Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Wea

The Wea (Waayaahtanwa), a subtribe of the Nation, were a Miami-Illinois-speaking people who established villages along the in present-day and during the . Originally inhabiting areas near the western shore of in the late , they migrated southward over the subsequent decades, forming permanent settlements in the Wabash Valley where they pursued agriculture, hunting, and participation in the fur trade with French traders. Closely allied with the and Piankashaw bands, the Wea maintained cultural and linguistic ties within the broader Algonquian framework, though they developed distinct village sites such as those near Terre Haute by the late 1700s. Through a series of treaties, including the 1809 agreement ceding lands in the and later pacts in 1818 and 1832, the Wea relinquished much of their territory to the , leading to forced removals westward and eventual incorporation into the Peoria Tribe of Indians of .

Etymology and Identity

Name Origin

The name "Wea" is an anglicized shortening of the Miami-Illinois autonym waayaahtanwa, denoting "whirlpool people" or individuals associated with eddying waters. This term derives from the broader place-name waayaahtanonki, which refers to locales featuring s or turbulent river currents, such as bends in the where the Wea historically resided and fished. Alternative early recordings include Wawaagtenang, interpreted by 19th-century ethnologist as "place of the round, or curved, channel," reflecting hydrological features that produce eddies. Linguistic analysis confirms the root in Algonquian dialects spoken by the Wea, a subgroup closely affiliated with the , emphasizing environmental ties over abstract tribal identity. French colonial records from the 17th and 18th centuries, such as those by explorers along the Wabash and rivers, first adapted the term as "Oua" or "Ouia," evolving into "Wea" in English usage by the mid-18th century. These variations underscore the name's origin in specific geographic phenomena rather than a self-chosen ethnic descriptor independent of landscape.

Tribal Affiliation and Distinctions

![Portrait of Wea brave Go-to-ków-páh-ah by George Catlin][float-right] The Wea (Waayaathtanwa) constituted a distinct Algonquian-speaking tribe within the broader Miami-Illinois linguistic and cultural sphere, maintaining close affiliation with the Miami proper and Piankashaw as part of the Miami Confederacy. This alliance, which included autonomous subtribes like the Ouiatanon Wea, enabled coordinated defense and diplomacy but preserved separate political identities, with the Wea occupying the westernmost territories along the Wabash River in present-day Indiana and Illinois. By the late 17th century, European accounts, such as Jesuit Relations from 1673, identified the Wea as a recognizable group distinct from neighboring tribes like the Kickapoo and Potawatomi, though intermarriage and shared dialects fostered fluidity. Key distinctions included the Wea's primary villages, such as Ouiatenon established around 1717 near modern , which served as a hub for French trade and differed from heartlands farther east or Piankashaw settlements near . The tribe's seasonal practices, like winter hunting grounds located 30-35 miles from summer villages, underscored adaptive territorial strategies unique within the confederacy. U.S. treaties, including the 1795 and the 1818 Treaty of St. Mary's, treated the Wea as a sovereign entity capable of independent land cessions, reflecting their recognized autonomy despite confederate ties; for instance, the 1805 Treaty at required mutual consent among , Wea, and Piankashaw for territorial agreements. Following relocations in the 1820s to and alongside the Piankashaw, the Wea merged into a formal with the Peoria and in 1854, driven by U.S. removal policies and diminishing populations—estimated at around 1,200 in 1765 but reduced by disease and conflict. This consolidation formed the precursor to the Peoria Tribe of Indians of , reinstated in 1978, yet historical ethnographies emphasize the Wea's enduring self-identification as a distinct band within the Illinois-Miami continuum, separate from eastern Algonquian groups.

Language

Linguistic Features

The Wea dialect belonged to the Miami-Illinois continuum, a Central Algonquian tongue closely related to Sauk-Fox-Kickapoo and , characterized by polysynthetic structure where verbs incorporate extensive morphological information including subject, object, tense, mood, and . Miami-Illinois exhibits a robust animate-inanimate distinguishing nouns and verbs by the perceived agency of referents, with animate forms typically marked by distinct endings such as *-a for singular animate nouns versus *-i for inanimate. Phonologically, Miami-Illinois features nine vowels—four short (/a, e, i, o/) and five long counterparts—with length contrastive and phonemic, as in apeehsia ('fawn') versus lengthened variants altering meaning; (a breathy onset before stops like /ph, kh/) is a suprasegmental trait aiding , while consonants include stops (/p, t, k/), (/s, š/), nasals (/m, n/), and (/w, y/). The Wea dialect specifically innovated by frequently substituting the sibilant /s/ with an interdental fricative [θ] or [ð], as reflected in historical records distinguishing it from proper, though overall dialectal variances remained minor, primarily lexical rather than systemic. Morphologically, verbs dominate as the sentence core, agglutinating prefixes for proximate-obviative person hierarchies (favoring or primary actor) and suffixes for , , and directionality; for instance, a single form might encode 'I see him (obviative) running toward me' without independent pronouns or nouns. Nouns inflect for (e.g., neemil 'my heart' from miil) and obviation to track focus in polyadic clauses. Syntax permits flexible , typically verb-subject-object in main clauses but adjustable for emphasis, with dependent verbs and participles common in complex constructions. These traits align with broader Algonquian patterns but show Miami-Illinois innovations like consistent inanimate plural-obviative distinctions absent in relatives like .

Documentation and Extinction

The Wea dialect of the Miami-Illinois language was first systematically documented in the early through efforts among the Wea people in . The Wea Primer, published in 1837 by the Mission Press at the Friends' establishment near , , represents one of the earliest printed resources, containing basic vocabulary, phonetic representations, and religious texts adapted for Wea speakers. This primer, compiled by Quaker including and , drew on oral data from Wea informants and aimed to facilitate and Christian instruction, preserving elements of the dialect's and amid rapid cultural disruption. Subsequent documentation remained sparse, relying on incidental recordings by ethnographers, traders, and linguists interacting with remnant Wea communities after their forced relocation westward under U.S. treaties, such as the 1826 Treaty of Wabash Lands. Compilations like John White's The Wea Interpreter (late 20th century) aggregated surviving lexical items from the 1837 primer and other historical sources, highlighting the dialect's with other Miami-Illinois variants but noting distinctions, such as in nasal vowels. Academic analyses, including historical studies, have reconstructed Wea consonants and syntax from these fragments, confirming close ties to the broader Algonquian family's central branch, though full grammatical descriptions were never completed due to limited fieldwork opportunities. The Wea became extinct by the mid-20th century, with no remaining fluent speakers or associated ethnic linguistic identity. Factors including U.S. policies, boarding schools enforcing English-only education, and the Wea people's merger into broader or mixed communities in , , and accelerated the shift, leaving only English-dominant descendants. Revitalization initiatives by groups like the Wea Indian Tribe of , starting around 1999, have incorporated Wea-derived materials into broader Miami-Illinois restoration efforts, but these rely on reconstructed forms rather than native transmission, underscoring the dialect's irreversible loss.

Culture and Society

Subsistence and Economy

The Wea people, a band closely affiliated with the in the , maintained a mixed typical of Algonquian-speaking groups in the Valley and western regions, emphasizing village-based agriculture supplemented by , fishing, and gathering. Women primarily managed farming, employing slash-and-burn techniques to clear fields and cultivate staple crops including (corn), beans, , pumpkins, and , which formed the dietary foundation during summer months in semi-permanent villages. Fields were typically relocated every 10 to 20 years to maintain , with villages shifting seasonally between summer agricultural sites and winter hunting camps. Men focused on hunting large game such as deer, , , , and smaller mammals, using , and occasionally fire drives or ambushes, particularly during fall and winter expeditions that provided meat, hides, and bones for tools until crops ripened. in rivers like the Wabash supplemented protein sources, with weirs, nets, and hooks targeting species such as and , while gathering wild plants, nuts, and berries contributed seasonal variety. This division of labor ensured self-sufficiency, with surplus production enabling intra-tribal exchange and limited pre-colonial trade networks for items like beads or tools. European contact, beginning with traders in the early at posts like Fort Ouiatenon near Wea villages, shifted aspects of the economy toward fur trapping and pelt exports, particularly , in exchange for metal tools, firearms, cloth, and alcohol. By the mid-1700s, Wea participation in the intensified alliances with the against and interests, though overhunting depleted local populations, straining traditional hunting practices and increasing reliance on trade goods. Post-1763 dominance and later expansion further disrupted subsistence patterns through land loss and competition, transitioning many Wea toward wage labor and annuity-based economies by the early .

Social Organization and Warfare

The Wea, as a division of the Miami-speaking peoples, organized society around exogamous clans comprising large extended kinship groups that traced descent from common ancestors, with membership determined patrilineally through the father's line. Clan names included totems such as bear, deer, elk, crane, snake, and acorn, and exogamy required marriage outside one's clan to maintain alliances and genetic diversity. Villages featured distinct men's and women's councils, each electing a civil chief to handle internal affairs, while women exercised substantial authority over domestic production, agriculture, and community decisions. Men typically served as hunters, trappers, traders, and , whereas women managed farming of crops like corn, beans, and squash, as well as household and village maintenance, reflecting a gendered division of labor that supported semi-sedentary village life. was decentralized, with clan heads advising civil chiefs and war leaders emerging based on demonstrated prowess rather than alone, enabling flexible responses to external threats. This structure fostered kinship-based factions that influenced social relations and decision-making, prioritizing consensus among extended families over centralized authority. Warfare among the Wea emphasized small raiding parties led by multiple war chiefs selected for bravery, aimed at revenge, capturing prisoners for adoption or ritual, and securing territory against rivals like the during the of the late 17th century. alliances from the 1680s provided firearms and support, enabling Wea warriors to counter Iroquois incursions and reclaim lands after 1690, though villages like Ouiatenon faced destruction by American militia in 1791 under General Charles Scott. During the , the Wea sided with the British, and later some joined at Prophetstown in 1808, contributing to resistances like in 1791, where Native forces inflicted over 600 American casualties using guerrilla tactics and confederate coordination rather than formal ranks. These engagements underscored a pragmatic approach to warfare, blending traditional ambushes with European-supplied weapons to defend hunting grounds amid colonial expansion.

Spiritual Beliefs and Practices

The Wea adhered to traditional Algonquian spiritual beliefs emphasizing , wherein natural elements possessed inherent spiritual essence, a practice shared with closely related groups from whom the Wea diverged as a distinct band but retained cultural continuity in religious matters. Central to this system were manitous, pervasive spirits manifesting in animals, plants, humans, or inanimate objects like nuts, which individuals could petition for personal power through rituals of respect, including offerings, feasts, and sacrifices. The ultimate origin of manitou power derived from the kitchi manitou, an impersonal force often equated with rather than personified as a . To acquire a guardian manitou, Wea men typically undertook visionary quests involving fasting and isolation, interpreting dreams as encounters granting protective efficacy for endeavors like or warfare; success depended on ongoing reciprocity with the spirit via ceremonies. Shamans, as specialized intermediaries closer to s, wielded this power for communal benefit, diagnosing illnesses as spiritual intrusions extractable through rituals—such as removing symbolic objects like bones or shells from patients—and combining herbal treatments with supernatural feats, including participation in the healing society. These practitioners could also invoke harm against enemies, underscoring the dual potential of manitou-derived abilities. Key practices included the Calumet Dance, a pre-expedition featuring a decorated sacred passed in a circle with offerings to invoke favor, accompanied by rhythmic dancing and invocations. Feasts honored spirits through obligatory consumption of all prepared food, often tied to war preparations, while the "Striking the Pole" ceremony allowed warriors to recount and ritually affirm acts of bravery by striking a post with weapons. Post-mortem beliefs entailed souls navigating a treacherous road lined with obstacles—such as logs or cliffs—to reach a verdant realm of eternal abundance, reflecting a causal link between earthly conduct and spiritual outcomes. These elements prioritized empirical appeasement of observable natural forces over abstract , aligning with broader Algonquian causal in attributing success or misfortune to spirit negotiations.

Historical Development

Pre-Colonial Origins

The Wea (Miami-Illinois: Waayaahtanwa), a band within the broader Miami-Illinois linguistic and cultural group, trace their pre-colonial roots to Algonquian-speaking populations inhabiting the southern , encompassing modern , southern , northwestern , and adjacent areas prior to the . These ancestors participated in the Late Woodland (ca. 500–1200 CE) and early Mississippian (ca. 1200–1600 CE) cultural traditions, characterized by semi-sedentary villages, incipient supplemented by and gathering, and earthen enclosures or low palisades for defense, as evidenced by regional archaeological assemblages. However, precise linkage of these sites—such as those from the Oliver or Huber phases in the Kankakee and Wabash valleys—to specific later subtribes like the Wea remains tentative, owing to the absence of written records, gradual linguistic divergence, and material cultural continuity across multiple Algonquian groups rather than unique markers. Population dynamics for proto-Miami-Illinois communities are estimated at –12,000 individuals pre-contact, organized into six primary villages and dispersed hamlets, supporting subsistence through diversified economies adapted to and upland ecotones. Intergroup alliances and conflicts, including pressures from Siouan and Iroquoian neighbors, likely influenced band coalescence and territorial shifts within this homeland (Myaamionki), fostering the confederacy's loose structure of related clans by the early historic era. The Wea band's , possibly denoting "those of the " or "round channel place," reflects early associations with riverine locales conducive to fishing and trade, integral to their adaptive strategies. Disruptions from the proto-historic (ca. 1630s–1680s), involving expansion westward, prompted temporary northward displacements of some groups—including early Wea—to the and valleys by the 1670s, as noted in Jesuit observations, though core settlements persisted southward. This mobility underscores causal factors like resource competition and warfare in shaping pre-colonial distributions, with return migrations reestablishing Wabash Valley dominance post-1700, informed by oral traditions and ethnohistoric reconstructions rather than direct pre-1600 artifacts.

Colonial Era Alliances and Conflicts

The Wea, a subtribe of the Miami-Illinois confederation, established early alliances with the in the late as European expanded into the and Ohio Valley regions. French explorers like René-Robert Cavelier, Sieur de La Salle, encountered Wea groups around 1679 near the upper , initially noting temporary pacts with intermediaries but soon fostering direct ties to counter British influence and Iroquois expansion. By 1716, Vaudreuil pledged support, trade privileges, and infrastructure—including a and —to secure Wea loyalty, leading to the construction of Fort Ouiatenon on the around 1717 as a key outpost for regulating trade and defending against rivals. This alliance integrated the Wea into broader Franco-Indigenous networks, providing access to firearms and goods in exchange for furs and warriors against common foes. These partnerships fueled Wea involvement in intertribal conflicts aligned with French interests, notably the (1712–1733), where -Wea forces joined French-led coalitions against the (Fox) who disrupted trade routes between the Mississippi and St. Lawrence rivers. French commanders mobilized hundreds of and warriors, including Wea contingents, for expeditions such as the 1730 siege that decimated Fox strongholds near , resulting in heavy Meskwaki losses and French consolidation of the Country. During the (1754–1763), the Wea sided with France alongside , , and other allies, participating in raids to contest British advances into the Ohio Valley, though specific Wea engagements were subsumed under broader actions. French defeat in 1763 prompted a brief resurgence of resistance in , with Wea warriors joining Ottawa-led assaults on British forts like Ouiatenon and , capturing nine posts and killing or capturing over 400 British personnel before peace overtures in 1766. As control solidified post-1763, Wea alliances pragmatically shifted toward , particularly during the (1775–1783), where they initially remained neutral but later aligned with forces and kin against encroaching American settlers. In 1778, Wea delegates, alongside and , conferred with agents in to coordinate resistance, contributing scouts and fighters to disrupt colonial frontiers in and . This support stemmed from promises of territorial protection and trade continuity, though it yielded limited gains as American victories eroded positions; a Wea leader later lamented the alliance's failure, noting it accelerated their own territorial losses. These entanglements exacerbated conflicts with American militias and rival tribes like the , who sometimes backed colonists, setting precedents for post-war displacements.

American Expansion and Displacement

Following the War of 1812, United States authorities intensified efforts to acquire Native American lands in the Old Northwest Territory through negotiated treaties, driven by growing settler populations and federal policies favoring expansion. The Wea, residing primarily in western Indiana along the Wabash River, faced mounting pressure as American settlement encroached on their territories. On October 2, 1818, the Treaty of St. Mary's was signed between the Wea and the at St. Mary's, , resulting in the cession of all Wea-claimed lands within the states of , , and , excluding specific reserves such as a six-mile-square tract at the mouth of the Wildcat Creek and other smaller parcels. In exchange, the Wea received annual annuities of $1,000 in goods, agricultural implements, and provisions for schools, alongside reserved hunting rights on ceded lands until settlement rendered them impractical. This treaty opened approximately 1.5 million acres to American settlement, facilitating rapid influx of farmers and speculators into central . Subsequent agreements further eroded Wea land holdings. The October 23, 1826, Treaty of the Wabash, primarily with the (of which the Wea were a closely related subtribe), ceded claims north and west of the in , indirectly impacting Wea reserves through shared territorial interests and increasing settler demands for consolidation. Encroachments on remaining reserves persisted, with American settlers in adjacent and petitioning for Wea relocation amid reports of intertribal conflicts and declining game resources. The of 1830 formalized federal policy to relocate eastern tribes west of the , aligning with pressures on the Wea. On October 29, 1832, the Treaty with the Piankashaw and Wea at Castor Hill, Missouri, saw the tribes cede their remaining eastern lands in exchange for 250 sections (approximately 160,000 acres) in what became Territory, marking the Wea's forced migration westward beginning in the mid-1830s. This relocation displaced several hundred Wea individuals, exacerbating from disease and conflict. In , the Wea experienced further land reductions due to non-Native settlement and federal allotment pressures. By , with a significantly diminished population, the Wea confederated with the Piankashaw, , and Peoria tribes to form the Confederated Peoria, consolidating resources amid ongoing encroachments. The February 23, 1867, treaty compelled their final removal to in present-day , where they integrated into the Peoria Tribe of Indians of , ending independent Wea territorial claims east of the .

Territory and Settlements

Primary Villages

The Wea established their primary villages along the in present-day western during the early , leveraging the waterway for trade, agriculture, and defense. These settlements formed the core of Wea territory, which spanned from near northward to the Vermilion River, supporting a population engaged in cultivation, hunting, and alliances with traders. Among these, Ouiatenon stood as the largest and most strategically vital, located on the west bank of the Wabash near modern in Tippecanoe County. Known in the Miami-Illinois language as waayaahtanonki ("whirlpool place"), the village benefited from fertile floodplains and proximity to portage routes, fostering a diverse community that included Wea, , and occasional Kickapoo residents. French authorities erected Fort Ouiatenon directly across the river from the Ouiatenon village circa , establishing a that integrated the settlement into broader colonial networks for furs, foodstuffs, and firearms. The village itself comprised longhouses, fields, and council grounds, sustaining several hundred inhabitants at its peak and serving as a hub for intertribal diplomacy and resistance against incursions. By the late , however, American military campaigns led to the village's razing in 1791 under orders from President , displacing many Wea southward. Archaeological evidence from the site, including pottery and trade goods, confirms its centrality to Wea . A second key Wea village occupied the Terre Haute area by the late 1700s, elevated on high ground overlooking the Wabash and recognized for its defensive advantages. This settlement, documented as a primary Wea occupancy site, hosted Chief Jacco Godfroy and others who negotiated land cessions to the in the of Fort Wayne, which encompassed approximately 3 million acres including the village environs. By 1806, it had emerged as the Wea band's principal residence amid pressures from upstream displacements. The site's strategic position facilitated control over river traffic until American settlement platted the town of Terre Haute in 1816, leading to Wea relocation. The Wea maintained at least five major contiguous villages along the upper Wabash, including Ouiatenon and Terre Haute, with others near Logansport (Kenapacomaqua) and additional clusters opposite outposts. These formed a semi-permanent network adapted to seasonal migrations, though exact populations varied due to warfare and disease, estimated at 1,000–2,000 total Wea across settlements by mid-century. Earlier migratory villages, such as one at noted by Father Marquette in 1673 and persisting until around 1701, and another on the St. Joseph River observed in , preceded the Wabash consolidation but were less enduring as primary centers.

Archaeological Sites

The principal archaeological sites linked to the Wea tribe are historic-period settlements along the in northwestern , dating primarily from the late 17th to early 19th centuries, where colonial interactions and Native habitation left discernible material traces. These sites, often identified through ethnohistoric accounts corroborated by excavations, reveal patterns of village , goods, and subsistence remains consistent with Algonquian groups like the Wea, including ceramic sherds, lithic tools, and European-imported items such as glass beads and metal fragments. Fort Ouiatenon, established by the in 1717 near a cluster of Wea villages in present-day Tippecanoe County, represents a focal point of Wea archaeology, with the surrounding Ouiatenon Preserve (approximately 310 acres) preserving remnants of the fort and adjacent Native habitations. Excavations since the , including recent field seasons in 2022 and 2025 led by the and , have uncovered fur-trade-era artifacts such as Native-built structures, faunal remains indicating maize-based supplemented by hunting, and trade items like nails and kaolin pipe fragments, reflecting Wea engagement with commerce. Geophysical surveys from 2009 to 2017 further mapped subsurface features, including post molds suggestive of longhouses and palisades in the Wea village areas. The site's multilayered deposits distinguish Wea-specific layers from overlapping and occupations, with Wea ceramics showing continuity from protohistoric Miami-Illinois traditions. Additional Wea-associated sites include 12-T-6, an 18th-century village on the central Wabash River near Lafayette, where artifact assemblages—such as shell-tempered pottery and faunal evidence of deer and fish processing—align with documented Wea subsistence and exchange behaviors. Kethtippecanunk (12-T-59), another Tippecanoe County locale occupied by Wea and Kickapoo from the late 18th century, yielded 2006 excavations of domestic features like hearths and storage pits containing mixed Native and Euro-American goods, including brass kettles and gunflints, indicating sustained village life until displacement pressures in the early 1800s. Proto-historic Wea villages under the Grandview Focus, near Lafayette, exhibit transitional Mississippian-Algonquian traits, such as platform mounds repurposed for habitation and cord-marked ceramics, bridging pre-contact and colonial eras. Further afield, the Ehler Site (12-Hu-1022) in Huntington County documents early 19th-century habitation with Wea-influenced traits, including trade networks evidenced by over 1,000 beads and iron tools recovered from basins and refuse pits, underscoring the tribe's to economies before removal treaties. These sites collectively demonstrate Wea amid encroachment, though preservation challenges from riverine erosion and modern limit comprehensive recovery, with ongoing work emphasizing non-invasive methods to protect intact deposits.

Relations with Outsiders

Intertribal Dynamics

The Wea maintained their strongest intertribal ties with the confederacy, encompassing the Piankashaw and Eel River bands, sharing Algonquian linguistic roots and coordinating on territorial defense and diplomacy. This affiliation positioned the Wea as a key component of power in the Wabash Valley, though they occasionally asserted autonomy in local affairs at villages like Ouiatenon. Facing expansion in the late 17th century, the Wea and formed defensive alliances with confederacy, leveraging combined forces to repel incursions and halt eastward advances under leaders like Aquenackque. A brief opportunistic alignment occurred in 1679, when Wea, , and Mascouten bands allied with the against mutual rivals. However, by the early 18th century, realignments prompted the Wea and to join and in aggressive campaigns that decimated Illinois populations, effectively eradicating their regional presence and opening lands for resettlement. Subsequent betrayals marked these partnerships as pragmatic rather than enduring; the victorious and then targeted Miami groups, including Wea territories, defeating them decisively and seizing control of northern Indiana up to the . Cultural and kinship links with Illinois remnants persisted, evidenced by a 1854 confederacy in uniting Wea with Piankashaw, Peoria, and for mutual support amid displacement. In broader coalitions, Wea warriors contributed to multi-tribal efforts, such as the 1791 assembly under , where approximately 3,000 fighters from 12 tribes, including allies, achieved victory at . Some Wea later joined -led resistance movements under , reflecting ongoing intertribal diplomacy aimed at countering shared external threats through temporary unity. These dynamics underscored a pattern of fluid alliances driven by territorial competition, revenge cycles, and strategic necessities, with Wea leveraging centrality to navigate rivalries among Algonquian neighbors.

European Trade and Alliances

The Wea engaged primarily in the fur trade with traders, exchanging pelts such as for European goods including blankets, knives, kettles, guns, and jewelry. This commerce intensified after the establishment of Fort Ouiatenon in 1717 on the near present-day , a palisaded post designed to facilitate trade with the Wea and neighboring while securing influence against encroachment. The fort, named for the Wea (), served as a major hub where Wea hunters supplied furs trapped in the region's waterways, bolstering economic interests in the without immediate demands for land cession, which fostered relatively amicable relations compared to later and American interactions. French efforts to monopolize Wea trade included diplomatic overtures, such as missionary François Maunoir's 1716 promises of favored status, a , , and services, which preceded the fort's construction. However, traders began infiltrating Wea networks as early as the by engaging allied bands, prompting French countermeasures to redirect commerce southward. Following Britain's victory in the , control of Fort Ouiatenon transferred to forces in 1761, shifting trade dynamics but sparking Wea resistance. In 1763, the Wea joined leader Pontiac's confederation against expansion, participating alongside , , and others in attacks on forts like Ouiatenon to expel traders perceived as more exploitative and less inclined to intermarry or integrate. By the late 1760s, peace negotiations reconciled the Wea with the , enabling renewed under Crown policies that restricted settler incursions but maintained fur exchanges. During the (1775–1783), the Wea allied with the , providing warriors and leveraging Ouiatenon as a diplomatic base to counter American advances, though the fort was abandoned by 1778 amid ongoing hostilities. These alliances reflected pragmatic Wea strategies to preserve and access goods amid rival powers, with French-era ties emphasizing mutual economic benefit and relations marked by initial conflict followed by opportunistic partnership.

U.S. Treaties and Negotiations

The Wea tribe, a Miami-Illinois-speaking group primarily residing along the , negotiated several treaties with the starting in the early 1800s, which systematically reduced their land holdings in the and adjacent areas. These agreements followed U.S. efforts to secure territory after the (1795) and amid settler expansion, with negotiations often conducted by territorial governors or commissioners representing federal interests. The treaties typically involved cessions of land in exchange for annuities, goods, and limited reserves, though enforcement and subsequent encroachments frequently undermined the latter. On October 26, 1809, at in the , Wea representatives including chiefs Jacco, Shawanee, and Pequia signed a with Governor , acceding to land cessions outlined in the contemporaneous Treaty of Fort Wayne involving the , , , and Eel River tribes. In return, the provided an immediate payment of $1,500, an additional permanent annual of $300, and a further $100 contingent on Kickapoo consent to related terms. A more comprehensive cession occurred under the Treaty of St. Mary's on October 2, 1818, negotiated at St. Mary's, , by U.S. commissioners Jonathan Jennings, , and Benjamin Parke with Wea leaders such as Pequiah, Shingonsa, and Shepaqua. The Wea relinquished all claimed lands within the boundaries of , , and , excluding a reserved tract of 7 by 7 miles along the at the mouth of Raccoon Creek for their continued use. The committed to an annual annuity of $3,000 in silver coin ($1,150 continuing from prior agreements plus $1,850 new), along with individual land grants of one section each to mixed-descent individuals Christmas Dageny and Mary Shields, subject to presidential approval for alienation. The treaty also included Wea ratification of a prior cession from 1809. Further negotiations at on August 11, 1820, addressed remaining Wea holdings, with chiefs ceding a tract along the from Raccoon Creek northward to Flat Foot Creek, approximately 102,000 acres, while retaining smaller individual and band reserves. Compensation included $20,460 paid over installments, provisions, and services, reflecting ongoing U.S. pressure to clear titles for settlement. By the 1830s, amid the of 1830, the Wea were increasingly consolidated with the Piankashaw and for westward relocation; the Treaty with the Piankashaw and Wea at the Castor Hill Tract in ceded eastern lands for a reservation west of the , with annuities of $3,200 annually and relocation support. Subsequent 1846 and 1854 treaties finalized sales of western lands and per capita payments, dispersing survivors among tribes in and . These later pacts, ratified amid federal removal policies, marked the effective end of Wea territorial autonomy in the original homeland.

Notable Figures

Chiefs and Warriors

The Wea recognized both civil and war chiefs, with leadership often hereditary but earned through demonstrated prowess in council and combat. Jacco Godfroy (also known as Tackeketah or Jocco), a principal chief of the Wea in the early , played a key role in negotiating land cessions amid American expansion. In 1809, he and other Wea leaders signed a at , relinquishing lands along the , including areas near present-day Terre Haute, to the in exchange for annuities and reserved hunting grounds. Godfroy, whose name reflected French intermarriage common among Wea elites, continued as a signatory in the 1818 Treaty of St. Mary's, Ohio, ceding additional territories in and while securing protections for Wea villages. War chiefs among the Wea led raids and alliances during conflicts with invaders in the 17th century and later British-aligned efforts in (1763–1766), where Wea, , and warriors joined forces against British forts. Specific war chiefs included Mau-wee, documented attending a 1763 council in with British officials alongside four other Wea war leaders and three village chiefs, signaling unified resistance to colonial encroachment. These leaders coordinated ambushes and supply disruptions, contributing to temporary British setbacks before Pontiac's coalition fractured. Wea warriors, numbering in the hundreds during peak strength, specialized in guerrilla tactics suited to the wooded Wabash Valley, employing bows, war clubs, and later muskets acquired via trade. They participated in the (1785–1795), allying with kin under leaders like against U.S. forces, though Wea-specific battle honors are less documented than Miami counterparts. In the , Wea fighters supported , engaging in skirmishes such as the defense of Prophetstown in 1811, where warriors repelled William Henry Harrison's militia until overwhelmed by superior artillery. Post-war displacements reduced Wea military capacity, with surviving bands relocating to and by the 1830s–1840s under chiefs like Christmas Dagenette, who led migrations while preserving warrior traditions amid federal removal policies.

Other Influential Members

In Wea society, women held positions of distinct from male-dominated chiefly and roles, often serving as female chiefs responsible for overseeing major communal feasts and coordinating supplies for war expeditions. These responsibilities underscored their logistical and ceremonial authority within the tribe's matrilineal elements, contributing to social cohesion amid intertribal alliances and trade pressures in the 18th and early 19th centuries. Historical records, primarily from early observers and tribal oral traditions preserved in anthropological accounts, indicate that such women wielded indirect but essential power in decision-making, though specific names remain sparsely documented compared to prominent male leaders. No verified accounts identify individual Wea medicine people or traders as standalone influential figures beyond their integration into broader confederacy networks.

Modern Descendants

Federal Recognition and Consolidation

The Wea tribe underwent significant political consolidation in the mid-19th century through a treaty signed on May 30, , with the , which united them with the , Peoria, and tribes to form the Confederated Peoria Tribe. This agreement facilitated the cession of their lands in exchange for a reservation in (present-day ), reflecting U.S. policy to consolidate smaller remnants amid ongoing removal pressures. The consolidated group numbered approximately 437 individuals by the late 1850s, with the Wea comprising a portion of this population relocated to the northeastern corner of . Federal recognition of the Confederated Peoria Tribe, encompassing Wea descendants, persisted through the late 19th and early 20th centuries, supported by subsequent agreements such as the 1860 pact that adjusted boundaries and allotments. However, under the broader U.S. termination policy, the Peoria tribal government lost federal acknowledgment in via congressional action that dissolved tribal relations and distributed assets to individual members. This termination affected the unified entity, scattering Wea descendants and halting collective tribal governance until efforts. In response to advocacy by tribal leaders and members, reinstated federal recognition for the Peoria Tribe of Indians of Oklahoma on , 1978, through 95-281 (92 Stat. 246), reestablishing sovereignty and eligibility for federal services. The reinstated tribe, headquartered in , explicitly includes descendants of the Wea alongside the Kaskaskia, , and , operating under a constitution and bylaws approved by the Department of the Interior. As of 2023, the tribe maintains approximately 2,000 enrolled members, managing trust lands and economic enterprises while preserving Illinois Confederation heritage, including Wea-specific traditions where documented in historical records. Separate claims to Wea identity persist outside this federal framework, notably through the Wea Indian of Indiana, a nonprofit group of descendants recognized at the state level but lacking federal status despite filing a with the on January 15, 2007. This group's petition remains unprocessed under the Federal Acknowledgment Process, highlighting ongoing disputes over historical affiliations—such as distinctions from the , which does not federally encompass Wea descendants—and the challenges of verifying descent from 19th-century signatories amid fragmented records. No independent federal has been granted to Wea-specific entities, with consolidated under the Peoria Tribe as the primary federally acknowledged avenue for descendants.

State-Level Claims and Disputes

Groups claiming descent from the historical Wea have sought state-level acknowledgment in , the tribe's primary aboriginal territory, but Indiana maintains no formal state-recognized Native American tribes. The Wea Indian Tribe of , a based in , asserts state recognition derived from a letter by a former commissioner of the Indiana Native American Indian Affairs Commission, yet official state policy and multiple academic sources confirm the absence of any such designations. These unrecognized Indiana groups frequently clash with federally recognized tribes over authority to represent Wea heritage in state-sponsored cultural events, such as historical festivals commemorating Wea villages like Ouiatenon. For example, the Ouiatenon festival has faced criticism for excluding or marginalizing input from local Wea claimant organizations in favor of portrayals emphasizing broader Miami-Illinois , highlighting tensions between self-identified descendants and tribes with federal standing. Wea descendants are officially incorporated into the Peoria Tribe of Indians of Oklahoma, a federally recognized entity formed from Wea, , and Peoria bands under 19th-century consolidations, which holds aboriginal claims extending into but pursues them federally rather than at the state level. Related disputes mirror broader Miami factionalism, as the contests assertions by the unrecognized —which claims continuity with pre-removal Miami bands including the Wea—over treaty-derived rights, cultural repatriation under the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act (NAGPRA), and historical narrative control. These conflicts underscore the lack of state mechanisms for resolving intratribal or descendant-group legitimacy, often deferring to federal authority.

Cultural Preservation Efforts

The , as the federally recognized successor to the Wea and other Miami divisions, has implemented cultural revitalization programs that encompass Wea , including instruction in Miami-Illinois dialects spoken by the Wea and on traditional practices such as storytelling and craftsmanship. These initiatives, accelerated since the late , address the loss of fluent speakers by the mid-1900s through structured classes and community events aimed at transmitting oral histories and . The Myaamia Center, a collaborative effort between the and of , focuses on ethnohistorical research, language documentation, and practical revival of shared Wea-Miami traditions, including ribbonwork techniques and basketry derived from 18th- and 19th-century practices. Established to counter assimilation-era disruptions, the center produces resources like digital archives and immersion curricula, with over 20 years of documented progress in rebuilding cultural continuity for descendants. These efforts emphasize verifiable historical records over anecdotal revival, prioritizing primary sources such as 19th-century ethnographies to authenticate practices. In , state-recognized groups claiming Wea descent, including the , conduct local events to document and reenact ancestral spirituality and historical narratives, though these face challenges from limited federal resources and ongoing recognition disputes with the tribe. Preservation also involves partnerships with institutions like the for site protection, such as Wabash Valley markers tied to Wea villages, to safeguard archaeological evidence against development. Tribal historical officers coordinate these to ensure compliance with federal laws like the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act, repatriating artifacts to descendant communities since the 1990s.

References

  1. [1]
    History - Peoria Tribe Of Indians of Oklahoma
    The Wea Tribe was a subtribe of the Miami Nation. In the late seventeenth century they lived near the western shore of Lake Michigan. During the next 150 years, ...
  2. [2]
    IHB: Wea Tribe at Terre Haute - Indiana State Government
    At least one Wea village was present in area by late 1700s. Wea Chief Jacco Godfroy and others ceded these lands to US in 1809. Town of Terre Haute platted by ...
  3. [3]
    Treaty with the Piankashaw and Wea, 1832
    The Piankashaw and Wea ceded land to the US, receiving land in return, plus payments, farming assistance, and a shared blacksmith shop.Missing: history | Show results with:history
  4. [4]
    Wea Tribe - Access Genealogy
    A subtribe of the Miami. They are first mentioned in the Jesuit Relation for 1673 as living in east Wisconsin.<|separator|>
  5. [5]
    Wea Tribe - Legends of America
    The Wea people were a sub-tribe of the Miami Indians. The name Wea is a shortened version of the many recorded names, such as Wawaagtenang, meaning “place ...
  6. [6]
    Wea | The Encyclopedia of Oklahoma History and Culture
    Oct 23, 2024 · The Wea, or Waayaathtanwa, are a North American Indigenous group that are incorporated as part of the broader Peoria Tribe of Indians of Oklahoma.
  7. [7]
  8. [8]
    Language - Aacimotaatiiyankwi
    Miami-Illinois is a central Algonquian language and is most closely related to Sauk-Meskwaki (Fox)-Kickapoo, Ojibwe-Potawatomi-Ottawa and Shawnee. Miami- ...
  9. [9]
    Illinois-Miami Language (Myaamia, Maumee, Illini, Illiniwek, Peoria)
    Language: Miami and Illinois are dialects of the same Algonquian language, spoken in Indiana and later Oklahoma. Though no native speakers of the language ...
  10. [10]
    The Miami-Illinois Language (review) - Project MUSE
    Costa's description of Miami-Illinois (M-I) synchronic and historical phonology and inflectional morphology is an impressive testament to what can be ...
  11. [11]
    Miami-Illinois language Facts for Kids
    Oct 17, 2025 · In the Wea dialect, the /s/ sound was sometimes replaced with a "th" sound, like in "this." Vowels. Miami-Illinois has four short vowel ...
  12. [12]
    [PDF] A Miami Language Digital Tool for Language Reclamation
    Vowel length and preaspiration are crucial features in the phonology of Miami- Language Documentation & Conservation Vol. 10, 2016 Page 5 A Miami Language ...
  13. [13]
    Dialects of Miami-Illinois: What's the Difference Between the ...
    May 6, 2025 · The Miami, or Myaamia, language (also known as Myaamiaataweenki) is a member of the Algonquian language family. The languages of the ...
  14. [14]
    Langauge - The Wea Language - The Wea Indian Tribe Of Indiana
    That is from different dialects, Miami, Peoria, Piankashaw, Kaskaskia and Wea. ... sheds some information on our language and the differences in the languages ...
  15. [15]
    Miami-Illinois Word Order: Basic Constituent Order - jstor
    Miami-Illinois is an Algonquian language originally spoken in the southern Great Lakes area, primarily in what is now Illinois, northern. Indiana and western ...
  16. [16]
    The Historical Phonology of Miami-Illinois Consonants - jstor
    22 Miami-Illinois consistently distinguishes the inanimate plural and the obviative singular markers on nouns, which are identical in all other Algonquian ...
  17. [17]
    [PDF] The Mission Press Wea Primer of 1837
    In this paper I will discuss various linguistic and historic aspects of an important document in the Wea dialect of the Miami language, the Wea.
  18. [18]
    Wewaw Language (WEA) - Ethnologue
    Extinct - The language is no longer used and no one retains a sense of ethnic identity associated with the language.
  19. [19]
    Subsistence - Miami Tribe - Weebly
    Women were the only farmers of the tribe. Using slash-and-burn agriculture techniques, they cultivated corn squash beans, pumpkins, melons, and tobacco. With ...Missing: economy | Show results with:economy
  20. [20]
    Miami Indians | Encyclopedia.com
    May 29, 2018 · Bison were hunted by ambush or fire drive. The meat from this hunt was used for subsistence until the village's crops matured. Following the ...
  21. [21]
    Looking at History: Indiana's Hoosier National Forest Region, 1600 ...
    The Miami Indians had a pattern of alternating between summer villages and winter hunting camps. ... While subsistence farming may have been the pattern ...
  22. [22]
    DNR: State Parks: Indigenous Peoples in Indiana
    Refugees from other nations also resided in the area, including the Lenape (Delaware). Indiana was home to several bands of Miami, including Wea and Piankashaw.
  23. [23]
    Miami (tribe) | Research Starters - EBSCO
    The Wea and the Piankashaw were separate entities from the Miami, and they were politically independent by 1818, the year they set up separate tribal councils. ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  24. [24]
    kiwiinsooneminaana 'Our Names' - Aacimotaatiiyankwi
    Jun 24, 2020 · Clans among the Myaamia were large extended kinship groups who shared descent from a common ancestor. Evidence in the historical record ...
  25. [25]
    [PDF] JUN -91992 - BIA.gov
    A system of kinship-based factions ~as an important element in social relations within the group and social distinctions from non-Ipdians were Significantly ...<|separator|>
  26. [26]
    Miami - Religion and Expressive Culture
    Miami religion centered around Individual and group attempts to gain power from spirits known as manitous. The Miami believed that manitous roamed the world and ...
  27. [27]
    FAQ: Pre-Contact Miami Indian Population? - Aacimotaatiiyankwi
    Jan 9, 2014 · First, it is extremely difficult to connect the archaeological record of villages from the late 1400s directly to Miami speaking communities.Missing: evidence | Show results with:evidence
  28. [28]
    History - The Wea Indian Tribe Of Indiana
    A BRIEF HISTORY OF THE WEAS 1600s - 1800s · One of the earliest record of the Wea Tribe was In 1672 were Jesuit Claude · By 1711 all the WEA from Chicago and ...
  29. [29]
    Fox Wars (ca. 1710-1740) | Wisconsin Historical Society
    The Meskwaki Indians, with the occasional support of Mascouten and Kickapoo allies, were the only tribe to systematically oppose French domination in Wisconsin ...
  30. [30]
    The 1712-1736 Fox Wars - Military History Online
    The 1712-1736 Fox Wars, like all Indian Wars – wars between the various Native-American tribes and the people of European decent, including the French, the ...
  31. [31]
    Native Americans:Historic:The Illinois:Society:Neighbors:The British
    The Kaskaskia and Peoria tribes had been allies of the French for many generations, and they resisted British takeover of the Illinois Country for two years ...
  32. [32]
  33. [33]
    Cessions of Land by Indigenous Peoples in the State of Indiana
    Nov 14, 2024 · Land cessions in Indiana were the formal act of Indigenous tribes giving up land to the U.S. government, often through unequal treaties, ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  34. [34]
    Treaty with the Wea, 1818 - Tribal Treaties Database
    The Weas sanction a cession of land by the Kickapoos in 1809. The said Wea tribe of Indians accede to, and sanction, the cession of land made by the Kickapoo ...
  35. [35]
    Treaty with the Miami, 1826 - Tribal Treaties Database
    The Miami Tribe of Indians cede to the United States all their claim to land in the State of Indiana, north and west of the Wabash and Miami rivers.
  36. [36]
    [PDF] The History of Tippecanoe County
    Of the. Wea's five major settlements Ouiatenon was the largest. The Ouiatenon site was favorably located for trade and habitation, being situated on a ...
  37. [37]
    Speeches of the Wabash and Illinois Indians, 1–4 February 1793
    Ouiatenon, from which the Wea Indians derived their name, was a principal village of the Wea earlier in the eigtheenth century, and it was located on the ...
  38. [38]
    The Ouiatenon Preserve - Tippecanoe County Historical Association
    It was constructed across the river from the principal Ouiatenon (Wea) ... Join Today! Feast of the Hunters' Moon. 1001 South Street, Lafayette, IN 47901.
  39. [39]
    [PDF] National Register of Historic Places Registration Form - NPGallery
    Native Americans forcefully occupied Fort Ouiatenon ... A tiny portion of the district (the southeast comer) corresponds to the limits of the original village ...
  40. [40]
    [PDF] Indiana Archaeology Journal - IN.gov
    Apr 23, 2024 · Unfortunately, archaeologists have spent less time studying its Precontact archaeological sites, leaving us with a fair number of unanswered ...
  41. [41]
    The History and Archaeology of Fort Ouiatenon
    A multidisciplinary exploration of the fort, from its founding in 1717, through its historical significance over the years, and up to its present-day use.
  42. [42]
    USI's Archaeology Field School makes dreams come true at Fort ...
    Aug 12, 2022 · The dig took place outside Fort Ouiatenon in West Lafayette, Indiana, with a goal of finding artifacts from the fair-trade period.
  43. [43]
    Fort Ouiatenon Archaeology 2025 Excavation Artifact Show and Tell
    View artifacts excavated during the 2025 University of Southern Indiana and Purdue Archaeology Field School at Fort Ouiatenon.
  44. [44]
    2009-2017 geophysical survey of the Fort Ouiatenon vicinity ...
    The Ouiatenon Preserve contains the archaeological remains of Fort Ouiatenon, which was erected by the French in 1717. ... fort site, as well as a number of the ...Missing: excavations | Show results with:excavations
  45. [45]
    The History and Archaeology of Fort Ouiatenon: 300 Years in the ...
    Jun 1, 2024 · In 1968, archaeological excavations under the leadership of the Glenn Black Laboratory at Indiana University seemed to validate the actual ...
  46. [46]
    Report of the 2006 Archaeological Investigations at ... - Academia.edu
    ... in two Block 1 were manufactured by the historic period areas: 1) the easternmost portion of the site, east of Wea and/or Kickapoo residents at the site. A ...
  47. [47]
    [PDF] Archaeological Data Recovery at the Mary Ann Cole Site - DTIC
    collections from the Upper (Late) Mississipplan/Proto-Historic Wea Villages. (Grandview Focus) on the Wabash River near Lafayette, Indiana (Crouch. n.d.) ...
  48. [48]
    [PDF] Fort Ouiatenon and Feast of the Hunters' Moon School Guide
    The French recognized these furs as being valuable. They began trading blankets, jewelry, knives, kettles, and guns for the Indians' furs. The French sailed ...
  49. [49]
    Fort Ouiatenon - Visit Indiana
    Fort Ouiatenon (wee-ah-teh-non), named for the Wea tribes in the area, was established by the French in 1717 as a fur trading post.
  50. [50]
    Indiana: Traders, Forts, and Habitants - French Heritage Corridor
    They relied on Miami, Potawatomi, Odawa, Piankeshaw, Wea, and many other people to supply them with furs in exchange for the trade goods that they imported.Missing: alliances | Show results with:alliances
  51. [51]
    Pontiac's War | The Canadian Encyclopedia
    Obwandiyag's success encouraged the Miami, Illinois, Wea, Kickapoo, Mascouten, Delaware, and Shawnee to join. The Ojibwe captured Fort Michilimackinac with ...
  52. [52]
    American Indian Treaties | National Archives
    Jun 22, 2022 · From 1774 until about 1832, treaties between individual sovereign American Indian nations and the United States were negotiated to establish ...
  53. [53]
    Treaty with the Wea, 1809 - Tribal Treaties Database
    And the said commissioner, on the part of the United States, agrees to allow the said Indian tribe an additional annuity of three hundred dollars, and a ...Missing: negotiations | Show results with:negotiations
  54. [54]
    [PDF] A TREATY, - GovInfo
    ... Wea tribe of Indians, of the other part. Art . 1. The Chiefs, Warriors, and Head Men, of the said Tribe, agree to cede, and they do hereby cede and ...
  55. [55]
    Treaty: Treaty Between the United States and the Wea Indians ...
    11, 1820. Part of. Ratified Indian Treaty 113: Wea - Vincennes, Indiana, August 11, 1820. Named Native nations. Wea. Present-day Nations. Absentee-Shawnee Tribe ...
  56. [56]
    Wea - Tribal Treaties Database
    Wea ; 1820 · 1832 · 1833 ; Treaty with the Wea, 1820 · Treaty with the Piankashaw and Wea, 1832 · Treaty with the Kickapoo, Piankeshaw, Kaskaskia, Omaha, Delaware, ...Missing: list | Show results with:list
  57. [57]
    Miami Indian Chiefs and Leaders - Access Genealogy
    Little Turtle (Michikinikwca). A chief of the Miami tribe. Born at his village on Eel River, Ind., in 1752. His father was a Miami chief and his mother a.
  58. [58]
    Godfroy - Wea Connection - Angelfire
    GODFROY, b. Unknown. Notes for Jacco Tackeketah Godfroy: Nationality: Nation of Wea (Waayaahtanwa) Occupation: Principal Chief of the Wea Nation Jacco's ...
  59. [59]
    Indians 101: The Wea - Native American Netroots
    Feb 9, 2011 · Linguistically, the Wea spoke an Algonquian language and are closely related to the Miami, Piankashaw, Atchatchakangouen, Kilatika, Mengakonkia, ...<|separator|>
  60. [60]
    Indians 201: A very short overview of the Wea Indians - Daily Kos
    Jun 30, 2022 · The Wea are a relatively unknown tribe who were living in the Ohio Valley with the Miami and the Piankashaw when first encountered by the ...<|separator|>
  61. [61]
    Treaty with the Kaskaskia, Peoria, etc., 1854 - Tribal Treaties Database
    Consent of the United States to union of tribes. The tribes of Kaskaskia and Peoria Indians, and of Piankeshaw and Wea Indians, parties to the two treaties made ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  62. [62]
    Peoria (tribe) | The Encyclopedia of Oklahoma History and Culture
    May 22, 2020 · Economic activities included ownership and operation of Peoria Ridge Golf Course, a public facility opened in 1999. The Peoria Pow Wow had ...
  63. [63]
    Agreement with the Kaskaskia, Peoria, Piankeshaw, and Wea, 1860
    Whereas, by the treaty of May 30, 1854, concluded with the united tribes of Kaskaskia and Peoria, Piankeshaw and Wea Indians, they ceded and conveyed to the ...Missing: consolidation | Show results with:consolidation
  64. [64]
    The Wea Indian Tribe Of Indiana
    The Wea Tribe of Indiana are descendants of the Wea Indians, working to establish the tribe, bring back traditions, and share their history and culture.
  65. [65]
    Ouiatenon without Wea | Campus | purdueexponent.org
    Sep 24, 2022 · Fort Ouiatenon was one of those French trading posts, and the Wea became recognized as a separate tribe. The Wea have some disagreements with ...Missing: settlements | Show results with:settlements
  66. [66]
    Indiana Native Peoples - Diversity, Equity & Inclusion
    Written histories of the native peoples in the Great Lakes region begin in the 1600s when French Jesuit missionaries described the people they encountered.
  67. [67]
    [PDF] Miami Nation of Indians
    The claim relates to a treaty to which the predecessors of the Indiana Miami were a party. In fact, Chief Doug. Lankford's testimony claims that the Oklahoma ...
  68. [68]
    [PDF] Eight Tribes of Ottawa County Stand Against the Grand River Dam ...
    The Miami Tribe chose to take the mat- ter before the National NAGPRA Review Com- mittee and submitted a claim file totaling 472 pages of proof documentation ...
  69. [69]
    Effort to recover Indigenous language also revitalizes culture, history ...
    Oct 10, 2022 · The Miami Tribe lost the last speakers of the Myaamia language during the mid-20th century in part due to these assimilation efforts.
  70. [70]
    Myaamia Center - Miamination.com
    The Myaamia Nation will be strengthened through the revitalization of our distinct ways of knowing, speaking, and being. The Myaamia Center, a Miami Tribe of ...Missing: Wea | Show results with:Wea
  71. [71]
    Miami (tribe) | The Encyclopedia of Oklahoma History and Culture
    The Miami (the name possibly derived from the Chippewa word Omaumeg or "people of the peninsula") Indians live in two groups, the Miami Tribe of Oklahoma and ...
  72. [72]
    [PDF] Miami Nation of Indians of the State of Indiana, Inc. - BIA.gov
    Jun 5, 2025 · The Department again concluded that the Miami Nation had established community and political authority up to the 1940s but presented ...<|separator|>
  73. [73]
    Indigenous History in Indiana: Treaties and the Complexity of ...
    Nov 15, 2021 · Indigenous communities in Indiana existed before European contact. Treaties like Greenville and St. Mary's led to land loss and removal. ...Missing: distinctions | Show results with:distinctions
  74. [74]
    "We are a living people..." Remembering the Native American Tribes ...
    Nov 18, 2021 · Diane Hunter, tribal historical preservation officer of the Miami tribe, said the Wea and other Miami tribes were like other Native tribes.Missing: distinctions | Show results with:distinctions