Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

2021 Kabul airport attack

The 2021 Kabul airport attack was a suicide bombing executed by the (ISIS-K) on August 26, 2021, targeting crowds at the Abbey Gate entrance to Hamid Karzai International Airport amid the U.S.-led evacuation from Taliban-controlled . The assailant, ISIS-K operative Abdul Rahman al-Logari, detonated a laden with ball bearings in a throng of and others desperate to board outbound flights, exploiting the unsecured perimeter during the final days of the American withdrawal. The explosion killed 13 U.S. service members—11 , one Navy corpsman, and one soldier—and wounded at least 15 more Americans, while claiming the lives of approximately 160 civilians and injuring scores of others in the deadliest single incident of the evacuation operation. ISIS-K publicly claimed responsibility, with planning involving reconnaissance by affiliated members such as Mohammad Sharifullah, who scouted access routes and confirmed minimal security obstacles. U.S. military reviews later affirmed the attack as the work of a lone , identifying al-Logari through forensic evidence and intelligence, while dismissing unsubstantiated assertions of advance warnings or coordinated multiple assailants. The bombing underscored ISIS-K's opportunistic exploitation of the power vacuum post-Taliban resurgence, as the group vied for influence against the new regime, which had pledged but failed to fully secure the airport perimeter. In retaliation, U.S. forces conducted drone strikes targeting ISIS-K figures, though one August 29 operation erroneously killed 10 Afghan civilians, including seven children, in a misidentified vehicle. The incident prompted arrests of planners like Sharifullah in subsequent years and Taliban operations against ISIS-K leadership, including the 2023 killing of the cell's coordinator, yet it fueled enduring scrutiny over evacuation security protocols and the broader withdrawal's causal chain of vulnerabilities.

Historical and Strategic Context

US Military Presence and Objectives in Afghanistan

The United States launched Operation Enduring Freedom on October 7, 2001, initiating a military invasion of Afghanistan to dismantle al-Qaeda's operational base following the September 11 attacks and to remove the Taliban regime, which had refused demands to extradite Osama bin Laden and other al-Qaeda leaders. Initial objectives centered on counterterrorism: neutralizing immediate threats from al-Qaeda sanctuaries and preventing Afghanistan from serving as a launchpad for attacks on U.S. soil or allies. U.S. forces, supported by coalition partners and Afghan Northern Alliance militias, rapidly toppled the Taliban government by December 2001, scattering its leadership and disrupting al-Qaeda's core structure. Over the ensuing years, U.S. objectives evolved under the Bush administration from narrow to broader , encompassing the establishment of a centralized democratic government, reconstruction of infrastructure, and development of (ANSF) capable of independent operations against insurgents. This shift involved committing resources to train over 350,000 ANSF personnel by 2021 and channeling aid through Afghan institutions, with the intent of fostering self-sustaining governance to avert resurgence. However, these efforts disregarded Afghanistan's decentralized tribal dynamics and imposed top-down Western institutional models, contributing to misaligned priorities and eroded local legitimacy. Persistent strategic shortcomings included unchecked corruption in Afghan governance, where billions in U.S. aid fueled and ghost soldier payrolls, hollowing out ANSF and morale. The ANSF's reliance on U.S. enablers—such as , , and —exposed foundational dependencies, as units often fragmented without external sustainment due to failures and insufficient national cohesion. These vulnerabilities stemmed from absent clear metrics for success, resulting in a protracted that incurred 2,456 U.S. military deaths and approximately $2.3 trillion in direct and indirect expenditures without achieving a stable, self-reliant Afghan state.

Trump Administration's Withdrawal Agreement

The United States and the Taliban signed the Agreement for Bringing Peace to Afghanistan on February 29, 2020, in Doha, Qatar, committing the U.S. to a phased troop withdrawal from 13,000 to 8,600 personnel within 135 days, followed by a full withdrawal of all U.S. and allied forces by May 1, 2021, contingent on Taliban adherence to specified conditions. In exchange, the Taliban pledged to prevent any terrorist groups, including al-Qaeda, from using Afghan territory to threaten the security of the United States and its allies, specifically prohibiting al-Qaeda recruitment, training, fundraising, or planning operations against the U.S. from Taliban-controlled areas; to cease attacks on U.S. and coalition forces; and to initiate direct intra-Afghan negotiations with the Afghan government for a political settlement and ceasefire. The deal also included provisions for the Taliban to facilitate prisoner exchanges, with up to 5,000 Taliban prisoners released by the Afghan government in return for 1,000 government personnel. Despite these commitments, the Taliban demonstrated partial non-compliance, particularly on assurances, as evidenced by continued safe havens for leaders and affiliates in . U.S. assessments confirmed the presence of figures under Taliban protection, with no verifiable break in operational ties, undermining the agreement's intent to neutralize transnational threats. Regarding ISIS-K, an offshoot and rival to the Taliban, the group maintained operational capacity in eastern , conducting attacks that violated the spirit of the Taliban's pledge to prevent terrorist threats against U.S. interests, despite intermittent Taliban efforts to suppress ISIS-K competition. Intra-Afghan talks commenced in September 2020 but stalled amid Taliban insistence on preconditions and ongoing offensives against Afghan forces, further eroding the agreement's framework for de-escalation. The Trump administration advanced troop reductions in line with the timeline, drawing down to approximately 2,500 U.S. personnel by January , while establishing the deadline as the culmination of the withdrawal process. This framework, including the fixed endpoint and conditional guarantees, transitioned to the incoming Biden administration, which opted not to adhere to the original target amid ongoing evaluations of and strategic needs. The agreement's emphasis on rapid drawdown without robust enforcement mechanisms for promises contributed to vulnerabilities in maintaining U.S. leverage over terrorist sanctuaries, setting conditions that complicated subsequent .

Biden Administration's Implementation and Planning Failures

On April 14, 2021, President Biden announced the complete withdrawal of U.S. troops from , setting an initial deadline of September 11, 2021, to conclude operations that began after the 2001 terrorist attacks, despite assessments of the Afghan government's limited capacity to withstand advances without sustained U.S. support. This timeline extended the May 1, 2021, deadline from the Trump-era Doha Agreement but compressed the drawdown phase amid ongoing territorial gains, with U.S. intelligence indicating the Afghan National Defense and Security Forces' fragility in key provinces. By July 8, 2021, the administration accelerated the withdrawal to August 31, 2021, prioritizing a rapid exit over extended stabilization efforts, even as military leaders like Joint Chiefs Chairman General Mark Milley advised maintaining at least 2,500 troops to prevent a swift Taliban resurgence and Afghan governmental collapse. Milley and other advisors, including General Kenneth McKenzie, had repeatedly warned Biden in interagency meetings that a full troop reduction would likely lead to the Taliban's rapid takeover of Kabul, based on historical precedents of proxy-supported insurgencies outlasting conventional forces once external backing waned; these cautions were overridden in favor of projections emphasizing Afghan self-sufficiency. Pre-evacuation planning for noncombatant Americans and Afghan allies was inadequate, with the State Department delaying the activation of a (NEO) until August 14, 2021—after the 's capture of key cities—despite earlier indicators of accelerating provincial falls that left International Airport as the sole viable extraction point by forces. This ad-hoc response stemmed from underestimation of the Afghan government's collapse velocity, ignoring intelligence assessments that forecasted a potential of within weeks rather than months, which in turn fostered improvised security measures at the airport vulnerable to insurgent infiltration. Congressional reviews later attributed these lapses to a prioritization of withdrawal optics over contingency drills for mass extractions, exacerbating risks from restricted access routes and checkpoints.

Prelude to the Evacuation Chaos

Taliban Military Advances and Capture of Kabul

Following the acceleration of U.S. troop drawdown in early , the initiated a widespread offensive starting in May, rapidly capturing rural districts and border crossings, which eroded Afghan National Defense and Security Forces (ANDSF) morale and logistics. By July 9, , the seized their first provincial capital, Qala-i-Naw in , marking the beginning of a cascade of urban falls. Over the subsequent weeks, the group overran approximately half of Afghanistan's 370 districts, exploiting ANDSF desertions and supply shortages amid widespread , including commanders inflating "" on payrolls to siphon funds. The Taliban's momentum intensified in August 2021, with provincial capitals surrendering en masse due to minimal resistance. On August 8, they captured , a key northern hub, followed by and —the country's second- and third-largest cities—on August 13. fell early on August 15 without a fight, as local forces negotiated surrender. This swift disintegration highlighted the ANDSF's operational failures, despite the U.S. expending over $80 billion since 2002 on training, equipping, and sustaining an army nominally numbering 300,000 troops, which proved unable to sustain independent combat due to dependency on U.S. air support, leadership graft, and eroded will to fight. On August 15, 2021, Kabul collapsed unopposed as President fled the country by helicopter to , citing the need to avert bloodshed among residents, leaving behind a . fighters entered the capital later that day, raising their flag over the and declaring the Islamic Emirate restored without significant engagements. By August 16, forces had secured the city's perimeters, including approaches to Hamid Karzai International Airport, which complicated subsequent international access and created opportunities for insurgent infiltration amid the ensuing disorder. This rapid takeover, compressing a projected multi-year insurgency into 11 weeks, underscored the fragility of the U.S.-backed Afghan state and enabled rival groups like ISIS-K to exploit the instability in the capital region.

Initiation of US-Led Evacuations at International Airport

Following the Taliban's uncontested entry into on August 15, 2021, U.S. Central Command initiated by surging troops to secure International Airport (HKIA), establishing control over the inner perimeter to enable emergency airlifts of U.S. citizens, Afghan allies, and other eligible evacuees. The operation leveraged existing military assets, including C-17 Globemaster and C-130 Hercules aircraft, to process entrants through multiple checkpoints amid rapidly deteriorating external security. U.S. troop levels at HKIA expanded from a pre-surge presence of approximately 2,500 to over 5,400 personnel by late , with forces primarily tasked with vetting, boarding, and flight operations rather than extending defenses beyond the airport grounds. This constrained footprint prioritized maximizing evacuation throughput—ultimately processing more than 124,000 individuals between and 31—over comprehensive perimeter fortification, straining resources as service members managed simultaneous humanitarian and security demands. Severe overcrowding emerged immediately at primary access points like Abbey Gate, where desperate crowds numbering in the tens of thousands surged toward U.S.-controlled areas, creating bottlenecks and exposing entrants to risks in open, unmanaged spaces. U.S. forces coordinated with militants to enforce an outer security ring, tasking them with dispersing throngs and preventing unauthorized advances, despite the Taliban's demonstrated unreliability—including their mid-August release of thousands of ISIS-K detainees from Afghan prisons—which undermined trust in their ability to neutralize threats. This reliance on adversarial actors for external left dense gatherings as vulnerable "soft targets," amplifying logistical vulnerabilities inherent to the hasty setup.

Escalating ISIS-K Threats and Ignored Intelligence Indicators

The (ISIS-K) maintained a fierce ideological rivalry with the , denouncing them as apostates for engaging in negotiations with the and compromising on strict Salafi-jihadist principles in favor of nationalism. This antagonism positioned International Airport as a prime target during the U.S.-led evacuation, as ISIS-K sought to exploit the Taliban's tentative cooperation with American forces to undermine their legitimacy and inflict maximum casualties on Western personnel and collaborators. ISIS-K's prior operations in demonstrated its capacity for high-impact suicide bombings; on May 12, 2020, the group attacked a maternity ward in Kabul's Dasht-e-Barchi hospital, killing at least 24 people including mothers and infants using coordinated gunfire and explosives. By 2021, ISIS-K had escalated its attacks nationwide, targeting civilians and security forces to assert dominance amid the power vacuum. U.S. intelligence agencies issued multiple warnings of ISIS-K's intent to strike the airport in the days leading up to August 26, 2021, including assessments that the group was actively plotting vehicle-borne (VBIED) or attacks against crowded evacuation sites. A State Department later acknowledged persistent ISIS-K threats amid uncontrolled crowds at the airport, yet these alerts were often characterized as indicating potential rather than immediate dangers, despite historical patterns of ISIS-K employing tactics in urban settings. Public statements from U.S. military officials, such as warnings on August 22 about ISIS-K targeting the airport, underscored the elevated risk, but operational responses remained limited. Commanders failed to enact recommended security enhancements, such as dispersing concentrations of evacuees at gates or bolstering perimeter screenings, partly due to bureaucratic prioritization of maximizing evacuation throughput to meet the deadline over comprehensive threat mitigation. This approach reflected overreliance on Taliban-provided outer-ring , which indicated was unreliable against ISIS-K infiltration, as the group had recruited from released prisoners and exploited local grievances. Critics, including congressional reviews, argued that downplaying the specificity of warnings stemmed from political imperatives to portray the withdrawal as orderly, sidelining empirical indicators of ISIS-K's operational tempo.

The Suicide Bombing

ISIS-K Operational Planning and Ideology

, the , adheres to a purist Salafi-jihadist ideology that condemns the for establishing a nationalistic rather than advancing a borderless , viewing their negotiations with the as a betrayal of uncompromising global . This doctrinal opposition frames the as apostates, justifying ISIS-K's attacks on them as religiously mandated to purify the jihadist cause from compromise. ISIS-K explicitly rejects "nationalism," portraying it as a dilution of true Islamic governance that prioritizes Afghan sovereignty over universal conquest. Recruitment into ISIS-K draws primarily from disaffected elements of the Afghan and , alongside Central Asian militants from groups such as the and the , who pledge allegiance seeking a more radical alternative to pragmatism. These recruits, often former detainees or splinter factions, bolster ISIS-K's ranks amid ideological grievances over the Taliban's Doha Agreement and power-sharing exclusions. By 2021, this base enabled opportunistic operations exploiting Afghanistan's instability, with foreign fighters providing technical expertise in explosives and tactics. The airport attack's execution followed a lone model, with a single ISIS-K operative detonating smuggled explosives at Abbey Gate, as reaffirmed by a 2024 Department of Defense supplemental review of the incident. Subsequent arrests, including the March 2025 U.S. of ISIS-K planner Sharifullah for orchestrating the bombing, exposed a lean cell structure reliant on minimal coordination to infiltrate crowds amid vetting lapses during the evacuation chaos. Explosives were likely concealed and transported by the himself, capitalizing on the disorder to bypass layered security without requiring extensive logistical support. Strategically, ISIS-K timed the August 26 strike to sabotage U.S. withdrawal optics, killing American forces and Afghan civilians to highlight incapacity in securing key sites and to reaffirm the group's ambitions amid perceived Western retreat. By targeting the high-density evacuation hub, the attack sought to erode legitimacy, provoke retaliatory cycles, and signal ISIS-K's enduring threat to both infidels and rival Islamists, thereby sustaining and global relevance. This exploitation of withdrawal-induced vulnerabilities underscored ISIS-K's adaptive tactics over resource-intensive plots.

Detailed Sequence of Events on August 26, 2021

At approximately 5:50 p.m. local time (17:50), a bomber approached Abbey Gate—the primary western entrance to International Airport—through a dense crowd of Afghans awaiting evacuation processing and U.S.-allied personnel, then detonated an explosive vest containing roughly 25 pounds of high explosives. The device, concealed on the attacker's body, was triggered just short of the U.S. Marines' search perimeter, maximizing impact on the gathered throng outside the gate. The detonation produced a powerful and fragmentation effects, shattering nearby vehicles, damaging adjacent barriers and infrastructure, and scattering across the immediate area. U.S. troops on site experienced initial disorientation, with the explosion's acoustics and shock prompting some to interpret it as possible incoming , leading to a brief pause before confirming the suicide bombing nature. Forensic examination of the blast site, including residue and fragment patterns, corroborated the single suicide vest as the sole device, with no indicators of secondary explosives or coordinated follow-on attacks uncovered in Department of Defense investigations. These findings, reaffirmed in a 2024 supplemental review incorporating additional witness accounts and biometric data linking the perpetrator to ISIS-K, emphasized the attack's reliance on one individual's infiltration amid the unmanaged crowd dynamics.

Immediate Casualties and Physical Impact

The suicide bombing at Abbey Gate outside International Airport on August 26, 2021, killed 13 U.S. service members: 11 from the 2nd Marine Expeditionary Unit, one corpsman attached to the , and one . This represented the highest number of U.S. fatalities in a single incident in since a 2011 helicopter shootdown that killed 30 Americans. At least 18 U.S. service members were wounded immediately, with subsequent reports indicating dozens more suffered injuries ranging from shrapnel wounds to traumatic brain injuries. Among , U.S. military assessments reported roughly 170 deaths, predominantly civilians gathered for evacuation, while officials claimed between 169 and 182 fatalities. Over 200 were injured, many with severe blast trauma including amputations and internal injuries treated at nearby hospitals. The explosion, caused by a vest packed with explosives, inflicted localized physical damage to the gate's barriers and surrounding concrete, scattering and debris across the crowded area. Evacuation operations paused briefly amid the chaos and psychological shock to service members and crowds, though the airport's core infrastructure sustained no major structural compromise. Blast survivors, both U.S. and , faced long-term effects such as , neurological damage, and post-traumatic stress from proximity to the detonation.

US Military and Retaliatory Actions

On-Site Response and Security Adjustments

U.S. forces rapidly secured the blast site at Abbey Gate following the suicide bombing on August 26, 2021, establishing tighter control over the perimeter amid persistent threats from ISIS-K and presence. and other service members prioritized and on-site medical treatment, managing a that included triaging dozens of wounded personnel under austere conditions with limited resources. Critical care was provided by embedded medical teams, including forward surgical units, which handled blast-related trauma such as wounds and amputations before to higher-level facilities. In response to the attack's demonstration of vulnerabilities in crowd-dense areas, tactical security measures were adapted to minimize exposure, including restrictions on large gatherings at entry points and bans on non-essential vehicles approaching gates to counter potential vehicle-borne improvised explosive devices. Processing shifted toward smaller, vetted groups to facilitate screening while reducing the risk of secondary bombings, reflecting ground-level adaptations by commanders facing constrained manpower and an unsecured outer perimeter reliant on Taliban cooperation for crowd dispersal. These changes occurred without broader strategic overhauls, emphasizing immediate operational resilience. Body recovery efforts involved coordination with Taliban fighters under U.S. oversight to retrieve remains from the debris field, as American troops focused on securing the site and treating survivors rather than exhaustive searches in a hostile environment. No additional attacks materialized on August 26, enabling limited resumption of evacuation flights within approximately two hours of the blast. This allowed for the processing and of roughly 6,000 more evacuees in the ensuing days leading to the August 31 deadline, sustaining operations despite heightened risks and resource strains.

Targeted Drone Strikes Against ISIS-K

In retaliation for the August 26 suicide bombing, U.S. Central Command conducted an over-the-horizon strike on August 27, 2021, in , eastern , targeting ISIS-K operatives believed to be planning additional attacks on U.S. forces and evacuation operations. The operation utilized MQ-9 Reaper drones armed with missiles, guided by real-time intelligence from multiple sources including signals intercepts and human reporting, demonstrating post-withdrawal strike capabilities from bases outside . The strike killed two high-profile ISIS-K members—one identified as a facilitator and planner of external operations against the —and wounded a third individual, according to Pentagon assessments. U.S. officials asserted that the action degraded local ISIS-K cells and disrupted imminent follow-on plots against American personnel at International Airport, with no reported civilian casualties in the immediate aftermath. Tactically, the precision strike highlighted the efficacy of targeted killings in neutralizing mid-level operatives reliant on vehicle movements in rural areas, leveraging persistent to minimize risks compared to broader airstrikes. However, its strategic impact was constrained, as ISIS-K's decentralized structure allowed surviving elements to amplify the airport bombing's value through claims of successfully piercing U.S. defenses, thereby recruiting and sustaining threats beyond immediate cellular disruption.

The August 29 Civilian Drone Strike Mistake

On August 29, 2021, a U.S. MQ-9 Reaper drone launched a Hellfire missile at a white in a residential area of Kabul's Qahar Bagh neighborhood, under the belief that the vehicle and its occupants posed an imminent ISIS-K threat involving a vehicle-borne . The strike incinerated the car and killed 10 civilians, including Zemari Ahmadi, a 49-year-old employee of the U.S.-funded aid group Nutrition & Education International, his three-year-old daughter, and six other children aged 2 to 16 from two families. No military personnel or ISIS-K operatives were present. Intelligence flaws centered on misinterpretation of drone surveillance footage showing the Corolla being loaded with large plastic containers, which analysts erroneously assessed as bomb-making materials based on patterns observed in prior ISIS-K operations. Post-strike forensic review by U.S. Central Command determined the containers held water for household use and irrigation, with no explosive residues detected; Ahmadi's movements reflected routine errands, including picking up colleagues and groceries, corroborated by family videos and witness accounts. The target profile derived from signals intelligence linking a similar white Corolla to ISIS-K logistics, but lacked positive identification of the specific vehicle or driver, compounded by the absence of ground teams for real-time confirmation during the compressed evacuation timeline. The Pentagon initially described the strike as a successful preemptive action against an ISIS-K planner on September 2, 2021, but retracted this on September 17 following an internal investigation prompted by New York Times reporting that exposed discrepancies through on-site interviews and geolocated footage. Spokesman John Kirby termed it a "tragic mistake" attributable to "human error" in a compressed battlespace, where post-August 26 airport bombing pressures amplified threat perception without adequate cross-verification protocols. This incident underscored reliance on remote drone assessments over integrated human intelligence, as the operation proceeded without boots-on-the-ground assets amid the U.S. drawdown, leading to cascading confirmation biases in the targeting chain.

Investigations, Accountability, and Disputes

Pentagon and DoD Reviews of the Attack

The initial U.S. Central Command investigation, completed in late 2021 under General Kenneth F. McKenzie Jr., concluded that the August 26, 2021, suicide bombing at Abbey Gate was executed by a single ISIS-K operative carrying an explosive vest with approximately 20 pounds of military-grade C-4 and other components, resulting in the deaths of 13 U.S. service members and over 170 Afghan civilians. The probe focused on tactical operations at Hamid Karzai International Airport, attributing the attack's success to the bomber's ability to blend into crowds amid heightened threat warnings, but found no evidence of insider facilitation or multiple assailants. A supplemental review ordered by Secretary of Defense and released on April 15, 2024, reaffirmed the 2021 findings after re-interviewing over 50 service members involved in the evacuation and re-examining forensic evidence. It identified the attacker as Abdul Rahman al-Logari, an ISIS-K member previously detained by U.S. forces in 2019 and released by Afghan authorities, through biometric matching of remains collected post-explosion. The review noted persistent overcrowding at the gate—estimated at up to 1,000 people in proximity—as a exploited by the bomber, who approached undetected despite , but defended maintaining as essential to the evacuation mission, which ultimately processed over 123,000 individuals. Both reviews emphasized that U.S. forces lacked a clear firing opportunity on the bomber prior to detonation, with sentries positioned too far (over 300 meters) and visual obstructions from crowds preventing identification. They critiqued pre-attack measures, including insufficient barriers and personnel for the surge in evacuees, yet determined the bombing was not tactically preventable without halting operations or accepting higher risks elsewhere. No disciplinary actions were recommended against on-site personnel, as performance was deemed consistent with the chaotic operational environment. The assessments deliberately excluded evaluation of strategic decisions, such as timelines or higher-level sharing, limiting analysis to tactical execution and immediate response at Abbey Gate.

Intelligence and Leadership Failures Under Scrutiny

Field reports from U.S. on the ground at International Airport highlighted imminent threats in the days leading to the August 26, 2021, suicide bombing, including sightings of suspicious individuals amid crowds at Abbey Gate, yet higher command denied requests to neutralize potential attackers due to restrictive and coordination breakdowns between military and diplomatic entities. sniper Tyler Vargas-Andrews testified before that his team identified a man matching the suicide bomber's description hours before the detonation—carrying a vest and behaving erratically—but withheld authorization to strike, citing insufficient confirmation despite the acute risk environment. These lapses were exacerbated by inter-agency friction, as the State Department and failed to synchronize evacuation operations with threat , prioritizing rapid processing of evacuees over fortified perimeters, which left outer security reliant on checkpoints prone to infiltration. Congressional investigations, including the House Foreign Affairs Committee's September 2024 report, attributed the attack's success to the Biden administration's compressed withdrawal timeline—insisting on completion by August 31, 2021, despite advances—and empowerment of the through the Doha Agreement extensions without robust verification mechanisms, which accelerated Kabul's fall and compressed evacuation windows into a high-density target for ISIS-K. The Senate Foreign Relations Committee's February 2022 assessment similarly critiqued senior leadership for underestimating collapse velocity based on optimistic intelligence assessments, leading to inadequate contingency planning that funneled thousands into vulnerable assembly points without preempting ISIS-K's exploitation of chaos. President Biden's public statements during the evacuation, such as his August 20, 2021, remark that "nothing happened today" amid escalating reports of encroachments, reflected a prioritization of narrative stability over operational urgency, potentially delaying reinforcements or evacuee dispersal. Post-attack accountability remained elusive, with no senior officials or generals relieved of duty despite the deaths of 13 U.S. service members, in stark contrast to the frontline personnel who bore the operational burdens and sacrifices without policy-level recourse. These decisions contributed to vetting shortfalls during the , where over 124,000 evacuees were processed under duress, later revealing instances of inadequate screening that exposed ongoing risks from unverified individuals relocated stateside. Probes emphasized that such leadership oversights stemmed from a causal chain favoring political deadlines over empirical threat data, undermining causal realism in high-stakes .

Challenges to Official Accounts and Alternative Evidence

In April 2024, obtained and analyzed surveillance footage from a gas station approximately 500 meters from Abbey Gate at International Airport, depicting several men carrying rifles maneuvering through crowds toward the gate in the minutes leading up to the August 26, 2021, bombing. The footage, corroborated by witness accounts of gunfire preceding the blast, indicates potential ISIS-K spotters or accomplices directing the bomber or preparing follow-on attacks, contradicting the Pentagon's assessment of a standalone operation without coordinated gunfire support. The U.S. Central Command's 2022 investigation and its 2024 supplemental review insisted that no ISIS-K gunmen fired during the incident, attributing all observed shots to responding U.S. and forces, but acknowledged limitations in forensic analysis due to the chaotic environment and lack of access to Taliban-controlled areas. This evidence has fueled demands for reevaluation, with critics arguing it exposes gaps in the official narrative's emphasis on a "" bomber unassisted by external facilitation. lawmakers, including Rep. and members of the House Foreign Affairs Committee, responded by demanding provide unredacted intelligence, ballistic reports, and full video archives to reconcile the discrepancies, citing the footage as undermining two prior probes. Veterans' groups and Gold Star families have echoed these calls, asserting that declassification of pre-attack threat streams— including of multiple ISIS-K cells probing the perimeter—would reveal suppressed warnings of coordinated assaults beyond a single device. Taliban assertions of having relayed specific threat intelligence to U.S. forces hours before the blast, including sightings of suspicious individuals near the gate, were reportedly downplayed by commanders amid overcrowded evacuation priorities, though official reviews have not substantiated cooperation claims. Independent analyses have questioned casualty tallies, with Afghan hospital records and eyewitness compilations suggesting over 200 total deaths—exceeding the Pentagon's estimate of 170 Afghan fatalities—potentially due to underreported secondary effects from the blast's fragmentation in dense crowds. These challenges highlight broader scrutiny of investigative opacity, where reliance on incomplete partner data and classified holdings has perpetuated debates over operational complacency.

Broader Ramifications and Legacy

Completion of US Withdrawal and Abandonment of Assets

The final U.S. military flights departed Hamid Karzai International Airport on , 2021, marking the completion of the troop withdrawal and amid heightened risks following the August 26 attack. This rushed timeline, compressed by the suicide bombing that killed 13 U.S. service members and over 170 Afghans, precluded systematic asset recovery, leaving behind an estimated $7 billion in military equipment previously transferred to Afghan forces, including aircraft, vehicles, and weaponry. The abandonment included over 22,000 Humvees, thousands of machine guns and grenade launchers, and fixed-wing aircraft such as A-29 light attack planes, much of which fell intact into hands due to the Afghan National Defense and Security Forces' collapse. The prior handover of on July 2, 2021, without notification to Afghan commanders, had already curtailed viable fallback positions for the Kabul evacuation, exacerbating logistical constraints as encirclement intensified post-attack. This sequencing contributed to the irreversible ceding of operational hubs, with the subsequently parading captured U.S.-origin hardware—including helicopters and armored vehicles—in victory displays, such as the September 2021 Kandahar procession, symbolizing a tangible reversal of two decades of U.S. investment. Estimates indicated 100 to 200 U.S. citizens remained in post-withdrawal with intent to depart, alongside unextracted Afghan allies, underscoring the operation's incomplete scope amid the accelerated exit. These material losses represented not merely financial opportunity costs—equivalent to equipping multiple brigades—but a strategic forfeiture that empowered logistics without equivalent countermeasures, as the group integrated seized assets into its arsenal for internal control and regional projection.

Resurgence of ISIS-K and Ongoing Threats

Following the , ISIS-K demonstrated operational resilience through a series of bombings and assaults in and beyond, including a 2023 mosque bombing in that killed over 100 members and civilians, and a October 2023 attack on a checkpoint in . In March 2024, ISIS-K orchestrated the Crocus City Hall attack in , where gunmen killed 149 people at a concert venue, marking the group's first major successful strike in and highlighting its capacity for transnational operations using recruited fighters from . The persistence of such activities underscored ISIS-K's ability to recruit, train, and deploy operatives despite territorial losses, with estimates placing its fighter strength at 4,000–6,000 by mid-2024. In March 2025, U.S. authorities arrested Mohammad Sharifullah, an ISIS-K operative who admitted planning the Abbey Gate bombing and other attacks, demonstrating the group's enduring networks even years after the U.S. withdrawal. This capture, effected through intelligence cooperation with Pakistani forces, revealed Sharifullah's role in coordinating suicide operations from safe havens in Afghanistan and Pakistan. The engaged in frequent clashes with ISIS-K, conducting raids and arrests that killed hundreds of fighters between 2022 and 2024, yet failed to eradicate the group, as evidenced by ISIS-K's continued high-profile attacks on Taliban targets and civilians. Taliban suppression efforts, including operations in eastern , reduced ISIS-K's territorial control but allowed it to maintain dispersed cells capable of asymmetric strikes, with the group viewing the Taliban as apostates for insufficient jihadist purity. U.S. over-the-horizon operations against ISIS-K faced constraints after the loss of on-ground basing in , limiting real-time intelligence collection and strike precision compared to pre-withdrawal capabilities. This shift relied on regional partners and remote assets, but diminished networks hampered tracking of mobile ISIS-K leaders. Concerns over exported threats materialized in U.S. border encounters, with congressional testimony highlighting risks of -affiliated migrants exploiting southern border vulnerabilities; for instance, FBI Director Christopher Wray warned in 2024 of elevated plotting against the homeland, amid arrests of individuals with ties attempting entry. Multiple suspected -linked operatives were detained at the U.S.- border in 2024, including those with travel histories tied to Central Asian networks.

Policy Critiques and Geopolitical Fallout

Critiques of the Biden administration's withdrawal policy centered on its perceived overreliance on the for securing evacuation routes and airport perimeters, a decision congressional investigations described as strategically naive given the group's longstanding alliances with and failure to curb ISIS-K operations. A Republican-led House Committee probe, released in September 2024, attributed the chaos to the administration's rigid adherence to an accelerated inherited from prior agreements, arguing that this empowered jihadist adversaries by projecting irresoluteness and abandoning vetted partners without adequate safeguards. While the operation airlifted approximately 124,000 people—including U.S. citizens, allies, and vulnerable —between August 14 and 31, 2021, realists contended that the rushed exit eroded U.S. deterrence, enabling terrorist sanctuaries by prioritizing domestic political imperatives over sustained presence. Defenses of the , often from administration-aligned sources, framed the as a necessary termination of a protracted conflict to redirect resources toward peer competitors like , citing the avoidance of indefinite troop commitments. However, these rationales faced empirical rebuttal in the post-withdrawal resurgence of threats from Afghan-based groups, including ISIS-K's external plotting, which underscored the causal pitfalls of disengagement without verified local proxies capable of denying safe havens to extremists. Gold Star families of the 13 U.S. service members killed in the attack have advocated for accountability through repeated congressional testimonies and public demands for leadership firings, yet no senior officials were dismissed, and U.S. doctrine exhibited minimal adaptation to mitigate risks from analogous hasty retreats. Geopolitically, the withdrawal's disorder strained transatlantic alliances, with partners expressing diminished confidence in U.S. strategic foresight despite coordinated force drawdowns under the alliance's . No Western government has extended formal recognition to the regime, though pragmatic engagements persist amid debates over and intelligence-sharing, reflecting realism about the risks of legitimizing a government unable or unwilling to sever ties with global jihadists. The ensuing has seen over 6 million Afghans internally displaced and hundreds of thousands fleeing to and , where repatriation pressures have intensified since , exacerbating regional instability without comprehensive resettlement frameworks. The 's April 2022 ban on opium poppy cultivation—Afghanistan's primary illicit export—slashed production by over 95% in the 2023 harvest per UN estimates, but inflicted acute economic distress on rural farmers lacking viable alternatives, compounding risks and drivers in a manner that prioritized ideological enforcement over pragmatic stabilization.

References

  1. [1]
    United States Arrests ISIS-K Attack Planner for Role in Killing of U.S. ...
    Mar 5, 2025 · ... Abbey Gate attack, including scouting a route near the airport for an attacker. Sharifullah specifically checked for law enforcement and ...
  2. [2]
    Pentagon releases report on Kabul airport bombing that killed 13 ...
    Feb 4, 2022 · The August attack took place in the closing days of the U.S. withdrawal from Afghanistan ... attacker detonated a bomb that killed 13 U.S. ...
  3. [3]
    3 Years Later, Afghans Still Reeling From Impact Of Devastating ...
    Aug 26, 2024 · In August 2021, a suicide bombing outside Kabul airport killed 170 Afghans and 13 U.S. soldiers, in one of the deadliest attacks of the ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  4. [4]
    Kabul Airport Attack Review Reaffirms Initial Findings, Identifies ...
    Apr 15, 2024 · ... 2021 suicide bombing attack that killed 13 U.S. service ... Kabul Airport Attack Review Reaffirms Initial Findings, Identifies Attacker.
  5. [5]
    Country Reports on Terrorism 2021: Afghanistan - State Department
    2021 Terrorist Incidents: ISIS-K attacks in Afghanistan increased, compared with the previous year. ... No group claimed responsibility for the attack, but ...
  6. [6]
    US to conduct new interviews into the deadly 2021 bombing at ...
    Sep 15, 2023 · ... killed 10 innocent people, including seven children. An investigation by US Central Command concluded in November 2021 that the airport attack ...
  7. [7]
    Taliban kill IS leader behind Kabul airport bombing - BBC
    Apr 25, 2023 · The 2021 bombing during the evacuation from Afghanistan killed ... attack, or for the capture of ISIS-K leader Sanaullah Ghafari. The ...
  8. [8]
    Afghanistan War: How Did 9/11 Lead To A 20-Year War? | IWM
    In 2001 an international coalition led by the USA invaded Afghanistan to destroy terrorist organisation Al-Qaeda when the Taliban refused to hand over Osama ...
  9. [9]
    Timeline: The U.S. War in Afghanistan - Council on Foreign Relations
    The U.S. War in Afghanistan. The Taliban surged back to power two decades after U.S.-led forces toppled their regime in what led to the United States ...
  10. [10]
    Rebuilding Afghanistan - George W. Bush White House Archives
    “Now and in the future, we will support our troops and we will keep our word to the more than 50 million people of Afghanistan and Iraq .”-- President Bush, · " ...
  11. [11]
    [PDF] Reconstructing the Afghan National Defense and Security Forces
    Sep 23, 2017 · effectiveness of the Afghan basic police training was ... Moreover, in its report on the failure of international aid programs, the.
  12. [12]
    Why Nation-Building Failed in Afghanistan by Daron Acemoglu
    Aug 20, 2021 · Daron Acemoglu explains why the West's top-down approach to establishing state institutions was bound to end in tears.
  13. [13]
    [PDF] SIGAR 23-05-IP Why the Afghan Government Collapsed
    Nov 1, 2022 · ... Failure in Afghanistan”; SIGAR, Quarterly Report, SIGAR. 2021-QR-4, p ... effectiveness of service delivery in the absence of good security ...
  14. [14]
    Corruption in Conflict: Lessons from the US Experience in Afghanistan
    Our report notes that failure to effectively address corruption in future contingency operations means U.S. ... Afghan government's anticorruption campaign for it ...Missing: involvement | Show results with:involvement
  15. [15]
    Afghanistan War: U.S. Deaths and Costs - A-Mark Foundation
    Nov 21, 2021 · 2,456 U.S. military deaths occurred during the Afghanistan War, which ran October 7, 2001 to August 30, 2021. · 3,923 Department of Defense (DOD) ...
  16. [16]
    Costs of War | Brown University
    Costs of War research examines the human toll of U.S. military operations and spending, for U.S. service members, veterans, military contractors, and allies ...Costs of War · Findings · About Costs of War · Economic
  17. [17]
    [PDF] Agreement for Bringing Peace to Afghanistan
    Feb 29, 2020 · The obligations of the Islamic Emirate of. Afghanistan which is not recognized by the United States as a state and is known as the Taliban in ...
  18. [18]
    Al-Qaeda, the Taliban, and the Future of U.S. Counterterrorism in ...
    Sep 8, 2022 · ... counterterrorism assurances and a clear Taliban break from al-Qaeda. The Uzbek government initially seemed confident of securing such an ...Missing: compliance | Show results with:compliance
  19. [19]
    Two Years Under the Taliban: Is Afghanistan a Terrorist Safe Haven ...
    Aug 15, 2023 · The Taliban see ISIS-K as an implacable foe and the main opposition ... ISIS-K, is unclear and should be a focus of counterterrorism strategists.Missing: compliance | Show results with:compliance
  20. [20]
    United States Signs Agreement with the Taliban, but Prospects for Its ...
    On February 29, 2020, the United States signed an “Agreement for Bringing Peace to Afghanistan” with the Taliban. The agreement provides that the United ...
  21. [21]
    Timeline of U.S. Withdrawal from Afghanistan - FactCheck.org
    U.S. and Taliban sign an agreement that sets the terms for a U.S. withdrawal from Afghanistan by May 1, 2021, but do not release two ...
  22. [22]
    Biden to announce full withdrawal of U.S. troops in Afghanistan by ...
    Apr 13, 2021 · President Biden has decided to withdraw all American troops from Afghanistan by Sept. 11, 20 years after the terrorist attacks on the World Trade Center.
  23. [23]
    [PDF] U.S. Military Withdrawal and Taliban Takeover in Afghanistan
    Sep 15, 2021 · On April 14, 2021, President Biden announced that the United States would begin a “final withdrawal” on May 1, to be completed by September 11, ...<|separator|>
  24. [24]
    Remarks by President Biden on the Drawdown of U.S. Forces in ...
    Jul 8, 2021 · Our military mission in Afghanistan will conclude on August 31st. The drawdown is proceeding in a secure and orderly way, prioritizing the safety of our troops ...
  25. [25]
    Afghanistan: Biden was advised to keep 2,500 troops, say generals
    Sep 28, 2021 · Gen Milley said the US had been taken by surprise by the speed of the Afghan government's collapse. The two US generals were questioned by ...
  26. [26]
    Gen. Milley Says He Warned Biden Against Afghanistan Withdrawal
    Sep 30, 2021 · General Milley called the “noncombatant evacuation” in Kabul, Afghanistan's capital, last month “a logistical success but a strategic failure,” ...
  27. [27]
    Top US General Milley calls Afghanistan a 'strategic failure'
    Sep 28, 2021 · Milley and McKenzie said they had warned that the Western-backed government in Kabul would fall if the US withdrew all troops. US service ...
  28. [28]
    [PDF] After Action Review on Afghanistan - State Department
    Following President Biden's decision in April 2021 to proceed with the withdrawal of U.S. forces under a new deadline of September 11, the U.S. military ...
  29. [29]
    Afghanistan: US State Department report details damning failings ...
    Jun 30, 2023 · US State Department report details damning failings around chaotic Afghanistan withdrawal · Sharper criticism of Biden admin actions than earlier ...
  30. [30]
    Getting Answers on the Afghanistan Withdrawal
    As a result, 13 U.S. servicemembers were murdered by a terrorist attack on August 26, 2021. ... ISIS-K. America's credibility on the world stage was severely ...
  31. [31]
    State Department failed to plan or respond fast enough in ...
    Jun 30, 2023 · State Department failed to plan or respond fast enough in Afghanistan collapse, new U.S. report finds ... failures of Afghanistan into account ...Missing: pre- non- combatants
  32. [32]
    Timeline: Taliban's rapid advance across Afghanistan - Al Jazeera
    Aug 12, 2021 · The Taliban has taken control of Qalat, Terenkot, Pul-e Alam, Feruz Koh, Qala-e Naw and Lashkar Gah, raising the number of captured Afghan provincial capitals ...
  33. [33]
    How the Afghan Army Collapsed Under the Taliban's Pressure
    Aug 16, 2021 · Commanders not only created “ghost soldiers” to pad their payrolls but also skimmed the pay of serving soldiers and failed to deliver necessary ...
  34. [34]
    Afghanistan: Taliban Seize 3 Afghan Capital Cities in a Day
    May 5, 2025 · The Taliban seized a major strategic and propaganda prize early Sunday, capturing the crucial northern commercial hub of Kunduz and then breaking through in ...Missing: timeline | Show results with:timeline
  35. [35]
    Timeline: Afghanistan provincial capitals captured by Taliban
    Aug 11, 2021 · The provincial capitals that have fallen to or are being attacked by the armed group as it advances across the nation. Taliban fighters ...
  36. [36]
    Taliban surge exposes failure of U.S. efforts to build Afghan army
    Aug 14, 2021 · Taliban surge exposes failure of U.S. efforts to build Afghan army ... He said the Afghan army's collapse pointed to the wider failures of two ...
  37. [37]
    [PDF] THE FACTORS LEADING TO THE COLLAPSE OF THE AFGHAN ...
    Mar 2, 2023 · First, the Afghan government failed to recognize that the United States was actually leaving, rendering it unprepared for the U.S. withdrawal.
  38. [38]
    Taliban enters Afghan presidential palace after Ghani flees
    Aug 15, 2021 · Ghani left in order to avoid clashes with the Taliban that would endanger millions of Kabul residents, he said in a Facebook post – his first ...
  39. [39]
    Afghanistan conflict: Kabul falls to Taliban as president flees - BBC
    Aug 15, 2021 · The Taliban has claimed victory in Afghanistan after taking over the capital Kabul, bringing to a swift end almost 20 years of a US-led coalition's presence in ...
  40. [40]
    Taliban fire in the air to control crowd at Kabul airport | Reuters
    Aug 22, 2021 · The Taliban fired in the air and used batons to make people line up in orderly queues outside Kabul airport on Sunday, witnesses said.
  41. [41]
    Instability in Afghanistan | Global Conflict Tracker
    After the withdrawal of U.S. troops from Afghanistan in August 2021, the Taliban rapidly regained control of the country and the government in Kabul. Despite ...
  42. [42]
    Operation Allies Refuge: One year later - Expeditionary Center
    Aug 17, 2022 · During the 17 days of evacuation efforts, more than 500 Active, Reserve and National Guard aircrews flew missions around the clock.
  43. [43]
    More than 2000 evacuated from Afghanistan in 24 hours - Army.mil
    Aug 20, 2021 · The U.S. military footprint at Hamid Karzai International Airport has expanded to 5,200 troops, and there are now more gates for entry onto the ...
  44. [44]
    U.S. to prioritize troop evacuation in last two days of Kabul operation
    Aug 25, 2021 · There are about 5,400 troops at the airport, a number that President Joe Biden says is set to go down to zero by the end of the month, depending ...
  45. [45]
    Transportation Command Aids in Historic Evacuation - War.gov
    Sep 3, 2021 · The U.S. Transportation Command supported the evacuation of 124000 people in the historic Afghanistan airlift.,
  46. [46]
    [PDF] OIG's Review of the Department of State's Evacuation of U.S. ...
    Sep 20, 2023 · According to Secretary Blinken, the U.S. government and its partners ultimately evacuated approximately 124,000 individuals, including 6,000 U. ...
  47. [47]
    Kabul's airport is the epicenter of a desperate and deadly scramble ...
    Aug 23, 2021 · One week after the Taliban takeover of Kabul, the situation at the capital's airport has become increasingly desperate, with more than 20000 ...
  48. [48]
    ISIS-K in Afghanistan Poses Terrorist Threat to Evacuation in Kabul
    Nov 3, 2021 · ... airport unscathed, and in working against the threat of ISIS attacks, commanders say. After Aug. 31, military officials say, there is a real ...Missing: warnings | Show results with:warnings
  49. [49]
    Explainer: ISIS-Khorasan in Afghanistan | Wilson Center
    Aug 27, 2021 · ISIS-K promoted its vision of a global caliphate while disparaging the rival Afghan Taliban as “filthy nationalists” for limiting its ambitions to Afghanistan.
  50. [50]
    The evolving Taliban-ISK rivalry - Lowy Institute
    Sep 7, 2021 · The attack on evacuation efforts at the Kabul airport by the Islamic State- Khorasan Province (ISK, ISKP, or ISIS-K) triggered much speculation ...<|separator|>
  51. [51]
    Afghanistan: Pregnant women and babies attacked in Kabul hospital
    May 13, 2020 · MSF is devastated by yesterday's sickening attack on pregnant women, mothers, and their babies receiving care at our maternity ward in Dasht-e-Barchi hospital ...
  52. [52]
    US blames deadly Afghan maternity hospital attack on ISIS-K
    May 15, 2020 · In 2018, ISIS-K killed dozens of young students taking university entrance exams in the same Dasht-e-Barchi neighborhood of Kabul. They have ...
  53. [53]
    Did Biden, Trump administrations ignore ISIS-K threat in Afghanistan?
    Aug 31, 2021 · Publicly highlighting the threat of ISIS-K was politically inconvenient for politicians who promised to withdraw from Afghanistan, ...
  54. [54]
    The ISIS-K Resurgence - Wilson Center
    specifically its sub-group the Haqqani Network — ...
  55. [55]
    The Islamic State Threat in Taliban Afghanistan
    Jan 1, 2022 · [31] Abdul Sayed, “Opinion: ISIS-K is ready to fight the Taliban. ... Taliban-ISK rivalry,” Interpreter, September 7, 2021. [37] Authors ...
  56. [56]
    Why the Islamic State in Afghanistan is Too Weak to Overthrow the ...
    Sep 29, 2022 · ISIS-K, a branch of the Islamic State in Afghanistan that's known for its violent ideology and goal of militarily defeating the Taliban due to sectarian ...
  57. [57]
    ISIS-Khorasan - Terrorist Groups - DNI.gov
    ... attacks in the United States. ISIS-K also attacked US military personnel before US forces withdrew from Afghanistan. ISIS-K was formed in 2015 by members of ...Missing: threats intelligence warnings
  58. [58]
    ISIS has its sights set on a new potential ally—Uyghur jihadi groups
    Sep 30, 2025 · ISIS-K is recruiting from multiple disaffected groups across Central Asia and Afghanistan, including Tajiks, disillusioned former Taliban ...
  59. [59]
    What We Know About ISIS-K, The Group Behind The Kabul Attack
    Aug 26, 2021 · A regional Islamic State affiliate is a major rival to the Taliban in Afghanistan. The U.S. says ISIS-K has long planned attacks on its ...
  60. [60]
    As U.S. Troops Searched Afghans, a Bomber in the Crowd Moved In
    Oct 3, 2021 · And then he detonated the bomb, which was unusually large for a suicide vest ... bombing spread from Kabul to Kansas. At the mortuary at ...<|separator|>
  61. [61]
    Kabul airport attack involved a single bomb with 'disturbing lethality ...
    Feb 4, 2022 · The attack on the airfield's Abbey Gate occurred as the U.S. military raced to evacuate thousands of Afghan allies during a frantic, two-week ...
  62. [62]
    Hell at Abbey Gate: Chaos, Confusion and Death in the Final Days ...
    Apr 2, 2022 · In firsthand accounts, Afghan civilians and US Marines describe the desperate struggle to flee through the Kabul airport's last open entrance.Missing: incoming | Show results with:incoming
  63. [63]
    Abbey Gate Supplemental Review Findings - Centcom
    Apr 15, 2024 · TAMPA, Fla. – In August 2023, the commander of U.S. Central Command directed U.S. Army Central (ARCENT) to conduct supplemental interviews ...
  64. [64]
    FIRST ANNIVERSARY OF THE 2021 KABUL AIRPORT ATTACK ...
    Aug 26, 2022 · Confronted with a dishonorable attack against our allies and civilians, our Marines kept their honor clean. In the midst of chaos and bloodshed, ...
  65. [65]
    Deadliest days for US troops in Afghanistan - Al Jazeera
    Aug 27, 2021 · It was the worst single-day loss for American troops in Afghanistan since the August 2011 attack on a Chinook helicopter that killed 30 service ...
  66. [66]
    Families of Kabul airport bombing victims scramble for news
    Aug 27, 2021 · At least 175 people died in the attack, Taliban sources told Al Jazeera. With thousands of people crowded outside the Kabul airport when the ...
  67. [67]
    Kabul airport suicide bombing attack: Mass casualty management at ...
    Kabul airport suicide bombing attack: Mass casualty management at the EMERGENCY NGO Hospital ... J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2022 Oct 1;93(4):552-557. doi: 10.1097/ ...Missing: UN | Show results with:UN
  68. [68]
    US troops and Afghans killed in suicide attacks outside Kabul airport
    Aug 26, 2021 · ISIS in Khorasan, known as ISIS-K, has claimed that an ISIS militant carried out the suicide attack, but provided no evidence to support the ...Missing: 22 prediction
  69. [69]
    The medical response of United States and allied military teams ...
    Aug 26, 2023 · Military medical personnel treated 63 casualties from the Kabul airport suicide attack and performed 15 trauma operations. US air transport ...
  70. [70]
    Operation Allies Refuge: The FS View from the Front Lines
    This map is intended to show the movement of Afghan evacuees across the globe in the immediate aftermath of the US withdrawal from Afghanistan.
  71. [71]
    US warns of 'credible' threats of more Kabul attacks | Taliban News
    Aug 27, 2021 · United States forces helping to evacuate Afghans desperate to flee Taliban rule were on alert for more attacks after an ISIL-affiliated suicide bombing on ...
  72. [72]
    2 high profile ISIS targets killed in U.S. drone strike in Afghanistan ...
    Aug 28, 2021 · U.S. military forces conducted a drone strike on Friday against ISIS in Afghanistan in an apparent retaliatory attack against the terrorist ...
  73. [73]
    The U.S. Launches A Drone Strike On An ISIS-K Target - NPR
    Aug 27, 2021 · The US has struck back against ISIS-K, which claimed responsibility for Thursday's attack at the Kabul airport that left dozens dead, including 13 US troops.
  74. [74]
    Ten family members, including children, dead after US strike in Kabul
    Aug 30, 2021 · On Saturday, the Pentagon said two “high profile” ISIS targets had been killed and another injured in a US drone strike late Friday in Jalalabad ...
  75. [75]
    US military admits it killed 10 civilians and targeted wrong vehicle in ...
    Sep 17, 2021 · ... bombing in Kunduz province northern Afghanistan,. Video Ad ... strike as an example of the US ability to target ISIS-K. The White ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  76. [76]
    Pentagon Acknowledges Aug. 29 Drone Strike in Afghanistan Was ...
    Nov 3, 2021 · The Pentagon acknowledged on Friday that the last US drone strike before American troops withdrew from Afghanistan was a tragic mistake that killed 10 ...
  77. [77]
    Two Years Ago, Biden's Disastrous Afghanistan Withdrawal Caused ...
    Aug 15, 2023 · ... bomber hours before the blast, and were stopped from taking action. When his team asked for permission to engage, the battalion commander ...
  78. [78]
    Gold Star families rip Biden over Kabul airport blast - New York Post
    Aug 29, 2023 · Tyler Vargas-Andrews, who told the committee in March that “the suicide bomber had been identified well before the blast, but Marines were ...
  79. [79]
    https://foreignaffairs.house.gov/news/press-releases/chairman-mccaul-releases-historic-comprehensive-report-biden-harris-administration-s-afghanistan-withdrawal
  80. [80]
    New evidence challenges the Pentagon's account of a horrific attack ...
    Apr 24, 2024 · Those results, which were released on April 15, reaffirmed that a lone ISIS-K bomber carried out the attack, and found that “new information ...
  81. [81]
    Congressmen demand answers after CNN report contradicts ...
    May 8, 2024 · ... report contradicts Pentagon investigations into deadly Kabul airport attack ... Afghanistan, on August 26, 2021 – before the attack took place.Missing: casualties UN<|separator|>
  82. [82]
    DURING AND AFTER THE FALL OF KABUL: EXAMINING THE ...
    But the evacuation and relocation process are not without faults, many of ... Those failures were codified in the fall of Kabul in August 2021. The ...
  83. [83]
    Pentagon says deadly Afghan airport attack was carried out by a ...
    Feb 4, 2022 · The bomber was able to approach Kabul International Airport's ... US Marines initially considered the possibility that the Taliban could be ...
  84. [84]
    U.S. report on Afghanistan evacuation blames intelligence failures ...
    Apr 6, 2023 · U.S. report on Afghanistan evacuation blames intelligence failures, Trump administration ... The Biden White House put out its long-awaited report ...
  85. [85]
    US completes Afghanistan withdrawal as final flight leaves Kabul
    Aug 30, 2021 · General Kenneth McKenzie, commander of US Central Command, said that the US evacuated 79,000 people from Kabul, including 6,000 American ...
  86. [86]
    Last U.S. troops depart Afghanistan after massive airlift ending ...
    Aug 30, 2021 · The United States on Monday completed its military withdrawal from Afghanistan after a huge but chaotic airlift that cost the lives of 13 US troops.
  87. [87]
    FIRST ON CNN: US left behind $7 billion of military equipment in ...
    Apr 28, 2022 · $7 billion of military equipment the US transferred to the Afghan government over the course of 16 years was left behind in Afghanistan after the US completed ...
  88. [88]
    U.S. withdraws from Bagram Air Force Base in Afghanistan
    Aug 9, 2023 · On July 2, 2021, the United States vacates Bagram Airfield, the US Air Force Base north of Kabul, and turns it over to Afghan forces.
  89. [89]
    Taliban show off captured weapons at Kandahar victory parade - CNN
    Sep 2, 2021 · In videos posted on social media, the Taliban paraded hardware left behind by both Afghan and US forces after the withdrawal of the last ...
  90. [90]
    How Many Americans and Allies Are Left in Afghanistan?
    Sep 2, 2021 · As we noted earlier, in his press conference on Aug. 31, Biden said troops had facilitated the evacuation of about 5,500 Americans before the ...
  91. [91]
    Country Reports on Terrorism 2022: Afghanistan - State Department
    Throughout the reporting period, the Taliban fought against the Islamic State's Khorasan Province (ISIS-K), which they viewed as their primary threat. The ...Missing: 2022-2025 | Show results with:2022-2025
  92. [92]
    Suspects in 2024 Moscow concert hall attack that killed 149 face trial
    Aug 4, 2025 · ... (ISIS-K) – claimed responsibility for the attack. Moscow concert hall attack in 2024 A massive blaze is seen at the Crocus City Hall on the ...
  93. [93]
    Biden admin weighs working with the Taliban to combat ISIS-K
    Jul 3, 2024 · America's ability to track ISIS-K has diminished since the US military pulled out of Afghanistan in 2021. But ISIS-K and the Taliban are foes, something the US ...Missing: rivalry | Show results with:rivalry
  94. [94]
    [PDF] OES/OFS in Brief - USAID OIG's
    Loss of human intelligence assets in Afghanistan. ISIS-K Remains the Top Terrorist. Threat in Afghanistan pp. 14–16. This quarter, ISIS-K: • Had approximately ...Missing: limitations | Show results with:limitations
  95. [95]
    WELCOME BACK TO SEPTEMBER TENTH - Ohio Senate
    Sep 13, 2024 · FBI Director Christopher Wray testified to Congress in March that the threat ... ISIS – one that sounded just like Wray's description of ISIS-K.
  96. [96]
    [PDF] June 18, 2024 The Honorable Alejandro Mayorkas ... - Todd Young
    Jun 18, 2024 · id=111035401. 2 Julia Ainsley, Tom Winter, Andrew Blankstein & Antonio Planas, 8 suspected terrorists with possible ISIS ties arrested in ...
  97. [97]
    Republican-led probe blames Biden for chaotic Afghanistan ...
    Sep 9, 2024 · US involvement in Afghanistan began with coalition troops toppling the Taliban from power in 2001 in the wake of the September 11 attacks. It ...Missing: critiques | Show results with:critiques
  98. [98]
    Remarks by President Biden on Afghanistan | The White House
    Aug 16, 2021 · Our only vital national interest in Afghanistan remains today what it has always been: preventing a terrorist attack on American homeland. I've ...Missing: critiques | Show results with:critiques
  99. [99]
    Q&A: Long-Term Foreign Policy Effects of a Chaotic Withdrawal ...
    Aug 30, 2021 · ... Kabul. On Thursday, that same airport was the scene of a deadly suicide bombing attack, perpetuated by ISIS-K, the Afghan affiliate of the ...<|separator|>
  100. [100]
    Families of service members killed in 2021 Kabul airport attack ...
    Aug 29, 2023 · Gold Star families of the American service members killed in the 2021 Kabul airport attack demanded answers from President Joe Biden and his ...
  101. [101]
    McCaul, HFAC Republicans, Abbey Gate Gold Star Families ...
    Sep 10, 2024 · On the global implications of the botched Afghanistan withdrawal: "What happens after Afghanistan falls? Weakness is projected around the globe.Missing: advocacy | Show results with:advocacy
  102. [102]
    NATO and Afghanistan
    Aug 31, 2022 · In February 2020, the United States and the Taliban signed an agreement on the withdrawal of international forces from Afghanistan by May 2021.
  103. [103]
    NATO Allies decide to start withdrawal of forces from Afghanistan
    Apr 15, 2021 · NATO Allies decided on Wednesday (14 April 2021) to start withdrawing forces from the Resolute Support Mission in Afghanistan by May 1, ...
  104. [104]
    Experts react: The US withdrawal from Afghanistan is complete ...
    Aug 30, 2021 · ... Kabul airport attack created conditions that are ripe for insurgency. There is no guarantee that Afghanistan won't revert to its status as a ...
  105. [105]
    Afghanistan Refugee Crisis Explained - USA for UNHCR
    Sep 10, 2025 · While active fighting has largely ceased in Afghanistan following the Taliban takeover in 2021, poverty and hunger are widespread within the ...
  106. [106]
    One of the World's Largest Refugee Populations, Afghans Have ...
    Jan 7, 2025 · Hundreds of thousands of Afghans have been forcibly removed from Iran each year since the Taliban's resurgence, and the government in September ...
  107. [107]
    [PDF] opium cultivation in afghanistan | unodc
    The Taliban de facto authorities announced a ban on opium poppy cultivation in April 2022, just as the opium harvest was about to begin. However, a grace period ...Missing: resurgence 2021-2025
  108. [108]
    Trouble In Afghanistan's Opium Fields: The Taliban War On Drugs
    Sep 12, 2024 · The Taliban have instituted a ban on narcotics in Afghanistan. While that has led to a massive drop in production, it is hitting the rural poor particularly ...