Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Shishak

Shishak, known in ancient Egyptian records as (also spelled Sheshonq I), was a of the 22nd Dynasty who founded the and ruled from approximately 945 to 924 BCE. Of Libyan origin from the tribe, he rose from a position as a high commander under the previous dynasty to become Egypt's first of this line, marking a period of Libyan influence in Egyptian governance. Shoshenq I is best known for his major military campaign into the around 925 BCE, targeting the newly divided kingdoms of and following the death of King Solomon. This expedition, likely aimed at reasserting Egyptian dominance and securing tribute, is documented in Egyptian sources through the Bubastite Portal at the Temple of Amun in , where reliefs and inscriptions list over 150 conquered towns and regions in , including sites in the northern Kingdom of such as and Beth-Shean, as well as some in like Arad. Archaeological evidence supporting the campaign includes a victory fragment discovered at bearing his , dated to his reign, and scarabs inscribed with his name found in contexts linked to this era. In the , Shishak is explicitly identified as the Egyptian king who invaded in the fifth year of Rehoboam's reign (c. 926 BCE), plundering the gold shields and treasures from and palace in without destroying the city itself, an event interpreted as after the king's . (1 Kings 14:25–26; 2 Chronicles 12:2–9) Scholars widely equate the biblical Shishak with based on the phonetic similarity of their names and the chronological alignment of the events, though itself is notably absent from the list, possibly indicating it paid tribute rather than being besieged. This campaign not only weakened the United Monarchy's successors but also highlighted Shoshenq's role in stabilizing Egypt's foreign relations during a time of internal consolidation. Beyond his military achievements, Shoshenq I contributed to Egyptian religious and monumental architecture, notably expanding the Temple complex with the aforementioned , which served as celebrating his victories. His reign bridged the Third Intermediate Period, blending Libyan tribal elements with traditional pharaonic authority, and he was succeeded by his son . Artifacts such as statues and scarabs bearing his throne name Hedjkheperre Setepenre further attest to his in .

Biblical References

Account in 1 Kings

In the fifth year of King Rehoboam's reign over , approximately 926 BCE, Shishak, the king of , launched an invasion against , capturing the treasures of the Temple of the Lord and the royal palace. This military campaign marked a significant for the newly established southern kingdom, which had split from the united monarchy after Solomon's death, leaving it vulnerable to external aggression from . The biblical account in 1 Kings 14:25–28 provides a concise description of the plunder and its immediate aftermath:
In the fifth year of King , king of Egypt came up against . He took away the treasures of the of the and the treasures of the king's . He took away everything. He also took away all the shields of gold that had made, and King made in their place shields of bronze, and committed them to the hands of the officers of the guard, who kept the door of the king's . And as often as the king went into the of the , the guard carried them and brought them back to the guardroom.
The loss of the golden shields, symbolic of Solomon's prosperous era, underscored the diminished status of Judah, with Rehoboam substituting them with bronze equivalents as a practical response to the despoliation. This narrative in 1 Kings frames Shishak's incursion as an exploit of the political instability following the division of the kingdom, where Rehoboam's harsh policies had provoked the northern tribes to rebel under Jeroboam. Within the broader theological context of the book, the invasion illustrates divine judgment on Judah for the idolatrous practices that persisted after Solomon's reign, serving as a cautionary episode in the Deuteronomistic history of Israel's fidelity to Yahweh. A parallel but more interpretive account appears in 2 Chronicles 12.

Account in 2 Chronicles

In the account provided by the Chronicler, the invasion of Shishak occurs during the fifth year of 's reign over , following a period in which Rehoboam had successfully fortified his kingdom but subsequently abandoned fidelity to the , along with his officers and the people of . This unfaithfulness prompts Shishak, , to march against with a formidable comprising 1,200 chariots, 60,000 horsemen, and countless troops from the Lubim, Sukkiim, and Kushites, enabling him to take the fortified cities of and advance as far as itself. The narrative introduces a prophetic by of God Shemaiah, who delivers a divine message to and the leaders of assembled in , declaring that the invasion serves as punishment because they had forsaken : "This is what says, 'You have abandoned me; therefore, I now abandon you to Shishak.'" In response, the king, his leaders, and the people humble themselves before , prompting a partial of the judgment; , through Shemaiah, conveys mercy, stating that while Shishak will not destroy them outright, they will nonetheless become his subjects to learn the difference between serving and serving earthly kings. This theological framing underscores the Chronicler's emphasis on and divine as key to averting complete catastrophe. Consequently, Shishak proceeds to Jerusalem without fully besieging it, but he plunders the treasures of the of the Lord and the royal palace, including the golden shields crafted by , which Rehoboam later replaces with bronze ones. The account concludes by noting that, despite this subjugation, Rehoboam maintains his rule over and Benjamin for the remainder of his seventeen-year reign, though he does so in a diminished , ultimately dying after becoming strong but continuing in unfaithfulness. Unlike the briefer report in 1 Kings, this expanded version highlights the moral dimensions of and the conditional nature of , portraying the invasion not merely as a military event but as a corrective lesson in loyalty.

Name and Etymology

Hebrew Name Shishak

In the , the name of the Egyptian is rendered as שִׁישַׁק, commonly transliterated as Šîšaq or Shishak, with the providing the vocalization šî-šaq, featuring a hireq under the first šin, a tsere under the yod (implied in the pointing), and a patach under the final qof. An orthographic variant appears in 1 Kings 14:25 as the ketîb שׁוּשַׁק (Šûšaq), though the qere reading aligns with the standard form elsewhere. This name occurs exclusively in four passages: 1 Kings 11:40, which mentions Šîšaq providing refuge to ; 1 Kings 14:25, describing his invasion in the fifth year of ; and 2 Chronicles 12:2–9, which parallels the account of the campaign against without additional etymological or interpretive details on the name itself. Scholars widely regard Šîšaq as a Hebraized adaptation of an throne name, most commonly linked to ššnq (Shoshenq), with the nasal "n" dropped as a weak in transliteration patterns, though alternative theories propose or Libyco-Berber influences or derivations from Ramesside hypocoristics like ssysw, interpreting the initial šin as reflecting an sibilant /s/ rendered as /š/ in late West dialects. The final qof may stem from scribal confusion with waw in paleo-Hebrew script or direct representation of an q sound. The adaptation of Šîšaq exemplifies broader biblical patterns for foreign names, where Egyptian sibilants often shift to Hebrew šin (as in Ra‘messes, רַעְמְסֵס) and weak nasals are elided, similar to the rendering of Gath as Ginti in texts or Makkedah as Manqedah in inscriptions, facilitating phonetic integration into phonology without altering core consonants.

Egyptian Name Equivalents

The Egyptian royal nomenclature for the conventionally identified with the biblical Shishak consists of a throne name (prenomen) and a (nomen), both typically enclosed in in hieroglyphic inscriptions. The throne name is Hedjkheperre Setepenre (transliterated as ḥḏ ḫpr rꜥ stp n rꜥ), meaning "The bright one, the manifestation of , chosen of ," where ḥḏ signifies brightness, ḫpr denotes manifestation, and rꜥ refers to the sun god . This name appears in standard cartouche form with hieroglyphs including the sedge and for kingship, a scarab beetle for ḫpr, and the eye of . Variants substitute or for , such as Hedjkheperre Setepenamun (ḥḏ ḫpr rꜥ stp n jmn), reflecting cultic emphases in specific contexts. The birth name is Shoshenq (or Sheshonq, transliterated as ššnq), often extended to Shoshenq meryamun ("Shoshenq, beloved of "), with hieroglyphs featuring the š-sign (folded cloth) repeated for the initial šš, followed by nq (serpent and water ripple). This name derives from Libyan origins but was adapted into titulary, appearing in cartouches with epithets like "son of " in some attestations. These elements are documented in inscriptions from sites such as and , where the full royal protocol confirms the 's identity without reference to his broader activities. The phonetic adaptation from Egyptian ššnq to Hebrew ššq (Shishak) involves common Semitic transliteration practices, particularly the elision of the weak consonant n (a nasal sound often dropped in Hebrew proper names for euphony) and the shift of the emphatic q (uvular stop) to k (velar stop), aligning with Northwest Semitic phonology. Vowel shifts are minimal, as Egyptian ššnq likely pronounced /ʃeʃoŋk/ was simplified to /ʃiʃaq/ in Hebrew, reflecting assimilation to native sound patterns rather than direct copying. This mirrors broader patterns in biblical renderings of Egyptian names, such as Taharqa (Egyptian tꜣḥrqt, with ḥ as a pharyngeal) becoming Tirhakah (Hebrew tīrḥāqâ), where an initial t is preserved but vowels are adjusted and the final t softened, illustrating consistent consonantal simplifications across languages. Attestations of Shoshenq in inscriptions, such as those on stelae in (e.g., CG 42213) and reliefs at , consistently use the ššnq form within the royal cartouches, providing direct epigraphic evidence for the name's structure and supporting its linguistic link to biblical usage. These records, analyzed in scholarly catalogs, emphasize the name's stability in Third Intermediate Period hieroglyphs.

Identification with

Background of Shoshenq I

Shoshenq I, the founder of Egypt's 22nd Dynasty, originated from a prominent Libyan family of Meshwesh descent, a Berber-speaking group that had settled in the eastern Nile Delta region near Bubastis following their defeat and incorporation into Egyptian society during the late New Kingdom. His father, Nimlot, held the title of Great Chief of the Meshwesh, while his uncle, Osorkon the Elder, had briefly served as a king during the waning years of the 21st Dynasty, illustrating the rising influence of Libyan military elites in Egyptian politics. These families had been integrated as mercenaries and settlers since the reign of Ramesses III in the 20th Dynasty, forming semi-autonomous communities that evolved into a powerful administrative and military class centered in Bubastis. This Meshwesh heritage positioned Shoshenq within a network of Libyan chieftains who commanded foreign mercenary forces, contributing to the gradual shift of power from native Egyptian rulers to Libyan leaders. In his early career, Shoshenq served as the chief commander of the Egyptian under , the last king of the 21st , leveraging his background to oversee troops that included Libyan contingents integrated into the army. He held the prestigious title of Great Chief of the Ma(shwesh), reflecting his leadership over these tribal groups, which had become essential for maintaining order in a fragmented state. To solidify ties with the existing royal line, Shoshenq arranged a marriage alliance by wedding his eldest son, the future , to Maatkare, the daughter of , thereby bridging Libyan and Tanite dynastic interests without direct personal marriage to the royal family. This strategic union facilitated a peaceful , as Shoshenq's authority complemented the weakening central control of the 21st . Shoshenq ascended to the throne around 943 BCE, marking the inception of the 22nd Dynasty, also known as the or period, amid Egypt's post-New Kingdom fragmentation. The 21st Dynasty had overseen a divided realm, with in the north functioning as a separate power center from Theban priests in the south, exacerbated by economic decline and the growing autonomy of Libyan settlers. As a unifier, Shoshenq drew on his military prowess to reassert pharaonic authority, relocating the royal residence to and integrating Libyan elements into governance while preserving Egyptian traditions. His background as a Libyan thus enabled him to stabilize and centralize power in a period of regional disunity. Shoshenq I is widely identified with the biblical figure Shishak due to phonetic and chronological correspondences.

Chronological Synchronization

The identification of the biblical Shishak with Pharaoh relies on aligning the timelines of Judah's Divided Monarchy with Egypt's 22nd Dynasty. According to standard biblical , Shishak's invasion occurred in the fifth year of King , who succeeded in 931 BCE; this places the event around 926/925 BCE, calculated from the temple's dedication in Solomon's fourth regnal year at 967 BCE. Egyptian records date Shoshenq I's reign to approximately 945–924 BCE, with his campaign against the falling in 20 or 21, circa 925 BCE. This timing is supported by the Bubastite Portal reliefs at Temple, which commemorate the expedition, and by lunar astronomical synchronisms that anchor the Third Intermediate Period's relative chronology through Apis bull burial dates and solar alignments. Synchronization methodologies integrate these timelines via comparative king lists and scientific dating. Assyrian-Egyptian synchronisms, such as those linking the 25th Dynasty to records around 720–650 BCE, provide a backward anchor for the earlier 22nd Dynasty, while radiocarbon analysis of olive pits from destruction layers at Tel Rehov—mentioned in Shoshenq's list—yields calibrated dates of 980–835 BCE for V, consistent with a late 10th-century BCE incursion. Debates persist over high and low chronologies for the Third Intermediate Period, with the high variant (e.g., Kitchen's framework) maintaining the 10th-century alignment and the low variant (e.g., Finkelstein's revisions) proposing a downward shift of 20–50 years to fit IIA pottery sequences into the BCE. Nonetheless, the among most Egyptologists and biblical historians upholds the 10th-century BCE correlation, as radiocarbon results and epigraphic evidence outweigh the proposed adjustments.

Reign of Shoshenq I

Ascension to Power

Shoshenq I ascended to the throne around 943 BCE, marking the end of the weakened 21st Dynasty under , whose rule was characterized by declining central authority and reliance on military figures for stability. As the Great Chief of the (Meshwesh), a prominent Libyan settled in the , Shoshenq leveraged his military command role within the Egyptian army to position himself as a successor, effectively transitioning power through a blend of Libyan tribal influence and Egyptian administrative continuity. This shift was facilitated by Psusennes II's personal involvement, including a visit to to secure oracular approval for Shoshenq's kingship, ensuring a semblance of legitimacy amid the dynasty's fragility. He ruled for approximately 21 years until c. 922 BCE. Central to Shoshenq's consolidation were strategic family alliances that bridged the old dynasty and his emerging rule. His eldest son, , married Maatkare, the daughter of , forging a direct link to the previous royal line and smoothing the dynastic handover. Additionally, Shoshenq appointed his second son, Iuput, as at , along with titles such as Governor of Upper Egypt and Commander of the Army, thereby securing control over the influential Theban priesthood and southern administration. These maneuvers neutralized potential opposition from religious and regional elites, integrating Libyan leadership into Egypt's sacred and political structures. The establishment of the 22nd Dynasty, often called the Bubastite Dynasty after its power base in , maintained the royal center at , the seat of the previous dynasty, while emphasizing Libyan-influenced governance, a departure from the more Egyptian-centric 21st Dynasty. Shoshenq's Libyan heritage as a Meshwesh chief informed this new era, promoting tribal integration into the pharaonic system. To solidify his rule, he suppressed local rivals through diplomatic and military means, averting civil unrest by honoring traditional protocols.

Domestic Achievements

Shoshenq I undertook significant construction projects to bolster his legitimacy and enhance Egypt's religious infrastructure, focusing on key temple sites in the and . At , his dynastic base in the eastern , he expanded the temple complex dedicated to the goddess , incorporating new structures that reflected his Libyan origins while integrating traditional Egyptian architectural elements. In , the emerging royal capital in the northeastern , enlarged the Great Temple of by adding a forecourt and colonnades, utilizing reused materials from earlier periods to symbolize continuity with pharaonic tradition. His most prominent project was at , where he erected the Bubastite Gate—a monumental portal in the temple of Amun-Re—partly funded by tribute from sources, which adorned the structure with reliefs celebrating his royal piety. To consolidate power following his ascension through alliances with Theban priesthood, implemented administrative reforms that centralized authority by appointing members of the elite to high offices, thereby integrating his tribal kin into the Egyptian bureaucracy while maintaining control over fragmented regions. These appointments, often in military and provincial roles, helped stabilize governance in the , where he promoted economic revitalization and supported urban growth in . Shoshenq I's religious patronage emphasized the cult of to legitimize his foreign origins, with substantial donations of land and resources to Amun's temples at and , ensuring priestly support and divine favor. He adopted traditional pharaonic in temple reliefs and inscriptions, depicting himself in classic poses as the son of Amun and protector of the gods, which reinforced his role as a restorer of ma'at despite his Libyan heritage. Under , Egypt experienced economic prosperity marked by renewed trade networks with the , facilitating the import of timber, metals, and luxury goods that enriched ports like . Trade with also flourished, yielding gold, ivory, and ebony through established southern routes, which contributed to fiscal stability and funded monumental works without relying on extensive conquests.

The Levantine Campaign

Biblical Invasion of Judah

The biblical account of Shishak's invasion of Judah is detailed in 1 Kings 14:25–26 and 2 Chronicles 12:1–12, portraying it as a launched in the fifth year of King 's reign, shortly after the death of and the subsequent division of the united monarchy. This timing exploited the vulnerabilities of the newly weakened , which had lost the northern tribes to I, leaving with diminished resources and internal instability following the . Shishak's forces strategically targeted Judah's fortified cities, capturing them en route to , which underscored the kingdom's exposed defenses in the post-Solomonic era. The invasion's scale was immense, with Shishak commanding 1,200 chariots, 60,000 horsemen, and countless troops from , Cush, and other regions, overwhelming 's military without a prolonged of the capital. Rather than total destruction, the campaign culminated in the plundering of Jerusalem's treasures from the and royal palace, including Solomon's gold shields, which replaced with bronze equivalents as a of diminished glory. This tribute payment averted further devastation, highlighting the tactical restraint employed once submitted. Theologically, the invasion is framed as for Judah's , with 2 Chronicles explicitly attributing it to and the people abandoning the after initial strength. The Shemaiah conveyed God's message that forsaking Him had delivered into Shishak's hands, positioning the Egyptian king as an instrument of divine will to enforce faithfulness. However, upon the leaders' and acknowledgment of God's justice, the relented from total ruin, subjecting to servitude instead to teach the consequences of versus obedience. This narrative links back to an earlier reference in 1 Kings 11:40, where Shishak had sheltered the fugitive from , indirectly contributing to the kingdom's division that set the stage for Judah's later vulnerability.

Egyptian Campaign Records

The primary Egyptian documentation of Shoshenq I's expedition is found on the Bubastite Portal at the Temple of Amun in , erected during the 20th–21st year of his , circa 925 BCE. This structure features extensive reliefs and inscriptions that record the campaign's achievements, including a comprehensive list of over 150 toponyms representing conquered sites. The toponyms are grouped regionally, encompassing areas such as the , , and , with explicit claims of conquest over cities including Gibeon, , and Rehob. The reliefs portray in dynamic scenes of triumph, where he grasps and smites Asiatic chieftains while offering bound captives to , symbolizing divine endorsement of his victories. These elements underscore the portal's role as a propagandistic , designed to proclaim the pharaoh's success in reasserting hegemony over after centuries of diminished influence. Supplementary records include a fragmentary stela at inscribed with Shoshenq's , commemorating his military presence, and an inscription on a statue at by the local ruler Abiba'al, indicating tribute paid to the , though neither source mentions directly.

Archaeological Evidence

A fragment inscribed with the royal and prenomen of was discovered at during excavations by the Oriental Institute of the in 1925. Recent stratigraphic analysis places the fragment in an early 10th-century BCE context, potentially as part of an architectural element commemorating presence at the , while destruction layers in VA/IVB, characterized by burned structures and collapsed walls, have been dated to circa 925 BCE through radiocarbon and ceramic evidence, aligning with the timing of Shoshenq I's campaign. A 2023 study reinterprets the fragment as part of a building block rather than a traditional stela, based on its thickness and excavation context, further supporting its association with the campaign. Archaeological investigations at other sites listed in Shoshenq I's portal toponyms reveal destruction layers and -style artifacts from the early BCE. At Tel Beth Shean, Stratum S-1a features public buildings destroyed by fire, with associated pottery dated to the late IIA but overlapping the campaign's timeframe, alongside reused New Kingdom monuments like stelae of and . Similarly, Tel Rehov's Stratum VI ( BCE) yielded izing faience amulets depicting deities such as and , as well as a scarab bearing the name of , indicating continued cultural influence in the region during Shoshenq I's era, though no direct destruction layer is attributed to the campaign at this site. In southern Jordan's Faynan district, a scarab amulet inscribed with Shoshenq I's name was recovered from the copper production site of Khirbat Hamra Ifdan, providing evidence of administrative or oversight in the area's operations during his . This find, associated with radiocarbon-dated copper smelting activities from the late 12th to early BCE, suggests Shoshenq I's forces exerted control over valuable resources, potentially as part of the campaign's southern branch. Israel Finkelstein's analysis of post-campaign settlement patterns indicates that Shoshenq I's incursion triggered the collapse of an emerging territorial polity in southern , evidenced by the abandonment of I sites and a shift toward new polities in the , based on updated of ceramic phases. Archaeomagnetic studies conducted in 2022 on burned mud-brick structures from destruction layers across Israelite and Judahite sites have refined chronologies to the early BCE, supporting alignments with Shoshenq I's campaign timeframe for fires at locations like and Tel Beth Shean. Excavations at Tel Burna in the Judean Shephelah, potentially biblical Libnah, uncovered a destruction layer dated to the second half of the BCE, characterized by fire and debris, which may be linked to Shoshenq I's campaign, though Libnah is absent from the list.

Scholarly Debates

Omission of

One of the central puzzles in the study of Shoshenq I's campaign is the conspicuous absence of from the Egyptian records, particularly the topographical lists inscribed on the Bubastite Portal at the Temple complex. These lists, comprising over 150 name-rings of conquered sites primarily in the northern and , include locations such as , Beth-Shean, and Arad but make no reference to or other key Judahite centers like or Lachish. This omission stands in contrast to the biblical narrative in 1 Kings 14:25–26, which describes (identified with ) as advancing against . Scholars attribute this gap to the possibility that secured its position through tribute payments, thereby avoiding full-scale conquest and subsequent inscription as a defeated foe. Several theories have been proposed to explain this discrepancy. One prominent view posits a diplomatic submission by , as detailed in 2 Chronicles 12:7–9, where the Shemaiah intervenes, leading to the sparing of after is offered from the and treasuries; this arrangement may have rendered the city unworthy of listing among militarily subdued targets. Alternatively, the omission could result from deliberate erasure for propagandistic purposes, emphasizing Shoshenq I's triumphs over northern regions while downplaying any negotiated outcomes in the south to project unyielding dominance. Another explanation suggests the lists are inherently incomplete, focusing selectively on northern Israelite sites as primary objectives, with southern Judahite areas like receiving only peripheral attention or none at all due to logistical shifts during the campaign. This pattern of selective recording aligns with broader practices in royal inscriptions. For instance, the annals of , detailing his 17 campaigns in the , draw from expedition daybooks but emphasize victorious episodes and divine favor while omitting less glorious details, such as logistical setbacks or minor sites, to serve ideological and propagandistic aims. Such curation highlights how pharaonic records prioritized narrative coherence over exhaustive documentation, potentially influencing the Bubastite Portal's content to glorify Shoshenq I's achievements without acknowledging diplomatic concessions. The implications of 's omission extend to assessments of biblical historicity, suggesting that accounts of the to the city may exaggerate the campaign's intensity against to underscore theological themes of and humility. This scholarly debate underscores the challenges of reconciling Egyptian monumental propaganda with biblical narratives, where the sparing of is briefly noted as a outcome of timely submission.

Campaign's Historical Impact

The campaign of , known biblically as Shishak, immediately weakened the Kingdom of Judah during the reign of , as the pharaoh captured numerous fortified cities and extracted tribute from , including treasures from the and palace, thereby diminishing Judah's military and economic strength in the late BCE. This vulnerability contributed to Judah's subsequent defensive strategies, including the construction of a fortified city system in the BCE along key border routes leading to , marking the emergence of the kingdom's first organized border defenses amid ongoing regional threats. Regionally, the campaign triggered significant territorial shifts in the , leading to the collapse of early polities in southern and the , as well as an early entity in the central highlands associated with nascent Israelite settlement. According to Israel Finkelstein's analysis, these disruptions dismantled existing territorial formations, paving the way for new polities, such as a reorganized entity in the south and the consolidation of the Northern Kingdom in the highlands and . For , the expedition enhanced Shoshenq I's prestige as the first major pharaonic military venture abroad in centuries, securing substantial tribute that financed extensive domestic construction projects, including expansions at , el-Hibeh, and the First Court at . However, this resurgence proved short-lived; following Shoshenq's reign, Egyptian influence in the declined sharply during the Third Intermediate Period, with no comparable campaigns and increasing political fragmentation that limited further interventions in the region. The incursion also influenced the trajectory of Israelite history by exacerbating the north-south divide that had emerged after Solomon's death, as the heavier impact on allowed the northern territories to stabilize and evolve into a more robust , ultimately facilitating the rise of the Omride dynasty in the BCE. The notable omission of from Shoshenq's Karnak relief list underscores the campaign's selective focus but does not alter its broader destabilizing effects on power structures.

Recent Findings (2020–2025)

Israel Finkelstein's forthcoming study (2023–2025) analyzes recent archaeological surveys and radiocarbon data from the , arguing that Shoshenq I's campaign acted as a catalyst for the collapse of an early territorial entity in southern , leading to its reconfiguration and the rise of a new in the region. This interpretation draws on evidence of disrupted settlement patterns and economic shifts in Moabite territories, highlighting the campaign's broader geopolitical repercussions beyond immediate military targets. A scarab bearing Shoshenq I's name was discovered in 2014 at the copper production site of Khirbet Hamra Ifdan in the Faynan region of southern , in association with industrial remains, suggesting possible Egyptian interest in controlling key metallurgical sites to bolster Egypt's economy. However, recent has questioned the attribution and implications of this artifact for direct Egyptian oversight during his reign. Recent analyses as of 2025 in southern Israel, including the Beersheba Valley and Shephelah, continue to link destruction layers and ceramic transitions from the late Iron I to early Iron II periods to the aftermath of Shoshenq I's raid, suggesting it accelerated shifts toward fortified settlements and altered regional power dynamics into the Iron II period. These interpretations integrate archaeomagnetic and stratigraphic data to connect the campaign's impacts with longer-term developments. Additionally, as of February 2025, discussions persist on chronological discrepancies between Shoshenq I's campaign and the biblical account of Shishak, with some scholars proposing potential misalignments in dating that affect interpretations of the conundrum.

Alternative Theories

Fringe Identifications

One prominent comes from , who in his 1952 book Ages in Chaos identified the biblical Shishak with of Egypt's 18th Dynasty (c. 1479–1425 BCE in conventional ). Velikovsky argued that this aligns the pharaoh's campaigns, as recorded in Egyptian inscriptions at , with the biblical invasion of during Rehoboam's reign, compressing Egyptian history to synchronize it with Israelite events from the BCE. Another alternative identification is proposed by Egyptologist David Rohl in his New Chronology framework, outlined in works like A Test of Time (1995), where Shishak is equated with of the 19th Dynasty (c. 1279–1213 BCE conventionally). Rohl's model lowers Third Intermediate Period dates by approximately 300–350 years to better fit archaeological evidence for the United Monarchy of and , suggesting Ramesses II's extensive Levantine campaigns match the biblical account despite the name discrepancy. Peter James, in collaboration with the Centuries of Darkness project (1991) and later publications such as the edited volume Solomon and (2015), advanced the view that corresponds to of the 20th Dynasty (c. 1186–1155 BCE). This proposal draws on 's documented conflicts with the and his Libyan heritage—mirroring 's reported origins—to explain the campaign's timing amid late collapses, while proposing a 250-year downward shift in . These identifications have faced substantial criticism from Egyptologists for ignoring key , including the phonetic similarity between "Shishak" and Shoshenq I's name, as well as fixed chronological anchors like astronomical observations and synchronisms that anchor the 22nd Dynasty to the BCE. Scholars argue that the proposed shifts disrupt well-established Egyptian king lists and inter-regional historical correlations without sufficient supporting data, rendering the theories untenable.

Chronological Revisionism

Chronological revisionism, particularly as proposed by Egyptologist David Rohl in his New Chronology, seeks to compress the timelines of Egypt's Third Intermediate Period by approximately 350 years, thereby redating the campaigns of pharaohs like to align with a more expansive biblical United Monarchy under . This adjustment positions , traditionally identified with of the 22nd Dynasty in the BCE, as a figure from the earlier New Kingdom, such as of the 19th Dynasty, whose reign would be shifted downward to the mid-10th century BCE to synchronize with Rehoboam's era. Proponents argue that this revision resolves perceived archaeological discrepancies, such as the lack of monumental evidence for a grand Solomonic empire, by placing it contemporaneous with the height of New Kingdom imperial power. However, these theories exhibit significant methodological flaws, including the dismissal of key astronomical and textual anchors in . Revisionists often ignore the , a 1,460-year period based on the of Sirius (Sothis), which provides fixed points for dating reigns, such as the Sothic rising in year 9 of (c. 1541 BCE) and another in year 7 of in the (c. 1842 BCE or 1878 BCE depending on chronology variants). This cycle's reliability is upheld in mainstream as a cornerstone for synchronizing king lists, yet revisionist models reject it without sufficient alternative evidence, leading to ad hoc reinterpretations. Similarly, they overlook synchronisms in ancient king lists, such as the version of preserved by Africanus, which sequences dynasties and overlaps—like the 21st and 22nd Dynasties—essential for establishing relative timelines without drastic compression. Such revisions carry profound implications for biblical history, aiming to substantiate a maximalist view of the by relocating events like Shishak's invasion to an era of Egyptian dominance, thereby implying greater wealth and influence for Solomon's kingdom through ties to pharaohs like . This approach seeks to "prove" the of a vast, prosperous by bridging gaps between sparse and Egypt's well-documented New Kingdom records. Scholarly consensus rejects these revisionist frameworks, bolstered by independent scientific dating methods that affirm the conventional 10th-century BCE placement for Shishak's campaign. Radiocarbon analysis of organic materials from sites like Tel Rehov, linked to destruction layers attributed to the invasion, yields dates clustering around 923 BCE when modeled with Bayesian statistics, supporting the high chronology and historicity of the biblical account in 1 Kings 14:25–26. Complementary evidence from Jerusalem's Iron Age strata, including charred seeds and bones dated to the 12th–10th centuries BCE, confirms urban development and settlement continuity into the period of Rehoboam's reign, without requiring chronological shifts. Dendrochronological sequences from Anatolia and the Levant, developed by Peter Kuniholm and extending over 1,500 years, further anchor the Iron Age to absolute calendar years, cross-dating with Egyptian and biblical timelines to validate the 10th century BCE for events like Shishak's incursion without the need for revisionist adjustments.

Cultural Representations

In Literature and Art

Shishak's portrayal in 19th-century biblical literature often casts him as a powerful and antagonist to the divided kingdoms of and , drawing inspiration from the biblical accounts in 1 Kings 14:25–28 and 2 Chronicles 12:2–9. In historical novels focused on the era following Solomon's death, such as those exploring themes of political intrigue and , Shishak is depicted as leading a massive invasion force that plunders , symbolizing the consequences of Rehoboam's unfaithfulness. Shishak appears in similar fiction as a symbol of foreign threat and imperial ambition, underscoring the fragility of the young Judahite monarchy. In 19th- and , Shishak's campaign is illustrated in biblical engravings and prints that dramatize of . For instance, wood engravings depict Shishak's army approaching the city gates, with soldiers carrying spoils from the and royal , emphasizing and loss described in scripture. These visual representations, common in illustrated Bibles of the period, portray Shishak as a towering figure in , leading chariots and against the fortified walls, to evoke the scale of the and its theological implications. A notable example is the 16th-century "Illustration XXXII: Shishak, King of Egypt invades and loots the treasures of the Lord's and of the King's House (II Chronicles 12)," which captures the moment of plunder with dramatic contrasts of light and shadow. Scholarly representations of Shishak frequently include maps and reconstructions in archaeological literature to visualize his campaign route through . In Kenneth A. Kitchen's The Third Intermediate Period in Egypt (1100–650 B.C.), detailed maps trace the pharaoh's path based on the Karnak temple reliefs, plotting conquered sites from the northward, excluding but aligning with biblical descriptions of the Judahite incursion. These illustrations, often featuring topographic lists and hypothesized itineraries, aid in reconciling records with Hebrew texts, portraying the campaign as a strategic push for tribute and control over trade routes. Similarly, Kitchen's On the Reliability of the incorporates figures and maps that reconstruct the invasion's logistics, highlighting Shishak's forces as a mix of Libyan mercenaries and regulars.

In Film and Media

Shishak, the biblical pharaoh identified with Egypt's , has appeared sparingly in 20th- and 21st-century films, often as a historical reference rather than a central character. In the 1981 adventure film , directed by , archaeologist and his colleague Marcus Brody discuss Shishak's invasion of around 925 BCE, claiming he transported the to the ancient Egyptian city of , where it was hidden in the Well of the Souls. This depiction draws loosely from biblical accounts in 1 Kings 14:25–26 but fabricates the Ark's relocation to Tanis for narrative purposes. Documentaries from the and have featured Shishak more prominently, emphasizing archaeological links to his Temple reliefs. The History Channel's Digging for Truth series, in its 2021 episode "Pharaoh Shishak" (Season 4, Episode 129), explores Shishak's campaign against as described in the , connecting it to Shoshenq I's inscribed victory list at , which details conquests in the but omits . Similarly, the 2022 documentary "Shishak's Invasion of : The Archaeological Evidence" by Bible Archaeology Report examines fortifications at sites like and , attributing them to defensive preparations against Shishak's forces based on 1 Kings 14 and 2 Chronicles 12. These productions use 3D reconstructions of the reliefs to visualize the 's army and tribute-bearing captives, reinforcing the historical correlation between Shishak and Shoshenq I. In video games and animations, Shishak's presence is limited to niche biblical-themed content. The 2022 early-access game Adventures of the Old Testament, an action-adventure title covering Old Testament events, includes animated sequences of Shishak's invasion during the reign of Rehoboam, depicting the sack of Jerusalem and looting of the Temple treasures as per 2 Chronicles 12. No major strategy games like the Civilization series feature Shishak or Shoshenq as a playable leader, though his campaign influences procedural generation of ancient Near Eastern conflicts in some historical simulations. Post-2020 digital media has increasingly debated Shishak's through podcasts and series, often incorporating visual aids. The 2024 episode "(B4) The Untold Story of Shishak's Campaign and 's Role" from the Armstrong Institute series analyzes the omission of from the Karnak inscriptions, using animated maps and CGI reconstructions to argue for a biblical fulfillment in the 's unrecorded southern extension of his route. Likewise, the 2025 short "Uncover the Secrets of Shishak's Conquest!" on the channel employs digital modeling of Egyptian chariots and Judean cities to illustrate the campaign's scale, drawing on recent geomagnetic surveys at sites like for context. These formats prioritize visual storytelling to bridge archaeological evidence with scriptural narratives, appealing to audiences interested in biblical verification.

References

  1. [1]
    Sheshonq I | British Museum
    Details: individual; ruler; royal/imperial; biblical figure; Egyptian; Male ; Life dates: 945BC-924BC ; Biography: 22nd Dynasty ruler of Egypt. Titles/Epithets ( ...
  2. [2]
    The Campaign of Pharaoh Shoshenq I in Palestine | Bible Interp
    Shoshenq's campaign was not as widespread as previously thought. Instead, it focused only on Jerusalem, and Jerusalem itself was not destroyed.
  3. [3]
    Shoshenq I - Oxford Reference
    Egyptian pharaoh, “Great Chief of the Meshwesh Chief of Chiefs,” was the Libyco-Berber founder of the Twenty-Second Dynasty (c. 944–713 BCE) of pharaonic Egypt.Missing: historical credible
  4. [4]
    Did Pharaoh Sheshonq Attack Jerusalem?
    Yigal Levin and most modern scholars believe the Bubastite Portal recounts legitimate and historical campaigns conducted by the Egyptian Pharaoh Sheshonq.
  5. [5]
    UC San Diego-led Team Discovers Scarab from Time of Biblical ...
    Sep 16, 2014 · Most scholars agree that Sheshonq I, the founder of the 22nd Egyptian Dynasty, may be identified with the Pharaoh Shishaq mentioned in the ...
  6. [6]
    https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=1%20Kings%2014%3A25-26&version=ESV
  7. [7]
    Rehoboam, Shishak I (945-924 BC ) Canaan battle relief ... - Bible.ca
    The Bible allows us to set Shishak I into his time slot and dates the invasion to the 5th year of King Rehoboam in 926 BC. "Now it happened in the fifth ...
  8. [8]
    https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=1%20Kings%2014%3A25-28&version=ESV
  9. [9]
    1 Kings 14 Commentary - Precept Austin
    Feb 28, 2025 · ARCHAEOLOGICAL NOTE: Shishak's Invasion of Judah. Shishak's own record of this campaign is inscribed on the south wall of the great Temple ...
  10. [10]
    1 Kings 14:25 Study Bible: It happened in the fifth year of ... - Bible Hub
    The invasion is a precursor to later invasions by other foreign powers, such as the Babylonians, and highlights the theme of divine retribution throughout the ...Missing: analysis | Show results with:analysis
  11. [11]
    (PDF) Shoshenq I and biblical Šîšaq: A philological defense of their ...
    This paper examines this proposed re-identification from a philological perspective, concluding that the proposal to identify biblical Šîšaq with any king ...Missing: credible | Show results with:credible
  12. [12]
    The Name Shishaq: Shoshenq or Shyshu/q? Responding to the ...
    In this article the author re-examines the linguistic arguments raised by a number of critics against the derivation of the biblical name Shishak from ...
  13. [13]
    How Sheshonq Became Shishak - The BAS Library
    So it is no surprise that the Egyptian name Sheshonq became Shishak in the Hebrew Bible. The “n” has simply been dropped. As far as the shift from “q” to “k,” ...Missing: etymology scholarly sources<|control11|><|separator|>
  14. [14]
    Shoshenq I in hieroglyphs - Pharaoh.se
    The hieroglyphs of Shoshenq I, including rare variants, with detailed descriptions of the titles and the sources of the name. Shoshenq I was the first ...Missing: equivalents Hedjkheperre Setepenre transliteration
  15. [15]
    Shishak: An Archaeological Biography
    Jan 24, 2020 · Shishak/Sheshonq I was the first Pharaoh of the 22 nd Dynasty and reigned from approximately 945 to 924 BC.Missing: credible sources
  16. [16]
    Tirhakah: An Archaeological Biography
    Mar 18, 2022 · Tirhakah is identified with Taharqa (ca. 690-664 BC), a king of the 25 th Dynasty of Egypt. The 25 th Dynasty, also known as the Kushite/Nubian Dynasty.Missing: transliterations examples Shoshenq phonetic adaptation
  17. [17]
    Shoshenq I
    ### Summary of Shoshenq I's Background, Origins, Family, Early Career, Marriage, Ascension
  18. [18]
    (PDF) King Shoshenqs at Bubastis - ResearchGate
    Nov 7, 2017 · It even served as the capital or residential city of the Libyan kings of the 22nd dynasty in the 1st mill. BCE (Kitchen, 1996;Lange, 2008; ...Missing: Meshwesh | Show results with:Meshwesh
  19. [19]
    Sheshonq I, Founder of Egypt's 22nd Dynasty - Tour Egypt
    He was noted in the Theban records as "Great Chief of the Meshwesh", who originally were recruited from Libyan tribes as essentially an internal police force.Missing: sources | Show results with:sources
  20. [20]
    Sheshonk I | Pharaoh, Dynasty 22, & Egypt | Britannica
    Sheshonk I was the first king of the 22nd dynasty of ancient Egypt and came from a line of Libyan tribal leaders.Missing: credible | Show results with:credible<|control11|><|separator|>
  21. [21]
    [PDF] decline in ancient egypt? a reassessment of the late
    The late New Kingdom and Third Intermediate Period (1215-650 BC) have been, and continue to be, interpreted as periods of decline and dramatic change within ...
  22. [22]
    Ancient Egypt and the Hebrew Monarchies: A Review Article
    Jan 6, 2020 · The Libyan lineage of Shishak (Shoshenq I) was explicitly treated as foreign, e.g, the Thebans referred to him not as king but merely as 'the ...Missing: transliteration | Show results with:transliteration
  23. [23]
    967 B.C.E.: How the Lynchpin Date for Solomon's Temple Was ...
    Apr 23, 2022 · The widespread use of the date 967 b.c.e. for the building of Solomon's temple might also sound peculiar—not least because remains of the temple ...
  24. [24]
    [PDF] The Reconstructed Chronology of the Egyptian Kings – Volume Two
    ... year of Judah's King Rehoboam and the 20th year of Egypt's King Shoshenq I. ... year was 977 BCE,. 52 years earlier than Thiele's proposed date. But the date ...<|separator|>
  25. [25]
    (PDF) Shoshenq I and the Levant: Synchronising Chronologies
    The paper reveals that many scholars are increasingly uncertain about identifying Shoshenq I with Shishak, complicating archaeological interpretations of the ...
  26. [26]
    14C dates from Tel Rehov: Iron-Age chronology, pharaohs, and ...
    The list of places raided by Shoshenq, mentioned at Karnak (Egypt), includes Rehov (Israel). The site yielded a consistent series of radiocarbon dates from the ...
  27. [27]
    The Sheshonq I Campaign and the 8th Century BCE | Request PDF
    Aug 6, 2025 · ... This event is commonly dated to around 925 BCE, although difficulties with the biblical background for this date and insecurities regarding ...<|separator|>
  28. [28]
    None
    Nothing is retrieved...<|separator|>
  29. [29]
    [PDF] Multiplicity of Shoshenqs in the Early Twenty-second Dynasty A ...
    Shoshenq I both with Psusennes II (whose daughter later married the son and successor of Shoshenq I, Osorkon I), and with the two localities: Thebes as the ...
  30. [30]
    None
    Nothing is retrieved...<|separator|>
  31. [31]
    The House of Shoshenq - Cairo Scholarship Online
    The Twenty-second Dynasty. Examines a possible coregency of Shoshenq I with Pasebkhanut II; Iuput, the last in a succession of Theban pontiffs; funereal ...
  32. [32]
    Temple Building of the Twenty-Second to Twenty-Fourth Dynasty
    Aug 31, 2019 · At Tanis, Shoshenq III built a new western gateway for the Great Temple of Amun. This was a large pylon gateway of granite built through the ...
  33. [33]
    [PDF] The Third Intermediate Period in Egypt (1076–664 bce) has been ...
    The Third Intermediate Period in Egypt (1076–664 bce) has been characterised previously by political and social changes based upon the introduction of Libyan.
  34. [34]
    https://cairo.universitypressscholarship.com/view/10.5743/cairo/9789774165313.001.0001/upso-9789774165313-chapter-4
  35. [35]
    [PDF] A stylistic comparison of selected visual representations on Egyptian ...
    While the dominance of the cult of Amun-Re seems to have remained undisputed in the 21st Dynasty, the following period of Libyan rule saw it progressively ...
  36. [36]
    [PDF] A re-examination in the light of the royal ideology in the ancient near ...
    Son of Re, of his body: Shoshenq, beloved of Amun. ... He argued that there is no evidence of raising the deceased kings to the divine level in the cult of El or ...
  37. [37]
    https://brill.com/view/journals/jaa/23/1/article-p53_4.xml
  38. [38]
    Bible Gateway passage: 1 Kings 14:25-26 - New International Version
    ### Extracted Verses on Shishak's Invasion
  39. [39]
    Bible Gateway passage: 2 Chronicles 12:1-12 - New International Version
    ### Summary of 2 Chronicles 12:1-12 (NIV)
  40. [40]
    2 Chronicles 12:1-16 - Invasion of Shishak - Bible Outlines
    The Chronicler understands Shishak's invasion of Judah as punishment for sin, in that Rehoboam and all Israel have “abandoned the law of the LORD” (12:1).
  41. [41]
    https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=1%20Kings%2014%3A25-26&version=NIV
  42. [42]
    https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=2%20Chronicles%2012%3A1-12&version=NIV
  43. [43]
    https://www.bibleoutlines.com/2-chronicles-121-16-invasion-of-shishak-tarnishing-the-kingdom-from-gold-to-bronze/
  44. [44]
    https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=2%20Chronicles%2012%3A2-4&version=NIV
  45. [45]
    https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=2%20Chronicles%2012%3A3&version=NIV
  46. [46]
    https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=2%20Chronicles%2012%3A9-11&version=NIV
  47. [47]
    https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=1%20Kings%2014%3A26&version=NIV
  48. [48]
    Bible Gateway passage: 1 Kings 11:40 - New International Version
    - **Verse Text**: "Solomon tried to kill Jeroboam, but Jeroboam fled to Egypt, to Shishak the king, and stayed there until Solomon’s death." (1 Kings 11:40, NIV)
  49. [49]
    [PDF] reliefs and inscriptions at karnak
    NOTES ON THE DATE AND CONSTRUCTION OF THE PORTAl. The Bubastite Portal was built by Shoshenq I, for his original reliefs are the earliest ones upon it ...<|separator|>
  50. [50]
    [PDF] The Beth Shean Valley and its Vicinity in the 10th Century b.c.e.
    This article brings together results of archaeological explorations related to the. 10th century BCE in the Beth Shean Valley, with emphasis on the excavations.Missing: Rehob artifacts
  51. [51]
    (PDF) A Newly Discovered Scarab of Sheshonq I: Recent Iron Age ...
    The scarab bearing Sheshonq I's name is a rare epigraphic find from Iron Age Jordan. Excavations reveal copper production activities at Khirbat Hamra Ifdan ...Missing: Shoshenq | Show results with:Shoshenq
  52. [52]
    Finkelstein, I. (forthcoming). The Impact of the Sheshonq I Campaign ...
    The campaign was a game changer in the territorial history of the region: It brought about the collapse of an early territorial entity in southern Moab.
  53. [53]
    Reconstructing biblical military campaigns using geomagnetic field ...
    Oct 24, 2022 · The excavator of the site suggested that Beth-Shean had been destroyed by either Pharaoh Shoshenq I (biblical Shishak) in ca. 920 BCE or by ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  54. [54]
    Old testament battles confirmed in new study – DW – 10/31/2022
    Oct 31, 2022 · ... campaign into the Kingdom of Judah led by Hazael, King of Aram Damascus. Vaknin took samples of bricks from Tel Beth-Shean that were burned ...
  55. [55]
    https://www.academia.edu/8470122/A_Newly_Discovered_Scarab_of_Sheshonq_I_Recent_Iron_Age_Explorations_in_southern_Jordan
  56. [56]
    https://www.academia.edu/69280467/Finkelstein_I_forthcoming_The_Impact_of_the_Sheshonq_I_Campaign_on_the_Territorial_History_of_the_Levant_An_Update
  57. [57]
    (PDF) Did Pharaoh Sheshonq Attack Jerusalem? - Academia.edu
    Jerusalem's absence from the Bubastite Portal raises questions about Sheshonq's intentions and recorded victories. Scholars debate whether Sheshonq's campaign ...
  58. [58]
    Bubastite Portal Rows II and V as Indication of a Change of Plan by ...
    The text examines Jerusalem's absence on the Bubastite Portal as a significant historical inquiry. Shoshenq I's reign is dated to the mid-940s BCE, impacting ...
  59. [59]
    [PDF] ancient egyptian coregencies
    might indeed refer to the transfer of royal power to the new dynasty following the extinction of the Eleventh Dy- nasty ruling house, it might also allude ...
  60. [60]
    Shishak and Shoshenq: A Disambiguation - jstor
    biblical Egyptian King Shishak is to be distinguished from the historical Egyptian. King Shoshenq I, who is now to be situated about a century later in the ...
  61. [61]
    The Early Kingdom of Judah in Light of Radiometric Dating
    Dec 1, 2024 · The pattern that we observe includes fortified cities on the borders in locations where major routes led to Jerusalem. The ninth century BC is ...Missing: impact 9th
  62. [62]
    Immanuel Velikovsky and the History of Israel - Dr. Claude Mariottini
    Aug 20, 2009 · ... Thutmose III (not Thutmose I) was the biblical Shishak. On pages 103-104 Velikovsky discusses the Egyptian princess who became a wife of Solomon ...
  63. [63]
    Was Ramesses II Shishak? | ArmstrongInstitute.org
    For these reasons, Prof. Kenneth Kitchen prefers to render the biblical name Shishak as Shushaq (On the Reliability of the Old Testament).Missing: etymology sources
  64. [64]
    [PDF] The Levantine War-Records of Ramesses III - Centuries of Darkness
    Jun 12, 2018 · It was apparently in Danite territory, close to both the borders of Judah and Philistia. It may well be the same as the above mentioned Ir ...
  65. [65]
    David Rohl's Revised Egyptian Chronology: A View From Palestine
    Feb 23, 2002 · Late Bronze IIB is contemporary with the early Divided Monarchy, with Ramesses II being the Shishak of the Bible (149-70, 175). The Iron Age ...
  66. [66]
    [PDF] Was Thutmose III the biblical Shishak?— Claims for the 'Jerusalem ...
    Some brief observations follow which further undermine the Velikovskian claim that this bas-relief is proof that Thutmose III was the biblical Shishak.Missing: criticism | Show results with:criticism
  67. [67]
    [PDF] SHORT CRITIQUE - Dr Leslie McFall
    Rohl has no pharaoh called Shishak in his New Chronology who would answer to the biblical Shishak at this point in Hebrew history. This is a serious defect.
  68. [68]
    https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/reevaluating-shoshenq-i-shishak-jerusalem-conundrum-paul-r-e-jarvis-yqhze
  69. [69]
    [PDF] Sothic dating of the Egyptian Middle Kingdom - Douglas J. Keenan
    The chronology of dynastic Egypt is commonly divided into eight periods: the Early. Period, Old Kingdom, First Intermediate Period, Middle Kingdom, Second ...
  70. [70]
    The king lists of Manetho - Pharaoh.se
    The traditional dynasties of Manetho used in conjunction with the existing archaeological records, provide Egyptology with the basic chronology of ancient Egypt ...Epitomes · Transmission Of Manetho · Pseudo-ManethoMissing: revisionism | Show results with:revisionism<|separator|>
  71. [71]
    The Bible and Radiocarbon Dating: Archaeology, Text and Science
    Jan 27, 2016 · The book examines the dating of sites across the East Mediterranean, Jordon and Israel to test hypotheses concerning the historicity of the Old Testament.
  72. [72]
    https://biblearchaeology.org/research/conquest-of-canaan/3196-david-rohls-revised-egyptian-chronology-a-view-from-palestine
  73. [73]
    Anatolian Tree Rings and the Absolute Chronology of the Eastern ...
    Aug 9, 2025 · One such floating dendrochronology of 1,503 years includes samples relating to known rulers, sites and cultures of the ancient eastern ...
  74. [74]
    Illustration XXXII: Shishak, King of Egypt invades Jerusalem and ...
    Shishak, King of Egypt invades Jerusalem and loots the treasures of the Lord's Temple and of the King's House (II Chronicles 12)Missing: literature | Show results with:literature
  75. [75]
    On the Reliability of the Old Testament: Kitchen, K. A. - Amazon.com
    In a detailed, comprehensive, and entertaining manner, Kitchen draws on an unprecedented range of historical data from the ancient Near East -- the Bible's own ...
  76. [76]
    Topical Bible: Invasion by Shishak of Egypt
    The invasion by Shishak serves as a poignant reminder of the consequences of turning away from God's commandments and the importance of humility and repentance ...Missing: symbolism Jewish art
  77. [77]
    Indiana Jones True Story: Ark of the Covenant True History Explained
    Apr 17, 2021 · In Raiders, the key to finding the Ark was the lost city of Tanis, where the Egyptian Pharaoh Shishak brought the powerful artifact after ...<|separator|>
  78. [78]
    Raiders of the Lost Ark: The Well of Souls - Shmoop
    The Bible mentions Shishak, but his stealing of the Ark is a fabrication. The Well of Souls is a space that makes no ecological sense if you think about it ...
  79. [79]
    Pharaoh Shishak: Digging for Truth Episode 129
    Oct 17, 2022 · Bryan Windle will be on the program to talk about Pharaoh Shishak of Egypt. In I Kings 14, the biblical text claims that Shishak attacked ...Missing: 2010s 2020s
  80. [80]
    Shishak's Invasion of Judah: The Archaeological Evidence - YouTube
    Feb 22, 2022 · The Bible mentions that Shishak of Egypt invaded Judah, conquering towns and exacting tribute from Solomon's son Rehoboam.
  81. [81]
    Adventures of the Old Testament - The Bible Video Game - YouTube
    Sep 22, 2022 · Please note this is an early release/unfinished version of this game. This game will have constant free updates including new animations of ...
  82. [82]
    (B4) The Untold Story of Shishak's Campaign and Jerusalem's Role ...
    Feb 22, 2024 · Part B: The Untold Stories of Ancient Jerusalem The military campaign conducted by Shishak in the Land of Israel is the earliest historical ...Missing: 2010s 2020s
  83. [83]
    Uncover the Secrets of Pharaoh Shishak's Conquest! - YouTube
    Apr 15, 2025 · #documentary #translation #biblehistory #PharaohShishak #AncientHistory #Archaeology #BiblicalHistory #MilitaryCampaign #Egyptology # ...