Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Split S

The Split S is a classic aerobatic and defensive in , performed by first rolling the aircraft 180 degrees to an inverted and then pulling into the second half of a in a descending path, which reverses the aircraft's heading by 180 degrees while converting altitude into . This , requiring sufficient entry altitude (typically several thousand feet above , depending on and conditions) and precise control to manage g-forces (often around 4 Gs or more), demands care to ensure recovery above terrain. Historically, the Split S emerged as a tactical disengagement tool during World War II, with early use by German pilots seeking to evade British fighters; it was known to the Royal Air Force as the "Half Roll" and to the Luftwaffe as the "Abschwung," frequently employed to rapidly dive away from bombers or opponents. In modern contexts, it remains a standard element in military pilot training for basic fighter maneuvers (BFM), aerobatic competitions, and airshow demonstrations, though its execution has evolved with advanced aircraft capable of higher roll rates and thrust-to-weight ratios that allow for quicker reversals. The maneuver's inverse, the Immelmann turn, achieves a similar directional reversal but in an upward climb, highlighting the Split S's role in energy management tactics where potential energy (altitude) is traded for kinetic energy (speed) to evade threats. Despite its effectiveness, the Split S carries significant risks, particularly at low altitudes, where insufficient height can lead to ; aviation safety analyses have documented fatal accidents during unauthorized or improperly executed Split S attempts, underscoring the need for thorough and altitude awareness. In contemporary , it serves not only as a combat relic but also as a exercise to build pilot skills in high-angle-of-attack flight and recovery from unusual attitudes, contributing to overall flight safety in both military and civilian contexts.

Overview

Definition

The Split S is an executed by first performing a half-roll to place the in an inverted , followed by a positive half-loop in the downward direction to reverse the flight path. This sequence converts the 's altitude into a 180-degree change in heading, ending in level upright flight on the reciprocal course but at a significantly lower . The name "Split S" originates from the maneuver's flight path, which traces a shape resembling the lower half of an "S" letter, split from its upper portion. Key characteristics of the Split S include a substantial loss of altitude—typically 1,000 to 2,000 feet, varying by type, entry speed, and execution—and a corresponding gain in due to the during the descent. The demands precise control to manage the transition from inverted to pulling positive G-forces, ensuring the does not exceed structural limits or speeds at the bottom of the . In comparison, the Split S differs from the Immelmann turn, which achieves a similar heading reversal through an ascending half-loop followed by a half-roll, resulting in an altitude gain rather than loss. It also contrasts with the Lazy Eight, a non-aerobatic ground reference maneuver involving coordinated 180-degree climbing and descending turns in a figure-eight pattern without any inversion or looping elements.

Primary Uses

The Split S maneuver plays a prominent role in recreational aerobatics, where it is employed during airshows and pilot training to showcase precise aircraft control and effective speed management. In airshow sequences, it enables pilots to execute quick direction reversals, integrating seamlessly with other figures to create dynamic displays that highlight the aircraft's responsiveness. For training purposes, the maneuver builds foundational skills in coordinating aileron, elevator, and rudder inputs while managing airspeed variations, often practiced in light aircraft like the Citabria to instill confidence in vertical plane operations. In tactical , the Split S serves primarily as a disengagement , allowing pilots to break off pursuit, evade pursuing attackers, or rapidly reposition relative to threats. It is particularly effective against tail-chasing opponents, as the maneuver's descending path disrupts line-of-sight tracking and creates separation. Historically rooted in engagements, it remains a standard defensive option in energy-maneuvering dogfights, where pilots trade altitude for immediate speed gains to exit the fight or set up a counter. Modern applications of the Split S extend to both military and civilian contexts. In U.S. Air Force , it is integrated into aerobatic syllabi for like the T-6 Texan II and T-38 Talon, emphasizing energy management and three-dimensional awareness as foundational elements for advanced fighter programs, such as the Weapons Instructor Course. On the civilian side, the maneuver features prominently in International Aerobatic Club competitions, appearing in known sequences for categories like Sportsman to test pilots' precision in reversing direction while controlling altitude loss. The tactical advantages of the Split S lie in its ability to facilitate rapid energy exchanges, converting from altitude into for speed, which proves useful in dogfights requiring quick repositioning without excessive deceleration. This out-of-plane minimizes energy bleed compared to level turns, preserving options for reengagement while exploiting for . In outnumbered scenarios, it enables pilots to gain angular separation and disrupt enemy solutions, enhancing survivability through efficient vertical maneuvering.

Execution

Step-by-Step Procedure

The Split S maneuver begins with the in straight-and-level flight at a moderate entry speed, typically 130-200 knots (KIAS) depending on the type, and with adequate altitude clearance, such as a minimum of 2,000 feet above level (AGL) to account for the expected altitude loss of approximately 1,500 feet. The pilot must ensure the is configured for , including completing pre-maneuver checklists, performing clearing turns, and aligning with a reference line such as a section line on the . To execute the maneuver, the pilot first initiates a 180-degree to reach the inverted position while maintaining through appropriate input to prevent . Light is applied during the roll, followed by neutralizing the ailerons and applying slight forward stick pressure once inverted to initiate the descent. Next, with the aircraft inverted, the pilot applies slight forward stick to begin the descent, then pulls back on the stick to execute the descending half-loop (negative -forces, typically up to -4 ), using for coordination to keep the flight path smooth and input to control the rate, aiming to maintain an optimum . This phase trades altitude for speed as the nose pulls through the arc toward the horizon. The pull-through phase involves negative -forces, typically up to -4 , requiring appropriate pilot techniques to manage disorientation and blood flow. At the bottom of the half-loop, the pilot rolls the wings level to exit in straight-and-level flight on the opposite heading from the entry, adjusting as necessary to regain of and prevent or underspeed conditions. The concludes with the upright and stabilized, having reversed direction with minimal turn radius but significant altitude loss. Common variations in the procedure account for differences between jet and propeller-driven aircraft, particularly in throttle management; for example, pilots of jet aircraft may reduce throttle during the descending pull to avoid compressor stall from high-angle-of-attack conditions, while propeller aircraft often use idle power on entry to control acceleration.

Required Conditions

The Split S maneuver requires a minimum entry altitude of at least 1,500 feet above ground level (AGL) to comply with FAA regulations prohibiting aerobatic flight below this threshold, though practical execution demands 3,000 feet or higher to account for the significant descent during the half-loop, ensuring a safe pull-out with adequate margin above obstacles. In training contexts, such as U.S. T-38 operations, the minimum entry altitude is 15,000 feet AGL, with typical altitude loss of 10,000–12,000 feet, providing clearance for recovery. Entry must fall within 1.2 to 1.5 times the 's speed to maintain control authority during the initial half-roll while avoiding excessive velocity that could exceed structural limits or Vne during acceleration in the dive. For high-performance jets like the T-38, entry speeds are typically 300-350 KCAS, or 200 KCAS in some configurations, adjusted for power setting, weight, and technique to optimize the pull-through without overstressing the . Suitable aircraft are limited to those certified for , such as high-performance fighters or dedicated aerobatic planes with structural limits of at least +6g/-4g, including models like the Extra 300 or T-38; aircraft without such reinforcements or modifications are not recommended due to risk of exceeding design loads up to 3.8g in normal categories. Execution demands visual meteorological conditions (VMC) with flight visibility exceeding 3 statute miles and clear skies to minimize disorientation risks; or low ceilings must be avoided, as they can amplify control challenges during inverted phases. Pilots should have advanced aerobatic training and demonstrated proficiency in inverted flight, , and upset recovery. For airshow operations, a valid FAA Statement of Acrobatic Competency (Form 8710-7) may be required under waivers.

Aerodynamics

Forces Involved

During the descending half-loop phase of the Split S maneuver, the necessary to maintain the curved trajectory is supplied by the combined action of and the inverted generated by the wings. With the aircraft inverted, the vector points toward the center of the turn (downward relative to the ), augmenting 's contribution to provide the required inward acceleration; this demands precise elevator control to achieve and sustain the intended loop radius, as deviations can lead to an excessively tight or loose path. The maneuver imposes negative G-forces on the pilot and aircraft, typically peaking at -2 to -3 G during the inversion and initial descent, which can cause physiological effects such as redout from blood pooling in the head and potential structural stress on non-aerobatic designs. These negative loads also risk fuel starvation in aircraft without inverted fuel and oil systems, as gravity may prevent proper flow to the engine during prolonged exposure. Drag forces play a significant , with induced drag increasing due to the high required during the pull-down at the bottom of the loop to generate the necessary positive G-load for . Parasitic drag, while rising with the speed gained during descent, is managed through the maneuver's design to allow that supports the subsequent level-off without excessive loss. Roll are critical during the initial 180-degree inversion, where aileron authority must overcome aerodynamic loading to execute a clean roll without or hesitation. In propeller-driven , torque effects from the induce a yawing tendency opposite to the propeller rotation, necessitating coordinated rudder input to maintain precise control throughout the roll. The radius R of the turn in the descending loop phase can be calculated using the formula R = \frac{V^2}{g (n + 1)}, where V is the aircraft's velocity, g is the acceleration due to gravity, and n is the load factor magnitude (|lift|/weight). This equation accounts for both the inverted lift and gravity contributing to the centripetal acceleration and highlights the inverse relationship between speed and radius, emphasizing the need for appropriate entry velocity to achieve the desired path geometry.

Energy Management

In the Split S maneuver, the aircraft's total mechanical energy state is conserved through the exchange of , derived from altitude, for , manifested as increased airspeed, assuming balances during the descent. This principle follows the equation, where total energy E equals mgh plus \frac{1}{2}mv^2, with m as , g as , h as , and v as velocity. As the aircraft rolls inverted and pulls into the descending half-loop, gravitational is converted to , resulting in a typical altitude loss of approximately 2,500 feet at idle power, though this varies with aircraft configuration. The speed gain from this energy trade-off typically ranges from 20-50% increase in , depending on entry conditions and drag; for instance, an entry at 0.9 can yield an exit near 1.3 in high-thrust scenarios, illustrating the maneuver's capacity to accelerate rapidly. Entry airspeeds of 120-140 knots indicated are common in profiles, leading to substantial post-maneuver that enhances directional reversal but requires careful monitoring to avoid exceeding structural limits. Tactically, the Split S leverages this energy conversion for escaping pursuits by providing a quick 180-degree heading change and speed boost, though it depletes the aircraft's altitude reserve, contrasting with climbing maneuvers like the Immelmann that build for sustained vertical options. Efficiency is influenced by the aircraft's drag profile, which rises with and G-loading during the pullout (typically 3-4 Gs), power settings that can mitigate altitude loss at higher (up to 80% ), and atmospheric conditions such as , which affects descent rate and conversion.

History

Origins in World War II

The Split S maneuver, known to German pilots as the Abschwung, emerged as a key defensive tactic during the early phases of , particularly in 1940 during the . Luftwaffe pilots, flying Messerschmitt Bf 109s equipped with fuel-injected Daimler-Benz engines, employed the half-roll into a descending half-loop to rapidly reverse direction and evade pursuing (RAF) fighters. This maneuver allowed them to exploit a critical vulnerability in British aircraft powered by engines, which suffered from carburetor flooding under negative G-forces, causing temporary engine cutouts during dives. The tactic's effectiveness stemmed from the Merlin's updraught design, which relied on a prone to or flooding when inverted or pushed into negative G maneuvers like the Split S. German pilots could initiate a sharp dive after the half-roll, forcing pursuing Spitfire or Hurricane pilots to either break off or risk engine failure, often gaining a safe escape at lower altitudes. Aces such as later credited the Split S with aiding evasion in intense dogfights, as seen in his 1944 encounters where he used it to dive to treetop level and reposition for counterattacks. This innovation provided the a temporary tactical edge in pursuit scenarios until mid-1941. In response, the RAF and (USAAF) developed countermeasures, including the 1941 introduction of ""—a simple designed by engineer to limit fuel flow and prevent cutouts during negative G dives. With this fix retrofitted to Merlin-equipped aircraft, Allied pilots could more safely pursue in dives, though they often favored alternative reversals like the —a maximum-performance climbing turn—to conserve energy and altitude without committing to a low-level Split S. These adaptations were documented in USAAF training materials, such as the P-38 Lightning pilot manual, which outlined the Split S as an enemy evasion tactic while emphasizing chandelles for offensive positioning.

Post-War Developments

Following , the Split S maneuver was integrated into Cold War-era military training programs, particularly within the (USAF) and allies, as a defensive tactic for evading pursuers in high-speed engagements. By the , it appeared in USAF and operational manuals, where it was analyzed for risks during low-altitude execution, emphasizing the "point of no return" halfway through the pull-up to prevent stalls or ground impacts. This incorporation reflected adaptations for early jet fighters like the , which featured improved power-to-weight ratios allowing faster recovery from the descending half-loop while maintaining energy in flight. In civilian aviation, the 1970s marked a rise in the Split S's standardization through aerobatic competitions organized by the International Aerobatic Club (IAC), founded in 1970 to promote precision flying. The maneuver became a core element in Sportsman-level routines, refined for symmetrical execution with exact altitude matching between entry and exit to score high in judged sequences. Competitions emphasized its role in building pilot coordination, contributing to the IAC's growth from regional events to national championships that influenced broader recreational aerobatics. Technological advances further evolved the Split S for modern aircraft. Fly-by-wire systems in fighters like the General Dynamics F-16 Fighting Falcon, introduced in the 1970s, automate aileron and elevator coordination to reduce pilot workload during the inverted roll and pull, enabling tighter radii without manual trimming. Concurrent engine improvements, such as inverted fuel and oil systems in jet turbines, eliminated negative-G fuel starvation issues prevalent in WWII-era piston engines, allowing sustained inverted flight without power loss. A notable incident highlighting safety concerns occurred on September 14, 2003, when USAF Thunderbirds pilot Captain Chris Stricklin ejected from his F-16C during a Split S at , , due to after climbing to only 1,670 feet instead of the required 2,500 feet. The crash, which destroyed the $20 million aircraft but left Stricklin uninjured, prompted reforms including an additional 1,000-foot safety margin for the maneuver in demonstration routines to mitigate low-altitude risks.

Risks and Safety

Potential Hazards

One of the primary hazards of the Split S maneuver is altitude mismanagement, which can lead to (CFIT) if the aircraft enters the dive with insufficient height to recover. The maneuver requires a minimum entry altitude to account for the rapid descent during the half-loop, and misjudging this can result in impact with the ground or obstacles before the pull-out is completed. For instance, during a 2016 U.S. Navy Blue Angels practice flight, pilot Capt. Jeff Kuss initiated a Split S at excessive speed and too low an altitude, failing to arrest the descent and crashing into terrain, resulting in his death. In another example, a 2024 accident involving a Van's RV-7A resulted in a fatal crash when the pilot entered the Split S at excessive speed, underscoring persistent risks of speed and altitude errors. Structural overload poses another significant risk, particularly from exceeding the aircraft's negative G-limits during the inverted phase or positive G-limits in the recovery pull-out. Most aircraft are certified to a negative G-limit of -1.5 to -3 Gs, depending on the , beyond which components like wings or the can suffer deformation or failure. In aerobatic contexts, abrupt inputs can generate forces approaching or surpassing these thresholds; for example, a pull-out at might impose 3.8 Gs or more, risking structural compromise if the design load factor of 1.5 times the (e.g., 5.7 Gs ultimate) is approached. Physiological effects from negative Gs during the inverted descent can induce , as the rapid attitude change and fluid shifts overwhelm the , leading pilots to misperceive relative to the horizon. Negative G-forces cause to pool in the head, resulting in "red-out" (loss of ) after 2.5 to 3 Gs, potential rupture in the eyes or face, and in severe cases, temporary vision impairment or . Unlike positive G effects, there are limited countermeasures for negative G physiological responses, exacerbating disorientation risks in high-workload maneuvers like the Split S. Mechanical failures are heightened in propeller-driven due to oil starvation during the negative or inverted portion, where standard wet-sump engines may lose to critical components like bearings and pistons if not equipped with inverted oil systems. This can cause rapid overheating, seizure, or power loss within seconds of sustained negative Gs. Environmental factors amplify dangers during low-level executions of the Split S, where the maneuver's path increases exposure to strikes, which occur predominantly below 500 feet and can damage engines, windshields, or controls. Wire strikes are also a concern in terrain-following or near-ground profiles, as unseen power lines pose collision risks during the low-altitude pull-out, contributing to a notable portion of low-level incidents.

Mitigation and Training

Safety protocols for the Split S maneuver emphasize pre-flight briefings that outline altitude buffers to ensure recovery margins, typically recommending an additional 1,000 feet above the minimum safe altitude for the maneuver to account for variations in execution and aircraft performance. These briefings also cover the use of G-suits, which inflate to compress the lower body and counteract blood pooling during high-G phases of the pull-out, allowing pilots to sustain up to 9 G without loss of consciousness when combined with other techniques. Additionally, anti-G straining maneuvers (AGSM) are briefed, involving controlled muscle tensing and breathing patterns—such as rapid inhalation followed by exhalation against a closed glottis—to maintain cerebral blood flow and prevent G-induced loss of consciousness (G-LOC) during the maneuver's 4-6 G loads. Training for the Split S follows a structured progression, beginning with simulator sessions to familiarize pilots with the maneuver's and states without risk. This is followed by supervised high-altitude practice starts, typically above 10,000 feet, to build proficiency in roll and pull coordination while monitoring and G-forces, drawing from USAF (BFM) courses that integrate the Split S as a disengagement . Instructors stress awareness throughout , teaching pilots to track total (kinetic plus potential) to avoid excessive speed buildup during the dive, with clear abort criteria such as initiating if airspeed exceeds 300 knots or altitude drops below planned buffers to prevent structural overload or ground proximity. These guidelines ensure pilots can recognize and correct deviations early, prioritizing safe termination over completion. Certification standards for aerobatic maneuvers like the Split S under FAA Part 91 require operations in uncongested areas with at least 1,500 feet clearance from terrain and obstacles, though no specific pilot endorsement is mandated beyond ensuring the aircraft is suitable for aerobatic operations. Parachutes are required under 14 CFR § 91.307 only when carrying non-crew passengers for maneuvers exceeding 60° bank or 30° pitch/attitude relative to the horizon. In military contexts, qualifications follow structured syllabi emphasizing the Split S in tactical scenarios, requiring demonstrated mastery under instructor evaluation. Technological aids enhance mitigation efforts, including helmet-mounted displays (HMDs) that provide real-time orientation cues and altitude readouts to combat during inverted phases, as integrated in advanced trainers like the M-346. Post-1980s reforms, prompted by accidents involving and low-altitude errors in aerobatic flights, led to mandatory simulator-based upset recovery training and stricter emphasis on physiological countermeasures across U.S. programs.

References

  1. [1]
    [PDF] Aviation Investigation Final Report - NTSB
    Dec 22, 2011 · A split-“S” is an aerobatic maneuver in which the airplane is rolled into and inverted attitude followed by the second half of a loop downward.
  2. [2]
    Split S - CombatAircraft.com
    In this the defender rolls inverted and dives away vertically, pulling out in a direction opposite to that of his opponent. Most defensive maneuvers are ...
  3. [3]
    [PDF] Aircraft Maneuvers for the Evaluation of Flying Qualities and Agility ...
    Setup: The entry to this maneuver is basically a split-S. Starting above test airspeed and above test altitude, rol! inverted and pull to target AOA ...
  4. [4]
    SPLIT-S MANEUVER - Aviation Performance Solutions
    Oct 14, 2009 · A very effective and dramatic technique to demonstrate the risks, life-threatening dangers and challenges of the split-s pull through response to an over-bank ...
  5. [5]
    [PDF] Fighter Combat Tactics And Maneuvering
    The Split-S is essentially the reverse of the Immelmann. It begins with a half-roll to invert the aircraft, followed by a half-loop downward. This maneuver ...
  6. [6]
    [PDF] ACC Heritage Maneuvers Package - Federal Aviation Administration
    May 24, 2017 · Split-S. ... to flying the maneuver at maneuver minimums. (T-2). Document all maneuver evaluations on a grade sheet and maintain them in ...
  7. [7]
    Aerobatic Figures
    All aerobatic figures start and end from horizontal lines in either upright or inverted flight. ... The aerobatics version of the Lazy Eight is two wingovers back ...Aileron Rolls · Barrel Rolls · Slow Rolls · Avalanche
  8. [8]
    Challenges: Stretch your skills by trying a new form of flight - AOPA
    Feb 1, 2011 · In a split second, the split-S sends adrenaline flowing and blood pumping as full left aileron and rudder deflection flips the 1975 Citabria ...
  9. [9]
    Split-S Decision - Plane & Pilot Magazine
    Sep 20, 2024 · This is the split-S entry. It's a way to rapidly reverse course, sometimes used in air combat maneuvering to disengage from a fight. The full ...
  10. [10]
    None
    Below is a merged summary of the Split-S maneuver from "Fighter Combat: Tactics and Maneuvering," consolidating all provided segments into a single, comprehensive response. To retain the maximum amount of detail efficiently, I will use a table in CSV format to organize the information, followed by a narrative summary that ties it all together. The table captures key aspects such as definition, uses, tactical advantages, energy management, and relevant sections/URLs, while the narrative provides a cohesive overview.
  11. [11]
    [PDF] aetcman11-248.pdf - Air Force
    Aug 13, 2025 · The maneuver is complete when the aircraft is returned to level flight. ... maneuver as in the split-S. To avoid excessive G and airspeed at the ...
  12. [12]
    [PDF] aetcman11-251.pdf - Air Force
    Sep 10, 2024 · Split-S. ... The flight lead checks both aircraft in the direction of the training aircraft.
  13. [13]
    In the Loop - Flying the 2024 Sportsman Power Sequence
    #7 is basically a Split-S. So, the roll must be done fast enough to do the 2x4, but slow enough not to exceed the airspeed redline at the bottom of the half ...
  14. [14]
    Aerobatic Flight - Maneuvers & Procedures - CFI Notebook
    Aerobatic flight means an intentional maneuver involving an abrupt change in an aircraft's attitude, an abnormal attitude, or abnormal acceleration, ...
  15. [15]
    14 CFR § 91.303 - Aerobatic flight. - Law.Cornell.Edu
    (f) When flight visibility is less than 3 statute miles. For the purposes of this section, aerobatic flight means an intentional maneuver involving an ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  16. [16]
    [PDF] AC 91-45C - Waivers - Federal Aviation Administration
    Some events require nothing more than waiving FBR 5 91.71 (d) to permit acrobatic flight at less than 1,500 feet above the surface. Others may require waiving ...
  17. [17]
    Chapter 8. Accelerated Performance: Turns
    The acceleration in any turn of radius R is given by the following relation: ar = V2/R . This acceleration is directed radially inward toward the center of ...Missing: V² / (gn)
  18. [18]
    Pulling Gs: The Pilot's Body Sets the Limit - U.S. Naval Institute
    An upright, turning descent would not be able to be executed as dynamically as the split-s because of the negative Gs involved. Ultimately, there is just so ...
  19. [19]
    [PDF] united states air force aircraft accident investigation board report
    Oct 16, 2018 · While experiencing -2.06 G's in inverted flight, the MP initiated a descending half-loop maneuver (Split-S). After five seconds in the Split-S, ...
  20. [20]
    Spitfire engine failure in dive? | Aircraft of World War II
    Apr 10, 2008 · Do you happen to know if rolls, split-S's, loops, and the opposite of a split-S(forgot what its called) produced negative G's or positive G's?Fuel feed and negative G, worldwide. | Aircraft of World War IISchweiks Sim vs. Real Flying Debate Thread | Page 2 | Aircraft of ...More results from ww2aircraft.net
  21. [21]
    [PDF] Chapter 5: Aerodynamics of Flight - Federal Aviation Administration
    Forces Acting on the Aircraft. Thrust, drag, lift, and weight are forces that act upon all aircraft in flight. Understanding how these forces work and.Missing: Split | Show results with:Split
  22. [22]
    [PDF] Effect of Propeller on Airplane Dynamics - Aircraft Spruce
    Torque is a relatively light force in a small plane with an average engine, but does help create differences in roll rate from one direction to the other.
  23. [23]
    [PDF] Airplane Flying Handbook (FAA-H-8083-3C) - Chapter 4
    Energy management is essential for effectively achieving and maintaining desired vertical flight path and airspeed profiles, (e.g., constant airspeed climb) and ...Missing: Split S
  24. [24]
    [PDF] Time Safety Margin Theory and Practice
    Sep 21, 2016 · In flight test, a split-s maneuver is typically an abbreviated form of the aerobatic maneuver. By trading potential energy (altitude) to ...
  25. [25]
    The Engine That Won World War II - HistoryNet
    May 31, 2019 · The merlin is a species of falcon with thin, pointed wings that allow it to dive at high speeds. It was an appropriate choice in view of the ...
  26. [26]
    Ace of Aces - Warfare History Network
    Erich Hartmann amassed a remarkable tally of 352 aerial victories during World War II. ... Hartmann did a split-s, dove to treetop level, and stayed there ...
  27. [27]
    None
    Summary of each segment:
  28. [28]
    [PDF] basic fighter maneuvering (bfm) and all weather intercept (awi) flight ...
    It is acceptable to continue training after both fighters reset following a momentary illumination of the light after this kind of maneuver. 2. Compressor ...
  29. [29]
    Competition Levels - IAC Chapter 26
    New figures seen in Sportsman include the hammerhead and those combining basic elements such as the “goldfish,” “shark's tooth,” “humpty-bump” and “split-s.
  30. [30]
    [PDF] Photo Essay - International Aerobatic Club
    Sep 20, 2013 · Always the visionary, thinking ahead in the 1960s, he was very concerned about the use of homebuilt aircraft for aerobatics and gathered around.
  31. [31]
    Strapping on an F-16 - AVweb
    Dec 15, 2002 · The F-16 has a fly-by-wire system, making the stick essentially no more than an electronic joystick. ... maneuver. I struggled for a few ...
  32. [32]
    Negative G Dive - Aircraft of World War II - WW2Aircraft.net Forums
    Nov 17, 2008 · I believe that the negative G dive is what the jet jockeys call "unloading" the AC. It takes all the Gs off the AC and makes it easier to ...Spitfire engine failure in dive? | Aircraft of World War IINegative G Dives and Miss Shillings Orifice | Aircraft of World War IIMore results from ww2aircraft.net
  33. [33]
    Report: Thunderbirds pilot killed in crash lost consciousness in high ...
    Oct 16, 2018 · The Air Force on Tuesday released the report on the investigation into the April 4 crash at the Nevada Test and Training Range near Nellis Air ...
  34. [34]
    Document: Report on June Fatal Blue Angels Crash - USNI News
    Sep 16, 2016 · The following is the results of a Navy investigation into the June 2, 2016 crash in which Blue Angels pilot, Capt. Jeffery M. Kuss, USMC was killed in Smyrna, ...
  35. [35]
    Maneuvering Speed: How Va Protects Your Plane - Boldmethod
    Those rolling Gs can cause structural failure, even though you never exceeded the G limits. ... The airplane will not “break” at 3.8Gs. This is the positive limit ...
  36. [36]
    Do aerobatic rolls exert high G-forces on an airframe?
    Jan 3, 2024 · The answer is: It depends completely on how many Gs you pull. And that has little to do with the geometry of the maneuver itself.Missing: Split | Show results with:Split
  37. [37]
    Aerospace Physical Effects - StatPearls - NCBI Bookshelf
    Conversely, negative G force leads to abnormally increased cerebral vascular ... These aircraft routinely attain and sustain 9-G rotational ...
  38. [38]
    The Inverted Oil Dilemma - Kitplanes Magazine
    It became clear that inverted systems are great for positive or negative Gs; but right there in the middle (the low and zero-G regime), it is not uncommon for ...Missing: starvation | Show results with:starvation
  39. [39]
    [PDF] RESEARCH MEMORANDUM
    In afterburners and ram-jet combustors, other forms of combustion instability encountered have been referred to as. "rumble" and "buzz. " Rumble. - The type of ...
  40. [40]
    Bird and Wildlife Strikes - AOPA
    Bird strikes are a real and not uncommon danger. The majority of them go unreported and result in little or no damage to the aircraft.Missing: wire aerobatics
  41. [41]
    Frequently Asked Questions and Answers | Federal Aviation ...
    Jan 3, 2025 · Q: At what time of the day do most bird strikes occur? A: About 62% of bird strikes with civil aircraft occur in day, 8% occur at dawn or dusk, ...Missing: low | Show results with:low
  42. [42]
    [PDF] Guidelines For Pilots Seeking All Attitude Training - FAA Safety
    Aerobatic flight is often mistakenly assumed to occur only when an aircraft exceeds 30 degrees of pitch or. 60 degrees of bank relative to the horizon; the ...Missing: Split qualifications
  43. [43]
    AGSM or G-LOC—Is the Squeeze Worth the Juice?
    Jun 6, 2009 · A G-suit squeezes the abs and legs, forcing the blood up toward your cranium to help maintain vision and consciousness.Missing: Split S
  44. [44]
    [PDF] aetcttp11-1.pdf - Air Force
    Dec 31, 2024 · This manual contains fundamental procedures and techniques to accomplish. T-38C Introduction to Fighter Fundamentals (IFF) missions. It is ...
  45. [45]
    Learning BFM | BFM Series Intro | Part 1 - YouTube
    Nov 11, 2021 · Welcome to the beginning of the Basic Fighter Maneuvers (BFM) series. In this series we'll cover how the USAF teaches the fundamentals of ...Missing: course Split S
  46. [46]
    Split-S question and recovery theory | Pilots of America
    Jun 10, 2016 · The point to abort a low altitude Split-S is before you roll into it. Too fast and low is a recipe for disaster if you don't have the altitude.<|control11|><|separator|>
  47. [47]
    14 CFR 91.303 -- Aerobatic flight. - eCFR
    Aerobatic flight means an intentional maneuver involving an abrupt change in an aircraft's attitude, an abnormal attitude, or abnormal acceleration.
  48. [48]
    A-4 Skyhawk Production History
    Nov 9, 2016 · This plane enjoyed the longest production run of any tactical aircraft in the history of aviation, about 25 years! The Skyhawk's contribution to ...Missing: syllabus Split<|separator|>
  49. [49]
    M-346 advanced combat trainer's HMD (Helmet Mounted Display ...
    Feb 17, 2012 · The M-346 is the only Advanced trainer that has a HMD in both day and night configuration, something that has obviously been noticed by the Israeli Air Force.<|separator|>
  50. [50]
    Office of Aerospace Medicine Technical Reports
    Jun 1, 2012 · Several accidents and incidents are reviewed to illustrate that LOC occurs in some pilots during aerobatic maneuvers. Accelerometer ...