Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Uniform Civil Code

A Uniform Civil Code (UCC) constitutes a comprehensive body of civil laws intended to govern personal affairs such as marriage, divorce, inheritance, adoption, and live-in relationships uniformly for all citizens of India, transcending religious distinctions.^[1]^[2] Article 44 of the Indian Constitution, enshrined within the Directive Principles of State Policy, mandates that "the State shall endeavour to secure for the citizens a uniform civil code throughout the territory of India," reflecting an aspirational goal for legal uniformity rather than an enforceable fundamental right.^[3]^[4] The concept emerged during British colonial rule through efforts to codify personal laws, but post-independence reforms primarily unified Hindu personal laws via acts like the Hindu Marriage Act of 1955, while leaving Muslim, Christian, and other community-specific laws intact, perpetuating disparities in rights such as polygamy allowances and inheritance shares.^[2]^[5] This selective codification has fueled ongoing debates, with advocates emphasizing its potential to foster gender equality—evident in unequal treatment under certain religious codes, like patrilineal inheritance favoring males—and national cohesion by prioritizing constitutional equality over sectarian customs.^[6]^[7] Opposition, largely from religious minorities, centers on claims that a UCC would erode cultural and religious autonomy, potentially imposing a homogenized framework perceived as aligned with Hindu-majority norms, though judicial interpretations have underscored its compatibility with secularism and fundamental rights under Articles 14 and 15.^[8]^[9] In a landmark development, Uttarakhand enacted India's first state-level UCC in February 2024, with rules effective from January 2025, prohibiting polygamy, mandating live-in relationship registration, and equalizing inheritance rights, marking a practical step toward broader implementation amid persistent national contention.^[10]^[11]

Conceptual Foundations

Definition and Objectives

The Uniform Civil Code (UCC) constitutes a proposed framework of civil laws in India designed to regulate personal matters including marriage, divorce, adoption, inheritance, succession, and maintenance uniformly across all citizens, superseding religion-specific personal laws.^[12] This approach aims to establish a singular legal code applicable irrespective of religious, caste, or community affiliations, thereby replacing disparate customary practices derived from Hindu, Muslim, Christian, and other traditions.^[13] The concept draws from the principle of legal uniformity to address inconsistencies in family and property rights that currently vary by religious community.^[14] Enshrined as a directive principle in Article 44 of the Constitution of India, adopted on November 26, 1949, the provision states: "The State shall endeavour to secure for the citizens a uniform civil code throughout the territory of India."^[3] Though non-justiciable, this article reflects the framers' intent to prioritize secular governance in civil domains over religiously segmented laws, promoting equality under Article 14 and prohibiting discrimination under Article 15.^[2] The primary objectives of the UCC include fostering national integration by diminishing religious fragmentation in legal practices, ensuring gender justice through elimination of patriarchal elements in personal laws—such as unequal inheritance rights or polygamy allowances—and advancing social reform to curb practices like child marriage or arbitrary divorce.^[15] It seeks to simplify judicial processes by standardizing rules on guardianship and succession, thereby reducing litigation arising from conflicting personal laws, and to align India with modern egalitarian standards observed in secular jurisdictions.^[16] Proponents argue it would empower marginalized groups, particularly women, by guaranteeing equal rights in marital and property disputes, independent of religious orthodoxy.^[2]

Constitutional Basis and Principles

Article 44 of the Indian Constitution, located in Part IV under the Directive Principles of State Policy, mandates that "The State shall endeavour to secure for the citizens a uniform civil code throughout the territory of India."^[3] This provision envisions a common legal framework governing personal matters such as marriage, divorce, succession, and adoption, applicable uniformly irrespective of religious affiliation.^[3] The Directive Principles, including Article 44, are non-justiciable, meaning they cannot be enforced by courts, but they serve as fundamental guidelines for governance and policy-making to promote social welfare and justice.^[17] The constitutional basis for a Uniform Civil Code draws from the broader commitment to equality enshrined in Part III of the Constitution. Article 14 guarantees equality before the law and equal protection of laws, while Article 15 prohibits discrimination on grounds of religion, race, caste, sex, or place of birth, forming the egalitarian foundation that a UCC seeks to realize by eliminating religion-specific personal laws that may perpetuate inequalities, particularly in matters of inheritance and marital rights.^[1] However, this intersects with Article 25, which protects the right to freedom of conscience and the practice and propagation of religion, subject to public order, morality, and health; personal laws rooted in religious customs have historically been exempted, creating a tension between uniformity and religious autonomy.^[1] Underlying principles of the UCC emphasize secularism, national integration, and gender justice, aiming to foster a cohesive legal system that transcends communal divisions. Adopted on November 26, 1949, Article 44 reflects the Constituent Assembly's intent to gradually harmonize diverse personal laws, as evidenced by debates where proponents argued it would strengthen unity without infringing essential religious practices.^[3] Courts have reinforced these principles by interpreting Directive Principles as complementary to fundamental rights, urging legislative action toward UCC implementation to uphold constitutional morality and equality.^[1]

Historical Development

Colonial Era Reforms

During the early British colonial period, the East India Company adopted a policy of non-interference in Indian personal laws, as codified in Warren Hastings' Judicial Plan of 1772, which directed courts to apply Hindu law to Hindus and Islamic law to Muslims in matters of marriage, inheritance, and succession.^[18] This approach respected religious customs while establishing uniform procedural laws for criminal and civil matters outside personal domains.^[19] Reforms began in the 19th century, primarily targeting practices deemed inhumane within Hindu personal law, influenced by Indian social reformers like Raja Ram Mohan Roy and British evangelicals. The Bengal Sati Regulation of 1829, enacted by Governor-General Lord William Bentinck, criminalized the practice of sati (widow immolation), imposing penalties including fines and imprisonment on participants, marking the first major legislative override of customary Hindu rites.^[20] This was followed by the Hindu Widows' Remarriage Act of 1856 (Act XV), which legalized remarriage for Hindu widows, removed legal disabilities on their offspring's inheritance rights, and declared such children legitimate, though it did not mandate social acceptance or address dowry forfeiture issues. Further interventions included the Age of Consent Act of 1891, which raised the age of consent for sexual intercourse within marriage from 10 to 12 years, responding to cases like the Phulmoni Dasi tragedy and public outrage over child marriages.^[21] These reforms were selective, applying mainly to Hindus and Christians—such as the Indian Succession Act of 1865 and Indian Divorce Act of 1869, which provided limited uniform rules for Christian inheritance and divorce—while Muslim personal laws faced minimal alteration until the Muslim Personal Law (Shariat) Application Act of 1937, which affirmed Islamic law's primacy in family matters for Muslims opting in.^[14]^[22] The Lex Loci Report of 1840, commissioned by the British, examined the feasibility of a uniform civil law but ultimately recommended maintaining personal laws for Indians alongside territorial laws for Europeans, rejecting comprehensive uniformity to avoid alienating religious communities.^[23] Thus, colonial reforms introduced piecemeal changes to curb specific abuses rather than establishing a uniform civil code, reinforcing community-specific personal laws amid growing codification efforts by British jurists.^[24]

Post-Independence Hindu Codification

Following India's independence in 1947, the government initiated reforms to codify Hindu personal laws, which had previously been derived from ancient texts, customs, and colonial interpretations varying by region and community. These efforts culminated in the enactment of four key statutes between 1955 and 1956, collectively reforming marriage, succession, adoption, maintenance, and guardianship for Hindus, including Jains, Sikhs, and Buddhists.^[25]^[26] The reforms aimed to eliminate practices deemed discriminatory, such as polygamy and unequal inheritance, by imposing statutory uniformity over diverse customary laws.^[27] The groundwork for these laws originated with the Hindu Code Bill drafted by Dr. B.R. Ambedkar, introduced in the Constituent Assembly on April 11, 1947, even before full independence.^[28] Facing staunch opposition from orthodox Hindu leaders who viewed the proposals as an assault on scriptural authority and family structure, the bill stalled; Ambedkar resigned as Law Minister on September 27, 1951, citing the government's failure to prioritize its passage amid political resistance.^[29]^[30] Prime Minister Jawaharlal Nehru revived the initiative by dividing the comprehensive bill into separate acts to dilute controversy and secure parliamentary approval.^[31] The Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, enacted on May 18, 1955, defined marriage as a civil contract rather than solely sacramental, enforcing monogamy, setting minimum ages of 18 for brides and 21 for grooms, and introducing divorce on grounds including cruelty, desertion, and adultery.^[32]^[33] Complementing this, the Hindu Succession Act, 1956, passed on June 17, 1956, abolished the traditional Mitakshara joint family system for inheritance purposes and conferred coparcenary rights on daughters alongside sons in ancestral property, though full equality was limited until amendments in 2005.^[26] The Hindu Minority and Guardianship Act, 1956, and Hindu Adoptions and Maintenance Act, 1956, further standardized rules for child custody, natural guardianship prioritizing mothers in certain cases, and adoption rights extended to women.^[25] These codifications represented a deliberate state intervention to align Hindu laws with constitutional principles of equality under Articles 14 and 15, overriding scriptural and customary variances that often disadvantaged women.^[34] However, the reforms applied selectively to the Hindu majority, leaving Muslim personal laws uncodified and reliant on classical Sharia interpretations, a decision attributed to post-Partition communal sensitivities and electoral considerations favoring minority appeasement over uniform reform.^[35]^[36] Critics, including Ambedkar, argued this asymmetry perpetuated inequality, as the government prioritized political stability over the Directive Principle in Article 44 advocating a uniform civil code for all citizens.^[37]

Persistence of Religious Personal Laws

Following the post-independence codification of Hindu personal laws through enactments such as the Hindu Marriage Act of 1955, which mandated monogamy and introduced divorce provisions, and the Hindu Succession Act of 1956, which granted daughters inheritance rights, religious personal laws for Muslims, Christians, Parsis, and other minorities remained largely unreformed.^[38] These Hindu reforms applied uniformly to Hindus, Sikhs, Jains, and Buddhists, effectively secularizing aspects of family law for over 80% of India's population at the time.^[39] The Muslim Personal Law (Shariat) Application Act of 1937, originally enacted under British rule, persisted without significant amendment, mandating the application of Islamic Shariat principles to Muslims in matters of marriage, divorce, succession, inheritance, and maintenance, superseding contrary local customs unless explicitly declared otherwise by individuals.^[40] This framework allowed practices including polygyny for men and unequal inheritance shares favoring male heirs, with sons typically receiving twice the portion of daughters under Hanafi and other schools of jurisprudence interpreted in Indian courts.^[41] For Christians, colonial-era statutes like the Indian Christian Marriage Act of 1872 and the Indian Divorce Act of 1869 continued to regulate unions and dissolutions, often reflecting Victorian-era restrictions on divorce available primarily to husbands.^[42] Political considerations primarily drove this selective persistence, as the Nehru-led Congress government prioritized stability among Muslim communities post-Partition in 1947, facing vehement opposition from Muslim organizations like the All India Muslim Personal Law Board precursors when broader reforms were contemplated.^[43] Efforts to extend Hindu Code Bill principles to all citizens faltered amid fears of communal backlash, with Prime Minister Nehru reportedly conceding in 1951 parliamentary debates that forcing uniformity on minorities risked alienating them further.^[44] Constituent Assembly discussions similarly revealed insufficient consensus to render Article 44's Uniform Civil Code directive enforceable, relegating it to a non-justiciable policy goal despite endorsements from figures like B.R. Ambedkar.^[44] Successive administrations upheld this status quo, with intermittent commissions—such as the 1971 one under the Shah Commission—recommending gradual harmonization but encountering resistance tied to vote-bank dynamics and claims of infringing religious freedoms under Article 25.^[42] By 2023, over 170 million Muslims remained governed by uncodified Shariat interpretations varying by sect (Sunni Hanafi dominant), perpetuating disparities in gender equity compared to codified Hindu or statutory secular provisions.^[43] Parsis, under the Parsi Marriage and Divorce Act of 1936, and Jews with minimal customary applications, similarly retained distinct regimes, underscoring a fragmented civil law landscape where empirical data from National Family Health Surveys indicate higher polygamy rates (around 2-5% in Muslim households) and lower female inheritance claims versus Hindu counterparts.^[22]

Judicial Role in Advancing Uniformity

Shah Bano Case and Maintenance Disputes

In Mohd. Ahmed Khan v. Shah Bano Begum, decided on April 23, 1985, the Supreme Court of India ruled that a divorced Muslim woman is entitled to maintenance under Section 125 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC), which provides for support to wives, divorced wives, and children irrespective of religion, extending beyond the traditional iddat period under Muslim personal law until the woman can maintain herself.^[45]^[46] Shah Bano, aged 62 at the time, had been married to Mohd. Ahmed Khan since 1932 and separated in 1975 after 43 years; he pronounced talaq in 1978 and initially provided minimal support, prompting her petition for Rs. 500 monthly maintenance, which lower courts partially granted before the Supreme Court affirmed Rs. 179.20 per month plus litigation costs of Rs. 10,000.^[45]^[47] The judgment emphasized Section 125's secular character, holding that personal laws yielding inadequate remedies—such as Muslim law's limit to meher (dower) and three-month iddat maintenance—cannot override statutory obligations, as constitutional equality under Articles 14 and 15 supersedes discriminatory religious practices.^[46]^[45] Chief Justice Y.V. Chandrachud's opinion critiqued the "denial of maintenance to a divorced Muslim woman as short-sighted" and urged Parliament to enact a Uniform Civil Code (UCC) per Article 44's Directive Principle, arguing that disparate personal laws foster inequality and that a uniform code would secure gender justice without eroding secularism.^[46]^[47] The ruling ignited protests from Muslim clerical bodies, including the All India Muslim Personal Law Board, who viewed it as judicial overreach into Sharia and a threat to minority autonomy, leading to demands for legislative reversal amid claims of majoritarian imposition.^[48]^[49] In response, the Rajiv Gandhi-led Congress government introduced and passed the Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Divorce) Act, 1986, effective May 19, which confined a divorced Muslim woman's maintenance claim against her former husband to the iddat period, supplemented by a one-time "reasonable and fair provision," while shifting further liability to relatives or the Wakf Board, effectively nullifying Section 125's applicability post-divorce for Muslims.^[50]^[46] This legislative override amplified maintenance disputes, exposing how personal laws often cap remedies at subsistence levels—e.g., iddat averaging 90 days with nominal sums—contrasting with Hindu and secular provisions allowing lifelong alimony based on need and capacity, thus underscoring empirical gender disparities in divorce outcomes and reigniting calls for UCC to enforce uniform standards grounded in constitutional equality rather than religion-specific concessions.^[45]^[48] Subsequent cases like Danial Latifi v. Union of India (2001) interpreted the 1986 Act's "fair provision" as potentially lifelong but tied to divorce timing, yet failed to fully restore pre-1986 secular access, perpetuating fragmented rights where Muslim women face shorter, lower entitlements absent UCC implementation.^[46]^[50]

Sarla Mudgal and Interfaith Marriage Issues

The Sarla Mudgal v. Union of India case, decided by the Supreme Court of India on May 25, 1995, arose from public interest litigation filed by Hindu women whose spouses had converted to Islam to enter second marriages without dissolving their first unions under Hindu personal law.^[51] The petitions highlighted instances where Hindu husbands, bound by the monogamy provisions of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 (Section 17, prohibiting bigamy), underwent nominal conversion to Islam—where polygamy is permitted under Muslim personal law—to solemnize additional marriages, leaving first wives without legal recourse.^[52] The court examined whether such conversions dissolved the original Hindu marriage and validated subsequent unions, ruling that they did not; the first marriage remained subsisting, rendering the second ceremony void and punishable as bigamy under Sections 494 and 495 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860.^[53] ^[54] The judgment emphasized that religious conversion, while protected under Article 25 of the Constitution (freedom of religion), cannot be invoked to perpetrate fraud on personal laws or evade statutory obligations like monogamy imposed on Hindus post-1955 codification.^[51] Justices Kuldip Singh, R.M. Sahai, and S. Mohan observed that disparate personal laws foster legal anomalies, enabling exploitation particularly of women in interfaith or conversion-driven scenarios, and reiterated the directive principle in Article 44 for a Uniform Civil Code (UCC) to secure gender equality and uniformity in marriage, divorce, and inheritance.^[52] ^[55] The court declined to strike down practices like polygamy under Muslim law but urged legislative action toward UCC implementation, noting that Article 44's non-enforceability had allowed parallel legal systems to persist, undermining secular constitutional goals.^[56] In the context of interfaith marriages, the ruling exposed vulnerabilities where conversions facilitate polygamy or circumvent dissolution requirements, as Hindu law mandates divorce for remarriage while Islamic law allows up to four wives without prior termination.^[57] This practice, documented in the case through affidavits from affected families, illustrated causal links between legal pluralism and marital instability, with empirical patterns showing Hindu-to-Muslim conversions predominantly by men seeking multiple spouses—contrasting rarer reverse cases.^[52] ^[58] The decision influenced subsequent interfaith dynamics by affirming the Special Marriage Act, 1954, as a secular alternative for couples avoiding conversion, though it highlighted enforcement gaps; for instance, qazi-registered Islamic marriages post-conversion often evade scrutiny, perpetuating disputes over legitimacy and maintenance.^[59] Critics from Muslim organizations argued the verdict infringed religious freedom, but the court countered that true faith requires sincere belief, not instrumental use for legal evasion, aligning with first-principles of contractual integrity in marriage.^[55] The Sarla Mudgal precedent catalyzed discourse on UCC as a remedy for interfaith marriage inequities, informing later rulings like Lily Thomas v. Union of India (2000), which amended the IPC to disqualify converts from public office for bigamy convictions.^[57] It underscored data-driven needs for reform, with reports indicating thousands of annual bigamy complaints tied to conversions, disproportionately affecting women across communities due to uneven protections—Hindus via codified monogamy versus uncodified allowances elsewhere.^[56] Proponents cite this as evidence that UCC would enforce consistent standards, reducing conversion-for-marriage abuses and promoting empirical equity, while opponents frame it as cultural overreach, though judicial reasoning prioritized verifiable legal harms over unsubstantiated autonomy claims.^[58] ^[55]

Later Pronouncements on Equality

In John Vallamattom v. Union of India (2003), the Supreme Court invalidated Section 118 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925, which restricted Christians from bequeathing more than one-third of their property to religious or charitable purposes without beneficiary consent, deeming it discriminatory and violative of Article 14's guarantee of equality.^[60] The Court reasoned that such limitations lacked rational basis, imposing undue burdens on Christian testators compared to other communities, and observed that the persistence of disparate personal laws undermined constitutional equality, reiterating the directive under Article 44 to secure a Uniform Civil Code as essential for national unity and justice.^[61] This pronouncement extended the equality mandate to testamentary freedom, critiquing religious-specific exemptions that perpetuated inequality. Subsequent judgments reinforced this trajectory. In Shayara Bano v. Union of India (2017), a Constitution Bench by a 3:2 majority struck down the practice of instantaneous triple talaq (talaq-e-biddat) under Muslim personal law as manifestly arbitrary and violative of Articles 14, 15, and 21, emphasizing that gender-discriminatory practices in personal laws could not override fundamental rights to dignity and equality. The majority held that the unilateral power granted to husbands lacked procedural safeguards, manifesting "patriarchy" incompatible with modern constitutionalism, while concurring opinions urged legislative reform toward uniformity to eliminate such inequities across communities.^[62] Dissenting views prioritized religious accommodation but affirmed that personal laws must evolve to align with equality principles, highlighting judicial limits in overhauling entrenched customs without legislative action. These rulings underscored a judicial pattern post-1995 wherein personal laws yielding unequal outcomes—particularly for women and minorities—were scrutinized against constitutional benchmarks, with repeated calls for UCC implementation to harmonize civil relations devoid of religious fragmentation. The Court in John Vallamattom explicitly lamented legislative inaction on Article 44 despite decades of advocacy, positioning equality as paramount over uncodified traditions that foster disparities in inheritance, marriage, and divorce.^[63] By 2017, Shayara Bano demonstrated incremental judicial intervention, invalidating specific discriminatory elements while deferring comprehensive codification to Parliament, thereby advancing substantive equality without fully supplanting personal laws.

Arguments Supporting UCC

Promotion of Gender Justice and Equality

Proponents of the Uniform Civil Code (UCC) argue that it addresses entrenched gender disparities in India's personal laws by establishing uniform standards aligned with constitutional equality principles under Articles 14 and 15, which prohibit discrimination on grounds including sex.^[64] In particular, certain religious personal laws, such as those derived from Sharia in Muslim communities, permit practices like polygamy for men, grant women only half the inheritance share of male heirs, and facilitate unilateral divorce (talaq) for husbands while imposing stringent conditions like iddat or khula on wives, thereby perpetuating economic vulnerability and unequal bargaining power for women.^[65]^[66]^[67] These provisions contrast with post-1955 Hindu codifications, which banned polygamy and equalized inheritance rights for daughters, demonstrating that statutory reforms can empirically enhance women's legal protections without undermining cultural identity.^[68] A UCC would mandate monogamy, equal inheritance shares for sons and daughters regardless of religion, and gender-neutral divorce procedures with provisions for maintenance and alimony, thereby reducing instances of arbitrary repudiation and ensuring women's financial security post-dissolution.^[69]^[70] This uniformity eliminates selective application of laws that disadvantage women in minority communities, fostering causal equality by tying rights to citizenship rather than faith-based customs, as evidenced by the 2019 criminalization of triple talaq, which curtailed one discriminatory practice but left broader inequalities intact.^[71]^[72] Empirical models support these outcomes: Goa's Portuguese-era civil code, applicable to all residents since 1961, requires marriage registration and designates wives as equal co-heirs to spousal property, contributing to relatively higher female property ownership rates compared to states with segmented laws, though ongoing demands for further sensitization highlight implementation's role in realizing gains.^[73] Similarly, Uttarakhand's 2024 UCC explicitly bans polygamy, enforces equal parental inheritance for children, and provides gender-neutral dissolution rights including equal custody considerations, aiming to rectify prior disparities where women under uncodified laws received inferior shares or faced polygynous unions affecting household resource allocation.^[74]^[75] These state-level implementations illustrate how UCC frameworks can causally advance gender justice by standardizing protections, with data from reformed jurisdictions showing reduced litigation over maintenance and inheritance disputes.^[76]

Fostering National Integration and Secularism

Proponents contend that a Uniform Civil Code (UCC) would advance Indian secularism by instituting civil laws detached from religious doctrines, ensuring the state treats all citizens equally without privileging any faith's personal laws. This aligns with Article 44 of the Constitution, which mandates the state to "endeavor to secure for the citizens a uniform civil code throughout the territory of India," envisioning a legal framework that prioritizes equality over religious particularism in matters like marriage, divorce, and inheritance.^[2] Such a code would operationalize secularism as principled distance from religion in governance, countering the selective application of personal laws that currently allows religious bodies to influence state policy.^[77] In terms of national integration, advocates assert that religion-based personal laws perpetuate fragmented loyalties and ideological conflicts, hindering the development of a cohesive national identity in India's multi-religious society. A UCC would mitigate these divisions by imposing a singular legal standard, reducing communal fault lines that arise from disparate rules—such as varying inheritance rights or marriage solemnization—fostered under systems like the Muslim Personal Law or Hindu Succession Act.^[78] This unification is viewed as crucial for social harmony, as evidenced by constitutional framers' emphasis on uniformity to forge unity amid diversity, preventing personal laws from serving as tools for identity-based mobilization.^[79] Critics of the status quo argue that maintaining separate personal laws undermines true secularism by embedding religious orthodoxy into state functions, whereas a UCC would liberate civil matters from scriptural authority, promoting a citizenship model where individual rights supersede community-specific privileges. Empirical observations from regions with uniform codes, like Goa, suggest this fosters integration without eroding cultural pluralism, as civil uniformity does not impinge on religious rituals or beliefs protected under Article 25.^[80] Overall, supporters maintain that UCC implementation would consolidate national solidarity by aligning personal laws with constitutional equality, thereby diminishing incentives for religion-driven separatism.^[81]

Empirical Evidence from Existing Models

Goa's Civil Code, retained from Portuguese colonial rule and extended to all residents post-1961 liberation, serves as India's primary domestic model for uniform personal laws, governing marriage, divorce, succession, and adoption across religious communities with limited exceptions. Key provisions include mandatory monogamy for all, equal inheritance shares for sons and daughters from intestate succession, and a community property system dividing marital assets equally between spouses upon dissolution or death.^[82]^[83] National Family Health Survey (NFHS) data reveals Goa outperforming national averages in women's empowerment indicators, including higher female literacy rates (88.7% vs. India's 70.3% in NFHS-5, 2019-2021), greater decision-making autonomy in household matters, and improved access to healthcare resources, with analysts attributing these partly to the code's elimination of discriminatory religious practices like unequal inheritance under traditional Hindu or Muslim laws.^[84]^[85] Goa's female labor force participation rate stands at 25.5% (Periodic Labour Force Survey 2022-23), above the national 23.3% for rural women, correlating with provisions enabling women's property ownership and financial independence.^[86] The code's divorce framework, allowing judicial dissolution on grounds like cruelty or desertion with alimony, has resulted in lower polygamy prevalence (near-zero incidence) compared to states governed by Sharia-based laws, reducing economic vulnerabilities for women in plural marriages.^[83] Comparative state analyses rank Goa among top performers in comprehensive women's empowerment, alongside Punjab and Sikkim, with metrics showing reduced gender disparities in education and asset control, though causation intertwines with the state's high overall literacy (88.5%) and tourism-driven economy.^[86] Challenges persist, including elevated domestic violence reporting (28.5% lifetime prevalence per NFHS-4, higher than states like Kerala) and critiques that the code retains patriarchal elements, such as prioritizing male lineage in some succession scenarios, prompting calls for amendments by women's groups.^[87] Internationally, Turkey's 1926 Civil Code, adopting Swiss secular principles, empirically advanced gender justice by banning polygamy and mandating equal divorce rights, yielding initial rises in female literacy (from 10% in 1927 to 20% by 1950) and workforce entry, though land inheritance biases against women in rural areas limited fuller equity.^[88] France's Napoleonic Code framework, secularized post-1905 laïcité laws, underpins high Gender Inequality Index scores (0.072 in 2022 UNDP data, among global lowest), with uniform rules correlating to 50% female property ownership and low forced marriage rates, yet socioeconomic factors like education confound direct attribution.^[89] These models suggest uniform codes facilitate baseline equality in personal matters but require complementary reforms for comprehensive outcomes.

Criticisms and Counterarguments

Claims of Threat to Religious Freedom

Opponents of the Uniform Civil Code (UCC) in India, primarily Muslim organizations such as the All India Muslim Personal Law Board (AIMPLB) and Jamiat Ulema-e-Hind, assert that it poses a direct threat to religious freedom by compelling adherence to secular laws over faith-based personal laws. They argue that provisions on marriage, divorce, inheritance, and succession in religious texts like the Quran and Sharia constitute essential religious practices protected under Article 25 of the Constitution, which guarantees freedom of conscience and the right to freely profess, practice, and propagate religion, subject only to public order, morality, and health.^[90]^[91] Implementing a UCC, they claim, would violate this by prohibiting practices such as polygamy—permitted under Islamic law for up to four wives under specific conditions outlined in Surah An-Nisa—or unequal inheritance shares where daughters receive half the portion of sons, as mandated in Surah An-Nisa 4:11.^[92]^[93] These groups further contend that the UCC encroaches on Article 29, which safeguards the cultural and educational rights of minorities to conserve their distinct language, script, or culture, by eroding the autonomy of religious communities to govern internal affairs according to their doctrines. The AIMPLB has specifically warned that Muslims are bound by Sharia derived from the Quran and Hadith, and any uniform code imposing "majoritarian morality" would supersede minority rights, potentially leading to legal challenges in courts.^[91]^[94] In response to state-level enactments, such as Uttarakhand's UCC bill passed on February 7, 2024, the AIMPLB announced plans to contest its constitutionality, arguing it interferes with religious practices integral to faith.^[92] Similar objections have been raised by Jamiat Ulema-e-Hind, which on June 19, 2023, declared the UCC incompatible with constitutional religious freedoms and vowed opposition through legal means.^[90] Critics from tribal and other minority communities echo these concerns, fearing that a nationwide UCC would homogenize diverse customary laws, such as those among northeastern tribes or Parsis, which incorporate religious elements into inheritance and marriage, thereby undermining cultural pluralism under the guise of uniformity.^[95] The AIMPLB's submission to the Law Commission on July 5, 2023, reiterated that personal laws are not reformable by state intervention, as they stem from divine sources rather than civil enactments, and altering them equates to religious persecution.^[96]^[93] Proponents of these claims often reference historical precedents, noting that the Constitution's framers deferred UCC implementation to respect minority sensitivities post-Partition, viewing current pushes as selective secularism favoring Hindu norms.^[97]

Alleged Majoritarian Imposition

Critics of the Uniform Civil Code (UCC) in India contend that its implementation would represent a majoritarian imposition, wherein the preferences of the Hindu majority—comprising approximately 80% of the population—are codified into law, thereby eroding the religious and cultural autonomy of minorities, especially Muslims who adhere to Sharia-derived personal laws on marriage, divorce, and inheritance.^[98] ^[99] Organizations such as the All India Muslim Personal Law Board have articulated this view, arguing that the UCC threatens essential religious practices protected under Articles 25-26 of the Constitution, potentially alienating minority communities and fostering communal discord.^[100] This apprehension intensified following the Bharatiya Janata Party's (BJP) renewed push for UCC after 2019, with opponents framing it as an extension of Hindu nationalist policies rather than a neutral secular reform.^[101] ^[102] Such allegations often draw on the historical context of Hindu personal law reforms in the 1950s, which standardized practices for Hindus, Jains, Sikhs, and Buddhists under the Hindu Code Bills, while leaving Muslim and other minority laws largely untouched—a disparity critics claim sets a precedent for selective uniformity favoring the majority.^[103] However, this narrative overlooks that those 1950s reforms explicitly rejected orthodox Hindu customs like polygamy and unequal inheritance in favor of egalitarian principles, serving as a model for secular legislation rather than religious entrenchment.^[104] Proponents, including constitutional scholars, argue that a true UCC would derive from fundamental rights under Articles 14 (equality) and 15 (non-discrimination), not majority religious norms, thereby promoting individual justice over group-specific privileges that perpetuate intra-community inequalities, such as women's disadvantaged status in uncodified Muslim personal law.^[105] ^[106] Empirical precedents undermine claims of inherent majoritarian threat. Goa's Portuguese Civil Code, operational since 1867 and applicable to all residents irrespective of religion, has coexisted with a 27% minority population (including Muslims and Christians) without documented erosion of cultural identities or widespread religious conflict; it mandates monogamy and equal inheritance for all, yet accommodates community-specific concessions like Hindu bigamy in certain ancestral property cases.^[107] ^[108] Similarly, Uttarakhand's Uniform Civil Code Act, 2024, explicitly exempts Scheduled Tribes—about 3% of the state's population, including groups like Jaunsaris and Tharus—allowing them to retain customary practices, which demonstrates legislative sensitivity to minority customs rather than indiscriminate imposition.^[109] ^[110] The Supreme Court, in judgments like Shayara Bano v. Union of India (2017), has endorsed UCC pursuit without endorsing majoritarian framing, stressing its role in reconciling personal laws with constitutional equality and observing that religious practices yielding to reform do not violate freedom of religion.^[111] Criticisms of majoritarian imposition frequently originate from politically aligned sources, including opposition parties and advocacy groups, which prioritize preserving differential personal laws as a bulwark against perceived Hindu dominance, despite evidence that such laws sustain gender disparities across religions—e.g., triple talaq's prevalence until its 2019 criminalization.^[43] No verifiable data indicates that UCC models in Goa or Uttarakhand have diminished minority populations' religious adherence or demographic standing; instead, they correlate with higher gender parity indices in family matters.^[112] Thus, while the allegation persists in discourse, it conflates political advocacy with legal content, ignoring the UCC's grounding in universal rights over sectarian uniformity.^[113]

Practical Implementation Barriers

India's religious and cultural diversity, encompassing over 2 billion adherents across Hinduism (79.8%), Islam (14.2%), Christianity (2.3%), and other faiths as per the 2011 Census, poses a fundamental barrier to drafting and enforcing a UCC that accommodates varying customary practices in marriage, inheritance, and divorce without alienating communities.^[114]^[115] Muslim personal laws, derived from Sharia and codified in acts like the Muslim Personal Law (Shariat) Application Act of 1937, permit practices such as polygamy and unequal inheritance shares for women, which conflict with Hindu Succession Act amendments post-2005 that equalized coparcenary rights.^[116] Reformulating these into a singular code risks perceptions of cultural homogenization, as evidenced by Goa's Portuguese Civil Code, which applies uniformly but evolved in a less diverse context and excludes tribal customs.^[117] Political opposition, particularly from parties reliant on minority vote banks and organizations like the All India Muslim Personal Law Board (AIMPLB), has stalled consensus, with groups framing UCC as an assault on Article 25's guarantee of religious freedom despite the provision's subjection to public order, morality, and health.^[118]^[119] In July 2023, the Indian Union Muslim League and AIMPLB vowed legal and political resistance, arguing it undermines Sharia-based family structures, while opposition parties like Congress and CPI(M) criticized it as selective targeting of Muslims amid existing reforms in Hindu laws.^[120]^[121] This lack of broad-based support, coupled with fears of electoral backlash in states with significant Muslim populations (e.g., 68 million in Uttar Pradesh alone), has prevented parliamentary action since Article 44's adoption in 1950 as a non-enforceable Directive Principle.^[116]^[115] Enforcement hurdles arise from India's federal structure and logistical complexities, as personal laws fall under the Concurrent List (Entry 5, Seventh Schedule), requiring coordination between center and states amid varying regional customs, such as matrilineal systems in Kerala or tribal exemptions under Article 371.^[122] Implementing UCC nationwide would demand extensive consultation, judicial training, and dispute resolution mechanisms to handle resistance, potentially leading to increased litigation as seen in post-Shah Bano reversals via the 1986 Muslim Women Act.^[123] Critics highlight the risk of social unrest, with historical protests against similar reforms exacerbating communal tensions, though empirical data from Uttarakhand's 2024 UCC enactment shows initial compliance issues in rural areas due to low awareness and customary adherence.^[117]^[124] Constitutional tensions further complicate rollout, as Article 44's aspirational language lacks justiciability under Article 37, allowing states like Gujarat and Uttarakhand to enact partial codes in 2024-2025 without national uniformity, while challenges invoking Article 14's equality clash with Article 25's essential practices doctrine upheld in cases like the 2018 Sabarimala verdict.^[116]^[125] Drafting a code requires reconciling these without judicial overreach, yet past Law Commission consultations (e.g., 2018 report deeming UCC unnecessary) reflect institutional hesitancy amid bias toward preserving status quo personal laws.^[126]

Legislative and State-Level Progress

National Directive and Political Pledges

Article 44 of the Indian Constitution, part of the Directive Principles of State Policy, directs that "The State shall endeavour to secure for the citizens a uniform civil code throughout the territory of India."^[3] This provision, adopted in 1950, aims to promote uniformity in personal laws governing marriage, divorce, succession, and adoption, but as a non-justiciable directive under Article 37, it imposes no enforceable obligation on the state and serves primarily as a policy guideline.^[2] The Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) has included the implementation of a Uniform Civil Code (UCC) in its national election manifestos since at least 1998, framing it as essential for gender equality and national integration by replacing religion-specific personal laws.^[127] In its 2014 manifesto, the party pledged legislation for a secular set of personal laws applicable to all Indians irrespective of religion.^[127] This commitment was reiterated in the 2019 manifesto, emphasizing UCC's role in upholding constitutional values of equality and justice without discrimination.^[128] The 2024 'Sankalp Patra' manifesto explicitly promised nationwide UCC implementation, with Prime Minister Narendra Modi stating that the country had waited long for this step toward equality.^[129]^[130] Prime Minister Modi reinforced the pledge in his August 15, 2024, Independence Day address from the Red Fort, advocating a "secular civil code" as the need of the hour to replace what he described as an outdated "communal civil code" that fosters divisions and discrimination along religious lines.^[131] He argued that such a code would eliminate religious-based inequalities in personal laws and align with modern societal needs after 75 years of independence.^[132] Other national parties, such as the Congress, have historically opposed or deferred UCC implementation, prioritizing consultations with religious communities over uniform legislation, though no formal counter-pledges for nationwide UCC appear in their recent platforms.^[128] The BJP's consistent national-level advocacy has positioned UCC as a core ideological promise, often linked to broader goals like 'One Nation, One Law,' despite resistance from opposition parties citing threats to minority rights.^[133]

Goa as a Precedent

Goa's civil code, derived from the Portuguese Civil Code of 1867 introduced in the territory in 1870, governs personal matters such as marriage, divorce, succession, and adoption uniformly for all residents irrespective of religion.^[134] This code was retained following Goa's integration into India in 1961 through Section 5(1) of the Goa, Daman and Diu Administration Act, 1962, which preserved pre-existing laws unless explicitly repealed.^[82] Unlike the religion-specific personal laws prevalent elsewhere in India, Goa's framework applies a single set of rules, including provisions for monogamous marriages (with limited exceptions for bigamy under specific conditions like infertility of the first spouse and judicial consent) and a community property system where spousal assets acquired during marriage are jointly owned.^[135]^[136] The code's uniform application has operated continuously since 1962 in a demographically diverse state, where Hindus constitute approximately 66% of the population, Christians 25%, and Muslims 8%, without evidence of widespread religious conflict over its enforcement.^[134] It mandates equal inheritance rights for sons and daughters in paternal property and provides for maintenance obligations, though maternal property succession follows intestate rules favoring male heirs unless a will specifies otherwise.^[135] Proponents cite its longevity—over six decades—as empirical demonstration of a civil code's viability in promoting legal consistency and reducing forum-shopping across religious laws, with no systemic reports of implementation failures disrupting social harmony.^[82] Critics, including some women's rights advocates, argue that certain provisions retain patriarchal elements, such as discretionary bigamy allowances and limitations on female guardianship, potentially undermining full gender parity.^[137] Despite amendments like those in 2012 addressing procedural aspects, the code has not undergone comprehensive modernization to align with contemporary equality standards, leading to calls for reforms to enhance women's property rights and eliminate exceptions.^[138] Nonetheless, its operation as a de facto uniform civil code positions Goa as a practical precedent for national implementation, illustrating that a codified personal law system can function in a pluralistic society while prioritizing statutory uniformity over religious variances.^[134]^[136]

Recent State Enactments (Uttarakhand and Gujarat)

Uttarakhand enacted India's first state-level Uniform Civil Code through the Uniform Civil Code of Uttarakhand Act, 2024, introduced in the legislative assembly on February 6, 2024, by Chief Minister Pushkar Singh Dhami.^[139] The bill passed both houses of the assembly and received presidential assent, with implementation commencing on January 27, 2025, via notification of the Uniform Civil Code Rules, 2025.^[10]^[140] The law establishes uniform personal laws for marriage, divorce, succession, adoption, and maintenance, excluding Scheduled Tribes, and mandates registration of live-in relationships within one month to recognize offspring as legitimate and provide maintenance rights.^[141]^[142] Core provisions prohibit polygamy, halala, iddat periods, triple talaq, and child marriages; require marriage registration within 60 days under penalty of fines up to ₹25,000 for first offenses; and equalize inheritance rights between sons and daughters while granting daughters equal coparcenary rights in ancestral property.^[143]^[144] It standardizes the minimum marriage age at 21 years for both men and women, diverging from prior religious-specific norms, and introduces uniform divorce grounds including adultery, cruelty, and desertion applicable across communities.^[145] In October 2025, the state government filed an affidavit in the Uttarakhand High Court proposing amendments to rules on live-in relationship declarations and Aadhaar-based authentication to address practical concerns raised in petitions challenging enforcement mechanisms.^[146]^[147] Gujarat advanced toward UCC enactment by forming a five-member committee on February 4, 2025, chaired by former Supreme Court Justice Ranjana Desai, to assess feasibility, solicit public input, and draft legislation.^[148]^[149] The panel extended consultations until April 15, 2025, via an official portal, emphasizing provisions like mandatory marriage registration and equal property rights modeled partly on Uttarakhand's framework.^[150]^[151] State Law Minister Rushikesh Patel stated in March 2025 that Gujarat aimed to become the second state post-Uttarakhand, with the committee's report submitted during the monsoon session and a bill anticipated thereafter.^[152]^[153] As of October 2025, no bill has been introduced or passed in the Gujarat assembly, though the High Court upheld the committee's formation against challenges on minority representation in July 2025.^[154]^[155]

Current Status and Future Outlook

Nationwide Implementation Challenges

India's religious and cultural pluralism poses a primary obstacle to nationwide UCC adoption, as communities adhering to distinct personal laws—such as Muslim Sharia provisions allowing polygamy and unequal inheritance, or tribal customary practices—view the code as an erosion of their autonomy protected under Article 25 of the Constitution, which guarantees freedom of religion.^[116]^[117] This resistance is particularly acute among Muslim organizations like the All India Muslim Personal Law Board (AIMPLB), which has vowed legal and political opposition, arguing that UCC implementation would undermine minority rights and cultural identity.^[156] Christian and tribal groups in states like Nagaland and Meghalaya have similarly protested, citing threats to indigenous customs integrated into their governance.^[119]^[116] Political fragmentation exacerbates these issues, with major opposition parties including Congress and regional outfits like the Indian Union Muslim League (IUML) rejecting nationwide UCC as a majoritarian agenda lacking broad consensus, while even some BJP allies in the Northeast express reservations due to local sensitivities.^[119]^[157] As of October 2025, no central legislation has materialized despite BJP's manifesto pledges, hindered by electoral calculations in diverse states where appeasement politics prioritizes minority votes over uniform reforms.^[158]^[43] This deadlock reflects a broader lack of inter-party agreement, stalling parliamentary progress since the Law Commission's 2018 consultation, which noted over 8 million responses predominantly opposing the code.^[123] Constitutionally, Article 44's non-justiciable directive principle for UCC conflicts with fundamental rights under Articles 14, 15, and 25, requiring delicate reconciliation to avoid judicial invalidation; critics argue that overriding entrenched personal laws could necessitate amendments, demanding two-thirds parliamentary majority amid polarized debates.^[123]^[159] Federal dynamics further complicate enforcement, as concurrent list subjects like marriage fall under shared central-state jurisdiction, with non-BJP ruled states like Kerala and Tamil Nadu signaling resistance to central imposition, potentially leading to uneven application akin to the varied reception of Uttarakhand's 2024 law.^[160]^[145] Practically, codifying a UCC demands reconciling thousands of disparate customs into a non-discriminatory framework without alienating groups, involving extensive consultations and pilot testing beyond Goa's colonial-era model, which excludes certain communities; administrative burdens include retraining judicial personnel and updating registries across 28 states, amid fears of social unrest from perceived cultural homogenization.^[116]^[161] As evidenced by Uttarakhand's exemptions for tribals covering 2.5% of its population, nationwide scaling risks similar carve-outs, diluting uniformity and prolonging litigation in a judiciary already backlogged with personal law disputes.^[160]^[111]

Ongoing Judicial and Political Developments

In 2025, the Uttarakhand High Court continued to adjudicate challenges to the state's Uniform Civil Code, which was passed by the assembly on February 7, 2024, received presidential assent on March 13, 2024, and implemented on January 27, 2025. Four writ petitions were filed in February 2025 by organizations and individuals contesting provisions on marriage registration, inheritance, and live-in relationships, arguing violations of privacy and religious rights. On May 20, 2025, the court consolidated the petitions and directed the central government to submit its response within three weeks, signaling ongoing scrutiny of state-level reforms.^[162]^[163]^[111] The Gujarat High Court, on July 31, 2025, upheld the state government's authority to constitute a Uniform Civil Code committee, dismissing a petition that alleged insufficient minority representation in the panel formed in 2024. The ruling affirmed states' legislative competence under List III of the Seventh Schedule to explore UCC frameworks, despite opposition claims of procedural flaws.^[154] On September 27, 2025, the Delhi High Court invoked the need for a Uniform Civil Code while addressing discrepancies in child marriage prosecutions, where personal laws create enforcement conflicts; the bench observed that uniform laws could resolve such inconsistencies without encroaching on constitutional directives under Article 44.^[164] Politically, the Bharatiya Janata Party-led central government has deferred nationwide legislation post the 2024 Lok Sabha elections, citing coalition constraints in the National Democratic Alliance, though state initiatives persist as testing grounds. Prime Minister Narendra Modi, on January 28, 2025, endorsed the Uttarakhand implementation, stating it would "strengthen democracy" by promoting equality in personal laws.^[165] The 22nd Law Commission, tasked with UCC consultations in 2023, dissolved on August 31, 2024, without a final report due to leadership vacancies, prompting criticism from opposition parties like Congress for undermining deliberative processes.^[166]^[167] In September 2025, the Uttarakhand assembly enacted the Uniform Civil Code (Amendment) Bill, 2025, refining implementation rules alongside related legislation on religious conversions, reflecting iterative state-level adjustments amid national stasis. BJP leaders, including MPs, have advocated extending UCC to states like Jharkhand, with calls for pan-India adoption tied to electoral mandates, though no central bill has been tabled as of October 2025.^[168]^[169]

References

[1]
Article 44 of Indian Constitution - iPleaders
Nov 10, 2024 · Article 44 provides for a Uniform Civil Code applicable to all Indian citizens, aiming for uniformity across the nation.Significance and... · Constitutional provisions... · Landmark judgements relating...
[2]
What is Uniform Civil Code in India | Article 44 - BYJU'S
Article 44 says, “The State shall endeavor to secure for the citizens a uniform civil code throughout the territory of India.”
[3]
Article 44: Uniform civil code for the citizens - Constitution of India
Article 44 directs the State to secure a uniform civil code for citizens, covering marriage and inheritance, but it is a directive principle, not an immediate ...
[4]
Article 44 of the Costitution of India with Case law
Jun 13, 2025 · Text of Article 44: “The State shall endeavour to secure for the citizens a uniform civil code throughout the territory of India.” Explanation ...
[5]
Uniform Civil Code: The History and the Present
Feb 13, 2024 · ... uniform civil code throughout the territory of India.” This was introduced before the Constituent Assembly in the form of Draft Article 35 ...
[6]
Uniform Civil Code: Constitutional Promise or Political Agenda?
Jun 13, 2025 · The Uniform Civil Code (UCC), foreseen in Article 44 of the Indian Constitution, aspires to a uniform body of personal laws to provide for equality, gender ...
[7]
[PDF] Uniform Civil Code (UCC) - Shankar IAS Parliament
Article 44, a directive principle of the Constitution says that the state shall endeavour to secure a UCC for the citizens throughout the territory of India.
[8]
Article 44 of the Constitution of India | LawTeacher.net
The state shall endeavour to secure for the citizens a uniform civil code throughout the territory of India.<|separator|>
[9]
Uniform Civil Code in India: a controversial project - Acta Diurna
May 22, 2025 · The UCC continues to be a subject of considerable debate. Proponents of the bill argue that it ensures gender justice, secularism, and legal ...<|separator|>
[10]
Uttarakhand becomes first state to implement Uniform Civil Code
Jan 27, 2025 · The Uttarakhand Uniform Civil Code Act, 2024, will streamline various personal laws, including those related to marriage, divorce ...
[11]
UCC Uttarakhand
The Rules of Uniform Civil Code, Uttarakhand, 2025 establish a comprehensive legal framework aimed at unifying personal laws related to marriage, divorce, ...Download Acts · Login · A+ · Services
[12]
What is Uniform Civil Code Under Article 44? Meaning, Purpose ...
Jun 23, 2025 · It is a set of uniform laws regarding various matters like inheritance, marriage, adoption, succession, divorce, maintenance and inheritance applicable to all ...
[13]
What is Uniform Civil Code? Here's all you need to know - India Today
Jan 27, 2025 · The UCC refers to a singular legislative proposal under a common code, where all religious communities would be subject to the same laws governing marriage, ...
[14]
Uniform Civil Code (UCC) Act: Meaning, History & Current Status
The UCC seeks to simplify the rules pertaining to guardianship, inheritance, succession, divorce, adoption, and marriage.
[15]
Uniform Civil Code (UCC) in India – Overview | Significance
May 2, 2024 · UCC is a proposal in India that is aimed at replacing personal laws based on religions, customs, and traditions with one common law for everyone.<|separator|>
[16]
Uniform Civil Code in India: A Step Towards Equality and Uniformity
The Uniform Civil Code, as conceived in India, endeavors to codify and harmonize personal laws pertaining to marriage, divorce, adoption, inheritance, and ...
[17]
Profile - Directive Principles Of State Policy - Know India
The Constitution lays down certain Directive Principles of State Policy, which though not justiciable, are 'fundamental in governance of the country'.
[18]
[PDF] A Comprehensive Analysis of Personal Laws and Reform Efforts
Aug 20, 2025 · Under British colonial rule Hindus were guided by Mitakshara and Dayabhaga school rules while Muslims relied upon the Quran for their guidance ...
[19]
[PDF] History of Personal Laws in India
Dec 23, 2020 · For example, the major social reform legislations brought forth by the British were the abolition of Sati by Lord William Bentick and the ...
[20]
[PDF] The Legacy of Colonialism: Law and Women's Rights in India
The relationship between nineteenth century England and colonial India was complex in terms of negotiating the different constituencies that claimed.
[21]
(PDF) History of Personal Laws in India - ResearchGate
7 History of Personal Laws in India ; Wills Act of 1870 which for the first time conferred a power of ; testamentary disposition on Hindus; The Indian Majority ...
[22]
[PDF] From Tradition to Reform: A Comparative Study of Personal Laws in ...
The British colonial period played a pivotal role in shaping the codification of Muslim personal law in. India. While Islamic law continued to govern matters of ...
[23]
Explainer: What Is the UCC Indians Are Talking About? - Fair Observer
Jul 6, 2023 · Article 44 of the DPSP mandates a uniform civil code, but Article 37 stipulates that the principles of the DPSP “shall not be enforceable by ...
[24]
The codification of personal law and secular citizenship
The codification of personal law and secular citizenship: Revisiting the history of law reform in late colonial India. Eleanor NewbiginView all authors and ...<|separator|>
[25]
THE HINDU CODE BILLS - SRIRAM's IAS
Aug 12, 2024 · The Hindu Code Bills were a series of laws enacted in the 1950s to reform and codify Hindu personal law in India. These laws aimed to unify and ...
[26]
[PDF] The Evolution of Hindu Law and the Conceptual ... - IJMCER
After Independence during 1955-56, the Indian Parliament in the independent India over ruled most of traditional Hindu Laws with modern four acts on Marriage ...
[27]
4 Reform and Codification of Hindu Personal Law: The Hindu Code ...
The British colonial government sought to reform and codify Hindu personal law for reasons of administrative and judicial clarity and convenience.
[28]
Hindu Code Bill in the Parliament - Zikr-e-Dilli
Mar 12, 2021 · The Bill was introduced on 11th April 1947 by the Law Minister, Dr Bhim Rao Ambedkar in the Constituent Assembly in the Parliament, New Delhi.Missing: details | Show results with:details<|separator|>
[29]
Hindu Code Bill: Criticism, Ambedkar's Resignation & Reaction Of ...
The House ultimately adopted Ambedkar's motion that the Bill, as reported by the Select Committee, was to be considered on December 19, 1949, after some, albeit ...
[30]
Why Ambedkar quit Nehru Cabinet? Hindu Code Bill triggered his exit
Dec 20, 2024 · It was in April 1947 that Ambedkar presented the Hindu Code Bill to the Constituent Assembly, even before India gained Independence. The Bill ...
[31]
5th February in Dalit History – Dr. Ambedkar introduced Hindu Code ...
Feb 5, 2016 · 5 February 1951: Hindu Code bill was introduced in the Parliament. Following India's independence Jawaharlal Nehru entrusted his first Law ...Missing: details | Show results with:details
[32]
An overview of Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 (HMA) - iPleaders
Oct 22, 2024 · Section 5(iii) of the HMA of 1955 states that the bridegroom should be at least 21 years of age and the bride should be at least 18 years of age ...Introduction · Essential features of Hindu... · Divorce under Hindu Marriage...
[33]
Hindu Marriage Act (HMA), 1955: An In-Depth Analysis - Sahodar
Oct 22, 2024 · The Act lays down solemnisation, registration, divorce, maintenance, and remarriage provisions, addressing personal and societal issues in Hindu ...Ceremonies For Marriage · Divorce Under The Hindu... · Grounds For Divorce
[34]
[PDF] LEGISLATIVE HISTORY OF PERSONAL LAWS IN INDIA ... - IJNRD
After independence, the Indian legislature took some significant steps of codification of Hindu law. Since the opinion of the Muslim masses is not in favour ...
[35]
[PDF] Codified Hindu Law: Myth and Reality - Indian Knowledge Systems
Mar 11, 2017 · Most family kinship disputes were not brought before Muslim officials. Rules for dispute resolution differed considerably from one caste to.
[36]
Why did the Nehru government impose the Hindu bill code ... - Quora
Feb 12, 2022 · Because the constitution had guaranteed the minorities their own personal laws so obviously this law couldn't be applied to Muslims. Polygamy is ...Why did the first Indian Government under Nehru codify and amend ...Why there was no Muslim code bill similar to Hindu code bill? - QuoraMore results from www.quora.com
[37]
[PDF] Hindu Code Bill - Babasaheb Dr. B.R. Ambedkar
Oct 9, 2013 · To leave inequality between class and class, between sex and sex which is the soul of Hindu society, untouched and to go on passing legislation ...
[38]
The Labyrinth of Personal Laws in India: Navigating the Intersection ...
Feb 24, 2025 · The colonial period saw the gradual codification of personal laws, particularly Hindu and Muslim laws. This process involved British judges and ...
[39]
[PDF] From Religious Personal Laws to a Uniform Civil Code
India must take care to move away from religious personal laws and toward a uniform civil code, as envisioned by Article 44 of the Indian Constitution. 4 At ...
[40]
[PDF] Muslim Personal Law (Shariat) Application Act, 1937 - India Code
The Act makes provision for the application of Muslim Personal Law (Shariat) to Muslims, covering matters like succession, marriage, and maintenance.
[41]
Muslim Personal Law (Shariat) Act, 1937 - iPleaders
Aug 8, 2024 · This Act governs the issues related to family relations among Muslims, including marriage, divorce, inheritance, succession, dissolution of marriage, ...Introduction · Muslim Personal Law (Shariat... · Tussle between Muslim...
[42]
https://oxfordre.com/politics/display/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228637.001.0001/acrefore-9780190228637-e-845
[43]
Uniform Civil Code: A Solution to India's Minority Appeasement Politics
Feb 7, 2025 · Since independence, Hindus have been subject to a secular civil code, while religious minorities have followed their laws. Advocates believe ...<|separator|>
[44]
Why Uniform Civil Code wasn't made enforceable by framers of ...
Feb 7, 2024 · The framers of the Constitution, led by Dr BR Ambedkar, could not reach a consensus on making the UCC enforceable by law.
[45]
Mohd. Ahmad Khan v. Shah Bano Begum, 1985 SCR (3) 844
Oct 11, 2023 · Facts · The appellant husband married the respondent wife in 1932. · In 1975, the appellant forced the respondent to leave their shared residence.<|separator|>
[46]
Mohd. Ahmed Khan vs. Shah Bano Begum and Others (1985)
Sep 25, 2024 · After a long court procedure, the Supreme Court finally concluded that the husbands' legal liability would come to an end if a divorced wife was ...Details of the case · Judgement of the case · Significance and Aftermath of...
[47]
1985: Shah Bano case - Frontline - The Hindu
Aug 15, 2022 · In April 1985, the Supreme Court of India upheld the decision of the High Court that ordered the payment of maintenance to Shah Bano. The ...
[48]
Supreme Court revisits Uniform Civil Code debate 45 years after ...
Jun 29, 2023 · The issue of implementing the Uniform Civil Code began with the landmark case of Shah Bano, a woman who was abandoned by her husband after 43 ...
[49]
Rs 20/month alimony: How 1985 Shah Bano case paved way for ...
Jun 29, 2023 · Rs 20/month alimony: How 1985 Shah Bano case paved way for UCC debate · A Muslim woman, Bano, got married to an influential Indore-based advocate ...
[50]
[PDF] THE MUSLIM WOMEN (PROTECTION OF RIGHTS ON DIVORCE ...
[19th May, 1986.] An Act to protect the rights of Muslim women who have been divorced by, or have obtained divorce from, their husbands and to provide ...
[51]
Sarla Mudgal v. Union of India (1995) - Drishti Judiciary
Jan 9, 2025 · This is a landmark judgment that talks about the validity of second marriage by a Hindu husband after converting to Islam. This a very important ...
[52]
Sarla Mudgal vs. Union of India : case analysis - iPleaders
Jan 4, 2024 · The Petitioner asserts that the sole purpose of conversion to Islam was to facilitate the second marriage and to escape the matrix of Section ...Introduction · Sarla Mudgal vs. Union of India · Aftermath of Sarla Mudgal vs...
[53]
Sarla Mudgal v. Union of India: Landmark Case on Bigamy
Sarla Mudgal v. Union of India deals with the issue of bigamy while addressing complex issues surrounding religion, personal law, and fundamental rights.
[54]
Sarla Mudgal Vs Union Of India (1995) (Case Summary) - Fawyerz
The Supreme Court ruled that the remarriage of a Hindu man who converts to Islam without divorcing his first wife is not valid.<|separator|>
[55]
Sarla Mudgal VS. Union Of India - Rest The Case
Sep 20, 2024 · This case examined the problems of religious conversion and polygamy, but it also brought up significant issues regarding the necessity of a Uniform Civil Code.
[56]
Case Analysis: Sarla Mudgal V. Union Of India (AIR 1995 SC 1531)
Jan 30, 2023 · The case analysis examines the issue of bigamy, the conflict between existing personal laws on marriage, and the application of Uniform Civil ...
[57]
Detailed Case Study of Sarla Mudgal Vs Union of India (AIR 1995 ...
Apr 16, 2025 · The Sarla Mudgal decision critically examined previous legal precedents where individuals exploited religion to circumvent personal law ...
[58]
https://www.thelegalquorum.com/interfaith-marriages-in-india-legal-framework-challenges-and-societal-perspectives/
[59]
Case: Sarla Mudgal V. Union of India, 1995 Air 1531 - Dhyeya Law
The main issues in all the petitions revolved around Hindu men converting to Islam only to contract a second marriage without legally divorcing their first wife ...
[60]
John Vallamattom vs. Union of India (2003) - iPleaders
Jul 15, 2024 · This article explains the facts, issues, observations and judgement in the case of John Vallamattom vs. Union of India (2003).
[61]
uniform civil code revisited: a juridical analysis of john v all am a ttom
A THREE-judge bench decision of the Supreme Court in John. Vallamattom and Anr. v. Union of Indiai was delivered on July 21,. 2003. It hit the headlines of ...
[62]
From Accommodation to Substantive Equality: Muslim Personal Law ...
Sep 9, 2016 · The Court cites Mahmood's Statute Law Relating to Muslims in India (1995) to illustrate the provision of maintenance in Muslim personal law: By ...
[63]
[PDF] EXPLORING THE PROSPECTS OF ENACTING A UNIFORM CIVIL ...
securing a Uniform Civil Code.17. 4. John Vallamattom v. Union of India. The Court in the instant case had similar reasoning as was given in the case of Sarla ...
[64]
Uniform Civil Code: Towards Gender Justice
Apr 14, 2024 · This article examines the idea of a Uniform Civil Code (UCC) as a possible tool for attaining gender equity in multicultural societies.
[65]
gender inequality and religious personal laws in india by - mythri raj
However, religious personal laws, which govern critical aspects of marriage, divorce, inheritance, and maintenance, often perpetuate gender-based discrimination ...
[66]
Navigating the Complexities of Muslim Inheritance Law in India
Sep 17, 2024 · ... Muslim inheritance law have been criticized for discriminating against women and perpetuating gender inequality. Balancing religious freedom ...
[67]
GENDER INEQUALITY IN HINDU AND MUSLIM PERSONAL LAWS
Aug 31, 2021 · IV). Divorce: Divorce laws are highly discriminatory; it gives almost no right to Muslim wife to divorce her husband. But, Muslim Husband can ...<|separator|>
[68]
[PDF] Gender Equality and the Uniform Civil Code
Proponents argue that a uniform set of laws would eliminate discriminatory provisions and ensure equal rights for women across religious communities.
[69]
The Uniform Civil Code: Paving the Way for Gender Justice in India?
One of the key arguments is that the UCC would eliminate the discriminatory provisions present in personal laws. It would ensure equal rights and protections ...
[70]
Legal Challenges and Implications of the Uniform Civil Code Debate
This bill promotes gender equality by eliminating discriminatory practices of personal laws. It also addresses discriminatory customs like polygamy. The UCC's ...<|separator|>
[71]
[PDF] Arguments For And Against Uniform Civil Code - IJCRT.org
Apr 4, 2025 · The UCC's supporters argue that the plan will strengthen India's secular nature while also advancing gender equality and legal consistency.
[72]
Nikah Halala and Personal Law Reform III - Supreme Court Observer
May 23, 2020 · ... discrimination faced by Muslim women in marriage and succession. ... discriminatory personal laws, despite repeated recommendations of the Court.
[73]
Goa women's groups fear UCC could wipe out positive provisions of ...
Jul 13, 2023 · The Goa code includes mandating compulsory registration of marriages before a civil authority, ensuring that the wife is an equal inheritor.<|separator|>
[74]
[PDF] Condition of Women in Uttarakhand Post-Uniform Civil Code - IJFMR
Marriage and Divorce Rights: The UCC in Uttarakhand has reformed marriage and divorce laws to ensure equal rights and protections for women. Previously, women ...
[75]
Uniform Civil Code, Uttarakhand, 2024—Uniformizing Marriage ...
Sep 23, 2024 · The Code seeks to enact uniform laws in the matters of personal nature, like marriage, divorce, inheritance of properties, adoption, and guardianship ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[76]
[PDF] Uniform Civil Code towards Gender Justice - The Academic
Mar 14, 2025 · The discourse surrounding the Uniform Civil Code (UCC) highlights its potential to address critical gender injustices and promote equality in ...
[77]
Beyond Religious Boundaries: The Need for a Uniform Civil Code
Nov 2, 2024 · The case for a Uniform Civil Code stems from the foundational principles of equality and secularism enshrined in the Indian Constitution. It ...
[78]
[PDF] Government of India Law Commission of India Consultation Paper ...
Aug 31, 2018 · The recent Supreme Court judgment Shayara Bano v. Union of India10 outlawing the practice of triple talaq has taken a first step towards ending ...
[79]
Article 44 of Indian Constitution, Interpretation, Significance
Aug 12, 2025 · Article 44 of Indian Constitution outlines the Uniform Civil Code, aiming to unify personal laws on marriage, divorce, inheritance, and adoption ...
[80]
Uniform Civil Code in India: Constitutional Implications and ...
Jul 9, 2025 · This article mentions that the UCC is a directive principle of state policy rather than a fundamental right.
[81]
[PDF] Secularism and the Law (2010)
Article 44 of Indian constitution contemplates a uniform civil code for the. Indian society. ... uniform civil code was required for national integration.
[82]
Explained: The Goa civil code, the new model for a uniform civil code
May 11, 2022 · UCC essentially refers to a common set of laws governing personal matters such as marriage, divorce, inheritance and succession for all citizens of the country.
[83]
[PDF] A Comparative Study on Goa Common Civil Code and Uttarakhand ...
Impact on Gender. Justice. Ensures gender equality in marriage and inheritance. Strengthens women's rights but faces resistance from conservative groups. 29 ...
[84]
Indian females in the twenty-first century: how they have fared? An ...
Mar 28, 2023 · The state enjoys better status in terms of women empowerment than rest of the country and it is mainly attributed to the unique set of civil ...
[85]
(PDF) Status of Women's Health in Goa and Sikkim: A Comparative ...
Status of Women's Health in Goa and Sikkim: A Comparative Analysis of State Fact Sheets of National Family Health Survey (NFHS)-3 and 4.Missing: metrics | Show results with:metrics
[86]
(PDF) Empowerment of women from the experience of Indian states
Mar 16, 2024 · The study reveals that Goa, Punjab, Chhattisgarh, and Sikkim have comprehensive levels of women's empowerment, while Rajasthan, Andhra Pradesh, West Bengal, ...
[87]
[PDF] 1. ABOUT GOA - National Commission for Women
The incidence of violence against women in Goa is higher than in several other larger States in. India. In Goa many cases still go unreported or under-reported ...
[88]
[PDF] What excludes women from landownership in Turkey ... - LSE
In this article, however, I investigate that the Turkish civil code discriminated against women inheriting small-scale agrarian land and other forms of rural ...
[89]
[PDF] Academic Blueprint for the Implementation of a Uniform Civil Code ...
Jan 1, 2011 · Those in favor of a uniform civil code tend to stress national unity and identity, human rights, and notions of equality. Those opposed to a ...
[90]
UCC against religious freedom, will oppose it under legal ambit
Jun 19, 2023 · Prominent Muslim organisation Jamiat Ulema-e-Hind on Monday claimed that the Uniform Civil Code is against the religious freedom guaranteed under the the ...
[91]
Muslim law board on UCC: Majoritarian morality can't supersede ...
Jul 6, 2023 · The All India Muslim Personal Law Board (AIMPLB) on Wednesday wrote to the Law Commission of India, reiterating its opposition to the UCC.
[92]
Uttarakhand: All India Muslim Personal Law Board opposes UCC ...
Feb 6, 2024 · ” He emphasised the constitutional right to religious freedom and announced AIMPLB's intent to legally challenge the UCC bill's validity.
[93]
AIMPLB opposes UCC in representation to law panel - Times of India
Jul 6, 2023 · The All India Muslim Personal Law Board (AIMPLB) has strongly opposed the proposal for a Uniform Civil Code, saying that they will not allow any change in ...
[94]
Muslim bodies, leaders, women, politicians reject Uttarakhand's ...
Feb 8, 2024 · He said, “In our religion, inheritance and marriage are part of religious practice; it is a violation of Articles 25 and 29 to force us to ...
[95]
Will Modi's Uniform Civil Code kill Indian 'secularism'? - Al Jazeera
Aug 17, 2023 · The short answer: Irrespective of the fine print of a UCC, a uniform code would fundamentally break with India's approach to secularism.
[96]
AIMPLB Calls Law Commission's Proposal to Seek Fresh Views on ...
Jul 5, 2023 · New Delhi: The All India Muslim Personal Law Board (AIMPLB) has opposed the implementation of the Uniform Civil Code (UCC) in its representation ...
[97]
From the India Today Archives (2023): The politics of Uniform Civil ...
Nov 5, 2024 · They claim the UCC violates Articles 25 and 29 of the Constitution, which protect a religious group's right to manage its affairs and the ...
[98]
[PDF] Uniform Civil Code In India : A Critical Analysis Of Legal Social And ...
Sep 9, 2025 · Seen as infringing on religious freedom guaranteed under Articles 25-28. •. Perceived as a majoritarian imposition on minorities. •. Practical ...Missing: criticism | Show results with:criticism
[99]
[PDF] Comparative examination of the uniform civil code: India and other ...
Opponents contend that the UCC may be viewed as a majoritarian imposition and alienate minority communities if it were adopted unilaterally64. ... [9] Tanushree , ...
[100]
The Uniform Civil Code: A Threat to India's Religious Diversity
Aug 12, 2024 · The UCC demands the repeal of personal laws for all religions. If implemented, the UCC would scrutinize the fundamental laws of every religious community in ...
[101]
[PDF] Uniform Civil Code: A Constitutional Promise or a Political Agenda?
Fear of Majoritarian Imposition. The politicization of the UCC has only deepened the distrust among minorities. With the issue being championed primarily by ...
[102]
India's BJP-ruled Uttarakhand implements 'totally biased' common ...
Jan 27, 2025 · Supporters say the UCC gives Muslim women the same rights as others by ending polygamy, setting equal property inheritance rights for sons and ...
[103]
[PDF] Uniform Civil Code and the Indian Constitution - ijrpr
Fear of Majoritarian Imposition. One of the most cited concerns is that a Uniform Civil Code, in practice, might reflect the values and norms of the majority ...
[104]
https://pmfias.com/uniform-civil-code/
[105]
Pratap Bhanu Mehta writes: Uniform Civil Code must be about ...
Jun 29, 2023 · Opinion Pratap Bhanu Mehta writes: Uniform Civil Code must be about justice, not majoritarianism. It will be a tragedy if the project of ...Missing: counterarguments | Show results with:counterarguments
[106]
Uniform Civil Code – Equality More Than Uniformity - India Foundation
Sep 2, 2024 · One of the most significant judgements of the Supreme Court on the need for UCC was delivered by Justices Kuldip Singh and R.M.Sahai in Smt.<|control11|><|separator|>
[107]
Goa is the only state with a Uniform Civil Code. Here's what it looks ...
Aug 16, 2023 · Minorities comprise more than 27 per cent of the population in Goa ... civil Code came into effect to codify the concessions to Hindus. One ...<|separator|>
[108]
How uniform is Goa's uniform civil code? - Frontline - The Hindu
Aug 24, 2023 · What is needed is legal education about the process of marriage registration and succession and inheritance laws; and an inclusive process of ...
[109]
Tribal Communities To Be Exempted From Uttarakhand Uniform ...
Feb 1, 2024 · The proposed Uttarakhand Uniform Civil Code, scheduled for introduction in the state assembly next week, is set to fully exempt the tribal population of the ...
[110]
Uttarakhand: Live-in registration under UCC not required if either ...
Feb 10, 2025 · Tribals, including major communities such as Jaunsari, Tharus, Bhotiyas, Buksa and Raji, are currently exempted from UCC. The ST community ...
[111]
UNIFORM CIVIL CODE IN INDIA: RECENT LEGISLATIVE MOVES ...
Jul 26, 2025 · Indian courts have repeatedly held that a UCC would reconcile personal laws with the ideals of equality and secularism in the Constitution. In ...
[112]
Between Uniformity and Justice: Rethinking the UCC Through Goa ...
Jul 30, 2025 · Women's organisations in Goa have consistently demanded revisions to the law that would make it more gender-sensitive and reflective of the ...Missing: outcomes | Show results with:outcomes
[113]
Can there be a constitutional case for the Uniform Civil Code?
Aug 24, 2024 · This article seeks to take UCC out of the cage of narrow religious politics and set it free into the larger realm of liberating values.
[114]
Religion in India: Tolerance and Segregation - Pew Research Center
Jun 29, 2021 · Indians say it is important to respect all religions, but major religious groups see little in common and want to live separately.
[115]
Uniform Civil Code (UCC): Pros and Cons in a nutshell - Clear IAS
Jul 9, 2024 · Practical difficulties due to diversity in India · Perception of UCC as encroachment on religious freedom · Interference of state in personal ...<|separator|>
[116]
Uniform Civil Code: Need, Challenges and Different Views on UCC
Cultural Sensitivities: It might not adequately accommodate the unique customs and sensitivities of different communities. Social Unrest: Implementing a UCC ...
[117]
Disadvantages of Uniform Civil Code (UCC) in India | Key Challenges
Jul 10, 2025 · One of the primary concerns is that the UCC could infringe upon the fundamental right to freedom of religion, which is guaranteed under Article ...
[118]
Muslim clergy staunchly oppose UCC, but women's organisations ...
Jul 9, 2023 · Muslim clerics and bodies in India have come out strongly against the fresh proposal for a Uniform Civil Code (UCC) in India, terming it “anti-Shariat” (Muslim ...
[119]
Parties in support/opposition of Uniform Civil Code - Deccan Herald
Jun 30, 2023 · While a majority of the Opposition parties are against implementing the UCC in the country, the ruling BJP, AAP, and some others have voiced their support of ...
[120]
Muslim groups in Kerala for political, legal fight against UCC, not ...
Jul 4, 2023 · A group of Muslim organisations in Kerala, led by the Indian Union Muslim League (IUML), have called for “political and legal fight” against the proposed ...
[121]
Uniformity versus Equal Rights - Communist Party Of India (Marxist)
Jul 6, 2023 · It has categorically rejected the path of a uniform civil code as being “neither necessary nor desirable.” Firstly, it has made detailed ...
[122]
[PDF] UNIFORM CIVIL CODE (UCC) & THE CONCEPT OF FEDERALISM
The cultural, religious, and legal diversity of India is at the heart of this dispute. It has been challenging to draft UCC due to varying opinions on the ...
[123]
[PDF] Uniform Civil Code Implementation: Challenges And Implications in ...
Moreover, the issue of majoritarian imposition adds another layer of complexity. The Hindu majority's support for the UCC might be viewed with suspicion by ...
[124]
Decoding The Uniform Civil Code Debate In India - Eurasia Review
Feb 5, 2025 · The implementation of UCC faces several challenges like balancing religious freedom with the need for legal uniformity, addressing concerns ...What Is Ucc? · The Constitutional Debate · Women's Movement And Gender...
[125]
https://lawvs.com/articles/article-44-through-the-lens-of-article-25-constitutional-cohesion-not-conflict
[126]
Hurdles In The Implementing Of UCC In India
Jun 10, 2022 · This paper demonstrates the challenges faced in implementation of Uniform Civil Code. The paper begins with an explanation and meaning of uniform civil code.
[127]
India's BJP manifesto pledges uniform civil code: what do you think ...
Apr 7, 2014 · Legislation that would create a secular set of personal laws has been pledged India's Bharatiya Janata party. What do you think?
[128]
Modi's BJP promises jobs, common civil code in manifesto for India ...
Apr 14, 2024 · The Hindu nationalist party unveils its promises days before the start of a multiphase general election.
[129]
BJP promises Uniform Civil Code in its 'Sankalp Patra' for Lok ... - Mint
Apr 14, 2024 · The BJP's manifesto 'Sankalp Patra' includes pledge to implement Uniform Civil Code nationwide to replace religious personal laws.
[130]
BJP manifesto 2024: Uniform Civil Code (UCC) will be implemented ...
Apr 14, 2024 · Before the 18th Lok Sabha elections, the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), the largest party in the ruling alliance, unveiled its highly ...
[131]
Secular Civil Code is the need of the hour, says PM Modi in ...
Aug 15, 2024 · Prime Minister Narendra Modi made a compelling case for a Uniform Civil Code. He said the laws that create divisions within the country are outdated and should ...
[132]
'Secular civil code' need of the hour, says PM Narendra Modi
Aug 15, 2024 · Prime Minister Narendra Modi on Thursday said a "secular civil code" is the need of the hour and described the existing set of laws in the ...
[133]
Modi's BJP promises common civil code ahead of India polls
Apr 14, 2024 · India's ruling party on Sunday pledged to introduce a new common civil code for the country, calling it a crucial step for gender equality, ...
[134]
Unlocking the Goa Civil Code Significance - SRIRAM's IAS
Aug 3, 2023 · It comes from the Portuguese Civil Code 1867, which was introduced in Goa in 1870. The civil code continued in Goa even after its merger with ...
[135]
Portuguese Civil Code: The silent law that unites Goa, Daman and Diu
Jul 27, 2023 · The historical significance of the Portuguese Civil Code in Goa, Daman, and Diu, the only place in India with a common civil code.
[136]
PTI Fact Check: Goa has its own version of a Uniform Civil Code
Goa has been following the Portuguese Civil Code 1867, which is also called Uniform Civil Code. After its liberation from Portuguese rule, the UCC survives ...Missing: history | Show results with:history
[137]
[PDF] A CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF UCC IN GOA AND UTTARAKHAND
Mar 13, 2025 · The Uniform Civil Code aims to make personal laws less patriarchal if implemented in different states. 1537 The Constitution of India, 1950, Art ...
[138]
[PDF] FAMILY LAW IN GOA AFTER THE ACT OF 2012
Feb 6, 2020 · 1. On the 1st of July 2020, 150 years will have passed since the Portuguese Civil Code of 1867 became applicable in Goa. Proceeding Act 2012 ( ...
[139]
The Uniform Civil Code (UCC) of Uttarakhand
Jan 27, 2025 · Uttarakhand's Uniform Civil Code aims for gender fairness and legal uniformity but raises concerns over liberty, privacy, and religious freedom.
[140]
Uniform Civil Code to come into effect in Uttarakhand from January 27
Jan 25, 2025 · The Uniform Civil Code (UCC) will come into effect in Uttarakhand from January 27, a government order issued by Home Secretary Shailesh Bagauli stated.Missing: details | Show results with:details
[141]
Uniform Civil Code UCC In Uttarakhand - Sharks of Law
Mar 8, 2025 · The Uniform Civil Code in Uttarakhand is a historic legal reform for uniformity concerning marriage, divorce, inheritance, and adoption laws ...
[142]
Uttarakhand Uniform Civil Code - Shankar IAS Parliament
What is Uttarakhand Uniform Civil Code? · It requires compulsory registration of live-in relationships through a “statement of live-in relationship”. · It may be ...
[143]
Salient Features of Uniform Civil Code Introduced in Uttarakhand
Jan 28, 2025 · Compulsory Registration of Marriage: All marriages need to be registered within 60 days of ceremony failing which there is a monetary fine of Rs ...
[144]
Decoding the Uniform Civil Code: A Critical Analysis of ...
May 14, 2024 · Prohibition of Polygamy, Halal, Iddat, Triple Talaq, and Child Marriage · Uniform Age for Girls' Marriage · Equal Property Share for Women ...
[145]
Uniform Civil Code (UCC) Debate Post-Uttarakhand Legislation
Jul 4, 2025 · Key provisions include: Uniform Marriage Age: The law prescribes a uniform minimum marriage age (21 years for men and 18 for women) for all ...
[146]
https://www.financialexpress.com/india-news/uttarakhand-to-amend-ucc-live-in-relationship-rules-aadhaar-based-authentication-heres-what-will-change/4016722/
[147]
https://www.news18.com/india/uttarakhand-to-amend-civil-code-rules-what-changes-to-expect-ws-e-9645613.html
[148]
Gujarat forms panel for Uniform Civil Code review, latest news CMO
Gujarat CM announces a 5-member committee, led by ex-SC Judge Ranjana Desai, to examine and draft the Uniform Civil Code law. Read the latest updates.
[149]
Gujarat sets UCC rolling, picks same head as Uttarakhand for panel
Feb 5, 2025 · If the UCC promise was made just before the 2022 Assembly elections in Gujarat, the announcement of the panel comes a day before Delhi votes and ...Missing: passed | Show results with:passed
[150]
UNIFORM CIVIL CODE :: Gujarat 2025
Contribute your views on the implementation of the Uniform Civil Code in Gujarat. Submit suggestions by March 24, 2025, through our portal, email, or mail.
[151]
After Uttarakhand, Gujarat announces implementation of Uniform ...
Feb 4, 2025 · It includes provisions such as mandatory marriage registration, equal property rights for sons and daughters, and recognition of children from ...
[152]
Gujarat will be second state to implement UCC: Minister
Mar 25, 2025 · State law minister Rushikesh Patel said in the Gujarat assembly on Tuesday that after Uttarakhand, Gujarat will be the second state in the country to implement ...
[153]
Gujarat set to implement Uniform Civil Code, report likely in ...
Aug 6, 2025 · Gujarat set to implement Uniform Civil Code, report likely in monsoon session · According to sources, the committee submitted its report during ...
[154]
Gujarat HC upholds state's power to form Uniform Civil Code panel ...
Jul 31, 2025 · The Gujarat High Court has dismissed a petition against the state's Uniform Civil Code committee. The court stated that forming the committee ...
[155]
Gujarat HC dismisses plea challenging state UCC panel over no ...
Jul 29, 2025 · The Gujarat High Court dismissed a petition challenging the composition of the state-appointed Uniform Civil Code (UCC) committee, citing the ...
[156]
More parties, groups speak out against any UCC move
Jul 6, 2023 · The Kerala-based Indian Union Muslim League (IUML) and the All India Majlis-e-Ittehadul Muslimeen also opposed UCC, saying it was aimed at ...
[157]
IUML to oppose Uniform Civil Code - The Hindu
Jun 28, 2023 · The Indian Union Muslim League (IUML) has come out against the Uniform Civil Code (UCC) mooted by Prime Minister Narendra Modi.Missing: nationwide | Show results with:nationwide
[158]
Is Uniform Civil Code Implemented In India? - Sharks of Law
Feb 27, 2025 · As of February 2025, India has not implemented a nationwide Uniform Civil Code (UCC). There are no signs that any momentum toward adoption has been gained.
[159]
UNIFORM CIVIL CODE IN INDIA: A COMPREHENSIVE REVIEW
Sep 20, 2024 · Law should be drafted in such a way that it fosters principles of equality and justice irrespective of the religious background. Furthermore, as ...
[160]
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/396679220_Challenges_in_Implementing_UCC_in_India_A_Critical_Analysis_with_the_Case_Studies_of_Goa_Uttarakhand
[161]
Uniform Civil Code Debate in India (2024–25): Legal, Political, and ...
Sep 30, 2025 · ... UCC, its implementation has faced challenges due to India's religious diversity. In 2024–25, the debate intensified after Uttarakhand became ...
[162]
Uttarakhand HC asks Centre to respond to UCC challenges within 3 ...
May 20, 2025 · Uttarakhand high court (HC) has given the Centre three weeks to submit its reply on the Uniform Civil Code (UCC) after a joint hearing on multiple petitions ...
[163]
Uttarakhand's UCC faces legal challenge: Four writ petitions filed ...
Feb 12, 2025 · Four writ petitions have been filed in the Nainital High Court by various organizations and individuals opposing the controversial Uniform Civil Code.
[164]
Delhi HC calls for Uniform Civil Code amid conflicts over child ...
Sep 27, 2025 · Delhi HC calls for Uniform Civil Code amid conflicts over child marriage laws. Vineet Upadhyay / Sep 27, 2025, 03:34 IST.
[165]
"Will Strengthen Democracy": PM Modi On Uniform Civil Code - NDTV
Jan 28, 2025 · The introduction of a Uniform Civil Code to replace laws on marriage, divorce and inheritance has been a longstanding goal of PM Modi and his party, the BJP.
[166]
Uniform Civil Code - Wikipedia
It was decided to add the implementation of a uniform civil code in Article 44 of the Directive principles of the Constitution specifying, "The State shall ...History · Significance of Shah Bano case · Current status and opinions
[167]
Uniform Civil Code report in limbo as 22nd law commission's term ...
Aug 26, 2024 · A leadership vacuum in the Law Commission has stalled the implementation of the Uniform Civil Code, a long-time BJP poll promise, as the 22nd panel's term is ...
[168]
Law panel's UCC paper ignored, says Congress - The Hindu
Jan 21, 2025 · The Congress on Tuesday (January 21, 2025) pointed out that the 22nd Law Commission had been wound up without submitting its report on the UCC.
[169]
Uttarakhand: A model Hindu state in the making?
Sep 6, 2025 · The Bills in question are the Uniform Civil Code (UCC) (Amendment) Bill, 2025; the Freedom of Religion and Prohibition of Unlawful Conversion ( ...
[170]
UCC should be implemented in whole nation, says BJP's Praveen ...
Nov 4, 2024 · BJP MP Praveen Khandelwal supports Home Minister Amit Shah's proposal to implement the Uniform Civil Code (UCC) in Jharkhand and nationwide.