Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Saul

Saul (Hebrew: שָׁאוּל, Šāʾūl, meaning "asked for") was the first king of the Israelites according to the Hebrew Bible's Books of Samuel, reigning circa 1021–1000 BCE as a transitional figure from tribal leadership to monarchy. From the tribe of Benjamin, he was anointed by the prophet Samuel in response to the people's demand for a king to lead them against external threats, standing head and shoulders taller than others as a symbol of his initial charismatic authority. Saul's early reign focused on military consolidation, achieving victories over the Ammonites, Moabites, Edomites, and Philistines, which helped unify disparate Israelite tribes under centralized command. Despite these accomplishments in , Saul's was marked by controversies stemming from perceived disobedience to divine instructions, including his premature offering of sacrifices at and incomplete destruction of the Amalekites as commanded. These acts led to his rejection by through , fostering toward the rising , whom Saul pursued relentlessly after David's successes against and the . His mental torment, interpreted in the text as an from , culminated in consulting the and ending in during the Philistine at , where his was mutilated before by loyalists from . The historicity of Saul remains debated among scholars, with the biblical portrayal serving theological purposes that emphasize obedience and divine sovereignty over empirical kingship; archaeological data provides minimal corroboration for a grand united monarchy, suggesting he may represent an amalgamated memory of Iron Age tribal chieftains rather than a fully historical monarch.

Biblical Narrative

Anointing as King

In the biblical , Saul, of Kish from the and noted for his impressive stature—"from his shoulders upward he was taller than any of the " (1 Samuel 9:2, NIV)—undertook a search for his father's lost donkeys, which providentially led him to the at Ramah. , having received divine to a Benjamite as ruler over Israel to deliver the from Philistine oppression, hosted Saul and his servant, revealing that the donkeys had been found and confirming Saul's destined role. The next morning, privately Saul by pouring oil on his head, kissed him, and declared, "Has not the Lord you ruler over his inheritance?" (1 Samuel 10:1, NIV), marking the inaugural establishment of kingship among the Israelite s. Samuel then provided Saul with three prophetic to affirm the : encountering two men at who would the donkeys recovered and mention a further errand; meeting three men ascending to who would offer him bread, curds, and wine; and joining a band of prophets at , where the of the would seize him, causing him to prophesy and be transformed into another . These events unfolded as foretold, culminating in Saul's ecstatic prophecy among the prophets, which prompted the question, "Is Saul also among the prophets?" (1 Samuel 10:11, NIV), echoing a proverb and highlighting the divine empowerment. Public confirmation followed when Samuel convened the Israelites at Mizpah and conducted a lottery by tribe and clan, with the lot falling on Benjamin, then Matri's family, and finally Saul, who was found hiding among the baggage out of reluctance. The people shouted, "Long live the king!" (1 Samuel 10:24, NIV), and Samuel explained the monarchical rights and duties before dispersing the assembly; Saul returned home to Gibeah with a contingent of valiant supporters, though some "troublemakers" dismissed his kingship (1 Samuel 10:27, NIV). This dual process—private anointing around 1050 BCE per some biblical chronologies and public selection—transitioned Israel from judgeship to hereditary rule, though Saul's initial reluctance underscored the narrative's portrayal of kingship as divinely imposed rather than Saul's ambition.

Early Military Victories

Upon learning of the Ammonite siege of Jabesh-Gilead by Nahash, who demanded the right eyes of the city's inhabitants as tribute, Saul, newly anointed as king, rallied Israel's forces after the Spirit of God came upon him powerfully. He mustered an army of 330,000 men from Israel and Judah, dividing them into three companies for a surprise dawn attack on the Ammonite camp. The Israelites routed the enemy, slaughtering them until no two Ammonites remained together, thus relieving the city and demonstrating Saul's initial leadership. This victory prompted the people to reaffirm Saul's kingship at , where they proclaimed him ruler and offered peace sacrifices, solidifying tribal under his command. Following this , Saul launched campaigns against surrounding adversaries, including , , the of , and the , punishing them wherever he engaged. These efforts subdued threats on multiple fronts, establishing Saul's reputation as a who expanded Israelite . Early clashes with the Philistines intensified soon after, as Saul maintained a standing force of 3,000 select troops to counter their garrisons in Israelite territory. Although specific battles like Jonathan's raid at Michmash escalated the conflict, Saul's oversight contributed to driving back Philistine incursions, preventing deeper penetration into central Israel. These actions marked the onset of prolonged warfare, with Saul inflicting defeats that temporarily secured borders against Philistine iron weaponry and chariots.

Rejection by Samuel

In 1 Samuel 13, Saul faced mounting Philistine threats at , where he awaited to offer sacrifices before . Growing impatient as the scattered, Saul presumptuously performed the burnt offering himself, violating priestly . arrived shortly after and rebuked him, declaring, "You have done foolishly. You have not kept the command of the your ," and foretold that Saul's would not endure, as sought a man after His own heart. The decisive rejection occurred during the campaign against the , longstanding enemies of who had ambushed the at centuries earlier ( 17:8–16). instructed to convey to Saul: "Go and Amalek and devote to destruction they have. Do not spare them, but devote to destruction man and woman, child and , ox and sheep, and ." Saul mobilized forces from and , defeating the Amalekites from to Shur but sparing Agag alive and preserving the best sheep, oxen, and fatlings, while destroying only the worthless. He rationalized this as intent for sacrifices to the at . Samuel confronted Saul at Gilgal, where Saul claimed obedience but admitted sparing Agag due to the troops' pressure. Samuel retorted that rebellion equates to divination and arrogance to iniquity, emphasizing, "Because you have rejected the word of the Lord, he has also rejected you from being king." God informed Samuel of regret over making Saul king, prompting Samuel to summon and execute Agag before Saul. Samuel then refused to reinstate Saul, announcing the kingdom's transfer, though he lamented Saul's fall privately. This marked the irrevocable divine repudiation of Saul's dynasty, paving the way for David's anointing.

Relationship with David

Following the prophet Samuel's anointing of David as future king amid Saul's divine rejection, an evil spirit from God tormented Saul, leading him to seek a musician for relief; David's skill on the lyre was recommended, and Saul appointed him as armor-bearer. David's subsequent victory over the Philistine champion Goliath in the Valley of Elah elevated his status, with Saul initially inquiring about his identity and integrating him into the court. The relationship began favorably, as David loyally served Saul while the spirit's episodes were alleviated by his music. Military successes under David's command against the fueled Saul's jealousy when Israelite women sang, "Saul has struck down his thousands, and David his ten thousands," interpreting this as a to his . Saul's manifested in violent outbursts, including two attempts to pin David to with a while the was upon him. To bind David closer and potentially eliminate him, Saul offered his daughter Michal in marriage contingent on David killing 100 , a dowry David exceeded by bringing 200 foreskins. Despite this, Saul plotted David's death, prompting his flight from the court with aid from Michal and Jonathan, Saul's son, who repeatedly interceded and affirmed their covenant of friendship. David's band of followers grew in exile, and he twice spared Saul's life despite opportunities for retribution: first in the cave at En Gedi, where he cut only the corner of Saul's robe, and second in the wilderness of Ziph, taking Saul's spear and water jug while he slept. In both instances, David demonstrated restraint, citing his refusal to harm "the Lord's anointed," leading Saul to temporarily repent, bless David, and acknowledge his eventual kingship. The relationship remained marked by Saul's persistent pursuit, driving David to seek refuge among Philistine lords, though he ultimately avoided betraying Israel. This dynamic of initial patronage devolving into obsessive enmity underscored themes of divine favor shifting from Saul to David, culminating in Saul's demise without reconciliation.

Final Battle and Death

Faced with the Philistine army encamped at Shunem, Saul gathered the Israelites opposite them on the slopes of Mount Gilboa, but divine inquiries yielded no response, prompting him to consult a medium at Endor despite his prior expulsion of such practitioners. The medium summoned the spirit of Samuel, who rebuked Saul and prophesied that the Lord would deliver Israel, including Saul and his sons, into Philistine hands the following day. This encounter underscored Saul's desperation and disobedience, as the apparition confirmed his rejection as king. The ensuing saw the the , with heavy on ; Saul's sons , Abinadab, and Malchishua fell slain. Saul, critically wounded by arrows from Philistine archers, commanded his armor-bearer to thrust him through to avoid capture and abuse, but the bearer refused out of fear; Saul then fell upon his own sword, and the armor-bearer followed . , Philistines discovered the bodies, beheaded Saul, stripped his armor, and displayed his head and armor in their temples while fastening the corpses to the wall of Beth-shan. Valiant men from Jabesh-gilead, recalling Saul's earlier of their , retrieved the of night, burned them, and buried the charred bones beneath a tamarisk in Jabesh before seven days in . A parallel in 2 Samuel reports an Amalekite claiming to that he killed Saul at the king's request after finding him propped on his , presenting Saul's as proof; however, this conflicts with the primary in 1 Samuel, where Saul self-inflicted the fatal wound, suggesting the Amalekite fabricated the story to curry favor.

Religious Interpretations

Jewish Perspectives

In Jewish , Saul is recognized as the first king of a united Israel, anointed by the prophet around 884 BCE amid threats from neighboring , embodying the from judgeship to as anticipated in Deuteronomy 17:14-15. His selection highlighted qualities of —he initially hid among during his acclaim—and physical prowess, standing head and shoulders above , which rabbinic sources interpret as divinely granted for . Saul's early reign featured military successes, including the defeat of the Ammonite and of with an of 330,000, fostering and cries of "Long live !" Rabbinic literature, including the Talmud and Midrash, presents dual assessments of Saul's character, balancing praise for his piety with critique of his failings. He is lauded as modest, upright, and ritually pure even on grueling 120-mile marches, superior to David in monogamy and self-sacrifice, and credited with eradicating idolatry from Israel during his rule. Talmudic passages (Yoma 22b; Berakhot 48b) depict him as bribe-resistant and sinless in youth, with his mercy toward dissenters after victories exemplifying restraint. Yet, this same mercy is faulted as excessive, leading to his pivotal disobedience: sparing Amalekite king Agag and livestock despite explicit divine commands via Samuel to destroy them utterly (1 Samuel 15:17-28), interpreted as prioritizing sentiment over obedience. Further criticisms focus on Saul's later actions, such as impatience in offering unauthorized sacrifices, susceptibility to slander against David and the priests of Nob, and consulting the Witch of Endor, violations compounding his rejection by God. Midrashim (Numbers Rabbah i. 10; Leviticus Rabbah ix. 2) portray him as a "weak branch" sustained by ancestral merits, whose traits like jealousy eroded his kingship, ending his dynasty after a mere two years of effective rule. Despite this, some traditions hold that Saul merited forgiveness, dwelling in paradise with Samuel ('Erubin 53b), underscoring themes of potential redemption. Overall, Saul's narrative in Jewish thought functions as a moral exemplar and cautionary archetype: a pious leader whose reign unified tribes against Philistines, Ammonites, and others (1 Samuel 14:47-48), but whose rationalization of divine mandates through compassion perpetuated threats like Amalek's ideology, influencing later adversaries. Orthodox commentaries emphasize his role in modeling restrained authority under Torah, warning against "dangerous innocence" where unchecked empathy overrides halakhic duty.

Christian Views

In Christian theology, King Saul exemplifies the perils of partial obedience and self-reliance, serving as a foil to the ideal kingship fulfilled in Jesus Christ. Anointed by divine selection through Samuel around 1020 BCE, Saul's early successes against the Ammonites and Philistines demonstrated God's initial empowerment, yet his impatience at Gilgal—offering a sacrifice without waiting for Samuel—marked the beginning of his rejection, as it usurped prophetic authority and reflected distrust in God's timing. This act, detailed in 1 Samuel 13:8-14, is interpreted by theologians as prioritizing human control over divine dependence, a recurring theme in Christian ethics where obedience precedes ritual. The pivotal episode of Saul's campaign against the Amalekites, commanded by God through Samuel to execute total destruction as judgment for their historical aggression against Israel (Exodus 17:8-16; Deuteronomy 25:17-19), highlights the gravity of incomplete compliance. Saul spared King Agag and the finest livestock for presumed religious or economic gain, prompting Samuel's rebuke: "Behold, to obey is better than sacrifice, and to listen than the fat of rams" (1 Samuel 15:22). Protestant interpreters, such as those emphasizing sola scriptura, view this as a foundational lesson that external piety cannot substitute for holistic submission to God's explicit directives, with Saul's rationalizations exposing self-deception and pride. Catholic perspectives similarly stress obedience as essential to covenant fidelity, equating Saul's error to thwarting divine purpose, which demands total allegiance. God's subsequent "regret" in appointing Saul (1 Samuel 15:11, 35) is understood not as ontological change in the immutable God but as anthropomorphic accommodation to human understanding, conveying relational grief over Saul's willful rebellion. Saul's tormented pursuit of David, fueled by envy after the women's song praising David over him (1 Samuel 18:7), illustrates the corrosive effects of unrepented sin, with an "evil spirit from the Lord" afflicting him (1 Samuel 16:14). Christian commentators see this as judicial hardening or psychological consequence of rejecting God's Spirit, contrasting David's anointing and harp-playing as symbols of grace amid persecution. Saul's final descent—consulting the medium at Endor to summon Samuel's spirit (1 Samuel 28), an abomination under Mosaic law (Deuteronomy 18:10-12)—epitomizes apostasy, prioritizing occult means over repentance and prayer. His suicide by falling on his sword after the Battle of Mount Gilboa (1 Samuel 31:4), amid Philistine victory circa 1000 BCE, underscores the futility of self-preservation apart from God, serving as a cautionary archetype for ecclesiastical leaders against similar lapses in humility. Theologically, Saul's prefigures the Davidic covenant's messianic , where flawed yields to Christ's , obedient (2 Samuel ; :32-33), emphasizing that kingship fails without divine . Early modern reformers like highlighted Saul's story to critique papal overreach, analogizing unauthorized sacrifices to ecclesiastical abuses, while contemporary evangelicals it to sanctification, against "functional " in .

Islamic Account

In Islamic scripture, Saul is identified as Talut, the divinely appointed king of the Israelites, whose narrative centers on themes of obedience, divine selection, and victory through faith. The primary account is detailed in Surah Al-Baqarah (Quran 2:246–251), where the Children of Israel, under oppression from neighboring foes, petition their unnamed prophet—commonly interpreted in tafsirs as Samuel (Shamwil)—to appoint a ruler capable of leading them in battle. The prophet relays God's decree that Talut, a man noted for his knowledge and physical prowess but lacking wealth or noble lineage, has been chosen as king, prompting objections from tribal leaders who questioned his suitability based on material criteria. To affirm the appointment, the prophet cites a miraculous sign: the recovery of the (Tabut), containing remnants from the families of and , along with a spirit of tranquility from their Lord, which would confirm Talut's authority upon its appearance. Marching forth with his forces, Talut subjects the troops to a test of discipline at a river, instructing that only those limiting themselves to a single handful of water would prove their allegiance, while excessive drinkers would be excluded. This trial sifted the army, reducing it from an estimated 80,000 to a mere 313 faithful warriors who demonstrated self-restraint and trust in divine provision. Facing the formidable army of Jalut (Goliath), Talut rallies his diminished ranks by invoking God's past interventions, such as aid to Moses against Pharaoh and the transformation of the sea into dry land. The confrontation culminates in the young Dawud (David) volunteering to duel Jalut, slaying him with a slingshot and thereby securing victory for the believers; as a result, God establishes Dawud in the kingship thereafter, granting him prophethood, wisdom, and judgment. Classical tafsirs, such as those by Ibn Kathir and Maududi, emphasize Talut's role as a exemplar of merit-based leadership over hereditary privilege, portraying him as a non-Israelite or from humble origins elevated by God for his virtues, with the episode underscoring that numerical superiority yields to qualitative faith and perseverance. The Quranic narrative omits details of Talut's personal failings, anointing, or demise found in Biblical texts, focusing instead on collective trials and divine sovereignty in governance. Hadith literature provides scant elaboration, reinforcing the story's moral lessons without extending the chronology.

Historicity and Evidence

Archaeological Corroboration

Excavations at Tell el-Fûl, traditionally identified as biblical , Saul's tribal hometown and administrative center (1 Samuel 10:26, 11:4), have yielded Iron Age I remains consistent with a fortified from the late 11th century BCE. American William F. Albright's digs in and uncovered a wall enclosing approximately 2.5 hectares, a large rectangular structure interpreted as a palace or fortress (about 22 by 33 meters), and typical Israelite four-room houses, silos, and cisterns hewn from bedrock. These features indicate centralized authority capable of mobilizing labor for defense, aligning with accounts of Saul's operations against Ammonites and Philistines from this base. Khirbet Qeiyafa, a 32,000-square-meter hilltop in the overlooking Philistine , provides further of organized Judahite activity during the Saulide ( 1025–975 BCE, per of pits and short-lived seeds). Directed by Yosef Garfinkel and Saar Ganor from 2007–2013, the excavations revealed massive cyclopean stone walls (up to 4 meters high), two city with administrative , zones for and , and no pig bones or Philistine bichrome ware—markers distinguishing it as Judahite. The strategic and suggest it served as a border fortress amid conflicts described in 1 Samuel 13–17, predating Solomonic-era gates and challenging minimalist views of pre-monarchic anarchy. An inscribed ostracon in archaic Hebrew, possibly detailing rations or officials, evokes early royal administration akin to Saul's reported governance. Regional surveys corroborate a demographic shift in the central highlands around 1100–1000 BCE, with over new villages featuring collared-rim jars, terraced , and pillared houses—hallmarks of proto-Israelite distinct from or Philistine norms. This , peaking during the Iron I-IIA , implies hierarchical coordination for and , consistent with 's unification of tribes against external threats ( 11, ). Philistine sites like Gath, excavated by Aren Maeir, show contemporaneous urban (e.g., Lower City temples and fortifications from A3, BCE), contextualizing biblical battles without Israelite mentions. While no inscription names , these findings empirically support a tribal confederation under a chieftain-like figure rather than isolated villages, countering skeptical interpretations that attribute such developments solely to later Davidic influence.

Scholarly Debates on the United Monarchy

Scholars debate the historicity and extent of the United Monarchy, the biblical polity encompassing the reigns of Saul, David, and Solomon circa 1020–930 BCE, questioning whether it constituted a centralized territorial state with imperial ambitions or merely fragmented tribal entities. Maximalists, drawing on biblical descriptions of military campaigns, administrative structures, and building projects, posit a historical kernel supported by indirect archaeological indicators such as fortified settlements in Judah and the Shephelah during the late 11th to early 10th centuries BCE. They argue that the scarcity of monumental evidence reflects the region's geopolitical periphery and use of perishable materials rather than non-existence. In contrast, minimalists like Israel Finkelstein advocate a "Low Chronology" that redates key Iron Age IIA sites—such as Megiddo Strata VA-IVB, Hazor Stratum X, and Gezer Stratum VIII—to the 9th century BCE, attributing them to northern Israelite kings like Omri rather than Solomon's purported constructions in 1 Kings 9:15. This framework portrays the 10th century as a period of decentralized highland villages and small chiefdoms, with Jerusalem remaining a modest hill-country settlement incapable of sustaining a united kingdom; biblical accounts are seen as 7th-century BCE Judahite inventions to legitimize later aspirations. Finkelstein's model, influential since the 1990s, relies on pottery sequences and destruction layers but has faced criticism for selective data interpretation and overreliance on stratigraphic assumptions not universally accepted. Opponents, including Amihai Mazar and , defend a "High Chronology" via from sites like (late 11th–early 10th century BCE), which yielded urban fortifications, public , and absence of bones suggestive of Judahite , indicating emerging under Davidic . The 9th-century BCE Tel Dan Stele, inscribed by an Aramean , explicitly mentions the "House of " as a , providing the earliest extra-biblical to and implying a prior Judahite polity of sufficient prominence to warrant notice. For Saul's era specifically, evidence is scantier, with no inscriptions or major sites directly linked, leading some to characterize his kingship as a rudimentary tribal confederation rather than a full monarchy, though Philistine conflicts at sites like Gath align with biblical narratives of Iron Age I transitions. The debate lacks , with methodological divides exacerbated by interpretive biases: minimalist positions often prevail in skeptical of ancient Near Eastern and statehood claims, while maximalists emphasize of textual and . Recent syntheses propose a —a modest Judah-centered entity under expanding modestly, without Solomonic splendor—but acknowledge that negative evidence from Jerusalem's tell, compounded by erosion and reuse, limits definitive resolution. Ongoing excavations, such as at Timna's mines showing 10th-century intensification possibly tied to regional powers, continue to but not settle the question.

Analytical Perspectives

Psychological Profile

Saul's early portrayal in biblical accounts depicts a man of impressive physical stature—described as taller than any other Israelite from head to shoulder—and initial humility, as he hid among the baggage during his selection as king by lot (1 Samuel 9:2; 10:22). This suggests a baseline personality marked by reticence and lack of ambition for leadership, consistent with traits of introversion or low self-regard prior to his anointing. Scholarly analyses note that such modesty may reflect adaptive caution in a tribal context, but it transitioned into instability following perceived divine rejection after his incomplete obedience in the Amalekite campaign (1 Samuel 15). Post-rejection, Saul exhibited behaviors indicative of profound psychological turmoil, including episodes of and relieved temporarily by , as when David's harp-playing soothed the " from the " that troubled him ( Samuel 16:14-23; 18:10-11). Modern psychiatric interpretations, drawing from these descriptions, propose recurrent unipolar or affective disorder, characterized by mood swings, irritability, and prophetic-like frenzies where Saul stripped naked and prophesied amid distress ( Samuel 19:23-24). Alternative frameworks attribute his symptoms to combat-related or post-traumatic , given repeated military exposures and losses, manifesting as , violent temper, and personality disintegration. These traits escalated into acute and toward David, triggered by popular acclaim comparing their victories ( Samuel 18:6-9), leading to multiple assassination attempts and obsessive pursuits despite David's loyalty. In his final decline, Saul's desperation peaked with the consultation of the medium at Endor to summon 's spirit, bypassing prohibited amid battlefield fears (1 Samuel 28:3-25), followed by suicide after defeat at (1 Samuel 31:4). Psychiatric evaluations caution against retrospective diagnosis, emphasizing cultural and theological framings—like divine causation—over purely biomedical models, yet consensus identifies maladaptive responses to rejection, , and unchecked as causal factors in his unraveling. Some studies explore as a fit for his ecstatic seizures, though aligned with work stress remains prevalent in analyses. Overall, Saul's profile illustrates a trajectory from reluctant leader to tormented figure, driven by interpersonal rivalry and internal conflict rather than inherent pathology alone.

Literary and Theological Themes

The of Saul in the Books of 1 Samuel presents him as a tragic hero archetype, characterized by initial promise, a flaw of manifesting as of and desire for approval, and inevitable through disobedience and toward . Literary highlights Saul's as paralleling classical , where his early successes—such as victories against the Ammonites and —contrast sharply with his later unraveling, driven by impulsive actions like the unauthorized sacrifice at Gilgal (1 Samuel 13:8-14) and sparing Amalekite spoils (1 Samuel 15:9), which underscore themes of hubris and self-justification. The text employs analogy, particularly in chapters 24 and 26, to juxtapose Saul's pursuit of with 's mercy, emphasizing irony and moral inversion to critique unchecked power and foreshadow the transfer of divine favor. Theological themes center on divine sovereignty in kingship, portraying Saul's election as conditional upon obedience to Yahweh's commands mediated through prophets like Samuel, with his rejection in 1 Samuel 15:23 explicitly linking rebellion to divination and arrogance to idolatry. This underscores the Deuteronomistic principle that Yahweh establishes and revokes human authority, as seen in the departure of the divine spirit from Saul and its tormenting replacement by an evil spirit (1 Samuel 16:14), symbolizing the causal consequences of covenantal infidelity rather than arbitrary fate. Saul's consultation with the witch of Endor (1 Samuel 28) further illustrates theological motifs of desperation apart from prophetic guidance and the limits of human agency against divine decree, reinforcing that true kingship aligns with God's law over ritual or self-preservation. These elements collectively affirm a realist view of causality, where personal failings precipitate national peril, without mitigating Saul's accountability.

References

  1. [1]
  2. [2]
    [PDF] King Saul - UCL Discovery - University College London
    The subject of this thesis is King Saul of Israel. Though Saul is depicted negatively in the biblical narrative, carefiil examination of the Books of Samuel and.
  3. [3]
    Saul, Benjamin, and the Emergence of Monarchy in Israel - jstor
    The traditions about the formation of the Israelite monarchy that are embedded within 1 Sam 9–2 Sam 5 tell about Saul, the first king of the Israelites, who ...
  4. [4]
    (PDF) “The Lord Has Rejected You As King Over Israel”: Saul's ...
    Aug 7, 2025 · This article presents a literary analysis of the extant text of Samuel 15 and argues that Saul's deposal is represented as the result of his ...
  5. [5]
    King Saul & Self-Deception - The Bible Project
    Mar 19, 2017 · Saul's root character flaw is self-exaltation and self-deception. He thinks he knows better than everyone else, including God.Missing: achievements controversies sources
  6. [6]
    King Saul's Downfall: Sight and Sound - TheTorah.com
    Jul 17, 2024 · Saul's failure to see and be seen when the Bible first introduces him signals his dismal prospects for a successful reign.
  7. [7]
    First Person: Did the Kingdoms of Saul, David and Solomon Actually ...
    Hershel Shanks introduces a seminal article that includes a critical assessment of the historicity of the United Monarchy of Israel.
  8. [8]
  9. [9]
  10. [10]
    Eli, Samuel, Saul, David 1046-1019 BC - Bible.ca
    Saul was anointed king in 1052 BC at age 30 by Samuel, and his reign lasted 27 years before David was anointed in 1025 BC.
  11. [11]
    Enduring Word Bible Commentary 1 Samuel Chapter 11
    David Guzik commentary on 1 Samuel 11 describes Saul's victory at Jabesh Gilead and is crowned and accepted as king by the entire nation.
  12. [12]
    Topical Bible: Saul's Victory over the Ammonites
    The Battle and Victory:​​ Saul divided his forces into three companies and launched a surprise attack on the Ammonite camp during the morning watch. The ...Missing: military | Show results with:military
  13. [13]
  14. [14]
  15. [15]
    Saul's Military Campaigns - 1 Samuel - iBible Maps
    After Saul had assumed rule over Israel, he fought against their enemies on every side: Moab, the Ammonites, Edom, the kings of Zobah, and the Philistines.
  16. [16]
  17. [17]
    11. Saul Fights the Philistines (1 Samuel 14:15-52) | Bible.org
    May 25, 2004 · Saul is not the source of Israel's military successes, but a hindrance to them. Israel's victories are more in spite of their king than a result ...
  18. [18]
  19. [19]
    12. Saul and the Amalekites (1 Samuel 15:1-35) - Bible.org
    May 25, 2004 · Saul's refusal to totally annihilate the Amalekites costs him his kingdom. It is a most serious sin. Our text not only exposes Saul's sin, it may very well ...
  20. [20]
  21. [21]
    1 Samuel 15 – God Rejects Saul as King - Enduring Word
    David Guzik commentary on 1 Samuel 15, where Saul fights the Amalekites, and is disobedient in not following God's instructions. God rejects Saul as king.Missing: text scholarly
  22. [22]
  23. [23]
  24. [24]
  25. [25]
  26. [26]
  27. [27]
  28. [28]
  29. [29]
  30. [30]
  31. [31]
  32. [32]
  33. [33]
  34. [34]
  35. [35]
    Enduring Word Bible Commentary 1 Samuel Chapter 28
    So Saul gathered all Israel together, and they encamped at Gilboa. When Saul saw the army of the Philistines, he was afraid, and his heart trembled greatly. a.
  36. [36]
  37. [37]
  38. [38]
  39. [39]
  40. [40]
  41. [41]
    Saul, First King of Israel - Chabad.org
    "No one shall be put to death," he proclaimed, "for has not G‑d wrought deliverance in Israel this day?" He ordered feasts of public rejoicing to be held and ...
  42. [42]
    History Crash Course #16: King Saul - Aish.com
    He is the model for the rest of the nation to emulate: a leader, a scholar, pious, righteous and God-fearing. He is a catalyst that enables the Jewish people to ...
  43. [43]
    King Saul | My Jewish Learning
    The Bible depicts Saul as a study in contrasts. Although he was Israel's first king, he was ultimately rejected (1 Samuel 15:10-11).
  44. [44]
    SAUL - JewishEncyclopedia.com
    —In Rabbinical Literature: Two opposing views of Saul are found in rabbinical literature. One is based on the usual opinion that punishment is a proof of guilt ...
  45. [45]
    How Can an Unchanging God Regret Making Saul King?
    Aug 23, 2020 · ' In the first ten verses of 1 Samuel 15, Saul rebels against the word of God given through Samuel; only afterward does God express his regret. ...
  46. [46]
  47. [47]
    The Rise and Fall of King Saul | BibleTalk.tv
    Saul's failure to trust in God's provision, combined with his desire to maintain control over the situation, led him to take unauthorized action. Samuel ...<|separator|>
  48. [48]
    Indefensible? Saul and the Amalekite Genocide
    Feb 23, 2017 · The fact is, Saul did not fully kill the Amalekites; neither did his successor, King David—even though he was the proto-type of the coming king.
  49. [49]
    Tafsir Surah Al-Baqarah - 246 - Quran.com
    The name of the prophet mentioned here is Samuel (Arabic: Hebrew: Shemuel). Verse 248: The story of Talut and Jalut. The Bani Isra'il used to have the legacy ...
  50. [50]
  51. [51]
    Surah Baqarah ayat 249 Tafsir Ibn Kathir | And when Saul went forth ...
    Allah states that Talut, the king of the Children of Israel, marched forth with his soldiers and the Israelites who obeyed him. His army was of eighty thousand ...
  52. [52]
  53. [53]
    Talut and Jalut Part I - Hadith of the Day
    Oct 15, 2016 · The story of Talut and Jalut took place after the time of Musa AS. During this period, the Israelites had become a stingy and controlling race.
  54. [54]
  55. [55]
    Qeiyafa Ostracon Relates the Birth of the Kingdom of Israel
    May 8, 2012 · The only known Judahite fortified city dating to the time of Saul and David, Khirbet Qeiyafa has reshaped debates on urbanism during the early ...
  56. [56]
    Khirbet Qeiyafa | ArmstrongInstitute.org
    The suggested translation of this ostracon reads strikingly similar to the biblical record of King Saul's appointment (1 Samuel 8:11-19). This could support the ...
  57. [57]
    Evidence for Saul, David, and Solomon · Creation.com
    Jul 9, 2023 · Archaeologists have recently excavated material in Gath from Saul and David's time, which revealed a more impressive and powerful city than they ...
  58. [58]
    The United Monarchy Under David and Solomon
    A significant academic debate developed over the historical accuracy of the Bible's description of the United Monarchy under David and Solomon.
  59. [59]
    David and Solomon's Kingdom as a State: An Archaeo-Historical ...
    Debate has raged over whether the archaeological record of the 10th century BCE in Israel really reflects the existence of such a kingdom as the biblical ...
  60. [60]
    The Archaeology of the United Monarchy: an Alternative View: Levant
    Jul 18, 2013 · According to this 'Low Chronology', Stratum VA-IVB at Megiddo, Stratum XI at Arad and Stratum V at Beer-sheba should all be dated to the ninth ...
  61. [61]
    [PDF] Chronology and United Monarchy - Tuhat
    FINKELSTEIN changed his views about ancient Israel, but not his model. Pre-LC papers on the United Monarchy share the same model and the same conclusions about ...
  62. [62]
    Did King David Actually Exist? - The Bart Ehrman Blog
    Sep 20, 2022 · In 1993 archaeologist in the northern part of Israel discovered fragments of an ancient stele – a stone slab on which an inscription was ...
  63. [63]
    Debating the United Monarchy: Let's See How Far We've Come
    Apr 22, 2016 · This article reviews the two opposing sides of the ongoing debate concerning the historicity of the biblical United Monarchy, the kingdom of ...
  64. [64]
    Did David and Solomon's United Monarchy Exist? Vast Ancient ...
    Nov 21, 2017 · No archaeological evidence has been found that even remotely supports the grandeur described in the biblical accounts of David and Solomon.
  65. [65]
  66. [66]
    What was the Mental Disease that Afflicted King Saul? - Sage Journals
    Evaluation of the passages referring to King Saul's disturbed behavior indicates that he was afflicted by a mental disorder.
  67. [67]
  68. [68]
    The case of King Saul: did he have recurrent unipolar depressionor ...
    Jan 2, 2018 · It is widely accepted that Saul, the first king of Israel, had a mental disorder. Probably it was depression, soothed when David played on ...
  69. [69]
    King Saul, work‐related stress and depression - PMC - NIH
    The story of King Saul in the Bible provides a good example of a man suffering from depression, and I believe that the story fits well with current scientific ...
  70. [70]
    King Saul and the Evil Spirit: Personality Change and Combat Trauma
    Mar 26, 2020 · The torment Saul faced during his kingship showed many indicators of combat trauma. He exhibited signs of mood swings, apathy and depression, violent temper, ...Missing: scholarly | Show results with:scholarly
  71. [71]
  72. [72]
    Rejection Realized: Saul, the Evil Spirit and the Loss of Kingship
    Nov 28, 2022 · We witness as Saul, driven by petty fears and jealousies, becomes a disintegrated personality, but most disturbing is the realization that the ...<|separator|>
  73. [73]
  74. [74]
    What Is a Reasonable Framework in Which to Understand the ...
    The previous explanations of the psychological disorder that plagued Saul, the first king of Israel, have focused on depression, post-traumatic stress disorder, ...
  75. [75]
    [PDF] An Unexpected Leader: A Psychiatric Analysis of King Saul
    Scholars in the fields of both Judaic studies and medicine have proposed that Saul's behavior matched that of a patient with clinical epilepsy. Epilepsy, a ...
  76. [76]
    [PDF] A Psychological Examination of the Life of King Saul - ijrpr
    This study critically explores the psychological context of “an evil spirit from the Lord troubled him” in the life of King Saul.
  77. [77]
    The Tragic Dimensions of Saul | ScriptureCentral
    Saul's tragic flaw was pride, often manifested as a fear of criticism and a love of popular approval. This flaw resulted in a tendency to make significant ...
  78. [78]
    [PDF] An Analysis of 1 Samuel 9-31: Is Saul a Tragic Hero?
    Furthermore, many have failed to consider the theological implications of the Saul narrative as either a biblical tragedy of fate, or as a biblical tragedy of ...
  79. [79]
    [PDF] DAVID'S RISE AND SAUL'S DEMISE: NARRATIVE ANALOGY IN 1 ...
    It is in any case indisputable that the second half of 1 Samuel is focused principally on David: 'the stories of Saul and David are really stories about David'.
  80. [80]
    1 Samuel | Commentary | S. A. Fix and J. Robert Vannoy | TGCBC
    Certainly, the paramount theme of 1–2 Samuel is the affirmation of divine sovereignty over human history, because this theme incorporates the theme of the ...
  81. [81]
    Saul's Rejection in the Book of Samuel - Oxford Academic
    Saul is rejected as king unambiguously in 1 Sam 15, and this chapter immediately precedes the divine violence of the evil spirit of God upon Saul in 1 Sam 16–18 ...<|separator|>
  82. [82]
    Saul's prophetic representations and its parody in 1 Samuel
    The paper engages the intrigue of Saul's description as a "prophetic figure" in the beginning of 1 Samuel and his description as the "patron" of witchcraft at ...
  83. [83]
    [PDF] An Analysis of God's Rejection of King Saul
    Disobedience was the primary vehicle by which Saul separated his authority from God's authority. Saul's first act of disobedience occurs in 1 Samuel 13 as ...Missing: achievements controversies sources