Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Ward Connerly

Wardell Anthony "Ward" Connerly (born 1939) is an American businessman, political activist, and former regent renowned for leading the effort to enact California's Proposition 209 in 1996, a ballot initiative that banned the consideration of race, sex, or ethnicity in employment, admissions, and contracting. Born in , during the Jim Crow era, Connerly was orphaned young and raised by his grandparents before relocating to as a child, where he built a career in and government consulting. Appointed to the Board of Regents by Governor in 1993, Connerly emerged as a vocal critic of , arguing that race-based preferences contradicted the principle of equal treatment under the law and often resulted in mismatched outcomes for beneficiaries. He founded the American Civil Rights Institute in 1997 to promote color-blind policies nationwide, spearheading similar ballot measures in states including (Proposal 2, passed 2006), , and , though some efforts faced legal challenges or reversals. Connerly's campaigns have provoked intense opposition from civil rights organizations and academics, who contend that prohibiting affirmative action exacerbates disparities in access to and opportunities for underrepresented groups; proponents, including Connerly, counter that of affirmative action's limited and its role in perpetuating racial divisions justifies its elimination in favor of socioeconomic or merit-focused alternatives. As a conservative who rose from without relying on racial preferences, he has endured personal vilification, including accusations of betraying his , yet maintains that true advancement stems from individual merit rather than government-mandated group advantages.

Early Life and Education

Childhood and Upbringing

Ward Connerly was born Wardell Anthony Connerly on June 15, 1939, in . His father departed the family when Connerly was two years old, leaving his mother to raise him alone until her death when he was four. Following his mother's passing, Connerly was taken in by relatives, initially living with his maternal aunt Bertha and uncle James Louis, who relocated from to , and later to . By around 1947, he had moved in with his grandmother, a full-blooded Indian, in a working-class, predominantly neighborhood in Sacramento, where the family faced financial strains without reliance on external aid. To contribute to the household amid these hardships, young Connerly engaged in various informal jobs, including running errands, helping a carpenter, and selling ice water to laborers, fostering an early emphasis on personal initiative and economic self-sufficiency. These experiences underscored a formative environment of limited resources and individual agency, absent preferential interventions based on or socioeconomic status.

Academic Background and Early Influences

Connerly attended American River Junior College before transferring to , where he earned a degree with honors in in 1962. He was the first in his family to graduate from college and served as student body president during his time there. Amid the emerging , Connerly engaged in political activism, leading a 1959 campaign against housing discrimination and testifying before state legislators in support of fair-housing legislation that influenced the Rumford Act. His early life, marked by the loss of his parents and upbringing by his grandmother and other relatives in Sacramento, instilled a strong emphasis on and hard work. His grandmother, a full-blooded Indian, enforced the principle of prioritizing study before leisure, while relatives modeled self-made success through determination rather than reliance on external aid. At age 13, Connerly rejected assistance after a demeaning experience and became self-supporting through employment, reinforcing his aversion to dependency. These experiences shaped Connerly's conviction that individual merit, not group-based entitlements, determines success, viewing racial barriers as surmountable through personal effort once basic opportunities exist. He credited positive interactions with white individuals and his mixed racial heritage for fostering the belief that race should be irrelevant to judgment, contrasting sharply with narratives of perpetual victimhood prevalent in some civil rights discourse. This foundation of merit-based progression and rejection of entitlement mindsets informed his later opposition to race-conscious policies.

Personal Life

Family and Relationships

Ward Connerly married Ilene Crews in 1962 after meeting her while attending college in Sacramento. Crews, of European-American descent, has been described as a supportive partner throughout Connerly's professional and activist endeavors, with their interracial union occurring at a time when such marriages remained uncommon in the United States. The couple has two children: a son, , and a daughter, . Connerly has emphasized raising his family with a focus on self-reliance and merit-based achievement, noting that his children pursued opportunities without reliance on racial preferences. This personal stability provided a foundation amid his increasing public visibility in the and beyond, though specific details on family responses to media scrutiny remain limited in .

Personal Philosophy on Race and Identity

Connerly's philosophy emphasizes individual over racial categorization, positioning himself foremost as an rather than defined by ethnic ancestry. With a encompassing African , , , and elements, he resents state-imposed labels—such as "colored" on his —that pigeonhole into rigid groups, asserting that " are not defined by their ." He rejects the notion that should dictate personal or societal roles, drawing an analogy to automobiles: "I’ve had a black , a green and a white . But how fast they went was not determined by the color of the car. are no different." While acknowledging early encounters with segregation in the Jim Crow South—which he describes as imprinting as a "scar" on American life—Connerly maintains that overt against people of color has been effectively eliminated, allowing advancement through merit alone. He contrasts these past hardships with his conviction that racial preferences exacerbate division by institutionalizing group-based favoritism, which breeds resentment, dependency, and further inequities: "-based remedies only prolong America’s racial divisions." In his view, such policies contradict equal treatment under law, substituting one form of bias for another under guises like "building diversity." Connerly seeks to erode fixed racial boundaries by endorsing multi-racial designations on forms, including the U.S. Census, as a means to reflect blended identities and reduce insistence on monolithic self-labeling. He has decried the rejection of a multi-racial option, arguing it would unify the populace and alleviate tensions by challenging mutually exclusive categories that perpetuate segregationist thinking. Ultimately, he aims to abolish such checkboxes entirely—"getting rid of those friggin’ boxes"—to foster a where race demands no compelled identification or consequence.

Professional Career

Business Ventures and Achievements

Ward Connerly co-founded Connerly & Associates, Inc., in with his wife, Ilene, creating a Sacramento-based specializing in research, , land-use planning, and association management. The firm expanded to a professional staff of 15, securing substantial earnings through expertise in preparing housing elements, , and policies for public and private clients. Connerly & Associates achieved prominence by administering the Construction Industry Advancement Fund and other industry funds, while leading efforts to help California's building sector comply with energy conservation standards and state building codes. The company captured a significant share of the statewide market for developing housing plans and conducting studies, serving numerous cities and counties with land-use strategies that facilitated major development projects. A key contract exemplifying competence-driven success was a $1.1 million with the Energy Commission, awarded in 1994—over a year before state laws mandated 15% set-asides for minority- or women-owned businesses—demonstrating based on prior rather than preferential allocations. Connerly's ventures, rooted in his earlier roles at the Sacramento and Redevelopment Agency and as Director of the of and , built multimillion-dollar operations through merit-based contracts, providing of minority advancement via skill and market opportunity absent racial preferences.

Rise in Real Estate and Consulting

In 1973, Connerly left his position as in California's state housing and agency to enter the , co-founding Connerly & Associates, Inc., with his wife Ilene as an equal partner in the Sacramento-based firm specializing in , housing research, and consulting. The company focused on advising clients on , projects, and urban policy navigation, drawing on Connerly's prior government experience without reliance on racial preference programs that were not yet dominant in state contracting at the time. The firm secured early contracts with local redevelopment agencies and state entities for housing and land-use advisory services, building a portfolio that emphasized technical expertise in , community planning, and government relations. By the late and into the 1980s, Connerly & Associates expanded through merit-based client acquisition, managing trade associations and non-profits while avoiding set-aside preferences, which demonstrated the viability of competitive bidding in a field often influenced by political and regulatory hurdles. Connerly's accumulated proficiency in land-use , including contributions to related regulations, elevated the firm's profile, leading to broader recognition in policy circles by the early as a key player in California's development consulting landscape. This period marked the firm's maturation into a multimillion-dollar operation, underscoring Connerly's ascent via specialized knowledge rather than preferential treatment.

University of California Involvement

Appointment as Regent

In March 1993, California Governor appointed Ward Connerly, a Sacramento-based real estate consultant and longtime personal friend, to a 12-year term on the Board of Regents, the 26-member governing body responsible for setting policy across the UC system's campuses. The selection drew immediate scrutiny from education activists and Democratic legislators, who argued it exemplified given Connerly's substantial financial contributions to Wilson's campaigns and lack of prior administrative experience. Despite the controversy, the state confirmed the appointment, marking Connerly's entry into statewide public service. Connerly served until the expiration of his term in March 2005, during which he held the position of vice chairman of the Board. In his early years, the Regents' duties emphasized fiscal and institutional amid California's recurring state budget deficits, which reduced public funding for and necessitated scrutiny of operational efficiencies and long-term financial planning for the multi-campus system. Through direct engagement with UC operations as a Regent, Connerly encountered evidence of disparities in admissions practices, where racial and ethnic preferences appeared to override strict merit-based evaluations, prompting his initial questioning of such mechanisms' alignment with principles. This exposure, drawn from committee reviews and policy discussions, informed his evolving perspective on university without immediate policy advocacy.

Reforms in Admissions and Governance

Ward Connerly, as a University of California regent, proposed Resolution SP-1 to eliminate the use of , , , , color, or national origin as factors in undergraduate admissions decisions across UC campuses. The Board of Regents adopted SP-1 on July 20, 1995, by a vote of 14-10, with the policy taking effect for the entering class of 1997 and requiring that 50-75% of students be admitted based solely on academic merit. This reform addressed documented disparities in the prior system, where data from cases like that of Allan revealed that Asian American and white applicants with higher GPAs, test scores, and academic achievements were routinely denied admission while applicants from preferred racial groups with inferior qualifications were accepted. Connerly simultaneously drove the passage of SP-2, which barred affirmative action preferences in university hiring, promotions, and contracting, effective January 1, 1996. These resolutions marked the first instance in the U.S. of a major system formally suspending race-conscious policies in and operations, predating the statewide ban via Proposition 209. Central to Connerly's rationale was the mismatch theory, which holds that preferential admissions expose beneficiaries to standards beyond their preparation, fostering academic failure rather than success. He cited pre-reform UC data indicating low graduation rates—such as four-year rates below 30% for students at flagship campuses like Berkeley—among those admitted under lowered thresholds, arguing this evidenced systemic harm over benefit. Subsequent analyses corroborated the theory's predictions, showing minority graduation rates rising post-SP-1 as admissions aligned more closely with applicant qualifications.

Campaigns Against Racial Preferences

Proposition 209 and California Initiative

Ward Connerly, leveraging his position as a Regent, promoted and led the campaign for Proposition 209, formally the California Civil Rights Initiative, a ballot measure co-authored by Glynn Custred and Thomas Wood.) Introduced to amend Article I, Section 31 of the Constitution, it prohibited state and local governments from discriminating against or granting preferential treatment to individuals based on , , color, , or in public employment, , and contracting.) Connerly's advocacy built on his earlier success in 1995 convincing UC Regents to suspend racial preferences in admissions, positioning the initiative as a statewide extension of color-blind merit principles. The campaign faced vehement opposition from Democratic politicians, civil rights groups including the and ACLU, and much of the , which framed the measure as a to diversity and equity.) Supporters, including Governor and the Yes on 209 committee chaired by Connerly, countered with arguments emphasizing equal treatment under law, drawing funding from business donors and individual contributors totaling $5.24 million—surpassing the opposition's $3.31 million from labor unions and advocacy coalitions.) On November 5, 1996, voters approved the initiative 54.55% to 45.45%, with over 8.2 million yes votes, marking the first statewide ban on racial and gender preferences in decision-making.) Immediate implementation revealed resilience in minority participation despite predictions of collapse. At the , underrepresented minority (URM) applications remained stable post-1998, while race-neutral strategies like expanded , holistic review (increasing URM enrollment by ~10% at six campuses), and the Eligibility in the Local Context program (boosting system-wide URM enrollment by ~3.5% annually until 2012) mitigated initial admissions dips at selective campuses such as and UCLA. Overall URM freshman enrollment fell from 19.3% in 1997 to 17.5% initially but recovered to 20.1% by 2000, with URM graduation rates rising 4.4 percentage points due to improved student-campus matching absent mismatched placements from preferences. These outcomes challenged claims of inevitable erosion, demonstrating that socioeconomic and academic-focused could sustain or enhance access without racial classifications.

Founding of American Civil Rights Institute

Ward Connerly founded the American Civil Rights Institute (ACRI) in 1997 as a aimed at extending opposition to race- and gender-based preferences beyond through national ballot initiatives and public education campaigns. The institute was formally announced on January 15, 1997, in the wake of Proposition 209's success, with the explicit goal of replicating such measures in other states to enforce equal treatment under the law regardless of race or sex. ACRI's mission centered on highlighting the detrimental effects of preferential policies, drawing on principles of individual equality and evidence of their practical failures, including mismatched qualifications in hiring and admissions that undermined merit-based systems. As a 501(c)(3) entity, it focused on research and advocacy to demonstrate how such preferences distorted markets and fostered dependency rather than genuine advancement. Among its initial efforts, ACRI conducted and disseminated studies quantifying the economic costs of racial preferences, such as inefficiencies in contracting where set-asides led to higher expenses and suboptimal outcomes due to non-competitive bidding. These analyses underscored causal links between preference programs and resource misallocation, providing data-driven critiques to inform public discourse and policy challenges.

Expansion to Other States

Following the success of Proposition 209 in , Ward Connerly, through his American Civil Rights Institute, spearheaded ballot initiatives in multiple states to prohibit racial and gender preferences in public employment, , and contracting. These efforts aimed to extend color-blind policies nationwide, framing them as restorations of equal protection under the law rather than discrimination. In , Connerly's Michigan Civil Rights Initiative qualified Proposal 2 for the November 7, 2006, ballot, which amended the state constitution to ban preferences. The measure passed with 58% approval (2,766,650 yes votes to 2,042,540 no), effective December 2006, prohibiting public institutions from discriminating or granting preferential treatment based on race, sex, color, ethnicity, or .) Nebraska voters approved Initiative 424 on November 4, 2008, by a margin of approximately 59% to 41% (about 447,000 yes to 307,000 no), amending the constitution to bar or preferential treatment in public , employment, and contracting.) Arizona followed with 107 passing on November 2, 2010, 60% to 40% (1,413,000 yes to 947,000 no), similarly prohibiting or preferences based on , sex, or ethnicity. In Oklahoma, Question 759 succeeded on November 6, 2012, with 59.2% support (745,854 yes to 514,163 no), enacting a constitutional ban on in public sectors.) Efforts faltered elsewhere. In , Amendment 46, which would have banned preferences while preserving anti-discrimination laws, failed narrowly on November 4, , with 51% opposed (1,114,000 no to 1,069,000 yes); a companion measure, Amendment 59, aimed at funding preferences via taxes, also failed at 50.4% opposed. In , the Missouri Civil Rights Initiative did not reach the ballot after proponents, including Connerly allies, failed to collect sufficient signatures by the May deadline, despite campaigns in Kansas City and elsewhere.) Connerly's campaigns emphasized voter-driven ballot measures to circumvent legislative resistance, coupled with public messaging on the merits of merit-based systems fostering individual over group-based entitlements. He argued that such policies countered dependency narratives by prioritizing character and achievement, drawing on California's post-209 experience where minority high school graduation rates rose without preferences. Post-ban data from these states reveal mixed but empirically grounded outcomes challenging assumptions of inevitable decline in minority success. In Michigan, underrepresented minority enrollment at the University of Michigan flagship dropped initially (Black undergraduates from 7% in 2006 to 4% by 2021), yet graduation rates for admitted minorities improved, with studies attributing this to reduced admissions mismatch—where lower-credentialed students placed in overly competitive environments face higher attrition. Similar patterns emerged in Nebraska and Arizona, where bans correlated with stable or shifting minority participation via socioeconomic proxies, sustaining overall achievement metrics without race-based interventions. In Oklahoma, the 2012 ban prompted universities to enhance outreach on income and geography, maintaining minority persistence rates while avoiding the overrepresentation critiques of pre-ban eras. These results empirically support contentions that preferences hinder long-term equity by inflating mismatch costs, though enrollment at elite flagships declined 10-20% for underrepresented groups across bans.

Broader Political Engagement

Party Affiliation and Elections

Ward Connerly identifies as a , aligning with the party's traditional commitments to intervention and prioritization of individual rights over collective group entitlements. His political ascent included appointment to the Board of Regents in 1993 by Republican Governor , serving a 12-year term until 2005. In 1998, the named him co-chair of its finance committee, leveraging his business acumen for fundraising amid internal debates over his anti-preference activism. Though urged toward electoral bids, including potential runs for U.S. or statewide office, Connerly declined traditional candidacy paths, preferring initiatives as a mechanism for policy change without the constraints of partisan primaries or campaigns. This choice reflected his view that direct voter appeals offered greater leverage for advancing core principles than navigating party machinery or opponent attacks in general elections. Connerly has critiqued the at times for insufficient resolve in opposing identity-driven appeals, arguing that such lapses undermine commitments to merit and personal agency, even as he maintains loyalty to its broader framework of fiscal restraint and . His approach exhibits pragmatic flexibility, including occasional endorsements across party lines on matters detached from racial classifications, prioritizing outcomes over ideological purity.

Positions on Social Policies

Connerly has consistently advocated for social policies grounded in individual liberty and equal treatment under the law, extending his opposition to group-based classifications to broader issues of personal contracts and government forms. In 1997, as a regent, he supported the extension of domestic partner benefits to same-sex couples employed by the UC system, arguing that such measures aligned with principles of contractual equality rather than preferential treatment. This stance reflected his view that government should facilitate voluntary agreements without imposing race- or identity-based distinctions. Connerly extended this reasoning to marriage policy, publicly opposing California's Proposition 8 in 2008, which sought to define marriage as solely between a man and a woman. He framed as a matter of individual contractual rights, consistent with intervention in personal relationships, and criticized the proposition as inconsistent with equal protection principles he had long championed. In parallel, he proposed the Racial Privacy Initiative (Proposition 54) in 2003, aiming to eliminate racial and ethnic checkboxes from most government forms, including those for employment, education, and public services, to promote a color-blind society and reduce incentives for identity-based division. On , Connerly opposed California's 2022 recommendations for payments to Black residents, contending that such policies lack direct causal links between historical injustices and contemporary individuals, exacerbate racial fragmentation, and undermine personal responsibility. He argued that true redress requires evidence of specific harm to specific parties, not blanket group entitlements, aligning with his broader critique of policies that prioritize over individual merit.

Controversies and Criticisms

Financial and Ethical Allegations

In 2012, Jennifer Gratz, a former employee and ally who collaborated with Connerly on anti-affirmative action efforts including her role as plaintiff in the 2003 case , accused him of financial misconduct at the American Civil Rights Institute (ACRI), the nonprofit he founded. Gratz alleged in a letter to the ACRI board that Connerly misused donations for personal enrichment, including excessive salaries to himself and family members, issuance of inaccurate W-2 forms, and mismanagement that led to the organization's and halt of charitable activities since June 2011. She highlighted Connerly's compensation exceeding $1.3 million for the fiscal year ending June 2010, later reduced to $850,000 amid difficulties, claiming it included payments for management, fundraising, speeches, research, and security unrelated to core operations. Connerly rejected the claims, attributing 90% of Gratz's assertions to falsehoods and portraying her as a disgruntled former associate motivated by personal ambitions to supplant him. He maintained that his compensation reflected legitimate work on advocacy, travel, and administrative duties for ACRI's campaigns against racial preferences. The allegations prompted investigations by the and into ACRI's finances, salaries, and compliance, but no criminal charges were filed against Connerly or ACRI personnel. ACRI's publicly filed IRS returns demonstrated transparency in reporting revenues, expenditures, and executive pay, with no substantiated evidence of illicit personal gain emerging from the probes. Earlier scrutiny arose over Connerly's consulting fees tied to anti-affirmative action ballot initiatives. In 2005, California's Fair Political Practices Commission sued Connerly and ACRI for alleged violations of campaign disclosure laws in connection with out-of-state contributions to 209-related efforts, resulting in a $95,000 civil without admission of wrongdoing. Critics, including proponents, repeatedly cited his substantial earnings—such as $1.6 million in 2006 from campaign-related activities—as evidence of profiteering, though these were defended as standard compensation for strategic consulting, signature gathering, and public advocacy in multi-state drives. No ethical violations or criminal findings stemmed from these examinations, contrasting with unproven narratives of often amplified by opponents to undermine his policy positions.

Ideological Attacks and Personal Repercussions

Opponents of Ward Connerly's campaigns against racial preferences frequently resorted to attacks, labeling him an "," "sell-out," "," and "," with civil rights leader publicly using the latter term during debates over California's Proposition 209 in 1996. Such rhetoric portrayed Connerly as a betrayer of black interests, with critics like an anonymous protester in 1997 accusing him of being "a traitor" and "an embarrassment to your race" during public confrontations. Media outlets amplified these depictions, with some profiles questioning his racial identity and suggesting psychological disturbance rooted in his upbringing by a grandmother who reportedly favored lighter-skinned individuals, framing his opposition to preferences as evidence of . These ideological assaults extended to personal repercussions, including public harassment where strangers accosted Connerly with epithets like "Uncle Tom" or "Angry Oreo" upon recognizing him, and instances of being shouted down at events by audiences opposed to his views. Critics, often from progressive and civil rights establishments, dismissed his arguments on empirical grounds—such as affirmative action's role in fostering stigma and academic mismatch for beneficiaries—by instead emphasizing racial loyalty, thereby aiming to delegitimize dissent without engaging data on policy outcomes. Connerly rebutted these characterizations by pointing to his own rise from poverty in segregated to business success and regent without relying on racial preferences, arguing that such personal evidence contradicted claims of self-betrayal or inadequacy absent quotas. He contended that the attacks perpetuated a dependency framework, diverting attention from verifiable harms of race-based policies—like reduced and intergroup resentment—toward unsubstantiated narratives of perpetual victimhood that hindered broader advancement. This pattern of personal vilification, rather than substantive refutation, underscored efforts to enforce ideological conformity on race-related reforms.

Reception and Evaluations

Support from Conservative and Libertarian Perspectives

Conservative thinkers have lauded Ward Connerly for his role in dismantling policies, arguing that such measures undermine meritocracy by prioritizing group identity over individual achievement and constitutional color-blindness. Economists like , who has critiqued for creating perverse incentives such as academic mismatch—where underqualified students are admitted to selective institutions leading to higher dropout rates—align closely with Connerly's advocacy for race-neutral standards that foster genuine equality of opportunity. Connerly has received numerous accolades from conservative organizations recognizing his efforts to advance these principles. In 1997, he was awarded the Bronars Defender of Freedom Award by the Freedom Alliance for his leadership in the Proposition 209 campaign. The following year, the (CPAC) presented him with its State Achievement Award for curbing race-based preferences in public institutions. These honors underscore views within conservative circles that Connerly's initiatives restore fairness by rejecting government-engineered outcomes in favor of equal treatment under the law. From a libertarian standpoint, Connerly's campaigns exemplify opposition to state-enforced racial classifications, which are seen as violations of individual liberty and market-driven selection. Libertarian analysts have described as a that fails to deliver promised benefits, instead perpetuating division; Connerly's success in is cited as evidence that eliminating preferences enables true civil rights progress through voluntary, non-coercive means. Connerly is often portrayed as a leading figure in black conservatism, embodying a that prioritizes personal agency, , and rejection of victimhood narratives in favor of principles applicable to all Americans regardless of race. His trajectory from modest beginnings to business success without preferential treatment serves as a model for this perspective, challenging dependency on racial entitlements. Empirical evidence from post-Proposition 209 implementation supports conservative and libertarian claims of improved outcomes via alternatives to racial preferences. Research indicates that minority graduation rates at University of California campuses increased following the ban, with one analysis estimating a 4.4 percentage point rise attributable to better student-institution matching rather than affirmative action placements. This suggests that outreach and socioeconomic-focused admissions can sustain or enhance targeted group performance without relying on race as a proxy for disadvantage.

Opposition from Progressive Viewpoints

Progressive critics contend that Connerly's campaigns against dismantle essential mechanisms for addressing historical and ongoing racial inequities, potentially widening disparities in and employment by enforcing race-neutral policies that overlook systemic barriers. For instance, opponents argue that metrics like scores and grade-point averages, favored in race-blind admissions, perpetuate advantages for groups with better-resourced K-12 systems, thereby disadvantaging underrepresented minorities without compensatory measures. Such viewpoints, articulated in outlets aligned with left-leaning perspectives, frame the removal of preferences as a of toward , prioritizing individual merit over collective redress for past . Connerly has faced accusations from progressive activists of embodying "internalized oppression" through his advocacy, with detractors labeling him an "," "house slave," or "traitor to his race" for allegedly siding with majority interests against advancement. These personal attacks, often voiced by figures like , portray his stance as a denial of persistent racism's role in shaping opportunities, suggesting he ignores the need for race-conscious interventions to counter entrenched biases. Critics in this vein frequently omit discussions of enduring achievement gaps—such as those in graduation rates and test scores among racial groups despite decades of preferential policies—focusing instead on symbolic commitments to as a societal imperative. Some progressive analyses concede evidence of mismatches between affirmative action beneficiaries and institutional demands, such as lower graduation rates for preferentially admitted students, yet maintain that diversity's intangible benefits, like cross-racial exposure, justify continued use of racial criteria over strict outcome-based evaluations. This perspective, drawn from academic and advocacy sources, emphasizes ideological goals of inclusivity, critiquing Connerly's color-blind approach as naive to power imbalances while downplaying data on policy efficacy in closing socioeconomic divides.

Empirical Assessments of Policy Impacts

Following the passage of California's Proposition 209 in 1996, which prohibited race-based in admissions, underrepresented minority (URM) freshman enrollment at the (UC) system initially declined by approximately 10,000 students annually, with sharper drops at selective campuses like UC Berkeley and UCLA—up to 12% for URM groups. However, system-wide URM enrollment stabilized and recovered over subsequent years through race-neutral strategies, including expanded outreach to high schools with high URM populations, socioeconomic-based admissions proxies, and eligibility guarantees for top-performing students from under-resourced schools, achieving URM representation comparable to pre-ban levels by the mid-2000s. Graduation rates among enrolled URM students rose post-Proposition 209, particularly at the level, where four-year completion rates for and enrollees increased by 5-10 percentage points, attributed to improved academic matching that reduced dropout risks associated with prior preferential admissions placing students in overly competitive environments. This aligns with mismatch analyses showing that pre-ban often directed marginally qualified URM applicants to elite campuses where attrition rates exceeded 50%, whereas post-ban shifts to less selective campuses or (CSU) systems yielded higher persistence and degree attainment, with CSU URM graduation improvements of similar magnitude. Countervailing studies, such as a 2020 difference-in-differences analysis of longitudinal UC data, have claimed long-term earnings reductions for affected URM cohorts (e.g., 5-7% lower wages for and women), potentially due to foregone access to prestigious networks, though these findings are contested by evidence of net mobility gains from better-fit placements and have been critiqued for underemphasizing selection effects in pre-ban admissions. In other states influenced by Connerly-backed initiatives, such as Michigan's Proposal 2 (2006), patterns mirrored California's: URM enrollment at public flagships dipped initially (e.g., 20-30% at ), but diversity rebounded via holistic review emphasizing socioeconomic factors, with no sustained system-wide erosion and evidence of elevated URM graduation rates from reduced mismatch. States without race preferences, including , , and (via race-neutral top-percent plans post-Hopwood v. Texas in 1996), maintained URM shares at public institutions through class-based proxies and recruitment, often outperforming pre-ban systems in overall minority degree production without relying on racial classifications. The elimination of racial preferences under these bans correspondingly diminished reverse discrimination litigation, as pre-initiative affirmative action programs had generated hundreds of lawsuits alleging unequal treatment of non-preferred groups (e.g., Asian American and applicants denied admission despite superior qualifications), with post-ban legal challenges shifting away from race-based claims and reducing administrative burdens on institutions. Empirical reviews indicate that such preferences empirically heightened intergroup and credential skepticism, as evidenced by higher mismatch-induced failures correlating with perceptions of underqualification among beneficiaries.

Legacy and Recent Developments

Long-Term Policy Influence

Connerly's campaigns against racial preferences in , initiated with California's Proposition 209 in 1996, established a model that inspired voter-approved bans in at least six additional states by 2012. These measures prohibited the consideration of race, ethnicity, or gender in public employment, education admissions, and contracting, including Washington's Initiative 200 (passed November 3, 1998, with 59% approval), Michigan's Proposal 2 (November 7, 2006, 58% approval), Nebraska's Initiative 424 (November 4, 2008, 58% approval), Arizona's Proposition 107 (November 2, 2010, 59% approval), New Hampshire's legislative adoption following a 2012 initiative, and Oklahoma's State Question 759 (November 6, 2012, 59% approval). These enduring state prohibitions have withstood repeal efforts, such as California's Proposition 16 on November 3, 2020, which sought to overturn Proposition 209 but failed with 57% of voters opposing it. The policies have produced measurable reductions in race-based preferences, particularly in government contracting and admissions. In , post-Proposition 209 implementation correlated with annual losses of up to $823 million in contracts for minority- and women-owned businesses reliant on preferential programs, reflecting a pivot to competitive bidding without racial set-asides. system data indicate sustained declines in admissions rates for underrepresented minorities at selective campuses like and UCLA, with Black enrollment dropping from 6% to under 3% at by the early , though partial recoveries occurred through race-neutral expansions. Nationally, the state bans contributed to a broader policy environment emphasizing merit-based criteria, diminishing explicit preference claims in public sectors across affected jurisdictions. Connerly's influence extended to federal discourse on racial classifications, bolstering arguments for race-neutral alternatives in and hiring, though direct legislative changes remained limited. The model of Proposition 209 informed challenges to programs, aligning with executive initiatives under President Trump that scrutinized race-conscious contracting and promoted alternatives like socioeconomic proxies. Critiques highlight incomplete policy eradication, as public institutions in ban states developed workarounds including class-based affirmative action, targeted recruitment, and holistic reviews that indirectly advance goals without explicit racial criteria. Private colleges, unbound by state s, retained practices like admissions favoring children—often disproportionately white and affluent—prompting subsequent reforms such as California's 2024 legislative on at public universities. These adaptations underscore persistent tensions between formal bans and institutional incentives for demographic outcomes.

Response to Supreme Court Decisions and Ongoing Advocacy

Connerly hailed the 's 6-3 decision on June 29, 2023, in Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. President and Fellows of as a pivotal affirmation of race-neutral admissions, aligning with his decades-long push for color-blind policies. In a pre-ruling , he framed the anticipated outcome as advancing the Founders' aim of "" by rejecting race-conscious preferences in . He dismissed efforts to achieve "" through racial criteria as euphemistic cover for , arguing that such practices inherently prioritize over individual merit. Labeling race-based admissions as "affirmative discrimination," Connerly viewed the ruling as a long-overdue rejection of policies that, in his assessment, undermined equal treatment under the law, drawing parallels to California's post- experience where merit-focused systems persisted without mandated racial balancing. He anticipated institutional pushback, predicting that some universities would seek "workarounds" to maintain race-conscious practices, potentially discriminating against non-preferred groups in the process. From 2022 onward, Connerly sustained his advocacy against reparations proposals, contending in June 2022 that California's Proposition 209 framework could block such measures by prohibiting race-based allocations of public resources. Through the American Civil Rights Institute (ACRI), which he founded and chairs, he continued critiquing (DEI) mandates as extensions of preferential treatment, warning post-ruling that evasion tactics would perpetuate division rather than foster unity based on shared humanity over racial identity. Connerly forecasted enduring cultural resistance to merit-based shifts but expressed optimism for broader empirical progress, citing evidence from states like where abandoning racial preferences had not eroded opportunity but reinforced individual agency.

References

  1. [1]
    Ward Connerly (1939- ) | BlackPast.org
    Jun 4, 2008 · Anti-affirmative action activist, businessman and former University of California regent Wardell (Ward) Anthony Connerly is popularly known ...
  2. [2]
    Ward Connerly, The Father of Proposition 209 - Capitol Weekly
    Ward Connerly was born into the Jim Crow South, Louisiana in 1939, where he was a second class citizen because of the color of his skin.Missing: biography | Show results with:biography
  3. [3]
    Ward Connerly - POLITICO
    Jun 28, 2023 · Ward Connerly: I was born in Leesville, Louisiana, in 1939, and at that time, the state of Louisiana would place the race of people on birth ...Missing: biography | Show results with:biography
  4. [4]
    Ward Connerly | America: A Nation of Equals
    Ward Connerly was born in the western Louisiana town of Leesville. His father left the family when Ward was 2 years old; the boy's mother died when he was 4.Missing: biography | Show results with:biography
  5. [5]
    Ward Connerly - Ballotpedia
    Wardell "Ward" Connerly is a political activist, businessman, and former member of the University of California Board of Regents.
  6. [6]
    Ward Connerly - The Federalist Society
    Ward Connerly is founder and President of the American Civil Rights Institute – a national, not-for-profit organization aimed at educating the public about ...
  7. [7]
    Ward Connerly: Anti-affirmative action leader calls Proposition 16 ...
    October 28, 2020. Republish. Twenty-four years after he led efforts that banned affirmative action in California, former UC Regent Ward Connerly is ...
  8. [8]
    Ward Connerly Talks Affirmative Action, Contracting And Black Lives ...
    Sep 11, 2020 · Two decades ago Wardell “Ward” Connerly was arguably the most hated Black man in America. Anti-affirmative action champion Ward Connerly has ...
  9. [9]
    Ward Connerly Won the Battle — Now He's Facing the War
    Sacramento businessman and university of California regent Ward Connerly professes amazement at the attacks and public scrutiny he has received for ...
  10. [10]
    What Drives Ward Connerly in his crusade to end affirmative action ...
    Mar 31, 1996 · His mother, Grace, died when he was 4. His grandmother, a full-blooded Choctaw Indian, and an aunt and uncle raised Connerly in Sacramento.
  11. [11]
    [PDF] WARD CONNERLY Part I: From Rural Louisiana to California
    Ward Connerly is born in the Jim Crow South and comes to California in 1947. After college he goes to work in government, confronts racial barriers and ...Missing: biography | Show results with:biography
  12. [12]
    RACE IN AMERICA: FAIRNESS OR FOLLY? - Time Magazine
    Jun 23, 1997 · As a child, Connerly found work running errands, helping a carpenter, hawking ice water to laborers. “I was a little hustler,” he says with a ...Missing: early | Show results with:early
  13. [13]
    Connerly, Ward 1939– | Encyclopedia.com
    As a child, he was cared for by various relatives, living first in Washington state and then in Sacramento, California, where he was raised by his grandmother.Missing: orphaned | Show results with:orphaned
  14. [14]
    Ward Connerly - NNDB
    University: American River Junior College, Sacramento, CA University: BA Political Science, Sacramento State College (1962). American Civil Rights CoalitionMissing: degree | Show results with:degree
  15. [15]
    Connerly, Ward(ell) (Anthony) 1939- | Encyclopedia.com
    Education: Attended American River Junior College; Sacramento State College, B.A. (with honors), 1962. ADDRESSES: Office—Connerly & Associates, 2215 Twenty- ...<|separator|>
  16. [16]
    An Interview with Ward Connerly - Interracial-Voice
    I was student-body president there. After graduation, I went to work for the government in a civil service position. I was hired as a result of a civil service ...Missing: early odd labor
  17. [17]
    ward connerly - California Homebuilding Foundation
    Jan 1, 1994 · After earning a bachelor's degree in Political Theory from California State University, Sacramento in 1962, he immediately became involved ...
  18. [18]
    Race In America: Fairness Or Folly? - June 23, 1997 - CNN
    Jun 23, 1997 · Connerly & Associates grew to a professional staff of 15. He won't disclose company earnings except to say they are "substantial." Connerly has ...
  19. [19]
    [PDF] Back to Equality - Imprimis - Hillsdale College
    Ward Connerly reminds us that the civil rights movement really began in 1776 ... A few miles down the road, we stopped to relieve ourselves in a farm field; we ...
  20. [20]
    The End Of Affirmative Action - Newsweek
    Feb 12, 1995 · Ward Connerly owns precisely half of a land-use consulting firm in Sacramento. His wife, Ilene, owns the other half.
  21. [21]
    The education of Ward Connerly - Forbes
    May 5, 1997 · Born in 1939 into a poor family in Louisiana, Connerly overcame the obstacles of prejudice and discrimination and established a successful ...Missing: milestones | Show results with:milestones
  22. [22]
    Questions of Race Run Deep for Foe of Preferences
    Jul 27, 1997 · By society's measure, he emerged black from the gene pool, a peculiar arithmetic that Ward Connerly insists he has never understood.Missing: reliance | Show results with:reliance
  23. [23]
    Wilson's Choice for UC Regent Criticized : Education: Activists say ...
    Feb 24, 1993 · Pete Wilson's appointment of a close friend and large campaign donor to the University of California Board of Regents. At a news conference ...
  24. [24]
    https://research.policyarchive.org/2031.pdf
  25. [25]
    Ward A. Connerly - Independent Institute
    He received his Bachelor of Arts degree with honors in political science from California State University, Sacramento, where he was also student body president.Missing: College | Show results with:College
  26. [26]
    [PDF] A Brief on the Events Leading to SP1 - the Academic Senate
    ... Connerly, would debate the future of affirmative action at UC. A month after the Council meeting, the universitywide Senate's Committee on. Affirmative Action ...
  27. [27]
    UC Regents, in Historic Vote, Wipe Out Affirmative Action : Diversity
    Jul 21, 1995 · University of California regents took a historic step late Thursday, abolishing race-based preferences in students admissions, hiring and contracting.
  28. [28]
    Notice, October 1995 - the Academic Senate - University of California
    One of them, SP-2, states that "Effective January 1, 1996, the University of California shall not use race, religion, sex, color, ethnicity, or national origin ...
  29. [29]
    [PDF] Misshaping the River: Proposition 209 and Lessons for the Fisher ...
    graduation rates will be just as large if not larger than 2003. As for graduation rates at UC Berkeley and UCLA, again note that there was a steep upward ...
  30. [30]
    Research and Analyses on the Impact of Proposition 209 in California
    Applications, Admissions and Enrollment. Were minority students discouraged from applying to University of California campuses after the affirmative action ban?
  31. [31]
    Affirmative action and university fit: evidence from Proposition 209
    Proposition 209 banned the use of racial preferences in admissions at public colleges in California. We analyze unique data for all applicants and enrollees ...Missing: funding | Show results with:funding
  32. [32]
    Ward Connerly Fights On - City Journal
    While internal polls indicated that his chances were good, Connerly determined that he was too much of a maverick—and too committed to the single issue of ...Missing: early influences individual
  33. [33]
    The American Civil Rights Institute: Taking CCRI to the National Stage
    May 1, 1997 · So on January 15th of this year, I announced the creation of the American Civil Rights Institute, a new, national civil rights organization ...
  34. [34]
    American Civil Rights Institute - GuideStar Profile
    WARD CONNERLY. Main address. PO Box 188350. Sacramento, CA 95818 United ... Financials. American Civil Rights Institute. lock. Unlock financial insights by ...
  35. [35]
    [PDF] Supreme Court of the United States - SCOTUSblog
    ACRI is a nonprofit research and educational organization. ACRI ... studies discussing the costs of racial preferences at public universities.21.Missing: early | Show results with:early
  36. [36]
    [PDF] 1 The Story of Parents Involved in Community Schools Before Brown ...
    Until 1968, it was legal to discriminate against minorities when renting or selling real estate in Seattle. ... 76 Ward Connerly, On the Defensive, Quota ...<|separator|>
  37. [37]
    Affirmative action foes push ballot measures - NBC News
    Mar 25, 2008 · Sixteen months after voters in Michigan voted to kill affirmative action in the public sphere, opponents of preferences based on race and ...
  38. [38]
    Ward Him Off: Anti-affirmative action activist Ward Connerly ...
    Mar 15, 2007 · After a major electoral victory in November 2006 on Proposal 2 in Michigan, a ballot initiative which outlawed all preferences based on race, ...
  39. [39]
    Ward Connerly Kills Affirmative Action in Michigan - St. Louis American
    The initiative, known as Proposal 2, passed, 58 percent to 42 percent despite the fact that it was criticized by civil rights advocates, feminists, academics ...<|separator|>
  40. [40]
    Vote Results Are Mixed on a Ban on Preference - The New York Times
    Nov 7, 2008 · In Nebraska, a proposed ban on affirmative action passed easily, while in Colorado a nearly identical proposal was narrowly rejected.
  41. [41]
    Arizona Bans Affirmative Action - Inside Higher Ed
    Nov 2, 2010 · Arizona voters on Tuesday approved Proposition 107 to ban the consideration of race, ethnicity or gender by units of state government, including public ...
  42. [42]
    Arizona Voters Support Health Care Freedom - Reason Foundation
    Nov 3, 2010 · Proposition 107: By a 60-40 margin, Arizonans passed this constitutional ban on affirmative action programs in government employment, public ...
  43. [43]
    2012 Referendum General Election Results - Oklahoma
    Referendum: State Question 759, Popular Vote. Yes, 745,854, 59.19%. No, 514,163, 40.81%. Total Vote, 1,260,017. State Seal · Map Key. > 40%. > 50%. > 60%. > 70% ...
  44. [44]
    Colorado voters reject affirmative action ban - The Denver Post
    Nov 7, 2008 · Amendment 46 would have barred state officials from considering race or gender in decisions on hiring, contracting and admissions to public ...Missing: 59 | Show results with:59
  45. [45]
    Affirmative action ban fails in Colorado - SFGATE
    Voters narrowly reject measure passed elsewhere with help of Ward Connerly. By Colleen Slevin, Associated Press Nov 8, 2008. Colorado voters became the ...
  46. [46]
    Anti-affirmative action crusader comes to Missouri – The Denver Post
    Ballot initiatives are also being organized in Arizona, Colorado, Oklahoma and Nebraska. On Thursday, Connerly touted his plan at two events in Kansas City ...
  47. [47]
    WARD CONNERLY: 'We're saying race should not be used'
    Aug 17, 2016 · In the area of public employment, we have essentially purged preferential treatment based on race, gender, ethnicity, family origin out of the ...Missing: strategies | Show results with:strategies
  48. [48]
    Connerly continues his campaign to end racial preferences
    Mar 25, 1998 · Connerly, an African American man, spoke of experiencing “Jim Crow” laws in Louisiana during his childhood and countless other acts of dignity- ...Missing: first rejecting
  49. [49]
    Which States Have Banned Affirmative Action? - The New York Times
    Oct 31, 2022 · Black undergraduate enrollment dropped to 4 percent in 2021 from 7 percent in 2006, the year the state approved a referendum banning affirmative ...
  50. [50]
    Affirmative action bans and college graduation rates - ScienceDirect
    Affirmative action bans raise underrepresented minority graduation rates within colleges, but overall, fewer become graduates of selective colleges. Overall ...
  51. [51]
    [PDF] The Impact of Affirmative Action Bans in Graduate Education - ERIC
    Affirmative action bans reduced the average proportion of graduate students of color by 12%, with larger drops in engineering (26%) and natural sciences (19%).
  52. [52]
    How Do Affirmative Action Bans Affect the Racial Composition of ...
    Oct 1, 2020 · Further, the bans also decreased the enrollment of underrepresented racial-ethnic minority students at four state public flagship universities.
  53. [53]
    The results of Oklahoma's affirmative action ban - Fast Company
    Jun 14, 2023 · In 2012, the Oklahoma legislature passed a ballot initiative known as the Oklahoma Affirmative Action Ban, or State Question 759. The ...
  54. [54]
    Calif. Regent Ward Connerly Closes Controversial Tenure
    Jan 25, 2005 · Connerly, 65, was appointed to a 12-year term in 1993 by then-Gov. Pete Wilson, a Republican. He is best known for his work opposing affirmative ...
  55. [55]
    Controversial GOP Finance Pick / Affirmative action foe Connerly ...
    Jun 24, 1998 · 1998-06-24 04:00:00 PDT Sacramento -- Ward Connerly, the combative leader of the state's anti-affirmative action initiative campaign, ...<|separator|>
  56. [56]
    What It's Going to Take to End Racial Preferences - Politico
    Aug 13, 2017 · Ward Connerly is president of the American Civil Rights Institute, a ... party seems unwilling to defend its principles when it comes to race.
  57. [57]
    Q&A: Ward Connerly Talks Race, Affirmative Action And Why He ...
    Sep 28, 2020 · I betrayed, if you will, my party as a regent when I supported equal rights for people who were domestic partners because I feel that they're ...Missing: family | Show results with:family
  58. [58]
    12.03.97 - Domestic Partners Passes - Berkeley News
    The board also adopted a budget plan for 1998-99 that would restore faculty salaries to competitive levels, accommodate an additional 2,000 students and ...Missing: 1999 | Show results with:1999
  59. [59]
    https://www.thedartmouth.com/article/1999/04/ward-connerly-
  60. [60]
    Ward Connerly, the affirmative action foe, takes a stand in support of ...
    Oct 31, 2008 · Connerly, an African American, is the former University of California regent who promoted Proposition 209, the 1996 initiative that abolished ...
  61. [61]
    Connerly On Proposition 8 - The Atlantic
    Jul 3, 2008 · I've long since seen opposition to affirmative action, support for a flat tax and marriage equality as lynchpins of limited government equal- ...
  62. [62]
    Ward Connerly's New Cause - Reason.com
    He hopes that the myriad racial check boxes with which Californians are confronted on government forms will join de jure segregation as relics of a bygone, and ...
  63. [63]
    A colorblind California? - Salon.com
    May 9, 2002 · Dubbed the “Racial Privacy Initiative” by supporters, Connerly's proposal would eliminate the racial check boxes that Californians encounter on ...
  64. [64]
    Ward Connerly Resurfaces to Oppose Reparations for Black ...
    Jun 7, 2022 · On June 4, Connerly tweeted that Prop 209 could stop any form of reparations for Black Californians from happening.
  65. [65]
    Are reparations needed and will polio show up again in California?
    Sep 23, 2022 · Cohen speaks with Ward Connerly, president and founder of the American Civil Rights Institute, about why he believes reparations are not needed.
  66. [66]
    Ward Connerly resurfaces to oppose reparations for Black ...
    This time, Connerly, now 82, is speaking up in opposition to reparations for Black Californians. He is making his objection as the state moves closer than any ...
  67. [67]
    Ward Connerly Faces Allegations of Fiscal Misdoing
    Jan 17, 2012 · Mr. Connerly has faced accusations of profiteering before, as supporters of affirmative action highlighted his salary in an effort to discredit his cause.Missing: competence | Show results with:competence
  68. [68]
    Onetime employee says former UC regent mishandled donations
    Jan 19, 2012 · She urged the board to look into irregularities, including annual compensation to Connerly that in recent years amounted to more than $1 million ...
  69. [69]
    Connerly to Settle FPPC Suit for $95,000 - Los Angeles Times
    May 19, 2005 · Affirmative action opponent Ward Connerly has agreed to pay $95000 to settle a state lawsuit that accused him and his American Civil Rights ...Missing: resolution | Show results with:resolution
  70. [70]
    Ward Connerly puts the kibosh on 'affirmative action' – Iowa State ...
    During his unpaid term on the University of California Board of Regents, he successfully motioned to eliminate racial preferences from the university admissions ...
  71. [71]
    Ward Connerly's trumpet blast - The Economist
    Mar 27, 1997 · Mr Connerly's detractors have accused him of everything from McCarthyism to self-hatred to being a Ku Klux Klan sympathiser, but he seems ...Missing: hating criticism
  72. [72]
    Connerly's Courage - Washington Examiner
    Connerly formed a consulting firm, advising communities and businesses how to cope with government, and soon became rich. He did not work for Wilson ...<|separator|>
  73. [73]
    It's Time to Junk the Double Standard on Free Speech - The Atlantic
    Jan 1, 2002 · Examples: Ward Connerly, the black California businessman who has campaigned across the nation to outlaw racial preferences, has been shouted ...
  74. [74]
    Thomas Sowell on Caste Reservations (affirmative action) in India
    May 26, 2004 · ... Sowell himself seems to be a bit of a Ward Connerly-ite: he is an African American intellectual who is opposed to affirmative action. For ...<|separator|>
  75. [75]
    The Loneliness of the “Black Conservative” - Hoover Institution
    Under his American identity a black Republican is conservative, but under his racial identity he may be quite liberal. Many black Republicans, for example, are ...
  76. [76]
    Ward Connerly - Young America's Foundation
    Ward Connerly, author of the autobiography, Creating Equal: My Fight Against Race Preferences, is founder and chairman of the American Civil Rights Institute, ...Missing: biography | Show results with:biography
  77. [77]
    State Achievement Award | Video | C-SPAN.org
    Jan 31, 1998 · Ward Connerly was presented with the State Achievement Award by the Conservative Political Action Committee (CPAC) for his work in attempting to curb ...
  78. [78]
    The Affirmative Action Myth | Libertarianism.org
    Apr 13, 2005 · Ward Connerly has called it the civil rights struggle of our time. ... view of affirmative action is a myth. Preferences do not offer ...
  79. [79]
    Ward Connerly - SourceWatch
    Ward Connerly, a conservative black businessman from California, serves as chairman of the American Civil Rights Coalition and the California Civil Rights ...Missing: transition 1970s
  80. [80]
    [PDF] The Effects of Proposition 209 on College Enrollment and ...
    More notably, we find that minority graduation rates increased after Prop 209 was implemented, a finding consistent with the argument that affirmative action ...
  81. [81]
    Affirmative Action and University Fit: Evidence from Proposition 209
    After Prop 209, graduation rates of minorities increased by 4.4%. We characterize conditions required for better matching of students to campuses to account for ...
  82. [82]
    Ward Connerly Is Still Fighting | Publisher's Desk | - Inside Sacramento
    Ward Connerly founded the American Civil Rights Institute, a national nonprofit organization in opposition to racial and gender discrimination and preferential ...Missing: website | Show results with:website
  83. [83]
    A "poison" divides us - Salon.com
    Mar 27, 2000 · Connerly, however, believes that affirmative action is the real poison ruining relationships between blacks and whites. So he is trying to undo ...Missing: achievements | Show results with:achievements
  84. [84]
    Why California Rejected Racial Preferences, Again - The Atlantic
    Nov 10, 2020 · In that milieu, Connerly began to study how racial preferences worked in the UC system. After reviewing admissions statistics, he was convinced ...
  85. [85]
    [PDF] The impact of Proposition 209 and access-oriented UC admissions ...
    Prop 209 caused large immediate changes to URG UC applicants' likelihood of UC admission and enrollment. Each. URG UC applicant became substantially less likely ...
  86. [86]
    Will the Ban on Affirmative Action Hurt Diversity? Look to California
    Dec 4, 2023 · The University of California regents had voted to end race-conscious admissions within the UC system in 1995, on a motion by Ward Connerly, a ...
  87. [87]
    [PDF] CSHE.10.2020 AFFIRMATIVE ACTION, MISMATCH, AND ...
    Prop 209 curbed the large admissions advantages provided to all underrepresented minority (URM) UC applicants by affirmative action, with many URM applicants ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  88. [88]
    The Long-Run Impacts of Banning Affirmative Action in US Higher ...
    Aug 1, 2024 · Thus, affirmative action bans resulted in an increase in racial/ethnic disparities in both college degree completion and earnings among women.
  89. [89]
    Affirmative Action, Mismatch, and Economic Mobility after ...
    Proposition 209 banned race-based affirmative action at California public universities in 1998. Using a difference-in-difference research design and a ...
  90. [90]
    Affirmative action and its race-neutral alternatives - ScienceDirect
    UC's affirmative action and top percent policies increased underrepresented minority (URM) enrollment by over 20 percent and less than 4 percent, respectively.
  91. [91]
    Long-Term Effects of Affirmative Action Bans | NBER
    Dec 1, 2024 · State-level bans on affirmative action in higher education reduced educational attainment for Blacks and Hispanics and had varied, but mostly negative, labor ...
  92. [92]
    Reverse Discrimination in the Spotlight: Recent Developments and ...
    Aug 5, 2025 · Reverse discrimination cases claim that nonminority individuals were discriminated against on the basis of race, etc.; for example, that ...
  93. [93]
    [PDF] Does Affirmative Action Lead to “Mismatch”? A Review of the Evidence
    The aforementioned Bleemer study of Prop. 209, however, found that banning affirmative action in California reduced the number of minority STEM graduates; ...
  94. [94]
    Connerly still targets racial preferences - Los Angeles Times
    Jan 17, 2007 · In Michigan, Connerly helped lead the charge for Proposal 2, a ban on affirmative action approved in November by 58% of that state's voters. The ...
  95. [95]
    [PDF] The Impact of Proposition 209 on California's MWBEs
    2014 $) for MWBEs who sought to be sub-contractors on. San Jose construction projects. The City of Oakland's MWBE program reached levels of MWBE contracting.
  96. [96]
    A Detailed Look at the Downside of California's Ban on Affirmative ...
    Aug 22, 2020 · Because of Proposition 209, students of color in the study earned 5 percent less on average every year, an effect that persisted into their mid- ...Missing: amounts | Show results with:amounts
  97. [97]
    [PDF] Did the Sky Really Fall? Ten Years After California's Proposition 209
    May 1, 2005 · By adopting Proposition 209, California voters amended the. California State Constitution, the organic law that determines the state's governing ...
  98. [98]
    Proposition 209 and the Hidden Diversity Ecosystem
    Oct 22, 2024 · The UC Regents passed SP-1 in 1995, implementing a UC ban ... resolution to end affirmative action and race-based admissions at UC schools.
  99. [99]
    California bans legacy admissions at colleges - CalMatters
    Sep 30, 2024 · While a handful of private colleges allow legacy admissions, backers say banning the practice will help more students feel welcome.
  100. [100]
    California Passed an Anti-Affirmative Action Law, and Colleges ...
    Sep 1, 2018 · California shows the power, and the limitations, of the crusade for a color-blind America led by Ward Connerly, architect of the 1996 ...<|separator|>