Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Targeted individual

A targeted individual (TI) is a self-identifier used by persons who report experiencing systematic, covert persecution orchestrated by coordinated groups, typically involving surveillance, psychological manipulation, and alleged technological assaults such as directed energy weapons or "voice-to-skull" transmissions.^[1]^[2] These beliefs, often termed "gang stalking," describe a multi-perpetrator harassment schema lacking verifiable empirical support and frequently aligned with persecutory delusions in clinical assessments.^[1]^[3] The phenomenon has proliferated through online forums and self-published accounts since the early 2000s, where TIs share narratives of isolation, hypervigilance, and existential threat from nebulous entities like government agencies or shadowy networks.^[1] Content analyses of TI testimonies reveal recurring motifs of auditory hallucinations, electronic interference, and community-wide complicity, yet independent investigations find no corroborating physical evidence or institutional involvement.^[1]^[4] However, to date, no large-scale, independent, proactive empirical investigation specifically designed to test the physical or electronic components of gang-stalking claims has ever been published in the peer-reviewed literature or conducted by law-enforcement or intelligence agencies. Psychological research frames TI ideation as a shared delusional system, potentially rooted in underlying conditions like schizophrenia-spectrum disorders or trauma-induced paranoia, exacerbated by internet echo chambers that validate untested claims.^[3]^[5] Notable controversies include associations with violent extremism, as some mass attackers have cited TI experiences in manifestos, prompting studies on risk factors for escalation from perceived victimization to aggression. Despite advocacy for recognition as a public health crisis, therapeutic interventions emphasize reality-testing and mental health support over endorsement of the harassment narrative, given the absence of causal mechanisms beyond cognitive biases.^[3]^[1]

Definition and Terminology

Core Definition

A targeted individual (TI) is a self-applied label used by persons who believe they are victims of systematic, covert persecution involving coordinated harassment, surveillance, and psychological operations by organized groups, often purportedly orchestrated by government intelligence agencies, corporations, or unidentified conspiratorial entities.^[6]^[7] These individuals typically describe experiences of "gang stalking," where unrelated strangers are alleged to participate in stalking, noise campaigns, and social sabotage to induce isolation and distress.^[1] Claims frequently include advanced technological elements, such as "voice-to-skull" auditory hallucinations, directed-energy weapons causing physical sensations, and remote neural monitoring.^[2]^[8] The phenomenon emerged prominently in online communities during the early 2000s, with TIs forming support networks on forums and social media to document and validate their narratives, often interpreting mundane events—like coincidental encounters or electronic glitches—as evidence of targeting.^[9] Self-reports emphasize themes of retribution for perceived whistleblowing, ideological dissent, or random selection as test subjects in non-consensual experiments, echoing historical concerns over programs like MKUltra but lacking substantiation for contemporary scale or methods described.^[5] Psychiatric literature classifies TI beliefs as indicative of delusional disorder, persecutory subtype, or shared psychotic delusions amplified by internet echo chambers, where confirmation bias and group reinforcement sustain convictions absent empirical corroboration.^[3]^[1] No peer-reviewed evidence supports the existence of ubiquitous, individualized targeting campaigns as alleged, with case analyses revealing overlaps with conditions like schizophrenia spectrum disorders, where hypervigilance to neutral stimuli is misinterpreted as intentional malice.^[10] Isolated federal acknowledgments of past surveillance abuses, such as COINTELPRO (discontinued in 1971), do not extend to validating TI-specific assertions of ongoing, tech-mediated operations against civilians.^[2] The term gang stalking, also known as group stalking or organized stalking, is often used interchangeably with "targeted individual" to describe claims of coordinated surveillance and harassment by networks of perpetrators, including neighbors, strangers, and institutions, aimed at psychological destabilization.^[1] ^[2] These variations emphasize the multi-perpetrator aspect, with self-reports alleging tactics like repeated street theatrics, vehicle tailing, and entry into residences, purportedly orchestrated by government agencies or shadowy groups.^[1] Electronic harassment, sometimes termed electromagnetic harassment or psychotronic torture, constitutes another closely related concept, focusing on alleged non-ionizing radiation or directed-energy technologies to induce symptoms such as burning sensations, auditory hallucinations, or sleep disruption.^[11] Proponents within targeted individual communities link this to "voice-to-skull" (V2K) technology, claiming microwave-based transmission of voices or commands directly into the mind, drawing on documented microwave auditory effects but extending them to unverified weaponized applications.^[12] ^[1] Variations like TI (abbreviation for targeted individual) and victims of gangstalking appear predominantly in online forums and self-published accounts, serving as self-identifiers for those reporting combined physical, electronic, and social persecution.^[8] ^[13] These terms overlap significantly, with electronic elements often integrated into gang stalking narratives, though empirical validation of systemic coordination remains absent in peer-reviewed investigations, studies such as Sheridan and James (2015) and Bell et al. (2006) correlate such beliefs with isolated persecutory ideation.^[14]^[15]

Historical Background

Government Surveillance Precedents (1950s–1970s)

During the Cold War, U.S. intelligence agencies conducted covert domestic operations that involved surveillance, psychological manipulation, and harassment of targeted individuals and groups deemed subversive. The Central Intelligence Agency's Project MKUltra, authorized on April 13, 1953, and terminated in 1973, focused on developing mind-control techniques through human experimentation.^[16] This program comprised 149 subprojects across 80 institutions, including universities and hospitals, where researchers administered LSD, hypnosis, sensory deprivation, and electroshock to unwitting subjects—often U.S. citizens—to test interrogation resistance and behavioral modification. Declassified records, including those from the 1977 Joint Hearing before the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence, confirmed instances of non-consensual dosing leading to psychological harm, such as the 1951 death of CIA scientist Frank Olson after unwitting LSD administration.^[16] The Federal Bureau of Investigation's COINTELPRO (Counter Intelligence Program), initiated in August 1956 and formally ended on April 28, 1971, targeted domestic political dissidents through systematic disruption.^[17] Initially aimed at the Communist Party USA, it expanded to over 2,000 operations against civil rights organizations, black nationalist groups like the Black Panther Party, and anti-Vietnam War activists, using wiretaps, informant penetration, forged correspondence, and media leaks to foster paranoia, incite violence, and discredit leaders.^[17] A 1967 FBI memorandum outlined goals to "prevent the rise of a messiah" among black nationalists, exemplified by efforts against Martin Luther King Jr., including surveillance of his personal life and anonymous letters urging suicide.^[17] These tactics, documented in internal FBI files released post-exposure, involved collaboration with local police and private entities to isolate targets socially and professionally.^[17] The 1975 Senate Select Committee to Study Governmental Operations with Respect to Intelligence Activities, known as the Church Committee, exposed these programs as abuses of power, revealing overreach by the CIA, FBI, and NSA into civilian affairs without legal oversight.^[18] Its reports detailed the NSA's Project SHAMROCK (1945–1975), which scanned millions of international telegrams for domestic surveillance, and the CIA's CHAOS program (1967–1974), which infiltrated U.S. dissent groups abroad and compiled dossiers on 300,000 Americans.^[18] While justified as anti-communist measures, the committee found no evidence of widespread internal threats warranting such secrecy, leading to executive orders limiting domestic spying and the creation of oversight mechanisms. These documented precedents of individualized targeting via covert psychological and surveillance tactics provided empirical basis for later concerns about government capabilities, though confined to ideological adversaries rather than arbitrary citizens.^[18]

Emergence of Modern TI Claims (1980s–2000s)

In the 1980s, following congressional investigations into historical U.S. government programs such as MKUltra and COINTELPRO—which involved surveillance, psychological operations, and non-consensual experimentation—isolated individuals began articulating claims of ongoing personal targeting by shadowy agencies. These assertions often blended fears of residual covert operations with emerging concerns over electromagnetic technologies, including allegations of microwave-based harassment intended to induce physical or auditory effects. Such claims appeared sporadically in legal filings, media reports, and self-published accounts, though they lacked organized dissemination due to limited communication channels.^[19] During the 1990s, as personal computing and early internet access proliferated, reports of "electronic harassment" and organized "group stalking" increased, with claimants describing coordinated surveillance by civilians and officials using vehicles, signals intelligence, and prototype directed-energy devices. These narratives drew on declassified military research into the microwave auditory effect—demonstrated in laboratory settings since the 1960s but speculated by claimants to be weaponized for voice transmission (V2K)—and reflected broader societal anxieties over electronic privacy amid the digital revolution. Documented cases included petitions to regulatory bodies like the FCC for relief from alleged radio frequency attacks, though investigations typically found no corroborating evidence beyond subjective testimonies.^[19]^[1] The 2000s marked a pivotal coalescence of these claims into a self-identified movement, facilitated by web forums, blogs, and early social media. The phrase "targeted individual" (TI) first surfaced in searchable online contexts around 2004, enabling claimants to connect disparate experiences of alleged psychotronic torture, neural monitoring, and community-based harassment into shared frameworks often attributed to government or corporate perpetrators. By 2007, media outlets documented active TI networks discussing tactics like V2K and implant-based control, with estimates of thousands affected worldwide, though empirical validation remained absent and claims were frequently linked to psychiatric evaluations in professional literature. This era's growth paralleled post-9/11 expansions in surveillance discourse, amplifying pre-existing suspicions without introducing verifiable new mechanisms.^[20]^[19]

Claims by Self-Identified Targeted Individuals

Alleged Forms of Harassment

Self-identified targeted individuals frequently report experiences of gang stalking, described as coordinated surveillance and intimidation by networks of perpetrators, including strangers, neighbors, and institutions, with 94% of analyzed accounts citing physical following and 60% electronic monitoring such as hacking or tracking devices.^[1] These claims often encompass noise campaigns and street theater, where perpetrators allegedly stage disruptive sounds or provocative behaviors in public to induce paranoia or social isolation.^[1] Home invasions and vandalism are also commonly alleged, with 34% reporting unauthorized entries and 32% theft or damage to property, purportedly to heighten insecurity.^[1] Technological harassment forms a significant subset of allegations, including directed energy weapons (DEWs), extremely low-frequency (ELF) radiation, and psychotronic devices claimed to cause physical symptoms like burning sensations, sleep disruption, or organ manipulation.^[2] Voice-to-skull (V2K) technology is cited in 26% of cases, where auditory hallucinations are attributed to microwave-based transmission of voices directly into the mind, often interpreted as remote neural monitoring or mind control efforts affecting 40% of self-reports.^[1] Implantable microchips for tracking or bodily control are another recurring claim, alongside assertions of poisoning or covert physical assaults leading to unexplained ailments in 36% of accounts.^[1]^[2] Social and psychological tactics allegedly include slander and reputation sabotage, with 34% describing gossip or false accusations spread by alleged perpetrators to alienate support networks.^[1] Broader narratives frame these as part of conspiracies involving government or corporate cover-ups (80% of claims), where harassment serves to neutralize perceived threats through sustained isolation and psychological erosion.^[1] Such reports emphasize non-lethal, deniable methods to avoid detection, drawing parallels to covert operations but lacking independent verification in empirical studies.^[1]

Technological and Psychological Tactics Claimed

Self-identified targeted individuals (TIs) frequently allege the use of advanced technological methods for harassment, including directed energy weapons (DEWs) that purportedly deliver microwave or electromagnetic pulses to induce physical pain, such as burning sensations, muscle spasms, or organ disruption, often without visible evidence.^[2]^[10] These claims reference patents for non-lethal directed energy systems, such as those involving millimeter waves or pulsed microwaves, though TIs assert covert deployment beyond disclosed military applications.^[21] Voice-to-skull (V2K) technology is another common assertion, described as microwave-based auditory transmission that projects synthetic voices or sounds directly into the target's cranium, mimicking internal monologue or external commands, with alleged origins in declassified U.S. military research from the 1960s onward.^[2]^[22] Additional technological tactics claimed include remote neural monitoring via implanted microchips or nanoscale devices for tracking location and manipulating thoughts, purportedly achieved through extremely low-frequency (ELF) radiation or psychotronic weapons that interface with neural activity.^[2]^[1] TIs report electronic interference, such as hacked devices emitting targeted noise or signals causing sleep disruption, and bodily implantation during routine medical procedures, enabling constant surveillance akin to GPS tracking.^[10] These allegations often invoke historical precedents like the CIA's MKUltra program (1953–1973), which experimented with behavioral modification, though TIs extend this to contemporary, unacknowledged programs.^[23] Psychological tactics described by TIs encompass organized "gang stalking" or mobbing, involving coordinated groups staging overt surveillance, such as vehicles following targets or strangers mimicking behaviors to induce paranoia, termed "street theater" or "sensitivity training."^[1]^[2] Noise campaigns are alleged, including incessant banging, sirens, or construction near residences to erode mental stability, combined with gaslighting through home invasions that rearrange items or introduce allergens.^[24]^[1] Reputation sabotage via character assassination—spreading rumors of mental illness or criminality to employers and social circles—is claimed to foster isolation, drawing parallels to East German Stasi techniques like Zersetzung, which aimed to psychologically dismantle dissidents through subtle provocation.^[3] These methods purportedly exploit cognitive biases, such as confirmation bias, to amplify perceived threats, with TIs asserting fusion centers or community policing networks facilitate civilian involvement.^[25]

Psychological and Medical Explanations

Associations with Mental Health Conditions

Self-identified targeted individuals who seek psychiatric evaluation are frequently diagnosed with disorders characterized by persecutory delusions, including delusional disorder (persecutory type) and schizophrenia spectrum conditions.^[5] For instance, clinical presentations involving beliefs in organized electronic harassment or surveillance often align with diagnostic criteria for psychosis, where such convictions lack external corroboration and impair daily functioning.^[26] A linguistic analysis of online gangstalking forums—frequented by targeted individuals—revealed discourse patterns mirroring those in documented psychotic narratives, including heightened references to conspiracy and persecution, supporting an interpretation of these beliefs as symptomatic rather than veridical.^[5] Case studies further illustrate this linkage; for example, reports of four men self-identifying as targeted individuals described coordinated stalking and technological interference, which clinicians attributed to underlying delusional systems rather than external threats, with symptoms responsive to antipsychotic treatment in some instances.^[1] Empirical scrutiny in forensic psychiatry highlights that targeted individuals typically reject diagnostic explanations, preferring communal validation online, which can perpetuate and intensify delusional content akin to shared psychotic disorder (folie à plusieurs).^[27] While not all individuals endorsing these beliefs meet full psychotic criteria—some may exhibit traits of paranoia or trauma-related disorders without frank delusions—the preponderance of peer-reviewed assessments frames the phenomenon as a manifestation of psychiatric vulnerability, particularly in isolated or socially disconnected persons.^[28] No controlled studies have validated the external reality of claimed targeting, reinforcing the causal primacy of internal psychological processes.^[29]

Diagnostic Criteria and Case Studies

The beliefs reported by self-identified targeted individuals (TIs) regarding organized harassment, surveillance, and technological persecution commonly align with the DSM-5-TR criteria for delusional disorder, persecutory type.^[30]^[31] However, the DSM definition of a delusion excludes beliefs ordinarily accepted by members of the person's subculture or cultural group, raising a diagnostic paradox for shared convictions within online communities, as highlighted by Bell et al. (2006) in their examination of mind control experiences.^[15] Some researchers, including Reed (2024), propose framing gangstalking as a cultural concept of distress applicable to the TI subculture, while Pierre (2024) addresses the diagnostic paradox noted by Bell et al. (2006), where shared online beliefs challenge delusion criteria, suggesting gangstalking beliefs may be delusion-like rather than proper delusions within the TI subculture; however, he argues that unfounded self-referential beliefs about personal gangstalking remain delusional, even when embedded in broader conspiracy theories about government surveillance or harassment.^[32] This diagnosis requires one or more delusions persisting for at least one month, without prominent hallucinations, disorganized behavior, or negative symptoms typical of schizophrenia; daily functioning remains relatively intact outside the delusion's influence, and the condition is not attributable to substances, medical issues, or other psychiatric disorders.^[30]^[31] Delusions in this subtype center on the conviction of being mistreated, spied upon, conspired against, or harmed by individuals, organizations, or shadowy groups, often involving plausible but unverified scenarios like covert monitoring—mirroring TI narratives of "gang stalking" or electronic targeting.^[35]^[36] Differential diagnosis emphasizes ruling out brief psychotic episodes or mood disorders with psychotic features, though persecutory delusions frequently co-occur with anxiety or irritability, leading to defensive or litigious behaviors among affected individuals.^[30] Psychiatric assessments distinguish these fixed beliefs from rational threat perception by their resistance to contradictory evidence and encapsulation within otherwise normal cognition.^[30] Empirical scrutiny frames TI claims as non-bizarre delusions (involving real-world elements like technology or neighbors) rather than verifiable conspiracies, with onset often linked to psychosocial stressors rather than external causation.^[3] While TIs typically reject such framings, favoring interpretations of systemic cover-ups, clinical consensus prioritizes delusion-based explanations absent corroborating proof of coordinated persecution.^[27] A seminal case series derives from Sheridan and James's 2015 study of 128 self-reported "gang-stalking" complaints. In this study, 127 participants met criteria for delusional disorder, schizophrenia-spectrum disorders, or related conditions, exhibiting profound distress including isolation, paranoia, and suicidal ideation in roughly 30% of cases.^[37] Respondents described identical themes of ubiquitous surveillance by coordinated actors, yet no evidence supported organized external involvement; the outlier case involved documented single-stalker harassment without group elements.^[38] This aligns with forensic reviews of TI allegations in U.S. federal courts, where claims of electronic or psychological targeting routinely trace to untreated persecutory delusions rather than substantiated plots, often complicating legal proceedings due to impaired reality-testing.^[10] The study was exploratory, with authors explicitly noting the need for replications to establish its findings; they rejected subculture status for TI beliefs, stating "The existence of self-published webpages concerned with particular beliefs was not taken as evidence of the belief belonging to a culture or sub-culture (Bell et al., 2006)." Additional clinical vignettes from psychiatric literature highlight patterns: individuals presenting with TI symptoms, such as perceived voice-to-skull transmissions or directed-energy attacks, receive psychotic disorder diagnoses upon evaluation, with delusions persisting despite negative neuroimaging or surveillance verifications.^[5] Content analyses of 50 TI self-documentation videos reveal multimodal "evidence" (e.g., anomalous sounds or patterns) interpreted delusionally, reinforcing self-diagnosis over professional assessment.^[29] These cases underscore causal links to internal cognitive biases, like heightened threat attribution, over empirical validation of external orchestration.^[1]

Sociological and Cultural Dimensions

Online Communities and Shared Beliefs

Self-identified targeted individuals (TIs) have formed extensive online networks since the early 2000s, utilizing platforms such as dedicated forums, YouTube channels, and Facebook groups to connect, document experiences, and disseminate information.^[39]^[20] These communities, which include groups like "Freedom for Targeted Individuals" hosting annual conference calls, enable participants to share narratives of harassment and purported evidence, fostering a sense of solidarity among thousands worldwide who report similar ordeals.^[8] Interactions often involve uploading videos of alleged stalking incidents in public spaces, which members analyze semiotically to interpret everyday events—such as vehicles or pedestrians—as coordinated signals or threats.^[29] Core shared beliefs revolve around "gang stalking," a purported organized campaign of surveillance and psychological torment executed by covert operatives embedded in civilian life, including neighbors, coworkers, and strangers coerced or programmed to participate.^[2] TIs commonly assert that this harassment extends to technological interventions, including "voice-to-skull" (V2K) devices that beam synthetic voices or thoughts directly into the mind, directed energy weapons causing physical symptoms like burning sensations, and psychotronic tools for remote neural manipulation.^[22] These convictions are framed as extensions of historical precedents like MKUltra, with communities rejecting mental health diagnoses as fabricated cover stories propagated by perpetrators.^[7] Within these networks, beliefs evolve through collective reinforcement, where individual testimonies are cross-validated, and dissent—such as suggestions of delusion—is attributed to infiltration by agents or "perps."^[5] Linguistic patterns in online discussions reveal a consistent persecutory framework, emphasizing themes of omnipresent monitoring and bodily invasion, which sustains group cohesion despite lack of verifiable external corroboration.^[5] Some subgroups advocate countermeasures like Faraday cages or legal filings, while others produce content warning of recruitment tactics that allegedly ensnare new victims via everyday interactions.^[2] As of 2024, these digital spaces continue to expand, blending support with amplification of unproven claims, occasionally intersecting with broader conspiracy ecosystems.^[2]

Influence of Broader Conspiracy Theories

Self-identified targeted individuals (TIs) frequently incorporate elements from historical conspiracy narratives centered on government mind control experiments, particularly the CIA's MKUltra program, which conducted unethical human testing on drugs, hypnosis, and sensory deprivation from 1953 to 1973.^[40] TIs often claim these operations persist covertly, framing personal experiences of perceived harassment as extensions of such documented abuses, thereby lending a veneer of plausibility drawn from declassified records.^[20] Contemporary TI accounts also intersect with expansive theories positing elite orchestration, including "deep state" cabals, New World Order agendas, and Illuminati influence, where individuals view themselves as selected victims in broader schemes of population control. These narratives integrate technological paranoia, such as assertions that 5G networks or HAARP ionospheric heaters enable directed energy attacks, mirroring chemtrail and electromagnetic weapon conspiracies that attribute anomalous health effects to hidden governmental agendas.^[2] Such linkages position TI experiences within a causal chain of systemic malice, where isolated incidents are reinterpreted as coordinated assaults by shadowy networks.^[7] Online platforms exacerbate this influence, as TI forums and social media groups cross-pollinate with general conspiracy ecosystems, where users reference MKUltra precedents alongside modern surveillance fears amplified post-Edward Snowden revelations in 2013.^[41] This shared digital space fosters resonant beliefs, with TIs adopting explanatory templates from wider theories to validate subjective perceptions of gang stalking or voice-to-skull transmissions, often without empirical corroboration beyond anecdotal convergence.^[5] Sociological analyses highlight how these interconnections sustain TI identity through communal reinforcement, though they parallel patterns in conspiracy thinking where sinister attributions override prosaic explanations like coincidence or confirmation bias.^[42]

Evidence Assessment

Verifiable Historical Parallels

The Federal Bureau of Investigation's COINTELPRO (Counter Intelligence Program), active from 1956 to 1971, systematically targeted perceived domestic threats, including civil rights leaders and activists, through tactics such as anonymous letters designed to incite marital discord, forged documents to sow internal group conflicts, and media manipulation to discredit individuals.^[17] Declassified FBI records reveal operations against figures like Martin Luther King Jr., involving surveillance, blackmail attempts via tapes of personal encounters, and efforts to isolate targets professionally and socially, often without their knowledge of the orchestration.^[17] These methods aimed to neutralize influence by fostering paranoia and self-doubt, paralleling claims of coordinated psychological disruption, though COINTELPRO focused on organized groups rather than isolated civilians and was exposed by congressional investigations in 1975-1976.^[43] In the German Democratic Republic, the Ministry for State Security (Stasi) implemented Zersetzung ("decomposition") from the early 1970s until 1989 as a non-violent strategy to undermine political dissidents and suspected opponents through covert psychological operations.^[44] Techniques documented in post-reunification Stasi archives included recruiting neighbors and colleagues for subtle harassment, such as noise disturbances, anonymous rumors of infidelity or unreliability, and staged interpersonal conflicts to erode trust and mental stability, often leading targets to question their sanity.^[45] Over 5,000 such operations were recorded by 1989, affecting an estimated tens of thousands, with effects persisting post-1989 as victims sought compensation for induced isolation and career sabotage.^[46] This state-sponsored "silent destruction" bears resemblance to allegations of community-based stalking and gaslighting, though it was confined to a totalitarian surveillance apparatus monitoring 1 in 63 citizens.^[47] The Central Intelligence Agency's MKUltra program (1953-1973) involved experiments on unwitting U.S. and Canadian civilians using LSD, hypnosis, and sensory deprivation to explore behavioral modification, with declassified documents confirming over 150 subprojects testing psychological coercion techniques.^[40] While primarily laboratory-based rather than field harassment, instances of dosing individuals in social settings without consent induced disorientation and paranoia, mirroring narratives of covert technological or chemical targeting, until public exposure via the 1975 Church Committee halted it.^[16] These programs demonstrate governments' historical capacity for organized, deniable psychological operations against select targets, substantiated by archival evidence, but differ from contemporary targeted individual assertions by their scale against ideological adversaries and eventual documentation through leaks or regime collapse.

Empirical Scrutiny of Contemporary Claims

Contemporary claims by self-identified targeted individuals (TIs) typically allege coordinated, covert operations involving physical surveillance, psychological manipulation, and advanced technological harassment, such as directed energy weapons or voice-to-skull (V2K) transmissions, purportedly orchestrated by government agencies, corporations, or shadowy networks.^[2] These assertions, disseminated through online forums and personal testimonies since the early 2000s, lack substantiation from independent, verifiable data; qualitative analyses of TI accounts reveal consistent patterns of subjective distress but no objective markers of external causation, such as detectable surveillance artifacts or perpetrator identification.^[1] For instance, content analyses of over 200 TI narratives identify recurring themes of isolation, hypervigilance, and perceived electronic interference, yet these derive solely from self-reports without corroborative forensic or technical evidence.^[48] Empirical investigations into gang stalking allegations, a core TI narrative, consistently fail to uncover organized perpetrator networks. A review of U.S. federal court filings involving gang stalking claims from 2007 to 2017 found that complainants rarely identified specific actors or provided physical proof, with outcomes dominated by mental health evaluations rather than validations of conspiracy; in 85% of cases, claims were deemed unsubstantiated or delusional under psychiatric scrutiny.^[10] Law enforcement assessments, including those by the FBI, attribute reported incidents to misinterpretations of routine social interactions or isolated stalking by known individuals, not large-scale operations; no multi-jurisdictional probes have confirmed TI-described syndicates employing thousands in harassment campaigns.^[7] Similarly, examinations of "evidence" videos uploaded by TIs to platforms like YouTube—numbering in the thousands as of 2021—employ semiotic analysis to show reliance on ambiguous footage (e.g., strangers glancing or vehicles passing), interpretable via confirmation bias rather than causal proof of targeting.^[6] Claims of technological harassment, including microwave auditory effects or remote neural monitoring, lack empirical support from physical measurements in TI complainants, with no peer-reviewed studies documenting attempts to detect anomalous electromagnetic fields, directed energy exposure, or physiological anomalies beyond stress-induced baselines. TI assertions of such technologies remain uncorroborated by forensic evidence, and peer-reviewed bioelectromagnetics research on the microwave auditory effect (also known as the Frey effect) indicates that non-ionizing radiofrequency energy induces perceived sounds only through thermoelastic expansion requiring pulsed exposure at intensities typically necessitating source proximity, producing rudimentary clicks or buzzes rather than intelligible voices or undetectable remote neural control.^[49] Government disclosures on classified programs, such as declassified CIA behavioral experiments from the 1970s (e.g., MKUltra), reveal historical precedents for isolated mind-control research but no evidence of ongoing, scalable deployment against civilians as alleged by TIs. In sum, the evidentiary void—coupled with replicable psychological models attributing beliefs to persecutory ideation—positions TI claims as unfalsifiable hypotheses rather than empirically grounded phenomena.^[10]

Legal and Institutional Responses

Lawsuits and Court Outcomes

Individuals claiming to be targeted individuals (TIs) have filed numerous civil lawsuits in U.S. federal courts, primarily alleging organized harassment through gang stalking, electronic surveillance, and directed-energy weapons perpetrated by government agencies or shadowy organizations. These suits typically seek injunctions, damages, or declarations of constitutional violations under theories such as the Fourth Amendment or the Administrative Procedure Act.^[10]^[50] A comprehensive review of "gang stalking" allegations in U.S. federal courts identified dozens of cases where plaintiffs asserted coordinated, multi-perpetrator harassment campaigns, often attributing them to state actors. In 87.5% of analyzed cases, courts dismissed claims in whole or part on procedural grounds (e.g., failure to state a claim, lack of standing), meritless assertions, or both, with no instances where courts validated the existence of organized "gang stalking" as described by TI litigants.^[10] Courts frequently noted the implausibility of claims lacking corroborative evidence, such as verifiable perpetrator identities or technological mechanisms, leading to sanctions in extreme frivolous filings.^[10] Prominent examples include Targeted Justice, Inc. v. Garland (No. 23-20342, 5th Cir. 2024), where eighteen individuals and the organization sued FBI Director Christopher Wray and others, claiming illegal "targeting" via psychotronic weapons causing symptoms akin to Havana syndrome. The U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas dismissed the complaint with prejudice for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction and failure to plead plausible facts, a ruling affirmed by the Fifth Circuit on March 8, 2024, emphasizing sovereign immunity and speculative allegations without evidence of redressable harm.^[50] Similarly, a 2024 petition for certiorari in the U.S. Supreme Court by Targeted Justice plaintiffs reiterated prior dismissed claims of twenty-five years of retaliation, surveillance, and torture but received no relief, underscoring courts' consistent rejection of unsubstantiated TI narratives.^[51] No recorded U.S. court outcomes have resulted in judgments affirming TI-specific claims of widespread, covert technological or organized harassment programs. Isolated allowances for amended complaints occurred in a minority of cases, typically to pursue narrower tort claims like defamation, but these rarely advanced to trial or yielded favorable rulings on core allegations.^[10] Legal scholars attribute the pattern of dismissals to evidentiary voids, with plaintiffs often relying on self-reported experiences over forensic or documentary proof.^[10]

Government and Law Enforcement Positions

U.S. federal law enforcement agencies, including the FBI, have not acknowledged or substantiated claims of systematic domestic "gang stalking" or "targeted individual" (TI) programs involving coordinated harassment by government actors or civilian networks using covert technologies. Instead, the FBI investigates verifiable instances of transnational repression, where foreign governments target dissidents, journalists, or activists in the U.S., but distinguishes these from unsubstantiated domestic conspiracy narratives lacking forensic evidence.^[52] Reports of alleged TI experiences are handled under existing anti-stalking frameworks, such as federal statutes prohibiting interstate stalking (18 U.S.C. § 2261A) or state laws, but broad allegations of organized, multi-perpetrator campaigns rarely yield prosecutable evidence, often resulting in referrals to mental health services rather than coordinated operations. A 2015 exploratory study by psychologists Lorraine Sheridan and David V. James surveyed 128 self-identified gang stalking victims alongside 128 individual stalking victims; all gang stalking complainants were professionally assessed as delusional, reporting implausibly vast perpetrator numbers (averaging over 100) and severe life disruptions, with no corroboration of group coordination.^[38] In U.S. federal courts, TI-related lawsuits alleging government-orchestrated stalking have uniformly failed to produce admissible evidence of such programs, with cases dismissed for insufficient proof; a review of multiple filings revealed patterns of unsubstantiated claims, frequent plaintiff histories of psychiatric diagnoses, and no verified instances of organized operations, underscoring law enforcement's evidentiary thresholds.^[10] Similar positions prevail internationally; for instance, UK police treat group stalking reports skeptically absent concrete threats, prioritizing individual perpetrator accountability over collective conspiracy models, as group claims exceed typical investigative yields.^[38] This stance aligns with causal assessments favoring isolated criminal acts or perceptual distortions over undetected nationwide networks, given the absence of whistleblower corroboration, leaked documents, or epidemiological patterns matching TI prevalence estimates (potentially thousands self-reporting annually online). While historical precedents like FBI's COINTELPRO (discontinued 1971) involved targeted surveillance of activists, contemporary TI assertions diverge by invoking unproven elements like psychotronic weapons, prompting authorities to deem them incompatible with operational feasibility and resource allocation.^[10]

Criticisms and Alternative Interpretations

Debunking Specific TI Narratives

Claims of gang stalking, wherein individuals assert coordinated surveillance and harassment by large groups of civilians acting as operatives, have been examined through content analyses of self-reported experiences, revealing patterns consistent with persecutory delusions rather than verifiable organized campaigns.^[1] Psychological assessments frame these beliefs as a blend of conspiracy ideation and shared delusional disorder, amplified by online echo chambers, with no empirical evidence of widespread covert coordination by authorities or private entities.^[7] Court reviews of related lawsuits in the U.S. federal system similarly find allegations unsubstantiated, often attributing them to mental health factors without forensic support for the claimed networks.^[10] The narrative of voice-to-skull (V2K) technology, positing microwave-induced auditory hallucinations for mind control, rests on the established microwave auditory effect, which generates basic perceptions like clicks or buzzes from pulsed radiofrequency exposure but lacks capacity for transmitting complex, intelligible speech covertly.^[49] Peer-reviewed analyses confirm the effect requires high-intensity pulses close to the target, producing thermoelastic expansion in tissue that yields indistinct sounds, not modulated voices, rendering weaponized application for harassment implausible without detectable equipment or physiological harm.^[53] Investigations into analogous incidents, such as Havana Syndrome, have identified non-adversarial causes like insect noise or psychogenic factors over directed energy, with no confirmed cases of V2K deployment.^[54] Assertions of electronic harassment via directed energy weapons (DEWs) causing physical sensations or injuries face scrutiny from biophysical limits: purported symptoms like burning or vibrations align more closely with somatic delusions or environmental hypersensitivities than scalable, undetectable DEW effects, as no peer-reviewed studies validate non-thermal, low-level RF as a harassment vector.^[55] Extensive research on radiofrequency fields, including military and civilian exposure data, demonstrates thresholds far exceeding covert capabilities for targeted effects, with claims often self-diagnosed without medical corroboration.^[49] Alternative explanations, including nocebo responses or preexisting conditions, predominate in clinical evaluations of self-identified victims.^[7]

Potential for Isolated Real Targeting

While the broader narratives advanced by self-identified targeted individuals typically lack verifiable evidence and align with patterns observed in persecutory delusions, isolated cases of coordinated targeting by state actors or small groups have been substantiated through legal proceedings and government acknowledgments. These instances involve deliberate surveillance, harassment, and intimidation directed at specific individuals, often political dissidents or whistleblowers, rather than indiscriminate or technologically exotic campaigns. Such targeting can superficially resemble elements of targeted individual accounts, such as persistent following or psychological pressure, but is confined to narrow motives like silencing opposition and does not imply systemic programs against ordinary citizens.^[52] A prominent category involves transnational repression, where foreign governments orchestrate operations against expatriates in the United States. The Federal Bureau of Investigation defines this as extraterritorial efforts to intimidate, harass, or harm diaspora members, employing tactics including physical stalking, online disinformation, and threats to family abroad.^[52] For instance, in March 2022, the U.S. Department of Justice charged five individuals with stalking, harassing, and spying on U.S. residents at the direction of People's Republic of China (PRC) secret police stations, targeting Chinese dissidents through surveillance and coercion to return to China.^[56] Similarly, in April 2023, federal indictments were unsealed against 40 current and former PRC national police officers for transnational repression schemes, including creating fake social media accounts to harass U.S.-based critics and collaborating with telecommunications employees for intelligence gathering.^[57] These prosecutions, supported by evidence from FBI investigations, confirm organized, multi-actor efforts but attribute them to geopolitical motives against high-profile activists, not delusional constructs.^[58] Non-state examples of multi-perpetrator harassment, though less frequently prosecuted at scale, appear in victim surveys and stalking research. Bureau of Justice Statistics data indicate that some stalking incidents involve multiple offenders or unidentified groups, with victims reporting coordinated behaviors like repeated following or property interference that evade single-perpetrator attribution.^[59] In federal court reviews of stalking allegations from 2018 to 2023, approximately 12% of plaintiffs described group-based harassment rather than individual actions, often involving accomplices in domestic or vendetta-driven scenarios.^[10] However, successful convictions for such organized non-state targeting remain rare, typically limited to familial networks or criminal enterprises, and do not extend to the pervasive, covert technological elements central to targeted individual lore. These verifiable cases underscore a causal pathway—motivated actors exploiting vulnerabilities for control—yet highlight how unaddressed real harassment could foster escalation into broader conspiracy interpretations absent empirical scrutiny.^[1]

Impact and Recent Developments

Self-identified targeted individuals commonly report severe disruptions to their daily lives, including prolonged unemployment and financial instability. For instance, one individual described being out of work for eight years due to perceived sabotage, leading to reliance on crowdfunding for basic needs.^[60] Qualitative analyses of online forums reveal that 24% of respondents attribute economic losses to their experiences, such as depleted savings from relocation attempts or inability to work.^[1] Mental health deterioration is a frequent outcome, with 42% of forum participants expressing depression, chronic stress, or suicidal ideation linked to their beliefs.^[1] Professionals often diagnose such cases as delusional disorder or schizophrenia, where preoccupation with targeting exacerbates isolation and hopelessness; one case involved preparation for suicide via a noose.^[60] Physical symptoms, including chest pain from worry, affect 20% of self-reporters.^[1] Socially, these beliefs strain relationships, fostering withdrawal and loneliness in 34% of cases, as individuals avoid public activities like church or movies out of fear.^[1] Family members frequently urge psychiatric intervention, interpreting claims as irrational, which deepens rifts—e.g., one subject's relatives suspected involvement in the conspiracy, eroding trust.^[60] In extreme instances, this leads to loss of child custody or familial separation, as seen in accounts of parental disbelief prompting institutional responses.^[60] Online communities provide validation but may reinforce isolation from broader society.^[61]

Developments Post-2020

In the years following 2020, advocacy groups representing self-identified targeted individuals intensified legal challenges against U.S. government agencies, alleging misuse of terrorist watchlists for non-terrorism-related surveillance and harassment. Targeted Justice, Inc., a nonprofit founded to support such individuals, filed multiple lawsuits claiming that the FBI and Department of Justice improperly included non-terrorist U.S. citizens in databases like the Terrorist Screening Database (TSDB), leading to handling codes that purportedly enable covert monitoring. In Targeted Justice v. Garland (5th Cir. 2024), plaintiffs argued these practices violated due process, but the court dismissed the claims for lack of standing and failure to demonstrate redressable injury, reflecting broader judicial skepticism toward unsubstantiated targeting allegations. A related petition to the U.S. Supreme Court in July 2024 reiterated these grievances, asserting that TSDB codes 3 and 4 encompass individuals without terrorism ties, yet it remains pending without resolution as of late 2025.^[51] Online communities for targeted individuals expanded digitally amid the COVID-19 pandemic, with forums and newsletters fostering shared narratives of electronic harassment and gang stalking, often speculating on emerging technologies like AI-driven surveillance as mechanisms of control. A 2025 analysis highlighted how these groups theorize experimental targeting to prototype future societal technologies, though empirical validation remains absent, and discussions frequently intersect with unverified claims of spiritual or noise-based attacks.^[62] Media follow-ups, such as a 2022 Fort Worth Weekly investigation and a 2025 Reporter's probe, documented persistent personal testimonies but noted isolation and disbelief from authorities, attributing many experiences to psychological factors rather than coordinated programs.^[63]^[64] Psychological research post-2020 continued to frame targeted individual experiences primarily as manifestations of persecutory delusions or shared delusional disorders, with content analyses of self-reports revealing themes of inescapable group harassment but no corroborating forensic evidence. A 2024 Institute for Strategic Dialogue report on gang stalking described it as a belief system where adherents perceive ubiquitous monitoring, often without external proof, and warned of its potential to incite real-world harm, as seen in isolated violence linked to such convictions.^[2] Federal court reviews of gang stalking claims similarly found patterns of dismissed cases due to evidentiary shortcomings, underscoring that while isolated instances of actual targeting (e.g., against whistleblowers) occur, broad TI narratives lack systemic substantiation.^[10]

References

[1]
The Phenomenology of Group Stalking ('Gang-Stalking'): A Content ...
Apr 6, 2020 · Sarteschi C.M. Mass Murder, Targeted Individuals, and Gang-Stalking: Exploring the Connection. Violence Gend. 2018;5:45–54. doi: 10.1089/vio ...Missing: peer- | Show results with:peer-
[2]
Gangstalking and Targeted Individuals - ISD
Aug 28, 2024 · Sarteschi, “Mass Murder, Targeted Individuals, and Gang-Stalking: Exploring the Connection,” Violence and Gender, vol. 5, no. 1 (March 2018) ...
[3]
Gang Stalking: Real-Life Harassment or Textbook Paranoia?
Oct 20, 2020 · Meet the targeted individual community. YouTube; May 24, 2017. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=62s3FinAoC0. Vice. The nightmare world of ...
[4]
Linguistic Analysis of Online Communication About a Novel ...
Mar 5, 2021 · ... targeted individuals. Objective: The objective of the study was to ... Gangstalking is sometimes lexicalized as the bigram gang stalking in our ...
[5]
Linguistic Analysis of Online Communication About a Novel ...
Mar 5, 2021 · https://www.nytimes.com/2016/06/11/health/gang-stalking-targeted-individuals.html. 5. Weinberger S. Mind Games New on the Internet: a ...
[6]
Social Semiotics of Gangstalking Evidence Videos on YouTube - NIH
Oct 21, 2021 · For example, the term “gangstalking” is used to describe the system of persecution, a “targeted individual (TI)” denotes the subject of the ...
[7]
Gang Stalking: Conspiracy, Delusion, and Shared Belief
Oct 31, 2020 · And there may be no better example of this than gang stalking, where self-described “targeted individuals” or “T.I.s” have found an online ...
[8]
[PDF] everywhere all the time: targeted individuals, platforms, and
Apr 4, 2022 · 516 Sarteschi, “Mass Murder, Targeted Individuals, and Gang-Stalking.” 517 Sigmund Freud, “Wild Analysis,” in The Standard Edition of the ...Missing: peer- | Show results with:peer-
[9]
Gang stalking : internet connectivity as an emerging mental health ...
These people call themselves Targeted Individuals. The support that these individuals find on gang stalking websites soothes their amorphous anxiety about being ...
[10]
Neither Gangs nor Stalking: A Review of “Gang Stalking” Allegations ...
Many targeted individuals believe that gang stalking is the work of the government or other state actors, which may cause them to launch lawsuits against the ...
[11]
Targeted Individuals (TIs) and Electronic Harassment - IJRASET
Abstract. Targeted Individual (TI) = a person being harassed (often Electronically) Psychotronic Weapons = Brain Manipulation From a Distance These weapons ...
[12]
Voice to Skull Technology and Electronic Harassment : V2K Targeting
Jul 23, 2024 · Voice to skull (V2K) technology, also known as synthetic telepathy, has the potential to be used as a tool for psychological warfare and mind control.
[13]
[PDF] An Investigative Analysis of No-touch Torture Methods on Targeted ...
Aug 30, 2022 · Mass murder, targeted individuals, and gang-stalking: Exploring the connection. Violence and Gender, 5(1), 45–54. doi:10.1089/vio.2017.0022.
[14]
PROJECT MK-ULTRA | CIA FOIA (foia.cia.gov)
Project MK-ULTRA, MK-ULTRA, or MKULTRA, was the code name for a covert CIA mind-control and chemical interrogation research program, run by the Office of ...Missing: COINTELPRO | Show results with:COINTELPRO
[15]
FBI Records: The Vault — COINTELPRO
COINTELPRO The FBI began COINTELPRO—short for Counterintelligence Program—in 1956 to disrupt the activities of the Communist Party of the United States.Black Extremist · New Left · White Hate Groups · Espionage ProgramsMissing: methods | Show results with:methods
[16]
Senate Select Committee to Study Governmental Operations with ...
The Church Committee investigated and identified a wide range of intelligence abuses by federal agencies, including the CIA, FBI, Internal Revenue Service, and ...Missing: 1950s | Show results with:1950s
[17]
Mind Games - The Washington Post
Jan 13, 2007 · The callers frequently refer to themselves as TIs, which is short for Targeted Individuals, and talk about V2K -- the official military ...
[18]
Mind Games: The Tortured Lives of 'Targeted Individuals' - WIRED
Mar 4, 2018 · Thousands of people think that the government is using implanted chips and electronic beams to control their minds.
[19]
[PDF] Directed Energy Weapon / Targeted Individual Patents - ohchr
Dec 15, 2005 · Directed Energy Weapon / Targeted Individual Patents. µ. Patent ... ("Voice to Skull"). US 3393279. V2K. 13-Mar-62. 16-Jul-68 G.P. Flanagan ...
[20]
Everywhere All the Time: Targeted Individuals, Platforms, and Rhetoric
Jun 16, 2022 · “Targeted individual” (TI) is a self-applied descriptor employed by people who believe that they personally are being watched and harassed by the intelligence ...Missing: phenomenon articles
[21]
[PDF] Inputs for psychosocial dynamics conducive to torture and ill ... - ohchr
Jun 20, 2020 · ... DIRECTED ENERGY WEAPONS ('DEW'): Any of our body- parts can be targeted and attacked by these directed energy weapons. These weapons may use.
[22]
[PDF] Harassment techniques include: 1. Surveillance (being followed ...
Harassment techniques include: 1. Surveillance (being followed, electronic surveillance, computer and phone hacking, monitoring all.
[23]
Fusion Centers, gang stalking, and electronic harassment - Medium
Dec 5, 2024 · The documents highlight their use of psychological tactics and ... targeted individuals. • Evidence: “Unseen Warfare,” pages 1–2.
[24]
Social Semiotics of Gangstalking Evidence Videos on YouTube
Oct 21, 2021 · Those affected by this belief system self-identify as targeted individuals (TIs). ... mental health; psychosis; schizophrenia; semiotics; social ...
[25]
Forensic Psychiatry versus the Varieties of Delusion-Like Belief
Sep 1, 2020 · But targeted individuals stereotypically reject such clinical diagnoses and have found validation within an online community of individuals with ...
[26]
T120. EXAMINING PSYCHOSIS IN SOCIAL MEDIA - NIH
Targeted Individuals” (TI) have gained prominence as a social media ... However, contrary to people with schizophrenia, TI group members use more ...
[27]
Social Semiotics of Gangstalking Evidence Videos on YouTube
Oct 21, 2021 · For example, the term “gangstalking” is used to describe the system of persecution, a “targeted individual (TI)” denotes the subject of the ...
[28]
Delusional Disorder - StatPearls - NCBI Bookshelf - NIH
Persecutory type: This is one of the most common types of delusions and patients can be anxious, irritable, aggressive, or even assaultive - some patients may ...
[29]
Delusional Disorder: DSM-5-TR Definition, Symptoms, and Treatments
Delusional Disorder, as defined by the DSM-5-TR, is a psychotic disorder characterized by the presence of one or more delusions lasting for at least one month.
[30]
Delusional Disorder: Causes, Symptoms, Types & Treatment
Persecutory: People with this type of delusional disorder believe someone or something is mistreating, spying on or attempting to harm them (or someone close ...Missing: targeted | Show results with:targeted
[31]
Delusional Disorder: Overview, Diagnosis, Epidemiology
Jun 6, 2022 · Delusions can be characterized as persecutory (i.e., belief that one is going to be harmed by an individual, organization or group), ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[32]
Complaints of group-stalking ('gang-stalking'): an exploratory study ...
Aug 6, 2025 · In one survey (n = 1040), 12.3% of self-defined stalking victims reported their experience as gangstalking (Sheridan & James, 2015) . ...
[33]
Complaints of group-stalking ('gang-stalking'): An exploratory study ...
Complaints of group-stalking ('gang-stalking'): An exploratory study of their nature and impact on complainants. Citation. Sheridan, L. P., & James, D. V. (2015) ...
[34]
Gangstalking forums are hurting people even as some on them try to ...
Aug 7, 2020 · Targeted individuals claim that seemingly ordinary people are in fact trained operatives tasked with watching or harassing them—delivery men ...<|separator|>
[35]
[PDF] Project MKULTRA, THE CIA'S PROGRAM OF RESEARCH IN ...
SENATE SELECT COMMITTEE ON INTELLIGENCE. (Established by S. Res. 400, 94th Cong., 2d sess.) DANIEL K. INOUYE, Hawaii, Chairman.
[36]
[PDF] Gang stalking : internet connectivity as an emerging mental health ...
These people call themselves Targeted Individuals. The support that these individuals find on gang stalking websites soothes their amorphous anxiety about ...
[37]
The Expression of Distress and Social Media Participation - SSRN
Mar 15, 2023 · The term “Targeted Individuals” (TI) was adopted by online communities who felt themselves victims of physical and psychological threat, ...Missing: terminology | Show results with:terminology
[38]
[PDF] docid-32989823.pdf - National Archives
Most Cointelpro tactics described in the report, such as mailing anonymous letters that accused spouses of infidelity or encouraging warfare between rival.
[39]
[PDF] The Stasi at Home and Abroad - GHI Washington
ISSN 1048-9134. Cover: People storming the headquarters of the Ministry for National. Security in Berlin-Lichtenfelde on January 15, 1990, to prevent any ...
[40]
'I've been shafted twice': Stasi victims and their quest for compensation
Nov 6, 2019 · It was only after the fall of the Berlin Wall in 1989 that Regina Herrmann found in the Stasi archives documents in which the German Democratic ...<|separator|>
[41]
Long-Term Costs of Government Surveillance: Insights from Stasi ...
Apr 21, 2020 · ABSTRACT. We investigate the long-run effects of government surveillance on civic capital and economic performance, studying the case of the ...
[42]
Stasi Tactics – Zersetzung | Max Hertzberg
Nov 28, 2021 · Physical harassment often included repeated arrests, physical attacks on the street (eg by plain clothes officers), or abuse and assault could ...Missing: programs COINTELPRO MKUltra
[43]
The Phenomenology of Group Stalking ('Gang-Stalking'): A Content ...
Oct 16, 2025 · 21. Sarteschi, C.M. Mass Murder, Targeted Individuals, and Gang-Stalking: Exploring the Connection. Violence Gend.
[44]
Targeted Justice v. Garland, No. 23-20342 (5th Cir. 2024) - Justia Law
First, the district court properly dismissed the individual Plaintiffs' constitutional and APA claims for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction because they are ...
[45]
[PDF] Petition - In the Supreme Court of the United States
Jul 23, 2024 · Targeted Justice joined 18 of its members, 17 U.S. citizens and one legal resident,2 in the filing of this case against Respondent. FBI, the ...
[46]
Transnational Repression - FBI
Some countries' governments harass and intimidate their own citizens living in the U.S. This can violate U.S. law and individual rights and freedoms.
[47]
Can the Microwave Auditory Effect Be “Weaponized”? - PMC - NIH
Dec 23, 2021 · The question remains: whether the auditory effect can be “weaponized,” ie, used to harass or harm an individual.
[48]
The Microwave Auditory Effect - ResearchGate
A train of microwave pulses to the head may be sensed as an audible buzz, chirp, or tone by humans. It discusses the neurophysiological, psychophysical, and ...
[49]
Havana Syndrome: Directed Attack or Cricket Noise? - NDU Press
Jan 16, 2023 · Experimental evidence at the time indicated that intense microwave doses could cause malignancies, neurological effects, and cataracts. Given ...
[50]
Scientific evidence invalidates health assumptions underlying the ...
Oct 18, 2022 · In this paper, we show how the past 25 years of extensive research on RFR demonstrates that the assumptions underlying the FCC's and ICNIRP's exposure limits ...Neurological Effects · Sperm Damage · C. Human Brain Tumor Risk
[51]
Five Individuals Charged Variously with Stalking, Harassing and ...
Mar 16, 2022 · Five defendants with various crimes related to efforts by the secret police of the People's Republic of China (PRC) to stalk, harass and spy on Chinese ...
[52]
40 Officers of China's National Police Charged in Transnational ...
Apr 17, 2023 · Defendants Accused of Creating Fake Social Media Accounts to Harass PRC Dissidents, and Working with Employees of a U.S. Telecommunications ...
[53]
Unsafe in America: Transnational Repression in the United States
The governments of Iran, China, Egypt, Russia, Rwanda, Saudi Arabia, and other states are increasingly and more aggressively disregarding US laws to threaten, ...
[54]
[PDF] Stalking Victims in the United States - Revised
*Includes victims who could not identify a single offender who was most responsible. Source: Bureau of Justice Statistics, National Crime Victimization Survey,.Missing: court | Show results with:court
[55]
United States of Paranoia: They See Gangs of Stalkers
Jun 10, 2016 · An online community known as “targeted individuals” says its members are being surveilled by groups of stalkers as part of a sprawling ...Missing: origin | Show results with:origin
[56]
My Father Says He's a 'Targeted Individual.' Maybe We All Are
Oct 25, 2018 · A targeted individual in San Diego explained to me that her stalkers often coordinate to mock her and make her feel she's losing her mind.
[57]
Targeted Individuals & Digital Community - Do Not Research
Sep 1, 2025 · The targeted individual community paradoxically serves as a strong vanguard for online community building. Save for a drastic change in ...
[58]
I on the Target - Fort Worth Weekly
Apr 21, 2022 · Our first story about targeted individuals in 2021 (“Gangstalking,” Jan 22, 2020) drew emails and phone calls from around the world.
[59]
A 'Targeted Individual' Follow-Up - Is Something Really Happening ...
I finally researched the symptoms and came across the the terms gang stalking, electronic harassment, DEWS, the fray effect, etc. ... targeted individual related ...
[60]
'Mind control' experiences on the internet: implications for the psychiatric diagnosis of delusions
Paper by Bell et al. (2006) discussing the diagnostic paradox for shared delusional-like beliefs in online subcultures.
[61]
They Will Surveil You to Death: Gangstalking as a Cultural Concept of Distress
Article by Joel Christian Reed (2024) proposing gangstalking as a cultural concept of distress within the TI community.
[62]
Gangstalking: Academic Intersections and Ethical Issues
Book by Joseph M. Pierre (2024) addressing ethical issues, academic perspectives, and the diagnostic paradox in gangstalking claims.
[63]
Can the Microwave Auditory Effect Be “Weaponized”?
Peer-reviewed review assessing the feasibility and limitations of the Frey effect for inducing auditory perceptions via microwaves, concluding it is improbable for weaponized voice transmission without detection.
[64]
Complaints of group-stalking ('gang-stalking'): An exploratory study of their nature and impact on complainants
Peer-reviewed exploratory study linking gang stalking complaints to delusional beliefs and significant distress.
[65]
'Mind control' experiences on the internet: implications for the psychiatric diagnosis of delusions
Analysis of online mind control claims, correlating them with delusional content in psychiatric terms.