Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Activated sludge

Activated sludge is a suspended-growth biological wastewater treatment process in which a mixture of wastewater and microorganisms, known as activated sludge, is aerated in a tank to facilitate the aerobic degradation of organic pollutants into carbon dioxide, water, and biomass.^[1] The process typically follows primary sedimentation and precedes secondary clarification, where the treated mixture, or mixed liquor, settles to separate the clarified effluent from the sludge solids, a portion of which is recycled back to the aeration tank to maintain an active microbial population.^[1] Excess sludge is wasted to control the biomass concentration, measured as mixed liquor suspended solids (MLSS), which influences treatment efficiency.^[1] The activated sludge process was pioneered in 1914 by Edward Ardern and William T. Lockett at the Manchester Corporation's Davyhulme sewage works in England, building on observations of microbial flocculation in aerated sewage.^[2] Their seminal work, published that year, demonstrated that prolonged aeration with intermittent settling and sludge return could achieve high biochemical oxygen demand (BOD) removal, marking the first full-scale implementation of the technology.^[2] By the 1920s, the process had spread to the United States, with early plants like those in Cleveland and Milwaukee adapting it amid patent disputes that were eventually resolved in favor of public domain use. Key operational parameters include the food-to-microorganism (F:M) ratio, which balances organic loading against biomass, typically ranging from 0.05–0.45 depending on the configuration (e.g., conventional or extended aeration); mean cell residence time (MCRT), often 4–25 days to optimize microbial growth and nitrification; and dissolved oxygen levels maintained at 2–3 mg/L via mechanical aeration systems like diffusers or surface aerators.^[1] Variations such as the step-feed, contact stabilization, and oxidation ditch processes modify tank configurations or aeration patterns to handle specific wastewater characteristics, including industrial effluents or nutrient removal needs.^[3] Today, activated sludge remains the most widely used secondary treatment method globally and in the United States, achieving BOD reductions of 85–95% under optimal conditions.^[4]^[5]

Fundamentals

Purpose and Applications

The activated sludge process is a biological wastewater treatment method that employs a mixed community of aerobic microorganisms to metabolize and break down organic matter present in sewage and other wastewaters.^[6] This process serves as a core component of secondary treatment in wastewater facilities, where it significantly reduces biochemical oxygen demand (BOD) and total suspended solids (TSS) by converting dissolved and particulate organics into carbon dioxide, water, and biomass.^[7] Typically, it achieves BOD and TSS removals of 85-95%, transforming influent wastewater with BOD levels of 200-300 mg/L into effluent with BOD below 30 mg/L, thereby preventing oxygen depletion in receiving water bodies.^[8] In municipal settings, the activated sludge process is widely applied in urban wastewater treatment plants to handle domestic sewage from large populations, ensuring compliance with environmental discharge standards.^[9] For industrial applications, it effectively treats effluents from sectors such as food processing, textiles, and pulp and paper mills, where high organic loads are common; for instance, in textile wastewater, it can degrade up to 95% of dyes under optimized conditions.^[6] Additionally, compact, small-scale activated sludge systems are utilized in remote or isolated areas, including rural communities, hotels, and subdivisions, providing reliable treatment where centralized infrastructure is impractical.^[10] The primary benefits of the activated sludge process include its cost-effectiveness for processing large volumes of wastewater and its ability to produce high-quality effluent suitable for direct discharge into waterways or further tertiary treatment, such as nutrient removal or disinfection.^[6] This versatility supports sustainable water management by minimizing environmental impacts from untreated discharges, while the process's straightforward operation and low space requirements make it adaptable to diverse scales and conditions.^[9]

Biological Basis

Activated sludge consists of a diverse mixed microbial community that drives the biological treatment process, primarily comprising bacteria, protozoa, fungi, and other microorganisms capable of degrading organic matter.^[11] Bacteria dominate the biomass, with floc-forming species such as Zoogloea playing a key role in aggregating cells into stable flocs essential for sedimentation.^[12] Protozoa, particularly ciliates, contribute through predation on dispersed bacteria, promoting floc stability and reducing effluent turbidity by grazing on free-floating microbes.^[13] Fungi, though less abundant, aid in the degradation of complex organics and contribute to overall community resilience under varying conditions.^[14] Floc formation in activated sludge relies on the production of extracellular polymeric substances (EPS), which are complex mixtures of polysaccharides, proteins, and nucleic acids secreted by bacteria. These EPS act as a biological glue, binding microbial cells and particulate matter into dense, settleable aggregates that facilitate solid-liquid separation in secondary clarifiers. The structural integrity of flocs depends on the balance of EPS composition, with excessive or deficient production leading to issues like bulking or poor settling. This bioflocculation process enhances the efficiency of organic matter removal by concentrating biomass and protecting inner cells from environmental stresses.^[15] The core of the activated sludge process is the aerobic metabolism of heterotrophic bacteria, which oxidize organic carbon from wastewater into carbon dioxide, water, and new biomass. This catabolic activity utilizes dissolved oxygen as the terminal electron acceptor, converting biochemical oxygen demand (BOD) substrates through respiration. A simplified representation of this oxidation, using glucose as a model organic compound, is:

\ce{C6H12O6 + 6O2 -> 6CO2 + 6H2O + energy}

This process generates energy for microbial growth while reducing organic load, with approximately 40-60% of the consumed BOD incorporated into biomass. To sustain aerobic conditions, dissolved oxygen (DO) levels are maintained between 1-4 mg/L in the aeration basin, preventing anaerobic shifts that could impair treatment. The oxygen uptake rate (OUR), measured as the rate of DO consumption by the microbial community, serves as a key indicator of metabolic activity and process health, typically expressed in mg O₂/L·min.^[16]^[17]^[18]^[19] Biomass yield in the activated sludge process, defined as the mass of microbial biomass produced per unit of BOD removed, typically ranges from 0.4 to 0.6 g of volatile suspended solids (VSS) per g BOD. This yield reflects the efficiency of carbon assimilation, where heterotrophs convert a portion of organics into cellular material while oxidizing the rest for energy. Factors such as substrate type and environmental conditions influence this coefficient, but it provides a fundamental metric for estimating sludge production and oxygen requirements in system design.^[18]

Process Description

Core Components and Flow

The core components of the standard activated sludge process include the aeration tank, also known as the bioreactor, where biological treatment occurs; the secondary clarifier, which separates treated water from solids; the return activated sludge (RAS) pump system, which recycles settled biomass; and the waste activated sludge (WAS) line, which removes excess solids to control system inventory.^[20]^[21]^[22] In the process flow, influent wastewater enters the aeration tank and mixes with recirculated RAS to form mixed liquor, which undergoes aeration to promote microbial degradation of organic matter; the mixed liquor then flows to the secondary clarifier for gravity settling, where clarified effluent is discharged and settled solids are either returned via the RAS pump or removed through the WAS line.^[20]^[21] The RAS recycle rate typically ranges from 50-100% of the influent flow to maintain mixed liquor suspended solids (MLSS) concentrations of 2000-4000 mg/L in the aeration tank.^[20]^[22] The hydraulic retention time (HRT) in the aeration tank is generally 4-8 hours, allowing sufficient contact between wastewater and biomass for treatment.^[21]^[20] Solids retention time (SRT), equivalent to mean cell residence time, is controlled at 5-15 days through selective WAS removal to balance microbial growth and decay.^[21]^[22] The food-to-microorganism (F/M) ratio, calculated as influent biochemical oxygen demand (BOD) divided by the product of MLVSS concentration and aeration tank volume, is typically maintained at 0.2-0.5 kg BOD per kg MLVSS per day to optimize treatment efficiency.^[21]^[20]

Sludge Production and Recycling

In the activated sludge process, sludge production arises from the microbial conversion of organic matter in wastewater, typically yielding 0.4 to 0.7 kg of volatile suspended solids (VSS) per kg of biochemical oxygen demand (BOD) removed.^[23] This yield is quantified by the yield coefficient Y, defined as the mass of biomass produced per unit mass of BOD consumed, with a typical value of 0.5 g biomass per g BOD.^[24] The production rate is influenced by operational parameters such as the food-to-microorganism (F/M) ratio and temperature; higher F/M ratios promote greater biomass growth, while lower temperatures reduce decay rates and can increase net yield.^[25] The mixed liquor in the aeration basin consists of a suspension with 0.2% to 0.5% solids by weight, primarily as mixed liquor suspended solids (MLSS) ranging from 2,000 to 5,000 mg/L.^[26] Excess sludge, removed to maintain process balance, is dewatered to achieve 20% to 30% solids content prior to further handling, significantly reducing volume for transport and treatment.^[27] Recycling of sludge occurs through return activated sludge (RAS), which recirculates settled biomass from secondary clarifiers back to the aeration basin to sustain the required microbial inventory and mixed liquor concentration.^[28] To prevent excessive biomass accumulation, a portion of the sludge is wasted strategically, controlling the solids retention time (SRT) typically between 3 and 15 days depending on treatment goals; this wasting rate equals the net biomass production to achieve steady-state operation.^[29] Post-separation, excess sludge undergoes thickening to concentrate solids from 1% to 4-6% via gravity or mechanical means, followed by stabilization through anaerobic or aerobic digestion to reduce volatile content and pathogens.^[30] Final disposal options include land application for nutrient recycling where regulations permit, or incineration for volume reduction and energy recovery in facilities equipped for thermal treatment.^[31]

Nutrient Removal Processes

Nutrient removal in activated sludge systems integrates biological processes to eliminate nitrogen and phosphorus from wastewater, primarily through nitrification, denitrification, and enhanced biological phosphorus removal (EBPR). These mechanisms rely on specific microbial communities thriving in controlled aerobic, anoxic, and anaerobic environments within the treatment basins. Nitrification converts ammonium (NH₄⁺) to nitrate (NO₃⁻) via autotrophic bacteria, including Nitrosomonas species that oxidize ammonia to nitrite (NO₂⁻) and Nitrobacter species that further oxidize nitrite to nitrate, occurring in aerobic zones where sufficient oxygen is supplied.^[32]^[33] The process follows Monod kinetics influenced by substrate and oxygen concentrations, often simplified as the rate equation:

\frac{d[\ce{NH4+}]}{dt} = -k \times [\ce{NH4+}] \times [\ce{O2}]

where k is the rate constant, reflecting dependency on ammonium and dissolved oxygen levels.^[34] Optimal performance requires dissolved oxygen (DO) above 2 mg/L and pH in the range of 7–8, as lower DO limits bacterial activity and pH outside this range inhibits enzyme function.^[35]^[33] Denitrification reduces nitrate to nitrogen gas (N₂) in anoxic zones by heterotrophic bacteria, such as Pseudomonas and Paracoccus species, which use nitrate as an electron acceptor while oxidizing an organic carbon source for energy.^[17] This process requires a carbon source like methanol or endogenous substrates from the influent, with the stoichiometry represented by:

$5\ce{CH3OH} + 6\ce{NO3-} \rightarrow 3\ce{N2} + 5\ce{CO2} + 7\ce{H2O} + 6\ce{OH-}

DO must remain below 0.2 mg/L to prevent inhibition by oxygen competition.^[36]^[17] Enhanced biological phosphorus removal (EBPR) involves polyphosphate-accumulating organisms (PAOs), such as Candidatus Accumulibacter, which store phosphorus as polyphosphate under alternating anaerobic and aerobic conditions. In anaerobic zones, PAOs release stored phosphorus while taking up volatile fatty acids (VFAs) for energy via glycolysis, creating a phosphorus-rich effluent. Subsequent aerobic exposure triggers "luxury" uptake, where PAOs reabsorb and store excess phosphorus as polyphosphate granules, exceeding metabolic needs for enhanced removal.^[37] This cycle requires VFAs (e.g., acetate) availability and avoids nitrate or oxygen intrusion into anaerobic zones to prevent inhibition.^[36] Common configurations for simultaneous nitrogen and phosphorus removal include the A2O (anaerobic-anoxic-oxic) process, featuring sequential basins for EBPR and nitrification-denitrification, and the Bardenpho process, with multiple anoxic and aerobic stages (typically four or five) to optimize denitrification. These setups achieve typical removal efficiencies of 80–90% for total nitrogen and over 90% for total phosphorus under optimal conditions, such as adequate carbon-to-nitrogen ratios and sludge retention times.^[36] Inhibitory factors can compromise these processes; low temperatures below 15°C slow nitrification rates by reducing bacterial growth and enzyme activity, often requiring extended retention times. Additionally, nitrification consumes alkalinity at a rate of 7.14 g CaCO₃ per g of NH₄⁺-N oxidized, potentially lowering pH and necessitating alkalinity supplementation to maintain process stability.^[38]^[39]

System Variations

Conventional Plant Types

Conventional activated sludge plants represent the foundational designs for wastewater treatment, emphasizing steady-state operations in large-scale municipal and industrial settings. These systems typically involve a series of aeration tanks followed by secondary clarification, where microorganisms degrade organic matter under controlled aerobic conditions. Established since the early 20th century, conventional configurations prioritize reliability and scalability, with variations tailored to flow rates, load stability, and site constraints. Plug flow systems, also known as step-feed or series tank configurations, direct wastewater through a sequence of multiple aeration tanks in series, creating a gradient of treatment intensity from inlet to outlet. This design promotes higher biomass concentrations and better organic removal efficiency, often achieving BOD reductions of 85-95% in municipal applications, but it requires careful hydraulic control to avoid short-circuiting and is more vulnerable to toxic shock loads. Widely used in large plants handling over 10 million gallons per day, plug flow systems exemplify the conventional approach by simulating a piston-like flow that minimizes back-mixing. In contrast, complete mix systems employ a single large aeration tank with vigorous mixing to achieve uniform distribution of substrate, biomass, and oxygen throughout the volume. This configuration simplifies construction and operation, making it suitable for smaller or variable-flow facilities, though it demands higher aeration energy—typically 1.5-2.0 kWh per kg of BOD removed—due to the need for constant mixing to prevent settling. Complete mix designs ensure stable performance under fluctuating loads by maintaining consistent mixed liquor suspended solids (MLSS) levels around 2,000-4,000 mg/L. Package plants offer prefabricated, modular solutions for decentralized treatment in communities serving fewer than 5,000 people, often incorporating extended aeration with hydraulic retention times (HRT) of 24 hours or more to enhance sludge stabilization and reduce excess sludge production. These compact units, typically constructed from steel or fiberglass, integrate aeration, clarification, and sometimes disinfection in a single footprint under 1,000 square meters, providing BOD removal efficiencies of 90% or greater with minimal on-site expertise required. Their plug-and-play nature makes them ideal for rural or temporary installations, though they are limited by higher operational costs per capita compared to centralized systems. Oxidation ditches utilize an oval, racetrack-shaped channel where wastewater circulates continuously around the basin, aerated by horizontal brush or rotor mechanisms that also drive the flow. This low-speed, endogenous respiration-focused design achieves stable operation for variable organic loads, with MLSS levels maintained at 3,000-5,000 mg/L and typical HRTs of 12-24 hours, yielding nitrification alongside BOD removal. Common in suburban plants treating 1-10 million gallons per day, oxidation ditches reduce energy use to about 0.5-1.0 kWh per kg BOD removed by combining mixing and aeration in one step. Surface-aerated basins feature shallow ponds or lagoons upgraded with floating mechanical aerators that agitate the surface to transfer oxygen and mix the contents, suitable for rural or land-abundant sites with low to moderate flows. These systems operate at depths of 3-5 meters with HRTs exceeding 8 hours, promoting partial nitrification and BOD reductions of 70-85% while minimizing infrastructure costs. The design's simplicity allows retrofitting of existing lagoons, though oxygen transfer efficiency drops in deeper waters, necessitating multiple aerator units for uniform coverage.

Advanced and Hybrid Configurations

Advanced and hybrid configurations of the activated sludge process represent evolutions designed to address limitations in conventional systems, such as space constraints, variable loading, and enhanced treatment needs. These variants integrate elements like batch operations, specialized reactor geometries, membranes, or biofilm media to optimize oxygen transfer, biomass retention, and pollutant removal while maintaining the biological core of aerobic degradation. By combining suspended growth with attached growth or filtration technologies, they achieve higher efficiency and versatility for municipal and industrial applications.^[40] Sequencing batch reactors (SBRs) function through a cyclic operation in a single basin, sequentially performing fill, react, settle, and decant phases to complete treatment without separate clarifiers. This batch mode enables precise control over reaction times and aeration, providing flexibility to accommodate peak flows or varying influent characteristics by modifying cycle durations. Typical cycles last 4-6 hours, allowing the system to balance treatment capacity with operational demands.^[41] SBRs support nutrient removal via alternating aerobic and anoxic conditions within the cycle.^[41] Deep shaft reactors employ tall vertical shafts, typically 20-60 meters deep, to exploit hydrostatic pressure for superior oxygen dissolution and transfer into the mixed liquor. The design elevates oxygen saturation levels, enabling high-rate treatment at food-to-microorganism (F/M) ratios up to 1.0 day⁻¹, which is significantly higher than conventional activated sludge. This configuration is particularly effective for high-strength industrial wastes, where rapid biodegradation of elevated organic loads is required, though it demands robust mixing to prevent settling in the shaft base.^[42]^[43] Membrane bioreactors (MBRs) couple activated sludge with submerged or external ultrafiltration membranes that perform solid-liquid separation, eliminating the need for secondary clarifiers and producing effluent of superior clarity suitable for reuse. These systems sustain mixed liquor suspended solids (MLSS) concentrations up to 10,000 mg/L or higher—often 8,000-12,000 mg/L—facilitating compact designs and robust organic and nutrient removal under high biomass conditions. A primary operational challenge is membrane fouling from extracellular polymeric substances and particulates, which requires periodic cleaning and air scouring to maintain flux rates.^[44]^[44] Integrated fixed-film activated sludge (IFAS) enhances conventional suspended growth by incorporating fixed or moving media carriers within the aeration basin to promote simultaneous biofilm development. Media such as plastic carriers from moving bed systems provide additional surface area for microbial attachment, increasing overall biomass inventory and stabilizing treatment against fluctuations. This hybrid approach notably improves nitrification by protecting slow-growing nitrifiers in the biofilm layer, achieving complete ammonia removal exceeding 90% even at shorter hydraulic retention times. IFAS reduces plant footprint and enhances sludge settling compared to purely suspended systems.^[45]^[45] Hybrid moving bed biofilm reactors (MBBRs) integrate carriers—typically polyethylene elements with protected surface areas of 500-1,200 m²/m³—for attached growth alongside activated sludge in the same reactor, boosting volumetric treatment capacity without expanding infrastructure. The carriers, filling 50-70% of the basin volume, foster diverse microbial communities that complement suspended biomass, enabling higher organic loading rates and reduced sludge production. This configuration can halve the required footprint relative to traditional activated sludge plants by achieving up to 50% space savings through intensified treatment.^[46]^[46]

Aeration Methods

Diffused Aeration Systems

Diffused aeration systems supply oxygen to activated sludge processes by releasing compressed air through submerged diffusers at the bottom of aeration tanks, creating bubbles that rise and dissolve oxygen into the mixed liquor. This method is widely used in conventional wastewater treatment plants to meet the oxygen demands of aerobic microorganisms degrading organic matter. The efficiency of oxygen transfer depends on bubble size, diffuser material, tank depth, and wastewater characteristics, with standard oxygen transfer efficiency (SOTE) typically ranging from 20% to 30% for fine bubble systems under standard conditions. In fine bubble diffused aeration, small-diameter bubbles (less than 2 mm) are generated using diffusers made from materials such as ethylene propylene diene monomer (EPDM) rubber or polyurethane, which form membranes, discs, or tubes that release air in a controlled manner. These systems are particularly effective in deeper tanks (greater than 4 m), where longer bubble residence time enhances oxygen dissolution, achieving energy efficiencies of 0.5 to 1 kWh per kg of oxygen transferred. Fine bubble diffusers promote high oxygen transfer rates while minimizing turbulence, supporting stable microbial activity in the activated sludge. Coarse bubble diffused aeration employs larger orifices or open-end tubes to produce bubbles typically 3 to 50 mm in diameter, prioritizing mixing over maximum oxygen transfer. With SOTE values of 10% to 15%, these systems are less efficient for oxygenation but excel in shallow tanks (less than 4 m) or zones with high mixed liquor suspended solids, where enhanced circulation prevents settling. Coarse bubble setups often use ceramic or plastic diffusers and are simpler to install in variable flow conditions. Design of diffused aeration systems involves calculating air flow rates based on the oxygen demand of the influent, generally requiring 1.5 to 2 kg of oxygen per kg of biochemical oxygen demand (BOD) removed, adjusted for process efficiency and safety factors. Blower sizing accounts for the static pressure head from tank depth (approximately 0.1 bar per meter of water depth) plus dynamic losses, ensuring adequate air delivery without excessive energy use. Diffuser layout is optimized for uniform coverage, often in grid or spiral patterns, to maintain dissolved oxygen levels above 2 mg/L throughout the tank. Advantages of diffused aeration include uniform distribution of dissolved oxygen, which supports consistent biological treatment, and scalability for large municipal plants. However, disadvantages encompass potential fouling and clogging of diffusers by biomass or scaling, necessitating periodic cleaning or replacement to sustain performance.

Mechanical and Surface Aeration

Mechanical and surface aeration methods in activated sludge processes involve devices that agitate the water surface to entrain atmospheric oxygen, facilitating gas exchange without relying on submerged air injection. These systems typically employ low-speed vertical turbines, cones, or propellers mounted on fixed or floating platforms, which create turbulence and splash to transfer oxygen into the mixed liquor. Such aerators are particularly suited for shallow basins with depths less than 4 meters, where their installation is straightforward as they do not require basin dewatering or extensive piping.^[47]^[20] Low-speed vertical surface aerators, often featuring impellers or cones with diameters ranging from 1 to 5 meters, achieve oxygen transfer efficiencies of 1 to 2 kg O₂/kWh in clean water conditions, though this drops to 0.7 to 1.5 kg O₂/kWh in process wastewater due to factors like salinity and alpha factor effects. Design considerations emphasize power input based on the required oxygen transfer rate and aeration efficiency, typically achieving 1-2 kg O₂/kWh in clean water and 0.7-1.5 kg O₂/kWh in process wastewater. Operational focus remains on equivalent aeration rates of 0.01 to 0.05 m³ air/m²/min to meet oxygen demands. In oxidation ditches, these aerators not only oxygenate but also propel the mixed liquor along the channel, maintaining velocities of 0.25 to 0.35 m/s for effective solids suspension.^[47]^[48] Brush or horizontal rotor aerators, commonly rotary brushes partially submerged in channels, provide dual functionality by entraining oxygen through surface agitation and propulsion, with reported efficiencies around 1.5 kg O₂/kWh. These are widely applied in oxidation ditch configurations within conventional activated sludge plants, where they support biological treatment in elongated basins. Additionally, spray-type surface aerators enhance the stripping of volatile compounds alongside oxygenation, aiding in the removal of gases like ammonia or VOCs from the wastewater.^[47]^[48]^[20] Maintenance for mechanical and surface aerators generally involves lower fouling risks compared to submerged systems, as there are no diffusers prone to clogging, but they require regular inspections of motors, gearboxes, and impellers for wear. However, these devices can generate higher noise levels and water splash, necessitating enclosures or barriers in operational settings to mitigate environmental and safety concerns.^[47]^[20]

Oxygen-Enriched Methods

Oxygen-enriched methods in activated sludge processes utilize pure oxygen, typically generated on-site through pressure swing adsorption (PSA), to achieve oxygen purities of 90-95%.^[49] These systems employ covered tanks to contain the oxygen gas, preventing its escape and minimizing atmospheric release while maintaining a controlled environment for microbial activity.^[50] The PSA process separates oxygen from ambient air using molecular sieves, providing a reliable supply for large-scale operations where air-based aeration proves insufficient.^[50] The use of pure oxygen enhances oxygen transfer efficiency due to a higher driving force across the gas-liquid interface, enabling standard oxygen transfer efficiencies (SOTE) of up to 50% in fine-bubble diffusion systems.^[51] This improved transfer supports elevated mixed liquor suspended solids (MLSS) concentrations of 6000-8000 mg/L, allowing for more compact reactor designs with reduced footprints compared to conventional air systems.^[52] According to Henry's law, oxygen solubility in wastewater increases proportionally with its partial pressure, as expressed by the equation:

[O_2] = k \times P_{O_2}

where [O_2] is the dissolved oxygen concentration, k is the Henry's law constant, and P_{O_2} is the partial pressure of oxygen.^[53] This higher solubility not only boosts oxidation rates but also reduces the stripping of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) from the wastewater, enhancing overall treatment efficacy. These methods are particularly suited for high-rate treatment of industrial wastes, where elevated organic loads demand robust oxygenation.^[50] Historically, systems like the Tex-Ox configuration have been applied in such scenarios to achieve rapid stabilization of complex effluents.^[54] However, implementation involves higher capital costs for on-site oxygen generation facilities and raises safety concerns with oxygen enrichment exceeding 25%, due to increased fire and explosion risks in enclosed spaces.^[55]

Process Control

Monitoring and Parameters

Monitoring the activated sludge process involves tracking several key parameters to ensure efficient treatment, biomass health, and compliance with effluent standards. Mixed liquor suspended solids (MLSS) concentration in the aeration tank is a primary indicator of biomass density, typically maintained between 2000 and 5000 mg/L for conventional systems to support adequate organic matter removal. Sludge volume index (SVI), which measures settleability, is calculated as the volume of settled sludge after 30 minutes divided by the MLSS concentration, with optimal values ranging from 80 to 150 mL/g to promote good clarification and prevent solids loss in effluent.^[56] Dissolved oxygen (DO) levels in the aeration tank are critical for aerobic microbial activity and are usually kept at 2 to 4 mg/L to avoid oxygen limitation while minimizing energy use for aeration.^[57] Biochemical oxygen demand (BOD) and chemical oxygen demand (COD) are monitored in both influent and effluent to assess organic loading and treatment efficiency; secondary treatment standards require effluent BOD below 30 mg/L and total suspended solids (TSS) below 30 mg/L on a monthly average basis, though many facilities target stricter limits such as BOD under 10 mg/L and TSS under 20 mg/L for enhanced performance.^[58] Nutrient monitoring focuses on nitrogen species, with post-nitrification ammonia levels targeted below 1 mg/L to ensure complete conversion to nitrate, which is typically maintained at 5 to 10 mg/L in systems with denitrification to balance removal and avoid excessive effluent nitrogen.^[59] Online sensors provide real-time data, including DO probes for aeration control, pH meters (optimal range 6.5 to 8.0), and temperature sensors (ideal 20 to 30°C for microbial kinetics); oxygen uptake rate (OUR) measurements quantify respiration activity by tracking oxygen consumption per unit biomass, helping gauge process vitality.^[60] Bulking sludge, characterized by poor settling and increased effluent solids, is detected when SVI exceeds 150 mL/g, often linked to excessive filamentous bacteria growth, which can be identified and quantified through microscopic examination of sludge samples.^[56] The food-to-microorganism (F/M) ratio, relating influent BOD to MLSS, may be referenced briefly as a loading indicator but is primarily managed through solids inventory control.^[61]

Optimization Strategies

Optimization strategies in activated sludge processes aim to enhance treatment efficiency, reduce operational costs, and improve effluent quality by fine-tuning key operational parameters and incorporating targeted interventions. These approaches focus on balancing microbial growth, nutrient utilization, and energy inputs while maintaining system stability. Common tactics include adjusting sludge retention time (SRT), implementing flow equalization methods, precise chemical additions, energy-efficient aeration controls, microbial enhancements, and basic automation systems.^[62] SRT control is a foundational optimization technique that regulates the average residence time of biomass in the system to support microbial community balance and treatment performance. SRT is calculated as the total mass of mixed liquor suspended solids (MLSS) in the aeration basin divided by the mass of wasted activated sludge (WAS) per day, expressed as:

\text{SRT} = \frac{\text{Total MLSS mass (lb)}}{\text{WAS rate (lb/day)}}

Operators adjust the WAS rate—typically by increasing it to shorten SRT during periods of excess biomass growth or decreasing it to lengthen SRT for better settling and nitrification—allowing the system to adapt to varying influent loads while preventing sludge bulking or washout. Maintaining an optimal SRT, often in the range of 8–18 days depending on temperature and effluent goals, ensures efficient organic removal, stable sludge settleability, and reduced solids production.^[17]^[62] Step-feed or multi-stage aeration configurations optimize load equalization by dividing influent flow across multiple aeration zones, which distributes organic loading and enhances biological treatment capacity. In a typical step-feed system, primary effluent is split into equal or variable portions (e.g., 25% per pass in a four-pass setup) entering sequential anoxic-oxic stages, promoting denitrification and reducing peak load impacts on sludge settleability. This approach allows for higher MLSS concentrations in upstream passes, minimizing tank volumes while achieving consistent effluent quality, such as total nitrogen below 7.6 mg/L under varying flows.^[63]^[64] Chemical dosing provides targeted adjustments to support flocculation and pH stability in activated sludge systems. Polymer flocculants, such as cationic polyacrylamide, are dosed at rates of 10–20 lbs/ton of dry solids to bridge suspended particles, improving sludge settling and dewatering by enhancing floc strength and reducing effluent turbidity. For pH control, alkaline agents like lime or soda ash are added to maintain basin pH above 7.5, countering acidification from nitrification or toxicants like hydrogen sulfide (H2S), which can inhibit oxygen uptake rates (OUR) by up to 50% at 1 mg/L under neutral conditions.^[65]^[56] Energy optimization in aeration, which often accounts for over 50% of plant energy use, involves integrating variable frequency drives (VFDs) on blowers with dissolved oxygen (DO) feedback loops to match air supply to real-time demand. DO sensors monitor levels (typically set at 1.0–2.0 mg/L) and automatically adjust blower speeds, reducing aeration energy consumption by approximately 16–30% compared to constant-speed operation. This feedback control prevents over-aeration during low-load periods, lowering operational costs and extending equipment life while maintaining process stability.^[66] Bioaugmentation enhances the degradation of refractory pollutants by introducing specialized microbial cultures to the activated sludge biomass, supplementing native communities that may lack sufficient catabolic capabilities. Specific strains, such as those domesticated for toxic organics, are added directly or via co-metabolism with substrates like glucose, achieving COD removal rates above 85% in systems treating industrial wastewaters. This method improves shock resistance to high organic loads and restores performance after disruptions, with combined approaches like powdered activated carbon-augmented sludge further boosting removal efficiency by 8–10%.^[67] Basic automation through programmable logic controllers (PLCs) enables precise management of DO setpoints and other parameters via closed-loop control systems. PLCs integrate sensors for real-time monitoring and adjust aeration or wasting rates to maintain targets, such as DO profiles that optimize oxygen transfer without excess energy use. These systems provide reliable on-off or proportional control, improving response to diurnal variations and reducing manual interventions for consistent effluent compliance.^[68]

Challenges

Operational Issues

One of the most prevalent operational issues in activated sludge systems is sludge bulking, characterized by the excessive growth of filamentous bacteria that hinders the settling of mixed liquor solids in secondary clarifiers.^[56] This condition often results from the proliferation of organisms such as Microthrix parvicella, which thrives under low dissolved oxygen (DO) levels below 2 mg/L or nutrient deficiencies, particularly in long sludge retention times exceeding 15 days.^[69] The poor settling leads to elevated total suspended solids (TSS) in the effluent, typically exceeding 30 mg/L, which can violate discharge permits and impair downstream treatment processes.^[70] Foaming represents another significant disruption, often caused by the overgrowth of hydrophobic filamentous bacteria like Nocardia species or other Actinomycetes, which form stable scum layers on aeration basins and clarifiers.^[56] These organisms proliferate in the presence of grease or oils in the influent and at elevated temperatures above 20°C, creating viscous foams that reduce effective tank volume and aerosolize contaminants.^[71] Control measures include the implementation of anoxic selectors to favor floc-formers over filaments or targeted chlorination of return activated sludge at doses of 5-10 mg/L to selectively inhibit foam-producers without broadly harming the biomass.^[17] Toxic upsets pose acute challenges, typically triggered by sudden industrial discharges containing heavy metals (e.g., copper or chromium at concentrations >1 mg/L) or organic inhibitors like phenols (>50 mg/L), which disrupt microbial metabolism and cause biomass die-off.^[72] Such shocks inhibit enzymatic activity in key bacteria, leading to process instability, increased effluent biochemical oxygen demand (BOD), and potential filamentous bulking during recovery.^[17] Recovery strategies primarily involve replacing affected biomass with fresh seed sludge from healthy sources or diluting the influent to restore microbial populations over 7-14 days.^[73] Nitrification failure is a common issue affecting nitrogen removal, often due to temperature drops below 15°C, which slow the growth rates of autotrophic nitrifiers like Nitrosomonas and Nitrobacter to less than half their optimal activity.^[3] Additionally, free ammonia concentrations exceeding 10 mg/L can inhibit ammonia-oxidizing bacteria, while nitrite-oxidizing bacteria are particularly sensitive at lower levels (0.1–1 mg/L), with toxicity exacerbated at pH levels above 7.5, resulting in ammonia accumulation in the effluent.^[74]^[75] This failure can lead to incomplete nitrogen conversion, elevating effluent total nitrogen levels and risking regulatory non-compliance. Effluent violations frequently stem from high BOD levels, caused by hydraulic short-circuiting in aeration basins—where influent bypasses full contact with biomass due to poor mixing—or insufficient aeration maintaining DO below 1 mg/L.^[70] Short-circuiting reduces effective retention time, allowing partially treated wastewater to exit prematurely and increase soluble BOD above 20 mg/L in discharges. Under-aeration exacerbates this by limiting oxygen transfer, fostering anaerobic zones that produce fermentation byproducts and degrade overall organic removal efficiency.^[56] Brief monitoring of key parameters can aid early detection of these hydraulic and aeration deficiencies.^[70]

Economic and Environmental Factors

The economic viability of activated sludge systems hinges on capital and operational expenditures, which vary based on plant scale, location, and configuration. For conventional activated sludge plants, capital costs can range from $200 to $2,500 per cubic meter of treatment capacity, varying by region, scale, and configuration (e.g., $200–$500 in some developing regions), encompassing construction of aeration tanks, clarifiers, and ancillary infrastructure.^[76]^[77] Over the lifecycle of a facility, operations and maintenance (O&M) costs account for 20-40% of the total expenses, driven by labor, chemical dosing, and equipment upkeep.^[78] Energy consumption represents a major O&M component, averaging 0.3-0.6 kWh per cubic meter of wastewater treated, with aeration processes consuming 50-60% of this total due to the need for oxygen transfer in microbial metabolism.^[79] Technology selection influences these costs; plug-flow configurations prioritize efficiency in high-load, steady-state operations to minimize energy use, while sequencing batch reactors (SBRs) offer flexibility for variable flows and smaller footprints, making them preferable where land availability is limited or stringent effluent standards require adaptable nutrient removal.^[80] Factors such as hydraulic load, regulatory discharge limits, and site constraints guide this choice, often balancing upfront investments against long-term savings. Plant types, like conventional versus membrane-enhanced variants, further modulate costs through differences in equipment durability and sludge handling.^[81] Environmentally, activated sludge processes contribute to greenhouse gas emissions, particularly nitrous oxide (N₂O) from incomplete denitrification, which accounts for 3–5% of total anthropogenic N₂O releases and has a global warming potential 265 times that of CO₂ over 100 years. Sludge disposal poses additional burdens, as excess biomass generated—often 0.4-0.6 kg of dry solids per kg of biochemical oxygen demand removed—requires management to prevent leaching of heavy metals, pathogens, and organic pollutants into soil and water bodies if landfilled or inadequately treated. Common disposal methods include land application, incineration, or anaerobic digestion, each carrying risks of secondary pollution if not regulated. Sustainability metrics highlight a carbon footprint of 0.5-1 kg CO₂ equivalent per cubic meter treated, primarily from electricity for aeration and indirect emissions from sludge processing, underscoring the need for energy-efficient designs to mitigate climate impacts.^[82]^[83]^[84]^[85]

Recent Developments

Biological and Microbial Innovations

Aerobic granular sludge (AGS) is a novel wastewater treatment technology developed in the Netherlands under the brand name Nereda® through a public-private partnership involving Delft University of Technology, and has seen worldwide adoption with over 100 plants operational by 2023 as a rapidly growing innovation in biomass engineering for activated sludge processes, characterized by self-aggregating microbial granules that enable simultaneous carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus removal in a single reactor. Unlike traditional flocs, which typically maintain mixed liquor suspended solids (MLSS) levels of 3,000–5,000 mg/L, AGS achieves denser biomass concentrations up to 10,000–15,000 mg/L, improving settling velocities and reactor efficiency. This structure facilitates stratified microbial zones—an aerobic outer layer for nitrification and an anoxic core for denitrification—reducing the need for separate treatment stages. Recent pilots, such as the 9-month AquaNereda® trial at the Noman M. Cole Jr. Pollution Control Plant in Virginia, demonstrated AGS achieving total inorganic nitrogen below 6 mg/L and total phosphorus below 0.5 mg/L without tertiary treatment, even under variable flows.^[86]^[87]^[88]^[89] Microbial engineering has introduced targeted genetic modifications to enhance pollutant degradation in activated sludge communities, particularly for recalcitrant compounds like pharmaceuticals. CRISPR-Cas9 editing has been applied to bacteria such as Pseudoxanthomonas mexicana to amplify chemotaxis receptors, boosting nonylphenol (an endocrine disruptor from pharmaceutical precursors) degradation by over 20% in sludge environments compared to wild-type strains. These edited microbes exhibit accelerated breakdown rates, achieving near-complete removal (up to 99%) in contaminated matrices over extended periods. Complementing this, quorum sensing (QS) mechanisms—cell-to-cell signaling via autoinducers—have been harnessed to regulate biofilm formation and prevent excessive biomass growth in activated sludge. At low temperatures (e.g., 15°C), QS-active bacteria pioneer biofilm colonization, stabilizing community structures and mitigating issues like sludge bulking by modulating extracellular polymeric substance production. Studies constructing QS signaling networks in sludge microbiomes reveal interspecies interactions that optimize floc stability and treatment performance.^[90]^[91] Bioaugmentation strategies involve introducing specialized microbial consortia to bolster activated sludge functionality, especially in challenging conditions like cold climates where nitrification rates can decline significantly. Nitrifying consortia, comprising enriched Nitrosomonas and Nitrospira species, have been added to systems at 4–10°C, improving ammonia oxidation performance through daily or slug dosing that maintains solids retention. Recent studies (2020–2025) show bioaugmentation enhances nitrification resilience at low temperatures, with lab-scale tests under stress conditions restoring function more rapidly than non-augmented systems via targeted supplementation. This approach proves particularly effective in flocculent activated sludge, enhancing cold-weather resilience without altering core process designs.^[92]^[93] Sludge-derived biochar, produced via pyrolysis of waste activated sludge (WAS) at 500–700°C, serves as a high-value adsorbent for heavy metal remediation in wastewater treatment, transforming a disposal challenge into a resource. The process yields porous materials with surface areas of 300–1,000 m²/g, rich in functional groups that facilitate ion exchange and complexation, achieving over 90% removal of metals like cadmium and lead under optimized conditions (e.g., pH 5–7). Modifications such as calcium oxide doping further elevate efficiency to nearly 100% for specific ions, while co-pyrolysis with biomass stabilizes metals within the char matrix, minimizing leaching risks. Advances from 2020 to 2025 emphasize integrated applications, including biochar-enhanced activated sludge systems that combine adsorption with biological degradation for synergistic pollutant capture.^[94] Metagenomic approaches, leveraging high-throughput DNA sequencing, have revolutionized the profiling of activated sludge microbial communities, enabling precise identification of functional guilds and predictive modeling of process stability. By analyzing 16S rRNA and whole-genome sequences, researchers map diversity and abundance, revealing correlations between taxa shifts and operational issues like sludge bulking—often linked to excessive filamentous bacteria such as Microthrix parvicella. Artificial intelligence models, including graph neural networks trained on historical metagenomic data, forecast community dynamics with high accuracy (>85%), predicting bulking events days in advance based on relative abundance patterns. This integration of omics and AI supports proactive adjustments, such as aeration tweaks, to maintain floc integrity and effluent quality.^[95]^[96]

Technological and Sustainability Advances

Recent advancements in activated sludge technology from 2020 to 2025 have focused on integrating engineering innovations to enhance efficiency and sustainability, particularly through hybrid systems and digital tools. Hybrid membrane bioreactors (MBRs), which combine submerged membranes with activated sludge processes, have demonstrated superior effluent quality in urban pilot applications. These systems achieve effluent turbidity levels below 1 NTU, enabling high-quality water reuse while addressing membrane fouling through innovative mitigation techniques such as vibration or ultrasonic methods. For instance, vibrating MBR configurations have shown reduced fouling rates in domestic wastewater treatment pilots conducted between 2023 and 2025, extending membrane lifespan and lowering operational costs in urban settings.^[97]^[98]^[99] Artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) have revolutionized process optimization in activated sludge systems, particularly for aeration control and predictive maintenance. Predictive models driven by AI analyze sensor data to dynamically adjust aeration rates, achieving energy reductions of 15-25% in wastewater treatment plants while maintaining effluent standards. In 2024 implementations, these models have been deployed to issue early alerts for sludge bulking by processing real-time sensor inputs, such as sludge volume index and microscopic imaging, preventing operational disruptions and improving overall stability. Such integrations highlight AI's role in transitioning activated sludge processes toward more responsive and energy-efficient operations.^[100]^[101]^[102] Cyclic activated sludge variants, including modified sequencing batch reactors (SBRs), incorporate anaerobic-anoxic phases to facilitate resource recovery alongside treatment. These configurations promote phosphorus release under anaerobic conditions, followed by recovery as struvite—a valuable fertilizer—reducing nutrient discharge and supporting circular economy principles. Pilot studies from 2020 to 2025 have validated this approach in SBR systems, achieving up to 90% phosphorus recovery rates from wastewater sludge while minimizing chemical additions.^[103]^[104]^[105] The adoption of Industrial Internet of Things (IIoT) has enabled real-time remote monitoring and dynamic dosing in activated sludge facilities, enhancing operational precision. IIoT platforms integrate sensors for continuous data collection on parameters like dissolved oxygen and sludge levels, allowing automated adjustments that yield efficiency gains of up to 30% as reported in 2025 industry analyses. These systems facilitate predictive maintenance and remote oversight, reducing downtime and energy use in distributed treatment networks.^[106]^[107]^[108] Energy recovery strategies have advanced sustainability in activated sludge processes by capturing waste heat from aeration exhaust and producing biogas from sludge digestion. Heat recovery from aeration systems provides low-grade thermal energy for plant heating, while anaerobic digestion of waste activated sludge generates biogas for on-site power, contributing to net-zero emission pilots. Between 2020 and 2025, these integrated approaches in circular economy frameworks have demonstrated potential for self-sufficient operations, with some facilities achieving positive energy balances through combined heat, power, and resource recovery.^[109]^[110]^[111]

History

Invention and Early Adoption

The activated sludge process was invented in 1913–1914 by Edward Ardern, a chemist, and W. T. Lockett, his assistant, while employed by the Manchester Corporation Rivers Department at the Davyhulme Sewage Works in the United Kingdom.^[112] Their work built on the limitations of existing trickling filter systems, which required large land areas and extended treatment times of up to three weeks for biological oxidation of sewage.^[113] Ardern and Lockett's breakthrough came from laboratory experiments seeding raw sewage with previously aerated sludge and subjecting the mixture to continuous aeration, which "activated" the microbial floc to rapidly consume organic matter.^[114] They presented their findings in a seminal paper to the Society of Chemical Industry in 1914, coining the term "activated sludge" to describe the biologically enriched material that enabled efficient purification.^[115] In their key experiments, Ardern and Lockett demonstrated that aerating sewage-seed mixtures for approximately 9 hours achieved over 90% reduction in biochemical oxygen demand (BOD) (from around 130 mg/L to less than 15 mg/L), with substantial nitrification and clarification, far surpassing the performance of unaerated controls.^[116] This rapid BOD removal highlighted the process's potential for compact, accelerated wastewater treatment without reliance on fixed media like stone beds in trickling filters.^[113] Early adoption faced challenges in scaling aeration from lab bottles to full treatment volumes, including the need for reliable diffused air systems to maintain oxygen transfer efficiency and prevent uneven mixing or excessive foaming.^[113] The first full-scale implementation occurred in San Marcos, Texas, in 1916, marking the process's debut in the United States for municipal sewage. In the UK, a similar plant opened at Worcester in the same year, treating 626,000 gallons per day.^[117] By the 1920s, the process had spread to the United States amid patent disputes that were resolved in favor of public domain use, with early plants in Cleveland and Milwaukee adapting the technology. Post-World War I, adoption accelerated in the UK and Europe, driven by urban population growth and the need for land-efficient sewage solutions amid wartime infrastructure strains.^[113]

Evolution and Key Milestones

During the 1920s and 1930s, the activated sludge process saw significant expansion in the United States, particularly in the Midwest, where large-scale municipal plants were constructed to address growing urban wastewater demands. Notable examples include the Chicago North Side Treatment Plant, operational since 1927 with a capacity of 175 million gallons per day (MGD), and the Milwaukee plant, which began operations in 1925 at 85 MGD; these facilities marked a shift toward continuous-flow systems capable of handling substantial volumes efficiently.^[118] By the 1940s, this adoption had solidified the process as a cornerstone of secondary treatment, with over a dozen major U.S. installations demonstrating reliable biochemical oxygen demand (BOD) removal rates exceeding 90% under optimized conditions. A key technological advancement in the 1930s was the widespread introduction of diffused aeration systems, which replaced earlier mechanical surface aerators by injecting fine air bubbles directly into the mixed liquor for improved oxygen transfer efficiency. This innovation, first implemented at scale in plants like Chicago's North Side facility in 1927 and refined through the decade, reduced energy consumption by up to 20% compared to prior methods while minimizing sludge bulking issues.^[118]^[119] In the 1950s, the oxidation ditch variant emerged as a low-maintenance adaptation of activated sludge, patented by Dutch engineer A. Pasveer at the TNO Research Institute for Public Health Engineering in the Netherlands around 1954-1955. This circular, extended aeration system, featuring horizontal rotors for mixing and oxygenation, achieved BOD removals of 85-95% with minimal operator intervention, making it suitable for smaller communities and influencing global designs.^[120] By the 1970s, advancements in nutrient removal integrated into activated sludge, exemplified by the Bardenpho process developed in South Africa. Introduced in full-scale operation at the Bardenpho plant in 1973 by James L. Barnard, this multi-stage anoxic-aerobic configuration enabled simultaneous biological nitrogen and phosphorus removal, reducing effluent totals to below 10 mg/L for both nutrients without chemical additions.^[121]^[122] The 1980s brought commercialization of the sequencing batch reactor (SBR), a cyclic activated sludge variant that consolidated aeration, settling, and decanting in a single basin, gaining traction for its flexibility in variable flows. Early commercial installations in the U.S. and Europe, such as those by Envirex and Parkson in the mid-1980s, demonstrated 90-95% BOD and suspended solids removal while reducing footprint by 30-50% compared to conventional systems. In the 1990s, membrane bioreactor (MBR) prototypes advanced the process by integrating ultrafiltration membranes with activated sludge, eliminating secondary clarifiers and achieving effluent turbidities below 0.2 NTU. Pioneering submerged configurations, like Kubota's flat-sheet modules in Japan (1990s) and Zenon's hollow-fiber systems in North America (late 1980s-early 1990s), paved the way for pilot-scale deployments treating 1-5 MGD with enhanced pathogen removal.^[123] These developments were accelerated by the U.S. Clean Water Act of 1972, whose amendments through the 1980s and 1990s imposed stricter effluent limits via NPDES permits, prompting widespread upgrades to municipal plants for nutrient removal and advanced treatment, with nearly 37% of facilities (about 5,468 out of 14,780) exceeding secondary treatment standards by 2008.^[124] From the 2010s, energy audits became a standard practice in activated sludge operations, identifying optimization opportunities amid rising energy costs, which account for 25-40% of plant expenses. Post-2010 assessments, such as those conducted in European small-scale facilities (2011-2015), revealed potential savings of 20-30% through aeration fine-tuning and blower retrofits, with methodologies emphasizing key indicators like specific energy consumption per cubic meter treated.^[125] Concurrently, granular sludge research advanced, with the EU-funded anMOgran project (2013-2015) demonstrating lab-scale reactors combining aerobic granules for methane and nitrogen removal, achieving 80-90% efficiency in a compact footprint 50% smaller than flocs-based systems.^[126] By 2000, activated sludge had achieved widespread global adoption, comprising over 80% of secondary treatment in developed nations' municipal facilities due to its proven reliability and scalability. In developing regions, adaptations like simplified oxidation ditches and low-energy SBRs facilitated implementation, treating millions of cubic meters daily while addressing resource constraints.^[2]

References

[1]
[PDF] Activated Sludge Process Control Manual - State of Michigan
Time, Hrs. The Activated Sludge Process is a biological wastewater treatment process. This means that treatment occurs as pollutants are used as a food source ...
[2]
A hundred years of activated sludge: time for a rethink - PMC
One hundred years ago, Ardern and Lockett (1914) described the process of activated sludge (AS) for biological remediation of sewage, based on heterotrophic ...
[3]
[PDF] Optimize Your Wastewater Treatment Plant: Save Energy and ...
Oct 21, 2021 · 4. Activated Sludge Process – a biological wastewater treatment process in which a mixture of the wastewater and activated sludge (biomass) is.
[4]
U.S. Wastewater Treatment Factsheet
A common form of wastewater treatment is activated sludge, an aerobic process that exposes microbes to oxygen to break down organic waste.8; Over 17,000 ...
[5]
Activated Sludge Process - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
The activated sludge process is defined as a biological method of wastewater treatment that utilizes a mixed community of microorganisms in an aerobic ...
[6]
[PDF] Advanced Wastewater Treatment to Achieve Low Concentration of ...
Influent BOD and ammonia nitrogen were reported to be approximately 200 to 300 mg/l and 30 mg/l, respectively. Effluent BOD concentrations average about 2.2 mg/ ...
[7]
https://www.epa.gov/sites/default/files/2019-02/documents/advanced-wastewater-treatment-low-concentration-phosphorus.pdf
[8]
Instructional Resources Monograph Series: Activated Sludge
... Purpose: There are several variations of the activated sludge process. The most frequently used process var iations are conventional, contact stabilization ...
[9]
[PDF] A Drop of Knowledge - Rural Community Assistance Partnership
Small activated sludge package plants are used frequently for isolated facilities, such as hospitals or hotels, cluster situations, subdivisions, and small ...Missing: remote | Show results with:remote
[10]
Analysis of Bacterial Community Structure of Activated Sludge ... - NIH
The biological community of activated sludge has a large biological diversity and contains a variety of viruses, bacteria, protozoa, fungi, algae, and metazoan.
[11]
Comparative genomics analyses on EPS biosynthesis genes ...
Oct 1, 2016 · Zoolgoea and its related floc-forming bacteria are required for formation of AS flocs which is the key to gravitational effluent-and-sludge ...
[12]
Predation increases multiple components of microbial diversity in ...
Dec 1, 2021 · Protozoan predators form an essential component of activated sludge communities that is tightly linked to wastewater treatment efficiency.
[13]
A Review of the Role of Extracellular Polymeric Substances (EPS) in ...
EPS are the important components of activated sludge and play a specific role in sludge bioflocculation, settling, and dewatering properties [11]. 5.1. Effects ...
[14]
Activated Sludge - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
The sludge microorganisms oxidize the organic carbon in the wastewater to produce new cells, carbon dioxide, and water. As microorganisms grow, they form ...
[15]
[PDF] NOTES ON ACTIVATED SLUDGE PROCESS CONTROL - Maine.gov
INTRODUCTION. Activated sludge is a biological wastewater treatment process that brings together wastewater and a mixture of microorganisms under aerobic ...
[16]
[PDF] Activated Sludge Concepts - Waste Reduction Partners
Feb 25, 2021 · Y = biomass yield constant k = maximum specific substrate ... 0.4 to 0.8 VSS/BOD. 5. 0.6 VSS/BOD. 5. Page 21. Activated Sludge Evaluation.
[17]
[PDF] Oxygen Uptake Rate as a Monitoring and Control Parameter For ...
In activated sludge processes, the oxygen uptake rate (OUR) of the mixed liquor is used frequently to assess the activity of the active biomass, to determine ...
[18]
[PDF] Module 15: The Activated Sludge Process Part 1 - DEP
The Activated Sludge Process is one of several biological wastewater treatment alternatives in. Secondary Treatment. When Activated Sludge is added to ...Missing: applications paper
[19]
[PDF] Lesson 8: The Activated Sludge Process
The activated sludge process is the most commonly used method of reducing the organic load of the wastewater stream after primary treatment.
[20]
[PDF] ACTIVATED SLUDGE AND AEROBIC BIOFILM REACTORS
Y = yield coefficient (gVSS produced per gBOD removed) (gXv/gBOD5). Kd ... Sludge production (Pss) per BOD removed (Sr). 1.4 with solids, without primary ...
[21]
Replacement of Activated Sludge Secondary Clarifiers by Dynamic ...
------- activated sludge yield of 0.50 kg VSS/kg BOD removed (0.50 Ib VSS/lb BODc removed)was used. A waste activated sltidge yield of 0.56 kg VSS/kg BOD5 ...
[22]
[PDF] Temperature Effects on Extended Aeration Activated Sludge Process
be more affected by F/M ratio than temperature variation. Both cell yield coefficient and specific organism decay rate showed maximum values at room ...
[23]
Activated Sludge Process
Common ranges for F/M for a conventional activated sludge plant are from 0.15 to 0.5. These values refer to calculations based on the 5 day BOD test. The ...Missing: components HRT EPA<|control11|><|separator|>
[24]
Quantification of wastewater sludge dewatering - ScienceDirect.com
Oct 1, 2015 · Despite this, as stated earlier, most dewatering operations only achieve 20–30 vol% solids, leaving a nominal gap of 45–55 vol% of water that is ...
[25]
[PDF] Wastewater Technology Fact Sheet Package Plants
The extended aeration process is one modification of the activated sludge process which provides biological treatment for the removal of.Missing: core | Show results with:core
[26]
[PDF] Nutrient Control Design Manual August 2010
Aug 1, 2010 · RAS = Return activated sludge; WAS = Waste activated sludge. Source ... This can be accomplished with an activated sludge SRT of 8 to 10 days.
[27]
[PDF] Module 6: Solids Handling and Disposal - DEP
Aerobic digesters are used to treat waste activated sludge, waste activated sludge from plants without primary sedimentation tanks, or a combination of waste ...
[28]
[PDF] Biosolids Technology Fact Sheet on Centrifuge Thickening and ...
Centrifuge thickening and dewatering uses rapid rotation to separate wastewater solids from liquid, reducing volume and producing a drier material.
[29]
[PDF] Module 18 The Activated Sludge Process Part IV - DEP
♢ Heterotrophic bacteria normally present in activated sludge perform this conversion when there is no molecular oxygen or dissolved oxygen, and there is ...<|separator|>
[30]
[PDF] Nitrification - U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Nitrosomonas has an optimal pH between approximately 7.0 and 8.0, and the optimum pH range for Nitrobacter is approximately 7.5 to 8.0.
[31]
Maximum nitrification rate in activated sludge processes at low ...
Aug 9, 2025 · ... (K NH =0.05 mg NH 4 -N ℓ -1 , K OH =0.05 mg O 2 ·ℓ -1 , and K s =30 mg COD·ℓ -1). These modifications, implemented on the basis of more ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[32]
[PDF] Conversion or Removal of Nitrogen From Sewage
Rule of Thumb: Maintain dissolved oxygen concentration at 2.0 mg/l or higher for complete nitrification. ... (K'o is oxygen inhibition constant). Anoxic condition.
[33]
[PDF] Municipal Nutrient Removal Technologies Reference Document | EPA
Sep 9, 2008 · It presents detailed technical and cost information about both biological and physiochemical treatment technologies. The technical information ...
[34]
Research Advances and Challenges in the Microbiology of ...
Mar 1, 2011 · Enhanced biological phosphorus removal (EBPR) is a well-established technology for removing phosphorus from wastewater.
[35]
Maintaining Nitrification During Cold Weather - EBS
Jun 6, 2025 · If cooler wastewater temperatures decrease the growth rate enough, nitrifiers may be removed from the WWTP through sludge wasting faster than ...
[36]
How Alkalinity Affects Nitrification
During nitrification, 7.14 mg of alkalinity as CaCO3 is destroyed for every milligram of ammonium ions oxidized. Lack of carbonate alkalinity will stop ...
[37]
Recent progress in integrated fixed-film activated sludge process for ...
IFAS offers advantages over the conventional activated sludge process such as reduced footprint, enhanced nutrient removal, complete nitrification, longer ...Review · Introduction · Ifas Operating Parameters
[38]
Implementation of Sequencing Batch Reactors for Municipal Treatment
The authors point out the great flexibility of the SBR process to control substrate tension at any desired level. It can be noted in the above strategies that A ...
[39]
Applications of the deep-shaft activated sludge process in ...
Aug 7, 2025 · The main objective of this system is to increase the amount of dissolved oxygen available for biological activity.
[40]
Technology Assessment of the Deep Shaft Biological Reactor
The Deep Shaft biological treatment process is essentially a high-rate activated sludge process capable of operating at BOD5 loading ratios (F/M) between ...
[41]
Membrane bioreactor for wastewater treatment: A review
MBR is widely used for municipal and industrial wastewater treatment. This review addresses basic concepts of MBRs plants and subsequently provides information
[42]
Recent progress in integrated fixed-film activated sludge process for ...
Aug 15, 2020 · IFAS offers advantages over the conventional activated sludge process such as reduced footprint, enhanced nutrient removal, complete ...<|separator|>
[43]
Advancement in biological wastewater treatment using hybrid ...
Apr 22, 2022 · The MBBR technology offers some advantages such as; increased volumetric treatment capacity, less clogging of carrier media and a low head loss.
[44]
[PDF] Aeration
Feb 8, 2010 · Aeration occurs in many water and wastewater treatment processes, but in the activated sludge process and its variants, it consumes more energy ...
[45]
[PDF] Wastewater Technology Fact Sheet Oxidation Ditches
An oxidation ditch is a modified activated sludge biological treatment process that utilizes long solids retention times (SRTs) to remove biodegradable.
[46]
Water Handbook - Wastewater Treatment | Veolia
As the name implies, pure oxygen activated sludge processes supply oxygen (90-99% O2) to the biomass instead of air. The increased partial pressure increases ...
[47]
Oxygen Activated-sludge Wastewater Treatment Systems Design ...
The use of oxygen in place of air in the activated-sludge process is one recent advancement in this basic process.
[48]
The use of pure oxygen for aeration in aerobic wastewater treatment
Deep shaft aeration employs hydrostatic pressure in a deep well to achieve better OTEs. Mass transfer depends on the depth of the well and the technique is ...
[49]
Activated Sludge Process Using Pure Oxygen - epa nepis
The MLSS increased to over 8000 mg/1 when operated with alum addition for phosphorus removal. This report was submitted in fulfillment of Project 101/11010 FRN ...
[50]
https://nepis.epa.gov/Exe/ZyPURL.cgi?Dockey=20008RE1.TXT
[51]
EPA Experiences in Oxygen-Activated Sludge
This concept is intended primarily for upgrading existing air activated sludge plants with a minimum capital expenditure by utilizing conventional air blowers ...
[52]
Pure Oxygen Systems - BrainKart
Jul 8, 2017 · Despite their clear advantages, pure oxygen systems suffer with some major drawbacks. For one thing, the capital costs involved in installing ...
[53]
[PDF] Activated Sludge Microbiology Problems and Their Control - NY.Gov
Jun 8, 2003 · Examples of toxicity events were the washing of cement or lime trucks to a manhole, dumping of congealed diesel fuel to the sewer system, and ...
[54]
[PDF] CHAPTER 7 Activated Sludge - TN.gov
Jan 1, 2016 · The activated sludge process is used for sewage amenable to biological treatment, requiring close attention and operator supervision.
[55]
Secondary Treatment Standards | US EPA
Sep 11, 2025 · EPA's secondary treatment standards are minimum requirements for wastewater plants, based on BOD5, TSS removal, and pH, with alternative ...Missing: ammonia nitrate
[56]
[PDF] Biological Nutrient Removal - Minnesota Pollution Control Agency
This system is similar to a conventional activated sludge process with an anaerobic zone at the head of the secondary train. This system is used where ammonia ...
[57]
[PDF] Module 2 Activated Sludge Operational Strategies for Nitrogen ...
Sludge Yield (Y) = 0.67 lbs VSS lb BOD. 5 consumed. Observed Yield (Y obs. ) ... • Calculate BOD consumed in Activated Sludge. Process. • Determine VSS ...
[58]
[PDF] Biological Treatment: Suspended Growth Processes Study Guide
This is known as the F/M ratio. For conventional activated sludge, the F/M ratio is usually between 0.2 and 0.5.<|separator|>
[59]
[PDF] Optimizing the Activated Sludge Process - Virtual In-Plant Trainings
Therefore, it is imperative that the activated sludge process be operated at a SRT that provides excellent process performance and satisfies effluent quality ...
[60]
None
### Summary of Step-Feed Process in Activated Sludge from http://fwrj.com/Articles%202002/FWRJ%201_02%201.pdf
[61]
Optimization of the step feeding ratio for nitrogen removal by SBR ...
Apr 19, 2021 · The results showed that the SBR with the multi-step-feeding system achieved a high nitrogen removal rate of 92.7% at the three-step influent feeding mode.
[62]
[PDF] Polymer 101: Fundamentals of Flocculation
Jun 25, 2020 · Polymer dosage, concentration and aging. Polymer – sludge mixing. Sludge thruput. Procedure: Add polymer to untreated sludge, mix, filter and.
[63]
None
### Summary of Energy Optimization Using DO Feedback and VFDs in Aeration
[64]
Bioaugmentation Technology for Treatment of Toxic and Refractory ...
Jul 1, 2021 · The activated sludge is put into a dynamic simulation reactor, and the sludge is cultured and domesticated with nutrients and toxic and ...
[65]
[PDF] Use of Programmable Logic Controllers to Automate Control ... - DTIC
Jul 27, 1991 · This report summarizes the concepts underlying PLC use in WWTPs, out- iines successful applications of PLC technology in commercial WWTPs, and ...
[66]
Microthrix parvicella?, a filamentous bacterium causing bulking and ...
Aug 7, 2025 · Microthrix parvicella can cause poor settlement or foam problems in the activated-sludge process. It is normally identified on the basis of ...
[67]
[PDF] Troubleshooting Activated Sludge Processes Introduction - Maine.gov
Sometimes a suspended solids problem carries with it a particulate-matter BOD problem if the effluent TSS gets quite high. Ordinarily, one mg/L of effluent. TSS ...Missing: efficiency | Show results with:efficiency
[68]
Lesson 8: Filamentous Bacteria Foaming in Activated Sludge
Recent work has shown that a number of actinomycetes can cause foaming and include Nocardia Amarae, N. pinensis, N. rhodochrus and other Nocardia-like species.
[69]
Impact of phenol shock loads on the performance of a combined ...
Aug 6, 2025 · Alves et al. (2017) reported that the performance of an activated sludge-MBBR system was severely affected by a 3,000 mg/L phenol shock load, ...
[70]
Full-scale Demonstration Of Industrial Wastewater Treatment ...
... toxic upsets caused by shock loads of organic compounds. Because of the variety and large number of batch production operations at Chambers Works, it is not ...
[71]
Lesson 18: Activated Sludge
BOD stands for Biochemical Oxygen Demand and it represents the amount of oxygen required by microbes to biochemically oxidize organic and inorganic contaminants ...Missing: equation simplified glucose
[72]
Ammonia | US EPA
Feb 7, 2025 · Unionized ammonia can cause toxicity to Nitrosomonas and Nitrobacter bacteria, inhibiting the nitrification process. This inhibition can result ...
[73]
(PDF) Cost analysis of activated sludge and membrane bioreactor ...
Oct 23, 2025 · According to Arif et al. [106] , the cost of conventional methods ranges from $0.2 to $0.43 per cubic meter of treated water, but these methods ...<|separator|>
[74]
[PDF] Facility Upgrade Plan for Dundas Wastewater Treatment Plant ...
Aug 29, 2024 · lifecycle O&M cost is $102M. The 30-year NPV cost would be $342M, for which the capital cost is $252M and the lifecycle O&M cost is $89M.
[75]
Energy consumption in anaerobic and aerobic based wastewater ...
May 17, 2021 · The most probable values are for AQP anaerobic plants: 0.53 kWh/m3 and: 1.09 kWh/m3 for aerobic digestion plants. MPV for all plants are: 1.9 ...
[76]
[PDF] Wastewater Technology Fact Sheet Sequencing Batch Reactors
In many conventional activated sludge systems, separate equalization is needed to protects the biological system from peak flows, which may wash out the biomass ...
[77]
MBBR vs MBR vs SBR vs SBBR vs ASP: Wastewater Treatment ...
Jun 19, 2025 · This article aims to provide a comprehensive guide to these five critical wastewater treatment technologies: MBBR, MBR, SBR, SBBR, and ASP.
[78]
[PDF] CH4 AND N2O EMISSIONS FROM WASTE WATER HANDLING
Typically around 40 to 45 percent of the volatile matter in the feed sludge is converted to methane and carbon dioxide. This gas is generally burned to heat the ...<|separator|>
[79]
Basic Information about Sewage Sludge and Biosolids | US EPA
Sep 26, 2025 · Uses in this category could include application to lands for the purposes of growing food crops, feed crops, fiber crops, energy crops (i.e. ...
[80]
[PDF] Comparative analysis of energy intensity and carbon emissions in ...
This intensity (kW h/m3) was multiplied by emission factors (kg CO2e/ kWh) to calculate the GHG emissions (kg CO2e/m3) of these WWTPs.
[81]
Aerobic Granular Sludge | Biological Treatment
An innovative wastewater treatment technology that provides advanced biological treatment using the unique features of aerobic granular biomass.
[82]
Innovative Aerobic Granular Sludge Tech Meets Low-Nutrient Targets
The AGS pilot achieved the low TIN target (less than 6 mg/L) along with low TP levels (less than 0.5 mg/L). Those results, when combined with NCPCP's ...Missing: flocs 10000
[83]
Enhanced chemotaxis and degradation of nonylphenol in ... - Nature
Apr 24, 2025 · Rediverting electron flux with an engineered CRISPR-DdAsCpf1 system to enhance the pollutant degradation capacity of Shewanella oneidensis.
[84]
Constructions of quorum sensing signaling network for activated ...
Jan 27, 2024 · In this study, we constructed a QS signaling network, providing insights into the intra- and interspecies interactions of activated sludge microbial ...Introduction · Materials and methods · Results · Discussion
[85]
The Effectiveness of Bioaugmentation in Nitrifying Systems Stressed ...
Aug 6, 2025 · In this study, laboratory-scale completely stirred tank reactors were bioaugmented with nitrifying bacteria while operated under high-stress ...
[86]
Nitrification in Cold Weather - Aquafix Inc.
Nitrifying bacteria are highly sensitive to cold, and as temperatures drop, nitrification rates can decrease by up to 50%, making ammonia removal more ...
[87]
A Mini-Review of Sludge-Derived Biochar (SDB) for Wastewater ...
Recent studies have shown that SDB is highly efficient in removing heavy metals, with removal rates typically exceeding 90% under optimal conditions [15,16].2. Adsorptive Removal Of... · 2.1. Heavy Metals · 4. Electrochemical And...
[88]
Activated sludge models at the crossroad of artificial intelligence—A ...
Mar 8, 2021 · This perspective paper presents a new vision to advance process modeling by explicitly integrating the information about the microbial community as measured by ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[89]
Predicting microbial community structure and temporal dynamics by ...
Oct 14, 2025 · We have developed a graph neural network-based model that uses only historical relative abundance data to predict future dynamics. Each model is ...
[90]
Optimization of Critical Factors Affecting Dynamic Membrane ... - MDPI
Nov 15, 2023 · With the prolonged filtration time, the effluent turbidity further decreased to approximately 1 NTU in about 30 min. And thereafter, the ...
[91]
Utilizing ultrasonic vibrations to mitigate membrane fouling in ...
Aug 13, 2023 · This mini review encapsulates research on using ultrasound-induced vibration to mitigate membrane fouling in domestic wastewater systems.
[92]
Insights on fouling development and characteristics during different ...
Aug 10, 2025 · Membrane fouling remains a major hindrance to a prevalent application of membrane bioreactor (MBR) for wastewater treatment. Vibrating ...
[93]
A Review of AI-Driven Control Strategies in the Activated Sludge ...
The control and optimization of energy consumption in the aeration process have been of significant research interest, and many modifications that have had ...
[94]
(PDF) Energy efficiency in activated sludge process using adaptive ...
Apr 20, 2024 · The improvement of the proposed method over BSM1 PI is demonstrated by a reduction in aeration energy of up to 24%. In conclusion, if the ...
[95]
AI-Driven Early Warning of Sludge Bulking via Microscopic Image ...
Oct 26, 2025 · Activated sludge bulking critically undermines the operational stability and effluent quality of wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs), ...
[96]
Evaluating the opportunities for mainstream P-recovery in anaerobic ...
Feb 20, 2024 · In this study, a pilot-scale anaerobic-anoxic-aerobic (A2O) process was operated for simultaneous COD/N/P removal and P-recovery under different ...Missing: cyclic | Show results with:cyclic
[97]
A review on the integration of mainstream P-recovery strategies with ...
Apr 1, 2022 · This work shows the mainstream P-recovery technologies reported so far, both in continuous and sequenced batch reactors (SBR) based configurations.
[98]
Phosphorus recovery potential from sewage sludge by struvite ...
Jul 16, 2024 · Struvite (raw fertilizer) and biochar recovery from sludge has emerged as viable methods to reduce carbon emission and ensure economic sustainability of STPs.
[99]
APAH: An autonomous IoT driven real-time monitoring system for ...
Their system enabled dynamic monitoring and adjustment of operational parameters like chemical dosing, ensuring stable operation and high treatment efficiency.
[100]
An Industrial Cloud-Based IoT System for Real-Time Monitoring and ...
In this paper, we propose a new IIoT cloud-based model for real-time wastewater monitoring and controlling. The proposed system monitors the power of hydrogen ( ...Missing: gains | Show results with:gains
[101]
5 Emerging Wastewater Treatment Technologies to Watch in 2025
The AI predicted optimal set-points for aerators and other equipment, cutting energy use for aeration by about 30% while maintaining strict effluent quality .
[102]
Reduction of energy consumption and greenhouse gas emissions in ...
Apr 6, 2025 · This case study provides a comparison of some feasible engineering strategies for reducing energy consumption and GHG emissions in an existing domestic WWTP ...
[103]
Pathways to a net-zero-carbon water sector through energy ... - Nature
Sep 26, 2022 · Biogas, a renewable methane source produced from AD, can be utilized for combined heat and power (CHP), decreasing energy consumption and CO2 ...
[104]
Transitioning Wastewater Treatment Plants toward Circular ... - NIH
These process routes include a bioelectrochemical energy recovery scheme and codigestion of organic sludge for biogas generation in anaerobic digesters. From ...Missing: exhaust zero pilots 2020-2025
[105]
Ardern-Lockett Award - IWA MEWE-11 CONFERENCE
The activated sludge process was invented in 1913-1914 by Mr. Edward Ardern, a chemist at the Manchester-Davyhulme wastewater treatment plant, and his co ...
[106]
Evolution of the activated sludge process: the first 50 years
Oct 6, 2014 · The paper presents a critical overview of the first 50 years in the evolution of the activated sludge process.
[107]
(PDF) Activated sludge - ResearchGate
Mar 3, 2022 · The activated sludge process was discovered in 1913 in the United Kingdom by two engineers, Edward Ardern and W.T. Lockett, who were ...
[108]
Experiments on the oxidation of sewage without the aid of filters
Experiments on the oxidation of sewage without the aid of filters · E. Ardern, W. T. Lockett · Published 30 May 1914 · Environmental Science, Chemistry · Journal of ...Missing: BOD reduction
[109]
[PDF] Activated-sludge-process-article-Nigel-Horan.pdf - Aqua Enviro
for what was effectively the first full-scale activated sludge plant, built at Worcester in 1916 to treat a flow of 626,000 gallons. A similar arrangement ...
[110]
PAPER - Reflections on Seven Decades of AS History
The activated sludge process has undergone seven decades of colorful evolution since Fowler originally acquired his illuminating idea at Lawrence in November, ...
[111]
[PDF] Milestones in the Development of the Activated-Sludge Process ...
Some discoverers of activated-sludge process: William Lockett sitting OR right and Edward. Ardern standing on left (The names ofthe others are not known). The ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[112]
A Comparison of Oxidation Ditch Plants to Competing Processes for ...
HISTORY The oxidation ditch was developed during the 1950's at the Research Institute for Public Health Engineering (TNO) in the Netherlands as an easily ...
[113]
(PDF) The Modified Bardenpho Process - ResearchGate
Jul 31, 2018 · In order to control discharge of nutrients to receiving water bodies, biological nutrient removal (BNR) systems have been developed in the 1960s ...
[114]
[PDF] Activated Sludge – Evolution to Nitrogen Removal
1. Describe the activated sludge process in detail. 2. Identify methods for nitrogen and phosphorus removal. 3. Identify how to measure and control activated ...
[115]
The interesting history of MBR Membrane
In the 1990s, Kubota developed a flat plate submerged MBR. in the late 1980s and early 1990s, Zenon Environmental developed two registered products successfully ...Missing: prototypes | Show results with:prototypes
[116]
[PDF] Emerging Technologies for Wastewater Treatment and In-Plant Wet ...
control by using activated sludge modeling and data mining instead of traditional PID control. OPTIMaster™ allows automatic selection of DO and SRT set points.
[117]
(PDF) Energy audit in small wastewater treatment plants
Aug 6, 2025 · This work is aimed at formulating a suitable methodology to perform audits in WWTPs and identifying the most suitable key energy consumption indicators.
[118]
Anaerobic methane oxidation in granular sludge reactors for sustainable wastewater treatment | anMOgran | Project | Fact Sheet | FP7 | CORDIS | European Commission
### Summary of EU Project (ID: 329328) on Granular Sludge Research (circa 2015)
[119]
AquaNereda® Aerobic Granular Sludge Technology - ACG
Details the development of Nereda® technology in the Netherlands through a public-private partnership involving Delft University of Technology.
[120]
Nereda changes wastewater treatment with the 100th plant
Reports on the worldwide adoption of Nereda® technology, including the milestone of the 100th plant by 2023, highlighting its rapid growth.