Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Smoke-developed index

The Smoke-Developed Index (SDI) is a dimensionless, comparative measure that quantifies the density and obscuration of smoke produced by building materials during controlled fire exposure, serving as a key indicator of fire safety performance in construction applications.^[1] Developed as part of the ASTM E84 standard test method, the SDI evaluates smoke emissions relative to reference materials like red oak flooring (assigned an SDI of 100) and inorganic reinforced cement board (assigned an SDI of 0), providing a standardized metric for assessing potential hazards in enclosed spaces.^[2] The SDI is determined through the Steiner Tunnel test outlined in ASTM E84, where a 24-foot-long (7.32 m) specimen of the material is mounted face-down in a test chamber and exposed to a gas flame ignition source for 10 minutes under controlled airflow conditions.^[1] Smoke produced travels through a vent pipe, where its obscuration is continuously measured using a photometer system consisting of a light source and photocell; the total smoke area under the obscuration-time curve is then integrated and normalized to yield the SDI value, which is reported as a rounded number without direct correlation to flame spread behavior.^[2] This method emphasizes relative performance rather than absolute smoke toxicity or heat release, and results can vary based on specimen support, with lower indices possible for materials that melt, drip, or delaminate during testing.^[1] In building regulations such as the International Building Code, the SDI is used alongside the Flame Spread Index to classify interior wall and ceiling finishes, with a maximum allowable value of 450 for most applications in Classes A, B, and C materials to limit smoke propagation in fire scenarios.^[2] This threshold helps architects, engineers, and code officials select compliant materials for high-risk areas like plenums and corridors, reducing visibility obstruction and inhalation risks during evacuations, though the test's limitations—such as its focus on early-stage smoke rather than full-scale fire dynamics—have prompted supplementary standards like ASTM E2768 for more realistic assessments.^[2]

Overview

Definition

The Smoke Developed Index (SDI) is a relative measure of the visible smoke production from a burning material, quantified by the degree of light obscuration caused by smoke particles in a controlled test environment during exposure to a standardized fire.^[2] This index forms a key component of surface burning characteristics testing under the ASTM E84 standard, which evaluates building materials' fire response.^[1] Values are reported on an arbitrary scale calibrated such that inorganic reinforced cement board, producing minimal smoke, is rated at 0, while red oak flooring serves as the reference standard at 100; materials generating substantially more smoke may yield indices exceeding 100.^[3] Unlike the Flame Spread Index, which assesses flame propagation speed, or smoke toxicity evaluations that focus on chemical hazards, the SDI specifically gauges the density of visible smoke output.^[2]^[4]

Purpose

The smoke-developed index serves to assess the potential of building materials to produce obscuring smoke during combustion, which significantly impairs visibility and hinders occupant evacuation in fire scenarios. By quantifying the density of smoke generated relative to reference materials, this index evaluates how materials contribute to reduced sightlines, making it difficult for individuals to locate exits or navigate safely amid a fire.^[5]^[1] This measurement aids in classifying materials for interior applications in buildings, enabling the selection of those that minimize smoke propagation and thereby support safer environments. It complements assessments of flame spread by addressing the distinct hazard of smoke accumulation, which can spread independently and exacerbate fire risks even if flames are contained.^[1]^[4] By prioritizing smoke production as a key factor, the index directly contributes to life safety strategies, recognizing that smoke inhalation accounts for the majority of fire fatalities—often through rapid incapacitation—rather than direct exposure to heat or isolated toxic effects.^[5] It is integrated into building codes to regulate interior finishes and limit overall smoke hazards in occupied spaces.^[6]

Historical Development

Origins of ASTM E84

The ASTM E84 standard, which generates the smoke-developed index, traces its origins to 1944 when Albert J. (A.J.) Steiner, an engineer at Underwriters Laboratories (UL), and S.H. Ingberg at the National Bureau of Standards (NBS) developed the foundational test method amid a pressing demand for standardized fire safety evaluations in building materials. This innovation responded to deadly fires in the early 1940s, such as the 1942 Cocoanut Grove nightclub fire, amid growing concerns about fire propagation and smoke production from interior finishes, including emerging synthetic materials. Steiner's work at UL aimed to provide a reliable, repeatable assessment of how surfaces contribute to fire hazards, addressing gaps in earlier, less consistent testing protocols from the 1920s and 1930s.^[7]^[8] Initially designated the Steiner Tunnel Test, the method was engineered to replicate the dynamics of flame and smoke movement across building material surfaces under controlled exposure to a gas flame, offering a simulated corridor-like environment for evaluation. This design focused on measuring both flame spread and smoke obscuration, with the smoke-developed index derived from light attenuation data collected during the 10-minute test duration. The test's apparatus—a 25-foot (7.6-meter) steel tunnel lined with firebrick—became a benchmark for comparative analysis, prioritizing practical simulation over complex theoretical modeling to support immediate regulatory needs.^[7]^[9] By 1950, the Steiner Tunnel Test was formally adopted by the American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) as E84, marking its transition from a UL-specific procedure to a broader industry standard. The National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) followed suit in 1955, incorporating it as NFPA 255, which paralleled UL's UL 723 equivalent. This early integration facilitated its inclusion in nascent building codes during the 1950s, such as those influencing interior finish requirements, thereby embedding the smoke-developed index into fire safety frameworks across North America.^[10]^[3]

Evolution of the Standard

The Steiner tunnel test, originally developed in 1944 by A. J. Steiner at Underwriters Laboratories following major fire incidents like the Cocoanut Grove fire, laid the groundwork for standardized surface burning assessments.^[11] This method was formally adopted as ASTM E84 in 1950, marking its acceptance as a key standard for evaluating flame spread and smoke development in building materials, with initial refinements emphasizing test consistency and calibration to ensure reliable comparative data. In the 1970s, the standard underwent significant updates to enhance the accuracy of smoke density measurements within the smoke-developed index, particularly in response to concerns over cellular plastics' flammability and the need for more precise optical readings during testing. These changes improved the reliability of smoke obscuration data, addressing early limitations in detecting low-level smoke production. The 1980s and 1990s brought further advancements through interlaboratory studies that refined calibration procedures for light sources and detectors, significantly reducing variability in smoke-developed index results across different testing facilities. These updates, informed by collaborative research, minimized discrepancies in optical density measurements and standardized protocols for consistent reporting. Revisions in the 2000s focused on mitigating persistent variability in test outcomes by incorporating detailed guidelines for specimen preparation and environmental controls, ensuring more reproducible smoke development evaluations. By the 2022 edition (ASTM E84-22), the standard introduced explicit provisions for distinguishing between adhered and unadhered materials—recognizing how substrate support affects smoke production—and advanced harmonization with international standards like ISO 5659-2:2017 for smoke optical density testing, promoting global interoperability.^[1]

Testing and Measurement

The Steiner Tunnel Test

The Steiner Tunnel Test, standardized under ASTM E84, is a bench-scale fire test designed to evaluate the surface burning characteristics of building materials by simulating flame spread and smoke production in a controlled environment. Developed in 1944 by Albert J. Steiner at Underwriters Laboratories in response to major fire incidents like the Cocoanut Grove nightclub fire, the test apparatus consists of a steel tunnel measuring 25 feet (7.6 m) in length, 18 inches (46 cm) in width, and 12 inches (30 cm) in height, providing an insulated chamber for consistent testing conditions.^[11]^[12] The test begins with sample preparation, where a representative specimen of the building material—nominal 24 feet (7.32 m) long by 20 inches (508 mm) wide, trimmed to fit the tunnel—is conditioned to equilibrium at 23°C (73°F) and 50% relative humidity for at least 48 hours. The sample is then mounted upside down on the ceiling of the tunnel using a removable lid to secure it in place, mimicking the orientation of interior finishes like wall or ceiling coverings; for composite or adhered materials, additional fastening methods such as mechanical fasteners or adhesives may be employed to replicate end-use installation.^[12]^[13]^[14] Once installed, the tunnel is sealed, and a regulated airflow of approximately 240 linear feet per minute is established using exhaust fans at the far end to draw air through the chamber, creating a consistent ventilation rate that influences combustion and smoke transport. Two gas burners, positioned at the ignition end and delivering a nominal heat output of about 88 kW from methane flames spaced 8 inches apart, expose the sample to a controlled ignition source directed upward toward the ceiling-mounted specimen for a duration of 10 minutes. During this exposure, flame progression is visually observed through side viewports, marking the advancement of the flame front along the sample length at timed intervals to assess spread rate.^[15]^[13] Concurrently, smoke generated by the burning sample is drawn into an exhaust collection chamber connected to the tunnel's outlet, where it passes through a photometer system equipped with photocells and a light source. The photocells continuously monitor the transmission of light through the smoke-laden air, recording the percentage of obscuration over time to quantify smoke density and total smoke development; this optical measurement captures the attenuation caused by particulate matter in the effluent stream, providing data on the material's smoke-producing potential. After the 10-minute exposure, the burners are extinguished, and the system runs for an additional period to clear residual smoke, ensuring complete data collection before the tunnel is vented and prepared for the next test.^[12]^[13]

Calculation of the Index

The smoke developed index (SDI) quantifies the smoke production of a building material relative to standard references during the ASTM E84 test, which measures light obscuration over a 10-minute exposure period. Smoke density is assessed using a photocell positioned in the exhaust chamber to detect the percentage of light blockage caused by smoke particles. This data is plotted as light obscuration percentage against time, capturing both peak smoke density and the duration of smoke release to provide a comprehensive measure of obscuration.^[2] The SDI is computed by determining the total area under the smoke density curve for the test specimen and normalizing it against the corresponding area for liquid heptane, which serves as the reference material assigned an SDI of 100 (replacing red oak calibration in the 2021 revision of ASTM E84 for improved consistency), while fiber cement board is assigned 0 to represent negligible smoke production. This normalization process ensures comparability across materials by scaling the test results to established benchmarks. The calculation accounts for the integrated smoke output over the full test duration, emphasizing sustained production rather than isolated peaks.^[16]^[17] The precise formula for the SDI is given by:

\text{SDI} = \left( \frac{A_{\text{test}}}{A_{\text{heptane}}} \right) \times 100

where A_{\text{test}} is the area under the smoke density curve for the test material, and A_{\text{heptane}} is the area under the curve for the heptane standard. Values are typically rounded to the nearest multiple of 5 for SDI below 200 and to the nearest multiple of 50 above 200, though the core computation remains uncapped. In practice, the test is calibrated using consistent reference runs to ensure reproducibility, with heptane providing the primary scaling for SDI and red oak for the flame spread index.^[18]^[19]

Ratings and Classifications

Standard Ratings

The smoke-developed index (SDI) in ASTM E84 testing establishes numerical thresholds that classify materials based on their smoke production during a standardized fire exposure, guiding fire safety compliance for building interiors. For most interior wall and ceiling finishes, model building codes such as the International Fire Code permit an SDI of 450 or less, allowing materials to qualify for general use without excessive smoke hazard in occupied spaces.^[20]^[21] In more critical areas, stricter limits apply to prevent smoke accumulation in ventilation systems. Plenum spaces and air-handling areas require materials with an SDI of 50 or less, as specified in standards like NFPA 90A, to minimize smoke propagation through HVAC ducts and ensure safer air circulation during fires.^[22]^[23] These ratings vary by material type, with non-combustible substances like fiber-cement board achieving values near 0, serving as the test baseline for minimal smoke development.^[24] Among combustible woods, low-smoke examples include Western Larch with an SDI of 20, while higher values occur in species like Ponderosa Pine at 135, illustrating natural variations in wood performance under the test.^[25]^[26] Such SDI thresholds are typically evaluated in combination with flame spread indices to assign overall Class A, B, or C fire ratings.

Relation to Flame Spread Index

The smoke-developed index (SDI) and flame spread index (FSI) are both derived from the ASTM E84 standard test method for surface burning characteristics of building materials, which evaluates a material's response to fire exposure in a controlled tunnel apparatus.^[1] These indices are used together to classify materials into fire performance categories that inform their suitability for various building applications.^[2] Material classifications under ASTM E84 integrate both metrics as follows: Class A requires an FSI of 0-25 and SDI of 0-450; Class B requires an FSI of 26-75 and SDI of 0-450; and Class C requires an FSI of 76-200 and SDI of 0-450.^[2] The SDI complements the FSI by quantifying the potential smoke hazard from a burning material, whereas the FSI measures the rate of flame propagation across the surface, together providing a balanced evaluation of overall fire safety risks such as visibility obstruction and toxicity in fire scenarios.^[2] In practice, a high SDI can disqualify a material from higher classifications even if its FSI is low; for example, in exit access corridors where building codes like the International Building Code mandate Class A materials for certain occupancies, an SDI exceeding 450 would prevent approval despite a favorable FSI.^[27] This interplay ensures that materials selected for critical areas address both flame growth and smoke production comprehensively.^[28]

Applications and Regulations

In Building Codes

The International Building Code (IBC), in Section 803, establishes requirements for the fire performance and smoke development of interior wall and ceiling finishes, mandating a maximum smoke-developed index (SDI) of 450 for materials classified as Class A, B, or C in most occupancy types and locations, such as rooms, corridors, and exit enclosures.^[28] This threshold applies broadly to ensure controlled smoke propagation during fire events, with stricter classifications (e.g., Class A) required in high-hazard areas like exit stairways and ramps. Compliance is verified through testing per ASTM E84 or equivalent standards, integrating the SDI directly into occupancy-specific tables for finish selection.^[29] The NFPA 101 Life Safety Code incorporates SDI limits within its interior finish classifications for enhanced occupant safety, requiring Class A or B materials—both with SDI values not exceeding 450—in exit enclosures, exit access corridors, and high-risk occupancies such as assembly or institutional spaces. For air-handling plenums, NFPA 90A imposes a more stringent limit of SDI ≤50 for materials exposed to airflow, alongside a flame spread index of ≤25, to minimize smoke contribution to HVAC system spread in ventilation spaces. These provisions align with the code's focus on life safety by limiting smoke obscuration in critical egress paths. Pre-1997 editions of the Uniform Building Code (UBC), a predecessor model code, similarly restricted SDI to 450 or less for interior wall and ceiling finishes in comparable applications, reflecting consistent regulatory evolution toward smoke control.^[25] Internationally, Eurocodes adapt SDI-like metrics through reaction-to-fire classifications under EN 13501-1, which evaluate smoke production (e.g., s1 for low smoke) in building product standards to meet equivalent safety objectives in European regulations.^[30] These requirements tie into standard Class A/B/C ratings, emphasizing SDI as a key compliance parameter without altering core numerical thresholds.^[28]

Use in Material Selection

The smoke-developed index (SDI) plays a pivotal role in selecting interior finishes for buildings, particularly in areas requiring high visibility during emergencies, such as escape routes, corridors, and stairwells. Materials like wood paneling, plastic laminates, and paints are evaluated using ASTM E84 to ensure their SDI does not exceed limits that could obscure evacuation paths with excessive smoke; for instance, most wood species, including alder (SDI 165) and red oak (SDI 100), naturally achieve SDI values well below the typical maximum of 450, allowing their use in Class B or C classifications for interior walls and ceilings where moderate smoke control is needed.^[31] Similarly, low-VOC paints and fire-retardant coatings on plastics are chosen to maintain SDI under 450, prioritizing formulations that minimize smoke opacity to support safe egress by preserving line-of-sight distances.^[2] In HVAC systems and plenum spaces, the SDI is essential for choosing insulation and duct materials that limit smoke propagation through air-handling pathways, which could otherwise distribute hazardous smoke to occupied areas. Fiberglass composites and closed-cell foams engineered for low smoke emission, such as those with SDI values below 50, are preferred for duct linings and pipe insulation to comply with requirements preventing smoke spread via ventilation networks; for example, certain phenolic foam insulations achieve SDI ratings of 0-25, significantly reducing smoke density compared to red oak's baseline of 100.^[32] These selections are critical in plenums, where oxygen-rich environments amplify fire risks, ensuring materials like faced batt insulations do not contribute to rapid smoke buildup in return air paths.^[33] The SDI directly influences product labeling and third-party certifications, enabling manufacturers to market materials as suitable for fire-safe applications. Underwriters Laboratories (UL) listings, based on ASTM E84 or equivalent UL 723 testing, verify SDI performance for items like acoustic panels and wiring insulation, with labels indicating compliance (e.g., "25/50 rated" for flame spread ≤25 and SDI ≤50) to guide architects and builders in specifying low-smoke options.^[32] Such certifications streamline material approval processes, as seen in UL's database for plenum-rated composites that meet SDI thresholds for enhanced safety in commercial interiors.

Limitations and Alternatives

Criticisms of the Test

The Steiner Tunnel Test, upon which the smoke-developed index is based, originates from a 1944 design developed by Underwriters Laboratories that predates the widespread use of modern synthetic materials, such as polymer composites and non-homogeneous assemblies commonly found in contemporary construction.^[34] This outdated methodology fails to adequately replicate real-world fire behaviors for these advanced materials, often resulting in inconsistent and non-representative smoke obscuration measurements, particularly for layered or composite samples where smoke production can vary unpredictably due to differing decomposition patterns. Although the smoke-developed index quantifies total smoke obscuration through optical density in the exhaust stream, it does not evaluate the chemical toxicity of the smoke, such as concentrations of carbon monoxide (CO) or hydrogen cyanide (HCN), which are primary causes of fire-related fatalities and pose greater risks to occupants than reduced visibility alone.^[35] Studies have highlighted that this omission limits the index's utility in assessing overall fire hazard, as toxic gas yields can differ significantly from obscuration levels across material types.^[36] The test's large-scale tunnel apparatus, as specified in ASTM E84, demands substantial resources for setup, operation, and calibration, while introducing variability from procedural factors like sample mounting—whether adhered directly to the tunnel ceiling or supported on spacers—which can alter smoke release patterns and lead to non-reproducible results.^[37] This inherent variability undermines the reliability of the smoke-developed index for comparative assessments, especially in regulatory contexts.^[34]

Modern Testing Methods

Modern testing methods for assessing smoke production in fire safety have advanced beyond traditional large-scale evaluations, incorporating bench-scale and intermediate-scale tests that offer more detailed, material-specific insights into heat release, smoke yield, and toxicity. These approaches utilize controlled radiant heating and gas analysis to quantify dynamic smoke parameters, enabling better predictions of fire behavior in realistic environments and supplementing indices like the smoke-developed index (SDI) derived from ASTM E84.^[38] The Cone Calorimeter, standardized under ASTM E1354 and ISO 5660-1, evaluates the fire response of small material samples (typically 100 mm × 100 mm) exposed to a controlled radiant heat flux ranging from 0 to 100 kW/m². It measures key parameters including heat release rate via oxygen consumption calorimetry, mass loss rate, and dynamic smoke production rate through light obscuration in the exhaust duct, yielding specific smoke extinction area (m²/kg) and total smoke release (m²). This bench-scale method provides granular, material-intrinsic data that correlates with full-scale smoke yields, allowing for early-stage screening and modeling of smoke development without the variability of large-scale tests like the Steiner Tunnel.^[38] For instance, studies have shown strong correlations between Cone Calorimeter smoke indices and room fire smoke production rates for wood products, enhancing its utility in material selection.^[39] The ISO 9705 Room/Corner Test serves as an intermediate-scale assessment simulating fire growth in a furnished room, using a 3.6 m × 2.4 m × 2.4 m enclosure with a gas burner igniting wall and ceiling linings. It quantifies heat release rate and smoke production rate over time, capturing smoke yield under well-ventilated, post-flashover conditions that reflect realistic building fire scenarios, such as those not fully replicated in linear tunnel tests. Smoke is measured via exhaust duct photometry, providing total smoke release and production rate curves that address limitations in scalability and ventilation effects of older methods. This test has been instrumental in validating smoke predictions, with empirical models linking its results to full-scale fire risks for lining materials. Standards such as ASTM E1678 focus on smoke toxicity, determining the lethal toxic potency (LC50) of combustion products from materials exposed to flaming or non-flaming conditions in a bench-scale apparatus. It involves generating smoke in a closed chamber, analyzing effluent gases (e.g., CO, HCN, HCl), and exposing rats to quantify time-to-incapacitation or lethality, yielding a toxicity index for fire hazard analysis. This complements traditional smoke obscuration metrics like SDI by incorporating physiological impacts, aiding in holistic assessments for occupant safety in enclosed spaces.^[40] The method supports performance-based design, with applications in transportation and building materials where toxic smoke poses significant risks beyond mere visibility reduction.^[41]

References

[1]
E84 Standard Test Method for Surface Burning Characteristics of ...
Feb 10, 2023 · 1.3 The purpose of this test method is to determine the relative burning behavior of the material by observing the flame spread along the ...
[2]
ASTM E84: Standard Test Method for Surface Burning ... - Intertek
The Smoke Developed Index (SDI) is calculated with data recorded from a photo meter system that consists of a light source, photocell and specialize electronic ...
[3]
Demystifying ASTM E84 25/50, UL 723 and NFPA 255 | Aeroflex USA
Oct 20, 2020 · The flame spread and smoke developed index results are reported on a scale from 0 (cement board) and 100 (red oak). The flame spread index ...
[4]
ASTM E84-23: Surface Burning Of Building Materials - The ANSI Blog
Smoke developed index: a comparative measure derived from smoke obscuration data collected during the test for surface burning characteristics. How ...
[5]
Reporter's Guide: The consequences of fire - NFPA
Most fire deaths are not caused by burns, but by smoke inhalation. Often smoke incapacitates so quickly that people are overcome and can't make it to an ...Missing: primary | Show results with:primary
[6]
CHAPTER 8 INTERIOR FINISHES - ICC Digital Codes
Chapter 8 contains the performance requirements for controlling fire growth and smoke propagation within buildings by restricting interior finish and ...
[7]
What You Need to Know about the Steiner Tunnel - UL Solutions
Since the 1940s, the 25-foot test tunnel, known as the Steiner Tunnel, has been one of the prevailing reaction to fire test methods for assessing the surface ...
[8]
ASTM E84 Testing | SwRI
ASTM E84 testing ensures building materials comply with fire safety standards under the International Building Code (IBC), International Fire Code (IFC) and ...Missing: fatalities | Show results with:fatalities
[9]
The Origins of the ASTM E84 Fire Test
Jan 3, 2024 · ASTM E84, also commonly referred to as the “tunnel test.” It’s used to evaluate the flame spread characteristics of surface materials along with the smoke ...Missing: obscuration fatalities
[10]
[PDF] BUILDING & CONSTRUCTION INFORMATIONAL BULLETIN - Intertek
The Steiner Tunnel was adopted as an ASTM Standard in 1950 and given the designation of E84. Equivalent standards are maintained by NFPA and UL as NFPA 255, UL ...
[11]
[PDF] A history of fire testing - NIST Technical Series Publications
became an Underwriters' Laboratory test method in 1944 and also became ASTM E84 ... Figure 3 Photograph of Tunnel Test Apparatus, ASTM E84, NFPA 255, & UL 723.
[12]
[PDF] Surface Flammability Measurements for Building Materials and ...
The Steiner or 25-ft tunnel furnace method (ASTM Standard E84-70), as developed by the Underwriters' Laboratories, has the widest acceptance by code and ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[13]
ASTM E84 Tunnel Test - Commercial Testing Company
The surface burning data points and light obscuration data points are recorded and used to calculate the Flame-Spread Index (FSI) and Smoke-Developed Index (SDI) ...
[14]
Steiner Tunnel Withstands the Test of Time - Fire Safety Search
Oct 6, 2021 · The Steiner Tunnel test method, as described in UL 723 and ASTM E84, is one of the most popular “reaction to fire” test methods within the US.
[15]
[PDF] HPVA LABORATORIES ASTM E84 Test Method Spectra-Glaze II
ASTM E84 ... area under the curve relative to the standard red oak curve area. ... The value of smoke developed is derived by calculating the net area under the ...
[16]
[PDF] ASTM E84 Test Report Template - Fabritrak
Aug 31, 2017 · The Flame Spread Index (FSI) and the Smoke Developed Index (SDI) are based on an area under the curve calculation and the red oak flooring ...
[17]
Where There's Smoke... - Intertek
Sep 26, 2017 · ASTM E84 (E84) is one of the most frequently specified test methods used to evaluate surface burning behavior of building products and ...
[18]
2021 International Fire Code (IFC) - 803.1.2 Interior wall and ceiling ...
803.1.2 Interior wall and ceiling finish materials tested in accordance with ASTM E84 or UL 723. · Class A: Flame spread index 0–25; smoke-developed index 0–450.<|control11|><|separator|>
[19]
ASTM E84 Class A Fire Rated Questions and Answers
Nov 25, 2019 · The ASTM E84 (often referred to as just “E84”) is the standard test method for assessing the surface burning characteristics of building products.
[20]
Plenum Spaces: ASTM E84 Flame/Smoke Testing
Jun 23, 2021 · A material with a smoke developed index of < 50 will produce 50% less smoke than heptane. This ASTM E84 test is especially important when it ...
[21]
ASTM E84 25/50-Rated Pipe and Duct Insulation Fire Safety
Jun 25, 2021 · To be “plenum-rated”, an insulation's flame-spread index must be not more than 25 and a smoke-developed index not more than 50. Mechanical ...
[22]
The Ins and Outs of ASTM E84 Fire Testing | atlasroofing.com
ASTM E84 measures surface flame spread and smoke density, comparing a material's burning behavior to red oak, using a 24-foot chamber with a draft.
[23]
[PDF] Flame-Spread Ratings & Smoke- Developed Indices
76-200 flame-spread–Class C (or III) Other rooms and areas. The model building codes require a smoke-developed index of 450 or less for most construction ...
[24]
[PDF] FLAME-SPREAD RATINGS - Unity Forest Products
Western Larch. 45. B. 20. HPVA. Western Red Cedar. 65. B. 150. HPVA. White Fir. 40. B. 80 ... The model building codes require a smoke-developed index of 450 or.
[25]
https://images.thdstatic.com/catalog/pdfImages/33/33138b19-ce92-47c7-9a12-ff5d919afb7b.pdf
[26]
CHAPTER 8 INTERIOR FINISHES - 2021 INTERNATIONAL BUILDING CODE (IBC)
### Summary of Flame Spread Classification Requirements for Interior Wall and Ceiling Finishes
[27]
803.1.1 Flame-Spread and Smoke-Development Tests - UpCodes
Interior wall and ceiling finish materials shall be tested and accorded indices for flame spread and smoke development in accordance with ASTM E 84 or UL 723.
[28]
[PDF] Handbook 1 - Eurocodes - European Union
"The Eurocodes to establish a set of common technical rules for the design of buildings ... and smoke control systems and efficiency of the used fire ...
[29]
[PDF] Flame Spread Performance of Wood Products Used for Interior Finish
A smoke-developed index was also measured for some of the wood products listed in Table 1 and Table. 2. This index has a value of approximately 100 for the.
[30]
A Focus on Insulation and Surface-Burning Characteristics
Jan 1, 2019 · 720.2—Insulating materials in concealed spaces of buildings are required to have a flame-spread index of not more than 25 and a smoke-developed ...
[31]
Materials in HVAC Plenums - Warren Forensics
Aug 22, 2024 · Materials in HVAC plenums must be noncombustible or have a flame spread index of 25 or less and a smoke developed index of 50 or less. PVC ...
[32]
https://insulation.org/io/articles/a-focus-on-insulation-and-surface-burning-characteristics/
[33]
Evaluation of Toxic Potency Values for Smoke from Products and ...
Neviaser, J.L., Gann, R.G. Evaluation of Toxic Potency Values for Smoke from Products and Materials. Fire Technology 40, 177–199 (2004). https://doi.org ...
[34]
Characteristics of Fire Scenarios in Which Sublethal Effects of ...
Cite this article. Peacock, R.D., Averill, J.D., Reneke, P.A. et al. Characteristics of Fire Scenarios in Which Sublethal Effects of Smoke are Important.
[35]
E2231 Standard Practice for Specimen Preparation and Mounting of ...
This practice describes, in detail, specimen preparation and mounting procedures for single-component pipe or duct insulation systems and for multi-component ...
[36]
ISO 5660-1:2015 - Reaction-to-fire tests — Heat release, smoke ...
In stockISO 5660-1:2015 specifies a method for assessing the heat release rate and dynamic smoke production rate of specimens exposed in the horizontal orientation.
[37]
(PDF) Correlation of smoke development in room tests with cone ...
A direct proportionality has been found between the smoke extinction area (SEA) for smoke of room linings and the SEA as measured in the cone calorimeter ...<|separator|>
[38]
Standard Test Method for Measuring Smoke Toxicity for Use in Fire ...
Jul 1, 2024 · 1.1 This fire-test-response standard covers a means for determining the lethal toxic potency of smoke produced from a material or product ...
[39]
[PDF] Scale Fire Tests: 1. NFPA 269 / ASTM E 1678
“Standard Test Method for Measuring Smoke Toxicity for Use in Fire Hazard Analysis,”. ASTM E1678-10, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2010. 16. (a) ...