstrate crew/space vehicle/mission support.
  16. [16]
    [PDF] 59690251-Post-Launch-Report-for-Mission-AS-202.pdf - Ibiblio
    ... NASA-S-66-10220. °. Lift-off, Mission AS-202. Page 8. J. Page 9. CONTENTS. Section ... IVB. CUTOFF ............... 7-198. NAVIGATION. ERRORS. AT S-IVB. CUTOFF.
  17. [17]
    [PDF] Results of the First saturn IB Launch Vehicle Test Flight, AS-201 ...
    The space fixed total velocity was 8.0 m/s higher than nominal at cutoff of the first stage and. 0.5 m/s lower than nominal at S-IVB cutoff. The propulsion.
  18. [18]
    [PDF] EVALUATIONOF AS-203 LOW GRAVITYORBITAL EXPERIMENT
    This report presents the orbital flight results and detailed evaluation of the low gravity liquid hydrogen experiments conducted on the Saturn.
  19. [19]
    [PDF] apollo 7 mission report - NASA
    ... S-IVB AND SERVICE MODULE ENTRY. LAUNCH VEHICLE PERFORMANCE SUMMARY . COMMAND AND SERVICE MODULE PERFORMANCE. 5 .1. STRUCTURES . . . . . . . . . • . 5 . 1 . 1. 5 ...
  20. [20]
    [PDF] Description and performance of the saturn launch vehicle's ...
    A review of the navigation, guidance, and control system of the Saturn launch vehicle includes the system analysis and design, signal flow diagrams, redundancy,.
  21. [21]
    [PDF] SATURN V LAUNCH VEHICLE FLIGHT EVALUATION REPORT-AS ...
    7.3. S-IVB Mainstage Performance for First Burn. 7-6. 7.4. S-IVB Shutdown Transient Performance for. First Burn. 7-8. 7.5. S-IVB Coast Phase Conditioning.
  22. [22]
    [PDF] saturn v launch vehicle flight evaluation report-as-502 apollo 6 mission
    Nine of the sixteen primary objectives of this mission were completely accomplished, six partially accomplished, and one (S-IVB restart) was not accomplished.
  23. [23]
    [PDF] Apollo Program Summary Report JSC-09423 - NASA
    Jan 2, 2010 · The launch was normal except that S-IVB cutoff and S-IVB/command and service module separa ... Postlaunch Report for Mission AS-201. NASA Johnson ...
  24. [24]
  25. [25]
    Apollo 13 - Transposition, Docking and Extraction - NASA
    Apr 21, 2020 · The booster engineer reports the preliminary indications are that our Saturn S-IVB evasive maneuver was successful. The Flight Dynamics ...Missing: avoidance | Show results with:avoidance
  26. [26]
    50 Years Ago: The Launch of Skylab, America's First Space Station
    May 14, 2023 · Engineers at the McDonnell Douglas plant in Huntington Beach, California, converted the S-IVB stage of Saturn IB-212 into the Skylab OWS, ...
  27. [27]
    Apollo 13 S-IVB Impact Site - NASA Scientific Visualization Studio
    Apr 6, 2020 · The impact of the Apollo 13 S-IVB is seen as a brief flash on the night side of a waxing gibbous Moon. The camera then flies very close to the surface to show ...
  28. [28]
    Apollo 15 Mission report Chapter 1 - NASA
    About 1 hour later, the impact of the S-IVB stage was sensed by the Apollo 12 and 14 seismometers.
  29. [29]
    Newly Discovered Object Could be a Leftover Apollo Rocket Stage
    Sep 11, 2002 · J002E3 is currently observable at magnitude 16.5; it is easily detectable in asteroid surveys, and even bright enough to be seen by many amateur ...Missing: solar | Show results with:solar
  30. [30]
    [PDF] Apollo by the Numbers - NASA
    All provide he end of the decade through the first lunar landing on July 20, 1969, on to the last of six successful Moon landings with Apollo 17 in December ...
  31. [31]
    Apollo 14 Flight Journal - Day 1, part 1: The Launch - NASA
    Sep 6, 2023 · As the Apollo spacecraft components come off the production line, they are also assigned serial numbers. Each had modifications which built ...
  32. [32]
    [PDF] B-161366 Incentive Provisions of Saturn V Stage Contracts
    INTRODUCTION. CONVERSION OF S-IC AND S-IVB CONTRACTS. Payment of schedule incentives not needed to achieve intended objectives.
  33. [33]
    Apollo 15 Flight Journal - Launch and Reaching Earth Orbit - NASA
    Oct 27, 2023 · The third stage of the Saturn V, called the S-IVB for historical reasons, could be described as a smaller version of the S-II stage in that ...
  34. [34]
    [PDF] Mars book 2 - NASA
    For Faget, a piloted Mars flyby mission in the 1970s was a deviation from ... rocket with a modified S-IVB (MS-IVB) third stage. The MS-IVB would ...
  35. [35]
    [PDF] development of the j-2x engine for the ares icrew launch vehicle and ...
    The Ares I Upper Stage is powered by the J-2X engine, a liquid oxygen/liquid hydrogen (LOX/LH2) engine based on the J-2 engine used in the S-II and S-IVB upper ...
  36. [36]
    [PDF] Update on the Ares V to Support Heavy Lift for U.S. Space ...
    S-IVB. (1 J-2 Engine). 108.9 mT. (240.0k lbm). LOX/LH2. S-II. (5 J-2 Engines) ... • Aluminum-Lithium (Al-Li) propellant tanks. • Composite dry structure. • 10-m ...
  37. [37]
    The Saturn Rocket Survivors - John A. Weeks III
    The Saturn rocket family is a series of rocket stages that could be stacked in different configurations as needed to meet a variety of mission requirements.
  38. [38]
    S-IVB - Wikipedia
    12 200-series and 16 500-series S-IVB stages were built, alongside 3 test stages. NASA was working on acquiring 4 additional 200-series stages (as part of 4 new ...History · Configuration · Stages built · Derivatives
  39. [39]
    [PDF] CRYOGENIC UPPER STAGE SYSTEM SAFETY
    In this paper, we examine the failure history of previous upper stages with liquid oxygen (LOX)/liquid hydrogen (LH2) propulsion systems. Launch data from 1964 ...Missing: influence restartable
  40. [40]
    [PDF] The Enduring Legacy of Saturn V Launch Vehicle Flight Dynamics ...
    [1] Bilstein, R., Stages to Saturn: A Technological. History of the Apollo/Saturn Launch Vehicles,. NASA SP-4206, 1980. [2] NASA TM X-881, “Apollo Systems ...