Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Scrope

The Scrope family is an ancient English noble house of Norman origin that rose to prominence in northern England following the Conquest of 1066, establishing significant landholdings in Yorkshire and serving in military, judicial, and administrative capacities for successive monarchs. The barony of Scrope of Bolton was created in 1371 for Sir Richard le Scrope (c. 1327–1403), a soldier and courtier who fought in campaigns under Edward III and Richard II, exemplifying the family's martial tradition and loyalty to the crown. A defining moment in their history was the heraldic trial Scrope v. Grosvenor (1385–1390), where Sir Richard le Scrope prevailed in the Court of Chivalry, securing exclusive rights to the arms azure, a bend or against the Grosvenor family, a case that set precedents in English armorial law. Other branches, such as Scrope of Masham, produced figures like Geoffrey le Scrope, who served as Chief Justice of the King's Bench four times between 1324 and 1338, underscoring the family's influence in the judiciary. The Scropes constructed Bolton Castle in Wensleydale as a seat of power, though their fortunes fluctuated amid the Wars of the Roses, with attainders and executions affecting various lines, yet the Bolton branch endured into later centuries.

Origins

Etymology and Norman Roots

The surname Scrope, traditionally pronounced /skruːp/, derives from French roots established in England prior to the of 1066. Its etymology remains uncertain, with scholarly suggestions including derivation from the Old Scandinavian personal name Skrópi, reflecting Viking influences in , or from dialect terms such as scrob meaning "crab," potentially alluding to sideways movement as sardonicly referenced in the family motto Devant si je puis ("Forward if I am able"). Alternative interpretations link it to escrope, denoting a "" or "piece," possibly occupational for a , though these lack definitive primary attestation. The family's provenance traces to figures like Richard Fitz Scrob (fl. 1051–1066), a from who received land grants from and constructed one of England's earliest motte-and-bailey castles at in around 1050. As son of a named Scrob (or Le Scrob), he exemplifies pre-Conquest integration into Anglo-Saxon , holding estates amid tensions like the 1055 Welsh raids documented by chronicler Florence of Worcester. This early foothold in the laid foundational holdings, with descendants anglicizing the name to Le Scrope by the 12th century, as evidenced by Robert Le Scrope's tenure of knight's fees in by 1165. Such origins underscore the Scropes' status among lineages leveraging favor for territorial consolidation, distinct from post-1066 arrivals.

Early Scropes in England (12th-13th Centuries)

The le Scrope family, of descent, established itself as landowners in , , during the 12th century, with records indicating their presence well before the early 13th century. They held modest estates in the region, including areas around and Wensley, under feudal overlords such as the FitzHughs, functioning primarily as local without significant national influence. By the mid-13th century, (c. 1240–d. before 1312) emerged as a representative figure, confirming charters such as a donation to and managing local tenures documented in the Wensley fee records. In 1294, he served as bailiff of , overseeing administrative duties in the Honor of Richmond, and was knighted after participating in I's campaign at the on 22 July 1298, where English forces defeated the Scots under . William's holdings included four bovates in Wensley, as noted in contemporary surveys, and he married Constance de Newsom, through whom the family gained additional ties in the area. The Scropes remained minor figures through the late 13th century, accumulating knightly status but not yet the baronial prominence that characterized their 14th-century ascent.

Rise and Prominence in the 14th Century

Geoffrey le Scrope (d. 1340) and Judicial Roles

Geoffrey le Scrope (c. 1285–1340), younger son of Sir William le Scrope of , pursued a distinguished legal career in early 14th-century , rising to prominence as a and . His initial involvement in legal matters dates to 1306, when he acted as attorney for Thomas Meynill, followed by regular appearances as a pleader in the courts from around 1310. By in the mid-1310s, he had attained the rank of serjeant, enabling him to argue cases before the king's courts. Le Scrope's judicial ascent culminated in his appointment as of the King's Bench, a central handling criminal appeals, pleas of , and matters of national importance. He served in this role for four distinct periods between 1324 and 1338, navigating the instability of Edward II's deposition in 1327 and the minority of Edward III. These intermittent tenures—beginning with his initial commission on 20 March 1324—reflected both his legal acumen and the political demands of the era, including temporary removals amid shifts in royal favor and parliamentary influence. As , le Scrope presided over proceedings that reinforced the court's authority during a time of constitutional flux, contributing to the continuity of administration despite baronial oppositions and royal upheavals. His decisions and oversight helped maintain , though specific case records highlight his adherence to procedural rigor in handling writs and appeals. He retired in 1338 owing to advancing age, having also balanced judicial duties with in the king's Scottish campaigns. Le Scrope died on 2 December 1340, reportedly in while on , leaving a legacy as a foundational figure in the Scrope family's judicial prominence.

Richard le Scrope, 1st Baron Scrope of (c. 1327–1403)

Richard le Scrope was an English , , and , around 1327 as the of Henry le Scrope (d. before 1351) and grandson of Geoffrey le Scrope, Chief Justice of the King's Bench (d. 1340). He inherited estates centered on in , , and rose through service to Edward III and Richard II, culminating in his elevation to the . Scrope's career exemplified the transition from martial prowess to high governance, marked by loyalty to the crown amid the turbulent politics of the late fourteenth century. He died on 30 May 1403 at his manor of Mendlesham, (or alternatively in some accounts), and was buried at Easby Abbey, . Scrope entered royal service through military campaigns during the and Scottish conflicts. His earliest recorded action occurred at the on 26 August 1346, where he fought in the retinue of as part of the English longbow vanguard that secured victory over the French. Later that year, on 17 October 1346, he participated in the near , a decisive English triumph over Scottish invaders led by David II; Scrope was knighted on the field for his valor by William Zouche, . He continued campaigning in France, serving initially with the Earl of Warwick's retinue and later under , , including expeditions to and further chevauchées into . These services earned him recognition as an experienced warrior, with indentures for troops under his command reflecting standard feudal obligations of the era. Transitioning to administrative roles, Scrope was elected for to the Parliament of 1364, representing county interests in debates on taxation and war funding. On 8 January 1371, writs of summons directed to "Ricardo le Scrop de " called him to the , establishing the barony of Scrope of by —a common mechanism for creation in the period, conferring hereditary dignity without formal patent. Immediately thereafter, on 27 1371, III appointed him of , a position he held until 26 September 1375, overseeing crown finances during fiscal strains from ongoing wars and domestic unrest. In September 1375, he became joint warden of the Western toward , responsible for border defense against raids. From 4 August 1377 to 6 January 1382, under the new reign of Richard II, Scrope served as steward of the royal household, managing daily court operations and warrants. He received a license to crenellate on 13 February 1378 (or 1379 in variant dating), fortifying his ancestral seat at an estimated cost of 18,000 marks, which symbolized both defensive needs and his growing wealth from fees, wardships, and escheats. Scrope's allegiance to Richard II persisted through the king's minority and early rule, though he navigated the Good Parliament of 1376 and subsequent "" crises without overt opposition. Deprived of stewardship in 1382 amid factional shifts favoring Gaunt's rivals, he retained influence via family ties, marrying Blanche de la Pole (d. 1377 or later), sister to Michael de la Pole, 1st and royal favorite. The union produced at least four sons— (d. 1415, 2nd Baron), Geoffrey (d. 1443), (d. 1420), and —and a daughter, strengthening Scrope's networks among northern and Lancastrian circles. Following Richard II's deposition in 1399, Scrope submitted to without resistance, securing his estates and avoiding , unlike some royalist kin. His later years involved local judicial commissions and estate management, including holdings in , , and acquired through marriage and grants.

William le Scrope, Earl of Wiltshire (c. 1350–1399) and Execution

William le Scrope (c. 1350 – 29 July 1399) was the eldest son of Richard le Scrope, 1st Baron Scrope of Bolton, and his wife Blanche, daughter of William de la Pole. As a prominent member of the Scrope family, he rose through military and administrative service under King Richard II, becoming a trusted and recipient of royal favor. Le Scrope participated in key campaigns, including service in the and diplomatic efforts, which elevated his status within the royal household. In 1397, amid Richard II's consolidation of power following the Appellants' crisis, le Scrope was elevated to the as , a new creation reflecting his loyalty and the king's strategy to reward adherents with titles forfeited from executed or exiled opponents. He was also granted the lordship of of Man, styling himself , and admitted to the , underscoring his integration into the highest echelons of chivalric and territorial elites. By 1398, le Scrope served as ambassador to for peace negotiations, and in early 1399, he was appointed Lord Treasurer of , managing royal finances during a period of fiscal strain. When Richard II departed for in May 1399 to suppress rebellion, le Scrope remained in as one of three principal counselors—alongside Sir John and Sir Henry —tasked with governance and defense against the impending threat of Henry Bolingbroke's return from exile. Bolingbroke, , landed in on 24 July 1399, rapidly gaining support amid discontent with Richard's rule. Le Scrope and his colleagues failed to mobilize effective resistance, retreating westward as Lancastrian forces advanced. On 28 July 1399, le Scrope, , and were captured by Lancastrian supporters at . The following day, 29 July, they were summarily tried by a panel assembled by Bolingbroke and convicted of for their roles in advising Richard II and alleged misgovernment, including extortionate taxation. Without appeal or formal parliamentary process, the three were beheaded at , their executions serving as a swift deterrent to royalist holdouts and a signal of Bolingbroke's intent to seize power. Le Scrope died without legitimate issue, causing the earldom to become extinct; his lands, including , were confiscated and redistributed, though some familial properties were later restored to his relatives under .

Scrope v. Grosvenor Heraldic Dispute (1385–1390)

The heraldic dispute between Sir Richard le Scrope and Sir Robert Grosvenor arose in August 1385 during King Richard II's invasion of Scotland, when Scrope observed Grosvenor's banner displaying the arms azure, a bend or, matching those long borne by the Scrope family. Scrope, a Knight of the Garter, former Treasurer of England, and Yorkshire baron, immediately protested the use, claiming exclusive prescriptive right based on his lineage's prior adoption and continuous display of the undifferenced arms. Grosvenor, a Cheshire knight of lesser prominence, asserted his family's ancient entitlement to the same bearings, allegedly dating to the Norman Conquest era. The case proceeded to the Court of Chivalry, the specialized tribunal for armorial matters under the Constable and Marshal of , with initial hearings in 1386 at locations including and before adjourning to . Proceedings involved extensive depositions from over 300 witnesses, including nobles like , poet (testifying for Scrope), and future Welsh rebel (for Grosvenor), who recounted sightings of the respective arms in battles such as Crécy (1346) and (1356). Scrope's proofs emphasized documented family use from the 1320s onward, corroborated by seals, effigies, and eyewitness accounts of banners in royal service; Grosvenor's relied on charters and oral traditions of origins but lacked comparable contemporary verification. In June 1389, the court commissioners ruled for Scrope, affirming his sole right to the plain azure, a bend or and enjoining Grosvenor from bearing it undifferenced. King Richard II ratified the decision in 1390, permitting Grosvenor a differenced variant—such as the bend within a bordure argent—though subsequent Grosvenor arms evolved to include a garter charge. Scrope waived awarded costs, and the knights reconciled publicly at the king's behest, embracing to signify amity. Preserved in the Scrope and Rolls—transcribed and published from original Latin records by Nicholas Harris Nicolas in 1832—the trial established evidentiary precedence over mere antiquity claims in , prompting greater armorial registration and reducing identical bearings among unrelated houses. It highlighted the Court of Chivalry's role in enforcing prescriptive rights through witness testimony, influencing English heraldic law toward formalized proof of usage.

15th-Century Challenges and Wars of the Roses

Archbishop Richard le Scrope's Rebellion (1405)

Archbishop Richard le Scrope, appointed to the see of in 1398 by King Richard II, initially submitted to after the latter's usurpation in 1399 but grew disaffected due to the king's demands for heavy subsidies to fund campaigns against Welsh rebels under and ongoing northern unrest. By early 1405, following the Percy family's defeat at the in 1403, Scrope aligned with conspirators including Thomas Mowbray, Earl Marshal (son of the exiled Thomas de Mowbray, ), and Thomas Bardolf, seeking to exploit regional grievances against Lancastrian rule. The plot drew on from Richard II's deposition, accusing Henry of for allegedly swearing not to claim the throne beyond his ducal rights. In late May 1405, Scrope departed with his episcopal seal, rendezvousing with Mowbray near where they raised a force estimated at 9,000 to 18,000 men, including retainers from gentry alienated by royal exactions. Scrope issued a justifying the rising, decrying Henry's "tyrannical" , fiscal oppression, and violation of oaths, framing the rebellion as a defense of communal liberties rather than personal ambition—though historians debate whether Scrope was a primary instigator or reluctantly drawn in by lay magnates. The rebels advanced to Shipton Moor on 29 May, but their army dispersed without engaging royal forces, reportedly due to a false of IV's approach or betrayal by a subordinate like Sir William Cliff, who shifted loyalties. Scrope and Mowbray were captured shortly after near or Clifton, with Scrope claiming he had been deceived into the enterprise and sought in his archiepiscopal capacity. , advancing northward with an army, convened a summary trial in on or around 3 before a panel of 12 to 20 northern lay magnates—deliberately excluding to bypass protections—charging them with high for levying war against the crown. The pronounced Scrope and Mowbray guilty without allowing formal to or the king's bench, a process criticized even contemporarily for lacking . Both were beheaded on 8 1405 in a field outside (later known as Knavesmire), with Scrope reportedly refusing a reprieve and forgiving his ; his head was displayed on walls before burial in . The executions provoked outrage, with protesting the violation of clerical immunity and threatening an on , though this was averted through diplomatic negotiation. In , Scrope rapidly attained folk-saint status, with reports of miracles at his tomb attracting pilgrims and fueling anti-Lancastrian sentiment; chroniclers like those in the tradition portrayed him as a for opposing unjust taxation, though royal records emphasized his active role in mustering arms. The event underscored tensions between crown and church while highlighting the fragility of Henry IV's regime, reliant on coerced northern loyalty amid fiscal strains.

Family Attainders, Restorations, and Branch Divergence

The Masham branch of the Scrope family faced a major attainder in 1415 when Henry Scrope, 3rd Baron Scrope of Masham, was convicted of treason for participating in the —a conspiracy uncovered on 2 August 1415 to assassinate and replace him with Edmund Mortimer, , during preparations for the campaign. Henry was summarily tried by his peers, attainted, and beheaded on 5 August 1415 at , resulting in the forfeiture of his lands and title. His brother's subsequent efforts led to a reversal of the ; John Scrope, as 4th Baron Scrope of Masham, was summoned to beginning in 1426 and repurchased confiscated family estates, restoring the branch's position under . This early 15th-century episode highlighted the precariousness of noble loyalties amid Lancastrian consolidation, but the Bolton branch avoided similar forfeiture. Richard Scrope, 1st Baron Scrope of Bolton (d. 1403), had established that line's in 1371, and his descendants maintained continuity without interruption from royal plots or rebellions like the archbishop's 1405 uprising, which primarily implicated Masham kin. By mid-century, the Bolton Scropes under John, 5th Baron (d. 1498), aligned with the Yorkist cause during the Wars of the Roses, fighting at the on 29 March 1461 and earning knighthood from , thus evading Lancastrian reprisals. The parallel trajectories underscored branch divergence originating from Geoffrey le Scrope's (d. 1340) progeny—Henry founding the Masham barony (summoned 1328) and Richard the Bolton (1371)—with Masham enduring attainder risks from court intrigues and the Bolton line benefiting from judicial and military service stability into the dynastic conflicts. While Masham recovered via parliamentary summons and repurchase, its later holders, including John 4th Baron as Treasurer of England (1434–1433? wait, 1443? but d.1455), navigated Henry VI's reign without further wholesale forfeiture, though the branch's male line waned by century's end. Bolton's Yorkist fidelity ensured unblemished peerage progression, diverging in political fortune and territorial focus around Wensleydale strongholds like Bolton Castle.

Tudor and Early Stuart Era (16th-early 17th Centuries)

Key Figures and Peerage Elevations

Henry Scrope, 9th Baron Scrope of Bolton (c. 1534–1592), succeeded his father John Scrope, 8th Baron, upon the latter's death in 1549 and held the barony during much of Elizabeth I's reign. Appointed a Knight of the Garter in 1592, he served as Warden of the West Marches, overseeing border security with Scotland, and briefly held Mary, Queen of Scots, at Bolton Castle in 1568 following her flight from Scotland. His son, Thomas Scrope, 10th Baron Scrope of Bolton (c. 1565–1598), inherited the title in 1592 and pursued , including as to France in 1598, though his tenure was cut short by his death that same year without male issue beyond his son Emanuel. Emanuel Scrope, 11th Baron Scrope of Bolton (1584–1630), succeeded his father in 1598 and rose to prominence under and , serving as (1614–1620) and Lord President of the Council of the North (1619–1627). On 19 June 1627, he was elevated to the earldom of in the , recognizing his administrative roles and family standing, though the creation stipulated succession limited to heirs male of his body. The earldom extinguished upon his death on 30 May 1630, as he left no legitimate issue; the barony of Scrope of Bolton then became dormant, with later claims unresolved until in the .

Properties and Patronage

The Scrope family of Bolton retained Bolton Castle in Wensleydale, North Yorkshire, as their chief seat throughout the 16th century, a quadrangular fortress originally erected between 1378 and 1399 at a cost of approximately 18,000 marks. The castle encompassed four towers connected by ranges, designed for both defense and residential comfort, and symbolized the family's enduring northern influence. John Scrope, 8th Baron Scrope of Bolton (d. 1549), maintained residence there amid regional upheavals like the Pilgrimage of Grace in 1536, during which the family navigated tensions without direct rebellion. His successor, Henry Scrope, 9th Baron Scrope of Bolton (c. 1534–1592), further elevated the estate's prominence by hosting Mary, Queen of Scots, from July 1568 to January 1569 under Elizabeth I's directive, incurring significant expenses for her upkeep estimated at over £500 monthly. The castle's robust walls and strategic location underscored its role in border security, remaining unsold and in Scrope hands without interruption. Ancillary properties included the of Langar in , where the Scropes held lordship but delegated management, prioritizing their Yorkshire base. Henry Scrope's tenure as Warden of the West Marches from 1587 extended family oversight to estates in and , bolstering defensive holdings against Scottish incursions, though primary wealth derived from Wensleydale tenancies yielding rents and agricultural yields. These lands, centered on and lead mining, sustained the barony's status amid inflationary pressures of the period. Patronage flowed both ways: the Scropes received crown favor, with Henry appointed Knight of the Garter in 1591, signaling Elizabeth I's trust in their loyalty for northern governance. Locally, as lords of , they dispensed patronage through tenurial rights, dispute arbitration, and infrastructure like mills and bridges, fostering client networks essential for regional stability. Ecclesiastical ties, once robust—such as advowson over Easby Abbey, dissolved in 1537—shifted post-Reformation; the family conformed to , redirecting influence toward secular administration rather than monastic benefaction. No notable artistic or literary patronage is recorded in this era, with resources focused on fortification and border duties rather than cultural endeavors.

Civil War, Regicide, and Later Stuart Scropes (Mid-17th Century)

Adrian Scrope's Involvement in the and

Adrian Scrope (c. 1601–1660), a landowner from in , emerged as a committed at the outbreak of the in 1642. In October of that year, he raised a troop of horse to support the Parliamentary cause and served as a captain under the Earl of Essex's army, participating in the on 23 October 1642, where forces clashed with Royalists in the war's first major engagement. By 1644, Scrope had transferred to Sir Robert Pye's cavalry , continuing active service in the Parliamentary , which played a crucial role in outmaneuvering forces through mobility and scouting. His military career advanced amid the New Model Army's formation in 1645; by 1646, he held the rank of in a of , reflecting his reliability in field commands and logistical support for Parliament's campaigns. Scrope's Puritan convictions aligned him with the army's radical faction, leading him to side with the soldiers during the 1647 Army-Parliament disputes; contemporary accounts suggest he may have aided Cornet in seizing I from on 3 June 1647, an act that underscored the military's growing dominance over civilian authority. As tensions escalated toward , Scrope backed Colonel Thomas of the on 6–7 December 1648, which excluded presumed sympathizers and enabled the Rump Parliament's radical agenda. In January 1649, he was among the officers tasked with organizing the trial of , and appointed him head of security for the proceedings at , ensuring the king's containment from 20 January to 27 January 1649. As one of 135 commissioners named to the , Scrope attended sessions daily, voted for the king's guilt on treason charges, and affixed his signature as the 27th on the death warrant ordering the execution, carried out by beheading on 30 January 1649 outside . This act positioned Scrope irrevocably among the 59 regicides who authorized the realm's first regnum regis interruption through judicial killing of a .

Post-Restoration Consequences and Family Splits

Following the Restoration of the monarchy in May 1660, Colonel Adrian Scrope faced immediate scrutiny as one of the regicides who had signed King Charles I's death warrant in January 1649. Initially, the House of Commons considered fining him and discharging him due to his compliance in surrendering, but the House of Lords overruled this, insisting on trial for high treason. Scrope was convicted and executed by hanging, drawing, and quartering at Charing Cross on 17 October 1660, alongside regicides such as Thomas Scot and Gregory Brandwood Clement. Under the Act of Attainder passed in the Convention Parliament, Scrope was posthumously declared guilty of high treason, resulting in the forfeiture of his estates, including Wormsley Manor in Oxfordshire and properties in Buckinghamshire totaling several thousand acres. His widow, Mary, and children endured financial ruin and social ostracism, with family members petitioning for clemency; within a year, surviving son Thomas Scrope secured partial restoration of Wormsley through royal favor, though the family lost significant wealth and influence. These events exacerbated divisions within the extended Scrope family, whose branches had already diverged in allegiances during . While the cadet line—tainted by —faced decline, unaffected collateral branches, such as the Scropes holding lands since the , maintained continuity and even parliamentary representation post-1660 without repercussions. Thomas Scrope's heir, grandson John Scrope, became the last male of the direct line, dying without issue in 1752; per John's father's will, the estate passed to female heirs, splitting inheritance to the Fane family through John's sister Anne's marriage to Henry Fane, thus diluting Scrope control and marking the branch's effective end. This fragmentation contrasted with the family's earlier unified noble claims, underscoring how the 's consequences isolated and diminished the lineage amid broader Stuart realignments.

Decline of Titles and Later History (18th-19th Centuries)

Extinction of Baronial Lines

The of Scrope of Masham, created by in 1350, fell into in 1517 following the without of Geoffrey Scrope, the 10th . http://www.cracroftspeerage.co.uk/scropem1350.htm This arose between his three sisters and their descendants, with no subsequent termination by , leaving the title unresolved into the 18th and 19th centuries. http://www.cracroftspeerage.co.uk/scropem1350.htm Similarly, the of Scrope of , established by in 1371, became dormant upon the in 1630 of Emanuel Scrope, 11th and 1st , who left no legitimate male heirs. http://www.cracroftspeerage.co.uk/scropeb1371.htm The absence of male succession in the prevented any immediate , and the title's persisted without successful or royal intervention through subsequent centuries. http://www.cracroftspeerage.co.uk/scropeb1371.htm By the , both baronies were effectively defunct in practice, as no peer summoned to the under these dignities sat after the early , reflecting the extinction of the primogenital male lines capable of asserting undivided claim. https://europeanheraldry.org/united-kingdom/families/families-s/house-scrope/ Genealogical records confirm that while female-line descendants survived, the baronial peerages required male succession under norms, which failed due to successive childless or heiress-only outcomes. https://europeanheraldry.org/united-kingdom/families/families-s/house-scrope/ In the , amid heightened interest in dormant titles, no verified claims specifically targeting these baronies advanced to termination; instead, related efforts, such as Simon Thomas Scrope's 1859 petition for the attainted Earldom of Wiltshire (a collateral Scrope from 1397), were rejected by the Committee for Privileges, underscoring the unrevivable status of associated honors. http://www.cracroftspeerage.co.uk/scropeb1371.htm This judicial outcome reinforced the baronial lines' extinction, as the family's noble status devolved to untitled branches without peerage restoration.

Cadet Branches and Genealogical Claims

The emerged as a prominent in the , descending from Christopher Scrope, a younger son of the Masham branch, who acquired Danby Hall in through marriage to Margaret Danby around 1490. This branch maintained continuous male-line descent from the medieval Scrope barons, retaining significant local estates despite the extinction of the senior peerages. By the , the Danbys had preserved their Catholic faith amid penalties, which limited political influence but sustained familial continuity at Danby Hall, a property held without interruption into the 19th century. Other cadet lines, such as that stemming from the Bolton branch's collateral kin, produced figures like George Julius Poulett Scrope (1797–1876), a and who adopted the Scrope surname upon inheriting related estates from his uncle in 1820, though his direct descent was through a female intermediary from earlier Scropes. These lesser branches often dispersed geographically, with some members entering military or scholarly pursuits, but lacked the territorial cohesion of Danby. The regicidal Adrian Scrope's descendants, from a cadet of Bolton, faded in prominence post-Restoration, with no major 18th- or 19th-century revivals documented. Genealogical claims centered on reviving the dormant Barony of Scrope of Bolton, extinct in legitimate male line since Emanuel Scrope's death in 1630. In 1859, Simon Thomas Scrope (1790–1872) of Danby Hall petitioned as heir male presumptive, asserting descent via collateral lines from the 11th , supported by heraldic and parish records tracing back to 16th-century forebears. The claim failed before the Committee for Privileges, as evidentiary gaps in pre-1500 linkages and interruptions from attainders undermined strict requirements under English law. Subsequent heads, including Simon Egerton Scrope (1934–2010), upheld informal seniority without legal success, reflecting persistent but unverified assertions of baronial continuity amid Catholic disenfranchisement.

Modern Descendants and Continuity

Survival of the Family Line

The senior male line of the Scrope family persists today through the Danby branch, which traces an unbroken patrilineal descent from medieval forebears and has been seated at Danby Hall in since the late . This cadet line, unencumbered by titles since the 17th century, maintains the family surname and local estates without the baronial dignities held by earlier branches. Simon Egerton Scrope (born 23 December 1934, died 7 March 2010), the 20th-century head of the house, resided at Danby and managed the family's 1,500-acre estate there; he worked as an while upholding the lineage's Roman Catholic traditions as one of England's oldest recusant families. Married to Jane Parkinson from 1971 until his death, he fathered a son, , who succeeded him as the senior male representative. Henry Scrope, born in 1974, continues the direct male succession as the current head of Scrope of Danby, preserving the family's historical continuity amid the extinction of titled lines in prior centuries. Genealogical records affirm no interruption in this patriline, distinguishing it from collateral branches where inheritance passed through female lines, such as the ownership of by non-Scrope descendants via the Orde family (Barons Bolton). The Danby Scropes have periodically asserted claims to dormant peerages, including an unsuccessful 1859 petition by Simon Thomas Scrope (1790–1872) to revive the Barony of Scrope of Masham, underscoring ongoing recognition of their .

Recent Family Events

The Scrope family, particularly its Danby branch, has experienced a series of births, deaths, and engagements in the , reflecting the continuity of its lines. On 4 2020, Leontine Maud Catherine Scrope was born to a member of the family descended from the Earls of . In May 2022, Maximus Simon Parkinson Scrope was born, continuing the naming traditions within the family. Catherine Scrope, a of the Scropes of Danby born in 1936 and daughter of Ralph Henry Scrope, died on 6 April 2022 at age 86. Further events included the birth of Clementine Lily Scrope in 2023 to Richard Scrope, grandson of Cuthbert Scrope (1906-1992) and Everilda Sykes, daughter of , 6th Baronet. Elizabeth Jane Scrope, born 5 June 1937 and another of the Danby line, died on 20 March 2024 at age 86. Engagements have also marked family alliances: on 16 December 2023, the engagement was announced between Thomas Henry Aloysius Scrope (born 31 August 1994), son of Peter and [mother] Scrope, and Cressida , elder daughter of Professor Rory and the late Sarah . Most recently, on 25 April 2025, an engagement between a Scrope and a Kaye was announced, linking the family to another established lineage. These events underscore the family's ongoing presence in British aristocratic circles, with the Danby estate in remaining a focal point for descendants, though no hereditary titles have been revived. Earlier in the period, the death of Simon Egerton Scrope, head of the Danby family, on 7 March 2010 at age 75, transitioned leadership to the next generation, including Simon Harry Richard Scrope (born 1974).