Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Sodom and Gomorrah

Sodom and Gomorrah were ancient cities in the near the , depicted in 19 of the as sites of extreme moral corruption destroyed by God through a torrent of from the sky. The narrative centers on Lot, Abraham's nephew, who resided in ; divine messengers visited him, prompting the male inhabitants to demand their sexual violation, an act thwarted by angelic intervention before the cities' annihilation, with Lot's family fleeing—his wife perishing as a pillar of for glancing backward. Biblical texts attribute the cities' downfall to a confluence of sins, including haughtiness, excess, failure to aid the destitute, and unspecified abominations, alongside the explicit violence and sexual aggression illustrated in the episode. While the account is theological, geological analyses suggest it may encode a real catastrophe, such as seismic upheaval igniting the area's rich and deposits, yielding sulfurous flames and explosive devastation. Archaeological proposals for the sites include Early and nearby in the southeastern basin, which exhibit layers of conflagration and subsequent abandonment circa 2350–1950 BCE.

Etymology

Origins and Linguistic Analysis

The for , סְדֹם (Sədōm), derives from an unused root s-d-m connoting scorching or burning, evoking a volcanic or bituminous district consistent with its biblical association near the Dead Sea. derivations link it to verbs such as sadam ("to burn") or shadad ("to act violently" or "devastate"), reflecting potential topographic or destructive connotations rather than a pre-existing place name. These roots align with linguistic patterns but lack consensus, as no direct or cognates definitively trace the term's pre-biblical usage. For Gomorrah, rendered in Hebrew as עֲמֹרָה (ʿĂmōrā), the name stems from the ʿ-m-r, associated with binding sheaves into a or gripping tightly, possibly implying a "ruined " or bundled . Etymological proposals include ties to ʿamar ("to subdue" or "bind"), suggesting connotations of restraint or tyranny, though these interpretive extensions remain speculative without broader attestation. The term's form parallels agricultural or structural imagery in ancient Near Eastern contexts, but like , it appears primarily in without evident derivations from earlier dialects. No archaeological inscriptions or extrabiblical texts predating the confirm the names or , underscoring their likely emergence within Israelite linguistic traditions rather than as inherited toponyms from cultures. Proposed sites such as yield material evidence of ancient settlements in the region but no epigraphic matches to these specific designations, leaving etymologies reliant on post-compositional Hebrew analysis.

Biblical Narrative

Prelude: Lot's Settlement and the Invasion by

After the strife between their herdsmen due to increasing possessions, Abram suggested separation to his nephew Lot, allowing Lot to choose first. Lot lifted his eyes and saw the entire as well-watered everywhere like the garden of the or , before the destruction of and Gomorrah, and chose to dwell in the cities of the plain, pitching his tents near . The text notes the men of as wicked sinners against the exceedingly at that time. In the geopolitical conflicts of the region, the kings of , , , Zeboiim, and Bela (that is, Zoar) had served king of for twelve years but rebelled in the thirteenth. , in coalition with king of , king of Ellasar, and king of Goiim, campaigned against various peoples including the Rephaim, Zuzim, Emim, and , then defeated the rebelling kings in the Valley of Siddim (full of pits). The defeated kings fled with their forces, some falling into the pits, while their goods, food, and Lot—who dwelt in —with his possessions were captured and taken northward. This highlighted the cities' vulnerability amid broader Mesopotamian influence and local alliances. Upon learning of Lot's capture from an escapee, Abram mobilized 318 trained men born in his household and allied with , Eshcol, and Aner to pursue the captors to , then routed them by night in a surprise attack northward to Hobah near , recovering all goods, people, women, and Lot with his possessions. On the return to , king of Salem—priest of Most High—brought and wine, blessed Abram in the name of Most High creator of heaven and earth, and received a tenth of everything from Abram. The king of met Abram in the Valley of Shaveh to reclaim persons and goods, offering Abram the goods while taking the persons, but Abram refused, swearing by the Lord Most High not to take thread or sandal strap lest the king claim to have made Abram rich, though permitting his allies their share. This episode established patterns of divine favor through priestly mediation amid regional power struggles.

Divine Visitation and Judgment Pronounced

In 18:1-15, three visitors—identified in the narrative as the accompanied by two angels—appear to Abraham near the oaks of while he sits at the entrance of his tent during the heat of the day. Abraham offers them , washing their feet and preparing a meal of curds, , and a choice . During this visitation, the reaffirms the promise of a son to Abraham and , despite her advanced age of ninety years, prompting to laugh in disbelief from within the tent; the responds by questioning her reaction and confirming that "Is anything too hard for the ?" The narrative then shifts in Genesis 18:16-21 to the impending judgment on Sodom and Gomorrah, as the visitors rise to depart toward those cities. The discloses His intentions to Abraham, reasoning that Abraham, as the progenitor of a great nation through whom "all the nations of the shall be blessed," must know God's purpose to "do and judgment" in fulfillment of the established in 12 and 15. This underscores a causal link between divine and procedural verification: the states that "the outcry against Sodom and Gomorrah is great" and "their is very grave," yet declares, "I will go down to see whether they have done altogether according to the outcry that has come to me," implying an empirical assessment rather than presumptive condemnation. The two angels proceed as scouts to investigate, while the remains with Abraham. Abraham's follows in 18:22-33, where he appeals to the 's , querying whether fifty righteous individuals might avert destruction of the cities. The agrees, progressively conceding to Abraham's bargaining—down to forty-five, forty, thirty, twenty, and finally ten righteous—affirming that He would spare the cities for the sake of such a remnant to avoid harming the innocent alongside the guilty. This dialogue highlights a principle of in judgment, rooted in the recognition that the cities' collective guilt does not negate individual , though Abraham ultimately ceases after ten, unaware that even this threshold would not be met. The exchange concludes with the departing and Abraham returning to his place, setting the stage for the verification in without preempting the outcome.

The Destruction Event

The two angels lodged with Lot in , but the men of the city, both young and old, surrounded the house and demanded that the visitors be brought out so that they might "know" them, implying intent for . Lot went out to them, shut the door, and offered his two virgin daughters in their place, urging the mob not to act wickedly toward the strangers. The angels then seized Lot, pulled him inside, and struck the men of with blindness, both small and great, so that they wearied themselves groping for the door. The angels instructed Lot to gather his family—sons-in-law, sons, daughters, or any he had in the city—and flee, warning that the outcry against was so great that the had sent them to destroy it. Lot spoke to his sons-in-law, who dismissed it as jest; at dawn, the angels urged haste, as Lot hesitated, then compelled him, his wife, and two daughters out of the city for the sake of Abraham. They directed the family to escape to the hills and not look back or stop in the valley, but Lot requested refuge in nearby Zoar instead, which was granted. As they entered Zoar, the rained on and Gomorrah and fire from the out of heaven, overthrowing those cities, all the valley's inhabitants, and every vegetation of the ground. looked back from behind him and became a pillar of . Abraham went early in the morning to the place where he had stood before the , gazed toward Sodom and Gomorrah and the whole , and beheld dense smoke rising from the land like a . Thus, the destroyed the cities of the due to their verified , while delivering Lot amid the for Abraham's sake.

Scriptural References Beyond

Hebrew Bible Allusions to Sin and Fate

In the Book of Ezekiel, the prophet likens Jerusalem's iniquity to that of Sodom, specifying the latter's sins as pride, overabundance of food leading to idleness, and failure to aid the poor and needy, culminating in the commission of an "abomination" (Hebrew to'evah), a term denoting profound moral and ritual corruption warranting divine removal. This passage frames Sodom's fate as a direct outcome of societal haughtiness and ethical neglect, serving as a cautionary archetype for Israel's potential judgment. Deuteronomy evokes the desolation of Sodom and Gomorrah to depict the consequences of , portraying the land as a barren waste of and where no grows, akin to the cities' overthrow by in his . Similarly, prophesies Babylon's downfall, equating its ruin—the glory of kingdoms reduced to uninhabitable desolation—with the utter , emphasizing irreversible against imperial excess. The prophet recounts partial overthrows in mirroring and 's fate, where survivors were like brands snatched from fire yet failed to repent, underscoring persistent unrighteousness as the root cause of repeated calamity. extends this motif, comparing Jerusalem's corrupt prophets to and its people to for , deceit, and bolstering evildoers, while foretelling Edom's and Babylon's uninhabitability like the cities' overthrow. These references collectively pattern and as emblematic of unchecked moral decay—encompassing , pride, and grave ethical violations—culminating in exemplary as a perpetual warning and inevitable causal endpoint.

New Testament and Deuterocanonical Mentions

In the , verses 6–7 draw a parallel between and the cities of Sodom and Gomorrah, describing the latter as having "in a similar way also acted immorally (ἐκπορνεύσασαι, ekporneusasai) and gone after other flesh (σαρκὸς ἑτέρας, sarkos heteras), undergoing a penalty of fire as an example." This reference positions the destruction as a paradigmatic warning of for sexual deviance, with "other flesh" denoting relations outside natural order, distinct from the broader "" (porneia). The Second Epistle of Peter, in 2:4–10, cites and Gomorrah's reduction "to ashes" by as an exemplar of on the unjust, contrasting it with the of Lot, "a righteous man distressed by the sensual conduct (ἀσέλγεια, aselgeia) of the wicked," whose soul was tormented daily by their lawless deeds. The passage emphasizes this event as evidence that the knows how to deliver the pious from trials while reserving the unrighteous—particularly those indulging "the flesh in defiling passion" and scorning authority—for punishment until the day of . These texts employ the Sodom narrative eschatologically, underscoring moral corruption as a precursor to apocalyptic fire. Among Deuterocanonical writings, the (Wisdom of Solomon) 10:6–7 alludes to the episode in recounting how divine wisdom "rescued a righteous man" who fled a city amid "ungodly men" before "righteous retribution" struck the "five cities" with fire, traditionally understood as Lot's escape from the . This portrayal frames the event as an archetypal vindication of the just against pervasive vice, reinforcing themes of providential intervention without retelling the details. Such references in literature highlight Sodom and Gomorrah's enduring role as symbols of retribution for ethical in early Jewish and Christian thought.

The Sins of Sodom and Gomorrah

Primary Biblical Depictions of Immorality

In 13:13, the men of are described as "wicked and sinners before the exceedingly," establishing their moral corruption as a collective trait known to prior to Lot's there. This characterization underscores a pattern of overt defiance against divine standards, prompting divine awareness of their escalating depravity. Subsequently, in 18:20, declares that "the cry of Sodom and Gomorrah is great, and because their sin is very grievous," indicating that reports of their injustices—likely from or witnesses—have reached , necessitating personal investigation to confirm the extent of the offenses. The narrative in 19 provides the most direct depiction of Sodom's immorality through the actions of its inhabitants toward Lot's angelic visitors. The men of the city, encompassing "both old and young, all the people from every quarter," surround Lot's house and demand, "Where are the men which came in to thee this night? bring them out unto us, that we may know them." The Hebrew verb yādaʿ ("know"), used here, frequently denotes in biblical contexts, as seen in Genesis 4:1 and other passages, signaling the mob's aggressive intent for homosexual regardless of the visitors' status. This episode illustrates corporate participation in attempted , violating norms of and escalating to a direct threat against divine emissaries, which confirms the "grievous " warranting immediate judgment. Ezekiel 16:49-50 later specifies Sodom's vices in a prophetic likening to her: "pride, fulness of bread, and abundance of idleness was in her and in her daughters, neither did she strengthen the hand of the poor and needy. And they were haughty, and committed abomination [tôʿēḇâ] before me." While listing social neglect—pride, gluttony, laziness, and failure to aid the vulnerable—the culminating "abomination" refers to detestable acts paralleling the in and 20, where tôʿēḇâ denotes prohibited sexual relations, including male homosexual acts (; 20:13). This progression from societal excess to ritual and moral defilement exemplifies a verifiable biblical pattern wherein unchecked communal immorality provokes , as the text attributes destruction directly to these accumulated transgressions rather than isolated incidents.

Traditional Interpretations Emphasizing Sexual Vice

In Jewish literature, the Testament of (circa 2nd century BCE) depicts the sin of as a fundamental violation of , likening it to the Watchers' illicit unions and specifying that the Sodomites "changed the order of nature," which exegetes interpret as including homosexual acts that inverted divinely ordained sexual roles and contributed to communal dissolution. Philo of Alexandria (circa 20 BCE–50 CE), in On Abraham, condemned the Sodomites for "men having with men," portraying their practices as an unnatural inversion of and procreative purpose, which he argued eroded social cohesion and provoked as a direct consequence of unchecked lust overriding rational . Flavius Josephus (37–100 CE), in Antiquities of the Jews (1.194–203), recounts the men of Sodom demanding to "know" (implying sexual abuse) Lot's male visitors, framing this as emblematic of their broader depravity, including pride-fueled hatred and exploitation, with sexual aggression against strangers signaling a societal breakdown where vice supplanted justice and hospitality. Early Christian texts reinforced this linkage: the (1:7) states that Sodom and Gomorrah "indulged in sexual immorality and pursued strange flesh" ( sarkos heteras, denoting deviation from normative human sexual relations), traditionally understood as the men's homosexual advances on the angels, akin to the angels' own prior against kind boundaries, thus exemplifying how such perversions invite eschatological judgment. Similarly, 2 Peter 2:6–10 describes Sodom's destruction as an example to the ungodly, citing their surrender to "sensual conduct of unprincipled men" (aselgeia, connoting licentious excess, including forbidden liaisons), which tormented the righteous Lot and illustrated divine opposition to societies corrupted by base desires that undermine familial and moral structures. These ancient exegeses collectively attribute the cities' annihilation to sexual vices—chiefly —as the precipitating moral rot, positing a causal chain wherein individual deviance proliferates into collective and injustice, rendering the populace irredeemable and necessitating erasure to preserve cosmic order.

Modern Revisionist Views and Their Critiques

In the late 20th and early 21st centuries, certain biblical scholars and theologians, often aligned with interpretations, have proposed that the primary sins of Sodom and Gomorrah were breaches of , , or failure to aid the poor, rather than sexual . These views emphasize :49, which states that Sodom's iniquity involved "pride, excess of food, and prosperous ease, but did not aid the poor and needy," interpreting the 19 narrative as a cautionary tale against or toward strangers, with the mob's demand to "know" the angelic visitors reframed as attempted emblematic of inhospitality rather than targeted sexual vice. Proponents, such as those in theological circles, argue this aligns with broader prophetic critiques of economic , minimizing the sexual elements to avoid implications for contemporary debates on . Critics of these revisionist interpretations contend that they impose modern ideological priorities over the plain reading of the texts, selectively prioritizing Ezekiel's partial list of sins while disregarding Genesis 19's explicit details: the men of Sodom surround Lot's house demanding the visitors be brought out to "know" them—a Hebrew idiom (yada') consistently denoting sexual intercourse in biblical contexts (e.g., Genesis 4:1)—and Lot's response offering his daughters instead underscores the sexual nature of the threat, not mere rudeness to guests. Ezekiel 16:50 explicitly adds that Sodom committed "abomination" (to'evah), the same term used in Leviticus 18:22 and 20:13 for male homosexual acts, indicating sexual depravity as the culminating offense rather than an omission of Ezekiel's focus. Furthermore, ancient Near Eastern hospitality codes, while culturally significant, did not typically provoke divine in other biblical or extrabiblical accounts of violations, such as the inhospitable of strangers in (), which elicited human retribution but not total destruction; this suggests the scale of judgment in correlates with graver moral corruption, including the uniform ancient and medieval exegeses—from and in the 1st century CE to in the 4th—identifying sexual immorality, particularly and same-sex acts, as central to the narrative's condemnation. Such lacks attestation in pre-20th-century Jewish or Christian sources, emerging amid cultural shifts prioritizing affirmation of non-traditional over textual , often reflecting institutional biases in toward de-emphasizing biblical prohibitions on .

Historicity and Archaeological Evidence

Geographic and Chronological Context

The biblical narrative situates Sodom and Gomorrah within the patriarchal era, aligned with Abraham's migration and residence in , which conservative chronologies date to approximately 2100–1900 BCE during the Middle IIA period. This timeframe corresponds to a regional context of semi-nomadic and emerging urban settlements in the , with Abraham's birth estimated around 2166 BCE and his key interactions, including the events involving Lot's residence in Sodom, occurring by circa 2091 BCE. Geographically, Genesis describes the cities as part of a confederation in the "plain of the Jordan" (kikkar ha-Yarden), a fertile lowland east of and , extending toward the (Dead Sea) and characterized as abundantly irrigated like the Valley or , up to the vicinity of Zoar. The allied cities included , , , Zeboiim, and Bela (later called Zoar), whose kings rebelled against Mesopotamian overlords in the Valley of Siddim, later identified with the due to its tar pits. The Dead Sea basin, proximate to this described region, exhibits geological features including extensive (asp halt) deposits that surface periodically, often linked to seismic disturbances along the Dead Sea system, a major left-lateral strike-slip fault extending from the northward. Historical and paleoseismic records document recurrent earthquakes in the area, with evidence of events capable of inducing ground or in unconsolidated sediments, potentially contributing to localized submersion of low-lying terrains over millennia. Such dynamics have informed hypotheses tying natural cataclysms to the destruction lore, though direct causation remains unverified without stratigraphic correlation to the biblical timeline.

Proposed Sites and Supporting Data

One prominent proposal locates Sodom and Gomorrah at the Early sites of and in the southeastern region of the Dead Sea in . , excavated from 1973 to 1979, spanned approximately 10 hectares with fortifications, a large containing over 500 tombs and evidence of a population in the thousands during its peak in Early III (ca. 3200–2350 BCE). The site exhibits widespread destruction by fire around 2350 BCE, marked by ash layers, collapsed structures, and charred remains, followed by permanent abandonment, aligning with biblical descriptions of total obliteration without subsequent habitation. Adjacent , a smaller fortified settlement about 1 kilometer south, shows analogous fiery destruction at the same period, with collapsed walls and heat-affected pottery, positioning it as a candidate for due to its proximity and reduced scale compared to . An identifies Tall el-Hammam, a larger Middle site northeast of the Dead Sea, as , based on excavations revealing a 1.5-meter-thick destruction layer with vitrified (melted) materials, , and high-temperature indicators exceeding 2000°C around 1650 BCE. Proponents, including Steven Collins, attribute this to a cosmic airburst event analogous to the Tunguska , as detailed in a 2021 study analyzing spherules and anomalies. However, the paper faced significant criticism for methodological issues, including non-reproducible data, image manipulation, and overinterpretation of impact proxies, leading to its retraction in 2025. Moreover, the site's dating postdates conventional estimates for the patriarchal (ca. 2100–1900 BCE) by centuries, and post-destruction reoccupation contradicts biblical accounts of enduring desolation. Geographic factors, such as the site's northern placement versus biblical indicators of a southern plain and eastward Zoar, further weaken the identification. Ongoing debates persist between northern proposals like Tall el-Hammam and southern sites such as Bab edh-Dhra and Numeira, with recent 2024-2025 excavations at Zoar (modern Safi) revealing Early Bronze connections and supporting southeastern locations around 2000-1900 BCE. Comparative assessments favor the / cluster for its alignment with a densely populated, fortified complex destroyed by and left uninhabited, consistent with empirical stratigraphic and evidence from the Early horizon, despite chronological debates tying the biblical narrative to later periods. Tall el-Hammam's extreme thermal signatures, while intriguing, rely on contested extraterrestrial mechanisms lacking corroboration from independent proxies, prioritizing observable fire-based ruin over speculative impacts.

Destruction Mechanisms and Recent Findings

Archaeological investigations at proposed Sodom sites, such as Tall el-Hammam in the , have revealed a ~1.5-meter-thick layer of , , and high-temperature melt materials capping Middle Bronze Age structures, suggesting a sudden destructive event involving extreme heat exceeding 1,500°C, which vitrified and mudbricks. Collapsed buildings at these loci show evidence of instantaneous structural failure, with roof beams combusting prior to walls toppling inward, consistent with fire-induced collapse rather than gradual decay or siege warfare. Similar burn layers and incinerated remains appear at southeastern sites like , where deposits up to 40 cm thick overlie collapsed fortifications, indicating rapid conflagration potentially triggered by seismic activity in the tectonically active . A 2021 hypothesis attributed Tall el-Hammam's destruction around 1650 BCE to a cosmic airburst from a fragmented or , citing , spikes, and microspherules as extraterrestrial markers, akin to the . However, this theory faced scrutiny for methodological flaws, including inconsistent dating and alternative explanations for the geochemical signatures via terrestrial processes like earthquakes igniting natural deposits abundant in the region. In July 2025, retracted the paper after determined the evidence insufficient to support an airburst over mundane seismic-thermal mechanisms, emphasizing that high-heat anomalies could result from localized earthquakes fracturing salt diapirs and releasing flammable hydrocarbons. This retraction underscores the need for replicable data in interpreting ambiguous stratigraphic anomalies. Excavations from 2023–2025, including work by Titus Kennedy at potential Zoar sites southeast of the Dead Sea, have uncovered unburned comparative strata absent the cataclysmic markers seen at adjacent ruined loci, reinforcing a localized pattern where fire and structural collapse spared nearby settlements like Zoar. Steven Collins' ongoing Tall el-Hammam digs report continued recovery of heat-altered artifacts, but without affirming origins post-retraction, aligning destruction with earthquake-amplified fires that could volatilize sulfurous bitumens, evoking biblical "fire and brimstone" through natural combustion of regional volatiles rather than divine or cosmic intervention. These findings prioritize empirical stratigraphy over speculative etiology, with seismic models explaining the uniformity of burn horizons across multiple sites via fault-line propagation of ignited subsurface gases.

Theological and Religious Perspectives

Jewish Exegesis and Moral Lessons

In , the destruction of and Gomorrah exemplifies against a society characterized by systemic immorality, including sexual deviance and profound social injustice. The in 109a recounts that the inhabitants engaged in egregious acts, such as enacting laws that penalized and , exemplified by statutes imposing death for aiding strangers or the poor, thereby institutionalizing cruelty and greed. These narratives portray Sodomites as embodying inverted ethics, where communal welfare was criminalized, leading to an "outcry" that provoked God's judgment, as aggregated vices—described hyperbolically as fifty measures concentrated in Sodom compared to the world's broader distribution—rendered the cities irredeemable. Midrashic expansions, such as in , further detail perversions like judicial corruption and exploitation of the vulnerable, underscoring that sexual sins, while present, intertwined with broader ethical decay rather than standing alone. Moral lessons drawn emphasize the causal link between collective societal and divine , warning that unchecked perversion and rejection of natural moral order invite annihilation. Rabbinic stresses communal responsibility, positing that Sodom's downfall illustrates how prosperity, derived from fertile lands like the well-watered , fostered arrogance and , eroding interpersonal bonds essential to human flourishing. Lot's partial serves as a cautionary : though spared for his toward the angels, his offer of his daughters to and subsequent familial lapses highlight flawed insufficient against pervasive , teaching that individual cannot redeem a rotten without broader ethical . Medieval commentators like Rashi and Ramban reinforce these themes by tying the narrative to timeless imperatives of tzedakah (righteous giving) and mishpat (justice), viewing the cities' fate as a paradigm for how violations of covenantal ethics—rooted in Torah principles of mutual aid—trigger causal consequences from a just deity. This exegesis affirms the historicity of the events as tied to identifiable locales in the Jordan Valley, per some midrashim, to ground the moral imperatives in real-world exemplars rather than mere allegory, privileging empirical anchors for ethical instruction.

Christian Doctrinal Applications

Early Church Fathers such as regarded the destruction of Sodom and Gomorrah as divine retribution for sexual immorality, portraying the cities' fate as a lingering warning where the land still bore the scent of brimstone. invoked the event to exemplify God's judgment on sodomy, emphasizing lust as a core vice provoking eternal fire akin to hell's preview. Similarly, Augustine in contrasted Sodom's annihilation for unnatural vices with Rome's survival despite comparable depravities, underscoring the archetype of lust's catastrophic consequences under God's causal justice. The reinforces this in 1:7, which describes Sodom and Gomorrah as undergoing eternal fire for pursuing "strange flesh," a phrase evangelical interpreters understand as homosexual acts, paralleling the 19 demand for male visitors by the city's men. During the , figures like and perpetuated this emphasis, using Sodom as a singular exemplar of God's wrath against , with deploying it rhetorically against moral inversion and Calvin viewing the delay in destruction as divine forbearance overwhelmed by accumulated sexual crimes. Contemporary evangelical doctrine upholds homosexuality as a central sin of Sodom, citing the biblical narrative's focus on male-on-male assault rather than mere inhospitality, which Lot mitigated by offering shelter yet failed to avert due to the deeper vice. Progressive reinterpretations reducing the sin to hospitality violations—drawing selectively from Ezekiel 16:49's mention of pride and neglect of the poor—are critiqued as revisionist, overlooking Genesis 19's explicit sexual intent and Jude's "strange flesh," which denotes unnatural desire beyond xenophobia. Such dilutions ignore the text's causal primacy of lust, as evidenced by the angels' male form triggering the assault, rendering social justice framings textually ungrounded.

Islamic Narratives and Parallels

In the , the prophet Lut, identified as the nephew of , is dispatched to the people of four cities near the Dead Sea, known collectively as the "people of Lut," who prospered materially but descended into egregious moral corruption, particularly the unnatural act of men pursuing sexual relations with men rather than women. This depravity, coupled with rejection of prophetic warnings and violations of , forms the core vice prompting divine intervention, as detailed in Surah Hud (11:74-83), where angels dispatched to proceed to Lut, affirming their protective role and instructing family evacuation under cover of night. Lut implores his people to heed the message of and abandon their abominations, offering his daughters in to redirect their lusts, but the inhabitants demand access to the male guests, exposing their persistent disbelief and hostility toward messengers. The recounts the cataclysm in Surah Al-Hijr (15:57-77), where the angels reveal their mission, and at dawn, the cities are inverted, bombarded with stones of baked clay designated for sinners, extinguishing the populace save Lut's obedient kin—his wife perishes for lingering in sympathy with the condemned. Hadith collections, such as Jami' at-Tirmidhi, elaborate on the narrative through prophetic traditions, portraying the people's sins as encompassing , on highways, and public indecency, with the destruction serving as exemplary punishment for unrepentant vice and ingratitude toward Allah's signs. While sharing motifs of prophetic , angelic visitation, spousal , and retributive overturning with biblical accounts, Quranic depictions diverge by foregrounding the causal primacy of homosexual inversion and prophetic repudiation over broader inhospitality, omitting post-deluge incestuous episodes, and specifying lithic projectiles as the of , underscoring divine against corroborated ethical inversion.

Cultural Impact and Symbolism

In Historical Literature and Art

In Dante Alighieri's Divine Comedy, completed around 1320, the biblical destruction of Sodom and Gomorrah serves as a key allegory for the punishment of sodomy in the seventh circle of Inferno. Sinners there, including figures like Brunetto Latini, endure eternal fire on a burning plain, directly evoking the sulfurous brimstone rained upon the cities for their unnatural vices, as referenced in Inferno XI, lines 49-50, where Dante equates the sin with "Sodom and Cahors." This placement underscores a medieval Christian view of sodomy as violence against nature, warranting infernal retribution akin to the cities' annihilation. Medieval artistic representations, such as those in illuminated manuscripts like William de Brailes' 13th-century depiction of Lot's family fleeing, portray the cataclysm with vivid flames and fleeing figures to illustrate divine justice against collective sin. The 1493 further exemplifies this by showing Sodom engulfed in fire, reinforcing the narrative's role in moral instruction through visual warnings of for moral decay. Renaissance works intensified the dramatic symbolism, with Albrecht Dürer's Lot Fleeing with his Daughters from Sodom (c. 1498) capturing the family's urgent escape amid exploding infernos, symbolizing the righteous remnant spared from sin's consequences. Similarly, Peter Paul Rubens' The Flight of Lot and His Family from Sodom (1613–1615) depicts angels guiding the escape, emphasizing themes of obedience and the wages of iniquity through dynamic composition and fiery backdrops. These pre-modern depictions consistently framed Sodom and Gomorrah as exemplars of hubris and vice, transitioning biblical judgment into enduring allegories of retribution in European literature and visual arts.

Contemporary References and Debates

In the United States, the Supreme Court's 2003 ruling in Lawrence v. Texas declared state sodomy laws unconstitutional under the Due Process Clause, invalidating statutes in 13 states that criminalized private consensual sexual acts between adults, including same-sex sodomy. This decision, which overturned the 1986 Bowers v. Hardwick precedent, elicited criticism from religious organizations arguing that such laws reflected biblical moral standards, with some invoking Sodom and Gomorrah as exemplars of divine opposition to homosexual conduct. For instance, the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops condemned the ruling for undermining traditional Judeo-Christian ethics rooted in scriptural narratives of sexual immorality. Culturally, the Sodom and Gomorrah story has influenced 20th-century media portrayals of moral excess and cataclysmic judgment. The 1962 epic film Sodom and Gomorrah, directed by and starring as Lot, depicted the cities as hubs of , , and sexual license, culminating in their fiery destruction amid Hebrew resistance to local corruption. Earlier, the 1922 silent film Sodom and Gomorrah by emphasized festival revelry and familial tragedy, using the biblical motif to explore themes of and in a lavish production involving thousands of extras. These adaptations, while dramatizing the narrative for entertainment, reinforced the cities' symbolic role as archetypes of societal decadence in popular imagination. In political discourse, particularly among conservatives, Sodom and Gomorrah serve as rhetorical warnings against contemporary moral decline, often analogized to the erosion of traditional family structures and the expansion of sexual freedoms. Figures on the right have likened modern urban centers or policy shifts toward LGBTQ+ acceptance to the biblical cities' trajectory, portraying them as precursors to cultural collapse, as seen in critiques framing 21st-century liberalism as inviting divine or natural consequences akin to the ancient brimstone judgment. Scholarly and activist debates in the late 20th and 21st centuries have intensified over the narrative's applicability to , with LGBTQ+-affirming interpreters emphasizing inhospitality, , and as the core sins rather than consensual same-sex relations. Organizations like The Reformation Project contend that of over 20 biblical references to , none explicitly tie its downfall to , prioritizing :49-50's focus on pride and neglect of the poor. Conversely, traditionalist scholars highlight the Genesis 19 account's depiction of male inhabitants demanding sexual access to male visitors—interpreted historically as homosexual —and trace "sodomy" as a term for such acts directly to the story, arguing that modern reframings underemphasize the sexual violence's gendered nature to align with progressive ideologies. This divide reflects broader tensions, where empirical textual analysis of the attempted male-on-male violation supports a sexual emphasis, countering inhospitality-only views that sources attribute to selective canonical weighting influenced by post-1960s cultural advocacy.

References

  1. [1]
    The Bible and geology: destruction of Sodom and Gomorrah
    The biblical story of the destruction of Sodom and Gomorrah is interpeted as a reflection of a real natural disaster.Missing: scholarly | Show results with:scholarly
  2. [2]
    Homosexuality, the Bible, and the Rabbis | Bible Interp
    In Genesis 19.5, the male citizens of Sodom demanded that Lot allow them to commit homosexual rape against his visitors, and were only prevented from carrying ...Missing: analysis | Show results with:analysis
  3. [3]
    [PDF] Sodom and Gomorrah from an Eschatological Perspective
    The destruction of Sodom by fire and brimstone also points to it. In the account concerning Sodom the destruction is clearly a punishment. As Alter points ...
  4. [4]
    Which Site Is Sodom? A Comparison of Bab edh-Dhra and Tall el ...
    Two archaeological sites have been proposed for the biblical city of Sodom—Bab edh-Dhra and Tall el-Hammam. Both locations have evidence of fiery destruction ...Missing: peer- | Show results with:peer-
  5. [5]
    Strong's Hebrew: 5467. סְדֹם (Sedom) -- Sodom - Bible Hub
    From an unused root meaning to scorch; burnt (ie Volcanic or bituminous) district; Sedom, a place near the Dead Sea -- Sodom.
  6. [6]
    The amazing name Sodom: meaning and etymology
    The name Sodom: Summary ; From an unused verb סדם (sadam), to burn. ; From the verb שדד (sadad), to harrow or plough a field, or the verb שדד (shadad), to act ...
  7. [7]
    Sodom: Etymologies and Location - B-Hebrew
    May 7, 2016 · The root of “Sodom”, namely סד, may render all three of the following Assyrian/Akkadian words: (i) sādu/“pasture”/“an alloy of gold”; and ...Sodom: Etymologies and Location - Page 2 - B-HebrewSodom and Gomorrah - B-Hebrew: The Biblical Hebrew ForumMore results from bhebrew.biblicalhumanities.org
  8. [8]
    Strong's Hebrew: 6017. עֲמֹרָה (Amorah) -- Gomorrah - Bible Hub
    NASB: Gomorrah Word Origin: [from H6014 (עָמַר - To bind sheaves)] 1. a (ruined) heap 2. Amorah, a place in Israel. Strong's Exhaustive Concordance. Gomorrah.
  9. [9]
    The name Gomorrah - meaning and etymology - Abarim Publications
    Meaning: Tyrannical Dealings, Throes: People Of Fear, People Who Shoot Arrows; Etymology: From the verb עמר ('amar), to grip of bind.
  10. [10]
    Gomorrah - Etymology, Origin & Meaning
    From Hebrew 'omer meaning "sheaf," this biblical site name likely refers to regional fertility; related term: Gomorrean. Origin and meaning combined.
  11. [11]
    The Discovery of the Sin Cities of Sodom & Gomorrah
    Archaeological, geographical, and other lines of evidence clearly show that Sodom and Gomorrah have been found at Bab edh-Dhra and Numeira.
  12. [12]
    Sodom and Gomorrah | A Historical, Archaeological and Theological ...
    Jan 24, 2023 · I will compare the scholarly views and findings on the location and archaeological evidence of Sodom. ... Bab edh-Dhra, if it is Sodom, of ca.Missing: peer- | Show results with:peer-
  13. [13]
    https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Genesis%2013:5-13&version=ESV
  14. [14]
    https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Genesis%2014:1-12&version=ESV
  15. [15]
    https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Genesis%2014:13-24&version=ESV
  16. [16]
    https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Genesis+18%3A1-15&version=ESV
  17. [17]
    https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Genesis+18%3A16-21&version=ESV
  18. [18]
    https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Genesis+18%3A22-33&version=ESV
  19. [19]
    https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Genesis%2019:4-11&version=ESV
  20. [20]
    https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Genesis%2019:12-26&version=ESV
  21. [21]
    https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Genesis%2019:27-29&version=ESV
  22. [22]
    https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Ezekiel%2016%3A49-50&version=NIV
  23. [23]
    https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Deuteronomy%2029%3A23&version=NIV
  24. [24]
    https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Isaiah%2013%3A19&version=NIV
  25. [25]
    https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Amos%204%3A11&version=NIV
  26. [26]
    https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Jeremiah%2023%3A14&version=NIV
  27. [27]
    https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Jeremiah%2049%3A18&version=NIV
  28. [28]
    https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Jeremiah%2050%3A40&version=NIV
  29. [29]
    Jude 1:7 Commentaries: just as Sodom and Gomorrah and the cities ...
    In like manner, as Sodom, and Gomorrah did, likeness of sin inferring likeness of punishment. Strange flesh; margin, other flesh; he means male flesh, which is ...
  30. [30]
    Genesis 13:13 - King James Bible
    Genesis 13:13. “But the men of Sodom were wicked and sinners before the LORD exceedingly.” King James Version (KJV).Missing: exact | Show results with:exact
  31. [31]
    Genesis 18:20 - King James Bible
    Genesis 18:20 KJV: And the LORD said, Because the cry of Sodom and Gomorrah is great, and because their sin is very grievous;Missing: exact | Show results with:exact
  32. [32]
    Genesis 19:5 - King James Bible
    But before they lay down, the men of the city, even the men of Sodom, compassed the house round, both old and young, all the people from every quarter:And ...Missing: exact | Show results with:exact
  33. [33]
    Q&A: Homosexuality or Inhospitality? - Genesis 19:5
    Why was Sodom and Gomorrah destroyed because of inhospitality? After all, they just wanted to know the visitors, right? (Gen. 19:5, KJV)
  34. [34]
    https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Ezekiel%2016:49-50&version=KJV
  35. [35]
    Sodom and Gomorrah throughout the Bible - Watchful
    Aug 6, 2014 · Even more, “abomination” may describe sexual sin in Ezekiel 16:50. The word also appears in Leviticus 18 and 20 in the context of laws ...
  36. [36]
    [PDF] IDENTIFYING THE SIN OF SODOM IN EZEKIEL 16:49–50
    Many affirming scholars triumphantly assert that based upon Ezekiel's teaching, Sodom's sin cannot be homosexuality especially as reflected in today's “loving, ...
  37. [37]
    Testament of Naphtali 3:2 | Jude 1:13 | intertextual.bible
    ... Sodom, which changed the order of nature. In like manner the Watchers also changed the order of their nature, whom the Lord cursed at the flood, on whose ...
  38. [38]
    The Ancient Pedigree of Homosexuality as the Sin of Sodom
    A tradition within Second Temple Judaism and the primitive church attributes sexual sins, including homosexuality, to Sodom and its neighbors.
  39. [39]
    The Sin of Sodom in Late Antiquity - jstor
    first to interpret the Sodom narrative in this way was Philo of Alexandria, a Hellenized Jewish writer of the first century CE. Philo's interpretation of ...
  40. [40]
    Josephus: The Complete Works - Christian Classics Ethereal Library
    HOW GOD OVERTHREW THE NATION OF THE SODOMITES, OUT OF HIS WRATH AGAINST THEM FOR THEIR SINS. ... Sodom. 3. When Abraham heard this, he was grieved for the ...
  41. [41]
    https://answersingenesis.org/contradictions-in-the-bible/what-was-primary-sin-sodom-gomorrah/
  42. [42]
    What is the strange flesh in Jude 1:7? | GotQuestions.org
    Jul 8, 2025 · "Strange flesh" in Jude 1:7 traditionally refers to homosexual desire, linked to Sodom, and is "different" from God's plan for sexuality.
  43. [43]
    What Does Jude 7 Mean By "Other Flesh"? - The Gospel Coalition
    May 22, 2015 · The “other flesh” in verse 7 is a reference to the men of Sodom trying to have sex with Lot's angelic visitors.
  44. [44]
    [PDF] A Literature Survey of the History of Interpretation of the Sodom and
    As regards pre-Christian interpretation, Josephus, Philo, apocryphal and intertestamental sources, as well as the rabbis, all condemned Sodom for homosexual.
  45. [45]
    Sodom and Gomorrah and the Sin of Inhospitality - Catholic Answers
    It's true that one of the sins of Sodom and Gomorrah was inhospitality. Ezekiel 16:49 says as much: “Behold, this was the guilt of your sister Sodom.Missing: modern revisionist interpretations injustice
  46. [46]
    The story of Sodom and Gomorrah asks us to consider our own ...
    Dec 11, 2022 · Just before the guests leave, God reveals to Abraham his plans to destroy Sodom and Gomorrah, a city of extreme wickedness. An initial contrast ...
  47. [47]
    Sodom and Gomorrah: How the "classical" interpretation gets it wrong
    Sep 19, 2018 · The story of Sodom and Gomorrah is one of the favorite passages of persons who oppose same-sex behavior. It occurs in Genesis 19:1-29.Missing: modern revisionist inhospitality social injustice<|separator|>
  48. [48]
    The Sin of Sodom and Gomorrah is not about "Hospitality"
    Dec 4, 2012 · The sin of Sodom “has nothing to do with homosexual acts, or homosexual rape. Rather,” they said, “It is only about violations of hospitality rules of the ...
  49. [49]
    What Did God Hate About Sodom? | Catholic Answers Magazine
    Jul 28, 2025 · Why were the people of Sodom and Gomorrah destroyed? For the sin of inhospitality? Or does the obvious answer make more sense?
  50. [50]
    Patriarchal Era 2166-1876 BC - Associates for Biblical Research
    Patriarchal Era 2166-1876 BC. Archaeological and historical articles and media dealing with the veracity and reliability of the Patriarchal narratives found in ...
  51. [51]
    Life of Abraham Timeline - Bible Study
    1960 BC Abraham (Abram) is Born Abram (his birth name before being renamed Abraham) is the third son born to a man named Terah living in Ur of the Chaldees.
  52. [52]
    The Patriarchs | The Bible Timeline
    The Patriarchs c.2166–c.1660 BC From the call of Abraham, to Sodom and Gomorrah, and the rise of the 12 Jewish tribes through Isaac and Jacob.
  53. [53]
    The Location of Sodom: What Does the Bible Say?
    Dec 30, 2021 · So Sodom was somewhere east of Bethel and Ai in the Jordan River Valley north of the Dead Sea. We can further identify the location of Sodom ...
  54. [54]
    What were Admah and Zeboiim in the Bible? | GotQuestions.org
    Jan 4, 2022 · Admah and Zeboiim (or Zeboyim) are two cities in the vicinity of Sodom and Gomorrah that suffered the same fate as Sodom and Gomorrah.
  55. [55]
    Genesis 14:8 - The War of the Kings - Bible Hub
    - The ruler of Admah, a city allied with Sodom and Gomorrah. ... - The ruler of Zeboiim, also allied with Sodom and Gomorrah. ... - The ruler of Bela, later known ...Audio · Cross · Study
  56. [56]
    Geology and Bitumens of the Dead Sea Area, Palestine and ...
    Sep 14, 2019 · The appearance of the bitumen is said always to be preceded by earthquakes. The last-named historian68 wrote that the material. is blown to ...Missing: seismic | Show results with:seismic
  57. [57]
    resolution geological record of historic earthquakes in the Dead Sea ...
    Feb 10, 2001 · questions regarding the seismic activity in the Dead Sea region remain open, our correlation between historical earthquake re- cords and the ...Missing: bitumen | Show results with:bitumen
  58. [58]
    Dead Sea Chronicles Part VII: Sodom, Gomorrah, and the Seismic ...
    Jan 20, 2025 · Tectonic setting: The Dead Sea sits along the active Dead Sea Transform fault, ensuring a steady supply of seismic events to create seismites.
  59. [59]
    Ancient History in depth: The Destruction of Sodom and Gomorrah
    Feb 17, 2011 · Professor Frostick believed the ground around the Dead Sea was capable of liquefying. However, the towns had to be built on ground that ...
  60. [60]
    Uncovering the Biblical City of Sodom | ArmstrongInstitute.org
    Chief credit for the discovery of Bab edh-Dhra goes to the late “father of biblical archaeology,” William F. Albright (1891–1971). Albright believed Sodom, ...
  61. [61]
    https://www.bibleplaces.com/babedhdhra/
  62. [62]
    Locating Sodom: A Critique of the Northern Proposal
    Excavations at two sites in that region, Bab edh-Dhra and Numeira, have provided strong evidence that these two sites should be identified as Sodom and Gomorrah ...
  63. [63]
    Part 2 - Finding Sodom and Gomorrah with Dr. Titus Kennedy
    Jul 11, 2025 · And then we hear about the destruction of Sodom and Gomorrah in verse 24-25. If we go down to verse 30, here's where we get to the story ...
  64. [64]
    The Destruction of Sodom: Archaeological Evidence Behind the ...
    Nov 8, 2024 · The Bible says that God destroyed Sodom and Gomorrah with fire and brimstone because the people there lived a vicious and godless life.
  65. [65]
    Biblical Problems Identifying Tall el-Hammam as Sodom
    Mar 10, 2021 · “Which Site is Sodom? A Comparison of Bab edh-Dhra and Tall el-Hammam.” Biblical Research Bulletin 14, no. 1: 1–17. Petrovich Douglas ...
  66. [66]
    Evidence that a cosmic impact destroyed ancient city in the Jordan ...
    Sep 20, 2021 · Tall el-Hamman has been the focus of an ongoing debate as to whether it could be the biblical city of Sodom, one of the two cities in the ...<|separator|>
  67. [67]
    Criticism engulfs paper claiming an asteroid destroyed Biblical ...
    Oct 1, 2021 · A paper implying that the Biblical story of the destruction of Sodom and Gomorrah might have been the retelling of the devastation wrought by an exploding ...Missing: critiques | Show results with:critiques
  68. [68]
    Tunguska-Like Event May Not Have Inspired Biblical Tale Of Sodom ...
    May 26, 2025 · Some think the city may have been the biblical city of Sodom, however, archaeological dating shows its destruction was later than biblical ...
  69. [69]
    Where Is Sodom? - Biblical Archaeology Society
    Feb 20, 2013 · Sodom and its sister cities are located in the large oval-shaped, fertile plain just north of the Dead Sea called simply ha-kikkar, or “the Disk” (Genesis 13, ...
  70. [70]
    RETRACTED ARTICLE: A Tunguska sized airburst destroyed Tall el ...
    We present evidence that in ~ 1650 BCE (~ 3600 years ago), a cosmic airburst destroyed Tall el-Hammam, a Middle-Bronze-Age city in the southern Jordan Valley ...
  71. [71]
    BIBLICAL BURNING - ECU News Services - East Carolina University
    Oct 7, 2021 · A Middle Bronze Age city called Tall el-Hammam, located in the Jordan Valley northeast of the Dead Sea, was destroyed by a cosmic airburst.
  72. [72]
    Was Sodom destroyed by a comet? Journal pulls controversial study
    Jul 14, 2025 · Scientific Reports retracts 2021 Tall el-Hammam “airburst” paper after reviewers say the evidence does not add up.Missing: peer- reviewed
  73. [73]
    Sodom and Gomorrah were not destroyed by the impact of an ...
    Apr 24, 2025 · A team of U.S. scientists had just presented evidence suggesting that “a cosmic airburst” obliterated Tall el-Hammam, a town located in the ...<|separator|>
  74. [74]
    Finding Sodom and Gomorrah with Archeologist Dr. Titus Kennedy
    Jun 27, 2025 · Dr. Titus Kennedy talked about the location of Sodom and Gomorrah, which he believes to be southeast of the Dead Sea.
  75. [75]
    Is Tall el-Hammam Sodom? With Dr. Steven Collins (Part 2) - YouTube
    Feb 11, 2025 · ... Sodom. Do the archaeological remains found during excavations confirm a meteorite airburst over this ancient city? Does Tall el-Hammam fit ...Missing: Titus Kennedy 2023-2025
  76. [76]
    Archaeology and the Destruction of Sodom - Aish.com
    The Biblical account describes Sodom and Gomorrah and the surrounding area ... There is no evidence of collapsed walls across the entire city. There ...
  77. [77]
    Sodom and Gomorrah: Cities Destroyed by G-d - Chabad.org
    The cities of Sodom and Gomorrah have come to epitomize moral depravity and cruelty. As we read in this week's Torah portion, G‑d's only recourse was to ...
  78. [78]
    Lessons From Sodom and Gomorrah - Tablet Magazine
    Nov 11, 2019 · In Sodom, feeding a hungry person was a criminal act that carried the death penalty. The act that forced God's interference was a legal one.
  79. [79]
    Biblical Archeology: Sodom and Gomorrah - Aish.com
    Sodom and Gomorrah were part of a metropolis assumed to have been located on the eastern bank of the Dead Sea consisting of five cities, each with its own king.Missing: linguistic | Show results with:linguistic
  80. [80]
    Apology Chapter 40 - Tertullian - Logos Virtual Library: Catalogue
    ... Sodom and Gomorrah were consumed by fire from heaven. The country yet smells of that conflagration; and if there are apples there upon the trees, it is only ...
  81. [81]
    12 Quotes Against Sodomy - America Needs Fatima
    Jan 20, 2014 · Tertullian (160-225). Tertullian was a great genius and apologist ... “And Sodom and Gomorrah might have appeased it [God's wrath], had ...
  82. [82]
    The City of God: on Augustine's vision of Empire - Engelsberg Ideas
    Aug 12, 2020 · Far worse has happened in Roman history, and Rome has not been wiped off the face of the earth like Sodom and Gomorrah, the 'cities of the ...
  83. [83]
    A Singular Example of the Wrath of God: The Use of Sodom in ...
    Aug 2, 2005 · Second, he distances himself from interpretations of Sodom's sin as principally sexual sin. Third, he does not identify the desires and acts ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  84. [84]
    In Season: Jacob's “Ladder” and the Condescension of God in ...
    For example, God walked in the garden (Gen. 3); descended to earth in order to mercifully confuse our languages (Gen. 11); investigated the sins of Sodom and ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  85. [85]
    Homosexuality and “Strange Flesh” - Apologetics Press
    Oct 5, 2004 · An honest and objective appraisal of Jude 7 provides no support for the homosexual cause. The Bible consistently treats homosexual behavior as ...Missing: traditional | Show results with:traditional
  86. [86]
    The Story of Prophet Lut (عَلَيْهِ ٱلسَّلَامُ) - My Islam
    Learn about the story of Prophet Lut in Islam from the Quran. The story deals with the Cities of sodom and Gomorrah both which were prosperous and thriving.
  87. [87]
    Islam and Homosexuality: What happened in Sodom and Gomorrah ...
    Mar 6, 2017 · Men of the towns of Sodom and Gomorrah would perform sexual acts upon each other, acts of sodomy that go against human nature, and against the ...
  88. [88]
    Biblical and Quranic narratives - The Glorious Quran and Science
    Aug 9, 2017 · Following the destruction of Sodom, the Bible describes an incestous event between Lot and his two daughters, at his daughters' behest, in ...
  89. [89]
    Sodomy - Danteworlds
    Identifying the sins of these last two groups with Sodom and Cahors (Inf. 11.49-50), Dante draws on the biblical destruction of Sodom (and Gomorrah) by fire and ...
  90. [90]
    Dante's Inferno - Circle 7 - Cantos 12-17 - Danteworlds
    Identifying the sins of these last two groups with Sodom and Cahors (Inf. 11.49-50), Dante draws on the biblical destruction of Sodom (and Gomorrah) by fire and ...
  91. [91]
    Sodomy in Dante's Inferno and Purgatorio - jstor
    Although condemning the sin of Sodom in Inferno, he draws a transparent distinction between sin and sinners. He does so most obviously in the portrayal of ...
  92. [92]
    William de Brailes William de Brailes, Lot and his Family Flee ...
    This page from Walters manuscript W.106 depicts a scene from the story of Sodom and Gomorrah. Having saved Lot and his family from the Sodomites, ...Missing: depictions | Show results with:depictions
  93. [93]
    Lot's Wife Turns as an Act of Resistance: The Art of Yehuda Levy ...
    Oct 18, 2021 · The renowned Nuremberg Chronicle, an illustrated encyclopedia from 1493, depicts the destruction of a medieval-looking town of Sodom. Sodom and ...
  94. [94]
    Lot Fleeing with his Daughters from Sodom by DÜRER, Albrecht
    Lot Fleeing with his Daughters from Sodom. c. 1498. Oil and tempera on panel, 52 x 41 cm. National Gallery of Art, Washington.
  95. [95]
    File:The Flight of Lot and His Family from-Sodom by Peter Paul ...
    Dec 21, 2024 · File:The Flight of Lot and His Family from-Sodom by Peter Paul Rubens,1613-15. Oil on canvas.From the Ringling Museum.jpg.
  96. [96]
    Ezekiel 16:49 Now this was the iniquity of your sister Sodom
    This was the sin of your sister Sodom and her daughters: Pride, too much food, undisturbed peace, and failure to help the poor and needy.Audio · Cross · Study
  97. [97]
    Lawrence v. Texas - Lambda Legal
    The Supreme Court declared all sodomy laws unconstitutional, putting an end to the sodomy laws that remained on the books in 13 states at the time of the ...Missing: biblical | Show results with:biblical
  98. [98]
    ANALYSIS: The implications of Lawrence v. Texas - Baptist Press
    Jul 9, 2003 · However, the court did not explicitly declare a right to engage in sodomy; instead, it declared a right of privacy entitling consenting adults ...Missing: biblical debates
  99. [99]
    Conference President Criticizes Supreme Court Decision | USCCB
    ... decision, Lawrence vs. Texas, striking down that state's sodomy law: June 23, 2003. WASHINGTON—Belleville Bishop Wilton D. Gregory, president of the ...Missing: debates | Show results with:debates
  100. [100]
    Sodom and Gomorrah (1962) - IMDb
    Rating 5.7/10 (2,392) Sex, torture, and betrayal in Biblical Sodom and Gomorrah. Lot, leader of the Hebrews, believes that his people can co-exist with the Sodomites--a disastrous ...
  101. [101]
    Sodom and Gomorrah (1922) A Silent Film Review
    Nov 24, 2019 · Anyway, we are shown the ancient cities of Sodom and Gomorrah as they prepare for their annual festival. Kurt Ehrle is back as Lot and Lucy ...
  102. [102]
    The Corrosive Politics of Virtue - The American Prospect
    Dec 19, 2001 · ... morality and family solidarity. We have arrived at the gates of Sodom and Gomorrah." Recall that God burned Sodom and Gomorrah to cinders in ...Missing: modern | Show results with:modern
  103. [103]
    Sodom and Gomorrah - The Reformation Project
    Discover how the biblical account of Sodom and Gomorrah, often cited against same-sex relationships, actually condemns inhospitality.