Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

The Wall Street Journal

The Wall Street Journal (WSJ) is a daily American newspaper specializing in business, finance, economics, and politics, headquartered in . Founded on July 8, 1889, by Charles Henry Dow, Edward Jones, and as a four-page focused on developments, it has evolved into a global publication with millions of subscribers. Owned by through its subsidiary since 2007, the Journal maintains a clear separation between its news reporting, which emphasizes empirical analysis and data-driven journalism, and its editorial page, which consistently promotes free-market principles, , and individual liberty. This distinction has positioned it as a counterweight to prevailing biases in much of the , where often permeates news coverage. The publication's news operations are widely regarded for reliability and depth, earning high marks for factual accuracy from independent evaluators, while its opinion section draws criticism from outlets for challenging regulatory overreach and fiscal expansionism. With over four million paid subscriptions and a reach extending to influential decision-makers in and , the WSJ shapes sentiments and on economic issues. It has secured multiple Pulitzer Prizes, including recent awards for national and investigative reporting on topics such as and financial misconduct. Defining characteristics include its commitment to of outcomes over ideological narratives, though ownership ties to have sparked debates about potential influence on coverage, despite evidence of in news.

History

Founding and 19th-Century Origins

was established in 1882 by Charles H. Dow and as a providing financial bulletins to brokerage houses and banks via a messenger service. Charles M. Bergstresser joined the partnership shortly thereafter, contributing capital and operational expertise to the venture. The firm initially focused on delivering timely market updates, filling a gap left by slower telegraph services and competing news agencies like Kiernan Wall Street News. In 1884, Dow introduced the Dow Jones averages, simple price-weighted indices tracking railroad stocks and later expanded to industrials, marking an early innovation in . These averages provided subscribers with a snapshot of market trends, evolving from Dow's observations of stock price movements. By 1889, the company's Customers' Afternoon Letter, a twice-weekly bulletin summarizing the day's financial , had grown in scope and prompted the launch of a dedicated . The Wall Street Journal debuted on July 8, 1889, as a four-page priced at two cents, with an initial print run serving around 5,000 subscribers—primarily the firm's existing clients. Bergstresser proposed the title "The Wall Street Journal" to emphasize its focus on financial district happenings, distinguishing it from general news dailies. The inaugural issue covered commodity prices, stock quotations, and corporate developments, establishing a precedent for detailed, data-driven reporting on business affairs without editorializing. Circulation expanded modestly through the 1890s amid economic volatility, including the , as the Journal solidified its niche serving investors and traders.

20th-Century Growth and Milestones

In 1902, acquired , publisher of The Wall Street Journal, marking a shift in ownership that stabilized the firm amid early financial challenges. Circulation reached approximately 7,000 daily copies by 1900, growing modestly to 18,750 by 1920 and 29,780 by 1939, reflecting steady but limited expansion tied to Wall Street's recovery from economic downturns. The 1929 launch of the edition extended distribution westward, just before the , aiding resilience during the when page counts were reduced from 28 to 16. Post-World War II, under managing editor Bernard Kilgore (appointed 1941), the Journal underwent transformative national expansion, adopting a standardized front-page format emphasizing news over stock tables and prioritizing broader business coverage to attract non-Wall Street readers. Circulation surged, reaching 205,000 in 1951, 400,000 by 1955, and exceeding 500,000 by 1957, driven by Kilgore's strategy of regional editions and aggressive marketing. Regional launches included the Southwest edition in 1948 and Midwest edition in 1951, enabling same-day delivery across the U.S. and boosting paid subscribers beyond traditional financial centers. The paper ceased Saturday publication in 1953 following the New York Stock Exchange's trading schedule change.
The Journal earned its first in 1947 for editorial writing by William Henry Grimes, followed by a second in 1953 for Vermont Royster's editorials, affirming its rising journalistic stature amid growing influence. By 1966, circulation surpassed 1 million, coinciding with going public in 1963 and acquisitions like the Ottaway newspapers in 1970, which diversified revenue streams. International growth accelerated with the Asian Wall Street Journal in 1976 and the edition in 1983, targeting global business audiences and contributing to the paper's status as the largest U.S. paid-circulation by 1979. Late-century moves included stakes in Telerate (1985, completed 1990) for electronic data services and the 1995 debut of the "Money & Investing Update" online precursor, foreshadowing digital shifts while print circulation peaked near 2 million.

Acquisition by News Corporation and 21st-Century Shifts

In May 2007, Rupert Murdoch's News Corporation launched a $5 billion unsolicited bid to acquire Dow Jones & Company, the parent of The Wall Street Journal, aiming to expand its portfolio in financial journalism. The Bancroft family, which controlled about 64% of the voting shares through a family trust, initially opposed the offer, citing apprehensions that Murdoch's history of influencing editorial content at outlets like The Times of London and The New York Post could compromise the Journal's journalistic integrity. Negotiations persisted amid internal family divisions and external pressure from shareholders seeking the premium price, leading to a definitive merger agreement on August 1, 2007, for $60 per share in cash. The deal faced shareholder pushback, including from figures like James Ottaway, a major investor who urged rejection over fears of diminished independence, but ultimately won approval from Dow Jones shareholders in November 2007. News Corporation completed the acquisition on December 13, 2007, integrating The Wall Street Journal into its holdings and prompting Murdoch to pledge safeguards such as an independent board committee to oversee newsroom autonomy. Post-closing, News Corporation appointed Robert Thomson, formerly managing editor of The Times, as publisher, and initiated cost-cutting measures, including staff reductions of about 6% at , while emphasizing digital expansion to counter declining print advertising. In June 2013, News Corporation underwent a major restructuring, splitting into two entities: a new focused on publishing assets like The Wall Street Journal, and for and properties, allowing the arm to prioritize operations amid shifting media economics. Under ownership, the Journal experienced a pivot toward digital subscriptions, with online revenue growth offsetting print ad declines of roughly 6% annually in the mid-, though critics observed a front-page shift from business stories (down to about 30% of coverage by 2010 from higher pre-acquisition levels) toward political and investigative reporting. The section retained its reputation for factual rigor, distinct from the more ideologically conservative opinion pages, despite occasional tensions highlighted by former Bancroft members who later expressed regret over the sale, claiming in 2011 they would have resisted had they foreseen perceived erosions in standards. This era solidified the Journal's adaptation to 21st-century challenges, including enhancements that boosted subscriber numbers to over 3 million by the late , while navigating ownership-driven efficiencies.

Digital Era Adaptations and Recent Leadership Changes

In response to declining print circulation and the rise of online news, The Wall Street Journal launched WSJ.com in 1996 as one of the first major newspapers to establish a digital presence, initially offering free access to select content. By 2010, Dow Jones implemented a metered paywall, limiting free articles to encourage subscriptions and establishing a revenue model focused on premium digital access, which marked a shift from ad-dependent print to subscriber-funded journalism. This adaptation proved effective, with digital subscriptions doubling over four years to approximately 3.8 million by late 2024, comprising roughly 80% of Dow Jones' revenue from subscriptions. Further digital enhancements included apps, podcasts, and video , enabling audience expansion beyond traditional readers to broader and policy topics, while maintaining protections to sustain quality reporting amid competition from free digital aggregators. In early 2025, total subscriptions reached 4.2 million, reflecting a 6.6% year-over-year increase driven by bundled offerings and targeted , though print editions continued to decline in favor of integrated multi-platform delivery. Recent leadership changes emphasized digital priorities and operational efficiency. In February 2023, News Corp appointed Emma Tucker, formerly editor of The Sunday Times, as editor-in-chief of The Wall Street Journal and Dow Jones Newswires, tasking her with overseeing global news operations and accelerating digital innovation. Tucker's tenure has involved restructuring the newsroom to prioritize audience analytics and faster digital publishing, including staff reductions and a focus on high-impact investigative work, amid internal debates over editorial direction. These shifts align with broader News Corp strategies to counter digital disruption, though they have drawn criticism from some veteran journalists for altering the paper's traditional culture.

Organizational Structure and Operations

Newsroom Practices and Journalistic Standards

The Wall Street Journal's newsroom maintains a strict separation between its news reporting and opinion sections to ensure and factual accuracy in coverage. News articles focus on providing verifiable facts, , and without assertions or opinions, while opinion pieces are clearly labeled and confined to a distinct department. This , emphasized since the paper's founding but reinforced in public statements, aims to prevent editorial influence from bleeding into reporting, with news editors operating independently from the opinion staff. A dedicated Standards & Ethics team, led by figures such as Lipschutz, oversees adherence to journalistic principles, including rigorous and balanced presentation of all sides in stories. The team enforces policies prohibiting news personnel from misrepresenting themselves or posting comments in capacities that could compromise objectivity. The Journal publishes a monthly internal bulletin, Style & Substance, covering language usage, style guidelines, and evolving issues in journalistic practice to standardize reporting across bureaus. These measures support the newsroom's emphasis on empirical verification over narrative-driven accounts, contrasting with broader media trends where institutional biases may prioritize interpretive framing. Transparency in errors is handled through a formal corrections and amplifications process, where identified inaccuracies in news articles are promptly published online and in print, often detailing the original error and the correction. Readers can report potential mistakes via email to [email protected] or by calling 888-410-2667, facilitating accountability without delaying publication. This policy underscores a commitment to post-publication rectification, though internal debates, such as a 2020 letter from over 280 news staff urging clearer distinctions from opinion content amid perceived transparency lapses, highlight ongoing efforts to refine these practices amid digital pressures. In practice, WSJ reporters are instructed to suppress personal opinions and prioritize primary sourcing, such as corporate filings, , and on-the-record interviews, particularly in financial and coverage where precision is paramount. The newsroom's standards have drawn praise for upholding against external adversities, including political scrutiny, though critics from left-leaning outlets have occasionally alleged subtle conservative tilts in story selection—claims the Journal counters by pointing to its award-winning investigative work grounded in rather than . This approach aligns with in reporting, tracing events to verifiable antecedents like or documents, rather than relying on unattributed prone to in academic or activist circles.

Opinion and Editorial Division

The Opinion and Editorial Division of The Wall Street Journal produces the newspaper's unsigned editorials, signed columns, op-eds, and reviews, distinct from the news reporting operations to preserve separation between factual and . This division, led by Editorial Page Editor since September 2001, emphasizes principles of free markets, individual liberty, and skepticism toward expansive government intervention, often framing its arguments in terms of and historical precedents like the American founding. The , an institutional voice comprising Gigot as alongside members including James Freeman (assistant editor), , Dorothy Rabinowitz, , , and , authors daily editorials on topics ranging from to international affairs. These pieces consistently advocate for , tax cuts, and free enterprise, as evidenced by endorsements of and opposition to protectionist tariffs, while critiquing perceived overreach in areas like antitrust enforcement against tech firms. Recurring features include "Potomac Watch" for political analysis, "Main Street" by on cultural matters, and "Declarations" by Noonan, who has contributed since and received a in 2017 for distinguished commentary. Historically, the division gained prominence under editor Robert Bartley (1979–2003), who broadened its focus beyond business to neoconservative advocacy, including support for anti-communist efforts and the , influencing platforms through ideas like the "supply-side revolution." Earlier, Vermont Royster (1958–1971) established a tone of principled rooted in anti-New Deal skepticism. Pulitzer recognitions for editorials, such as Joseph Rago's 2011 award for critiques of health-care reform, underscore its impact on policy debates. The division solicits external op-eds via guidelines prioritizing concise, evidence-based arguments (600–1,200 words), with submissions reviewed for alignment with empirical reasoning over ideological conformity. Critics, including some analysts, characterize it as staunchly conservative, contrasting with the newsroom's straighter , though the opinion staff defends its positions as grounded in data-driven defenses of against alternatives like . Its influence persists in shaping elite discourse, with columnists like Holman Jenkins providing long-term since the .

Key Features, Supplements, and Digital Platforms

The Wall Street Journal's daily print edition is structured around core sections emphasizing financial markets, corporate developments, and broader . The Markets & Finance section delivers on stocks, bonds, commodities, and economic indicators, including proprietary indexes like the updates. U.S. and World sections cover , , and international affairs with a focus on their economic implications, while the Business subsection examines corporate earnings, mergers, and industry trends. The Opinion pages feature editorials and columns advocating free-market principles, distinct from the reporting. Weekend and supplementary sections expand into lifestyle and specialized topics. The Weekend Edition, launched as a Saturday publication in September 2005 with an initial print run of 1.5 million copies, includes dedicated content on , , , and under sections like and the newly introduced Pursuits, which highlights leisure activities, hobbies, and cultural pursuits. Mansion, a recurring real estate supplement, profiles luxury properties, market trends, and development deals, often integrated into the Weekend or monthly formats. Off Duty (formerly elements of Personal Journal) addresses , , , and , positioning the edition as a leisure-oriented counterpart to weekday focus. These supplements aim to broaden readership beyond finance professionals, with circulation data showing Weekend editions comprising a significant portion of total distribution. Digital platforms enhance accessibility through subscription models, with wsj.com providing unlimited article access, interactive charts, and video content since its full implementation in 1997. Mobile applications for and , available since the early , offer push alerts for , offline downloads, and integrated market tools, garnering over 500,000 ratings with average scores above 4.5 stars as of 2025. The Print Edition replicates the physical in app format for subscribers. Audio offerings include podcasts like "The Journal," a narrative-driven daily show on business and power dynamics co-produced with , and "What's News," a brief twice-daily briefing on top headlines; these have amassed millions of downloads, emphasizing concise, data-backed recaps. Newsletters such as "The 10-Point" deliver curated daily scoops to inboxes, while WSJ+ provides exclusive events and perks tied to membership. These platforms reported over 3 million subscribers by 2023, reflecting adaptations to and audio consumption trends.

Editorial Philosophy and Positions

Core Economic Principles

The editorial board of The Wall Street Journal articulates core economic principles centered on free-market capitalism, explicitly standing for free trade and sound money while opposing confiscatory taxation and policies associated with collectivism or authoritarian control. This framework prioritizes individual autonomy in economic decision-making, viewing markets as the most effective mechanism for , , and when unhindered by excessive government edicts. The Journal's opinion pages have historically championed these tenets, influencing U.S. policy debates by critiquing interventions that distort price signals or incentivize dependency, such as expansive expansions or industrial subsidies that favor select sectors over competitive neutrality. In practice, these principles manifest as advocacy for to reduce bureaucratic and operation, arguing that overregulation stifles and raises costs for consumers without commensurate safety or efficiency gains. The Journal consistently endorses low, broad-based taxation to encourage investment and labor participation, as evidenced by its support for the 2017 , which lowered the corporate rate to 21% and was credited with boosting capital expenditures and wage growth prior to external shocks. Sound money principles extend to skepticism toward unchecked monetary expansion, favoring policies that maintain currency stability to prevent inflation's erosion of savings and , often critiquing actions that prioritize short-term stimulus over long-term fiscal discipline. Critics from heterodox economic perspectives, such as post-Keynesians, have accused the Journal's editorials of rigidly applying supply-side logic that underemphasizes demand-side dynamics or fiscal multipliers during recessions, yet the publication defends its stance through empirical references to historical episodes like the Reagan reforms, where tax reductions and correlated with sustained GDP growth averaging 3.5% annually from 1983 to 1989. Overall, the Journal's economic worldview aligns with classical liberal thinkers like , promoting via agreements to leverage comparative advantages, while warning against protectionism's tendency to invite retaliation and inefficiency, as seen in analyses of Smoot-Hawley Tariff Act's exacerbation of the .

Political and Policy Stances

The editorial pages of The Wall Street Journal consistently advocate positions aligned with and , favoring intervention, , and market-oriented solutions over expansive regulatory or welfare expansions. This stance manifests in criticism of progressive policies perceived as undermining economic incentives or institutional integrity, such as expansive entitlements or identity-based preferences, while supporting measures that prioritize national and merit-based systems. In electoral politics, the board has endorsed presidential candidates emphasizing fiscal restraint and foreign realism, including in 2000 and 2004 for their tax cuts and security measures, in 2008 for experience and hawkish internationalism, and in 2012 amid concerns over Barack Obama's regulatory agenda. It withheld endorsement from in 2016, deeming him unprepared and prone to protectionist impulses diverging from free-trade principles, though subsequent editorials critiqued specific Trump actions like pardons or retaliatory legal pursuits while acknowledging policy alignments on deregulation. In 2024 coverage, assessments highlighted geopolitical risks under as echoing prior Democratic administrations' perceived weaknesses, without a formal endorsement. On immigration , editorials call for stricter enforcement against illegal entries, including asylum limits and reduced access to deter economic migration, while advocating expanded legal pathways for high-skilled workers to address labor shortages and bolster innovation—positions framed as balancing humanitarian concerns with economic realism and . A January 13, 2025, piece argued for prioritizing "the immigrants needs" through skill-based visas over broad , citing data on global competitors' selective systems that sustain growth without overwhelming public resources. This contrasts with critiques of policies and unchecked border flows, which are linked to crime spikes and fiscal burdens in reporting and opinion. Foreign policy views emphasize deterrence against authoritarian regimes, supporting robust alliances and military aid to counter threats from and . Editorials have backed U.S. assistance to , warning that abandonment would embolden aggressors like and by signaling weakness, as articulated in analyses tying sustained resistance to broader stability. On , positions advocate economic in strategic sectors, tariffs on unfair trade, and vigilance against intellectual property theft, viewing 's Ukraine neutrality as opportunistic rather than genuine . Skepticism toward accommodationist deals persists, with 2025 commentary questioning Trump-era overtures to or as risking a fragmented global order. Regarding social issues, the board opposes stringent as infringing Second Amendment rights without addressing root criminality, decrying Democratic platforms that elevate it as a amid evidence of limited efficacy in reducing violence. On abortion, post-Dobbs editorials endorse state-level determinations over federal mandates, critiquing both absolute bans' demographic impacts and unrestricted access as ignoring science and societal costs. , once opposed as eroding traditional institutions, has been accepted post-Obergefell as settled law, with focus shifting to conservative advocacy's role in incremental legalization via rather than judicial fiat. These views prioritize empirical outcomes—such as crime data, economic migration effects, and alliance deterrence—over ideological purity, often diverging from populist extremes on either side.

Scientific and Regulatory Views

The Wall Street Journal's editorial page emphasizes empirical evidence and cost-benefit analysis in evaluating scientific claims, often critiquing instances where regulatory policies appear driven by incomplete data or alarmist projections rather than observable outcomes. In climate science, editorials have challenged the prevailing narrative of imminent catastrophe, arguing that models overestimate warming impacts while underplaying adaptation and technological solutions. For instance, a 2014 editorial disputed the 97% consensus on human-caused global warming, asserting that dissenters among experts undermine claims of unanimity. More recently, following the Trump administration's 2025 Energy Department report, WSJ praised efforts to reassess foundational climate science, including the EPA's endangerment finding, as a step toward rational policy unburdened by overstated threats. This stance prioritizes historical temperature data and economic modeling over predictive simulations, viewing excessive regulation as counterproductive to human welfare. On regulatory matters, particularly in health and pharmaceuticals, WSJ editorials advocate for streamlining FDA processes to accelerate and reduce costs, contending that stringent requirements beyond testing hinder access to treatments. A October 2025 piece argued that limiting FDA oversight to could lower drug prices through market competition, allowing consumers to weigh risks independently. The board has criticized FDA delays in approvals, noting a slowdown in novel drugs in 2025 amid staffing cuts and bureaucratic reversals, such as the withdrawal of gene-therapy endorsements that prompted resignations like that of oncologist . Broader regulatory philosophy opposes expansive agency authority, as seen in support for rolling back environmental rules deemed economically distortive, with editorials framing deregulation as essential for energy abundance and growth. In environmental and , WSJ views favor market-driven solutions over command-and-control mandates, highlighting studies showing most policies fail to reduce emissions effectively while imposing high costs. An of over 1,500 policies across 41 countries found only 63 yielded verifiable cuts, underscoring the preference for incentives like carbon pricing over prohibitions. This approach extends to of accords, which are portrayed as transferring regulatory burdens without addressing core emissions drivers in developing nations. Overall, the board's positions reflect a commitment to regulatory humility, where scientific uncertainty justifies restraint unless causal links and benefits are demonstrably clear.

Notable Reporting and Investigations

Early Investigative Breakthroughs

The Wall Street Journal's early investigative reporting emphasized scrutiny of financial markets and corporate governance, often revealing manipulations and frauds that undermined investor confidence during periods of economic instability. In the late 1920s and early 1930s, amid the lead-up to and aftermath of the 1929 stock market crash, the newspaper highlighted irregularities in stock trading practices, including undisclosed pools and excessive leverage in brokerage operations, which foreshadowed systemic vulnerabilities. Circulation challenges persisted into the 1930s, with readership at around 32,000 by 1940, yet the Journal maintained rigorous market analysis that exposed overvalued securities and hidden risks in utility holding companies like those of Samuel Insull, whose 1932 collapse revealed a $2 billion pyramid scheme defrauding thousands of investors. A pivotal breakthrough came in 1938 with coverage of the Richard Whitney scandal, where the Journal detailed the embezzlement by the former president of approximately $1 million from the exchange's Gratuity Fund and additional sums from family trusts to cover losses at his firm, W. R. Grace & Co. Whitney, once hailed as the " of " for his role in stabilizing markets during the 1929 , pleaded guilty to grand larceny on March 28, 1938, and was sentenced to five years in prison. This reporting underscored conflicts of interest at the highest levels of self-regulated exchanges, prompting reforms in oversight and contributing to the strengthening of Securities and Exchange Commission authority under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. These efforts, though constrained by the era's limited resources and the Journal's focus on business over general news, laid groundwork for later investigative standards by prioritizing verifiable and causal links between executive actions and economic harm, often drawing on primary sources like exchange filings and trader accounts rather than unverified rumors.

Corporate and Financial Scandals

The Wall Street Journal's investigative reporting has frequently targeted corporate accounting manipulations and financial fraud, particularly during the early 2000s wave of scandals involving , WorldCom, and Adelphia Communications. A series of articles illuminated how executives used entities and aggressive to inflate earnings, contributing to widespread distrust following the dot-com bust. This work earned the Journal the 2003 , recognizing its detailed dissection of systemic flaws in and auditing practices. In one of its most impactful modern exposés, the Journal revealed severe deficiencies in Inc.'s blood-testing technology, which the startup claimed could perform hundreds of diagnostics from finger-prick samples but relied heavily on conventional lab equipment from partners like . Reporter John Carreyrou's October 16, 2015, article detailed whistleblower accounts of inaccurate results, regulatory scrutiny from the FDA, and internal efforts to silence employees via nondisclosure agreements, shattering the company's $9 billion valuation and prompting federal investigations. Subsequent reporting exposed misleading demonstrations to investors, including , and falsified proficiency tests, leading to the resignation of founder and charges of wire fraud against her and former president Ramesh Balwani. Holmes was convicted on four counts of fraud in January 2022 and sentenced to 11 years and three months in prison on November 18, 2022. The Journal has also scrutinized ongoing financial improprieties, such as plans' upcoding of patient diagnoses to inflate reimbursements, which a 2023 investigation estimated cost taxpayers over $100 billion annually through practices like adding unsubstantiated conditions to claims. In the realm of , historical reporting in the 1980s uncovered networks involving figures like , whose 1986 guilty plea to illegal trading on nonpublic information—prompted in part by Journal probes—unraveled a broader scandal implicating and , resulting in billions in fines and prison terms. These efforts underscore the Journal's focus on verifiable evidence from documents, whistleblowers, and regulatory filings to expose causal links between executive incentives and market distortions.

Contemporary Exposés and Impacts

In 2015, Wall Street Journal reporter published a series of articles exposing significant flaws in Inc.'s blood-testing technology, revealing that the company, valued at $9 billion, relied on third-party machines for most tests rather than its proprietary Edison device and had manipulated demonstrations to investors. The reporting prompted federal regulators to investigate, leading to void two years of test results affecting thousands of patients and face Securities and Exchange Commission charges in 2018. , the company's founder, was convicted in 2022 on charges of wire and , resulting in an 11-year , while the scandal heightened regulatory scrutiny on startups and biotech claims, contributing to stricter investor in high-valuation ventures. The Journal's investigations into Hunter Biden's foreign business dealings, including a 2023 report tracing $40,000 in funds through associates to Joe Biden's personal during his vice presidency, built on earlier coverage verifying emails from a left at a Delaware repair shop in 2019. Despite initial dismissal by much of the as unsubstantiated or disinformation—a stance later contradicted by forensic analyses and federal investigations—the Journal's reporting fueled House Oversight Committee probes starting in 2023, culminating in an impeachment inquiry into President Biden over influence-peddling allegations. These disclosures correlated with Hunter Biden's federal indictments on and firearms charges, his 2024 convictions, and a presidential in December 2024 covering activities from 2014 onward, amplifying debates on political accountability and media credibility in handling politically sensitive stories. On the origins of , the Journal reported in 2023 that the U.S. Department of Energy assessed with low confidence that the pandemic likely stemmed from a incident at the , citing classified intelligence on lapses and funded indirectly by U.S. agencies. Subsequent coverage in 2025 detailed the CIA's shift to favoring the lab-leak hypothesis and allegations that Director misled Congress by denying U.S. support for such research in , drawing on private communications among scientists who publicly endorsed a natural origin but privately questioned it. This reporting contributed to a broader reassessment, including FBI endorsement of the lab-leak theory with moderate confidence and congressional demands for on research funding, influencing policy proposals to restrict high-risk pathogen studies and exposing early institutional resistance—often aligned with academic and media sources favoring zoonotic spillover without equivalent evidentiary weight.

Reception, Awards, and Influence

Pulitzer Prizes and Journalistic Accolades

The Wall Street Journal has won dozens of Pulitzer Prizes since 1947, when it received its first for editorials by William Henry Grimes. As of 2025, the publication holds 38 such awards, placing it among the most honored American newspapers for journalistic excellence. These prizes recognize outstanding work in categories including , investigative reporting, national reporting, commentary, and . Notable Pulitzer wins include the 2007 Public Service award for a series exposing backdated stock options among corporate executives, which prompted federal investigations, executive dismissals, and reforms in practices. In 2017, columnist earned the Commentary prize for her analysis of the 2016 U.S. presidential election, highlighting divisions in American society and political shifts. The 2023 Investigative Reporting award went to WSJ staff for revealing conflicts of interest involving over 2,600 federal officials' investments in companies they regulated. In 2025, the Journal secured the National Reporting prize for its in-depth series on Elon Musk's transformation into a political influencer, detailing his personal habits, business decisions, and alignment with government policies under the second administration. Earlier achievements encompass the 2000 National Reporting award for coverage of U.S. military readiness issues and a Columbine-related series, alongside a Commentary prize that year. Beyond Pulitzers, the Journal has garnered other journalistic accolades, such as multiple New York Press Club Awards, including 13 in 2025 for reporting on business, politics, and international affairs. It also received the Hinrich Foundation Award for Distinguished Reporting on Trade from the National Press Foundation for coverage of global economic policies. These honors underscore the publication's sustained impact on financial, political, and .

Criticisms of Bias and Objectivity Claims

The Wall Street Journal maintains a strict separation between its news reporting, which emphasizes factual accuracy and is rated as center or least biased by independent evaluators, and its editorial pages, which espouse conservative viewpoints. AllSides rates the news section as Center, while the opinion section leans right; Ad Fontes Media deems the overall outlet neutral/balanced and highly reliable for analysis and fact reporting. Media Bias/Fact Check classifies it as right-center biased primarily due to editorial content, but notes high factual reporting in news with minimal failed fact checks. Despite this reputation, critics from across the political spectrum have questioned the outlet's objectivity, often conflating news and opinion or alleging subtle influences from ownership under News Corp. Left-leaning critics frequently accuse the Journal's editorial board of promoting a hard-right agenda, particularly on economic deregulation, tax cuts, and skepticism toward climate change regulations, which they argue distorts public discourse. For instance, a 2016 analysis in The Guardian highlighted conservative media, including the WSJ, for inflating climate denial through opinion pieces that downplay scientific consensus, extending occasionally to news coverage. During the Trump era, outlets like The Guardian criticized the Journal for adhering to a conservative worldview that allegedly softened scrutiny of administration policies, such as trade tariffs, while prioritizing business interests. Progressive commentators have also pointed to opinion columns opposing expansive mail-in voting in 2020 as partisan fearmongering rather than objective analysis. Conversely, some conservative and libertarian analysts claim the news pages exhibit a liberal tilt, prioritizing regulatory concerns over free-market principles and occasionally framing stories with progressive undertones. A 2005 study by UCLA economist Tim Groseclose and others found the WSJ news content to be among the most left-leaning outlets analyzed, with a slant quotient placing it left of and , based on citations of think tanks and phrasing in economic reporting. This perception intensified with investigative pieces, such as 2018 reporting on 's alleged payoffs to women via intermediaries, which conservatives viewed as amplifying unverified claims akin to those in liberal . In 2025, former President escalated disputes by suing the Journal over a story alleging he wrote a suggestive note to , calling it libelous and biased against him. Such incidents underscore claims that, despite firewalls, ownership influences or newsroom culture—potentially shaped by urban, elite journalists—undermine full objectivity. These criticisms persist amid broader debates on media trust, where a 2018 Simmons Research survey ranked the WSJ as America's most trusted organization, yet audience perceptions split along ideological lines: data shows 41% liberal readers versus 35% conservative. Defenders argue the Journal's commitment to empirical sourcing in —evident in low scores—outweighs opinion-driven critiques, attributing detractors' views to discomfort with its pro-capitalist core rather than systemic flaws.

Broader Cultural and Market Impact

The Wall Street Journal's reporting has exerted significant influence on financial markets through its timely dissemination of exclusive information to a readership of over 4 million subscribers, including investors, executives, and policymakers. Its scoops on corporate deals, such as Exxon Mobil's $60 billion acquisition announcement, have prompted immediate price reactions and trading volume surges. Empirical studies analyzing decades of WSJ articles demonstrate their predictive power for returns, as textual sentiment from the paper correlates with subsequent market movements. Broader coverage of and further amplifies , with announcements often leading to intraday jumps in indices like the . In the cultural sphere, the shapes discourse and by serving as a primary for economic trends viewed through a market-oriented lens. Initiatives like the WSJ CEO Council and foster networks among top corporate directors and provide data-driven rankings of influential boards, reinforcing standards of and innovation among leaders. Its opinion and reporting sections contribute to debates on capitalism's role in , countering narratives from outlets with differing ideological tilts by emphasizing empirical outcomes of and . This positions the Journal as a in cultural conversations on commerce, influencing how practices intersect with broader societal values like and risk-taking.

Major Controversies

Disputes with Political Administrations

The Wall Street Journal's investigative reporting on the Internal Revenue Service's (IRS) scrutiny of conservative nonprofits during the Obama administration sparked significant tensions. In May 2013, revelations emerged that IRS agents had applied heightened review criteria—such as references to "" or "patriot"—to applications for tax-exempt status from right-leaning groups, delaying approvals ahead of the 2012 election. The Journal's coverage highlighted internal IRS communications and whistleblower accounts, prompting President Obama to publicly express outrage and call the actions "outrageous," leading to the resignation of IRS Acting Commissioner Steven Miller on May 15, 2013. The administration maintained the targeting stemmed from poor management rather than political directive, a claim disputed by congressional investigations and Journal editorials citing lost emails from key official , who invoked the Fifth Amendment. No high-level Obama officials faced charges, though the contributed to perceptions of , with the Journal arguing it exemplified broader institutional bias against conservative viewpoints. Similar frictions arose over the Journal's scrutiny of Operation Fast and Furious, a Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) initiative under the Obama Justice Department. Launched in , the operation allowed illegal gun purchases to track straw buyers, but lapsed oversight enabled over 2,000 firearms to flow to Mexican cartels, including one used in the 2010 killing of U.S. Border Patrol Agent Brian Terry. The Journal detailed management failures and interagency disputes in reports from 2011 onward, amplifying congressional probes that accused Attorney General of withholding documents. The administration invoked in June 2012 to shield internal communications, leading to a contempt citation against Holder—the first against a sitting cabinet member. Justice Department Inspector General reports later confirmed tactical errors but cleared officials of intentional misconduct, a conclusion the Journal critiqued as downplaying accountability for foreseeable risks. The 2012 Benghazi attack further exemplified clashes, as reporting exposed internal discord over the assault on the U.S. diplomatic compound in , which killed Christopher Stevens and three others. Initial administration statements attributed the violence to a spontaneous over an anti-Islam video, but accounts revealed real-time pointing to al Qaeda-linked premeditation and delays in altering CIA talking points. President Obama defended the response in May 2013 hearings, asserting military assets were appropriately deployed, yet the highlighted infighting among agencies and revised narratives that minimized ties amid the election cycle. Subsequent probes, including a 2014 House report, found no deliberate but faulted the Department's risk assessments, with the emphasizing systemic failures in threat evaluation under Secretary . Under the Trump administration, disputes escalated to legal action following a July 18, 2025, Journal report detailing a 2003 letter purportedly from to , suggesting closer ties than previously acknowledged, alongside flight logs and social connections. denied the letter's authenticity and filed a $10 billion libel suit against the Journal, its publisher , and owner , alleging fabrication to damage his reputation. The subsequently excluded Journal reporters from the press pool during a trip, citing the story's "falsehoods," marking a rare direct retaliation against the outlet. The Journal stood by its sourcing from Epstein's records and associates, framing the suit as an attempt to intimidate , while allies viewed it as emblematic of media's occasional divergence from pro- alignment. These episodes underscore recurring tensions when Journal reporting—rooted in document reviews and insider accounts—challenges administrative accounts, often prompting defenses that prioritize operational explanations over potential politicization. Administrations across parties have disputed the implications rather than core facts, with outcomes varying from personnel changes to litigation, reflecting the paper's role in amplifying amid claims of bias from critics.

Ownership Influence Allegations

, controlled by , acquired , publisher of The Wall Street Journal, on December 13, 2007, for approximately $5.6 billion, amid concerns from journalists and the about potential interference in editorial decisions. To address these, and established an independent committee tasked with protecting journalistic standards and newsroom autonomy, with commitments to avoid direct owner involvement in daily reporting. Allegations of ownership influence have centered on claims that Murdoch's right-leaning political priorities have eroded the separation between the WSJ's and sections, despite the firewalls. Media critics and former insiders have argued that post-acquisition shifts, such as increased front-page political coverage at the expense of , reflect alignment with News Corp's broader conservative agenda, as documented in a 2011 analysis showing a 20% drop in business stories on page one from 2007 to 2011. These changes were attributed by some to Murdoch's directive to make the paper more competitive with politically oriented outlets like , which he also controls. Specific instances include internal dissent over editorial direction. In July 2020, resigned from the board, citing "disagreements over certain editorial content" that promoted skeptical views on and , which he viewed as prioritizing political narratives over factual accuracy. That same month, over 280 WSJ newsroom staff signed a letter protesting the opinion page's "fictionalized facts, conspiratorial conjectures, and misleading claims," arguing it undermined the paper's reputation for objectivity and deterred sources from cooperating with reporters due to perceived ties to ownership-driven bias. More recent controversies have involved coverage of political figures, fueling claims of selective influence. In July 2025, President filed a $10 billion libel suit against , , and personally over a WSJ report citing an alleged letter linking Trump to , which Trump denied as fabricated; the suit highlighted Murdoch's role in approving contentious stories amid . Critics from left-leaning outlets have pointed to such episodes, alongside the paper's endorsements of conservative policies, as evidence of ongoing owner sway, though WSJ defenders maintain news reporting remains empirically grounded and distinct from . These allegations persist despite third-party assessments rating WSJ news as center-leaning and highly reliable, suggesting perceptions of influence often stem from ideological opposition to Murdoch's worldview rather than proven operational meddling.

International Reporting Conflicts

In February 2020, the Chinese government revoked the press credentials of three Wall Street Journal reporters—Josh Chin, Chao Deng, and Lingling Wei—stationed in Beijing, the first instance of Beijing expelling multiple correspondents from a single foreign outlet. This decision stemmed from an editorial-page opinion piece published earlier that month, titled "The Sick Man of Asia," which faulted the Chinese Communist Party's initial handling of the COVID-19 outbreak and its broader governance failures. Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson Geng Shuang condemned the article's headline as "racist" and insulting to the Chinese people, demanding a formal apology that the Journal declined to provide, citing its commitment to editorial independence. The expulsions barred the affected journalists from reporting in mainland China, Hong Kong, and Macau for five years, effectively curtailing the Journal's on-the-ground coverage amid escalating U.S.-China tensions. The incident highlighted longstanding frictions between the Wall Street Journal and over critical reporting on 's economy, , and political system, with prior blocks on the outlet's Chinese-language website dating to August 2013, when censors severed domestic access following coverage deemed sensitive by authorities. In March 2020, broadened its measures in response to Department restrictions on Chinese journalists' visas, announcing that it would not renew credentials for all U.S. nationals working for the Journal, , and whose permits expired that year, further limiting American media operations across Chinese territory including semiautonomous regions. These actions underscored 's strategy of using visa and access controls to pressure foreign outlets, though the Journal maintained that its news reporting—distinct from the opinion section—remained fact-based and unaffected by the editorial in question. Beyond China, the Journal has encountered lesser restrictions elsewhere, such as a 2013 block on its website alongside ' by censors, reflecting periodic of business-focused international coverage. In , evolving national security laws contributed to the Journal's decision in May 2024 to relocate its headquarters to , citing a deteriorating environment for freedoms after Beijing's 2020 imposition of the security law, though no direct expulsion occurred. These episodes illustrate how the Journal's scrutiny of authoritarian governance and economic opacity has provoked retaliatory measures, contrasting with its editorial stance favoring market transparency and rule-of-law principles in global reporting.

References

  1. [1]
    On this Day 135 Years Ago: The Wall Street Journal Makes Its Debut
    Jul 8, 2024 · On July 8, 1889, The Wall Street Journal made its debut. It was published by Charles Henry Dow, Edward Davis Jones and the often-overlooked ...Missing: founders | Show results with:founders<|separator|>
  2. [2]
    July 8, 1889: The First WSJ
    Jul 7, 2014 · The name "The Wall Street Journal" was the idea of Charles Bergstresser, the "forgotten" third man who teamed with Dow and Jones to create the news company.
  3. [3]
    The Beginning: 1882-1899 - The Wall Street Journal
    Dow, Jones & Co. was founded in 1882. The Dow Jones Averages first appeared in 1884. The Customers' Afternoon Letter became The Wall Street Journal in 1889. ...
  4. [4]
    Who Actually Owns the Wall Street Journal? - Investopedia
    The Wall Street Journal is owned by Dow Jones & Company, which in turn is a subsidiary of News Corp. The media conglomerate is controlled by Rupert Murdoch's ...History of the Wall Street Journal · Phone-Hacking Scandal
  5. [5]
  6. [6]
    Wall Street Journal (News) - AllSides
    During the Editorial Review, a multipartisan AllSides panel of reviewers on the left, center, and right determined WSJ has a Center bias. While the team noted ...What a "Center" Rating Means · How Many Americans Trust...
  7. [7]
    Wall Street Journal - Bias and Credibility - Media Bias/Fact Check
    Jul 18, 2016 · Overall, we rate the Wall Street Journal Right-Center biased due to low-biased news reporting combined with a strong right-biased editorial ...
  8. [8]
    Wall Street Journal connects potential readers to its offerings ... - INMA
    Feb 17, 2025 · Now boasting more than 4 million subscriptions, WSJ has solidified itself as a go-to destination for global news. In today's evolving media ...
  9. [9]
    The Wall Street Journal Wins 2025 Pulitzer Prize for ... - Dow Jones
    May 5, 2025 · The staff of The Wall Street Journal has won the 2025 Pulitzer Prize for National Reporting for its ardent coverage of businessman Elon Musk.
  10. [10]
    The Wall Street Journal Wins 2023 Pulitzer Prize for Investigative ...
    May 8, 2023 · The staff of The Wall Street Journal has won the 2023 Pulitzer Prize for Investigative Reporting for its remarkable Capital Assets series.
  11. [11]
    The Wall Street Journal under Rupert Murdoch | Pew Research Center
    Jul 20, 2011 · When Murdoch bought the Journal, he also made clear his desire to reshape the paper to more directly challenge the New York Times, even ...
  12. [12]
  13. [13]
    Charles Bergstresser - History of Business Journalism
    1882 – Charles Dow, Edward Jones and Charles Bergstresser begin a wire service that delivers news to investment houses along Wall Street. Charles Dow wrote ...
  14. [14]
    Wall Street Journal | Encyclopedia.com
    With the largest daily circulation of any newspaper in the United States, the Journal is the nation's most influential newspaper.<|control11|><|separator|>
  15. [15]
  16. [16]
  17. [17]
    Controlling family opposes selling Dow Jones - NBC News
    May 1, 2007 · The Bancroft family that holds a majority stake in Dow Jones, publisher of The Wall Street Journal, is opposing a $5 billion, all-cash offer ...
  18. [18]
  19. [19]
    Major shareholder Jim Ottaway opposes Murdoch's $5 billion bid for ...
    May 6, 2007 · The $5 billion bid for Dow Jones from Murdoch's News Corp. has already been opposed by Dow Jones' controlling shareholders, the Bancroft family, ...
  20. [20]
    Murdoch completes Wall St. Journal takeover - NBC News
    Dec 13, 2007 · Rupert Murdoch completed his $5 billion-plus deal to acquire Dow Jones & Co. Thursday, adding The Wall Street Journal to his global media ...Missing: date | Show results with:date
  21. [21]
  22. [22]
    Case study: News Corp
    Digital revenues at The Wall Street Journal continued to rise. But News Corp's financial statements also showed big changes were ahead. Print ad revenue fell 6% ...
  23. [23]
    Former Wall St Journal owners: 'We wouldn't have sold if we had ...
    Jul 13, 2011 · Bancroft family members, who controlled Dow Jones & Company, say they would have resisted Murdoch bid in 2007.
  24. [24]
  25. [25]
    The Evolution of WSJ Digital Subscribers: A Historical Perspective
    Jul 29, 2025 · The major turning point came with the launch of a more structured paywall in 2010, which marked the beginning of a dedicated revenue model ...
  26. [26]
    Dow Jones doubles digital subscriptions in four years - Axios
    Feb 8, 2024 · Roughly 80% of Dow Jones' overall revenue is generated by subscriptions.
  27. [27]
    100k Club: 2025 ranking of world's biggest news publishers by ...
    Feb 13, 2025 · The Wall Street Journal had 3,787,000 digital-only subscriptions on average in the final three months of 2024, up 7% compared to the same ...
  28. [28]
    WSJ sees subscription growth as its paywall gets a door - Nieman Lab
    Feb 25, 2025 · Here's some of what we've seen lately. WSJ sees subscription growth as its paywall gets a door. A Media Operator / Christiana Sciaudone / Feb 25 ...
  29. [29]
    WSJ Sees Subscription Growth as Wall Gets a Door
    Feb 25, 2025 · Subscriptions to the Journals totaled 4.2 million in the first quarter, up 6.6% from a year earlier, a sign that something is working.
  30. [30]
    How Wall Street Journal Editor Emma Tucker Is Remaking the ...
    Oct 24, 2024 · In February 2023, it installed Emma Tucker, who previously ran the UK's Sunday Times for the Murdochs, as the Journal's editor in chief.
  31. [31]
  32. [32]
  33. [33]
    The inside story of the Murdoch editor taking on Donald Trump
    Aug 2, 2025 · Since her arrival at the Wall Street Journal, British editor-in-chief Emma Tucker has shaken up not only her own newsroom but also the White ...
  34. [34]
  35. [35]
  36. [36]
    The Wall Street Journal - Ethics - NLA - News Leaders Association
    These policies are intended to give additional guidance for appropriate professional conduct for news personnel of The Wall Street Journal, Newswires and ...
  37. [37]
  38. [38]
  39. [39]
    Over 280 Wall Street Journal employees raise credibility concerns ...
    Jul 21, 2020 · In a statement to The Hill, Almar Latour, CEO of Dow Jones, said that the publication is “proud that we separate news and opinion at The Wall ...
  40. [40]
  41. [41]
    From Wall Street Journal Opinion: One of the most basic journalistic ...
    Aug 12, 2025 · From Wall Street Journal Opinion: One of the most basic journalistic principles is that reporters are obligated to suppress their opinions ...
  42. [42]
  43. [43]
    None
    Nothing is retrieved...<|control11|><|separator|>
  44. [44]
    Peggy Noonan of The Wall Street Journal - The Pulitzer Prizes
    Peggy Noonan is an opinion columnist at The Wall Street Journal where her column, Declarations, has run each week since 2000. ... Vice President/Editorial Page ...Missing: notable | Show results with:notable
  45. [45]
    The Man Who Built The Wall Street Journal Editorial Page
    May 16, 2019 · Throughout Phillips' increasingly significant stints of leadership, he nurtured and protected the Journal's trademark conservative philosophy.<|separator|>
  46. [46]
    Joseph Rago of The Wall Street Journal - The Pulitzer Prizes
    Joseph Rago of The Wall Street Journal ... For his well crafted, against-the-grain editorials challenging the health care reform advocated by President Obama.
  47. [47]
  48. [48]
    How do the editorial pages of The Wall Street Journal and The New ...
    Oct 31, 2024 · Their editorial board is rated “right” biased, generally supporting conservative and Republican talking points and policies. The editorial page ...Can The Wall Street Journal be considered a reliable source of ...Does the Wall Street Journal lean left or right? - QuoraMore results from www.quora.com
  49. [49]
    The Wall Street Journal's Brilliant, Penetrating Columnist, Holman ...
    Oct 9, 2025 · Many columnists come and go. But Holman has been writing for and guiding the editorial page of the Wall Street Journal for a third of a century.
  50. [50]
  51. [51]
    [PDF] WSJ Weekend: America's #1 Weekend Newspaper - Dow Jones
    Feb 26, 2019 · Weekend Edition. Page 4. WSJ Weekend: Exchange. The new Exchange ... A powerful lineup of some of the Wall Street Journal's best columnists.
  52. [52]
  53. [53]
    The Wall Street Journal. News - App Store
    Rating 4.7 (552,132) · Free · iOSGet the trusted insights, in-depth analysis and real-time updates you need from the WSJ App.
  54. [54]
  55. [55]
    Latest Podcasts - The Wall Street Journal
    Listen to the latest Audio news articles and Podcasts from The Wall Street Journal.The Journal. · Opinion: Potomac Watch · What’s News · All Things with Kim Strassel
  56. [56]
  57. [57]
    Free People, Free Markets: How the Wall Street Journal Opinion ...
    This book is about how the Wall Street Journal's opinion pages became the leading forum for the discussion of political and economic policies in the US.
  58. [58]
  59. [59]
    Why The Wall Street Journal Editorial Page is a Disgrace
    Jul 24, 2020 · Macroeconomics simply took basic laws of economics we know to be true for the firm or family –i.e., that demand curves are downward-sloping; ...Missing: core | Show results with:core
  60. [60]
  61. [61]
  62. [62]
    [PDF] Is The Wall Street Journal Conservative - Leevers Foods
    The WSJ editorial board has historically championed conservative economic principles. For decades, the board has supported tax cuts, deregulation, and free ...
  63. [63]
    2020 General Election Editorial Endorsements by Major Newspapers
    Nov 10, 2020 · Joseph R. Biden, Jr. Democratic, Donald Trump Republican, DID NOT ENDORSE. Total Endorsements, 47, 7, 44. Total ...
  64. [64]
    Wall Street Journal offers barbed assessments of the presidential ...
    Nov 1, 2024 · The Journal offered a mixed-to-negative review of Kamala Harris under the headline, 'A Harris Victory Means a Fourth Obama Term'.Missing: political | Show results with:political
  65. [65]
  66. [66]
  67. [67]
    Seth G. Jones in The Wall Street Journal: Ditching Ukraine ... - CSIS
    Feb 21, 2024 · Seth G. Jones in The Wall Street Journal: Ditching Ukraine Would Help China and Iran.<|control11|><|separator|>
  68. [68]
  69. [69]
  70. [70]
  71. [71]
  72. [72]
  73. [73]
    Wall Street Journal (Opinion) - AllSides
    AllSides noted WSJ opinion writers are comfortable with delineating from the dominant Republican view on any given issue, refusing to parrot popular talking ...
  74. [74]
    The Wall Street Journal denies the 97% scientific consensus on ...
    May 28, 2014 · This week, they published an editorial denying the 97% expert scientific consensus that humans are causing global warming.
  75. [75]
  76. [76]
    WSJ Opinion: And End To Climate Alarmism
    Oct 2, 2025 · He argues that government incentives have created a 'climate industrial complex' that continues to promote an alarmist message, but says the ...
  77. [77]
  78. [78]
    WSJ Opinion: The FDA's Gene-Therapy Reversal and the Exit of ...
    Jul 30, 2025 · WSJ Opinion: The FDA's Gene-Therapy Reversal and the Exit of Vinay Prasad. A top official at the Food and Drug Administration steps down after ...
  79. [79]
    WSJ Opinion: Climate Regulation Liberation Day
    Jul 29, 2025 · Speaking in Indiana on July 29, 2025, Environmental Protection Agency Administrator, Lee Zeldin, and Energy Secretary, Chris Wright, ...
  80. [80]
  81. [81]
  82. [82]
    The Wall Street Journal - Wikipedia
    The Wall Street Journal ; It's Your Business ; Type, Daily newspaper ; Format, Broadsheet ; Owner, Dow Jones & Company.Dow Jones & Company · Editorial board at The Wall... · Emma Tucker · Paul Gigot
  83. [83]
    From Embezzling Millions to Milking Cows, the Rise and Fall of a ...
    May 23, 2023 · “Richard Whitney Halts Stock Panic,” read one headline, and tabloids dubbed him the “White Knight of Wall Street.” The rally didn't last long— ...
  84. [84]
  85. [85]
    Richard Whitney, 86, Dies; Headed Stock Exchange
    Dec 6, 1974 · In 1938, exposed as the embezzler, of funds entrusted to him by the stock exchange and the New York Yacht Club, of which he was treasurer, as ...
  86. [86]
    The Rise and Downfall of Richard Whitney - Novel Investor
    Oct 30, 2020 · This is the story of how Richard Whitney went from Wall Street savior in 1929 to completely broke in less than 10 years.
  87. [87]
    [PDF] 130 years - The Wall Street Journal
    Jul 8, 2019 · The stories here are only a small selec- tion from the many epic events, people and mo- ments we have covered. But we believe they have value, ...
  88. [88]
  89. [89]
  90. [90]
  91. [91]
  92. [92]
  93. [93]
    How they did it: “Testing Theranos”
    Nov 23, 2016 · The impact of the Journal's reporting has been profound. Theranos has voided two years of blood-test results generated by its proprietary ...
  94. [94]
    Reporters Committee honors John Carreyrou with 2019 Freedom of ...
    Apr 5, 2019 · The Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press will honor Carreyrou with a Freedom of the Press Award for his reporting on the Theranos scandal.Missing: impact | Show results with:impact
  95. [95]
    WSJ Opinion: Money from China Traced to Joe Biden's Bank ...
    Dec 1, 2023 · Joe Biden's son Hunter Biden received funds originating in China that the bank investigator was concerned were unrelated to actual business.
  96. [96]
  97. [97]
  98. [98]
  99. [99]
  100. [100]
  101. [101]
    U.S. Dept of Energy says with 'low confidence' that COVID may have ...
    Feb 28, 2023 · The FBI says it has moderate confidence that it was a lab leak and the Energy Department, as we've just heard, saying with low confidence. The ...
  102. [102]
  103. [103]
    The ranking of the media with more Pulitzer Prizes - TheNBP
    These are Associated Press (52 awards), Los Angeles Times (46) and The Wall Street Journal (37). In this year's edition, the Reuters agency has won two awards: ...
  104. [104]
    The Wall Street Journal - The Pulitzer Prizes
    Winners in Public Service · 2025 · ProPublica, for urgent reporting by Kavitha Surana, Lizzie Presser, Cassandra Jaramillo and Stacy Kranitz · 2024 · ProPublica, ...
  105. [105]
  106. [106]
  107. [107]
  108. [108]
    The Wall Street Journal Wins 13 New York Press Club Awards
    May 14, 2025 · The Wall Street Journal has received 13 New York Press Club Journalism Awards, the most for any news organization this year.
  109. [109]
    The Wall Street Journal Wins Hinrich Trade Award
    Wall Street Journal reporters who won the Hinrich Foundation Award for Distinguished Reporting on Trade from the National Press Foundation accepted their award.
  110. [110]
    Wall Street Journal Bias and Reliability - Ad Fontes Media
    Ad Fontes Media rates The Wall Street Journal, an international, business-focused daily newspaper, as neutral/balanced in terms of bias and most reliable .
  111. [111]
    Conservative media bias is inflating American climate denial and ...
    Sep 6, 2016 · A study last year found that the WSJ's biased climate coverage extended beyond its opinion pages to its news coverage as well. And during the ...
  112. [112]
    The Wall Street Journal's Trump problem - The Guardian
    Sep 10, 2017 · By adhering to the conservative worldview – newly supercharged by Trump – that all media skews liberal, Baker just may have helped the Journal ...
  113. [113]
    WSJ's Awful Opinion Pieces : r/neoliberal - Reddit
    Sep 25, 2020 · They accused the Democrats of trying to steal the election by… (checks notes) trying to ensure everyone gets to vote by having mail-in ballots ...
  114. [114]
    [PDF] Media Bias: It's Real, But Surprising - UCLA College
    While the editorial page of The Wall Street. Journal is conservative, the newspaper's news pages are liberal—even more liberal than The New. York Times.
  115. [115]
    Breaking Right - Columbia Journalism Review
    Breaking Right. The Wall Street Journal's stubborn conservatism. September 14, 2021 By Adam Piore · b ... The editorial board's response to the letters was ...
  116. [116]
    Trump escalates battle with Wall Street Journal over Epstein story
    Jul 21, 2025 · The president sued the Journal for libel over its story reporting that Trump wrote a sexually suggestive note to alleged sex trafficker ...
  117. [117]
    The Wall Street Journal's Leftist Bias - I Blog to Differ
    Jun 1, 2025 · The Wall Street Journal's SQ of 85.1, making it the furthest-left of all the media outlets Groseclose evaluates.
  118. [118]
  119. [119]
    Researchers use Wall Street Journal articles to predict stock returns
    Nov 19, 2021 · Culling decades of Wall Street Journal articles, researchers created a new way to gauge stock performance that matches well to real returns.
  120. [120]
    News as sources of jumps in stock returns: Evidence from 21 million ...
    Material news events can be potentially important sources of jumps in stock returns. We collect 21 million news articles associated with more than 9000 ...3. Realized Jumps And News... · 3.3. Realized Jump-Size... · 4. Cross-Sectional...
  121. [121]
  122. [122]
  123. [123]
    How The Wall Street Journal is leveraging first-party data and ...
    Oct 5, 2023 · "Our substantial first-party data encompasses a diverse and influential audience, including business leaders, policymakers, and investors.
  124. [124]
  125. [125]
  126. [126]
  127. [127]
  128. [128]
  129. [129]
    Fast and Furious Report Cites Management Failures
    Sep 19, 2012 · Simon Constable and Evan Perez discuss the findings from Justice Department probe into the Fast and Furious operation, and Joseph Walker ...Missing: dispute | Show results with:dispute
  130. [130]
  131. [131]
  132. [132]
  133. [133]
    Trump sues Wall Street Journal and Rupert Murdoch over story ...
    Jul 19, 2025 · President Donald Trump filed a $10 billion lawsuit against The Wall Street Journal and media mogul Rupert Murdoch Friday.
  134. [134]
    Trump sues Wall Street Journal over Epstein report, seeks $10 billion
    Jul 20, 2025 · The president has vehemently denied the Journal report, which Reuters has not verified, and had warned Murdoch that he planned to sue. Dow Jones ...
  135. [135]
    The Trump administration goes on the attack against The Wall Street ...
    Jul 22, 2025 · Days after The Wall Street Journal dropped an exclusive story that tied President Donald Trump to Jeffrey Epstein, the Journal has been banned ...<|separator|>
  136. [136]
    Trump's WSJ Lawsuit Raises a New Constitutional Question - Politico
    Jul 22, 2025 · Trump's lawsuit against The Wall Street Journal over the paper's reporting on his relationship to the late convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein.
  137. [137]
    Trump v Murdoch: why the Wall Street Journal isn't toeing the line
    Jul 18, 2025 · Yet the Journal's critical stance on aspects of Trump's presidency is far from proof of a decisive break between Murdoch and the president.
  138. [138]
    [PDF] The News Corp.—Dow Jones Merger and the Separation of Editorial ...
    Dec 1, 2007 · The recent merger of News Corp. and Dow Jones highlights the latest threat to the integrity of business news in the United States and beyond ...
  139. [139]
    News Corp, Dow Jones agree on WSJ editorial integrity: source
    Jun 27, 2007 · News Corp. has reached a verbal agreement with Dow Jones to safeguard the editorial integrity of the Wall Street Journal, removing a major ...
  140. [140]
    WSJ posts editorial agreement between Dow Jones and News Corp.
    Jun 29, 2007 · The agreement that is supposed to protect journalists at The Wall Street Journal from interference by News Corp. executives if the company ...
  141. [141]
    How Has 'Wall Street Journal' Fared Under Murdoch? - NPR
    Jul 22, 2011 · "The Journal was turned into a propaganda vehicle for its owner's conservative views. That's half the definition of Fox-ification," he wrote. " ...
  142. [142]
    James Murdoch Exits News Corp. Board On Editorial Content ...
    Jul 31, 2020 · James Murdoch, the youngest son of patriarch Rupert, Exits News Corp. Board Due To Differences Over Editorial Content.
  143. [143]
    At Wall Street Journal, News Staff and Opinion Side Clash
    Jul 24, 2020 · The opinion department of The Wall Street Journal openly antagonized the paper's news staff Thursday by publishing a tersely worded note to readers.
  144. [144]
  145. [145]
  146. [146]
    Beijing expels three Wall Street Journal reporters | CNN Business
    Feb 23, 2020 · The Chinese government announced Wednesday that it is revoking the press credentials of three Wall Street Journal reporters, the largest ...
  147. [147]
    China Expels 3 'Wall Street Journal' Reporters, Citing 'Racist' Headline
    Feb 19, 2020 · China's Foreign Ministry said Wednesday it is canceling the visas of three journalists working for The Wall Street Journal after what it said ...
  148. [148]
    China revokes 3 Wall Street Journal reporters' credentials | PBS News
    Feb 19, 2020 · Like most foreign media, The Wall Street Journal is unavailable within China and its website and stories are blocked by online censors. It ...
  149. [149]
    Wall Street Journal's Chinese version site blocked in China
    Aug 4, 2013 · Access to the Wall Street Journal's Chinese-language edition has been cut off in China, where official censors routinely delete online content deemed sensitive.
  150. [150]
  151. [151]
    China to expel New York Times, Wall Street Journal and ... - CNN
    Mar 17, 2020 · China has announced it will expel journalists from three US media outlets, in a major escalation of tensions with Washington.<|separator|>
  152. [152]
    Inside The Wall Street Journal, Tensions Rise Over 'Sick Man' China ...
    Feb 22, 2020 · An internal debate over an op-ed headline resurfaced tensions between The Wall Street Journal's news and opinion sides.
  153. [153]
    China blocks Reuters and Wall Street Journal sites - RSF
    Nov 15, 2013 · Reporters Without Borders firmly condemns China's censorship of the Chinese sites of Reuters and the Wall Street Journal, revealed today by ...
  154. [154]
    Wall St Journal to move Asia HQ from Hong Kong to Singapore
    May 3, 2024 · Wall St Journal was one of the publications banned from Singapore during LKY era that's why they were in Hong Kong in the first place.