Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Sphericity

Sphericity is a dimensionless in the physical sciences that quantifies how closely the shape of a particle or object approximates that of a perfect , typically by comparing its volume-equivalent 's properties to its actual . Introduced by Hakon Wadell in 1932, sphericity is formally defined as the of the surface area of a having the same as the particle to the actual surface area of the particle itself, expressed mathematically as \psi = \frac{\pi^{1/3} (6V_p)^{2/3}}{S_p}, where V_p is the particle and S_p is its surface area. This measure ranges from 0 to 1, with values approaching 1 indicating near-perfect sphericity, and it focuses on the overall form rather than surface irregularities. In and , sphericity helps characterize the of clastic grains, providing insights into their formation, transport history, and depositional environments, as more spherical particles tend to travel farther due to reduced . In chemical and , it influences particle behavior in processes like , mixing, and , where non-spherical shapes affect flow dynamics and packing efficiency. Sphericity is distinct from roundness, another particle shape descriptor; while sphericity assesses the three-dimensional similarity to a , roundness evaluates the or of edges and corners on a particle's surface . Various methods exist for estimating sphericity, including direct via or using axial dimensions, with modern techniques like improving accuracy for irregular particles.

Fundamentals

Definition

Sphericity, denoted as \Psi, is a dimensionless parameter introduced by Hakon Wadell in 1932 to quantify the degree to which the shape of a three-dimensional object, such as a rock particle, approximates that of a perfect sphere. Originally developed in the field of sedimentology, it provides a standardized measure for assessing deviations from ideal spherical geometry in natural particles, aiding in the analysis of their formation and transport processes. The defining formula for sphericity is \Psi = \pi^{1/3} (6V_p)^{2/3} / A_p, where V_p represents of the particle and A_p its surface area. Physically, this expression corresponds to the ratio of area of a possessing the same as the particle to the actual surface area of the particle itself. For a perfect , \Psi = 1, while for any non-spherical object, \Psi < 1, a consequence of the isoperimetric inequality, which establishes that the minimizes surface area for a fixed among all closed surfaces.

Derivation

The derivation of sphericity, originally proposed by Wadell, proceeds from fundamental geometric principles by comparing the particle's volume to that of an equivalent sphere. Let V_p denote the volume of the particle. This volume is set equal to the volume of a sphere with radius r, given by V_s = \frac{4}{3} \pi r^3. Solving for the equivalent radius yields r = \left( \frac{3 V_p}{4 \pi} \right)^{1/3}. The surface area A_s of this equivalent sphere is then A_s = 4 \pi r^2. Substituting the expression for r gives A_s = 4 \pi \left( \frac{3 V_p}{4 \pi} \right)^{2/3} = (36 \pi V_p^2)^{1/3}. Simplifying further, A_s = \pi^{1/3} (6 V_p)^{2/3}. Sphericity \Psi is defined as the ratio of this equivalent spherical surface area to the actual surface area A_p of the particle: \Psi = \frac{A_s}{A_p} = \frac{\pi^{1/3} (6 V_p)^{2/3}}{A_p}. This formula encapsulates how closely the particle's surface area approaches that of a sphere of identical volume, with \Psi = 1 for a perfect sphere. The derivation assumes that the irregular particle possesses a well-defined, measurable volume V_p and surface area A_p, treating it as an opaque, closed geometric body without accounting for internal structure or specific orientation. Porosity is ignored unless explicitly incorporated into the measurements of V_p and A_p. These assumptions facilitate application to a broad range of particles in sedimentology and engineering contexts. A key limitation of this derivation lies in its dependence on precise determinations of V_p and A_p, which prove challenging for non-convex shapes where surface irregularities, such as re-entrant features or concavities, complicate accurate surface area quantification. Manual or early measurement techniques often underestimate A_p for such particles, leading to inflated sphericity values. Modern imaging methods mitigate this to some extent but still require validation for complex geometries.

Calculations for Specific Shapes

Ellipsoidal Objects

Ellipsoids of revolution, known as , are characterized by three semi-axes where two are equal: the semi-major axis a and the semi-minor axes b = c. For spheroids, the equatorial semi-axis a exceeds the polar semi-axis b (a > b), resulting in a flattened shape. The volume of an oblate spheroid is given by V = \frac{4}{3} \pi a^2 b. The surface area requires evaluation via elliptic integrals, leading to the exact expression A = 2\pi a^2 + \frac{\pi b^2}{e} \ln\left(\frac{1 + e}{1 - e}\right), where the e = \sqrt{1 - (b/a)^2}. The sphericity \Psi for an oblate spheroid, defined as the ratio of the surface area of a sphere with equivalent volume to the spheroid's surface area, yields the closed-form expression: \Psi = \frac{2 (a b^2)^{1/3}}{a + \frac{b^2}{\sqrt{a^2 - b^2}} \ln\left( \frac{a + \sqrt{a^2 - b^2}}{b} \right)}, where a > b. This formula arises from substituting the volume and surface area into the general sphericity definition \Psi = \pi^{1/3} (6V)^{2/3} / A. For prolate spheroids, the polar semi-axis a exceeds the equatorial semi-axes b = c (a > b), producing an elongated shape. The volume is V = \frac{4}{3} \pi a b^2. The surface area is A = 2\pi b^2 + \frac{2\pi a b}{e} \arcsin(e), with e = \sqrt{1 - (b/a)^2}. The corresponding sphericity is: \Psi = \frac{2 (a^2 b)^{1/3}}{b + \frac{a^2}{\sqrt{a^2 - b^2}} \arcsin\left( \sqrt{1 - \left(\frac{b}{a}\right)^2} \right)}, where a > b. As in the oblate case, this derives from the standard sphericity formula applied to the prolate geometry. In both cases, sphericity \Psi = 1 when a = b (a ) and decreases as e increases, reflecting greater deviation from sphericity due to the , which bounds \Psi \leq 1 with equality only for spheres. For example, an oblate spheroid with axis ratio a/b = 2 has \Psi \approx 0.91.

Common Geometric Objects

Sphericity provides a quantitative measure of how closely common geometric objects approximate a , computed via the \Psi = \frac{\pi^{1/3} (6 V_p)^{2/3}}{A_p}, where V_p is the particle volume and A_p is the surface area. For these shapes, volumes and areas are derived from standard geometric , assuming normalized dimensions (e.g., side length or base of 1 for consistency). For example, consider a with side length s = 1: V_p = s^3 = 1, A_p = 6s^2 = 6, yielding \Psi = \frac{\pi^{1/3} (6 \cdot 1)^{2/3}}{6} = \frac{\pi^{1/3} \cdot 6^{2/3}}{6} = \frac{\pi^{1/3}}{6^{1/3}} \approx 0.806. Similar explicit computations apply to other shapes, substituting their respective V_p and A_p expressions into the . The following table summarizes sphericity values for selected common geometric objects, based on optimal or standard aspect ratios where applicable:
ShapeDescription/Assumptions\Psi (approximate)
Perfect sphere, r = 11.000
Side length s = 10.806
Regular Edge length a = 10.671
Height/diameter h/d = 1 (i.e., h = 2r)0.874
Optimum w = \sqrt{2} (height/base ratio maximizing \Psi)0.794
These values illustrate key trends: polyhedral shapes exhibit lower sphericity due to their faceted surfaces, with decreasing as angularity increases (e.g., from to ). Among solids, sphericity rises with the number of faces—the (\Psi \approx 0.910) and (\Psi \approx 0.939) approach spherical values more closely than fewer-faced polyhedra, demonstrating that increasing facets reduces deviation from a . rotational solids like cylinders and cones achieve higher \Psi near equidimensional ratios, though still below 1. In natural contexts, such as sediments, grains often display sphericity values averaging around 0.75, akin to those of angular polyhedra or suboptimal cones, reflecting and effects that round edges without fully achieving sphericity. particles similarly approximate ranges of 0.7–0.9, depending on geological processes.

Mathematical Properties

Sphericity, denoted as \Psi, is a dimensionless shape descriptor that quantifies the degree to which an object resembles a , with its value bounded by $0 < \Psi \leq 1. The upper bound \Psi = 1 is achieved exclusively for perfect , while values approach 0 for highly elongated or flat objects, such as thin rods or disks, where the surface area becomes disproportionately large relative to the volume. This range directly stems from the isoperimetric inequality in three dimensions, which states that $36\pi V_p^2 \leq A_p^3 for any compact convex body with volume V_p and surface area A_p, with equality holding only for spheres. Sphericity is mathematically equivalent to the cube root of the isoperimetric quotient Q = 36\pi V_p^2 / A_p^3, so \Psi = Q^{1/3}, ensuring the bound \Psi \leq 1 and highlighting the sphere as the shape minimizing surface area for a given volume. As a ratio derived from volume and surface area, \Psi exhibits key invariance properties: it is scale-invariant due to its dimensionless nature, rotationally invariant under rigid body transformations, and independent of translation since neither V_p nor A_p depends on the object's position or orientation in space. For a fixed volume, \Psi is monotonically decreasing with respect to surface area, as deviations from sphericity—such as elongation or flattening—increase A_p and thus reduce \Psi. Regarding composition, \Psi is approximately additive for non-overlapping unions of disjoint objects when computed separately for each component, but it lacks exact additivity for composite shapes where surfaces interact or merge. Despite these strengths, \Psi has limitations: it is not strictly additive for overlapping or connected composite forms, where the combined surface area does not simply sum, and it is highly sensitive to surface roughness, as even minor irregularities inflate A_p and lower the computed value.

Comparison to Other Shape Descriptors

Sphericity, as a three-dimensional shape descriptor, finds its primary two-dimensional analogue in , defined as $4\pi A / P^2, where A is the projected area and P is the perimeter of the particle. This metric quantifies how closely a 2D shape approaches a circle, analogous to how measures deviation from a sphere using volume and surface area. However, and circularity are not equivalent, particularly for highly elongated or irregular particles, as circularity is sensitive to projection orientation while integrates full 3D geometry. Another related 2D metric is , which assesses edge sharpness by comparing the radius of the inscribed circle to the particle's nominal diameter, focusing on surface features rather than overall form. In contrast to sphericity, the aspect ratio—defined as the ratio of the maximum to minimum Feret diameters (e.g., length/width)—emphasizes elongation without accounting for surface area or roughness. For instance, a prolate ellipsoid with an aspect ratio of 3:1 exhibits a sphericity of approximately 0.85, illustrating how moderate elongation reduces sphericity from unity while the aspect ratio highlights the directional stretch. This difference arises because aspect ratio ignores volumetric efficiency, making it orthogonal to sphericity's focus on isoperimetric properties. Within sedimentology, elongation (ratio of longest to intermediate axis) and flatness (ratio of intermediate to shortest axis) serve as complementary indices to describe rod-like or platy forms, respectively, and are largely independent of sphericity, which remains a measure of overall compactness regardless of principal axis orientations. These metrics together form a bivariate framework for shape classification, such as , where sphericity provides the "form" component orthogonal to elongation and flatness. Other descriptors include compactness, which is mathematically equivalent to sphericity in some definitions (e.g., (36\pi V^2)^{1/3} / S) but sometimes varies in application to emphasize bounding volume ratios, making it similar yet contextually distinct for granular media analysis. Fractal dimension, conversely, quantifies surface roughness or irregularity at multiple scales, complementing sphericity by addressing textural deviations that sphericity assumes are absent. Sphericity excels in evaluating volume-to-surface efficiency, ideal for smooth or idealized shapes. Selection among these descriptors depends on the analytical goal: sphericity is favored for applications involving drag forces or packing efficiency, as it directly correlates with hydrodynamic resistance and void fraction in suspensions. Aspect ratio or elongation suits scenarios influenced by particle orientation, such as anisotropic settling or alignment in flows. Ultimately, no single metric encapsulates all facets of shape, necessitating combined use for comprehensive characterization, as shape comprises orthogonal dimensions like form, roundness, and roughness.

Applications

In Particle and Sediment Analysis

Sphericity, denoted as Ψ, plays a crucial role in particle and sediment analysis within geology and materials science, particularly for characterizing the shape of sediments and powders derived from natural or industrial processes. As defined by in 1932, sphericity quantifies the degree to which a particle approximates a sphere, providing insights into the effects of erosion, transport, and deposition on grain morphology. Wadell's method measures the ratio of the surface area of a sphere with the same volume as the particle to the actual surface area of the particle, allowing researchers to assess how transport processes affect grain form over time. While roundness increases with abrasion, sphericity is more influenced by particle origin and breakage, changing less during transport. In sedimentology, sphericity is used to classify the shapes of sand and gravel particles, where low values of Ψ (typically below 0.6) indicate elongation or flattening, often resulting from minimal transport, while high values (approaching 1) signify near-spherical forms. This descriptor helps infer depositional environments; for instance, fluvial sands from river systems generally exhibit lower sphericity due to shorter transport distances, whereas beach sands, subjected to continuous wave action, often achieve higher sphericity exceeding 0.8, reflecting mature, well-sorted deposits. Such distinctions enable geologists to reconstruct paleoenvironments, as particles with low sphericity and roundness suggest proximal, high-energy fluvial settings, while those with higher values point to distal marine or aeolian influences. Particle size analysis frequently integrates sphericity with sieving techniques to evaluate sediment characteristics beyond mere diameter, as shape influences packing efficiency and hydraulic properties. In soils and rocks, higher sphericity correlates positively with increased porosity in unconsolidated sediments, facilitating better void space formation in granular media, which in turn affects permeability—essential for understanding groundwater flow and hydrocarbon reservoir performance. For example, more spherical grains promote uniform packing and higher permeability compared to elongated ones, impacting the engineering assessment of unconsolidated sediments. Modern applications extend sphericity to industrial materials, such as in 3D printing where powders with sphericity greater than 0.9 exhibit superior flowability, enabling consistent layer deposition and reducing defects in processes. In pharmaceuticals, high sphericity ensures uniformity in drug particle size and shape, improving dissolution rates and content uniformity in formulations like products. Measuring sphericity remains challenging, with traditional visual estimation methods relying on comparative charts prone to subjectivity and operator variability, whereas digital imaging techniques offer more precise, automated quantification through image analysis software. Digital approaches, such as those using extreme vertices models or local thickness algorithms, provide reproducible results for both 2D projections and 3D reconstructions, though they require high-resolution equipment to capture fine surface details accurately.

In Fluid Dynamics and Engineering

In fluid dynamics, sphericity (Ψ) plays a crucial role in predicting the drag experienced by non-spherical particles in flows, where deviations from perfect sphericity increase drag compared to equivalent spheres. For low Reynolds numbers, Stokes' law provides the baseline drag force for spheres, but empirical corrections for non-spherical particles incorporate Ψ to account for higher resistance; for instance, models adjust the drag coefficient (C_D) with factors such as Ψ^{-0.25} in transitional regimes, leading to settling velocities that scale approximately with Ψ^{0.5} for certain shapes due to the inverse relationship between drag and terminal velocity. These corrections are essential in applications like sedimentation and pipeline transport, where non-spherical particles settle slower, impacting process efficiency. In fluidized beds and packed systems, higher sphericity enables denser particle packing, with spheres achieving a random close packing void fraction of approximately 0.36–0.40, compared to higher voids (up to 0.45) for irregular shapes, which influences fluidization behavior and heat transfer rates. Sphericity affects bed permeability and minimum fluidization velocity, with spherical particles requiring lower gas velocities for fluidization and providing more uniform heat transfer coefficients in reactors, as irregular shapes create channeling and reduce contact efficiency. This is particularly relevant in chemical engineering processes like , where high-Ψ particles minimize pressure drops and enhance thermal performance. Engineering applications demand precise sphericity for optimal performance; in ball bearings, precision grades require Ψ exceeding 0.999 (e.g., sphericity deviations below 0.000003 inches for grade 3 balls) to minimize friction and wear during rolling contact. Similarly, in abrasives and catalysts, sphericity above 0.95 reduces uneven wear and improves flow, extending service life in grinding operations and reactor beds. Modern advancements leverage sphericity in additive manufacturing, where metal powders with Ψ > 0.95 ensure uniform laser sintering by enhancing powder bed density and flowability, reducing defects in selective laser melting processes. In simulations, discrete element method (DEM) models incorporate Ψ to accurately represent particle collisions and interactions in fluid-particle flows, enabling predictions of granular behavior in engineering designs. Since the 2000s, computational fluid dynamics (CFD) integrations of sphericity in multiphase models have advanced post-1932 developments, allowing detailed analysis of non-spherical particle dynamics in complex flows like fluidized beds.

References

  1. [1]
    Sphericity - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
    Sphericity is a measure of how closely the volume of a particle compares with the volume of a circumscribing sphere. Roundness refers to the outline of the ...
  2. [2]
    Sphericity of Sphere Formulas and Calculator - Engineers Edge
    Defined by Wadell in 1932, the sphericity ψ of a particle is the ratio of the surface area of a sphere with the same volume as the given spherical particle to ...
  3. [3]
    Sphericity measures of sand grains - ScienceDirect.com
    May 2, 2019 · The sphericity of a grain should measure the similitude of its shape with that of a sphere. Sphericity is a shape descriptor of ...
  4. [4]
    (PDF) Sphericity measures of sand grains - ResearchGate
    Apr 8, 2019 · The sphericity of a grain should measure the similitude of its shape with that of a sphere. Sphericity is a shape descriptor of ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  5. [5]
    [PDF] Orientation, Sphericity and Roundness Evaluation of Particles Using ...
    Sphericity and roundness indices have been used mainly in geology to analyze the shape of particles. In this paper, geometric methods are proposed as an.
  6. [6]
    Sphericity and Roundness of Rock Particles | The Journal of Geology
    Sphericity and Roundness of Rock Particles. Hakon Wadell. Hakon Wadell. Search ... Free first page. Details; Figures; References; Cited by.
  7. [7]
    The isoperimetric inequality - Project Euclid
    November 1978 The isoperimetric inequality. Robert Osserman · DOWNLOAD PDF + SAVE TO MY LIBRARY. Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. 84(6): 1182-1238 (November 1978).
  8. [8]
    [PDF] 2 Particle characterisation
    For spheres, the volume shape coefficient is π/6; i.e. it is the factor that the diameter cubed must be multiplied by in order to give the volume of the shape.
  9. [9]
    Sphericity and roundness computation for particles using the ...
    The so-called true sphericity index was defined by Wadell [44] as the ratio of the nominal surface area, Sn (surface area of a sphere having the same volume ...
  10. [10]
    A Review of Particle Shape Effects on Material Properties for ... - MDPI
    This review not only covers basic shape definitions, shape characterization methods, and the effect of particle shape on industrial material properties.
  11. [11]
    Volume, Shape, and Roundness of Rock Particles
    The present paper deals with the fundamental principles, conceptions, and ideas upon which some new sedimentological research methods are based.
  12. [12]
    [PDF] How Spherical Are the Archimedean Solids and Their Duals? - WPI
    Jan 6, 2011 · The Isoperimetric Quotient, or IQ, introduced by G. Polya, characterizes the de- gree of sphericity of a convex solid. This paper obtains closed ...
  13. [13]
    Connecting particle sphericity and circularity - ScienceDirect.com
    ... oblate and prolate spheroidal particles become a circle and ellipse, respectively. ... Li et al. Sphericities of non-spherical objects. Particuology. (2012). D ...Missing: formula | Show results with:formula
  14. [14]
    Presentation of representative shape parameters of porous media ...
    Nov 3, 2024 · The sphericity variable was defined by Wadell as the ratio of the spherical surface with the same volume of the particle to the actual surface ...Properties Of Porous Media · Grain Size And Sorting · Morphology Of Grains And...Missing: limitations | Show results with:limitations
  15. [15]
    (PDF) Sphericities of non-spherical objects - ResearchGate
    Aug 7, 2025 · ... 2ϕ. +. (1/˛2)sin2 . cos2ϕdϕd . (14). For. prolate. spheroid. (˛. > 1),. the. sphericity. function. is. prolate =2˛2/3. 1. +˛2. 2√˛2−1(arcsin((˛ ...
  16. [16]
    Particle shape: a review and new methods of characterization and ...
    Oct 1, 2007 · This paper re-examines the basic concepts of particle shape and suggests a number of new and modified methods which are widely applicable to a range of ...
  17. [17]
    Representativity of 2D Shape Parameters for Mineral Particles in ...
    The selected parameters were: Wadell's roundness (Rw), solidity (So), sphericity (S), normalized perimeter vs. area ratio (¥), and fractal dimension (FD).1.2. Shape Parameter... · 3. Results · 3.3. Shape Parameter...
  18. [18]
    A direct and theoretically consistent method for the calculation of the ...
    Jun 22, 2025 · The results, presented for a prolate spheroid with aspect ratio λ = 4 , show that the skewness in the present study has the same sign as in ...
  19. [19]
    Elongation, flatness and compactness indices to characterise ...
    Flatness is meant to express how flat (or flaky or platy) a particle is, while elongation is meant to express how elongated (or rod-like) it is. Some approaches ...
  20. [20]
    Volume, Shape, and Roundness of Quartz Particles
    The article deals with methods of measuring the volume, shape, and roundness of sedimentary quartz particles.
  21. [21]
    [PDF] Particle shape analysis - SERC (Carleton)
    Lines of equal sphericity, based on the Wadell-Krumbein sphericity index are added to the Zingg diagram.
  22. [22]
    Grain Shape Evolution of Sand‐Sized Sediments During Transport ...
    Mar 16, 2023 · Repeated eolian abrasion in dune fields significantly increases dune sand's grain sphericity, symmetry, and geochemical maturity ...
  23. [23]
    Shape development on Tahiti-Nui | Journal of Sedimentary Research
    Mar 3, 2017 · The maximum projection sphericity averaged .68 for rivers, .64 for low-wave-energy beaches, and .58 for high-wave-energy beaches. Roundness ...
  24. [24]
    The influence of grain shape and size on the relationship between ...
    May 9, 2022 · We show that grain sphericity and porosity exhibit a positive relationship whereas no such relationship exists with grain size.
  25. [25]
    Influence of Texture on Porosity and Permeability of Unconsolidated ...
    Sep 20, 2019 · The probable effect of low sphericity (grain shape) and high angularity (grain roundness) is to increase porosity and permeability of ...Porosity Of Natural And... · Permeability Data · Grain Size And Sorting<|separator|>
  26. [26]
    Characterization and flowability methods for metal powders - Nature
    Dec 3, 2020 · Sphericity is a significant advantage for good flowability of metal powders ... The sample of metal powder 316L was taken from a 3D printing ...Introduction · Materials And Methods · Results And Discussion
  27. [27]
    Spherical crystallization: A technique use to reform solubility ... - NIH
    Application of the SC technique includes production of compacted spherical particles of drug having improved uniformity in shape and size of particles, good ...
  28. [28]
    Particle Roundness and Sphericity from Images of Assemblies by ...
    This paper compares the results of particle sphericity and roundness estimation from such captured images as performed by individuals using standard charts to ...
  29. [29]
    A New One‐Equation Model of Fluid Drag for Irregularly Shaped ...
    Dec 13, 2017 · A new drag law for nonspherical rough particles is presented The drag laws cover all ranges of irregular shapes and fluid dynamic regimes of ...
  30. [30]
    New Model for Non-Spherical Particles Drag Coefficients in ... - MDPI
    Oct 2, 2022 · The settlement drag coefficient of non-spherical particles (SDCNPs) is a crucial parameter in the field of petroleum engineering.
  31. [31]
    Effect of particle shape on void fraction - ScienceDirect.com
    High circularities may be considered as sphericity for most shapes. Sphericity is not affected by size of irregular shape particles.
  32. [32]
    Effect of particle shape on particle flow and heat transfer behavior ...
    Feb 7, 2025 · It was shown that the minimum jet velocity increases with decreasing particle sphericity. Boer et al.8 developed a digital image analysis ...
  33. [33]
    Nonspherical particles in a pseudo‐2D fluidized bed - NIH
    Gas‐solid fluidized beds are widely employed in many industries due to their favorable mixing, mass‐ and heat‐transfer characteristics. Fluid catalytic cracking ...
  34. [34]
    High Precision Bearings - Abbott Ball Company
    The normal range of sphericity for precision balls is from grade 3 at +/-0.000003 to grade 50 +/- 0.00005. Surface Integrity. or Tribology of a ball is critical ...
  35. [35]
    Wear Model of Silicon Nitride Ceramic Balls in Three-Body Coupling ...
    May 8, 2023 · Ball grinding is a process of removing materials by using abrasive particles to decrease ball diameter, improve sphericity, and reduce surface ...
  36. [36]
  37. [37]
    Fluidisation of spherocylindrical particles: computational fluid ...
    In this paper, a coupled CFD–DEM method is used and the reliability of the model in this paper is verified with the help of high-speed photography experiments.
  38. [38]
    CFD simulation of bubbling fluidized bidisperse mixtures
    Oct 11, 2013 · In this work we simulated the dynamics of a fluidized bed of a binary solid mixture using the isothermal multi-fluid model of the commercial ...