Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Visions fugitives

Visions fugitives, Op. 22, is a cycle of twenty brief miniatures composed by Russian composer between 1915 and 1917. Each piece, lasting roughly a minute on average, explores contrasting moods ranging from lyrical and serene to whimsical and agitated, totaling about 22 minutes in performance. The work draws inspiration from the Symbolist poetry of , particularly his lines evoking "fugitive visions" filled with shifting rainbows and worlds, which influenced Prokofiev's aim to capture ephemeral images through dissonant harmonies and impressionistic textures. Originally conceived as individual vignettes—some even nicknamed "doggies" by Prokofiev for their biting character—and dedicated to specific friends, the pieces were arranged non-chronologically for publication to heighten dramatic contrast. First published in 1917 by A. Gutheil in , Visions fugitives received its premiere as a complete on April 15, 1918, in Petrograd, performed by Prokofiev himself. The reflects Prokofiev's early stylistic evolution, blending tonal foundations with increasing and across its three compositional phases (1915, 1916, and 1917), influenced by predecessors like Schumann's Carnaval and Chopin's preludes. Notably, the seventh piece was also issued separately for , highlighting its versatility. As a cornerstone of 20th-century , Visions fugitives showcases Prokofiev's innovative approach to miniature forms amid the turbulent historical context of and the , which shaped his compositional output during this period. It has been frequently performed in recitals—either in full or selected movements—and transcribed for various ensembles, underscoring its enduring appeal and adaptability. The work's imaginative character pieces continue to be studied for their technical demands and expressive depth, cementing Prokofiev's reputation as a modernist bridging traditions and avant-garde experimentation.

Background

Literary inspiration

The title of Sergei Prokofiev's piano cycle Visions fugitives, Op. 22—originally Mimolyotnosti in Russian—derives from Konstantin Balmont's 1903 poem "I Do Not Know ," where the invented word mimolyotnosti evokes and the swift passage of transient impressions. This linguistic choice captures the essence of Balmont's Symbolist aesthetic, which prioritizes fleeting sensory experiences over enduring truths, a theme that resonated deeply with Prokofiev during the work's creation in 1915–1917. Central to the poem is Balmont's declaration of his poetic mission, as seen in these lines:
"I do not know , that is for others,
I merely turn visions into verse.
In each vision I see worlds
Full of the changing play of rainbows." These verses portray visions of nature—such as rainbows—and as ephemeral phenomena, much like clouds drifting across the , emphasizing their beauty in transience rather than permanence.
As a leading figure in Russian Symbolism, Balmont profoundly shaped the artistic outlook of Prokofiev's generation of composers, who drew on his vivid, impressionistic imagery to explore momentary states of feeling and perception in music. The poem's focus on capturing "fugitive visions" directly informed the cycle's form as a series of brief, self-contained miniatures, each distilling a singular, passing mood akin to Balmont's poetic snapshots. Prokofiev's longstanding engagement with Symbolist poetry, including early vocal settings of Balmont's texts, highlights how this literary source infused the work with its thematic core of impermanence.

Historical context

Sergei Prokofiev entered the St. Petersburg Conservatory in 1904 at the age of 13, studying composition under and other prominent figures, where he developed a reputation for his bold, dissonant style that often clashed with the institution's conservative traditions. He graduated in 1914, earning diplomas in composition and piano after a contentious "battle of the pianos" competition that highlighted his technical prowess and innovative approach. With the outbreak of in 1914, Prokofiev returned to the Conservatory in 1915 to study organ, a strategic move to secure student deferment from military conscription amid the escalating conflict. During 1915–1917, Prokofiev's creative output flourished in Petrograd (formerly St. Petersburg), a period marked by personal productivity despite the war's disruptions and the impending social upheaval. Visions fugitives, Op. 22, composed between 1915 and 1917, represents a pivotal work in his early catalog, following the Scythian Suite, Op. 20 (1914–1915), which originated from his rejected ballet Ala i Lolli and premiered to acclaim in 1916, showcasing his fascination with primal, folk-inspired rhythms. This cycle of piano miniatures served as a bridge between Prokofiev's youthful experiments—such as the sarcastic No. 2 (Op. 14, 1912)—and his emerging mature voice, blending impressionistic brevity with modernist dissonance. The onset of the in 1917, beginning with the overthrow of Tsar Nicholas II, intensified the chaos; Prokofiev witnessed the events firsthand in Petrograd before departing for the West in 1918 with official Soviet approval. In the broader cultural landscape of 1910s Petrograd, Prokofiev navigated a vibrant yet polarized artistic scene where challenged entrenched . The St. Petersburg Evenings of Contemporary Music, active since 1902, provided a key platform for experimentation, where Prokofiev premiered daring works from onward, attracting intellectuals and contrasting with the Conservatory's academic rigidity. This milieu, influenced by Symbolist poetry and Western innovations like Debussy and Scriabin, fostered tensions between traditionalists upholding Rimsky-Korsakov's nationalist and radicals pushing harmonic and rhythmic boundaries in salons and theaters. Prokofiev's position as a young provocateur in these circles positioned Visions fugitives as emblematic of Russia's pre-revolutionary modernist ferment.

Composition and publication

Creative process

Prokofiev began composing Visions fugitives in , creating the pieces in clusters over the next two years amid the disruptions of and the . The set is divided into three chronological groups: the initial pieces from , a middle group from 1916, and the final pieces from 1917, reflecting the composer's evolving style during this turbulent period. These short miniatures, most lasting under two minutes, were self-initiated without a formal and intended primarily as private works, many dedicated to specific friends in Prokofiev's circle. The composer's motivation stemmed from a desire to evoke ephemeral impressions through concise, improvisatory forms, drawing from his habit of playing spontaneous vignettes at intimate gatherings. Balmont, inspired by Prokofiev's playing, composed an that Prokofiev described as a "magnificent ," which influenced the work's title. In , he selected and arranged twenty pieces from his sketches into a cohesive cycle, ordering them non-chronologically to heighten dramatic contrasts for publication that year. This process occurred against the backdrop of wartime upheaval, including Prokofiev's travels and the revolutionary events that influenced the later pieces.

Editions and availability

Visions fugitives was first published in by A. Gutheil in as Op. 22, with the French title added to the original Russian "Mimoletnosti" for broader international appeal. Following the , the work saw reprints in the , including editions by the State Music Publishers (Gosudarstvennoe Izdatelstvo) that incorporated corrections supervised by Prokofiev during his visits and later residency. Prokofiev made minor revisions in 1922 and further amendments in 1934, the latter forming the basis for the 1939 Soviet edition. These post-revolutionary versions addressed minor notational and interpretive issues from the original Gutheil printing. In the West, modern urtext editions emerged in the mid-20th century, with issuing a version in the based on Prokofiev's 1922 revisions. During Prokofiev's exile from 1918 to 1936, availability of Visions fugitives was limited in the due to disrupted publishing and political sensitivities around émigré composers, with original manuscripts preserved in Russian state archives. Since the early 2000s, digital scores have become widely accessible through repositories like IMSLP, facilitating global study and .

Premiere and early performances

First public performance

The first public performance of Visions fugitives, Op. 22, took place on April 15, 1918, in Petrograd (present-day ), with himself performing the complete cycle on piano. Although individual pieces had been played in private settings earlier, including a performance in on October 14, 1917, this marked the premiere of the full cycle. The event occurred at the Tenishev School, a prominent educational institution that hosted one of the scarce musical gatherings amid the chaos of the early Soviet era following the . This concert, organized in honor of Prokofiev, highlighted his recent compositions and underscored the challenges of artistic life in a city gripped by political upheaval and resource shortages. The program centered on Prokofiev's solo piano works, including the world premiere of his Piano Sonata No. 3 in A minor, Op. 28, alongside the 20 miniatures of . The cycle, which Prokofiev had composed individually between 1915 and 1917 for various friends and associates, was presented as a cohesive set lasting about 22 minutes, its fleeting, introspective character ideally suited to the intimate acoustics of the small venue. The audience comprised members of Petrograd's musical elite, drawn together despite the era's scarcities in fuel, food, and performance opportunities. Prokofiev prepared the pieces during the turbulent final years of and the 1917 revolutions, refining them in relative isolation as civil unrest disrupted daily life in the city. Following the premiere, he made no significant revisions to the cycle, which had already appeared in print the previous year through A. Gutheil in .

Initial audience and critical response

The premiere of Visions fugitives in Petrograd on April 15, 1918, occurred amid the chaos of the . Initial reception was mixed, with some appreciating the cycle's novelty and lyricism—particularly its fleeting, poetic miniatures that contrasted Prokofiev's earlier "mechanical" style—but others found its occasional "" elements jarring and unconventional. Prokofiev's departure from Soviet beginning in May 1918 further restricted the work's exposure in his homeland, with performances scarce until his return tours in the . Initial audiences encountered Visions fugitives through published scores and manuscripts shared within musical circles in 1919.

Musical style and analysis

Influences and innovations

Prokofiev's Visions fugitives, Op. 22, draws on several key influences from contemporary European modernism while establishing his distinctive voice. Dissonant harmonies reminiscent of Arnold Schoenberg's atonal experiments appear in pieces like No. 10 ("Ridicolosamente"), where dense clusters and chromatic saturation evoke the psychological tension of Schoenberg's early free , as Prokofiev had performed and introduced Schoenberg's Op. 11 Klavierstücke to Russian audiences in 1911. Scriabin's mystical harmonic language, particularly the "" and ecstatic lyricism, informs the more introspective, lyrical movements, where Prokofiev blends Scriabin's progressive Symbolist aesthetics with Russian romantic traditions to create ethereal, otherworldly atmospheres. Similarly, Debussy's impressionistic colorism permeates the cycle through whole-tone scales and modal ambiguities, evident in Nos. 3, 4, and 10, where pentatonic inflections and parallel harmonies produce shimmering, evanescent textures; Prokofiev reportedly played Debussy's repeatedly during the composition period, absorbing its subtle timbral effects via his studies with Nikolai Miaskovsky. In Visions fugitives, Prokofiev first fully articulated his self-described "five lines" of stylistic development—classical, , , lyrical, and —blending these with modernist fragmentation and echoes of modalities to forge a . The line manifests in chromatic dissonances and polytonal shifts, while the lyrical and elements introduce ironic contrasts and folk-like melodic contours, as seen across the cycle's aphoristic forms; this prefigures his neoclassical turn in works like the Classical Symphony. Unlike Stravinsky's contemporaneous emphasis on rhythmic and diatonic , Prokofiev prioritizes nuanced dynamic shadings, , and subtle irony, creating fleeting vignettes that capture psychological nuance over overt vitality. These innovations, including irregular phrasing and pedal-enhanced sonorities akin to Debussy and Ravel, underscore Prokofiev's departure toward a "new simplicity" that integrates tradition with experimentation.

Structural and technical features

_Visions fugitives, Op. 22, comprises twenty untitled miniatures, each identified solely by markings, forming a that totals approximately twenty minutes in performance. Composed between and 1917, the pieces were reordered upon to heighten musical and rather than following their chronological , resulting in a that prioritizes diverse characters and moods over a linear . While lacking an overarching programmatic storyline, the exhibits subtle thematic interconnections through recurring ostinatos and motivic fragments that echo across movements, fostering a sense of ephemeral unity amid the vignettes' transience. The harmonic language of Visions fugitives employs innovative techniques to evoke fleeting impressions, prominently featuring bitonality and within a predominantly tonal framework. For instance, bitonality appears in superimpositions such as triads in close proximity, as in the opening where contrasting tonal centers create immediate , while pedal points sustain dissonance to blur resolutions and heighten atmospheric instability. These elements, including frequent , "wrong-note" harmonies, octatonic collections, and tritone-based progressions, systematically avoid cadential closure, reinforcing the work's theme of impermanence through unresolved tensions and modal shifts. Such practices draw briefly from impressionistic precedents like those in Debussy's preludes, adapted to Prokofiev's sharper, more angular idiom. Pianistically, the cycle presents demands suited to intermediate-advanced performers, testing finger independence, dynamic nuance, and interpretive flexibility across its rapid mood transitions. Toccata-like sections, such as those emphasizing , require precise articulation and evenness in fast passagework, while broader demands include large leaps, hand crossings, and clear voicing in polyphonic textures. Pedaling plays a crucial role in achieving harp-like resonance and sustaining harmonic ambiguities, particularly in lyrical or atmospheric passages, necessitating subtle control to avoid blurring the crisp rhythmic profiles. Overall, the work's technical profile balances accessibility— with several pieces graded as moderately difficult—against challenges in phrasing and coloristic effects, making it a staple for developing pianists seeking expressive depth.

Movements

1915 pieces (Nos. 1–7)

The seven pieces composed in mark the initial phase of Visions fugitives, Op. 22, reflecting Prokofiev's exploratory approach during his time in Petrograd, with lighter textures and tentative moods that introduce the cycle's diverse vignettes. These works, written amid the composer's engagement with modernist experimentation, emphasize subtle harmonic ambiguities and evocative atmospheres, drawing on lyrical and elements within Prokofiev's stylistic lines. No. 1, Lentamente, serves as a slow, dreamlike in , featuring bitonal overlays that create an ethereal, mist-evoking quality through layered dissonances and a confined with chordal . A of descending thirds recurs in the simple, lyrical , supported by a dissipating ending that avoids emphatic resolution, aligning with the piece's reflective and subdued mood in . No. 2, , unfolds as a gentle with a lyrical , incorporating subtle rubato and expansive broken chords in to convey a mysterious, character. Harmonic shifts from major to minor occur through chromatic and disjunct melodic lines, enhanced by left-hand leaps and difficult rhythms that demand precise dynamic control in its structure. No. 3, Allegretto, presents a playful driven by rhythms and folk-like accents, built on an of major seconds and unstable seventh harmonies in , evoking humor through , leaps, and passagework. The grotesque line dominates its , culminating in an abrupt ending that heightens the whimsical, light-hearted vitality. No. 4, Animato, bursts with energetic elements, including rapid scales and homophonic with frequent thirds, infusing humor into its dramatic, restless mood in . The continuous development structure relies on driving syncopated rhythms, showcasing Prokofiev's modernist tendencies through sharp dynamic contrasts and rhythmic vitality. No. 5, Molto giocoso, exudes humorous, dance-like energy with offbeat accents and irregular phrasing, employing and syncopations in to capture a mischievous, noisy fun within its scherzo-like grouping. The features contrasting sections with hand position shifts, arpeggios, and broken octaves, emphasizing the grotesque line's playful shifts. No. 6, Con eleganza, offers an elegant with arpeggiated figures suggesting a setting, refined dynamics, and distant tonalities in that evoke grace and clarity. Its structure, part of a grouping, incorporates modern elements like chromatic and a dissipating ending, balancing classical poise with subtle dissonances. No. 7, Pittoresco (Arpa), employs harp-like glissandi and ostinatos through rolled chords and scalar passagework, pictorially evoking a in its lyrical, vivid mood with left-hand leaps. The , including an introduction and , draws on classical influences with sharp contrasts and chromatic melody; Prokofiev also arranged it for solo , highlighting its evocative, free-form imagery.)

1916 pieces (Nos. 8–14)

The pieces Nos. 8–14, composed in 1916, represent a pivotal middle group in Visions fugitives, characterized by increased emotional depth and rhythmic complexity that reflect Prokofiev's experiences during , introducing darker, more conflicted tones in contrast to the relative lightness of the earlier movements. These miniatures explore a broader palette of moods, from deceptive serenity to grotesque humor and aggressive intensity, often through sparse textures, modal harmonies, and dynamic contrasts that heighten tension. No. 8, Commodo, presents a relaxed, song-like melody supported by pedal sustains that create a hazy, impressionistic atmosphere, with inflections adding subtle color shifts to the lyrical line. The piece unfolds in a simple , emphasizing phrasing and gentle dynamic swells to evoke a momentary respite amid the cycle's growing intensity. No. 9, Allegro tranquillo, conveys a deceptive calm through velvety sixteenth-note runs in the right hand and bell-like quarter and eighth notes in the left, building underlying tension that culminates in a climactic ostinato-driven surge. Structured in A-B-A form, it demands flexible rubato and precise dynamic control to highlight the contrast between its graceful etude-like passages (at ♩=120–140) and the more introspective central section, where large intervals require careful voicing for smooth . No. 10, Ridicolosamente, embodies a grotesque parody with exaggerated dynamics and wrong-note humor, featuring bitonal clashes between repeated dyads in the left hand and whimsical right-hand melodies that shift abruptly. Its A-B-A structure relies on scherzo-like repetition and crisp staccato- tenut o articulations (at ♩=72–100), with minimal pedaling to maintain a dry, humorous bite; grace notes add to the parody, demanding uniform tone in the ostinato patterns for comedic effect. No. 11, Con vivacità, bursts forth as a vivacious moto perpetuo driven by triplet figures and virtuosic scalar runs, creating a scherzo-like energy with accented phrases and unison melodic lines in the contrasting B section. The A-B-A form features rapid tempo shifts (A at ♩=160–176, B at ♩=116–144), requiring bright tone, precise dynamic nuances, and sparse rubato to accent unexpected beats while sustaining relentless forward momentum through thirty-second-note passages. These technical demands, such as rapid hand shifts, underscore the piece's playful yet demanding virtuosity. No. 12, Assai moderato, offers an introspective with sparse texture that emphasizes silence between poignant dissonances, evoking a sense of through ascending thirds and chromatic phrases. The structure builds mysteriously from initial measures of isolated notes to fuller harmonic resolutions, highlighting emotional restraint and the weight of wartime introspection in its deliberate pacing. No. 13, Allegretto, unfolds as a nostalgic with disjunct melodies and accompanimental patterns that echo Tchaikovsky's lyricism while incorporating modernist twists through irregular phrasing and subtle harmonic ambiguities. Its balances dance-like grace with underlying unease, using waltz rhythms to blend classical elegance and contemporary edge. No. 14, Feroce, erupts in a fierce, aggressive outburst characterized by pounding chords and a rhythmic drive that embodies Prokofiev's style, with ascending and descending sequences built on thirds providing propulsive energy. The piece's compact structure intensifies through dynamic extremes and motoric repetition, capturing raw agitation as a climactic release for the 1916 group.

1917 pieces (Nos. 15–20)

The pieces Nos. 15–20 of Visions fugitives, Op. 22, were composed in amid the turmoil of the , marking a shift toward greater emotional intensity and surrealistic expression in Prokofiev's cycle. These final vignettes build to a climactic resolution, contrasting restless agitation and mournful depth with dreamlike introspection and frenzied outbursts, ultimately dissolving into ethereal ambiguity. Unlike the more balanced contrasts of the preceding 1916 pieces, this group emphasizes otherworldly tension, reflecting the composer's response to revolutionary unrest in Petrograd. No. 15, Inquieto ("Restless"), opens the 1917 set with fragmented motifs driven by syncopated rhythms, evoking a pervasive sense of anxiety through repetitive patterns and disjunct lines. The piece employs sharp dynamic contrasts and typical of Prokofiev's modern , with no pedal indicated in measures 13–15 to heighten textural clarity and unease. Its structure features abrupt shifts, underscoring the restless mood without emphatic resolution. No. 16, Dolente ("Mournful"), serves as an emotional peak of the cycle, structured as a mournful with descending chromatic lines over a sustained E pedal tone that anchors its slow rhythmic movement. The A section unfolds in phrasing at a of ♩=92–104, conveying doleful , while the contrasting B section (mm. 19–34) introduces detached and temporary relief from the prevailing grievousness, slowed further for emphasis. Performers apply rubato to eighth notes and avoid on long notes to maintain instability, enhancing the piece's somber, lyrical quality. No. 17, Poetico ("Poetic"), evokes a dreamy atmosphere through Scriabin-influenced , with floating suspended over a right-hand chromatic that creates a sense of mystery. At a of ♩=132–160, the lyrical features tenutos and dynamic nuances, supported by flexible pacing and rubato to differentiate voicing between and . This highlights Prokofiev's blend of modern chromatic intervals and lyrical flow, contributing to the cycle's introspective . No. 18, Con una dolce lentezza ("With a sweet slowness"), unfolds as an impressionistic waltz-like at ♩=76–84, with chromatic passages and subtle color shifts evoking Debussy's La plus que lente. Extensive rubato avoids rigidity, treating grace notes slowly and voicing the melody clearly amid large intervals; the main theme returns in m. 12 with a mystical accompaniment, building to a smorzando fade. This piece's dreamlike washes prioritize nuanced over strict , emphasizing Prokofiev's innovative textural subtlety. No. 19, Presto agitatissimo e molto accentuato ("Very agitated and very accented"), erupts as a frenetic, percussive storm with extreme accents and syncopated chords, capturing the chaotic energy of crowds during the in Petrograd. Its toccata-like drive features disjunct motifs and tritone-based structures, heightening the cycle's intensity through rapid, athletic leaps and insistent rhythms that demand precise articulation. Prokofiev later noted this piece reflected revolutionary impressions rather than deeper essence, underscoring its raw, surreal agitation. No. 20, Lento irrealmente ("Unreal slow"), provides an ethereal close with unresolved harmonies that fade into ambiguity, echoing the opening mood of the cycle through dissipating endings and chromatic ambiguity. This lyrical employs soft dynamic contrasts and free , creating a surreal, dreamlike dissolution that unifies the set's fleeting visions without firm resolution. Its structure reinforces Prokofiev's characteristic blend of modern instability and poignant .

Reception and legacy

Critical reception over time

In the 1920s and , Western critics frequently praised Visions fugitives for its poetic brevity and innovative lyricism, viewing the miniatures as evocative snapshots of Prokofiev's modernist sensibility. However, upon its earlier Western debut in in 1918, some responses were mixed, with the New York Times noting the "exhausting" effect of its modern harmonies while acknowledging its startling innovation and technical steeliness. In contrast, following the 1948 Zhdanov decree, Prokofiev's early output, including works like Visions fugitives, faced suppression as part of broader criticisms labeling it "formalist"—detached from and overly intellectual—limiting performances and publications until the late . Following , Visions fugitives experienced a rediscovery in the , largely through champion performances by , whose interpretations emphasized the pieces' emotional depth and dynamic contrasts, bringing them back into Soviet concert repertoires and international attention. Richter's recordings, for instance, captured the work's introspective lyricism, contributing to its rehabilitation as a cornerstone of Prokofiev's output. By the 1970s, Soviet musicological analyses repositioned the cycle as a pinnacle of Prokofiev's lyrical expression, praising its melodic asymmetry and Beethovenian influences while integrating it into narratives of the composer's evolution toward accessible modernism during the post-Stalin thaw. In modern scholarship from the onward, Visions fugitives has been celebrated for its stylistic diversity and pedagogical value, though critiques often note its relative underappreciation compared to Prokofiev's more monumental piano sonatas, which overshadow its subtler innovations in recital programming. Jessie Welsh's 2023 presentation, "Embodied Visions," explores the work's performance and teaching potential, emphasizing its range of moods and textures as ideal for developing interpretive flexibility in advanced students. Recent analyses, such as those in Harlow Robinson's biographical studies, reinforce its status as a refined precursor to Prokofiev's later lyricism, with growing emphasis on its Debussy-like atmospheric evocations in contemporary editions and recordings.

Notable recordings and interpretations

One of the earliest and most authoritative recordings of Visions fugitives is Sergei Prokofiev's own 1935 session in , which captures nine or ten pieces from the set via transfer. This rare document emphasizes the work's wistful subtlety and delicate shadings, with Prokofiev employing rhythmic freedom that sets a benchmark for interpretive tempi, particularly in lyrical movements like No. 18 ("Con una dolce lentezza"). His approach highlights the intimate, poetic essence of the miniatures, influencing subsequent performers to balance with emotional nuance. Sviatoslav Richter's recordings from the , issued on Melodiya and captured in live settings such as Kiev in , showcase dynamic contrasts that amplify the work's grotesque and sardonic elements. Richter's luminescent tone and impeccable timing bring out the biting irony in pieces like No. 14 ("Feroce"), making his selections—though not the complete cycle—particularly influential in the Soviet bloc, where they exemplified bold, expressive . His performances underscore the cycle's range from tender introspection to aggressive wit, shaping Eastern European interpretations during the era. In modern recordings, Martha Argerich's fiery energy in her partial selections from the on infuses the pieces with intense vitality, particularly in the more percussive vignettes. Yefim Bronfman's 2000s Sony Classical excerpts emphasize clarity and structural precision, aiding listeners in appreciating the work's architectural diversity. More recently, Beatrice Rana's 2022 Warner Classics release highlights themes of transience, with production notes addressing eco-friendly practices and interpretive focus on fleeting moods, offering a contemporary lens on the cycle's ephemerality. Interpretive trends in Visions fugitives often emphasize rubato in the lyrical pieces, such as Nos. 1 and 17, to evoke impressionistic fluidity without disrupting the overall rhythmic drive. This approach, evident in recordings like Nicholas Angelich's, allows for subtle emotional expansion while preserving Prokofiev's edge. The work is also widely used pedagogically in conservatories to introduce students to early 20th-century , focusing on its blend of classical clarity and gestures through targeted etudes on pieces like No. 10 ("Ridicolosamente").

References

  1. [1]
    "“Visions Fugitives”: Glimpses into Prokofiev's Compositional ...
    Inspired by the poetry of Konstantin Balmont (1867–1942), twenty-four year old Sergei Prokofiev (1891–1953) began composing a set of miniatures in 1915 that ...
  2. [2]
    Toward an understanding of Sergei Prokofiev's Visions fugitives ...
    Feb 17, 2014 · Visions Fugitives is a work that is becoming increasingly known. The cycle is regularly performed at piano recitals, either In its entirety or ...
  3. [3]
    Prokofiev's Visions Fugitives: A Performance Guide - Scholars' Bank
    This document aims to provide readers with a performance guide for Prokofiev's Visions Fugitives, Op. 22, based on analyses of Visions recordings by Prokofiev ...
  4. [4]
    [PDF] маскарад
    He took the title from a 1903 poem by Konstantin Balmont containing the lines: I do not know wisdom, that is for others,. I merely turn fugitive visions into ...
  5. [5]
    Visions Fugitives by Prokofiev: Little Impressionist Worlds
    Jul 9, 2019 · Read and learn about the inspirations and stories behind Prokofiev's "Visions Fugitives", a work of 20th century Russian Impressionism.
  6. [6]
    Prokofiev's Musical Interpretations of Russian Silver-Age Poetry
    Under the formative influence of Symbolism and Impressionism, the young Prokofiev had fallen in love with Balmont's poetry while still a student at the St.
  7. [7]
    Sergei Prokofiev (1891–1953): Biography, Music + More | CMS
    Prokofiev spent his youth in Imperial Russia as a student at the St. Petersburg Conservatory, but after the 1917 October Revolution relocated to the West ...
  8. [8]
    Sergei Prokofiev | San Francisco Classical Voice
    Petersburg, 1904-1914: Prokofiev's parents are persuaded to let Sergei study music full time at the St. Petersburg Conservatory. He completes his composition ...
  9. [9]
    Sergei Prokofiev, classical music composer
    ... Prokofiev's career. With the outbreak of World War I, Prokofiev returned to the Conservatory to avoid conscription. Worried that the Germans would capture ...
  10. [10]
    Scythian Suite, Op.20 (Prokofiev, Sergey) - IMSLP
    Year/Date of CompositionY/D of Comp. 1914-15. First Performance. 1916-01-29 in Petrograd, Maryinsky Theatre. Orchestra of the Petrograd Conservatory, Sergey ...
  11. [11]
    Sergei Prokofiev - Wise Music Classical
    World War I led Prokofiev to return to studies at the Saint Petersburg Conservatory, but with revolutions shaking Russia in 1917, he departed for the US.
  12. [12]
    Sergey Prokofiev: revolutionary composer who gave us some of the ...
    Sep 13, 2024 · He studied with Rimsky-Korsakov at the St Petersburg Conservatoire ... Prokofiev rebelled against the academicism of the Conservatoire ...
  13. [13]
    Modernism in Russian Piano Music: Skriabin, Prokofiev
    In 1917 he was still working on such early compositions as Visions fugitives Op. 22, and in 1918 he settled in New York and later in Paris. One might suppose ...Missing: career | Show results with:career
  14. [14]
    Visions fugitives op. 22 | HN1158 | HN 1158 - Henle
    Visions fugitives op. 22 · Urtext Edition, paperbound · Piano solo · Pages 48 (IX+39), Size 23,5 x 31,0 cm · Weight 200 g · ISMN 979-0-2018-1158-1.
  15. [15]
    Visions fugitives - Wind Repertory Project
    Oct 28, 2024 · Visions fugitives, Op. 22, are a series of short piano pieces composed by Russian composer Sergei Prokofiev (1891–1953) between 1915 and 1917. ...
  16. [16]
    Nicolas Slonimsky Collection:
    ... State Music Publishers, . 1949. Gimn sovetskogo soiuza [voice and piano] ... Mimoletnosti (Visions fugitives), op. 22 [piano].Moscow: Gosudarstvennoe ...
  17. [17]
    Prokofiev • Visions fugitives - Pianodao
    Jul 25, 2024 · Selected and reviewed by ANDREW EALES ... twenty wildly distinctive miniatures which together offer a stunning kaleidoscope of the composer's art.
  18. [18]
    Serge Prokofieff - Visions fugitives - Boosey & Hawkes
    Visions fugitives. op. 22 (1915-17). for piano. Duration: 20'. Publisher. Boosey & Hawkes. Territory. This work is available from Boosey & Hawkes for the world ...
  19. [19]
    Visions fugitives, Op.22 (Prokofiev, Sergey) - IMSLP
    Prokofiev, Sergey · Early 20th century style · Early 20th century · Pieces · For piano · Scores featuring the piano · For 1 player · For orchestra (arr) ...
  20. [20]
    [PDF] Australian Chamber Orchestra - Cal Performances
    Mar 22, 2013 · Prokofiev premiered the Visions Fugitives on April 15, 1918, at a concert in his honor at the Tenishev School in St. Petersburg, one of ...
  21. [21]
    Prokofiev: Visions Fugitives, op. 22 - Fugue for Thought
    Jul 23, 2018 · Prokofiev wrote his Visions Fugitives from around 1915 to 1917, and the work was officially premiered on April 15, 1918 in Petrograd.Missing: history | Show results with:history
  22. [22]
    [PDF] PROKOFIEV'S EARLY SOLO PIANO MUSIC: CONTEXT ...
    Debussy, these are linked to Prokofiev's use of a Konstantin Balmont poem in writing his Visions fugitives. His inspiration from spirituality will also be ...
  23. [23]
    [PDF] Prokofiev Piano Style Influences Thesis
    Prokofiev's piano writings for this period are few. Before leaving Russia he had composed his Fugitive Visions,. Op. 22, and while in America he had written ...Missing: career | Show results with:career
  24. [24]
    Visions Fugitives Insights Into Prokofiev's Compositional Vision | PDF
    Rating 5.0 (2) Prokofiev: Developing Composer: 1891-1918. The piano was a prominent vehicle for Sergei Prokofievs musical expression. The piano works have been steadily ...
  25. [25]
    Visions Fugitives: Insights into Prokofiev's Compositional Vision
    Visions Fugitives: Insights into Prokofiev's Compositional Vision. Authors ... Chapter 4 provides an aural examination of Prokofiev's gramophone recording ...
  26. [26]
    [PDF] university of oklahoma - ShareOK
    “Visions Fugitives, Opus 22: Insights into Sergei Prokofiev's. Compositional Vision.” D.M.A. doc., University of Nebraska—Lincoln, 2007. Accessed July 5 ...
  27. [27]
    Visions fugitives, Op 22 (Prokofiev) - MP3 and Lossless downloads
    Recording details: December 2011. Henry Wood Hall, London, United Kingdom Produced by Andrew Keener Engineered by David Hinitt Release date: February 2013
  28. [28]
    [PDF] Harmonic Function in the Music of Sergei Prokofiev - Thesis Template
    Chapter 6 offers a conclusion and suggestions for future research, emphasizing the value of studying Prokofiev's harmonic practice in relation to nineteenth- ...
  29. [29]
    https://scholarsbank.uoregon.edu/server/api/core/b...
    9 Laryssa Davis, “'Visions Fugitives': Glimpses into Prokofiev's Compositional Development From 1915– 1917,” ProQuest Dissertations and Theses (D.M.A., Ann ...
  30. [30]
    a Biography - Sergei Prokofiev - Dave Ratcliffe Piano
    When I was researching and writing about the life and music of the. Russian composer Sergei Prokofiev (1891-1953) in the late 1970s and early. 1980s, the Cold ...
  31. [31]
    Out of Stalin's shadow | Classical music - The Guardian
    Jan 16, 2003 · Listening to Prokofiev's tantalising Visions Fugitives for piano, which seems to promise a disclosure that never quite comes, it is possible ...
  32. [32]
    Sviatoslav Richter (piano) in the 1950s [JW]: Classical CD Reviews
    He plays ten of the Visions fugitives. Six and nine were favourites of long-standing. Other recorded evidence exists but this is the most extensive ...
  33. [33]
  34. [34]
  35. [35]
    SVIATOSLAV RICHTER ARCHIVES VOLUME 5 - Classics Today
    While Richter never programmed the entire Prokofiev Op. 22, this is the largest group of Visions Fugitives we have from the pianist (recorded July 10, 1962, in ...
  36. [36]
    Opera and Concert Recordings Reveal Prokofiev's Variety
    Jul 4, 2003 · And if the shatteringly broad contrasts in this performance of the ''Romeo ... 8; ''VISIONS FUGITIVES'' NOS. 3, 6 AND 9. Sviatoslav Richter ...
  37. [37]
  38. [38]
    PROKOFIEV Visions fugitives. Piano Sonata No 8 (Nicholas Angelich)
    In the Visions fugitives this is almost entirely for the good, because his rubato is both subtle and appropriate to the atmosphere, especially the moments of ...Missing: Repertuar 1918