Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Synchronizer

A synchronizer is a device or circuit used to achieve synchronization between components operating at different speeds or timings in various engineering fields, including electronics for handling asynchronous signals across clock domains and mechanics for matching gear speeds in transmissions. In electronic systems, synchronizers are specialized digital circuits employed in synchronous integrated circuits to transfer signals from asynchronous sources while mitigating the risk of metastability, an unstable state in flip-flops that can lead to unpredictable logic errors.^[1]^[2] These circuits are essential in modern very-large-scale integration (VLSI) designs, such as system-on-chips (SoCs) and field-programmable gate arrays (FPGAs), where multiple clock domains coexist to optimize performance and power efficiency.^[2] The primary challenge addressed by electronic synchronizers is metastability, which arises when a flip-flop receives an input violating its setup or hold time requirements, causing its output to oscillate or remain indeterminate for an extended period.^[1] To counter this, the most common synchronizer design employs two or more flip-flops in series, providing a resolution time window (typically one clock cycle) for the metastable state to settle into a stable logic level, thereby increasing the mean time between failures (MTBF) to practically infinite durations in reliable systems.^[2]^[1] The MTBF can be quantified using the formula MTBF = \frac{e^{t_r / \tau}}{f_{\text{clk}} \cdot \alpha}, where t_r is the resolution time, \tau is the metastability time constant, f_{\text{clk}} is the clock frequency, and \alpha is the rate of asynchronous events; for typical 0.25 \mum processes, this yields MTBF values exceeding billions of years under normal operating conditions.^[2] For single-bit signals, the two-flip-flop synchronizer suffices, but multi-bit data transfers require advanced techniques to avoid data corruption, such as handshaking protocols (e.g., four-phase or two-phase) for bus synchronization or FIFO buffers with gray-coded pointers to ensure safe pointer synchronization across domains without full data resynchronization.^[2] Historical analysis of electronic synchronizers dates back to 1952 with mathematical modeling by Lubkin, followed by experimental validation in 1973, underscoring their foundational role in reliable digital design.^[1] Ongoing research focuses on optimizing synchronizer parameters amid process variations and technology scaling to maintain reliability in sub-nanometer nodes.^[3]

General Concept

Definition and Purpose

A synchronizer is a device or circuit designed to align the timing or speed of two or more asynchronous components, thereby preventing errors, data corruption, or mechanical damage that could arise from mismatched operations. In electronic systems, it facilitates safe data transfer by coordinating signals across different clock domains, where asynchronous inputs might otherwise cause timing violations. In mechanical contexts, such as transmissions, it ensures smooth engagement by equalizing rotational speeds between gears. In media applications, it supports coordinated playback by maintaining alignment between visual and audio elements.^[4] Broad applications of synchronizers span diverse fields, including signal synchronization in digital systems to avoid metastability issues during asynchronous communication. In automotive transmissions, they enable speed matching to allow seamless gear shifts without clashing. For film editing, synchronizers align multiple strips of film or soundtracks to preserve temporal consistency during manual handling.^[4] The term "synchronizer" derives from the verb "synchronize," which entered English in the 1620s from the Latinized Greek synkhronizein, meaning "to be of the same time" or "happen simultaneously," combining syn- (together) and khronos (time).^[5] Early applications in 19th-century mechanics involved synchronizing clocks for railway operations and engine components to coordinate timing in industrial settings, laying the groundwork for modern devices.^[6]

Principles of Synchronization

Synchronization in systems, whether electronic or mechanical, relies on fundamental principles that align the timing, phase, or speed of components to ensure coherent operation. Phase locking is a core mechanism, particularly in electronic systems, where a phase-locked loop (PLL) uses a feedback control system to maintain a fixed phase relationship between an input reference signal and an output signal.^[7] This involves a phase detector comparing the phase difference, a low-pass filter to generate a control voltage, and a voltage-controlled oscillator (VCO) that adjusts its frequency to minimize the error, achieving lock through negative feedback.^[8] In mechanical contexts, friction-based equalization serves a analogous role, where frictional contact between components generates torque to reduce speed differences, as seen in transmission synchronizers that equalize rotational velocities before engagement.^[9] Feedback loops are universal across domains, continuously monitoring discrepancies and applying corrective actions to sustain alignment.^[10] Logical synchronization addresses timing discrepancies in digital systems by employing state machines or buffers to manage asynchronous events. State machines, implemented as finite state machines (FSMs), define discrete states and transitions based on input signals and clock edges, ensuring ordered progression and resolution of protocol mismatches between modules.^[11] Buffers, such as first-in-first-out (FIFO) structures, temporarily store data crossing clock domains, preventing loss or corruption due to differing rates by handshaking readiness signals.^[12] These methods enforce deterministic behavior, allowing systems to handle variable latencies without violating timing constraints. Physical synchronization in mechanical systems applies torque or drag to match rotational speeds, often through frictional interfaces that convert kinetic energy differences into heat until equilibrium is reached. In transmissions, drag torque from viscous lubricants or direct cone friction accelerates or decelerates gears, bridging initial speed mismatches.^[13] This process relies on controlled slip, where relative motion generates the necessary equalization force without excessive wear.^[14] The mathematical foundation for synchronization time can be expressed as t_{\text{sync}} = \frac{\Delta \omega}{\alpha}, where \Delta \omega represents the initial angular speed difference and \alpha is the angular acceleration induced by the synchronizing mechanism, providing a basic estimate of the duration required to achieve speed matching.^[15] This equation assumes constant acceleration and neglects nonlinear effects, serving as a foundational model for both electronic frequency pull-in and mechanical torque application. Common challenges in synchronization include jitter, slip, and phase noise, which introduce variability and degrade performance. Jitter manifests as short-term fluctuations in signal timing, arising from noise in feedback paths or environmental factors.^[16] In mechanical systems, slip refers to unintended relative motion post-initial alignment, potentially caused by lubricant inconsistencies or wear, leading to inefficiency or damage.^[17] Phase noise, prevalent in oscillators, adds random phase perturbations that propagate through loops, complicating lock acquisition in high-precision applications.^[18]

Electronic Synchronizers

Design and Operation

In digital electronic systems, the standard design for a synchronizer is a two-stage chain of D flip-flops, where the asynchronous input signal feeds the data input (D) of the first flip-flop (FF1), clocked by the destination synchronous clock, and the output (Q) of FF1 connects to the D input of the second flip-flop (FF2), also clocked by the same clock.^[19] This architecture captures potentially unstable asynchronous signals in the first stage and propagates a more stable version to the second stage for output.^[2] The operation begins with the asynchronous input being sampled by FF1 on a rising clock edge, producing Q1 after the flip-flop's propagation delay t_{pd}. On the subsequent clock edge, FF2 samples Q1, generating the synchronized output Q2 after another t_{pd}, ensuring the output stabilizes within the clock period.^[2] The basic functional equation for this process is:

Q_2 = Q_1[n-1] = \text{async\_in}[n-2]

where n denotes the clock cycle, illustrating that the output lags the input by two clock cycles.^[1] Variations on this design include three-stage synchronizers, which insert an additional flip-flop to enhance reliability in high-speed applications by providing extra resolution time.^[20] In more complex system-on-chip (SoC) environments, handshaking protocols supplement flip-flop chains, using paired request and acknowledge signals synchronized across domains to coordinate data transfers safely.^[21] Key operational parameters encompass the setup time t_{setup} (minimum duration the input must be stable before the clock edge) and hold time t_{hold} (minimum stability after the clock edge), both critical for preventing sampling errors in the flip-flops.^[22] The maximum clock frequency f_{clk} is limited by these, typically satisfying f_{clk} < \frac{1}{t_{pd} + t_{setup}} to allow sufficient settling.^[2] Practical implementations appear in FPGA input/output (I/O) ports, where synchronizers integrate external asynchronous signals into the internal clock domain.^[23] They are also essential in CPU interrupt handlers to synchronize external event signals before processing.^[24]

Metastability and Reliability

In electronic synchronizers, metastability occurs when a flip-flop samples an asynchronous input signal that arrives too close to the clock edge, violating the setup or hold time constraints and causing the output to enter an unstable intermediate state between logic 0 and 1, resulting in unpredictable timing and value. This phenomenon is particularly prevalent in clock domain crossing scenarios, where signals from one clock domain are captured by a flip-flop in another, potentially leading to glitches or error propagation if the metastable state persists.^[25] The resolution of metastability is governed by the analog behavior of the flip-flop's internal circuitry, typically modeled as a cross-coupled differential amplifier or latch. In this model, any small initial voltage imbalance \Delta V(0) at the metastable point (the balance point of the inverters) amplifies exponentially over time due to the regenerative feedback:

\Delta V(t) = \Delta V(0) \exp\left(\frac{t}{\tau}\right),

where \tau is the resolution time constant, representing the timescale of this amplification. The constant \tau derives from the small-signal analysis of the latch, given by \tau = C / g_m, with C as the parasitic capacitance at the output nodes and g_m as the transconductance (gain) of the input transistors. Typical values of \tau range from 10 ps to 100 ps (0.01–0.1 ns) in modern sub-28 nm CMOS processes, with larger values in older nodes. The time required to resolve to a stable logic level (e.g., achieving a voltage separation sufficient for reliable downstream sampling, often \Delta V(t) \gg kT/q thermal noise) is t_{\text{res}} = \tau \ln(\Delta V_{\text{req}} / \Delta V(0)), where \Delta V_{\text{req}} is the threshold for logic resolution (e.g., 100 mV or more). If the available resolution time is insufficient, the output may remain metastable or resolve incorrectly, increasing failure risk. A related metric is the time for the voltage difference to double (\Delta V(t) = 2 \Delta V(0)), which is t_d = \tau \ln 2, yielding \tau = t_d / \ln 2 \approx 1.443 t_d; here, t_d serves as an effective resolution rate indicator in some characterizations.^[25] Reliability in synchronizers is assessed via the Mean Time Between Failures (MTBF) due to metastability, a key metric for predicting long-term dependability. The formula is

\text{MTBF} = \frac{\exp(t_w / \tau)}{f_{\text{clk}} \cdot T_0 \cdot f_d},

where t_w is the available resolution time (e.g., clock period minus clock-to-output delay and setup time in a synchronizer stage), \tau is the resolution time constant, f_{\text{clk}} is the destination clock frequency, T_0 is the metastable timing window width (typically 10^{-12} to 10^{-9} s, the interval around the clock edge where input changes trigger metastability), and f_d is the rate of asynchronous data transitions (events per second). To derive this, consider that the probability of a data event falling into the metastable window per clock cycle is T_0 \cdot f_d. Given metastability, the probability it fails to resolve within t_w (remaining metastable or resolving too late) is \exp(-t_w / \tau), based on the exponential tail of the resolution distribution. The per-cycle failure probability is thus T_0 \cdot f_d \cdot \exp(-t_w / \tau). With f_{\text{clk}} cycles per unit time, the failure rate \lambda is f_{\text{clk}} \cdot T_0 \cdot f_d \cdot \exp(-t_w / \tau), so MTBF = $1 / \lambda = \exp(t_w / \tau) / (f_{\text{clk}} \cdot T_0 \cdot f_d). For a 1 GHz clock with \tau = 20 ps, T_0 = 20 ps, t_w = 1 ns, and f_d = 100 MHz, MTBF is on the order of $10^{30} years, illustrating the exponential sensitivity to t_w / \tau.^[25] Mitigation strategies focus on reducing the effective T_0, increasing t_w, or minimizing \tau. A primary approach is multi-stage synchronizers, chaining 2–4 flip-flops in the destination domain; each stage provides additional resolution time (e.g., one full clock period per stage), exponentially improving MTBF by factors of \exp(T_{\text{clk}} / \tau) per stage. Flip-flops optimized for low metastability, such as those with higher gain (g_m / C) or sense-amplifier-based designs, achieve smaller \tau (e.g., <0.1 ns in advanced nodes). For multi-bit synchronization, Gray coding ensures adjacent values differ by one bit, preventing simultaneous metastability across bits and containing errors to a single metastable bit. These techniques can boost MTBF by orders of magnitude without excessive area or power overhead.^[25] In safety-critical applications like avionics, synchronizer reliability metrics emphasize ultra-low failure probabilities to comply with certification standards. Requirements often mandate P_f < 10^{-9} per flight hour for catastrophic failures, corresponding to MTBF > $10^9 hours per synchronizer, verified through metastability testing (e.g., stressing with asynchronous data statistically independent of the clock). Multiple synchronizers in a system aggregate risks, requiring design MTBF = [ \sum (1 / \text{MTBF}_i) ]^{-1} to meet overall targets, with tools simulating error rates under varied conditions.^[26] Case studies in multi-clock SoCs highlight metastability's impact, where numerous domain crossings amplify risks. In early processor designs from the 1980s–1990s, inadequate synchronization led to historical bugs, such as intermittent data corruption and unexpected resets in asynchronous peripherals, as retrospective analyses of test chips revealed MTBF dropping to minutes under high-speed conditions without mitigation. Modern SoCs, like those in embedded systems, use simulation to predict and avert such issues, demonstrating that unaddressed metastability can cause system hangs or computation errors, but proper multi-stage designs restore reliability to exceed $10^{12} hours.^[25]

Mechanical Synchronizers

Automotive Transmission Applications

Synchronizers play a crucial role in multi-speed manual gearboxes, enabling smooth, clash-free shifting between gears with differing ratios by equalizing rotational speeds before engagement.^[27] This prevents grinding and damage to gear components, allowing drivers to transition seamlessly during operation. In automotive transmissions, they are integral to achieving reliable performance in vehicles ranging from everyday passenger cars to high-performance models.^[28] The invention of the synchronizer is credited to Earl A. Thompson, who developed the first synchromesh transmission in 1928 for Cadillac vehicles, marking a significant advancement in manual shifting technology.^[29] Over the decades, designs have evolved, with modern high-performance applications incorporating carbon-fiber linings on synchronizer rings to enhance durability and synchronization efficiency under extreme conditions.^[30] Key components include the synchronizer ring, typically made of brass or molybdenum-coated materials for friction properties; the hub, which splines to the shaft; the sleeve, which slides to engage gears; and blocking rings that facilitate speed matching.^[31]^[32] These assemblies are positioned on the output shaft of the transmission, where they engage with conical surfaces on the gears as the shift lever is moved by the driver via a shift fork.^[28] During a shift, the sleeve moves the blocking rings into contact with the gear cone, generating friction to synchronize speeds in approximately 100-500 milliseconds.^[33] Synchronizers are engineered to handle torque capacities up to 500 Nm in typical passenger car applications, ensuring robustness under load.^[34] Compared to non-synchromesh transmissions, which require precise rev-matching by the driver, synchronizers significantly reduce shifting effort and minimize wear on dog teeth, extending component life.^[35] They are standard in 5- and 6-speed manual transmissions found in most production vehicles, though absent in racing dog-box transmissions, where faster shifts are prioritized at the expense of ease.^[35]

Synchronization Mechanism

The synchronization mechanism in mechanical synchronizers operates through a sequence of physical interactions designed to equalize rotational speeds between the gear and the shaft. Initially, the sliding sleeve pushes the synchronizer ring into frictional contact with the cone surface on the target gear, generating drag torque that begins to reduce the speed differential. As the friction torque accelerates or decelerates the components, the speeds approach equality, typically reaching 95-98% synchronization before the blocker mechanism unlocks. Finally, with minimal speed mismatch, the dog teeth on the sleeve engage the corresponding teeth on the gear, completing the positive lock without grinding.^[28] The core of this process relies on friction dynamics between the conical surfaces, where torque arises from the interaction of normal and frictional forces. The normal force N at the contact interface is determined by the axial shift force F_a and the cone semi-angle \alpha, given by N = F_a / \sin \alpha, as the axial component balances the projection of the normal force along the cone axis. The frictional force f then equals \mu N, where \mu is the coefficient of friction, opposing relative motion tangentially to the surface. The resulting synchronization torque T is this frictional force multiplied by the mean cone radius r, yielding T = \mu N r = \mu F_a r / \sin \alpha. This equation derives from basic principles of cone clutch mechanics, where the geometry amplifies the effective friction for torque transmission.^[36] Traditional synchronizer rings are constructed from brass alloys for their balance of wear resistance and frictional properties, with \mu \approx 0.2-0.3 against steel under operational conditions, enabling reliable speed matching without excessive abrasion. Modern designs increasingly employ sintered bronze linings, which offer improved thermal stability and reduced wear while maintaining comparable friction coefficients.^[37]^[38] Overheating represents a primary failure mode, where prolonged friction generates excessive heat, causing glazing—a hardened, shiny surface layer on the cone or ring that reduces \mu and promotes slip during engagement. Typical operational temperature limits for the friction interface are 200-300°C, beyond which material degradation accelerates, leading to incomplete synchronization or component failure.^[39]^[40] Efficiency in speed matching is influenced by transmission oil viscosity, which affects drag torque prior to engagement; higher viscosity can enhance initial alignment but may prolong synchronization if it hinders cone contact. The process generally achieves 95-98% speed equalization before dog engagement, minimizing wear and ensuring smooth shifts.^[17] Simulation of the mechanism often employs basic rotational dynamics, modeled by the differential equation \frac{d\omega}{dt} = -\frac{T}{I}, where \omega is angular velocity, T is the friction torque, and I is the moment of inertia of the rotating components. Integrating this under constant torque assumptions yields synchronization time t_s = \frac{I \Delta \omega}{T}, allowing prediction of shift performance and optimization of design parameters.^[41]

Specialized Applications

Film Editing Devices

In film editing, a synchronizer is a mechanical device designed to link picture and sound reels, enabling precise alignment of multiple strips of film during the post-production process. This tool allows editors to advance film strips simultaneously through shared sprockets, maintaining frame-accurate synchronization between visual and audio elements to avoid misalignment in the final cut.^[42] The development of film synchronizers emerged in the 1920s amid the transition to sound cinema in Hollywood, with early innovations like the Moviola editing machine patented in 1924 by Dutch-American engineer Iwan Serrurier. Originally conceived as a home projector in 1917, the Moviola was adapted for professional editing by 1924, incorporating gang sprockets to handle picture and sound tracks together, which became essential for postsynchronization techniques following the introduction of talkies in 1927. Gang synchronizers, a key evolution, allowed multiple film strips to be threaded onto a single shaft for coordinated movement, revolutionizing workflows in studios like those at Warner Bros. and MGM.^[43]^[44]^[42] Operationally, film synchronizers rely on perforation-driven sprockets, where toothed wheels engage the film's edge perforations to advance strips frame by frame at a consistent rate, ensuring mechanical lockstep between reels. Tension arms or rollers maintain steady pressure on the film path, preventing slack or drift that could cause desynchronization during manual cranking by the editor. These devices typically feature a hand crank connected to the central shaft, allowing controlled playback speeds while viewing through an integrated viewer or microscope for precise cuts.^[45]^[46] Key features include gang synchronization for handling up to four or more strips simultaneously—such as picture, sound, and effects tracks—facilitating complex assemblies in feature films. Many models incorporated audible click tracks, generated by a metronome-like mechanism or optical sensor, to provide rhythmic cues for aligning dialogue and music, particularly useful in scoring sessions where musicians followed the film's tempo. These elements ensured lip-sync accuracy without electronic aids, relying instead on the physical precision of the mechanical setup.^[42]^[47] Film editing standards centered on 24 frames per second (fps) for 35mm motion pictures, a rate established in the 1920s to balance motion smoothness with film stock economy. Synchronization tolerance was typically limited to less than one frame—around 21 milliseconds at 24 fps—to prevent perceptible lip-sync errors, as specified in industry practices for analog workflows.^[48]^[49] While analog synchronizers dominated until the late 20th century, their role evolved with the rise of digital non-linear editors in the 1990s, such as Avid Media Composer, introduced in 1989, which replaced mechanical gangs with software-based timeline syncing for greater flexibility and non-destructive editing. Nonetheless, analog devices remained in use for film restoration and specialized workflows into the 2000s, preserving the tactile precision of traditional synchronization.^[50]

Aviation and Military Uses

In aviation, propeller synchronizers are essential instruments for multi-engine aircraft, aligning the rotational speeds (RPM) of propellers to minimize vibration, noise, and uneven thrust. These systems operate by detecting RPM differences through sensors on each engine and sending electrical signals to the propeller governors, which adjust blade pitch via hydraulic or electro-hydraulic mechanisms to fine-tune speeds automatically once coarsely matched by the pilot.^[51]^[52] A pivotal advancement in military applications was the synchronization gear, invented by Anthony Fokker in 1915, which enabled aircraft machine guns to fire through the spinning propeller arc without striking the blades. This device, first fitted to the Fokker Eindecker monoplane, used a mechanical cam linked to the propeller shaft to interrupt the gun trigger at precise intervals, allowing bullets to pass only through the gaps between blades. Early versions achieved timing precision on the order of 1/20 second, corresponding to typical propeller rotation periods at combat speeds.^[53] The synchronization gear dramatically shifted World War I aerial warfare, granting German pilots a decisive edge known as the "Fokker Scourge" from late 1915, as Eindecker fighters dominated the skies with forward-firing armament that allowed accurate aiming by pointing the aircraft. Aces like Max Immelmann and Oswald Boelcke exploited this technology to score numerous victories, effectively blocking Allied reconnaissance during key battles such as Verdun. In World War II, variants persisted in aircraft like the Messerschmitt Bf 109, where fuselage-mounted machine guns used similar interrupter mechanisms to synchronize fire through the propeller.^[54] In modern propeller-driven military aircraft, such as turboprops, electronic systems continue to support synchronized operations, integrating with engine controls for reliability, though synchronization gears for guns are largely historical.

References

[1]
[PDF] Metastability and Synchronizers: A Tutorial - Computer Science
METASTABILITY EVENTS ARE common in digital circuits, and synchronizers are a necessity to pro- tect us from their fatal effects. Originally, synchron-.
[2]
[PDF] Synchronization in Digital Logic Circuits
Synchronization is needed because digital abstraction depends on reliable synchronization of external events, and asynchronous events can cause metastability. ...Missing: definition | Show results with:definition
[3]
https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/8326975
[4]
Film Editing – SAIC Media Resources
Description: 16mm Film Synchronizer; Comments: Used to synch film; Accessories available separately: 16mm Rewind Kit, 16mm Film Reels. 16mm Tape Splicer FVNMA.
[5]
Synchronize - Etymology, Origin & Meaning
From Greek synkhronizein, meaning "be of the same time," this 1620s word means to occur simultaneously, reflecting its origin and meaning clearly.
[6]
Synchronization - Scholarpedia
Oct 22, 2013 · The history of synchronization goes back to the 17th century when the famous Dutch scientist Christiaan Huygens reported on his observation ...
[7]
An Overview of Phase-Locked Loop: From Fundamentals to ... - MDPI
Phase-Locked Loops (PLLs) are fundamental building blocks in modern electronic systems, enabling precise frequency synthesis, signal synchronization, ...
[8]
The Principles of Phase-Locked Loops in Analog Signals
Jan 20, 2023 · A PLL is a closed-loop control system with negative feedback, which maintains a well-defined phase relationship between two periodic signals.
[9]
[PDF] A Review on Multicone Synchromesh Transmissions
Apr 30, 2019 · Its purpose is to produce the friction torque needed to synchronize the input and output shafts. The cone surfaces are provided with thread ...
[10]
Phase-Locked Loops for Analog Signals | Zurich Instruments
A PLL is a closed-loop control system with negative feedback that maintains a well-defined phase relation between two periodic signals.
[11]
[PDF] Chapter 3: Sequential Logic Design
Outputs of sequential logic depend on current and prior input values – it has memory. • Some definitions: – State: all the information about a circuit.
[12]
[PDF] Clocked synchronous state machine example
Nov 5, 2002 · Clock rise and fall times should be short, in case flip-flops respond to different voltage levels. (Use similar flip-flops when possible.).
[13]
[PDF] Drag Torque and Synchronization modelling in a Dual Clutch ...
This is achieved through synchronization rings that, through friction, synchronize the speeds of the components before engaging them to each other. However, ...
[14]
[PDF] Modelling and simulation of synchronization processes
This Master's Thesis project deals with a study of the synchronization processes in manual transmission gearboxes with focus on commercial vehicles.
[15]
[PDF] Formulae Handbook - Maxon Motor
Time t. Velocity v. Speed n. Force F, torque M. Velocity v. Speed n. For ... α = Δω / Δt = constant. [α] = 1 / s2 = rad/s2. Δω = α · Δt. Δn = · α · Δt π. 30. 1.
[16]
The Trinity of Inaccuracy: Phase Noise, Jitter and Short-Term Stability
Jan 10, 2023 · Phase noise, jitter and short-term stability are different ways of looking at the same physical phenomena. This article provides an overview of the ...
[17]
Synchronization: A Study in Timing - Transmission Digest
Sep 1, 2003 · Improper transmission lubricant, which causes the synchronizer rings to slip or bind; Worn synchronizer sleeve and hub causing binding or ...
[18]
[PDF] Understanding Jitter and Phase Noise
Using the tools provided in this book, you will learn how and when jitter and phase noise occur, their relationship with one another, how they can degrade ...
[19]
Clock Domain Crossing Techniques & Synchronizers - EDN Network
Sep 30, 2014 · In general, a conventional two flip-flop synchronizer (2-FF) is used for synchronizing a single bit level signal. As shown in Figure 1 and ...
[20]
3.1.3.3. Identifying Synchronizer CDC Issues - Intel
The following Verilog HDL and VHDL examples show how to define a three-stage synchronizer. These synchronizers take an asynchronous input signal from one clock ...
[21]
Clock Domain Crossing (CDC) - AnySilicon
Synchronizer circuits purpose is to protect the downstream logic to go into metastable state by minimize the probability of the metastability and increase MTBF.<|control11|><|separator|>
[22]
Setup and Hold Time Basics - EDN
Apr 19, 2012 · Setup time is defined as the minimum amount of time before the clock's active edge that the data must be stable for it to be latched correctly.
[23]
https://adaptivesupport.amd.com/s/question/0D52E00006iHuIfSAK/iob-register-and-synchronizer
[24]
AN219842 How to use interrupt in TRAVEO™ T2G
Aug 30, 2024 · The Interrupt synchronizer block synchronizes the interrupts to the CPU clock frequency. ... CPU interrupt handler for software interrupt ...
[25]
[PDF] Metastability and Synchronizers: A Tutorial - Technion
One common way of demonstrating metastability is by supplying two clocks that differ very slightly in frequency to the data and clock inputs; every cycle the ...
[26]
[PDF] Data Network Evaluation Criteria Handbook
It requires detailed knowledge of communications systems, aviation communication and application requirements, mechanisms for creating dependable architectures ...
[27]
Manual Transmission Synchronizers 101 - TREMEC Blog
Oct 25, 2023 · In every synchronizer assembly, there are three primary components: Slider, also referred to as a shift sleeve.
[28]
Gear synchro - x-engineer.org
The purpose of a gear synchronizer is to synchronize the speeds of the input and output shafts of a gearbox.
[29]
Synchromesh Gearbox | The Online Automotive Marketplace
Sep 23, 2018 · The first synchromesh gearbox was pioneered by General Motors and appeared with the 1928 Cadillac. There have been many different designs of ...
[30]
Powertrain - SGL Carbon
Our carbon friction linings for wet running are often found in synchronizer rings. Over the past decade, the increase in automated transmissions, especially the ...Missing: cars | Show results with:cars
[31]
How do synchronisers work? - Afton Chemical
A synchroniser is a ring device that is placed between the driving gear and the synchroniser hub and acts through friction to equalise the speeds of the main ...
[32]
Precision Synchronizer Rings in Brass and Steel for All ...
The brand Formed@Diehl combines both conventional forged synchronizer rings made of brass as well as cold formed steel synchronizer rings. Depending on the ...
[33]
https://repairsadvisor.com/blog/how-transmission-synchronizers-work/
[34]
[PDF] 5-Speed Synchronized Manual Transmissions - TREMEC
Five-speed rear wheel drive manual transmission. Torque Capacity: Model TR-S46-5A: 460 lb.-ft. (620 Nm); Model TR-S56-5A: 560 lb.-ft. (760 Nm). Maximum Gross ...
[35]
Gearbox Beatdown - Synchromesh vs. Dog Box - MotorTrend
Sep 12, 2011 · Synchromesh uses a collar to match gear speeds, while dog box uses large teeth for fast, precise shifting without a synchronizing mechanism.
[36]
Cone clutch - Roy Mech
Cone Clutch. Uniform Wear. From the above formulae for Force and torque it is clear that. T = F.μ .(ro + ri ) /( 2.sin α). Uniform pressure. From the above ...Missing: WR / | Show results with:WR /
[37]
Microstructures and wear properties of brass synchroniser rings
In this study, the wear behaviour of synchroniser rings produced from a (α+β) high-strength brass was investigated under dry sliding conditions by pin on ...
[38]
DE4443666A1 - Synchronizer ring with sintered bronze friction surface
The bronze alloy is a sintered composite material possessing the usual sintered porosity and largely non-porous near its friction surface.
[39]
Single vs. multi-cone synchronizers with carbon friction lining—a ...
Jun 30, 2020 · The minimum CoF µlock at which TF equals TZ, highly differs between single and multi-cone synchronizers (Eq. 3). Although, the blocker ...Missing: formula | Show results with:formula
[40]
Overhaul Clutch and Manual Transmission PDF
glazing, overheating, or excessive wear. Discoloration of the surface ... check synchronizer ring Measure clearance between synchronizing ring ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[41]
Friction Coefficient Compensation Control in Synchronizer ... - MDPI
As one of the main components of a transmission, the synchronizer generates friction torque during friction synchronization, thereby eliminating the difference ...
[42]
[PDF] CLASSICAL HOLLYWOOD, 1928–1946: Editing Paul Monticone 3
same shaft—the “gang sprocket” or multiple synchronizer—moved sound and ... DeMille is among the longest filmmaker-editor partnerships in film history, from. 1915 ...
[43]
History of Editing Machines - Lucy Carroll's WordPress
Created in 1917 by Iwan Serrurier and was originally a device used for people to watch project movies on. It soon became a video editing device in 1924 and is ...
[44]
Moviola | Science Museum Group Collection
The Moviola, designed by Iwan Serrurier in 1917, was a home movie projector manufactured in 1923, later adapted for film editors in 1924.
[45]
Intermittent Sprocket
May 29, 2020 · Sprockets are toothed drums that engage with the perforations (also called sprocket holes) to advance the film through the projector.
[46]
[PDF] Steenbeck operating instructions - filmlabs.org
To obtain the correct tension, first hold the film taut when you wind it round the last sprocket, and then allow it to slide slowly back until the notches ...
[47]
Film Music 101: The Click Track
Jan 17, 2016 · A click track is an audible metronome signal that the conductor and musicians hear through a set of headphones while recording is in progress.
[48]
The Surprisingly Fascinating World of Frame Rates - PremiumBeat
Sep 30, 2022 · Universally, 24fps is accepted as the norm for a “cinematic” frame rate. 30fps is accepted for broadcast in North America, and 25fps is the ...
[49]
Audio/video sync - frame rate limitations? - SOS FORUM
... standards bodies will allow a maximum of a 1-frame lag too, although half a frame (21ms at 24fps ) is the spec tolerance for film, I believe. Last edited by ...
[50]
The Evolution Of Video Editing - Film Editing History - MASV
Nov 4, 2021 · Late 1980s/early 90s: The advent of digital NLE software such as Avid Media Composer and Adobe Premiere marks the beginning of modern video ...
[51]
[PDF] Chapter 7 - Propellers - Federal Aviation Administration
A governor is an engine rpm-sensing device and high- pressure oil pump. In a constant-speed propeller system, the governor responds to a change in engine rpm ...
[52]
Propeller Synchronisation | SKYbrary Aviation Safety
Propeller synchronisation is the process of manually or automatically adjusting the propellers of a multi-engine propeller driven aeroplane so that they all ...Missing: alignment signals governors
[53]
The invention that turned the tide of aerial combat - RAF Association
Apr 9, 2024 · The Fokker synchronisation gear required the pilot to activate it when they wished to commence firing. Once activated, a cam wheel connected to ...
[54]
The Fokker Scourge: Imperial Germany's Secret Weapon in the First ...
Jun 7, 2017 · These gears were synchronized to the firing of the machine gun to the rotation of the propeller, ensuring that bullets never hit it. Fitted to ...Missing: dominance | Show results with:dominance
[55]
INTEGRATED FLIGHT AND FIRE CONTROL - Air Power Australia
In a modern fighter, inputs from the pilot's controls are fed into a Stability Augmentation System (SAS) computer. This computer is programmed to a control law, ...<|separator|>
[56]
Enabling Fires Modernization: How PEO IEW&S Supports ... - Army.mil
Mar 31, 2025 · PNT ensures synchronization and communication across networks, including command and control systems, fire control systems, and munitions.
[57]
Sync Gear: How World War I Fighters Avoided Damaging Their Own ...
Nov 29, 2016 · Sync gear, also known as an interrupter or gun synchronizer, was developed during World War I to ensure that an armament attached to a single-engine aircraft ...Missing: cam precision