Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Anaconda Smelter Stack

The Anaconda Smelter Stack is a freestanding brick located in , completed on May 5, 1919, at a height of 585 feet (178 meters), making it the tallest surviving structure in the world. Constructed by the Mining Company for the adjacent Washoe Smelter complex, the stack featured an inside diameter of 75 feet (23 meters) at its base tapering to 60 feet (18 meters) at the top, with walls 6 feet thick at the bottom reducing to 2 feet at the summit. Its design, incorporating approximately 2.5 million specially manufactured radial bricks, enabled efficient dispersion of smelter gases high into the atmosphere to address local pollution complaints from copper ore processing. Erected amid booming demand for during , the structure symbolized the industrial prowess of the Mining Company, which dominated Montana's mining economy and employed thousands in operations that refined vast quantities of from nearby deposits. However, despite the stack's purpose of elevating emissions to reduce ground-level fallout, decades of released substantial , lead, and compounds, contaminating soils, water, and vegetation across thousands of acres, with from further mobilizing heavy metals. The smelter ceased operations in 1980 amid declining profitability, stringent environmental regulations, and technological shifts away from pyrometallurgical methods, leaving behind a legacy of hazardous waste that prompted designation as a site by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Today, the preserved stack anchors Anaconda Smoke Stack State Park, listed on the , serving as a tangible relic of extractive industry while ongoing remediation efforts address the causal chain of pollution from unchecked emissions to ecosystem degradation and human health risks. Its endurance contrasts with the dismantled smelter facilities, highlighting engineering achievements in construction against the backdrop of environmental costs borne by causal emissions pathways rather than mere regulatory hindsight.

Historical Background

Origins of the Anaconda Smelter

The Anaconda Smelter was established by , an Irish immigrant who had risen to prominence in Montana's mining industry, to process copper ore extracted from his holdings in . After acquiring the copper-rich Anaconda lode in around 1880, Daly recognized the limitations of shipping raw ore to distant smelters, such as those in , , which incurred high transportation costs and delays. To address this, he initiated construction of a dedicated smelting facility in 1883, selecting a site approximately 26 miles west of along Warm Springs Creek for its abundant water supply essential to hydrometallurgical and pyrometallurgical processes. The smelter's development marked a pivotal step in for the Mining Company, which Daly formally organized to control extraction, transportation, and under one entity. This approach minimized per-ton processing expenses by concentrating on-site—reducing its volume by up to 90% through —before any further shipment of refined , thereby capturing greater value from Butte's prolific deposits amid rising global demand for the metal in the electrical age. Operations commenced with the firing of furnaces at the Upper Works in the fall of , coinciding with the rapid buildup of Anaconda as a featuring over 80 structures, including worker housing and support facilities. Initial capacity focused on handling output from Daly's mines, with the facility employing early technology adapted for low-grade sulfide ores prevalent in . By the early 1900s, as 's annual surged past 100 million pounds, the smelter expanded modularly to accommodate escalating volumes, solidifying Anaconda's role as the primary reduction works for the region's mines and enabling the company to achieve unattainable through reliance on external processors. This growth underscored the empirical advantages of localized , where integrated rail links between and Anaconda further lowered logistics costs compared to pre-1883 practices.

Expansion and Industrial Context

The expansion of the Anaconda smelter in the was driven by escalating national demand for , fueled by the rapid growth of the electrical industry and the exigencies of . From 1910 onward, U.S. consumption of for wire and cable in utilities surged, reflecting broader efforts that wired homes, factories, and with conductors essential for and durability. Anaconda Copper Mining Company, as a dominant producer centered on Butte's ore bodies, supplied key outputs that supported this buildout, including alloys integral to electrical and wartime applications like casings and telegraph lines. intensified this pressure, with 's strategic role in munitions and communications prompting production ramps to meet Allied and domestic needs, as U.S. output constituted roughly half of global supply by the early . Prior smelter stacks at Anaconda proved inadequate for dispersing the mounting emissions from expanded operations, as daily outputs included approximately 30 tons of and 2,500 tons of by the mid-1900s, exacerbating local deposition. This led to persistent complaints from surrounding agriculture and timber interests, culminating in legal challenges such as the federal lawsuit by the U.S. government against Anaconda for smelter-induced forest devastation in the Deer Lodge Valley. Though Anaconda successfully defended earlier suits like those from Deer Lodge Valley farmers, regulatory and litigative pressures mounted with output growth, linking directly to the need for enhanced emission control to avert operational shutdowns and sustain the company's dominance in . Empirical production data underscore this causal dynamic: Anaconda's smelter throughput escalated from handling Butte's consolidated shipments post-1906 centralization, volumes that ballooned into hundreds of thousands of tons annually by the late 1910s to align with spikes. Inadequacies in earlier infrastructure risked concentrating toxic effluents locally, prompting the strategic shift toward a taller design to elevate plumes and dilute impacts, thereby enabling uninterrupted scaling amid industrial imperatives.

Construction and Design

Engineering Challenges and Innovations

The Anaconda Smelter Stack was engineered to address the of concentrated emissions from smelting operations, which previously caused severe local air quality issues through low-level venting. The design prioritized elevating the smoke plume to approximately 585 feet to leverage atmospheric winds for broader and dilution, thereby reducing ground-level buildup in Anaconda and surrounding areas. This solution drew on principles of plume rise and , where stack height correlates with effective vertical mixing and horizontal transport, informed by regional wind patterns and emission volumes exceeding 1 million cubic feet per minute. A major lay in the self-supporting configuration, which eliminated internal bracing or external supports, depending solely on the tapered —75 feet at the base narrowing to 60 feet at the top—for structural integrity against gravity and . This approach tested the compressive limits of under sustained loads while ensuring resilience to lateral forces, marking an advancement in chimney engineering for industrial scales. Commissioned by the Mining Company and built by the Alphons Custodis Chimney Construction Company, the stack achieved a height 30 feet greater than the , confirming its status as the world's tallest freestanding structure upon completion in 1919.

Materials and Dimensions

The Anaconda Smelter Stack stands at a total of 585 feet 1.5 inches (178.3 m), encompassing both the brick chimney and its , with the masonry portion measuring 555 feet (169.2 m). The structure rests on a 30-foot-high octagonal base designed to accommodate the sloped terrain, providing stability for the overlying cylindrical brick shaft. The stack's base features an exterior width of 86 feet (26.2 m), tapering upward, while the interior measures 75 feet (23 m) at the bottom and 60 feet (18 m) at the top. Wall thickness varies from 6 feet at the to 2 feet near the summit, optimizing and wind resistance. Primarily constructed from approximately 2.46 million radial bricks—curved to conform to the chimney's cylindrical profile—the stack incorporates specialized weighing 23,810 tons. These larger-than-standard radial bricks, equivalent in volume to over 6.6 million common bricks, enhance joint minimization and structural strength, enabling resistance to wind pressures of 33 pounds per .

Construction Timeline

The foundation for the Anaconda Smelter Stack was completed in May 1918, marking the onset of principal construction activities. On May 23, 1918, smelter manager Frederick Laist laid the first brick, initiating the masonry phase under contract to the Alphons Custodis Chimney Construction Company of . Bricklaying proceeded at scale with an average crew of 12 workers per eight-hour shift, limited to one shift daily, achieving completion after 142 working days on , 1918. This pace reflected efficiency amid World War I-era constraints on materials and labor, bolstered by the U.S. government's prioritization of output for munitions and wiring. Initial operation followed in early 1919, with the first rising through the in late April or early May, confirming structural integrity and integration with the Washoe Smelter's expanded capacity.

Operational Role

Smelting Processes and Output

The Anaconda smelter employed a multi-stage pyrometallurgical centered on copper concentrates in multiple-hearth furnaces to oxidize impurities and volatilize sulfur as SO₂, followed by in reverberatory furnaces where the roasted material was melted with fluxes to produce copper-iron containing 30-70% and separate . Matte from these furnaces was then transferred to converters for further oxidation to blister copper, while exhaust gases laden with SO₂, , and particulates were routed through an extensive network of flues to the smelter for dispersion. An integrated sulfuric acid plant, operational from the early , captured a portion of the SO₂ for commercial use, though the majority of gases were vented during peak periods to maintain furnace throughput. Peak operational capacity in the 1920s through 1970s reached approximately 14,600 tons of ore concentrates processed daily across dozens of furnaces, enabling the smelter to handle inputs from Anaconda's mines and external sources. This scale supported annual outputs contributing 10-15% of U.S. refined supply during high-production years, with cumulative smelter-processed materials from 1919 to 1980 exceeding several million tons of metal equivalent based on company records of and blister production. The stack's height and volume facilitated rapid venting of up to 700 tons of SO₂ and 30 tons of daily on average, preventing backpressure that could halt furnaces and thus sustaining uninterrupted high-volume despite emission intensities. Efficiency gains from the stack's dispersion role allowed output expansion without proportional local accumulation of gases, as evidenced by sustained daily charges growing from early 8,000-ton designs to over 14,000 tons by through additions and optimizations. This configuration prioritized throughput over full gas capture until regulatory pressures in the , underscoring the engineering trade-offs in early 20th-century smelter design.

Technological and Economic Achievements

The Anaconda Smelter's integration of the 585-foot stack enabled large-scale by leveraging atmospheric dispersion principles, where elevated emissions diluted pollutants through plume rise and , empirically lowering ground-level and particulate concentrations compared to shorter stacks used previously. This design sustained operational productivity, processing thousands of tons of daily without necessitating frequent shutdowns due to localized air quality issues that had plagued earlier facilities. The stack's engineering thus causally supported the transition to high-volume operations, which converted into more efficiently than prior methods by indirect heating, marking an early industrial adoption that scaled output from mines. Subsequent advancements included electrolytic refining at the Anaconda facilities, where impure anode underwent electrochemical purification to achieve 99.99% purity, essential for electrical applications; this process was implemented on a major scale by the , with the stack's capacity handling the increased volumes from expanded converter and refinery stages. These technological integrations positioned the smelter as a hub for processing innovations, facilitating the company's annual capacity of up to 1 billion pounds by the mid-20th century, with domestic output comprising about 40% of that total. Economically, the stack-enabled operations underpinned Anaconda Copper's peak production, which from 1892 to 1903 made it the world's largest mine, generating over $300 million in value (adjusted to historical dollars) through refined output critical for U.S. and wartime demands. During , the smelter's contributions ranked Anaconda 58th among U.S. firms in military production contracts, supplying refined vital for wiring, ammunition casings, and infrastructure, thereby bolstering national industrial mobilization without reliance on foreign imports. This output sustained the company's status as one of the five largest global mining enterprises at various points, with the smelter's scale-up directly linking to broader advancements in U.S. nonferrous metals processing.

Environmental and Health Consequences

Mechanisms of Pollution Dispersion

The Anaconda smelter released primarily (SO₂) gas, averaging approximately 700 tons per day, alongside particulate emissions containing (over 1,300 pounds per day circa 1920), lead (nearly 800 pounds per day circa 1920), and other metals derived from roasting and processes. The 585-foot stack channeled these hot exhaust gases, whose —driven by thermal differences from combustion—propelled initial vertical ascent intended to surpass the , enabling wind-driven for regional dilution rather than localized settling. In practice, the sheer volume of emissions overwhelmed optimal dispersion, with plumes extending laterally across more than 300 square miles due to topographic channeling in the Deer Lodge Valley and variable wind patterns, contrary to expectations of effective high-altitude dilution. Pre-1970s monitoring documented and metal deposition gradients, with concentrations peaking near the stack and diminishing with distance—evident in and samples aligned to downwind , as higher levels appeared in areas like (4 miles east) versus upwind zones. These patterns confirmed advection-dominated transport, where plume and rates produced inverse distance-decay in fallout, verified by early damage surveys extending 5–8 miles from the source by 1910–1911.

Documented Impacts on Ecosystem and Human Health

Operations at the Anaconda Smelter from to 1980 released airborne emissions containing , , lead, , and , contaminating approximately 20,000 acres of upland s across a 300-square-mile area. concentrations in affected soils reached over 630 mg/kg, correlating with high levels of stress as measured by the Total Metal Index exceeding 3,500 mg/kg in severely impacted zones. These contaminants concentrated primarily in the upper 2 inches of soil, with extending to 18 inches due to acidic conditions, inhibiting vegetation establishment and contributing to barren landscapes. By 1910-1911, smelter emissions had induced die-off within 5-8 miles of the , expanding to influence up to 22 miles away by the , rendering large expanses of grasslands and forests barren due to phytotoxic effects. Post-closure confirmed persistent ecological damage, with remediation efforts treating 11,500 acres by 2014 but leaving some areas poorly vegetated, as contaminants continued to limit organisms, , and regrowth. Epidemiological studies of 8,014 male smelter workers employed from 1938 to 1955 linked occupational airborne exposure to excess mortality, estimating 4 additional respiratory cancer deaths per 1,000 workers by age 70, alongside 22 excess all-cause deaths potentially attributable to . Inhaled inorganic from smelter operations has been associated with elevated respiratory cancer risks in such cohorts, with prior analyses showing patterns consistent across smelters including Anaconda. Community near the site revealed elevated urinary levels in children, with 1985 samples averaging 54-66 µg/g in the Mill Creek area adjacent to the smelter. Residential soils exhibited pre-remediation arsenic averages up to 263 mg/kg, exceeding the 250 mg/kg action level and posing a lifetime cancer of 9.4 × 10^{-5} from incidental , particularly for children with behavior facing acute doses up to 0.05 mg/kg/day. Historical exposure pathways included dust and soil , contributing to documented absorption in children near smelters, though recent 2018-2019 testing of 367 residents found urinary inorganic medians (4.6 µg/g ) comparable to national levels, indicating reduced but lingering from residual contamination.

Empirical Data from Studies and Monitoring

Soil sampling conducted by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) during the era, beginning in the 1980s and continuing through periodic five-year reviews into the 2020s, has quantified smelter-derived contamination across more than 300 square miles in the Deer Lodge Valley, with elevated concentrations of , lead, , , and in surface soils. These investigations employed systematic grid-based sampling and laboratory analysis, revealing levels exceeding 100 parts per million (ppm) in many residential and agricultural areas, far above background concentrations of less than 10 ppm, directly attributable to airborne deposition from stack emissions rather than local geology. Over 20,000 acres of soils were identified as requiring remediation due to these exceedances. Pre-closure monitoring by the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) documented acidification of regional waterways, including the system, linked to sulfur dioxide emissions from smelter operations that formed via atmospheric reactions and precipitation. Water quality assessments from the mid-20th century reported levels as low as 4.5 in affected streams during peak operations, with elevated sulfate and metal loadings correlating temporally with smelter output peaks in the 1940s–1970s. Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR) exposure investigations, including a 2018 community sampling of blood and from over 100 Anaconda residents, measured median blood lead levels of 0.9 micrograms per deciliter (µg/dL) and median urine of 13.6 µg/L, with subsets showing elevations above reference values (e.g., urine >50 µg/L in frequent attic entrants due to residual dust). These biomarkers indicate in humans from ongoing contact with contaminated soils and dust, despite post-closure reductions. studies corroborate this, with small mammals on the site exhibiting concentrations up to 50 ppm in liver and , exceeding safe thresholds and demonstrating trophic transfer in the . Chemical speciation analyses of soils, including , have identified contaminant signatures—such as arsenate phases dominant in smelter fly ash—matching emission profiles and distinguishing them from natural or mining waste sources, providing causal linkage to stack dispersion. These methods rule out alternative origins like regional volcanics, as smelter-derived particles show distinct oxidation states and associations with compounds.

Economic and Social Significance

Contributions to Local and National Prosperity

The Anaconda Smelter operations sustained thousands of workers attracted from across the and abroad, forming the backbone of the local economy in . At the end of 1885, the reduction works alone supported a for 1,700 employees, with the company's subsidiaries extending influence over , transportation, and other sectors to bolster . This economic activity drove population growth, with Anaconda-Deer Lodge County reaching a peak of 10,356 residents in 1990 amid sustained mining-related prosperity, though earlier 20th-century highs reflected the smelter's direct role in drawing families and funding such as schools and housing. Nationally, the smelter processed vast quantities of copper ore from nearby mines, enabling the Mining Company to supply a substantial share of U.S. output—51 percent in 1896 alone—which fueled expansions like railroads and early from 1910 to 1940. Overall, Butte-area operations under Anaconda yielded approximately 21.5 billion pounds of between 1880 and 2004, with the smelter as the critical refining hub contributing to industrial growth and GDP through domestic consumption and exports. The company's revenue peaked during the amid rising metal prices, marking a "golden" era of expansion that amplified national economic gains from copper-dependent sectors. During , smelter-facilitated production boomed to meet wartime demands, with Anaconda prospering through heightened output of essential for military applications, underscoring its role in national defense and postwar recovery.

Workforce and Community Dynamics

The workforce at the Anaconda smelter was shaped by targeted recruitment efforts led by , an immigrant who founded the town in 1883 and prioritized hiring fellow laborers, supplemented by and other Southern European immigrants drawn to smelting jobs as operations expanded in the late 19th and early 20th centuries. This influx created a predominantly Catholic demographic, with chain migration sustaining communities and fostering ethnic enclaves that integrated into the company's operations. As a quintessential , Anaconda exhibited paternalistic structures where the Mining Company (ACM) exerted influence over and institutions to promote worker retention and loyalty, including support for construction amid a of company-dominated residences and businesses. Wages exceeded national averages, with smelter workers securing minimum daily rates around $4.75 by the —substantially higher than typical pay of $2–$3 per day in the —binding employees through economic dependence despite the controlling environment. Low workforce turnover reflected this stability, as the smelter's dominance limited alternatives in the isolated community. Post-World War I, the community demonstrated resilience by adapting to fluctuating copper demands while viewing the 585-foot stack, completed in 1918, as an enduring emblem of economic continuity and local identity, sustaining social cohesion amid broader industrial shifts.

Controversies and Criticisms

Corporate Dominance and Labor Relations

The Mining Company exerted significant influence over local and media in Anaconda and , often described as a "" dynamic where the firm shaped political outcomes and controlled newspapers through what contemporaries termed the "copper press." This dominance stemmed from its status as the state's largest employer, enabling coordinated investments in infrastructure and operations that proponents argued fostered and growth amid volatile markets. Critics, however, contended that such control suppressed competition and independent , prioritizing corporate interests over public accountability. Early corporate rivalries, particularly between and John D. Ryan's Amalgamated Copper interests, influenced labor practices by leveraging worker support for competitive advantage. Heinze, rising from mining ranks, granted an eight-hour workday to his employees in the late to undercut rivals, a concession that pressured Anaconda to follow suit after acquiring Heinze's properties in 1906. Management defended these consolidations as essential for and scaling production, which sustained employment during market fluctuations, though union advocates viewed the resulting as a tool for quelling dissent. Tensions peaked during the 1917 Butte miners' strike, initiated June 18 by the Metal Mine Workers' Union demanding abolition of the "rustling card" system—which allowed Anaconda to blacklist agitators—and improved safety amid wartime demands. The strike lasted four months, idling thousands and drawing federal attention; Congresswoman advocated for miners by criticizing Anaconda's owner John D. Ryan and proposing government intervention to nationalize operations or enforce fair practices, though her efforts failed to resolve the impasse. Company officials maintained that resisting union demands preserved managerial control necessary for wartime output, while strikers highlighted hazardous conditions like risks. In the , labor unrest continued with smelter shutdowns and wage disputes; the Washoe smelter closed briefly in 1920 before reopening in 1921 at reduced pay scales, reflecting post-war price drops. Miners' daily wages had peaked at $4.75 during booms—above general industrial averages adjusted for hazard premiums—but declined amid these conflicts, fueling critiques of corporate despite the firm's role in stability. Pro-company perspectives emphasized that such pay structures attracted workers to remote, risky sites, enabling Anaconda's expansion and Montana's output dominance.

Balancing Industrial Benefits Against Environmental Costs

The Anaconda Smelter's production of ore concentrates fueled critical advancements in , , and military applications, supplying materials that underpinned the and Allied victories in both World Wars. This output dominated Montana's metals sector, generating substantial economic activity through direct employment, supply chains, and export revenues that supported national infrastructure development. mining operations historically exhibit GDP multipliers exceeding direct contributions by up to 70%, as and amplify value creation. Environmental costs from smelter emissions necessitated remediation efforts totaling over $120 million under agreements, reflecting accumulated , , and particulate dispersal over decades of operation. Prior to 1970s-era pollution controls, technologies relied on rudimentary processes without viable alternatives for capturing emissions, rendering zero-discharge infeasible given the era's engineering constraints and the chemical necessities of . These byproducts, while significant, aligned with prevailing industrial norms where resource extraction prioritized output over abatement, absent modern catalytic converters or . The 1980 closure, driven by post-Clean Air Act compliance burdens and declining ore grades, eliminated roughly 1,000 direct jobs at the smelter—accounting for 78% of Anaconda's primary employment—and exacerbated statewide industry contraction, leaving thousands unemployed across and Great Falls operations. Analyses favoring contend that such mandates accelerated , forgoing net societal gains from 's role in technological progress against retroactive environmental standards; counterarguments highlight unmitigated harms but overlook persistent risks in current "green" mining, where and energy demands yield analogous trade-offs.

Closure, Cleanup, and Preservation

Shutdown and Regulatory Factors

The acquired the Anaconda Company, including its smelter operations, in 1977. Facing stringent sulfur dioxide (SO2) emission limits enforced by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) under the Clean Air Act, the smelter could not achieve compliance without installing costly pollution control technologies, estimated at over $400 million. These regulatory requirements, intensified by the 1977 Clean Air Act Amendments addressing nonferrous smelters, coincided with a sharp decline in global prices starting in 1979, rendering continued operations economically unviable. ARCO announced the smelter's closure on September 25, 1980, with operations ceasing by November of that year. The decision was driven by the combined pressures of unattainable emission standards—hourly concentrations frequently exceeded limits in 1980—and market conditions, including foreign competition and plummeting demand. Production at the facility halted entirely, marking the end of after nearly a century. The shutdown triggered immediate economic fallout, with 1,000 to 1,200 smelter workers laid off overnight and several hundred more in subsequent months, affecting approximately 70 percent of primary local employment. Anaconda's total workforce plummeted from around 8,000 to 2,500 within a year, severely contracting the town's GDP reliant on -related activities. Related operations wound down by 1982 amid ongoing low prices.

Superfund Remediation Efforts

The Anaconda Co. Smelter site was added to the under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) in September 1983, initiating federal oversight due to extensive contamination from , lead, and other in , waste, and water. Early remediation focused on operable units (OUs) involving excavation and removal of over 10 million cubic yards of , mine waste, and contaminated across the site's more than 200 square miles, alongside capping of approximately 500 million cubic yards of waste over 5,000 acres to prevent further dispersal. In September 2022, the U.S. Department of Justice and Environmental Protection Agency reached a settlement with Atlantic Richfield Company (AR), the site's primary responsible party, requiring completion of remaining cleanup actions estimated at $83 million, including additional soil removal and institutional controls, with AR also paying $48 million toward federal past costs and over $21 million more in a 2025 agreement for prior response expenses. Total Superfund expenditures have exceeded $100 million since designation, funding actions like dust suppression and waste consolidation, with the 2023 settlement effective February 14 aiming to conclude active remediation by 2027. The EPA's sixth five-year review in 2020 and seventh in 2025 confirmed that remedies in all five OUs have addressed smelter waste, contaminated soil, and dust, achieving over 90% completion of physical removal and capping milestones, including updates on OU-1 remedial design coordination. Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR) investigations, such as the 2018-2019 exposure study, documented reduced community risks, with average blood lead and urine levels in Anaconda residents comparable to or slightly below national benchmarks post-remediation, indicating effective mitigation of direct exposure pathways. Groundwater contamination persists as a key unresolved challenge, with historical smelter s introducing metals into aquifers, necessitating ongoing monitoring and systems despite surface remedies; the 2025 five-year review noted that while and capping have stabilized sources, long-term remains incomplete and requires indefinite and maintenance. In August 2024, additional EPA funding supported remedial design for contaminated areas, underscoring the protracted nature of subsurface cleanup.

Current Status as State Park and Cultural Icon

In 1986, following the 1980 closure of the associated smelter, the Anaconda Smelter Stack was designated as to preserve it as a public landmark. The park features interpretive viewing platforms and a constructed in 2000, allowing safe observation of the 585-foot structure, which remains one of the world's tallest free-standing masonry chimneys. As a state-managed site, it serves as an accessible point for public engagement with the site's industrial legacy, with no reported structural failures or major incidents since closure due to its engineered durability using over 1.3 million bricks. The stack attracts tourists as a key attraction in Anaconda, contributing to the local economy through visitation tied to events like the annual Smeltermen's Day festival, where special stack tours are offered. Post-pandemic travel surges have boosted Anaconda's , with tripling from 2020 to 2022, partly driven by interest in historical sites like the stack. Maintenance remains minimal, focused on periodic inspections rather than extensive repairs, reflecting the stack's robust post-construction design and the absence of operational stresses after 1980. Recognized in 1983 as part of the National Historic Landmark-designated Washoe Smelter site (along with surrounding structures), the stack symbolizes engineering achievement amid the decline of Montana's industry. A 2023 study by graduate student Megan Moore highlighted residents' deep cultural attachments to the stack, viewing it as a marker of and in post-industrial Anaconda, rather than solely a remnant of environmental challenges. This enduring icon represents the transition from resource extraction dominance to heritage-based identity in southwestern Montana's Deer Lodge Valley.

References

  1. [1]
    Anaconda Smelter Exposure Investigation (EI) | ATSDR
    Nov 8, 2024 · At 585 feet tall, the Anaconda Smelter Stack is the tallest surviving masonry structure in the world. ... Anaconda Copper Mining Company in Deer ...
  2. [2]
    Anaconda Smoke Stack State Park - Montana FWP
    The old Anaconda Copper Company smelter stack, completed in 1919, is one of the tallest free-standing brick structures in the world at 585 feet.
  3. [3]
    Anaconda Smoke Stack | Destination Montana
    The Anaconda Smelter Stack is a brick smoke stack, once part of the smelter of the Anaconda Copper Mining Company at Anaconda, Montana in the United States.
  4. [4]
    Anaconda, Montana now thriving after more than three decades of ...
    Feb 15, 2023 · In addition, stack emissions contained sulfur dioxide (SO2) which lowered pH in soils which in turn allowed the metals to impact vegetation.
  5. [5]
    ANACONDA CO. SMELTER | Superfund Site Profile - gov.epa.cfpub
    The Anaconda Co. Smelter site, a former copper processing facility, is a Superfund site due to contamination from operations that produced arsenic, lead, and ...
  6. [6]
    Anaconda Smoke Stack State Park - Montana State Parks Foundation
    Listed in the National Register of Historic Places, the smelter closed in 1980. · Much like the smelter and other buildings that used to be located on Smelter ...
  7. [7]
    Anaconda Copper Mining Company records - Archives West
    In 1876 Walker Brothers, a Salt Lake City, Utah, mining and banking firm, hired Marcus Daly to investigate silver mining properties in Butte, Montana.
  8. [8]
    Anaconda History - UtahRails.net
    Aug 4, 2024 · This smelter, built in 1892, duplicated many of the facilities in Anaconda, handling all levels of ore processing from concentration to refining ...Missing: establishment | Show results with:establishment
  9. [9]
    Anaconda Smelter, ca. 1884. - Story of Butte
    Anaconda Smelter, ca. 1884. ... Marcus Daly's Anaconda Company was the first Butte mining company to build a smelter elsewhere, in Anaconda, 26 miles west of ...<|separator|>
  10. [10]
    Anaconda- A Montana Gem
    Anaconda is a Montana town known for its copper smelting history, the world's largest smelter, the Stack, and its location near the Continental Divide.<|separator|>
  11. [11]
    Anaconda Commercial Historic District
    By the time the furnaces of the Upper Works fired up in the fall of 1884, Anaconda's 80 buildings included seven hotels and boarding houses and twelve saloons.
  12. [12]
    [PDF] Marcus Daly - (1841-1900)
    Anaconda smelter, twenty-seven miles away. During this period, Daly also established banks, built power plants and irrigation systems, and founded the Anaconda.
  13. [13]
    RECORD BY UTILITIES IN USE OF COPPER - The New York Times
    In 1920, a decade earlier, total consumption of copper wire and cable for the above purpose was about 60,000,000 pounds. During the past ten years the output of ...
  14. [14]
    [PDF] Darkening Light: - Jason Dunn - Economics
    May 17, 2021 · The electrification and telecommunication of the US increased copper demand and created new industrial barons. Marcus Daly bought a 12 to 15 ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  15. [15]
    [PDF] COPPER MINING IN NORTH AMERICA
    ... United States alone produced about half of the copper of the world. During the last 10 years increasing production in South America and Africa has reduced ...
  16. [16]
    Donald MacMillan. Smoke Wars: Anaconda Copper, Montana Air ...
    By 1906 nearly all of Butte's ore was shipped twenty‐six miles down the valley to ACM's Anaconda smelter. Each day it belched thirty tons of arsenic and 2,500 ...Missing: complaints 1910s
  17. [17]
    Government Action Against Anaconda Company to Protect Forests.
    Fed Govt seeks ct injunction against Anaconda Copper Mining Co to prevent further destruction of forests around Anaconda plant, Helena, Mont.
  18. [18]
    Anaconda Smoke Case Defense Negatives, 1910 - Archives West
    By 1910, the Anaconda Copper Company had already successfully defended its smelting operation in Montana from a lawsuit filed by Deer Lodge valley ...Missing: inadequacies | Show results with:inadequacies
  19. [19]
    A dangerous job that gave life to a town - Montana Standard
    Aug 8, 2018 · The idea was a taller stack would send the arsenic farther up into the atmosphere and spread out the toxins.
  20. [20]
    material and imagined nature in the smelter city of Anaconda, Montana
    While Anaconda's airshed cleared after the smelter shutdown in 1980, smelter smoke continued to figure critically in the production of space in the ...
  21. [21]
    [PDF] Fourth Five-Year Review Report, Anaconda Smelter National ...
    Oct 27, 2010 · This report documents the fourth, five-year review conducted by the U.S.. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Region 8, for the Anaconda ...
  22. [22]
    [PDF] innovation in mineral processing - ResearchGate
    BUILT & OPERATED THE ANACONDA SMELTER. The Stack was built by the Alphons Custodis Chimney Construction Company of New York. At the time it was built, May 5 ...
  23. [23]
    Tallest brick structure | Guinness World Records
    The brick smokestack stands 169.2 m (555 ft) tall – 178.38 m (585 ft 1.5 in) including its concrete foundation pedestal – and is 26.2 m (86 ft) wide at its base ...
  24. [24]
    Butte, America's Story Episode 129 - Anaconda Smelter Stack
    Dec 9, 2024 · The Washoe Smelter stack in Anaconda is the tallest free-standing masonry structure in the world. Yes, it is. Historian Carrie Johnson laid ...
  25. [25]
    Anaconda Smelter Stack - Atlas Obscura
    Nov 12, 2009 · It is 585 feet tall, making it tallest freestanding masonry structure in recorded history. On May 4, 1919, the stack was placed into ...
  26. [26]
    Reverberatory Smelting - 911Metallurgist
    Mar 9, 2017 · At Anaconda the calcine enters the reverberatories at a temperature of 900° F.; and most of the flue dust is thoroughly hot. Preheating the Air.
  27. [27]
    [PDF] AP-42, CH 12.3: Primary Copper Smelting - EPA
    Flash furnace smelting combines the operations of roasting and smelting to produce a high- grade copper matte from concentrates and flux. In flash smelting ...
  28. [28]
    [PDF] The Practice of Copper Smelting - Survivor Library
    Methods of Producing. Metallic Copper from Matte, 458. The Blister Process, 460. Elimination of Impurities during Blister-Roasting, 465. Sep- aration of Gold in ...
  29. [29]
    [PDF] Purification Department of Zinc Leaching Division at Anaconda ...
    The smelter has a capacity of 14,600 tons of co)per ore treated per twenty-four hours and the Zinc plant can turn out. 200 tons of metallic zinc per twenty ...Missing: daily | Show results with:daily
  30. [30]
    [PDF] COPPER - USGS.gov
    Copper was recovered or processed at 25 mines (17 of which accounted for more than 99% of mine production), 2 primary smelters, 1 secondary smelter, 2 primary ...
  31. [31]
    "Impact of copper smelter emissions on subalpine vegetation in the ...
    ... Anaconda, Montana was the largest industrial point source of sulfur dioxide (SO2) ... smelter emissions averaged 700 tons of SO2 and 30 tons of particulates daily.Missing: stack vented furnaces
  32. [32]
    Anaconda imagines a future beyond smelting and Superfund
    Feb 15, 2023 · The cleanup deal for the Anaconda Smelter Superfund Site went into effect Tuesday, February, 14th, and creates a roadmap to finish active remediation by 2027.Missing: impact | Show results with:impact
  33. [33]
    Innovations: The Butte Copper Mines
    By 1883 Daly had built his smelter 26 miles west of Butte in Anaconda. The smelter used the latest processing technology from England.Missing: vertical integration benefits
  34. [34]
    modern copper smelting. - Project Gutenberg
    At Anaconda, indeed, the fully-equipped electrolytic plant was shut down, owing to the commercial conditions such as have just been indicated, having rendered ...
  35. [35]
    Business: Anaconda & Copper - Time Magazine
    Anaconda's domestic production, largely centred in Montana, amounts to about 40% of its total capacity of 1,000,000,000 lb. per year. All domestic output and ...
  36. [36]
    Anaconda's mining history - Aug 5, 2008 - MyTripJournal
    Aug 5, 2008 · From 1892 through 1903, the Anaconda mine was the largest copper-producing mine in the world.[1] It produced more than $300 billion worth of ...
  37. [37]
    Anaconda Copper Mining Company 1950's (Montana) - Old stock
    Anaconda ranked 58th among United States corporations in the value of World War II-military production contracts. The end of World War II brought another ...<|separator|>
  38. [38]
    Butte, America's Story Episode 275 - Anaconda Company Heritage
    Dec 28, 2020 · The Anaconda Copper Mining Company grew to become at various times the largest copper mining company in the world, one of the five largest mining companies of ...Missing: market | Show results with:market
  39. [39]
    [PDF] Anaconda Smelter, Montana, Superfund Case Study - US EPA
    The Anaconda smelter had a national reputation as one of the leading producers of copper and boasted the largest free- standing smokestack in the world, ...Missing: Stack specifications engineering
  40. [40]
    [PDF] Health Consultation - CDC
    Oct 19, 2007 · Children in the other copper smelter towns surveyed had lower mean urine arsenic concentrations than Ajo and Anaconda (geometric mean 30.8 μg/L) ...
  41. [41]
  42. [42]
    [PDF] Anaconda County Smelter Health Consultation
    Oct 17, 2019 · Soils contain elevated levels of lead and arsenic from the deposition of particulate from stack emissions and the disposition of slag. Some ...
  43. [43]
    [PDF] THE WATER RESOURCES OF BUTTE MONTANA
    Dec 11, 2024 · The acidity has probably been produced by the sulphurous acid in the smelter fumes, washed into the soil by the rain. Prof. Gieseker ...
  44. [44]
    [PDF] Anaconda Smelter Summary of Exposure investigation
    The survey also revealed that people who entered their attic regularly had increased levels of lead and urine arsenic (because some attics remain contaminated ...
  45. [45]
    Heavy metal and arsenic bioaccumulation in small mammals ...
    Heavy metal and arsenic bioaccumulation in small mammals inhabiting the Anaconda Smelter Superfund Site, Montana ... animals inhabiting hazardous waste sites.Missing: ATSDR 2024 humans
  46. [46]
    Trace element speciation in selected smelter-contaminated soils in ...
    Long-term copper smelting in the Anaconda and Deer Lodge Valley area of Montana has resulted in an extensive area of trace element contamination.
  47. [47]
    Trace Element Speciation in Selected Smelter-Contaminated Soils ...
    Aug 7, 2025 · ... It is estimated that non-ferrous smelter emissions account for 40 to 73% of emissions of metals such as Zn, Cd and Pb into the environment ...
  48. [48]
    Organized Labor - The Historical Marker Database
    Marker is located in Anaconda Smelter Stack State Park, along the circular walkway around the smelter stack exhibit, just east of the parking lot. Touch for map ...Missing: construction | Show results with:construction
  49. [49]
    Anaconda-Deer Lodge County, Montana Population History | 1990
    The peak population of Anaconda-Deer Lodge County was in 1990, when its population was 10,356. In 1990, Anaconda-Deer Lodge County was the 2,392nd largest city ...
  50. [50]
    Butte, Montana: Copper Mining - Rock & Gem Magazine
    Oct 30, 2023 · According to the Mining History Association, in 1896 Butte produced 26 percent of the world's copper supply and 51 percent of the United States' ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  51. [51]
    Butte Mining and Remediation History | BPSOU Environmental ...
    The first crude smelter was built in approximately 1867 to treat the rich copper ore from the Parrot mine. It was built by Dennis Leary, an Irishman, and three ...History · Mining And Remediation · Butte's Mining Heyday<|separator|>
  52. [52]
    Yerington Monday: Anaconda Copper Mine Part One - The History ...
    Jan 31, 2016 · During the 1920s, metal prices went up and mining activity increased. Those were really the golden years for Anaconda. The company was ...
  53. [53]
    [PDF] BUTTE-ANACONDA HISTORIC DISTRICT Page 1
    The Anaconda Mining Company Smelter Smoke Stack is also a discontiguous property that makes a primary contribution to the Butte-Anaconda Historic District.
  54. [54]
    Anaconda - Montana Historical Society
    At the time of its founding in 1883, the “Smelter City” of Anaconda quickly established itself as one of the state's more ethnically diverse communities.Missing: production output
  55. [55]
    [PDF] The Populist Producer╎s Ethic, Immigrant Workers, and Nativism ...
    Apr 12, 2008 · The chain migration by family members and friends from Ireland made the large size of the Irish population in Anaconda and Butte possible.Missing: workforce demographics
  56. [56]
    [PDF] butte-anaconda historic district - NPGallery - National Park Service
    In 1961, Butte's national prominence as a copper-producing center was recognized with its designation as a. National Historic Landmark under the theme of ...
  57. [57]
    Faith and a Smelter Town | Montana's Historic Landscapes
    Mar 3, 2016 · Anaconda over 100 years ago was a place of opportunity for laborers who wanted to gain a foothold in the Rocky Mountains through hard labor ...
  58. [58]
    [PDF] Children of the Hill - Montana Women's History
    Smelter Workers won recognition, a closed shop, and a contract from the Anaconda Company providing for a minimum salary of $4.75 per day and a 50-cents- per ...Missing: demographics | Show results with:demographics
  59. [59]
    Prices and Wages by Decade: 1910-1919 - Library Guides
    Oct 17, 2025 · Compares wage rates and hours of work for the WWI and WWII eras, focusing specifically on the manufacturing, mining, railroad, printing and ...Missing: Anaconda Copper
  60. [60]
    [PDF] environmental cleanup and historic preservation in us west mining ...
    A key aspect in understanding the post-WWI shift in mining community tourism is ... Anaconda: Labor, Community, and Culture in Montana's Smelter City. Urbana ...
  61. [61]
    [PDF] The Anaconda Copper Mining Company - Montana Historical Society
    The Anaconda Company dominated the state's metals industry and influenced other business sectors.Missing: local prosperity
  62. [62]
    Montana Mosaic: The Company - PBS LearningMedia
    Mar 24, 2014 · In many ways the story of the Anaconda Copper Mining Company, through the first seven decades of the Twentieth Century, best illustrates ...Missing: peaks 1920s 1950s
  63. [63]
    Historic Butte | Research Starters - EBSCO
    In 1910 Clark sold his remaining Butte mining properties to Amalgamated (which again became Anaconda Copper Mining Company that year), giving ACM complete ...Early History · Decline Of Silver And Rise... · The Election Of 1900
  64. [64]
    [PDF] Copper Opera: The Butte Miners' Strike of 1917: A documentary
    As the strike neared the three-month mark some nine-thousand miners had returned to work. Then the union turned to the Smeltermen at the huge Washoe smelter in.
  65. [65]
  66. [66]
    [PDF] This content downloaded from 161.7.59.13 on Mon, 21 Dec 2015 23 ...
    Dec 21, 2015 · Ross Toole, "A History of the Anaconda Copper Mining Company: A ... Copper prices were high and miners' wages reached. $4.75 a day ...<|separator|>
  67. [67]
    [PDF] The Impacts of Copper Mining in Chile
    Considering these multiplier efects, the contribution mining activity makes to GDP could be up to 70% higher than what is shown in the graph above. Copper also ...
  68. [68]
    [PDF] Environmental Aspects of Copper Production - Princeton University
    In flue gas desulfurization (FGD), the SO2 is chemically removed through reactions with lime, magnesium oxide, ammonia, or dimethylaniline. (DMA, an organic ...
  69. [69]
    Dark Clouds Loom in Montana's Big Sky as Smelter Closes
    Oct 3, 1980 · The closure abruptly eliminated 1,000 jobs in Anaconda, but the troubles ran even deeper. The town elders figure that 78 percent of the jobs ...
  70. [70]
    From 1983: Montana's collapsed copper mining industry - YouTube
    Jul 30, 2021 · In western Montana, where copper was once king, shuttered mines in the 1980s left the people of Butte, Anaconda and Great Falls groping ...
  71. [71]
    Economic Impact of Environmental Regulations on the United States ...
    The first, has been the availability of sulfuric acid in the West as a consequence of air pollution control measures at the copper smelters smelting sulfides.
  72. [72]
    The Environmental Problems Caused by Mining | Earth.Org
    Apr 3, 2022 · There have been many documented instances of environmental pollution caused by mining operations, which are often caused by leakages of mining tailings.Missing: debate | Show results with:debate
  73. [73]
    WHEN ARCO LEFT TOWN - The New York Times
    Jul 25, 1982 · The Anaconda smelter, which stands at the town's entrance like a ... Few workers, however, successfully founds jobs through this service.
  74. [74]
    Role of Clean Air Act Requirements in Anaconda Copper ...
    When it was operating, the smelter achieved less than 30 percent control of S02 and was one of the largest sources of S02 emissions in the country. The smelter ...Missing: SO2 | Show results with:SO2
  75. [75]
    Anaconda In Utah - UtahRails.net
    Aug 12, 2024 · By 1983, the copper mine at Butte was closed, forcing the closure of the smelter at Anaconda, with the associated costs of environmental cleanup ...Overview · Timeline · Anaconda And Arco
  76. [76]
    Smelter history in brief - Anaconda - Montana Standard
    First smoke comes from Washoe Smelter's Big Stack. March 2, 1971 — Anaconda Co. announces $26 million construction program to ...Missing: 1917 | Show results with:1917
  77. [77]
    November 14, 1980: Anaconda: The smelter shuts down, and so ...
    November 14, 1980: Anaconda: The smelter shuts down, and so does the town. Citing antiquated equipment, pollution control problems and foreign competition, ...
  78. [78]
    In Landmark Agreement $83 Million Entered at Anaconda Smelter ...
    In 1977, Atlantic Richfield Company purchased the Anaconda Co. Smelter. Operations at Anaconda Smelter ceased in 1980 and the smelter facilities were ...Missing: chronology | Show results with:chronology
  79. [79]
    Anaconda Smelter: 30 years later - Montana Standard
    Sep 26, 2010 · Between 1,000 and 1,200 smelter workers woke up without jobs. Several hundred more were laid off in the coming year. Total employment in ...
  80. [80]
    Anaconda, Montana: a 'company town' that has lost the company
    Feb 13, 1981 · Smelter workers received severance pay of up to $3,500. Also, for the time being, their plight is eased by $100 a week supplemental benefits ...<|separator|>
  81. [81]
    ANACONDA CLOSING OPEN-PIT COPPER MINE AT BUTTE
    Apr 25, 1982 · The Anaconda Copper Company announced it was closing the Berkeley Pit at Butte, one of the world's largest open-pit copper mines.
  82. [82]
    Atlantic Richfield Company Agrees to Complete Multimillion-Dollar ...
    Sep 30, 2022 · The closure of smelting operations in 1980 left large volumes of smelter slag, flue dust and hazardous rock tailings that have had to be secured ...Missing: Stack | Show results with:Stack
  83. [83]
    Atlantic Richfield to pay over $21 million for past costs at Anaconda ...
    May 27, 2025 · The Montana District Court approved a past cost settlement with Atlantic Richfield to reimburse the EPA for over $21 million of its cleanup costs.
  84. [84]
    Feds, ARCO announce Anaconda smelter clean-up agreement
    Sep 30, 2022 · The settlement, which includes an estimated $83 million for future cleanup work, will address pollution left by a century of industrial copper production.Missing: impact | Show results with:impact
  85. [85]
    Seventh Five-Year Review of Anaconda Co. Smelter Superfund Site ...
    Oct 16, 2025 · The FYR found that the remedies implemented to date address smelter waste, contaminated soil, and dust in all five operable units (OUs) ...Missing: ATSDR bioaccumulation
  86. [86]
    County receives EPA funding for continued remediation work at ...
    Aug 14, 2024 · The funding will support the ongoing effort toward remediation at the superfund site, including coordination on the remedial design at OU-1 as ...
  87. [87]
    Anaconda Residents Show Typical Levels Of Lead, Arsenic, Health ...
    Nov 1, 2019 · ATSDR found that Anaconda residents, on average, actually had slightly lower inorganic arsenic levels than the rest of the U.S. population. But ...Missing: reduction | Show results with:reduction
  88. [88]
    Anaconda Smoke Stack State Park - Montana History Portal
    DescriptionHeralded as the tallest freestanding masonry structure in the world when it was completed in May 1919, the Washoe Stack measures 585 feet in height ...
  89. [89]
    Anaconda's famed smelter stack closed 45 years ago - KXLF.com
    Sep 29, 2025 · ANACONDA - The giant smelter stack that looms over the city of Anaconda was shutdown permanently 45 years ago forever changing the economy ...Missing: 1000 | Show results with:1000
  90. [90]
    Tourism or industry? A southwestern Montana town faces an ...
    Aug 29, 2025 · Copper baron Marcus Daly established Anaconda in 1883 to smelt ore mined in nearby Butte. The smelter closed in 1980, and the U.S. Environmental ...
  91. [91]
    UM Study Finds Deep Connections in Anaconda to Town's Smelter ...
    Mar 20, 2023 · UM graduate student Megan Moore's research on the Superfund cleanup around Anaconda soon focused on the town's long relationship with its smelter stack.