Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Surfactant

A surfactant, short for surface-active agent, is an amphiphilic molecule composed of a hydrophilic (water-attracting) head and a hydrophobic (water-repelling) tail, typically a hydrocarbon chain of 8–18 carbon atoms, that reduces the surface tension between two immiscible phases, such as liquids, solids, or gases, thereby facilitating processes like wetting, emulsification, and dispersion.^[1]^[2] These compounds exhibit key properties including the ability to adsorb at interfaces, lowering interfacial tension and enabling the formation of micelles above a critical micelle concentration (CMC), where the hydrophobic tails aggregate inward to minimize contact with water while the hydrophilic heads interact with the aqueous environment.^[1] Surfactants can also generate foams, solubilize hydrophobic substances in water, and stabilize emulsions, making them essential in both natural biological systems, such as pulmonary surfactants that prevent alveolar collapse in lungs, and industrial formulations.^[2] Surfactants are classified based on the charge of their hydrophilic group into four main types: anionic (negatively charged, e.g., sodium dodecyl sulfate), cationic (positively charged, e.g., cetyltrimethylammonium bromide), nonionic (uncharged, e.g., polyoxyethylene alkyl ethers), and amphoteric or zwitterionic (both charges, e.g., betaines), with additional distinctions between synthetic surfactants produced via chemical synthesis and biosurfactants derived from microorganisms like Bacillus species.^[1]^[2] Their applications span diverse fields, including detergents and cleaning products for removing oils and dirt, pharmaceuticals for drug solubilization and delivery, food processing as emulsifiers in creams and sauces, agriculture as adjuvants in pesticides to enhance spreading, and environmental remediation in oil spill cleanup through enhanced oil recovery techniques.^[1]^[2]

Fundamentals

Definition and General Properties

Surfactants are amphiphilic compounds characterized by distinct hydrophilic (water-loving) and hydrophobic (water-repelling) regions, enabling them to reduce surface tension at interfaces between liquids, solids, or gases.^[3] This dual nature allows surfactants to orient themselves at interfaces, with the hydrophobic tails typically extending away from water and the hydrophilic heads interacting with it, thereby stabilizing systems that would otherwise separate.^[4] The primary function of surfactants stems from this amphiphilicity, which disrupts cohesive forces in liquids like water, promoting better spreading and interaction across phases.^[5] Key general properties of surfactants include their ability to lower interfacial tension, which facilitates processes such as emulsification—where immiscible liquids like oil and water are mixed into stable dispersions—and wetting, by which liquids penetrate or spread over solid surfaces more effectively.^[6] They also contribute to foaming, creating stable air-liquid interfaces that trap gas bubbles, and dispersion, aiding the suspension of particles in liquids.^[7] These properties make surfactants essential in diverse applications, from cleaning agents to industrial formulations, by enhancing solubility and stability without altering bulk phase compositions significantly.^[8] The term "surfactant," derived from "surface active agent," was coined in the 1950s by Antara Products to describe these versatile compounds.^[9] Historical evidence traces the earliest known surfactant to soap, produced around 2800 BCE in ancient Babylon through the reaction of fats with wood ashes, marking the inception of surfactant use in cleansing.^[10] Modern synthetic surfactants, developed extensively in the 20th century, expanded beyond natural soaps to include tailored molecules for enhanced performance in detergents and beyond.^[11] A fundamental concept for characterizing surfactants is the hydrophile-lipophile balance (HLB) scale, introduced by William C. Griffin in 1949, which assigns numerical values (typically ranging from 0 to 20) to quantify the relative affinity for water versus oil, aiding predictions of solubility and emulsification behavior.^[12] Higher HLB values indicate greater hydrophilicity, suitable for oil-in-water emulsions, while lower values favor water-in-oil systems, providing a practical tool for formulation design.^[13]

Critical Micelle Concentration

The critical micelle concentration (CMC) is defined as the minimum concentration of surfactant in solution above which micelles begin to form spontaneously, marking a transition from individual monomer behavior to cooperative self-assembly.^[14] This threshold is characterized by abrupt changes in physical properties, such as a plateau in surface tension or a break in conductivity plots, reflecting the onset of aggregation driven by the amphiphilic nature of surfactant molecules.^[15] The CMC is a fundamental parameter that determines the efficiency of surfactants in applications like detergency and emulsification, as concentrations below the CMC result in primarily monomeric species that adsorb at interfaces without forming bulk aggregates, while above the CMC, micelles solubilize hydrophobic substances and enable phenomena such as soil removal in cleaning processes.^[14] Understanding the CMC is essential for optimizing surfactant formulations, as it indicates the minimum amount required for effective performance without excess usage.^[16] Several factors influence the CMC value. Longer hydrophobic chain lengths decrease the CMC due to enhanced hydrophobic interactions; for ionic surfactants, each additional methylene (CH₂) group in the tail typically reduces the CMC by a factor of approximately 2–3.^[17] Larger or more hydrated head groups increase the CMC by promoting greater steric repulsion and solvation, as seen in comparisons between anionic surfactants like sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) and nonionic ones with poly(ethylene oxide) heads.^[14] Temperature effects vary by surfactant type: for ionic surfactants, rising temperature generally increases CMC due to strengthened hydration of charged heads, whereas for nonionic surfactants, it often decreases CMC as hydrogen bonding weakens and hydrophobicity strengthens.^[18] Added salts lower the CMC of ionic surfactants by screening electrostatic repulsions between head groups, facilitating earlier micelle formation.^[19] Common methods for measuring CMC include surface tension analysis via the Gibbs adsorption isotherm, where a plot of surface tension versus logarithm of concentration shows a break at the CMC, as determined using techniques like the Du Noüy ring method.^[14] Conductivity measurements are particularly useful for ionic surfactants, revealing a change in slope due to reduced mobility of counterions in micelles.^[20] Fluorescence probe methods, such as those using pyrene, detect shifts in emission spectra indicative of the polar environment change at the CMC.^[14] For homologous series of surfactants, the CMC follows an empirical logarithmic relationship with chain length, known as the Klevens equation:

\log(\text{CMC}) = A - B \cdot n

where n is the number of carbon atoms in the hydrophobic tail, and A and B are constants dependent on the head group type (e.g., B \approx 0.3 for many ionic surfactants, reflecting the ~2-fold decrease per CH₂ unit).^[21]^[22]

Molecular Structure

Components of Surfactant Molecules

Surfactant molecules are characterized by their amphiphilic nature, featuring a hydrophilic head group covalently linked to a hydrophobic tail, which enables their unique interfacial properties.^[6] This dual structure arises from the combination of polar or ionic components that interact with water and nonpolar segments that avoid it.^[23] The hydrophilic head group consists of polar or ionic moieties designed to form hydrogen bonds or electrostatic interactions with water molecules. Common examples include the sulfate group (-OSO₃⁻) and the carboxylate group (-COO⁻), which confer solubility in aqueous environments.^[24] These head groups are typically small and charged, contributing to the molecule's overall polarity.^[25] In contrast, the hydrophobic tail is a nonpolar hydrocarbon chain that repels water and promotes association with non-aqueous phases. These tails generally comprise 8 to 18 carbon atoms, arranged in linear or branched alkyl chains, or as alkylbenzene structures in some variants.^[26] The length and branching of the tail influence the molecule's packing efficiency and conformational flexibility.^[27] The general architecture of a surfactant molecule is often denoted as R-X, where R represents the hydrophobic tail and X the hydrophilic head, connected via a covalent bond such as an ester or ether linkage.^[28] A representative example is sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS), with the formula C₁₂H₂₅SO₄Na, where the dodecyl (C₁₂H₂₅) chain serves as the tail and the sulfate (SO₄) as the head.^[29] Regarding molecular dimensions, the effective cross-sectional area of the hydrophilic head group typically ranges from 0.4 to 0.6 nm², determining the space it occupies at interfaces. The tail length, corresponding to the extended chain of 8–18 carbons (approximately 1–2.5 nm), modulates the overall geometry and influences packing and curvature tendencies in molecular arrangements.^[30]

Variations in Head and Tail Groups

Surfactants exhibit diverse properties through modifications to their head and tail groups, which directly influence solubility, interfacial activity, and aggregation behavior. Head groups, responsible for hydrophilic interactions, can be ionic or nonionic, altering electrostatic effects in solution. Ionic head groups include anionic types, such as sulfate or carboxylate, which carry a negative charge and promote repulsion between surfactant molecules, enhancing solubility in water but limiting interactions with negatively charged surfaces. In contrast, cationic head groups, like quaternary ammonium, bear a positive charge, enabling attraction to negatively charged substrates such as cell membranes or minerals, which is advantageous in applications like antimicrobial agents or flotation processes.^[31] Nonionic head groups, often comprising polyoxyethylene chains, provide neutral charge and tunable hydrophilicity via varying chain length, improving compatibility in mixed systems and reducing sensitivity to electrolytes.^[32] Tail groups, the hydrophobic components, primarily consist of hydrocarbon chains whose structure impacts packing efficiency and surface activity. Saturated linear tails, such as alkyl chains in sodium dodecyl sulfate, promote tight packing in micelles due to strong van der Waals interactions, leading to efficient adsorption at interfaces.^[33] Unsaturated tails, incorporating double bonds like in oleic acid derivatives, introduce kinks that disrupt packing, resulting in looser aggregates and potentially higher solubility but elevated critical micelle concentrations (CMCs).^[34] Branched tails reduce packing density compared to linear counterparts, increasing the CMC while lowering the Krafft point—the temperature below which surfactants precipitate—thus broadening the usable temperature range for applications in cold environments.^[35] Fluorinated tails, featuring perfluoroalkyl chains, confer exceptional chemical stability and surface tension reduction, achieving lower CMCs than hydrocarbon analogs due to enhanced hydrophobicity and minimal interfacial energy.^[36] These structural variations profoundly affect overall surfactant performance, particularly in micelle geometry and stability. Larger head groups increase the head-to-tail volume ratio, favoring spherical micelles over cylindrical or lamellar structures by steric hindrance, which stabilizes dispersions in nonionic systems.^[32] Tail branching similarly expands the effective volume at the core, promoting spherical shapes but compromising efficiency in dense packing, as seen in elevated CMCs for branched alkylbenzenesulfonates.^[37] Representative examples illustrate these principles: Tween 80, a nonionic surfactant with a polyoxyethylene head and unsaturated oleate tail derived from vegetable oils, exhibits high solubility and emulsifying power suitable for food and pharmaceuticals.^[38] Conversely, CTAB (cetyltrimethylammonium bromide), featuring a cationic trimethylammonium head and saturated cetyl tail, demonstrates strong adsorption to negative interfaces, commonly used in DNA extraction and templating mesoporous materials.^[39] Recent developments emphasize sustainability through bio-based tail modifications, particularly using vegetable oils like palm or soybean to derive oleochemical tails, which reduce reliance on petrochemicals and enhance biodegradability. Post-2020 innovations include enzymatic esterification of fatty acids from vegetable oils to produce anionic surfactants with tailored chain lengths, achieving comparable performance to synthetics while meeting eco-label standards in detergents and cosmetics.^[40] These bio-derived tails maintain low Krafft points and effective CMCs, supporting greener formulations amid regulatory pressures on persistent fluorinated and petroleum-based alternatives.^[41]

Classification

By Electrical Charge

Surfactants are classified by the electrical charge of their hydrophilic head groups into four main categories: anionic, cationic, nonionic, and zwitterionic (also known as amphoteric).^[42] This classification influences their solubility, interactions with electrolytes, critical micelle concentration (CMC), and applications in formulations.^[43] Ionic surfactants (anionic and cationic) generally exhibit higher CMC values in pure water compared to nonionic surfactants due to electrostatic repulsion between charged head groups, but their CMC decreases significantly in the presence of electrolytes as salts screen these repulsions; nonionic surfactants show lower sensitivity to electrolytes, with minimal changes in CMC.^[44] Anionic surfactants possess a negatively charged head group, typically sulfate, sulfonate, phosphate, or carboxylate, which provides strong hydrophilic character. Common examples include sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS), a sulfate-based surfactant widely used in detergents, and alkylbenzene sulfonates like sodium dodecylbenzenesulfonate. These surfactants are known for their excellent foaming ability, detergency, and emulsification properties, making them ideal for cleaning applications such as laundry detergents and dishwashing liquids. They hold the largest market share among surfactant types, accounting for approximately 48% of global demand due to their cost-effectiveness and performance in removing oils and greases. However, anionic surfactants are pH-sensitive, performing best in alkaline conditions, and can form insoluble salts with divalent cations like calcium and magnesium in hard water, potentially reducing efficacy.^[42]^[45]^[43] Cationic surfactants feature a positively charged head group, most often quaternary ammonium or pyridinium structures. Representative examples are cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB), used in antimicrobial formulations, and benzalkonium chloride, common in disinfectants and fabric softeners. Their positive charge enables strong adsorption onto negatively charged surfaces like hair, skin, or fabrics, providing conditioning and antistatic effects; they also exhibit antimicrobial activity by disrupting bacterial membranes. Cationic surfactants are incompatible with anionic types, often forming precipitates when mixed due to electrostatic attraction between opposite charges. They are more effective in acidic pH ranges and less sensitive to hard water than anionics, though their production volume is smaller than that of anionics or nonionics.^[42]^[43]^[46] Zwitterionic surfactants contain both positively and negatively charged groups in the head region, such as quaternary ammonium and carboxylate or sulfonate, resulting in a net neutral charge at neutral pH but zwitterionic behavior. Examples include betaines like cocamidopropyl betaine, derived from coconut oil and used in personal care products, and amino acid-based surfactants like sodium lauroyl sarcosinate. These surfactants are mild to skin and eyes, with low irritation potential, and maintain stable performance across a wide pH range (pH-independent), making them suitable for shampoos, body washes, and baby products where gentleness is prioritized. They show moderate electrolyte sensitivity, similar to nonionics, and can enhance foam stability when combined with other types.^[42]^[43]^[44] Nonionic surfactants lack any electrical charge on the head group, relying on uncharged polar moieties like polyoxyethylene chains for hydrophilicity. Typical examples are alcohol ethoxylates, such as those with C12-C14 alkyl chains and 6-9 ethylene oxide units (e.g., C12E6), and alkyl glucosides like octyl glucoside. They are highly versatile, with low toxicity and biodegradability, and are less affected by water hardness or pH variations, allowing use in diverse environments including hard water. Nonionic surfactants produce less foam than ionics but excel in emulsification and wetting; their solubility limit is often determined by the cloud point, the temperature at which they become insoluble due to dehydration of the head group. They constitute nearly 45% of surfactant production (excluding soaps) and are common in household cleaners, agrochemicals, and pharmaceuticals.^[42]^[43]^[44]

By Chemical Composition

Surfactants exhibit diverse chemical compositions that define their molecular backbones and functional groups, influencing solubility, stability, and performance across applications. This classification emphasizes structural variations in the hydrophilic head and hydrophobic tail, distinct from ionic charge considerations. Key classes include those based on sulfonate or sulfate groups, carboxylates, ethoxylates, quaternary ammonium compounds, and fluorinated structures, each offering unique physicochemical traits. Sulfonate- and sulfate-based surfactants incorporate strong acid functional groups, such as -SO3- or -OSO3-, attached to alkyl chains, resulting in high water solubility and robust dissociation even in neutral or acidic conditions. Linear alkylbenzene sulfonates (LAS), for example, feature a benzene ring linked to a C10-C14 alkyl chain and a sulfonate head, making them highly effective for detergency due to their ability to lower surface tension efficiently. Similarly, alkyl sulfates like sodium lauryl sulfate (SLS) with C12-C18 aliphatic tails provide excellent foaming and emulsifying properties, though they require stabilization to prevent hydrolysis in hard water. These structures ensure broad solubility, with critical micelle concentrations typically around 0.1-1% in aqueous solutions.^[47]^[7] Carboxylate-based surfactants, commonly known as soaps, derive from the saponification of fatty acids, yielding a -COO- head group on long-chain aliphatic tails (C12-C18). Their solubility and activity are pH-dependent, performing optimally above pH 9 where the carboxylate ion is fully deprotonated, but precipitating in acidic or hard water environments due to insoluble metal salts. Sodium oleate, with an unsaturated C18 tail from oleic acid, exemplifies this class, offering mild cleansing and emulsification while being readily biodegradable under aerobic conditions. This pH sensitivity limits their use in versatile formulations compared to sulfonates, but their natural origin enhances environmental compatibility.^[48]^[47] Ether and alcohol ethoxylates form a major nonionic class, synthesized by adding ethylene oxide units (typically 3-15) to fatty alcohols, creating a polyoxyethylene chain as the hydrophilic segment alongside an aliphatic tail. Alcohol ethoxylates, such as those from C12-C15 primary alcohols, exhibit excellent water solubility across a wide pH range and low foaming tendencies, making them ideal for cold-water detergents. The ethylene oxide degree tunes hydrophilicity, with higher values increasing cloud points and solubility but reducing wetting speed. These structures avoid charge-related interactions, enhancing compatibility with ionic surfactants.^[47]^[7] Quaternary ammonium surfactants feature a positively charged nitrogen atom bonded to four alkyl groups, often synthesized via alkylation of tertiary amines with alkyl halides. Common examples include cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB), with a C16 tail and three methyl groups, which provides antimicrobial efficacy through membrane disruption and good solubility in water at neutral pH. Their cationic nature imparts substantivity to surfaces, aiding conditioning in hair care, though solubility decreases with longer tails. These compounds are less sensitive to water hardness than anionics but can form complexes with anionic species.^[48]^[7] Fluorinated and perfluorinated surfactants represent a specialized class with partially or fully fluorinated carbon chains (e.g., C4-C8), replacing hydrogen with fluorine to achieve exceptional chemical stability and surface activity. Perfluoroalkyl sulfonates (PFAS), such as perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS), feature a -SO3- head on a perfluoroalkyl tail, enabling ultra-low surface tensions (around 15-20 mN/m) for extreme wetting on low-energy surfaces like Teflon. This C-F bonding confers hydrophobicity and oleophobicity, but severely limits biodegradability, as microbial enzymes struggle to break the strong bonds, leading to environmental persistence.^[49]^[50] The molecular backbone—aromatic versus aliphatic—profoundly impacts overall properties, particularly biodegradability. Aromatic structures, as in LAS with benzene rings, enhance thermal and chemical stability for industrial durability but resist microbial degradation due to ring recalcitrance, often requiring linear alkyl substituents for partial breakdown. In contrast, aliphatic backbones in alcohol ethoxylates or fatty acid carboxylates facilitate easier enzymatic cleavage, promoting higher biodegradability rates (e.g., >60% in 28-day OECD tests) and reducing environmental accumulation. This trade-off guides selection for sustainable formulations.^[47]^[7]

By Origin and Application

Surfactants are classified by their origin into synthetic and natural categories, with the latter often referred to as biosurfactants when derived from biological sources. Synthetic surfactants are primarily petroleum-derived and dominate global production due to their cost-effectiveness and versatility in large-scale manufacturing. For instance, linear alkylbenzene sulfonates (LAS), a common anionic surfactant, are produced from petroleum feedstocks and widely used in household detergents, accounting for a significant portion of the detergent market because of their strong cleaning efficacy at low concentrations.^[51] However, these surfactants exhibit variable environmental impacts, including moderate to high toxicity to aquatic organisms and incomplete biodegradability, which can lead to accumulation in wastewater and ecosystems.^[52]^[53] Natural surfactants, or biosurfactants, originate from microbial, plant, or animal sources and are gaining prominence for their biodegradability and lower toxicity profiles compared to synthetics. Microbial biosurfactants, such as rhamnolipids produced by bacteria like Pseudomonas aeruginosa through fermentation processes, offer excellent surface activity and emulsification properties. Plant-derived examples include saponins, amphiphilic glycosides extracted from sources like soapwort or quinoa, which provide natural foaming and wetting capabilities. Recent advances from 2023 to 2025 have focused on scalable production of these biosurfactants via optimized fermentation techniques, including solid-state fermentation using agro-industrial wastes as substrates, achieving yields up to several grams per liter and reducing production costs by 20-30% through strain engineering and process intensification.^[54]^[55]^[56] Beyond origin, surfactants are often categorized by their primary applications, which dictate formulation and performance requirements. Wetting agents, typically non-ionic or anionic surfactants, are essential in agriculture for enhancing the spread and penetration of pesticides and herbicides on plant surfaces by reducing water's surface tension, thereby improving efficacy and minimizing runoff. In the food industry, emulsifiers such as lecithin-derived or mono- and diglycerides stabilize oil-in-water emulsions in products like mayonnaise and dressings, preventing phase separation and ensuring consistent texture. Dispersants, often polymeric or low-molecular-weight surfactants, play a critical role in enhanced oil recovery by mobilizing trapped oil in reservoirs through interfacial tension reduction and wettability alteration, with applications in chemical flooding techniques that can boost recovery rates by 10-20%.^[57]^[58]^[59] Market trends reflect a shift toward green and bio-based surfactants, driven by regulatory pressures and sustainability demands, with the global biosurfactants sector projected to grow at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 5.8-6.1% from 2025 to 2030, reaching market values exceeding $4.7 billion. This transition is particularly evident in the phase-out of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS)-based fluorosurfactants, which are notorious for their environmental persistence—resisting degradation for decades—and bioaccumulative toxicity, prompting industries to adopt alternatives that minimize long-term ecological harm. A representative example is alkyl polyglucosides (APG), non-ionic surfactants synthesized from renewable glucose and fatty alcohols derived from coconut or palm kernel oil, which serve as eco-friendly components in household cleaners due to their mildness, high biodegradability (over 90% within 28 days), and compatibility with hard water.^[60]^[61]^[62]

Behavior in Solutions

Micelle Formation and Phase Behavior

Surfactants self-assemble into micelles above the critical micelle concentration (CMC), primarily driven by the hydrophobic effect, where nonpolar tails aggregate to minimize contact with water while polar heads interact with the aqueous environment.^[44] At low concentrations just above the CMC, surfactants typically form spherical micelles with a hydrophobic core of 2–5 nm in diameter and a hydrophilic corona.^[63] As concentration increases, more elongated structures emerge, such as cylindrical or rod-like micelles, and at even higher levels, vesicular or bilayer assemblies, depending on the surfactant's molecular geometry.^[64] For instance, sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) forms spherical micelles above its CMC of approximately 8 mM in water at room temperature.^[65] The phase behavior of surfactant solutions follows a progression dictated by concentration and molecular packing, often represented in lyotropic phase diagrams. These diagrams typically show a transition from an isotropic micellar solution to ordered phases: hexagonal (cylindrical micelles packed in a hexagonal lattice), cubic or liquid crystalline (bicontinuous structures), lamellar (bilayer sheets), and eventually a gel phase at high concentrations.^[66] The morphology of these phases is predicted by the packing parameter P = \frac{v}{a l}, where v is the volume of the hydrophobic tail, a is the effective head group area at the aggregate interface, and l is the tail length; values of P < \frac{1}{3} favor spherical micelles, \frac{1}{3} < P < \frac{1}{2} cylindrical micelles, and P \approx 1 lamellar phases. Several factors influence micelle formation and phase transitions. Increasing surfactant concentration promotes higher-order phases by enhancing aggregation and packing efficiency.^[44] Temperature affects solubility and head group hydration, often shifting phases toward more disordered structures at higher temperatures for nonionic surfactants.^[44] Cosurfactants, such as short-chain alcohols (e.g., butanol), can tune phase behavior by inserting into the micelle interface, expanding head group area a and altering P to favor specific morphologies like hexagonal or lamellar phases.^[67] Micelle formation is dynamic, characterized by a rapid equilibrium between free monomers and micelles, with surfactant molecules continuously exchanging between states. The exchange rate for typical ionic surfactants like SDS is on the order of $10^6 s^{-1}, corresponding to a residence time of approximately $10^{-6} s per molecule in the micelle.^[68] This fast kinetics ensures micelles respond quickly to changes in solution conditions, maintaining structural integrity while allowing solute incorporation.

Solubility Limits and Temperature Effects

The solubility of surfactants in aqueous solutions varies significantly depending on their ionic nature and environmental conditions. Ionic surfactants, such as anionic and cationic types, generally exhibit higher solubility in water compared to nonionic surfactants due to electrostatic repulsion between charged head groups, which prevents tight aggregation and promotes dispersion.^[69] In contrast, nonionic surfactants rely on hydrogen bonding between their polar head groups and water molecules for solubility, resulting in comparatively lower overall solubility, particularly at elevated concentrations.^[70] Temperature plays a critical role in modulating surfactant solubility, with distinct behaviors observed between ionic and nonionic classes. For ionic surfactants, solubility typically increases with rising temperature, following a conventional endothermic dissolution process. However, below the Krafft temperature (Tk), the minimum temperature required for sufficient solubility to enable micelle formation, these surfactants precipitate as hydrated crystals due to their limited monomeric solubility. For example, sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS), a common anionic surfactant, has a Tk of approximately 10°C, below which micellar solutions cannot form stably.^[71] The Krafft temperature approximates a linear proportionality with the hydrophobic chain length, where longer alkyl chains elevate Tk by enhancing crystal lattice stability and reducing solubility.^[72] Nonionic surfactants display an inverse temperature dependence on solubility, driven primarily by entropic factors rather than enthalpic ones. As temperature increases, the structured hydration shell around the hydrophilic head groups weakens through dehydration, reducing hydrogen bonding and leading to decreased solubility. This manifests as the cloud point, the temperature at which the solution becomes turbid due to phase separation into a surfactant-rich layer and a dilute aqueous phase. For instance, Triton X-100, a widely used nonionic surfactant, exhibits a cloud point around 65°C, above which macroscopic phase separation occurs.^[73] External factors further influence these solubility boundaries. Salts promote salting-out effects by increasing ionic strength, which dehydrates surfactant head groups and lowers solubility—particularly pronounced in nonionic surfactants, where added electrolytes reduce the cloud point and can induce precipitation at moderate concentrations. Conversely, cosolvents such as alcohols or glycols enhance solubility by disrupting water structure and improving hydrophobic tail accommodation, effectively raising the cloud point for nonionics or suppressing Krafft precipitation for ionics. Exceeding solubility limits through oversaturation, often during formulation or storage, leads to uncontrolled precipitation, which compromises solution stability and efficacy. This is especially problematic for ionic surfactants below Tk or nonionics above the cloud point, where crystal formation or phase separation can clog delivery systems or reduce active concentrations, necessitating temperature-controlled storage protocols.^[74]

Interfacial Dynamics

Adsorption at Interfaces

Surfactants adsorb at interfaces due to their amphiphilic nature, with the hydrophobic tails seeking to minimize contact with water and the hydrophilic heads remaining solvated, leading to an accumulation that lowers interfacial tension. This adsorption is a fundamental process enabling surfactants to stabilize dispersions and modify surface properties in various applications. At the air-water interface, surfactants typically orient with their hydrophobic tails extending into the vapor phase and hydrophilic heads anchored in the aqueous subphase, forming a monolayer that reduces surface tension from about 72 mN/m for pure water to as low as 20-30 mN/m depending on the surfactant type.^[75] In contrast, at the solid-water interface, particularly on hydrophilic surfaces like cellulose, surfactants orient with heads directed toward the solid and tails protruding into the water, facilitating wetting behaviors.^[76] The extent of adsorption is often described by the Langmuir isotherm model, which assumes monolayer coverage on a homogeneous surface without lateral interactions between adsorbed molecules. The surface excess concentration Γ, representing the amount of surfactant at the interface, is given by

\Gamma = \frac{\Gamma_{\max} K c}{1 + K c}

where Γ_max is the maximum surface excess, K is the equilibrium adsorption constant, and c is the bulk surfactant concentration. This model fits well for many nonionic and ionic surfactants below the critical micelle concentration (CMC), predicting saturation at high concentrations.^[77] The relationship between adsorption and interfacial tension is thermodynamically linked by the Gibbs adsorption equation, which for a single surfactant component states

d\gamma = -\Gamma d\mu

where γ is the surface tension and μ is the chemical potential of the surfactant in solution; integration of this equation allows calculation of Γ from experimentally measured γ versus concentration data, confirming adsorption densities on the order of 2-5 molecules per nm² at saturation.^[78] Adsorption kinetics depend on the rate-limiting step, which can be diffusion-limited—where surfactant transport from the bulk to the subsurface is the slowest process—or barrier-controlled, involving an energy barrier for attachment to the interface due to reorientation or partial dehydration of the headgroup. Diffusion-limited kinetics follow models like the Ward-Tordai equation, with initial adsorption rates proportional to the square root of time, while barrier-controlled cases exhibit linear time dependence initially. Surface tension gradients arising from uneven adsorption can induce Marangoni flows, where surfactant-depleted regions experience higher tension, driving fluid motion to replenish the interface and enhancing overall adsorption efficiency.^[79]^[80] The critical micelle concentration (CMC) sets an upper limit on interfacial adsorption, as concentrations above the CMC favor micelle formation in the bulk over additional surface accumulation, resulting in a plateau in Γ versus c plots. Mixed surfactant systems often exhibit synergy, where combinations like anionic-nonionic pairs achieve lower surface tensions and higher adsorption efficiencies than single surfactants at equivalent total concentrations, due to favorable interactions that reduce the effective CMC and enhance packing at the interface. For instance, mixtures can lower the minimum surface tension by 5-10 mN/m compared to pure components, attributed to electrostatic or hydrophobic synergies.^[81]^[82]

Formation of Emulsions and Foams

Surfactants play a crucial role in stabilizing emulsions by adsorbing at the oil-water interface to form a protective monolayer that reduces interfacial tension and prevents droplet coalescence. In oil-in-water (O/W) emulsions, the dispersed oil droplets are surrounded by this monolayer, with the hydrophilic heads of the surfactant molecules oriented toward the continuous aqueous phase; these are typically favored by surfactants with a hydrophilic-lipophilic balance (HLB) value greater than 8. Conversely, water-in-oil (W/O) emulsions feature water droplets dispersed in a continuous oil phase, stabilized by surfactants with lower HLB values that position their hydrophobic tails toward the oil.^[13]^[83] Emulsions are classified into macroemulsions and microemulsions based on their stability and droplet size. Macroemulsions exhibit kinetic stability, relying on the energy barrier created by the surfactant layer to resist coalescence over time, whereas microemulsions are thermodynamically stable systems with droplet sizes below 100 nm, formed spontaneously without high energy input due to ultra-low interfacial tension. Key factors influencing emulsion formation include surfactant concentration, which determines the extent of interface coverage, and mixing energy, which controls droplet size distribution; higher energy input generally produces smaller, more stable droplets. Additionally, Ostwald ripening—where smaller droplets dissolve and larger ones grow due to differences in solubility—is minimized by selecting oils with matched solubility parameters or using co-surfactants to equalize chemical potential across droplets. A representative example is mayonnaise, an O/W macroemulsion where egg yolk lecithins act as natural surfactants to stabilize up to 80% oil content.^[84]^[85]^[86] Foams, dispersions of gas bubbles in a liquid, are stabilized by surfactants that form viscoelastic films around the bubbles, imparting resistance to rupture. These films arise from the adsorption of surfactant molecules at the air-liquid interface, creating a network that slows liquid drainage from the plateau borders between bubbles. Coalescence and drainage are primarily prevented through the Gibbs-Marangoni effect, where surface tension gradients induced by uneven surfactant distribution generate restoring flows that thicken thinning films and maintain structural integrity. Surfactant concentration above the critical micelle concentration enhances this viscoelasticity, while sufficient aeration provides the initial bubble formation. Fire-fighting foams exemplify this, where anionic surfactants generate stable, long-lasting bubbles to blanket and suppress flammable liquids.^[87]^[88]

Characterization Methods

Surface Tension and Interfacial Measurements

Surface tension measurements are essential for characterizing the behavior of surfactants at air-liquid or liquid-liquid interfaces, providing insights into their ability to reduce interfacial energy and promote processes like wetting and emulsification. These measurements quantify the force per unit length required to maintain a liquid surface or interface, typically expressed in millinewtons per meter (mN/m). Common techniques distinguish between static (equilibrium) and dynamic conditions, where surfactants exhibit time-dependent adsorption kinetics that lower tension over timescales from milliseconds to minutes.^[89] The Wilhelmy plate method is a widely used force-based technique for measuring both static and dynamic surface tension of surfactant solutions. In this approach, a thin platinum or glass plate is partially immersed in the liquid, and the force F exerted by the meniscus is balanced against the surface tension \gamma via the equation F = \gamma \cdot P \cdot \cos \theta, where P is the wetted perimeter of the plate and \theta is the contact angle. For ideal wetting (\theta = 0^\circ), the cosine term simplifies to 1, allowing direct calculation of \gamma. This method is particularly effective for surfactants, as it can capture adsorption dynamics by monitoring force changes over time, with equilibrium tensions often dropping below 30 mN/m for typical concentrations above the critical micelle concentration (CMC).^[90]^[91] Pendant drop analysis offers an optical alternative for precise surface and interfacial tension measurements, especially suitable for surfactant-laden systems where minimal sample volume is needed. A pendant drop of liquid is suspended from a capillary, and its shape is analyzed by fitting to the Young-Laplace equation, \Delta P = \gamma \left( \frac{1}{R_1} + \frac{1}{R_2} \right), where \Delta P is the pressure difference across the interface, and R_1 and R_2 are the principal radii of curvature. Numerical algorithms solve this differential equation to extract \gamma from drop profiles captured via high-resolution imaging, achieving accuracies within 0.1 mN/m. For surfactants, this technique reveals CMC transitions as abrupt changes in drop shape and tension, typically in the range of 25-40 mN/m at equilibrium.^[92]^[93] Interfacial tension between immiscible liquids, such as oil and water in surfactant systems, is often ultralow (<1 mN/m) and requires specialized methods like the spinning drop technique. Here, a small drop of the less dense phase (e.g., oil) is placed in a capillary filled with the denser phase (e.g., water containing surfactant), and rotation elongates the drop into a cylindrical shape. The interfacial tension is calculated from the drop radius r and rotation speed \omega using \gamma = \frac{\Delta \rho \omega^2 r^3}{4}, where \Delta \rho is the density difference. This method excels for surfactant formulations in enhanced oil recovery, where tensions can reach 10^{-3} mN/m, enabling microemulsion formation.^[94]^[95] Key parameters derived from these measurements include equilibrium surface tension, which stabilizes after surfactant adsorption; dynamic tension, reflecting relaxation times (often 0.1-10 s for diffusion-limited processes); and contact angle \theta, which quantifies wetting via Young's equation \gamma_{SV} = \gamma_{SL} + \gamma_{LV} \cos \theta, where subscripts denote solid-vapor (SV), solid-liquid (SL), and liquid-vapor (LV) interfaces. Surfactants reduce \theta below 90° to enhance spreading on hydrophobic surfaces.^[96]^[89] Recent advancements in atomic force microscopy (AFM) have enabled nanoscale probing of surfactant layers at interfaces, particularly for measuring adsorbed monolayer thickness. In AFM, a sharp tip scans the surface in tapping or contact mode, revealing height profiles of surfactant films with resolutions down to 0.1 nm. For instance, studies of anionic surfactant monolayers on mica substrates show thicknesses of 1-2 nm, influenced by packing density and chain length, with 2020s developments incorporating high-speed AFM for real-time dynamics during adsorption. These tools complement traditional tensiometry by linking interfacial tension reductions to molecular-scale organization.^[97]^[98]

Molecular and Structural Analysis Techniques

Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy provides detailed insights into the molecular environments and dynamics of surfactants in solution. Self-diffusion coefficients, measured via pulsed-field gradient NMR, reveal micelle sizes and shapes by distinguishing between monomeric and aggregated surfactant diffusion rates, with slower diffusion indicating larger micellar assemblies.^[99] For instance, in short-chain ionic surfactant systems like octanoate, double-exponential decay in spin-echo signals quantifies the proportion of surfactant in micelles versus monomers, enabling estimation of aggregation degrees and counterion binding.^[99] Chemical shifts in ¹H NMR spectra differentiate head group and tail environments, reflecting changes in polarity and packing as surfactants transition from monomers to micelles; upfield shifts in tail protons signal incorporation into hydrophobic cores.^[100] Small-angle X-ray scattering (SAXS) and small-angle neutron scattering (SANS) are essential for determining micelle structures at the nanoscale, yielding structure factors that describe inter-micelle interactions and overall assembly geometry.^[101] The radius of gyration, derived from scattering profiles via indirect Fourier transformation or model fitting, quantifies micelle compactness and shape, with SANS often providing contrast-enhanced resolution for core-shell architectures due to deuterium labeling.^[101] In non-ionic surfactants like octyl-β-maltopyranoside, SAXS and SANS data fit a spherical shell model, confirming stable micelle radii around 20-30 Å across concentrations up to 188 mM.^[101] SANS particularly excels in revealing core-shell models for ionic micelles, such as sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS), where the hydrophobic core and hydrated head layer are resolved, supporting aggregation numbers of 50-100 molecules per micelle.^[102]^[103] Cryo-transmission electron microscopy (cryo-TEM) enables direct visualization of surfactant assemblies in their native hydrated state, preserving delicate structures like micelles and vesicles without drying artifacts.^[104] By rapidly freezing aqueous samples in vitreous ice, cryo-TEM images reveal morphologies, sizes, and polydispersity; for siloxane surfactants, it captures unilamellar vesicles with diameters of 100-500 nm alongside smaller micelles.^[104] This technique has elucidated transitions in mixed systems, such as vesicle-to-micelle transformations induced by alkyl sulfates, showing initial vesicle swelling followed by fragmentation into globular micelles of 5-10 nm.^[105] Fluorescence correlation spectroscopy (FCS) probes local surfactant concentrations and aggregation dynamics by analyzing fluorescence fluctuations from labeled probes diffusing through micellar environments.^[106] It measures diffusion coefficients to infer aggregation numbers and micelle sizes, with slower probe diffusion indicating entrapment in larger aggregates; for Triton X-100 micelles, FCS yields aggregation numbers around 147.^[107] In wormlike micelle systems, FCS tracks growth and scission events, revealing aggregation numbers that evolve with concentration and additives, providing insights into non-spherical phase behaviors.^[108]

Applications

In Cleaning and Detergents

Surfactants play a central role in cleaning and detergents by facilitating the removal of dirt and oils through micellar solubilization, where hydrophobic tails of surfactant molecules encapsulate non-polar soil particles within micelle cores, allowing them to be suspended in water and rinsed away.^[109] This process is particularly effective above the critical micelle concentration, enabling the dissolution of otherwise insoluble greasy substances in aqueous solutions.^[110] In detergent formulations, blends of anionic and nonionic surfactants, such as linear alkylbenzene sulfonate (LAS) and alcohol ethoxylates, exhibit synergy by lowering the overall critical micelle concentration and enhancing solubilization efficiency compared to single surfactant systems.^[111] This combination improves cleaning performance across a range of soil types, with the anionic component providing strong detergency and the nonionic aiding in compatibility with diverse water conditions. Typical formulations in liquid detergents contain 15-30% surfactants to balance efficacy, stability, and cost, while powder detergents often incorporate similar levels adjusted for density and dissolution rates.^[42] Builders, such as phosphates, were historically added to enhance surfactant performance by sequestering calcium and magnesium ions in hard water, preventing precipitation and maintaining cleaning power; however, their use has been largely phased out since the 1990s due to environmental concerns over eutrophication in waterways.^[112] Modern alternatives include zeolite or citrate-based builders to achieve comparable water-softening effects without the ecological drawbacks.^[113] Surfactants contribute to overall cleaning performance by promoting wetting, which reduces water's surface tension to spread the solution across surfaces and penetrate fabrics, and by enabling emulsification to lift and disperse oily soils into fine droplets for easy removal.^[114] In hard water environments, sequestrants like ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) or sodium citrate mitigate ion interference by chelating metal cations, preserving surfactant activity and preventing scum formation on cleaned items.^[115] These mechanisms ensure effective soil removal even under challenging conditions, such as in household laundry or hard-surface cleaning. The cleaning and detergents sector accounts for approximately 50% of global surfactant consumption, underscoring its dominance in the market as of 2024.^[45] Recent trends show a shift toward bio-based surfactants, with alkyl polyglucosides (APG) gaining prominence in eco-friendly formulations due to their renewable sourcing from glucose and fatty alcohols, offering comparable performance to synthetic options while aligning with sustainability demands.^[116] This transition reflects broader industry efforts to reduce environmental footprints in consumer products.^[117]

In Pharmaceuticals and Medicine

Surfactants play a crucial role in pharmaceutical formulations by enhancing the solubility of hydrophobic active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs) through micelle formation, which encapsulates poorly water-soluble drugs in their hydrophobic cores. For instance, Cremophor EL, a nonionic surfactant composed of polyethoxylated castor oil, has been widely used to solubilize paclitaxel, a chemotherapeutic agent with limited aqueous solubility, enabling its intravenous administration in formulations like Taxol.^[118] This micellar solubilization improves drug bioavailability and therapeutic efficacy while reducing precipitation risks in systemic circulation.^[119] In drug delivery systems, surfactants facilitate the creation of emulsions and liposomes that stabilize formulations for oral and intravenous routes, with nonionic surfactants preferred for their ability to maintain emulsion stability without disrupting biological membranes. These systems enhance the absorption and targeted release of drugs, such as in lipid-based nanoemulsions for oral delivery of lipophilic compounds.^[120] Cationic surfactants are particularly employed in gene therapy, where they form complexes with DNA through electrostatic interactions, condensing the genetic material into compact structures suitable for cellular uptake and transfection.^[121] This complexation protects DNA from degradation and promotes endosomal escape, advancing non-viral vectors in therapeutic applications.^[122] Pulmonary surfactants, primarily composed of dipalmitoylphosphatidylcholine (DPPC), are essential in treating neonatal respiratory distress syndrome (NRDS) by reducing surface tension in premature infant lungs, preventing alveolar collapse. Exogenous surfactant replacement therapy, approved in the early 1990s, has significantly lowered NRDS mortality rates, with formulations like Survanta and Infasurf demonstrating clinical efficacy in randomized trials.^[123] Recent advancements include synthetic analogs, such as CHF5633, which incorporate recombinant surfactant protein C mimics and have shown improved lung function and reduced inflammation in preclinical models as of 2023-2024 studies.^[124] Despite their benefits, surfactants pose challenges in medical applications, particularly ionic types that can induce hemolysis by disrupting erythrocyte membranes through solubilization or osmotic mechanisms.^[125] This hemolytic potential has driven the preference for zwitterionic surfactants, which exhibit milder interactions with cell membranes and lower toxicity profiles in parenteral formulations.^[120]

In Food and Agriculture

In food processing, surfactants serve primarily as emulsifiers and stabilizers to maintain the homogeneity of oil-in-water or water-in-oil mixtures, preventing separation and enhancing texture. Lecithin, derived from sources like soybeans, is widely used as an emulsifier in products such as mayonnaise, where it facilitates the dispersion of oil droplets in an aqueous phase, and in chocolate to reduce viscosity and improve flow during manufacturing. Mono- and diglycerides of fatty acids act similarly in ice cream, stabilizing fat globules to create a smoother texture and prevent ice crystal formation during storage. These compounds are affirmed as generally recognized as safe (GRAS) by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) under 21 CFR 184.1400 for lecithin and 21 CFR 184.1505 for mono- and diglycerides, allowing their use within current good manufacturing practices without specified limits.^[126]^[127]^[58] Surfactants also contribute to foaming properties in aerated food products like whipped toppings. Polysorbates, known as Tweens (e.g., Tween 60 or polysorbate 60), promote stable foam formation by reducing surface tension at the air-liquid interface, increasing volume and lightness in vegetable-based whipped toppings. Sorbitan esters, or Spans (e.g., Span 60), are often combined with Tweens to enhance emulsion stability in these applications, ensuring consistent aeration and preventing collapse during whipping. These nonionic surfactants are GRAS-listed by the FDA and integral to achieving the desired overrun and firmness in such products.^[128]^[129]^[130] In agriculture, surfactants function as adjuvants in pesticide formulations to improve wetting, spreading, and penetration, thereby enhancing efficacy while minimizing off-target effects. Nonionic surfactants reduce the surface tension of spray solutions from approximately 72 mN/m (pure water) to 20-25 mN/m, allowing droplets to spread into thin films on leaf surfaces for uniform coverage and reduced runoff. This mechanism decreases droplet size, promoting better adhesion and absorption through cuticles or stomata, which can increase pesticide uptake by up to 50% in some cases. Organosilicone superspreaders, such as trisiloxane-based compounds (e.g., Silwet L-77), exemplify this by enabling rapid wetting on hydrophobic surfaces, commonly added to herbicides like glyphosate to boost penetration into weeds.^[131]^[132]^[133] The agricultural surfactants market, valued at USD 2.1 billion in 2025, is projected to grow to USD 2.9 billion by 2030, driven by demand for bio-based adjuvants that offer environmental benefits like faster biodegradation. Regulatory oversight by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) emphasizes low aquatic toxicity for these surfactants under the Safer Choice program, requiring rapid degradation (e.g., >60% in 28 days) for those with higher toxicity profiles to mitigate ecological risks. Additionally, EPA guidelines on pesticide drift mandate formulations that avoid excessive volatility or small droplet formation, promoting low-drift surfactants to protect non-target areas like water bodies.^[134]^[135]^[136]

In Personal Care and Cosmetics

Surfactants play a central role in personal care and cosmetics, particularly in products like shampoos, soaps, and lotions, where they provide cleansing, foaming, and conditioning benefits while prioritizing mildness to minimize skin and scalp irritation. The shift toward sulfate-free formulations has accelerated since 2020, driven by consumer demand for gentler alternatives that reduce dryness and irritation associated with traditional anionic sulfates like sodium lauryl sulfate. Alkyl polyglucosides, such as decyl glucoside and coco glucoside, have emerged as popular non-ionic substitutes, offering effective cleansing with lower irritancy profiles suitable for sensitive skin in shampoos and body washes.^[137]^[138] In foaming applications, amphoteric surfactants enhance sensory appeal by producing creamy, stable lather that improves the user experience in rinse-off products. Cocamidopropyl betaine, a common amphoteric surfactant derived from coconut oil, boosts foam volume and stability when combined with anionics, creating a luxurious texture in shampoos and 2-in-1 conditioning formulas without compromising mildness.^[139]^[140] For hair conditioning, cationic surfactants like behentrimonium chloride are incorporated into conditioners to deposit on negatively charged hair surfaces, reducing static electricity and improving detangling for smoother, frizz-free results. This antistatic effect helps maintain hair manageability, particularly in damaged or curly hair types, while contributing to a soft sensory feel post-rinse.^[141]^[142] In skin care formulations such as lotions and creams, surfactants function as emulsifiers to stabilize oil-in-water (O/W) emulsions, enabling the dispersion of moisturizing oils in aqueous bases for lightweight, non-greasy hydration. Non-ionic and amphoteric surfactants, including those derived from amino acids like sodium cocoyl glutamate, are favored in 2024 green cosmetics for their biodegradability and low irritation potential, aligning with sustainable trends in moisturizers.^[143]^[144]^[145] Mildness is rigorously evaluated using metrics like the zein test, which measures a surfactant's potential to denature proteins and thus irritate skin or scalp, with lower zein solubilization indicating gentler formulations for use in sensitive personal care products. Viscosity building, essential for desirable product texture in shampoos and lotions, is often achieved by adding salts like sodium chloride to anionic surfactant systems, which promote micelle elongation and thickening without altering mildness.^[146]^[139]^[147]

In Industrial Processes

Surfactants play a pivotal role in various industrial manufacturing processes by reducing surface tension, facilitating wetting, and stabilizing dispersions, thereby enhancing efficiency and product quality across sectors like textiles, oil recovery, paper production, and beyond. In the textile industry, anionic surfactants such as sulfosuccinates are widely employed as wetting agents during dyeing to enable uniform penetration of dyes into hydrophobic fibers like cotton by lowering the liquid-solid interfacial tension.^[148] Nonionic surfactants, including fatty acid ethoxylates, serve as antistatic agents to mitigate electrostatic buildup on synthetic fibers during processing, preventing adhesion and improving handling.^[149] Additionally, finishing agents based on cationic or nonionic surfactants reduce inter-fiber friction by forming lubricating films on fabric surfaces, resulting in smoother textures and reduced wear during weaving or knitting.^[150] In the oil and mining sectors, surfactants are essential for enhanced oil recovery (EOR) techniques, particularly through surfactant flooding and foam-assisted methods that lower oil-water interfacial tension (IFT) to ultralow levels, often around 10^{-3} mN/m, to mobilize trapped oil.^[59] Viscoelastic surfactants (VES), such as zwitterionic-anionic mixtures, generate stable foams that improve sweep efficiency in heterogeneous reservoirs by blocking high-permeability zones and diverting fluids toward oil-rich areas, typically boosting recovery yields by 10-20% of the original oil in place (OOIP).^[151] These foams leverage the wormlike micelle structures of VES to enhance stability under reservoir conditions, minimizing surfactant adsorption on rock surfaces.^[152] For paper production and recycling, nonionic surfactants like alkyl ethoxylates are critical in deinking processes, where they detach ink particles from fiber surfaces through emulsification and prevent re-deposition during pulping.^[153] In flotation deinking, these surfactants act as aids by stabilizing air bubbles that selectively attach to hydrophobic ink particles, enabling their removal via froth flotation and improving pulp brightness and yield in recycled paper mills.^[154] Beyond these core applications, surfactants contribute to lubricants used in machining, where they emulsify oils in water-based coolants to enhance heat dissipation and reduce tool wear by improving lubricity at metal interfaces.^[155] In inks and coatings, surfactants facilitate pigment dispersion by adsorbing onto particle surfaces to prevent agglomeration, ensuring stable, low-viscosity formulations for consistent color strength.^[156] Specifically, fluorosurfactants are incorporated into printer inks to optimize jetting performance by rapidly lowering surface tension, enabling precise droplet formation and adhesion on substrates.^[157] Recent advancements as of 2025 highlight the integration of bio-surfactants into sustainable polymer processing, where they serve as eco-friendly dispersants and wetting agents during the testing and formulation of biodegradable plastics, reducing energy use and improving material homogeneity in applications like packaging.^[158]

Natural and Biosurfactants

Natural Occurrence in Biological Systems

Surfactants occur naturally in various biological systems, where they perform essential roles in maintaining physiological functions through their amphiphilic properties that reduce surface tension at interfaces. In humans, bile salts such as sodium taurocholate serve as endogenous surfactants critical for fat digestion in the small intestine, where they emulsify dietary lipids into micelles to facilitate their absorption.^[159] These bile salts, derived from cholesterol metabolism in the liver, enhance the solubility of lipophilic nutrients and vitamins, underscoring their role in lipid transport and processing.^[160] Pulmonary surfactant, another key endogenous surfactant in humans, lines the alveoli to prevent collapse during respiration by dramatically lowering surface tension at the air-liquid interface. Composed of approximately 90% lipids (primarily phospholipids like dipalmitoylphosphatidylcholine) and 10% proteins (including surfactant proteins SP-B and SP-C), it ensures lung compliance by counteracting Laplace pressure, which would otherwise cause alveolar instability.^[161] In plants, saponins act as natural surfactants; for instance, those in soapwort (Saponaria officinalis) produce foaming effects by lowering surface tension, aiding in defense mechanisms such as deterring herbivores through their soap-like properties.^[162] Certain animal venoms also incorporate biosurfactant-like amphiphilic peptides, such as melittin in bee venom, which disrupt cell membranes to immobilize prey.^[163] These biological surfactants contribute to broader functions like membrane stabilization and cellular signaling. In the lungs, pulmonary surfactant stabilizes alveolar membranes against collapse and facilitates immune signaling via proteins like SP-A, which bind pathogens to enhance host defense.^[164] Evolutionarily, surfactants trace back to ancient roles in lipid transport and emulsification, predating vertebrate lungs and enabling the transition to air breathing by minimizing interfacial tensions in respiratory structures.^[165] Deficiencies in pulmonary surfactant, as seen in neonatal respiratory distress syndrome, lead to severe alveolar collapse and impaired gas exchange due to unchecked surface tension.^[166] Notably, lung surfactant exhibits a high turnover rate, with fractional synthesis around 20% per day in preterm infants, reflecting its dynamic recycling by type II alveolar cells to maintain respiratory efficiency.^[167]

Biosurfactant Production and Advantages

Biosurfactants are primarily produced through microbial fermentation processes, where bacteria such as Bacillus species synthesize lipopeptides like surfactin, and Pseudomonas species produce glycolipids such as rhamnolipids.^[168] These methods often employ submerged or solid-state fermentation, utilizing low-cost waste substrates like agro-industrial residues (e.g., potato peels, molasses, or food waste) to enhance sustainability and reduce production costs.^[168] Yields can reach up to 40-50 g/L in optimized conditions using waste feedstocks, such as food waste for rhamnolipids and sophorolipids, with ongoing research aiming for higher efficiencies.^[169] Common types of biosurfactants include glycolipids (e.g., rhamnolipids and sophorolipids), lipopeptides (e.g., surfactin and lichenysin), and phospholipids.^[168] For instance, rhamnolipids feature a hydrophilic head of one or two L-rhamnose units glycosidically linked to a hydrophobic tail consisting of a dimer of β-hydroxydecanoic acid, enabling their amphiphilic properties.^[170] Compared to synthetic surfactants, biosurfactants offer superior biodegradability, with rhamnolipids exhibiting high degradation under aerobic conditions, outperforming many chemical counterparts like Triton X-100.^[171] They exhibit low toxicity, often non-irritating to skin and non-toxic to aquatic life, in contrast to synthetic options such as Marlon A-350, which show high hemolytic activity.^[171] Additionally, biosurfactants demonstrate enhanced tolerance to extreme temperatures (e.g., stable at 50°C) and high salinity (up to 50 g/L NaCl), making them suitable for harsh environments.^[171] Recent sustainability advances from 2023–2025 highlight their growing market adoption, particularly in enhanced oil recovery (EOR), where rhamnolipids have been shown to increase recovery by an additional 11.91% compared to synthetic surfactants, and in cosmetics for eco-friendly formulations like skincare emollients. As of 2025, the global biosurfactants market is projected to reach USD 4.99 billion, reflecting this growth.^[171]^[172] Despite these benefits, biosurfactant production faces challenges, including high costs—typically 5–20 USD/kg, or 5–10 times that of synthetic surfactants (around 1–3 USD/kg)—due to downstream recovery and purification steps.^[40] Scalability efforts are addressing this through genetic engineering, such as CRISPR-Cas9 editing of microbial strains to overexpress biosynthetic pathways, improving yields and reducing expenses in strains like Pseudomonas aeruginosa.^[173] A notable example is sophorolipids, which are increasingly incorporated into eco-detergents for their low-foaming, fast-wetting, and grease-removal properties, as seen in palm-free formulations like SOPHOROLIPID ECOS for household cleaning.^[174]

Environmental and Safety Aspects

Biodegradability and Ecological Impact

Surfactants exhibit varying degrees of biodegradability depending on their chemical structure and environmental conditions, with most modern types designed to undergo rapid breakdown to minimize persistence. Under aerobic conditions, linear alkylbenzene sulfonates (LAS), a common anionic surfactant, primarily degrade via ω-oxidation at the terminal methyl group of the alkyl chain, followed by β-oxidation that shortens the chain by two-carbon units, ultimately mineralizing to CO₂, sulfate, and water.^[175] This pathway produces transient intermediates such as sulfophenyl carboxylates (SPCs), which further degrade efficiently.^[175] Laboratory assessments using OECD 301 guidelines confirm ready biodegradability for LAS, achieving 90–98% degradation within 28 days, often meeting the 10-day window criterion.^[175] In contrast, anaerobic biodegradation is slower and less complete, particularly for surfactants with branched alkyl chains, where steric hindrance impedes β-oxidation by microbial enzymes; linear chains degrade more readily, with removal rates up to 63% in marine sediments over 160 days per OECD 308 tests, while branched variants like certain alcohol ethoxylates show only 40% primary degradation in 28 days compared to over 80% for linear forms.^[176]^[177] Ready biodegradability metrics, such as half-lives in natural waters, underscore the transient nature of many surfactants. For instance, linear alcohol ethoxylates (AEs) exhibit half-lives of 4–24 hours in surface waters at environmentally relevant concentrations (e.g., 10 μg/L), reflecting rapid microbial assimilation under aerobic conditions.^[178] These short persistence times align with broader evaluations showing most non-ionic and anionic surfactants mineralizing substantially within weeks in rivers and wastewater effluents.^[179] Ecological risks arise from potential bioaccumulation and toxicity, though modern surfactants are formulated to limit these. Many exhibit log K_ow values of 3–4, indicating moderate hydrophobicity that promotes sorption to sediments rather than extensive biomagnification in aquatic food webs; bioaccumulation factors (BCFs) remain below regulatory concern levels (e.g., <2,000 L/kg) due to rapid metabolism and excretion.^[180] Acute toxicity to algae and fish is generally low for contemporary types, with LC50/EC50 values exceeding 1 mg/L—such as geometric means of 3.2–9.1 mg/L for LAS across species like fathead minnows (Pimephales promelas) and green algae (Selenastrum capricornutum).^[179] However, per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS)-based surfactants pose significant concerns due to their extreme persistence, resisting both aerobic and anaerobic degradation and accumulating in sediments; the European Commission proposed a class-wide restriction under REACH in 2023, with an updated proposal published by ECHA in August 2025 and evaluation expected to complete by the end of 2026.^[181]^[182] Mitigation strategies emphasize bio-based alternatives and regulatory thresholds to curb impacts. Biosurfactants derived from renewable sources, such as microbial or plant origins, degrade more completely and exhibit lower toxicity than petroleum-derived synthetics, reducing eutrophication risks and sediment contamination.^[51] Emerging regulations, including the U.S. EPA Safer Choice program and EU Detergents Regulation updates, mandate at least 60% ultimate biodegradation (mineralization to CO₂) within 28 days for approved surfactants, promoting formulations with enhanced environmental profiles.^[135]^[183] A representative case is LAS in river systems, where measured concentrations typically range below 0.1 mg/L (e.g., mean 2.21 μg/L in the Mississippi River across 362 samples), well under predicted no-effect concentrations (PNECs) of 0.25 mg/L, resulting in negligible chronic effects on aquatic communities such as no observed adverse impacts on fish reproduction or algal growth in field studies.^[175]

Health Risks and Regulations

Surfactants generally exhibit low acute oral toxicity, with most having an LD50 greater than 2000 mg/kg in rats, classifying them as low-risk substances under hazard criteria.^[184] For example, alcohol ethoxylates show an LD50 of over 1400 mg/kg orally and more than 5000 mg/kg dermally. However, skin and eye irritation varies by type; anionic surfactants often cause moderate to severe irritation due to their charge-based interaction with biological membranes, while nonionic surfactants produce minimal effects.^[52]^[185] Certain amphoteric surfactants, such as cocamidopropyl betaine used in shampoos and cleansers, are recognized contact allergens, leading to delayed hypersensitivity reactions in sensitized individuals.^[186]^[187] Chronic exposure raises concerns for endocrine disruption, particularly from nonylphenol ethoxylates, which mimic estrogen and have been largely phased out in the EU and Canada since the early 2000s due to their persistent metabolites.^[188]^[189] Inhalation of surfactant aerosols can inhibit pulmonary surfactant function, potentially causing respiratory distress, with toxicity proportional to concentration and duration.^[190]^[191] Common surfactants lack evidence of carcinogenicity according to the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), though some derivatives like diethanolamine are classified as possibly carcinogenic (Group 2B).^[192] Regulatory frameworks address these risks through mandates on safety and use. In the European Union, the REACH Regulation requires surfactants in detergents to meet ultimate biodegradability criteria to minimize health and environmental hazards, with ongoing updates to enhance testing bans on animal-derived products.^[189]^[193] Under the U.S. Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA), restrictions on per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), including certain fluorinated surfactants, were finalized in 2024 to prevent reintroduction into commerce without review.^[194] The FDA grants Generally Recognized as Safe (GRAS) status to select surfactants like sunflower lecithin for use as emulsifiers in food, provided they meet safety criteria through scientific procedures.^[195] For mists containing surfactants, such as in metalworking fluids, OSHA sets a PEL of 5 mg/m³ (8-hour TWA) for mineral oil mist, with NIOSH recommending 0.4 mg/m³ (thoracic fraction) to prevent respiratory irritation.^[196]^[197] The EPA continues to review nanoscale materials under TSCA, including those subject to premanufacture notifications, to assess potential risks.^[198] Mitigation strategies include mandatory precautionary labeling for irritants and allergens under the Federal Hazardous Substances Act, promotion of safer alternatives via EPA's Safer Choice program, and substitution with low-toxicity nonionics in formulations.^[199]^[200]

References

[1]
Surfactant - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
Surfactant is defined as a surface active agent that consists of long molecules with a hydrophilic head and a hydrophobic tail, allowing them to lower the ...
[2]
Surfactants: physicochemical interactions with biological ... - NIH
Feb 3, 2021 · Surfactants are used in a wide range of industrial applications (Banat and Thavasi 2018). In agriculture, for example, phytosanitary agents are ...
[3]
Surfactant - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
Surfactants are defined as surface-active agents that decrease the surface tension of liquids, functioning as spreading and wetting agents.
[4]
What are surfactants and how do they work? - Biolin Scientific
Jan 7, 2025 · Surfactants are amphiphilic molecules with distinct hydrophobic and hydrophilic components. The hydrophobic tail can be a hydrocarbon, fluorocarbon, or ...
[5]
Surfactants: the ubiquitous amphiphiles | News | Chemistry World
Jun 30, 2003 · Detergent action to remove oily/greasy soiling involves wetting, emulsification, solubilisation and micelles. Emulsification Adsorption at the ...Missing: general | Show results with:general
[6]
Wetting the surface: A deep dive into chemistry and applications of ...
In terms of structure, surfactants are organic molecules that contain a tail that repels water (hydrophobic) and a head that attracts water (hydrophilic). Most ...
[7]
[PDF] SURFACTANTS Types and Uses
Nonionic surfactants are good detergents, wetting agents and emulsifiers. Some of them have good foaming properties. Some categories exhibit a very low ...
[8]
Fundamentals of surfactants for metal cleaning applications - STLE
Surfactants act to stabilize the interface between oil or particles and water in a dispersion, which is important for removing and stabilizing the oil or ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[9]
The Surface Activity of Surfactants at Liquid Interfaces: The Role of ...
Aug 31, 2025 · The main group of these special “agents” are so-called surfactants, a term derived from “surface-active agent,” coined in the 1950s by Antara ...
[10]
Soaps & Detergents History | The American Cleaning Institute (ACI)
Evidence has been found that ancient Babylonians understood soap making as early as 2800 BC Archeologists have found soap-like material in historic clay ...
[11]
[PDF] A Short History and Preamble of Surfactants
The first authentic mention of soaps as cleansing agents appears in the 200 AD in the script of Galen, the Greek physician who has reported the preparation of.
[12]
The Studies on Hydrophilic-Lipophilic Balance (HLB): Sixty Years ...
Aug 6, 2025 · The Hydrophilic-Lipophilic Balance (HLB)was formally presented by William C. Griffin sixty years ago at a meeting in Chicago for the first time.
[13]
Hydrophilic-Lipophilic Balance - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
Surfactants with HLB values in the 8 to 18 range are most commonly used in O/W emulsions (Griffin, 1949). The longer the fatty acid chains in the SEs and the ...
[14]
Surfactant Self-Assembling and Critical Micelle Concentration - NIH
The minimum concentration of surfactant at which micelles form is termed as “critical micelle concentration” (CMC) and represents one the most important ...
[15]
Critical Micelle Concentration - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
Critical micelle concentration (CMC) can be defined as the minimum concentration of the surfactant at which micelle formation takes place.
[16]
Critical Micelle Concentration (CMC) - Nanoscience Instruments
The Critical Micelle Concentration (CMC) is defined as the concentration of surfactants at which micelles spontaneously form in the bulk of a liquid.
[17]
[PDF] Role of chain length and electrolyte on the micellization of anionic ...
Furthermore, adding one -CH2- group to the surfactant alkyl chain decreases the CMC by a factor of about two in the case of ionic surfactants in water with no ...
[18]
Effect of temperature on critical micelle concentration and ...
For non-ionic surfactants, the CMC decreases with increasing temperature due to an increase in hydrophobicity caused by the destruction of hydrogen bonds ...Missing: salt | Show results with:salt
[19]
effects of concentration, temperature, and salt - RSC Publishing
Jul 27, 2020 · The addition of relatively small amounts of salt, screens the surfactant head-group repulsions and thus facilitates micellar packing and growth.
[20]
The methods of determination of critical micellar concentrations of ...
Jun 27, 2010 · Conductometry. For ionic surfactants, in monomeric form (below cmc), the surfactants behave like a strong electrolyte and dissociate completely.
[21]
On the hydrophobic chains effect on critical micelle concentration of ...
Apr 28, 2020 · In the case of the conventional surfactants, the logarithm of cmc is a linear function of alkyl chain carbon number to at least sixteenth carbon ...
[22]
Structure and aggregation in dilate solution of surface active agents
Cite this article. Klevens, H.B. Structure and aggregation in dilate solution of surface active agents. J Am Oil Chem Soc 30, 74–80 (1953). https://doi.org ...
[23]
Structure and Applications of Surfactants - IntechOpen
Surfactant molecules have two parts, a lipophilic (apolar) part that retains fat and a hydrophilic (polar) part that is miscible with water.
[24]
Anionic Surfactant - Alfa Chemistry
Their hydrophilic groups typically contain functional groups such as sulfonates (-SO3-), sulfates (-OSO3-), and carboxylates (-COO-), while their hydrophobic ...
[25]
A Comprehensive Review on the Creation, Description, and ...
Jun 24, 2024 · The molecular structure of surfactants consists of two parts. One part is hydrophilic head-bearing charges which are soluble in water, while the ...
[26]
Multifunctional Gemini Surfactants: Structure, Synthesis, Properties ...
Hydrophobic moiety is usually a straight or branched hydrocarbon or fluorocarbon chain with 8–18 carbon atoms, whereas hydrophilic moiety is a polar or ionic ...
[27]
[PDF] Important facts about surfactants & its properties
The length of the chain of the chain is in the range of 8-18 carbon atoms. The degree of chain branching, the position of the polar group and the length of ...
[28]
Surfactant-driven modifications in protein structure - RSC Publishing
May 20, 2025 · This review article will summarize the fundamentals and recent updates on (i) protein interaction with surfactants; (ii) the phenomenon of protein unfolding ...
[29]
Overview of Sodium Dodecyl Sulfate - Alfa Chemistry
Sodium dodecyl sulfate is an organic compound with a chemical formula of C12H25SO4Na. It is a white or light yellow powder that is easily soluble in water and ...
[30]
[PDF] Modeling self-assembly of surfactants at solid/liquid interfaces. I ...
Molecular constants for surfactant head groups. a0 (nm2) d (nm). Surfactant head group d (nm) ap (nm2). Sodium alkyl sulfate. 0.17. 0.17. 0.545. –. 0.21. 0.07.
[31]
Effects of head group and counter-ion variation in cationic ...
Cationic surfactants increase surface charge, leading to micelle breakdown, reducing size, and increasing cloud point, while increasing solubilization of QN.
[32]
Differences in free surfactant concentration and aggregation ...
Aug 25, 2018 · Increasing the length of a nonionic surfactant headgroup can hinder biodegradation [5] and detergency efficacy [6]. The ratio of the head and ...Missing: variations | Show results with:variations
[33]
Influence of tail group length, amide functionality and added salt ion ...
The lower Krafft temperatures of the longer tailed oleyl (C18:1) and erucyl (C22:1) tailed surfactants is a result of the unsaturation in their tail group, ...
[34]
Description of surfactant 2D monolayer formation at the air/water ...
This difference is attributed to structural variations between cis-unsaturated and saturated carboxylic acids, including the presence of sp3-and sp2-hybridized ...
[35]
Synthesis and properties of two surfactants containing ...
Two surfactants containing polyoxypropylene block and branched tail were synthesized. •. They present low Krafft point and excellent salt tolerance. •. They ...
[36]
Fluorinated surfactants: A review on recent progress on synthesis ...
Fluorinated surfactants are more effective in reducing surface tension compared to hydrocarbon surfactants with similar hydrophobic tail lengths. Surfactants ...
[37]
Branched zwitterionic gemini surfactants micellization and ...
The focus of this work was to examine the effect of branching of the tails on the aggregation properties of gemini surfactants. Herein we report the ...Missing: point | Show results with:point
[38]
Comprehensive Review on the Role of Surfactants in the Chemical ...
Jan 3, 2022 · Surfactants used in cEOR are instrumental in reducing interfacial tension (IFT) and altering the wettability of rock, which leads to additional oil recovery.
[39]
Effect of head-group of cationic surfactants and structure of ionic ...
It was found that the steric nature of the head group of surfactants weakens its interaction with the polyelectrolyte. It is regarded from the scientific ...
[40]
Understanding Bio-Based Surfactants, Their Production Strategies ...
Bio-based surfactants have demonstrated significant potential as economically viable and environmentally sustainable alternatives to petroleum-derived ...
[41]
Advances in the production of biosurfactants as green ingredients in ...
Home and personal care industry is currently witnessing a growing demand for sustainable and eco-friendly alternatives to synthetic surfactants.
[42]
Surfactants - The Essential Chemical Industry
Amphoteric (or zwitterionic) surfactants are so called because the head-group carries both a negative and positive charge. A range of methods is used to produce ...
[43]
[PDF] Chapter 1 Introduction to Surfactants - OSTI.gov
Nov 10, 2020 · Broadly speaking, surfactants are classified into four categories: anionic, cationic, nonionic, and zwitterionic. The focus of this book is on ...
[44]
Surfactant Self-Assembling and Critical Micelle Concentration
May 6, 2020 · For surfactants with a CMC >1 mM (generally ionic surfactants), the CMC values can be approximated to the intercept between the two lines ...
[45]
Surfactants Market - Size, Manufacturers, Industry Share & Growth
Sep 3, 2025 · Anionic surfactants hold the largest 48.35% share of total demand. Which application segment is expanding fastest? Personal-care ...
[46]
Influence of Surfactants with Differently Charged Headgroups on the ...
The surfactant head groups are located toward the water phase, with the charged head groups [ammonium (b) and sulfate (d)] being more integrated into the ...
[47]
Surfactants - The Essential Chemical Industry
For example, in the anionic surfactants, the carboxylate group in soap is replaced by a sulfonate or sulfate group as the hydrophilic component. The ...
[48]
[PDF] A Concise Review on Surfactants and Its Significance
surfactants may contain two charged groups of different sign. Whereas the positive charge is almost always ammonium, the source of the negative charge may vary.
[49]
Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances in the environment - Science
Feb 4, 2022 · The fluorine in PFAS is mined from fluorite (CaF2) mineral deposits, which is digested to form hydrofluoric acid (HF) (Fig. 1). HF and other non ...
[50]
Trends and Insights from Microbiological Studies on PFAS
Mar 11, 2025 · This meta-analysis indicated that the likelihood of PFAS biotransformation was higher under aerobic conditions, in experiments with defined or axenic cultures.
[51]
Green Surfactants (Biosurfactants): A Petroleum-Free Substitute for ...
Mar 24, 2023 · There are many negative environmental consequences of using synthetic surfactants, including their high levels of toxicity and poor ...
[52]
Environmental risks and toxicity of surfactants - NIH
Sep 29, 2021 · Some of the commercially available surfactants pose a severe environmental and public threat to humans and ecosystems. For instance, anionic ...
[53]
Effect of synthetic surfactants on the environment and the potential ...
Aug 8, 2025 · The environmental impacts of the use of synthetic surfactants are discussed in this work such as their high levels of toxicity and low biodegradability.
[54]
Recent fermentation developments for improved rhamnolipid ...
Jun 13, 2025 · This review provides a detailed assessment of recent studies that have achieved higher RL production through improvements in microbial producers.Missing: saponins | Show results with:saponins
[55]
Biosurfactants production from plant-based saponin - ResearchGate
Oct 10, 2025 · A thorough analysis indicates that natural saponins from plants could be an effective and eco-conscious option instead of artificial surfactants ...
[56]
Production of rhamnolipid biosurfactants in solid-state fermentation
Jan 24, 2023 · Rhamnolipid biosurfactant represented high surface activity and good stability over a wide range of temperatures, pH, and sodium chloride ...Missing: plants saponins scalable<|separator|>
[57]
Surfactants in Mining and Agriculture - Industrial Chemistry Consulting
Adding wetting agents to water lowers the interfacial tension and allows water to wet particles better, penetrate rock or coal and thereby reducing dust.
[58]
Food Emulsifiers - OSU Extension - Oklahoma State University
Food emulsions are produced from two immiscible liquids, usually oil and water, in the presence of anemulsifier and by applying an emulsification method.Missing: dispersants recovery
[59]
Advancements in Surfactant Carriers for Enhanced Oil Recovery
Jul 22, 2024 · This review explores the latest advancements in surfactant carriers for EOR, focusing on their mechanisms, challenges, and opportunities.2. Surfactants In Eor · 2.1. Surfactants And... · 2.2. Surfactants And...<|separator|>
[60]
Biosurfactants Market Size & Share | Industry Report, 2030
The global biosurfactants market size was estimated at USD 3.13 billion in 2023 and is projected to reach USD 4.74 billion by 2030, growing at a CAGR of 6.1% ...
[61]
https://www.expertmarketresearch.com/reports/green-surfactants-market
[62]
PFAS contamination and mitigation: A comprehensive analysis of ...
Research has consistently shown that PFAS are persistent in the environment, bioaccumulative [21], and toxic [22]. Long-chain perfluoroalkyl carboxylic acids ( ...
[63]
Micelle formation, structures, and metrology of functional metal ...
Jul 15, 2021 · Specific micelle structures include spherical micelles, cylindrical micelles, bilayer vesicles, lamellar phases, and inverse micelles [17,18,19] ...
[64]
Formation of crystal-like structures and branched networks from ...
Dec 9, 2015 · Surfactant molecules can self-assemble into different morphologies such as spherical micelles, cylindrical micelles, vesicles and lamellar ...<|separator|>
[65]
Kinetics of Structural Transitions Induced by Sodium Dodecyl Sulfate ...
As might be expected, SDS in phosphate buffer undergoes a structural transition as its concentration increases from 8 to 40 mM, from spherical micelles to rod ...
[66]
Phase studies of surfactant–water systems - ScienceDirect.com
The present work will be focused on the experimental reports of the phase behavior of aqueous surfactants which have appeared over the past 3 years with the ...
[67]
Calorimetric determination of the thermodynamics of alcohol ...
Mar 15, 2020 · Longer chain alcohols can act as co-surfactants. Co-surfactants by themselves are not generally able to form micelles due to their relative ...
[68]
Adsorption Kinetics in Micellar Solutions of Nonionic Surfactants
The fast relaxation time, τ 1 , corresponds to exchange of a surfactant monomer between a micelle and the solution and occurs at a rate close to the diffusion- ...
[69]
A recent overview of surfactant–drug interactions and their importance
Jun 12, 2023 · Surfactants are amphiphiles, surface-active agents that change interfacial properties and help to remove a phase from solid surfaces. Also, ...2.2. Surface Tension... · 2.3. Viscosity Measurement · 3.3. Solvent<|separator|>
[70]
Heliyon - Cell Press
Nonionic surfactants have good cleaning power, are milder to human skin, and are highly soluble (Fung et al., 2007). Differing from anionic surfactants, ...<|separator|>
[71]
Krafft Point - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
The Krafft point is the temperature at which the solubility of ionic surfactants in water increases drastically. To be more precise, the Krafft point is ...
[72]
Krafft Point - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
The Krafft point of the ionic surfactant is directly related to its hydrocarbon chain length: a higher Krafft point has a longer hydrocarbon chain.Missing: scholarly | Show results with:scholarly
[73]
Effect of Organic Additives on the Cloud Point of Triton X-100 Micelles
Nonionic surfactant exhibit clouding behavior when their aqueous solutions are heated to a certain temperature known as Cloud Point (CP), which is ...
[74]
Effect of Salts and Organic Additives on the Solubility of Proteins in ...
Aug 8, 2025 · The presence of salts can increase the solubility (salting-in effect) by compensating the protein's surface charge with oppositely charged ions, ...
[75]
Effects of conventional and ionic liquid-based surfactants ... - Nature
Jan 31, 2024 · The results showed the positive impact of salinity on the pH reduction and reduced the alkaline effect for pH reduction.
[76]
[PDF] Crystallisation of sodium dodecyl sulfate and the corresponding ...
At higher SDS concentrations, precipitation occurs immediately as the Krafft temperature is reached. XRD studies further support the existence of ...Missing: length scholarly articles
[77]
Surfactant headgroup orientation at the air/water interface - PubMed
We have used vibrational sum-frequency spectroscopy to provide the first measurement of the spectrum and orientation of the polar headgroup of a charged ...
[78]
[PDF] Detergency Mechanisms and Cellulosic Surfaces: A Review
intermediate affinity of the cellulose favors a surfactant orientation having the tails facing ... adsorption at the hydrophilic solid-water interface,” Advan.
[79]
Surfactant Adsorption Isotherms: A Review - PMC - NIH
Nov 24, 2021 · The Langmuir isotherm is applicable for monolayer adsorption on a homogeneous site, whereas Freundlich is valid for multilayer adsorption on ...
[80]
On the Factor in Gibbs Equation for Ionic Surfactants
The adsorption layer of soluble surfactants can be described by the well-known Gibbs equation. It states that the surface excess Γ is given by the slope of the ...
[81]
Surfactant adsorption kinetics in microfluidics - PMC - NIH
Sep 29, 2016 · We design a microfluidic method to measure the kinetics of adsorption of surfactants to the droplet interface, a key process involved in foaming, ...
[82]
Marangoni Instability Driven by Adsorption and Association of ...
Jul 18, 2025 · Linear stability analysis reveals that gradients generated by dynamic adsorption alone cannot drive instability, which only becomes possible if ...
[83]
Mixed Surfactant Systems - American Chemical Society
At this critical micelle concentration (CMC), surfactant molecules undergo cooperative self-association to form large surfactant aggregates. (micelles) with the ...
[84]
Adsorption and Micelle Formation of Mixed Surfactant Systems in ...
Nov 17, 2003 · The present paper reports that marked synergistic phenomena in surface activity as well as in micelliza- tion were found for three combinations ...
[85]
Surfactant-stabilized emulsions - ScienceDirect.com
This paper establishes that the electrostatic repulsion and the depletion attraction simply add together; however, the micellar diameter that is involved in the ...
[86]
Introduction to Macro- and Microemulsions - ACS Publications
Mar 27, 1985 · For surfactant stabilized macroemulsions, the energy barrier obtained experimentally is very high, which prevents the occurrence of flocculation ...
[87]
Advances in emulsion stability: A review on mechanisms, role of ...
Pickering emulsions are stabilized through three primary mechanisms: particle adsorption at the oil-water interface, network formation, and steric hindrance ( ...
[88]
Mayonnaise - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
Mayonnaise is an oil-in-water emulsion that is added to foods before consumption to improve flavor and palatability. It is a high-fat-containing calorie-dense ...
[89]
Foam Stability - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
Marangoni effect: The Marangoni effect (also called the Gibbs–Marangoni effect) is the fluid mass transfer along an interface between two regions due to ...
[90]
Stability and rheological properties of firefighting foams with sodium ...
Apr 15, 2024 · Hydrocarbon surfactants can decrease interfacial tension at the oil–water interface, and improve the foaming ability. Fluorocarbon surfactants ...
[91]
Techniques to measure dynamic surface tension - ScienceDirect.com
Recent developments of techniques used to measure dynamic surface tension aim at incorporating measurements during area changes, and improving speed of ...
[92]
Modelling and impact of tensiometer plate geometry and sample ...
Oct 15, 2024 · The aim of this work is to evaluate the surface tension capacity of three commercial glycolipid biosurfactants in terms of water ST reduction ...
[93]
[PDF] Determination of Aqueous Surfactant Solution Surface Tensions with ...
The Wilhelmy plate method is commonly used to measure surface tension. This method involves using a thin platinum plate to be immersed in a liquid, so that.
[94]
On the calculation of surface tension from measurements of pendant ...
The results have been used to calculate, to an accuracy of 0.001 to 0.01 %, the constants needed for measuring surface and interfacial tensions.
[95]
Measurement of surface and interfacial tension using pendant drop ...
Sep 15, 2015 · Pendant drop tensiometry offers a simple and elegant solution to determining surface and interfacial tension – a central parameter in many colloidal systems.
[96]
Measurement of Ultralow Interfacial Tension with Application to ...
This paper describes a modified sessile drop technique, described by Padday (1969), to study the dynamic variation of oil/water interfacial tensions from the ...
[97]
Measurement of Surfactant-Induced Interfacial Interactions at ...
Feb 25, 2008 · Because the spinning-drop method can be used for low-IFT measurements and the pendant-drop technique is only applicable for relatively higher- ...<|separator|>
[98]
How Surfactants Affect Droplet Wetting on Hydrophobic ...
We provide a quantitative understanding of how surfactants alter the wetting state and contact angle of aqueous drops on hydrophobic microstructures.
[99]
(PDF) Experimental methods in chemical engineering: Atomic force ...
May 31, 2025 · Recent advances combine AFM and infrared spectroscopy to simultaneously map the surface topography and distribution of chemical species. High‐ ...
[100]
Advances in Atomic Force Microscopy: Imaging of Two - Frontiers
This perspective reviews the latest progresses in the utilization of AFM imaging in 2D and 3D interfacial water, including adsorbed water networks and ...
[101]
NMR Investigation of the Short-chain Ionic Surfactant−Water Systems
On the basis of measurements of the self-diffusion coefficients D, it is possible to estimate the micellar size and shape, the degree of counterion binding, and ...
[102]
Application to conductivity, NMR, diffusion, and surface tension data
Mar 15, 2012 · The application and validity of the model are demonstrated with electrical conductivity, surface tension, NMR chemical shift, and self-diffusion ...Missing: spectroscopy | Show results with:spectroscopy
[103]
Comparison of Small-Angle Scattering Methods for the Structural Analysis of Octyl-β-maltopyranoside Micelles
### Summary of SAXS/SANS for Surfactant Micelles (Octyl-β-maltopyranoside)
[104]
Contrast Variation SANS Investigation of Composition Distributions ...
At a total aggregation number of 100, and a 50:50 average composition, the width of the composition distribution should be σ = 0.05 (and larger for smaller ...
[105]
Recent advances in particle-based simulation of surfactants
Above the CMC, surfactants self-assemble into nm-sized aggregates (micelles), which typically have mean aggregation numbers of the order 50–100 molecules [78].
[106]
Cryo transmission electron microscopy study of vesicles and ...
Cryo transmission electron microscopy study of vesicles and micelles in siloxane surfactant aqueous solutions ... Silicon-modified surfactants and wetting: I.
[107]
Vesicle Solubilization by Alkyl Sulfate Surfactants: A Cryo-TEM ...
All surfactants were found to induce vesicle growth at subsolubilizing concentrations and a transformation into small globular lipid/surfactant mixed micelles.
[108]
Fluorescence correlation spectroscopy in colloid and interface science
Studying the self-aggregation of surfactants, lipids or amphiphilic copolymers to micellar structures in solutions is another important application of FCS.
[109]
Quantitative Fluorescence Correlation Spectroscopy Reveals a ...
The average aggregation number of TX100 in a TX100 micelle is ∼147 (21).This implies that the average distance between TX100 micelles in a 23 μM solution ...
[110]
Tracking Wormlike Micelle Formation in Solution: Unique Insight ...
Feb 15, 2022 · Fluorescence correlation spectroscopy (FCS) is an ideal tool for measuring mol. diffusion and size under extremely dil. conditions. However, the ...<|separator|>
[111]
Kinetics of Triglyceride Solubilization by Micellar Solutions of ...
A theoretical model of oil solubilization in micellar surfactant solutions is developed. We consider oils that are practically insoluble in pure water, ...
[112]
https://19january2021snapshot.epa.gov/sites/static/files/2017-12/documents/ee-0214f-01.pdf
[113]
Surfactant Synergistic Effect and Interfacial Properties of ...
May 21, 2024 · The synergistic use of nonionic and anionic surfactants makes the aggregation and interfacial behavior of micelles more complex, and ...
[114]
[PDF] laundry detergent industry - US EPA
The greatest environmental challenge to the detergent industry was the use of phosphates as builders. Phosphorus, the primary component of phosphates, is a ...
[115]
Procter & Gamble touts 'win-win' of cutting phosphates in all laundry ...
Jan 27, 2014 · But P&G already stopped using phosphates in laundry detergent sold across the US in the early 1990s as part of a voluntary commitment from the ...Missing: builders phased
[116]
Surfactant Basics 1 (Detergents) | TECHNOLOGY / APPLICATION
Note that the concentration of surfactants is high, which tends to leave streaks on glass surfaces, so the ratio of surfactants is kept low.
[117]
Winning the Hard Water Battle: Optimizing Detergent Performance in ...
Jun 20, 2023 · The use of chelating agents and water softening agents in detergents helps to mitigate the negative effects of hard water on the cleaning ...
[118]
Alkyl Polyglycoside Market - Size, Share & Industry Analysis
Oct 10, 2025 · The Alkyl Polyglycoside Market is expected to reach 96.31 kilotons in 2025 and grow at a CAGR of 3.32% to reach 113.39 kilotons by 2030.
[119]
Alkyl Polyglucosides APG Biosurfactants Market Valuation
Rating 4.6 (45) Alkyl Polyglucosides (APG) Biosurfactants Market was valued at USD 1.75 Bn in 2024 and is projected to reach USD 4.55 Bn by 2031, growing at a CAGR of 13%
[120]
A New Hydrotropic Block Copolymer Micelle System for Aqueous ...
A co-solvent system, Cremophor EL® (a polyoxyethylated caster oil)/ethanol (50:50, v/v), has been successfully used to solubilize PTX, but a large volume of ...
[121]
Modulation of the anticancer activities of paclitaxel by Cremophor ...
Jun 15, 2021 · The objective of this study was to determine the effect of Cremophor (CrEL) on the antineoplastic effect induced by paclitaxel (PTX).
[122]
A General Approach on Surfactants Use and Properties in Drug ...
This review aims to elucidate the different classes of surfactants based on their charges (cationic, anionic, nonionic, zwitterionic, and dimeric), the micelles ...
[123]
Complexation of DNA with cationic surfactant - ScienceDirect
The direct association of cationic surfactant to DNA decreases the effective negative charge of the nucleic acid, allowing the DNA-surfactant complex to ...
[124]
Complexation of DNA with cationic surfactants as studied by small ...
Sep 20, 2014 · Cationic lipid-DNA complexes for gene therapy: understanding the relationship between complex structure and gene delivery pathways at the ...
[125]
Surfactant Replacement Therapy for Preterm and Term Neonates ...
Jan 1, 2014 · Surfactant replacement was established as an effective and safe therapy for immaturity-related surfactant deficiency by the early 1990s.<|control11|><|separator|>
[126]
The Synthetic Surfactant CHF5633 Restores Lung Function ... - NIH
Apr 29, 2024 · Synthetic surfactant with a recombinant surfactant protein C analogue improves lung function and attenuates inflammation in a model of acute ...
[127]
Hemolysis by surfactants — A review - ScienceDirect.com
Surfactants cause hemolysis by disturbing cell membranes, leading to shape changes and lysis via osmotic or solubilization mechanisms. Surfactants are key in ...Missing: zwitterionic | Show results with:zwitterionic
[128]
CFR - Code of Federal Regulations Title 21
**Summary of Lecithin GRAS Status for Food Use as Emulsifier:**
[129]
CFR - Code of Federal Regulations Title 21
**Summary of Mono- and Diglycerides GRAS Status for Food:**
[130]
TWEEN 60 - Ataman Kimya
Tween 60 can act as a foaming agent in certain formulations, contributing to the formation of stable foams. This property is particularly useful in products ...
[131]
CAS 9005-67-8 Tween 60 - Alfa Chemistry
Rating 5.0 (1) Known also as polysorbate 60, Tween 60 plays a crucial role in whipped vegetable toppings to improve volume and lightness, in cakes to augment volume and ...
[132]
Span Emulsifiers in Dairy: Benefits and Applications - Chemsino
Oct 20, 2025 · For example, Span 60 and Tween 60 together create stable emulsions for dairy beverages, coffee creamers, and whipped toppings. Span 60 and tween ...
[133]
Boosting Pesticide Effectiveness with Agricultural Surfactants
Advanced agricultural surfactants reduce surface tension to 20-25 mN/m, enabling complete surface coverage. This dramatic reduction allows spray droplets to ...
[134]
(PDF) Organosilicone surfactant performance in agricultural spray ...
Organosilicone surfactants lower surface tension to 20-31 mN/m, enhancing foliar uptake and agrochemical efficacy. This review evaluates performance, ...
[135]
The impact of silicone-based surfactants on herbicide spray ...
Apr 8, 2024 · In general, silicone-based surfactants significantly enhance herbicide effectiveness by improving wetting, spreading, adhesion, and penetration.
[136]
Agricultural Surfactants Market Size, Report, Share & Growth Drivers ...
Jul 4, 2025 · The agricultural surfactants market, valued at USD 2.1 billion in 2025, is projected to reach USD 2.9 billion by 2030, growing at a CAGR of 6.7% during the ...
[137]
Safer Choice Criteria for Surfactants | US EPA
Jul 17, 2025 · Safer Choice criteria for surfactants consider biodegradation rate, degradation products, and aquatic toxicity. Higher toxicity requires faster ...Missing: low- agriculture avoid drift
[138]
Introduction to Pesticide Drift | US EPA
Sep 16, 2025 · Pesticide spray drift is the movement of pesticide dust or droplets through the air at the time of application or soon after, to any site other than the area ...Missing: toxicity surfactants
[139]
Beyond Sulfate-Free Personal Cleansing Technology - MDPI
Sulfate-free surfactants are a vital part of the sulfate-free trend in personal cleansing products, and amino-acid based surfactants are the most important of ...
[140]
Application of Alkyl Polyglucosides as Components of the Extraction ...
Sep 19, 2025 · This study highlights the use of alkyl polyglucosides (APGs) as sustainable and mild surfactants in cosmetic preparations, such as shampoos, ...
[141]
A review of shampoo surfactant technology: consumer benefits, raw ...
Nov 2, 2017 · ... zein proteins can be used to screen actives for skin mildness. They show that, for a series of model surfactants, skin flex wash and skin ...
[142]
https://www.byrdie.com/behentrimonium-chloride-hair-5218621
[143]
Behentrimonium Chloride (Preservative): Cosmetic Ingredient INCI
Nov 28, 2022 · Behentrimonium chloride is an antistatic, hair conditioning, emulsifying agent. It is a type of trimonium that makes cationic chains attract to anionic charges.
[144]
Behentrimonium Chloride for Hair: Benefits and How to Use It - Byrdie
Jan 11, 2023 · "The frizz-free, detangling, and conditioning properties of the compound help maintain manageable, soft, and moisturized hair."
[145]
Emulsifier for Cosmetic - Types, Uses , Benefits & Limitations
Jul 18, 2025 · Emulsifiers are ingredients used in cosmetics to help mix substances that usually don't blend well like oils and water.
[146]
Moisturizer in Patients with Inflammatory Skin Diseases - PMC - NIH
Among them, amphoteric surfactants or nonionic surfactants are mainly used for the purpose of emulsifying moisturizers in the form of lotions and creams.
[147]
Development of amino acid-based surfactants: from synthesis to ...
This review provides an overview of the latest developments of amino acid-based surfactant over the past decade, with a particular focus on the past five years.
[148]
Zein Test finds the irritant potential of a surfactant
Sep 2, 2016 · The Zein test enables to determine the irritation potential (harshness) of a surfactant-based product (shower gel, shampoo, soap, washing-up liquid, etc.).Missing: index | Show results with:index
[149]
(PDF) Understanding Salt Curves - ResearchGate
These interactions affect viscosity, foam, rheology and aesthetics of the formulation and often commercial success or failure of a formulation. This article ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[150]
Understanding the Role of Wetting Agent for Textile Processing
Jun 26, 2025 · Examples of wetting agents used in textiles include fatty alcohol ethoxylates, sulfosuccinates, and siloxane-based surfactants. Brand examples ...
[151]
The importance of surfactants in the textile industry
Aug 9, 2023 · Their main function is emulsification. They are also used for cleaning as well as equalising dyes and as wetting agents. Fatty acid ethoxylates ...
[152]
Soft Handle - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
However, softening finishing is mainly obtained by chemical softening agents reducing the interyarn and interfiber forces of friction at the fiber surface.
[153]
Review article The use of surfactants in enhanced oil recovery
2.2. At the Krafft temperature, however, the solubility of the surfactant increases sharply, and further increase in temperature allows for micelle formation ...Missing: branching | Show results with:branching
[154]
Stability mechanisms of viscoelastic zwitterionic-anionic surfactants ...
Jan 1, 2023 · The newly viscoelastic surfactant-enhanced foam possesses sufficient stability and exhibits great EOR potential in low-permeability reservoirs.
[155]
[PDF] Natural Surfactants for Flotation Deinking in Paper Recycling
Two of the most common types of surfactants used for deinking are fatty acid soaps and polyethyleneoxide alkyl ethers, which are classified as anionic and non- ...
[156]
Roles of surfactants in flotation deinking - ResearchGate
Aug 6, 2025 · Paper mills use surfactants for detaching the ink from cellulose fibers and for separation of dispersed ink particles from the pulp slurry.
[157]
[PDF] PFAS and fluorine-free alternatives in lubricants and construction ...
Assess the use of PFAS-based lubricants and construction products and their fluorine-free alternatives. • Assess emissions, economic and human/social ...<|separator|>
[158]
The Role of Surfactants in Aqueous Pigment Dispersion | 2016-04-04
Apr 4, 2016 · Grind surfactants will typically provide faster pigment particle size reduction during milling and dispersion,2 resulting from better ...Missing: cooling fluorosurfactants printer
[159]
Superior Surfactants for Inkjet Inks, Product Article - ChemPoint.com
Capstone™ fluorosurfactants are the highest-performing surfactants for lowering surface tension; in water-based ink solutions, they can reduce surface tension ...
[160]
The Global Biosurfactants Market 2025-2035
The global biosurfactants market is experiencing robust growth, driven by increasing environmental concerns, stringent regulations on synthetic surfactants, ...
[161]
The role of the sodium-taurocholate cotransporting ... - PubMed
Bile salts are a major constituent of bile and are secreted by hepatocytes into bile and delivered into the small intestine, where they assist in fat digestion.
[162]
Absorption-Enhancing Effects of Bile Salts - PMC - NIH
Bile salts are endogenous surfactants which have been employed widely as absorption enhancers to increase drug transport across various biological barriers.
[163]
The Role of Surfactant in Lung Disease and Host Defense against ...
Surfactant is composed of 90% lipid and 10% protein. The lipid content contains primarily phospholipid, specifically dipalmitoylphosphatidylcholine, which is ...
[164]
Soapwort (Saponaria officinalis L.) Extract vs. Synthetic Surfactants ...
Sep 16, 2021 · The plant produces high amounts of glycosidic compounds (saponins), capable of lowering surface tension to the extent comparable to that of ...
[165]
Ribosomally synthesized and post-translationally modified peptide ...
These peptides are believed to function as biosurfactants ... Biologically-active peptides from animal venoms are an increasingly important class of natural ...
[166]
Pulmonary Surfactant: An Immunological Perspective - PMC - NIH
Optimal surfactant function requires the presence of four proteins named SP-A, SP-B, SP-C, and SP-D. Of the four, SP-A is the most abundant comprising 50–70% of ...<|separator|>
[167]
Pulmonary surfactant: the key to the evolution of air breathing
This system had a single evolutionary origin that predates the evolution of the vertebrates and lungs.
[168]
Genetic Disorders of Surfactant Dysfunction - PMC - NIH
Pulmonary surfactant is a unique mixture of lipids and proteins that reduces surface tension at the air-liquid interface, preventing collapse of the lung at the ...
[169]
Endogenous surfactant turnover in preterm infants with respiratory ...
The fractional synthesis rate (FSR) of PC-LLA was higher than that of PC-PA (22.7 +/- 15.9 versus 12.1 +/- 7.7% per day, p = 0.018). Half-life (HL) of PC-PA was ...Missing: lung | Show results with:lung
[170]
A comprehensive review on production of bio-surfactants by bio ...
Aug 29, 2023 · This write up is a dedicated review to update the existing knowledge of inexpensive carbohydrate sources as substrates, microorganisms and technologies of ...
[171]
Sustainable Production of Biosurfactants Using Waste Substrates
Aug 8, 2025 · It has been shown that FW performs well in the production of rhamnolipid and sophorolipid biosurfactants (over 100 g/L) because of their easy ...
[172]
Rhamnolipids: diversity of structures, microbial origins and roles - NIH
Rhamnolipids are glycolipidic biosurfactants produced by various bacterial species. They were initially found as exoproducts of the opportunistic pathogen ...
[173]
Biotechnological Potential of Microbial Bio-surfactants: Applications
In this review, we described the importance of biosurfactants for the environment, including their biodegradability, low toxicity, environmental compatibility, ...
[174]
Unlocking the potential of biosurfactants: Innovations in metabolic ...
Jul 25, 2024 · Metabolic and genetic engineering strategies enhance biosurfactant production by modifying microbial pathways and genetics. Strategies include ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[175]
Palm-Free Biosurfactant for Gentle Cleaning - SOPHOROLIPIDS
SOPHOROLIPID ECOS is a palm-free biosurfactant, especially designed for low foaming, fast wetting, and degreasing household and surface cleaning formulations.
[176]
[PDF] LINEAR ALKYLBENZENE SULFONATE (LAS)
The LAS molecule contains an aromatic ring sulfonated at the para position and attached to a linear alkyl chain at any position except the terminal carbons. The ...Missing: omega | Show results with:omega
[177]
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304415700000137
[178]
The biodegradation of surfactants in the environment - ScienceDirect
Linear AE are considered readily biodegradable, Kravetz et al. [84] observed >80% primary degradation in 28 days for linear AE and 40% for branched AE. Balson ...
[179]
Impact of experimentally derived surface water half-lives on the accuracy of exposure modeling for readily biodegradable substances
No readable text found in the HTML.<|separator|>
[180]
Environmental Safety of the Use of Major Surfactant Classes in ...
These results illustrate that C12–16 alcohols rapidly biodegrade in activated sludge with half-lives on the order of minutes. The anaerobic biodegradation of ...
[181]
[PDF] Bioaccumulation potential of surfactants - EOSCA
Surfactants are difficult to assess for bioaccumulation due to their surface-active properties, and their lipophilic/hydrophilic structure leads to collection ...Missing: Kow | Show results with:Kow
[182]
The battle over PFAS in Europe - C&EN - American Chemical Society
Sep 18, 2023 · The European Commission (EC) is proposing that all per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) be banned because it says they are persistent, can be toxic, and ...
[183]
EU PFAS Ban Update: ECHA to Restrict PFAS under EU REACH
Sep 5, 2025 · The EPA has announced the delay of the PFAS reporting period under U.S. Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) from July 2025 to April 2026.Missing: surfactants | Show results with:surfactants
[184]
Understanding the European Commission's Regulation on Detergents
The surfactants need to meet 60% biodegradability within 28 days from one of the following recommended tests: EN ISO Standard 14593: 1999 (Evaluation of ...
[185]
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4065701/
[186]
Nonionic Surfactant Vesicles in Ocular Delivery - NIH
Nonionic surfactants are preferred due to less irritation power which decreases in order of cationic > anionic > ampholytic > nonionic. Niosomes >10 μm are ...
[187]
Contact allergy to cocamidopropyl betaine - PubMed
Cocamidopropyl betaine is an amphoteric surfactant used increasingly in cosmetic products. We describe 20 cases of cosmetic allergy to cocamidopropyl ...
[188]
Cocamidopropyl betaine allergy - PubMed
Cocamidopropyl betaine (CAPB) is a surfactant, and reports of allergic contact dermatitis to this chemical have been reported in the literature.
[189]
Endocrine Disrupting Compounds (Nonylphenol and Bisphenol A)
Endocrine disrupting compounds (EDCs) are a particularly dangerous group because they have estrogenic activity.
[190]
52009DC0208 - EN - EUR-Lex
The regulatory approach adopted in the EU for surfactants as organic ingredients of detergents is that they must be aerobically biodegradable. Organic ...
[191]
An in vitro method for predicting inhalation toxicity of impregnation ...
The aim of this study was to evaluate whether disruption of the pulmonary surfactant film can be used as a predictor of the toxic effects in vivo.
[192]
Prediction of acute inhalation toxicity using in vitro lung surfactant ...
Aug 17, 2017 · Private consumers and professionals may experience acute inhalation toxicity after inhaling aerosolized impregnation products.
[193]
[PDF] DIETHANOLAMINE 1. Exposure Data - IARC Publications
Surfactants ... : 1, carcinogenic to humans; 2A, probably carcinogenic to humans; 2B, possibly carcinogenic to humans; 3, not classifiable as to its ...
[194]
Council and Parliament strike a deal to make detergents safer for the ...
Jun 10, 2025 · The provisional agreement empowers the commission to improve the biodegradability of surfactants in detergents (in particular in films covering ...<|separator|>
[195]
Biden-Harris Administration Finalizes Rule to Prevent Inactive PFAS ...
Jan 8, 2024 · EPA finalized a rule that prevents companies from starting or resuming the manufacture or processing of 329 per- and poly-fluoroalkyl substances (PFAS)
[196]
Sunflower lecithin - GRAS Notices - FDA
Intended for use as an alternative lecithin source, emulsifier, surfactant, dispersing agent, and as a nutritional ingredient in all currently authorized food ...Missing: pharmaceuticals | Show results with:pharmaceuticals
[197]
Metalworking Fluids: Safety and Health Best Practices Manual - OSHA
Currently two OSHA air contaminant permissible exposure limits apply to MWFs. They are 5 mg/m3 for an 8-hour time weighted average (TWA) for mineral oil mist, ...
[198]
Receipt and Status Information for February 2025 - Regulations.gov
May 7, 2025 · EPA will review the notice, make a risk determination on the new chemical substance or significant new use, and take appropriate action as ...
[199]
Business Guidance FAQ | CPSC.gov
The FHSA requires precautionary labeling on the immediate container of hazardous household products to help consumers safely store and use those products.
[200]
Steps to Get the Safer Choice Label on Your Product | US EPA
Aug 13, 2025 · Consult EPA's Safer Chemical Ingredients List (SCIL) and GreenBlue's CleanGredients® to find safer chemical alternatives for your formulation.Missing: mitigation | Show results with:mitigation