Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Swing bridge

A swing bridge, also known as a swing span bridge, is a type of movable bridge that rotates horizontally around a vertical to open a channel for while maintaining a roadway or railway above. The rotating span is typically supported at its midpoint by a central or in the , allowing it to align to the when open and perpendicular across the channel when closed. This design enables efficient passage for vessels in constrained spaces where vertical clearance is limited, with the span often constructed as a or structure powered by electric motors or hydraulic systems for operation.

Overview

Definition and Purpose

A swing bridge is a type of movable bridge that rotates horizontally around a fixed vertical axis, typically located at the center of a , to allow the passage of vessels beneath it. This rotation opens the bridge by aligning it parallel to the , creating clear channels on either side, while in the , the aligns to the to support or . The design may feature a center-bearing configuration, where the span's weight is primarily supported by a central , or a rim-bearing setup, utilizing a circular track with rollers for load distribution. The primary purpose of a swing bridge is to facilitate over waterways by providing on-demand clearance for boats and ships, thereby minimizing disruptions to land-based transportation routes compared to fixed bridges that require permanent high clearances. It serves as an efficient solution for crossing navigable channels where constructing elevated fixed spans would be uneconomical or structurally challenging due to approach grades and land constraints. Unlike bascule or vertical lift bridges, swing bridges offer a balanced, mechanically simple operation suited to sites with limited vertical space or where counterweights for tilting mechanisms are impractical. A key engineering principle underlying their function is the typical 90-degree around the , which swiftly transitions the span from obstructing the to permitting full transit without vertical movement. This horizontal pivoting relies on the bridge's balanced structure to ensure stability and efficient load transfer during operation.

Basic Components

A swing bridge's central serves as the foundational element, typically consisting of a fixed or turntable positioned at the bridge's to the entire rotating . This is anchored to a cylindrical or equipped with roller bearings, such as center-bearing or rim-bearing systems, enabling horizontal rotation around a vertical axis while bearing the dead load of the span. The foundation is often constructed from to provide stability against vertical and lateral forces. The swing span forms the movable portion of the bridge, comprising a or plate superstructure that includes the roadway or deck surface, railings, and any necessary flooring. This section rotates to align with the fixed approaches, typically featuring two balanced arms or counterweighted designs to minimize unbalanced loads during movement. Constructed primarily from for its strength and durability, the swing span must endure torsional stresses induced by wind, unbalanced loads, and the process itself. Abutments and approaches provide the fixed connections linking the swing span to the surrounding . Abutments are sturdy end supports, often made of stone or , that bear the weight of the closed and transfer loads to the ground. Approaches consist of non-movable spans or ramps supported by piers or bents, ensuring seamless transitions for vehicular or traffic to and from the rotating section. Fender systems encircle the central pivot to safeguard it from potential collisions with passing vessels. These protective barriers, typically built from timber, , or elements, absorb impact and prevent damage to the pier and rotating machinery.

History

Early Origins

Swing bridges have roots in medieval , where early forms resembled simple drawbridges hinged for rotation, though surviving examples are rare. In the United States, the earliest documented instance dates to around 1768 over the Northeast in . The design gained prominence in the early as a practical solution for movable crossings over waterways, credited to engineers addressing the challenges of expanding inland navigation during the . In the , one of the earliest notable implementations occurred with the completion of the in 1822, where cast-iron swing bridges, such as the Moy Bridge constructed around 1820, were installed to facilitate road traffic across the canal without obstructing boat passage. Similarly, in the United States, swing bridges appeared on major canals shortly thereafter, with initial wooden and iron examples built across the following its opening in 1825 and the , enabling efficient crossings for growing canal commerce. The development of these bridges was driven by the Industrial Revolution's demand for navigable canals and railroads that intersected urban waterways, necessitating structures that could rotate to allow vessel transit while supporting land transport. By the 1830s, swing bridges became key features in canal systems across the and , often operated manually via winches or direct leverage, as exemplified by the timber swing spans on the Delaware and Raritan Canal, which used designs for simple hand operation. Early designs were primarily wooden and hand-powered, constrained by material limitations to short spans typically under , such as the 68-foot spans common on early American canal bridges. By the mid-1800s, the shift to iron construction, accelerated by rising maritime trade and railroad , permitted larger spans and greater durability, transitioning swing bridges from modest accommodations to vital for heavier loads.

Development and Evolution

The late represented a pivotal shift in swing bridge , transitioning from wooden and iron constructions to frameworks that supported longer spans and heavier loads. This adoption of , particularly in the United States, enabled swing spans reaching up to 300 feet, facilitating the of railroad networks across navigable waterways. For instance, by the , American railroads began constructing all- swing bridges to accommodate growing freight demands, marking a departure from earlier manual-operated wooden designs that limited structural integrity and span lengths. In the early , mechanical advancements further refined swing bridge functionality, with the introduction of electric and hydraulic drive systems replacing manpower for operation. These innovations, emerging around the , provided smoother motion and reduced operational times, addressing previous limitations in speed and reliability. Hydraulic actuators, first widely applied in during the , gained prominence globally for their high and variable speed capabilities, while electric motors became standard in many installations for precise control. Post-World War II developments integrated these drives with early signaling systems, enhancing coordination between , , and in urban settings. Swing bridges peaked in prevalence during the , with hundreds documented alone, driven by urban port expansions and booms that necessitated movable crossings over busy waterways. In regions like , surveys recorded 27 swing bridges in 1981, reflecting an earlier high of dozens per state during this era, though many were later repurposed or replaced. The global evolution of swing bridges paralleled colonial projects, as designs from 19th-century spread to and other territories through imperial engineering efforts, adapting local waterways for trade routes. In the , swing bridge construction has declined sharply due to escalating costs and the preference for vertical lift or bascule alternatives that minimize channel obstruction. However, retrofitting existing structures for heritage preservation has become common, incorporating sensors for —such as gauges and accelerometers—to detect and in . Automation systems now enable remote operation and , improving efficiency without full replacements. Current engineering trends emphasize sustainable materials, including corrosion-resistant alloys like and duplex stainless steels, which extend service life in harsh marine environments and reduce long-term maintenance needs.

Design and Mechanics

Pivot Mechanism

The pivot mechanism of a swing bridge enables horizontal rotation about a vertical , typically anchored to a central via a kingpost or turntable that serves as the rotational . This allows the to swing perpendicular to the waterway, opening a channel. Swing bridges employ two primary pivot support systems: center-bearing, where the directly supports the full dead load of the for balanced rotation, and rim-bearing, where the dead load is primarily carried by peripheral rollers on a circular , with the central providing guidance and partial load sharing to distribute weight more evenly during operation. In center-bearing configurations, live loads are transferred to end supports or the when closed, while rim-bearing systems use the to handle both dead and live loads more uniformly across the . Bearing systems minimize during , commonly utilizing tapered roller bearings in setups or spherical bearings in to accommodate axial and radial forces. Gear mechanisms, such as pinion-rack arrangements, further reduce resistance by converting rotational input into along the track. The required for is primarily to overcome frictional, inertial, and environmental resistances. For balanced spans, the net from weight is zero, but the drive system must provide sufficient , often calculated considering equivalent forces at the ; this ensures the drive system can overcome inertial and frictional resistances. Drive mechanisms typically include electric motors coupled to gear reducers and pinions that engage a circular around the , hydraulic or motors for direct slewing action, or manual cranks for . Power requirements with length and weight, generally ranging from 50 to 100 kW, for example, 100 (approximately 75 kW) electric motors are used for a 480-foot to achieve 90-degree rotations in under two minutes. Precise alignment is critical for safe closure, achieved through centering devices and secured by wedges or lock bars that engage sockets to prevent movement under load. Engineering challenges include managing unbalanced forces on the exposed , such as wind loads that can induce overturning moments, mitigated by balance wheels rolling on a concentric to maintain . Vessel wakes introduce dynamic lateral impacts, addressed through rollers and buffers at the pivot ends to absorb deflections without compromising rotational .

Span Configuration and Counterweights

Swing bridges typically feature a single central that rotates horizontally around a vertical , often by 90 degrees, to open a navigable channel for vessels. This allows the to align perpendicular to the when closed, providing continuous roadway support, while the clears the path when open. For wider channels, double- variants, such as double- or bobtail designs, extend the structure with a shorter rear to enhance and reduce the 's load. In bobtail configurations, the rear is typically 30-40% of the main length to maintain balance. Counterweight systems are essential for balancing the span's center of gravity relative to the pivot, minimizing the torque required for rotation and ensuring operational efficiency. In symmetrical designs, the span is inherently balanced, but small counterweights may correct transverse imbalances caused by factors like wind or uneven loading. For asymmetrical bobtail spans, concentrated counterweights are mounted at the end of the shorter rear arm, while distributed weights can be integrated within the truss structure to offset the longer forward span's mass. The counterweight mass is calculated using principles of moment equilibrium, where m_c = \frac{m_s \times d_s}{d_c}, with m_s as the span mass, d_s as the distance from the pivot to the span's center of gravity, and d_c as the lever arm length to the counterweight. These systems often employ concrete blocks or steel boxes, sometimes filled with water or dense materials like lead for fine-tuned adjustability during installation or maintenance. Truss designs in swing bridges prioritize lightweight strength to reduce the overall mass and rotational inertia, commonly utilizing through-truss or deck-truss configurations for . Through-trusses, which enclose the roadway between upper and lower chords, provide high with minimal depth, suitable for spans up to 500 feet, as seen in examples like the Coleman Bridge. Deck-trusses place the roadway above the main structure, offering a lower profile for clearance constraints. These designs support live loads for vehicular traffic, with capacities governed by standards allowing up to approximately 50 tons depending on the bridge class and regional specifications. To ensure precise closure and prevent misalignment, swing bridges incorporate alignment aids such as guide rails along the abutments and protective fenders at the ends. These elements with the fixed approaches to guide the rotating into position, compensating for any pivot-induced deviations. Hydraulic may be employed post-rotation to make minor corrections, maintaining a surface for safe traffic flow.

Operation

Opening and Closing Process

The opening and closing of a swing bridge begins with preparation to ensure safe clearance of land traffic. Upon receiving a request from marine traffic, the bridge activates signals, turning traffic lights to red, sounding an alarm bell, and lowering gates or barriers to halt vehicular and movement on the approaches. Locks securing the to the abutments are then disengaged, often using hydraulic or mechanical retractors, while end mechanisms such as wedges, rollers, or raise the ends slightly to free them from the resting piers and prevent binding during rotation. The rotation sequence follows, where electric motors or hydraulic systems drive the span via pinions engaging a curved rack on the central pivot pier, turning the bridge horizontally up to 90 degrees to align perpendicular to the waterway and create navigable channels. Position sensors monitor progress, pausing at mid-rotation if needed to verify clearance for vessels, with the full 90-degree turn typically completing in 1 to 3 minutes for most modern bridges. The process is overseen by operators in a control house or through automated programmable controllers that detect obstacles and enable emergency stops to halt movement if anomalies arise. Closing reverses the sequence, with the drive system rotating the back to its original alignment, decelerating precisely to within 1/4 inch of the abutments for seamless connection. End lift devices then lower the onto the piers, and locks—such as center wedges or tail locks—engage hydraulically or mechanically to secure it against live loads and impacts, restoring structural integrity. Once verified, traffic signals switch to green, gates lift, and alarms cease, reopening the crossing; the entire cycle from closed to open and back typically takes under 6 minutes in automated systems. Timing variations exist based on bridge size and actuation method: smaller manual swing bridges may require 5 to 10 minutes per cycle due to hand-cranked or simpler gearing, while larger automated ones achieve under 2 minutes for rotation through redundant motors and interlocked controls. Throughout, brief references to control systems ensure procedural adherence without delving into detailed protective features.

Safety and Control Systems

Swing bridges employ centralized control interfaces to manage precise rotational movements, typically featuring operator consoles equipped with switches, indicator lights, and joysticks or similar handles for manual slewing control, often integrated with programmable logic controllers (PLCs) that automate sequencing and monitor equipment status in . These systems ensure coordinated operation during the bridge's rotation, with PLCs handling diagnostics and fault detection to prevent errors. Key safety features include limit switches that halt movement at predefined positions, such as stopping lift mechanisms within one inch of full stroke with a at three-quarters inch, alongside obstruction detectors using linear position sensors to continuously monitor bridge alignment and detect deviations. Redundant power supplies, such as multiple hydraulic pumps with one as standby and generators for outages, maintain operational integrity during failures. Additionally, brakes, mandated by AASHTO standards since the 1980s, engage automatically via spring-set mechanisms when power is lost, preventing uncontrolled drift and limiting deceleration forces. Operational protocols integrate maritime signaling requirements under U.S. Navigation Safety Regulations, including automatic audio and visual alarms to alert vessels and , alongside gates and lights controlled by the . For proximity, some systems incorporate FAA-compliant lighting and obstruction marking to mitigate hazards. Wind speed limits restrict operations, with maximum gusts typically not exceeding 35 mph during opening to ensure stability, as per design criteria aligned with AASHTO guidelines. Post-1980s swing bridges incorporate enhanced brakes and emergency stop circuits that halt motion in under 10 seconds by de-energizing motors and centering valves, reflecting advancements in AASHTO specifications for movable structures. Annual inspections are standard for assessing , alignment, and mechanical integrity, using access ladders and retraction procedures to minimize while complying with national bridge safety management programs. In emergencies, manual overrides allow operators to activate high-pressure emergency slewing or halt systems via dedicated stop buttons, with evacuation signals triggered through integrated alarms to clear personnel and traffic. These procedures, supported by redundant circuits and timers in PLCs, ensure rapid response to malfunctions without compromising overall safety.

Advantages and Disadvantages

Key Advantages

Swing bridges provide exceptional navigational efficiency by rotating the entire span horizontally around a central vertical , granting full unobstructed clearance to the below without any vertical of the . This is particularly beneficial for accommodating tall ships or vessels with high masts, as it avoids the limitations imposed by vertical clearance requirements in other movable bridge types like bascules or vertical lifts. The design ensures minimal disruption to maritime traffic, allowing vessels to pass through the opened channel swiftly and safely. In terms of cost-effectiveness, swing bridges are advantageous for medium-length spans, typically under 200 feet, where construction expenses are lower than those for bascule bridges due to simpler machinery and the use of plate girder spans rather than complex systems. For instance, the replacement of a 163-foot single-track swing bridge was completed at a total cost of $3.5 million, well below the $10 million threshold often associated with comparable bascule or lift designs for similar spans. Additionally, the horizontal operation reduces wind-induced moments on the structure, minimizing material requirements and overall engineering complexity. Swing bridges maintain minimal impact on headroom and surrounding , as they lack the tall counterweights or lifting towers found in vertical lift or bascule designs, thereby preserving scenic and avoiding conflicts with low-altitude air . Operationally, the rotational motion enhances . Their versatility extends to their adaptability for multiple uses, including , roadway, or , through modular configurations that support double-deck arrangements without requiring vertical elevation. This multi-modal capability makes them suitable for diverse urban and industrial settings. While these benefits are significant, swing bridges do necessitate ongoing of the and bearing systems to ensure reliable performance.

Primary Disadvantages

Swing bridges require substantial space for the rotation of the moving span, necessitating wide landing areas adjacent to the to accommodate the bridge when it swings open parallel to the . This spatial demand often limits their applicability in densely populated urban environments, where available land for such clearances is scarce and upgrading or duplicating the structure for higher traffic volumes becomes challenging. Maintenance of swing bridges is particularly demanding due to the high wear on pivot mechanisms and bearings, which support the full weight of the during and are subject to constant mechanical stress from numerous . Common issues include worn machinery, lack of , misalignments, and broken supports, making routine inspections and repairs more inaccessible and labor-intensive compared to fixed bridges. These factors contribute to significant ongoing costs, with movable bridges in general posing elevated operating and maintenance expenses for owners. In operation, swing bridges cause notable disruptions for land users, as frequent openings to allow passage can lead to delays, exacerbated by the longer time required for the complex mechanical process of swinging the compared to other movable bridge types. Additionally, these bridges are vulnerable to environmental conditions such as icing on mechanical components or high winds, which can hinder safe operation and necessitate closures. Seismic for older bridges is costly due to the need to reinforce piers and spans against forces. This has contributed to a decline in swing bridge construction since the , as fixed high-level bridges have become preferred alternatives for navigable waterways, offering greater reliability without movable components. bridges also present environmental risks through potential oil leaks from hydraulic systems used in , which can contaminate adjacent waterways and harm local and if not properly contained.

Types and Variations

Rim-Bearing Swing Bridges

In rim-bearing swing bridges, the weight of the movable span is primarily supported by a series of peripheral rollers that bear on a circular track encircling the island or . This transfers the dead load of the through radial beams or a circular to the rollers, which are typically tapered or beveled to accommodate rotation while maintaining alignment. The central serves mainly as a guide to keep the rollers centered, though it may carry a minor portion of the load in some configurations. These bridges were commonly applied in late 19th- and early 20th-century railroad constructions, for spans including heavy and long ones up to over 400 feet, where the distributed support allowed for handling heavy rail traffic over navigable waterways. For instance, the Center Street Bridge in , , completed in 1901, exemplifies this type with its rim-bearing mechanism supporting a span for rail and road use. The approach suited sites requiring balanced load transfer without excessive central concentration. A key advantage of rim-bearing designs lies in their simpler construction relative to more centralized systems, as the peripheral facilitates straightforward assembly of the rolling elements and provides easier access for routine and of the rollers. Additionally, the distributed support enhances load balancing during and reduces sensitivity to uneven settlements. Load distribution occurs across multiple contact points, with the weight shared evenly among the rollers spaced along the circular to ensure even pressure and prevent localized . Rim-bearing swing bridges were common from the to the for a range of spans, though center-bearing designs became more prevalent afterward for longer and heavier applications due to advancements in pivot technology. Notable historical examples include older canal bridges, such as the Eastwood Swing Bridge on the Nottingham Canal, which utilized rim-bearing mechanisms for accommodating traffic.

Center-Bearing Swing Bridges

Center-bearing swing bridges represent a subtype of swing bridges where the entire dead load of the movable is supported by a central bearing when the bridge is in the open position, allowing for rotation around a vertical axis on a central or . This design utilizes a single large bearing, often a mechanical such as a disc between discs, or more modern spherical antifriction bearings, to concentrate the load at the center turntable. In the , the is supported by the center bearing and two end rest piers, distributing the load across three points, while balance wheels at the ends provide additional resistance to tilting and maintain alignment. When opening, retractable wedges or supports at the ends shift the full weight to the central bearing, enabling smooth horizontal rotation with minimal vertical movement. This configuration contrasts with rim-bearing designs by eliminating reliance on peripheral tracks for primary load support during operation, though a brief reference to rim-bearing simplicity highlights its use in smaller-scale applications. These bridges are particularly suited for longer spans, such as the 300-foot center-bearing swing spans historically constructed for railroads, due to their enhanced structural integrity and ability to handle extended lengths without excessive complexity. Post-1950s developments have established center-bearing as a standard for heavy traffic environments, incorporating advanced spherical bearings for improved durability and load distribution under demanding conditions like rail or use. Key advantages include reduced wear on the support , as properly balanced spans position the end wheels to clear the by approximately 0.2 inches during , minimizing and . Additionally, the central load concentration provides higher under varying loads, with lower susceptibility to forces compared to lifting-type movable bridges, ensuring reliable performance for spans subjected to dynamic . Modern adaptations often integrate computer-based control systems for precise operation, including automated monitoring of alignment, load shifting, and rotation mechanics, enhancing safety and efficiency in contemporary installations. These systems, part of broader electrical controls for movable bridges, allow for adjustments and with infrastructure.

Notable Examples

Europe

Europe's dense network of canals and navigable rivers, particularly in countries like the and the , fostered the widespread adoption of swing bridges from the onward to accommodate maritime and inland traffic without impeding navigation. These structures proliferated due to the need for efficient crossings over busy waterways, with many now preserved as heritage sites reflecting industrial-era engineering ingenuity. For instance, the Rewley Road Swing Bridge in , , originally built in as a cast-iron railway swing span, underwent restoration in 2023 to maintain its historical integrity. A prominent example is the Tyne Swing Bridge in , , completed in 1876 and designed by William Armstrong to span the tidal River Tyne. This center-bearing swing bridge, measuring 560 feet in length and weighing over 1,300 tons, was one of the largest of its kind at the time and facilitated access to expanding shipyards and ports during the . Its hydraulic mechanism historically allowed a full 90-degree in under two minutes, adapting to the river's tidal fluctuations while supporting both road and pedestrian traffic. The bridge has been unable to swing open since 2019 due to mechanical issues, with restoration work underway to resume operations by 2026, and is recognized for its architectural and historical importance in connecting Newcastle and . In the , the De Hef railway bridge in , initially constructed as a swing bridge in 1878, exemplifies early adaptations for and . Originally a pivot swing span to allow tall-masted ships passage, it was later modified into a bascule design in 1927 due to increasing traffic demands but retains its historical significance as a symbol of Rotterdam's maritime heritage. The country's extensive system, exceeding 6,000 kilometers, necessitated numerous such swing bridges, many of which feature center-bearing mechanisms for balanced rotation over narrow waterways. France's Colbert Bridge in , opened in , stands as one of Europe's last operational 19th-century hydraulic bridges, spanning the tidal Arques River near the port, which underwent comprehensive restoration completed in October 2025. Designed by engineer Paul Alexandre with a 70.5-meter pivoting span, it was engineered to handle tidal variations and heavy maritime traffic, opening via hydraulic rams powered by a originally. Damaged during , it underwent reconstruction in 1947 using original components where possible, preserving its status as a protected historic monument. In busy ports like , such bridges open multiple times daily around high tide to accommodate shipping, typically twice per tidal cycle. Germany's Rendsburg area featured significant rail swing spans prior to 1913, including parallel rotating bridges built between 1887 and 1895 over the to support expanding naval and commercial traffic. These center-bearing designs allowed 360-degree rotation for large vessels but were replaced by the current high-level due to canal enlargements; their historical role underscores adaptations to and industrial waterways. In Estonia, the Admiral Bridge (Admiralisild) in Tallinn's Old City Harbour, completed in 2021, represents a modern automated swing bridge for pedestrian use, pivoting hydraulically to permit marine access in the port area. It highlights ongoing evolution in automation for tidal environments.

North America

In , swing bridges have played a crucial role in supporting and urban infrastructure, particularly in regions with heavy maritime traffic like the and the basin, where they facilitate and highway crossings while allowing passage for commercial vessels. These structures emerged prominently in the late 19th and early 20th centuries to meet the demands of expanding rail networks and growing shipping, enabling efficient of goods such as , , and manufactured products across vital waterways. A notable example is the Fort Madison Bridge in , constructed between 1925 and 1927, which spans the and features the world's longest double-decker swing span at 525 feet, accommodating rail traffic on the upper level and vehicular traffic on the lower. This bridge, listed on the , exemplifies the engineering adaptations for dual-use in industrial settings and opens frequently—more than 2,000 times per year—for barge traffic supporting and in the Midwest. In the Great Lakes area, the Manistee River Swing Bridge in , a rare plate design built for the Marquette system, underscores the regional emphasis on rail connectivity for timber and transport, with its pivot mechanism allowing swings for lake freighters. Similarly, Canada's Railway Swing Bridge, operational since the early for , bridges the Otonabee River and handles both train and boat movements in an urban-industrial corridor. These bridges often exceed 300 feet in total length, balancing structural efficiency with navigational needs. The Government Bridge, linking Rock Island, Illinois, and Davenport, Iowa, across the Mississippi since 1896 (with reconstructions), represents urban applications with its full 360-degree swing capability for combined road and rail use, aiding commerce in the Quad Cities manufacturing hub and opening over 100 times annually for river traffic. In Canada, the historic Wasauksing Swing Bridge, completed in 1912 on Georgian Bay, connects First Nations communities and supports local industry, with its 140-foot span pivoting for small vessels. Post-1990s earthquakes, such as the 1994 Northridge event, prompted seismic reinforcements for many North American swing bridges in vulnerable zones, including the addition of energy-dissipating devices and strengthening to mitigate lateral forces during swings, as outlined in federal guidelines for movable structures. For instance, assessments and retrofits on spans incorporated base isolation and bracing to enhance performance under seismic loads, ensuring continued reliability for industrial operations.

Other Regions

In regions beyond Europe and , swing bridges often embody colonial engineering legacies from and French influences in and , while contemporary designs in developing ports address expanding trade demands. These structures highlight adaptations to local environments, including hybrid configurations for systems and measures against tropical from , saltwater, and microbial activity, which can degrade components up to twice as fast as in temperate zones. Australia's , opened in 1902 in Sydney's , exemplifies early 20th-century colonial innovation as one of the world's oldest electrically operated swingspan bridges, now repurposed as a heritage-listed pedestrian and cycling link across Cockle Bay. In , the Qingling swivel bridge in , completed in 2019, represents modern engineering prowess with its 252-meter main span and 46-meter width—claimed as the longest and widest swivel bridge at the time of completion—facilitating urban expressway traffic over the Yangtze River while minimizing waterway disruption. South Africa's V&A Waterfront , inaugurated in 2019 in Cape Town's historic harbor, serves as a cable-stayed pedestrian link between the and Alfred basins, enhancing tourism in one of Africa's busiest ports and drawing on colonial dockyard foundations. In , the Kidderpore Swing Bridge in , constructed in the 1890s by British firm Westwood, Baillie & Co., remains operational after over 130 years, rotating 180 degrees to access Kidderpore Docks and illustrating enduring colonial infrastructure in a major Asian trade hub. Vietnam's Han River Bridge in , built in 2000, marks the country's first swing bridge, rotating 90 degrees nightly to permit maritime passage and symbolizing post-colonial in . Further exemplifying hybrid designs, the , installed in by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, integrated directly with lock gates to allow vehicle crossings over the Pacific entrance, addressing logistical needs in a tropical canal zone prone to until its replacement in the . These global implementations underscore swing bridges' versatility in diverse climates, from corrosion-resistant coatings in humid to efficient pivoting for efficiency.

References

  1. [1]
    Swing Span
    Swing span bridges open by rotating the movable span about a vertical axis so that the span is parallel with the navigation channels.Missing: civil | Show results with:civil
  2. [2]
    [PDF] WisDOT Structure Inspection Manual - Chapter 4 Swing Bridges
    The movable span of a swing bridge, also termed the draw, rotates about a vertical axis. (pivot axis). If the pivot axis is at mid-length of the draw, ...Missing: definition engineering
  3. [3]
    Movable Bridges - NCDOT
    Jul 13, 2020 · ​Movable bridge technology dates to the medieval period in Europe, with the earliest being simple drawbridges that were hinged at one end and ...
  4. [4]
    [PDF] A swing bridge is a movable bridge that opens for navigation by ...
    Jul 1, 2011 · When a tall ship or boat needs to pass beneath, traffic is stopped. (usually by traffic signals and barriers) and electric motors then rotate.
  5. [5]
  6. [6]
    2010 – Ben Sawyer Swing Bridge
    The new swing span is a 640-ton center-pivot modified Pratt through-truss with top and bottom chords at the same elevation as the existing truss.Missing: civil | Show results with:civil
  7. [7]
  8. [8]
    [PDF] chapter-17-movable-bridges.pdf - NET
    A movable bridge is a bridge across a navigable waterway, or other travel way, that has at least one span which can be temporarily moved to increase the ...
  9. [9]
    [PDF] MOVABLE BRIDGES - Maryland State Highway Administration
    Swing bridges turn about a vertical axis which is usually located on a center pier; swing spans may bear centrally on this pier (center-bearing) or may bear on ...
  10. [10]
    [PDF] Chapter 3—Historic Context for Common Historic Bridge Types
    Although swing spans were once the most popular form of movable bridge in the United States, they were gradually supplanted by bascule and vertical lift ...
  11. [11]
    None
    ### Summary of Swing Bridge Components from Structural Analysis and Design of Movable Bridges
  12. [12]
    [PDF] A Study - Design and Analysis of A Swing Bridge - IJSEA
    Swing span bridges are provided with a central pier and rotating machinery, the span of bridge rotates around the central pier. When normal road traffic has to ...
  13. [13]
    Moy Bridge - HistoricBridges.org
    ... swing bridge ... 1822. Whilst the canal was constructed for commercial use it was never a commercial success. Since its opening it was beset by problems ...
  14. [14]
    American Swing Bridges 1797 to 1907 | Practice Periodical on Structural Design and Construction | Vol 16, No 4
    ### Summary of Early Origins and Invention of Swing Bridges (Pre-1900, ASCE Paper)
  15. [15]
    Canal Bridges - D & R Canal - Delaware and Raritan Canal State Park
    The A-framed swing bridge served the D&R Canal well for over 80 years before being replaced in the early part of the 20th century with the stouter kingpost ...Missing: United | Show results with:United
  16. [16]
    Location - Historic Bridges
    C&NW constructs a swing bridge, among the first all-steel spans in the U.S., at Kinzie Street crossing. 1897, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers survey of Chicago ...<|separator|>
  17. [17]
  18. [18]
    [PDF] Evolution of Modern Hydraulic Drive Systems for Movable Bridges
    Until the beginning of the twentieth century movable bridges were driven by man power. In the first half of the twentieth century more and more mechanical ...Missing: post- WWII
  19. [19]
    [PDF] THE HISTORIC HIGHWAY BRIDGES OF FLORIDA - FDOT
    This report represents the third statewide inventory of Florida's historic highway bridges. The survey was performed as a task work order under contract ...
  20. [20]
    Automation and Control Systems for Lifting Bridges - ResearchGate
    Nov 24, 2024 · These bridges, including types such as bascule, swing, and vertical lift bridges, allow for efficient passage of vessels while maintaining road ...
  21. [21]
    Application of self-sensing concrete sensors for bridge monitoring
    Mar 15, 2025 · Recent advances in self-sensing concrete technology have shown promising potential for bridge monitoring applications.
  22. [22]
    [PDF] Stainless Steel in Infrastructure: Bridges - Worldstainless
    It is the first bridge structurally combining two high performance and corrosion-resistant materials: stainless steel and glass fiber reinforced polymers (GFRP) ...
  23. [23]
    None
    Summary of each segment:
  24. [24]
    [PDF] DESIGN FEATURES OF A UNIQUE SWING BRIDGE HYDRAULIC ...
    The pumps are powered by 100 hp. electric motors. A standby diesel driven generator set can provide each pivot pier with sufficient power for reduced speed ...Missing: rams | Show results with:rams
  25. [25]
    None
    ### Summary on Swing Bridges from Bridge Engineering Handbook (Ch. 21)
  26. [26]
    [PDF] In the picture - Hardesty & Hanover
    On rim-bearing swing bridges, all the dead load of the superstructure is supported by a large-diameter rolling element bearing – a slewing bearing – or tapered ...<|separator|>
  27. [27]
    Bridge Counterweights | Mars Metal Specialty Casting Division
    Mars Metal will work with you to design the specific bridge counterweight to meet your requirements or we can simply lead fill your predesigned / manufactured ...
  28. [28]
    [PDF] Swing Bridge - IRJIET
    motors rotate the bridge horizontally about its pivot point. The typical swing bridge will rotate approximately 90 degrees, or one-quarter turn; however, a ...Missing: precision | Show results with:precision
  29. [29]
    [PDF] FAIL-SAFE CONTROL SYSTEMS FOR HEAVY MOVABLE ...
    The focus is fail-safe control system design for heavy movable structures, and more specifically for movable bridges. Emergency stop control circuits that are ...Missing: swing | Show results with:swing
  30. [30]
    33 CFR Part 164 -- Navigation Safety Regulations - eCFR
    The system shall provide unattended monitoring of all radar echoes and automatic audio and visual alarm signals that will alert the watch officer of a possible ...Title 33 · 33 CFR 164.55 -- Deviations... · 33 CFR 164.46 · 33 CFR 164.72<|separator|>
  31. [31]
    Standard 621 - Obstacle Marking and Lighting - Canadian Aviation ...
    Apr 4, 2025 · The purpose of obstruction marking and lighting standards is to provide an effective means of indicating the presence of objects likely to present a hazard to ...
  32. [32]
    [PDF] Swing Bridge Swing Bridge and Longbird Bridge Replacement ...
    The impact load for the ferry deckhouse is estimated to be 20% of the hull impact load, and the impact load for the mast is estimated to be 10% of the deckhouse ...Missing: wake | Show results with:wake
  33. [33]
    [PDF] Movable Bridge Symposium
    Annual inspections using these manuals minimize maintenance problems and promote confidence in the continuing integrity of the structures. *Professor, ...
  34. [34]
    Guideline for Bridge Safety Management - Transports Canada
    Feb 18, 2019 · The objective of this Guideline is to provide railway companies with a guide for the development of their Bridge Safety Management Program (BSMP)<|control11|><|separator|>
  35. [35]
    Advantages and Disadvantages of Different Types of Movable Bridges
    Movable bridges are used to provide both waterway for vessels and ships to pass though the bridge and provide traffic way for cars, trains, and other forms of ...
  36. [36]
    [PDF] Steel Bridges 2019–2020
    CSX'S SINGLE-TRACK, 163-FT-LONG Bayou Sara Swing Bridge is one of the rail ... sure window at a total construction cost of $3.5 million. And though the ...
  37. [37]
    [PDF] Swing Bridge - IJSRD.com
    At last it is concluded that Swing Bridge is the best alternative for the short span rivers and canals and also suitable for large spans if carefully designed. ...
  38. [38]
    [PDF] Bascule and Swing Span Bridges - Part 2 - Transport for NSW
    Swing bridges are categorised according to the type of pivot bearing. If all the dead load is supported at the centre, the swing span is said to be centre.Missing: precision | Show results with:precision
  39. [39]
    [PDF] AASHTO GUIDELINES FOR THE OPERATION OF MOVABLE ...
    Movable bridges pose significant operating and maintenance costs to their owners. Per the Code of. Federal Regulations, movable bridges are expected to be ...
  40. [40]
    [PDF] Seismic Retrofitting Manual for Highway Structures: Part 1 – Bridges
    This manual is the first part of a two-part publication on seismic retrofitting, focusing on bridges, and is a revision of a 1995 manual.Missing: swing | Show results with:swing
  41. [41]
    [PDF] chapter-17-movable-bridges.pdf - NET
    The entire main span weight of a center pivot swing bridge rotates about and is supported by the center pivot bearing. Bronze disc type or an anti-friction ...
  42. [42]
    [PDF] A Context For Common Historic Bridge Types
    This study covers bridges built in the United States through 1955, up to the year of the passage of the Federal Aid Highway Act of 1956, which created the ...<|separator|>
  43. [43]
    [PDF] DATA SHEET DATA SHEET
    Truss draws range in span from about 150' to 520'. With the exception of plate girder draws, most swing bridges are through to give the maximum clearance below ...Missing: kW | Show results with:kW
  44. [44]
    [PDF] A study of the operating mechanism for rolling lift bridges - CORE
    A pinion is driven from each side of the differential through a series of bevel and spur gears that reduce the motion. By shifting the clutch the power is ...
  45. [45]
    Category:Swing bridges over canals in England
    Jan 2, 2017 · Subcategories ; B · Bridge 147 (Winkwell), Grand Union Canal (Main Line) (13 F) ; E · Eastwood Swing Bridge (4 F) ; F · Fox Alley Swing Bridge (7 F).
  46. [46]
    [PDF] Understanding Movable Bridges and a Guide to Design and ...
    ➢ Movable bridges are unique because they integrate conventional structural components with mechanical drives that are controlled with electrical systems ...
  47. [47]
    Bridges on the Netherlands Waterways
    The bridges are either fixed bridges or Beweeg Brugge (moveable bridges) and these could be lift bridges or swing bridges or hef (vertical lift) bridges.
  48. [48]
    History and heritage of Britain's canal and river bridges
    Oct 22, 2021 · A history and heritage of Britain's bridges, how they have developed over time and highlights some fascinating but lesser-known bridges.
  49. [49]
    Rewley Road Swing Bridge - Oxford Preservation Trust
    The Swing Bridge is a unique Victorian cast-iron railway bridge, designed by the famous Victorian engineer Robert Stephenson and dating from 1851.Missing: European | Show results with:European
  50. [50]
    Rewley Road Swing Bridge Restoration Recognised
    Sep 19, 2023 · The Oxford Preservation Trust is celebrating receiving a National Railway Trust Award for its restoration of the Rewley Road Swing Bridge.
  51. [51]
    Swing Bridge - HistoricBridges.org
    Swing bridge opened in 1876, a necessary development to allow for up river navigation by sea going vessels, particularly to Lord Armstrong's expanding Elswick ...
  52. [52]
    History of the Tyne Bridge - Co-Curate - Newcastle University
    The Swing Bridge over the River Tyne was first used for road traffic on 15th June 1876 and opened for river traffic on 17th July 1876. It had an innovative ...
  53. [53]
    The Caernarfon Swing Bridge Across The Seiont - Helpful Colin
    Mar 24, 2012 · The Caernarfon Swing Bridge is found crossing the River Seiont from Caernarfon Castle to a point near the Bridge Keeper's Lodge on the south ...Missing: Europe | Show results with:Europe
  54. [54]
    Five extraordinary Dutch bridges - Utrecht
    After yet another incident in which a ship landed against the piers, the renovated bridge was reopened in 1927. The swing bridge had been changed into a lift ...Missing: Cittert | Show results with:Cittert
  55. [55]
    [PDF] Pont Colbert (Colbert Bridge), Dieppe, France Report | Europa Nostra
    The Pont Colbert, built in 1889, is a swing bridge in Dieppe, France, that has been neglected for 15 years and is not yet a designated monument.
  56. [56]
    Pont Colbert - DIEPPE : Normandy Tourism, France
    Built in 1889, the Colbert Bridge was designed by the chief engineer of the Ponts et Chaussée, Paul Alexandre (1847-1921), in order to link the Pollet district ...
  57. [57]
    Why save the Colbert bridge? In Dieppe - Normandy Then and Now
    Mar 10, 2023 · After the war, because of the lack of manpower and raw materials, it took two years for the bridge to be rebuilt. It was back in service in 1947 ...
  58. [58]
    Horaires des ouvrages du port de Dieppe EN
    Opening times: 1 hour 45 minutes before high tide and 1 hour 15 minutes after high tide. These times vary significantly according to sea conditions.
  59. [59]
    Rendsburg - Puentes Transbordadores
    The bridge was finally opened on 1st October 1913, making it the longest railway bridge in Germany, a record it held for 99 years.
  60. [60]
    Mystery Bridge Nr. 239: The Lost Bridges of Rendsburg, Germany
    May 6, 2025 · The first span featured a drawbridge and a swing bridge, located side-by-side on each end of the lock. The bridges dated back to 1784. The ...
  61. [61]
    The Admiral Bridge, known as “Admiralisild,” is a notable pedestrian ...
    The Admiral Bridge, known as “Admiralisild,” is a notable pedestrian swing bridge in Tallinn, Estonia. This modern infrastructure was designed by ...
  62. [62]
    Movable bridge in Tallinn - Witteveen+Bos
    In August 2021, Estonia's only dynamic, moveable pedestrian bridge, located in Tallinn's Old City Harbour, was opened for use.Missing: automated | Show results with:automated
  63. [63]
  64. [64]
    Canadian Pacific Railway Swing Bridge
    Historic Truss Bridge in Peterborough Peterborough County, Ontario. This impressive swing bridge continues to operate for trains and boats as needed and is ...<|separator|>
  65. [65]
    Fort Madison Bridge - Atlas Obscura
    Aug 23, 2022 · At a mile long, the Fort Madison Bridge is the largest double-decker swing-span bridge in the world.<|control11|><|separator|>
  66. [66]
    Ft. Madison Bridge | Department of Transportation - Iowa DOT
    The Ft. Madison Bridge, built 1925-1927, is a rigid-connected, double-deck swing truss, 1675 feet long, with a 525-foot swing span, and is listed on the ...
  67. [67]
    Swing Bridge | Manistee County Tourism
    This Swing Bridge services the Marquette Rail system across the Manistee River. This plate girder swing bridge is a rare structure type in Michigan, ...Missing: region | Show results with:region
  68. [68]
    20 Iconic Bike and Pedestrian Bridges in America
    Jun 8, 2022 · Between Rock Island, Illinois, and Davenport, Iowa, is the Government Bridge—a 1,854-foot-long structure capable of swinging a full 360 degrees ...
  69. [69]
    [PDF] Seismic Retrofitting Guidelines for Complex Steel Truss Highway ...
    Aug 1, 2006 · These guidelines summarize the state-of-the-practice for retrofitting steel truss bridges, focusing on the superstructure, and are for ...
  70. [70]
    Steel Bridge-Coating Systems and Their Environmental Impacts
    Apr 29, 2023 · The study reviews commonly examined coating systems and their expected service life in moderate and highly corrosive environments.
  71. [71]
    Pyrmont Bridge Darling Harbour - world's oldest electrical ...
    Pyrmont Bridge is one of the world's oldest surviving electrically operated swingspan bridges. The first bridge began operating in 1857.
  72. [72]
    Swivel bridge with world's longest span and widest deck swings into ...
    Sep 12, 2019 · The cable-stayed bridge at Qingling section is a swivel bridge with main span of 252 meters and width of 46 meters, both hitting the world's ...
  73. [73]
    V&A Waterfront Swing Bridge - SMEC
    A new landmark pedestrian swing bridge for South Africa's oldest working harbour. Situated in South Africa's oldest working harbour.
  74. [74]
    KoPT throws open swing bascule bridge for eight days | Kolkata News
    Oct 15, 2013 · The swing bridge was closed to road traffic since March, 2004. SER was entrusted to repair the structure and the swing mechanism by the state ...
  75. [75]
    6 Unique Bridges in Vietnam - Google Arts & Culture
    Han River bridge is a cable-stayed swing bridge in Da Nang, Vietnam. In the middle of the night, traffic is stopped from crossing the Han Bridge and it swings ...
  76. [76]
    Bridge of the Americas - Panama Canal Museum Collection
    At the Miraflores Locks there was a gray swing bridge (opened June 1942) with two moving sections, effectively connecting Gaillard Highway on the Fort Clayton ( ...