Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

AVS-36

![AVS-36 rifle](./assets/AVS-36_AM.068386_$2 The AVS-36 (Avtomat Simonova obraztsa 1936 goda, or Simonov Model of 1936) was a selective-fire developed by Soviet designer Sergei Simonov and adopted by the in 1936 as one of the world's first standard-issue rifles capable of both semi-automatic and fully automatic fire. Chambered for the powerful cartridge and employing a short-stroke gas piston operating system, the featured a 15-round detachable , an integral to mitigate in automatic mode, and a folding , with overall specifications including a weight of approximately 4.3 kg and a barrel length of 612 mm. Production ran from 1936 to 1940 at the , yielding an estimated 35,000 to 65,800 units, though exact figures vary across records due to limited documentation and wartime disruptions. Despite its innovative design, the AVS-36 suffered from significant reliability flaws, including a complex mechanism susceptible to fouling in dusty or muddy conditions, a steep feed path prone to jams, and risks of the remaining unlocked after firing, which could cause injury from uncontrolled . These issues manifested in early combat use during the in 1939 and the against in 1939–1940, prompting its official withdrawal from frontline service by 1941 in favor of simpler semi-automatic designs like the Tokarev SVT-38/40, although some examples persisted in secondary roles through . Limited numbers were also supplied to Republican forces in the , highlighting its brief but notable role in pre- conflicts as a pioneering, if flawed, step toward modern automatic infantry weapons.

History

Development Origins

, a Soviet firearms designer with prior experience assisting Vladimir Fedorov on the , initiated development of a gas-operated around 1930 to address the Red Army's limitations with the bolt-action Mosin-Nagant, which restricted infantry firepower in modern warfare scenarios observed during and after . The project aimed to provide semi-automatic capability in the standard cartridge, enabling faster follow-up shots without manual cycling, amid broader Soviet military modernization efforts in the 1930s that sought automatic or self-loading infantry weapons to match emerging global trends. The first prototype emerged in 1931, demonstrating viability through initial trials that highlighted reliable gas operation via a short-stroke and vertical locking block, though early designs focused on semi-automatic function. Iterations through the early incorporated selective-fire mechanisms, allowing full-automatic rates of approximately 700 rounds per minute, to further enhance squad-level potential beyond the Mosin-Nagant's capabilities. These advancements responded directly to doctrinal shifts emphasizing increased automatic weapon density, influenced by experiences in the and internal evaluations of foreign designs like the American prototypes. By 1935, refined prototypes underwent comparative trials against rival designs, including those from , where the AVS configuration excelled in automatic fire demonstrations despite noted mechanical complexities such as asymmetrical locking flaps prone to fouling in unclean conditions. Official adoption as the Avtomaticheskaya Vintovka Simonova obr. 1936 (AVS-36) followed in 1936, prioritizing its selective-fire versatility for elite units over simpler semi-automatic alternatives, though evaluators expressed reservations about long-term durability under field stresses. This selection marked an early Soviet commitment to intermediate automatic rifles, predating widespread proliferation.

Adoption and Production

The AVS-36 was officially adopted by the in 1936 as the Avtomaticheskaya Vintovka Simonova model 1936, marking one of the Soviet Union's initial efforts to field a selective-fire infantry rifle. Initial issuance was restricted due to its specialized role and production constraints, primarily equipping select units rather than achieving widespread distribution akin to the Mosin-Nagant. Manufacturing commenced at the Izhevsk Mechanical Plant in late 1936, following prototype trials, with mass production ramping up in 1937. The rifle's intricate gas-operated mechanism and requirement for high-precision machining, including specialized steel alloys, contributed to elevated production costs and yields far below Soviet wartime small arms norms—total output estimates range from approximately 33,000 to 65,800 units by cessation, with yearly figures including around 10,000 in 1937 and 24,000 in 1938 per some records. These limitations stemmed from industrial bottlenecks in the late 1930s, including tool wear and quality control issues inherent to the design's complexity. Production halted in 1940 amid evaluations revealing the AVS-36's logistical unsuitability for mass issuance, prompting a shift to the simpler developed by . This transition reflected broader priorities for scalable output during escalating pre-war tensions, as the AVS-36's full-automatic capability, while innovative, proved incompatible with rapid mobilization demands. Remaining stocks were largely withdrawn from frontline service post-1940, though some persisted in or reserve roles.

Combat Deployment

The AVS-36 entered combat with Soviet units during the against , commencing on November 30, 1939, where it was employed to deliver selective-fire suppression at the squad level in forested and frozen terrain. Intended to augment firepower beyond bolt-action rifles, the weapon saw deployment in assaults on fortifications, though its gas-operated mechanism struggled in sub-zero temperatures, leading to reported stoppages from frozen dirt accumulation. forces captured examples during counteroffensives, such as at in December 1939–January 1940, where encircled Soviet divisions abandoned equipment amid heavy losses exceeding 27,000 personnel. In the opening stages of on June 22, 1941, AVS-36-equipped units participated in border defenses against the invasion, particularly in the western Ukrainian and Belorussian fronts, providing burst during hasty retreats from cities like and . Soviet records indicate rapid attrition, with thousands of rifles lost to advances that overran depots and field positions, contributing to an estimated 4 million captured by forces in the first six months. The rifle's limited magazine capacity and sensitivity to under sustained restricted its role to short defensive engagements before units transitioned to more robust alternatives. Post-1941 service dwindled due to battlefield losses and official withdrawal favoring the , though isolated sniper-modified AVS-36 variants, fitted with PU scopes for semi-automatic precision fire, remained in use by select marksmen into 1942. Notable among these was Soviet sniper Vladimir Pchelintsev, credited with over 200 confirmed kills, who reportedly adapted AVS-36 platforms for urban and engagements during the defense of Leningrad and subsequent counteroffensives. Such modifications highlighted the rifle's potential in skilled hands despite systemic vulnerabilities, but overall deployment shifted to mass-produced Mosin-Nagant derivatives amid industrial retooling.

Design

Operating System

The AVS-36 operates using a short-stroke gas system, with the positioned above the barrel to harness gases tapped from the barrel's gas . Upon firing, high-pressure gases propel the rearward for a short , imparting to the connected bolt carrier while the barrel remains stationary, thereby initiating the action cycle without excessive barrel movement. This design minimizes impulse transmitted to the shooter compared to long-stroke systems. Locking is achieved via a vertically sliding block located in the between the magazine well and breech face, featuring two asymmetrical lugs on its upper surface that engage corresponding recesses on the 's underside. In battery position, forward pressure from the bolt carrier depresses the spring-loaded block downward, aligning the lugs to clear the recesses before the block springs upward upon rearward carrier movement, securing the against the barrel extension primarily through vertical translation with minor tilt for extraction. This mechanism ensures reliable headspace maintenance under the cartridge's pressure, though the asymmetrical flaps introduce potential for uneven wear. The trigger group facilitates from a , permitting semi-automatic single shots or full-automatic bursts at a cyclic rate of 700-800 rounds per minute, controlled by a safety/selector lever on the receiver's left side above the . Ammunition feeds from a detachable 15-round box loaded with rimmed cartridges, which the system's geometry accommodates despite rim drag challenges. A with ports reduces muzzle climb and felt during sustained automatic fire, enhancing controllability for the rifle's intermediate power profile.

Key Features and Specifications

The AVS-36, designed by Sergei Simonov, is a gas-operated, select-fire rifle chambered in the full-power 7.62×54mmR cartridge, marking it as one of the earliest Soviet attempts at an automatic battle rifle. Its operating system employs a flapper-locked bolt, with gas tapped from the barrel driving a piston to cycle the action. The rifle feeds from a detachable 15-round box magazine inserted into the underside, supporting both semi-automatic and full-automatic fire modes selectable via a fire control lever. Key physical attributes include an overall length of 1260 mm and a barrel length of 627 mm, contributing to its substantial profile. Unloaded weight is 4.2 kg without , with a wooden stock and handguard for basic . Fixed are standard, graduated to 600 meters, though practical effective range in semi-automatic mode is approximately 400 meters, diminishing significantly in full-automatic due to from the high-powered and limited controllability. A large integral helps reduce muzzle climb and during automatic fire, while a accommodates standard Soviet rifle bayonets. The design's use of a full in a select-fire configuration was innovative for but highlighted challenges with sustained automatic fire owing to the caliber's power.
SpecificationValue
Caliber
ActionGas-operated, flapper-locked
Rate of fire~800 rounds/min
Magazine capacity15 rounds (detachable box)
Muzzle velocity~830 m/s
SightsFixed iron, adjustable to 600 m

Accessories and Modifications

The AVS-36 featured a prominent single-baffle fitted to the barrel end as standard equipment, intended to counteract muzzle climb and in full-automatic fire, though testing revealed it provided only marginal control. A on the barrel supported attachment of a , uniquely permitting both horizontal and vertical mounting orientations for versatility in close-quarters use. The rifle also included a fixed cleaning rod secured along the right side of the stock for field maintenance. A limited production run of sniper-configured AVS-36 rifles existed, equipped with a (Pritsel Eksperimentalny) mounted offset to the left of the receiver axis; this positioning avoided interference with the mechanism's upward ejection of spent casings. These variants numbered in the low hundreds at most, reflecting the weapon's overall scarcity and unsuitability for precision roles due to inherent design instabilities. No significant factory-sanctioned variants or optional accessories beyond these were developed, constrained by the AVS-36's brief service life and mechanical unreliability, which discouraged widespread adoption or customization. Aftermarket modifications remained negligible owing to low survivability rates and limited availability of parts. Captured specimens, such as those acquired by Finnish forces during the , saw occasional field use with minimal reworking, primarily retaining original configurations for testing or secondary issuance. Adversaries like designated it as the Selbstladegewehr 257(r) but applied no documented systematic alterations.

Performance and Limitations

Field Reliability Issues

The AVS-36 experienced rapid overheating during full-automatic fire at approximately 800 rounds per minute, driven by the high-pressure cartridge's energy output overwhelming the rifle's lightweight construction and limited heat dissipation surfaces. This thermal buildup caused parts expansion, accelerated in the gas system, and contributed to stoppages, as the design's long recoil operation failed to isolate heat-sensitive components effectively. Jamming was frequent due to dirt infiltration, carbon fouling, and feeding inconsistencies from the rimmed cartridge's variable rim dimensions, with the steep feed path and exposed recoil spring exacerbating debris accumulation in the bolt mechanism. In harsh field environments like the Winter War's mud, snow, and subzero temperatures starting October 1939, unremoved factory grease froze in moving parts, halting operation until manually cleared, while ammunition variations further induced malfunctions. Maintenance challenges arose from the rifle's intricate internals, including a complex gas piston and multi-part bolt assembly, which resisted quick field stripping and required specialized tools unavailable at unit level, leading to extended and acute spare parts shortages. The receiver's relative fragility under stress limited sustained firing bursts, as vibrational loosened components like the rear sight over prolonged use, compounding operational failures in . These design-inherent vulnerabilities resulted in high attrition rates, prompting warehousing and partial scrapping by 1941.

Comparative Analysis

The AVS-36 offered selective-fire capability, enabling both semi-automatic and full-automatic modes at a cyclic rate of approximately 550-600 rounds per minute, surpassing the semi-automatic-only 's rate of 180-200 rounds per minute in effective fire potential. However, this automatic function exacerbated reliability problems in the AVS-36, including sensitivity to and cold weather, rendering it less suitable for frontline use compared to the SVT-40, which prioritized consistent semi-automatic performance despite shared gas-operated designs. The SVT-40's simpler mechanism facilitated higher production volumes, totaling around 1.6 million units including variants, versus the AVS-36's limited output of roughly 8,000 rifles before its withdrawal in 1940. Compared to the American (BAR), the AVS-36 weighed approximately 4 kilograms empty, about half the BAR's 8-9 kilograms, enhancing individual soldier mobility but compromising durability in squad automatic roles. The BAR's robust construction and 20-round supported sustained bursts with the rimless .30-06 cartridge, providing better control and reliability under combat stress, whereas the AVS-36's full-automatic mode struggled with the rimmed round, prone to feeding interruptions from rim overlap in its 15-round detachable during rapid fire. This highlighted inherent trade-offs in adapting full-power, rimmed ammunition—optimized for machine guns—to lightweight selective-fire rifles, limiting the AVS-36's versatility against heavier, purpose-built automatics like the BAR. Overall, the AVS-36's design innovations, such as its short-stroke gas piston and vertical locking block, pioneered select-fire for Soviet infantry rifles but proved overambitious for manufacturing and materials, with fragility under full-auto stress foreshadowing the shift toward rugged, tolerance-insensitive systems like the for reliable automatic fire with intermediate cartridges. Its replacement by semi-automatic alternatives underscored a doctrinal pivot away from complex automatics until intermediate ammunition enabled practical assault rifles postwar.

User Experiences

Soviet soldiers frequently encountered difficulties controlling the AVS-36 in full-automatic mode due to its lightweight construction and the high recoil of the cartridge, leading many to favor semi-automatic fire for improved accuracy during engagements. Accounts from early wartime use highlighted frequent malfunctions in adverse conditions, such as mud and cold, exacerbating reliability concerns and prompting troops to abandon the weapon during retreats, which contributed to high loss rates and its scarcity post-production. Finnish forces captured several hundred AVS-36 rifles during the and but viewed them as finicky and maintenance-intensive, rarely integrating them into regular units despite occasional use by specialized troops; the same operational shortcomings observed by Soviets deterred widespread adoption. German captors similarly reported persistent jamming and sensitivity to dirt, limiting its utility to experimental or short-term applications without significant modification efforts. In the hands of well-trained personnel, the occasionally demonstrated effectiveness in semi-automatic roles, such as precise aimed at medium ranges, but such successes were exceptional and dependent on meticulous ; overall, users across factions regarded it as suitable only for or rested operators, not scalable for frontline under .

Users and Capture

Primary Operators

The AVS-36 was issued exclusively to the , serving as a selective-fire for Soviet units from its in 1936 until its withdrawal in 1941 due to reliability concerns and replacement by the SVT-38. Production totaled approximately 35,000 to 65,000 units between 1936 and 1940, limiting its distribution to select formations and preventing widespread standardization across the force. This scarcity meant the AVS-36 equipped less than 1% of frontline s, with priority given to specialized roles rather than general issue. No other Soviet branches, such as border guards or , received significant allocations, as the rifle's operational issues curtailed broader deployment. The weapon saw no exports, remaining confined to domestic use within USSR military structures amid the Red Army's emphasis on bolt-action Mosin-Nagant rifles for mass equipping.

Captured and Secondary Use

Finnish forces captured several hundred AVS-36 rifles during the (1939–1940) and (1941–1944), with documented examples including a photographed skiing with one in March 1940. Approximately 300 were acquired overall, some of which underwent testing at the factory in , revealing persistent reliability issues under field conditions. While a limited number entered Finnish service, often with modifications to address jamming and overheating, adoption remained minimal due to the rifle's mechanical unreliability and incompatibility with Finnish logistics; user reports indicated mixed reception, with praise for full-automatic fire but criticism for frequent stoppages in cold weather. German units captured AVS-36 rifles during in 1941, designating them as Selbstladegewehr 258(r) for potential issue to second-line troops. However, widespread use was curtailed by logistical barriers, including the scarcity of ammunition and the rifle's propensity for malfunctions, leading to most being relegated to training or scrapped rather than frontline deployment. Postwar, surviving captured examples had negligible secondary roles; Soviet authorities systematically withdrew and destroyed serviceable AVS-36s by 1941–1942 to prevent proliferation, while adversarial captures were largely dismantled or lost in scrapping efforts amid shifting priorities to more reliable designs like the SVT-40. No verified instances of extended use emerged in conflicts such as the Korean War, with extant specimens today primarily held in museums or private collections derived from wartime recoveries.

Legacy

Influence on Soviet Firearms

The AVS-36's mechanical unreliability, particularly its gas system vulnerabilities to fouling and the challenges of feeding rimmed cartridges, underscored the limitations of selective-fire designs using full-power ammunition in harsh field conditions. These empirical shortcomings, observed during limited production of approximately 8,000 units between and , prompted Soviet designers and military evaluators to prioritize semi-automatic mechanisms over full-automatic capability for rifles. This shift influenced the adoption of simpler gas-operated systems in subsequent weapons, such as Fedor Tokarev's SVT-38 and , which dispensed with the AVS-36's complex locking flappers and automatic sear in favor of a more robust tilting-bolt , though both shared extraction issues with rimmed rounds. While the AVS-36 produced no direct variants, its field data reinforced doctrinal preferences for mass-producibility and durability, contributing to the Red Army's reliance on bolt-action Mosin-Nagant rifles during and a broader reevaluation of automatic weapon feasibility. The rifle's failures highlighted the need for mechanisms tolerant of dirt, cold, and rough handling—lessons that indirectly informed Sergei Simonov's later semi- in , which employed a refined short-stroke gas piston derived from pre-war experiments. Moreover, persistent problems with rimmed accelerated advocacy for rimless cartridges, paving the way for post-war intermediate rounds like the , which enabled controllable automatic fire in designs such as the AK-47.

Historical Assessment

Modern analyses regard the AVS-36 as an ambitious but ultimately unsuccessful experiment in design, innovative in concept yet undermined by empirical shortcomings in reliability and durability. Limited of 35,000 to 65,000 units from to highlighted its incompatibility with the demands of industrialized warfare, as the rifle's and fragility precluded amid resource constraints and high rates. Soviet evaluators terminated output in favor of sturdier semi-automatic alternatives, prioritizing proven ruggedness over selective-fire novelty. Key critiques center on the design's emphasis on full-power 7.62x54mmR automatic fire, which disregarded physiological limits of recoil control, environmental fouling from mud and cold, and logistical burdens of maintenance—realities that simpler bolt-actions like the accommodated effectively through minimalism and tolerance for abuse. Field-derived data revealed frequent jams, overheating, and structural failures under sustained use, attributing these to insufficient mass and overly intricate gas mechanisms rather than inherent cartridge flaws. This contrasts with later Soviet successes grounded in redundancy and simplicity, underscoring how the AVS-36's theoretical advantages evaporated against causal exigencies of infantry combat. Contemporary simulations, including the multiplayer game Enlisted, portray the AVS-36 with modeled reductions in accuracy and stability to align with documented handling deficiencies, eschewing romanticized depictions. Collectors esteem it for rarity—many extant examples trace to captures—valuing historical artifact status over practical shootability, as restored functionality remains marginal due to wear and parts scarcity. Such evaluations affirm the rifle's role as a cautionary pivot in Soviet arms development, where data on failures, not ingenuity myths, informed enduring paradigms of reliability.

References

  1. [1]
    Russian AVS-36 Rifle - Forgotten Weapons
    May 9, 2012 · The Simonov AVS-36 was adopted into Soviet service in 1936, and two years later replaced by the Tokarev SVT-38.Missing: specifications | Show results with:specifications
  2. [2]
    A Rare Look at the Soviet AVS-36 Automatic Rifle | thefirearmblog.com
    Mar 11, 2016 · The AVS-36 featured a large single-baffle muzzle brake to help control recoil in fully automatic fire. It turned out that the AVS-36 was too fragile for normal ...Missing: specifications | Show results with:specifications
  3. [3]
    Simonov AVS-36 - Internet Movie Firearms Database
    Specifications ; Country of Origin: Soviet Union ; Caliber: 7.62x54mmR ; Weight: 9.5 lbs (4.3 kg) ; Length: 48.4 in (123 cm) ; Barrel length: 24.1 in (61.2 cm) ...
  4. [4]
    AVS-36: The Worst Rifle Ever Developed By the Soviet Union
    Feb 6, 2023 · There were a number of problems related to the muzzle, magazine and ammunition. The cartridge feed path was long and steep, making it prone to ...Missing: flaws | Show results with:flaws
  5. [5]
    AVS-36 Rifle | World War II Database
    AVS-36 rifles were officially withdrawn from Soviet service in 1941, although working examples would remain in service through the duration of WW2. Source ...
  6. [6]
    Rare Photos & Footage - Honor the Veterans
    Approximately 65,800 AVS-36s were produced between 1936 and 1940. Official Soviet production breakdown figures are: 106 made in 1934, 286 in 1935, 10,280 in ...
  7. [7]
    Journey to the AK47 Part 2: Simonov's AVS36 - Firearms News
    Oct 4, 2019 · Simonov's AVS36 was a gas-operated rifle with a short-stroke piston whose bolt was locked by two asymmetrical locking flaps and a vertically sliding locking ...Missing: history | Show results with:history
  8. [8]
    Sergei Simonov | World War II Database
    In the early 1930s Simonov began work on a semi-automatic rifle, the AVS-36 but although adopted by the Soviet Army in 1936 it failed to stand up to the rigours ...
  9. [9]
    100 years of Red Army: AVS-36 || Kalashnikov Media
    Aug 25, 2021 · In the 1930s, the self-loading or automatic rifle was considered the most promising weapon for infantry forces in most developed countries ...Missing: Sergei Soviet<|separator|>
  10. [10]
    FINNISH ARMY 1918 - 1945: RIFLES PART 4 - JAEGER PLATOON
    Aug 28, 2021 · Simonov's rifle became the one that was accepted to mass-production. Izhevsk arsenal started mass-producing AVS-36 year 1937.Missing: adoption date
  11. [11]
    AVS-36 - Military Wiki - Fandom
    The designer, Sergei Simonov, began his work with a gas-operated self-loading rifle in 1930. The first prototype was ready in 1931 and appeared promising, and ...
  12. [12]
    AVS-36 Simonov - Modern Firearms
    The AVS-36 seen not much combat, but it was used during Winter War between USSR and Finland in 1940, as well as in early stages of Great Patriotic War of 1941- ...Missing: deployment 1939-1940
  13. [13]
    Print Page - Snajperisti - Paluba.Info
    Prva sovjetska poluautomatska snajperska puška bila je AVS-36 (Avtomatičeskaja vintovka Simonova, obrazec 1936. ... Vladimir Nikolaevich Pchelintsev bio je jedan ...Missing: modifications | Show results with:modifications
  14. [14]
    AVS-36 - Gun Wiki - Fandom
    "Simonov automatic rifle, Model of 1936") was a Soviet automatic rifle designed in 1936 by Sergei Simonov and produced from 1936 to 1938 by IZhMASh. One of the ...
  15. [15]
    AVS-36 - Frontline: Karelia 40 - 44 - Miraheze
    Only one source (Soviet Small-Arms and Ammunition) claims total production having been about 65,800 rifles and it to have continued until year 1940. Anyway, ...Missing: service | Show results with:service
  16. [16]
    SVT 38/40 over AVS 36? : r/enlistedgame - Reddit
    Feb 15, 2022 · AVS rate of fire is three times that of the SVT. 550-600 shots per minute versus 180-200 shots per minute. AVS also has slightly higher vertical recoil and ...AVS-36, SVT-40, SKS - RedditThe Avs 36 is better in almost everyway than Avt 40 : r/enlistedgameMore results from www.reddit.comMissing: reliability production
  17. [17]
    The AVS-36 One of the Soviet Union's first select-fire rifles, the AVS ...
    Mar 16, 2023 · Like the venerable Mosin-Nagant that preceded it, the AVS-36 was chambered in the large 7.62x54mmR rimmed cartridge. Rather than ejecting from ...
  18. [18]
    AVS-36 vs. BAR - Which INSANE WEAPON is BETTER? - YouTube
    Jul 9, 2018 · AVS-36 vs. BAR - Which INSANE WEAPON is BETTER? - GUN VS. GUN EP. 18 I was on FIRE! Which gun is better in your opinion?Missing: Browning Automatic
  19. [19]
    The Soviet Jackhammer: Shooting an AVS-36 - Forgotten Weapons
    Apr 6, 2019 · As a light rifle firing full-power 7.62x54R ammunition, this is sure to be an exhilarating experience. I am curious to see how the muzzle brake performs.
  20. [20]
    List of German Captured Equipment of WWII/Firearms
    Selbstladegewehr 257(r), 7.62x54mmR · AVS-36. Selbstladegewehr 258(r), 7.62x54mmR · SVT-38. Selbstladegewehr 259(r), 7.62x54mmR · SVT-40. Z.F., Selbstladegewehr ...
  21. [21]
    AVS-36 History All You Need To Know : r/enlistedgame - Reddit
    Aug 3, 2021 · The AVS-36 was produced in a short time before it was replaced by the SVT due to reliability issues and other design problems. The gun was ...Missing: adoption | Show results with:adoption