Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Total return swap

A total return swap (TRS), also known as a total rate of return swap, is a bilateral derivative contract between two counterparties in which the total return payer transfers the total economic performance—including income, capital appreciation, and depreciation—of a specified reference asset, index, or basket of assets to the total return receiver, in exchange for periodic payments based on a fixed or floating interest rate applied to a notional principal amount.^[1]^[2] The reference asset is typically not transferred in ownership; instead, the swap synthetically replicates the asset's returns, allowing the receiver to gain exposure without direct purchase or possession.^[3]^[4] In a standard TRS structure, payments are netted and exchanged at regular intervals, such as quarterly, based on the performance differential between the reference asset's total return and the agreed-upon funding leg, often tied to a benchmark like SOFR plus a spread.^[1] If the reference asset appreciates, the payer compensates the receiver for the gain; conversely, if it depreciates, the receiver reimburses the payer for the loss, in addition to covering the funding costs.^[2] The notional amount serves as the basis for calculations but is not exchanged upfront, making the contract off-balance-sheet for both parties at inception, with a net present value typically set to zero.^[4] Common reference assets include equities, bonds, loans, or indices, and the contract term often ranges from one to five years, governed by standardized documentation such as ISDA master agreements.^[3] Total return swaps are widely used in financial markets to achieve leveraged exposure to assets, hedge credit or market risks, and facilitate regulatory capital relief without altering ownership structures.^[2] For instance, hedge funds and collateralized loan obligations (CLOs) employ TRS to gain amplified returns on syndicated loans or bonds while minimizing upfront capital requirements and operational burdens like custody.^[4] Banks and dealers, as payers, can offload risk from their balance sheets or monetize assets synthetically, though they assume counterparty credit risk from the receiver.^[1] In the U.S., TRS fall under the credit asset class for regulatory reporting purposes per the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC), subjecting them to Dodd-Frank Act oversight, including mandatory clearing for certain standardized swaps, margin requirements, and anti-fraud provisions.^[1]^[4] Despite their efficiency, TRS carry significant risks, including market volatility exposure for the receiver, potential collateral calls on value declines, and bilateral credit risk for both parties in non-cleared trades.^[2] Post-2008 financial reforms have increased transparency through swap data repositories, but bespoke nature of many TRS—especially loan-based ones—can complicate valuation and introduce material non-public information challenges under SEC Rule 10b-5.^[4] Overall, TRS remain a cornerstone of structured finance, enabling sophisticated risk transfer in global credit markets.^[3]

Fundamentals

Definition

A total return swap (TRS) is a bilateral derivative contract in which one party, known as the total return payer, agrees to transfer the total economic performance of a specified reference asset to the other party, the total return receiver, in exchange for receiving periodic payments based on a funding leg, typically a floating interest rate such as SOFR plus a predetermined spread.^[2]^[5] This structure enables the receiver to obtain synthetic exposure to the asset's performance without directly owning or purchasing it, while the payer effectively hedges or funds its position.^[2] The "total return" component encompasses the full economic outcome of the reference asset, including any income generated—such as dividends for equities or interest payments for bonds—along with capital appreciation or depreciation based on changes in the asset's market value over the contract period.^[6]^[2] It may also account for certain costs associated with holding the asset, like transaction fees, though these are often netted in the performance calculation as specified in the agreement.^[2] This comprehensive transfer captures both positive and negative returns, providing a complete replication of the asset's yield.^[6] Unlike plain vanilla interest rate swaps, which primarily exchange fixed and floating interest payments to manage interest rate risk, a TRS transfers both the market risk (from price fluctuations) and credit risk (from potential default or deterioration) of the underlying asset.^[2]^[7] This broader risk profile distinguishes TRS as a key tool in credit derivatives, facilitating leveraged or off-balance-sheet exposure.^[7] Total return swaps emerged in the late 1980s as part of the evolution of credit derivatives, with formal introduction in the New York market around 1991, driven by banks' needs to manage credit exposures and provide synthetic asset access without ownership.^[2]^[8] This development built on the broader swaps market growth in the 1980s, enhancing flexibility in capital markets.^[8]

Parties and Roles

In a total return swap (TRS), the two primary parties are the total return payer and the total return receiver, who enter into the contract to exchange the economic performance of a reference asset without transferring ownership of the underlying asset itself.^[9] The payer, often the legal owner of the reference asset, assumes the role of providing the total return while receiving funding payments, thereby transferring the asset's performance risks to the other party.^[10] Conversely, the receiver takes on the performance risks in exchange for synthetic exposure to the asset's returns.^[11] The total return payer is typically an institution such as a bank or financial entity that holds the reference asset, which could include loans, bonds, equities, or indices.^[4] In this role, the payer agrees to compensate the receiver for the total return of the asset, encompassing both income (such as interest or dividends) and capital appreciation or depreciation, while receiving periodic funding payments from the receiver, often based on a floating rate like SOFR plus a spread applied to the notional amount.^[9] By entering the swap, the payer retains legal ownership and any associated economic benefits but effectively offloads the market and credit risks of the asset to the receiver.^[10] The total return receiver, commonly a hedge fund, collateralized loan obligation (CLO), or other investor seeking leveraged exposure, pays the funding leg to the payer and receives the total return of the reference asset in return.^[4] This party does not acquire ownership of the asset but gains the equivalent economic performance, including any upside from price increases or downside from losses, scaled to the notional amount.^[11] For instance, a hedge fund might act as the receiver to obtain exposure to a syndicated loan without needing to purchase it outright, thereby avoiding operational burdens like administration.^[4] The notional amount serves as the reference value in the TRS, determining the scale of the total return and funding payments exchanged between the parties, but it does not involve the actual transfer of the reference asset or principal.^[9] This amount is typically set equal to the current market value of the reference asset at the swap's inception.^[10] Motivations for the parties often align with their strategic needs: the payer may seek alternative funding sources or regulatory capital relief by monetizing the asset while retaining ownership, as seen when banks use TRS to manage balance sheet constraints.^[11] The receiver, meanwhile, pursues leveraged access to restricted or high-yield assets, enabling higher potential returns without the full capital outlay or ownership restrictions imposed by credit agreements.^[4]

Structure and Mechanics

Reference Asset

The reference asset in a total return swap (TRS) serves as the underlying instrument whose economic performance—encompassing both income and capital appreciation or depreciation—is exchanged between the parties. Eligible asset classes for the reference asset are diverse and include equities, such as individual stocks or equity indices; fixed income securities, including bonds and syndicated loans; credit instruments like corporate debt obligations; commodities; and composite indices spanning multiple categories. These assets must be clearly identifiable and exhibit observable returns, ensuring transparency and verifiability in performance measurement throughout the swap's term.^[11]^[10]^[12] In a typical TRS arrangement, the total return payer maintains physical ownership or economic interest in the reference asset, often holding it directly or through a special purpose vehicle to hedge their obligations under the contract. This setup allows the payer to retain legal title and associated rights, such as voting or collateral pledges, while transferring only the performance economics to the receiver. The synthetic nature of the TRS enables the receiver to replicate exposure to the asset without acquiring ownership, avoiding regulatory hurdles related to asset transfers or balance sheet impacts.^[4]^[10] Valuation of the reference asset is critical for determining periodic payments and margin adjustments, with methods varying by asset liquidity. For publicly listed assets like equities or exchange-traded bonds, market prices from recognized exchanges or quotation systems provide the primary basis for valuation, ensuring objectivity and real-time updates. Illiquid or over-the-counter assets, such as private loans or certain commodities, may instead rely on internal models, dealer quotations, or consensus polls among market participants to estimate fair value, particularly for daily mark-to-market purposes in loan-based TRS.^[13]^[4] The selection of a reference asset profoundly shapes the TRS contract's overall scope and dynamics. For instance, high-volatility assets like individual equities or commodities introduce greater return fluctuations compared to more stable fixed income options such as government bonds. The asset's income profile—dividends for equities, interest coupons for bonds, or storage costs for commodities—defines the recurring cash flow components exchanged. Additionally, credit-sensitive assets like corporate loans or debt may incorporate provisions for events such as defaults or restructurings, which can prompt valuation adjustments or early termination to reflect impaired performance.^[11]^[10]^[4]

Payment Flows and Calculations

In a total return swap (TRS), payments are exchanged periodically between the total return payer and the total return receiver, with the direction of net flows depending on the performance of the reference asset relative to the funding leg obligations. The total return leg obligates the payer to compensate the receiver for the full economic performance of the reference asset, including both price appreciation and any income generated, such as dividends or coupons. Conversely, the funding leg requires the receiver to make payments to the payer based on a floating interest rate benchmark plus a spread, typically calculated on the notional amount. These legs are designed to replicate the economic exposure to the asset without transferring ownership.^[9]^[10] The core calculation for the total return payment from the payer to the receiver over a given period is given by:

\text{Total Return Payment} = \text{Notional} \times \frac{\text{Ending Value} - \text{Starting Value} + \text{Income}}{\text{Starting Value}}

where the ending and starting values represent the market value of the reference asset at the end and beginning of the period, respectively, and income includes any dividends, interest coupons, or other distributions received during the period. Adjustments are made for corporate actions, such as stock splits or mergers, which may alter the asset's value or income stream, ensuring the total return reflects the adjusted economic outcome. For the funding leg, the payment from the receiver to the payer is:

\text{Funding Payment} = \text{Notional} \times (\text{Floating Rate} + \text{Spread}) \times \frac{\text{Days in Period}}{360}

using a benchmark like SOFR or other risk-free rates such as SONIA for the floating rate, with the day count convention often following the money market basis.^[2]^[13]^[14] Payments under a TRS are typically settled on a quarterly or semi-annual basis, aligned with the funding leg's interest accrual periods, though the exact frequency is specified in the swap agreement. At each settlement date, the amounts due under the two legs are netted, with the party owing the larger amount paying the difference to the other; if the total return exceeds the funding cost, the payer compensates the receiver, and vice versa. This netting mechanism minimizes cash flows and operational complexity while maintaining the economic equivalence to holding the reference asset. In cases of interim events like defaults or early terminations, payments may incorporate recovery values or marked-to-market adjustments based on fair market prices.^[9]^[2]

Settlement and Termination

Total return swaps are typically settled periodically through cash payments that reflect the net difference between the total return on the reference asset and the funding leg obligations, with valuations often conducted quarterly or more frequently to account for price changes and income.^[4] These settlements are based on mark-to-market calculations of the reference asset's performance, ensuring that the total return receiver compensates the payer for any depreciation or receives payments for appreciation during the period.^[15] In loan-based total return swaps, for instance, the total return payer performs daily valuations, triggering variation margin exchanges where the receiver posts collateral if the asset value declines or receives it back upon increases.^[4] Collateral management in total return swaps employs initial margin posted at inception—often a percentage of the reference asset's value—to cover potential market volatility and counterparty default risk, alongside variation margin that adjusts dynamically to maintain a target loan-to-value ratio.^[16] These collateral requirements are enforced through a Credit Support Annex (CSA) attached to the underlying agreement, which specifies posting thresholds, eligible collateral types, and dispute resolution for valuations, thereby reducing exposure during the contract's life.^[16] Variation margin calls occur periodically, such as daily in high-volatility scenarios, to align collateral with current asset values and prevent accumulation of unsecured credit risk.^[4] Termination of a total return swap may occur at its scheduled maturity date, through early termination triggered by an event of default such as one party's failure to pay or bankruptcy, or via specific credit events affecting the reference asset issuer, like insolvency or restructuring. Upon termination, the final settlement payment is computed as the total return from the effective date to the termination date, netted against any outstanding funding leg amounts and adjusted for collateral positions, with the non-defaulting party entitled to close-out amounts if applicable.^[15] Mutual agreement for early termination is also possible, often requiring notice periods, while additional termination events—such as illegality or tax changes—can be negotiated in the contract schedule. Documentation for settlement and termination in total return swaps follows the International Swaps and Derivatives Association (ISDA) framework, primarily the ISDA Master Agreement, which outlines general termination procedures, supplemented by a bespoke schedule and confirmation detailing the reference asset, payment dates, collateral terms, and event triggers.^[16] The schedule specifies periodic settlement frequencies and valuation methods, while the confirmation incorporates ISDA definitions for events like credit defaults, ensuring standardized handling of close-outs and payments.^[15] This structure allows for customization, such as adding net asset value decline thresholds as additional termination events, while adhering to ISDA's protocols for dispute resolution and netting.^[17]

Applications and Benefits

Primary Uses

Total return swaps (TRS) provide investors with synthetic exposure to the performance of reference assets, such as equities, bonds, or loans, without the need for direct ownership or the associated regulatory, tax, or operational hurdles. This is particularly valuable for accessing restricted or illiquid assets, including emerging market equities or sovereign debt, where outright purchase may involve high transaction costs or capital controls. For instance, institutional investors can use TRS to replicate the economic returns of foreign indices, as seen in early applications like equity swaps on Japanese stock indices to bypass international inflow barriers.^[18]^[2] In recent years, there has been a resurgence in loan total return swaps, particularly in 2024-2025, as hedge funds use them to gain leveraged exposure to syndicated loans amid elevated interest rates and market opportunities. Trading volumes for US equity TRS have also doubled in 2025 compared to the same period in 2024.^[19]^[20] Asset owners frequently employ TRS for hedging performance risks while maintaining legal and beneficial ownership of the underlying asset, which is essential for compliance with regulatory requirements or to preserve collateral value. Banks and insurers, for example, can transfer credit and market risk on loans or bonds to counterparties without selling them, thereby retaining the assets on their balance sheets for capital adequacy purposes. This approach allows lenders to mitigate exposure to emerging market volatility by swapping the total return of project loans against fixed-rate government bonds, offsetting potential declines in asset value.^[21]^[2] The receiver in a TRS can achieve leveraged exposure to asset returns with minimal upfront capital, as the funding leg—typically a floating rate like SOFR plus a spread—functions similarly to a collateralized loan, enabling amplified positions relative to cash investments. Hedge funds commonly utilize this structure to build large synthetic long positions in equities or credit assets by "renting" the balance sheet of a bank, avoiding the need for full funding. Conversely, by acting as the total return payer, hedge funds can establish synthetic short positions, paying the asset's performance to the receiver in exchange for the funding leg, which effectively replicates a short sale without borrowing securities.^[10]^[21]^[11] Banks leverage TRS for balance sheet management by transferring credit risk off-balance-sheet, which frees up regulatory capital and improves financial ratios without disposing of assets. For example, a commercial bank might enter a TRS as the payer on a loan portfolio, passing income and principal risk to a hedge fund receiver while receiving steady funding payments, thus optimizing capital allocation. Similarly, corporations can use TRS to swap the variable returns of their loan assets for fixed-rate funding, stabilizing cash flows for operational needs.^[10]^[9]

Advantages for Participants

Total return swaps (TRS) offer significant advantages to payers, typically asset owners such as banks or financial institutions, by enabling regulatory capital relief under frameworks like Basel III. Through risk transfer mechanisms, TRS reduce risk-weighted assets (RWA) by synthetically securitizing exposures, such as loans, without off-balance-sheet treatment or asset sales; for instance, transferring credit risk on a loan portfolio can lower required capital from 8.5% to as little as 1.7% of the exposure amount.^[22]^[23] This capital optimization supports loan growth and can improve return on equity (ROE) on de-risked portfolios.^[24] Additionally, payers benefit from access to funding at rates potentially lower than secured loans, as the funding leg (often SOFR plus a spread) allows borrowing against retained assets while outsourcing administration.^[4] TRS also preserve client relationships in loan syndication by avoiding outright sales, maintaining confidentiality and ongoing borrower interactions.^[2] For receivers, such as hedge funds or investors seeking exposure, TRS eliminate ownership hassles, including custody requirements; however, withholding taxes on dividend equivalents may still apply depending on the jurisdiction and reference asset, such as under US tax rules (IRC Section 871(m)) for US equities.^[2]^[25]^[26] This facilitates higher leverage ratios, enabling amplified returns on minimal upfront capital compared to outright purchases.^[10] Receivers can further customize exposure duration to match specific strategies, independent of the reference asset's maturity, enhancing flexibility in portfolio management.^[2] Overall, TRS provide efficiencies through lower transaction costs relative to outright asset purchases, as they bypass settlement, legal transfer, and ongoing administrative burdens like interest collections.^[10] They ensure anonymity in sensitive trades by keeping positions off public records, unlike direct ownership.^[27] Moreover, TRS support portfolio diversification without custody issues, allowing broad asset exposure—such as equities or loans—while avoiding operational complexities of physical holding.^[28]^[2] Comparatively, TRS outperform securities lending by avoiding recall risks, where lenders can demand immediate return of borrowed assets, disrupting positions; TRS offer stable, contractually fixed terms without such interruptions.^[17] Versus options, TRS deliver a linear payoff mirroring the full asset return without upfront premiums, providing cost-effective, symmetric exposure to upside and downside.^[13]^[17]

Risks and Regulations

Key Risks

Total return swaps (TRS) expose participants to several inherent risks, primarily due to their derivative nature and the transfer of economic exposure without physical asset ownership. These risks can amplify losses in volatile markets, particularly when leverage is involved, as the receiver gains amplified exposure to the reference asset's performance while posting limited collateral.^[29] Counterparty risk arises from the potential default of either the total return payer, who may fail to deliver the asset's total return, or the receiver, who may default on funding payments. This risk is typically limited to unrealized profits and losses at any given time, as no initial principal is exchanged, but it can escalate with leverage, where small margin requirements allow large notional exposures. Mitigation often involves collateral posting and netting agreements under ISDA master documentation, though defaults remain possible in stressed conditions, such as when a counterparty faces liquidity shortages.^[30]^[2]^[29] Market risk subjects the receiver to the full volatility of the reference asset, including price fluctuations and income variations, without the ability to hedge through ownership. This exposure mirrors direct investment but is synthetic, potentially leading to significant losses if the asset declines sharply. Additionally, basis risk emerges if the funding leg (e.g., LIBOR plus spread) diverges from the asset's actual return, creating mismatches in expected cash flows.^[2]^[30]^[31] In terms of credit risk transfer, the payer aims to offload the reference asset's credit exposure, but this may not be complete if the TRS is not explicitly structured to isolate credit events, such as issuer defaults, from market movements. Unlike credit default swaps, TRS transfers both credit and market risks holistically, potentially leaving residual exposure if the contract does not trigger payments solely on credit deterioration. The payer retains the asset on its balance sheet, maintaining some regulatory and operational credit ties despite the economic transfer.^[2]^[21] Liquidity and operational risks stem from challenges in unwinding positions on illiquid reference assets, where forced sales during terminations can incur substantial losses. Valuation disputes may arise over non-traded assets, requiring dealer polls that delay settlements and increase costs. Operational hurdles include managing collateral calls, documentation errors, and event determinations, which can compound in high-volume or complex portfolios.^[2]^[31] The 2008 financial crisis illustrated these risks' potential impact, as TRS amplified losses in leveraged equity and structured positions; for instance, Lehman Brothers' collapse exposed cat bond investors to counterparty defaults in TRS arrangements, leading to unresolved arbitrations and a sharp decline in TRS usage for such assets from 12% to 1% of issuances by 2012.^[32]

Regulatory Framework

The regulatory framework for total return swaps (TRS) has evolved significantly following the 2008 financial crisis, with major jurisdictions implementing reforms to enhance transparency, mitigate systemic risk, and ensure financial stability. In the United States, the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 classifies TRS as swaps, mandating reporting to Swap Data Repositories (SDRs), central clearing for standardized contracts, and collateral requirements for non-cleared trades to reduce counterparty and operational risks.^[33]^[34] In the European Union, the European Market Infrastructure Regulation (EMIR) of 2012 imposes similar obligations, requiring both counterparties to report TRS details to approved trade repositories within a specified timeframe and mandating variation and initial margin for uncleared over-the-counter derivatives, including TRS, to cover potential future exposures.^[35]^[36]^[37] EMIR also designates certain TRS as subject to mandatory clearing if they meet standardization criteria, aiming to centralize risk management.^[38] Under the Basel III framework, finalized in 2010 and implemented progressively through 2025, TRS are recognized as effective tools for credit risk transfer, allowing banks to achieve capital relief by synthetically transferring the economic exposure of reference assets, provided the swaps meet strict eligibility and recognition criteria for reducing risk-weighted assets.^[39]^[22] Central clearing is mandatory for certain index-based TRS under both Dodd-Frank and EMIR, with central counterparties (CCPs) such as LCH.Clearnet facilitating the process to mutualize default risk and improve market resilience; for instance, LCH provides clearing services for equity index swaps, including those akin to TRS structures.^[40]^[41]^[42] Disclosure and reporting requirements further underpin the framework, with U.S. rules under Dodd-Frank directing TRS trade data—including notional amounts, maturity, and valuation—to SDRs for regulatory oversight, while EMIR's trade repositories serve a parallel function in the EU.^[43]^[44] Additionally, the EU's Markets in Financial Instruments Directive II (MiFID II) enforces suitability assessments for complex derivatives like TRS, ensuring investors receive adequate disclosures on risks and costs.^[45]^[46] As of 2025, recent developments include the full transition of funding legs in USD-denominated TRS from LIBOR to the Secured Overnight Financing Rate (SOFR) or other risk-free rates, mandated by U.S. regulators with cessation of LIBOR panels by June 2023 and ongoing remediation for legacy contracts to avoid fallback disruptions.^[47]^[48]^[14] There is also heightened regulatory scrutiny on synthetic exchange-traded funds (ETFs) employing TRS, particularly regarding potential tax deferral benefits under U.S. Section 871(m) rules, with the phase-in period extended through 2026 under IRS Notice 2024-44, following previous delays, to curb withholding tax avoidance on dividend equivalents.^[49]^[50] Jurisdictional differences persist, with the EU's EMIR adopting a more prescriptive approach—such as broader clearing mandates and detailed margin calculations—compared to the U.S. Dodd-Frank's principles-based framework, which emphasizes flexibility in swap definitions and exemptions for certain end-users, leading to variations in compliance burdens for cross-border TRS.^[51]^[52]^[53]

References

[1]
Swaps Report Data Dictionary | CFTC
Total Return Swap. A total rate of return swap (or “total return swap”, “TRS”) is an agreement between two counterparties where one party, the seller of the ...
[2]
[PDF] The PricewaterhouseCoopers Credit Derivatives Primer
into a total return swap may provide a more efficient means of making a leveraged bond investment than acquiring the bond and financing it in a con ...
[3]
Note 8: Derivative Instruments - SEC.gov
Total return swaps – one counterparty agrees to pay or receive from the other cash amounts based on changes in the value of a reference asset or group of assets ...
[4]
Loan Total Return Swaps: What You Need to Know - LSTA
Nov 21, 2024 · The total return payer calculates the value of the loan on a daily basis and if it decreases in value then the total return receiver will post ...
[5]
[PDF] Collaboration-and-Standardization-in-Derivatives-and-SFT-Markets ...
Oct 1, 2020 · 9 A total return swap is a form of swap whereby one party makes payments based on the return of a reference asset such as a bond, equity or ...
[6]
[PDF] schedule rc-l – derivatives and off-balance sheet items - FDIC
swaps. A total return swap transfers the total economic performance of a reference asset, which includes all associated cash flows, as well as capital ...
[7]
[PDF] Credit Derivatives: An Overview - Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta
May 15, 2007 · First, a total return swap transfers to total economic performance of a reference obligation from one party (total return payer) to the other ( ...Missing: origin | Show results with:origin
[8]
A Primer on Equity Swaps – BSIC | Bocconi Students Investment Club
Oct 13, 2024 · Equity swaps evolved in the late 1980s and early 1990s, as a part of the broader development of over the counter (OTC) derivative markets.Missing: origin | Show results with:origin
[9]
Understanding Total Return Swaps: Definition, Function, and ...
A Total Return Swap (TRS) is an agreement where one party pays a set rate, while the other receives payments based on the return of a referenced asset, ...Missing: authoritative | Show results with:authoritative
[10]
Total Return Swap - Overview, Structure, Benefits
Aug 28, 2025 · A Total Return Swap is a contract between two parties who exchange the return from a financial asset between them.What is a Total Return Swap... · Structure of a Total Return...Missing: SEC | Show results with:SEC
[11]
Total Return Swaps (TRS): Benefits, Risks, and Applications
A total return swap (TRS) is a financial contract between a total return payer (asset owner) and a total return receiver (investor).
[12]
Commodity Swaps and Exposure to Commodities - CFA, FRM, and ...
Nov 29, 2021 · In a total return swap, one party makes payments based on a set rate (either fixed or floating). On the other hand, the other party makes ...
[13]
[PDF] Total return swap - HKUST Math Department
Investors can access entire asset classes by receiving the total return on an index. Motivation of the receiver. Page 6. 6. The payer creates a hedge for both ...
[14]
Total Return Swap Confirmation - SEC.gov
TOTAL RETURN SWAP CONFIRMATION. The purpose of this letter agreement (this “Confirmation”) is to confirm the terms and conditions of the Transaction entered ...
[15]
[PDF] Total Return Swaps and Repos: Financing Solutions for Credit Funds
Mar 1, 2025 · Total return swaps (TRS) are derivative contracts for synthetic exposure, while repos are a true sale with a repurchase agreement, driven by ...Missing: authoritative | Show results with:authoritative
[16]
[PDF] Total Return Swaps, Structured Repos and SPV Financing (Part One
Apr 5, 2018 · TRS financings are highly customizable. They can provide for commitment terms with respect to reference assets, subject to certain asset and ...
[17]
[PDF] Preliminary Staff Report- Overview on Derivatives
Jun 30, 2010 · An equity swap is a type of total return swap in which the underlying asset is a stock. While it is unclear when the first equity swaps were ...Missing: origin | Show results with:origin
[18]
[PDF] Credit Derivatives
First, a total return swap transfers the total economic performance of a reference obligation from one party (total return payer) to the other (total return ...
[19]
[PDF] Capital Relief Trades: Structuring Considerations for Synthetic ...
Capital Relief Trades (CRTs) are synthetic securitizations that release capital by reducing risk-based regulatory capital, and do not require off-balance sheet ...
[20]
The Economics of Synthetic Risk Transfers - Bank Policy Institute
Dec 17, 2024 · We've discussed how, when regulatory capital requirements significantly overstate the risk of loan portfolios, SRTs allow banks to continue to ...<|separator|>
[21]
[PDF] CREDIT RISK TRANSFERS (CRTs) A HANDBOOK FOR U.S. BANKS
Credit risk transfers (CRTs) are an increasingly important tool for capital optimization and credit risk management, used for capital management.
[22]
What's a total return swap? - Advisor.ca
Jun 24, 2016 · Tax advantages. Besides perfect tracking and low fees, the ... tax savings by avoiding U.S. withholding tax and potential estate taxes.
[23]
[PDF] What Is a Total Return Swap and How Did Archegos Capital Use It?
Mar 31, 2021 · In addition, these swaps allow investors like Mr. Hwang to maintain their anonymity. Why do investors like total return swaps? Many ...
[24]
Total Return Swaps: The Complete Portfolio Strategy - FasterCapital
Apr 11, 2025 · 2. Market Access and Diversification: Through TRS, investors can gain exposure to a broader range of assets, including those that may be ...
[25]
[PDF] The Financial Stability Implications of Leverage in Non-Bank ...
The Bank of England study looks specifically at total return swaps, and how these can be concentrated on specific equity stocks, which might not be traded ...
[26]
[PDF] Total Return Swaps: What Do Investors Need to Know?
A total return swap is a contract between a “receiver” of the total return of the underlying asset and the “payer”, usually an investment bank. Liberty Cove ...
[27]
Counterparty and liquidity risks in exchange-traded funds
In a total return swap, the ETF transfers the cash received through investor inflows to a counterparty for a basket of securities that serves as collateral. The ...
[28]
The death of the total return swap in the cat bond market is almost ...
Feb 12, 2013 · This theory came unstuck during the 2008 financial markets crisis when Lehman Brothers collapsed leaving a number of cat bonds exposed to ...
[29]
Margin and Capital Requirements for Covered Swap Entities
Nov 30, 2015 · A joint rule to establish minimum margin and capital requirements for registered swap dealers, major swap participants, security-based swap dealers, and major ...
[30]
Total Return Swaps for Crypto Quant Strategies
In the U.S., the Dodd-Frank Act (2010) introduced enhanced reporting, clearing, and collateral requirements. It also established classifications like “Swap ...
[31]
[PDF] Final Report https://sherpa.esma.europa.eu/sites/ MKT/MDP/Groups ...
Dec 14, 2022 · Article 9(1) EMIR, as amended by Regulation 2019/834, may be no longer fulfilled ... A Total Return Swap is a contract between two parties who ...
[32]
EMIR REFIT FAQs - Compliance Solutions Strategies
Sep 10, 2021 · Total Return Swaps There have been some misconceptions around TRS and if they are reportable under EMIR or SFTR. ESMA's opinion is that a TRS ...
[33]
EMIR reporting obligation
EMIR establishes the reporting obligation on both counterparties that should report the details of the derivative trades to one of the trade repositories (TRs).
[34]
The Complete Guide to EMIR: European Market Infrastructure ...
May 20, 2025 · Learn everything about European Market Infrastructure Regulation (EMIR) and a step-by-step compliance checklist for businesses trading ...
[35]
[PDF] Basel III: Finalising post-crisis reforms
Basel III is a response to the global financial crisis, addressing pre-crisis shortcomings and aiming to reduce variability of risk-weighted assets.
[36]
What We Clear - LCH SwapClear - LSEG
We give our Clearing Members and their clients access to the most liquid range of OTC interest rate swap clearing options in the marketplace today.Missing: CCP | Show results with:CCP
[37]
[PDF] Clearing for Equity Swaps: The Time is Right
Sep 27, 2022 · Clearing for equity swaps is now compelling due to the 2007-08 crisis, the need for transparency, and the GFC's exposure of OTC market ...
[38]
[PDF] Central Clearing in the Equity Derivatives Market
All exchange-traded equity derivatives products are cleared through CCPs. Eurex clears through. Eurex Clearing, and NYSE-Liffe clears via ICE Clear Europe for ...
[39]
Swap Data Recordkeeping and Reporting Requirements
Nov 25, 2020 · CEA section 21(b) directs the Commission to prescribe standards for swap data recordkeeping and reporting. Part 45 of the Commission's ...
[40]
EMIR Reporting - | European Securities and Markets Authority
EMIR mandates reporting of all derivatives to Trade Repositories (TRs). TRs centrally collect and maintain the records of all derivative contracts.
[41]
[PDF] MiFID II / MiFIR post-trade reporting requirements - AFME
Designed to provide market participants with near real-time broadcast of basic trade data around executed trades. This paper addresses the post-trade ...
[42]
MIFID II and Transparency for Swaps: What You Need to Know |
Sep 29, 2015 · RTS 2 has requirements on transparency to ensure that investors are informed as to the true level of actual and potential transactions.
[43]
The End of LIBOR: Hotel California Edition [Part IV] - ArentFox Schiff
Apr 22, 2025 · In the United States, the deadline for the transitioning of LIBOR facilities to SOFR was June 30, 2023 (though delayed for securitizations and ...
[44]
LIBOR Transition - SIFMA
The financial industry and global regulators have transitioned from the London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR) to more robust alternative reference rates.
[45]
Transition from LIBOR - Federal Reserve Bank of New York
June 30, 2023 then marked the cessation of all USD LIBOR panel settings—the final major step in the transition. Today, SOFR is the dominant U.S. dollar interest ...
[46]
Full Implementation of Section 871(m) Further Delayed Until 2025
Aug 25, 2022 · The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) has further extended until 2025 certain transitional relief from full implementation of the US withholding regime under ...Missing: total return
[47]
Synthetic investing makes quiet comeback among wealth managers
Jul 30, 2025 · “In some cases, synthetic ETFs can offer a more tax ... exchange these institutions subsequently offload their risk via total return swaps.
[48]
[PDF] OTC Derivatives Market Regulation: EU vs US Initiatives
Dodd-Frank applies to “swaps” and “security-based swaps”, which broadly include options, contingent forwards, and exchanges linked to economic interests of any.
[49]
[PDF] Overview of U.S. & EU OTC Derivatives Regulator Reforms
These charts provide a comparison of derivatives regulatory reforms under the laws of the United States and the European Union. THESE CHARTS DO NOT PURPORT TO ...Missing: return | Show results with:return
[50]
Comparison of US and EU Regulation of the Swaps Market
Sep 1, 2014 · Comparison of US and EU Regulation of the Swaps Market. Monday, September 01, 2014. Publication. Related Documents. Comparison of US and EU ...Missing: total | Show results with:total