Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Superparamagnetism

Superparamagnetism is a form of magnetism exhibited by small ferromagnetic or ferrimagnetic nanoparticles, typically with diameters below 100 nm, in which thermal fluctuations overcome the material's magnetic anisotropy energy, causing the magnetization direction to flip randomly and resulting in zero net magnetization without an external field.^[1] These single-domain particles, often composed of materials like iron oxides (e.g., magnetite or maghemite), behave like paramagnets under an applied magnetic field, aligning their giant magnetic moments to produce high susceptibility and rapid response, but without the residual magnetism or hysteresis seen in larger ferromagnetic materials.^[2] The phenomenon arises due to the nanoscale size, where the energy barrier for magnetization reversal is low enough for thermal energy to induce frequent flips, governed by the Néel relaxation time described by the Arrhenius equation: τ_N = τ_0 exp(KV / k_B T), with τ_0 ≈ 10^{-9} to 10^{-12} s, K as anisotropy energy density, V as particle volume, k_B as Boltzmann's constant, and T as temperature.^[1]^[3] A critical aspect of superparamagnetism is the blocking temperature (T_B), the threshold above which thermal agitation dominates and the superparamagnetic state prevails; below T_B, the magnetization is "blocked" in a stable direction on typical measurement timescales (e.g., T_B ≈ KV / k_B ln(τ_m / τ_0), where τ_m is the measurement time).^[1] This temperature depends on particle size, shape, and material properties, with smaller particles (e.g., 3–20 nm for iron oxides) exhibiting lower T_B values, enabling room-temperature superparamagnetism in many applications.^[4] Unlike conventional paramagnetism, which involves independent atomic spins with weak susceptibility, superparamagnets derive their enhanced response from the collective alignment of thousands of atomic moments within the nanoparticle, yet they lack the domain walls and permanent alignment of bulk ferromagnets.^[2]^[3] Superparamagnetic materials, such as superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles (SPIONs), find widespread use in biomedical imaging (e.g., as MRI contrast agents), targeted drug delivery, and hyperthermia therapy due to their biocompatibility, non-agglomeration after field removal, and precise magnetic control.^[4] In electronics, they enable high-frequency inductors and contribute to data storage limits in hard drives, where thermal instability sets a "superparamagnetic limit" around 10 nm grain sizes for maintaining data integrity.^[3] These properties stem from careful synthesis methods like co-precipitation or thermal decomposition, ensuring monodisperse particles with tailored surface coatings for stability and functionality.^[4]

Basic Concepts

Definition and Characteristics

Superparamagnetism is a magnetic phenomenon observed in single-domain ferromagnetic or ferrimagnetic nanoparticles, typically with diameters ranging from 1 to 50 nm, where thermal fluctuations at temperatures above the blocking temperature T_B cause the particle's total magnetic moment to randomize in direction, exhibiting paramagnet-like response but with exceptionally large "supermoments" on the order of $10^3 to $10^6 Bohr magnetons (\mu_B).^[1]^[5] This behavior arises because the nanoparticles consist of a uniform magnetization without internal domain walls, allowing the entire moment to flip coherently under thermal agitation. The concept was first proposed in the 1930s by Frenkel and Dorfman, who predicted it for fine particles of ferromagnetic materials such as iron.^[6] Key characteristics of superparamagnetic nanoparticles include rapid magnetization reversal at room temperature when T > T_B, resulting in negligible remanent magnetization and zero coercivity in thermal equilibrium, as the system lacks stable magnetic hysteresis.^[7] The onset of superparamagnetism is inherently size-dependent, governed by the superparamagnetic limit where thermal energy k_B T surpasses the anisotropy energy barrier, leading to frequent moment fluctuations on timescales observable in experiments.^[8] These properties make superparamagnetic materials responsive to external fields without residual magnetism, distinguishing their utility in applications requiring reversible magnetization. The physical prerequisites for superparamagnetism include the maintenance of a single-domain state, in which the nanoparticle's magnetization remains uniform due to the high exchange energy suppressing domain wall formation, typically for sizes below the single-domain limit.^[9] The energy barrier opposing moment reversal scales with particle volume V, given by KV where K is the anisotropy constant, such that smaller volumes lower the barrier and facilitate thermal overcoming. The critical radius marking the transition from stable ferromagnetic to superparamagnetic behavior scales as (k_B T / K)^{1/3}, determined by the condition where the barrier height KV is on the order of 25 k_B T for typical measurement timescales at room temperature. This reversal primarily proceeds via the Néel relaxation mechanism.^[10]

Comparison to Other Magnetisms

Superparamagnetism exhibits similarities to paramagnetism in that both display no magnetic hysteresis and respond linearly to applied magnetic fields, resulting in reversible magnetization. However, the key distinction lies in the underlying mechanism: paramagnetism arises from independent atomic or ionic moments aligning with the field, whereas superparamagnetism involves strongly coupled atomic moments within a nanoparticle that collectively form a large effective magnetic moment, or "supermoment." This coupling leads to a significantly enhanced magnetic susceptibility compared to ordinary paramagnets, given by \chi \approx \frac{N \mu^2}{3 k_B T}, where N is the number density of nanoparticles, \mu is the supermoment, k_B is Boltzmann's constant, and T is the temperature.^[11] In contrast to bulk ferromagnetism, where stable magnetic domains persist below the Curie temperature and produce characteristic hysteresis loops with remanence and coercivity, superparamagnetism in nanoparticles eliminates such hysteresis when the temperature exceeds the blocking temperature T_B, as thermal energy enables rapid reorientation of the supermoment over anisotropy barriers. This transitional behavior highlights how reducing particle size disrupts domain wall formation, shifting from persistent magnetization in larger ferromagnets to dynamic, thermally activated switching in nanoscale systems. Ferrimagnetism, akin to ferromagnetism but featuring opposing sublattice magnetizations that yield a net moment, also transitions to superparamagnetic behavior in sufficiently small nanoparticles, such as those of magnetite (Fe₃O₄), where the ferrimagnetic order within each particle behaves as a giant paramagnet above T_B. For instance, magnetite nanoparticles below approximately 20 nm exhibit superparamagnetism at room temperature, contrasting with the stable ferrimagnetic state of bulk magnetite. The transitional nature of superparamagnetism is particularly evident in size-dependent behaviors within nanomaterials, such as magnetic quantum dots or atomic clusters, where for extremely small particles, below the minimum size for ferromagnetic exchange coupling (typically a few nm), the behavior reverts to that of independent paramagnetic atomic moments, as there is insufficient coupling to form a coherent supermoment. The single-domain threshold sets the upper limit for uniform magnetization. In solid matrices, the dominant relaxation mechanism is Néel relaxation, involving internal flips of the particle's magnetic moment, as opposed to Brownian relaxation, which requires physical rotation of the particle and is suppressed in immobilized systems.

Theoretical Foundations

Magnetic Anisotropy in Nanoparticles

Magnetic anisotropy in nanoparticles refers to the directional dependence of magnetic properties arising from interactions between the magnetization and the particle's internal structure or geometry. It manifests primarily through three types: magnetocrystalline anisotropy, which originates from the crystal lattice and spin-orbit coupling, favoring specific crystallographic directions; shape anisotropy, which stems from the demagnetizing fields associated with the particle's geometry; and surface anisotropy, which arises from broken symmetry and altered coordination at the nanoparticle surface, often contributing significantly in small particles.^[12]^[13]^[14] For uniaxial anisotropy, commonly observed in elongated or high-symmetry nanoparticles, the anisotropy energy density is given by E_a = K V \sin^2 \theta, where K is the anisotropy constant, V is the particle volume, and \theta is the angle between the magnetization and the easy axis. This expression describes the energy barrier that the magnetization must overcome to reverse direction, with the barrier height \Delta E = K V. Superparamagnetism emerges when thermal energy k_B T becomes comparable to \Delta E, enabling spontaneous magnetization reversals via thermal activation, such as in the Néel relaxation process.^[15]^[16] Nanoparticles exhibit superparamagnetism only if they are single-domain, meaning the demagnetization energy exceeds the exchange energy, preventing the formation of multiple magnetic domains; this restricts sizes to approximately 10-100 nm for typical ferromagnetic materials. For iron (Fe), the magnetocrystalline anisotropy constant K \approx 4.5 \times 10^5 erg/cm³ allows single-domain sizes up to about 11-30 nm, while for cobalt (Co), with K \approx 4.3 \times 10^6 erg/cm³, the limit is smaller, around 6-13 nm, due to the higher anisotropy stabilizing uniform magnetization against domain wall formation. In smaller particles, surface effects dominate, often increasing the effective K by up to an order of magnitude compared to bulk values, as uncompensated spins at the surface enhance the overall anisotropy.^[17]^[18]^[19] Several factors influence the anisotropy in nanoparticles. Particle shape plays a key role; prolate spheroids, for instance, enhance shape anisotropy by aligning the easy axis along the long dimension, increasing the effective energy barrier. Defects, such as vacancies or lattice distortions, can modify the local crystal field and thus alter K, while surface coatings or ligands may induce additional interfacial anisotropy through chemical interactions or strain. These effects collectively determine the stability of the superparamagnetic state and its sensitivity to temperature.^[20]^[15]

Néel Relaxation Process

The Néel relaxation process refers to the mechanism by which the magnetization direction in a single-domain ferromagnetic nanoparticle undergoes thermal activation over an energy barrier due to magnetic anisotropy, without requiring physical rotation of the particle. This theory was developed by Louis Néel in 1949 to account for time-dependent magnetic phenomena, such as magnetic viscosity, in fine-grained ferromagnets. In the model, the particle's magnetic moment is treated as a superspin that can reversibly flip between preferred easy axes, enabling superparamagnetic behavior in assemblies of non-interacting nanoparticles. The relaxation time \tau_N governing this process follows an Arrhenius-type expression derived from thermal activation theory:

\tau_N = \tau_0 \exp\left(\frac{\Delta E}{k_B T}\right),

where \tau_0 is the characteristic attempt time, typically ranging from $10^{-9} to $10^{-13} s and associated with the inverse of the Larmor precession frequency, \Delta E is the height of the anisotropy energy barrier, k_B is Boltzmann's constant, and T is the absolute temperature. For uniaxial magnetic anisotropy, the barrier height simplifies to \Delta E = K V, with K denoting the anisotropy constant and V the magnetic volume of the particle. This formulation assumes coherent rotation of the atomic moments within the particle, consistent with the low-temperature Stoner-Wohlfarth model of magnetization reversal. At low temperatures where T \ll T_B (with T_B the blocking temperature defined by \tau_N \approx measurement time), the relaxation time \tau_N greatly exceeds typical observation times (e.g., 100 s), resulting in stable ferromagnetic-like behavior with persistent remanent magnetization. Conversely, at high temperatures where thermal energy k_B T approaches or exceeds the barrier \Delta E, \tau_N becomes very short, leading to rapid fluctuations and the superparamagnetic state characterized by zero remanence in zero field. In the intermediate temperature regime near T_B, the relaxation exhibits a logarithmic dependence on time, manifesting as magnetic viscosity where the magnetization decays as M(t) \propto -\ln(t). For particles with more complex anisotropy barriers, such as multi-axial or irregular shapes, multistate models extend the basic Néel framework by considering multiple energy wells and transition paths to describe the overall relaxation dynamics. The Néel process applies specifically to fixed, non-interacting nanoparticles, such as those embedded in a solid matrix, where particle rotation is negligible. It is distinct from Brownian relaxation, which dominates in fluid suspensions and involves physical rotation of the entire particle to reorient the magnetization, with relaxation time \tau_B = 3 \eta V_h / k_B T, where \eta is the medium viscosity and V_h the hydrodynamic volume.

Blocking Temperature

The blocking temperature T_B, also denoted as the superparamagnetic blocking temperature, represents the critical temperature separating the superparamagnetic regime from the blocked (ferromagnetic-like) state in magnetic nanoparticles. Below T_B, the Néel relaxation time \tau exceeds the characteristic experimental timescale—typically around 100 s for DC magnetization measurements—causing the magnetic moments to become frozen in their orientations due to insufficient thermal energy to overcome the anisotropy energy barrier \Delta E = K V, where K is the anisotropy constant and V is the particle volume.^[21] This freezing leads to remanent magnetization and coercivity, mimicking bulk ferromagnetism on observable timescales, while above T_B, rapid thermal fluctuations enable superparamagnetic behavior with negligible remanence.^[21] A widely used empirical expression for T_B is given by

T_B \approx \frac{K V}{25 k_B},

where k_B is Boltzmann's constant; this arises from the condition \tau = \tau_0 \exp(\Delta E / k_B T_B) = 100 s, with a typical prefactor \tau_0 \approx 10^{-10} s, yielding \Delta E / k_B T_B \approx 25 (ln(100 / 10^{-10}) \approx 25).^[21] The value of T_B scales linearly with particle volume V (hence with the cube of diameter for spherical particles) and anisotropy K, making it highly sensitive to nanoparticle size and material properties. In real polydisperse ensembles, a distribution of V and K broadens the transition, resulting in a range of effective blocking temperatures rather than a sharp threshold. Importantly, T_B is not an intrinsic material property but depends on the measurement technique and its associated timescale; for instance, alternating current (AC) susceptibility probes with frequencies corresponding to \tau \approx 10^{-5} to $10^{-1} s yield lower effective T_B values compared to static DC methods. Representative examples illustrate this dependence: for 10 nm iron (Fe) particles, T_B is approximately 5–10 K under typical low-field conditions, reflecting moderate K for elemental Fe.^[22] Achieving room-temperature superparamagnetism (T_B > 300 K) requires high-K alloys like FePt, where optimized nanoparticles of 4–6 nm diameter exhibit T_B well above ambient temperatures due to their large uniaxial anisotropy (K \approx 7 \times 10^7 erg/cm³).^[23] Theoretical extensions account for external influences on T_B. An applied magnetic field reduces T_B(H) < T_B(0) by tilting the energy barrier and lowering the reversal activation energy, with the shift scaling roughly as T_B(H) \approx T_B(0) (1 - H / H_K) for small fields, where H_K = 2K / M_s is the anisotropy field.^[24] Additionally, interparticle dipole interactions in dense assemblies generally lower T_B by promoting collective moment fluctuations that effectively decrease the barrier height, though strong interactions can sometimes enhance apparent blocking in clustered systems.^[25]

Dynamic Behavior

Zero-Field Relaxation

In the absence of an external magnetic field, superparamagnetic nanoparticles exhibit thermal fluctuations that drive the magnetization to an equilibrium state where the net magnetization averages to zero over sufficiently long timescales when the temperature exceeds the blocking temperature T_B. This occurs because the thermal energy kT surpasses the magnetic anisotropy energy barrier, allowing the particle's magnetic moment to switch between up and down orientations with equal probability, leading to rapid Néel relaxation and no remanent magnetization.^[26] Below T_B, the relaxation time becomes longer than typical experimental observation periods, resulting in a metastable alignment of the moments that persists, mimicking ferromagnetic behavior on short timescales.^[27] The relaxation dynamics in zero field display distinct regimes depending on temperature relative to T_B. Above T_B, the magnetization undergoes a fast initial exponential decay toward the zero equilibrium, governed by the Néel relaxation process with a characteristic time \tau_N = \tau_0 \exp(KV / kT), where \tau_0 is an attempt time, K the anisotropy constant, V the particle volume, k Boltzmann's constant, and T the temperature.^[28] In assemblies resembling spin glasses, such as densely packed nanoparticle systems, aging effects emerge, where the relaxation rate slows over time due to the history-dependent evolution of moment configurations, leading to non-exponential decay and memory phenomena.^[29] Interparticle interactions, particularly dipolar coupling, introduce collective effects that modify zero-field relaxation. In concentrated nanoparticle ensembles, these interactions can frustrate the superspins, inducing a superspin glass state characterized by slowed dynamics, frozen configurations at low temperatures, and enhanced relaxation times compared to non-interacting particles.^[30] This collective behavior arises from the random dipolar fields that compete with single-particle anisotropy, promoting glass-like irreversibility without long-range order.^[31] Zero-field relaxation is prominently observed through zero-field-cooled (ZFC) and field-cooled (FC) magnetization protocols, where samples are cooled without or with a small applied field, respectively, before measurement. In ZFC protocols, the magnetization is low due to random orientations frozen below T_B, while FC shows higher values from aligned moments; the bifurcation between ZFC and FC curves at T_B signals the onset of superparamagnetic blocking and irreversibility.^[32] Dynamic scaling in zero-field relaxation is evident in the frequency-dependent magnetic susceptibility, where the temperature of the susceptibility peak shifts with measurement frequency \omega according to the Arrhenius law \ln \omega \propto 1/T, reflecting the thermally activated nature of the Néel process in the superparamagnetic regime.^[33] This scaling confirms the single-particle dominance above T_B but deviates in interacting systems toward collective glass-like responses.^[27]

Field-Induced Effects

In superparamagnetic systems, an applied external magnetic field H significantly modifies the energy landscape by tilting the anisotropy barrier, thereby influencing the magnetization reversal process. For uniaxial anisotropy, the effective energy barrier height is reduced to \Delta E(H) = KV (1 - h)^2, where K is the anisotropy constant, V is the particle volume, and h = H / H_k with H_k = 2K / M_s being the anisotropy field (M_s is the saturation magnetization). This reduction biases the direction of moment reversal, favoring alignment with the field and altering the probability of thermal activation over the barrier. The Néel-Brown model, originally developed for zero-field conditions, is extended to nonzero fields through the inclusion of the Zeeman energy term in the stochastic differential equations governing moment dynamics, providing a theoretical framework for these field-modified relaxation processes. At low applied fields (H \ll H_k), superparamagnetic particles exhibit enhanced magnetic susceptibility due to the partial alignment of magnetic moments without reaching saturation. The magnetization follows a Langevin-like response, M(H) \approx \frac{n \mu^2 \mu_0 H}{3 k_B T}, where n is the particle density, \mu is the magnetic moment, \mu_0 is the permeability of free space, k_B is Boltzmann's constant, and T is temperature, reflecting the thermal agitation that prevents complete alignment.^[34] In contrast, at high fields (H > H_k), the barrier can be sufficiently lowered to allow coherent rotation toward saturation, but above the blocking temperature T_B, thermal fluctuations dominate, limiting full moment alignment and resulting in an approach to saturation governed by the Langevin function rather than abrupt ferromagnetic behavior. A key feature is the field-dependent blocking temperature, with the critical field for blocking approximated as H_B \approx H_k \left(1 - \sqrt{T / T_B}\right), where T_B is the zero-field blocking temperature; this relation arises from setting the reduced barrier equal to the thermal activation threshold. Such field-induced effects are prominently observed in magnetic fluids, where superparamagnetic nanoparticles suspended in a carrier liquid demonstrate reversible magnetization responses to external fields, with the tilted barriers leading to measurable shifts in susceptibility peaks and relaxation rates. The interaction with relaxation dynamics further depends on the field's direction relative to the moment: when aligned with the easy axis, the field lowers the barrier in the reversal direction (accelerating flips) while raising it in the opposite sense (slowing flips), thus modifying the overall Néel relaxation rate in a directionally asymmetric manner.

Magnetization Time Dependence

In superparamagnetic systems below the blocking temperature T_B, the after-effect decay of magnetization following the removal of an applied magnetic field exhibits a characteristic logarithmic time dependence, arising from the thermal activation over anisotropy barriers in nanoparticles with a narrow distribution of sizes or energy barriers. This relaxation is described by the approximate relation

M(t) = M_0 - \frac{k_B T}{2 K V} \ln\left(\frac{t}{\tau_0}\right),

where M_0 is the initial magnetization, k_B is Boltzmann's constant, T is the temperature, K is the magnetic anisotropy constant, V is the particle volume, and \tau_0 is the attempt time (typically $10^{-9} to $10^{-11} s). This form reflects the magnetic viscosity effect, where the coefficient of the logarithmic term represents the susceptibility to thermal fluctuations relative to the energy barrier K V. Such behavior has been observed in assemblies of iron oxide nanoparticles, confirming the role of distributed relaxation times in producing non-exponential decay.^[35] The frequency response of superparamagnetic materials is probed through alternating current (AC) magnetization, where the magnetization lags the applied oscillating field, leading to a phase shift and energy dissipation. The imaginary component of the AC susceptibility, \chi'', exhibits a peak at the relaxation frequency f \approx 1/(2\pi \tau), corresponding to the condition where the measurement frequency matches the inverse Néel relaxation time \tau. This peak shifts with temperature or particle size, providing a signature of superparamagnetic dynamics, as demonstrated in studies of ferrite nanoparticles where \chi''(T) maxima align with Arrhenius-activated \tau. In non-interacting systems, the response follows Debye relaxation, but deviations occur due to anisotropy or polydispersity. For interacting superparamagnetic nanoparticle ensembles, dynamic scaling laws describe deviations from simple Arrhenius behavior, often fitted by the Vogel-Fulcher relation \tau = \tau_0 \exp\left[ E_a / (k_B (T - T_0)) \right], where T_0 quantifies mean-field-like interactions that effectively lower the barrier activation energy E_a. Power-law fits, such as \tau \propto (T - T_g)^{-\zeta}, apply to strongly clustered systems approaching spin-glass states, with exponents \zeta indicating collective dynamics. A crossover from Néel (intrinsic spin) relaxation to diffusive (Brownian rotation) regimes occurs in suspended nanoparticles, dominated by hydrodynamic effects at low frequencies or high viscosities, as seen in magnetic fluids where Néel times are faster (ps–ns) than Brownian (μs–ms). Representative examples include the viscoelastic magnetic after-effect in particulate magnetic tapes, where particle-binder interactions lead to slow logarithmic remagnetization decay over seconds to minutes, influencing signal stability in recording media. Time scales in superparamagnetic systems span from nanoseconds in ultrafast optical switching of magnetization via laser-induced demagnetization in metallic nanoparticles, to hours for ensuring thermal stability in data storage applications, where \tau > 10^7 s prevents bit flipping. In dynamic hysteresis measurements, frequency-dependent loops narrow as the drive rate increases beyond $1/\tau, eventually vanishing in the superparamagnetic limit due to rapid thermal equilibration, as observed in cobalt nanoparticle arrays where high-frequency coercion approaches zero. These transients are modulated by field-induced changes to energy barriers, altering relaxation pathways without altering equilibrium states.^[35]

Experimental Methods

Magnetization Measurements

Vibrating sample magnetometry (VSM) is a widely used technique for characterizing the magnetization behavior of superparamagnetic materials, particularly through the measurement of magnetization versus applied magnetic field (M-H) loops. In superparamagnetic nanoparticles, VSM reveals the absence of coercivity and remanence above the blocking temperature T_B, confirming reversible magnetization aligned with the Langevin model rather than hysteresis typical of ferromagnets. The method operates by vibrating a sample in a uniform magnetic field, inducing a voltage proportional to the sample's magnetic moment, with sensitivities reaching down to $10^{-6} emu, enabling detection of low-moment nanoparticle assemblies.^[36] Superconducting quantum interference device (SQUID) magnetometry provides even higher sensitivity for superparamagnetic nanoparticles, often down to $10^{-8} emu, making it ideal for dilute or low-moment samples. It employs zero-field-cooled (ZFC) and field-cooled (FC) protocols, where the ZFC curve shows a peak at T_B due to blocked moments below this temperature, while the FC curve indicates irreversible behavior and higher susceptibility. These measurements map the distribution of blocking temperatures and confirm superparamagnetic relaxation dynamics in systems like iron oxide nanoparticles.^[37] Alternating current (AC) susceptibility measurements probe the dynamic relaxation processes in superparamagnetic materials by applying a small oscillating magnetic field and measuring the in-phase \chi'(T) and out-of-phase \chi''(T) components as functions of temperature and frequency. Frequency sweeps from 1 Hz to 1 MHz reveal peaks in \chi''(T), which shift to higher temperatures with increasing frequency, directly reflecting Néel relaxation times and the transition from superparamagnetic to blocked states. These peaks arise from the energy dissipation during moment reorientation, providing insights into anisotropy and particle interactions without requiring DC fields.^[38] Torque magnetometry measures the magnetic anisotropy in superparamagnetic nanoparticles by detecting the torque exerted on a sample in a rotating magnetic field, particularly useful for determining uniaxial or cubic anisotropy constants. This technique was historically employed in the 1950s to confirm Louis Néel's theoretical predictions of superparamagnetism in fine ferromagnetic particles, as demonstrated in early studies on single-domain iron particles.^[39]^[6] Data from these magnetization measurements, especially M-H loops from VSM or SQUID, are analyzed by fitting to the Langevin function to estimate particle size distributions:

L(x) = \coth(x) - \frac{1}{x}, \quad x = \frac{\mu H}{k_B T}

where \mu is the magnetic moment, H the applied field, k_B Boltzmann's constant, and T the temperature; such fits reveal average diameters and polydispersity in superparamagnetic ensembles like magnetite nanoparticles. These methods resolve time-dependent magnetization effects by capturing relaxation over measurement timescales.^[40]

Structural Characterization

Structural characterization of superparamagnetic nanoparticles is essential to elucidate their size, shape, and composition, as these parameters directly govern the onset of superparamagnetism through influences on magnetic anisotropy and single-domain behavior. Techniques such as transmission electron microscopy (TEM), X-ray diffraction (XRD), Mössbauer spectroscopy, small-angle X-ray scattering (SAXS), and dynamic light scattering (DLS) provide complementary insights into the nanoscale architecture that enables thermal fluctuations of magnetization in the absence of coercivity. For instance, precise determination of particle dimensions in the single-domain regime (typically below ~80 nm for iron oxides like magnetite) and sufficiently small (e.g., 10–30 nm) to exhibit superparamagnetic properties at room temperature.^[41]^[42] Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) offers direct visualization of individual nanoparticle morphology, enabling accurate assessment of size distribution and shape uniformity critical for confirming single-domain configurations in superparamagnetic systems. High-resolution TEM images reveal core diameters often in the 5–20 nm range for materials like magnetite (Fe₃O₄), with shape analysis distinguishing spherical, cubic, or faceted geometries that minimize demagnetization effects and promote isotropic superparamagnetism. Energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy coupled with TEM further verifies elemental composition, ensuring the absence of impurities that could disrupt uniform magnetic behavior.^[43] X-ray diffraction (XRD) is widely employed to identify the crystalline phase and estimate crystallite size in superparamagnetic nanoparticles, particularly for ferrites exhibiting spinel structures such as inverse spinel in Fe₃O₄. The technique's diffraction patterns confirm phase purity, with peaks corresponding to (hkl) planes like (220), (311), and (440) indicative of cubic spinel symmetry. Crystallite size D is calculated using the Scherrer formula:

D = \frac{K \lambda}{\beta \cos \theta}

where K is the shape factor (≈0.9), \lambda is the X-ray wavelength, \beta is the full width at half maximum of the diffraction peak, and \theta is the Bragg angle; this yields sizes aligning with TEM data, typically 10–15 nm for superparamagnetic iron oxides.^[34] Mössbauer spectroscopy probes the local electronic and magnetic environment at iron sites, distinguishing superparamagnetic relaxation through line broadening and collapse of hyperfine splitting in nanoparticles. At temperatures above the blocking temperature, spectra show narrowed, paramagnetic-like doublets due to rapid Néel relaxation, with isomer shifts and quadrupole splittings confirming octahedral and tetrahedral coordination in spinel ferrites. This method sensitively detects relaxation broadening, where linewidths increase with decreasing particle size, providing indirect evidence of superparamagnetic dynamics without applied fields.^[44] Small-angle X-ray scattering (SAXS) excels in characterizing ensemble-averaged size distributions and aggregation states of superparamagnetic nanoparticles in solution or powder, revealing core radii and polydispersity indices that TEM might miss due to sampling limitations. Complementarily, dynamic light scattering (DLS) measures the hydrodynamic radius, accounting for surface coatings or solvation layers that expand effective particle size in suspensions, often 20–50 nm for stabilized iron oxide colloids. These techniques together quantify structural heterogeneity, as size polydispersity broadens the distribution of blocking temperatures across an ensemble.^[41] The structural features determined by these methods correlate strongly with magnetic properties: polydispersity in size leads to a spread in blocking temperatures, resulting in gradual rather than sharp transitions in magnetization behavior. Compositional variations, such as between magnetite (Fe₃O₄) and maghemite (γ-Fe₂O₃), tune the magnetocrystalline anisotropy constant K, with maghemite exhibiting higher K (≈4.5 × 10⁴ J/m³) than bulk magnetite (≈1.1 × 10⁴ J/m³), thereby shifting the superparamagnetic regime.^[45]^[46]

Practical Applications

Data Storage Technologies

Superparamagnetism imposes a fundamental limit on the areal density of hard disk drives (HDDs) by causing thermal instability in magnetic grains when their sizes shrink below approximately 10 nm, as the blocking temperature approaches room temperature, leading to spontaneous magnetization reversal and data loss.^[1]^[47] This superparamagnetic limit restricts conventional perpendicular magnetic recording (PMR) to areal densities around 1 Tb/in², beyond which thermal fluctuations destabilize the stored bits without additional interventions.^[48]^[49] The phenomenon was theoretically predicted by Louis Néel in 1949 through his work on thermal fluctuations in small ferromagnetic particles, but it emerged as a practical challenge for HDDs in the 1990s as bit sizes decreased to pursue higher densities.^[49]^[50] The transition to PMR between 2006 and 2010, utilizing high-anisotropy materials such as CoPt alloys to increase energy barriers, effectively delayed the onset of the superparamagnetic limit by enabling smaller, more stable grains while maintaining writability.^[51]^[52]^[53] However, without further advancements, conventional HDD technology is projected to reach its density ceiling by around 2030, as ongoing grain miniaturization exacerbates thermal instability.^[54] To mitigate the superparamagnetic limit, several strategies have been developed, including heat-assisted magnetic recording (HAMR), which temporarily heats grains to reduce their coercivity during writing, allowing use of ultra-high-anisotropy materials while preserving stability at room temperature.^[55] Bit-patterned media isolate individual magnetic islands to eliminate inter-grain exchange, preventing unintended switching and enabling densities beyond 1 Tb/in² by treating each patterned bit as a single domain.^[56] Additionally, energy barrier engineering via exchange bias, where ferromagnetic grains are coupled to antiferromagnetic layers, provides an additional unidirectional anisotropy to enhance thermal stability without increasing grain volume. These approaches address the trade-offs in the magnetic recording trilemma—balancing signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), writability, and thermal stability—where superparamagnetic effects reduce write field margins due to thermal fluctuations and degrade SNR through increased transition jitter.^[57]^[58]

Biomedical Implementations

Superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles (SPIONs) serve as effective contrast agents in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), primarily by shortening the T2 relaxation time to produce negative contrast that enhances the visibility of tumors and other abnormalities.^[59] For instance, Feridex (ferumoxide), approved by the FDA in 1996 for liver imaging, utilizes SPIONs coated with dextran to target the reticuloendothelial system, allowing detection of focal lesions with high sensitivity.^[60] The superparamagnetic properties of these nanoparticles prevent remanent magnetization, avoiding aggregation and unintended magnetic field distortions in vivo.^[61] More recently, ferumoxytol (Feraheme), initially approved in 2009 for iron deficiency anemia, has been repurposed off-label and fully approved in October 2025 as Ferabright for brain MRI, demonstrating improved safety over gadolinium-based agents due to its biocompatibility and renal clearance.^[62]^[61] In magnetic hyperthermia therapy, SPIONs generate heat through Néel and Brownian relaxation mechanisms under alternating magnetic fields, enabling localized tumor ablation while sparing healthy tissue; the specific absorption rate (SAR), defined as power dissipated per unit mass, quantifies heating efficiency.^[63] NanoTherm, an aminosilane-coated SPION formulation, received European regulatory approval in 2010 for treating glioblastoma multiforme when combined with radiotherapy and chemotherapy, with clinical trials showing median survival extensions of up to 6 months in recurrent cases.^[64] Ongoing phase III trials continue to evaluate its efficacy in adjuvant settings, highlighting the role of superparamagnetism in achieving uniform heat distribution without residual fields post-treatment.^[65] For targeted drug delivery, SPIONs facilitate magnetic guidance to specific sites, such as tumors, where external fields direct their accumulation, and triggers like pH changes or alternating fields enable controlled release from encapsulating barriers.^[66] This approach enhances therapeutic precision, as demonstrated in systems where polyethylene glycol (PEG)-coated SPIONs loaded with doxorubicin achieve site-specific release under tumor acidic conditions, reducing systemic toxicity.^[67] Particle sizes optimized at 10-20 nm promote prolonged blood circulation by minimizing renal filtration and opsonization, with PEG coatings further improving stealth properties against immune clearance.^[68]^[4] Regarding biocompatibility, the zero remanence of superparamagnetic nanoparticles mitigates risks of embolization or vascular occlusion, while their clearance primarily occurs via the reticuloendothelial system, leading to biodegradation into iron stores without long-term accumulation.^[69] FDA approvals for SPIONs, such as Feridex for liver-specific imaging and ferumoxytol for anemia treatment with imaging extensions, underscore their low toxicity profile, though surface coatings are essential to prevent oxidative stress-induced cellular damage.^[70]^[71] Studies confirm that PEGylated SPIONs exhibit negligible cytotoxicity in vitro at clinically relevant doses, supporting their safe integration into multifunctional theranostic platforms.^[72]

Emerging Technologies

Superparamagnetic nanoparticles have enabled advancements in magnetic sensors, particularly through integration with giant magnetoresistance (GMR) devices for highly sensitive biosensing applications. In these systems, superparamagnetic labels bind to target biomolecules, and their magnetization response modulates the GMR signal, allowing detection without optical interference. This approach achieves detection limits as low as femtomolar (fM) concentrations for analytes like DNA or proteins, surpassing traditional fluorescent methods in matrix-rich environments.^[73]^[74] In environmental remediation, superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles (SPIONs) facilitate the adsorption of pollutants such as heavy metals from wastewater, leveraging their high surface area and magnetic recoverability. For instance, functionalized SPIONs effectively capture ions like lead, mercury, and chromium through chelation or electrostatic interactions, with removal efficiencies exceeding 90% under optimized conditions. The key advantage is their easy separation using an external magnetic field, enabling reuse and minimizing secondary waste, which makes them suitable for scalable water treatment processes.^[75]^[76] Within spintronics, superparamagnetic effects are managed in tunnel junctions to develop next-generation spin-transfer torque magnetic random access memory (STT-MRAM). High-anisotropy alloys like L1₀-FePd are employed in the free layer to enhance thermal stability, preventing superparamagnetic relaxation in nanoscale volumes while enabling low-current switching. These junctions exhibit tunnel magnetoresistance ratios up to 65% and ultralow switching current densities, supporting denser, energy-efficient memory devices beyond conventional storage limits.^[77]^[78] Recent 2020s developments include self-assembled monolayers of superparamagnetic nanoparticles, enabling visualization of magnetic order.^[79] Additionally, SPIONs have demonstrated over 95% efficiency in arsenic removal from contaminated water, combining adsorption with magnetic retrieval for practical purification systems.^[80] Looking ahead, superparamagnetic quantum dots hold promise for quantum computing, potentially serving as scalable spin qubits with tunable coherence times.^[81]

References

[1]
Superparamagnetism - Engineering LibreTexts
Sep 7, 2021 · Superparamagnetism is a form of magnetism exhibited by small ferromagnetic or ferrimagnetic nanoparticles.Properties of Superparamagnets · Blocking Temperature · Magnetization CurvesMissing: key | Show results with:key
[2]
Superparamagnetism - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
Superparamagnetism is defined as a form of magnetism that occurs in small ferromagnetic or ferrimagnetic nanoparticles, where the magnetization can randomly ...
[3]
Superparamagnetic materials: Properties and uses - ResearchGate
Superparamagnetism is a distinctive behavior of single-domain nanoparticles, originated from the fast flipping process of the total magnetic moment due to ...Missing: definition | Show results with:definition
[4]
Superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles - PubMed Central - NIH
These particles exhibit the phenomenon of “superparamagnetism”, ie, on application of an external magnetic field, they become magnetized up to their saturation ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[5]
Superparamagnetism - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
Superparamagnetism is the behavior of magnetic particles where magnetization depends on external field and temperature, found in tiny ferromagnetic NPs.<|control11|><|separator|>
[6]
Superparamagnetism | Journal of Applied Physics - AIP Publishing
J. Frenkel. and. J. Dorfman. ,. Nature. 126. ,. 274. (. 1930. ). Google Scholar ... High temperature annealing induced superparamagnetism in CoFeB/MgO/CoFeB ...
[7]
Critical superparamagnetic/single-domain grain sizes in interacting ...
Smaller single-domain particles become magnetically unstable owing to thermal fluctuations and are termed superparamagnetic (SP).
[8]
Superparamagnetism
Superparamagnetism is a distinctive behavior of single-domain nanoparticles, originated from the fast flipping process of the total magnetic moment due to ...
[9]
Thermal fluctuations of magnetic nanoparticles: Fifty years after Brown
The reversal time, superparamagnetic relaxation time, of the magnetization of fine single domain ferromagnetic nanoparticles owing to thermal fluctuations ...
[10]
(PDF) Supermagnetism - ResearchGate
Aug 9, 2025 · However, in magnetic nanoparticle systems,. where each nanoparticle has a moment m≈103–105µB, the. energy may correspond to an ordering ...
[11]
Thermal fluctuations and longitudinal relaxation of single-domain ...
The conditions at which the particle becomes superparamagnetic define the thermal stability of the magnetized state and therefore are also valuable for ...
[12]
Magnetism of materials: theory and practice in magnetic resonance ...
Dec 4, 2021 · 3. Superparamagnetism: where magnetic susceptibility is much larger than the one of paramagnets, but lower compared to ferromagnetic materials;
[13]
Magnetic and electronic properties of anisotropic magnetite ...
The effective magnetic anisotropy of a nanoparticle is constituted as the cumulative result of magnetocrystalline, surface, and shape anisotropy [39].
[14]
3. Magnetic Anisotropy | College of Science and Engineering
Shape Anisotropy. The third type of anisotropy is due to the shape of a mineral grain. A magnetized body will produce magnetic charges or poles at the surface.
[15]
Surface Magnetic Anisotropy - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
Magnetic surface anisotropy refers to the variation in magnetic properties at the surface of nanoparticles, primarily arising from the unique coordination and ...Monolayer Films: Magnetism · Ferromagnetic Resonance In... · 15.5 Parallel Field...
[16]
Anisotropic magnetic nanoparticles: A review of their properties ...
In this review we focus on anisotropic MNPs that exhibit (i) elongated shapes and (ii) plate-like shapes. This is because the shape and magnetocrystalline ...
[17]
Superparamagnetic Relaxation and Magnetic Anisotropy Energy ...
The magnetic moment is 2.42 μB at the tetrahedral lattice site and −1.60 μB at the octahedral site. Figure 4 Neutron diffraction patterns of CoFe2O4 ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[18]
Fe-Co Alloy Nanoparticles Dispersed in Polymer-Derived Carbon ...
For Fe nanoparticles, the single-domain size has been estimated to be within the range of 11–30 nm, while for Co nanoparticles, the estimated single-domain size ...
[19]
Magnetocrystalline anisotropy of Fe, Co, and Ni slabs from density ...
Nov 22, 2019 · We report magnetocrystalline anisotropy (MCA) calculations of Fe, Co, and Ni slabs of various thicknesses and crystallographic orientations ...Article Text · INTRODUCTION · MCA OF Co, Fe, AND Ni SLABS · CONCLUSION
[20]
Size effects in the magnetic anisotropy of embedded cobalt ... - Nature
Oct 6, 2015 · An established model to calculate surface contributions to the magnetic anisotropy is the Néel pair model which has successfully been used for ...
[21]
The shape anisotropy of magnetic nanoparticles: an approach to cell ...
Apr 17, 2023 · Here, we design and synthesize spherical magnetic nanoparticles and their anisotropic assemblies, namely magnetic nanochains (length ∼800 nm).
[22]
https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.85.174415
[23]
Size and Shape Control of Monodisperse FePt Nanoparticles
The as-synthesized nanoparticles were found to be superparamagnetic at room temperature and their blocking temperature is size dependent, which increases with ...
[24]
[PDF] Field Dependence of Blocking Temperature in Magnetite ...
Dependence of the blocking temperature TB on the applied field H (open ... ~ (1- TB/T0), where T0 represents the blocking temperature at zero field. This.
[25]
Effect of Dipole Interactions on Blocking Temperature and ... - NIH
Dipole interactions were found to play a crucial role in modifying the blocking temperature behavior of the superparamagnetic nanoparticles.
[26]
Magnetic resonance relaxation properties of superparamagnetic ...
Mar 11, 2009 · Nanometric crystals of maghemite are known to exhibit superparamagnetism. Because of the significance of their magnetic moment, ...
[27]
On the relaxation time of interacting superparamagnetic ... - NIH
Jun 24, 2019 · A critical discussion on the presently available models for the relaxation time of magnetic nanoparticles approaching the superparamagnetic ...
[28]
Characterization of Néel and Brownian Relaxations Isolated from ...
Sep 11, 2019 · The magnetization dynamics involved in applying an alternating field are composed of a superposition of Néel and Brownian relaxations.Introduction · Materials and Methods · Results and Discussion · References
[29]
Memory effects in a superparamagnetic system | Phys. Rev. B
Jul 19, 2005 · The aging experiments show an absence of any waiting time dependence in the magnetization relaxation due to a field change after field cooling ...
[30]
Superspin glass originating from dipolar interaction with controlled ...
Jun 28, 2011 · Many studies show that a highly concentrated nanoparticle assembly exhibits a phase transition from a superparamagnetic state to a collective ...
[31]
Superspin glass behavior of self-interacting CoFe 2 O 4 nanoparticles
Apr 15, 2015 · The nanoparticles within the densely packed assembly can exhibit strong dipolar as well as exchange coupling, which will enhance the MS value as ...
[32]
Magnetocaloric effect and evidence of superparamagnetism in G d A ...
Mar 23, 2016 · The bifurcation between ZFC and FC curves decrease as the field ... superparamagnetism [58] . The magnetization variation of a ...
[33]
Superparamagnetic behavior of La0.67Sr0.33MnO3 nanoparticles ...
Aug 7, 2025 · The frequency dependent AC susceptibility was found to obey the Neel - Arrhenius law. Both observations are compatible with a model of non ...
[34]
https://pubs.aip.org/aip/jap/article/105/8/083924/933940/Size-determination-of-superparamagnetic
[35]
A novel characterization technique for superparamagnetic iron oxide ...
Feb 1, 2019 · Furthermore, AC susceptibility (ACS) measurements were performed as part of the evaluation of the three techniques. SPaQ and VSM results were ...
[36]
Sensitive SQUID Bio-Magnetometry for Determination and ... - NIH
Oct 9, 2020 · SQUID magnetometry is one of the methods enabling to determine the blocking temperature (e.g., so-called zero field cooled—ZFC, field cooled—FC ...
[37]
[PDF] Introduction to AC Susceptibility
From the slope of 1/ χ' vs. T, one obtains the volume of the magnetic particles (assuming monodisperse particle size).6 In a recent experiment, Lee and ...
[38]
Anisotropy of Superparamagnetic Particles as Measured by Torque ...
The apparent magnetocrystalline anisotropy as measured both by torque and resonance has been deduced for the cases of uniaxial and cubic anisotropies.
[39]
Monitoring of Superparamagnetic Particle Sizes in the Langevin ...
Nov 19, 2019 · The Langevin function, and thus magnetization, is equal to zero at zero magnetic induction which is also a characteristic of paramagnetism. On ...Introduction · Materials and Methods · Results and Discussion · Conclusion
[40]
Best Practices for Characterization of Magnetic Nanoparticles for ...
Sep 30, 2019 · This Feature highlights some “best practices” in the analytical techniques and challenges in the measurement of the properties of these materials.<|control11|><|separator|>
[41]
Superparamagnetic Iron Oxide Nanoparticles for Drug Delivery
Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) data showed the average diameter of these monodisperse nanoparticles to be around 12 nm; energy dispersive X-ray ...
[42]
Size determination of superparamagnetic nanoparticles from ...
Apr 28, 2009 · Average particle sizes of 6.4 ± 0.4 and 7.6 ± 0.5 nm for samples 1 and 2, respectively, are determined using the Scherrer relation from the (311) ...Missing: typical | Show results with:typical
[43]
Mössbauer spectroscopy of superparamagnetic Fe3O4 nanoparticles
Dec 1, 2021 · Mössbauer spectra at 300 K of Fe 3 O 4 nanoparticles clearly show superparamagnetic A- and B-sites. A magnetic field produces ferrimagnetic hyperfine splitting.
[44]
Size and polydispersity effect on the magnetization of densely ...
Oct 15, 2012 · The main focus is put on particle size, and size polydispersity influences on the magnetization curve. The particles are modeled as uniformly ...
[45]
[PDF] Magnetic Properties of Variable-sized Fe3O4 Nanoparticles ...
Sep 21, 2007 · Among the nanocrystalline ferrites, Fe3O4 and γ-Fe2O3 have attracted particular interest ... anisotropy constant (K) of the nanocrystalline ...
[46]
Magnetic Storage: The Medium That Wouldn't Die - IEEE Spectrum
Dec 1, 2000 · ... grains will demagnetize spontaneously at room temperature. ... This grain is larger than the 10 nm grains used today but only one is needed.
[47]
Thermal Transport, Thermal Protrusion, and Thermally-Induced ...
Jan 1, 2021 · Conventional hard disk drive (HDD) technology, perpendicular magnetic recording (PMR), has reached the superparamagnetic limit of ~ 1 Tb/in2. To ...
[48]
[PDF] Prediction of the Superparamagnetic Limit for Magnetic Storage ...
Jun 12, 2024 · It is a magnetic property predicted by the scientist Néel in 1949 [1, 2]. Superparamagnetism plays a crucial role in various fields.
[49]
Ultrafast optical manipulation of magnetic order | Rev. Mod. Phys.
Sep 22, 2010 · Although superparamagnetism was discussed by Néel in 1949 ( Néel, 1949 ), it has recently become a real critical issue for magnetic storage ...
[50]
Magnetic and structural properties of Co–Pt perpendicular recording ...
It is known that a high perpendicular magnetic anisotropy of the film can be achieved even with a room temperature deposition process. Vacuum evaporated Co3Pt ...
[51]
[PDF] The Transition to Perpendicular Magnetic Recording - IDEMA
Dec 18, 2006 · ▫ In PMR recording part of the head structure must be built into the disk! • Magnetically soft disk under layer placed immediately under hard ...
[52]
2005: Perpendicular Magnetic Recording arrives | The Storage Engine
Perpendicular magnetic recording (PMR) bits align vertically and offer a significant increase in areal density compared to conventional longitudinal magnetic ...
[53]
2023 IRDS Mass Data Storage
Perpendicular. Magnetic Recording technology has nearly reached its limit in areal density near 1.2Tbpsi. Higher. HDD capacities are currently being achieved ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[54]
Heat-assisted magnetic recording - Wikipedia
The limitation of traditional as well as perpendicular magnetic recording is ... drives by 2023, and 100 TB drives by around 2030. At the same ...
[55]
[PDF] Plasmonic near-field transducer for heat-assisted magnetic recording
Jun 2, 2014 · An areal density of 1 Tb/in2 is estimated to be the limit for the present HDD products using the PMR technology, due to the requirement of ...
[56]
[PDF] Role of Bit Patterned Media in Future of Hard Disk Drives
The maximum write field is around 400 kA mi', leading to a minimum grain diameter of approximately 11-12 nm to ensure thermal stability in CoCrPt-based.
[57]
[PDF] The thermodynamic limits of magnetic recording
Feb 6, 2012 · The thermal stability requirement leads to what has been termed the “trilemma of magnetic recording”.3 Achieving a sufficient signal-to-noise ...
[58]
Future hard disk drive systems | Request PDF - ResearchGate
Aug 7, 2025 · Recording [1] The superparamagnetic limit is a trade-off between the media trilemma's: signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), writability, and thermal ...
[59]
Sensitive T2 MRI Contrast Agents from the Rational Design of Iron ...
Jan 6, 2023 · Iron oxide nanoparticles are an FDA-approved and gadolinium-free alternative to conventional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) contrast agents.Introduction · Results and Discussion · Conclusions · Supporting Information
[60]
Advancing MRI with magnetic nanoparticles - RSC Publishing
Apr 2, 2024 · The first commercially available iron oxide NP solution was approved in 1996 by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), had a hydrodynamic size ...<|separator|>
[61]
Iron-Based Superparamagnetic Nanoparticle Contrast Agents for ...
Ferumoxytol is the only SPION approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for human use in the United States. Specifically, ferumoxytol is approved for ...
[62]
FDA Approves Iron-Based Contrast Agent for Brain MRI
Oct 18, 2025 · The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has approved Ferabright™ (ferumoxytol injection), reportedly the first iron-based contrast agent for ...
[63]
Comprehensive understanding of magnetic hyperthermia for ... - NIH
Effective cancer theranostics with polymer encapsulated superparamagnetic nanoparticles: combined effects of magnetic hyperthermia and controlled drug release.
[64]
NanoTherm In Adjuvant Therapy of Glioblastoma Multiforme
Hyperthermia and thermotherapy have been treatment methods studied in cancer patients and magnetic hyperthermia induced using nanoparticles is becoming the ...
[65]
Magnetic hyperthermia in oncology: Nanomaterials-driven ...
This formulation is currently undergoing phase III clinical trials and shows promise in improving drug release at specific temperatures. In a separate study, ...
[66]
Targeted Drug Delivery with Polymers and Magnetic Nanoparticles
Apr 25, 2016 · This review covers the principles, advantages, and drawbacks of passive and active targeting based on various polymer and magnetic iron oxide nanoparticle ...
[67]
Use of Magnetic Fields and Nanoparticles to Trigger Drug Release ...
Magnetic fields can be used in combination with magnetic nanoparticles to trigger drug release from thermally sensitive nanocarriers or increase drug ...
[68]
Synthesis and modification of uniform PEG-neridronate-modified ...
Jul 24, 2019 · With the aim to find an optimal size for a prolonged blood stream circulation, newly synthesized 10-, 20-, and 31-nm particles were tested in ...
[69]
Iron Oxide Nanoparticles for Biomedical Applications - NIH
The toxicity of IONPs for different cell lines may be partially explained by the production of ROS, which causes cellular oxidative stress [249]. When uptaken ...
[70]
Diagnostic and therapeutic applications of an FDA-approved ...
The following iron oxide nanoparticles have been approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for clinical use: Feraheme® for iron deficiency; ...
[71]
Potential toxicity of superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles ...
This review focuses on one of the most widely used NPs in medical diagnostics, aiming to highlight the potential adverse biological effects and safety issues ...Toxicity Studies · Altered Cellular Responses · Changes In Gene Expression
[72]
PEGylation of Superparamagnetic Iron Oxide Nanoparticles ... - MDPI
The P(PEGMA-AA)@MNPs have excellent blood compatibility as demonstrated in blood sedimentation, smears, and white blood cell viability experiments.
[73]
Femtomolar limit of detection with a magnetoresistive biochip
Apr 15, 2009 · A novel hybridization detection system based on magnetoresistive (MR) sensors associated to the use of superparamagnetic micro- and nano ...
[74]
Matrix-insensitive protein assays push the limits of biosensors ... - NIH
Here we present a magnetic nanosensor technology that is matrix insensitive yet still capable of rapid, multiplex protein detection.
[75]
Application of superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles (SPIONs ...
The adsorption performance of nano adsorbents based on SPIONs for heavy metals (lead, mercury, chromium, copper, arsenic, nickel, and cadmium) has been compiled
[76]
Removal of Heavy Metals from Aqueous Systems with Thiol ...
We have shown that superparamagnetic iron oxide (Fe3O4) nanoparticles with a surface functionalization of dimercaptosuccinic acid (DMSA) are an effective ...
[77]
(PDF) L10 FePd-based perpendicular magnetic tunnel junctions ...
Feb 9, 2024 · L10 FePd is increasingly recognized as a potential candidate for magnetic tunnel junctions (MTJs), yet there remains room for enhancing device ...
[78]
Perpendicular magnetic anisotropy at transition metal/oxide ...
Jun 28, 2017 · This review deals with PMA at magnetic metal/oxide interfaces from its discovery, by examining the diversity of systems in which it has been observed.
[79]
Visualizing Magnetic Order in Self-Assembly of Superparamagnetic ...
Jan 2, 2024 · Our work demonstrates the crucial role of layered structure in shaping the magnetization of nanoparticle assemblies, providing new opportunities ...Missing: qubit cooling 2020s
[80]
Remarkable efficiency of ultrafine superparamagnetic iron(III) oxide ...
A complete arsenate removal is achieved at Fe/As ratio equal to ∼20/1 and at pH in the range from 5 to 7.6. Under these conditions, the arsenates are completely ...
[81]
Unlocking the Potential and Versatility of Quantum Dots: from ...
May 15, 2024 · In addition, superparamagnetic MQDs exhibit high resistance to thermal fluctuations, making them ideal candidates for use in high-density ...