Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Spread Networks

Spread Networks LLC is a telecommunications firm founded by Dan Spivey that specializes in ultra-low-latency fiber-optic infrastructure connecting major U.S. financial exchanges, most prominently through its 825-mile dedicated network linking data centers in Chicago's South Loop to Carteret, New Jersey (proximate to New York-area servers). Operational since August 2010, the straight-line route was engineered to minimize physical distance—and thus signal propagation delay limited by the speed of light in fiber—yielding an initial round-trip latency of 13.3 milliseconds, surpassing existing curved paths by approximately 3 milliseconds and facilitating rapid arbitrage by high-frequency trading entities. The project, costing around $300 million and funded partly by investors such as James Barksdale (former Netscape CEO), demonstrated how targeted infrastructure investment could capture value from latency-sensitive financial applications demanding dedicated dark fiber and lit services. Later optimizations reduced round-trip latency to 12.98 milliseconds, while the network's carrier-neutral design supported diverse bandwidth needs up to 100 Gbps. Acquired by Zayo Group Holdings in 2018 for $127 million, Spread Networks' assets continue to underpin premium low-latency offerings amid ongoing competition from alternatives like microwave transmission.

Founding and Development

Inception and Key Founders

Spread Networks originated from the recognition of a critical need in for minimized in data transmission between major U.S. financial hubs, specifically the and New York-area stock exchanges. , a Chicago-based trader, conceived the idea in 2007 after observing how existing fiber optic routes, often following indirect paths shaped by historical infrastructure, imposed unnecessary delays that disadvantaged traders in opportunities where microseconds determined profitability. 's vision centered on engineering the shortest possible terrestrial route—nearly straight-line—to transmit at the in fiber, addressing a gap unmet by incumbent providers. Development commenced secretly around 2008 under Spivey's leadership, with the company formally launching in 2010 following completion of the core infrastructure. , former CEO of Communications, provided crucial financial backing through Barksdale Management and served as chairman, enabling the $300 million investment in an 827-mile dedicated without reliance on public funding or subsidies. This private initiative exemplified entrepreneurial response to empirical demands in , where reductions translated directly into economic advantages for clients executing strategies sensitive to timing disparities.

Construction of the Core Network

Spread Networks initiated construction of its primary fiber optic link in early 2009, targeting a dedicated route connecting the to data centers in , near NASDAQ servers. The 827-mile path was engineered for minimal distance and curvature, routing through rural areas to avoid urban congestion and signal-degrading bends common in legacy networks, thereby optimizing propagation speed in . This design prioritized geometric efficiency over conventional infrastructure constraints, achieving a straighter trajectory than competitors' offerings. The project, costing an estimated $300 million, involved burying high-capacity dark fiber cables capable of supporting ultra-low without multiplexing for public internet traffic, ensuring exclusive use by subscribers. Construction proceeded discreetly, with final splicing completed by July 2010, culminating in the network's operational launch on August 25, 2010. This timeline reflected aggressive execution, leveraging from investors including former CEO Jim Barksdale, without reliance on government subsidies or public funding mechanisms. Upon activation, the dark fiber service delivered a round-trip of 13.33 milliseconds between endpoints, surpassing prior commercial routes' typical 16-17 milliseconds by exploiting the shortest feasible path for fiber-optic transmission. This improvement stemmed directly from the unshared, purpose-built , where signal travel adhered closely to the physical limit of in glass (approximately 200,000 km/s effective speed), free from contention or rerouting delays. The feat underscored how targeted private capital deployment could drive advancements in latency-sensitive applications, independent of broader subsidies.

Technical Architecture

Fiber Optic Design and Path Optimization

Spread Networks engineered its primary fiber optic route to connect the area with data centers in , proximate to Nasdaq facilities, by prioritizing geometric straightness to minimize propagation distance. This design choice adheres to the physical constraint that signal transit time in is governed by the path length divided by the refractive index-adjusted , yielding an effective velocity of approximately 200,000 km/s in silica-based fibers. By constructing a dedicated —spanning roughly 827 miles (1,331 km)—deviating minimally from a great-circle approximation while navigating terrain and regulatory hurdles, the layout reduced excess path length compared to preexisting routes that followed population centers or legacy infrastructure. Signal integrity was enhanced through the selection of nonzero -shifted fiber, particularly TrueWave RS from OFS Optics, which features optimized characteristics (near-zero at 1550 nm operating wavelengths) and low slope to counteract pulse broadening from chromatic effects over extended spans. This fiber type mitigates the accumulation of differential group delays, enabling longer amplifier spacings—up to 80-100 km between erbium-doped fiber amplifiers—without interim compensation modules or optical-electrical-optical regeneration, which introduce fixed delays from processing overhead. The approach thus prioritizes causal , limiting impairments that could necessitate detours or added hardware in standard single-mode fibers like G.652. Customers access the infrastructure via leased dark fiber pairs, unlit conduit strands that permit independent provisioning of laser sources, modulators, and receivers optimized for minimal group delay variation. This contrasts with illuminated services on shared dense systems, where provider-managed parameters constrain end-user tuning for factors like overhead or symbol rates. Dark fiber deployment supports bespoke wavefront engineering, such as phase-aligned coherent detection, to approach the theoretical fiber refractive limit without intermediary penalties from multiplexing contention or standardized protocols.

Latency Reduction Techniques

Spread Networks achieved its core latency reductions by engineering a fiber optic route between and that approximated the straight-line propagation path as closely as possible, minimizing physical distance to counter the reduced in (approximately two-thirds of speed due to ). The path spanned roughly 827 miles (1,331 km) in effective length, enabling a one-way transit time approaching the physical limit for , with round-trip initially measured at 13.33 milliseconds upon operational launch in 2010. Subsequent refinements in 2012 further optimized the route through path tweaks and equipment adjustments, yielding a verified round-trip of 12.98 milliseconds for dark service, as confirmed by testing. Key techniques included strategic placement of optical amplification and regeneration sites to reduce the number of signal hops, thereby minimizing processing delays inherent in each regeneration cycle. Repeater huts were spaced approximately every 120 kilometers, incorporating low-noise optical amplifiers and compensation modules to maintain signal integrity without excessive latency penalties from accumulation or signal broadening. of latency-optimized optical transport systems, such as those from , reduced equipment-induced delays by over 80% compared to standard configurations, allowing cut-through switching and minimal buffering to preserve sub-millisecond timing precision. These methods addressed chromatic dispersion—the wavelength-dependent variation in propagation speed within the —through targeted compensation, ensuring pulse integrity over the full distance without broadening that could add effective . Empirical tests validated the approach's adherence to causal limits, with the 12.98 ms round-trip representing near-optimal exploitation of 's physical constraints, though independent benchmarks later showed radio alternatives achieving marginally lower latencies (around 10-12 ms round-trip) via air-based paths closer to speed, highlighting trade-offs in reliability and capacity.

Business Operations

Service Offerings and Pricing

Spread Networks primarily offers dedicated dark services between the and metropolitan areas, enabling customers to deploy their own transponders and achieve the lowest possible through self-managed of the fiber strands. This customer-lit model provides full control over allocation and , appealing to firms requiring customized, ultra-low- without reliance on third-party . Historical for to this premium dark capacity has been set at $176,000 per month per firm, typically requiring multi-year lease commitments to justify the infrastructure's capital-intensive build. In addition to dark fiber, the company provides lit services, including managed offerings such as one- and ten-gigabit waves, which deliver low-latency for clients lacking in-house expertise in lighting. These lit options guarantee round-trip latencies around 14-15.75 milliseconds, balancing ease of deployment with performance suitable for applications. Pricing for lit services is generally lower than dark fiber equivalents, reflecting reduced customization and operational overhead borne by Spread Networks, though exact figures remain and vary by capacity and contract terms. The firm's centers on capacity leasing, where high margins from premium low-latency access fund ongoing investments without dependence on regulatory subsidies. This approach leverages market-driven demand from latency-sensitive users, with wholesale options available to carriers at competitive rates to diversify income streams beyond exclusive HFT clientele.

Customer Base and Market Position

Spread Networks' primary customers are high-frequency trading (HFT) firms specializing in latency arbitrage between futures markets in , such as the , and equity exchanges in and , including the NYSE and . These clients, predominantly quantitative trading operations on , subscribe to the network's dedicated services to transmit order data in as little as 13 milliseconds one-way, enabling rapid execution of price discrepancy trades across venues. The service targets entities requiring consistent sub-millisecond advantages over public routes, which typically exceed 20 milliseconds round-trip for the same corridor. As a niche provider focused exclusively on ultra-low-latency connectivity for financial markets rather than broad , Spread Networks established early market dominance through its 2010 launch of a straight-line route minimizing physical distance to 827 miles. The $300 million construction cost created high sunk , limiting initial replication and positioning Spread as the premier option for HFT data transport between these key hubs. This specialization yielded leadership in the sector, with services priced at around $300,000 per month per client for access shared among up to 200 firms. Spread sustained its position via iterative latency reductions, such as a 2012 upgrade trimming round-trip time to 12.98 milliseconds through optimized amplification and regeneration points. Against alternatives, which emerged post-2010 offering marginally lower via line-of-sight transmission, Spread's infrastructure provides superior reliability, achieving over 99.99% uptime since inception due to immunity from atmospheric interference like that can disrupt wireless signals. This edge in consistent performance appeals to HFT operations prioritizing outage-free connectivity for continuous trading.

Role in High-Frequency Trading

Facilitation of Low-Latency Strategies

Spread Networks' direct optic route, spanning approximately 825 miles between the (CME) data centers in , and New York-area equity exchange facilities such as those in (NYSE) and (), achieves a round-trip of 12.98 milliseconds on dedicated dark , surpassing prior routes that averaged 15-16 milliseconds. This reduction in propagation delay, derived from a straighter geographical path minimizing signal travel distance at near-light speed in (approximately 200,000 km/s effective velocity), allows (HFT) firms to transmit and orders between futures and cash markets with a competitive edge measured in milliseconds. The network technically enables latency by permitting traders to detect and exploit microsecond-level price divergences, such as between CME-traded 500 futures and underlying NYSE/NASDAQ-listed stocks, before slower participants on legacy infrastructure can respond. For instance, a price update in futures can be arbitraged against prices by routing data through Spread's optimized path, where even 1-2 millisecond advantages facilitate order placement that effectively front-runs delayed reactions from competitors, capturing spreads on correlated assets without relying on predictive models. Integration with co-location facilities enhances end-to-end latency minimization, as Spread provides server directly on its backbone at key endpoints including CME's site, Chicago's 350 Cermak facility, and exchange hubs like Secaucus (NY4/NY5). This setup allows HFT operators to position hardware proximate to exchange matching engines, reducing queuing and processing delays beyond mere transmission, thereby supporting strategies that chain multiple legs across venues in sub-millisecond increments relative to non-optimized connections. Launched in August 2010, the network's availability coincided with expanded HFT adoption, as U.S. exchange data reflected a rise in volumes from around 25% of trades in 2007 to over 50% by 2010, with low-latency like enabling broader participation in cross-market arbitrage by firms previously constrained by route inefficiencies.

Contributions to Market Liquidity

The deployment of Spread Networks' low-latency fiber optic link in 2010 enabled high-frequency traders (HFTs) to execute strategies that demonstrably improved by narrowing bid-ask spreads and enhancing quote depth. on U.S. markets shows that higher HFT participation is associated with tighter effective spreads, reducing trading costs for liquidity demanders including retail and institutional participants. For instance, analyses of post-2007 data reveal that HFT market-making activity outweighs any liquidity-consuming effects, leading to overall lower spreads and greater resiliency during normal conditions. This improvement stems from HFTs' ability to rapidly price discrepancies across exchanges, a capability amplified by sub-millisecond latencies like those offered by Spread. HFT facilitated by such infrastructure also increased , allowing larger orders to be absorbed with minimal price impact, which benefits non-HFT traders by providing a more stable quoting environment. Competition among HFT firms, incentivized by speed advantages, has been linked to higher trading volumes and deeper order books, as evidenced by market studies where intensified HFT rivalry correlated with improved metrics. In the U.S. context, post-2010 data from major exchanges indicate that HFT-driven provision extended to less liquid stocks, mitigating risks for slower participants. Spread-enabled HFT contributed to continuous quoting practices that dampened arising from imbalances. demonstrates that HFTs maintain quotes across conditions, reducing the amplification of imbalances into larger swings compared to pre-HFT ; for example, interruptions in HFT activity lead to disproportionately higher imbalance persistence and . Pre-2010 versus post-2010 comparisons in U.S. show HFTs supplying net during volatile periods, with their quoting less sensitive to imbalance fluctuations, thereby stabilizing intraday . This dynamic reflects competitive pressures fostering efficient provision, akin to historical advancements in where speed innovations lowered costs without entrenching monopolistic barriers.

Controversies and Criticisms

The Speed Arms Race and Economic Rationale

The launch of Spread Networks' Chicago-to-New York fiber-optic route in 2010, costing approximately $300 million, epitomized the escalating "" among (HFT) firms, where competitors poured resources into infrastructure yielding marginal reductions of around 3 milliseconds one-way, or a round-trip of 13.1 milliseconds. This investment reflected a broader dynamic in which HFT entities paid substantial premiums for such edges, rationalized by the capacity to execute orders ahead of rivals and capture fleeting opportunities in liquid markets, thereby generating alpha through sheer volume despite razor-thin per-trade margins. Economically, these expenditures invite scrutiny for potentially enabling zero-sum rent extraction, as faster speeds confer advantages primarily at competitors' expense rather than expanding overall market efficiency; however, participating firms bore the full private , with profitability hinging on sustained alpha capture amid rapid technological . Empirical analyses affirm that HFT-driven has tightened bid-ask spreads—often by 50% or more in affected equities—lowering execution costs for non-HFT investors to levels below 1 annually in aggregate, as provision offsets any front-running premiums. Critics in popular have amplified narratives of wasteful excess, likening the to an unproductive frenzy, yet data from studies counter this by demonstrating net positive effects on price efficiency and reduced costs, validating the investments' rationale within efficient, competitive trading ecosystems where speed enhancements propagate broader gains. Such outcomes underscore that while individual firm advantages may erode quickly, the collective pressure fosters systemic improvements, with costs internalized by profit-seeking entities rather than imposed externally.

Links to Market Instability and HFT Debates

Spread Networks' low-latency and infrastructure, operational by late , exemplified the infrastructure enabling (HFT) speeds that critics associate with heightened market fragility. During the May 6, , major indices like the plummeted nearly 9% intraday before recovering, with HFT algorithms contributing to volatility amplification through rapid order withdrawals amid a large 500 futures sell order from Waddell & Reed. However, joint SEC-CFTC analysis attributes primary causation to a imbalance triggered by the $4.1 billion algorithmic sell program and erroneous "stub quotes" at $0.01, rather than HFT advantages alone; HFT firms demanded immediacy but did not initiate the . Critics, often from progressive policy circles, portray HFT facilitated by networks like Spread as enabling "predatory" front-running, where traders exploit microsecond edges to anticipate and profit from slower orders, allegedly exacerbating instability and disadvantaging retail investors. Such practices are likened to latency arbitrage, with claims that private data feeds and co-location create informational asymmetries akin to insider trading, potentially sowing seeds for flash events. Empirical counter-evidence from transaction-level data, however, indicates HFT predominantly supplies liquidity during normal conditions, narrowing bid-ask spreads by up to 50% and reducing long-term trading costs for investors by facilitating price efficiency without systemic front-running dominance. Studies like Brogaard et al. (2014) find HFT contributes positively to price discovery, with liquidity provision outweighing demand in aggregate, debunking notions of inherent predation as causal to broad instability. Debates extend to regulatory responses, including proposals for financial transaction taxes (FTTs) targeting HFT volumes to dampen speed-driven ; advocates argue low-rate taxes (e.g., 0.1%) could raise while curbing without eliminating . Opponents, citing empirical models, contend FTTs act as blunt tools that disproportionately hike costs for non-HFT participants and may widen spreads during stress, as observed in Sweden's 1984-1991 tax experiment where trading volume fell 85% and volatility rose. While Spread's role underscores the arms race's role in HFT evolution, causal analyses prioritize order flow imbalances over latency infrastructure in isolated crashes, with no verified evidence linking it directly to recurrent systemic risks.

Ongoing Developments and Legacy

Latency Improvements Post-2010

Following its launch, Spread Networks implemented ongoing route optimizations, resulting in a reduction of the Chicago-New York round-trip latency from an initial 13.1 milliseconds to 12.98 milliseconds by October 2012, achieved through refinements to the dark path without altering the core 825-mile distance. These enhancements stemmed from iterative adjustments to minimize signal propagation delays, demonstrating sustained focus on fiber-level efficiencies independent of external regulatory interventions. In February 2018, Holdings acquired Spread Networks for $127 million, integrating its ultra-low-latency infrastructure into Zayo's broader fiber portfolio to extend connectivity beyond the core Chicago-New York corridor while preserving the optimized route's performance characteristics. This move facilitated hybrid offerings, such as combining Spread's dark fiber with Zayo's lit services for diversified low-latency paths to additional financial hubs, without reported disruptions to the primary linkage. Post-acquisition, the network maintained its emphasis on managed dark fiber and wavelength services, supporting demands through incremental tweaks rather than wholesale rebuilds. As of 2025, Spread Networks remains operational under Zayo, continuing to provide the lowest-latency dedicated route between and exchanges with greater than 99.99% reliability, free of major shutdowns or capacity constraints that would necessitate discontinuation. listings confirm its active role in delivering premium dark fiber and lit services, underscoring operational continuity amid evolving demands.

Broader Industry Impact

The introduction of Spread Networks' dedicated fiber optic route in catalyzed a competitive escalation in low-latency , prompting to deploy alternative technologies such as networks, which propagate signals at approximately the in air and thus achieve sub-millisecond advantages over in certain routes. This response included investments in line-of-sight microwave links between key trading hubs like and , where microwave now handles up to 47% of index futures volume during volatile periods despite comprising only 28% of overall capacity. Such innovations forced broader efficiency gains in financial markets by narrowing effective spreads and intensifying opportunities, though latency races have been estimated to account for 31% of price impact in equilibria. Spread Networks exemplifies how private capital, driven by profit motives in unregulated environments, can rapidly address unmet demands for high-speed , in contrast to government-subsidized initiatives that have often yielded inefficient outcomes due to misaligned incentives and over-reliance on political priorities. The $300 million investment in its Chicago-New York cable not only spurred a wave of targeted builds but also demonstrated empirical parallels to historical cost reductions in , where eroded monopolistic pricing and expanded capacity without public funding. This model underscores causal drivers of infrastructure deployment: genuine economic returns from latency-sensitive applications outweighed upfront costs, fostering incremental advancements like hybrid fiber-microwave hybrids. Looking forward, Spread's legacy persists in shaping infrastructure for AI-augmented trading systems, where sub-microsecond latencies remain critical for real-time inferences and cross-market , even as algorithmic sophistication increases. However, the ensuing highlights risks of over-investment bubbles, as evidenced by cost overruns in subsequent projects that failed to sustain profitability amid diminishing marginal returns on speed. These dynamics suggest that while private innovation accelerates technological frontiers, unchecked escalation can lead to resource misallocation absent countervailing market corrections.

References

  1. [1]
    Wall Street's Speed War - Forbes
    Sep 9, 2010 · The result was Spread Networks of Ridgeland, Miss., which spent the last two years secretly digging a gopher hole from Chicago to New York, ...
  2. [2]
    Spread Networks - Crunchbase Company Profile & Funding
    Launched in August 2010, the network offers 12.9 millisecond round trip transmissions on dedicated dark fiber and 14 milliseconds roundtrip transmissions via ...
  3. [3]
    Spread Networks Lights Chicago-NY Link - WatersTechnology.com
    Ridgeland, Miss.-based startup Spread Networks has gone live with its high-speed trading connection between Chicago and New York, according to vendor ...<|separator|>
  4. [4]
    Spread Networks improves latency on Chicago-New York route
    Spread's flagship Ultra Low Latency (ULL) dark fiber service between Chicago and New York is now operational at a roundtrip latency of 12.98 ms.
  5. [5]
    Spread Networks adds 100G on its Chicago-to-New York route
    Sep 18, 2012 · Spread Networks, a privately owned network provider known for its low latency and dark fiber networks, is adding a 100G flavor to its service ...<|separator|>
  6. [6]
    Zayo to Acquire Spread Networks | Press Release
    Nov 27, 2017 · Zayo Group Holdings, Inc. (Zayo) (NYSE: ZAYO) today announced it has entered into a definitive agreement to acquire Spread Networks for $127 million in cash.
  7. [7]
    Spread Networks - CME Group
    Spread Networks is a private company that offers dark fiber and lit services between the greater New York and greater Chicago metropolitan areas.
  8. [8]
    An Alternative to High-Frequency Trading | Chicago Booth Review
    Spread Networks, a Mississippi-based telecom provider, announced with fanfare in June 2010 that it had completed a high-speed fiber optic cable between ...
  9. [9]
    Spread Networks Sets the New Standard in Trading Latency ...
    Spread Networks has assembled a world-class management team and financial sponsors led by Barksdale Management. All are proven leaders in their respective areas ...
  10. [10]
    The Rigged Market: A Review of Flash Boys
    Sep 30, 2014 · Under the cover of night, the firm Spread Networks was secretly laying an 827-mile fiber optic cable connecting Chicago and Northern New Jersey ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  11. [11]
    https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424052702304065704577426500918047624
  12. [12]
    Spread Networks To Take NYC/Chicago Latency Down 3-4 Pegs?
    Jun 21, 2010 · 13.33ms, over three milliseconds faster than existing routes. How ... August 11, 2010 at 2:13 pm. The service is up under 13.3 for about ...
  13. [13]
    Spread Networks - HOCH
    Spread Networks is an ultra low-latency 825 mile direct fiber optic network between Chicago and New York.
  14. [14]
    Spread Networks laid a new fibre optics cable between New York ...
    Spread Networks laid a new fibre optics cable between New York and Chicago ... fiber-optic network between New York and Chicago. Curiously, we never hear a ...
  15. [15]
    Spread Networks Announces Chicago-New York Latency ... - CNBC
    Oct 4, 2012 · Spread's 12.98 millisecond dark fiber offering provides customers with unlimited bandwidth on a 99.999% available service at the lowest ...
  16. [16]
    Spread Networks - Wikipedia
    Spread Networks is a company founded by Dan Spivey and backed by James L. Barksdale (former CEO of Netscape ) that claims to offer Internet connectivity
  17. [17]
    Spread Networks Announces Chicago-New York Latency ...
    Oct 4, 2012 · Spread's 12.98 millisecond dark fiber offering provides customers with unlimited bandwidth on a 99.999% available service at the lowest ...
  18. [18]
    Spread Networks Reduces Latency - Light Reading
    Spread's flagship Ultra Low Latency Chicago-New York Dark Fiber service is now operational at a roundtrip latency of 12.98 milliseconds roundtrip.
  19. [19]
    Spread Networks Offers New "Lowest" Latency Route ... - IP Carrier
    Jun 22, 2010 · Spread Networks provides customers two strands of dark fiber, which are lit using optoelectronics provided by ADVA Optical Networks. Traffic ...
  20. [20]
    Infinera and Spread Networks Enable Sub-13.33 ms Route Between ...
    Jun 22, 2010 · Infinera's latency-optimized optical networking solution is designed to reduce the equipment drag on Spread's dark fiber by more than 80%, when ...Missing: path | Show results with:path
  21. [21]
    Which trading communication technology (e.g., laser, microwave ...
    Oct 5, 2015 · There is no avoiding speed of light delays. Signals traveling in fiber optics travel slower than free air microwaves, from .6C to C. (In the ...
  22. [22]
    [PDF] Capital's Geodesic - Edinburgh Research Explorer
    3) reports that the fee was $176,000 per month, with a requirement to enter into leases several years long. The new cable, which began to operate in August ...
  23. [23]
    Spread Networks Introduces 15.75 millisecond Low Latency Wave ...
    Oct 14, 2010 · Spread Networks is offering one and ten gigabit wave services at a guaranteed round-trip latency of 15.75 milliseconds. Each customer will ...
  24. [24]
    Spread Networks acquisition by Zayo complete, creates new low ...
    Mar 1, 2018 · “We acquired Spread Networks because of their leadership in ultra low-latency network solutions for the financial and trading sectors,” said ...
  25. [25]
    Latency in fragmented markets - ScienceDirect.com
    Yet cross-venue latency remains important: In 2010, Spread Networks spent $300 million to lay a fibre optic cable between Chicago and New York exchanges ...Missing: tests | Show results with:tests
  26. [26]
    Entrepreneurs and secrets - Athos Capital
    May 9, 2021 · Spread Networks' line was valuable if access was scarce. They settled on providing access to 200 firms and pricing this access at 300k a ...
  27. [27]
    Fiber vs. Microwave: Key Differences in Backhaul Connectivity
    Compare optical fiber and microwave technologies for backhaul networks, covering capacity, cost, deployment, terrain, climate effects, and regulation.
  28. [28]
    [PDF] Latency Arbitrage, Market Fragmentation, and Efficiency: A Two ...
    The HFT strategy we examine here is latency arbitrage, where an advantage in access and response time enables the trader to book a certain profit. Arbitrage ...Missing: Networks facilitation
  29. [29]
    Latency Arbitrage Trading: Strategies & Risks - MarketBulls
    Jul 2, 2024 · Latency arbitrage trading lets traders make money from small time gaps in market prices. These gaps, often milliseconds long, offer chances to profit.
  30. [30]
    Spread Networks Offers Server Collocation on the Lowest Latency ...
    Nov 1, 2010 · Spread Networks is now offering customers access to a server collocation service directly on the fastest fiber backbone connecting New York and ...
  31. [31]
    Spread Networks Server Collocation - Bobsguide
    Spread Networks Server Collocation Service offers customers the opportunity to collocate servers directly on the fastest fiber backbone from NY to Chicago ( ...
  32. [32]
    The Impact of High-Frequency Trading on Modern Securities Markets
    Sep 23, 2022 · In Europe, the market share of high-frequency trading (HFT) represents around 35% of the total equity trading volume after peaking in 2010 with ...
  33. [33]
    [PDF] High-Frequency Trading and Market Quality
    Greater HFT participation improves market quality, but aggressive trading can negatively affect it. Market-making by HFTs outweighs the negative effects.
  34. [34]
    How does competition among high-frequency traders affect market ...
    Dec 15, 2020 · First, more competition is accompanied by more high-frequency trading and larger trading volumes, which improve market liquidity. Second, more ...
  35. [35]
    [PDF] Competition among high-frequency traders, and market quality
    We study empirically how competition among high-frequency traders (HFTs) affects their trading behavior and market quality. Our analysis exploits a unique ...
  36. [36]
    Does high-frequency trading actually improve market liquidity? A ...
    The impact of HFT on market liquidity is mixed; some models show positive effects, others negative. The direction depends on the HFT measure used.
  37. [37]
    HFT Provides Continuous Trading Under All Market Conditions
    ... HFT firms net increase the supply of liquidity when market volatility increases and their liquidity is less affected by swings in order imbalances. July ...
  38. [38]
    Where Paul Krugman Goes Wrong Over The Value Of High ... - Forbes
    Apr 14, 2014 · In more detail, that the Spread Networks fibreoptic line from Chicago to New York doesn't make much economic sense, and that the growth of the ...Missing: rationale | Show results with:rationale
  39. [39]
    [PDF] The Economics of High-Frequency Trading: Taking Stock
    I review the recent high-frequency trader (HFT) literature to single out the economic channels by which HFTs affect market quality. I first.
  40. [40]
    [PDF] High-Frequency Trading and Market Quality: Evidence from Account ...
    Jul 7, 2022 · Greater HFT participation is associated with improved market quality, but aggressive trading can have an adverse effect. Market-making HFTs' ...
  41. [41]
    High Frequency Quoting, Trading, and the Efficiency of Prices
    Aug 7, 2025 · HFT reduces 'spreads' (the difference between the prices of sell and buy offers) and increases market efficiency (Conrad, Wahal and Xiang ...
  42. [42]
    [PDF] Findings Regarding the Market Events of May 6, 2010 - SEC.gov
    May 6, 2010 · This is a report of the findings by the staffs of the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading. Commission and the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission ...
  43. [43]
    Good HFT, Bad HFT: Dividing Line between Predatory and Passive ...
    Sep 17, 2014 · The more contentious debate revolves around so-called predatory HFT strategies, even though the distinction between passive and predatory HFT is rarely made ...
  44. [44]
    [PDF] Informational Inequality: How High Frequency Traders Use Premier ...
    One of the many complaints against high-frequency traders is over parasitic trading practices, such as front-running. ... 79 HFT Front Running, All The Time, ...
  45. [45]
    High-Frequency Trading and Price Discovery - Oxford Academic
    Abstract. We examine the role of high-frequency traders (HFTs) in price discovery and price efficiency. Overall HFTs facilitate price efficiency by trading.
  46. [46]
    [PDF] High frequency trading and price discovery - European Central Bank
    We find no evidence that on average HFTs' liquidity demand ... Anatomy of the trading process Empirical evidence on the behavior of institutional traders.
  47. [47]
    Financial transaction taxes in theory and practice | Brookings
    We explore issues related to a financial transaction tax (FTT) in the United States. We trace the history and current practice of the tax in the United ...
  48. [48]
    Financial Transaction Taxes: FAQs - Investment Company Institute
    An FTT would probably discourage high-frequency trading, but it is a very blunt instrument to use in reaching that goal. Any broad-based tax on securities ...
  49. [49]
    [PDF] Preliminary Findings Regarding the Market Events of May 6, 2010
    May 6, 2010 · On May 6, 2010, the financial markets experienced a brief but severe drop in prices, falling more than 5% in a matter of minutes, only to ...
  50. [50]
    Zayo Closes Acquisition of Spread Networks | Press Release
    Feb 28, 2018 · Zayo closed the acquisition of Spread Networks. See how the business unit, Spread Networks by Zayo, will focus on premium ULL & low-latency ...
  51. [51]
    Zayo Spread Networks $127 Million Acquisition Includes Low ...
    Nov 27, 2017 · A planned $127 million Zayo Spread Networks acquisition, announced today, will bring Spread Networks' low-latency assets into the Zayo gold.Missing: position | Show results with:position
  52. [52]
    Spread Networks 2025 Company Profile - PitchBook
    When was Spread Networks founded? Spread Networks was founded in 2010. Where is Spread Networks headquartered? Spread Networks is headquartered in Ridgeland, MS ...
  53. [53]
    Hollow Fiber: The New Option for Low Latency - No Jitter
    Dec 17, 2020 · Spread Networks went live on its Chicago/Carteret link in Aug. 2010, offering round-trip latency of 13.3 msec., compared to 14.5 msec. via ...
  54. [54]
    On Wall Street Low Latency Microwave Fulfills Faster than Fiber
    This extra distance covered contributes delay to the overall latency experienced by trades sent via fiber as compared to microwave. Then the immutable laws of ...
  55. [55]
    Microwave vs. Fiber: The Network Showdown Reshaping Financial ...
    Aug 28, 2025 · Modern microwave networks bear little resemblance to their predecessors. Adaptive modulation maintains 99.999% uptime by automatically adjusting ...
  56. [56]
    [PDF] High-Frequency Trading and the Design of Financial Markets
    Jul 24, 2023 · ▷ In 2010, Spread Networks invests $300mm to dig a high-speed fiber ... spread: races are 31% of price impact, 33% of effective spread.
  57. [57]
    [PDF] The Impact of High-Speed Networks on HFT Performance
    Feb 5, 2025 · High-Speed Networks, defined by their low latency and high bandwidth, ensure the seamless transmission of vast quantities of data in real-time.
  58. [58]
    Rationalizing Latency Competition in High-Frequency Trading
    May 1, 2024 · Investments in expensive telecommunications lines like Spread networks resulted in cost overruns for companies including Getco and Chopper.Missing: rationale | Show results with:rationale