Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Speech from the throne

A speech from the throne is a ceremonial address delivered by the reigning or viceregal representative from a in the chamber of the of to open a new session in Commonwealth realms, outlining the government's proposed legislative program and policy priorities for the ensuing parliamentary term. Drafted exclusively by the elected government without input from the sovereign, who reads it verbatim, the speech underscores the constitutional separation wherein acts solely on ministerial advice while maintaining formal precedence in parliamentary proceedings. The practice traces its origins to 16th-century , evolving from medieval customs where the sovereign or officials explained the summons of , with formalized delivery by the monarch from the throne becoming standard during the . In the , it anchors the , featuring rituals such as the Yeomen of the Guard's search for intruders—a precaution rooted in the 1605 —and the summoning of by . Adapted across realms like , , and , the speech is typically presented by the , preserving Westminster-model conventions amid devolved executive authority. Beyond symbolism, the speech prompts debate on an Address in Reply, functioning as an implicit confidence vote; historical defeats, such as those precipitating government collapses in 1835 and 1841, highlight its role in enforcing ministerial accountability to . This mechanism ensures that the government's agenda receives legislative scrutiny from the outset, reinforcing within .

Origins and Historical Development

Early English Roots

The antecedents of the speech from the throne lie in the medieval English monarch's prerogative to summon parliamentary assemblies and declare their purposes, a practice rooted in feudal traditions of royal consultation with vassals and estates. In the 13th century, kings such as and I convened councils that evolved from ad hoc feudal gatherings—predecessors to formalized —where the or their opened proceedings by announcing the summons's objectives, including redress of grievances, confirmation of charters, and requests for financial aids to fund wars. This mechanism underscored the king's unilateral authority to initiate legislative sessions, as could not convene without royal writs specifying the agenda. A pivotal example occurred with Edward I's of November 1295, summoned via writs to approximately 292 and temporal, along with representatives from shires and boroughs, to address pressing fiscal needs amid conflicts with and . The opening address by the articulated these imperatives, framing the assembly as an extension of royal will rather than an independent body, thereby maintaining monarchical control over ' deliberations. Such addresses, drawn from the writs' content, served to orient proceedings toward the king's priorities, transitioning informal advisory councils into structured legislative openings without yielding prerogative power. Surviving historical records, including writs in the Close Rolls and early parliamentary rolls from the late , provide of these practices as tools for dominance, where the dictated the assembly's scope to secure consent for taxation and policy while precluding unsolicited initiatives from . This early form predated later constitutional balances, reflecting a causal dynamic wherein summons and declarative addresses were essential to legitimize and direct feudal-era law-making, ensuring alignment with the crown's strategic imperatives.

Evolution in the United Kingdom

In the eighteenth century, during the reign of George III (1760–1820), the speech from the throne retained elements of royal prerogative, with the monarch personally delivering it and exerting influence over its content amid ongoing consultations with ministers, reflecting the era's balance between crown authority and emerging cabinet cohesion. This period marked a gradual causal shift as ministerial drafting gained prominence, driven by the practical necessities of policy coordination and the monarch's limited capacity to dictate amid factional politics. By the early nineteenth century, the 1832 Reform Act fundamentally altered parliamentary representativeness by enfranchising middle-class male householders, abolishing rotten boroughs, and reallocating seats to industrial areas, thereby amplifying the House of Commons' democratic legitimacy and reinforcing cabinet accountability to elected representatives rather than the crown. This representational expansion causally propelled the speech toward embodying the government's program, culminating in 1841 when Lord John Russell explicitly stated in that it reflected ministers' advice, solidifying its role as an executive outline detached from personal royal input. In the twentieth century, post-World War II standardization further ceremonialized the institution, with the speech approved via and limited to minor monarchical adjustments, aligning it with Britain's transition to a welfare-oriented state and diminished imperial commitments. II's inaugural delivery on 4 November 1952, preceding her , emphasized continuity with her father's legacy while outlining legislative priorities in a decolonizing context, such as ties and domestic reconstruction, without notable deviations from governmental draft. The 2019 prorogation crisis exemplified persistent tensions in this evolved framework, when Prime Minister Boris Johnson's request to suspend from mid-September to mid-October—ostensibly to prepare a new following his July appointment—prevented legislative scrutiny during deadlines, prompting legal challenges. The UK Supreme Court ruled the unlawful on 24 September 2019, determining it frustrated 's essential functions without justification and undermined the crown's impartiality in assenting to executive advice, thereby affirming judicial boundaries on such ceremonial mechanisms to preserve constitutional equilibrium. This episode highlighted how the speech's preparation and timing, now firmly governmental, remain susceptible to political instrumentalization, yet constrained by evolving norms of .

Expansion to Commonwealth Realms

The tradition of the Speech from the Throne extended to British dominions in the nineteenth century as colonial legislatures with adopted analogous procedures, whereby governors delivered opening addresses outlining executive priorities to assembled parliamentarians. In , the British North America Act of 1867 formalized a modeled on the United Kingdom's, incorporating the Speech from the Throne as a from the outset of , with Lord Monck delivering the inaugural federal address to mark the summoning of . Similarly, pre- provincial assemblies in had employed governor's speeches since gaining in the 1840s, establishing continuity in the practice. Australia's federation in 1901 marked a further adaptation, as the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act enabled the opening of the first federal Parliament on 9 May 1901, when the Duke of Cornwall and York—acting for King Edward VII—delivered the Speech from the Throne in Melbourne's Exhibition Building, articulating the new government's program to the assembled houses. This event reflected the dominion's evolution from colonial assemblies, where governors had long opened sessions with policy addresses, into a unified entity retaining the ceremonial link to the Crown for legislative legitimacy. New Zealand, having established its Parliament under the New Zealand Constitution Act 1852, integrated comparable governor-delivered openings as part of its responsible government framework, predating full dominion status. The Statute of Westminster, enacted on 11 December 1931, granted legislative autonomy to the dominions by ending the Parliament's superior authority over them, yet Commonwealth realms preserved the Speech from the Throne as a constitutional convention tied to their shared . This persistence stemmed from the structural necessity of distinguishing the Crown's representative—via the —from the partisan in Westminster-style systems, ensuring parliamentary sessions commenced with a neutral of causes rather than direct ministerial initiative, even as realms exercised independent foreign and domestic policies. The retention amid processes highlighted the tradition's functional role in upholding monarchical impartiality and institutional stability, independent of imperial oversight.

Constitutional Role and Purpose

Separation of Executive and Legislative Powers

The Speech from the Throne exemplifies constitutional arrangements in Westminster systems where the Crown serves as a neutral figurehead, delivering the executive government's legislative program to Parliament without direct partisan involvement from the Prime Minister or ministers. This mechanism upholds a formal distinction between the executive—embodied in the responsible government drawn from the legislature—and the legislature itself, even as fusion of powers occurs through ministerial accountability. By having the monarch or viceroy read the speech, the process reinforces the Crown's role above party politics, presenting the agenda as a statement of royal will while ensuring legislative scrutiny begins immediately upon delivery. This practice aligns with Walter Bagehot's 1867 analysis in , which differentiates the "dignified" elements—such as the , which command deference and symbolize national unity—from the "efficient" elements, including the and , which exercise real power. The Throne Speech bridges these by vesting the dignified with the task of articulating the efficient government's priorities, thereby preserving public reverence for the while channeling executive intent through a non-partisan medium. Bagehot argued this arrangement conceals the efficient machinery beneath dignified forms, preventing overt displays of partisan control that could erode institutional stability. In operational terms, the speech formally summons into session, marking the transition from and enabling the to convene for business. It initiates debate on the in Reply, which serves as an implicit vote in the ; defeat on this motion historically signals loss of parliamentary support, prompting or , as seen in Canadian instances where minority governments faced tests post-election, such as the Liberal survival of the 2025 Throne Speech vote. This structure tests executive stability empirically, particularly after elections, by requiring legislative endorsement of the outlined agenda before substantive lawmaking proceeds. Contrary to misconceptions portraying the as the speech's originator, authorship resides unequivocally with the , a convention solidified by the amid the rise of responsible parliamentary rule. Ministers draft and approves the content, reflecting the 's policy priorities, while the Crown's delivery maintains ceremonial detachment—a verifiable division evidenced in procedural records and scholarly examinations of agenda-setting. This delineation counters attributions of executive power to the , emphasizing instead the Crown's conduit function in a system where legislative confidence sustains the ministry.

Symbolic and Ceremonial Functions

The Speech from the Throne embodies the symbolic role of the monarch as an impartial , seated on the throne in the to represent the continuity of independent of transient political majorities. This positioning underscores the constitutional principle that acts as a non-partisan for national authority, distinct from the executive's policy agenda outlined in the speech itself. The throne, as a enduring of monarchical power, has historically signified of legitimate rule, reinforcing the 's detachment from legislative partisanship in systems. Ceremonial rituals during the State Opening, such as the royal procession and the monarch's donning of state regalia, serve to affirm the unity of Parliament's three components—the , the , and the —without endorsing any government's program. A element is the summoning of Commons members by the of the , whose initial refusal of entry—marked by the door being slammed shut—symbolizes the elected chamber's autonomy from the and the hereditary , preserving bicameral equilibrium. This tradition, observed consistently since at least the , highlights how ceremonial acts maintain institutional checks amid evolving political contexts. These non-partisan symbols and rituals contribute to national cohesion by publicly enacting reverence for constitutional norms and the , fostering a shared that transcends electoral divisions. In constitutional monarchies, such ceremonies correlate with enhanced regime stability, as evidenced by the model's endurance for over 300 years since the of 1688–1689, during which rituals have helped mitigate factional strife without reliance on forceful interventions. Scholarly analysis attributes this persistence partly to the monarchy's symbolic function in providing unity and limiting executive overreach, contrasting with more volatile republican alternatives in comparable historical settings.

Preparation by Government

The Speech from the Throne is drafted by the government to outline its legislative agenda, reflecting the executive's priorities as derived from electoral mandate. In the , civil servants in relevant departments contribute sections under ministerial direction, with the coordinating the process to ensure coherence across policy areas. The draft is then reviewed iteratively by senior ministers, the , and the —often via the Parliamentary Business and Legislation Committee—before finalization as a statement of intended government action. Upon completion, the text is submitted to the or viceregal representative for approval prior to delivery; constitutional conventions limit involvement to ceremonial endorsement, with substantive changes historically rare to maintain neutrality and avoid policy interference. For instance, prior to the early , meetings allowed for potential monarchial input, but modern practice emphasizes governmental authorship, as alterations would undermine the speech's role in binding the executive to its announced programme. In , a parallel process occurs through the and departmental officials, where the Prime Minister's office leads drafting of policy goals into a cohesive , submitted to the without expectation of revision. Though non-binding, the speech serves as a forecast of legislative intentions, enabling parliamentary and public , with governments in majority-held legislatures typically advancing a substantial share of proposed measures. UK data from the Hansard Society reveals that, in sessions like 2022–2023, roughly 40–50% of introduced government bills—many stemming from the speech—achieve by mid-session, rising with extended parliamentary time and executive control. This empirical pattern across realms affirms the mechanism's function in translating electoral outcomes into policy articulation, free from viceregal alteration.

Practice in the United Kingdom

The King's Speech Procedure

The King's Speech procedure forms the ceremonial core of the , initiating a new parliamentary session. The arrives at the , typically by state coach from , accompanied by a procession that includes the . Upon entering the , peers don their ceremonial robes and coronets, while the announces the 's approach. The Gentleman Usher of the then proceeds to the , where doors are slammed in her face to symbolize parliamentary independence, before she knocks three times and summons the to the Lords chamber. Seated on the Sovereign's Throne in the , the monarch receives the speech from the , who presents it on a crimson cushion. The or reads the speech aloud, outlining the government's legislative agenda for the session, as occurred on 17 2024 when III delivered the address before both Houses, emphasizing priorities such as border security and economic stability. Commoners and bishops remain uncovered (hats off) during the delivery, while peers don coronets upon the monarch's command at the speech's conclusion, underscoring the hierarchical traditions. The speech concludes with the monarch's withdrawal, after which resumes business. Following the delivery, each debates a motion for an "Address in Reply" to the , expressing thanks for the speech and serving as the primary forum for scrutinizing the government's program. In the , the Leader of the Opposition traditionally moves an to this motion, critiquing the agenda; historically, such amendments have tested government support, with defeat signaling a loss of confidence, though no government has fallen on this vote since 1924. The multi-day , often spanning five days, allows broad discussion across areas. In cases of the monarch's absence due to illness or other reasons, Lords Commissioners—typically senior royals or privy councillors appointed by —read the speech from the throne to ensure procedural continuity, as in 1959 and 1963 when Queen Elizabeth II was unable to attend. The presiding commissioner delivers the text verbatim, maintaining the separation of the sovereign's role from governmental authorship. This adaptation preserves the ceremonial integrity without the sovereign's physical presence.

Key Traditions and Variations

The State Opening features the monarch donning the and in the Robing Room before leading a through the Royal Gallery to the . is transported separately in its own coach and carried into the Robing Room by the . These elements emphasize ceremonial grandeur and the symbolic unity of the realm under . A central tradition involves the Gentleman Usher of the summoning members of the after the Lords are assembled, with the Commons door initially slammed shut before being opened following three knocks with the rod. This ritual, originating in the 1641 incident when attempted to arrest MPs, underscores the Commons' independence from direct monarchical summons and prevents potential armed confrontations akin to those precipitating the . By ritualizing exclusion until formal invitation, the practice enforces a structured separation that has maintained procedural stability across centuries. While the core ceremony persists with minimal alteration to preserve its symbolic authority, adaptations occur for practical reasons, such as enhanced security protocols post-2001 or broadcasting adjustments since 1958 to broaden public access. In recent openings, including , the full and rituals were retained despite shorter speech durations tailored to legislative priorities, balancing with contemporary efficiency. Empirical records indicate rare disruptions, with no substantive interruptions to the core sequence in over 300 years, affirming the 's causal efficacy in averting procedural conflicts through formalized deference.

Practice in Other Commonwealth Realms

Canada

In Canada, the Speech from the Throne opens each session of and outlines the federal government's legislative agenda and priorities for the coming term. It is typically delivered by the , as the monarch's representative, from the throne in the Senate chamber, with members of the summoned to attend. The speech is prepared by the Prime Minister's Office and , reflecting the executive's policy intentions rather than the Governor General's personal views. Due to Canada's bilingual framework under the Official Languages Act, the speech is read in both English and , often alternating paragraphs or sections to ensure accessibility. The procedure emphasizes ceremonial : the arrives in a formal , the of the the , and the speech concludes with the traditional formula summoning "to declare the causes of its ." Following delivery, both houses the in Reply, a motion thanking that serves as an implicit confidence vote in the government; defeat on this motion has historically led to resignation or . This dynamic underscores the speech's role in testing parliamentary support post-election or . On May 27, 2025, III personally delivered the speech to open the first session of the 45th —the first such instance by a reigning since II in 1977—highlighting Canada's distinct amid external pressures, including U.S. Trump's public remarks on and annexation threats. The 2025 address committed to bolstering national defense, , and economic resilience, framing Canada as "strong and free" against "unprecedented challenges." Controversies have arisen when the speech intersects with confidence crises, as in December 2008, when requested from Michaëlle Jean hours before a vote on the Address in Reply, avoiding defeat by a ; critics argued this undermined parliamentary , though defenders cited reserve powers discretion. Such events illustrate the speech's vulnerability to maneuvers, with the 's role limited to ceremonial delivery absent clear constitutional breach. At the provincial level, lieutenant governors deliver analogous speeches opening each , mirroring federal form but tailored to provincial competencies like health and education; alignment with the federal throne speech varies by partisan control, with data from 2019–2024 showing over 70% thematic overlap in resource and infrastructure priorities under Liberal federal and provincial s, dropping to under 50% in conservative-led provinces amid policy divergences. These subnational speeches reinforce federalism's decentralized execution while maintaining the Crown's symbolic unity.

Australia and New Zealand

In , the opens each new by delivering a speech in the Senate chamber of , outlining the government's legislative priorities for the term. This practice, rooted in the adopted upon federation in 1901, underscores the constitutional separation between the executive and legislature, with the speech prepared entirely by the elected government and read verbatim by the as the monarch's representative. The ceremony is markedly less elaborate than the UK's, lacking processions or regalia like Black Rod's summons, and focuses on procedural efficiency in a bicameral federal context. Recent examples include the July 2025 opening of the 48th Parliament, where the speech addressed economic reforms and amid post-election priorities. Australia's republican debates, ongoing since the 1999 referendum rejection, have fueled scrutiny of the 's role in this ritual, with proponents arguing it perpetuates monarchical symbolism incompatible with an independent republic; however, no reforms have materialized, preserving the tradition despite periodic calls for an elected to deliver or adapt the address. In practice, speeches have incorporated local policy emphases, such as indigenous reconciliation efforts; for instance, the November 2022 opening speech for the 47th committed to constitutional via an , culminating in the October 2023 , which failed with 60.06% voting against amid concerns over divisiveness and legal risks. In New Zealand, the Governor-General similarly delivers the Speech from the Throne at the State Opening of Parliament, a unicameral process that integrates bicultural elements distinct from the UK model, including a Māori haka pōwhiri (formal welcome) and guard of honour before the address in the Legislative Chamber, Wellington. Adopted post-1852 self-governance and formalized as a dominion in 1907, the format emphasizes Treaty of Waitangi principles, with speeches frequently referencing Māori-Crown relations and equitable outcomes, as in the 2020 address committing to strengthened partnership amid COVID-19 recovery. The December 2023 opening for the 54th Parliament, under the new National-led coalition, detailed 33 priorities like reinstating Three Waters reforms and disestablishing the Māori Health Authority, reflecting a shift toward fiscal restraint and frontline service delivery over prior expansive initiatives. These antipodean variants maintain the core Westminster function of signaling government intent while diverging through simplified ceremonies, absence of royal attendance, and contextual adaptations—Australia's federalism and republican tensions versus New Zealand's bicultural protocols and post-1950 unicameral efficiency—yielding shorter, policy-focused addresses typically under 30 minutes compared to the UK's hour-plus spectacle. Empirical patterns show consistent post-election delivery within weeks, ensuring legislative momentum without the UK's annual cycle.

Smaller Realms and Territories

In smaller realms, the speech from the throne retains its core constitutional function of outlining the government's legislative agenda at the opening of parliament, delivered by the as the monarch's representative, though ceremonies are often scaled to local resources and incorporate viceregal protocols adapted from traditions. In , the presents the Throne Speech annually during the ceremonial opening, as seen on February 13, 2025, when Deputy Governor-General Steadman Fuller delivered it in the absence of the principal officeholder, emphasizing legislative priorities including processes amid ongoing debates on transitioning from a . This practice persists despite republican pressures, serving to maintain separation of and legislative roles while providing a platform for government policy articulation. Papua New Guinea exemplifies viceregal delivery in a Pacific context, where the formally opens parliamentary sessions with a speech prepared by the , as occurred on August 30, 2022, for the Eleventh Parliament, detailing national goals and directions under the Westminster-derived system. The procedure underscores constitutional continuity in diverse, multi-ethnic settings, with the address introducing bills and priorities, though hybrid elements reflecting indigenous customs occasionally influence ceremonial aspects without altering the speech's substantive role. Similarly, in the , the 's Speech from the Throne opens parliamentary meetings, inheriting the model to affirm democratic processes, as demonstrated on April 24, 2025, by Sir David Tiva Kapu, who highlighted national unity and responsibilities amid post-election stability needs. Retention of this counters sporadic advocacy in the region by reinforcing monarchical impartiality and procedural familiarity, with the speech serving as a non-partisan of objectives despite smaller-scale events compared to larger realms. These adaptations ensure the mechanism's functionality in low-population territories, prioritizing legal continuity over elaborate pomp while facing pressures from movements that have not yet disrupted its observance.

Equivalents in Other Monarchies

Japan

In Japan, the delivers a ceremonial address, known as the okotoba (imperial utterance), at the opening of ordinary and extraordinary sessions of the , the country's bicameral legislature. This practice, established under the post-World War II Constitution of 1947, symbolizes the continuity of imperial tradition while underscoring the 's apolitical role as "the symbol of the State and of the unity of the People," as defined in Article 1. Unlike legislative agenda-setting speeches in other systems, the 's address is brief, typically expressing hopes for successful deliberations, national unity, and public welfare without outlining government policy. For instance, at the opening of the first Diet session on June 23, 1947, conveyed profound joy at the assembly of representatives and emphasized the Diet's role in advancing 's welfare under the new democratic framework. The content and delivery of the address reflect the 1947 Constitution's deliberate shift from the prewar (1889), where the held substantive legislative prerogatives, such as exercising power with the Diet's consent (Article 5 of the Meiji text). reforms, influenced by Allied authorities, confined the to ceremonial acts performed "with the advice and approval of the " (Article 7), mirroring the symbolic evolution of throne speeches in realms but rooted in Japan's unique cultural emphasis on imperial reverence (tennō sei) for social cohesion. The address is prepared in coordination with the and , ensuring alignment with constitutional limits, though it avoids partisan content. This ceremonial function occurs annually for the ordinary session (typically January) and as needed for extraordinary sessions, with the arriving in state procession to the . Distinct from the Emperor's address, the Prime Minister's subsequent policy speech (seiji shushō hōsei) details the Cabinet's legislative priorities, economic plans, and , serving as the de facto equivalent to policy-outlining elements in other parliamentary openings. The imperial address thus fulfills a non-legislative , fostering a sense of national solemnity and historical continuity amid democratic governance, without influencing debate or votes. This arrangement has persisted through transitions, including Emperor Akihito's addresses in the late and Emperor Naruhito's in recent sessions, such as the 219th extraordinary on October 24, 2025. By invoking imperial symbolism, it causally reinforces public acceptance of parliamentary authority in a society where the embodies cultural stability, as evidenced by consistent ritual observance since 1947 despite political upheavals.

Malaysia

In , the Yang di-Pertuan Agong delivers the Royal Address (Ucapan Yang di-Pertuan Agong) at the ceremonial opening of each session of the federal Parliament, presenting the government's priorities for legislative action. This procedure, instituted upon on August 31, 1957, under the first Yang di-Pertuan Agong, Tuanku Abdul Rahman ibni Almarhum Tuanku Muhammad, integrates the ceremonial into the parliamentary process while adhering to constitutional limits on monarchical authority. The address, drafted by the and Cabinet, is read from the throne in the chamber, followed by a motion of thanks debated by members, which serves as the initial forum for government-opposition exchanges. The elective nature of the Malaysian monarchy distinguishes this practice from hereditary systems, as the Yang di-Pertuan Agong is selected for a five-year term by the —a council of the nine hereditary sultans from states—emphasizing consensus among state-level monarchs over automatic . This rotational election, occurring every five years since 1957, positions the address as a post-selection of federal unity, where the newly installed king symbolically bridges state autonomies with national policy in a comprising sultanates and non-royal territories. The process underscores causal reliance on ruler agreement, enabling discretionary inputs in areas like and , though the speech remains government-driven. Content of the address prioritizes Islamic foundational principles, affirming the religion's status under Article 3 of the Federal Constitution while permitting non-proselytizing practice of other faiths, alongside multi-ethnic cohesion to counter race-religion-royalty sensitivities. It addresses by advocating adaptation of policies to state contexts, including observance of the 1963 for and integration, and economic imperatives such as 2023's 3.7% GDP expansion, RM329.5 billion in investments, and 127,000 new jobs, with calls for subsidy targeting and debt management. For instance, Ibrahim's February 26, 2024, address to the 15th Parliament's third session highlighted these themes, urging unity and self-reliance in .

Other Examples

In the Netherlands, the Troonrede, or Speech from the Throne, is delivered by the monarch to a joint session of the States General on Prinsjesdag, the third Tuesday in September. The King outlines the government's planned policies and legislative priorities for the upcoming parliamentary year, a practice rooted in constitutional tradition where the speech is drafted by the cabinet. The event features a ceremonial procession from the Noordeinde Palace to the Binnenhof, including the Golden Coach and the carrying of royal regalia such as the crown and scepter, underscoring symbolic continuity amid modern governance. Sweden's equivalent occurs at the opening of the session, typically in early September following elections, where the monarch formally declares the assembly open with a brief . King Carl XVI Gustaf, for instance, delivered such a speech on September 27, 2022, invoking national unity and historical continuity before the presents the government's agenda. This ceremonial act, stripped of substantive policy influence since the 1974 , persists as a marker of monarchical-head-of-state status in a parliamentary democracy. Both nations exemplify the evolution of monarchical parliamentary openings from absolutist-era assertions of royal will to formalized rituals under elected oversight, empirically enduring in social democracies where welfare policies dominate despite the ceremonies' limited causal role in .

Equivalents in Republics and Supranational Bodies

Republican Ceremonial Speeches

In the United States, the State of the Union address fulfills a constitutional obligation for the president to report on national conditions and propose legislation to Congress. Article II, Section 3 of the Constitution requires the president to "from time to time give to the Congress Information of the State of the Union, and recommend to their Consideration such Measures as he shall judge necessary and expedient." The first such address occurred on January 8, 1790, when President George Washington outlined federal priorities before a joint session. Annually since 1947, it has been broadcast, serving primarily to advance the executive's agenda amid partisan dynamics. This direct delivery by the head of government and state contrasts with viceregal practices, as it embeds the speech within the president's political accountability without an independent intermediary, potentially amplifying executive influence over legislative debates. India's President's Address to Parliament provides a closer structural parallel in a , where the ceremonial delivers a government-drafted outline of policy priorities. Article 87(1) of the Indian Constitution mandates the address at the first session following general elections to and the first session each year thereafter, informing of summons causes and government plans. For instance, on June 27, 2024, President addressed a , highlighting economic reforms and amid coalition dynamics. Prepared by the , the content reflects intentions, followed by a motion of thanks enabling debate, akin to responses in monarchical systems. Yet, as an elected officeholder in a , the lacks the apolitical permanence of a hereditary or appointed , tying delivery more explicitly to electoral cycles despite ceremonial separation. These republican formats highlight causal variances in accountability: presidential systems like the U.S. route speeches through the fused head of state-, fostering unmediated executive-legislative confrontation, whereas semi-presidential or parliamentary republics like interpose a , diluting direct political heat but retaining authorship. In Ireland, no routine equivalent exists; the president may address the under Article 13.7.2° of the Constitution, but such interventions are , with session openings handled by legislative leaders rather than a scripted program. This sparsity underscores how republican designs often prioritize elected autonomy over formalized viceregal announcements.

European Union and Similar

The address in the serves as the primary supranational equivalent to a speech from the throne, delivered annually by the to the of the , typically in September. This practice, initiated by Commission President in 2010, assesses past achievements and outlines legislative and policy priorities for the coming year. Unlike the ceremonial and non-partisan nature of throne speeches in realms, the EU address is an executive policy statement, often accompanied by a detailing proposed initiatives and submitted alongside the Commission's work program. Ursula von der Leyen, President since 2019 and re-elected for the 2024-2029 term, delivered the 2025 address on September 10 in , emphasizing security priorities amid threats from and regional instability, while proposing enhancements to defense preparedness and economic resilience. The speech triggers parliamentary debate but lacks the binding legislative opening function of a throne speech, as the Commission's proposals require approval from the European Parliament and the of the EU, reflecting the body's limited supranational authority derived from treaties ratified by sovereign member states. This format underscores the EU's partial sovereignty transfer, where member states retain veto powers in key areas like and taxation, constraining the address's role compared to a unified executive's agenda-setting in monarchies. Empirical evidence from integration history shows persistent challenges, with opt-outs and requirements—such as the 27 member states' needed for treaty changes—limiting the Commission's ability to impose programs akin to a government's throne speech mandate. Looser parallels exist in other supranational organizations, such as the Secretary General's annual reports to the , which outline alliance priorities but do not initiate legislative sessions or carry ceremonial weight. Similarly, the UN Secretary-General's addresses to the General Assembly, including annual reports on global threats, focus on coordination among sovereign states without enforceable legislative triggers, highlighting the absence of pooled sovereignty sufficient for throne-like rituals. These examples illustrate how supranational bodies prioritize policy advocacy over the formalized, tradition-bound openings seen in constitutional monarchies.

Criticisms, Defenses, and Public Reception

Arguments for Irrelevance and Cost

Critics of the Speech from the Throne argue that it serves little substantive purpose in contemporary parliamentary democracies, functioning primarily as a scripted formality where the or recites a government-drafted agenda without input or . The document outlines legislative priorities determined by the prime minister's office, rendering the ceremonial delivery redundant as the content could be disseminated through modern channels like press conferences or parliamentary statements, which are more direct and cost-free. This view posits the ritual as an anachronistic holdover from feudal traditions, disconnected from elected where lies with ministers rather than hereditary figures. Public opinion data underscores claims of widespread indifference, particularly in realms like Canada where the event garners minimal engagement. A May 2025 Angus Reid Institute poll found 83% of Canadians expressed indifference to King Charles III delivering the Speech from the Throne, with only 37% viewing it positively despite a slight edge over negative perceptions. Such apathy reflects broader republican sentiments in Australia and New Zealand, where advocates argue the ceremony symbolizes outdated imperial ties irrelevant to national identity and policy-making. Fiscal critiques highlight the event's expense as unjustified given its perceived obsolescence, with preparation involving security, protocol, and broadcast costs borne by taxpayers amid competing public priorities. In the United Kingdom, the State Opening of Parliament—encompassing the King's Speech—entails significant outlays for pageantry and logistics, though exact annual figures are not itemized separately from broader operations; critics extrapolate from related royal events, estimating indirect costs in the low millions of pounds when factoring security and maintenance. In Canada, the 2020 Speech from the Throne, delivered amid economic recovery from the COVID-19 pandemic, drew backlash for prioritizing rhetorical commitments over immediate fiscal restraint, including promises on reconciliation and anti-racism that some opposition members deemed performative amid debates over monument removals tied to Black Lives Matter protests. These arguments frame the Speech from the Throne as a resource drain in resource-constrained environments, where funds could redirect to or social programs; republican groups in contend it perpetuates a misaligned with egalitarian values, amplifying calls for constitutional to eliminate such vestigial expenses.

Benefits for Stability and Tradition

The Speech from the Throne enhances political stability by establishing a predictable ceremonial opening to parliamentary sessions, wherein the government's agenda is publicly declared, enabling immediate structured debate and scrutiny by opposition parties. This process facilitates the Address in Reply motion, which historically includes opportunities for amendments, thereby testing the government's legislative legitimacy early in the session without precipitating crises. By embodying centuries-old constitutional practices, the speech reinforces institutional continuity, distinguishing constitutional monarchies—which data show are markedly stable, comprising the majority of long-enduring democracies—from republics prone to higher turnover and regime disruptions. Empirical analyses indicate that monarchies correlate with stronger property rights protection and elevated living standards, attributes linked to their ritualistic separation of and roles. Public approval for the monarchy in realms like the United Kingdom sustains this framework, with polls recording steady support around two-thirds, underpinning regime resilience amid partisan volatility elsewhere. The low incidence of throne speech-related parliamentary collapses—typically resolved through routine votes rather than breakdowns—counters claims of obsolescence, as the event's formality minimizes procedural disruptions in diverse, multi-party legislatures. Furthermore, the speech's non-partisan delivery by the or symbolizes national unity above electoral divides, a causal mechanism for cohesion in federations where regional tensions persist, as evidenced by consistent ceremonial adherence across nations without fostering division.

Empirical Data on Public Support and Controversies

In , a May 2025 Angus Reid Institute poll indicated that 83% of respondents were indifferent to King Charles III delivering the Speech from the Throne, the first by a reigning since 1957, though a of those expressing an opinion viewed it more positively than negatively. A concurrent Pollara Strategic Insights survey found 48% of believed the 's delivery enhanced national , compared to 22% who saw it as detrimental, amid U.S. Trump's annexation . These polls coincided with a surge in overall favorability, rising from 44% in 2024 to 52% in 2025 per Research Co., attributed by some to the speech's emphasis on constitutional stability during external threats. The 2025 Canadian speech sparked limited , primarily from advocates critiquing it as an anachronistic reinforcement of colonial ties, while monarchist groups highlighted its role in underscoring apolitical continuity against perceived foreign encroachments. No widespread protests occurred, and legislative confidence votes post-speech proceeded without disruption, reflecting the ritual's minimal direct impact on parliamentary function. In the , public reception of centers more on policy content than ceremony, with 's July 2024 poll showing divided views on legislative proposals but no equivalent data isolating ceremonial support. Broader retention polls, such as 's August 2025 tracker, report 65% favoring continuation versus 23% for an elected , stable despite generational divides where only 37% of 18-24-year-olds express support. Across Commonwealth realms, support for monarchical institutions varies, with at the lowest end (23-52% retention favorability in 2025 polls) yet showing ritual endurance; maintains Governor-General openings amid ~40% republic sentiment but without polled opposition to the event itself. Controversies remain policy-driven rather than ceremonial, as evidenced by the absence of significant public backlash in recent iterations, prioritizing empirical stability over reformist critiques.

References

  1. [1]
    State Opening of Parliament
    The Monarch's Speech. The Monarch's Speech is delivered by the Monarch from the Throne in the House of Lords. Although the Monarch reads the Speech, it is ...
  2. [2]
    What is the King's Speech? - The House of Commons Library
    Jul 15, 2024 · The King's Speech sets out the government's legislative agenda for the following parliamentary session. It can be delivered by the Monarch in person or by ...Missing: definition | Show results with:definition
  3. [3]
    About the Speech from the Throne - Canada.ca
    May 27, 2025 · The Speech from the Throne opens every new session of Parliament. The Speech introduces the government's direction and goals, and outlines how it will work to ...
  4. [4]
    What is a Speech from the Throne? | Samara Centre for Democracy
    Dec 4, 2015 · The Speech from the Throne explains why Parliament has been called. The Speech outlines the Government's legislative agenda and priorities for ...
  5. [5]
    [PDF] State Opening of Parliament - history and ceremonial
    Jul 18, 2024 · The Speech from the Throne must be approved in Council by the Sovereign, but ... The State Opening of Parliament in Commonwealth Realms ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  6. [6]
    King's speech: what is it and why does it matter? - The Conversation
    Nov 7, 2023 · The tradition of a king's speech has its origins in the medieval parliament, but the speech from the throne as we know it today first evolved in ...
  7. [7]
    British History in depth: The Birth of Parliament - BBC
    Feb 17, 2011 · How did parliament evolve from an ad hoc talking shop into a powerful assembly that could defy the king and even legitimise regime change?
  8. [8]
    Birth of the English Parliament
    The English Parliament developed naturally from the King's needs, not intentionally, and through periods of rapid growth, involving events like revolt and war.Missing: speech | Show results with:speech
  9. [9]
    Changes under Edward I - UK Parliament
    The next time the burgesses were summoned along with the knights of the shire was in 1295. This was to become known as the Model Parliament, because its ...
  10. [10]
    II. The Place of Parliament in the King's Government
    However, only a single Parliament, that of March 1416, ran to two sessions, with the second (mainly convened to allow the Emperor Sigismund to address ...
  11. [11]
    George III and his Prime Ministers - History of government
    Apr 24, 2013 · ... Cabinet ties and increased his influence with the monarch. Indeed, George, who appreciated the degree to which the initiative in policy ...
  12. [12]
    The Reform Act 1832 - UK Parliament
    Another change brought by the 1832 Reform Act was the formal exclusion of women from voting in Parliamentary elections, as a voter was defined in the Act as a ...
  13. [13]
    Queen's Speech to Parliament, 1952
    The first State Opening of Parliament presided over by Queen Elizabeth II took place on 4 November 1952. This preceded her Coronation and was her first major ...
  14. [14]
    The Prorogation Dispute of 2019: one year on
    Sep 24, 2020 · The UK Supreme Court held that Parliament had been unlawfully prorogued in September 2019. This paper explains the judgment, and the background to it.
  15. [15]
    https://www.supremecourt.uk/cases/docs/uksc-2019-0192-judgment.pdf
  16. [16]
    Proroguing parliament | Institute for Government
    Prime minister Boris Johnson wrote to Conservative MPs in August 2019 confirming he had asked Queen Elizabeth II to prorogue parliament in the second sitting ...
  17. [17]
    Speeches from the Throne - Library of Parliament
    The Speech from the Throne imparts the causes of summoning Parliament, prior to which neither House can embark on any public business.
  18. [18]
    What is the Speech from the Throne? - Province of Manitoba
    Tradition. Delivery of the Speech from the Throne acknowledges that our system of government is based on hundreds of years of British tradition.
  19. [19]
    [PDF] A Study of British Origins and the Evolution of the Canadian Throne ...
    This study is a response to these gaps and includes an exploration of thirteen Throne Speeches: five British and five Canadian Throne Speeches, and three ...
  20. [20]
    The first sitting of the Commonwealth Parliament 1901
    At midday on 9 May 1901, HRH The Duke of Cornwall and York (later King George V)1 opened the first Parliament of the Commonwealth of Australia, on behalf of ...
  21. [21]
    Speech delivered by His Royal Highness the Duke of Cornwall and ...
    Speech delivered by His Royal Highness the Duke of Cornwall and York at the opening of the first Federal Parliament, 9th May, 1901.
  22. [22]
    The Inauguration of the Commonwealth 1901 - Parliament of Australia
    Australia became a nation on 1 January 1901. The inauguration ceremonies began with a grand parade from Sydney's Domain to Centennial Park.
  23. [23]
    Part I: Statute of Westminster, 1931 - Enactment No. 17
    Aug 17, 2022 · The Statute of Westminster, 1931, gives effect to resolutions from Imperial Conferences, requiring all Dominions' assent for law changes and UK ...
  24. [24]
    The Statute of Westminster, 1931 - Canada.ca
    May 23, 2025 · It granted the Dominions full legal autonomy except in those areas where they chose not to take advantage of that autonomy. Some Dominions, ...
  25. [25]
    Statute of Westminster, 1931 | The Canadian Encyclopedia
    The Statute of Westminster, passed in 1931, gave Canada and other Dominions legislative equality with Britain, and cemented their legislative independence.
  26. [26]
    Anniversary of the Statute of Westminster - Canada.ca
    Dec 13, 2024 · This was to find expression through the granting of legislative equal status for all the self-governing dominions. The Statute of Westminster, ...
  27. [27]
    The Project Gutenberg E-text of The English Constitution, by Walter ...
    The Queen is only at the head of the dignified part of the Constitution. The Prime Minister is at the head of the efficient part. The Crown is, according to ...
  28. [28]
    Dignified/efficient - Oxford Reference
    Walter Bagehot, in The English Constitution, published in 1867, asserted that a constitution needed two parts, 'one to excite and preserve the reverence of ...
  29. [29]
    The Confidence Convention - Parliaments and Ministries
    The convention provides that if the government is defeated in the House on a question of confidence, then it is expected to resign or seek the dissolution of ...
  30. [30]
    Liberals survive confidence vote, as throne speech motion ... - iPolitics
    Jun 4, 2025 · The throne speech is traditionally considered a confidence vote, meaning, if it had been defeated, it could have triggered a snap election.
  31. [31]
    The Agenda of British Government: The Speech from the Throne ...
    Sep 15, 2010 · This article considers how UK governments use the Speech from the Throne (also known as the Gracious Speech and the King's or the Queen's ...
  32. [32]
    The role of the Monarchy | The Royal Family
    As Head of State, The Monarch undertakes constitutional and representational duties which have developed over one thousand years of history.
  33. [33]
    Crown, Monarch, Throne, and Sovereign - UOLLB
    Jul 14, 2024 · Throne: The throne is a physical or symbolic chair or seat on which a monarch sits during formal ceremonies, including the coronation.
  34. [34]
    State Opening of Parliament
    It is customary for the Sovereign to be present at the ceremony, which serves as a symbolic reminder of the unity of the three constituent parts of Parliament: ...Missing: functions | Show results with:functions
  35. [35]
    Black Rod - UK Parliament
    Traditionally the door of the Commons is slammed in Black Rod's face to symbolise the Commons independence. He or she then bangs three times on the door with ...Missing: symbolism | Show results with:symbolism
  36. [36]
    Black Rod - UK Parliament
    The tradition has been continued as a way to symbolise the Commons' independence from the Sovereign and the Lords. After knocking, Black Rod is admitted to the ...Missing: symbolism | Show results with:symbolism
  37. [37]
    What is the State Opening of Parliament? - Hansard Society
    Nov 6, 2023 · State Opening is the ceremony that takes place to formally mark the start of a new Session of Parliament. It is a historic ceremony rich in constitutional ...<|separator|>
  38. [38]
    The State Opening of Parliament: history, tradition and what to expect
    Jun 21, 2017 · The State Opening of Parliament is the main ceremonial event of the parliamentary year and has symbolic significance.
  39. [39]
    What's The Point of Constitutional Monarchy? - Oxford Academic
    Nov 9, 2024 · The symbolism of monarchy is an active form of symbolism, one buttressed by ceremony and ritual. The monarch is presented as the focal point for ...
  40. [40]
    A conversation with Nikki da Costa - Parliament Matters podcast ...
    Aug 16, 2024 · How is a King's Speech crafted? What really happens behind the doors of the Parliamentary Business and Legislation Cabinet Committee?
  41. [41]
    The Legislative Process: From Government Policy to Proclamation
    May 1, 2025 · The process involves all three components of the legislative branch (the Sovereign, the Senate and the House of Commons) operating in concert.
  42. [42]
    How many Government Bills have been passed and are still to be ...
    Jul 21, 2023 · Compared to the situation in May, the proportion of Queen's Speech Bills that have achieved Royal Assent has now risen (to 45%); but so has that ...
  43. [43]
    The King's Speech 2024 - GOV.UK
    Jul 17, 2024 · My Government will seek to strengthen the border and make streets safer. A Bill will be introduced to modernise the asylum and immigration ...Missing: explanation | Show results with:explanation
  44. [44]
    The King's Speech: What is the debate on the 'Address'?
    Nov 6, 2023 · In both Houses, the debate starts with the motion to make a humble Address to the King being moved and seconded. The King's Speech debate is the ...
  45. [45]
    State Opening of Parliament in Depth
    At 1104hrs the Crown is borne by the Lord Great Chamberlain into the Robing Room. At 1107hrs the Lord High Chancellor enters the Royal Gallery from the ...
  46. [46]
    State Opening of Parliament | The Royal Family
    Upon arrival, Their Majesties proceed to the Robing Room where they are bedecked in long Robes of State. The King then leads the Royal Procession through the ...
  47. [47]
    Black Rod and the Door of the House of Commons
    Jan 21, 2020 · The ceremony is often said to be in some way connected to the occasion on 5 January 1642 when the king entered the House of Commons.Missing: symbolism | Show results with:symbolism
  48. [48]
    Who is Black Rod and what do they do in Parliament? - BBC
    Jul 17, 2024 · After being sent from the House of Lords, Black Rod knocks on the door of the House of Commons, to summon MPs for the King's Speech. ...Missing: symbolism | Show results with:symbolism
  49. [49]
    State Opening of Parliament - history and ceremonial
    Jul 18, 2024 · The State Opening of Parliament straddles Walter Bagehot's differentiation between the “dignified” and “efficient” parts of the British ...
  50. [50]
    The State Opening of Parliament 2023 | The Royal Family
    Nov 7, 2023 · Black Rod strikes the door three times before it is opened. Members of the House of Commons then follow Black Rod and the Commons Speaker to ...
  51. [51]
    State opening of UK parliament could be disrupted by security staff ...
    Oct 19, 2023 · State opening of UK parliament could be disrupted by security staff strikes. Next month's state opening of parliament, one of the set-piece ...Missing: frequency | Show results with:frequency
  52. [52]
    Parliamentary Cycle - Our Procedure - House of Commons
    Each session is opened by a new Speech from the Throne, read in the Senate by the Governor General (or the Sovereign). Video: The Opening of a Parliament ...
  53. [53]
    Senate Procedural Note No. 1 - Opening of Parliament
    The opening of Parliament signals the formal beginning of the work of a new Parliament following a general election.Missing: cohesion | Show results with:cohesion
  54. [54]
    Address in Reply to the Speech from the Throne - Special Debates
    The House normally debates the Address early in the session when there is little or no government business on the Order Paper.<|control11|><|separator|>
  55. [55]
    Speech from the Throne - Canada.ca
    May 29, 2025 · The Speech from the Throne opens every new session of Parliament. The Speech introduces the government's direction and goals, and outlines how it will work to ...
  56. [56]
    Canada 'strong and free' and other takeaways from King's throne ...
    May 27, 2025 · King Charles delivered the first throne speech in Canada by a monarch since 1977, amid tensions with the US.Missing: realms | Show results with:realms
  57. [57]
    King Charles emphasizes Canada's 'self-determination' as he opens ...
    May 27, 2025 · King Charles III used a significant speech in Canada's parliament on Tuesday to underscore the country's sovereignty following pressure from US President ...
  58. [58]
    Federal: Parliament: Speech from the Throne - CraigMarlatt.com
    It is called the Speech from the Throne because the Governor General reads it while sitting in the seat in the Senate Chamber reserved for the Head of State or ...
  59. [59]
    Opening Parliament and the Speech From the Throne | CPAC.ca
    When King Charles reads the Speech from the Throne to open Canada's 45th Parliament, it will be in the Senate chamber. CPAC's Andrew Thomson explains why the ...
  60. [60]
    Chapter 1 - The opening of Parliament
    The Governor-General, Major General Michael Jeffery, AC, CVO, MC, delivers the opening speech at the commencement of the 42nd Parliament on 12 February 2008.
  61. [61]
    Speech at the opening of the 48th Parliament of the Commonwealth ...
    This speech was prepared by the Government, and read by the Governor-General at the Opening of the 48th Parliament of the Commonwealth of Australia.
  62. [62]
    Today, the Governor-General performed her constitutional duty at ...
    Jul 22, 2025 · Their duties on behalf of the King include reading the Speech from the Throne and welcoming visiting heads of state and other important ...
  63. [63]
    Australia's royal dilemma as King Charles serves conflicting ...
    Jun 11, 2025 · But to turn a governor-general into a president, Australia will first need a republican movement less concerned with enacting broader ...
  64. [64]
    Referendum night speech | Ministers' media centre
    Oct 14, 2023 · Gloria and Clive voted 'Yes' in this referendum because they want to see a better future for their children and grandchildren.Missing: Governor- | Show results with:Governor-
  65. [65]
    Hansard - Senate 9/02/2023 Parliament of Australia
    This year, a referendum on the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Voice will occur, and it's about two things: recognition and consultation. The Voice will ...<|separator|>
  66. [66]
    State Opening of the 54th Parliament | The Governor-General of ...
    Dec 6, 2023 · Today marked the State Opening of Aotearoa New Zealand's 54th Parliament, which began with a haka pōwhiri and a guard of honour for Dame Cindy and Dr Davies.
  67. [67]
    Speech From The Throne 2020 | The Governor-General of New ...
    Nov 26, 2020 · The Government will strengthen the Māori-Crown relationship to ensure that the Crown can grow to be a better Treaty Partner and work in true ...
  68. [68]
    Full transcript: Speech from the Throne, formal opening of Parliament
    Dec 5, 2023 · It is my privilege to exercise the prerogative of His Majesty the King and open New Zealand's 54th Parliament.
  69. [69]
    Speech From the Throne - 2023-vr5697- New Zealand Gazette
    Dec 8, 2023 · The Māori Health Authority will be disestablished. There will be no co-governance of public services and emphasis will shift to the frontline ...
  70. [70]
    Governor-General Dame Cindy Kiro highlights government's ... - RNZ
    Dec 6, 2023 · Governor-General Dame Cindy Kiro has given her first Speech from the Throne, laying out the government's agenda for the coming three years.
  71. [71]
    [PDF] Brexit adventures—comparing the UK and NZ Parliaments
    The UK Parliament has an established pattern of proroguing once a year. A short recess is followed by a State Opening and Speech from the Throne. In a break ...
  72. [72]
    The Legislature - Jamaica Information Service
    The Governor-General represents the Monarch in Parliament. Once a year, at the official opening of Parliament, the Governor-General delivers the “Throne Speech” ...
  73. [73]
    Parliament Opens Third Meeting with Governor General's Speech ...
    Apr 24, 2025 · The Speech from the Throne is a long-standing tradition in Solomon Islands' democratic system, inherited from the Westminster model. It ...
  74. [74]
    [PDF] THRONE SPEECH 2025 - Jamaica Information Service
    Feb 13, 2025 · Among other pieces of legislation, a Referendum Bill will be tabled to provide for the procedures for the people's participation in the reform ...
  75. [75]
    Jamaica - Facebook
    Feb 12, 2025 · Thursday's Throne Speech during the ceremonial opening of Parliament is to be delivered by Deputy Governor General, Steadman Fuller, the Custos of Kingston.
  76. [76]
    [PDF] Throne-Speech-2022-.pdf - Office of the Prime Minister
    Feb 17, 2022 · Start the process of reviewing the Constitution, and, the process to shift Jamaica's status as a Constitutional Monarchy. One critical piece ...
  77. [77]
    [PDF] FIRST DAY Tuesday 30 August 2022 ...
    Aug 30, 2022 · OFFICIAL OPENING OF THE ELEVENTH PARLIAMENT – ADDRESS BY. THE GOVERNOR-GENERAL OF PAPUA NEW GUINEA .............................................
  78. [78]
    Governor-General Grand Chief Sir Bob Dadae delivering his speech ...
    Aug 29, 2022 · The speech is read every time a new session of Parliament is opened. It introduces the government's direction and goals with an overview of ...
  79. [79]
    HIS EXCELLENCY REVEREND DAVID TIVA KAPU, GOVERNOR ...
    SPEECH FROM THE THRONE: HIS EXCELLENCY REVEREND DAVID TIVA KAPU, GOVERNOR GENERAL OF SOLOMON ISLANDS. August 14, 2024. SPEECH FROM THE THRONE.
  80. [80]
    Speech from the Throne - Facebook
    Apr 24, 2025 · SPEECH FROM THE THRONE WATCH: Governor-General Sir David Tiva Kapu delivers the Speech from the Throne at the Opening of Parliament.<|separator|>
  81. [81]
    https://solomonstarnews.com/third-parliament-meeting-opens-with-ggs-speech-from-the-throne/
  82. [82]
    5-4 Opening Ceremony of the First Session of the Diet, June 23, 1947
    The Imperial Message begins, "Today, I am filled with a profound joy to see the people gathered to represent all the people of Japan at this, the opening ...
  83. [83]
    THE CONSTITUTION OF JAPAN
    Article 6. The Emperor shall appoint the Prime Minister as designated by the Diet. The Emperor shall appoint the Chief Judge of the Supreme Court as designated ...Missing: drafted | Show results with:drafted
  84. [84]
    https://www.constituteproject.org/constitution/Japan_1946?lang=en
  85. [85]
    Fundamental Structure of the Government of Japan
    The Emperor is the symbol of Japan and of the unity of the people, performs the following acts in matters of state, with the advice and approval of the Cabinet, ...
  86. [86]
    Comparison of the Status of the Monarch's Speech in Parliament ...
    Jun 8, 2022 · After the Emperor's OKOTOBA is given, the Prime Minister gives a speech referring to government policies and political matters. It has been ...
  87. [87]
    General Explanation of the Constitutional Revision Drafted by the ...
    The draft revision proposes to maintain a system wherein the Emperor exercises sovereign power, rather than to adopt a republican form of government with a ...
  88. [88]
    List of His Majesty The King - Parlimen Malaysia
    THE FIRST YANG DI-PERTUAN AGONG. Al-Marhum Tuanku Abdul Rahman Ibni Al-Marhum Tuanku Muhammad. State: Negeri Sembilan. Term of Office: 3 August 1957 - 1 April ...
  89. [89]
    His Majesty The Yang di-Pertuan Agong, Al-Sultan Abdullah Ri ...
    OPENING CEREMONY OF THE SECOND SESSION OF THE FOURTEENTH PARLIAMEN.
  90. [90]
    Official Portal of The Parliament of Malaysia -
    After the Opening Ceremony, a motion will be moved that an address expressing the thanks for the Royal Address of the Yang di-Pertuan Agong be agreed to by the ...
  91. [91]
    Sultan Ibrahim's royal address for the Opening Ceremony of the ...
    Feb 26, 2024 · Sultan Ibrahim delivered his joint inaugural address at the Opening Ceremony of the Third Session of the 15th Parliament.
  92. [92]
    Explainer: Malaysia's unique rotational monarchy - Reuters
    Oct 26, 2023 · The federal constitution requires the monarch to act upon the advice of the prime minister and cabinet with only a few exceptions. The king is ...
  93. [93]
    MONARCHY, SULTANS AND KINGS IN MALAYSIA | Facts and Details
    Malaysia has acquired 14 Yang di-Pertuan Agong for 56 years since 1957. This explains the inconspicuous and the low profile of the Yang di-Pertuan Agong ...
  94. [94]
    The speech from the throne | House of Representatives
    As Head of State, King Willem-Alexander delivers the so-called Speech from the Throne on Prince's Day on behalf of the Dutch Government.
  95. [95]
    Pomp and ceremony as the Dutch government presents its budget
    Sep 17, 2024 · The budget is always presented on the third Tuesday in September and the day itself is known as Prinsjesdag.<|separator|>
  96. [96]
    HM The King opens the Parliamentary Session - Kungahuset
    Sep 27, 2022 · On Tuesday 27 September, HM The King opened the first Parliamentary Session of the newly-elected Riksdag.
  97. [97]
    The opening of the Riksdag session 2025
    Jun 9, 2025 · The opening of the Riksdag session took place on 9 September 2025. Once again, it was time to open the doors of Kopparporten in the East Wing of ...
  98. [98]
    HM The King's speech at the Opening of the Parliamentary Session
    Sep 13, 2016 · We have gathered here today to begin a new parliamentary year. You will now continue your important work to carry our nation forwards. We live ...
  99. [99]
    State of the Union Address | US House of Representatives
    President Harry S. Truman's January 6, 1947, State of the Union Address before a Joint Session of Congress was the first shown on television.
  100. [100]
    Article 87: Special address by the President - Constitution of India .net
    The President shall address both Houses of Parliament assembled together and inform Parliament of the causes of its summons.
  101. [101]
    President Address - PRS India
    Article 87 of the constitution provides two instances when the President specially addresses both Houses of Parliament. The President of India addresses ...
  102. [102]
    Explained: Why the President's Address matters - PRS India
    The Constitution gives the President and the Governor the power to address a sitting of the legislature. The special power is with regard to two occasions. The ...<|separator|>
  103. [103]
    State of the Union 2025 - European Commission
    Sep 5, 2025 · On 10 September 2025, President von der Leyen delivers the State of the Union (SOTEU) annual address to the European Parliament.The speech · Proposed initiatives · Letter of intent
  104. [104]
    2025 State of the Union address: Purpose, historical significance ...
    Sep 2, 2025 · The European Commission President, Ursula von der Leyen, will deliver her fifth State of the Union address on 10 September 2025. This will be ...
  105. [105]
    2025 State of the Union Address by President von der Leyen - EEAS
    Sep 9, 2025 · President von der Leyen delivered the first State of the Union Address of the 2024-2029 Commission.
  106. [106]
    Podium of power: Von der Leyen's State of the Union address ...
    Sep 17, 2025 · Ursula von der Leyen's 2025 State of the Union speech stressed that Europe faces mounting threats from Russia, instability in the Middle ...
  107. [107]
    [PDF] Qualified Autonomy and Federalism versus Secession in EU ...
    Foster Europe offers its International Studies Series, continued in irregular inter- vals, as a token of its aim to launch a new culture of dialogue and ...
  108. [108]
    [PDF] EUROPEAN INTEGRATION - Fondation Jean Monnet
    The alliance guarantees the collective security of its members and binds the US to Europe ;. NATO and the EU are the two key organisations of Europe today.
  109. [109]
    New Realities in Foreign Affairs: Diplomacy in the 21st Century
    Supranational Representation. The EU is the prime example of a supranational actor in today's world. With the entry into force of the Lisbon Treaty in ...
  110. [110]
    What are the differences between NATO, the UN and the EU?
    Jul 9, 2024 · All three entities hold significant power at the international level, but they differ in their functions and origins.
  111. [111]
    Lessons from Throne Speeches past: Don't believe the hype
    Sep 17, 2020 · Far from a 'road map for government', past throne speeches from the PM have been packed with promises for things that never happened.
  112. [112]
    Is the throne speech pointless? | Nerds on Politics - YouTube
    May 26, 2025 · With every new session of parliament comes a tradition that's essential to our democracy - and minutes after it's finished, the government ...Missing: equivalents | Show results with:equivalents
  113. [113]
    Republican Sentiment in the Realms of the Queen - CanLII
    REPUBLICAN TRADITION IN BRITAIN IT MAY BE THOUGHT THAT A MONARCHY HAS NO PLACE in a modern, egalitarian society, such as New Zealand's. Such arguments were ...
  114. [114]
    83 per cent of Canadians not interested in King Charles' throne ...
    May 26, 2025 · 83% of Canadians say they're “indifferent” to King Charles reading the throne speech, though more view it as a “good thing” than “bad.”
  115. [115]
    Majority of Canadians 'don't care' about King's speech: poll
    May 27, 2025 · A new poll found that 83 per cent of Canadians are 'indifferent' about King Charles III's throne speech to open parliament.
  116. [116]
    Debating Notes – crownedrepublic.com.au
    TEN REPUBLICAN ARGUMENTS AND ANTI-REPUBLICAN COUNTER-ARGUMENTS REPUBLICAN ARGUMENTS. ARGUMENT 1 – AUSTRALIA NEEDS A MODERN CONSTITUTION. 1. The Constitution ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  117. [117]
    'Obscene': Anger after cost of King Charles's coronation revealed
    Nov 21, 2024 · The coronation of King Charles in May 2023 cost taxpayers at least £72m, official figures have revealed. The cost of policing the ceremony was £21.7m.
  118. [118]
    What we're seeing in 2020 is Idle No More 2.0 - Macleans.ca
    Sep 15, 2020 · You do not have to be a political scientist to see that if Trudeau doesn't have a plan to centre human rights in his next Throne Speech, he'll ...
  119. [119]
    It's high time we take on the monument debate the Canadian way
    the leading figure in the creation of modern Canada, but also the ultimate overseer ...
  120. [120]
    AUSTRALIA – A Constitutional Monarchy With Republican Potential
    Feb 11, 2022 · This Digital Snapshot takes a closer look at the republican debate in Australia, including the arguments in favour of retaining the status quo.
  121. [121]
    The Confidence Convention and th - Simon Fraser University
    votes on the main budget motion and on the address in reply to the speech from the throne; any other matter that the government states to be a matter of ...
  122. [122]
    [PDF] The Functions of Constitutional Monarchy - NYU Law
    The presence of a monarch provides an upper limit on the power of political leaders. The symbolic unity provided by monarchy can limit the most problematic ...
  123. [123]
    [PDF] Monarchies, Republics, and the Economy - Wharton Faculty Platform
    We find strong evidence that monarchies contribute to a greater protection of property rights and higher standards of living through each of the three ...
  124. [124]
    New YouGov poll shows steady 2/3 support for the British monarchy
    Aug 8, 2025 · The Princess of Wales is approved of by 71%. The King holds steady with a 59% approval rating and a 31% disapproval - nowhere near as high as ...Missing: 2024 | Show results with:2024
  125. [125]
    Frequently Asked Questions - Canada.ca
    Jan 6, 2025 · The Speech from the Throne officially opens every new session of Parliament. The Speech sets out the broad goals and directions of the government.Missing: definition | Show results with:definition
  126. [126]
    Canadians warming to King Charles and the monarchy
    48% of Canadians believe it is good for Canada's sovereignty for King Charles to deliver the throne speech while only 22% think this will be a bad thing for ...
  127. [127]
    Perceptions of Constitutional Monarchy Improve Across Canada
    Mar 21, 2025 · “The gap between republicanists and monarchists has shrunk from 23 points in 2024 to nine points in 2025.”
  128. [128]
    King Charles's throne speech, deconstructed - National Post
    May 27, 2025 · The historic throne speech was tied to the annexations threat from Donald Trump, and many were looking for some defiance from King Charles.
  129. [129]
    King's big moment in Canada after Trump row - BBC
    May 23, 2025 · "I hope that Trump understands," says Mr Kinsman, ahead of the King becoming the first monarch to open Canada's Parliament in almost 70 years.
  130. [130]
    What do Britons think of the policies in the 2024 King's Speech?
    Jul 19, 2024 · The King's Speech is the once-a-year opportunity for a government to clearly set out their legislative agenda. For their first State Opening ...
  131. [131]
    Royal family favourability trackers, August 2025 | YouGov
    Aug 8, 2025 · Two-thirds of the British public (65%) believe we should continue to have a monarchy, while a quarter (23%) would favour an elected head of ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  132. [132]
    https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cwy7e4q779wo
  133. [133]
    Support for the monarchy has hit a record low, according to new ...
    Sep 13, 2025 · New Poll: Support in Canada for keeping the monarchy is lowest in the Commonwealth realms at 23%. If a referendum were held today, Canada ...
  134. [134]
    The monarchy: the view from the "Commonwealth realms"
    May 5, 2023 · Yesterday we looked at what my new polling tells us about how people in the UK see the monarchy in the run-up to the coronation.