Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

UTM parameters

UTM parameters, also known as Urchin Tracking Module parameters, are standardized tags appended to URLs to enable tools, such as , to track the source, medium, and performance of campaigns and referral traffic. These parameters provide marketers with granular insights into visitor origins, allowing for accurate attribution of traffic to specific sources like search engines, , or email newsletters. The core UTM parameters consist of five key variables: utm_source, which specifies the traffic source (e.g., "" or ""); utm_medium, indicating the marketing medium (e.g., "" for cost-per-click or ""); utm_campaign, naming the specific campaign (e.g., "q4_promo"); utm_term, used for paid search keywords (e.g., "running shoes"); and utm_content, to differentiate similar content or ads (e.g., "banner_ad" vs. "text_link"). While utm_source, utm_medium, and utm_campaign are recommended as essential for comprehensive tracking, utm_term and utm_content are optional but valuable for detailed analysis. When implemented correctly via tools like Google's Campaign URL Builder, these parameters ensure data is captured without affecting URL readability or , though best practices emphasize consistency in naming conventions to avoid data fragmentation in reports. Originating from the Urchin Tracking Module—a client-side JavaScript sensor developed for the Urchin web analytics software—these parameters were designed to augment server logs with referral data for precise visitor measurement. Following Google's acquisition of Urchin Software Corporation in 2005, the technology evolved into the foundation of Google Analytics, where UTM parameters became a standard for manual campaign tagging alongside automated features like auto-tagging for Google Ads. Today, they remain integral to modern analytics platforms, supporting multi-channel attribution models and integration with tools beyond Google, such as Adobe Analytics, while adhering to privacy standards by avoiding personally identifiable information.

History and Development

Origins in Urchin Software

UTM parameters originated with the development of the Urchin Traffic Monitor (UTM) by Urchin Software Corporation, a San Diego-based company founded in 1995, which introduced the system around 2002 as a core feature of its web analytics software. This innovation allowed website owners to track granular web traffic insights, particularly for marketing campaigns, by augmenting server log analysis with custom URL tagging. The primary purpose of these early UTM parameters was to enable precise attribution of referral sources in web analytics, achieved by appending simple query string parameters to outbound links in emails, ads, or other promotions. This approach facilitated the differentiation of traffic from various channels, such as paid search or email campaigns, directly within the log files generated by web servers like Apache or IIS, without requiring complex scripting on the destination site. A key technical innovation was the adoption of the "utm_" prefix for all tracking parameters, designed to namespace them and prevent conflicts with existing URL query variables used by websites for other functions, such as session management or e-commerce. Early implementations emphasized parameters like utm_source (to identify the referrer, e.g., "google") and utm_medium (to categorize the channel, e.g., "cpc" for paid search or "email"), providing foundational tracking for campaign performance in an era dominated by server-side log parsing. Urchin's software, including its UTM capabilities, was distributed as an on-premise solution that customers installed on their own servers to process and report on log file data, predating the widespread adoption of cloud-based platforms. This self-hosted model empowered businesses to maintain control over their data privacy and customization while analyzing traffic patterns in .

Acquisition by Google and Evolution

In March 2005, Google Inc. announced its acquisition of Urchin Software Corporation, a San Diego-based firm, for an undisclosed amount, with the deal aimed at enhancing Google's capabilities in tracking online traffic and user behavior. This move integrated Urchin's proprietary tracking technology, including its URL parameter system, directly into Google's ecosystem, paving the way for broader accessibility beyond enterprise clients. By November 2005, rebranded and transformed Urchin's on-premise software into , a free, cloud-based service launched on November 14, which democratized advanced for websites of all sizes. This shift from a paid, server-hosted solution to a scalable, no-cost platform significantly expanded the adoption of Urchin's tracking parameters, enabling small businesses and marketers worldwide to monitor campaign without substantial infrastructure investments. The release of enhanced campaign tracking features in solidified UTM parameters as the primary method for attributing traffic sources, allowing users to dissect marketing efforts across channels with greater precision. Subsequent evolutions included expanded support for custom parameters in premium offerings, such as (launched in 2011 and rebranded as in 2016), which provided advanced customization and integration for enterprise-scale tracking without data sampling limitations. In October 2020, launched (GA4), a new property type focused on event-based measurement and cross-platform tracking, while continuing to support UTM parameters for campaign attribution. Universal Analytics properties were deprecated on July 1, 2023, with data processing ceasing thereafter, marking the full transition to GA4 as of 2025.

Definition and Purpose

Core Concept of UTM Parameters

UTM parameters, or Tracking Module parameters, are standardized key-value pairs appended to the end of URLs to encode about the origin of , enabling precise attribution of visits to specific marketing campaigns or sources. These parameters follow a consistent , beginning with "utm_" followed by the name and an equals sign, such as utm_source= or utm_medium=, allowing tools to systematically categorize incoming traffic without requiring custom server-side modifications. A fundamental understanding of URL structure is essential to grasping UTM parameters. A URL typically consists of a base domain and path, followed by an optional initiated by a question mark (?), where parameters are listed as key-value pairs separated by ampersands (&). For instance, in the URL ://example.com/landing-page?utm_source=newsletter&utm_medium=email, the query string "?utm_source=newsletter&utm_medium=email" transmits data via HTTP GET requests from the user's to the upon page load. This transmission occurs transparently as part of standard web protocol, ensuring the parameters reach the destination without impacting core page rendering. The core mechanics of UTM parameters involve parsing by platforms during the initial page load. When a user arrives via a tagged , the analytics script—such as ' gtag.js—examines the browser's location object to extract values from the , associating them with the session to attribute traffic accurately to campaigns, sources, or mediums. This extraction happens before data is sent to the analytics server, preserving page functionality as the parameters serve no operational role beyond tracking. A key aspect of UTM parameters is their non-persistent nature: they appear only in the entry and are typically stripped during internal site navigation to avoid redundant transmission or dilution. Instead, attribution persists through browser cookies or server-side mechanisms, which store the parsed UTM data for the duration of the user's session, enabling consistent tracking across multiple pages without repeated URL tagging.

Role in

UTM parameters play a pivotal role in by enabling precise segmentation and attribution of website traffic to specific channels and campaigns, such as distributions, promotions, or paid search advertisements. This granularity allows marketers to calculate (ROI) by linking traffic sources to revenue-generating actions and uncover audience insights, including behavioral patterns tied to particular mediums. For example, distinguishing between organic social traffic and sponsored posts reveals which channels yield higher engagement quality, informing budget allocation decisions. In analytics platforms, UTM parameters integrate directly into reporting dashboards to track essential metrics like conversion rates, bounce rates, and cost per acquisition (CPA). When appended to URLs, these tags are captured by tools such as Google Analytics 4, where they populate dimensions like session source/medium and campaign, enabling real-time visualization of performance data across traffic segments. This integration supports ongoing monitoring, such as identifying underperforming ads through elevated bounce rates or low conversions, thereby guiding tactical adjustments. The broader impact of UTM parameters extends to advanced analytics applications, including of creative elements, geographic targeting evaluation, and . Marketers use distinct UTM values, such as varying the content parameter for test variants, to compare outcomes like click-through rates in split s, optimizing future iterations. In platforms beyond , like Adobe Analytics, UTM data facilitates classification and multi-device analysis, revealing how users transition from ads to conversions. Central to this role is the application of UTM data in attribution models, which assign credit for conversions based on user interactions. Last-click attribution credits the final fully, while models distribute value across multiple engagements, using UTM details to trace paths from initial awareness to purchase. Google Analytics employs data-driven attribution powered by UTM parameters to dynamically weigh channel contributions, providing more accurate insights than rule-based approaches and enhancing strategic decision-making.

Standard Parameters

Primary UTM Tags

The primary UTM parameters consist of five standard query string tags defined by for attributing traffic sources, mediums, and campaigns in digital analytics platforms like . These parameters enable marketers to segment and analyze visitor data by appending them to URLs, providing granular insights into campaign performance without requiring custom coding. recommends using at least the core three—source, medium, and —for comprehensive tracking, while the other two support specialized use cases. utm_source identifies the specific source or referrer from which traffic originates, such as a , publication, or social platform (e.g., "" for organic search traffic or "" for email referrals). It is a required for all campaigns to classify incoming traffic accurately and prevent it from being categorized as "(direct)/(none)" in reports. utm_medium categorizes the marketing medium or channel type, such as paid search, , or display ads (e.g., "" for cost-per-click or "" for newsletters). This works in tandem with utm_source to enable channel-level breakdowns, allowing analysts to compare performance across mediums like organic versus paid. It is also required for all campaigns to ensure proper attribution hierarchies. utm_campaign specifies the name of the particular driving the traffic, enabling isolation of individual initiatives (e.g., "q4_promo" for a seasonal sales drive). As a required , it is essential for measuring at the campaign level and is limited to 100 characters in 4 to align with event parameter value constraints. utm_term is used to track keywords in paid search campaigns, capturing the search term that triggered the ad (e.g., "running shoes" for a PPC bid). Though optional, it is particularly valuable for pay-per-click (PPC) advertising to evaluate keyword effectiveness and optimize bidding strategies. Google recommends its use solely for search traffic. utm_content helps differentiate between similar content or ad variants within the same campaign and medium, such as multiple banners or email links (e.g., "banner_ad_a" versus "banner_ad_b"). This optional parameter supports A/B testing and content optimization by revealing which creative elements perform best in driving engagement. These parameters establish the de facto standard for URL-based tracking with case-sensitive values and recommended brevity to avoid truncation.

Optional and Custom Parameters

The standard optional UTM parameters extend the core tracking capabilities by providing finer-grained insights into specific elements. In addition to utm_term and utm_content, defines further optional parameters including:
  • utm_id: A for the , required for import to imported with tracked sessions. It helps in organizing and de-duplicating .
  • utm_source_platform: Specifies the platform within the source (e.g., "" for a video), useful for distinguishing sub-platforms in reports.
  • utm_creative_format: Identifies the format of the creative (e.g., "banner"), though this parameter is not currently reported in 4.
  • utm_marketing_tactic: Describes the tactic used (e.g., "contextual"), also not currently reported in GA4.
For needs beyond these standard parameters, marketers can capture additional data using custom query parameters (not necessarily prefixed with "utm_"), but these are not automatically attributed by . Instead, they must be configured as custom dimensions or event parameters in Universal Analytics (legacy, sunset in 2023) or GA4 setups to enable segmented analysis. In GA4, custom parameters are captured as event parameters (limited to 100 characters) and can be registered as custom dimensions for reporting. Parameter names should be concise to maintain efficiency. This approach supports diverse applications while preserving core tracking integrity, though it requires additional configuration.

Implementation and Usage

Constructing UTM-Tagged URLs

To construct a UTM-tagged URL, append the parameters to the end of the base using a (?) before the first and an (&) to separate subsequent parameters. The follows the structure base_url?utm_source=value&utm_medium=value&utm_campaign=value, where names must be in lowercase and prefixed with "utm_". This syntax ensures compatibility with and other tracking platforms that recognize UTM tags. Values containing special characters, such as spaces or punctuation, require URL encoding to prevent parsing errors; for instance, a space should be replaced with %20, and non-ASCII characters encoded according to RFC 3986 standards. Parameter names themselves should never use uppercase letters, as tools like Google Analytics treat them case-sensitively and may ignore or misinterpret variations. Additionally, avoid adding parameters to URLs that already contain query strings by using & to append after the existing ? in the base URL. A practical example of a fully constructed UTM-tagged URL is https://www.example.com/product-page?utm_source=google&utm_medium=cpc&utm_campaign=summer_sale&utm_term=shoes&utm_content=ad1, where the base URL is https://www.example.com/product-page, followed by the tagged parameters identifying the source as , the medium as cost-per-click , and the campaign as a summer sale promotion. This breakdown allows marketers to track specific traffic flows when users click the link. For easier generation, Google provides built-in URL builders within Google Analytics interfaces, as well as the standalone Campaign URL Builder tool, which automates the addition of UTM parameters by inputting the website URL and campaign details into a form that outputs the tagged URL. Third-party generators can also assist, but official tools ensure adherence to Google's standards.

Integration with Analytics Platforms

In Google Analytics 4 (GA4), UTM parameters are automatically parsed and processed without requiring additional configuration beyond implementing the standard tracking code, such as the gtag.js snippet. The gtag.js library, which serves as the primary tagging mechanism for GA4, detects UTM tags like utm_source, utm_medium, and utm_campaign directly from the URL's query string upon page load and incorporates them into event data by default. Following the deprecation of Universal Analytics in July 2023, migration to GA4 involves updating from the older implementation to gtag.js, where UTM parameters now populate event-based dimensions such as session_source, session_medium, and session_campaign rather than session-level hits. This shift to event-based tracking, introduced with GA4's launch in 2020, ensures that UTM values captured mid-session are attributed to specific events without triggering new sessions, enhancing flexibility for cross-channel analysis. The processing flow in GA4 begins with client-side detection of UTM parameters from the URL via the gtag.js upon page load, followed by their capture and transmission to servers via events, where they are processed into dimensions for session attribution, maintained across pageviews using like _ga for client . These values are then mapped to standardized dimensions—such as source (e.g., "") and medium (e.g., "")—and aggregated in reports under Acquisition > Campaigns, enabling marketers to view metrics like sessions and conversions tied to specific campaigns. Beyond , UTM parameters are supported in other platforms through custom variable mappings. In Adobe Analytics, the s.campaign variable captures campaign identifiers, which can be populated dynamically by parsing UTM-like query parameters (e.g., via s.Util.getQueryParam("cid")) from , with a maximum length of 255 bytes for tracking efforts. Similarly, Mixpanel's automatically parses UTM parameters from URL queries by default, storing them as event properties to facilitate segmentation of user actions by source, medium, and other attributes using built-in attribution models.

Best Practices and Analysis

Naming and Organization Strategies

Effective naming conventions for UTM parameters ensure consistency across campaigns, facilitating accurate data segmentation and reporting in platforms. A widely recommended practice is to use lowercase letters exclusively for all UTM values to mitigate case-sensitivity issues that could fragment data. For separating words within values, underscores or hyphens are preferred over spaces, as in "black_friday_sale" or "black-friday-sale", to maintain URL readability and compatibility. Standardization of formats, such as structuring campaign names as "source_medium_campaign" (e.g., "_cpc_black_friday"), promotes uniformity across teams and simplifies aggregation. Organization strategies for UTM values emphasize hierarchical structures to capture additional context without introducing custom parameters. Incorporating elements like dates, geographic regions, or phases—such as "2025_us_email_promo" or "2025-10-q4_launch-us-01"—allows for granular segmentation while aligning with the primary UTM tags like and medium. To prevent data loss or truncation, values should be limited to 100 characters or fewer to comply with 4 event parameter limits. Team collaboration is essential for maintaining these conventions, with best practices including the development of shared glossaries or spreadsheets that document approved values for sources, mediums, and campaigns. For instance, establishing a central repository prevents variations like "google" versus "google_ads", ensuring all stakeholders use identical terminology. A key best practice is to avoid dynamic values in UTM parameters that vary per user or session, such as personalized identifiers or auto-generated tags from platforms like social media, as these hinder data aggregation and inflate unique entries in reports. Instead, opt for static, predefined values to support reliable trend analysis over time.

Interpreting Data in Reports

In Google Analytics 4 (GA4), UTM-tagged data appears in the Acquisition section of the Reports interface, where users can navigate to the Traffic acquisition report to view breakdowns by session source/medium, which aggregates utm_source and utm_medium values for traffic segmentation. This report displays key performance metrics such as sessions, users, and engagement rates attributed to specific campaigns. To isolate data, apply filters for particular source/medium combinations, like "google / cpc" or "newsletter / email," enabling focused analysis of traffic quality and volume from tagged sources. Key analyses involve evaluating effectiveness through metrics like (ROI), calculated as (revenue - cost) / cost × 100% after importing cost data—for instance, if a generates $10,000 in against $2,000 in costs, the ROI is 400%. Identifying top-performing channels relies on engagement indicators, such as lower s (percentage of non-engaged sessions, where engaged sessions last at least 10 seconds, trigger a event, or include two or more page views) and higher average session duration (time on site), which signal more relevant ; a with a 30% versus the site's 50% average highlights superior content alignment. Advanced techniques include segmenting reports by custom parameters, such as utm_content or utm_term, after registering them as custom dimensions in GA4's data configuration to enable breakdowns in Explorations reports. Conversions tied to UTMs are tracked by configuring key events or goals, then viewing event counts and conversion rates by campaign in the or reports, attributing outcomes like form submissions or purchases back to specific tagged sources with configurable attribution windows. Unmatched UTMs, often resulting from typos or inconsistencies (e.g., "email" vs. "Email"), appear as "(not set)" in reports, distorting attribution; these can be resolved post-collection by exporting data to and applying SQL-based search-and-replace functions to standardize values before re-importing or querying for corrected insights. Consistent naming conventions, as established during tagging, minimize such issues by ensuring uniform parameter values across campaigns.

Limitations and Alternatives

Key Drawbacks and Challenges

One significant technical limitation of UTM parameters is the potential for truncation due to and server-imposed length restrictions, which can occur when multiple or lengthy parameters are appended to already long base URLs. URL length limits vary significantly among modern browsers (e.g., up to 2 MB in and 80,000 characters in ), but practical constraints from web servers and proxies often limit URLs to 2,000–8,000 characters, potentially causing of lengthy UTM parameters and leading to incomplete tracking data in platforms. Another technical vulnerability arises from parameter stripping during redirects or in environments, where server configurations, shorteners, or app deep-linking processes often fail to preserve query strings like UTMs. For instance, 301 or 302 HTTP redirects may alter or remove UTM tags unless explicitly configured to pass query parameters, resulting in lost attribution for traffic funneled through such paths. In , UTMs are frequently stripped when links transition from to in-app browsers or during redirects, compromising tracking continuity for cross-platform campaigns. UTM parameters also raise privacy concerns, as they embed campaign-specific details directly into shareable URLs, potentially exposing sensitive strategies or without any native anonymization mechanisms. This visibility can conflict with regulations like GDPR and CCPA, particularly if custom parameters inadvertently include personal identifiers, leading to unintended data leakage when URLs are shared via , , or logs. In sectors like healthcare, such exposure risks violating standards such as HIPAA by revealing through tracked links. On the practical side, manual tagging of UTM parameters is prone to human errors, such as inconsistent naming, missing tags, or incorrect capitalization, which can cause significant or fragmentation in reports. Without rigorous testing, these mistakes propagate across campaigns, rendering attribution unreliable and requiring extensive cleanup efforts post-launch. For high-volume campaigns, the lack of built-in exacerbates challenges, as managing thousands of unique tagged URLs manually becomes inefficient and error-prone, often necessitating specialized tools to maintain at scale. Additionally, changes introduced with Apple's 14.5 update in 2021, including App Tracking Transparency (), have diminished the accuracy of UTM-based tracking for mobile and app-related traffic by restricting cross-app identifier sharing and ad attribution. This has led to underreported conversions and traffic from iOS devices, particularly in ad-driven campaigns, as users opt out of tracking at rates exceeding 70% in some regions, forcing reliance on aggregated or probabilistic models that dilute UTM precision.

Complementary or Replacement Tracking Methods

Complementary tools enhance UTM parameter usage by automating their application and ensuring persistence across user sessions. facilitates dynamic tagging, allowing marketers to inject or transfer UTM parameters via variables without manual modifications, which is particularly useful for multi-page campaigns or cross-domain tracking. For instance, can capture UTM values from the initial and append them to subsequent internal links, maintaining attribution accuracy in analytics reports. Server-side tracking complements UTMs by processing parameters on the backend to preserve them against losses, such as those caused by features or redirects; this method involves redirecting traffic through a server that extracts and stores UTMs before forwarding to the destination, thereby improving data reliability in privacy-focused environments. As replacements for UTMs, platform-specific identifiers offer more seamless integration for ad-driven traffic. The (GCLID), introduced in 2007 as part of auto-tagging, appends a unique ID to ad click URLs, enabling direct attribution of conversions to specific campaigns without relying on manual UTM setup. Similarly, Facebook's fbclid parameter, a click identifier added to outbound links from since 2018, tracks user interactions across and ads, facilitating precise of ad performance. As of September 2025, Apple's browser has expanded its privacy protections by removing click identifiers like GCLID and fbclid from URLs in all browsing modes (previously limited to private mode), further emphasizing the need for server-side tracking solutions. -based tracking, such as the , provides an alternative through embedded code that fires events like page views or purchases directly on the site, bypassing parameters altogether and supporting custom events for detailed tracking. Emerging methods address UTM limitations in and attribution complexity. 4's Consent Mode, updated to version 2 in November 2023, enables privacy-compliant tracking by adjusting data collection based on user consent signals, using modeling to estimate metrics when full data is unavailable due to restrictions. In , Attribution AI employs algorithms to assign credit across journeys, analyzing historical and to quantify impacts without depending solely on UTM-tagged sessions. UTM parameters are best suited for simple, URL-based scenarios like campaign links, where they provide straightforward source identification, whereas direct integrations excel in app environments, such as deep links that invoke specific in-app content via SDKs like those from Branch.io, ensuring accurate attribution without exposing parameters in visible URLs.

References

  1. [1]
    URL builders: Collect campaign data with custom URLs - Google Help
    By adding utm campaign parameters to the destination URLs you use in referral links and ad campaigns, you can view which campaigns refer traffic.
  2. [2]
    Traffic-source dimensions, manual tagging, and auto-tagging
    Because of this, if you're setting one UTM parameter, we strongly recommend that you set all relevant UTM parameters, especially utm_source , utm_medium , ...
  3. [3]
    Urchin Tracking Module (UTM) - Google Help
    The UTM Sensor enables client-side data collection, which is then funneled back through the web server augmenting the normal logfile. The client-side ...
  4. [4]
    Step 1: Track Campaign Data (Set up UTM-3) - Urchin Help
    The UTM variables provide a way of tracking your referrals along the five dimensions of campaign tracking by attaching campaign data to your links.
  5. [5]
    Best practices to avoid sending Personally Identifiable Information (PII)
    Be sure not to include PII in custom campaign parameters utm_source, utm_medium, utm_term, utm_campaign, and utm_content. Site search dimensions: Site ...
  6. [6]
    Urchin - the first Google Analytics - Tracking Garden
    Up until Google Universal Analytics, a Analytics Property IDs began with UA - this was the abbreviation for Urchin Analytics. Or you surely know UTM parameters.The Story Of Urchin · Urchin 3 · Urchin 6
  7. [7]
    The History of UTM Parameters: From Urchin to Google Analytics
    The Five Core UTM Parameters · utm_source · utm_medium · utm_campaign · utm_term · utm_content.
  8. [8]
    Marketing Matters: The Full History of UTM - Keitaro Blog
    Sep 18, 2023 · By 2002, the Urchin Traffic Monitor (UTM) was launched, which could provide granular web traffic insights. This system was ground-breaking ...
  9. [9]
    What is UTM tracking – Voluum Glossary
    The origins of UTM tracking can be traced back to the early 2000s when the Urchin Software Corporation, a web analytics company, developed a system for adding ...
  10. [10]
    URL tracking using UTM parameters: a simple explanation - IONOS
    Oct 17, 2022 · Thanks to the prefix utm_, Google “knows” which parameters are intended for URL tracking and picks them from the query string. UTM parameter : a ...Missing: reason | Show results with:reason
  11. [11]
    The unlikely origin story of Google Analytics, 1996–2005-ish
    Sep 2, 2016 · The UTM, or Urchin Traffic Monitor, was an early method for augmenting Apache (or IIS, etc.) log files with cookies, such that unique visitors ...
  12. [12]
    Urchin Software acquired by Google - Crunchbase Acquisition Profile
    Urchin Software Urchin Software analyzes web server log file content to generate traffic reports based on the log data.
  13. [13]
    What the hell is a UTM? - Buttondown
    But no: UTM stands for Urchin Tracking Module ... But any software could log UTM codes when someone ... utm_ prefix. Yet standardization counts for ...
  14. [14]
    What is a UTM (Urchin Tracking Module)? - Singular
    The term “UTM” stands for “Urchin Tracking Module” and originates from Urchin Tracker, which is a discontinued software that was acquired by Google in 2005 ...
  15. [15]
    Google Acquires Urchin Software - The New York Times
    Mar 29, 2005 · Google Acquires Urchin Software ... MOUNTAIN VIEW, Calif., Mar. 28 - Google Inc., the Internet search company, said late Monday that it had agreed ...
  16. [16]
    News Scan: March 29, 2005 - Forbes
    Mar 29, 2005 · Google Acquires Urchin Software. Google said late Monday it has agreed to acquire Urchin Software, which makes software to help companies ...
  17. [17]
    Google Agrees To Acquire Urchin - News announcements
    Mar 28, 2005 · MOUNTAIN VIEW, Calif. – March 28, 2005 – Google Inc. today announced it has agreed to acquire Urchin Software Corporation, a San Diego, ...
  18. [18]
    Web Analytics Free of Charge, Courtesy of Google
    Nov 14, 2005 · Monday, November 14, 2005. Web Analytics Free of Charge, Courtesy of Google. Powerful web analytics service now available to all businesses.Missing: launch | Show results with:launch
  19. [19]
    New Version of Google Analytics!
    May 8, 2007 · Since Google Analytics launched in November 2005, the demand for website analytics has increased significantly. Today there are hundreds of ...
  20. [20]
    Google Analytics is 10 years old – What's changed?
    Nov 10, 2015 · Google Analytics launched on the 11th November 2005 (it was a Friday) – the result of acquiring a company called Urchin Software.
  21. [21]
    2006 - Google Analytics Solutions
    Dec 6, 2006 · Qualitative Measurement for Brand Lift Campaigns in Tracking and Testing. Beyond conversion rates, average visit values, and ROI, it's ...
  22. [22]
    Introducing Google Analytics Premium
    Sep 29, 2011 · We developed Google Analytics Premium around these pillars: more data, advanced tools, dedicated support and guarantees. Here's a summary of ...
  23. [23]
    [GA4] Campaigns and traffic sources - Analytics Help
    This article describes how Analytics collects, processes, and reports the campaign and traffic-source data.
  24. [24]
    About Analytics sessions - Google Help
    The session_start event carries the information that determines the attribution of the session, such as the gclid, UTM parameters, and referrer. The attribution ...Missing: persistent | Show results with:persistent
  25. [25]
    What is UTM Tracking? A Complete Guide for 2025 - AgencyAnalytics
    May 16, 2025 · This guide explains how to use UTM tracking to pinpoint exactly where your client's traffic comes from, which campaigns perform, and how to build client-ready ...How To Create Utm Codes · Using A Utm Builder Or... · Utm Tracking In Google...
  26. [26]
    Complete Guide to Google Analytics UTM tagging (GA4 updated)
    Oct 15, 2025 · This article focuses on how to use UTMs to ensure the traffic you acquire to your site shows up correctly in Google Analytics.Google Analytics dimensions · How to use UTM parameters...
  27. [27]
    How To Perform A/B Testing - Urchin Help
    For A/B testing, you should use utm_source, utm_medium, utm_content. If you have multiple types of products or multiple campaigns, you should also use ...
  28. [28]
    UTM Parameters | Adobe Marketo Measure
    Feb 28, 2024 · There are five main UTMs parameters available: Medium, Source, Campaign, Content, and Term. These are discussed in more detail in the next section.Missing: concept | Show results with:concept
  29. [29]
    Get started with attribution - Analytics Help
    There are 3 attribution models available in the Attribution reports in Google Analytics properties: Data-driven attribution; Paid and organic last click ...
  30. [30]
    [PDF] The Ultimate Guide to Attribution - Think with Google
    Attribution is the art and science of assigning a value to each marketing touchpoint in a customer journey. This guide explains why it's important.
  31. [31]
    Event collection limits - Analytics Help - Google Help
    Collection limits · the page_title parameter must be 300 characters or fewer · the page_referrer parameter must be 420 characters or fewer · the page_location ...
  32. [32]
    UTM Tagging in GA4 vs Universal Analytics - Terminus App
    Google Analytics 4 introduces three new UTM parameters you can implement, bringing the total number of UTM parameters up to 8. Here are the new UTM parameters ...
  33. [33]
    GA4 UTM Parameters Builder & Best Practices for Tracking Paid ...
    Mar 15, 2023 · Character limits of UTMs · 100 characters (custom event parameter character count in GA4) · 200 characters · 255 characters for campaign names ...
  34. [34]
  35. [35]
    Campaign URL Builder - Google Analytics Demos & Tools
    This tool allows you to easily add campaign parameters to URLs so you can measure Custom Campaigns in Google Analytics.
  36. [36]
    Set up the Google tag with gtag.js | Tag Platform
    This page explains how to set up and deploy a Google tag on your site using the gtag.js framework.Google tag API reference · Gtag.js parameters · Configure Google products...
  37. [37]
  38. [38]
    campaign | Adobe Analytics - Experience League
    Jun 22, 2025 · The s.campaign variable is a string that typically contains a tracking code used in marketing efforts. Its max length is 255 bytes; values ...
  39. [39]
    Traffic Attribution: Analyze your marketing channels - Mixpanel Docs
    Mixpanel's Javascript library tracks all UTM tags by default. This allows you to segment key actions by relevant campaign information using attribution models.
  40. [40]
  41. [41]
    UTM Best Practices: The Ultimate List - AdRoll
    Jan 30, 2025 · 1. Determine which campaigns warrant UTM parameters for tracking · 2. Don't use UTM Tags for internal links · 3. Use a UTM parameter builder · 4.
  42. [42]
    UTM Best Practices - HockeyStack
    Oct 23, 2025 · Use lowercase only · Use hyphens (-) instead of spaces or underscores · Avoid special characters ( & , % , $ , etc.) · Don't reuse UTM strings ...
  43. [43]
    An Advanced Guide to UTM Naming Conventions & Best Practices
    Create a centralized UTM governance document that is accessible to everyone. Define clear rules for naming conventions and acceptable values for each parameter.
  44. [44]
    18 UTM Tagging Mistakes & Errors To Avoid (With Fixes) - DumbData
    Jun 11, 2025 · Another UTM practice you might be doing is appending UTM parameters to internal links that lead website visitors to other pages. Doing this isn' ...
  45. [45]
    [GA4] What the value (not set) means in your reports - Analytics Help
    If you manually tag destination URLs with UTM parameters instead of using auto-tagging, (not set) can appear for URLs with incomplete or incorrect parameters.Missing: constructing | Show results with:constructing<|control11|><|separator|>
  46. [46]
    8 BigQuery Mistakes in GA4 Export & How to Avoid Them in 202
    Feb 17, 2025 · Data Cleansing: BigQuery allows you to clean and correct errors in your GA4 data, such as fixing UTM parameter mistakes, and aligning campaign ...Missing: typos | Show results with:typos
  47. [47]
    A Guide to UTM Parameters in Google Analytics 4
    Oct 9, 2025 · Updated: October 9th, 2025. UTM parameters are short text codes you add to a URL to track the performance of marketing campaigns in Google ...
  48. [48]
    Maximum length of a URL in different browsers - GeeksforGeeks
    Jul 23, 2025 · Google Chrome allows the maximum length of the URL to be of the size 2MB (2,097,152 characters). Mozilla Firefox - In Firefox the length of the ...Missing: UTM | Show results with:UTM<|separator|>
  49. [49]
    GA4 UTM parameters not working? Here is how to fix it.
    Oct 2, 2025 · The best practice is to use all lowercase for UTM parameters and values. Using lowercase will ensure that your parameters are consistent and easy to read.
  50. [50]
    UTM parameters not working in Google Analytics 4? Here are the ...
    Jun 17, 2025 · This guide will explore why your UTM parameters may not be working correctly and how to fix these issues!
  51. [51]
    How to avoid UTM parameters removal - Stape
    Dec 2, 2024 · Removing UTM parameters from URLs can significantly impact your marketing campaign's performance evaluation. In this article, we will consider ...Missing: length | Show results with:length
  52. [52]
    What is a UTM Parameter? | Feroot Education Center
    Jul 15, 2025 · UTM parameters track traffic sources, but in healthcare, they can expose PHI and violate HIPAA. Learn what they are and how they work.
  53. [53]
    Understanding Analytics For Privacy Litigation - Darrow AI
    Aug 12, 2024 · Collecting and processing user data through URL parameters may raise privacy concerns, especially if sensitive information is involved.Cookies, Pixels, And Url... · Url Parameters · What Is Analytics?Missing: CCPA exposure<|separator|>
  54. [54]
    10 critical UTM mistakes that are affecting your marketing analytics
    Aug 2, 2024 · UTM parameters can make your URLs long and unwieldy. This isn't just an aesthetic issue; it can actually impact your marketing effectiveness.
  55. [55]
    5 Limitations Of Free UTM Builders That Can Cost You More Than ...
    Limited Scalability​​ Let's accept free UTM builders are not scalable, particularly when managing large-scale campaigns or generating/tracking bulk UTM codes.
  56. [56]
    The impact of Apple IOS 14.5 update on Facebook Ads
    Sep 5, 2023 · A sharp decline in reported traffic and returning users from Facebook ads on mobile devices. The 'Landing page views' metric is no longer ...
  57. [57]
    The Impact of iOS14.5+ and App Tracking Transparency (ATT)
    In April 2021 Apple released iOS 14.5 which introduced App Tracking Transparency (ATT). This allows users to control which apps can track their activity.