Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Blast wave

A blast wave is a supersonic generated by the rapid deposition of a large amount of into a small volume, such as from a chemical or , resulting in a propagating pressure disturbance that compresses and heats the surrounding medium while followed by an expansive flow known as the blast wind.

Formation and Characteristics

Blast waves form when high-pressure, high-temperature gases expand outward from the energy source, driving a leading shock front that travels faster than the speed of sound in the ambient medium, abruptly increasing pressure, density, and temperature across the front. The wave's pressure profile typically follows the Friedlander waveform, characterized by an initial sharp rise to peak overpressure (Ps), an exponential decay during the positive phase, and a subsequent negative phase of partial vacuum. Key parameters include peak overpressure, impulse (the integral of pressure over time), and dynamic pressure from the associated airflow, all of which diminish with distance from the source according to scaling laws like Z = r/W1/3, where r is distance and W is energy yield. In air, velocities can exceed Mach 1 initially, but the wave decelerates as it sweeps up mass; reflections off surfaces can amplify pressures up to eight times the incident value in normal incidence cases.

Theoretical Foundations and History

The physics of blast waves has roots in early 20th-century studies of shock waves, but systematic theoretical development accelerated during with analyses of high-explosive and atomic detonations. Pioneering work by in 1941–1950 described the self-similar expansion of strong blast waves using , predicting radius R ∝ (E t2/ρ)1/5, where E is energy, t is time, and ρ is ambient density—this "Sedov-Taylor solution" applies to both terrestrial explosions and astrophysical events. Post-war research extended these models to account for chemical reaction zones in detonations and asymptotic behaviors at large distances, where waves transition from strong shocks to acoustic waves. Numerical simulations and scaled experiments, such as those using high explosives or laser-induced blasts, have validated these theories, revealing instabilities like Rayleigh-Taylor mixing at interfaces.

Effects and Damage Potential

Blast waves cause damage through overpressure, which shatters structures, and dynamic pressure, which imparts momentum to objects; for instance, overpressures above 35 kPa can rupture eardrums, while 100–200 kPa levels demolish reinforced buildings. In humans, primary blast injuries arise from rapid external loading on organs, leading to lung contusions or traumatic brain injury even without penetration; the positive phase duration (typically 0.1–10 ms) determines if tissues can equalize internal pressures. Secondary effects include debris projection and tertiary effects from body displacement, with total damage scaling with energy yield and inversely with standoff distance. Confined environments, like urban areas or vehicles, intensify loading via reflections and focusing, increasing injury risk.

Applications and Broader Contexts

In , blast waves inform protective designs for military vehicles, bunkers, and civilian infrastructure using single-degree-of-freedom models and pressure-impulse diagrams to predict failure thresholds. In , analogous blast waves drive remnants, where stellar explosions release ~1051 erg, accelerating cosmic rays and shaping via Sedov-Taylor phases before . These waves also model afterglows and relativistic jets in active galactic nuclei, influencing particle acceleration to PeV energies. Experimental studies, including colliding blast configurations, aid research and validate hydrodynamics codes for high-energy density physics.

Fundamentals

Definition and Formation

A blast wave is a large-amplitude discontinuity that propagates through a medium faster than the local , arising from the sudden deposition of a substantial amount of energy in a confined volume. This phenomenon manifests as a front where , , and jump abruptly, followed by a region of compressed and heated material. Unlike weaker disturbances, the blast wave's supersonic velocity distinguishes it from ordinary , which propagate at or below the without such discontinuous jumps. The formation of a blast wave begins with an abrupt release of energy, such as from a rapid or other intense localized event, generating a hot, high-pressure region within the ambient medium. This high-pressure zone expands outward at supersonic speeds, driving a wave that steepens into a front due to the nonlinear nature of the involved. As the front advances, it compresses and heats the surrounding medium, creating a blast —a high-velocity behind the —that sustains the wave's . In its initial phase, the blast wave forms a nearly planar front near the energy source before transitioning to a spherical or cylindrical as it expands from a point-like origin, such as a generic point-source . This expansion phase involves the front leading a region of elevated pressure and flow, with the wave's strength diminishing over distance as dissipates into the medium. The supersonic character ensures that information about the disturbance cannot propagate ahead of the front, maintaining its coherence until it weakens sufficiently to resemble an .

Physical Principles

A blast wave propagates as a supersonic front driven by the rapid release of , governed by the principles of compressible and . The core physical principles include adiabatic expansion of the hot gas behind the front and the strict , momentum, and across the shock discontinuity. These conservation laws, encapsulated in the Rankine-Hugoniot relations, ensure that the jump conditions at the shock front relate the pre- and post-shock states without dissipation other than through . As the shock advances, it compresses and heats the ambient medium, such as air, leading to significant thermodynamic changes. The compression ratio across the front approaches 4 for strong shocks in monatomic gases, causing rapid heating to temperatures of thousands of Kelvin, which produces luminosity primarily through thermal radiation. This process irreversibly increases entropy, as the shock converts ordered kinetic energy into disordered thermal energy, with the entropy jump proportional to the shock Mach number for supersonic flows. The adiabatic index \gamma, defined as the ratio of specific heats C_p / C_v for the ideal gas, plays a crucial role in determining the blast wave's strength and structure. For diatomic gases like air, \gamma \approx 1.4, which influences the post-shock pressure and temperature jumps; a lower effective \gamma due to molecular excitation, dissociation, or ionization (e.g., \gamma^* \approx 1.2) weakens the shock by allowing more energy to be partitioned into internal degrees of freedom, altering the wave's expansion rate. Over time and distance, a blast wave transitions from a strong , where overpressure greatly exceeds ambient conditions, to a weak resembling an . This decay occurs when the drops below approximately 1.1–1.2, with the radius following a strong-shock scaling r \propto t^{2/5} initially before transitioning to linear propagation at the ambient sound speed; the criterion is typically when the blast energy dissipates sufficiently relative to the ambient pressure, marking the shift to isobaric expansion.

Mathematical Modeling

Governing Equations

The dynamics of blast waves are governed by the compressible Euler equations, which describe the conservation of , , and in an inviscid . These equations are expressed in conservative form for a three-dimensional as follows: \frac{\partial \rho}{\partial t} + \nabla \cdot (\rho \mathbf{v}) = 0 \frac{\partial (\rho \mathbf{v})}{\partial t} + \nabla \cdot (\rho \mathbf{v} \mathbf{v} + p \mathbf{I}) = 0 \frac{\partial E}{\partial t} + \nabla \cdot ((E + p) \mathbf{v}) = 0 where \rho is the density, \mathbf{v} is the velocity vector, p is the pressure, \mathbf{I} is the identity tensor, and E = \frac{1}{2} \rho |\mathbf{v}|^2 + \frac{p}{\gamma - 1} is the total energy per unit volume, with \gamma being the adiabatic index. These partial differential equations capture the hyperbolic nature of the flow, allowing for the formation of discontinuities such as shock fronts inherent to blast wave propagation. Across the shock discontinuity in a blast wave, the Rankine-Hugoniot jump conditions enforce laws in integral form, relating the states on either side of the . In the , with subscript 1 denoting the pre-shock state and 2 the post-shock state, and u_n the normal velocity component, the conditions are derived by integrating the Euler equations over a thin pillbox straddling the :
  • : \rho_1 u_{n1} = \rho_2 u_{n2} = j (),
  • Momentum conservation: j u_{n1} + p_1 = j u_{n2} + p_2,
  • Energy conservation: j \left( \frac{1}{2} u_{n1}^2 + \frac{\gamma}{\gamma-1} \frac{p_1}{\rho_1} \right) = j \left( \frac{1}{2} u_{n2}^2 + \frac{\gamma}{\gamma-1} \frac{p_2}{\rho_2} \right).
These yield explicit relations for shocks (where p_2 \gg p_1), such as the post-shock ratio \rho_2 / \rho_1 = (\gamma + 1)/(\gamma - 1), p_2 / p_1 \approx (2 \gamma / (\gamma + 1)) (u_{s1}^2 / a_1^2) - (\gamma - 1)/(\gamma + 1), and normal velocity u_{n2} / u_{s1} = (\gamma - 1)/(\gamma + 1), where u_{s1} is the shock speed and a_1 the pre-shock speed; the post-shock follows from the as T_2 / T_1 = (p_2 / p_1) (\rho_1 / \rho_2). These jump conditions ensure physical admissibility, with increasing across the shock to satisfy the second law. The system is closed by an equation of state relating pressure, density, and . For blast waves in air or similar media, the ideal gas assumption is commonly employed: p = (\gamma - 1) e \rho, where e is the specific , leading to p = \rho R T with gas constant R and T. For polytropic processes behind the , the relation simplifies to p \propto \rho^\gamma, which preserves the hyperbolic structure and facilitates analysis of adiabatic and . This assumption holds well for high-temperature, low-density flows typical of blast waves, though deviations occur at extreme conditions. Initial conditions for blast waves model the sudden release of energy in a quiescent medium. For a point explosion, the initial state consists of uniform ambient density \rho_0 and pressure p_0 everywhere, with total energy E instantaneously deposited at the origin (e.g., \rho(\mathbf{r}, t=0) = \rho_0, \mathbf{v}(\mathbf{r}, t=0) = 0 for r > 0, and an impulsive energy input at r=0). For planar waves, the setup is analogous but in one dimension: uniform \rho_0, p_0, and zero velocity ahead of the front, with energy release along a plane at t=0. Boundary conditions typically invoke symmetry (e.g., zero radial velocity at the origin for spherical symmetry) and far-field ambient conditions.

Similarity Solutions

Blast waves exhibit self-similarity in their propagation due to the absence of intrinsic length or time scales following the instantaneous release of energy in a uniform medium, allowing the flow variables to depend on a single dimensionless similarity variable. This property arises from the dimensional homogeneity of the problem, where the relevant parameters are the released energy E, time t, ambient density \rho_0, and position r, enabling a reduction of the partial differential equations governing the flow to ordinary differential equations in the similarity variable \xi = r / R(t). Self-similar solutions thus capture the essential scaling behavior without resolving initial transients, provided the shock remains strong and the medium is ideal. The seminal Sedov-Taylor solution describes the evolution of a spherical blast wave from a point-source explosion in a uniform medium, assuming an instantaneous energy release and adiabatic flow behind a strong shock. Dimensional analysis yields the shock radius scaling as R(t) \sim \left( \frac{E t^2}{\rho_0} \right)^{1/5}, where the constant of proportionality depends on the adiabatic index \gamma; for an ideal monatomic gas (\gamma = 5/3), it is approximately 0.868. To derive this, the velocity, pressure, and density fields are assumed self-similar: u = \dot{R}(t) U(\xi), p = \rho_0 \dot{R}^2(t) P(\xi), \rho = \rho_0 D(\xi), with \xi = r / R(t). Substituting into the Euler equations, continuity, and energy conservation reduces the system to a set of ordinary differential equations solved numerically subject to Rankine-Hugoniot jump conditions at \xi = 1, where the post-shock pressure is \frac{2}{\gamma + 1} \rho_0 \dot{R}^2 in the strong-shock limit (Mach number \gg 1). The solution reveals a characteristic structure: a steep shock front followed by a peak in pressure and density near the origin, with velocity decreasing monotonically, and total energy conserved at E. Analogs of the Sedov-Taylor solution exist for non-spherical geometries, adapting the scaling exponents based on dimensionality. For cylindrical blasts (line-source ), the radius scales as R(t) \sim (E t^2 / \rho_0)^{1/4}, reflecting the two-dimensional distribution, with self-similar profiles obtained similarly by solving ODEs in \xi = r / R(t) under cylindrical . In the planar case (one-dimensional, like a surface ), the scaling becomes R(t) \sim (E t^2 / \rho_0)^{1/3}, where per unit area drives a planar , and the again collapses the equations, though the profiles differ due to geometric spreading effects. These solutions assume strong and neglect or heat conduction, remaining valid until the approaches unity. As the blast wave propagates, it eventually enters decay regimes where self-similarity breaks down, transitioning from the strong-shock phase to an acoustic phase dominated by sound speed propagation. This occurs when the shock pressure ratio drops below approximately 1.1, after which the wave decays exponentially as an acoustic disturbance with constant amplitude perturbations, and energy dissipates through radiative or viscous losses, invalidating the adiabatic assumption. The transition distance scales with initial energy, marking the end of the blast wave's supersonic phase.

Historical Development

Early Observations

Early observations of blast waves emerged from practical encounters with explosions in and industrial contexts, where the concussive effects were noted long before systematic study. In the , artillery gunners and witnesses during sieges and battles described the powerful effects from cannon blasts, which could knock down nearby individuals and damage structures even without direct impact from projectiles. These accounts highlighted the sudden pressure surge radiating from the muzzle, often referred to as the "wind of the ball," capable of causing or from near misses. Similarly, in operations using black powder since the but intensifying in the , explosions were observed to propagate destructive waves through tunnels, shattering rock and injuring workers with that traveled faster than . The late 19th century marked a shift toward empirical visualization of blast waves through innovative optical techniques. Austrian physicist , collaborating with photographer Peter Salcher, pioneered in the 1880s to capture the shock waves generated by supersonic bullets fired from rifles. Their 1887 publication in und Chemie presented the first photographs revealing the and tail waves around projectiles, demonstrating how air compresses into visible density gradients. further analyzed the reflection of these shock waves off surfaces, identifying a distinct pattern of irregular reflection now known as Mach reflection, where the wave bends sharply upon encountering a boundary. Concurrently, early 20th-century mining experiments, such as those at Altofts Colliery in 1908 and documented in British reports, measured the velocity and pressure of explosive waves in coal galleries to mitigate accidents. World War I intensified observations of blast waves in large-scale combat, particularly during the 1916 , where British and French artillery fired over 1.7 million shells in preliminary bombardments, creating a continuous barrage of shock waves. Eyewitness reports from the front lines described the ground-shaking concussions that disoriented troops, with the from high-explosive shells causing immediate physical trauma like ruptured eardrums and concussions. This led to an epidemic of , affecting about 10% of the wounded—around 80,000 cases in the —manifesting as neurological symptoms from repeated exposure to blast without direct wounds. The dawn of the nuclear age brought the first controlled, large-scale empirical study of a blast wave during the Trinity test on July 16, 1945, at the Alamogordo Bombing Range in . Detonating a 21-kiloton device, the explosion generated a spherical front expanding at supersonic speeds, observed by scientists from distances of 10 miles. , stationed at the base camp, recorded the air blast arriving approximately 40 seconds later, strong enough to displace loose paper sheets by 2.5 meters, estimating the yield equivalent to 10,000 tons of based on the effects. Instrumentation and visual accounts captured the initial fireball's rapid growth into a visible shock dome, providing unprecedented data on blast propagation in open air.

Theoretical Advancements

In the 1940s, G.I. Taylor advanced the theoretical understanding of blast waves through his analysis of intense explosions, particularly those associated with atomic bombs. Working under wartime secrecy from 1941 to 1946, Taylor developed scaling relations using dimensional analysis to describe the expansion of a strong shock wave in air, deriving the energy yield of the Trinity test explosion solely from declassified photographs of the blast radius at different times. This approach demonstrated that the blast radius R scales as R \propto (E t^2 / \rho)^{1/5}, where E is the energy release, t is time, and \rho is ambient density, allowing estimation of the bomb's yield as approximately 22 kilotons of TNT without access to classified data. Following World War II, Leonid Sedov in 1946 and G.I. Taylor in 1950 independently formulated self-similar solutions for the propagation of a spherical blast wave from a point source of instantaneous energy release in a uniform medium. Sedov's solution provided analytical profiles for the flow variables behind the shock front, assuming an ideal gas with constant \gamma (adiabatic index), and showed that the shock position evolves as R \propto t^{2/5} in the energy-conserving phase. Taylor's concurrent work extended these ideas to strong shocks, confirming the same scaling through numerical integration and emphasizing the self-similarity variable \xi = r / (E t^2 / \rho)^{1/5}, which unifies the description across scales. These Sedov-Taylor solutions became foundational for modeling blast wave dynamics, applicable to both terrestrial and astrophysical contexts. From the to the , theoretical progress incorporated real-gas effects, such as variable \gamma due to and , and extended to multi-dimensional numerical simulations for more complex geometries. John von Neumann's earlier wartime contributions on shock waves in explosives laid groundwork for theory, where focused waves produce high-velocity jets; later refinements in this era modeled the nonlinear interactions using finite-difference methods to account for material strength and non-ideal equations of . These advancements enabled predictions of blast wave in applications like munitions, with numerical codes simulating multi-dimensional that revealed instabilities not captured in spherical self-similar models. In the , theoretical developments have refined relativistic blast wave models, particularly for gamma-ray bursts (GRBs), building on the 1976 Blandford-McKee solution for ultra-relativistic spherical expansion in a uniform medium. The Blandford-McKee solution describes a thin shell of shocked material with Lorentz factor \Gamma \propto t^{-3/2} in the adiabatic phase, providing energy distributions essential for interpreting GRB afterglows. Recent refinements incorporate radiative losses, structured jets, and off-axis viewing effects through relativistic hydrodynamics simulations, improving fits to observational light curves; for instance, extensions account for energy injection from central engines, altering the deceleration profile to \Gamma \propto t^{-3/8} in certain regimes. These updates enhance predictions for GRB energetics and jet collimation.

Wave Characteristics

Structure and Propagation

A blast wave is characterized by a distinct internal structure comprising a leading shock front, a compressed region, a contact discontinuity, and a trailing rarefaction tail. At the shock front, there is an abrupt discontinuity where pressure, density, and temperature rise sharply, compressing and heating the ambient medium instantaneously. Behind the shock, the pressure profile exhibits a peak overpressure followed by a gradual decay during the positive phase, while density increases significantly across the front (typically by a factor approaching 6 for strong shocks in air with γ=1.4) and remains elevated until the contact discontinuity. The particle velocity jumps to a fraction of the shock speed immediately post-shock (2/(γ + 1) ≈ 0.83 of the shock velocity for strong shocks in air), then decreases toward the center. The contact discontinuity separates the low-density explosion products from the shocked ambient material, marking a jump in composition and density but no pressure change. The rarefaction tail follows, where expansion waves cause the pressure to drop below ambient levels in the negative phase, with velocity profiles showing outward flow that diminishes over time. Propagation behavior varies markedly with the surrounding medium. In air, blast waves attenuate due to nonlinear effects that cause steepening and through and conduction, resulting in overpressures decaying roughly as 1/r for spherical waves beyond the initial phase. This nonlinearity leads to formation and energy , limiting range compared to linear . In , no propagating blast wave occurs, as there is no medium for and ; instead, the products undergo free radial without a coherent structure. In denser media like , propagation is faster (initial speeds exceeding 1500 m/s versus ~340 m/s in air) with reduced relative due to higher incompressibility and , allowing the wave to maintain higher pressures over longer distances and cause more severe localized damage. Spherical blast waves, typical of point-source explosions, experience geometric spreading that dilutes as 1/r², causing overpressure and to decrease more rapidly with distance than in planar . Planar , approximated in long tubes or far from edges, maintain more uniform strength along the propagation direction without such dilution, though real scenarios often transition from spherical near the source to quasi-planar at large scaled distances (e.g., Z > 10 m/kg^{1/3}). Multi-dimensional effects arise in non-point sources, such as line or surface charges, introducing : propagation is stronger perpendicular to the source due to focused release, while along the it weakens, resulting in ellipsoidal or cylindrical wavefronts with varying peak pressures and non-uniform loading on targets. The radius of propagation follows self-similar solutions like the Sedov-Taylor model for strong spherical blasts in uniform media.

Reflection and Interference

When a blast wave encounters a surface at an oblique angle, it undergoes , which can manifest as either regular or Mach depending on the geometry and wave strength. In regular , the incident shock wave reflects off the surface as a separate reflected shock, maintaining attachment at the reflection point without forming an additional transverse shock; this process resembles a simple mirroring of the incident wave, preserving the overall structure while increasing local pressure behind the reflected front. Mach reflection arises when the surface geometry, such as a , prevents regular from satisfying the no-flow-through boundary condition, leading to the formation of a Mach stem—a stronger, nearly perpendicular shock that merges the incident and reflected waves downstream of a . At the , the incident shock, reflected shock, and Mach stem intersect, with the stem propagating along the surface and intensifying the pressure and velocity fields in its vicinity; this configuration is characterized by complex dynamics, including the lateral motion of the relative to the surface. The transition from regular to Mach reflection is governed by the incident shock Mach number M_s and the wedge angle \theta; specifically, regular reflection dominates for small \theta (typically below a critical angle \theta_c \approx 20^\circ - 40^\circ for air shocks with M_s > 1.5), while Mach reflection occurs for larger \theta where the reflected shock would otherwise detach, as predicted by two-shock and detachment criteria. For blast waves from explosions, this transition is observed in surface bursts, where Mach stems form beyond a roughly equal to the burst , amplifying overpressures to nearly twice the free-field value within the stem region. Beyond single-surface interactions, blast waves from multiple sources or repeated reflections can interfere, modifying the profile through superposition. Constructive happens when waves converge in , such as in confined geometries where reflections overlap, resulting in overpressures up to twice the individual wave amplitudes due to additive pressure fronts; this effect is prominent in enclosed spaces, sustaining higher impulses over longer durations. Destructive interference, though less common in blast scenarios, occurs when opposing waves meet out of phase, generating rarefaction waves that attenuate the peak by partial cancellation of the compression fronts, thereby reducing the net in the interaction zone.

Effects and Impacts

Structural Damage

waves inflict structural primarily through dynamic and associated impulses that exceed the capacity of building components. as low as 0.5 to 1.0 are sufficient to shatter windows, creating widespread hazards from flying . At 1 to 2 , light frame houses experience minor such as cracked partitions and broken windows, while moderate including roof displacement and framing cracks occurs around 1.7 to 2.6 . Higher of approximately 5 lead to severe or in wood-frame residences and unreinforced houses, with failures due to shearing or . For buildings with light frames, moderate repairable begins at 0.75 to 1 , escalating to severe at about 3.1 , and reinforced concrete structures may withstand up to 8 before widespread destruction. These thresholds represent incident , but reflected pressures on surfaces facing the can amplify loads by factors of 2 to 8, hastening failure. The of the blast wave, defined as the pressure-time over the positive duration, further characterizes damage potential by quantifying the transfer to structures. For instance, impulses on the order of 300 to 800 psi-ms can cause incipient failure in wall elements, depending on duration (typically 5 to 20 ms for conventional blasts), as the total impulse determines the dynamic response more accurately than peak pressure alone for flexible components. Blast loading on structures occurs through several mechanisms, including , , and fragmentation. loading dominates for rigid or enclosed buildings, where the blast wave bends around corners and edges, creating a that pulls on leeward faces after initial compression on windward sides. loading, relevant for or open structures like vehicles or light frames, arises from the on the , often equivalent to a lateral that shears connections or overturns elements, particularly in the Mach stem region near the ground. Fragmentation contributes to secondary damage as brittle components like cladding or walls shatter into projectiles accelerated by the wave, impacting adjacent structures with proportional to . Material responses to these loads vary by composition and failure mode. Brittle materials such as and unreinforced exhibit sudden cracking and spalling under tension, with fracturing into cubical shards at stresses around 16,000 psi and showing dynamic increases (up to 19% via strain-rate factors) but vulnerability to rear-face scabbing from reflected waves. In contrast, ductile materials like deform plastically, absorbing energy through bending or yielding with ratios up to 20 before , allowing support rotations of 6 to 12 degrees in laced elements without total collapse. Blast testing standards, such as those in UFC 3-340-02, quantify these responses using dynamic increase factors (e.g., 1.23 for yield stress) to predict ultimate capacities under short-duration impulses. Basic mitigation of structural damage relies on standoff distance and building orientation, which reduce incident pressures exponentially with range and minimize reflected loads, respectively. For example, increasing separation from the source by factors of 2 can lower overpressures below critical thresholds for breakage, while orienting facades to the wave diffracts loads more evenly, limiting impulses on vulnerable walls.

Biological Consequences

Blast waves from explosions can cause a range of physiological injuries to humans and animals, primarily through the interaction of the front with body tissues, leading to significant morbidity and mortality. These effects are categorized into primary, secondary, , and quaternary injuries, with primary blast injuries being unique to the overpressure and underpressure phases of the wave. Primary blast injuries result directly from the blast wave's compressing air-filled organs, such as the s, ears, and , causing . For instance, rupture threshold is approximately 35 kPa (5 ), with 50% incidence around 100–140 kPa (15–20 ), while damage threshold begins at about 100 kPa (15 ), with alveolar hemorrhage and severe contusions above 140–210 kPa (20–30 ). These thresholds reflect the wave's ability to generate forces and in fluid-filled structures and can vary with and duration of the pressure pulse; potentially leading to or permanent if untreated. Secondary blast injuries arise from fragments or debris propelled by the blast wave's , penetrating soft tissues and causing lacerations, fractures, or ; the , which integrates over time, determines the velocity and of these projectiles. Tertiary injuries occur when the body's by the wave results in upon impact with surfaces, often exacerbating skeletal and organ damage through acceleration forces tied to the wave's transfer. Quaternary blast injuries encompass all other effects, including burns from the coupled with the blast wave, which can cause dermal and subcutaneous damage without direct involvement. These burns contribute to overall by complicating management and increasing risk in blast survivors. Animal studies have been instrumental in understanding blast injury scaling, revealing patterns in susceptibility across species, though scaling is complex and not solely based on body mass. Historical experiments, such as those using and in early 20th-century tests, demonstrated varying mortality rates at overpressures of 100-200 kPa depending on animal size and exposure conditions. These findings underscore the need for species-specific thresholds in extrapolating animal data to .

Applications

Military and Explosives

In military applications, shaped charges utilize the intense shock waves generated by high explosives to collapse a metal liner into a high-velocity , enabling deep of armored targets. These shock waves, propagating at velocities around 8 km/s, produce peak pressures exceeding 200 GPa at the liner interface, optimizing the jet's tip speed beyond 10 km/s for effective armor defeat in anti-tank munitions and warheads. Air-burst artillery shells are designed to detonate at optimal heights above the ground, typically 2-3 meters for conventional charges, to maximize the formation of stems—coalesced fronts that amplify overpressures by up to twice the incident wave strength. This configuration enhances blast wave intensity across a wider area, improving fragmentation and penetration effects against personnel and light vehicles in tactical engagements. Improvised explosive devices (IEDs) and landmines exploit blast waves for , generating high overpressures (often 100-400 kPa at close range) to disrupt vehicle mobility and create anti-personnel hazards through propelled debris and structural . In tactical scenarios, vehicle-borne IEDs amplify these effects with larger charges, such as ANFO-based assemblies, to convoys, while anti-personnel mines use confined blasts to produce dynamic pressures sufficient to disable formations over limited radii. Nuclear weapons distinguish between tactical and strategic roles based on and dominance. Tactical variants, with yields ranging from 0.3 to 170 kilotons (for variants), prioritize waves as the primary destructive mechanism for suppression, delivering focused overpressures to neutralize concentrations or fortifications. In , strategic weapons, exceeding 100 kilotons, treat effects as secondary to thermal and radiation impacts, aiming for widespread urban devastation over hundreds of kilometers. Demolition employs precisely timed charges to induce controlled building implosions, sequencing detonations across structural columns to direct inward and manage blast wave . For instance, in high-rise demolitions, delays of 100-300 between floor levels or axes ensure progressive failure, limiting impulses and debris scatter to protect adjacent .

Engineering and Protection

Blast-resistant design principles emphasize the use of materials and configurations that mitigate the dynamic pressures and impulses from blast waves, such as those causing structural deformation or fragmentation. Standards like ASCE/SEI 59-22 outline minimum requirements for planning, , , and of buildings subjected to effects, including the establishment of threat parameters, levels, loading conditions, and material specifications to prevent ; this 2022 update incorporates advanced computational modeling for enhanced accuracy. For glazing, laminated systems with interlayers like bond glass plies together, retaining fragments upon failure and reducing hazardous debris projection; these are often anchored with special frames to enhance performance against peak overpressures exceeding 10 . Reinforced facades typically incorporate poured-in-place with added reinforcement and anchors around openings to distribute blast loads, achieving that limits brittle failure. Setback distances from potential sites, often 10 to 25 feet in contexts, allow blast wave decay and reduce incident pressures on building envelopes by up to 50% per laws. Vehicle hardening against blast waves relies on multi-layered armor systems that disrupt and attenuate shock propagation through the undercarriage and hull. Composite armors combining ceramics for initial hardening, metals for structural integrity, and polymers for dissipation can reduce transmitted impulses by absorbing overpressures and redirecting fragments, as demonstrated in designs tested against improvised devices. Armor , such as V-shaped hulls with reactive elements, deflects blast upward, minimizing vertical on occupants. For bunkers, compartmentalization divides interior spaces with reinforced barriers to contain blast overpressures and prevent wave transmission between zones, often using or bulkheads rated for 5-15 impulses. These strategies, combined with buried or bermed , enhance overall enclosure integrity by limiting confinement effects that amplify internal pressures. In , computational blast modeling simulates wave propagation through city layouts to optimize building placement and spacing, accounting for reflections off facades that can double local pressures in confined streets. Designs incorporating open plazas or varied setbacks reduce channeling of blasts along avenues, while strategic features—like louvered openings or exhaust systems—alleviate confinement by allowing pressure equalization, potentially lowering peak internal loads by 20-30% in enclosed urban corridors. Such modeling tools integrate with to prioritize resilient placement, minimizing cascading failures in dense environments. Advancements in the have introduced metamaterials engineered for superior absorption, leveraging sequential mechanisms to dissipate energy progressively without permanent deformation. These structures, often based on yield- lattices, maintain load-bearing capacity while absorbing impulses through controlled , outperforming traditional foams in reusable applications under high-velocity impacts. elastomer-based metamaterials further enhance performance by combining lightweight stiffness with tunable energy dissipation at speeds relevant to scenarios.

Astronomical Contexts

In astrophysics, blast wave models are essential for interpreting observations of supernova remnants (SNRs), where the expanding shock from a stellar explosion interacts with the interstellar medium. X-ray and radio observations reveal the structure of these shocks, particularly in young remnants like Cassiopeia A (Cas A), which exhibits bright synchrotron emission in radio and thermal X-ray emission from shocked plasma. Chandra X-ray Observatory data have mapped the forward shock front in Cas A, showing its deceleration as it sweeps up ambient material, consistent with the Sedov-Taylor phase of evolution where the blast wave radius scales as r \propto t^{2/5} for constant energy input. This phase allows age estimates for Cas A of approximately 330–350 years based on proper motion measurements of the shock, aligning with historical records of the supernova around 1680. Blast waves in SNRs also drive through diffusive , originally proposed by Fermi but formalized for by Bell. At the front, charged particles gain via repeated across the discontinuity, with upstream magnetic generated by the particles themselves amplifying fields to enable efficient up to PeV energies. Observations of gamma-ray emission from remnants like and W44, detected by Fermi-LAT, confirm non-thermal particle spectra consistent with power-law distributions from this first-order Fermi process, supporting SNRs as primary sources of galactic cosmic rays. In gamma-ray bursts (GRBs), relativistic blast waves model the afterglow phase following the initial prompt emission, where the decelerating produces observable across wavelengths. The Blandford-McKee describes the ultra-relativistic dynamics, with Lorentz factors \Gamma \propto t^{-3/8} in a constant-density medium, enabling to multi-wavelength light curves to infer isotropic-equivalent energies of $10^{52}–$10^{54} erg and structures. For instance, afterglow data from and ground-based telescopes for GRB 130427A have been modeled with blast wave evolution to constrain microphysical parameters like electron energy fraction \epsilon_e \approx 0.1, revealing collimated outflows with opening angles of a few degrees. Planetary impacts generate atmospheric blast waves analogous to explosions, as seen in the 2013 event, where a ~20-meter entered at ~19 km/s and airbursted at ~30 km altitude, releasing ~500 kilotons of . Hydrodynamic models treat the meteor as a strengthless body fragmenting progressively, producing a that propagated to the ground, causing over 1,200 injuries from window breakage up to 100 km away. Simulations using match and seismic data, estimating the energy deposition and blast profiles that explain the damage pattern without a surface .

Experimental Research

Experimental research on blast waves relies on controlled laboratory setups and advanced computational models to investigate their , , and with materials under repeatable conditions. Shock tubes and wind tunnels provide a primary method for producing planar blast waves, enabling precise studies of fundamental dynamics without the variability of full-scale explosions. These facilities typically consist of a high-pressure driver section separated from a low-pressure driven section by a , which ruptures to generate a propagating at controlled numbers up to 5 or higher. Visualization techniques such as capture density gradients in the flow, revealing shock fronts and induced vortices, while measures phase shifts in light waves to quantify density variations with high . For instance, has been used to observe the evolution of shock waves and vortex loops emerging from openings, providing insights into unsteady flow structures. In explosive arenas, scaled detonation tests replicate spherical blast waves from high explosives like C-4 or , allowing measurement of decay and in three dimensions. These setups involve burying or surface-placing small charges (e.g., 10-100 g) in instrumented fields, with standoff distances scaled to Hopkinson-Cranz criteria for similarity to larger blasts. High-speed cameras operating at 10,000-100,000 frames per second record shock front arrival times and morphologies, enabling reconstruction of wave kinematics via stereoscopic calibration and background-oriented for density mapping. Pressure gauges, such as piezo-resistive transducers, are deployed in arrays to capture peak s and positive phase durations, with data validating empirical scaling laws like those from Kingery-Bulmash. For example, experiments measuring time-of-arrival at multiple gauges have quantified blast parameter variability in far-field regimes, achieving resolutions down to microseconds for wave speed estimation. Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations complement physical experiments by modeling complex blast wave interactions in three dimensions, using hydrocodes that solve Euler or Navier-Stokes equations with finite volume or particle methods. AUTODYN, a widely adopted explicit dynamics hydrocode, handles multi-material flows under high strain rates, incorporating equation-of-state models for explosives, air, and solids to predict shock propagation and material response. It supports coupled Eulerian-Lagrangian approaches for fluid-structure interactions, simulating blast loading on barriers with peak overpressures matching experimental data within 10-15%. Advanced multi-physics extensions include (MHD) to analog astrophysical scenarios, where magnetic fields influence blast wave deceleration and reverse shock formation, as tested in spherical blast problems with Lorentz factors up to 10. Recent developments in the have introduced laser-driven miniature blast waves for high-fidelity studies relevant to (ICF), where ultrashort pulses (femtoseconds) deposit into solid targets to generate localized shocks exceeding 100 Mbar initial pressure. Facilities like the KrF laser-driven produce planar waves in millimeter-scale channels, probed by to measure electron temperatures and blast velocities. These mini-blasts mimic ICF processes, with rear-side expansion forming complex wave structures validated against radiation-hydrodynamics codes, advancing understanding of coupling in fusion-relevant regimes.

References

  1. [1]
    The formation of a blast wave by a very intense explosion I ...
    A finite amount of energy is suddenly released in an infinitely concentrated form. The motion and pressure of the surrounding air is calculated.
  2. [2]
  3. [3]
  4. [4]
  5. [5]
  6. [6]
    Blast wave kinematics: theory, experiments, and applications
    Jul 25, 2022 · The first integrand represents the kinetic energy density of the gas, whereas the second term corresponds to the thermal energy of the gas ...
  7. [7]
    [PDF] Chapter THE PHYSICS AND MECHANISMS OF PRIMARY BLAST ...
    The shock. wave that is generated by the rapid release of gas from. an explosive is called the blast wave.
  8. [8]
    Fundamental review on collision of blast waves - AIP Publishing
    Mar 17, 2023 · A blast wave is characterized by a rapid release of energy causing a discontinuous increase in fluid flow properties which decay exponentially ...Blast wave characteristics · III. BLAST WAVE... · Collision of two blast waves...
  9. [9]
    The Science of Blast - Blast Injury Research Coordinating Office
    Sep 12, 2024 · The extent of damage caused by the blast wave mainly depends on five factors: Peak of the initial positive pressure wave; Duration of ...
  10. [10]
    Blast waves and how they interact with structures - PubMed
    Explosions generate blast waves, which need not be due to explosives. A blast wave consists of two parts: a shock wave and a blast wind.Missing: definition | Show results with:definition
  11. [11]
  12. [12]
  13. [13]
    Astrophysical blastwaves | Rev. Mod. Phys.
    Jan 1, 1988 · The authors present a general discussion of spherical, nonrelativistic blastwaves in an astrophysical context.
  14. [14]
    Blast waves and reverse shocks: from ultra-relativistic GRBs to ...
    A blast wave consists of a propagating shock front and associated region of high pressure produced by an impulsive injection of a large amount of energy. Much ...
  15. [15]
    Blast Wave - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
    A blast wave is defined as a pressure disturbance or wave that radiates away from an explosion source, resulting from the rapid expansion of energetic ...
  16. [16]
    Blast Wave - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
    A blast wave is a fluctuation of air caused by an explosive, creating a shock wave from high-pressure, high-temperature gas that expands rapidly.<|control11|><|separator|>
  17. [17]
    [PDF] General Laws for Propagation of Shock Waves through Matter
    Five laws or theorems will be presented. The most important of them is the Rankine-Hugoniot (R-H) equations, which are derived from the conservation laws of ...Missing: blast principles
  18. [18]
    [PDF] Explosion Effects - Joseph Shepherd - Caltech
    Sep 7, 2009 · – Strength of shock wave. • Strong ∆ P >> Po. • Weak ∆ P << Po. – Distance from source. • Near R ~ R source. • Far R >> R source. Page 31. 7 ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  19. [19]
    Analytical study of ionizing blast waves in atomic hydrogen
    Apr 20, 2023 · Thus, ionization is found to act as a cooling effect at the shock front where a fraction of kinetic energy is absorbed to ionize the gas.
  20. [20]
    [PDF] THE STRONG/WEAK SHOCK TRANSITION IN CYLINDRICAL AND ...
    tail the strong/weak blast wave version of Chernyi's model for a cylindrical blast wave (§§ 3–5), and then describe the solution for the case of a planar blast.
  21. [21]
    The Euler equations of gas dynamics - Clawpack
    A shock wave (either a 1-wave or 3-wave) satisfies the Rankine-Hugoniot conditions and exhibits a jump in entropy. To be physically correct, the entropy of ...Missing: blast | Show results with:blast
  22. [22]
    [PDF] Rankie-Hugoniot relations - UCSB Physics
    A blast wave is a shock such that the pressure inside the shock front is immensely greater than the ambient medium. In this case we have the condition p2 ...
  23. [23]
    [PDF] The Formation of a Blast Wave by a Very Intense Explosion. I ...
    May 1, 2007 · In the first place the condition that the initial disturbance is so concentrated that the mass of the material in which the energy is originally ...
  24. [24]
    [PDF] The Sedov Solution
    In general we need to solve partial differential equations in r and t to obtain a solution. In the self-similar approach we look for solutions of one variable.
  25. [25]
    [PDF] Evaluation of the Sedov-von Neumann-Taylor Blast Wave Solution
    Dec 21, 2000 · In this note we state the solution put forward by Sedov [18] for the problem of self-similar, one-dimensional, compressible hydrodynamics in.
  26. [26]
    Propagation of strong shock waves - ADS - Astrophysics Data System
    Propagation of strong shock waves. Sedov, Leonid Ivanovich. Abstract. Publication: Journal of Applied Mathematics and Mechanics. Pub Date: 1946; Bibcode: ...
  27. [27]
    [PDF] PLANE, CYLINDRICAL, AND SPHERICAL BLAST WAVES ... - DTIC
    New solutions are given for plane and spherical waves in addition to the cylindrical solutions given previously by Oshima. ... spherical blast waves are given for ...
  28. [28]
    Explosions, Deflagrations, and Detonations - NFPA
    Mar 27, 2023 · A deflagration is an explosion where the flame speed is lower than the speed of sound, which is approximately equal to 335 m/sec (750 mph).Missing: equivalence | Show results with:equivalence
  29. [29]
    Properties of Selected High Explosives - PacSci EMC
    Explosives which detonate and propagate at velocities greater than 1000 m/s, are high explosives and include the secondary explosives RDX, HMX, HNS, DIPAM, ...Definitions · Properties & Characteristics · Stability Tests · Sensitivity Tests
  30. [30]
    [PDF] Estimating Equivalency Of Explosives Through A Thermochemical ...
    Comparing the detonation energy for an explosive with that of TNT allows estimation of the TNT equivalency with respect to peak pressure, while comparison of.Missing: deflagration | Show results with:deflagration
  31. [31]
    [PDF] The Effects of Nuclear Weapons - GovInfo
    With the development of thelmonucleai. (fusion) weapons, having energy yields in the range of millions of tors (i.e., megatons) of TNT. a new presentation, ...
  32. [32]
    [PDF] AN ABSTRACT OF THE THESIS OF - Oregon State University
    May 12, 2022 · Modeling the prompt neutrons released as a result of a nuclear blast is a critical aspect of analyzing nuclear weapons effects. While prompt ...
  33. [33]
    A Boiler: The Explosive Potential of a Bomb
    This classic BULLETIN article is a sobering reminder of the explosive force of boilers and pressure vessels. From home hot water heaters to industrial-size ...
  34. [34]
    Explosion Phenomena and Effects of Explosions on Structures. I
    A shock wave in air is generally referred to as a 'blast wave' because it resembles and is accompanied by a strong wind. In water or in the ground, however, the ...
  35. [35]
    The Halifax Explosion - Canada.ca
    Nov 2, 2016 · ... explosion prior to the atomic bomb. With a force equivalent to 2.9 kilotons of TNT, it killed nearly 2,000 people, injured another 9,000 ...
  36. [36]
    Modeling shock waves generated by explosive volcanic eruptions
    Dec 13, 2013 · In explosive volcanism (vulcanian to plinian), generation of an atmospheric shock wave is expected. Shock waves in volcanoes have been reported ...Introduction · Experimental Results · Modeling Shocks Induced by... · Conclusions
  37. [37]
    [PDF] Modeling Shockwaves Generated by Explosive Volcanic Eruptions
    Dec 10, 2013 · In explosive volcanism (vulcanian to plinian), generation of an atmospheric shock wave is expected. Shock waves in volcanoes have been reported ...
  38. [38]
    [PDF] Optical Characterization of Large Caliber Muzzle Blast Waves
    This has been observed as early as the 17th century [11], and became prominent in the 20th century with its use in observing supersonic air-. 000 STkkS. G ...Missing: historical | Show results with:historical
  39. [39]
    [PDF] History of Shock Waves, Explosions and Impact - ReadingSample
    Beginning in the 17th century, gun- nery evolved into a science of its own and the gunner into a lauded expert in applied mechanics, then the most advanced.
  40. [40]
    Ernst Mach's Experiments on Shock Waves and The Place of ...
    Dec 23, 2022 · The present paper studies Ernst Mach's experimental work with “spark waves” and other types of shock waves, which brought him to the 1887–88 famous schlieren ...
  41. [41]
    Newspaper Articles - Durham Mining Museum
    Arrangements were made for recording the pressure within the gallery during each explosion and for determining the velocity with which the explosive wave ...
  42. [42]
    The Shock of War - Smithsonian Magazine
    It was terrible. The concussion felt like a blow in the face, the stomach and all over; it was like being struck unexpectedly by a huge wave in the ocean.
  43. [43]
    'Shell Shock'—The 100-Year Mystery May Now Be Solved
    Jun 9, 2016 · A landmark study sheds new light on the damage caused by “blast shock”—the signature injury of wars for more than a century.
  44. [44]
    My Observations During the Explosion at Trinity on July 16, 1945
    E. Fermi. On the morning of the 16th of July, I was stationed at the Base Camp at Trinity in a position about ten miles from the site of the explosion.
  45. [45]
    Manhattan Project: The Trinity Test, July 16, 1945 - OSTI.GOV
    Until the atomic bomb could be tested, doubt would remain about its effectiveness. The world had never seen a nuclear explosion before, and estimates varied ...
  46. [46]
    A self-similar solution for blast waves with transport properties
    Sedov, 1946. Sedov L.I.. Propagation of intense blast waves. Prikl. Matem. i. Mekh., 10 (2) (1946), pp. 146-304. Google Scholar. Sedov, 1957. Sedov L.I..
  47. [47]
    An unpublished manuscript of John von Neumann on shock waves ...
    Aug 18, 2020 · Von Neumann studies bombs comprising a primary explosive charge along with explosive booster material. His goal is to calculate the minimal ...
  48. [48]
    [PDF] A Brief History of Shaped Charges - DTIC
    Starting in the 1950s–1960s, significant shaped-charge developments were made possible by the perfection of experimental techniques such as high-speed ...
  49. [49]
    Fluid dynamics of relativistic blast waves - AIP Publishing
    Aug 1, 1976 · A fluid dynamical treatment of an ultra‐relativistic spherical blast wave enclosed by a strong shock is presented.
  50. [50]
    The structure and evolution of relativistic jetted blast waves
    We provide analytic description of the jet lateral profile evolution for a range of initial structures, as well as the evolution of Γa and θc. For off-axis GRBs ...
  51. [51]
    [PDF] On the Propagation and Interaction of Spherical Blast Waves
    The boundary conditions include the condition that the particle velocity at the center of explosion must be zero. Numerical and approximate solutions are ...
  52. [52]
    Chapter III—Air Blast Phenomena in Air and Surface Bursts
    The main characteristic of this wave is that the pressure rises very sharply at the moving front and falls off toward the interior region of the explosion. In ...
  53. [53]
    Blast Wave - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
    A blast wave is defined as a shock wave that propagates through an explosive mixture at supersonic velocity, resulting from the almost instantaneous ...
  54. [54]
    [PDF] Detailed Comparison of Blast Effects in Air and Vacuum - OSTI.GOV
    Aug 1, 2007 · The average plate deflection from the air blast was 11 mm, ~10% deeper than the average vacuum plate deflection. Shock pressure estimates were ...Missing: water | Show results with:water<|control11|><|separator|>
  55. [55]
    [PDF] Blast wave interaction with structures – an overview - CORE
    The review is formed of five main parts, each describing: the direct loading of a blast wave on the surface of a finite-sized structure; the modified pressure ...
  56. [56]
    Study on the propagation and distribution of blast waves along the ...
    Apr 8, 2025 · The propagation of blast waves was analyzed considering the influence of the charge shape and the detonation location.
  57. [57]
    [2010.15868] The Taylor-von Neumann-Sedov blast-wave solution
    Oct 29, 2020 · At long times the profiles of the three conserved variables evolve to self-similar scaling forms, with a scaling exponent as predicted by the ...
  58. [58]
    Analytical investigation of reflection of a regular or ... - NASA ADS
    It is shown that 7 different reflection processes may be expected depending on the Mach number of the incident shock M sub i and the two wedge angles theta sub ...Missing: blast | Show results with:blast
  59. [59]
    Mathematical Model to Locate Interference of Blast Waves from Multi ...
    Constructive interference causes amplification in magnitude and sustains for longer duration. Destructive interference, on the other hand, results into low ...
  60. [60]
    Chapter V—Structural Damage From Air Blast - Atomic Archive
    At a blast overpressure of 3.1 pounds per square inch this building was severely damaged. The welded and bolted steel frame remained standing, but ...
  61. [61]
    Overpressure Levels of Concern | response.restoration.noaa.gov
    Additionally, these waves can damage buildings or even knock them flat—often injuring or killing the people inside them. The sudden change in pressure can also ...
  62. [62]
    [PDF] UFC 3-340-02 Structures to Resist the Effects of Accidental Explosions
    Description: This UFC 3-340-02 presents methods of design for protective construction used in facilities for development, testing, production, storage,.
  63. [63]
    Blast wave interaction with structures – An overview - Sage Journals
    Sep 26, 2022 · They showed for conditions typical of far-field (Z = 8 m/kg1/3), that is, a weak, planar shock, that diffraction waves do not repeatedly travel ...
  64. [64]
    Chapter IV—Air Blast Loading - Atomic Archive
    Like the diffraction loading, the drag loading, especially in the Mach region, is equivalent to a lateral (or translational) force acting upon the structure or ...Missing: fragmentation | Show results with:fragmentation
  65. [65]
    [PDF] A Manual for the Prediction of Blast and Fragment Loadings ... - DTIC
    Jan 3, 2025 · The manual provides state-of-the-art information and example problems for blast and fragment load predictive techniques for structures at the ...
  66. [66]
    [PDF] Structural deSign criteria 2 - Ready.gov
    Key blast parameters are explosive weight, type, and distance. Low-rise buildings may be vulnerable to blast loads from large explosives at large distances.
  67. [67]
    Blast Injuries - StatPearls - NCBI Bookshelf
    Whether through an accident or intentional act, explosions are an occurrence that can cause serious injury and death. Explosions have the ability to inflict ...Continuing Education Activity · Introduction · Etiology · Pathophysiology
  68. [68]
    Primary Blast Injury of the Brain - Research.va.gov
    Oct 3, 2022 · Research has demonstrated that 50 kPA (7.3 PSI) of blast overpressure can rupture the eardrum and cause lung injury. Hemorrhage in the lung ...Missing: thresholds | Show results with:thresholds
  69. [69]
    An animal-to-human scaling law for blast-induced traumatic brain ...
    Notable exceptions include blast injury to the lung, where scaling laws based on animal body mass have been shown to scale across more than one animal species ...
  70. [70]
    [PDF] Shock Waves in the Study of Shaped Charges - DTIC
    The hollow charge, or unlined shaped charge was first deployed on May 10, 1940 by the Germans on the. Belgian fort of Eben Emael. The hollow charges knocked out ...
  71. [71]
    [PDF] Engineering Design Handbook. Explosions in Air. Part One - DTIC
    Jul 15, 1974 · This handbook covers general phenomena of explosions, including blast wave characteristics, and air blast theory.
  72. [72]
    [PDF] IED Attack: Improvised Explosive Devices - Homeland Security
    An improvised explosive device (IED) attack is the use of a “homemade” bomb and/or destructive device to destroy, incapacitate, harass, or distract. IEDs are ...Missing: landmines | Show results with:landmines
  73. [73]
    [PDF] Military Aspects of Blast and Shock (MABS) - DTIC
    Sep 6, 1995 · A Study of the Boundary Layer in a Large Scale Blast Wave over a Natural Surface,. Dewey, McMillin, van Netten, Canada and Ethridge, Keefer, ...
  74. [74]
    Tactical Nuclear Weapons | Union of Concerned Scientists
    Jun 1, 2022 · Tactical nuclear weapons can have lower explosive “yield” than strategic weapons, meaning they're explosively less powerful. This may make them ...Missing: effects | Show results with:effects
  75. [75]
    "Full Scale 13-Story Building Implosion and Collapse: Effects on ...
    The demolition of these two structures included the implosion of controlled charges ... wave generated by the blast, contributed to the structural response.
  76. [76]
    Fundamentals of Controlled Demolition in Structures - MDPI
    Specifically, the first 5 stories are charged with explosives (denoted as 5e), followed by 5 consecutive stories without charges, then another 5 explosive- ...
  77. [77]
    Blast Protection of Buildings | Books - ASCE Library
    Blast Protection of Buildings provides minimum requirements for planning, design, construction, and assessment of new and existing buildingsMissing: summary | Show results with:summary
  78. [78]
    [PDF] Considerations for Blast-Resistant Glazing Design
    In this paper, the authors offer the architectural and engi- neering communities an approach that facilitates blast-resistant glazing design using readily ...Missing: reinforced setback
  79. [79]
    [PDF] building design guidance 3 | fema
    The following guidelines are commonly used to mitigate the effects of blast on structures and to mitigate the potential for progessive collapse. Details and ...
  80. [80]
    [PDF] Blast Considerations
    In most urban settings, the typical setback distance from the street to the building façade is typically 10 to 25 feet, which does not pose any access problems ...
  81. [81]
    IED Blast Mitigation: Engineering for Survivability - ND Defense
    Jan 14, 2025 · Ceramics harden the surface, metals reinforce the structure, and polymers absorb the shock. Together, they create a barrier strong enough to ...
  82. [82]
    Review of Design Techniques of Armored Vehicles for Protection ...
    Feb 9, 2020 · This review paper covers the subject of vehicle design for protection against the blast of improvised explosive devices.
  83. [83]
    [PDF] Design Guidance for Shelters and Safe Rooms - FEMA
    Similarly, an explosive vehicle or suicide bomber attack rarely provides advance warning; therefore, the shelter is most likely to be used after the fact to ...
  84. [84]
    A Review of Blast Loading in the Urban Environment - MDPI
    When a blast wave propagates in a crowded setting, the magnitude and form of the resulting blast load differ substantially from those of a free-air blast, ...<|separator|>
  85. [85]
    [PDF] HANDBOOK FOR BLAST-RESISTANT DESIGN OF BUILDINGS
    ... blast response analysis, and fragmentation and associated methods for effects analyses. Part 3: System Analysis and Design has f ve chapters that cover anal ...
  86. [86]
    Harnessing plasticity in sequential metamaterials for ideal shock ...
    Oct 16, 2024 · We exploit yield buckling to design metamaterials that buckle sequentially in an arbitrary large sequence of steps whilst keeping a load-bearing capacity.
  87. [87]
    Shock-Absorbing Metamaterial Holds Promise for Impact Protection
    May 24, 2022 · The foam-based LCE material the team developed is lighter than metal, displays better energy absorption at higher impact speeds, and can be reused.
  88. [88]
    Chandra Detection of the Forward and Reverse Shocks in ...
    We report the localization of the forward and reverse shock fronts in the young supernova remnant Cassiopeia A using X-ray data obtained with the Chandra ...Missing: observations | Show results with:observations
  89. [89]
    The acceleration of cosmic rays in shock fronts – I - Oxford Academic
    Abstract. It is shown that charged particles can be accelerated to high energies in astrophysical shock fronts. Fast particles are prevented from streaming.
  90. [90]
    NASA's Fermi Proves Supernova Remnants Produce Cosmic Rays
    Feb 14, 2013 · Each round trip through the shock ramps up the particle's speed by about 1 percent. After many crossings, the particle obtains enough energy to ...Missing: fronts | Show results with:fronts
  91. [91]
    Fluid dynamics of relativistic blast waves - ADS
    This paper presents a fluid dynamical treatment of an ultra-relativistic spherical blast wave, including a similarity solution and cases with varying external ...
  92. [92]
    Simulation and physical model based gamma-ray burst afterglow ...
    In this review, I describe the basic aspects of afterglow models, and the challenges involved in performing data analysis based directly on physical models.
  93. [93]
    Reconstruction of surface pressures on flat plates impacted by blast ...
    In addition, a background oriented schlieren (BOS) setup was used between the shock tube exit and test plate as shown in Fig. 1(a). BOS was used to visualize ...
  94. [94]
    Laboratory-scale blast wave phenomena – optical diagnostics and ...
    Nov 11, 2005 · This paper reviews and discusses the optical diagnostics that can be applied in these experiments and outlines how these techniques can be used ...
  95. [95]
    Holographic Interferometric Observation of Shock Waves ... - J-Stage
    This paper describes results of holographic interferometric observation of the evolution of shock waves and the primary vortex loop discharged from the open-end ...Missing: scholarly | Show results with:scholarly
  96. [96]
    [PDF] Three-dimensional shock wave reconstruction using multiple high ...
    The location and rotation of each camera is determined using a stereoscopic camera calibration procedure. The high speed images are processed using the ...
  97. [97]
    Time of arrival as a diagnostic for far-field high explosive blast waves
    Apr 1, 2022 · The ability to accurately determine blast loading parameters will enable more fundamental studies on the sources of blast parameter ...
  98. [98]
    Ansys Autodyn | Nonlinear Dynamics Analysis Software
    Ansys Autodyn simulates material responses to short, severe loadings, including complex interactions of solids, liquids, and gases, and shock waves.Missing: MHD | Show results with:MHD
  99. [99]
    Study of blast wave overpressures using the computational fluid ...
    Jun 12, 2017 · The Autodyn is a hydrocode developed to analyze systems under intense or very fast loadings. This software is based in computational fluid ...Missing: physics MHD
  100. [100]
    Modified Path-conservative HLLEM Scheme for ... - IOP Science
    Mar 10, 2021 · MHD Blast Wave. The three-dimensional MHD blast-wave problem is associated with strong magnetic fields, shocked flows, and smooth flow ...
  101. [101]
    Characterization of blast waves induced by femtosecond laser ...
    Nov 3, 2024 · Blast waves have been produced in solid target by irradiation with short-pulse high-intensity lasers. The mechanism of production relies on energy deposition.Missing: mini- 2020s
  102. [102]
    KrF laser-driven shock tube: Realization and first experiments
    We report on the first implementation of a miniature laser-driven shock tube (LDST) of 5 × 5 mm cross section and 50-mm length for generating and studying ...Missing: blast interferometry