Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Wing root

The wing root is the innermost section of an aircraft's fixed wing, located at the junction where the wing attaches to the fuselage, and it typically features the thickest airfoil profile along the wing's span to accommodate structural demands.^[1]^[2] In aircraft design, the wing root serves as the primary structural interface between the wing and fuselage, bearing the highest concentrations of shear loads and bending moments generated by the aircraft's weight and aerodynamic forces during flight.^[2] This region often employs a larger root chord length compared to the wing tip, with a taper ratio defined as the ratio of tip chord to root chord, enabling enhanced stiffness and resistance to aeroelastic phenomena such as flutter while minimizing overall weight.^[2] Fairings are commonly applied at the wing root to streamline the junction and reduce parasitic drag.^[1] Aerodynamically, the wing root influences lift distribution, stability, and stall behavior; for instance, it contributes to interference drag through the interaction of airflow from the wing and fuselage, generating turbulence and eddy currents at the intersection.^[3] In designs incorporating wing washout—a deliberate twist that positions the root at a higher angle of incidence than the tip—the root is engineered to stall first, preserving airflow over the outer wing sections to maintain aileron control and prevent abrupt rolling motions during high angles of attack.^[4] Additionally, in high-wing configurations, the elevated position of the wing root enhances lateral stability by creating a pendulum-like keel effect that restores level flight after disturbances.^[3]

Definition and Anatomy

Definition

The wing root is the innermost section of a fixed-wing aircraft's wing, located at the junction where it attaches to the fuselage, and it serves as the primary structural and aerodynamic interface for transmitting lift, drag, and other forces from the wing to the aircraft's main body.^[5]^[1] This region is engineered to bear the highest concentrations of bending moments and shear stresses generated during flight, making it critical for overall structural integrity.^[6]^[2] In contrast to the wing tip—the outermost end of the wing, which is typically tapered for reduced drag and optimized airflow—the wing root features maximum chord length and thickness to prioritize load-bearing capacity over aerodynamic efficiency.^[1] This design distinction ensures that the wing root can accommodate various attachment methods, such as bolted or bonded connections to the fuselage, while maintaining the aircraft's stability and performance.^[3]

Location and Attachment

The wing root represents the inboard portion of the wing, extending from the aircraft's fuselage centerline laterally to the onset of wing taper or sweep, where it typically encompasses the thickest cross-sectional chord of the airfoil profile.^[1] This positioning ensures the root section interfaces directly with the fuselage, forming the primary junction for structural continuity across the aircraft.^[8] Geometrically, the root chord defines the maximum chord length along the wingspan, providing the broadest airfoil dimension at this location to accommodate internal structures and enhance load-bearing capacity.^[9] The airfoil thickness-to-chord ratio at the root is often 20-30% greater than at mid-span sections, such as 15.2% at the root compared to 11.8% at the kink in representative transport aircraft designs, to support higher structural demands without excessive weight.^[10] Attachment of the wing root to the fuselage employs robust methods like bolted or riveted joints via wing carry-through structures, or adhesive bonding for composite materials, ensuring secure load transfer.^[8] In commercial jet aircraft, the center wing box commonly serves as this carry-through, integrating the wing roots with the fuselage and often functioning as a fuel tank, as seen in designs like those produced for Boeing models.^[11] These fittings, typically located at the inboard ends of the wing spars, provide a fail-safe connection that aligns the wing precisely during assembly.^[8]

Structural Design

Load Paths and Stresses

The wing root experiences the highest concentrations of primary loads in an aircraft wing, primarily due to its position as the attachment point to the fuselage. Bending moments are the dominant load, peaking at the root and calculated as the integral of the spanwise lift distribution multiplied by the distance from the root to each lift element, M_{\text{root}} = \int_0^{s} q(y) \cdot y \, dy, where q(y) is the local lift per unit span and s is the semi-span.^[12] This integration accounts for the cumulative effect of aerodynamic forces along the wing, with the root bearing the full spanwise accumulation. Vertical shear forces arise from the net unbalanced lift, while torsional shear results from moments induced by asymmetric loading such as fuel or engine placement. Additionally, fuselage interaction introduces torsion at the root, as the wing's attachment transmits yaw and roll moments from the body to the wing structure.^[13] These loads generate specific stress types at the wing root, notably compressive stresses on the upper surface and tensile stresses on the lower surface due to lift-induced bending, which tends to curve the wing upward. For a linearly tapered wing with taper ratio \lambda = c_t / c_r (tip chord over root chord), an approximate root bending moment under load factor N can be expressed as M(0) = \frac{N W b}{12} \cdot \frac{1 + 2\lambda}{1 + \lambda}, assuming lift distribution proportional to local chord length and W as the fuselage weight relieved by wing lift, with b the span; this simplifies to \frac{N W b}{8} for untapered wings (\lambda = 1).^[12] Torsional stresses further compound these, arising from the offset between the aerodynamic center and elastic axis. In design, the wing root must withstand ultimate loads up to 1.5 times the limit loads, as mandated by FAA regulations to ensure structural integrity under extreme maneuvers or gusts. Inertial relief from the wing's own mass—such as fuel and structural weight—significantly reduces net bending moments by counteracting upward lift forces, often lowering the effective root moment by 20-30% in fueled conditions depending on mass distribution. In swept-wing configurations, the root encounters additional torsion due to the coupling of bending and torsional loads influenced by the sweep angle.^[14]^[15]

Key Components at the Root

The wing root integrates several core structural elements essential for load transfer and attachment to the fuselage. The primary components include front and rear spars, which are anchored at the root to bear the majority of bending and shear forces, with the front spar typically positioned near 25% of the chord and the rear spar supporting attachments for control surfaces.^[13]^[16] Ribs at the root define the airfoil shape at the fuselage junction, providing form and distributing loads across the structure, while stringers serve as longitudinal stiffeners attached to the skin between ribs to prevent buckling under compressive loads.^[16]^[8] These elements collectively form the wingbox, an enclosed torsion-resistant structure that efficiently transfers shear loads from the wing to the fuselage.^[13]^[8] Materials for these root components prioritize high strength-to-weight ratios, with traditional designs using aluminum alloys such as 2024-T3 for spars, ribs, and stringers due to their durability and machinability.^[17] Modern applications increasingly incorporate composites, like carbon fiber reinforced polymers, for enhanced stiffness and reduced weight in the wingbox and skins.^[8] At the root, skins are thicker compared to outboard sections to resist buckling from concentrated stresses.^[13]^[18] Integration at the root often involves a carry-through box where spars and the wingbox extend seamlessly into the fuselage, ensuring continuous load paths without abrupt discontinuities.^[8] For instance, in the Boeing 737, the wing root incorporates the center fuel tank within the carry-through structure, spanning the fuselage and integrating fuel lines directly into the wingbox for efficient storage and distribution.^[19] Root ribs frequently feature cutouts to accommodate control linkages, fuel lines, or equipment passages, necessitating reinforced designs around these openings to maintain structural integrity and mitigate stress concentrations.^[20] These components endure high stresses from lift and maneuvers, but their design focuses on robust attachment to distribute such demands effectively.^[16]

Aerodynamic Implications

Interference Effects

Interference drag at the wing-fuselage junction primarily results from the collision between the fuselage boundary layer and the oncoming airflow over the wing root, causing flow distortion, separation, and the formation of secondary vortices that elevate form drag. This interaction skews the turbulent boundary layer around the junction, leading to adverse pressure gradients and roll-up of vorticity, which can contribute 5-10% to the total parasite drag of the aircraft in preliminary design estimates.^[21]^[22] Additionally, root vortex structures, such as the horseshoe vortex generated by the fuselage acting as an obstruction, disrupt smooth airflow attachment and further augment drag through increased turbulence and pressure losses.^[23]^[24] The presence of fuselage interference alters the spanwise lift distribution, where the wing root section, ideally contributing to an elliptical loading pattern for optimal induced drag minimization, experiences reduced local lift generation due to circulation changes and flow blockage at the junction. This typically lowers the sectional lift coefficient near the root compared to mid-span regions, compromising overall aerodynamic efficiency.^[25]^[26] In subsonic aircraft operating at low speeds, separation bubbles often develop at the junction trailing edge, driven by these adverse pressure gradients and boundary layer interactions, creating recirculating regions that extend spanwise and elevate both skin friction and form drag components while hindering lift recovery.^[26]^[23] In high-speed transonic and supersonic designs, the wing root becomes a focal point for shock wave formation, where the abrupt geometric transition at the junction interacts with compressibility effects to amplify wave drag through oblique and normal shock structures. These shocks, exacerbated by the combined cross-sectional area changes of the wing and fuselage, can significantly increase total drag beyond isolated component predictions.^[27]^[28] Such interference effects underscore the need for integrated aerodynamic shaping, often addressed via fairings to smooth flow transitions. Recent advancements, such as in truss-braced wing configurations, further reduce drag through optimized junction shaping.^[29]

Fairing Design

Wing root fairings are streamlined enclosures fitted over the junction between the wing and fuselage to mitigate aerodynamic interference, primarily by smoothing airflow transitions and reducing drag from flow separation and vortex formation at the joint. These fairings address the underlying interference effects by promoting attached flow and minimizing turbulence, which can otherwise increase parasitic drag significantly.^[30]^[31] The core purpose of fairings is to lower interference drag through optimized shaping that eliminates separation bubbles, while also facilitating laminar flow extension along the inboard wing sections for improved efficiency. Design features include contoured profiles that harmonize the wing's airfoil curvature with the fuselage contour, ensuring a seamless aerodynamic surface; common materials encompass fiberglass-reinforced plastics or carbon fiber composites, selected for their low weight, high strength, and smooth finish to avoid additional skin friction.^[32]^[33]^[34] Fairing optimization relies heavily on computational fluid dynamics (CFD) tools to refine geometries that delay boundary layer separation and reduce pressure drag; for example, NASA-supported designs for blended wing-body fairings on configurations like the DLR-F6 utilize RANS-based CFD solvers such as OVERFLOW to achieve fully attached side-of-body flow, resulting in drag improvements through targeted contour adjustments.^[30]^[35] In historical contexts, older aircraft employed simple fillet-style fairings for basic streamlining of the wing root junction.^[36] Contemporary jet designs integrate fairings with supercritical airfoil sections, employing advanced blended shapes to optimize transonic performance and further minimize wave drag at the root.^[37]

Applications in Aircraft

Conventional Fixed-Wing Designs

In conventional fixed-wing monoplane designs, wing roots serve as the critical junction between the wing and fuselage, typically featuring straight configurations for subsonic transports or swept layouts for high-speed applications to optimize structural load transfer and aerodynamic performance. For example, the General Dynamics F-16 Fighting Falcon employs a 40° swept trapezoidal wing root with a leading-edge extension, enabling high maneuverability while distributing bending moments effectively during intense flight regimes.^[38] In contrast, wide-body airliners like the Boeing 777 integrate the wing root seamlessly with the fuselage center section, utilizing a high-lift wing box structure that supports the aircraft's maximum takeoff weight of over 300,000 kg and facilitates efficient fuel storage within the thickened root fairing.^[39] Fighter aircraft roots, such as those on the F-16, prioritize robustness with airfoil sections like the NACA 64A-series at the root, featuring thickness-to-chord ratios around 4% to endure extreme g-forces without excessive weight penalty. Transport designs, exemplified by the Airbus A310, incorporate root thickness ratios of approximately 15.2% to balance spanwise bending relief from fuselage integration and the demands of cruise efficiency.^[10] Biplane configurations feature dual wing roots per side, with separate attachments for the upper and lower wings to the fuselage, often augmented by staggered interplane struts that enhance rigidity and reduce interference drag. A seminal historical implementation is the 1903 Wright Flyer, where wire-braced roots connected the biplane wings to a central framework of spruce spars and ribs, enabling the pioneering controlled flights through tensioned cables that resisted flight loads.^[40] These struts, typically arranged in an N or W pattern, transmit shear between the wings while the roots anchor the primary lift structure. In transport aircraft, wing root design involves trade-offs between maximizing inboard lift generation—where larger chord lengths contribute substantially to overall wing area and efficiency—and preserving fuselage volume for passenger or cargo accommodation, often requiring fairings to minimize drag penalties. Following World War II, a notable shift occurred toward low-wing root placements in many propeller-driven designs, such as twin-engine transports, to achieve adequate propeller ground clearance (minimum 9 inches) via extended landing gear, allowing larger, more efficient propeller diameters without compromising stability or increasing structural weight excessively.^[41] This evolution supported the transition to higher-performance civil aviation while leveraging advances in retractable gear for wing-mounted engines.

Variations in Advanced Configurations

In blended wing body (BWB) configurations, the wing root integrates seamlessly with the body, eliminating a traditional fuselage junction and creating a continuous lifting surface that minimizes interference drag.^[42] This design approach, exemplified by NASA's X-48B demonstrator—a 21-foot-span unmanned aerial vehicle developed in collaboration with Boeing—validates the potential for substantial aerodynamic improvements through such root blending.^[43] Flight tests of the X-48B demonstrated up to 30% reductions in drag compared to conventional tube-and-wing aircraft, primarily due to the reduced wetted area and smoother flow at the root-body transition.^[43] As of 2025, Boeing and NASA continue advancing BWB concepts, with recent studies projecting up to 50% fuel savings through optimized root blending.^[44] Joined-wing designs feature wing roots that connect through truss-like structures, often incorporating an aft wing with negative dihedral or sweep to form a closed structural loop with the forward wing. This configuration distributes loads across multiple paths, enhancing overall stiffness while allowing for unconventional planforms.^[45] Structural analyses of joined-wing aircraft have shown potential weight savings of approximately 20% relative to equivalent cantilever designs, achieved by optimizing the truss connections at the roots to alleviate bending moments and buckling risks.^[45] These benefits are particularly evident in high-altitude, long-endurance platforms where the root truss supports efficient load transfer without excessive material use.^[46] Variable-geometry wings adapt the root attachment to enable pivoting mechanisms that alter sweep angles during flight, optimizing performance across speed regimes. In the Grumman F-14 Tomcat, a carrier-based fighter, the wing roots incorporate hydraulic actuators and pivot fittings integrated with the fuselage center section, allowing seamless transitions.^[47] These root mechanisms accommodate sweep angles from 20 degrees for low-speed operations like takeoff and landing to 68 degrees for supersonic cruise, reducing wave drag while maintaining structural integrity under dynamic loads.^[47] The design's pivot system at the root ensures precise alignment and minimal gap exposure, contributing to the aircraft's versatility in naval aviation roles.^[48] Emerging concepts in unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) and hypersonic vehicles increasingly employ adaptive materials at wing roots to manage extreme thermal loads from aerodynamic heating. For hypersonic applications, roots utilize ceramic matrix composites (CMCs) and refractory alloys that withstand temperatures exceeding 2000°F, providing thermal protection while allowing minor shape adaptations to mitigate aeroelastic deformation.^[49] In UAV designs, shape memory alloys integrated into root structures enable morphing responses to thermal gradients, enhancing durability during high-speed maneuvers or reentry-like conditions.^[50] These material innovations prioritize resilience against coupled aerothermoelastic effects, supporting sustained operations in regimes where conventional roots would fail.^[51]

References

[1]
Parts of a Wing - Pilot Institute
Jan 10, 2022 · Wing Root. The wing root is where the wing meets the aircraft's fuselage. The wing root is nearly always the thickest part of the wing. What ...
[2]
Wing Shapes & Nomenclature – Introduction to Aerospace Flight ...
The wings carry the entire weight of the aircraft, so large shear loads and bending moments are produced near the root of the wing. To this end, the wing shape ...
[3]
[PDF] Chapter 5: Aerodynamics of Flight - Federal Aviation Administration
A wing root can cause interference drag. lift. Figure 5-6 ... high-speed trailing vortices similar to wing-tip vortices of larger fixed-wing aircraft.
[4]
How Wing Washout Makes Your Airplane More Stable - Boldmethod
It means that at any airspeed, at any attitude, the root of the wing root will fly at a higher angle-of-attack than the wing tip. Why Do Wings Need Washout? Why ...
[5]
Wing Geometry | Glenn Research Center - NASA
Jul 7, 2025 · The Wright brothers designed their 1903 flyer with a slight anhedral to improve the aircraft roll performance. Airfoil Geometry. A cut through ...
[6]
Wing root - Pilotscafe
The wing root is the part of the wing on a fixed-wing aircraft that is closest to the fuselage. Wing roots usually bear the highest bending forces in flight ...
[7]
22.16.2. Main Wing Box - Abbott Aerospace UK Ltd
They run parallel to the lateral axis of the aircraft, from the fuselage toward the tip of the wing, and are usually attached to the fuselage by wing fittings, ...
[8]
Mean Aerodynamic Chord (MAC) | SKYbrary Aviation Safety
The width of the wing is greatest where it meets the fuselage at the wing root and progressively decreases toward the tip. As a consequence, the chord also ...
[9]
[PDF] 7 Wing Design - HAW Hamburg
In the case of swept wings the mean aerodynamic chord is approximately at the center of gravity, but not the wing root. Swept wings therefore cause problems ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[10]
SUBARU Delivers 3000th Center Wing Box for Large Aircraft
May 26, 2023 · The center wing box is the section where the wings are attached to the fuselage sections and also serves as a fuel tank.
[11]
[PDF] Wing Bending Calculations
The shear and bending moment are then calculated by integrating equations (2) and (3). b/2. S(y) = q(y) dy. (32).
[12]
Introduction to Wing Structural Design - AeroToolbox
In both cases it is clear that the location of the highest shear and bending is the wing root.
[13]
14 CFR 25.303 -- Factor of safety. - eCFR
A factor of safety of 1.5 must be applied to the prescribed limit load which are considered external loads on the structure.
[14]
[PDF] Prediction of Wing Structural Mass for Transport Category Aircraft ...
May 11, 2023 · A real wing will have finite weight, which will provide inertial relief against lift induced shear and bending moment. To determine design ...
[15]
https://labs.engineering.asu.edu/aircraft-design/wp-content/uploads/sites/115/2023/05/AIAA-2015-3374.pdf
[16]
[PDF] Material and Thickness Grading for Aeroelastic Tailoring of the ...
Sep 1, 2014 · The baseline thickness distribution is seen in Figure 1, and aluminum (2024-T3 alloy) is used throughout. Stringers and rib stiffeners are ...
[17]
An Optimum Design of a Subsonic Aircraft Wing due to the ... - NIH
Jan 17, 2024 · Using a skin thickness of 2 mm and a core thickness of 2 mm, the maximum deformation of 149.83 mm and the resulted von Mises of 208.83 MPa were ...
[18]
Fuel - The Boeing 737 Technical Site
Boeing has developed a Nitrogen Generating System (NGS) which decreases the flammability exposure of the center wing tank to a level equivalent to or less than ...
[19]
[PDF] DESIGN AND ANALYSIS OF AN AIRCRAFT WING RIB FOR ... - IRJET
The ribs are cut to allow fuel or equipment to pass through it. Wing rib with cutouts reduces the weight and it can withstand more load. Wing ribs are the ...
[20]
Wind Tunnel - Interference Drag Adds Up - Kitplanes Magazine
Aug 5, 2011 · Barnaby Wainfan explains the role of properly designed wing-fuselage junctions in reducing interference drag.
[21]
None
### Summary of Interference Drag at Wing-Fuselage Juncture (NASA CR-3811)
[22]
[PDF] Flow-Field Measurements in a Wing-Fuselage Junction Using an ...
One area where flow separation occurs that has been especially difficult to predict accurately is the wing-fuselage junction near the wing trailing edge. The ...
[23]
Flow dynamics past a simplified wing body junction - AIP Publishing
Nov 18, 2010 · As illustrated in Fig. 1, a horseshoe vortex and a corner separation can be observed in a junction flow. These secondary flows have been widely ...<|separator|>
[24]
[PDF] Wing–Body Circulation Control by Means of a Fuselage Trailing Edge
Wing–body interference may alter the circulation at the wing root, and body circulation may exist such that the total lift of the wing– body combination may ...
[25]
Experimental Visualization of Junction Separation Bubbles at Low
An Experimental Investigation of a Wing-Fuselage Junction Model in the NASA ... The spanwise variation of laminar separation bubbles on finite wingsat low ...
[26]
[PDF] Interference Drag Associated with Engine Locations for ...
Nov 13, 2018 · Interference drag increases are partially explained by flow channels leading to choked flow and shock interactions between bodies.
[27]
[PDF] Aerodynamic characteristics of a hypersonic transport configuration ...
Although the difference in the drag-due-to-lift parameter is the total result of the mutual interference effects between the body and wing, the primary reason ...
[28]
[PDF] A Wing-Body Fairing Design for the DLR-F6 Model
Two wing-body fairings were designed for the DLR-F6 model. The first alleviates side-of-body separation, and the second removes it completely. The second has a ...
[29]
Wind Tunnel - Kitplanes Magazine
Aug 9, 2010 · Proper design of the fuselage can minimize the interference drag caused by the wingroot junction and reduce the size of the root fairing ...
[30]
[PDF] A review of numerical and experimental studies of the anti-fairing
The authors calculated a drag reduction of between 4.5% and 6.5% depending on the technique used to compute it. This correlates with the observed reduction in ...
[31]
CN213620210U - Wing root fairing coating - Google Patents
The utility model provides a wing root flow control foreskin which characterized in that: the glass fiber reinforced plastic composite material is an annular ...
[32]
Aircraft Components and Aero Design Services
Carbon-fiber composite wheel fairings are available for most RV models. ... Shown here are carbon wing root fairings, now available for a modest price..
[33]
[PDF] NAC--- - NASA Technical Reports Server (NTRS)
Increasing the thickness ratio of a wing- fuselage juncture from 16.9 percent to 22.2 percent led to an increment in airplane drag coefficient of 0.0005 at a ...
[34]
Technical question re. Wing/fuselage intersection interference drag
May 24, 2015 · Or perhaps 88 degs is so close to 90 degs that the drag increment is insignificant. Similarly the S6 fuselage may be oval but the local angle ...Missing: percentage | Show results with:percentage
[35]
[PDF] Flight-measured buffet characteristics of a supercritical wing and a ...
The modification consists of a new wing having a supercritical airfoil section and a different wing planform , a new overwing fairing , and a new fixed leading- ...
[36]
[PDF] Supersonic Aerodynamic Characteristics of an Advanced F-16 ...
The F-16 40 ° trapezoidal wing has been re- placed with a 50 °, clipped-delta wing that features an integrated forebody strake and no horizontal tall.
[37]
https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/19780015113/downloads/19780015113.pdf
[38]
Researching the Wright Way | National Air and Space Museum
The 1900 glider was the Wrights' first piloted aircraft, flight tested at Kitty Hawk that fall. It incorporated the wire-braced biplane structure and wing- ...Missing: root | Show results with:root
[39]
[PDF] Aircraft Design
▫ Most twin-engine aircraft are of low-wing design. ▫ For these, the location of the engine and propeller on the wing requires a longer landing gear ...
[40]
X-48B Blended Wing Body - NASA
Boeing's X-48B Blended Wing Body technology demonstrator shows off its unique lines at sunset on Rogers Dry Lake adjacent to NASA's Armstrong Flight Research ...
[41]
[PDF] Blended-Wing-Body Transonic Aerodynamics: Summary of Ground ...
Reynolds number is within 0.4 counts in drag coefficient, less than 1 count in pitching moment coefficient, and slightly over 2 counts in lift coefficient.
[42]
[PDF] Challenges, ideas, and innovations of joined-wing configurations
Jan 20, 2022 · Joined Wings are characterized by a structurally overconstrained layout which significantly increases the design space with multiple load paths.
[43]
Aerostructural Comparative Study of Composite Strut- and Truss ...
Oct 23, 2025 · This study demonstrates the synergistic benefits of composite materials and braced-wing architectures for achieving lightweight, structurally ...
[44]
US Navy F-14 Tomcat: The Evolution Of The Variable-Sweep Wing
Aug 28, 2024 · From its original 20-degree forward position, the wings can be swept all the way to 68 degrees. The aircraft can land with its wings fully swept ...
[45]
Variable sweep wing design - AIAA ARC
With the wing in the 20' sweep position, the. F-14 carrier approach speed is 116 hots. Comparison with the F-45, having a wing sweep angle of 51 degrees,.
[46]
[PDF] Ceramic Matrix Composite (CMC) Thermal Protection Systems (TPS ...
The required material attributes for hypersonic air-breathing vehicles are high temperature capability (2000 to. 4000°F), high strength at those elevated ...
[47]
Recent advancements in morphing applications: Architecture ...
This category summarizes the materials used in wing morphing applications such as smart materials (SMP: Shape Memory Polymer, SMA: Shape Memory Alloys, piezo, ...
[48]
Materials design for hypersonics | Nature Communications
Apr 18, 2024 · Passive thermal protection systems are ideal for moderate transient heat flux scenarios, and may be composed of: (i) insulated cold structures ( ...