Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

SCImago Journal Rank

The SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) is a size-independent bibliometric indicator that measures the scientific prestige and visibility of scholarly journals by calculating the average prestige per article, based on weighted citations received from other journals over a three-year period. Developed by the SCImago research group—a collaboration of the (CSIC) and Spanish universities including the Universities of , , III of , and Alcalá—SJR adapts the PageRank™ algorithm to transfer prestige through citation networks, where citations from higher-prestige journals carry more weight than those from lower-prestige ones. SJR draws exclusively from citation data in the ® database, which, as of 2025, covers approximately 28,000 active titles from over 7,000 international publishers since 1996, enabling comparisons across 27 major scientific domains and 334 specific subject categories. The indicator's calculation involves an iterative process: initially, all s receive equal prestige; subsequent iterations redistribute prestige proportionally based on incoming citations, normalized by the total outgoing citations from each citing , until is achieved (typically when changes fall below a predefined ). The core formula for a 's SJR in iteration i is:
\text{SJR}_i = \left[ d \cdot \sum \left( \frac{C_{ji}}{C_j} \cdot \text{SJR}_j \right) \right] + \frac{(1 - d - e)}{N} + \left[ e \cdot \frac{\text{Art}_i}{\text{Global Articles}} \right] + \left[ d \cdot \sum (\text{Dangling Nodes Prestige}) \cdot \frac{\text{Art}_i}{\text{Global Articles}} \right]
where d = 0.85 (), e = 0.10 (random prestige factor), C_{ji} is citations from j to i, C_j is total references from j, N is the number of s, and \text{Art}_i is articles in i. Self-citations are included but weighted proportionally within the total references of the citing , ensuring they do not disproportionately inflate prestige. Introduced in 2007 through the publicly accessible SCImago Journal & Country Rank portal, SJR provides annual rankings that divide journals into four (Q1 for the top 25% by prestige, down to Q4), with a "best quartile" denoting a journal's highest achieved position across categories. Unlike metrics, SJR accounts for the quality of citations rather than sheer volume, making it particularly useful for cross-disciplinary evaluations and identifying influential outlets in fields like , , , social sciences, and . The portal's facilitates global use by researchers, institutions, and policymakers for assessing journal performance and scientific output.

Background

Definition and Purpose

The SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) is a size-independent indicator that ranks academic journals based on their average per article, developed by the SCImago Research Group using data from the database covering the period from 1996 onward. This metric evaluates the scientific influence of journals by considering the transferred through , where the value of a citation depends on the standing of the citing journal rather than treating all citations equally. The primary purpose of SJR is to provide a more nuanced measure of journal impact that addresses the shortcomings of simpler metrics, such as raw citation counts or the Journal Impact Factor, by weighting citations according to the relative prestige of the source journal and normalizing for journal size and publication frequency. This approach aims to better reflect the true visibility and influence of scholarly work across diverse fields, enabling fairer comparisons among journals of varying scales and subject areas. SJR is a dimensionless value that is updated annually, and is freely accessible through the SCImago Journal & Country Rank , which covers more than 34,100 active titles from over 5,000 publishers across 239 countries and 27 major subject areas. For practical use, s are ranked within their specific subject categories and divided into quartiles based on SJR scores, with denoting the top 25% (highest prestige), Q2 the next 25%, Q3 the following 25%, and Q4 the bottom 25% (lowest prestige); for example, a in the field of might achieve a ranking if its SJR places it among the most influential outlets in that category.

Historical Development

The SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) originated from the efforts of the SCImago Research Group, a collaboration involving researchers from the Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC), the , the , , and the University of Alcalá. Led by Félix de Moya Anegón, the group initiated development in the early 2000s, leveraging citation data from Elsevier's database, which extends back to 1996. The SJR was launched as a publicly accessible portal in , providing a free alternative to proprietary metrics such as Clarivate's . The platform includes country-level scientific indicators, enabling broader assessments of national research output alongside journal evaluations. The SJR indicator draws conceptual influence from the PageRank algorithm, adapted to evaluate the prestige transferred through citations in academic journals. Its formal introduction came in a 2010 paper by González-Pereira, Guerrero-Bote, and Moya-Anegón, which outlined the metric's methodology for ranking journals based on average prestige per article. Key refinements followed in the post-2010 period, including improvements to subject category classifications via reference analysis to enhance accuracy and . In 2012, an updated version known as the SJR2 indicator was proposed by Guerrero-Bote and Moya-Anegón, introducing iterative adjustments to better account for citation networks and journal influence. Throughout the 2020s, annual updates have sustained the metric's evolution, with ongoing integrations of data to support analyses of publications and multidisciplinary research; as of 2025, SJR rankings reflect citation data up to 2024.

Theoretical Foundation

Rationale and Objectives

The SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) was developed to address significant flaws in traditional metrics like the Journal Impact Factor (IF), which overemphasizes recent citations, treats all citations equally regardless of source quality, and favors larger journals or fields with inherently higher volumes. By contrast, SJR's primary objective is to create a prestige-weighted indicator that evaluates journal influence through the quality of incoming citations, assigning greater value to those originating from high-prestige sources, thereby mitigating biases from self-citations and field size disparities. This approach draws inspiration from web-ranking algorithms, such as , to model scientific prestige as a network-based phenomenon where influence propagates iteratively across the . At its core, SJR employs the key concept of iterative prestige propagation, in which a journal's score is recursively derived from the aggregated prestige of the journals citing it, refined through multiple calculation stages until . This method ensures that is not merely a count of citations but a measure of the citing sources' standing, promoting more equitable cross-disciplinary comparisons by normalizing for variations in citation practices across scientific domains. The rationale underscores a shift from simplistic averaging to a dynamic, quality-focused that better captures the hierarchical structure of scientific communication. Launched in 2007, SJR offers transparent, freely accessible rankings derived from Scopus data, without the paywalls associated with proprietary metrics like the IF. Its objectives include empowering researchers to make informed journal selection decisions based on prestige rather than raw citation counts, while providing funding bodies and institutions with a reliable tool for evaluating scholarly output in a fair, size-independent manner. This commitment to openness facilitates broader access to bibliometric insights, supporting global scientific collaboration and evaluation.

Relation to Other Metrics

The SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) differs from the primarily in its methodological approach to citation weighting. While the IF calculates a simple average of citations received by a journal's articles in the two preceding years, divided by the number of citable items published in those years, SJR employs an iterative prestige-based algorithm that assigns greater weight to citations originating from highly influential journals, akin to a network flow model. This prestige weighting in SJR aims to reflect the scholarly more accurately by considering the of incoming citations, whereas the IF treats all citations equally regardless of the citing source's prestige. Additionally, SJR utilizes a three-year citation window and incorporates data from exclusively, avoiding the strict two-year limitation of the IF, which can undervalue journals with longer publication cycles. SJR exhibits a strong with the IF across scientific fields, indicating substantial overlap in ranking journals by overall impact, though SJR values are often slightly higher due to its and . However, this weakens in and sciences, where SJR tends to diverge more from IF rankings because of differences in citation practices and the IF's bias toward faster-citing disciplines like . In contrast to the , which measures the productivity and at the level of individual authors or specific papers by identifying the largest number h such that h publications have at least h citations each, SJR is strictly a journal-level metric focused on aggregate prestige transfer across the scholarly network. This distinction positions SJR as a tool for evaluating publication venues rather than personal or document-specific performance. Compared to , another Scopus-based metric, SJR incorporates an iterative prestige adjustment rather than relying on raw citation counts averaged over a four-year period, allowing SJR to better capture the hierarchical influence among journals. emphasizes sheer citation volume without differentiating the prestige of citing sources, making it more akin to the IF in its straightforward averaging, while SJR's algorithm propagates influence through multiple iterations, similar to . SJR shares conceptual similarities with the Score, both drawing inspiration from the algorithm to model citation networks and weight citations by the importance of the citing journal, but SJR relies solely on data and includes subject-category normalization to account for field-specific citation densities, whereas Eigenfactor uses data and a five-year window without such categorization. The SJR2 indicator, announced by SCImago Lab in September 2025, refines the original model by further adjusting for size-independent , incorporating thematic relevance between citing and cited articles using , capping prestige transfer to prevent manipulation, and extending multi-year windows to better handle varying publication tempos across disciplines. SJR is often used in tandem with the Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP), which normalizes citations against field-specific potentials to provide a complementary view of contextual impact, enabling researchers to assess both (SJR) and relative citation efficiency (SNIP) for more balanced journal evaluations.

Methodology

Data Sources and Scope

The SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) relies primarily on data from the database, maintained by , which indexes over 100 million content items as of 2025, encompassing content from approximately 28,000 active journals spanning historical coverage back to 1788 but with comprehensive indexing beginning in 1996. Scopus's content selection process emphasizes rigorous criteria, including , ethical publishing practices, and editorial standards, thereby excluding non-peer-reviewed materials and predatory publications through ongoing evaluation by its Content Selection and Advisory Board. The scope of SJR encompasses all scholarly disciplines, organized into 27 major subject areas and over 300 specific subject categories based on the classification system, which facilitates coverage of multidisciplinary journals and emerging fields without restriction to particular domains. This broad inclusion contrasts with narrower databases like , as incorporates a higher volume of non-English language journals and content from social sciences and humanities, promoting global representation while requiring English titles and abstracts for all indexed items to ensure accessibility. SJR calculations are updated annually, utilizing a three-year citation window—for instance, the 2025 values draw on citations received in 2024 by documents published in 2021, 2022, and 2023—to capture a balanced measure of influence over time. The resulting metrics are freely accessible through the SCImago portal, allowing users worldwide to explore journal rankings without subscription barriers.

Computation Process

The computation of the SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) employs an iterative algorithm that models citations among journals as a weighted , with journals serving as nodes and directed edges representing citation flows over a three-year window. This approach transfers prestige from citing to cited journals, emphasizing the quality of incoming s based on the prestige of the citing sources and their thematic relevance. The process draws from principles, akin to , to quantify journal influence independently of publication volume. Since 2023, the SJR2 refinement has been implemented, fully in use by 2025, incorporating subject-specific adjustments via of cocitation profiles to weigh citations by disciplinary closeness, enhancing fairness across fields. The first step constructs a C, where each entry C_{ij} denotes the number of citations from journal j to journal i within the three-year period. This is adjusted with thematic weights: Coef_{ji} = (Cos_{ji} * C_{ji}) / \sum (Cos_{jh} * C_{jh}), where Cos_{ji} is the between journals j and i based on cocitation patterns. Self-citations are incorporated but capped to prevent : no journal can transfer more than 50% of its total prestige via self-citations, and no single citation transfers more than 10% of the citing journal's prestige. An initial prestige vector \mathbf{P}^0 is assigned uniformly as P^0_i = \frac{1}{N} for all N journals in the network. The prestige is then updated iteratively via the SJR2 formula: P^{k+1}_i = \frac{1 - d - e}{N} + e \cdot \frac{\text{Art}_i}{\sum \text{Art}_j} + d \cdot \text{PSJR2}_D \cdot \sum_j \left( \text{Coef}_{ji} \cdot P^k_j \right) Here, d = 0.9 (damping factor), e = 0.0999 (random prestige factor), \text{Art}_i is the number of citable documents in journal i, and \text{PSJR2}_D accounts for total distributed prestige including dangling nodes. The damping simulates the likelihood of following a citation link, with the remainder representing random jumps weighted by article count or uniform. Iterations proceed until the vector stabilizes, typically when the maximum change \max_i |P^{k+1}_i - P^k_i| falls below a small threshold (e.g., $10^{-6}). The resulting steady-state prestige vector corresponds to the principal eigenvector of the modified transition matrix, scaled such that \sum_i P_i = 1 across all journals. The SJR value for a given year is this normalized prestige, averaged over the three-year citation window for temporal stability.

Application and Interpretation

SJR Values and Categories

The SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) serves as a prestige indicator, representing the average number of weighted citations received per document published in a journal, where weights account for the prestige of citing journals. An SJR value greater than 1 indicates above-average prestige and citation potential relative to the global average, which is normalized to 1 across all journals. While SJR values theoretically range from 0 to infinity, most journals have scores below 2, with exceptional multidisciplinary outlets like Nature achieving values around 18, reflecting their high influence. Journals are classified into 27 major areas based on the classification system, with many assigned to one primary category and potentially multiple secondary categories to capture interdisciplinary scope. Within each area and specific (over 300 in total), journals are ranked by SJR and divided into quartiles annually: encompasses the top 25% (highest prestige), Q2 the next 25%, Q3 the following 25%, and Q4 the bottom 25%. This field-specific stratification accounts for varying citation norms across disciplines, such as higher average SJR values in (where top journals often exceed 5) compared to and (where even journals typically remain below 1 due to lower volumes). SJR rankings are updated annually in June, with the 2025 values based on citations received in 2025 to documents published in 2022, 2023, and 2024. The complements SJR as a secondary , quantifying the number of articles (h) in a journal that have each received at least h citations, providing insight into sustained impact alongside prestige. For cross-field comparisons, SJR's normalization enables relative assessment, supplemented by ranks within categories on the SCImago platform, though primary evaluations remain discipline-specific to avoid from citation rate differences.

Practical Uses in Academia

Researchers and authors frequently consult the SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) when selecting journals for submission, prioritizing those in the top () to bolster their academic profiles and career advancement opportunities. By targeting high-SJR journals, scholars aim to publish in prestigious outlets that signal quality and visibility within their fields, as SJR accounts for the prestige of citing sources rather than mere . This practice is particularly common in competitive disciplines where publication venue influences hiring, grants, and promotions. In institutional and national research evaluations, aggregated SJR values contribute to rankings and assessments of academic performance. For instance, the SCImago Institutions Rankings () incorporate SJR as a key indicator to evaluate output across universities and research centers worldwide, enabling comparisons of institutional . At the country level, SJR aggregates facilitate comparisons of productivity and influence, with tools on the SCImago allowing users to nations based on total SJR scores and subject-specific contributions. Tenure and promotion committees often reference SJR quartiles to gauge the quality of candidates' publications, integrating them into holistic evaluations of scholarly output. In , the sexenio research incentive system, which awards six-year periods for sustained productivity, previously relied on quantitative metrics including SJR until ; since , evaluations have shifted toward qualitative assessments. SJR also integrates into analytical software like , where users can export data to compute and visualize journal metrics alongside personal citation profiles for comprehensive assessments. Furthermore, tracking upward shifts in SJR quartiles helps identify emerging fields, as journals experiencing rapid prestige gains often reflect growing momentum in innovative areas. By 2025, SJR's role has expanded in contexts, supporting mandates that favor high-quartile venues to ensure quality dissemination.

Criticisms and Limitations

Methodological Issues

The SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) relies heavily on data from , which introduces biases that underrepresent journals from non-Western regions. For instance, in , only 2% of indexed journals originate from , while 46% are from and 28% from , leading to top rankings dominated by Global North publications—such as the top 50 journals being exclusively from and . This geographical skew perpetuates a cycle where non-Western journals receive fewer citations due to limited visibility and perceived prestige, amplifying disparities in global academic evaluation. The iterative algorithm underlying SJR, adapted from , can exacerbate imbalances in smaller or emerging fields by amplifying initial citation patterns. In networks with limited journals, early citations from high-prestige sources disproportionately boost rankings, resulting in low discriminative capacity and unstable positions for new or niche publications. A critical highlighted significant rank variability, with a absolute change of 32 positions among top journals when compared to other metrics, underscoring the algorithm's sensitivity to sparse data. Additionally, the fixed of 0.9 assumes uniform citation behavior across disciplines, which critics argue overlooks field-specific norms, such as varying citation practices in versus sciences, leading to unfair prestige transfers. Concerns also arise from SJR's handling of self-citations and the three-year citation window. While self-citations are capped at 50% of a journal's prestige contribution and 10% per individual to mitigate , these limits remain vulnerable to citation cartels or coordinated referencing, allowing on scores. The three-year window disadvantages slow-publishing fields like , where citations accumulate over longer periods, resulting in systematically lower SJR values compared to faster-citing disciplines such as . Furthermore, the absence of fractional for co-authored citations—treating each as a full regardless of author numbers—overcredits collaborative works without adjusting for shared effort, a limitation noted in broader Scopus-based metrics critiques.

Broader Challenges and Alternatives

Despite its utility in evaluating journal prestige, the SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) faces broader systemic challenges that undermine its role in comprehensive academic assessment. One significant issue is its susceptibility to gaming through practices such as citation cartels, where groups of researchers systematically cite each other's work to inflate metrics, thereby distorting genuine scholarly influence. Additionally, SJR's focus on journal-based citations overlooks substantial scholarly output in books and , which are particularly vital in fields like and , leading to incomplete evaluations of impact. Equity concerns further complicate its application, as journals from the Global South often receive lower SJR scores due to geographical biases in citation patterns and limited indexing in underlying databases like , perpetuating underrepresentation of from these regions. In response to these challenges, several alternatives and complementary approaches have emerged to provide more holistic evaluations beyond journal-level metrics. Metrics offers broader web-based coverage by ranking publications using h5-index values derived from data, capturing influences across journals, conferences, and repositories that SJR misses. Tools like Dimensions and extend assessment through , tracking societal impact via mentions, policy citations, and engagement, which address SJR's narrow citation focus. The San Francisco Declaration on Research Assessment (), launched in 2012, advocates shifting away from overreliance on journal metrics like SJR toward qualitative evaluations of individual researcher contributions. Author-level alternatives, such as those integrated with profiles, enable personalized impact tracking by linking publications to metrics from multiple sources, including Scopus-derived SJR values alongside other indicators, promoting fairer assessments decoupled from journal prestige. As of 2025, policies under the Agreement on Reforming Research Assessment emphasize narrative-based evaluations and structured CVs over quantitative journal metrics, aligning with efforts to mitigate biases inherent in tools like SJR and its counterparts, such as the . Proposals for enhancing SJR include hybrid models that combine its quantitative scores with qualitative inputs to balance objectivity and expert judgment, though implementation remains exploratory. Comparisons to the Centre for Science and Technology Studies (CWTS) Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) highlight SJR's -oriented approach versus SNIP's field-normalized efficiency, suggesting potential for integrated frameworks to address gaps.

References

  1. [1]
    About Us - SJR
    The SCImago Journal & Country Rank is a publicly available portal that includes the journals and country scientific indicators developed from the information ...
  2. [2]
    [PDF] SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) indicator
    The Scimago Journal Rank (SJR) is based on the transfer of prestige from a journal to another one; such prestige is tranfered through the references that a ...
  3. [3]
    Help - SJR
    Journal title. SJR (SCImago Journal Rank): trend graph of this metric and the value obtained in the last year available. Journal title. Best Quartile and ...
  4. [4]
    Comparison of SCImago journal rank indicator with journal impact ...
    Apr 11, 2008 · Notably, the use of the SJR indicator allows for the estimation of a journal's impact without the influence of self-citations, since prestige ...
  5. [5]
    SCImago Journal Rankings - The Embassy of Good Science
    Mar 24, 2022 · SCImago Journal & Country Rank (SJR) is online database developed by Felix de Moya in Spain in 2007. SJR uses Scopus indexed journals to ...
  6. [6]
    Other metrics - Assessing Journal Quality - Libraries at Boston College
    Sep 15, 2025 · The main difference between SJR and the Impact Factor is that the IF gives equal weight to all citations, making no distinction between ...
  7. [7]
    Measuring a journal's impact - Elsevier
    On this page we introduce some of the most popular citation-based metrics employed at the journal level.
  8. [8]
    Network-based Citation Metrics: Eigenfactor vs. SJR
    Jul 28, 2015 · Eigenfactor is based on citations made in a given year to papers published in the prior five years, while the SJR uses a three-year window. The ...
  9. [9]
    Comparing impact factors from two different citation databases
    The results show that impact factors for journals included in both rankings are strongly correlated, with SJR impact factors in general slightly higher, ...
  10. [10]
    How Impact Factor and Other Metrics Differ across Disciplines
    40 One study suggests that SJR and Impact Factor have a high correlation, but the correlation between Eigenfactor and Impact Factor is not nearly as high. 41 ...<|separator|>
  11. [11]
    Which quantitative metrics are there of the quality and prestige of ...
    Dec 31, 2014 · This means that journal rankings based on e.g. JIF, SJR, SNIP will be very similar, while rankings based on the H-index or Eigenfactor will ...
  12. [12]
    A Comparative Evaluation of SJR and H-Index
    Jun 12, 2018 · Both the indicators follow different methods of calculation. SJR is a prestige based measure where the scholarly value of incoming citations ...
  13. [13]
    Scholarly Metrics: SJR and SNIP - Research Guides
    Sep 19, 2025 · Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) measures contextual citation impact by weighting citations based on the total number of citations in a subject field.Missing: relation | Show results with:relation
  14. [14]
    Differentiate JIF, JCI, Citescore, SJR, SNIP - WoS Journals
    CiteScore is based on the number of citations to documents (articles, reviews, conference papers, book chapters, and data papers) by a journal over four years, ...
  15. [15]
    Comparison Between Impact Factor, Eigenfactor Metrics, and ...
    SJR is a journal quality indicator that uses Scopus indexed journals for quality assessment. It is computed using similar method as the ES and AIS, but ...Missing: similarities | Show results with:similarities
  16. [16]
    [PDF] SJR2 indicator - Scimago
    In the following sections, we shall describe the methodological aspects of the development of the SJR2 indicator, and the results obtained with its ...
  17. [17]
    CiteScore, SNIP and SJR - Research Impact Metrics
    Oct 14, 2025 · For example, CiteScore covers a four-year period, while SJR and SNIP consider different aspects of citation impact. Using multiple metrics ...
  18. [18]
    Scopus content - Elsevier
    Scopus covers 330 disciplines to ensure researchers, instructors, librarians and students have confidence that they are not missing out on the vital ...
  19. [19]
    Scopus data crosses the 100 million item threshold! - Elsevier ...
    Mar 3, 2025 · In February 2025, Scopus added its 100 millionth content item! ... Scopus records contain up to 180 fields, and we monitor quality on ...
  20. [20]
    Scimago Journal & Country Rank
    The ranking spans 391 research centers representing the 22 countries in the MENA region. It examines 16 indicators from 3 dimensions: Research, Innovation and ...About Us · Journal Rankings · Help · Journal ValueMissing: explanation | Show results with:explanation<|control11|><|separator|>
  21. [21]
    Publish or Perish… but where? What is the value of Impact factors?
    The SJR takes some self-citation into account by limiting self-citation to 33% of the references, limits bias due to citations in review articles and ...Missing: capped | Show results with:capped
  22. [22]
    How SJR2 Is Calculated - SCImago
    Sep 22, 2025 · All SJR2 calculations are powered by data from Scopus, one of the world's most comprehensive citation and abstract databases. Scopus is known ...
  23. [23]
    https://www.scimagojr.com/
  24. [24]
    Ranking Methodology - SCImago Institutions Rankings
    The SCImago Institutions Rankings (SIR) is a classification of academic and research-related institutions ranked by a composite indicator.Missing: developers | Show results with:developers
  25. [25]
    SJR Compare Countries - SCImago
    Country/Region Comparison. Or try a comparison example. Developed by: Scimago Lab Powered by: Powered by scopus. Follow us on @ScimagoJRMissing: aggregates global
  26. [26]
    [PDF] Criteria for Tenure, Pormotion, and Post-Profesional Merit
    Aug 27, 2021 · Provide a guide for tenure and promotion committees and administrators to evaluate ... The Scimago Journal and Country Rank is abbreviated as SJR.
  27. [27]
    Excellence in Research for Australia | Australian Research Council
    ERA was Australia's national research assessment, comparing university research to international benchmarks to promote excellence and inform decisions.
  28. [28]
    [PDF] Experience from UAM and UC3M librari - UNICA, Network
    Apr 24, 2024 · Sexenios (Incentives to Research): What Happened in 2024? ... Based on quantitative metrics (JCR, SJR) in most of the research fields.
  29. [29]
    Measuring Impact: Journal Level - ECU Libraries' Research Guides
    Jun 26, 2025 · Publish or Perish is a free, downloadable software program developed by Ann-Wil Harzing, that retrieves and analyzes academic citations. SCImago ...
  30. [30]
    Evolution of journal rankings in orthopedics and sports medicine ...
    Jul 31, 2025 · The analysis of SJR-ranked journals reveals notable regional disparities, with Western Europe leading in the top Q1 quartile with 44 journals ...
  31. [31]
    [PDF] A Practical Methodology Using Zotero and Scimago - CEUR-WS.org
    Oct 8, 2025 · For the evaluation, Scimago Journal Rank was used, recognized for its reliability in measuring the impact of scientific journals indexed in ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  32. [32]
    How to address the geographical bias in academic publishing - PMC
    Dec 22, 2023 · The numerical advantage of Global North journals and the ranking process means they lead SCImago rankings. Of the top 200 journals; 60% and 32% ...
  33. [33]
    A critical review of SCImago Journal & Country Rank - ResearchGate
    Aug 7, 2025 · The aim of this article is the analysis of the advantages and limitations of SCImago Journal & Country Rank.
  34. [34]
    Scholarly Publishing : More info: SCIMago Journal Rank (SJR)
    Jul 16, 2025 · The SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) is a metric used to assess the prestige of academic journals. It is a journal-level metric, meaning it evaluates the overall ...Missing: explanation | Show results with:explanation
  35. [35]
    Measuring academic impact, journal rankings, and their implications
    Citation bias: Metrics such as the IF and CiteScore are often biased toward certain fields with high citation rates, such as life sciences, leaving humanities, ...
  36. [36]
    (PDF) Scopus's Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) Versus ...
    Aug 9, 2025 · Using fractional counting of citations-based on the assumption that impact is proportionate to the number of references in the citing documents- ...
  37. [37]
    Quantitative research assessment: using metrics against gamed ...
    Nov 3, 2023 · This review examines several gaming practices, including authorship-based, citation-based, editorial-based, and journal-based gaming as well as gaming with ...
  38. [38]
    [PDF] The Metric Tide - Literature Review - UKRI
    This document provides a literature review of academic research about a range of indicators that may be useful in research evaluations, including the next ...
  39. [39]
    [PDF] Scholarly publishing and peer review in the Global South - JLIS.it
    Jan 15, 2023 · Obstacles to publishing in 'international' journals: Bias. There have been persistent reports of bias against authors from the Global South.
  40. [40]
    The Agreement on Reforming Research Assessment is now final
    The Agreement on Reforming Research Assessment sets a shared direction for changes in assessment practices for research, researchers and research performing ...Missing: narrative | Show results with:narrative
  41. [41]
    [PDF] Best practices in research assessment reform across Europe - Zenodo
    Mar 31, 2025 · Narrative CVs: FNR replaced unstructured, often lengthy CVs with structured two-page narrative CVs (currently with no section word count) that ...<|separator|>