Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Social Science Research Network

The Social Science Research Network (SSRN) is a digital platform serving as an open-access repository for preprints, working papers, and early-stage scholarly outputs primarily in the social sciences, including economics, law, management, and related fields. Founded in 1994 by financial economists Michael C. Jensen and Wayne Marr, SSRN enables researchers to upload and share unpublished manuscripts, fostering rapid dissemination, feedback, and collaboration among over 2.4 million authors across more than 65 disciplines. By May 2016, SSRN had been acquired by Elsevier, a commercial academic publisher, which integrated it with services like Mendeley while committing to maintain free access to abstracts and downloads. This shift from independent operation to corporate ownership sparked debates over potential commercialization of open scholarship, prompting some journal editors to withdraw content amid concerns about data privacy and platform control. Despite these tensions, SSRN remains a cornerstone for pre-publication sharing, hosting over 1.7 million papers that accumulate millions of downloads annually and influence citation practices in disciplines reliant on working paper cultures.

History

Founding and Initial Launch

The Social Science Research Network (SSRN) was founded in 1994 by , a professor emeritus specializing in , and Wayne Marr, a finance professor then at . The initiative stemmed from a 1992 conversation between the two economists, who sought to address delays in traditional by creating a platform for quick sharing of working papers and preprints, particularly in . Incorporated as Social Science Electronic Publishers, Inc., in , SSRN operated initially as a nonprofit-oriented repository emphasizing to social science research ahead of formal journal publication. Launched in October 1994, SSRN began with a focus on the Finance Research Network, allowing authors to abstracts and full papers for free distribution via early protocols, predating widespread browsers. This model enabled rapid feedback among scholars, bypassing lengthy peer-review cycles, and positioned SSRN as an of digital sharing in the social sciences. By design, it prioritized efficiency in dissemination over revenue, with users registering to download papers and authors gaining visibility through networked abstracts. In its first years, SSRN expanded modestly from to related fields like and , amassing thousands of papers through voluntary submissions and email-based alerts, laying the groundwork for broader adoption in . The platform's success hinged on Jensen and Marr's academic networks, which seeded initial content and user engagement without institutional funding.

Expansion and Early Adoption

Following its launch in , SSRN expanded by establishing specialized electronic libraries, or eJournals, tailored to sub-disciplines within social sciences, beginning with and due to founder Michael C. Jensen's background in . The platform's initial networks focused on rapid sharing of working papers in these areas, where traditional journal publication timelines often exceeded one to two years, enabling authors to bypass delays and solicit immediate peer feedback. By the late , SSRN had broadened to include networks for , , and , reflecting organic demand from scholars seeking efficient dissemination mechanisms amid the internet's rise. Early adoption was driven primarily by academics in and related fields, who recognized SSRN's value in accelerating cycles and expanding audience reach beyond elite conference circuits. Jensen noted that pre-internet, cutting-edge work circulated informally among top scholars, creating a 2-3 year informational advantage; SSRN democratized this by allowing global access to preprints, fostering quicker citation and refinement of ideas. Usage grew through word-of-mouth in academic departments, particularly at institutions like , where Jensen held influence, leading to steady uploads of abstracts and full texts without formal . This phase solidified SSRN's role as a precursor to broader open-access repositories, with expansion into humanities-adjacent social sciences by the early , as evidenced by cumulative downloads approaching millions by decade's end—laying groundwork for its pre-acquisition scale of nearly 100 million full-text downloads since inception. Adoption metrics, though not publicly detailed for the , correlated with rising penetration among researchers, positioning SSRN as a standard tool for pre-publication sharing in empirical social sciences.

Key Milestones Pre-Acquisition

The (SSRN) was launched in October 1994 by , a professor of at , and Wayne Marr, with the aim of accelerating the dissemination of early-stage research through electronic sharing, beginning with a focus on and disciplines. In the late and early 2000s, SSRN expanded by developing specialized Research Networks, including those for , , and , which allowed researchers to upload and access working papers tailored to specific subfields, fostering interdisciplinary connections and increasing adoption among academics. A significant broadening occurred on October 19, 2007, when SSRN introduced the Research Network, extending its platform beyond core s to encompass history, , and related areas, thereby diversifying its user base and content repository. By May 2016, immediately preceding its acquisition by , SSRN had grown to host nearly 700,000 full-text papers and abstracts from over 300,000 authors across more than 65 disciplines, with tens of thousands of researchers routinely uploading preprints and the platform achieving millions of cumulative downloads, reflecting its established role as a key open-access venue for scholarship.

Ownership and Governance

Founders and Early Structure

The Social Science Research Network (SSRN) was co-founded in 1994 by , a prominent financial economist and former professor, and Wayne Marr, also a financial economist. The initiative emerged from Jensen's prior experience in , including co-founding the Journal of Financial Economics in 1974, and addressed the need for rapid dissemination of working papers in social sciences amid limited digital infrastructure. Early development traces to discussions around 1992, with Jensen recalling a pivotal outreach that shaped the network's focus on electronic sharing. SSRN's initial structure operated as a privately held corporation headquartered in , emphasizing a decentralized model for abstract registration and paper distribution via lists and rudimentary interfaces. Jensen assumed the role of chairman, overseeing strategic direction while leveraging academic networks to seed content, primarily in and . The platform's architecture prioritized free access and author-driven uploads, fostering organic growth without formal , which differentiated it from traditional journals and enabled quick feedback loops among scholars. In its formative years, SSRN lacked expansive staff or funding, relying on volunteer moderators for discipline-specific networks and basic server hosting to manage downloads, with early adoption driven by word-of-mouth in quantitative fields. This lean, founder-led governance model supported scalability, as evidenced by initial paper volumes in the hundreds by the late , before broader web integration. The structure's emphasis on open dissemination reflected Jensen's advocacy for unfiltered scholarly exchange, predating widespread norms.

Elsevier Acquisition and Rationale

On May 17, 2016, , a subsidiary of Group, acquired Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. (SSEP), the company operating the Social Science Research Network (SSRN), for an undisclosed sum. The deal brought SSRN, which hosted over 700,000 preprints and full-text papers primarily in social sciences, , and , under Elsevier's ownership, marking the publisher's entry into a major open preprint platform outside its core STEM domains. Elsevier's stated rationale centered on enhancing SSRN's capabilities through integration with its existing tools, particularly Mendeley, a free reference manager and academic social network acquired by Elsevier in 2013. The company emphasized combining SSRN's content repository with Mendeley's user data and analytics to deliver improved features, including advanced content discovery, download and citation metrics, data linking across platforms, and streamlined researcher workflows. Kumsal Bayazit, CEO of Elsevier at the time, described the acquisition as an opportunity to "accelerate the development of SSRN" and "help researchers collaborate more effectively, discover content and measure their impact," positioning it as a means to support the broader research ecosystem rather than impose paywalls. Strategically, the move addressed Elsevier's relatively limited market share in social sciences and humanities, where SSRN's established network of over 1.2 million registered users and disciplinary focus provided a foothold for expansion beyond traditional journal publishing. SSRN's revenue model, which included subscriptions to curated eJournals and abstract databases, aligned with Elsevier's hybrid approach of open dissemination paired with premium services, though the platform's core preprint sharing remained free and open post-acquisition. Critics, including some academics, questioned whether Elsevier's commercial interests—evident in its history of high journal subscription fees and opposition to certain open-access mandates—might eventually prioritize monetization over unfettered access, but Elsevier affirmed no immediate changes to SSRN's operational model.

Post-Acquisition Governance Changes

Following the acquisition of SSRN by Elsevier on May 17, 2016, the platform's governance transitioned from independent operation to integration within Elsevier's corporate framework, specifically under its Research Products division. SSRN's Managing Director, Gregg Gordon, who had led the organization since its early days, retained his role and assumed dual responsibilities overseeing SSRN alongside knowledge lifecycle management initiatives at Elsevier. Elsevier publicly affirmed that SSRN's leadership team, freemium access model—free submission and downloads with optional premium features—and user policies would remain unchanged, positioning the acquisition as an enhancement rather than a overhaul. Operational governance saw incremental shifts toward Elsevier's ecosystem, including plans to migrate SSRN's technology platform to align with , Elsevier's reference manager and collaboration network, to facilitate data linking between preprints and published works in . This integration expanded SSRN's analytics capabilities, such as citation tracking, while maintaining its role as an open repository; post-acquisition growth included staff increases, office relocation, and broadened market reach without imposing paywalls. Gordon's tenure extended until his retirement announcement on May 2, 2024, after 30 years at SSRN, including eight under ownership, marking a continuity in executive stability but underscoring SSRN's subordination to Elsevier's strategic priorities. Content moderation practices, however, generated scrutiny regarding governance evolution. In mid-2016, shortly after the acquisition, SSRN temporarily removed a small number of papers (estimated at up to 20) citing publisher policies, without initial notification, prompting accusations of overzealous enforcement inconsistent with prior practices. SSRN restored the affected works upon requests, attributing the actions to errors rather than alterations, yet the incidents fueled open-access advocates' concerns about Elsevier's potential to erode SSRN's independence as a preprint server. Subsequent updates, such as a 2023 clarifying handling of AI-generated content while reserving SSRN's right to remove ethically non-compliant papers, reflect ongoing alignment with broader publishing standards under oversight. These developments highlight a tension between preserved operational continuity and heightened corporate influence, though no formal board restructuring or explicit reversals were documented.

Operations and Technical Features

Core Platform Functionality

The Social Science Research Network (SSRN) functions primarily as an open-access digital repository enabling researchers to upload, index, and share preprints, working papers, and early-stage scholarly outputs, with a focus on social sciences including economics, law, and management. Users register for free accounts to submit papers, providing required metadata such as title, abstract (up to 1,000 words), author details, JEL classification codes or equivalent subject areas, and an uploaded PDF of the full text, which undergoes basic formatting checks and plagiarism screening before public availability. Abstracts are immediately indexed in SSRN's central database, while full texts become downloadable unless authors opt for restricted access, ensuring broad dissemination without paywalls or subscription barriers for readers. Search capabilities form a core technical feature, with an advanced query interface allowing filtering by keywords, authors, affiliations, publication dates, subjects, and networks, supporting precise discovery across the platform's holdings of over 1.7 million papers from more than 2.4 million researchers spanning 65+ disciplines. Download metrics are tracked in , generating author- and paper-level rankings based on abstract views and full-text downloads, which serve as proxies for and ; for instance, top-ranked papers often accumulate thousands of downloads within months of upload. Authors receive analytics dashboards to monitor these metrics, update versions (with version histories preserved), or withdraw submissions, while readers can save papers to personal libraries, view download histories, and share direct to abstracts or PDFs. Dissemination tools include customizable email alerts for new papers in user-selected research networks or eJournals—curated topical feeds updated daily—and feeds for automated monitoring, facilitating rapid feedback loops in research communities. The platform's backend assigns persistent identifiers to papers upon submission, enabling integration with citation tools and external databases, though it does not issue DOIs natively; this structure prioritizes speed over formal , with papers typically live within 1-2 business days of approval. Access remains free for all users worldwide, with no institutional logins required for basic functions, though Elsevier's ownership since 2016 has introduced optional premium analytics for high-volume authors without altering core open-access mechanics.

Research Networks and eJournals

SSRN's Research Networks consist of specialized, discipline-oriented communities that facilitate the sharing of preprints and early-stage research papers across fields such as , , , and . Each network operates as an open-access server, allowing authors to upload papers for rapid dissemination to global audiences, with the primary purpose of accelerating knowledge sharing and enabling early feedback among scholars. Examples include the Economics Research Network (ERN), which hosts economics-focused papers, and the Accounting Research Network (ARN), dedicated to accounting scholarship; these networks collectively span over 30 subject areas, enabling targeted discovery and collaboration. Within these networks, eJournals function as curated electronic series that aggregate and distribute papers on specific subtopics or themes, such as financial or . Authors uploading papers to SSRN can select up to 12 relevant eJournals for inclusion, or allow SSRN editors to assign them based on content classification, ensuring alignment with subscriber interests. eJournals disseminate content via periodic alerts containing abstracts of newly posted papers, which subscribers can access to download full texts, thereby promoting visibility and potential citations prior to formal publication. This structure supports institutional branding through Research Paper Series, where organizations compile their outputs as dedicated eJournals, providing metrics like downloads and readership beyond basic access counts. eJournals also integrate features like job openings and professional announcements within networks, fostering , though their effectiveness relies on curation to maintain amid the platform's volume of over 1.7 million preprints as of recent counts.

User Engagement and Metrics

SSRN engages a user base exceeding 2.4 million researchers, who have contributed over 1.7 million abstracts and full-text papers across more than 65 academic disciplines. These users primarily consist of academics, practitioners, and institutions uploading preprints for rapid dissemination and feedback prior to formal publication. Platform metrics highlight substantial engagement through download activity, with total paper downloads surpassing 344 million since inception. In the 12 months preceding October 2025, downloads exceeded 54 million, reflecting sustained interest in shared research. Individual paper-level metrics, including abstract views and download counts, are publicly available on SSRN, enabling authors to track real-time usage and compare dissemination relative to peers. Beyond basic downloads, SSRN incorporates PlumX metrics to quantify broader interactions, such as citations, saves, and shares, offering users a multifaceted assessment of preprint influence outside traditional journal impact factors. These tools support author rankings and institutional benchmarks, with top papers accumulating tens of thousands of downloads, as evidenced by SSRN's public leaderboards. Such data underscores SSRN's role in fostering iterative engagement, where high-download s often signal emerging trends or policy-relevant findings in sciences and beyond.

Content Model and Dissemination

Preprint Sharing Mechanism

SSRN's preprint sharing mechanism enables researchers to upload preliminary versions of manuscripts for rapid dissemination prior to formal peer review or publication. Authors initiate the process by creating a free SSRN user account and submitting required metadata, including the paper's title, writing date, English-language abstract, author affiliations, and the full text in PDF format, through an online submission form. Certain content types, such as health science case reports, require additional documentation like evidence of patient consent and conflict disclosures to ensure compliance. Upon submission, SSRN staff review the materials for completeness, relevance, and adherence to platform terms, without conducting peer review, followed by categorization by subject matter experts into one or more of over 65 specialized research networks known as eJournals. Once processed, preprints generate a public abstract page on the SSRN platform, which includes the metadata and a link to download the full PDF, making the content openly accessible without subscription fees or paywalls. Distribution occurs via automated email alerts to subscribers of relevant eJournals, typically in weekly batches containing titles, authors, abstracts, and direct links to the abstract pages, thereby targeting interested academics and facilitating early feedback. Preprints also become indexed and searchable on the SSRN site and major search engines, enhancing discoverability, while authors can upload revised versions to reflect iterative improvements, with each update preserving download metrics for the original. This non-exclusive model allows preprints to coexist with eventual journal publications, provided journal policies permit prior sharing. The mechanism emphasizes speed and broad reach, with papers often available within days of submission, contrasting slower traditional timelines, and has supported over 1.7 million preprints across disciplines as of recent counts. However, reliance on self-reported and minimal screening raises potential for unvetted content, though download counts and author affiliations serve as informal quality signals. Integration with Elsevier's ecosystem post-2016 acquisition has streamlined submissions for affiliated journals via "First Look" options, where authors opt to post preprints during journal submission with one click, but core SSRN sharing remains independent of Elsevier's proprietary workflows.

Access Policies and Openness

SSRN maintains an framework centered on dissemination of scholarly preprints and research papers, with abstracts publicly viewable without any barriers and full-text PDFs downloadable at no cost to registered users worldwide. registration, which requires only basic personal details and no payment, grants unlimited access to downloads, enabling broad scholarly engagement across its networks hosting over 1.7 million papers as of 2023. This model supports non-commercial, informational, and use, prohibiting automated scraping or redistribution without permission to protect content integrity. Post-2016 acquisition by , SSRN's core access policies remained unchanged, with explicit commitments to sustain free uploads and downloads regardless of a paper's later publication status, countering initial fears of imposed restrictions. Temporary disruptions occurred in 2016 when some papers were removed for alleged violations, but these were largely restored following author requests, preserving overall openness. While critics, including advocates, raised concerns about potential long-term shifts toward Elsevier's subscription-oriented ecosystem, no paywalls or fee-based access for core preprints have been implemented as of 2025. Exceptions apply to a minority of papers where third-party copyright holders impose download fees, though SSRN's standard policy defaults to gratis aligned with its founding emphasis on rapid, barrier-free . In 2020, platform updates introduced options for certain downloads without mandatory registration, further reducing friction while tracking usage metrics for author visibility. Content is governed by user-uploaded licenses, often or preprint defaults, ensuring downstream openness for scholarly reuse subject to attribution.

Integration with Publishing Ecosystems

SSRN facilitates integration between preprint dissemination and formal academic publishing through mechanisms that enable seamless transitions from early-stage sharing to peer-reviewed outputs. Authors submitting manuscripts to participating journals can opt to post versions on SSRN via a one-click process during submission, allowing journals to identify and engage with emerging research prior to formal review. This "First Look" initiative, a between SSRN and select influential journals, provides rapid to evolving scholarly work, bridging the gap between informal feedback loops and structured publication workflows. Post-Elsevier acquisition in May 2016, such features have been enhanced to leverage 's broader ecosystem, including tools like for and dissemination to wider audiences. The platform's "Partners in Publishing" program further embeds SSRN within publishing ecosystems by hosting papers from publishers, organizations, and journals, enabling the distribution of accepted or published works alongside s. This service allows information providers to submit finalized articles for broader visibility, often branded under specific research networks or eJournals, thus creating bidirectional flows where s inform journal selections and published papers amplify SSRN's repository. For instance, journals like Social Sciences & Humanities Open integrate SSRN directly into their submission processes, permitting authors to tick an option for posting, which streamlines progression from draft to peer-reviewed article while maintaining elements. These integrations support accelerated research cycles by allowing preprints to garner citations and feedback that strengthen subsequent submissions, with many outlets in sciences explicitly permitting prior SSRN postings. However, workflows vary by discipline and publisher policies, requiring authors to verify compatibility to avoid conflicts, as SSRN emphasizes sharing as a precursor rather than a substitute for rigorous . Overall, SSRN's ties to have expanded its role in models, where open preprinting coexists with subscription-based , though this has raised questions about potential tensions between and control in the .

Academic Impact and Usage

Adoption Across Disciplines

SSRN's adoption is most extensive within the social sciences, where it originated and continues to dominate as a primary platform for preprint dissemination. Founded in 1994 with an initial focus on economics and law, the platform has become integral to scholarly workflows in these fields, enabling rapid sharing of working papers prior to peer-reviewed publication. In economics, for instance, the Economics Research Network (ERN) hosts specialized series such as the National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER) Working Papers, facilitating widespread use among economists for feedback and citation accumulation. Similarly, the Legal Scholarship Network (LSN) supports legal scholars by aggregating papers from law schools and centers, with adoption reflected in routine posting practices that enhance visibility and influence job market outcomes. Management and accounting fields exhibit strong uptake through the Management Research Network (MRN) and Accounting Research Network, where interdisciplinary topics like finance and organizational studies thrive, underscoring SSRN's role in applied social science research. Beyond core social sciences, adoption extends to adjacent disciplines such as and via dedicated networks like the Political Science Network (PSN), though usage intensity varies by subfield. In these areas, SSRN serves as a complement to traditional journals, with scholars leveraging its metrics—such as download counts—for informal . Humanities disciplines, including history and , have garnered moderate adoption through the Humanities Research Network, which emphasizes critical analyses of cultural constructs, yet remains secondary to field-specific archives. Energy and networks illustrate niche extensions into policy-oriented social research, where SSRN's open-access model aids interdisciplinary collaboration, but overall paper volumes lag behind and . Post-2016 acquisition by Elsevier, SSRN expanded into life sciences, health sciences, and physical sciences, claiming coverage of over 65 disciplines with more than 1.7 million preprints from 2.4 million researchers as of recent counts. However, adoption in these STEM areas remains limited compared to specialized platforms like arXiv for physics or bioRxiv for biology, as social science-oriented norms and networks do not fully align with natural science preprint cultures that prioritize technical rigor over early-stage social analysis. This uneven penetration highlights SSRN's entrenched position in interpretive and policy-driven fields while revealing barriers in empirical, data-heavy disciplines, where alternative repositories offer better domain-specific tooling and community trust. Empirical evidence of cross-disciplinary growth exists in hybrid areas like health economics, but quantitative metrics indicate sustained dominance in social sciences, with total downloads exceeding 344 million platform-wide, disproportionately from those core networks.

Metrics of Influence and Citation Effects

SSRN assesses the influence of uploaded papers through metrics such as abstract views and full-text downloads, which quantify user engagement and serve as proxies for readership and dissemination reach. These data points are aggregated to generate dynamic rankings for individual papers, authors, institutions, and research networks, with rankings updated periodically based on trailing twelve-month or all-time download totals. For example, author-level rankings incorporate measures like total downloads, downloads per paper, and productivity-adjusted scores to evaluate scholarly output, explicitly positioned as complements to citation-based evaluations rather than replacements. Empirical analyses reveal a positive between SSRN download metrics and subsequent formal citations, though the relationship is imperfect and influenced by factors such as discipline-specific norms and upload timing. Studies of legal scholarship, a prominent category on SSRN, indicate that higher counts predict elevated rates, with one examination estimating that 50 to 140 downloads roughly equate to one across sampled documents. In broader samples, articles garnering the most downloads are disproportionately those receiving higher citations, suggesting downloads capture early that translates to long-term , albeit with variability—percentages of cited documents range from 40% to 56% depending on the dataset. Uploading papers to SSRN demonstrably amplifies effects by accelerating exposure prior to formal publication, particularly via its green model. on legal found that nearly 90% of highly cited works had SSRN versions, compared to under 50% for poorly cited ones, attributing the disparity to SSRN's role in broadening readership. Similarly, 87% of top-cited papers in analyzed datasets were posted on SSRN, with pre-journal uploads yielding the strongest gains; factors like longer abstracts and detailed keywords further enhance discoverability and downloads, indirectly boosting . SSRN-derived rankings, often download-based, exhibit high correlations with alternative measures, including counts, reinforcing their utility in gauging influence despite limitations such as undercounted in standard databases and potential self-download .

Role in Accelerating Research Cycles

The Social Science Research Network (SSRN) accelerates research cycles by enabling the immediate upload and global dissemination of preprints, which circumvents the protracted timelines of traditional peer-reviewed publication—often spanning 6 to 24 months or more from submission to acceptance. Authors can post working papers upon completion, allowing findings to reach peers within days rather than years, thereby compressing the interval between idea generation and community scrutiny. This mechanism fosters rapid iteration, as researchers access nascent results to refine hypotheses, replicate studies, or pivot methodologies without awaiting formal validation. Empirical evidence from preprint platforms, including SSRN, demonstrates enhanced speed in knowledge propagation: preprints garner significantly higher early readership—up to 8 times more views in the first year—compared to non-preprint counterparts, accelerating trajectories and collaborative opportunities. In sciences disciplines like and , where policy-relevant insights evolve amid real-time events, SSRN's eJournals and networks have facilitated downloads exceeding billions cumulatively, enabling scholars to build on emerging data sets and theoretical frameworks promptly. For instance, during economic crises or regulatory shifts, s on SSRN have informed contemporaneous debates and subsequent peer-reviewed outputs, shortening the feedback loop that traditionally delays paradigm shifts. Furthermore, SSRN's integration with author tools, such as automated alerts and abstracting services, amplifies this by directing tailored notifications to subscribers, which heighten and uptake of novel contributions. Analyses of disseminated via SSRN reveal that early posting correlates with faster subsequent rates and broader metrics, as informal peer feedback refines manuscripts prior to submission. This process not only expedites individual career progression through visible outputs but also propels field-wide advancement by mitigating the "publication bottleneck" inherent in gatekept systems, where rejection rates exceed 80% in top outlets.

Criticisms and Controversies

Pre-Acquisition Policy Issues

SSRN's reliance on download-based metrics to rank authors, institutions, and papers faced substantial for embedding systemic biases that distorted assessments of scholarly . Early analyses highlighted a pronounced favoritism toward U.S.-centric legal , stemming from the platform's foundational focus on networks, which overshadowed contributions from other disciplines and regions. These rankings, updated periodically based on aggregated download data, were further faulted for field-specific skews, where popular topics garnered disproportionate visibility irrespective of methodological rigor. Critics also pointed to the manipulability of SSRN's metrics under its pre-2016 policies, which lacked stringent safeguards against behaviors such as self-downloads or coordinated campaigns. This incentivized authors to prioritize attention-grabbing titles and abstracts over substantive depth, potentially amplifying sensational but in social sciences, a field already grappling with challenges. The absence of robust anti-manipulation protocols in SSRN's guidelines exacerbated perceptions that the platform rewarded virality over verifiable evidence, contributing to skewed incentives in academic . Underpinning these concerns were SSRN's and policies, which required authors to affirm and grant the platform a non-exclusive but perpetual, irrevocable for distribution—a standard predating the acquisition. While enabling free access, this broad grant raised apprehensions about authors' diminished control over revisions and withdrawals, particularly as SSRN's for-profit model monetized premium features like enhanced author profiles without commensurate protections for autonomy. Editorial screening by network volunteers, aimed at maintaining relevance, similarly drew implicit critique for opacity, potentially reflecting academia's documented ideological imbalances that could marginalize heterodox perspectives without transparent appeal processes.

Acquisition-Related Open Access Concerns

Elsevier acquired SSRN on May 17, 2016, for an undisclosed sum, prompting widespread concerns among advocates and researchers about the platform's future accessibility. Critics highlighted 's historical opposition to mandates, its reliance on high subscription fees for journals, and practices such as , which contrasted with SSRN's prior role as a free repository serving over 1 million users and hosting more than 700,000 papers across social sciences disciplines. The acquisition raised fears of potential paywalls, , or redirection of to 's journals, potentially undermining SSRN's and eroding trust in its open dissemination model. In response, Elsevier pledged to preserve SSRN's "freemium" structure—allowing free uploads and downloads while offering premium features—and committed to enhancing the platform through integrations with tools like Mendeley, without imposing access restrictions. However, skepticism persisted due to Elsevier's track record, including resistance to public access policies and involvement in over 16,000 researchers' boycott via the Cost of Knowledge campaign, leading some to question whether these assurances would hold amid profit-driven incentives. Post-acquisition developments fueled further unease, including policy shifts such as enhanced verification requirements and instances of paper withdrawals for alleged violations, which Authors described as restrictive toward authors' control over sharing decisions. These changes, alongside concerns over centralized control of scholarly data, spurred alternatives like SocArXiv, launched in 2016 to provide nonprofit, community-governed for social sciences preprints. Overall, while SSRN remained operational without immediate full paywalls, the acquisition amplified debates on corporate consolidation's risks to , with advocates urging diversification to mitigate dependency on for-profit entities.

Quality Control and Bias Challenges

SSRN operates as an open-access repository without formal , relying instead on voluntary community feedback and post-upload scrutiny for . This absence of upfront substantive review means papers can contain methodological errors, , or incomplete analyses, potentially influencing citations and policy discussions before corrections or retractions occur. For instance, on platforms like SSRN may disseminate findings with flaws that only emerge through later replication attempts, as highlighted in general critiques of unvetted research sharing. While SSRN addresses plagiarism complaints via a dedicated ethics channel after submission, it does not conduct pre-upload screening for content validity or originality beyond basic formatting and author verification. This minimal quality control has drawn criticism for enabling the rapid spread of low-quality work, particularly in fields prone to replication failures, where erroneous results can gain premature visibility through download metrics rather than rigorous validation. Bias challenges in SSRN-hosted papers mirror systemic issues in , including against null results—estimated to suppress over 90% of non-significant findings in some analyses—and ideological slants. Studies analyzing citation patterns across over 600,000 papers reveal a left-leaning in disciplines like and , with from certain institutions or authors cited disproportionately by liberal-leaning think tanks, correlating with donors' political affiliations (e.g., Republican-leaning researchers 16% less likely to be cited by left-leaning outlets). Such patterns suggest an echo chamber effect, where empirical claims challenging orthodoxies face underrepresentation, compounded by academia's documented overrepresentation of left-leaning viewpoints that influences submission and visibility on platforms like SSRN.

References

  1. [1]
    https://www.ssrn.com/index.cfm
  2. [2]
    CRNJob17001 - SSRN
    Mar 28, 2017 · SSRN was launched as the Social Science Research Network in 1994 by founders Michael Jensen and Wayne Marr. In May 2016, SSRN was acquired ...Missing: ownership | Show results with:ownership
  3. [3]
    Elsevier Acquires the Social Science Research Network (SSRN), the ...
    May 17, 2016 · Founded in 1994, SSRN is a Rochester, NY-based scholarly research preprint repository and online community. SSRN will be further developed ...Missing: history ownership
  4. [4]
    Elsevier Acquires SSRN - The Scholarly Kitchen
    May 17, 2016 · Today, Elsevier is announcing that it has acquired SSRN, the preprint and publishing community that focuses on social sciences and law.Missing: history | Show results with:history
  5. [5]
    Elsevier Stirs Up Controversy With SSRN Acquisition
    May 18, 2016 · Elsevier revealed yesterday it has purchased the open access Social Science Research Network (SSRN) for an undisclosed amount.
  6. [6]
    The Evolution of Open Access: a brief history | SciELO in Perspective
    Oct 21, 2013 · October 1994: Wayne Marr and Michael Jensen launch The Social Science Research Network – SSRN. 28th November 1994: the print format journal ...
  7. [7]
    David Warsh on SSRN
    [The founder of the Social Science Research Network, former Harvard Business School Professor Michael] Jensen remembers getting a call in 1992 from then ...
  8. [8]
    SSRN: Home
    About SSRN. SSRN is devoted to the rapid worldwide dissemination of preprints and research papers and is composed of a number of specialized research networks.Research Paper Series · Subscribe to SSRN eJournals · Contact Us · SSRN
  9. [9]
    Financial Economics Network - SSRN
    The Financial Economics Network (FEN) helps promote new scholarship in finance and fosters interdisciplinary discovery in areas that intersect with it.FEN Conferences & Meetings · Professional Announcements · Job Openings
  10. [10]
    Preprint servers: The Story Continues | openscience.eu
    Jan 15, 2024 · SSRN, short for the Social Science Research Network, was founded in 1994 by Michael C. Jensen and Wayne Marr with the vision of transforming the ...
  11. [11]
    Mike Jensen Explains SSRN
    Jun 6, 2008 · Mike Jensen, the distinguished financial economist and co-founder of SSRN, is interviewed here by Growthology's Tim Kane.Missing: history | Show results with:history
  12. [12]
    Growthology Blog Posts Interview with SSRN Chairman Michael ...
    Growthology Blog Posts Interview with SSRN Chairman Michael Jensen Tim Kane posted his interview of SSRN Chairman Michael Jensen regarding SSRN's history on ...Missing: years growth uploaded
  13. [13]
    Video: Pioneers in Finance: An Interview with Michael C. Jensen
    Oct 29, 2020 · The transcript covers what led to his agency theory and corporate governance work, and the resistance he experienced in getting this early work ...Missing: founding growth uploaded
  14. [14]
    SSRN, a leading social science and humanities repository and ...
    Press Release: Elsevier [May 17, 2016]. Elsevier's acquisition of the Social Science Research Network, with plans to strengthen it alongside Mendeley's ...
  15. [15]
    SSRN hits major growth milestones
    Sep 16, 2022 · SSRN reached two major milestones recently: one million papers have now been uploaded to the site, and our content has been downloaded two hundred million ...Missing: 1990s 2000s
  16. [16]
    Timeline before 2000 - Open Access Directory
    October 1994. The Social Science Research Network (SSRN) launched by Wayne Marr and Michael Jensen. See these details on the history of SSRN. November 28 ...
  17. [17]
    [PDF] The ALL-SIS Newsletter - AALL
    SSRN. The Social Science Research Network (SSRN). (http://ssrn.com/) was founded in 1994 by Michael. Jensen and Wayne Marr to provide an efficient means to ...
  18. [18]
    Timeline 2007 - Open Access Directory
    Mar 20, 2007 · October 19, 2007. The Social Science Research Network officially launched the Humanities Research Network, a collection of OA repositories in ...
  19. [19]
    SSRN's 2016 Year-End Update Letter
    2016 has been an exciting year of development at SSRN. Since joining Elsevier earlier this year, we have devoted significant resources to full-text search.Missing: timeline acquisition
  20. [20]
    Social-sciences preprint server snapped up by publishing giant ...
    May 17, 2016 · Tens of thousands of academics routinely upload working papers to the SSRN, which is “super-important to economists”, says Mark McCabe, an ...
  21. [21]
    Message from Michael Jensen, SSRN Chairman, 2016 - SSRN Blog
    May 17, 2016 · On a personal note, it has been an honor to be involved over the past 25 years in the founding and growth of the SSRN website and the ...
  22. [22]
    Elsevier purchase SSRN: Social scientists face questions over ...
    May 18, 2016 · Many regular users may not be aware that SSRN has been run by a privately held corporation since its founding in 1994. Elsevier, one of the ...Missing: history | Show results with:history
  23. [23]
    Michael C. Jensen | Being A Leader and The Effective Exercise of ...
    In 1994 he co-founded and was Chairman of Social Science Research Network (SSRN) devoted to the electronic publication of scientific working papers in the ...
  24. [24]
    Elsevier Buys SSRN: What It Means for Scholarly Publication
    SSRN, a for-profit company, provides a venue to publish pre-print and other editions of scholarly works for free and allows users to similarly access this ...
  25. [25]
    Elsevier Buys SSRN.com: What It Means for Scholarly Publication
    May 6, 2017 · An open source alternative in law, economics and the social sciences has been the Social Science Research Network, or SSRN (www.ssrn.com).
  26. [26]
    It's the Data, Stupid: What Elsevier's purchase of SSRN also means
    May 18, 2016 · On Tuesday May 17, 2016, SSRN announced that it was being acquired by Elsevier. SSRN, the Social Sciences Research Network, is a widely used ...
  27. [27]
    Elsevier buying SSRN and the future of open scholarship in the ...
    May 18, 2016 · In a move signalling further consolidation in scholarly communication, Elsevier announced yesterday its purchase of SSRN, a popular working ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  28. [28]
    Gregg Gordon | NISO website
    Gregory J. Gordon holds dual roles for the Research Products division of Elsevier; Managing Director of SSRN and Knowledge Lifecycle Management.
  29. [29]
    Elsevier Acquires Social Science Repository SSRN - Inside Higher Ed
    May 16, 2016 · The publishing giant Elsevier has acquired the Social Science Research Network, an online open-access repository for research.Missing: date | Show results with:date<|control11|><|separator|>
  30. [30]
    SSRN enjoys growth after its acquisition - Rochester Business Journal
    Jul 28, 2017 · It has been over a year since Social Science Research Network was acquired by Elsevier B.V., a $3.4 billion Netherlands-based information ...Missing: governance structure
  31. [31]
    A farewell from SSRN's Gregg Gordon - SSRN Blog
    May 2, 2024 · Gregg Gordon writes with some personal news. "After thirty years as Managing Director of SSRN, the last eight within Elsevier, I've decided ...
  32. [32]
    Moving from SSRN to SocArXiv - Association of Research Libraries
    Jul 22, 2016 · After a huge backlash, SSRN started restoring the papers upon the request of authors claiming a mistake in enforcing their copyright policies.Missing: buyout | Show results with:buyout
  33. [33]
    Just As Open Competitor To Elsevier's SSRN Launches ... - Techdirt.
    Jul 18, 2016 · We believe that up to 20 papers may have been affected. Nothing has changed in regard to our policies since being acquired by Elsevier. We ...<|separator|>
  34. [34]
    An Update on SSRN – Ownership and Copyright Policies
    Aug 24, 2016 · The SSRN-Elsevier Transaction. One of the big reasons why SSRN is so valuable is that it gives authors a platform to provide free online access ...
  35. [35]
    AI, preprints and SSRN – a new policy…
    Mar 7, 2023 · As always, SSRN reserves the right to remove papers that do not meet its content policies or violate standards of publication ethics and ...
  36. [36]
    Principles For Reassuring Authors of SSRN-Posted Papers Under ...
    May 19, 2016 · Despite some reassurances that SSRN policies won't change post-acquisition, there is reason to be concerned about the willingness of an Elsevier ...Missing: buyout | Show results with:buyout
  37. [37]
    [PDF] your paper's journey - SSRN
    • Save your favorite papers and view your download history. ANYONE CAN FREELY DISCOVER & ACCESS CONTENT. • Browse papers by Network & Subject Area : Find ...
  38. [38]
    Go Forth, Young Scholar: How to Use SSRN to Get Your Work Noticed
    May 22, 2019 · Once your working paper is uploaded to the SSRN community, it is available to be viewed and downloaded, and you can share links to it.
  39. [39]
    https://www.elsevier.com/solutions/ssrn
  40. [40]
    Economics Research Network - SSRN
    The Economics Research Network on SSRN is an open access preprint server that provides a venue for authors to showcase their research papers in economics.Research Paper Series · Professional Announcements · Job Openings · First Look
  41. [41]
    Accounting Research Network - SSRN
    The Accounting Research Network on SSRN is an open access preprint server that provides a venue for authors to showcase their research papers in our digital ...Job Openings · Research Paper Series · Professional Announcements · First Look
  42. [42]
    Management Research Network - SSRN
    The Management Research Network on SSRN is an open access preprint server that provides a venue for authors to showcase their research papers in management ...Missing: structure | Show results with:structure
  43. [43]
    Research Paper Series - SSRN
    We'll work with you to assemble your organizationally branded research as an eJournal and make it accessible to our community of users.Economics ERN · Legal Scholarship Network · Financial & Investment Planning
  44. [44]
    Posting Papers - SSRN - Website at University of Washington Law ...
    Sep 29, 2025 · Authors may select up to twelve eJournals. If they prefer, they can leave it to SSRN to select the eJournals. The editors of each eJournal will ...
  45. [45]
    SSRN Tips - Scholarly Communications Resources
    Aug 7, 2025 · SSRN allows authors to choose different journals and topics for targeted distribution when uploading papers. Browse the SSRN Journal and Topic ...
  46. [46]
    Home :: SSRN
    - **Full Name**: Social Science Research Network (SSRN)
  47. [47]
    [PDF] Do You SSRN?
    SSRN's eJournals periodically disseminate batches of newly posted abstracts by e-mail to subscribers, who can then access articles by clicking on the abstract.
  48. [48]
    Social Science Research Network (SSRN) - GSU Law Library
    The Social Science Research Network (SSRN) provides free access to the abstracts and full text of works of scholars in the social sciences.Missing: expansion early adoption growth
  49. [49]
    PRN eJournal Offerings :: SSRN
    Research Paper Series, Conference & Meetings, Subject Matter eJournals, Job Openings, Professional Announcements<|separator|>
  50. [50]
    Search eLibrary :: SSRN
    SSRN eLibrary Statistics: ; Papers & Authors. Abstracts: 1,724,523 ; Paper Downloads. To date: 344,367,632 ; References and Citations. Total References: 49,355,070 ...Browse JEL Classification Codes · Browse eLibrary · Loading Data...Missing: 2025 | Show results with:2025
  51. [51]
    10092025ann001 :: SSRN
    Oct 9, 2025 · Downloads from SSRN in the past 12 months total more than 54.4 million, with more than 341.8 million downloads since inception. SSRN's ...Missing: statistics users
  52. [52]
    SSRN Metrics - SSRN - Website at University of Washington Law ...
    Sep 29, 2025 · SSRN displays various metrics about papers, authors, and institutions. On the paper level, you can see how many times its abstract has been viewed and how many ...Missing: Elsevier | Show results with:Elsevier
  53. [53]
    Making Your Impact Factor More Measurable - SSRN Blog
    Mar 2, 2018 · The metrics recorded with PlumX provide a more complete view of what is happening to any research paper on SSRN and how the world is interacting ...
  54. [54]
    SSRN Top 10000 Papers
    Total New Downloads, Total # of Downloads · Total # of Citations · # of Authors. 1 ... Date Posted: 03 Oct 2024Last Revised: 04 Aug 2025. 24,885, 26,381, 0, 2. 8 ...Missing: users | Show results with:users
  55. [55]
    An index for SSRN downloads - ScienceDirect.com
    We propose a new index to quantify SSRN downloads. Our index reflects the author's productivity via paper download numbers.
  56. [56]
    Want to submit to SSRN?
    Sep 2, 2022 · It is actually very simple to start sharing your research at SSRN. All you need to do so is your paper, and a free SSRN User Account is required to submit a ...
  57. [57]
    SSRN Preprint Services | Open-access preprint community | Elsevier
    **Summary of SSRN's Research Networks and eJournals:**
  58. [58]
    The Best Time To Share Your Research - SSRN Blog
    Jan 9, 2018 · We think authors should evolve their research while sharing drafts with a broad audience. SSRN allows multiple versions of a paper to be posted.Missing: mechanism | Show results with:mechanism
  59. [59]
    first-look :: SSRN
    With one click during the submission process to the journal, authors choose to post a preprint version of their paper on SSRN where it is curated and ...
  60. [60]
    Organizations Series Network :: SSRN
    Subscribing to any of the Organization Series Network's eJournals provides the most efficient and convenient way to receive the latest research from the world's ...
  61. [61]
    Faculty Resources: SSRN - Guides at University of Alabama-Law
    Sep 4, 2025 · Registration to SSRN is free. Users are able to create their own account to post their papers or download papers or abstracts of interest.
  62. [62]
    SSRN - Website at University of Washington Law Library
    Sep 29, 2025 · SSRN has over 750,000 abstracts—and most of the papers are available for free download (PDF). It is a great tool for research (finding and ...
  63. [63]
    Terms of Use - SSRN
    It is a violation of Elsevier policy for an author or other person to directly or indirectly use SSRN with a view to affecting SSRN downloads and other usage ...
  64. [64]
    SSRN and open access for non-institutional scholars - CTSP
    Aug 4, 2016 · SSRN was an open access research network that allowed for free posting of academic research. In May of this year, academic publisher Elsevier purchased SSRN.
  65. [65]
    SSRN - Maastricht University Library
    Most papers can be downloaded without cost, though there are exceptions for papers whose copyrights are held by third parties that impose a download fee. SSRN ...
  66. [66]
    Improving the SSRN login experience
    Aug 3, 2020 · We added an actionable button reading “Download Without Registration”. The page to login is more clear and concise so that all of your options are visible.<|control11|><|separator|>
  67. [67]
    First Look - SSRN - Elsevier
    First Look is a place where journals and other research experts identify content of interest prior to publication.
  68. [68]
    SSRN a leading social science and humanities repository and ...
    May 17, 2016 · Mendeley and Elsevier will help close the loop from the preprint on SSRN to fuller collaboration and broader dissemination through the 5 million ...Missing: ecosystems | Show results with:ecosystems
  69. [69]
    Partners in Publishing :: SSRN
    SSRN is dedicated to the worldwide dissemination of research. While we aim largely to assemble, brand, and disseminate early scholarly research contributions, ...FEN Partners in Publishing · HRN Partners in Publishing · Research Networks
  70. [70]
    PRN Partners in Publishing :: SSRN
    We also offer information providers the opportunity to submit and distribute accepted or published papers via our service known as PARTNERS IN PUBLISHING.Missing: integration | Show results with:integration
  71. [71]
    Social Sciences & Humanities Open | ScienceDirect.com by Elsevier
    Social Sciences & Humanities Open partners with SSRN. When submitting your manuscript to the journal, by ticking 'yes' on the SSRN question, we can ...
  72. [72]
    SSRN for Authors and Researchers - Elsevier
    View ranking metrics below. Join SSRN! Follow the online process to guide your working paper submission. Submit Your Tomorrow's Research, Today: Create your ...
  73. [73]
    Recognising the power of preprints - SSRN Blog
    Sep 16, 2022 · Preprints allow rapid, early-stage research availability, enabling faster idea sharing and better research before peer-review, and are ...Missing: mechanism | Show results with:mechanism
  74. [74]
    Legal Scholarship Network - SSRN
    The Legal Scholarship Network on SSRN is an open access preprint server that provides a venue for authors to showcase their research papers in our digital ...
  75. [75]
    Political Science Network - SSRN
    The Political Science Network on SSRN is an open access preprint server that provides a venue for authors to showcase their research papers in our digital ...
  76. [76]
    humanities - SSRN
    Humanities are those disciplines that investigate human constructs, cultures and concerns, using critical and analytical approaches. Humanities encompass areas ...
  77. [77]
    Ranking Data Explained: Authors :: SSRN
    SSRN compiles rankings of Authors in our system based on a number of relevant measures, such as downloads and citations.
  78. [78]
    Article downloads and citations: Is there any relationship?
    Aug 6, 2025 · Third, there are positive correlations between downloads and citations, most downloaded articles are those that are more likely to receive ...Missing: actual | Show results with:actual
  79. [79]
    Figure 2: Correlation among Downloads and Citations As exhibited ...
    The percentages of cited documents range from 40 to 56 %. According to our study, 50–140 downloads correspond to one citation. A differentiation according to ...
  80. [80]
    [PDF] SSRN's Impact on Citations to Legal Scholarship and How to ...
    To explore this, we merged the SSRN-posted papers from all three data sets (for a total of 768 papers). We then compared the top and bottom ten percent based on ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  81. [81]
    SSRN's Impact on Citations to Legal Scholarship and How to ...
    Feb 18, 2022 · In this paper, we offer a brief overview of prior research on the benefits of open access. We then provide our data and findings.
  82. [82]
    Paper Spotlight: How SSRN Can Increase Citations
    Jan 26, 2023 · Posting on SSRN increases citations; 87% of highly cited papers were posted there. Keywords, abstract length, and time gap also affect  ...
  83. [83]
    [PDF] Assessing the SSRN-Based Law School Rankings
    Jan 1, 2006 · One noteworthy feature of the SSRN-based rankings is the high correlation between them and other rankings.
  84. [84]
    Early Stage Research Sharing Leads to Change - SSRN Blog
    Jan 24, 2020 · Social sharing of early stage research tends to lead to further conversations and collaboration helping to support the overall scientific progress of a given ...
  85. [85]
    Preprints 1: Speed, Readership, and Citation Advantage
    Jun 6, 2022 · In a study on preprints across different subjects, preprints were found to associate with 5 times more citations compared with a non-preprint ...
  86. [86]
    Research Dissemination and Impact: Evidence from Web Site ...
    The Journal of Finance web site disseminates research expediently to a broad audience. Papers were downloaded 284,170 times from November 1997 to November 1999.Missing: speed social
  87. [87]
    [PDF] Dissemination, Publication, and Impact of Finance Research
    Using numeric and textual data extracted from over 50,000 finance articles in SSRN during 2001–. 2019, we examine the relationship between measured qualities ...
  88. [88]
    [PDF] The Need for Speed
    How quickly do preprints become published articles? What benefits are there for authors considering posting a preprint and for those people.
  89. [89]
    [PDF] Ranking Law Schools: Using SSRN to Measure Scholarly ...
    Nov 18, 2005 · We find that all measures are strongly correlated; total and per-faculty measures are highly correlated; and SSRN measures based on number of ...
  90. [90]
    Assessing the SSRN-based law school rankings - ResearchGate
    Aug 7, 2025 · At the same time, the SSRN measures have important field and other biases, as well as gaming risks. We assess the correlations among the ...
  91. [91]
    [PDF] What Determines SSRN Downloads - Durham Research Online (DRO)
    Based on a sample of. 1107 papers of SSRN's Legal Scholarship Network, this article finds that a short title, a top-20 university affiliation, US authorship, ...
  92. [92]
    Elsevier Stirs Up Controversy with SSRN Acquisition
    May 18, 2016 · We'll also have access to Elsevier's broader collection of metrics and data analytics, which we can share with SSRN authors, readers and users.
  93. [93]
    Disappointing: Elsevier Buys Open Access Academic Pre-Publisher ...
    May 17, 2016 · So, quite obviously, there is reason to be concerned that Elsevier may make some “changes” to SSRN that make it a lot less valuable for the ...
  94. [94]
    Is it time for authors to leave SSRN? - Authors Alliance
    Jul 17, 2016 · It now appears that SSRN is taking up restrictive and hostile positions against authors' ability to decide when and how to share their work.Missing: controversies | Show results with:controversies
  95. [95]
    [PDF] SSRN and open access for non-institutional scholars - OSF
    SSRN and open access for non-institutional scholars. By Tiffany Li ... It is still possible that SSRN may change its policies to reflect open access ideals.
  96. [96]
    How useful is uploading a manuscript as a preprint to SSRN, and ...
    Dec 11, 2024 · Almost all good journals will still accept a submission of a paper that exists as a preprint- but do check their guidelines before submitting.
  97. [97]
    To what extent would you recommend or discourage publishing an ...
    Nov 29, 2018 · To what extent would you recommend or discourage publishing an academic working paper on SSRN to claim and put a stake in the ground (e.g., ...
  98. [98]
    Social sciences suffer from severe publication bias - Nature
    Aug 28, 2014 · Most null results in a sample of social-science studies were never published. This publication bias may cause others to waste time repeating the work.
  99. [99]
    Publication bias in the social sciences since 1959 - Research journals
    Feb 14, 2025 · We provide an in-depth analysis of publication bias over time by creating a unique data set, consisting of 12340 test statistics extracted from 571 papers ...
  100. [100]
    Is Social Science Research Politically Biased? - ProMarket
    Nov 15, 2023 · In new research, Matthew C. Ringgenberg, Chong Shu, and Ingrid M. Werner ask if academic research exhibits political slants.
  101. [101]
    https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4451697