Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Tongue thrust

Tongue thrust, also known as reverse swallow or deviant swallow, is an orofacial myofunctional characterized by thrusting of the tongue against or between the teeth during , speech, or at rest, often persisting beyond the typical infantile phase. This condition arises from a retained primitive pattern that most children naturally outgrow by age 4 to 5, but when it continues, it can result from factors such as prolonged non-nutritive sucking habits like thumb-sucking or use beyond age 3, due to allergies, enlarged tonsils or adenoids, anatomical issues like tongue-tie, or neurological conditions including , , or . Prevalence estimates among school-aged children range widely from approximately 5% to 62%, with higher rates observed in those with speech sound disorders. Key symptoms include visible protrusion, difficulties with , , speech articulation errors—particularly interdental lisps affecting sounds like "s," "z," "sh," and "j"—and potential long-term effects such as dental malocclusions (e.g., open bite, , or gaps between teeth), misalignment, (TMJ) disorders, and increased risk of orthodontic relapse. Diagnosis typically involves clinical observation by speech-language pathologists, dentists, or orthodontists to assess tongue movement, swallowing mechanics, and dental alignment, often recommended between ages 8 and 12 for optimal . Treatment primarily consists of orofacial myofunctional (OMT), a structured program led by trained speech-language pathologists to retrain proper posture, lip seal, and patterns through exercises such as tongue spotting, lip closure drills, and the 4S exercise; adjuncts may include orthodontic appliances like tongue cribs or braces to break the habit and correct alignment. With early intervention, outcomes are generally excellent, improving muscle function, speech clarity, and preventing dental complications, though untreated cases can lead to chronic issues requiring multidisciplinary care.

Overview

Definition

Tongue thrust, also known as reverse or immature , is an orofacial myofunctional disorder characterized by the forward thrusting of the against or between the teeth during , speech, or rest, rather than the tongue resting against the as in mature function. This abnormal pattern persists beyond infancy, where it is a normal adaptation for feeding, and involves atypical muscle activity in the , , and that can influence oral development. The condition was first described in the mid-20th century, with early characterizations in the attributing it to adaptive responses to oral habits such as prolonged thumb-sucking or bottle-feeding, which alter tongue positioning over time. Unlike structural anomalies such as (tongue-tie), which involves a shortened restricting tongue mobility, or , characterized by an enlarged tongue, tongue thrust primarily represents a arising from habitual muscle patterns rather than anatomical defects, though structural issues may sometimes contribute to its persistence.

Epidemiology

Tongue thrust, also known as atypical swallowing, exhibits a high in young children, with estimates of tongue thrust swallow in school-aged children ranging from 5% to 62%. This rate tends to decrease with age, dropping to 20-40% among adolescents as the swallowing pattern matures for many. In adults, estimates suggest a persistence rate of around 25%, though comprehensive data remain limited. Higher rates are observed in populations with contributing factors such as allergies, which promote , or habits like thumb-sucking, potentially exacerbating the condition. Demographically, tongue thrust appears more common in females, with studies reporting a ratio of approximately 1.5:1 compared to males. It is also noted at elevated levels in regions with high incidence, where nasal obstruction may influence tongue positioning. In adults, the condition is often underreported due to its asymptomatic nature in many cases, leading to underdiagnosis unless associated with orthodontic issues. Current epidemiological data reveal significant gaps, with much of the foundational prevalence information derived from pre-2018 studies that may not reflect contemporary trends. Recent reviews (as of 2024) emphasize the need for more longitudinal studies to track persistence and continue to cite wide prevalence ranges without significant updates. These gaps highlight the importance of updated, population-based research to better understand distribution across diverse demographics.

Pathophysiology

Normal Swallowing Mechanism

The normal swallowing mechanism is a coordinated neuromuscular process divided into three primary phases: oral, pharyngeal, and esophageal. In the oral phase, which is voluntary, the plays a central role by elevating against the to form a seal with the lips and cheeks, containing the food or liquid bolus (a soft mass prepared through mastication or minimal manipulation for liquids). The then propels the bolus posteriorly toward the oropharynx through a sequential wave-like motion, without exerting anterior on the teeth or lower lip, ensuring efficient containment and transport. During the pharyngeal phase, which is involuntary and triggered reflexively upon bolus entry into the oropharynx, the soft palate elevates via contraction of the tensor and levator veli palatini muscles to seal the nasopharynx and prevent nasal regurgitation. Simultaneously, the hyoid bone and larynx elevate through suprahyoid muscle contraction, protecting the airway by approximating the epiglottis over the glottis and inducing a brief swallowing apnea (lasting 0.5 to 1.5 seconds). Pharyngeal constrictor muscles (superior, middle, and inferior) generate peristaltic contractions at 20 to 40 cm/s to propel the bolus toward the upper esophageal sphincter, which relaxes via cricopharyngeus inhibition, allowing passage without residue. Lip closure maintains oral seal throughout, contributing to bolus stability. The esophageal phase follows involuntarily, with primary and secondary peristaltic waves propelling the bolus at 3 to 4 cm/s toward the , facilitated by relaxation of the lower esophageal . This pattern, involving precise coordination among the , , , pharyngeal muscles, and hyoid, ensures safe bolus transit and airway protection. Developmentally, swallowing begins as an infantile pattern characterized by forward thrusting and suckling, predominant in newborns and infants to accommodate a high laryngeal . As the elongates and the descends between birth and approximately 2 years, the oral cavity expands, enabling a transition to the pattern where the contacts the for posterior propulsion. This shift typically completes in most children by age 4 to 6 years, with studies indicating that 90% achieve a fully swallow by school age, aligning with the emergence of mixed and refined oral .

Abnormal Tongue Positioning

In tongue thrust, the pathophysiological process involves abnormal propulsion of the , either anteriorly or laterally, during , which generates reverse pressure against the anterior rather than the typical posterior elevation toward the . This deviant pattern contrasts with normal by producing positive pressure on the teeth, potentially leading to , open bites, and maxillary arch narrowing over time. The altered muscle patterns arise from this persistent forward force, which reinforces atypical orofacial habits and disrupts the coordinated sequence of , jaw, and hyoid movements essential for efficient bolus propulsion. Muscle imbalances play a central role in sustaining abnormal tongue positioning, with the muscle contributing to protrusive forces that prevent the tongue from resting posteriorly against the . Concurrently, or underactivation of the intrinsic tongue muscles—responsible for fine adjustments in tongue and —exacerbates the failure to achieve a stable posterior rest position, leading to reliance on compensatory anterior thrusting. These imbalances create a cycle of orofacial musculature tension, where mouth-closing muscles exhibit extreme hyperactivity and masticatory muscles show reduced contraction during , further entrenching the deviant pattern. Recent myofunctional research, including a 2025 systematic review of studies from 2022 onward, has examined tongue thrust in the context of orofacial myofunctional disorders (OMDs) and speech sound disorders, noting associations with atypical labial-lingual postures and challenges in tongue-jaw movement differentiation. For instance, post-frenectomy interventions using orofacial myofunctional therapy (OMT) have shown mixed results, with limited of significant improvements in speech outcomes compared to controls. This body of highlights ongoing questions regarding sensory-motor integration in OMDs, with in school-aged children ranging from 5.4% to 62.3%, often associated with speech sound disorders.

Classification

Anterior Tongue Thrust

Anterior tongue thrust is characterized by the forward protrusion of the tongue between the during or , often accompanied by lip incompetence where the lips fail to achieve proper closure at rest. This pattern exerts continuous pressure on the maxillary incisors, contributing to their proclination and the development of an anterior open bite. As the most common form of tongue thrust, it predominates in clinical observations among orthodontic patients, particularly in children and adolescents. Identification of anterior tongue thrust typically involves clinical examination revealing a visible forward push of the tongue against or between the front teeth, observable during deglutition or articulation of sounds such as /s/, /z/, /t/, /d/, /n/, /l/, or /sh/. This manifestation frequently leads to specific dental patterns, including an anterior open bite in approximately 52% of affected cases and associated lisping in up to 86%. Lip incompetence is a hallmark feature, present in 86% of diagnosed individuals, distinguishing it through observable mouth breathing and hyperactive mentalis muscle activity. Differentiation from other tongue thrust variants relies on its midline involvement, where the tongue's forward displacement occurs centrally rather than laterally or posteriorly. Recent case studies illustrate this distinction and the risks of untreated progression; for instance, a 2023 report described a pediatric with untreated anterior tongue thrust leading to worsened anterior open bite and spacing, resolved only after with a modified tongue crib appliance that improved competence and alignment over six months. Similarly, another 2023 case highlighted midline thrust progression exacerbating proclination in a with concurrent habits, underscoring the need for early to prevent dental deterioration.

Lateral Tongue Thrust

Lateral tongue thrust refers to a variant of orofacial myofunctional disorder in which the exerts pressure against the lateral aspects of the teeth during or at rest, rather than the typical forward positioning seen in anterior forms. This can occur unilaterally, where the tongue deviates to one side and presses between the posterior teeth on that side, or bilaterally, affecting both sides symmetrically. Unilateral cases often stem from asymmetries in oral muscle function or habits, while bilateral forms may relate to broader issues like low tongue posture or nasal obstruction, making them distinct from the midline-focused anterior tongue thrust. Clinically, lateral tongue thrust manifests through specific dental and soft tissue changes, particularly involving the posterior dentition. Unilateral variants commonly produce asymmetric posterior open bites or crossbites on the affected side, alongside potential scalloped markings on the tongue from chronic pressure against the teeth. Bilateral forms lead to symmetric posterior open bites, where the tongue's lateral pressure impedes proper eruption and alignment of molars and premolars, often resulting in uneven occlusal wear over time. These markers are frequently identified in orofacial examinations, with reports from recent therapy cases highlighting their role in diagnostic imaging like cephalometric analysis. The bilateral subtype presents unique treatment complexities, often proving more resistant to correction due to entrenched muscle patterns and contributing factors such as allergies or poor nasal breathing. Orofacial myofunctional therapy (OMT), involving exercises for tongue repositioning and swallowing retraining, is a primary approach, but bilateral cases show higher relapse tendencies if underlying etiologies like imbalances are not fully addressed. Adjunctive appliances like tongue cribs may enhance outcomes by mechanically discouraging lateral pressure, though comprehensive evaluation remains essential to mitigate recurrence.

Etiology

Genetic and Anatomical Factors

Tongue thrust can arise from inherent anatomical variations that alter normal tongue positioning and function during swallowing. , characterized by an enlarged tongue, is a key anatomical factor predisposing individuals to tongue thrust by exerting excessive pressure on the dentition, often leading to anterior open bite . This condition is frequently associated with genetic syndromes, such as (trisomy 21), where manifests in approximately 40% of cases due to and relative tongue enlargement within a smaller oral cavity. Similarly, Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome, caused by imprinting defects on , features in up to 90% of affected individuals, contributing to tongue protrusion and compensatory thrusting patterns that disrupt occlusal development. Congenital overall has a low prevalence of fewer than 5 per 100,000 births, with approximately 50% of cases associated with genetic syndromes. Neurological conditions can also contribute to tongue thrust through impaired muscle control or . For instance, often involves oromotor dysfunction leading to abnormal patterns, while autism spectrum disorder may present with tongue thrusting as a form of or due to sensory integration issues. Another significant anatomical contributor is , or tongue-tie, which restricts tongue mobility through a short lingual , potentially inducing compensatory forward thrusting during deglutition to achieve adequate seal. This congenital anomaly has a prevalence of 4.2-10.7% in newborns, with a male predominance (1.5:1 ratio), and can result in altered mechanics that favor anterior tongue positioning. Genetically, often follows an autosomal dominant inheritance pattern, involving genes such as (leucine-rich repeat-containing G-protein coupled receptor 5) and TBX22, which are implicated in lingual development and associated with syndromic forms like X-linked cleft . Familial patterns of tongue thrust have been observed, suggesting a heritable component influenced by neuromuscular and orofacial structural traits, as documented in early studies including those by Tulley (1969). Despite these associations, high-quality genetic research on tongue thrust remains limited, with most evidence derived from small-scale or syndromic studies rather than large genome-wide association analyses, highlighting gaps in understanding non-syndromic . Current literature emphasizes the need for updated longitudinal genomic studies to clarify causal variants, as earlier claims of strong genetic have been tempered by the predominant role of multifactorial interactions.

Environmental and Behavioral Influences

Behavioral habits play a significant role in the development of thrust, particularly prolonged non-nutritive sucking such as thumb-sucking or use extending beyond age 3 or 4. These habits encourage a forward position and immature patterns, increasing the likelihood of persistent tongue thrust into later childhood. Longitudinal studies indicate that children with ongoing digit-sucking demonstrate a statistically significant higher of tongue thrust and associated malocclusions compared to peers without these habits, with ratios for related dental issues reaching up to 5.6. Mouth breathing, frequently triggered by allergies or nasal obstructions, further exacerbates tongue thrust by altering resting tongue posture and swallowing mechanics. Conditions like allergic rhinitis or chronic congestion lead to habitual oral respiration, which positions the tongue low and forward, promoting interposition between the teeth during deglutition. A systematic review and meta-analysis found that mouth breathing is associated with a 3.7-fold increased risk (RR: 3.70; 95% CI: 2.06–6.66) of atypical swallowing, including tongue thrust, with one study reporting a 77.5% prevalence among mouth breathers. Environmental factors, such as prolonged exposure to soft diets or extended feeding in , can delay the transition to mature and reinforce tongue thrust patterns. These feeding practices maintain reliance on or semi-liquid textures, hindering the development of proper tongue elevation and posterior propulsion during . Research highlights prolonged feeding as a key contributor to improper swallow habits that persist as tongue thrust. Tongue thrust typically emerges from a multifactorial interplay of these behavioral and environmental influences, often modifiable through early intervention, in contrast to inherent anatomical factors. Addressing habits like non-nutritive sucking and managing allergy-related can mitigate risks, emphasizing the preventable nature of many cases.

Clinical Manifestations

Oral and Dental Impacts

Tongue thrust exerts significant pressure on dental structures during and at rest, leading to characteristic malocclusions. The most prevalent is anterior open bite, where the front teeth fail to meet, often resulting from the tongue's interposition between the dental arches; improper is observed in 81.3% of such cases. This is particularly associated with anterior tongue thrust, though lateral variants can contribute similarly. Proclination of the incisors occurs due to the forward thrust applying uneven forces, tilting the maxillary incisors labially and exacerbating spacing between teeth. Posterior crossbites may also develop, as the low position widens the lower arch while constricting the upper, disrupting normal transverse . Untreated progression can lead to increased interdental spacing or orthodontic , with persistent forces causing previously corrected alignments to revert, as evidenced in longitudinal evaluations of patterns. Chronic tongue contact contributes to long-term dental wear through , where repetitive mechanical abrasion accelerates substance loss on acid-softened surfaces. studies demonstrate that tongue licking after acid exposure significantly heightens and wear compared to non-abrasive controls, potentially compounding erosive damage over time. Tongue thrust is implicated in a substantial portion of adolescent malocclusions, with seminal indicating associations in cases involving open bite and related discrepancies. The resulting occlusal irregularities hinder effective plaque removal, elevating caries risk in affected children through impaired and associated that reduces salivary protection.

Speech and Functional Consequences

Tongue thrust often results in speech distortions, most notably lisping or frontal lisps characterized by the production of /s/ and /z/ sounds with the protruding between the teeth, due to aberrant positioning during . This improper placement disrupts the precise contact required for sounds, leading to interdental or lateral emissions. In a of children with tongue thrust, 86% exhibited lisping during speech, highlighting the high of this functional impairment. Beyond speech, tongue thrust contributes to functional challenges in eating and daily activities, including inefficient chewing and swallowing patterns that fail to properly propel food boluses, potentially causing digestive discomfort from inadequate breakdown and increased air ingestion. These inefficiencies arise from the forward tongue thrust exerting pressure against the teeth rather than the palate, compromising bolus formation and esophageal transit. Additionally, the associated low tongue posture frequently leads to lip incompetence, where the lips remain parted at rest, resulting in aesthetic concerns such as a strained facial appearance and chronic mouth breathing. Tongue thrust has potential links to sleep-disordered breathing in pediatric populations, with atypical deglutition observed in 74% of children aged 6–12 years diagnosed with moderate to severe syndrome, suggesting a bidirectional relationship influenced by altered airway dynamics and pharyngeal collapsibility. This association underscores broader functional risks, including disrupted quality and daytime fatigue, particularly in cases involving mixed .

Diagnosis

History and Physical Examination

The diagnosis of tongue thrust begins with a thorough history taking to identify contributing factors and rule out underlying issues. Clinicians conduct structured interviews with patients or, in the case of children, their parents or guardians, focusing on developmental milestones, oral habits such as the duration and intensity of thumb-sucking or pacifier use, and respiratory patterns including persistent mouth breathing, which may signal allergies or nasal obstructions. Additional inquiries cover medical and dental history, such as allergies leading to chronic nasal congestion, family history of orthodontic issues or orofacial structural anomalies, and any reported feeding or swallowing difficulties from infancy. Red flags like prolonged mouth breathing beyond early childhood or a family predisposition to open bites prompt further evaluation to distinguish tongue thrust from related conditions. Physical examination involves non-invasive clinical observations to assess orofacial function and confirm tongue thrust patterns. Intraoral inspection evaluates the tongue's rest position, noting if it protrudes forward against or between the teeth, which deviates from the ideal palatal posture. Clinicians observe a swallow demonstration, where patients sip or to reveal forward tongue thrusting or lack of lingual-palatal , often accompanied by grimacing or head tilting. seal and competence are assessed during speech tasks, checking for incomplete or compensatory movements that indicate weak orbicularis function; , , and in the lips, jaw, and are also examined for abnormalities like . These techniques help identify associated changes, such as anterior open bites, without requiring . Age-specific considerations guide the approach to ensure appropriateness and accuracy. In children, parental reports are essential for detailing early habits, developmental delays, and observed symptoms like noisy breathing or speech distortions, as young patients may lack ; tongue thrust is considered if persisting beyond age 4–5, when mature typically emerges. For adults, self-reported concerns often center on speech impediments, such as lisping on , or inefficiencies, with history emphasizing lifelong patterns or recent exacerbations from allergies. These protocols align with the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association's () guidelines, updated as of 2025, which emphasize interprofessional collaboration and comprehensive orofacial assessment starting from age 4 for intervention readiness.

Imaging and Specialized Assessments

Diagnosis of tongue thrust is primarily clinical, led by speech-language pathologists for functional assessment, with referrals to dentists or orthodontists for structural evaluation of associated issues like malocclusions. Radiographic methods may be used adjunctively in multidisciplinary settings to evaluate anatomical relationships and positional abnormalities related to tongue thrust. Cephalometric X-rays provide lateral views to measure tongue position relative to the and , as well as bite angles, particularly in cases of open bite or atypical deglutition. Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) enables three-dimensional visualization of tongue volume, oral cavity capacity, and spatial relationships, aiding in orthodontic assessments of muscle positioning. Functional tests can provide dynamic evaluation of swallowing mechanics in specific cases, such as suspected . Videofluoroscopy visualizes tongue movement during swallowing and may identify anterior protrusion in certain populations. (EMG) can assess electrical activity in tongue and circumoral muscles for research or complex neuromuscular evaluations, detecting patterns in individuals with tongue thrust. Low-radiation approaches, including and optimized , are prioritized in protocols as of 2023 to minimize exposure. In differential diagnosis, clinical history and observation help identify when to refer for neurological evaluation to distinguish tongue thrust from conditions like dystonias or neuromuscular disorders. For instance, absence of organic lesions in myofunctional cases can rule out entities like pantothenate kinase-associated neurodegeneration.

Treatment Approaches

Myofunctional and Speech Therapies

Myofunctional therapy involves a series of targeted exercises designed to strengthen the and orofacial muscles while retraining proper and patterns to address tongue thrust. Common exercises include the "spot hold," where the tongue tip is pressed against the alveolar ridge behind the upper front teeth for 10 seconds and repeated 10 times, and tongue push-ups, which involve elevating the tongue to contact the with resistance. Another key technique is the 4S exercise—spot the tongue position, salivate, squeeze the tongue against the , and —performed up to 40 times daily to promote a mature without anterior tongue protrusion. These interventions typically occur in programs lasting 4-6 months, with 10-20 sessions of 30-60 minutes each, starting weekly and tapering to biweekly or monthly, supplemented by daily home practice. Speech therapy is often integrated with myofunctional therapy to correct articulation errors associated with tongue thrust, particularly for sibilant sounds like /s/ and /z/, which are distorted by improper tongue positioning. Techniques include drills, such as practicing /s/ sounds with the tip elevated to the alveolar ridge, combined with retraining to ensure posterior movement during deglutition. This combined approach emphasizes consistent daily practice and may extend over 6-12 months to establish habitual changes, depending on patient age and compliance. Recent evidence from randomized controlled trials and scoping reviews supports the efficacy of these non-invasive , particularly in children. A 2016 pilot RCT involving children aged 7-11 with anterior open bite and dysfunction found that myofunctional achieved physiological posture at rest in 60% of participants and normalized patterns in 50-60% after 4-6 months. A 2020 study reported significant improvements in strength and orofacial function following myofunctional exercises in patients with thrust. A 2024 scoping review of nine studies, including children, indicated that 47% achieved normal after 8 weekly sessions of myofunctional , with success rates up to 58% in group settings and long-term stability observed over 3 years. These findings highlight resolution rates of 47-60% for key outcomes like correction in pediatric populations, underscoring the value of behavioral retraining without mechanical aids.

Orthodontic and Appliance Interventions

Orthodontic and appliance interventions for tongue thrust focus on mechanically addressing the resulting malocclusions, such as anterior open bite, by repositioning the and stabilizing dental alignment. These approaches are typically recommended when the habit has caused structural changes in the , providing physical barriers or corrective forces to interrupt thrusting patterns and support long-term bite correction. Tongue cribs and spurs represent foundational appliance types designed to directly block tongue thrusting, particularly in cases involving anterior dental interference. A tongue crib is a fixed intraoral device, often bonded to the posterior teeth and extending across the , that creates a barrier preventing the from pressing against the during or rest. This retrains associated orofacial muscles and has been described as extremely effective for habit cessation by disrupting the thrusting action and promoting proper . Bonded spurs, consisting of small projections attached to the lingual surfaces of the maxillary incisors, serve a similar function by physically deterring forward movement and are commonly used in early orthodontic phases for patients with associated open bites. Clinical comparisons indicate that fixed palatal cribs may outperform bonded spurs in correcting anterior open bite in growing patients, primarily through greater dentoalveolar effects. These appliances are applied selectively, with spurs showing success in restraining anterior and aiding bite closure. Palatal expanders address tongue thrust-related issues when the contributes to a constricted maxillary arch, which limits proper positioning and perpetuates dysfunctional . These devices, activated by the patient to gradually widen the upper , alleviate crowding or crossbites that may reinforce thrusting tendencies, thereby facilitating improved space and functional adaptation. Orthodontic protocols emphasize their role in comprehensive treatment for malocclusions influenced by tongue thrust. Integration of these appliances with conventional , such as fixed braces, follows updated clinical recommendations that pair mechanical correction with adjunctive therapy to minimize post-treatment instability. Recent evidence supports combining braces with myofunctional exercises during active orthodontic phases, which significantly reduced mean to 0.5 mm compared to 3.4 mm with orthodontics alone. Advancements in appliance design have introduced 3D-printed options, enabling customized fabrication of tongue cribs or guards with enhanced precision to patient anatomy, which improves fit, reduces discomfort, and optimizes interruption. , adapted for tongue thrust management through built-in attachments or programmed movements, offer a less invasive alternative to traditional braces, guiding dental alignment while incorporating myofunctional elements for sustained tongue retraining and stable outcomes.

Prognosis and Prevention

Long-Term Outcomes

Early intervention in children with tongue thrust, particularly through orofacial myofunctional therapy (OMT), yields high resolution rates, with studies reporting effectiveness in correcting resting tongue posture and swallowing patterns. In one cohort of children treated for open bite associated with tongue thrust, 90.3% achieved proper lip seal after 12 months of OMT combined with orthodontic management. These outcomes underscore the importance of addressing the condition before permanent dentition, where success rates can reach up to 90% for normalizing orofacial functions when therapy begins in early childhood. In adults, relapse risks following tongue thrust treatment are notable without ongoing maintenance, often linked to persistent low tongue posture. Long-term stability improves with adjunctive appliances like tongue elevators. Untreated persistence into adulthood heightens the likelihood of chronic complications, including (TMJ) disorders, with atypical swallowing patterns correlating to a 67.7% of TMD compared to 46.7% in those without such habits. Prognosis is significantly influenced by the timing of and ; early detection in children enhances outcomes through prevention of entrenched malocclusions and associated habits. Factors such as airway competency and resolution of underlying contributors like allergies further bolster long-term success, reducing relapse by promoting stable orofacial muscle balance.

Strategies for Prevention

Early interventions play a crucial role in reducing the risk of tongue thrust by addressing common contributors such as prolonged nonnutritive sucking habits and impaired nasal breathing. Discouraging extended use is a primary strategy, as long-term reliance beyond age 3 is associated with increased likelihood of anterior open bite and posterior crossbite, which often stem from altered tongue positioning. The American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry (AAPD) recommends anticipatory guidance during early dental visits to wean children from by 36 months, noting that discontinuation before this age substantially lowers rates, including those linked to tongue thrust patterns. Similarly, promoting nasal breathing through effective management helps prevent , a key factor in tongue thrust development; allergic rhinitis can cause nasal obstruction, leading to a 3.7-fold increased risk of atypical swallowing when predominates. Educational approaches empower parents and caregivers to foster proper oral habits from infancy. Parental training on appropriate feeding practices, such as transitioning from bottles to open cups by 12-18 months and selecting orthodontic pacifiers if needed, supports normal posture and development. The American Speech-Language-Hearing Association () emphasizes educating families on techniques, like using praise and rewards to eliminate nonnutritive sucking, during routine health visits starting at age 1. These strategies help mitigate environmental influences on risk factors, such as or improper bottle propping, without requiring invasive measures. School-age screening programs enhance early detection in at-risk populations, allowing for timely preventive counseling. Pediatric myofunctional screenings, integrated into or dental check-ups, assess for like low tongue posture or in children aged 7 and older, where tongue thrust prevalence ranges from 5.4% to 62.3%. The AAPD's 2024 guidelines advocate routine clinical examinations during well-child visits to identify habits contributing to unfavorable dentofacial growth, with referrals to interdisciplinary teams if nasal airway issues are suspected. Recent updates from dental associations, including the 2024 AAPD policy on developing , stress enhanced screening for high-risk groups—such as those with allergies or family history of malocclusions—to promote nasal and cessation, updating prior recommendations with a focus on interprofessional care.

References

  1. [1]
    Tongue Thrust: Signs, Causes & Treatment - Cleveland Clinic
    Oct 11, 2024 · Tongue thrust is a habit that involves pushing your tongue forward against the back of your teeth. Your tongue may move forward when your mouth ...
  2. [2]
    Orofacial Myofunctional Therapy in Tongue Thrust Habit - NIH
    Tongue thrust is a term that describes a swallowing pattern in which an individual pushes the tongue against or between the teeth. This habit has also been ...Missing: definition symptoms
  3. [3]
    Orofacial Myofunctional Disorders
    ### Summary of Tongue Thrust in Orofacial Myofunctional Disorders
  4. [4]
    Tongue Thrust and Treatment of Subsequent Articulation Disorders
    Tongue thrust (also called "reverse" or "immature" swallow) is the common name given to orofacial muscular imbalance, a human behavioral pattern in which the ...
  5. [5]
    FAQ - IAOM
    May 16, 2025 · Open mouthed posture (lips apart, tongue low and forward or between the teeth) · Tongue Thrusting during speech and/or swallowing · Non-nutritive ...
  6. [6]
    Effectiveness of orofacial myofunctional therapy in improving ... - NIH
    INTRODUCTION. The International Association of Orofacial Myology (IAOM) defines orofacial myofunctional disorders (OMDs) as “atypical, adaptive patterns that ...
  7. [7]
    The Influence of the Tongue on the Development of Dental ...
    May 29, 2024 · Infections: The tongue is forced forward due to discomfort and a reduction in space, resulting in a tongue thrust swallow, which causes chronic ...Missing: symptoms | Show results with:symptoms
  8. [8]
    Fussed about tongue thrust? - The Informed SLP
    Apr 10, 2022 · A large study of school-aged children found that around 52-53% of early school-aged children demonstrate a tongue-thrust swallow pattern; and by ...Missing: 2020-2024 | Show results with:2020-2024
  9. [9]
    An epidemiological study to know the prevalence of deleterious oral ...
    Prevalence of all deleterious habits were more among female children and it also showed significant differences according to age.
  10. [10]
    Mouth Breathing and Its Impact on Atypical Swallowing
    Jan 23, 2024 · The aim of this systematic review is the assessment of the effect of mouth breathing on the prevalence of tongue thrust.Missing: adolescents | Show results with:adolescents
  11. [11]
    Multidisciplinary Approaches to Tongue Thrust Management in ...
    A study from India reported a prevalence rate of 4.9% in children aged ... children, adolescents, and adults. Research and clinical experience suggest ...
  12. [12]
    Tongue Behavior in Anterior Open Bite—A Narrative Review - PMC
    Mar 14, 2025 · Tongue thrust was present more frequently in the group age of 8–12 compared to the 13–16 age group [35]. When assessing visceral swallowing in ...
  13. [13]
    Physiology, Swallowing - StatPearls - NCBI Bookshelf - NIH
    Jul 24, 2023 · The currently accepted model for swallowing describes three main stages: oral, pharyngeal, and esophageal phases. While solids and liquids share ...Introduction · Organ Systems Involved · Mechanism
  14. [14]
  15. [15]
    [PDF] Oral Habits - Columbia University
    Delayed transition between the infantile and adult swallowing pattern. Transition usually begins to happen around the age of 2 years. By the age of 6 years ...
  16. [16]
    [PDF] Tongue-thrust Etiology : A Review of the Literature - CORE
    The term "orofacial musculature imbalance" is used synonymously with "tongue-thrust". The three muscles concerned in this swallowing act appear to be the ...
  17. [17]
    Cortical Mechanisms of Tongue Sensorimotor Functions in Humans
    Somatosensory innervation of the tongue is supplied by the lingual nerve (mandibular branch of the trigeminal nerve (CN V); anterior two thirds of the tongue), ...<|separator|>
  18. [18]
    Effectiveness of Orofacial Myofunctional Therapy for Speech Sound ...
    Green [30] found that 41% of parents reported speech concerns in children with ongoing digit sucking, a form of OMD. The high percentage of parents who ...
  19. [19]
    Tongue Thrust Treatment | Textbook Orthodontics
    The most common form is anterior (or middle) tongue thrust, where the tongue pushes forward against the front teeth. This pressure can lead to spacing between ...Missing: 70-80% | Show results with:70-80%
  20. [20]
    Tongue Thrust and Treatment of Subsequent Articulation Disorders
    Feb 25, 2011 · Tongue thrust (also called "reverse" or "immature" swallow) is the common name given to orofacial muscular imbalance, a human behavioral pattern ...
  21. [21]
    Comparison of soft-tissue, dental, and skeletal characteristics in ...
    Aug 7, 2025 · Significantly, higher number of children with tongue thrusting showed lip incompetency (86% vs. 14%), mouth-breathing habit (38% vs. none), ...
  22. [22]
    Tongue Thrust - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
    A patient with an anterior tongue thrust is not able to create the vacuum needed to swallow when the lower lip is retracted because the seal and vacuum for the ...
  23. [23]
    [PDF] A Modified Tongue Crib Appliance for Correction of Tongue Thrusting
    Jun 16, 2023 · A modified tongue crib was used for six months resulting in significant improvement in maxillary anterior dentition position, lip competence, ...
  24. [24]
  25. [25]
    (PDF) TONGUE THRUSTING ORAL HABIT - A REVIEW
    Aug 6, 2025 · There was a significant difference in the age-wise prevalence of oral habits with older children showing greater prevalence of oral habits than ...
  26. [26]
    Bi-Lateral Tongue Thrust - aomtinfo
    The tongue moves forward or laterally, called anterior, bi-lateral, uni- lateral or bi-maxillary tongue thrust (dynamic).Missing: subtypes unilateral prevalence<|control11|><|separator|>
  27. [27]
    Review of Etiology of Posterior Open Bite: Is There a Possible ... - NIH
    Jun 25, 2020 · Lateral tongue thrust was detected among all three patients with clear scalloped dental marks on both sides of the tongue. The size of the ...Missing: wear | Show results with:wear
  28. [28]
    [PDF] Tongue Thrust: A Review
    Also it is a source of relief in passion and anxiety in both children and adults. It gives a soothing feeling when the region is stimulated with tongue, finger.
  29. [29]
    Diagnosis of macroglossia and indications for reduction glossectomy
    Macroglossia may contribute to anterior open bite malocclusion with prognathism, speech articulation disturbances, drooling and the perception of intellectual ...
  30. [30]
    prevalence of tongue alterations in a group of patients with down ...
    Results: DS had a high prevalence of macroglossia (40%) and fissure tongue (65.7%). Conversely, geographic tongue and irritation fibroma were found in 5.7% and ...
  31. [31]
    Beckwith-Wiedemann Syndrome: Open bite evolution after tongue ...
    Macroglossia causes functional deficits such as airway obstruction, drooling, phonation difficulties, and leads to protrusion of dentoalveolar structures ...
  32. [32]
    Macroglossia - DermNet
    Macroglossia is most often diagnosed in infants and children [1]. The prevalence of congenital macroglossia was reported to be fewer than 5 per 100,000 births, ...
  33. [33]
    Skeletal and dental characteristics in subjects with ankyloglossia
    Nov 7, 2013 · Ankyloglossia, commonly known as tongue tie, has a prevalence of 4.2% to 10.7% in the population [2]. There is a mild male predilection with a ...
  34. [34]
    [PDF] Operant Control of Pathological Tongue Thrust
    Tongue thrust is natural and normal behavior in suckling and swallowing and in the acquisition of speech in early life . Sometime between five and ten years of ...Missing: history | Show results with:history
  35. [35]
    Polymorphisms of genes encoding P2X7R, IL-1B, OPG and RANK in ...
    Age, overjet, tongue thrust, skeletal class II and the other polymorphisms made minor contributions. Conclusion: This study highlights the P2RX7 gene as a ...
  36. [36]
    A longitudinal study of the effects of digit- and dummy-sucking
    Children in whom digit-sucking persisted revealed a statistically significant increased proportion of Skeletal II dental base relationships, tongue-thrust ...
  37. [37]
    printer-friendly
    Apr 28, 2011 · ... thumb sucking had the smallest odd ratio of 5.6, compared to other oral habits related to malocclusion (pacifier sucking and tongue thrusting).<|separator|>
  38. [38]
    [PDF] Speech - Tongue Thrust - Cincinnati Children's Hospital
    Tongue thrust is a forward position of the tongue during rest, and a thrust against or between the teeth during swallowing and speech. A tongue thrust condition ...Missing: definition | Show results with:definition
  39. [39]
    Effect of Tongue Thrust Swallowing on Position of Anterior Teeth - NIH
    Many research studies have pointed out that a significant percentage of relapse after orthodontic treatment might be related to orofacial muscle imbalance and ...Missing: challenges | Show results with:challenges
  40. [40]
    A study in vitro of the abrasive effect of the tongue on enamel and ...
    The results suggest that the tongue could exert an abrasive effect on dental tissues softened by erosion, thereby increasing the overall loss of tooth substance ...
  41. [41]
    Common dental diseases in children and malocclusion - Nature
    Mar 13, 2018 · Disintegration of the primary tooth crown from severe caries may lead to malnutrition since dental status can affect masticatory function, food ...Missing: erosion | Show results with:erosion
  42. [42]
    Comparison of soft-tissue, dental, and skeletal characteristics in ...
    [3] Various epidemiological studies have reported prevalence of tongue thrusting to be 40-80% in children between age 4 and 6 years,[1,4] and 3-25% for children ...
  43. [43]
    The role of atypical deglutition in children and adolescents with ...
    Feb 19, 2024 · This cross-sectional study aimed to assess the prevalence of atypical deglutition (tongue thrust) in children diagnosed with moderate to severe obstructive ...
  44. [44]
    Understanding Tongue Thrust: Causes, Symptoms, and Treatment ...
    Apr 6, 2024 · Tongue thrust, also known as an orofacial myofunctional disorder (OMD), is a condition characterized by the abnormal forward positioning of the tongue during ...
  45. [45]
    Cephalometric Appraisal of Tongue and Related Soft Tissues ... - NIH
    Aim: To compare the tongue position of normal and open bite subjects at rest and to study if there is any difference in the hyoid bone and posterior ...
  46. [46]
    A cephalometric evaluation of tongue from the rest position to centric ...
    This study for the evaluation of the tongue position from the rest position to the centric occlusion showed no statistically significant changes in both groups.
  47. [47]
    Volumetric measurement of the tongue and oral cavity with cone ...
    CBCT has been used in the evaluation of tongue and oral cavity volumes to assess correlations between those volumes and with the upper airway.Missing: thrust | Show results with:thrust
  48. [48]
    Preliminary study: evaluating the reliability of CBCT images for ...
    May 3, 2020 · This study was intended to estimate the reliability of using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) to measure tongue space, which includes tongue ...
  49. [49]
    Tongue thrust swallowing in severely physically disabled children
    In five patients with severe physical and mental disabilities, a feeding pattern with tongue thrust was assessed videofluoroscopically.
  50. [50]
    Electromyographic investigations of the tongue and circumoral ...
    The electromyographic (EMG) examination of 11 normal individuals in whom bipolar fine-wire indwelling electrodes were placed showed no EMG activity during rest ...
  51. [51]
    Electromyographic features and efficacy of orofacial myofunctional ...
    May 7, 2021 · Recent research has demonstrated the high prevalence of harmful oral habits, such as thumb or dummy sucking, mouth breathing, and tongue-thrust ...
  52. [52]
    [PDF] Optimizing radiation safety in dentistry - Willamette Dental
    1.1. Digital rather than film-based imaging should be used because digital imaging allows for lower patient radiation exposure. 3.1.1.2. If film is used, only ...<|separator|>
  53. [53]
    Severe tongue protrusion dystonia: clinical syndromes and possible ...
    The pathophysiology of intermittent severe tongue protrusion remains unknown. Tongue protrusion dystonia is often unresponsive to oral drugs but may benefit ...
  54. [54]
    Tongue dysfunction in neurological and neuromuscular disorders
    Parkinsonian patients exhibit tongue movement problems, and patients with muscular disorders show tongue weakness. These symptoms can cause aspiration or ...
  55. [55]
    Severe tongue protrusion dystonia - Neurology.org
    Sep 25, 2006 · Tongue protrusion dystonia is often unresponsive to oral drugs but may benefit from botulinum toxin injections into the genioglossus muscle.
  56. [56]
    The effect of orofacial myofunctional treatment in children with ...
    Jul 1, 2015 · This prospective pilot study investigates the effects of OMT on tongue behaviour in children with AOB and a visceral swallowing pattern.
  57. [57]
  58. [58]
    Habit Breaking Appliance for Multiple Corrections - Abraham - 2013
    Oct 3, 2013 · Tongue crib appliances are extremely effective in breaking the tongue thrust habit [4, 5, 10, 11]. They create a mechanical barrier and prevent ...Missing: efficacy | Show results with:efficacy
  59. [59]
    Comparing skeletal and dentoalveolar effects of fixed palatal crib ...
    Aug 1, 2025 · Conclusion. The fixed palatal crib appliance was more effective than bonded spurs in managing anterior open bite in growing patients, mainly ...
  60. [60]
    Effects of tongue tamers and customized bonded spurs as an early ...
    Jan 16, 2025 · This study aimed to evaluate the effects of prefabricated metal-bonded tongue tamers and customized bonded spurs in the early treatment of anterior open bite.
  61. [61]
    How Myofunctional Therapy Supports Orthodontic Success—Before ...
    “Relapse rates in patients who completed myofunctional therapy during orthodontic treatment were reduced by as much as 62% compared to those who received ...
  62. [62]
    3D Printer-Assisted Layered Fabrication of a Novel Appliance ... - NIH
    Apr 28, 2024 · Tongue thrust, or low tongue, is a typical myofunctional disorder (MFD) that causes occlusal abnormalities, and the tongue thrust habit has long ...
  63. [63]
    Resolving Tongue Habits Using Clear Aligners - LearnDentistry™
    Dr. Shotell describes techniques using special adjustments made to clear aligners aimed at decreasing tongue thrusting habits.
  64. [64]
    Clear Aligners and Tongue Thrust: Managing Abnormal Swallowing ...
    Oct 28, 2024 · This article explores the latest insights on clear aligners for managing tongue thrust and how a holistic approach can create stable, lasting results.
  65. [65]
    Oral Myofunctional Disorders - Speak Easy Therapy
    These studies have shown that Orofacial Myofunctional Therapy can be 80-90% effective in correcting rest posture, swallowing and other oral functions, and that ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  66. [66]
    Impact of myofunctional therapy on orthodontic management and ...
    Apr 16, 2025 · This study found improvements in tongue position and function, increased tongue/palate contact, enhanced lip tension and function, and better ...
  67. [67]
    (PDF) Treatment and retention of relapsed anterior open-bite with ...
    Aug 6, 2025 · Relapse rates are high, with relapse estimated at about 20-30%, with slightly more stability for a surgical approach. Read more. Article ...
  68. [68]
    The correlation between temporomandibular disorders, atypical ...
    The prevalence of TMD among subjects with or without atypical swallowing is equal to 67.7% and 46.7%, respectively, being statistically significant (p<0.05), as ...Missing: untreated | Show results with:untreated
  69. [69]
    [PDF] Management of the Developing Dentition and Occlusion in Pediatric ...
    Abstract. This best practice asserts that the management of developing dentition and occlusion is an essential part of comprehensive oral health care.Missing: 2025 | Show results with:2025
  70. [70]
    Pacifier Use and Its Influence on Pediatric Malocclusion - MDPI
    Pacifier use was consistently associated with an increased prevalence of malocclusions, including anterior open bite, posterior crossbite, and overjet. The risk ...
  71. [71]
    [PDF] Policy on Pacifiers - AAPD
    Based on good-quality patient-oriented evidence, the AAP recommends offering a pacifier when an infant is placed to sleep due to its protective effect on the ...
  72. [72]
    Understanding Pediatric Myofunctional Screening
    Nov 28, 2023 · Pediatric myofunctional screening is a vital tool to detect orofacial myofunctional disorders (OMDs), such as tongue thrust or mouth breathing, in children.