Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Specific developmental disorder

Specific developmental disorders are a category of neurodevelopmental conditions characterized by clinically significant or delay in the development of specific psychological functions, such as speech and language, scholastic skills (e.g., reading, writing, or ), or , typically emerging in and without pervasive effects on overall intellectual functioning or social interaction. These disorders are distinguished from more global developmental issues, like intellectual disabilities, by their targeted impact on particular domains of functioning. In diagnostic classifications, specific developmental disorders form a core part of the ICD-10 block F80-F89 on disorders of psychological development, encompassing subcategories like specific developmental disorders of speech and language (F80), scholastic skills (F81), motor function (F82), and mixed or other specific disorders (F83). The ICD-10 criteria emphasize that these impairments must be atypical for the individual's age and mental level, not better explained by sensory deficits, neurological damage, or inadequate education, and often persist into adulthood if untreated. In contrast, the DSM-5 integrates these into the broader Neurodevelopmental Disorders chapter, renaming and specifying them as entities like Specific Learning Disorder, Language Disorder, Speech Sound Disorder, and Developmental Coordination Disorder, reflecting a shift toward more precise, evidence-based criteria without a unified "specific developmental disorder" category. This evolution highlights ongoing efforts to align international classifications, with ICD-11 further harmonizing terms under neurodevelopmental disorders. Prevalence estimates for specific developmental disorders vary by subtype and population, but overall neurodevelopmental disorders affect approximately 1 in 6 children , with specific learning disorders alone occurring in 5-15% of school-aged children globally. Etiologies are multifactorial, involving genetic predispositions, environmental influences (e.g., prenatal exposures), and neurobiological factors, though no single cause predominates. Early identification through standardized assessments is crucial, as interventions like speech therapy, educational accommodations, or can significantly mitigate long-term impacts on academic, social, and occupational functioning.

Overview

Definition

Specific developmental disorders are a category of neurodevelopmental conditions defined by clinically significant delays or impairments in the acquisition of specific skills or developmental milestones, such as , , , or , occurring in the context of otherwise normal intellectual functioning and intact sensory abilities. These disorders are characterized by a marked discrepancy between an individual's overall cognitive potential and performance in the affected domain, without evidence of global cognitive deficits. Unlike global developmental delays, which involve widespread impairments across multiple developmental domains often accompanied by intellectual disability, specific developmental disorders are limited to one or a few isolated areas of functioning, preserving adaptive skills and general . This specificity underscores their non-pervasive nature, distinguishing them from broader where IQ typically falls below 70 and adaptive behaviors are broadly compromised. Key diagnostic qualifiers for specific developmental disorders include early onset during the developmental period—usually in infancy or childhood—significant interference with academic, social, or occupational performance, and the absence of alternative explanations such as neurological diseases, sensory deficits, or environmental factors like inadequate education. The term has evolved from earlier, broader uses of "developmental disorders" to emphasize this targeted impairment, reflecting advances in understanding heterogeneous neurodevelopmental pathways.

Historical Development

The concept of specific developmental disorders emerged in mid-20th century , building on early studies of learning difficulties such as , which highlighted isolated deficits in otherwise typically developing children. Influenced by neurological research, the World Federation of Neurology's 1968 definition framed as a specific disorder of language learning, characterized by difficulties in reading, writing, and spelling despite adequate intelligence and educational opportunities, marking a shift toward recognizing discrete developmental impairments rather than global intellectual deficits. This perspective evolved from the 1960s notion of "minimal brain dysfunction," a broad term used to describe subtle neurological impairments leading to learning and behavioral issues without overt brain damage, often encompassing conditions now classified as specific developmental disorders. The formal introduction of specific developmental disorders as a distinct diagnostic category occurred with the publication of the DSM-III in 1980, which separated these conditions—manifested as delays in areas like reading, arithmetic, language, or motor skills—from pervasive developmental disorders and mental retardation, emphasizing their specificity and coding them primarily on Axis II to highlight enduring developmental impacts. This nomenclature shift from "minimal brain dysfunction" to "specific developmental disorders" aimed to reduce stigma associated with implied brain damage and focus on targeted skill deficits, reflecting growing evidence from child psychiatry that these issues were not merely maturational lags but required distinct clinical attention. Paralleling this, the ICD-9, adopted in 1975, included code 315 for "specific delays in development," covering reading retardation, arithmetic issues, and other learning difficulties, providing an international framework for tracking these conditions. The ICD-10, effective from 1992, refined this under block F80-F89 as "pervasive and specific developmental disorders," incorporating speech, scholastic, and motor subtypes while maintaining separation from broader psychological developments. Key milestones in the evolution included the DSM-IV's 1994 consolidation of specific learning disorders into a unified category with subtypes for reading, , and written expression, enhancing diagnostic reliability through standardized criteria. The , published in 2013, reorganized these under the broader umbrella of neurodevelopmental disorders, integrating specific learning disorder as a single entity with specifiers for affected domains to better capture heterogeneity and lifelong impacts. Similarly, the , implemented in 2019, updated neurodevelopmental disorders to emphasize dimensional spectra, renaming and restructuring categories like intellectual developmental disorders and aligning them more closely with evidence-based understandings of overlapping traits and comorbidities.

Classification

ICD-10 Taxonomy

In the International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision (ICD-10), specific developmental disorders are classified under the code block F80-F89, encompassing disorders of psychological development that exclude pervasive developmental disorders (coded separately under F84). This block focuses on conditions involving delays or impairments in specific areas of development, distinct from broader pervasive issues. The is organized into subcategories based on the primary domain affected. F80 covers specific developmental disorders of speech and language, including F80.0 (specific speech articulation disorder), F80.1 (expressive language disorder), F80.2 (receptive language disorder), and F80.9 (developmental disorder of speech and language, unspecified). F81 addresses specific developmental disorders of scholastic skills, such as F81.0 (specific reading disorder, often termed ) and F81.2 (specific disorder of arithmetical skills). F82 denotes specific developmental disorder of motor function, characterized by coordination impairments not attributable to general or neurological disease. Additionally, F83 specifies mixed specific developmental disorders, where multiple domains are affected without meeting criteria for a pervasive disorder. F88 and F89 cover other and unspecified disorders of psychological development, respectively, for cases that do not fit neatly into prior categories. The hierarchical structure distinguishes pure forms, where a single domain is predominantly impaired (e.g., F80-F82), from mixed forms involving multiple domains (F83), allowing for nuanced coding. Diagnoses may include qualifiers or additional codes for associated conditions, such as attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (), to reflect comorbidities without altering the primary classification. Clinically, these codes emphasize disorders with onset during infancy or early childhood, leading to functional impairments in daily activities or academic performance that deviate significantly from age-expected norms. The taxonomy, adopted internationally in 1990 and implemented widely from 1994, provided a standardized framework for global health reporting and was used until the transition to on January 1, 2022.

DSM-III Taxonomy

The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Third Edition (DSM-III), published by the in 1980, introduced Specific Developmental Disorders as a distinct category on II of its multiaxial classification system. This placement separated them from Axis I clinical syndromes and Pervasive Developmental Disorders, emphasizing their role as chronic conditions influencing overall functioning alongside other psychiatric factors. The category encompassed isolated impairments in specific developmental domains, such as language, academic skills, and motor functions, without implying global intellectual deficits or pervasive delays. Subtypes under Specific Developmental Disorders included those related to language and speech, academic skills, and . Language disorders were divided into expressive type (315.31), characterized by failure to develop vocal expression despite intact ; receptive type (315.32), involving deficits in both and expression; and articulation disorder (315.39), marked by inconsistent production of later-acquired like /r/, /sh/, and /th/. Academic skills disorders covered (315.00), with significant in reading accuracy and ; developmental arithmetic disorder (315.10), affecting calculation and mathematical reasoning; and, implicitly through related criteria, difficulties often subsumed under reading deficits. Motor skills disorder (315.4) addressed serious s in coordination and fine/gross motor abilities not attributable to intellectual retardation. Additional categories included mixed specific developmental (315.50) for equally severe multiple s and atypical specific developmental (315.90) as a residual for unclassified cases. Diagnostic thresholds required a significant discrepancy between actual achievement and that expected based on the individual's age, (IQ), and educational opportunities, typically manifesting before school age and persisting into adulthood. These criteria excluded cases due to sensory impairments, inadequate instruction, or general . The rationale for this taxonomy stemmed from the DSM-III's multiaxial framework, designed to facilitate comprehensive assessment by integrating developmental issues with Axis I disorders, personality traits (Axis II), and physical conditions (Axis III). It drew heavily from Michael Rutter's 1960s and 1970s on specific reading retardation, which validated the concept of circumscribed developmental delays unrelated to low IQ or broad , influencing the emphasis on discrepancy-based . This approach prioritized phenomenological description over , promoting reliability in clinical and applications.61060-8/pdf)

DSM-5 Classification

In the , published in 2013 by the , specific developmental disorders are no longer recognized as a standalone category but are instead subsumed within the Neurodevelopmental Disorders chapter, reflecting a lifespan developmental perspective on early-onset conditions affecting brain function. This reorganization consolidates previous specific learning disorders—such as reading disorder, mathematics disorder, and disorder of written expression—into a single diagnosis of Specific Learning Disorder, with specifiers denoting the primary impairment area (e.g., with impairment in reading, written expression, or mathematics). The chapter positions these disorders as interconnected with other neurodevelopmental conditions, emphasizing their onset during the developmental period and potential persistence into adulthood. A major shift in diagnostic criteria moves away from the DSM-IV's discrepancy model, which relied on a significant gap between intellectual ability (IQ) and , toward functional criteria that prioritize persistent difficulties in learning and academic skills despite targeted interventions. Under , diagnosis requires evidence of below-average performance on standardized tests, interference with academic or daily activities, and exclusion of alternative explanations like sensory or neurological issues, assessed through clinical , educational reports, and response to instruction. Severity is specified as mild (limited support needed), moderate (considerable support), or severe (extensive support), allowing for a dimensional of impairment level, while comorbidities—such as with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder or language impairments—are noted to guide comprehensive . Related conditions within the Neurodevelopmental Disorders chapter include (combining prior expressive and mixed receptive-expressive categories, focusing on deficits in comprehension or production); (replacing phonological disorder, addressing articulation errors impacting intelligibility); and (under the motor disorders subgroup, characterized by impaired motor coordination affecting daily activities). For international alignment, corresponds to code 6A01 in crosswalk systems. This framework draws from empirical evidence, including comprehensive literature reviews and DSM-5 field trials, which demonstrated continuity with DSM-IV categories while enhancing diagnostic reliability through dimensional elements like severity specifiers (test-retest kappa values for related neurodevelopmental diagnoses ranged from 0.61 to 0.79). Longitudinal studies further support the approach by showing stable trajectories of academic and functional impairments from childhood, validating the emphasis on early intervention over rigid thresholds.

ICD-11 Classification

In the , specific developmental disorders are integrated into Chapter 6, Mental, behavioural or neurodevelopmental disorders, reflecting a unified framework for conditions originating during the developmental period that impair personal, social, academic, or occupational functioning. Unlike the ICD-10's dedicated block F80-F89 for specific developmental disorders of speech, language, scholastic skills, and motor function, the eliminates this separate coding block and embeds these conditions within the broader neurodevelopmental disorders category (codes 6A00-6A0Z). The primary codes relevant to specific developmental disorders include 6A01 for developmental speech or language disorders (encompassing [6A01.0], developmental speech fluency disorder [6A01.1], and [6A01.2]), 6A03 for developmental learning disorder (with subtypes for difficulties in reading [6A03.0], written expression [6A03.1], and [6A03.2]), 6A04 for developmental motor coordination disorder, and 6A06 for stereotyped movement disorder. Key features of the ICD-11 classification emphasize a dimensional approach, incorporating qualifiers to specify severity (mild, moderate, or severe based on the degree of functional impairment) and associated features such as the presence of a of . This allows for a nuanced description of how the affects daily functioning across the lifespan, rather than relying on rigid categorical thresholds. For instance, developmental learning is diagnosed when there are persistent and marked limitations in acquiring academic skills despite adequate instruction and opportunity, with the focus on the discrepancy between expected and achieved performance relative to age and intellectual ability. The classification prioritizes clinical utility by highlighting the functional impact on social participation, education, and independence, informed by evidence from global clinical practice. Compared to , the reduces the number of discrete categories for specific developmental disorders, streamlining the taxonomy to avoid overlap and improve reliability; for example, the multiple subtypes in ICD-10's F80-F83 are consolidated into fewer, more flexible entities. Autism spectrum disorder (6A02) is now explicitly included under neurodevelopmental disorders as a unified spectrum, separate from but aligned with specific developmental conditions, drawing on harmonization efforts with through WHO-led field trials conducted between approximately 2014 and 2019. These trials, involving clinicians across multiple countries, tested diagnostic guidelines for consistency and cultural applicability, resulting in criteria that better reflect current neuroscientific understanding and reduce diagnostic heterogeneity. The was adopted by the in May 2019 and became effective on January 1, 2022, with the Mortality and Morbidity Statistics () version enabling linear coding for straightforward implementation in health systems. As of July 2025, 132 WHO member states are at various stages of adoption, with full global transition expected over the next several years to support international health reporting and resource allocation. This postcoordinated system allows for the addition of extensions (e.g., or course) to enhance precision without proliferating codes.

Specific Conditions

Speech and Language Disorders

Speech and language disorders represent a significant subset of specific developmental disorders, characterized by persistent difficulties in the acquisition and use of and that cannot be attributed to sensory impairments, neurological conditions, or general . These disorders typically emerge in and affect communication skills essential for interaction, learning, and daily functioning. In the context of specific developmental disorders, they are distinguished by their isolated impact on verbal abilities, with preserved non-verbal and reciprocity. The primary subtypes include (DLD, formerly known as or SLI), speech sound disorders, and childhood-onset fluency disorder (). DLD involves impairments in language comprehension and expression, such as delayed , grammatical errors in , and challenges with sentence structure, while receptive skills may show deficits in understanding complex instructions or abstract concepts. Speech sound disorders encompass articulation and phonological difficulties, where children substitute, omit, or distort sounds (e.g., pronouncing "rabbit" as "wabbit" or "tat" for "cat"), leading to reduced speech intelligibility. Childhood-onset fluency disorder, or , manifests as involuntary repetitions of sounds or syllables, prolongations of vowels, or blocks in speech flow, often exacerbated by excitement or stress. Prevalence estimates indicate that approximately 7% of children experience DLD, with rates slightly higher among boys (up to three times more likely than girls), and speech sound disorders affecting 8-9% of young children, while impacts 5-10% of preschoolers. Symptoms generally appear before school entry, with delayed milestones like first words or phrases, and can persist; longitudinal studies show that 50-70% of individuals with DLD continue to face challenges into adulthood, influencing ongoing communication and . Functionally, these disorders contribute to due to frustration in peer interactions and misunderstandings, as well as academic struggles, particularly in reading and writing, where deficits hinder development. Children may avoid speaking in group settings, leading to reduced and increased risk of behavioral issues, with long-term effects including lower and employment challenges in adulthood. Differentiation from conditions like autism spectrum disorder or relies on key features: individuals with these speech and language disorders exhibit normal non-verbal IQ (typically above 85) and intact , such as and , unlike the broader socio-communicative impairments in autism. is ruled out through audiometric testing, confirming normal auditory processing. In classification systems, these fall under codes like F80 in for specific developmental disorders of speech and language.

Scholastic Skills Disorders

Scholastic skills disorders, also known as specific learning disorders in academic domains, encompass neurodevelopmental conditions characterized by persistent difficulties in acquiring and using key scholastic abilities such as reading, writing, and , despite provision of appropriate instruction and absence of . These disorders are distinguished by unexpected underachievement, where the individual's overall cognitive potential does not align with observed academic performance, often leading to significant interference in daily activities and educational progress. The primary subtypes include , , and , each targeting distinct academic skills while sharing underlying neurobiological vulnerabilities. primarily involves deficits in reading accuracy, fluency, and comprehension, rooted in impairments that hinder the mapping of sounds to letters and words. manifests as challenges in written expression, including poor , legibility, and of ideas, often linked to difficulties in fine and orthographic processing. affects mathematical reasoning and computation, with core problems in , such as estimating quantities or understanding numerical magnitudes, which impairs arithmetic operations and problem-solving. Core features of these disorders include discrepancies between chronological age-expected performance and actual abilities, persisting across contexts and not attributable to sensory, neurological, or environmental factors alone. studies reveal structural and functional anomalies, particularly in left-hemisphere regions like the temporoparietal areas involved in and symbolic processing, with reduced during reading tasks in and similar parietal disruptions in . These conditions are classified under code F81 for specific developmental disorders of scholastic skills. Prevalence estimates indicate that dyslexia affects approximately 5-10% of school-aged children worldwide, with higher rates in populations with familial risk, while occurs in 5-20% and in 3-7%. These disorders can profoundly impact career trajectories, as individuals with untreated , for instance, face elevated risks of or occupational mismatches due to demands in modern economies. Comorbidity with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is common, affecting up to 40% of those with , which compounds executive function challenges and exacerbates academic setbacks. Developmentally, early signs emerge in preschool, such as delays in letter recognition for or struggles with counting for , reflecting foundational impairments in symbolic processing. Without targeted interventions like structured programs, these deficits persist into and adulthood, potentially leading to secondary issues like reduced , though early identification can mitigate long-term effects.

Motor Function Disorders

Developmental coordination disorder (DCD) represents the primary condition within motor function disorders, characterized by significant impairments in the acquisition and execution of coordinated motor skills that substantially interfere with , academic performance, or occupational tasks. These deficits manifest as clumsiness, poor fine and gross , and difficulties in tasks requiring precise movements, such as or participating in , persisting from and affecting individuals across the lifespan. In classifications like , DCD is diagnosed when motor skills are markedly below age-expected levels, not better explained by or , and causing functional limitations. Symptoms of DCD often include delays in achieving developmental motor milestones, such as learning to tie by ages 5-6 or button clothing independently, alongside challenges in gross motor activities like catching a or riding a bicycle. According to criteria, the disorder requires evidence of coordination difficulties in fine and/or , observed through clinical assessment or standardized testing, with onset during the developmental period and exclusion of medical conditions like . These impairments can lead to secondary issues, including avoidance of physical activities and social withdrawal. The prevalence of DCD is estimated at 5-6% among school-aged children, with higher rates in males, and it is associated with elevated risks of low and anxiety due to repeated experiences of motor and peer . Longitudinal studies indicate that children with DCD are more likely to report poorer social communication and less supportive friendships, exacerbating challenges. Subtypes of DCD include dyspraxia, which involves deficits in motor planning and execution, and , characterized by difficulties in performing purposeful movements despite intact . A mixed subtype combines ideomotor and visuo-spatial/constructional impairments, often overlapping in clinical presentations. Motor learning studies highlight cerebellar involvement, with neuroimaging evidence showing atypical activation in this region during skill acquisition tasks, contributing to persistent coordination deficits. Behavioral research further demonstrates slower implicit in individuals with DCD, underscoring the role of cerebellar pathways in these impairments.

Diagnosis and Assessment

Diagnostic Criteria

Specific developmental disorders are diagnosed based on shared criteria across major classification systems, emphasizing early onset during the developmental period, persistent impairments in specific domains such as , learning, or motor skills, exclusion of alternative causes like sensory or neurological conditions, and significant functional consequences in academic, social, or daily activities. These elements ensure that diagnoses focus on domain-specific deficits rather than global intellectual impairment or environmental factors alone. In the DSM-5, diagnostic criteria for specific developmental disorders, such as specific learning disorder and , require persistent difficulties in the acquisition and use of relevant skills that have lasted at least 6 months despite targeted interventions. For specific learning disorder, criteria include academic skills substantially below age expectations on standardized measures, onset during the school-age years (though not always manifest until demands exceed capacities), and interference with academic or occupational functioning, excluding explanations like , sensory impairments, or inadequate instruction. Similarly, involves deficits in comprehension or production across modalities (e.g., reduced , limited sentence structure, discourse impairments), with onset in the developmental period and exclusion of , neurological disorders, or . For , motor skills must be markedly below age-expected levels, interfering with daily activities from , and not attributable to or other neurological conditions. The builds on these by classifying specific developmental disorders under neurodevelopmental disorders, requiring marked and persistent difficulties originating in the early developmental period (typically before age 5 or during school years) that impair personal, social, academic, or occupational functioning due to underlying psychological or biological processes. It includes qualifiers for severity (mild, moderate, severe) based on functional impact and associated features such as , attention deficits, or co-occurring conditions like ADHD, while differentiating from intellectual developmental disorders through domain-specific rather than global impairments. For instance, developmental learning disorder (e.g., reading or subtypes) demands evidence of skill acquisition failures despite opportunity, excluding sensory deficits or lack of ; developmental speech and disorders require communication impairments not due to or disorder; and developmental motor coordination disorder involves coordination deficits affecting daily tasks, excluding or musculoskeletal issues. Diagnosis typically involves a multidisciplinary approach, integrating evaluations from psychologists, educators, speech-language pathologists, and occupational therapists to confirm criteria through clinical history, observations, and standardized assessments, ensuring cultural and linguistic appropriateness. This collaborative process verifies the developmental onset and rules out factors, with historical shifts in criteria—such as DSM-5's emphasis on functional over discrepancy models—reflecting evolving for more inclusive .

Assessment Methods

Assessment of specific developmental disorders typically involves a multidisciplinary approach utilizing standardized tools to evaluate cognitive, language, and motor domains, ensuring identification of discrepancies that inform . These assessments aim to measure functioning against age-based norms, highlighting areas of impairment while considering the child's overall development. Comprehensive evaluations integrate multiple data sources to provide a holistic profile, avoiding reliance on any single measure. Cognitive assessments are essential for identifying discrepancies between intellectual potential and , particularly in specific learning disorders. The (WISC), in its various editions such as WISC-IV, is widely used to assess IQ and detect patterns of cognitive strengths and weaknesses, including verbal comprehension deficits often observed in these disorders. For evaluating academic skills, the Woodcock-Johnson Tests of Achievement (WJ-III or later versions) provide detailed measures of reading, writing, and proficiency, allowing clinicians to quantify underachievement relative to cognitive ability. These tools are norm-referenced, ensuring comparisons across diverse populations, though interpretation requires caution to account for cultural and linguistic factors. Language assessments focus on receptive and expressive abilities to diagnose speech and disorders. The Clinical Evaluation of Language Fundamentals (CELF), particularly CELF-5, evaluates core skills such as semantics, syntax, and through structured tasks, helping to differentiate developmental delays from other conditions. The (PPVT-4 or PPVT-5) serves as a reliable measure of receptive , administered nonverbally via pointing to images, which minimizes bias in children with limited expressive skills. Both instruments are standardized for school-aged children and contribute to establishing severity levels in impairments. Motor evaluations target coordination and fine/gross motor skills in conditions like developmental coordination disorder. The Movement Assessment Battery for Children-2 (MABC-2) is a performance-based test assessing manual dexterity, aiming and catching, and balance through age-appropriate tasks, with scores indicating motor impairment severity. The Bruininks-Oseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency-2 (BOT-2) provides a broader profile of motor competence, including subtests for fine motor precision, manual coordination, body coordination, and strength, often used to track intervention progress. These assessments emphasize observational scoring to capture functional difficulties in daily activities. The assessment process for specific developmental disorders entails a comprehensive, multi-informant evaluation that includes standardized testing, and reports, direct , and behavioral checklists to contextualize results. interviews via tools like the Behavior Assessment System for Children (BASC) capture home-based challenges, while ratings, such as those from the Conners' scales, highlight classroom performance, ensuring . Direct in natural settings supplements quantitative data, revealing subtle impairments not evident in structured tests. Cultural adaptations are critical, involving linguistically appropriate norms, translated materials, and consideration of socioeconomic influences to reduce bias in diverse populations, as guided by cross-cultural neuropsychological guidelines. This integrated approach aligns with diagnostic criteria thresholds and facilitates tailored management strategies.

Etiology and Risk Factors

Genetic and Biological Factors

Specific developmental disorders exhibit a strong genetic component, with estimates from twin studies ranging from 50% to 80% across conditions such as and (DCD). Recent genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have identified polygenic risk factors contributing to these disorders, underscoring their complex genetic architecture. For , a of twin pairs reported of 73% for reading ability, highlighting the substantial influence of genetic factors on phonological processing and reading acquisition. Candidate genes, including DCDC2 and KIAA0319 located on , have been consistently associated with reading disorders through disruptions in neuronal migration and reading-related traits. Neuroimaging studies reveal structural brain differences underlying these disorders. In dyslexia, magnetic resonance imaging shows reduced leftward asymmetry of the planum temporale, a region critical for processing, with dyslexic individuals exhibiting more symmetric or rightward asymmetry compared to typical readers. For DCD, tensor imaging (DTI) demonstrates abnormalities in tracts, particularly in sensorimotor pathways like the , characterized by lower indicating impaired connectivity and motor coordination. Prenatal biological factors contribute to risk, with associated with higher incidence of DCD due to potential disruptions in maturation. Maternal during is associated with increased risk of neurodevelopmental disorders, including DCD. imbalances also play a role in symptom manifestation. dysregulation, influenced by genetic variations in dopamine-related genes, affects and coordination in DCD, leading to difficulties in skill acquisition.

Environmental and Social Factors

Prenatal and postnatal environmental exposures play a significant role in the onset and severity of specific developmental disorders, including speech, , scholastic skills, and motor function impairments. Lead exposure, particularly during prenatal and early postnatal periods, is associated with neurodevelopmental abnormalities such as reduced IQ, deficits, and learning disabilities, as it disrupts development and myelination processes. Studies indicate that children with lead levels ≥3.5 μg/ face an increased risk of cognitive and behavioral problems, with prenatal exposure specifically linked to developmental delays and behavioral disorders. in prenatal and postnatal stages further exacerbates these risks; for instance, undernutrition during is associated with a odds ratio of approximately 1.8 for atypical neurodevelopment, contributing to impairments and delays in and motor skills. Bilingual environments, while not causative of disorders, can influence the timing of milestones, with bilingual children often showing slightly delayed expressive vocabulary in each compared to monolinguals, though they typically catch up by school age without long-term deficits. Socioeconomic factors, particularly , are strongly correlated with higher rates of specific developmental disorders due to reduced to early , , and healthcare. Children from families below 100% of the federal level are 2.43 times more likely to have a diagnosis compared to those from higher-income households, reflecting the impact of limited educational resources and . This disparity arises from chronic stressors associated with low , which hinder brain development and increase vulnerability to scholastic skills disorders like . Educational and experiential factors can mimic or worsen specific developmental disorders. Inadequate instructional methods, such as overreliance on sight-word memorization without training, may produce reading difficulties that resemble , leading to misidentification of the underlying issue as a inherent disorder rather than instructional deficiency. (ACEs), including abuse, neglect, and household dysfunction, further aggravate outcomes by disrupting neurodevelopment and increasing the risk of language and cognitive delays, with early exposure linked to poorer learning and behavioral trajectories. Cultural and social contexts influence the identification and management of specific developmental disorders, often resulting in diagnostic biases and underdiagnosis in non- or low-resource settings. Standardized assessment tools, developed primarily from perspectives, can disadvantage children from diverse cultural backgrounds, leading to late or missed diagnoses of conditions like spectrum-related language disorders. In low-resource areas, limited access to trained professionals and culturally insensitive screening contributes to underdiagnosis, particularly for motor and scholastic disorders, exacerbating disparities in intervention timing. Racial and ethnic minorities, including those in non- contexts, are less likely to receive timely developmental delay diagnoses and services, perpetuating inequities in outcomes.

Treatment and Management

Therapeutic Interventions

Speech-language therapy plays a central role in addressing core deficits in speech and language disorders, such as dyslexia and specific language impairment (SLI), by targeting phonological processing skills through structured interventions like phonological awareness training. This approach involves exercises in sound segmentation, blending, and manipulation to enhance decoding and comprehension abilities. A meta-analysis of phonemic awareness instruction for children suspected of reading disabilities reported a moderate overall effect size (Hedges' g = 0.511), with stronger gains in segmentation (g = 0.571) and blending (g = 0.341), particularly effective in kindergarten and first grade. Similarly, for children at risk or with dyslexia, phonological awareness components in reading interventions yield moderate improvements (g = 0.34) in word reading and spelling outcomes. In SLI, broader speech-language interventions demonstrate moderate immediate effects on expressive and receptive language domains (g = 0.70 overall, with g = 0.72 for expressive phonology), though long-term gains are smaller (g = 0.23), emphasizing the need for sustained, intensive sessions of at least 21 weeks delivered by speech-language pathologists. Occupational therapy addresses motor function disorders, such as (DCD), through sensory integration techniques and task-specific practice to improve coordination, , and daily activity performance. Sensory integration therapy, which uses controlled sensory stimuli to organize neural pathways, shows moderate to large effects on (g = 0.85) in children with DCD, though its impact on is limited (g = 0.15). Task-specific practice, involving repetitive, goal-directed activities like exercises or skill drills, yields significant gains (mean difference = -3.63 on the Movement Assessment Battery for Children), with benefits extending to activity participation (g = 0.71 for task-specific practice). These interventions, often delivered in 8-12 week programs, prioritize functional outcomes over general motor training, as evidenced by randomized controlled trials. Cognitive-behavioral approaches are employed to manage comorbid anxiety often associated with specific developmental disorders, focusing on restructuring maladaptive thoughts and behaviors to reduce emotional distress. Cognitive-behavioral therapy () demonstrates robust efficacy in youth with anxiety disorders and comorbidities, achieving remission in approximately 66% of cases post-treatment, with no significant attenuation from co-occurring developmental conditions like . Adapted CBT protocols, including exposure and , effectively alleviate anxiety symptoms in children with neurodevelopmental overlaps, maintaining gains for up to 9 years. Complementing this, mindfulness-based interventions enhance executive function deficits common across these disorders by promoting attention regulation and . In preschoolers, mindfulness curricula improve inhibition and shifting, as shown by reduced neural activation in prefrontal regions during tasks (e.g., N200 amplitude changes in attentional network tests). Similarly, 15-session mindfulness programs in young children boost and cognitive shifting performance (p < 0.01), with decreased brain complexity indicating more efficient prefrontal processing. Pharmacological options remain limited for specific developmental disorders, primarily reserved for overlapping conditions like attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) rather than core deficits in language or motor domains. Stimulants such as and amphetamines, which enhance and norepinephrine activity in the , serve as first-line treatments for ADHD comorbidities (effective in 70-80% of cases), but their use in pure developmental disorders lacks strong evidence and requires careful monitoring for side effects like appetite suppression. Non-stimulants like may be considered as adjuncts, but guidelines emphasize behavioral therapies as primary, with medications targeted only at significant functional impairments from overlaps.

Educational and Support Strategies

In the United States, Individualized Education Programs (IEPs) are mandated under the (IDEA) of 2004 to provide to children with disabilities, including those with specific learning disorders such as or . These programs are developed collaboratively by educators, parents, and specialists to outline personalized goals, accommodations like extended time on tests or assistive technologies such as text-to-speech software, and related services to address academic challenges. Inclusive education models, such as multitiered systems of support (MTSS), promote universal access to quality instruction while offering targeted s for students with specific developmental disorders. MTSS operates through three tiers: provides high-quality core instruction for all students; Tier 2 delivers small-group supplemental support to approximately 15-20% of students who need additional academic or behavioral assistance; and Tier 3 offers intensive, individualized s for the remaining 5% with persistent difficulties. This framework, rooted in response to principles, has been shown to improve academic outcomes by integrating data-driven progress monitoring and early of needs. Transition planning to adulthood is essential for individuals with specific developmental disorders, focusing on vocational training, skills, and postsecondary opportunities to foster . Under IDEA, transition services begin by age 16, incorporating experiences and , which longitudinal studies indicate lead to better employment rates and when initiated early. For instance, cohorts followed from show that structured vocational programs reduce risks by up to 30% compared to those without such support. International policy frameworks, including the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (2006), underscore the global commitment to equitable access for individuals with developmental disorders. Article 24 of the Convention requires states to ensure inclusive, quality primary and on an equal basis, prohibiting and promoting reasonable accommodations to facilitate and participation. Ratified by over 180 countries, this framework has influenced national policies to prioritize barrier-free educational environments.

References

  1. [1]
    Disorders of psychological development (F80 ... - ICD-10 Version:2019
    A specific developmental disorder in which the child's ability to use expressive spoken language is markedly below the appropriate level for its mental age, but ...
  2. [2]
    Specific developmental disorder (Concept Id: C0037785) - NCBI
    Specific developmental disorder. MedGen UID: 508157; •Concept ID: C0037785; •: Mental or Behavioral Dysfunction. Synonyms: specific delays in development ...
  3. [3]
    DSM-5 Child Mental Disorder Classification - NCBI - NIH
    ADHD is a chronic neurodevelopmental disorder according to DSM-5 that is characterized by a persistent and pervasive pattern of inattention and/or hyperactivity ...Table 5, DSM-IV Pervasive... · Table 7, DSM-IV to DSM-5... · Major Depressive
  4. [4]
    Neurodevelopmental disorders in ICD-11 classification - PMC - NIH
    Neurodevelopmental disorders applie to a group of disorders with early onset that affect cognitive and social development.
  5. [5]
    Diagnosed Developmental Disabilities in Children Aged 3–17 Years
    Jul 13, 2023 · During 2019–2021, the prevalence of any diagnosed developmental disability in children aged 3–17 years increased from 7.40% to 8.56%.
  6. [6]
    Children at Risk of Specific Learning Disorder: A Study on ... - NIH
    Jun 22, 2024 · In DSM-5, it has been reported that the prevalence of SLD in school-aged children from different languages and cultures is between 5–15%, and ...
  7. [7]
    How specific are "specific developmental disorders"? The relevance ...
    The concept of "specific developmental disorder" (SDD) refers to delays in developmental domains such as language and speech development, motor coordination.
  8. [8]
    Understanding basic concepts of developmental diagnosis in children
    Identify a specific developmental disorder and its etiology if known, A diagnostic process that may involve appropriate laboratory, genetic, or metabolic ...
  9. [9]
    Specific Developmental Disorder - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
    Specific developmental disorder is defined as a condition where specific skills such as reading, spelling, arithmetical skills, and language are impaired ...A Review Of Behavioral... · Developmental Disorders · Definition And Prevalence
  10. [10]
    Perspectives on the Classification of Specific Developmental ...
    This volume deals with the classification of specific developmental disorders. The concept of specific developmental disorder ... normal intelligence, and in the ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  11. [11]
    Defining Criteria for Intellectual Disability - AAIDD
    Generally, an IQ test score of around 70 or as high as 75 indicates a significant limitation in intellectual functioning. Adaptive Behavior. Adaptive behavior ...
  12. [12]
    [PDF] The ICD-10 Classification of Mental and Behavioural Disorders
    There are several basic requirements for the diagnosis of any of the specific developmental disorders of scholastic skills. First, there must be a ...
  13. [13]
    Celebrating 50 Years Since the First Consensus Definition of Dyslexia
    Apr 5, 2018 · In April of 1968, the first meeting of the World Federation of Neurology's Research Group on Developmental Dyslexia and World Illiteracy ...
  14. [14]
    The history of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder - PubMed Central
    Nov 30, 2010 · Minimal brain dysfunction. The hypothesis that minimal brain damage may lead to behavior disorders became well established. In the 1960s ...
  15. [15]
    None
    Below is a merged summary of Specific Developmental Disorders in DSM-III, consolidating all the information from the provided segments into a comprehensive response. To retain the maximum amount of detail, I will use a table in CSV format for the category details, followed by a narrative summary that integrates the remaining information. This approach ensures all data is preserved while maintaining clarity and structure.
  16. [16]
    ICD-9-CM Diagnosis Codes 315.* : Specific delays in development
    315 Specific delays in development ; 315.0 Developmental reading disorder ; 315.00 Developmental reading disorder, unspecified convert 315.00 to ICD-10-CM ; 315.01 ...
  17. [17]
    Pervasive and specific developmental disorders F80-F89
    Look up free coding details for ICD-10 code range F80-F89 that cover Pervasive and specific developmental disorders.F89 · F80 · F80.0 · F80.1
  18. [18]
    DSM-5 Provides New Take on Neurodevelopment Disorders
    Jan 18, 2013 · The chapter on neurodevelopmental disorders is the first chapter in DSM 5 Section 2, reflecting a “lifespan” approach to organizing the text.<|control11|><|separator|>
  19. [19]
    Innovations and changes in the ICD‐11 classification of mental ...
    Neurodevelopmental disorders​​ Major changes in the ICD‐11 include the renaming of disorders of intellectual development from ICD‐10 mental retardation, which ...
  20. [20]
    Disorders of psychological development (F80 ... - ICD-10 Version:2016
    Disorders of psychological development (F80-F89) F80 Specific developmental disorders of speech and language F80.0 Specific speech articulation disorder.
  21. [21]
  22. [22]
  23. [23]
  24. [24]
  25. [25]
  26. [26]
    ICD-11 Implementation - World Health Organization (WHO)
    Feb 12, 2025 · The new Revision of ICD was endorsed by the World Health Assembly at the 72nd meeting in 2019, and came into effect globally on 1 January 2022.
  27. [27]
    A digest of the published work of Michael Rutter - ACAMH
    Jan 4, 2022 · This is a digest of all the papers in published in peer reviewed journals that Professor Sir Michael Rutter (MR) has authored or co-authored.
  28. [28]
    The concept of specific reading retardation - PubMed
    The concept of specific reading retardation. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 1975 Jul;16(3):181-97. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.1975.tb01269.x. Authors. M Rutter, W ...Missing: Michael influence DSM-
  29. [29]
    None
    ### Summary of Changes from DSM-IV-TR to DSM-5 for Neurodevelopmental Disorders
  30. [30]
    Table 3.3, Disorder Classification in the DSM-IV and DSM-5 - NCBI
    Pervasive developmental disorders (DSM-IV) Autism spectrum disorder (DSM-5) Disorders usually first diagnosed in infancy, childhood, or adolescence.
  31. [31]
    DSM-5 Changes in Diagnostic Criteria for Specific Learning ...
    A second practice shift is indicated by the abandonment of the IQ-Achievement discrepancy criterion, as well as the omission of cognitive processing deficits in ...
  32. [32]
    Clinical Characteristics of Learning Disabilities - NCBI - NIH
    This term includes conditions such as perceptual disabilities, brain injury, minimal brain dysfunction, dyslexia, and developmental aphasia.
  33. [33]
    Crosswalk from DC:0-5™ to DSM-5 and ICD-10 - Zero to Three
    Neurodevelopmental Disorders ; Early Atypical Autism Spectrum Disorder, Other Specified Neurodevelopmental Disorder, Pervasive Developmental Disorder, ...Neurodevelopmental Disorders · Sensory Processing Disorders · Obsessive-Compulsive And...
  34. [34]
    [PDF] Specific Learning Disabilities in DSM-5
    As noted above, the second major change was to eliminate the DSM-IV requirement for an IQ-Achievement discrepancy as the primary diagnostic criterion for SLD.
  35. [35]
    Are specific learning disorders truly specific, and are they disorders?
    Specific learning disorders, such as dyslexia and dyscalculia, are frequently studied to inform our understanding of cognitive development, genetic mechanisms ...
  36. [36]
  37. [37]
    Clinical descriptions and diagnostic requirements for ICD-11 mental ...
    Mar 8, 2024 · Clinical descriptions and diagnostic requirements for ICD-11 mental, behavioural and neurodevelopmental disorders (CDDR). 8 March 2024. | ...
  38. [38]
    [PDF] Clinical descriptions and diagnostic requirements for ICD-11 mental ...
    Clinical descriptions and diagnostic requirements for ICD-11 mental, behavioural and neurodevelopmental disorders. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2024.
  39. [39]
    Mental, behavioral and neurodevelopmental disorders in the ICD-11
    Jan 27, 2020 · In the ICD-11, the category 'neurodevelopmental disorders' includes (1) disorders of intellectual development, (2) developmental speech or ...Missing: 1994 | Show results with:1994
  40. [40]
    The reclassification of neurodevelopmental disorders in ICD-11
    Oct 1, 2025 · In the ICD-10 the developmental disorders are categorized under three different chapters: F7 for mental retardation, F8 for developmental ...
  41. [41]
    International Classification of Diseases (ICD)
    To facilitate the transition from ICD-10 to ICD-11, WHO has enhanced the digital mapping tables with additional mapping options, offering comprehensive ...List of Official ICD-10 updates · ICD-11 2024 release · ICD-11 Fact Sheet · Services
  42. [42]
    Childhood Speech and Language Disorders in the General ... - NCBI
    Speech and language disorders in children include a variety of conditions that disrupt children's ability to communicate.
  43. [43]
  44. [44]
  45. [45]
  46. [46]
    Developmental Language Disorder - NIDCD - NIH
    May 8, 2023 · Although some late talkers eventually catch up with peers, children with DLD have persistent language difficulties. Younger children with DLD ...
  47. [47]
    Stuttering: Understanding and Treating a Common Disability - AAFP
    Nov 1, 2019 · Childhood-onset fluency disorder affects 5% to 10% of preschoolers. Early identification of stuttering is important so that therapy can ...
  48. [48]
    Young Adults With Developmental Language Disorder: A Systematic ...
    Life outcomes of young adults with and without DLD, all aged between 18 and 34 years, in three life areas: education, employment, and independent living.
  49. [49]
    Differentiating ASD from DLD in Toddlers - PMC - NIH
    The children with DLD were similar to those with TD, and higher than those with ASD, in terms of their nonverbal cognitive skills, use of gestures to ...
  50. [50]
    What Are Specific Learning Disorders? - Psychiatry.org
    They are characterized by a persistent impairment in at least one of three major areas: reading, written expression, and/or math.Search · On This Page · Diagnosis
  51. [51]
    [PDF] Issues related to identification of children with specific learning ...
    The phrase "unexpected academic underachievement" is often cited as the defining characteristic of specific learning disorder in that the specific learning ...
  52. [52]
    Dyslexia: neurobiology, clinical features, evaluation and management
    Clinical features of dyslexia. Dyslexia has an estimated prevalence ranging from 5% to 17% of school-aged children (20,22).Missing: core | Show results with:core
  53. [53]
    Dysgraphia: What It Is, Symptoms, Diagnosis & Treatment
    Dysgraphia is a neurological condition in which someone has difficulty with writing skills for their age despite exposure to adequate instruction.Missing: core | Show results with:core
  54. [54]
    [PDF] Developmental trajectory of number acuity reveals a severe ...
    Developmental dyscalculia is a learning disability that affects the acquisition of knowledge about numbers and arithmetic. It is widely assumed that ...
  55. [55]
    Neurobiology of Dyslexia - PMC - NIH
    Brain Basis of Phonological Awareness (PA) Deficits. Impaired PA in dyslexia could reflect either a deficit in representing phonetic sounds and/or a deficit ...
  56. [56]
    Neural Systems Affected in Developmental Dyslexia Revealed by ...
    Lastly, four recent neuroimaging studies employing phonological tasks in dyslexics have found deficient task-related activation in the posterior superior ...
  57. [57]
    2026 ICD-10-CM Diagnosis Code F81.9
    F81 Specific developmental disorders of scholastic skills. F81.0 Specific reading disorder. F81.2 Mathematics disorder. F81.8 Other developmental disorders of ...
  58. [58]
    Top 7 Different Types of Learning Disabilities - Roman Empire Agency
    Nov 21, 2023 · Prevalence of Learning Disabilities ; Dyscalculia, 3-7% (Globally) ; Dysgraphia, 5-20% (Globally) ; LPD, 5-10% (Nationally) ; APD, 3-4% (Globally).
  59. [59]
    COMORBIDITY OF LEARNING AND ATTENTION DISORDERS
    Comorbidity rates for ADHD and dyslexia range from 11% to 40% [9,10]; in addition, at least 50% of dyslexic children show early motor problems [11–13]. During ...Missing: scholastic | Show results with:scholastic
  60. [60]
    January 2017: Brain Imaging and Theories of Developmental Dyslexia
    Thus, altered brain development typically observed in older children and adults with dyslexia is already present in children at risk for developing dyslexia ...Missing: prevalence trajectory
  61. [61]
    Developmental trajectory of number acuity reveals a severe ...
    We show that number acuity improves with age in typically developing children. In dyscalculics, numerical acuity is severely impaired.Missing: problems | Show results with:problems
  62. [62]
    Neurodevelopmental Disorders - Motor Disorders - Psychiatry.org
    Developmental coordination disorder impacts a person's motor skills and can be seen as clumsiness (such as dropping or bumping into things) and having slow and ...Neurodevelopmental Disorders... · Tic Disorders · Developmental Coordination...Missing: criteria | Show results with:criteria
  63. [63]
    Diagnosis and management of developmental coordination disorder
    Developmental coordination disorder is a common neuromotor condition, affecting about 5%–6% of school-aged children; this equates to more than 400 000 ...
  64. [64]
    DSM-5 Diagnostic Criteria for Dyspraxia/Developmental ...
    Jul 6, 2020 · Difficulties are manifested as clumsiness (e.g., dropping or bumping into objects) as well as slowness and inaccuracy of performance of motor ...
  65. [65]
    Developmental co-ordination disorder (dyspraxia) in children - NHS
    Delays in reaching normal developmental milestones can be an early sign of DCD in young children. For example, your child may take slightly longer than expected ...
  66. [66]
    Developmental Coordination Disorder DSM-5 315.4 (F82) - Theravive
    Diagnostic Criteria. The acquisition and execution of coordinated motor skills is substantially below that expected for the patient's age and opportunities for ...
  67. [67]
    Assessment, diagnosis, and management of developmental ...
    Sep 20, 2021 · Developmental coordination disorder (DCD) is a neurodevelopmental condition that affects 5% to 6% of school-aged children.
  68. [68]
    Mental health outcomes of developmental coordination disorder in ...
    In this follow‐up cohort, those with DCD were more likely to have poor social communication skills, lower self‐esteem, less supportive friendships, and report ...
  69. [69]
    Developmental Coordination Disorder, An Umbrella Term for Motor ...
    Two pure subtypes of DCD/dyspraxia were distinguished: ideomotor (IM) and visuo-spatial/ constructional (VSC), and a mixed subgroup (MX) comparable to the ...
  70. [70]
    Dyspraxia or developmental coordination disorder? Unravelling the ...
    Most individuals with dyspraxia manifest a combination of both ideational or planning dyspraxia and ideomotor or executive dyspraxia; ideational or planning ...Missing: subtypes | Show results with:subtypes
  71. [71]
    Cerebellar Differences after Rehabilitation in Children with ... - MDPI
    Jun 29, 2022 · The purpose of this study was to determine if CO-OP intervention induces functional improvements and structural changes in the cerebellum of children with DCD.
  72. [72]
    Motor learning in developmental coordination disorder
    Jun 22, 2023 · Developmental coordination disorder (DCD) is characterized by motor learning deficits that are poorly understood within whole-body activities ...
  73. [73]
    None
    ### Diagnostic Criteria for Specific Learning Disorder (DSM-5)
  74. [74]
    Neurodevelopmental Disorders - Psychiatry.org
    In 2013, the DSM-5 changed the diagnostic criteria for Specific Learning Disorder (SLD) to combine all three learning disorders (reading, mathematics, and ...
  75. [75]
    Language Disorder - PsychDB
    Mar 29, 2021 · Criterion A · Reduced vocabulary (word knowledge and use) · Limited sentence structure (ability to put words and word endings together to form ...Primer · DSM-5 Diagnostic Criteria · Differential Diagnosis
  76. [76]
    Clinical Practice Guidelines on Assessment and Management of ...
    Axis 1: Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder. Axis 2: Specific Developmental Disorder of Scholastic Skills. Axis 3: Average intellectual functioning. Axis 4 ...
  77. [77]
    The Relationship Between Standardized Measures of Language ...
    This study investigated the relationship between scores on standardized tests (Clinical Evaluation of Language Fundamentals [CELF], Peabody Picture Vocabulary ...
  78. [78]
    Developmental Language Disorder: Early Predictors, Age for the ...
    Nonetheless, 11–18% of children aged between 18 and 36 months may show a significantly slowed lexical development in the absence of brain lesions, intellectual ...
  79. [79]
    Children with developmental coordination disorders: a review of ...
    May 23, 2024 · This study aims to review the existing literature on DCD, providing a comprehensive overview of the assessment for children with DCD.
  80. [80]
    Relationship between the Developmental Coordination Disorder ...
    Feb 14, 2022 · This study investigated the relationship between the Developmental Coordination Disorder Questionnaire 2007 (DCDQ'07) and the Bruininks-Oseretsky Test of Motor ...
  81. [81]
    Initial Evaluation Practices to Identify Young Children with Delays ...
    Apr 4, 2023 · Specifically, initial evaluations should include observations, caregiver/parent report, and a combination of standardized, curriculum-based, and ...
  82. [82]
    Cross‐Cultural Paediatric Neuropsychological Assessment - NIH
    Jun 23, 2025 · Cross‐cultural paediatric neuropsychology examines how cultural, linguistic, and socioeconomic factors influence cognitive assessments in children.
  83. [83]
    The Polygenic Nature and Complex Genetic Architecture of Specific ...
    From the genetics perspective, SLD is a complex disorder with a strong genetic component; heritability estimates from family and twin studies vary between 40–70 ...The Polygenic Nature And... · 2.2. Candidate Gene... · 3.1. Genome-Wide Association...<|control11|><|separator|>
  84. [84]
    Meta-analysis of twin studies highlights the importance of genetic ...
    The meta-analysis estimated heritability, based on up to 5330 MZ and 7084 DZ twin pairs, at 73% for reading, 49% for reading comprehension, 57% for mathematics ...
  85. [85]
    DCDC2, KIAA0319 and CMIP Are Associated with Reading-Related ...
    Aug 1, 2011 · We show that DCDC2 is specifically associated with RD, whereas variants in CMIP and KIAA0319 are associated with reading skills across the ability range.
  86. [86]
    Planum temporale asymmetry in developmental dyslexia
    Results revealed an altered pattern of asymmetry of the planum temporale surface area in dyslexic boys only, with a greater proportion of rightward ...
  87. [87]
    White matter organization in developmental coordination disorder
    Our data are consistent with the view that motor impairment characteristic of DCD may be subserved by white matter abnormalities in sensorimotor tracts, ...
  88. [88]
    Developmental Coordination Disorder (DCD) - Physiopedia
    Developmental coordination disorder (DCD) is a neuromotor disorder affecting approximately 5-6% of school-aged children. In order to be accurately diagnosed ...
  89. [89]
    Maternal Smoking in Pregnancy and Offspring Depression - Nature
    Oct 3, 2017 · In meta-analysis, maternal smoking during pregnancy was associated with higher odds of offspring depression (OR 1.20, 95% CI:1.08,1.34), but ...
  90. [90]
    Genetic variation in dopamine‐related gene expression influences ...
    Jul 2, 2013 · This phenotype may depend on heritable variation in components of the dopamine (DA) system, which is known to play a critical role in motor ...
  91. [91]
    Markers for the central serotonin system correlate to verbal ability ...
    Sep 3, 2020 · The results demonstrated a significant positive correlation between brain activity to paralinguistic stimuli and brain serotonin transporter binding potential.
  92. [92]
    Early-life lead exposure and neurodevelopmental disorders - PMC
    An emerging body of population-based and preclinical studies support an association between developmental Pb2+ exposure and mental disorders such as major ...<|separator|>
  93. [93]
    Lead Poisoning Effects | Mt. Washington Pediatric Hospital
    Children who have been exposed to elevated levels of lead (>5 ug/dl) are at increased risk for cognitive and behavioral problems during development (CDC, 2012).
  94. [94]
    [PDF] Association between development level and nutritional status in ...
    Mar 14, 2025 · It shows that a higher degree of undernutrition increased the risk of atypical development: prevalence odds ratio (POR) 1.820 (95% CI: 1.671-1. ...
  95. [95]
    Bilingualism in the Early Years: What the Science Says - PMC - NIH
    As discussed above, there is no evidence that bilingual children are confused by early bilingualism, and the cognitive benefits associated with bilingualism run ...
  96. [96]
    Sociodemographic and socioeconomic correlates of learning ... - NIH
    Additionally, families in the lowest income level (0–99% FPL) are 2.43 times more likely to have children with learning disability compared to those in the ...
  97. [97]
    Disrupting links between poverty, chronic stress, and educational ...
    Nov 20, 2023 · A growing body of evidence suggests that growing up in poverty contributes to cumulative risk exposure—resulting in chronic stress which impacts ...
  98. [98]
    Specific Learning Disabilities: Issues that Remain Unanswered - PMC
    Sep 28, 2018 · Teaching methods such as sight words result in reading difficulty that mimic dyslexia. This method inhibits the development of left–right ...
  99. [99]
    The Impact of Adverse Childhood Experiences on Health and ... - NIH
    Feb 26, 2022 · Due to the rapid brain development in young children, ACE exposure early in childhood may impact children's health, learning, and behavior.
  100. [100]
    Toward Equity in Research on Intellectual and Developmental ...
    Indeed, most standardized tests are constructed from the perspective of Western cultural values, which can disadvantage individuals from non-Western ...
  101. [101]
    A Conceptual Framework for Understanding the Cultural and ...
    Feb 21, 2020 · Late or no diagnosis disadvantages individuals with ASD in distinct cultural or socioeconomic settings, and bars them from effective early ...
  102. [102]
    Racial Disparities in Developmental Delay Diagnosis and Services ...
    Racial minority children are less likely to be diagnosed by their pediatric provider with DD and less likely to receive services despite accounting for a ...
  103. [103]
    A Meta-Analysis of Phonemic Awareness Instruction Provided to ...
    The present meta-analysis sought to investigate the effects of phonemic awareness instruction provided to children suspected of having a reading disability.
  104. [104]
    Forty Years of Reading Intervention Research for Elementary ...
    Sep 13, 2022 · The purpose of our study, then, was to conduct a meta-analysis that would help to estimate the mean effect of interventions and identify ...
  105. [105]
    A Meta-Analysis on the Effectiveness of Intervention in Children With ...
    Overall, speech and language interventions demonstrated a moderate immediate effect size (g) on language outcomes in children with primary speech and language ...
  106. [106]
    Motor-Based Interventions in Children with Developmental ...
    May 26, 2025 · Research indicates that children with DCD experience deficits across various aspects of motor control, including movement planning and ...
  107. [107]
    Task‐oriented interventions for children with developmental co ...
    To assess the effectiveness of task‐oriented interventions on movement performance, psychosocial functions, activity, and participation for children with DCD
  108. [108]
    Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Anxiety Disorders in Youth - PMC
    Cognitive behavioral therapies (CBTs) have been shown to be efficacious for the treatment of anxiety disorders in children and adolescents.History Of Cbt For Anxiety... · Evidence Of Efficacy And... · Table 1
  109. [109]
    Neurodevelopmental Effects of a Mindfulness and Kindness ...
    Mar 15, 2023 · This study aimed to explore the effect of a mindfulness-based curriculum designed especially for preschoolers on facets of executive functions.
  110. [110]
    Using mindfulness-based intervention to promote executive function ...
    It was found that mindfulness training showed a positive effect on the performance of the DCCS and WM tasks, particularly significantly in the left DLPFC.
  111. [111]
    Pharmacologic management of attention deficit hyperactivity ... - PMC
    Pharmacologic treatment of children and adolescents with ADHD should begin with long acting stimulant medications in most cases. Medical practitioners should ...
  112. [112]
    [PDF] A Guide to the Individualized Education Program
    The guide is designed to help teachers, parents, and others—in fact, anyone involved in the education of a child with a disability—develop and carry out an IEP.
  113. [113]
  114. [114]
    MTSS: What Is a Multi-Tiered System of Supports? - Education Week
    Oct 13, 2023 · MTSS, or multi-tiered system of supports, is a widely used framework meant to offer students personalized education that meets their needs.
  115. [115]
    What is MTSS in Education? - A Multi-Tiered System of Supports
    Multi-Tiered System of Supports (MTSS) is a framework that helps educators provide academic and behavioral strategies for students with various needs.
  116. [116]
    Transition to Adulthood - Center for Parent Information and Resources
    Transition services are intended to prepare students to move from the world of school to the world of adulthood.IDEA's definition of transition... · When must transition services...
  117. [117]
    [PDF] Transition to Adulthood: Preparing Students With Specific Learning ...
    Apr 19, 2021 · Transition can be explored through: (a) job exploration counseling; (b) work-based learning experiences; (c) postsecondary education counseling; ...
  118. [118]
    Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities | OHCHR
    States Parties recognize the right of persons with disabilities to education. With a view to realizing this right without discrimination and on the basis of ...
  119. [119]
    Article 24 - Education - Division for Inclusive Social Development
    b) Persons with disabilities can access an inclusive, quality and free primary education and secondary education on an equal basis with others in the ...