Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Takeoff and landing

Takeoff and landing are the essential transition phases in operations, during which an accelerates from a position on the to achieve liftoff into sustained flight, and subsequently decelerates from conditions to a controlled and rollout on the surface. These phases demand a precise balance of the four fundamental forces—, , , and —to ensure safe execution, with takeoff involving increased to generate sufficient exceeding , and landing relying on reduced and increased to manage descent and braking. Governed by (FAA) standards, both processes are influenced by factors such as aircraft , , wind conditions, surface, and configuration settings like flaps, which can significantly alter required distances and speeds. In takeoff, the procedure typically unfolds in three main segments: the ground roll, where the aircraft accelerates to rotation speed (often 1.2 times the stall speed) using full throttle while maintaining directional control via rudder and brakes; rotation, involving a gentle pitch-up to increase the angle of attack and initiate liftoff; and the initial climb, establishing a positive rate of ascent to clear obstacles, such as the FAA-mandated 50-foot height, before retracting flaps and gear. Performance metrics, including ground roll distance, scale with the square of aircraft weight and inversely with air density, meaning higher weights or hot/high-altitude conditions can double or more the required runway length, while headwinds shorten it and tailwinds extend it proportionally. Specialized takeoffs, such as short-field or soft-field variants, adapt these principles by using full flaps for maximum lift coefficient or maintaining a nose-high attitude to minimize ground drag on unprepared surfaces. Landing mirrors takeoff in complexity but emphasizes deceleration and precision, comprising the approach (establishing a stabilized glide path at 1.3 times speed with flaps extended), (rounding out to reduce rate and achieve a gentle ), and rollout (braking and reverse thrust to stop within the available ). Like takeoff, landing distances increase quadratically with weight and are affected by environmental factors, but configurations such as full flaps can double the maximum to enable steeper approaches and lower speeds, while ground effect—reduced induced drag within one wingspan of the surface—cushions the final but complicates go-arounds if is insufficient. landings require techniques like crabbing or wing-low sideslip to counteract drift, with demonstrated limits up to 0.2 times speed, and protocols mandate go-arounds for unstabilized approaches if not stabilized by 1,000 feet above elevation in (IMC) or by 500 feet above elevation in (VMC). These phases account for a disproportionate share of incidents, with over 20% of accidents occurring during takeoff and departure, underscoring the need for pilot training, adherence to aircraft-specific performance charts in the Pilot's Operating Handbook (POH), and consideration of variables like runway contamination, which can lead to hydroplaning at speeds above 8.6 times the of tire pressure in pounds per . Advances in , such as high-lift devices and reversers, have improved margins, but operational limits remain tied to requirements ensuring clearance and stopping capability under varied conditions.

Fundamental Concepts

Takeoff Process

Takeoff in refers to the phase during which an transitions from a stationary position on the ground to sustained flight in the air, primarily achieved through engine thrust that overcomes aerodynamic drag and the gravitational force acting on the . This process requires the generation of sufficient aerodynamic to support the 's weight, marking the foundational transition to airborne operations for . The takeoff process unfolds in several key phases: the ground roll, where the aircraft accelerates along the from standstill to speed using maximum available ; , in which the pilot raises the nose to increase the angle of attack and initiate liftoff; initial climb, where the aircraft ascends while accelerating to a safe climb speed; and continued acceleration to reach the best speed (V_Y). During the ground roll, friction from tires and must be minimized, while propels the aircraft forward until builds enough for to exceed weight. At the core of takeoff physics is the lift equation, which quantifies the generated by the s: L = \frac{1}{2} \rho v^2 S C_L where L is , \rho is air density, v is , S is area, and C_L is the influenced by and flap settings. Successful takeoff demands a sufficient to accelerate the against and provide the excess power needed for climb, typically requiring to exceed the sum of and the horizontal component of during the roll. Runway length requirements are calculated based on , available , and environmental conditions, often using performance charts that account for acceleration distance to reach liftoff speed plus a margin. Several factors critically influence the takeoff process, including weight, which directly increases the required and extends the ground roll; flap settings, which enhance C_L to reduce the speed needed for liftoff; wind conditions, where headwinds shorten the roll by lowering groundspeed for a given ; and altitude, which decreases air (\rho) and thus reduces performance and efficiency, necessitating longer runways at high elevations. The historical foundation of powered takeoff was established on December 17, 1903, when Orville Wright achieved the first sustained, controlled flight of a heavier-than-air craft at , covering 120 feet in 12 seconds after a brief ground roll. This event demonstrated the practical integration of , , and control for overcoming and in manned flight.

Landing Process

Landing is the controlled phase of flight during which an aerial vehicle reduces its altitude and forward speed to make contact with a landing surface and subsequently stop. This process requires precise management of aerodynamic forces to ensure a safe touchdown and deceleration, distinguishing it from the acceleration and ascent of takeoff. The landing process unfolds in distinct phases: the approach, where the aircraft aligns with the runway centerline and maintains a stabilized descent at approximately 500-800 feet per minute; the flare, involving a gradual pitch-up to increase the angle of attack and arrest the descent rate just above the surface; touchdown, the moment of initial wheel contact ideally at or near stall speed; rollout, the ground phase following contact; and final deceleration to a stop. During rollout, deceleration is accomplished through aerodynamic drag from the aircraft's configuration, wheel brakes applied progressively to avoid skidding, spoilers that disrupt lift and augment drag, and reverse thrust on turbine-powered aircraft to redirect engine exhaust forward. Key physics underpin these phases, particularly aerodynamic drag for deceleration, described by the equation
D = \frac{1}{2} \rho v^2 S C_d
where D is drag force, \rho is air density, v is airspeed, S is reference area (typically wing area), and C_d is the drag coefficient, which increases with extended flaps and gear. In the flare, pilots manage the angle of attack to generate sufficient lift for a soft touchdown without exceeding the critical angle that induces a stall. Near the surface, ground effect enhances lift by reducing induced drag through suppressed wingtip vortices, potentially causing the aircraft to float and requiring adjusted pitch control to avoid a prolonged or hard landing.
Various environmental and operational factors affect landing safety and performance, including crosswinds necessitating and inputs to counter drift, reduced visibility demanding reliance on instruments or visual cues for , runway surface conditions like wet or contaminated pavement that diminish braking , and aircraft configuration changes such as extension, which boosts parasite but must occur early to stabilize the approach. Safety considerations emphasize metrics like distance required, calculated to include approach to 50 feet above , , and rollout under actual weight, wind, and conditions, often factored by 1.67 for dry runways in to provide a margin. procedures mitigate risks from unstabilized approaches, involving immediate full , adjustment for a positive climb rate, and gradual flap retraction.

Horizontal Takeoff and Landing Configurations

Conventional and Reduced Variants

Conventional takeoff and landing () refers to the standard horizontal takeoff and landing operations of that utilize the full length of a prepared surface for acceleration and deceleration. In , accelerate along the to achieve the necessary for rotation and liftoff, typically requiring paved or hardened surfaces to support the high speeds and weights involved. Reduced takeoff and landing (RTOL) variants build on principles but incorporate design features, such as low and advanced high-lift devices, to shorten required distances compared to conventional aircraft. For example, historical RTOL concepts have demonstrated field length reductions of around 25% in specific cases through optimized . Operational techniques like reduced settings, limiting to 75-95% of maximum, are sometimes used in but result in longer ground rolls due to slower acceleration; they are applied primarily to reduce engine wear under favorable conditions (e.g., low temperatures, long s) where full exceeds safety margins. Key design elements for CTOL and RTOL include , which is the aircraft's weight divided by its wing area and directly influences stall speeds and required takeoff velocities—higher demands longer runways for sufficient generation. High-lift devices such as leading-edge slats and trailing-edge flaps are deployed to increase the wing's and effective area, boosting the maximum by 50-100% during takeoff and landing phases. Engine placement, often under the wings or at the rear fuselage, is optimized to provide a thrust line that assists in rotation without excessive tail strikes, ensuring smooth transition to climb. These configurations are widely applied in commercial airliners like the , which typically requires about 2,000 meters of dry for takeoff at maximum weight under standard conditions. Military transports, such as the , also employ and RTOL for tactical operations, using runways of 900-1,500 meters depending on load and configuration to deliver troops and cargo to forward bases. Takeoff field length in these systems integrates factors like mass and ambient through performance models that scale distance quadratically with weight—doubling mass can quadruple the required length due to increased and needs—and inversely with air , where higher temperatures reduce density and extend distances by 10-20% per 10°C rise above standard. These effects are quantified in standards, ensuring safe margins for varying environmental conditions.

Short Takeoff and Landing Systems

Short takeoff and landing () systems refer to configurations engineered for takeoffs and landings on runways under 300 meters, often on unprepared or rough such as grass, gravel, or , enabling operations in remote locations where conventional cannot function effectively. These capabilities are achieved through specialized aerodynamic designs that prioritize low-speed generation and minimal ground roll, distinguishing STOL from standard horizontal takeoff and landing methods that require longer, prepared surfaces. Key technologies in STOL systems include , which uses air blowing over the wing surface to delay airflow separation and enhance lift at low speeds; high-aspect-ratio wings, which improve lift-to-drag ratios for better low-speed performance; and vectored thrust systems that direct engine exhaust to augment lift during critical phases. These enhancements allow STOL aircraft to operate with reduced stall speeds and higher angles of attack compared to conventional designs. Representative examples include the DHC-6 Twin Otter, a twin-engine capable of a ground roll takeoff of approximately 310 meters under standard conditions, and modern bush planes like the CubCrafters Carbon Cub, which exemplify ongoing advancements in lightweight designs for backcountry access. Performance features such as leading-edge slats reduce stall speed by increasing the critical angle of attack, enabling safer operations near stall; for instance, slats can extend the stall angle beyond 15 degrees, while post-takeoff climb rates in aircraft often exceed 2,000 feet per minute. STOL systems have supported military operations in Arctic and remote environments since the 1940s, with early examples like the Fieseler Fi 156 Storch providing reconnaissance and liaison roles on snow-covered fields during World War II. These aircraft facilitated troop insertions and supply missions in harsh terrains, influencing later designs for cold-weather logistics and forward basing.

Carrier-Based Systems

Carrier-based systems enable fixed-wing aircraft operations from the decks of naval vessels, primarily through specialized launch and recovery methods adapted to the constrained and dynamic environment of an aircraft carrier. These systems, developed to project air power at sea, rely on mechanical assistance for takeoff and rapid deceleration during landing to compensate for the short deck length, typically around 300 meters. The two primary configurations are CATOBAR (Catapult-Assisted Take-Off But Arrested Recovery) and STOBAR (Short Take-Off But Arrested Recovery), each tailored to specific naval requirements and aircraft capabilities. CATOBAR employs steam-powered or electromagnetic catapults to accelerate from stationary to takeoff speed over a brief distance, followed by arrested recovery where a tailhook engages wires to halt the rapidly. Steam catapults, using high-pressure from the ship's boilers, propel the via a shuttle connected to the nose gear, achieving end speeds sufficient for heavy loads. Modern electromagnetic systems, like the (EMALS), offer precise control and reduced maintenance. Arrested recovery involves four to five wires stretched across the deck, tensioned by hydraulic engines to decelerate the from over 200 km/h to a stop in about 100 meters by absorbing the 's . As of 2025, the U.S. Navy's Ford-class carriers use the Advanced (AAG), which employs rotary water twisters for more consistent and efficient energy absorption compared to traditional hydraulic systems. STOBAR, prevalent in non-U.S. navies, combines a short takeoff aided by a bow-mounted ski-jump ramp with arrested recovery using similar hook-and-wire mechanisms. The ski-jump, angled at 12-14 degrees, converts horizontal deck speed into vertical lift, allowing lighter payloads without catapults. This system limits compared to but simplifies carrier design and reduces mechanical complexity. Arrested landings in STOBAR function identically to , ensuring compatibility with conventional tailhook-equipped aircraft. Aircraft designed for carrier operations incorporate key adaptations, including reinforced to withstand high sink rates of up to 6.5 m/s and forces exceeding 3g, tailhooks for wire engagement, and folding wings to optimize storage in the ship's and on deck. The features strengthened struts and energy-absorbing mechanisms to handle impacts far exceeding land-based requirements, while tailhooks deploy from the to snag wires at precise angles. Folding wings, often pivoting at mid-span, reduce the aircraft's footprint by up to 50%, enabling carriers to accommodate dozens of . Representative examples include the U.S. Navy's F/A-18 Hornet, which uses for launches reaching approximately 250 km/h via , supporting full combat loads from carriers like the class. In contrast, India's MiG-29K operates under on the , utilizing the ski-jump for short takeoffs and arrested recovery for landings, with the carrier's 14-degree ramp enabling operations in the region. Carrier operations face significant challenges from deck motion due to sea states, which can pitch and roll the ship up to 10 degrees, complicating approach and wire engagement. Wind-over-deck conditions, influenced by ship speed (typically 20-30 knots) and natural winds, are optimized by steaming into the relative wind to boost effective airspeed by 10-20 knots, but turbulence from the island superstructure adds shear risks. Historical evolution traces to the 1910s, when biplanes like Eugene Ely's Curtiss pusher achieved the first shipboard takeoff from USS Birmingham in 1910 and landing on USS Pennsylvania in 1911, using rudimentary platforms and nets before modern catapults and wires emerged in the 1920s.

Vertical Takeoff and Landing Configurations

Aircraft Applications

Vertical takeoff and landing (VTOL) aircraft are designed to achieve full vertical lift without requiring a forward run, enabling operations in confined spaces such as environments or remote sites where traditional runways are unavailable. These aircraft generate the necessary through powered rotors, vectored engines, or embedded fans, allowing them to hover, ascend vertically, and transition to forward flight. This capability is particularly suited for applications like rapid troop insertion or in inaccessible areas, as well as emerging civilian uses in . VTOL aircraft encompass several distinct types, each addressing the challenges of vertical lift differently. Tail-sitter configurations, such as the Ryan X-13 Vertijet, position the entire fuselage vertically for takeoff and landing, using a jet engine for propulsion and relying on control surfaces or reaction jets for stability in hover before transitioning to horizontal flight by tilting the aircraft forward. Convertible designs, exemplified by tiltrotor systems like the Bell Boeing V-22 Osprey, feature rotating nacelles that shift proprotors from vertical to horizontal orientation, combining helicopter-like vertical performance with fixed-wing speed and range for missions requiring both hover and long-distance cruise. Lift-fan systems, as implemented in the Lockheed Martin F-35B Lightning II, employ a shaft-driven, counter-rotating fan mounted forward in the fuselage to provide supplemental vertical thrust, augmented by the main engine's vectored nozzle, enabling short takeoff and vertical landing (STOVL) operations from amphibious assault ships or austere bases. The historical development of operational aircraft began in the mid-20th century, with the emerging in the 1950s as the first successful fighter. Developed under the UK's P.1127 program, the Harrier utilized the engine with four vectored nozzles to direct thrust for vertical operations, achieving its in 1967 and entering RAF service in 1969 as a ground-attack platform capable of operating from improvised forward bases without runways. This jet-lift innovation paved the way for subsequent designs, influencing modern and fan-assisted systems used in confined-area combat and transport roles. Aerodynamic considerations in VTOL aircraft center on optimizing hover , smooth transition to forward flight, and managing —the ratio of to or area—which directly impacts power requirements and stability. In hover, lower enhances by distributing over a larger area, reducing induced power needs and enabling longer loiter times, as seen in -based systems where (a measure of hover performance) improves with reduced loading. Transition to forward flight involves careful control of pitch, , and to avoid stalls or excessive drag, with designs like the V-22 achieving this by progressively tilting while maintaining positive . High in jet-lift VTOLs, such as the , allows compact designs but demands precise nozzle management to counteract hot gas reingestion and ensure stable conversion. Key challenges in VTOL aircraft operations include diminished performance at hot/high altitudes and elevated fuel consumption during hover. At high elevations or in hot conditions, thinner air reduces engine mass flow and output, limiting capacity and hover duration; for instance, the F-35B's lift fan and vectored engine experience significant degradation in such environments, necessitating adjusted takeoff procedures. Hover phases are particularly fuel-intensive, with jet-lift systems consuming 3-4 times more per unit than conventional helicopters due to inefficient and high , which can restrict mission radius unless supplemented by forward flight efficiency. These issues drive ongoing advancements in propulsion integration for urban and expeditionary applications. As of November 2025, progress in electric (eVTOL) for includes beginning power-on testing of its first FAA-conforming aircraft in the final phase of type certification, alongside FAA plans for public trials of operations.

Rocket and Spacecraft Applications

Vertical takeoff and vertical landing () for s and involves a vertical ascent powered by engines to achieve access, followed by a controlled vertical descent using retro-propulsion to enable precise, reusable touchdowns on or other surfaces. This configuration relies on high-thrust chemical propulsion systems, such as and or engines, to counteract gravitational and aerodynamic forces during both phases. Unlike , operates in near-vacuum conditions and high hypersonic speeds, necessitating robust thermal protection and precise guidance for reentry and landing. Core technologies facilitating VTVL include grid fins for aerodynamic steering, retro-propulsion for deceleration, and deployable landing legs for impact absorption. Grid fins, consisting of lattice-like structures made from high-temperature materials like , deploy post-separation to generate moments by modulating and during atmospheric reentry, allowing trajectory corrections without continuous engine firing. Retro-propulsion entails reigniting main engines to fire against the descent velocity, reducing speed from hypersonic to near-zero for a . Landing legs, often pneumatically or hydraulically actuated, extend prior to to distribute loads and protect the vehicle's structure, enabling rapid refurbishment for reuse. The physics of centers on delta-v budgets for landing maneuvers and for attitude control. The delta-v requirement for the landing burn typically totals around 2000 m/s for orbital-class first stages, encompassing deceleration from terminal reentry to hover, with atmospheric assisting but engine burns providing the final precision. This value scales with vehicle mass and atmospheric , often reverse-engineered from operational profiles like those of reusable boosters. , achieved by gimbaling the engine nozzle, directs the vector to produce steering torques; mathematically, the thrust component in the body frame can be expressed as \vec{T} = T \begin{pmatrix} \sin \delta_x \\ \sin \delta_y \\ \cos \delta_x \cos \delta_y \end{pmatrix}, where T is the thrust magnitude and \delta_x, \delta_y are gimbal angles in pitch and yaw, enabling three-axis control during powered descent. Prominent examples of VTVL implementation include SpaceX's Falcon 9 booster, which pioneered orbital-class recoveries with its first successful landing on December 21, 2015, using Merlin engines for retro-propulsion and grid fins for guidance. Blue Origin's New Shepard suborbital vehicle achieved its inaugural VTVL on November 23, 2015, landing the BE-3 engine-equipped booster at low velocity via controlled burns and drag brakes. The first successful orbital VTVL operations entered routine service in the 2020s, building on these milestones. These systems highlight VTVL's advantages in reusability, which has reduced per-launch costs by up to 50% through booster reflights, amortizing manufacturing expenses across multiple missions and accelerating space access.

Hybrid and Multi-Mode Configurations

Vertical Takeoff with Horizontal Landing

Vertical takeoff with horizontal (VTHL) refers to a configuration that launches vertically using propulsion for ascent into , followed by an unpowered aerodynamic glide through the atmosphere and a landing similar to that of a conventional . This approach leverages the efficiency of vertical launch to escape Earth's gravity while enabling precise, reusable recovery via horizontal landing, reducing the need for specialized infrastructure compared to vertical landing systems. The design of VTHL vehicles typically features a winged orbiter equipped with thermal protection systems to withstand reentry heating, allowing controlled descent from orbital velocities. A prominent example is the , operational from 1981 to 2011, which utilized a delta-wing configuration and over 20,000 silica tiles on its underside for heat resistance during peak temperatures exceeding 1,650°C. The orbiter launched vertically atop solid rocket boosters and a main external tank, achieving before separating for independent reentry. During reentry, VTHL employ hypersonic glide , maintaining a high (around 40 degrees for the ) to generate lift while dissipating through atmospheric . Deceleration involves a series of S-turns in the terminal phase, typically below 80,000 feet altitude, to manage energy and align with the if the vehicle is too high or fast. Steering is initially provided by (RCS) thrusters in the thin upper atmosphere, transitioning to aerodynamic surfaces like elevons and rudders as increases. The Soviet Buran orbiter, launched once uncrewed in 1988 atop the Energia rocket, exemplified VTHL with a design nearly identical to the Shuttle, including cryogenic main engines (though unused in its sole flight) and automated horizontal landing capabilities demonstrated during approach and touchdown at 320 km/h. More recently, Sierra Space's Dream Chaser, a lifting-body spaceplane, has undergone testing in the 2020s for VTHL operations, featuring advanced thermal protection like TUFROC coatings and silicon-carbide tiles for reusability, with glide ratios enabling landings on runways as short as 2,500 meters. As of November 2025, it has completed key pre-flight tests, with its inaugural orbital flight targeted for late 2026 via a Vulcan rocket, landing at Vandenberg Space Force Base. A key drawback of VTHL systems is the extensive post-landing refurbishment required, particularly for thermal protection tiles prone to damage from debris or reentry plasma, necessitating inspections, repairs, and replacements that could take weeks to months per mission. For the , this process involved detailed tile mapping and subsystem overhauls at facilities like , contributing to turnaround times averaging 3-4 months between flights.

Horizontal Takeoff with Vertical Landing

Horizontal Takeoff with Vertical Landing (HTVL) is a configuration in which a suborbital or experimental achieves initial ascent via release from a carrier aircraft, providing a horizontal takeoff equivalent through air-launch at high altitude, followed by ignition of onboard engines and culminating in a vertical powered for recovery. This setup allows the vehicle to bypass much of the dense lower atmosphere, minimizing drag and structural stresses during launch. NASA analyses of horizontal launch systems highlight HTVL as a promising approach for reusable vehicles, enabling efficient access to suborbital trajectories by leveraging the carrier's altitude and speed for the initial phase. The process commences with the vehicle mated to a , such as a large , which ascends to 10-15 km altitude before releasing the . Upon separation, the vehicle undergoes a short free-fall phase, after which its motors ignite to propel it toward apogee. For descent, the vehicle reorients and executes a retro-propulsive burn to decelerate, enabling a controlled vertical using throttled engine to manage and position precisely. This sequence is outlined in conceptual designs for air-launched reusable systems, emphasizing the transition from aerodynamic drop to powered vertical maneuvers. While operational HTVL spacecraft are limited, concepts like air-launched reusable upper stages with propulsive vertical have been studied for suborbital and hypersonic applications. HTVL finds applications in suborbital tourism and hypersonic testing, where air-launch facilitates rapid, cost-effective missions without dedicated ground infrastructure. In suborbital tourism, concepts explore carrier-assisted access for passenger-carrying . For hypersonic tests, HTVL supports experimental dropped from to evaluate high-speed and , allowing recovery for iterative development as noted in U.S. Air Force and hypersonic flight test programs. A key advantage of HTVL is the substantial reduction in fuel mass required for initial ascent, as the carrier aircraft supplies the equivalent of a first-stage , enabling lighter, more economical vehicles compared to ground-launched vertical systems. During the vertical phase, precise control is maintained via cold gas thrusters, which deliver non-contaminating, pulse-mode adjustments for attitude and translation, as validated in testbeds for launch vehicle landing dynamics.

Versatile Short Takeoff and Landing

Versatile Short Takeoff and Landing () aircraft are defined as fixed-wing vehicles capable of performing , , or operations, adapting to mission requirements and environmental constraints while maintaining efficient cruise performance comparable to conventional aircraft. This multi-mode flexibility allows operators to select the optimal configuration based on factors such as runway availability, payload demands, or tactical needs, enabling operations from austere locations that would be inaccessible to purely conventional designs. Core technologies enabling versatility include nozzles, which redirect exhaust to provide vertical lift and control during hover and transition phases, and variable geometry systems that adjust wing or propulsion orientations for mode-specific performance. For instance, in designs like the utilized a main with a swiveling nozzle alongside auxiliary lift engines to achieve , while supporting and through nozzle positioning and aerodynamic enhancements. These systems often incorporate gimbaled or four-poster nozzles, as seen in early concepts, to manage pitch, yaw, and roll during transitions, with materials like X for high-temperature durability. Prominent examples of aircraft include the Jump Jet, which entered service in 1969 and pioneered operational multi-mode flight using the engine's four vectored nozzles for seamless VTOL-to-CTOL transitions in under 17 seconds. Similarly, the Lockheed Martin F-35B Lightning II, operational since the 2010s, integrates a shaft-driven LiftFan system with a thrust-vectoring F135 engine to enable operations at Mach 1.6 speeds, supporting both vertical lift and conventional runs from diverse surfaces. The Yak-141, a Soviet from the 1980s, demonstrated supersonic potential with its rotating exhaust nozzle, though it remained developmental. A key trade-off in V/STOL designs is the added weight from dual-mode propulsion and control systems, such as lift fans or vectoring hardware, which can increase overall aircraft mass by 10-20% compared to CTOL equivalents, thereby reducing capacity and operational . For example, higher requirements for vertical further limit load, directly impacting , while stability augmentation systems add complexity and penalty without proportional performance gains in cruise. These compromises necessitate careful optimization to balance hover efficiency with forward flight economics. V/STOL capabilities have proven essential for amphibious assault missions, where the Harrier supported U.S. Marine Corps operations from amphibious ships like the USS Nassau starting in the 1970s, enabling rapid deployment without full runways. Emerging concepts extend this versatility to urban air mobility, with NASA exploring V/STOL configurations for electric vertical takeoff vehicles to enable on-demand transport in congested cities, leveraging multi-mode operations for vertiport access and regional hops.

Advanced and Emerging Technologies

Autonomous and Electric Systems

Autonomous systems for takeoff and landing integrate advanced technologies such as GPS-guided precision approaches, for real-time obstacle detection and avoidance, and automated landing protocols to enhance safety and efficiency in , particularly for unmanned and electric vehicles. These features enable to execute maneuvers with minimal human intervention, relying on satellite-based navigation for accurate positioning during descent and ascent, while onboard cameras and algorithms process visual data to identify hazards like terrain or other . For instance, in operations, computer vision systems allow for GPS-denied landings by estimating relative position and orientation using visual landmarks, improving reliability in urban or obstructed environments. A prominent example of such autonomy is the system, introduced in 2019 and certified by the FAA in 2020 for aircraft like the M600 and Daher TBM 940, which autonomously selects the optimal runway based on weather, terrain, and performance data before executing a hands-free landing. In drone applications, DJI's Dock 2 system supports automated takeoff and landing with integrated RTK GPS for centimeter-level precision and omnidirectional obstacle sensing to ensure safe returns, even in low-visibility conditions. NASA's X-57 Maxwell project, an all-electric , demonstrated efficient electric propulsion configurations aimed at reducing takeoff and landing speeds through distributed electric motors, though the program concluded in 2023 without flight tests due to technical challenges. Electric vertical takeoff and landing () aircraft leverage battery-powered distributed propulsion systems to enable quiet, low-emission operations suitable for urban environments, where is critical for community acceptance. These systems use multiple electric motors to provide the thrust needed for vertical maneuvers, minimizing acoustic footprints during takeoff and landing compared to traditional . Joby Aviation's S4 , for example, employs six tilting propellers in a distributed setup and has advanced through FAA certification stages, completing the third stage by early 2024, the fourth stage in 2025, and entering the fifth (final) stage in November 2025, with the company beginning power-on testing of its first conforming aircraft, positioning it for potential commercial deployment. Despite these advancements, adoption faces key challenges, including limitations in battery energy density, which currently restricts mission ranges to around 80-200 km and demands rapid recharging to support frequent flights, as higher-density cells above Wh/ are needed for viability. Additionally, regulatory hurdles for beyond-visual-line-of-sight (BVLOS) operations persist, with the FAA's proposed Part 108 rule under review as of 2025 to establish safety metrics for scaled and flights up to feet, addressing integration and detect-and-avoid requirements. Looking ahead, urban air taxi networks are projected to emerge in the , with market analyses forecasting growth to USD 29 billion by 2030, driven by fleets rivaling current airline scales in daily operations and enabling integrated city transport systems in hubs like and U.S. metropolitan areas.

Spaceplane and Reusable Vehicle Innovations

Spaceplanes designed for horizontal takeoff and horizontal landing (HTHL) represent a key innovation in reusable space access, aiming to enable aircraft-like operations for orbital missions. The concept, developed by under funding in the 1990s, envisioned a (SSTO) vehicle with vertical launch but unpowered horizontal glide landing, leveraging composite materials and aerospike engines for efficiency. Intended to replace the with lower costs through reusability, the program was canceled in 2001 due to technical challenges with the linear aerospike engines and composite tank integrity. Similarly, the Skylon spaceplane, proposed by Limited, incorporates HTHL with the Synergetic Air-Breathing Rocket Engine (), which transitions from air-breathing mode to rocket mode to achieve SSTO capability. Ground tests of SABRE components, including the precooler , validated performance up to in air-breathing mode during trials in 2012 and 2024, though the company entered in late 2024 amid funding issues. Despite the company's administration, SABRE technology has been revived for use in the hypersonic spaceplane project, targeting operations and a first flight by 2031. Reusability advancements in these vehicles emphasize durable thermal protection and rapid turnaround to minimize refurbishment. SpaceX's Starship prototypes utilize a stainless-steel structure with over 18,000 heat shield tiles made from advanced ceramics, enabling survival of reentry temperatures exceeding 1,500°C while targeting orbital tests and landings as early as 2025. This progress was demonstrated in Starship's eleventh flight test on October 13, 2025, which achieved successful reentry and soft splashdown. Innovations include automated tile installation and metallic underlayers to seal gaps, reducing plasma intrusion and supporting turnaround times of hours rather than months, as demonstrated in suborbital hops and integrated flight tests by 2025. China's Shenlong experimental spaceplane has conducted multiple orbital recovery tests since 2020, completing uncrewed missions with runway landings after durations up to 268 days, showcasing maturing reusability for hypersonic reentry and payload deployment. These efforts address post-Shuttle gaps in horizontal recovery, with Shenlong's 2024 flight demonstrating autonomous deorbit and landing precision in the Gobi Desert. Hybrid propulsion systems integrate air-breathing and rocket modes to optimize SSTO performance, reducing onboard oxidizer mass by using atmospheric oxygen during ascent. The engine exemplifies this by operating in dual modes: ramjet-like air-breathing up to at 26 km altitude, then switching to rocket mode for operations, achieving a over 2,000 seconds in air-breathing phase. This transition relies on a precooler to condense incoming air from 1,000°C to -150°C in milliseconds, preventing engine meltdown while maintaining thrust. NASA's conceptual studies on rocket- combined cycles further explore mode-switching physics, where ramjet compression via vehicle speed (no moving parts) gives way to rocket combustion as air density drops, enabling efficient ascent trajectories. Cross-range landing capabilities enhance mission flexibility for reusable vehicles by allowing lateral maneuvering during reentry, expanding reachable landing sites beyond direct downrange paths. In spaceplanes like Skylon, designs and control surfaces enable up to 2,000 km cross-range deviation through bank-angle modulation in the hypersonic regime, where aerodynamic forces dominate over gravity. This is critical for orbital recovery, as vertical takeoff horizontal landing (VTHL) baselines like the offered limited cross-range compared to fully winged HTHL configurations. achieves similar capabilities via reaction control thrusters and body flaps during the terminal phase, steering for precise runway or offshore platform landings in tests. Such innovations collectively bridge the gap toward routine, airplane-style space operations.

References

  1. [1]
    Takeoff & Landing Performance – Introduction to Aerospace Flight ...
    During a takeoff maneuver, the airplane is in accelerated motion and experiences a continuously increasing airspeed. Finally, the airplane will reach sufficient ...
  2. [2]
    Dynamics of Flight
    Airplane wings are shaped to make air move faster over the top of the wing. When air moves faster, the pressure of the air decreases. So the pressure on the top ...
  3. [3]
    [PDF] Airplane Flying Handbook (FAA-H-8083-3C) - Chapter 6
    Initial Climb​​ On short-field takeoffs, the landing gear and flaps should remain in takeoff position until the airplane is clear of obstacles (or as recommended ...
  4. [4]
    [PDF] Airplane Flying Handbook (FAA-H-8083-3C) - Chapter 9
    Ground effect is a factor in every landing and every takeoff in fixed-wing airplanes. Ground effect can also be an important factor in go- arounds. If the ...
  5. [5]
    The Lift Equation
    Lift equals the lift coefficient times the density times the. Lift depends on the density of the air, the square of the velocity, the air's viscosity and ...
  6. [6]
    Thrust to Weight Ratio - Glenn Research Center - NASA
    Jun 23, 2025 · If the thrust to weight ratio is greater than one and the drag is small, the aircraft can accelerate straight up like a rocket. Similarly, ...
  7. [7]
    [PDF] AC 150/5325-4B, Runway Length Requirements for Airport Design
    Jul 1, 2005 · Various factors, in turn, govern the suitability of those available runway lengths, most notably airport elevation above mean sea level, ...
  8. [8]
    1903-The First Flight - Wright Brothers - National Park Service
    Oct 10, 2025 · Orville takes off with Wilbur running beside, December 17, 1903. NPS. At 10:35, he released the restraining wire. The flyer moved down the rail ...
  9. [9]
    [PDF] Chapter 5: Aerodynamics of Flight - Federal Aviation Administration
    The above lift equation exemplifies this mathematically and supports that doubling of the airspeed will result in four times the lift.
  10. [10]
    Ground Effect | SKYbrary Aviation Safety
    In normal flight operations, awareness of ground effect is important during the landing flare since it will exacerbate any tendency of an aircraft to float ...
  11. [11]
    [PDF] Advisory Circular 91-79B - Federal Aviation Administration
    Aug 28, 2023 · A calculation of landing distance based on actual landing weight, aircraft configuration, runway and meteorological conditions, including ...<|separator|>
  12. [12]
    [PDF] A Look at Aircraft Accident Analysis in the Early Days
    It appears that poor technique was the most important single factor in that he continued to pull the nose up, still further stalling the seaplane, when he ...
  13. [13]
    [PDF] Vertiports: Ready for Take-off … And Landing - SMU Scholar
    Jul 2, 2019 · Conventional takeoff and landing (CTOL): This refers to horizontal takeoff and landing, which is used by traditional airplanes and often ...
  14. [14]
    [PDF] Short Field Aircraft - NASA Technical Reports Server (NTRS)
    "Short-field Aircraft" is a catchall term under which can be lumped all aircraft which use advanced technology to achieve shorter than ordinary takeoff and ...
  15. [15]
    Reduced Thrust Takeoff | SKYbrary Aviation Safety
    A reduced thrust takeoff is a takeoff that is accomplished utilising less thrust than the engines are capable of producing under the existing conditions.
  16. [16]
    Wing Loading (W/S) - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
    Wing loading (W/S) is defined as the ratio of the weight of an aircraft to its wing planform area, which influences its landing and take-off performance.
  17. [17]
    Flaps and Slats
    On takeoff, we want high lift and low drag, so the flaps will be set downward at a moderate setting. During landing we want high lift and high drag, so the ...
  18. [18]
    [PDF] 737 Airplane Characteristics for Airport Planning - Boeing
    3.3.36 F.A.R. Takeoff Runway Length Requirements - Standard Day, +27°F. (STD + 15°C), Dry Runway: Model 737-700/-700W (CFM56-7B26. Engines at 26,000 LB SLST ...
  19. [19]
    C-130 Hercules > Air Force > Fact Sheet Display - AF.mil
    The C-130 Hercules primarily performs the tactical portion of the airlift mission. The aircraft is capable of operating from rough, dirt strips.Missing: conventional | Show results with:conventional
  20. [20]
    [PDF] Xl/7,3-3/93? NASA TN D-7441 ANALYTICAL STUDY OF TAKEOFF ...
    The effects of various parameters (i.e., wing loading, thrust-to-weight ratio, weight, ambient temperature, altitude) on takeoff and land- ing field length ...Missing: formula | Show results with:formula<|control11|><|separator|>
  21. [21]
    Short Take-Off and Landing (STOL) | SKYbrary Aviation Safety
    STOL is an acronym for short take-off and landing, a term used to describe aircraft with very short runway requirements.
  22. [22]
    A guide to understanding short takeoff and landing aircraft - Red Bull
    Jul 24, 2024 · The “short” in STOL refers to the length of the runway needed to take off and land. And that means these tiny planes are pretty powerful with ...
  23. [23]
  24. [24]
    [PDF] STOL HIGH-LIFT DESIGN STUDY - DTIC
    A STOL configuration with low wing loading, high aspect ratio, low sweep and a high lift curve slope embodies features which are detrimental to smooth ride qual ...
  25. [25]
    [PDF] Design Compendium, Vectored Thrust/Mechanical Fl - DTIC
    The scope of this investigation covers vectored thrust/mechani- cal flap high-lift systems installed on configurations suitable for a. STOL tactical transport.
  26. [26]
    [PDF] DHC-6 TWIN OTTER - Guardian - De Havilland Canada
    Jul 2, 2024 · STOL Takeoff*. 366 m**. 1,200 ft**. STOL Landing*. 320 m**. 1,050 ft ... Takeoff Ground Roll - Wheels. 310 m. 1,020 ft. SFAR 23 Landing Field ...
  27. [27]
    9 Best STOL Aircraft | Flying411
    Aug 13, 2025 · 1. CubCrafters Carbon Cub. The Carbon Cub is often called a modern classic. · 2. Piper Super Cub · 3. Aviat Husky A-1C · 4. Maule M-7 Series · 5.
  28. [28]
    Energizing Performance: Leading Edge Slots | Boldmethod
    Feb 3, 2014 · The most basic leading edge device is a "slot," and while it lets you generate more lift at slower speeds, it carries a price in drag.Missing: rates | Show results with:rates
  29. [29]
    Just Aircraft's SuperSTOL Extreme: Economy Class, STOL ...
    Oct 30, 2015 · It also provides climb rates as high as 3,000 fpm, and full flap stall comes at a ridiculously low 32 mph. I flew with Just factory test pilot ...
  30. [30]
    The Fieseler Storch Fi 156 - Warfare History Network
    For operations on snow-covered airfields, the Fi 156 was fitted with specialized ski-mounted underpods, and on all models wings could be folded back for ...
  31. [31]
    [PDF] Profile-Publications-Aircraft-228---Fieseler-Fi-156-Storch.pdf
    The object was to discover the strategic possi- bilities of Arctic operations. However, at that time no entirely suitable gyroplane-far less a helicopter ...
  32. [32]
    How Fighter Jets Take Off From Aircraft Carriers: 4 Methods Explained
    May 5, 2024 · STOBAR. Short Take-off, Barrier Arrested Recovery (STOBAR) is a launch and recovery system used by naval aircraft carriers to get their ...
  33. [33]
    What is the force exerted by the catapult on aircraft carriers?
    Feb 10, 2016 · Current steam catapults deliver up to 95 MJ over 94 m. Each shot consumes up to 614 kg of steam piped from the reactor.
  34. [34]
    China Experimenting With Catapult Launched Carrier Aircraft
    Sep 22, 2016 · China has stepped up development of Catapult-Assisted Take-Off But Arrested Recovery (CATOBAR) operations for its carriers.<|separator|>
  35. [35]
    Explained: STOBAR Vs CATOBAR type of Aircraft Carriers
    Jul 2, 2021 · STOBAR Type Of Aircraft Carriers. STOBAR stands for Short Take-off But Arrested Recovery (B stands for Barrier also). In this type of carrier ...
  36. [36]
    Why do naval jet aircraft need to have strengthened undercarriages?
    May 23, 2016 · Naval jets need strengthened undercarriages due to hard, precise landings at high vertical speeds, and the high forces from catapult takeoffs.
  37. [37]
    The Tailhook and Landing on an Aircraft Carrier | HowStuffWorks
    To land on the flight deck, each plane needs a tailhook, which is exactly what it sounds like -- an extended hook attached to the plane's tail.
  38. [38]
    America's First Aircraft Carrier | National Air and Space Museum
    Jan 4, 2022 · To save space, Navy aircraft tend to have foldable wings. This is one of the most visually striking aspects of the Navy aircraft on display at ...<|separator|>
  39. [39]
    What speed does an F-18 reach between its standing start ... - Quora
    Feb 23, 2022 · A F/A 18 can take of at 145 knots which it can reach in 450 meters ( lightly loaded I presume ) . If the aircraft carrier is sailing at 25 knots ...What is faster, an F18 at the end of the carrier launch, or a Tesla at ...Can the F-18 hornet take off from a catapult with a maximum ... - QuoraMore results from www.quora.com
  40. [40]
    INS Vikramaditya Aircraft Carrier - Naval Technology
    Feb 4, 2021 · INS Vikramaditya is the Indian Navy's largest short take-off but assisted recovery (STOBAR) aircraft carrier and warship converted from the Russian Navy.
  41. [41]
    [PDF] ANALYSIS OF AIRCRAFT CARRIER MOTIONS IN A HIGH ... - DTIC
    Carrier landing operations are often suspended because of severe deck motions. Attempts are being made to compensate for deck motions (and thereby extend ...
  42. [42]
    Why Do Aircraft Carriers Face The Wind During Flight Operations?
    Aug 13, 2025 · By turning the ship into the wind, you increase the airspeed across the flight deck, in turn allowing jets to lift off with less engine power ...
  43. [43]
    The first shipboard aircraft landing and takeoff - General Aviation News
    Oct 18, 2018 · First airplane landing on a warship: Eugene B. Ely's Curtiss pusher biplane about to touch down on the landing platform on USS Pennsylvania ( ...
  44. [44]
    [PDF] NASA Electric Vertical Takeoff and Landing (eVTOL) Aircraft ...
    eVTOL aircraft of different types and from different manufacturers may be used during humanitarian missions. Therefore ensuring that these aircraft are ...
  45. [45]
    V-22 Osprey - Marine Corps Aviation
    The V-22 Osprey is a multi-engine, dual-piloted, self-deployable, medium lift, vertical takeoff and landing (VTOL) tilt-rotor aircraft designed for combat.
  46. [46]
    Ryan X-13 Vertijet - Air Force Museum
    It was then fitted with a temporary "tail sitting" rig, and in May 1956 this X-13 flew vertically to test its hovering qualities. The second X-13 -- on ...
  47. [47]
    [PDF] F-35_Air_Vehicle_Technology_Overview.pdf - Lockheed Martin
    Jun 29, 2018 · Additionally, the F-35B STOVL variant incorporates Rolls-Royce's shaft-driven LiftFan® system. In lift mode, horsepower is extracted from the ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  48. [48]
    Rolls-Royce LiftSystem
    One of a kind vertical lift technology ; Our unique LiftFan is: Capable of delivering 20,000lbf cold thrust; Has a 50 inch diameter 2-stage counter-rotating fan ...
  49. [49]
    [PDF] review of basic principles of v/stol aerodynamics
    The shape of the power-required curve in transition depends upon the following items: the disk loading, which determines the power required in hovering (the low ...
  50. [50]
    [PDF] large-scale wind-tunru_l studies of several vtol types
    They include: (1) those using lightly loaded helicopter-type rotors,. (2) those using moderately loaded airplane-type propellers, and. (3) those using highly.
  51. [51]
    The Ups and Downs of our VTOL Program
    Even though it consumes fuel about four times faster than a helicopter with the same payload, this VTOL's propulsion system weight plus fuel for a ten-minute ...
  52. [52]
    New Shepard | Blue Origin
    ### New Shepard VTVL, Landing Process, and Technologies
  53. [53]
    https : / / www . spacex . com / vehicles / falcon - 9
    SpaceX designs, manufactures and launches advanced rockets and spacecraft. The company was founded in 2002 to revolutionize space technology, with the ultimate<|separator|>
  54. [54]
    [PDF] Multidisciplinary Design Optimization of Reusable Launch Vehicles ...
    Sep 3, 2020 · Therefore, we can assume a similar deceleration behavior due to atmospheric drag, leading to similar delta-v requirements for the landing burn.
  55. [55]
    [PDF] TB-03: Derivation of Thrust Vector Control (TVC) Actuator-Force ...
    Dec 10, 2024 · Thrust vector control (TVC) systems for rocket engine propulsion traditionally use a simple linear relationship to convert between actuator ...
  56. [56]
    SpaceX rocket in historic upright landing - BBC News
    Dec 22, 2015 · The first stage of the SpaceX Falcon 9 rocket returns to land at Cape Canaveral Air Image source, Reuters. Image caption,. The upgraded, 23 ...
  57. [57]
    Blue Origin Makes Historic Rocket Landing
    Nov 23, 2015 · Blue Origin successfully completed the 36th flight for the New Shepard program. New Shepard has now flown 86 humans (80 individuals) into space.
  58. [58]
    SpaceX's reusable Falcon 9: What are the real cost savings for ...
    Apr 25, 2016 · If SpaceX passed on to its customers 50 percent of the cost savings, the company could reduce today's Falcon 9 price by 21 percent, to $48.3 ...
  59. [59]
    [PDF] Horizontal Launch - NASA Technical Reports Server (NTRS)
    sive to develop, and in 1972, the Space Shuttle design was fixed as a vertically-launched rocket- ... vertical takeoff. VtoHl vertical takeoff horizontal landing.
  60. [60]
    The Aeronautics of the Space Shuttle - NASA
    Dec 29, 2003 · It uses a double-delta wing configuration to achieve the most efficient flight during hypersonic speed as well as providing a good lift -to-drag ...
  61. [61]
    Buran reusable shuttle - RussianSpaceWeb.com
    This mini-shuttle would be launched on the back of a hypersonic aircraft , itself capable of reaching Mach 6 (or six times of the speed of sound). After ...Missing: horizontal | Show results with:horizontal
  62. [62]
    Development of Low-Cost High Temperature Reusable Thermal ...
    Sierra Space is developing a low-cost, high-temperature, reusable Thermal Protection System (TPS) for application on the Dream Chaser® Space Plane.Missing: VTHL design reentry
  63. [63]
    Dream Chaser Crew Transport VTHL Spacecraft - Airport Technology
    Jul 3, 2012 · Dreams Chaser is a vertical-takeoff horizontal landing (VTHL) space vehicle being developed by Sierra Nevada Corporation's (SNC) subsidiary, SpaceDev.
  64. [64]
    [PDF] Space Shuttle: Orbiter Processing - NASA facts
    The process actually begins at the end of each flight, with a landing at the center or, after landing at an alternate site, the return of the orbiter atop a.
  65. [65]
    Virgin Galactic achieves space on SpaceShipTwo test flight
    Dec 13, 2018 · With pilots Mark Stucky and C.J. Sturckow at the controls, SpaceShipTwo fired its hybrid rocket motor for 60 seconds. The vehicle reached a peak ...<|separator|>
  66. [66]
    [PDF] Current Hypersonic and Space Vehicle Flight Test and Instrumentation
    Jun 22, 2015 · Hypersonic flight test applies to suborbital, space transit, and space access vehicles. Recent programs are being initiated by the US Air Force, ...Missing: HTVL tourism
  67. [67]
    X-37B - Boeing
    The X-37B is equipped with state-of-the-art technologies that provide exceptional performance and durability. Its modular design allows for a wide range of ...
  68. [68]
    [PDF] V/STOL Concepts and Developed Aircraft. Volume 1. A Historical ...
    1. The decision by the U.S. Air Force not to operate transport airplanes directly into a combat zone. This led to the ...Missing: Arctic | Show results with:Arctic
  69. [69]
    [PDF] Historical Overview of V/STOL Aircraft Technology
    For over 25 years a concerted effort has been made to derive aircraft that combine the vertical take- off and landing capabilities of the helicopter.Missing: definition multi-
  70. [70]
    F-35B Joint Strike Fighter (JSF) - GlobalSecurity.org
    Jul 31, 2015 · For vertical lift, the Yak-141 used two RD-41 jet engines mounted in tandem behind the cockpit and a thrust-vectoring main engine. The aircraft ...
  71. [71]
    [PDF] FG19-00608_002 Product Card F-35B.indd - Lockheed Martin
    STOVL capability gives the F-35B the unique capability to operate from a variety of ships, roads and austere bases near frontline combat zones, greatly ...<|separator|>
  72. [72]
    [PDF] technological gaps in v/stol development
    the penalty in terms of power required and overall aircraft weight. Studies of the effects of reducing the control power from the study requirement to half.
  73. [73]
    AV-8C Harrier - Naval History and Heritage Command
    Its initial operational service was in Marine Attack Squadron (VMA) 513, in which it served until 1982 before making a deployment in the amphibious assault ship ...
  74. [74]
    [PDF] VTOL Urban Air Mobility Concept Vehicles for Technology ...
    In our usage, a “type” refers to the general layout and control strategy of an aircraft. For instance a single main rotor helicopter, a tiltrotor, a quadrotor, ...
  75. [75]
    Vision-Based Autonomous Landing eVTOL in GPS-Denied Env
    The prototype vision-based system identifies a landing zone, and calculates relative position and orientation position without reliance on Global Positioning ...
  76. [76]
    Autonomous eVTOL: A summary of researches and challenges
    This paper provides a comprehensive review of latest researches related to autonomous eVTOL. It examines key technologies involved in autonomous eVTOL.
  77. [77]
    Garmin® revolutionizes the aviation industry with the first Autoland ...
    Oct 30, 2019 · The Autoland system determines the most optimal airport and runway, taking into account factors such as weather, terrain, obstacles and aircraft performance ...
  78. [78]
    Resources - Notices - FAA - FAASTeam - FAASafety.gov
    Jul 6, 2023 · Three aircraft have been certified with Garmin Emergency Autoland (EAL) systems in 2020: the Piper M600, the Daher TBM 940, and the Cirrus Vision Jet SF50.<|separator|>
  79. [79]
    DJI Dock 2 Elevates Automatic Drone Operations to New Heights
    Mar 26, 2024 · Both drones feature integrated RTK antennas, omnidirectional obstacle sensing, and automatic obstacle bypass, enhancing the success rate of ...
  80. [80]
    X-57 Maxwell Overview - NASA
    Sep 13, 2018 · The primary goal of the X-57 project is to share the aircraft's electric ... 57 to take off and land at the same speed as the baseline P2006T.Converting Existing Aircraft · Simulator · Airvolt · High-Aspect Ratio...
  81. [81]
    NASA's X-57 Electric Aircraft Program Ends Without a Flight
    Jun 29, 2023 · NASA is pulling the plug on its X-57 Maxwell electric airplane experiment without a single flight test on the books, the agency announced June 23.<|separator|>
  82. [82]
    Joby Completes Third Stage of FAA Certification Process
    Feb 21, 2024 · Joby has now completed three of five stages of type certification process; First eVTOL company to reach this milestone towards commercialization.
  83. [83]
    Joby Reports Record Certification Progress and Delivery of Second ...
    Feb 26, 2025 · Joby reports Fourth Quarter and Full Year 2024 results; Record progress on stage four of FAA certification; Delivery of second aircraft to ...Missing: eVTOL | Show results with:eVTOL
  84. [84]
    Challenges and key requirements of batteries for electric vertical ...
    Jul 21, 2021 · We experimentally demonstrate two energy-dense Li-ion battery designs that can recharge adequate energy for 80 km eVTOL trips in 5–10 min and ...
  85. [85]
    Solidion's Lithium-Sulfur Batteries and the Future of eVTOL Aircraft
    Mar 11, 2024 · Industry experts agree that "eVTOL aircraft needs a battery system with a gravimetric energy density > 400 Wh/kg"2. For an air taxi to carry ...
  86. [86]
    Industry split as FAA's Part 108 BVLOS drone rule moves into review ...
    Oct 8, 2025 · As the FAA's long-awaited BVLOS rule moves into review, experts say it could provide the “operational backbone” for scaling drone operations ...
  87. [87]
    Drone Beyond Line of Sight Proposed Rule: Top 10 Things You ...
    Aug 6, 2025 · The proposed rule would enable BVLOS operations up to 400 feet above ground level for unmanned aircraft weighing up to 1,320 pounds, including ...<|separator|>
  88. [88]
    Urban Air Mobility Market Size, Share & Trends Report, 2030
    The global urban air mobility market size was estimated at USD 3.58 Billion in 2023 and is projected to reach USD 29.19 Billion by 2030, growing at a CAGR ...
  89. [89]
  90. [90]
    The future of air mobility: Electric aircraft and flying taxis - McKinsey
    In 2030, passenger advanced-air-mobility operators could rival today's largest airlines in flights per day and fleet size. By 2030, the leading companies in the ...
  91. [91]
    Skunk Works' X-33 and VentureStar - SpaceflightHistories
    May 3, 2023 · Lockheed Martin's X-33 was a technology demonstrator of the VentureStar orbital spaceplane funded by NASA in the 1990s.
  92. [92]
    X-33
    Rockwell International's Space Division, which proposed a vertical takeoff / horizontal landing delta-winged, twin tail, vehicle with five engines. Rockwell's ...
  93. [93]
    Esa study examines Skylon space plane - BBC News
    Aug 7, 2013 · A consortium of companies will try to establish the business case for a reusable space plane in a new European Space Agency (Esa) funded study.
  94. [94]
    Space plane engine of the future to get flight test in 2020 - NBC News
    a privately funded, single-stage-to-orbit concept ...
  95. [95]
    Hypersonic engine developer Reaction enters administration
    Nov 1, 2024 · The SABRE engine is designed to operate in two modes – from take-off to hypersonic speeds of Mach 5 while within the atmosphere it sucks in air ...Missing: 2020s | Show results with:2020s
  96. [96]
    Elon Musk's 'Bakery' Forges the Future of Space Travel with Mass ...
    Oct 17, 2025 · The heat shield remains a primary focus, with ongoing innovation in material science and design crucial for achieving rapid reusability without ...
  97. [97]
    Starship heat shield - NASA Spaceflight Forum
    Oct 15, 2025 · So you can't have a rapidly reusable launch system if after every single launch you have to re-waterproof the tiles in a process that takes 5 ...Missing: metallic | Show results with:metallic
  98. [98]
    China tests experimental reusable spacecraft shrouded in mystery
    Sep 8, 2020 · China's official Xinhua news agency said Sunday the reusable spacecraft successfully landed Sunday, Sept. 6, after flying in orbit for two days.
  99. [99]
    China's Shenlong space plane ends third flight, shows 'maturing ...
    Sep 6, 2024 · China's experimental reusable spacecraft has completed its third orbital test, landing at its designated site in the Gobi Desert on Friday after 268 days in ...
  100. [100]
    China's spaceplane remains in orbit but clues emerge ... - SpaceNews
    Aug 16, 2022 · Though China has released no details of the mission, there are clear differences from the spacecraft's apparent first outing in September 2020.
  101. [101]
    Air-breathing rocket engine | Ingenia
    The concept of the SABRE engine for entry into space: an air-breathing jet for horizontal take-off and flight up to Mach 5 at 26 kilometres altitude, and ...
  102. [102]
    [PDF] An Air-Breathing Launch Vehicle Concept for Single-Stage-to-Orbit
    The propulsion system operates in four modes including ramjet, scramjet, and rocket modes from lilt-off to orbit. A new low speed mode, intended to minimize.
  103. [103]
    Conceptual Study of a Rocket-Ramjet Combined-Cycle Engine for ...
    Conceptual Study of a Rocket-Ramjet Combined-Cycle Engine for an Aerospace Plane. Takeshi Kanda,; Kouichiro Tani and; Kenji Kudo. Takeshi Kanda.
  104. [104]
    Aeroshape design of reusable re-entry vehicles by multidisciplinary ...
    These systems would support a large variety of mission objectives in terms of payload, range, cross-range, manoeuvrability, and landing capabilities on ...
  105. [105]
    [PDF] Concepts of Operations for a Reusable Launch Vehicle - GovInfo
    The term cross-range capability, as used here, refers to the ability of an RLV to maneuver within the atmosphere upon its return from space. This does not ...