Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Anti-nuclear protests

Anti-nuclear protests encompass a diverse array of public demonstrations, civil disobedience, and advocacy campaigns worldwide opposing the production, testing, deployment, and use of nuclear weapons as well as the construction and operation of civilian nuclear power plants, motivated primarily by apprehensions regarding radiation hazards, potential catastrophic failures, environmental contamination, weapons proliferation, and moral objections to mass destruction capabilities. These actions emerged prominently in the post-World War II era, with initial organized efforts in the 1950s involving pacifists, scientists, and women's groups responding to atmospheric nuclear testing and the escalating arms race. The movements intensified in the late 1970s and 1980s, spurred by accidents such as the 1979 Three Mile Island partial meltdown in the United States and widespread fears of nuclear escalation during the , culminating in mass rallies like those organized by the in Europe and the in America. Protests achieved notable policy influences, including heightened regulatory scrutiny, public referendums leading to phase-outs in countries like and , and contributions to treaties curbing nuclear testing and proliferation. However, empirical assessments indicate that opposition to has delayed its expansion, resulting in sustained reliance on fossil fuels; for instance, historical generation from 1971 to 2009 averted approximately 1.84 million premature deaths from and 64 gigatonnes of CO2-equivalent emissions compared to fossil alternatives. Key characteristics include alliances with broader environmental and peace activism, tactical diversity from petitions to occupations, and regional variations—such as Japan's hibakusha-led opposition rooted in wartime bombings or Germany's anti-reactor occupations at sites like Wyhl and Brokdorf. Controversies persist over the movements' risk perceptions, as exhibits death rates per terawatt-hour orders of magnitude lower than or , challenging narratives that equate it with existential threats while overlooking causal trade-offs in energy substitution that exacerbate impacts and burdens from conventional pollutants.

Historical Origins

Early Opposition to Nuclear Testing (1940s-1960s)

The atomic bombings of on August 6, 1945, and on August 9, 1945, by the marked the inception of organized opposition to weapons, primarily through the pacifist efforts of Japanese survivors known as . These survivors, having endured immediate deaths of approximately 118,000 people and long-term radiation effects, formed the basis for anti- sentiment in , advocating for and the abolition of nuclear arms in post-war movements. Globally, the bombings echoed in early groups in the U.S. and , though protests remained limited until atmospheric testing intensified concerns over radioactive fallout. Atmospheric nuclear tests, peaking in the late with an annual average of 55 explosions from 1955 to 1989, generated empirical evidence of health risks from fallout, notably , a radioactive that mimics calcium and accumulates in bones via contaminated supplies. Detection of elevated levels in U.S. , such as eight times higher concentrations in samples by 1961 compared to other regions, fueled public alarm and scientific campaigns against testing. These data, while validating fallout dangers from weapons tests, were sometimes extended without distinction to nascent civilian applications, amplifying broader anti-nuclear fears. The March 1, 1954, U.S. hydrogen bomb test at , yielding 1,000 times the power of the bomb, exposed the Japanese fishing vessel to heavy fallout, sickening its 23 crew members and igniting Japan's first large-scale protests against U.S. testing in the Pacific. This incident, contaminating tuna catches and sparking petitions with millions of signatures, catalyzed the "Ban the Bomb" movement in and influenced global cultural fears of radiation. In the United Kingdom, the Campaign for Nuclear Disarmament (CND) formed in February 1958 following a public meeting at Westminster's Methodist Central Hall, organizing the inaugural Aldermaston March over Easter that year to protest British nuclear weapons development and fallout risks. Similarly, in the U.S., groups like the National Committee for a Sane Nuclear Policy (SANE), established in 1957 amid strontium-90 concerns, coordinated Hiroshima Day and Easter marches in New York from the late 1950s, drawing thousands to demand test bans. Women Strike for Peace, active by 1961, highlighted fallout in everyday items like milk, contributing to pressures that led to the 1963 Partial Test Ban Treaty limiting atmospheric, underwater, and space tests.

Emergence of Anti-Power Plant Activism (1970s)

The shift toward opposing civilian nuclear power plants in the 1970s marked a transition from earlier focus on weapons testing to concerns over commercial energy infrastructure, fueled by construction projects amid growing environmental awareness. In the United States, the Clamshell Alliance formed in 1976 specifically to block the in , employing nonviolent including site occupations that drew hundreds of participants in initial actions on August 1, 1976, and escalated to mass arrests. These tactics, inspired by broader environmental coalitions, served as a model for subsequent protests, emphasizing decentralized organization and against regulatory approvals for plants perceived to pose unresolved safety hazards. The paradoxically accelerated advocacy by governments seeking energy independence from fossil fuels, with U.S. policies under President Nixon promoting as a domestic , yet this heightened scrutiny of associated risks like disposal and potential from civilian fuel cycles. Protesters highlighted uncertainties in long-term and the dual-use potential of enrichment technologies, arguing these outweighed benefits despite official endorsements of . In parallel, emerging (IAEA) safety frameworks, initiated in 1974, aimed to standardize reactor designs and operational protocols, but early often invoked probabilistic meltdown scenarios—estimated at low frequencies like 1 in 10,000 reactor-years by some models—that lacked empirical validation from operational data at the time. Internationally, regulatory battles galvanized mobilization, as seen in the United Kingdom's 1977 Windscale Inquiry, where opposition to a proposed () delayed proceedings through petitions and demonstrations, expanding the discourse to encompass waste reprocessing hazards beyond initial power generation. In , heated parliamentary debates from the mid-1970s, triggered by the Centre Party's 1973 anti-nuclear stance, involved public campaigns and blockades against ongoing reactor builds, foreshadowing the 1980 referendum and underscoring tactics like mass petitions to influence policy amid the oil shock's push for alternatives. These efforts integrated opposition into nascent , prioritizing perceived long-term ecological threats over immediate energy needs.

Ideological Foundations and Motivations

Safety and Health Fears Versus Empirical Risk Data

Anti-nuclear protesters have frequently highlighted the of rare but severe accidents, such as meltdowns, portraying as inherently prone to catastrophic failures with widespread release and long-term consequences. These concerns often invoke probabilistic models assuming high-consequence outcomes from low-probability events, amplified by media coverage of incidents like and , despite historical data indicating meltdown frequencies around 1 in 3,700 reactor-years globally. In contrast, empirical assessments reveal nuclear energy's operational record surpasses that of fossil fuels, with zero fatalities from in Western commercial reactors over decades of operation. Quantitative comparisons of mortality rates underscore this discrepancy: nuclear power registers approximately 0.03 deaths per terawatt-hour (TWh), including accidents and , far below 's 24.6 deaths/TWh or oil's 18.4 deaths/TWh, and even competitive with renewables like (0.44 deaths/TWh).
Energy SourceDeaths per TWh
24.6
Oil18.4
2.8
4.6
1.3
0.04
0.44
0.03
Protesters' health fears often rely on the linear no-threshold (LNT) model, which extrapolates risks from high-dose exposures to predict cancers from any radiation level, citing and as evidence of latent epidemics. However, critiques of LNT highlight its inconsistency with radiobiological data suggesting thresholds or adaptive responses at low doses, and post-accident epidemiological studies provide limited empirical support for such projections. UNSCEAR assessments conclude no detectable increase in overall cancer incidence among Chernobyl-exposed populations beyond acute thyroid cases linked to , with psychological effects dominating long-term health burdens rather than radiation-induced malignancies. Similarly, for , UNSCEAR reports no adverse health effects attributable to among residents, despite initial LNT-based predictions. Concerns over nuclear waste as an "eternal" hazard overlook its compact volume—equivalent to a few kilograms per person served annually in the U.S.—compared to coal ash, which generates over 100 million tons yearly and contains higher concentrations of natural radionuclides like and . Geological repositories address containment: Finland's Onkalo facility, the world's first deep repository for spent fuel, completed key trials in 2025 and anticipates operations in the mid-2020s, demonstrating stable isolation for millennia based on site-specific hydrogeological data. These empirical outcomes challenge waste phobia by showing engineered solutions mitigate risks more effectively than unmanaged waste streams.

Environmental and Political Ideologies Driving the Movement

The anti-nuclear movement has been propelled by environmental ideologies rooted in anti-industrialism and deep ecology, which portray nuclear energy as an inherently disruptive and "unnatural" technology emblematic of modern technological hubris. Organizations such as the Sierra Club, which adopted opposition to nuclear power in the 1970s, framed it as incompatible with ecological harmony, prioritizing decentralized and low-tech alternatives despite nuclear's lifecycle greenhouse gas emissions being empirically low at approximately 12 gCO2eq/kWh compared to natural gas's 490 gCO2eq/kWh. Green anarchism, emerging in the late 20th century, further reinforced this by linking nuclear infrastructure to broader critiques of industrial civilization, advocating primitive or post-industrial lifestyles that reject large-scale energy systems altogether. Politically, the movement allied with pacifist and left-leaning coalitions that conflated civilian with weapons proliferation, arguing that reactors could yield bomb-grade and undermine global efforts—a view prominent in U.S. protests where activists targeted power plants alongside sites. This perspective often disregarded safeguards under the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT), established in 1970, which permits peaceful while imposing (IAEA) inspections to prevent diversion to weapons. Such framing positioned as a militaristic extension of capitalist , fostering alliances with broader anti-war and socialist groups that amplified symbolic opposition over technical distinctions between for and for armaments. Countervailing views from pro-nuclear environmentalists, including climate scientist James Hansen, contend that anti-nuclear ideologies have delayed the deployment of zero-carbon baseload power, thereby entrenching reliance on fossil fuels and hindering decarbonization transitions. Hansen has described the opposition as "truly insane" given nuclear's capacity to displace coal and gas at scale, arguing that ideological aversion to its industrial character—favoring intermittent renewables lacking equivalent reliability—prioritizes anti-modern symbolism over causal pathways to emission reductions. This critique highlights how movement-driven phase-outs, such as in Germany post-2011, correlated with increased coal use, underscoring a preference for narrative purity over empirical outcomes in energy policy.

Major Incidents Fueling Protests

Three Mile Island Accident (1979)

The occurred on March 28, 1979, at Unit 2 of the near Middletown, , when a failure in the non-nuclear secondary cooling system triggered an automatic reactor shutdown. A stuck-open in the primary system allowed excessive loss, leading to partial core melting and the formation of a bubble in the reactor vessel, which raised concerns about potential ignition but ultimately did not explode due to containment integrity. Operators, hampered by misleading and inadequate , delayed effective response, exacerbating the core damage that reached about half the fuel assemblies, though the reactor's safety features prevented a of the containment structure. Offsite radiation releases were minimal, with the (NRC) estimating average public doses below 1 millirem—far less than annual natural of 100-125 millirem—and no confirmed health effects from . Epidemiological studies, including mortality analyses and cancer incidence reviews conducted over decades, have found no discernible direct radiological harm to nearby populations, attributing any observed psychological distress primarily to evacuation uncertainties and media coverage rather than physical . No immediate deaths resulted, and the event's core damage was contained onsite, demonstrating the efficacy of U.S. reactor design redundancies in averting catastrophic release, in contrast to less robust systems elsewhere. The accident catalyzed a surge in anti-nuclear protests, with rallies at the plant site drawing hundreds in April 1979 and expanding to thousands nationwide by 1980, amplifying calls for moratoriums and influencing near-misses like California's Proposition 15 ballot initiative to phase out nuclear power. Media amplification, coinciding with the March 16, 1979, release of the film The China Syndrome—which depicted a fictional meltdown cover-up—intensified public fears of unchecked risks, despite the film's prescient but dramatized scenario predating the event by days and portraying outcomes far graver than TMI's contained partial melt. Stricter NRC regulations followed, mandating improved operator training, instrumentation upgrades, and emergency planning, which delayed or canceled over 100 planned U.S. reactor projects and contributed to a construction hiatus. Public trust eroded markedly, as Gallup polls post-accident showed two-thirds favoring cutbacks until enhanced safety measures, with opposition to new rising from prior levels amid perceptions of inherent vulnerability, even as empirical data underscored TMI's low actual harm relative to incidents like disasters. Critics contend this disconnect—where safety systems mitigated worst-case scenarios yet fueled enduring opposition—highlights perception's outsized role over risk data in shaping policy.

Chernobyl Disaster (1986)

The Chernobyl disaster occurred on April 26, 1986, at Unit 4 of the Chernobyl Nuclear Power Plant near Pripyat in the Ukrainian Soviet Socialist Republic, when a low-power safety test spiraled into catastrophe due to procedural violations by operators and critical flaws in the RBMK-1000 reactor design, including its positive void coefficient that amplified reactivity during coolant loss, culminating in a steam explosion, core destruction, and graphite fire. This released an estimated 5,200 petabecquerels of radioactivity, far exceeding initial Soviet disclosures, with fallout contaminating large swaths of Europe. Acute effects claimed 31 lives—two from the initial blast and 29 from among plant staff and first responders—while a 2005 assessment, drawing on epidemiological data from exposed populations, projected up to 4,000 excess cancer deaths over decades, mainly treatable thyroid cases linked to , refuting early activist projections of tens or hundreds of thousands of fatalities. Soviet secrecy exacerbated outcomes: authorities suppressed information for 36 hours, delaying evacuations beyond Pripyat's 49,000 residents until May 1 and hindering global response; Sweden's detection of elevated cesium-137 at Forsmark on forced a partial USSR admission the next day. The incident galvanized anti-nuclear activism worldwide, particularly in Western Europe where transboundary fallout—detected as far as the UK—fueled perceptions of systemic nuclear peril, prompting mass marches and calls for shutdowns that often conflated RBMK-specific vulnerabilities, such as the absence of a full containment dome and graphite's combustibility, with universal risks. In Italy, Chernobyl's shadow directly spurred a November 1987 referendum abolishing nuclear power generation, following widespread public mobilization against resumption plans. Similar unrest swept Germany and beyond, amplifying demands for energy moratoriums despite Western light-water reactors' negative void coefficients and robust containments, which analyses indicate would have largely confined any analogous excursion. The crisis also catalyzed IAEA-led reforms, including the 1986 Convention on Early Notification of a Nuclear Accident and the Convention on Assistance in the Case of a Nuclear Accident or Radiological Emergency, mandating prompt reporting and mutual aid to avert secrecy-driven escalations.

Fukushima Daiichi Meltdown (2011)

On March 11, 2011, a magnitude 9.0 earthquake off Japan's Tōhoku coast triggered a tsunami exceeding 14 meters in height that inundated the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station, disabling backup diesel generators and cooling systems for reactors 1, 2, and 3. This led to core meltdowns in those units, hydrogen explosions that breached containment structures, and releases of radioactive isotopes including cesium-137 and iodine-131 into the environment. Despite the accident's severity—classified as Level 7 on the International Nuclear Event Scale—no personnel died from acute radiation syndrome, and the United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation (UNSCEAR) concluded in its 2013 report that radiation exposures produced no detectable increases in cancer rates or other health effects among exposed populations. The crisis amplified public fears, sparking widespread anti-nuclear protests in , with marches in drawing up to 60,000 participants by September 2011, the largest since the accident. These demonstrations, fueled by media portrayals of an unfolding apocalypse, pressured to abandon nuclear expansion plans and pledge a complete phase-out of atomic power by the , a policy shift that halted restarts of idled reactors and accelerated reliance on fossil fuels. Globally, the event influenced decisions in countries like , where expedited a nuclear exit, and , reinforcing opposition to new plants despite Japan's case stemming from an unprecedented rather than design flaws. Empirical data underscores the disconnect between perceived and actual risks: while zero deaths resulted from radiation, evacuation orders contributed to over 1,600 excess fatalities from stress, disrupted medical care, and suicides among the displaced, primarily elderly evacuees. This contrasts sharply with ongoing coal combustion in , which caused approximately 366,000 premature deaths from in 2013 alone, highlighting how anti-nuclear campaigns often overlook comparative hazards from alternative energy sources. In response, regulators worldwide implemented enhancements like the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission's FLEX , deploying portable pumps, generators, and hoses to enable flexible mitigation of prolonged station blackouts and floods, demonstrating adaptability to extreme events without necessitating plant shutdowns.

Movements by Region

Europe

Anti-nuclear protests in intensified during the , coinciding with the construction of plants across the continent, as local groups mobilized against perceived risks of accidents, , and environmental contamination. These movements often involved occupations, blockades, and large-scale demonstrations, influencing policy in several nations despite empirical data showing 's relatively low operational risk compared to alternatives like . By the 1980s, events such as the amplified public opposition, leading to referendums and phase-out commitments in countries including and .

Germany: Path to Nuclear Phase-Out

In , anti-nuclear activism emerged in the early 1970s with protests against planned reactors, exemplified by the 1975 occupation at Wyhl, where citizens successfully halted construction through sustained involving thousands. The movement grew post-Chernobyl in 1986, with recurring blockades of nuclear waste transports to sites like Gorleben, drawing up to 100,000 participants in some demonstrations. Political pressure culminated in the 2000 phase-out agreement under the Social Democrats and Greens, which extended reactor lifespans but set an end date; this was briefly reversed in 2010 before reinstatement in 2011 following , shutting eight reactors immediately and closing the last three on , 2023.

France: Contests Against Dominant Nuclear Sector

France, reliant on for over 70% of , faced persistent but smaller-scale protests against its expansive program, including a January 2004 march of up to 15,000 in opposing the European Pressurized Reactor () due to cost overruns and safety doubts. Groups like Sortir du nucléaire organized actions at sites such as Flamanville, where thousands demonstrated in 2016 against EPR construction delays and incidents. Despite opposition, policy has favored expansion, with protests highlighting issues like but failing to alter the state's pro-nuclear stance, as evidenced by ongoing EPR projects amid public polls showing over 80% against new builds in some surveys.

United Kingdom: Campaigns Against Siting and Expansion

In the UK, campaigns targeted facilities like and Sizewell, with 1980s protests against Sizewell B drawing thousands amid concerns over coastal siting and seismic risks. Recent opposition to Sizewell C, a proposed £20 billion project, saw about 200 march in 2022, focusing on environmental impacts and taxpayer funding. The (CND), while primarily weapons-focused, intersected with power opposition, advocating against new reactors as unsafe and uneconomic.

Other European Cases (Sweden, Switzerland, Italy)

's 1980 referendum, with 54% favoring phase-out, stemmed from 1970s protests and led to a 1990 policy reversal but eventual 2010 commitment to close reactors by 2020, later extended. Italy's 1987 , post-Chernobyl, banned with 80% support, halting restarts attempted in the 2000s. experienced multiple , approving a 10-year moratorium in 1990 and a 2017 phase-out, though recent 2025 proposals seek to lift new-build bans amid debates.

Germany: Path to Nuclear Phase-Out

The gained momentum in the 1970s with the occupation of the proposed Wyhl nuclear power plant site from February 1974 to March 1977, where local farmers, vintners, and activists halted construction through sustained and legal challenges, marking a pivotal victory that inspired broader opposition. This event exemplified the strategy of Bürgerinitiativen (citizens' initiatives), which combined with judicial appeals to block projects amid concerns over safety and environmental risks. The , formed in 1980 partly from anti-nuclear activism, amplified protests through mass rallies in the 1980s, such as those against the Brokdorf plant, influencing and policy by framing as incompatible with ecological . By the , sustained demonstrations, including Castor transport blockades to storage sites like Gorleben, pressured the Social Democratic-Green coalition to enact the 2002 phase-out law, committing to reactor closures by 2022. The 2011 Fukushima disaster prompted Chancellor Angela Merkel's government to accelerate the , shutting seven reactors immediately and scheduling the remainder for 2022, a decision driven by heightened fears despite no direct radiological impact on . This policy culminated in the deactivation of the final three reactors—Emsland, 2, and Neckarwestheim 2—on April 15, 2023, ending commercial generation after decades of advocacy. The phase-out exposed energy vulnerabilities, particularly after Russia's 2022 invasion of disrupted gas supplies, forcing reliance on reactivation and LNG imports; -fired generation rose sharply, comprising 34% of electricity in 2022 compared to 26% pre-crisis, as 's low-carbon baseload was absent. While total CO2 emissions declined 4.7% in 2022 due to reduced activity, power sector emissions increased by approximately 9% from substitution for gas, undermining decarbonization goals and highlighting causal trade-offs of forgoing dispatchable capacity. Economic analyses estimate costs exceeding €500 billion by 2025, including grid expansions, subsidies, and stranded nuclear assets, with consumer electricity prices rising over 50% since due to renewable levies and fossil backups, per federal data and independent studies. Small-scale protests in 2022-2023 opposed brief reactor life extensions amid the crisis, reflecting entrenched anti-nuclear sentiment despite empirical evidence of heightened fossil dependence and supply risks.

France: Contests Against Dominant Nuclear Sector

maintains the world's highest share of nuclear-generated , at approximately 70% as of 2023, primarily through the state-controlled utility EDF. This dominance, rooted in post-oil crisis policies from the , has consistently faced anti-nuclear opposition focused on , , and perceived risks, yet protests have yielded limited policy reversals due to sustained public backing and empirical advantages in reliability and emissions. Early contests emerged against the fast project in the , culminating in a major 1977 protest at Creys-Malville where thousands gathered, leading to clashes with authorities and highlighting transnational activist networks. Despite such mobilizations, the reactor proceeded to operation in 1986 before technical and economic issues prompted its 1997 decommissioning, underscoring that opposition influenced delays but not outright cancellation amid broader nuclear expansion. In the 2010s, campaigns targeted the aging Fessenheim plant, with the Stop Fessenheim group amassing over 63,000 petition signatures by 2011 to demand closure citing seismic vulnerabilities near the . The facility shut down in 2020 following a 2012 political pledge by then-candidate , marking a rare concession, though subsequent analysis revealed no major incidents and emphasized its role in baseload stability. Recent flares, including 2022-2023 public debates on EPR2 reactor deployments delayed to 2035-2038, have seen environmental groups protest construction overruns and implications, yet EDF advanced plans for six new units. Demonstrations often invoke risks, as in ongoing Bure site opposition involving thousands in 2025 rallies against deep geological repositories. Concerns over have historically centered on past testing proposals rather than current , with no active plans there. Protests' limited sway reflects strong empirical outcomes: France's emits about 45 gCO2/kWh, far below Germany's 300 gCO2/kWh post-phaseout, enabling exports and averting shortages during 2022-2023 volatility. Nuclear lifecycle emissions stand at 3.7 gCO2eq/kWh per EDF assessments. bolsters continuity, with 75% favoring nuclear in a 2022 IFOP poll, prioritizing over activist narratives. This pro-nuclear culture, unlike Germany's ideological pivot, sustains output despite localized resistance.

United Kingdom: Campaigns Against Siting and Expansion

In the and , campaigns against the in , , involved direct actions including site occupations in 1978 and 1980-1981, as well as a attended by over 10,000 people in May 1979. These efforts, led by groups like (Scottish Campaign to Resist the Atomic Menace), sought to halt construction of the plant but ultimately failed, with the station entering operation in 1988 and 1996 for its two units. Opposition to the Sizewell B in during the 1980s prompted a lasting from 1982 to 1987, which approved construction despite environmental and safety concerns raised by protesters. More recently, campaigns against Sizewell C, a proposed twin-reactor project, have included marches of about 200 participants in May 2022 and 300 in June 2025, focusing on impacts to the Suffolk Coast and Heaths . Groups such as Together Against Sizewell C (TASC) and Stop Sizewell C argue the £20-40 billion project threatens local ecosystems and heritage sites, though approvals proceeded in 2022 and 2024. Protests against C in , planned as a 3.2 GW facility, featured a by over 200 demonstrators from the Stop New Nuclear alliance, including (CND)-linked groups, in October 2011. Further marches, such as one with 150 participants in in October 2011, highlighted cost overruns and seismic risks, contributing to regulatory scrutiny but not cancellation, with construction starting in 2018. Despite ongoing local opposition, policy under both Conservative and governments has prioritized nuclear expansion for and , targeting 24 GW of capacity by 2050—quadrupling current levels—to supply about 25% of . Protests have influenced timelines, with C delayed to 2029-2031 and costs rising to £46 billion, and Sizewell C estimates doubling to £40 billion since 2020, adding billions in overruns amid and regulatory hurdles. These delays contrast with nuclear's historical role in low-carbon generation, where it provided up to 25% of in the late before fleet aging reduced output, underscoring protests' focus on perceived risks over dispatchable baseload benefits.

Other European Cases (Sweden, Switzerland, Italy)

In , anti-nuclear sentiment peaked following the 1979 , culminating in a , 1980, advisory where voters faced three phase-out options lacking any pro-nuclear alternative; options two and three, favoring completion of reactors under construction and operation of planned units before gradual shutdown, garnered a combined 77.6% support, with option three narrowly leading at 39.1%. Despite this, expanded to six operational reactors by the 1990s, supplying about 40% of at low cost and high reliability, prompting parliament to abandon the 2010 phase-out target in 2009 amid rising energy demands and renewable issues. Recent policy shifts, including 2024 plans for up to ten new reactors by 2045, reflect empirical recognition of nuclear's role in decarbonization, overriding earlier voter-driven moratoriums that ignored safety data from decades of incident-free operation. Switzerland's nuclear opposition, amplified by the 2011 Fukushima disaster, led to a 2016 popular initiative for an "orderly withdrawal" from , which voters rejected on November 27, 2017, by a 54.2% to 45.8% margin, affirming confidence in existing plants despite campaigns highlighting and aging risks. The 2011 parliamentary decision for gradual phase-out without new builds has constrained capacity, with providing 36% of electricity from five reactors as of 2023, but prompted 2024 Federal Council proposals to repeal the construction ban, citing geopolitical energy vulnerabilities and climate targets unmet by renewables alone. This reversal underscores how initial public fears, unmitigated by post-Fukushima safety upgrades like enhanced seismic designs, slowed infrastructure renewal, contrasting expert assessments of 's dispatchable low-carbon output. Italy's 1987 referendum, held May 8-9 amid Chernobyl-induced panic, saw 79.5% of 65% turnout approve abrogating laws authorizing new nuclear plants and foreign builds, effectively halting a nascent program after plants like Caorso were shuttered. The ban persisted through a failed 2009-2011 revival attempt quashed by another Fukushima-tied vote, exacerbating import dependence and costs estimated at €50 billion annually in fossil fuels by 2020. By 2024, under Giorgia Meloni's administration, endorsed nuclear's reintegration via small modular reactors (SMRs) for decarbonization, with draft regulations slated for early 2025 to enable advanced technologies addressing seismic vulnerabilities through passive safety systems—challenging voter overrides of engineering mitigations that had deemed risks manageable pre-1987.

North America

United States: Key Alliances and Blockades

The anti-nuclear movement in the United States gained momentum in the 1970s through grassroots alliances employing nonviolent direct action, including occupations and blockades, to oppose nuclear power plant construction. These efforts were catalyzed by concerns over safety risks, environmental impacts, and waste management following incidents like Three Mile Island, though protesters emphasized halting specific projects via civil disobedience. The Clamshell Alliance, formed in 1976 in , targeted the , organizing training in nonviolent tactics for participants from across . On April 30, 1977, over 2,000 demonstrators occupied the construction site, leading to 1,414 arrests and drawing national attention to the alliance's strategy of mass to delay operations. Subsequent actions, including a 1978 occupation, reinforced the group's influence, contributing to prolonged regulatory scrutiny and cost overruns for the project, though the plant eventually operated. In , the Abalone Alliance, established around 1977, focused on the , coordinating blockades and occupations between 1977 and 1984 to prevent fuel loading and operations. A pivotal two-week in 1981 involved nearly 2,000 arrests and drew over 10,000 participants, highlighting alliances between environmentalists, feminists, and local communities in using affinity groups for decentralized action. These protests exposed construction flaws, such as faulty seismic studies, delaying the plant's startup until 1985 and influencing broader public skepticism toward nuclear expansion. Broader coalitions in the , including the , shifted focus to weapons proliferation, with protests at missile sites in states like and emphasizing through petitions and site actions. While these alliances achieved partial successes in policy debates, such as talks, nuclear construction largely stalled due to combined regulatory, economic, and public resistance factors.

Canada: Limited but Persistent Opposition

Anti-nuclear opposition in Canada has centered on nuclear testing, weapons deployment, and waste storage rather than widespread power plant blockades, reflecting the country's role as a uranium supplier and ally with limited domestic reactors. Early efforts in the included marches against atmospheric testing, such as a 1960 demonstration by 150 participants advocating . A notable campaign from 1969 to 1971 opposed U.S. underground tests on Island, , organized by the Society for Pollution and Environmental Control through protests and the voyage of the ship Phyllis Cormack, which inspired the founding of and heightened cross-border activism. In the 1980s, large rallies against nuclear arms drew up to 100,000 in in 1984, pressuring local policies like the city's 1983 nuclear weapon-free zone declaration. Persistent resistance to has involved critiques of safety, costs, and impacts, with groups opposing projects like small modular reactors in 2020 and a proposed dump near in 2024, citing inadequate consultation and environmental risks on unceded territories. These efforts, often allied with environmental and organizations, have influenced federal reviews but not halted expansion plans, underscoring a pattern of advocacy through legal challenges and public campaigns rather than mass .

United States: Key Alliances and Blockades

The Abalone Alliance, a coalition of environmental and anti-nuclear groups in , coordinated non-violent and occupations at the Diablo Canyon site from 1977 to 1982, aiming to prevent construction and operation amid seismic and safety concerns. In June 1981, the alliance's two-week resulted in 1,907 arrests—the largest action against a nuclear facility in history—disrupting access and drawing national attention to regulatory flaws, including a transposed safety analysis that delayed licensing until 1985. On , , local residents and activists formed alliances opposing the , culminating in a June 3, 1979, of 15,000 participants that breached fences and led to 600 arrests, the largest such in the region's history. Sustained direct actions, combined with evacuation plan disputes, stalled full operation despite the plant's $6 billion completion in 1989, forcing its decommissioning as a power generator by 1994 after state intervention deemed it uneconomical and unsafe. The Shad Alliance united Valley groups with activists to blockade and litigate against units, citing terrorism vulnerabilities and seismic risks; decades of occupations, rallies, and NRC interventions contributed to Unit 2's closure in 2020 and Unit 3's in 2021, without federal mandates but through state-backed regulatory pressures. Opposition to the proposed in involved tribal alliances and direct actions, including Mother's Day protests since the 1980s and a March 1988 with 1,200 arrests near the , leveraging legal and political blockades to halt licensing despite federal selection in 2002, as seismic and risks prompted indefinite suspension by 2010. These site-specific tactics, often exceeding 1,000 arrests per major event, fostered NRC caution through safety reviews and delays, contributing to over 60 reactor order cancellations from 1975 to 1979 alone following heightened scrutiny post-Three Mile Island, with real construction costs rising from under $2,000 per kilowatt in the early to over $10,000 by the mid-1980s due to added regulations and overruns.

Canada: Limited but Persistent Opposition

In Canada, opposition to nuclear power has remained limited in scale compared to the , with 19 operational CANDU reactors contributing about 15% of the country's electricity, primarily in . Protests have focused on environmental risks to the from plants like Pickering and , as well as nuclear waste management, yet these facilities have operated for over 50 years without core damage accidents or significant radiation releases beyond design limits, underscoring a strong safety record unmatched in the global industry. This persistence of low-intensity reflects a context of stable operations and government support for nuclear as a low-emission baseload source, rather than widespread mobilization. Early protests emerged in the against expansions of the CANDU program, including opposition to the construction and operation of Pickering Generating Station Units 1-4, which began commissioning in 1971. Groups criticized impacts and potential hazards from heavy-water reactors near densely populated areas bordering , though demonstrations were smaller and less disruptive than contemporaneous U.S. actions at sites like Diablo Canyon. These efforts, often tied to broader and environmental campaigns, failed to halt development, as federal policy prioritized CANDU exports—12 units sold internationally by the —to bolster economic and ties. In the 2010s, demonstrations intensified around waste storage at , including on-site dry storage facilities for used fuel, with activists highlighting long-term containment risks to and lands. communities, particularly nations, have led persistent opposition to proposed deep geological repositories in northwestern and , citing inadequate consultation and threats to treaty rights and water sources; rallies in 2024 drew hundreds protesting sites near and Teeswater. Despite such actions, federal and provincial policies continue endorsing , including 2024 approvals for small modular reactors (SMRs) at to support exports and net-zero goals, with investments exceeding CAD 300 million in CANDU modernization. Critics, including environmental NGOs, argue SMRs exacerbate waste volumes without proven cost advantages, but public support for remains higher than in many peer nations.

Asia-Pacific

Japan: From Hibakusha Legacy to Post-Fukushima Mobilization

The anti-nuclear movement in Japan originated with hibakusha, survivors of the 1945 atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, who formed organizations advocating for nuclear disarmament and peace. Led by figures including the mayors of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, these groups influenced global nuclear abolition efforts through annual commemorations and international campaigns. The 2011 Fukushima Daiichi nuclear disaster, triggered by a tsunami, catalyzed unprecedented mobilization against nuclear power. Tens of thousands protested in Tokyo shortly after, with a March 2011 rally drawing 20,000 participants demanding an end to nuclear energy. Subsequent demonstrations, including a September 2011 event with 60,000 attendees chanting "Sayonara nuclear power," pressured the government to phase out reactors, though restarts occurred amid energy shortages. Academic analyses highlight how networks of activists, including long-standing anti-nuclear groups and new environmental advocates, sustained pressure through policy advocacy and public rallies.

India, South Korea, and Taiwan: Resistance to Expansion

In , protests against the in intensified from 2011, led by the People's Movement Against Nuclear Energy, focusing on safety risks and coastal ecology. Demonstrations involved thousands, including women-led sit-ins at Idinthakarai village, resulting in police actions and charges against nearly 9,000 participants by 2021. Despite suppression, local fisherfolk and farmers continued opposition, delaying but not halting construction. Similar resistance occurred at Jaitapur, where collectives contested expansion plans citing seismic vulnerabilities. South Korea's anti-nuclear efforts targeted power plant construction and waste storage, with early successes in blocking sites during the and through community protests. Opposition persisted against expansion, emphasizing accident risks and seismic concerns, though policy reversals under conservative governments promoted nuclear revival. Activists linked these campaigns to broader , critiquing nuclear reliance amid fossil fuel alternatives. Taiwan's movement contributed to a 2025 nuclear phase-out policy, yet faced backlash via an August 2025 referendum on restarting the Maanshan (Third) Nuclear Power Plant. While 74.2% favored extension absent safety issues, the vote failed due to insufficient turnout below 25% of eligible voters. Anti-nuclear groups rallied in Taipei against revival, citing earthquake risks and waste management failures, reinforcing commitments to renewables despite energy security debates.

Australia, New Zealand, and Pacific Islands: Testing and Waste Protests

's anti-nuclear protests from the 1970s focused on , with urban campaigns and Indigenous-led blockades halting projects like Jabiluka by the . Grassroots groups in cities like mobilized against exports and reactors, preventing new developments despite existing mines. New Zealand achieved a in 1987 via legislation banning nuclear-armed or powered vessels, rooted in 1970s protests against French testing at Mururoa and U.S. warship visits. The 1985 Rainbow Warrior bombing by French agents galvanized public support, embedding the policy in and influencing Pacific-wide advocacy. In Pacific Islands, Marshallese communities protested U.S. testing at and Enewetak atolls (1946–1958), involving 67 detonations that displaced residents and caused radiological harm, prompting evacuations like Rongelap in 1980s via actions. French Polynesian opposition to 193 Mururoa tests (1966–1996) included regional flotillas and independence movements decrying environmental devastation.

Japan: From Hibakusha Legacy to Post-Fukushima Mobilization

The hibakusha, survivors of the 1945 atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, have profoundly shaped Japan's anti-nuclear ethos, channeling personal trauma into advocacy against nuclear weapons and, by extension, nuclear energy. Numbering around 650,000 recognized survivors as of recent counts, hibakusha organizations like Nihon Hidankyo have campaigned globally for disarmament, emphasizing the humanitarian horrors of radiation and influencing domestic wariness toward nuclear technologies. This legacy fostered a cultural aversion to plutonium-based programs, evident in protests against the Monju fast-breeder reactor, which faced repeated halts due to accidents and opposition from peace groups linking it to weapons proliferation risks. Prior to 2011, Japan's simmered amid rapid nuclear expansion, with 54 reactors operational by 2010 supplying about 30% of electricity. Opposition focused on safety in a seismically active nation and reprocessing plans, but lacked mass mobilization until the March 11, 2011, triggered the Daiichi meltdowns. Protests erupted immediately, with 15,000 demonstrating in Tokyo's Kōenji district by and swelling to 60,000 by September, chanting "Sayonara power" and pressuring the government. This surge, the largest since the 1960 , contributed to the shutdown of all reactors by May 2012 for safety reviews, idling the entire fleet despite prior reliance on for . Empirically, the caused no direct deaths among the public, with exposures far below lethal levels, but evacuation of over 160,000 people led to approximately 2,300 indirect fatalities from stress, disrupted healthcare, and relocation hardships, exceeding projected cancer risks from by orders of magnitude. Shutdowns spiked imports by 58% in the following three years, costing $270 billion, and elevated CO2 emissions as and LNG filled the gap, rising until renewables and efficiency gains moderated the trend post-2013. Restarts began tentatively in 2015, with 10 reactors operational by late 2022, reducing LNG imports, but faced persistent, though diminished, protests. In December 2023, regulators lifted a ban on the Kashiwazaki-Kariwa plant's units 6 and 7—the world's largest by capacity—prompting local demonstrations and accusations of over TEPCO's $654 million resident subsidies. By 2023 surveys, 51% favored restarts amid crises, reflecting debates over seismic risks versus emission reductions, with smaller-scale actions continuing against plans to maximize utilization.

India, South Korea, and Taiwan: Resistance to Expansion

In , anti-nuclear protests have faced robust state suppression amid priorities for energy expansion to support . The 2011-2012 demonstrations against the in drew thousands, resulting in over 200 arrests during clashes with police, alongside broader charges against nearly 9,000 individuals, including . Despite such opposition, which delayed commissioning by years and contributed to construction timelines stretching over three decades for the two 1,000 MW units, operates 22 nuclear reactors as of 2024, with plans for further buildup to meet baseload demands. supplies only about 3% of total , leaving heavy reliance on , which accounted for 72% in recent years and exacerbated emissions amid stalled low-carbon alternatives. South Korea's resistance to expansion intensified post-Fukushima in 2011 and following the 2016 Gyeongju earthquake, which heightened safety concerns near plants like Wolsong, prompting weekly protests over risks and . Environmental groups rallied against restarts and new builds, leading to temporary halts such as the three-month suspension of Shin Kori 5 and 6 in 2017 amid public debate. Yet, needs prevailed, with resuming under policy shifts favoring for stable baseload over intermittent renewables, reversing earlier phase-out pledges and advancing secretive projects to sustain 30%+ share in electricity. Taiwan exemplifies amplified dissent constraining expansion, particularly against the Lungmen (Fourth) Nuclear Power Plant, where post-Fukushima protests in 2011-2014, including clashes with police using water cannons, stalled the 2,600 MW advanced boiling water reactors project. Construction halted in 2014, with Unit 1 mothballed after pre-operational checks, despite initial bipartisan support for energy diversification; subsequent referendums, including a narrow 2021 defeat for revival, reflected persistent opposition tied to seismic risks in the earthquake-prone region. This resistance has limited nuclear capacity to under 10% of the mix, pushing greater dependence on and gas imports, undermining baseload stability amid growth imperatives.

Australia, New Zealand, and Pacific Islands: Testing and Waste Protests

nuclear testing at in the from 1946 to 1958 involved 23 detonations, leading to the permanent displacement of approximately 167 indigenous inhabitants who were relocated without adequate compensation or return provisions. The tests, including the 15-megaton detonation on , caused widespread , health issues such as increased cancer rates among exposed populations, and ongoing environmental damage that persists in Pacific Island communities. These events spurred early protests by affected islanders, including a 1954 petition to the highlighting health and displacement harms. In , British nuclear tests at between 1952 and 1963, comprising seven major detonations and numerous minor trials, contaminated vast areas of South Australian land with and other radionuclides, affecting local Aboriginal populations through exposure and restricted land access. An initial cleanup in 1967 buried waste but failed to address widespread contamination, as revealed by surveys prompting a more comprehensive remediation from 1999 to 2000 costing over $100 million, primarily funded by . Protests emerged from Aboriginal groups and anti-nuclear activists in the and beyond, demanding compensation and full site rehabilitation due to documented health impacts like elevated rates among test participants and downwind communities. New Zealand's opposition intensified against French atmospheric tests at Moruroa Atoll, culminating in the July 10, 1985, bombing of the vessel Rainbow Warrior in harbor by French intelligence agents, killing photographer and halting a planned protest flotilla. This incident galvanized public support, contributing to New Zealand's 1987 nuclear-free legislation banning nuclear-powered or armed vessels, and fueled regional activism against testing that displaced Polynesian communities and released fallout across the Pacific. These grievances led to the , signed on August 6, 1985, establishing the South Pacific Nuclear Free Zone by prohibiting , and dumping among signatories including , , and Pacific Island states. Waste opposition persisted, with Pacific communities protesting proposals like Japan's planned ocean discharge of Fukushima-treated water starting in 2023, citing risks to fisheries and echoes of historical dumping fears despite IAEA endorsements of safety. In the 2020s, the pact—announcing Australia's acquisition of nuclear-powered submarines from the and in 2021—provoked protests in and concerns in over potential violations of the Rarotonga Treaty's spirit, including fears of nuclear waste storage at sites like . Demonstrations occurred in ports such as in September 2025 and Port Kembla, led by unions and anti-nuclear coalitions opposing base developments amid unresolved testing legacies.

Other Regions

In the Soviet Union, anti-nuclear dissent was largely suppressed under the state's authoritarian control, with public criticism of nuclear programs curtailed by censorship and KGB oversight prior to the Chernobyl disaster on April 26, 1986. The initial government cover-up of the accident, including delayed evacuation of Pripyat's 30,000 residents until April 27 and continuation of May Day parades in Kyiv amid radiation exposure, exemplified this suppression, fostering underground resentment rather than open protests. Chernobyl's aftermath mobilized approximately 600,000 liquidators for cleanup from 1986 to 1990, many of whom later protested for unfulfilled benefits and compensation, such as a 2000 march by nearly 100 liquidators to Moscow's Red Square. In peripheral republics, dissent surfaced more visibly; Kazakhstan's Nevada-Semipalatinsk movement, launched in 1989 amid revelations of contamination from over 450 Soviet tests since 1949, organized rallies that pressured the 1991 shutdown of the site. These efforts highlighted systemic risks but achieved limited policy shifts within the USSR, contributing indirectly to eroded trust in leadership and the state's 1991 dissolution. Post-Soviet saw sporadic anti-nuclear actions, often met with intervention, as in the breakup of a commemoration of Chernobyl's 20th anniversary in . Protests targeted specific projects, such as opposition to the Rostov and plants, but remained fragmented and ineffective against state-backed nuclear expansion, reflecting ongoing constraints on . In the Global South, the exemplified robust anti-nuclear mobilization against the (BNPP), constructed under but never operational due to safety and corruption concerns. From October 1983 to April , campaigns by groups like the Nuclear-Free Philippines Coalition involved marches, rallies peaking at 33,000 participants on June 20, 1985, strikes such as the three-day "Welgang Bayan Laban sa Plantang Nukleyar" in June 1985, and effigy burnings, linking nuclear opposition to anti-imperialist sentiments against U.S. bases. These efforts culminated in Corazon Aquino's postponement of the BNPP and a 1987 constitutional ban on nuclear weapons and power, with U.S. bases removed by 1992. The , an outlier in for its scale of mobilization, featured the November 21, 1981, peace demonstration in drawing hundreds of thousands against NATO deployments amid the "Hollanditis" wave, pressuring policy debates on arms though not halting deployments. Recent actions, like the May 17, 2025, nationwide campaign across 15 cities by WISE highlighting costs, underscore persistent opposition.

Soviet Union/Russia: Suppressed Dissent and Chernobyl Aftermath

In the prior to the 1986 disaster, opposition to facilities manifested primarily through underground channels rather than organized public protests, constrained by state censorship and the risk of severe reprisals. Informal networks, including scientists and local residents near plants, voiced concerns about and health risks via publications and private correspondence, but these efforts remained fragmented and largely undetected by authorities. For instance, early critiques highlighted from plutonium production sites in the Urals, yet no large-scale demonstrations occurred due to the regime's monopoly on information and suppression of dissent. The accident on April 26, 1986, exposed systemic flaws in Soviet operations, including the reactor's graphite-moderated design lacking robust , which exacerbated the explosion and radioactive release from a flawed safety test. Initial secrecy delayed public awareness, but Mikhail Gorbachev's policy permitted limited revelations, enabling small rallies in and by late 1986, where thousands demanded transparency and evacuation expansions. These gatherings, numbering in the low thousands, marked rare public challenges to policy, though they were curtailed by ongoing state control and focused more on immediate cleanup than broader anti- mobilization. Empirical attributes Chernobyl's severity to specific Soviet shortcuts and operator violations, not inherent risks, as evidenced by the absence of comparable incidents in pressurized reactors. Post-Soviet Russia saw sporadic, small-scale anti-nuclear actions, often targeting waste imports and storage amid Rosatom's expansion plans. In March 2009, environmental groups protested the arrival of tails from in , decrying Russia's role as a global dump site despite domestic opposition. By November 2010, approximately 7,000 demonstrators blocked a waste shipment to a Siberian facility, leading to police intervention after two days. Groups like the Russian Socio-Ecological Union organized camps and petitions against projects such as the Rostov plant, but participation rarely exceeded hundreds, reflecting regime labeling of activists as extremists and legal crackdowns, including 2017 arrests for exposing mishandling. These efforts achieved minor delays but paled against Western scales, underscoring how authoritarian oversight limited mobilization while state secrecy perpetuated unaddressed risks like legacy vulnerabilities.

Global South Examples (Philippines, Netherlands as outliers)

In the , opposition to nuclear power crystallized in the late 1970s against the (BNPP), a 620-megawatt facility whose construction began in June 1976 under President at a cost exceeding $2.3 billion. campaigns, initiated by organizations like the Citizens' Alliance for in , mobilized public sentiment by highlighting seismic risks near the plant—located 100 kilometers from on a fault line—and alleged corruption in contracts awarded to U.S. firm . These efforts intersected with anti-dictatorship activism, culminating in intensified protests from 1983 to 1986 that linked BNPP opposition to demands for removing U.S. bases, pressuring the government amid the regime's declarations. Following the 1986 , President ordered the plant's decommissioning in 1988, citing post-Chernobyl safety fears and financial irregularities, though it stood 85% complete and idle thereafter. The BNPP's non-operation contributed to severe energy deficits, including nationwide 8- to 12-hour rolling blackouts and power rationing from to 1993, which disrupted industries and households reliant on imported fuels amid insufficient baseload . In a developing with rapid and limited grid , such protests amplified vulnerabilities, as alternatives like and imports proved volatile and emission-intensive, perpetuating outages that cost billions in lost productivity without nuclear's dispatchable output. Sporadic modern activism, such as ' November 2024 silent protest at an international nuclear forum decrying "true costs" of , underscores persistent resistance even as government feasibility studies for revival proceed, potentially prolonging reliance on costlier, less reliable sources. The serves as a developed-world with analogous but contained anti-nuclear agitation, exemplified by 1980s occupations at the Borssele nuclear plant in , operational since 1973. On March 16, 1980, over 150 activists from the "Break the Netherlands Atomic Chain" group padlocked all seven plant gates, blocking personnel and supplies in a nonviolent to proliferation risks and potential, amid national debates over NATO-linked nuclear deployments. Similar episodic actions targeted closures at plants like Dodewaard, drawing thousands but resolving swiftly through legal interventions and policy compromises, with Borssele enduring as one of Europe's few remaining reactors despite the fervor. Unlike in resource-constrained Global South contexts, these s yielded marginal delays rather than halts, reflecting stronger institutional buffers and diversified energy options that mitigated broader disruptions.

Policy and Economic Impacts

Project Delays, Cancellations, and Cost Overruns

In the United States, anti-nuclear protests intensified after the 1979 , leading to widespread litigation, regulatory moratoriums, and over 60 cancellations of planned reactors between 1979 and 1988 alone. These cancellations, often driven by "not-in-my-backyard" () opposition and legal challenges from activist groups, halted projects that had already incurred preliminary costs, effectively stranding investments and deterring new commitments. By the late 1980s, the combination of protests-fueled delays and heightened regulatory scrutiny had transformed nuclear economics, with completed plants facing overruns that multiplied initial budgets by factors of 10 or more in some cases. Construction costs per gigawatt escalated sharply during this period, rising from roughly $1 billion in the early to over $5 billion by the in real terms, as delays from public interventions allowed inflation, interest accrual, and redesign mandates to compound expenses. data attributes much of this to post-1979 regulatory expansions and site-specific lawsuits, which extended permitting timelines from years to decades and increased "soft" costs like labor and supervision by over 50% in key projects. Protests directly contributed by mobilizing local opposition that triggered environmental impact reviews and injunctions, as seen in cases like Seabrook and Diablo Canyon, where construction was paused for years amid mass demonstrations and court battles. Globally, similar dynamics have imposed average delays of 5 to 10 years on projects, with OECD Nuclear Energy Agency analyses linking these to protest-induced regulatory tightening and public referendums that impose iterative safety retrofits. Recent builds, such as those in Western nations, have overrun original budgets by 2.5 times or more, as tactics and activist litigation extend timelines, escalating financing costs and supply chain disruptions. In , the 2023 completion of the phase-out—accelerated by decades of Green-led protests—abandoned sunk investments in and fuel cycles, imposing annual burdens of €1.1 billion while forgoing returns on prior expenditures estimated in the tens of billions. These patterns underscore how opposition strategies, rather than inherent technological flaws, have systematically inflated through prolonged uncertainty and de facto moratoriums.

Shifts in Energy Mix and Resulting Emissions

In Germany, the post-Fukushima acceleration of the nuclear phase-out, which shuttered eight reactors by May 2011 and committed to full exit by 2022, prompted a rebound in lignite and hard coal generation to meet baseload demand, displacing low-carbon nuclear output with higher-emission fossils. This shift increased power sector CO2 emissions in the immediate aftermath, with fossil fuel combustion rising to compensate for the lost 22% of electricity previously supplied by nuclear; a study quantified additional CO2 from heightened coal use in 2011-2013 as part of broader environmental costs exceeding benefits from avoided nuclear risks. In contrast, France's sustained nuclear reliance—providing over 70% of electricity—has kept its grid carbon intensity low at around 50-60 gCO2/kWh, far below Germany's 400+ gCO2/kWh in peak coal years, demonstrating stability in emissions without phase-out pressures. In the United States, anti-nuclear campaigns contributed to the premature retirement of reactors like Indian Point in 2021, where replacement generation from and imports elevated state by approximately 5 million metric tons of CO2 annually post-closure, reversing prior decarbonization gains. Broader modeling of U.S. retirements shows they redistribute emissions regionally, with and gas ramp-ups adding 10-20% more CO2 in affected grids under current infrastructure, as dispatchable capacity yields to variable renewables unable to fully backfill without fossil bridging. Similarly, Japan's near-total reactor idling after March 2011—reducing share from 30% to under 2% by 2012—drove a 10-15% surge in thermal power, yielding an extra 4.3 million metric tons of CO2 in 2011 alone and sustained higher emissions through 2013, equivalent to adding millions of vehicles until efficiency measures and renewables partially mitigated. These cases illustrate an empirical irony: anti- protests, often framed as advancing transitions, accelerated nuclear retreats faster than renewables could scale baseload-equivalent capacity, leading to pivots and net CO2 hikes—cumulatively around 800 million tons across developed nations since 2012—while gaps favored gas over delayed / buildouts. Peer-reviewed analyses confirm that without such phase-outs, emissions trajectories in , , and the U.S. would have declined more sharply, as nuclear's zero-operational-emission profile outperforms backups in causal decarbonization pathways.

Contributions to Energy Security Challenges

Anti-nuclear protests have historically influenced policies that diminished nuclear capacity in several nations, thereby heightening reliance on imported fossil fuels and exposing economies to geopolitical shocks. The (IEA) has warned that a steep decline in —often driven by public opposition—threatens by undermining the availability of reliable, low-carbon baseload generation essential for stable supply during disruptions. Without nuclear, countries face greater vulnerability to volatile international markets for gas and , as intermittent renewables alone cannot consistently meet demand without backup. In , decades of protests against , including mass demonstrations in the and renewed mobilization post-Chernobyl, pressured successive governments into the Atomausstieg phase-out, culminating in the shutdown of the last three reactors on , , after a temporary extension prompted by the 2022 . This policy left Germany dependent on Russian natural gas for over 50% of its supplies pre-invasion, leading to acute shortages, industrial rationing, and a surge in use when pipelines were curtailed following Europe's sanctions. The resulting , exacerbated by the prior nuclear exit, forced emergency measures like reopening mothballed plants and highlighted how opposition to had prioritized perceived risks over domestic, dispatchable . Japan provides another case, where widespread protests after the 2011 Fukushima accident delayed restarts of existing reactors and stalled new builds, reducing nuclear's share from about 30% of electricity to near zero by 2014 and necessitating a tripling of LNG imports to fill the gap. During the 2022 global energy crunch triggered by the Ukraine war, this import dependence drove LNG prices to record highs—up over 300% year-on-year at peaks—straining Japan's economy and prompting government interventions to secure spot cargoes amid competition from Europe and Asia. Analysts note that prolonged anti-nuclear sentiment, favoring emotional responses to accidents over empirical risk assessments, prolonged this vulnerability, as restarted reactors later helped curb LNG demand by 15% from 2015 peaks. Longer-term delays in Western projects, often amplified by local protests and litigation, contrast sharply with rapid expansions elsewhere, slowing progress toward . In the United States, opposition contributed to overruns at the Vogtle plant in , where Units 3 and 4 faced delays exceeding seven years and costs ballooning to over $30 billion—more than double initial estimates—limiting timely baseload additions amid rising import needs. Meanwhile, has constructed reactors in five to six years, with capacity projected to surpass the U.S. by 2030, bolstering its security through domestic low-carbon power less susceptible to foreign supply risks. Such disparities underscore critiques that protest-driven policies in the West have favored short-term aversion to over strategic resilience, as evidenced by IEA analyses emphasizing 's role in diversifying away from fossil import dependencies.

Scientific and Empirical Critiques

Radiation and Accident Risks in Comparative Context

exhibits one of the lowest mortality rates among sources when measured as deaths per terawatt-hour (TWh) of produced, encompassing accidents, occupational hazards, and effects. A comprehensive aggregating data from multiple studies estimates at 0.03 deaths per TWh, compared to 24.6 for , 18.4 for , and 2.8 for . These figures include the impacts of major incidents like (1986) and (2011), which contributed disproportionately to nuclear's tally despite representing outliers in over 18,500 cumulative reactor-years of operation worldwide since the . In contrast, deaths stem primarily from chronic and routine mining/extraction accidents, which dwarf nuclear's acute risks by orders of magnitude.
Energy SourceDeaths per TWh
24.6
18.4
2.8
0.03
0.04
0.02
Probabilistic risk assessments further quantify nuclear accident likelihood through core damage frequency (CDF), defined as the probability of significant reactor core meltdown per reactor-year. For modern regulated designs, CDF targets and achievements fall below 10^{-5} events per reactor-year, as established by bodies like the IAEA and national regulators such as the U.S. NRC. This equates to an expected core damage event once every 100,000 reactor-years, a threshold met across the global fleet post-1979 Three Mile Island reforms, which enhanced safety systems and operator training. Empirical data supports this: only three major accidents (Three Mile Island, , ) have occurred in approximately 18,500 reactor-years, yielding a historical core-melt probability of about 1 in 3,700 reactor-years, with Chernobyl's outdated Soviet design skewing early figures. Risk models for radiation often rely on the linear no-threshold (LNT) assumption, extrapolating high-dose harms linearly to low doses without empirical validation below 100 mSv. Emerging evidence for —suggesting adaptive benefits or reduced cancer risk at low doses—challenges LNT, as seen in studies of atomic bomb survivors and radiological workers showing no elevated risks or even protective effects at chronic low exposures. Anti-nuclear protests tend to emphasize these rare accidents as existential threats, amplifying their perceived probability while overlooking 's empirical record relative to alternatives; for instance, nuclear accidents account for less than 0.1% of total energy-related fatalities when normalized against chronic harms. This selective focus ignores the probabilistic rarity and containment successes in the other 99.9% of operations across roughly 440 reactors operating as of 2025.

Waste Management Myths and Technological Solutions

The volume of nuclear waste from commercial power generation is minimal relative to outputs from fossil fuels and the material demands of renewables. Annually, U.S. reactors produce about 2,000 metric tons of , a solid material whose physical volume is less than half that of an Olympic-sized (2,500 cubic meters). The cumulative U.S. inventory exceeds 90,000 metric tons but occupies a comparably due to high , in stark contrast to the over 130 million tons of ash generated yearly, much of which accumulates in expansive, leaching-prone surface impoundments. This disparity underscores how nuclear waste's small footprint facilitates containment, while byproducts have caused documented at hundreds of sites. Claims of nuclear waste's inherent uncontainability overlook proven reprocessing and decay management. France's closed fuel cycle recovers 96% of usable and from spent fuel via reprocessing at , slashing volume by a factor exceeding ten and isolating shorter-lived fission products in vitrified glass logs whose radiological hazard diminishes to near-background levels within centuries, far shorter than the multimillennial timelines for unprocessed spent fuel dominated by long-lived actinides. Such techniques transform what protesters decry as perpetual peril into a finite, engineered challenge, with the residual waste's isolation needs aligning more closely with historical human-engineered durations than exaggerated eternal threats. Deep geological disposal validates long-term isolation feasibility, countering alarmist narratives with empirical performance. The (WIPP), operational since 1999, has interred over 170,000 cubic meters of transuranic defense in salt beds without environmental releases affecting , as verified by annual monitoring and post-2014 incident assessments showing negligible off-site dispersal. Yucca Mountain's licensing design, evaluated by the , projected dose risks below regulatory limits for 10,000 years under conservative seismic and hydrologic scenarios, with delays stemming from political vetoes rather than technical deficiencies. Across six decades of U.S. commercial handling, no breaches from storage or pathways have resulted in off-site , affirming engineered barriers' efficacy. 's contained profile also compares favorably to renewables, where lithium-ion battery production alone entails excavating hundreds of s of per of refined material, yielding diffuse volumes orders of magnitude larger per unit delivered over a facility's life. Protests have amplified political barriers to scaling these solutions, prioritizing perception over deployable engineering despite evidence of solvability.

Hindrance to Low-Carbon Energy Transition

Anti-nuclear protests have contributed to delays and cancellations of nuclear projects worldwide, thereby hindering the deployment of a low-carbon energy source essential for meeting stringent climate targets. According to IPCC assessments, pathways limiting global warming to 1.5°C with limited overshoot require nuclear electricity generation capacity to expand to approximately 1,160 gigawatts by 2050, nearly tripling from current levels of around 394 gigawatts, as nuclear provides reliable, low-emission baseload power that supports rapid decarbonization of energy systems. The World Economic Forum has similarly highlighted nuclear's critical role in achieving net-zero emissions, noting its capacity to deliver consistent low-carbon electricity amid growing demand and the limitations of intermittent renewables. In regions affected by sustained protests, such as Western Europe and North America, nuclear capacity has largely stagnated since the 1980s, contrasting sharply with China's construction of over 50 reactors since 2010, which has bolstered global low-carbon progress. This opposition has causally prolonged reliance on , elevating during the transition period. For instance, California's 1976 moratorium on new nuclear plants, enacted amid public protests and safety concerns following incidents like Three Mile Island, prevented additional capacity additions and contributed to the state's heavy dependence on for electricity, which accounted for about 38% of its power mix in recent years despite aggressive renewable targets. Similarly, post-Fukushima nuclear phase-outs driven by protest-influenced policies in countries like resulted in immediate surges in and use, increasing CO2 emissions by millions of tons annually in the short term. Empirical analyses indicate that such closures have led to measurable rises in consumption and associated , undermining decarbonization metrics by substituting zero-emission nuclear output with higher-emitting alternatives. Nuclear power's dispatchable nature—providing flexible, on-demand generation—offers a distinct over variable renewables like and , which require fossil backups or to maintain grid stability during low-output periods, potentially increasing overall system emissions if not fully mitigated. The emphasizes that can mitigate intermittency risks from renewables, enabling deeper emission cuts without proportional fossil reliance. While anti-nuclear advocates contend that renewables alone suffice for net-zero pathways, data from integrated energy models reveal higher , material demands, and backup fuel needs for and -dominated grids, contrasting with 's proven track record of avoiding over 70 gigatons of CO2 emissions since 1971. This recognition of past hindrances is evident in the COP28 declaration, where 22 nations pledged to triple global capacity by 2050 to accelerate low-emission transitions, signaling a pivot toward empirical necessities over historical opposition.

Contemporary Status and Future Prospects (2000s-2025)

Post-2011 Trends and Declining Momentum

The 2011 Fukushima Daiichi nuclear accident triggered a surge in global anti-nuclear protests, with demonstrations drawing tens of thousands in cities like , , and , often linking concerns over reactor safety to broader opposition against expansion. In the immediate aftermath, countries such as accelerated phase-out policies amid heightened public pressure, while saw sustained rallies against restarts. Subsequent years witnessed a marked decline in the scale and frequency of mass anti-nuclear power protests, as evidenced by the absence of comparable global mobilizations despite ongoing plant operations and new builds in nations like the and . Public opinion surveys reflect this waning opposition: a 2023 analysis of global attitudes showed net support for (support exceeding opposition) in 22 of 31 countries surveyed, with majorities favoring its role in energy mixes amid climate goals. Similarly, in 17 of 20 countries polled, support levels exceeded 50%, contrasting with the post-Fukushima dip where opposition briefly peaked above 50% in several advanced economies. Contributing to this trend, heightened awareness of nuclear power's low-carbon attributes has aligned it with decarbonization imperatives, reducing protest traction as alternatives like intermittent renewables face reliability critiques during energy shortages. Advancements in (SMR) designs, promising enhanced safety and scalability, have further eroded traditional safety-based arguments against the technology. In the United States, planned restarts of plants like Palisades (targeting 2025) and Three Mile Island Unit 1 (for power) have elicited only localized opposition from advocacy groups, without triggering widespread demonstrations akin to those post-1979 or 1986 accidents. Residual anti-nuclear activism persists in niches focused on nuclear weapons rather than civilian power, such as the Treaty on the Prohibition of Weapons (TPNW), whose third meeting of states parties in March 2025 convened 55 states and numerous NGOs to advocate without addressing energy applications. Overall, the emphasis on power plant opposition has faded, supplanted by pragmatic policy shifts in countries confronting emissions targets and supply vulnerabilities.

Responses to Energy Crises and Climate Imperatives

In response to the 2022 energy crisis triggered by Russia's invasion of and subsequent reductions in supplies, several European governments reversed or delayed nuclear phase-out policies to bolster . Germany's Chancellor ordered the extension of operations for the country's three remaining plants until April 2023, providing an additional 4 GW of capacity amid gas shortages that threatened industrial output and heating. This move contradicted the 2023 phase-out enshrined under prior administrations, as low gas inventories and high prices exposed vulnerabilities in relying on intermittent renewables and imported fuels. , already nuclear-dependent for 70% of its , announced plans in 2022 to construct six new reactors and extend the lifetimes of existing ones beyond 40-50 years, prioritizing baseload capacity over historical opposition from environmental groups. similarly extended the operations of its youngest reactors, Doel 4 and Tihange 3, by ten years to 2035, adding 2 GW of reliable power despite earlier commitments to full phase-out by 2025. These decisions persisted amid ongoing anti- activism, but empirical pressures from supply disruptions and rising emissions—Germany's CO2 output increased 7% in 2022 due to reactivation—overrode ideological resistance. By 2023-2025, international bodies amplified calls for expansion to address net-zero imperatives and challenges of and wind, which require overbuilding and storage to achieve comparable dispatchability. The (IAEA) raised its global capacity projections for the fifth consecutive year in 2025, forecasting a high-case growth from 377 GW(e) in 2024 to 992 GW(e) by 2050, driven by needs for firm, low-carbon generation in data centers, , and grid stability. Anti- protests during this period remained subdued compared to post-Fukushima peaks, with minimal disruptions reported at events like U.S. (SMR) conferences in 2024, where policy focus shifted to deployment timelines amid energy demands. In , the Ukraine-induced crisis diminished protest momentum, as publics prioritized affordability and security over safety narratives, evidenced by polling showing favorability rising to 55% in by 2023. Looking ahead, data from the 2022-2025 crises underscore nuclear's role in mitigating renewables' , where and output variability necessitates 2-3 times overcapacity plus backups to match nuclear's 83% global . The United Kingdom's Civil Nuclear Roadmap to 2050, outlined in government policy, commits to 24 GW of new capacity by , including SMRs and large reactors, to replace retiring plants and support net-zero without excessive fossil reliance. This reversal reflects causal insights from real-world shortages: nuclear's high and 24/7 output provide irreplaceable inertia against blackouts, contrasting with renewables' weather dependence that exacerbated Europe's 2022 price spikes to €800/MWh. While anti-nuclear groups persist, their influence wanes against evidence of nuclear's lifecycle emissions (12 gCO2/kWh, akin to ) and record, with no energy-crisis fatalities versus thousands from fossil backups.

References

  1. [1]
    Anti-nuclear Activists and Protest Actions (U.S. National Park Service)
    Oct 20, 2020 · The anti-nuclear movement was not reinvigorated until the late 1970s and early 1980s, when Europe and the United States experienced a ...
  2. [2]
    Antinuclear Movement, 1950s-1960s
    The antinuclear movement in the 1950s-60s included traditional pacifists, scientists, and groups like SANE, Women Strike for Peace, and anti-civil defense ...
  3. [3]
    Nuclear Freeze Campaign, 1970s-1980s
    In the late 1970s, local groups began organizing around opposition to nuclear power plants. After the 1979 accident at the Three Mile Island nuclear power plant ...
  4. [4]
    [PDF] Origins, Goals, and Tactics of the U.S. Anti-Nuclear Protest Movement
    national energy policy, the conflict between the promotion and regulation of nuclear power by the AEC was the first political issue taken up by the ...
  5. [5]
    Prevented Mortality and Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Historical ...
    Mar 15, 2013 · We calculate that global nuclear power has prevented an average of 1.84 million air pollution-related deaths and 64 gigatonnes of CO 2 -equivalent (GtCO 2 -eq) ...
  6. [6]
    Hibakusha: Stories of Survivors of Hiroshima and Nagasaki - PBS
    Jul 23, 2025 · In August 1945, the United States dropped atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki, Japan. 118,000 people died immediately; by the end of the year ...
  7. [7]
    A Distant Flickering Light: The Hibakusha Peace Movement
    Aug 6, 2018 · This is because those individuals of Hiroshima and Nagasaki are the only humans who have ever experienced and survived a nuclear bombing. That ...
  8. [8]
    End Nuclear Tests Day - History | United Nations
    From 1955 to 1989, the average number of nuclear tests conducted every year was 55. Nuclear testing peaked in the late 1950s and early 1960s. The year 1962 ...
  9. [9]
    Strontium-90 Found in Cow's Milk in North Dakota | Prairie Public
    May 30, 2022 · In 1961, the city of Mandan gained national notoriety for having a concentration of Strontium-90 in cow's-milk eight times higher than milk from Wisconsin or ...
  10. [10]
    Narrative - 26. Strontium-90 - Linus Pauling and the International ...
    Public attention focused on one of the fallout components, strontium-90, a long-lived radioactive substance that was similar enough to calcium to enter the ...
  11. [11]
    Castle BRAVO at 70: The Worst Nuclear Test in U.S. History
    Feb 29, 2024 · Heavy Fallout from Test Sickened People on Marshall Island Atolls and Japanese Fishermen on Lucky Dragon. Blast Equivalent to 1,000 ...
  12. [12]
    How the unlucky Lucky Dragon birthed an era of nuclear fear
    Feb 28, 2018 · The Lucky Dragon incident helped spread widespread fear of nuclear radiation into popular culture. The radioactive monster Gojira (known in ...
  13. [13]
    The history of CND
    CND was launched with a massive public meeting in London in February 1958. Shortly afterwards at Easter the first Aldermaston March attracted a good deal of ...
  14. [14]
    National Committee For a Sane Nuclear Policy | Encyclopedia.com
    In June 1957, twenty‐seven prominent citizens concerned with the direct and indirect hazards of nuclear fallout (e.g., strontium 90 found in cow's milk) met in ...<|separator|>
  15. [15]
    Women Strike for Peace - International Disarmament Institute News
    There was particular worry that nuclear testing was responsible for high levels of Strontium-90 in the milk supply. On November 1, 1961, thousands of women all ...
  16. [16]
    Clamshell Alliance campaigns against Seabrook Nuclear Power ...
    The first protest organized by the group was only a few weeks later, on August 1, 1976. This demonstration consisted of between 200 and 600 people (conflicting ...
  17. [17]
    Guide to the Clamshell Alliance Papers, 1976-1988 - UNH Library
    The Clamshell Alliance was formed in 1976 in order to protest the construction of a nuclear reactor in Seabrook, New Hampshire. It consisted of a loosely-knit ...
  18. [18]
    Nixon's Nuclear Energy Vision » Richard Nixon Foundation | Blog
    Oct 20, 2016 · By October 1973, the member nations of the Organization of Petroleum Exporting States cut off oil shipments to the United States in protest of ...
  19. [19]
    The Evolution of the IAEA Safety Standards and Enhancing their ...
    Oct 3, 2023 · But that began to change in the 1970s when we saw a framework coming into place in 1974 with the Nuclear Safety Standards Programme,” said ...
  20. [20]
    [PDF] After Parker: A Review of the Windscale Inquiry and Subsequent ...
    For 100 days in 1977, an Inquiry was held in Great Britain to look at the implications of building a plant at Windscale, on the Cumbrian coast, to reprocess ...
  21. [21]
    Opposition to nuclear power - The history and heritage of Vattenfall
    The turning point came in 1973. During the Swedish Centre Party conference in Luleå that year, Hannes Alfvén, professor and 1970 Nobel Laureate in Physics and ...
  22. [22]
    Safety of Nuclear Power Reactors - World Nuclear Association
    Feb 11, 2025 · The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) has a Safety Guide on Seismic Risks for Nuclear Power Plants, and the matter is dealt with in the ...
  23. [23]
    How safe is nuclear power? A statistical study suggests less than ...
    Mar 2, 2016 · Using simple statistics, the probability of a core-melt accident within 1 year of reactor operation is 4 in 14,816 reactor years, or 1 in 3704 ...
  24. [24]
    Historical Deaths from Nuclear Energy - Environmental Progress
    Operator and first-responder mortality from the event is 35. All other known fatalities from nuclear plant operations have occurred among nuclear plant ...
  25. [25]
    What are the safest and cleanest sources of energy?
    Feb 10, 2020 · Coal: 24.62 deaths per TWh * 10,042 TWh = 247,000 deaths Oil: 18.43 deaths per TWh * 852 TWh = 16,000 deaths Gas: 2.82 deaths per TWh * 6,098 ...
  26. [26]
    Re-evaluation of the linear no-threshold (LNT) model using new ...
    Mar 1, 2019 · This model lacks safety thresholds and postulates that health risks caused by ionizing radiation is directly proportional to dose. Therefore ...
  27. [27]
    The Linear No-Threshold Relationship Is Inconsistent with Radiation ...
    The LNT model (with or without the DDREF) is inconsistent with biologic and experimental data, which show the nature and the effectiveness of immediate and ...
  28. [28]
    [PDF] Health effects of the Chernobyl accident: an overview
    Apr 24, 2006 · Mental health and psychological effects​​ The Chernobyl accident led to extensive relocation of people, loss of economic stability, and long-term ...
  29. [29]
    UNSCEAR 2020/2021 Fukushima Report - Frequently Asked ...
    Since the UNSCEAR 2013 Report, no adverse health effects among Fukushima residents have been documented that could be directly attributed to radiation exposure ...
  30. [30]
    Coal Ash Is More Radioactive Than Nuclear Waste
    Dec 13, 2007 · As a general clarification, ounce for ounce, coal ash released from a power plant delivers more radiation than nuclear waste shielded via water ...
  31. [31]
    https://www.nucnet.org/news/finland-completes-key-trial-for-world-s-first-deep-geological-nuclear-waste-repository-3-2-2025
  32. [32]
    Radioactive Waste Management - World Nuclear Association
    Jan 25, 2022 · The largest Tenorm waste stream is coal ash, with around 280 million tonnes arising globally each year, carrying uranium-238 and all its non- ...
  33. [33]
    [PDF] gn,dmcj?,::ucn:ti::r:iocn°,'°ern:jrc::Veeniy;I:efr°nt - Sierra Club
    Adopted by the Council of Club Leaders on 9/8/2023 by a vote of 30-8-6. Description of issue. The Sierra Club has opposed nuclear power since the 1970's. It is ...
  34. [34]
    Carbon Dioxide Emissions From Electricity
    Sep 3, 2024 · Over its life-cycle, nuclear produces about the same amount of CO2-equivalent emissions per unit of electricity as wind, and about one-third ...
  35. [35]
    Green anarchism - Wikipedia
    Green anarchism, also known as ecological anarchism or eco-anarchism, is an anarchist school of thought that focuses on ecology and environmental issues.History · From theory to practice · Contemporary theoretical... · Green syndicalism
  36. [36]
    https://www.weplanet.org/post/climate-scientist-james-hansen-the-opposition-to-nuclear-power-is-truly-insane
  37. [37]
    Climate scientist James Hansen: 'The opposition to nuclear power is ...
    Sep 5, 2023 · James Hansen, the renowned climate scientist, has been advocating nuclear for many years. WePlanet's editor-in-chief Marco Visscher met up with Hansen in 2017.
  38. [38]
    The Death of Anti-Nuclearism | The Breakthrough Institute
    Aug 10, 2023 · Elite anti-nuclear opinion about nuclear risk, meanwhile, is not based on a dispassionate analysis of nuclear safety and plausible public health ...
  39. [39]
    Backgrounder on the Three Mile Island Accident
    The Three Mile Island Unit 2 reactor, near Middletown, Pa., partially melted down on March 28, 1979. This was the most serious accident in U.S. commercial ...
  40. [40]
    Three Mile Island Accident - World Nuclear Association
    Oct 11, 2022 · In 1979 a cooling malfunction caused part of the core to melt at Three Mile Island 2. The reactor was destroyed. Some radioactive gas was ...The chain of events during the... · Health impacts of the accident · Unit 1
  41. [41]
    Lessons From the 1979 Accident at Three Mile Island
    Oct 20, 2019 · The TMI 2 accident caused no injuries, and more than a dozen epidemiological studies conducted since 1981 have found no discernible direct health effects.
  42. [42]
    Long-term follow-up of the residents of the Three Mile Island ... - NIH
    Abstract. The Three Mile Island (TMI) nuclear power plant accident (1979) prompted the Pennsylvania Department of Health to initiate a cohort mortality study ...
  43. [43]
    U.S. anti-nuclear activists campaign against restarting Three Mile ...
    U.S. anti-nuclear activists campaign against restarting Three Mile Island nuclear generator, 1979-1985 · Goals · Wave of Campaigns · Time period · Country · Location ...
  44. [44]
    Three Mile Island foreshadowed by Hollywood film days before
    Mar 18, 2019 · “The China Syndrome,” starring Jane Fonda, Jack Lemmon and Michael Douglas, debuted in theaters on March 16, 1979. The movie portrayed the ...
  45. [45]
    Three Mile Island: The driver of US nuclear power's decline?
    May 1, 2013 · What happened was Three Mile Island, and the birth of an antinuclear movement that stopped dozens of half-built or proposed reactors. In this ...
  46. [46]
    Gallup Vault: Nuclear Power Plant Fears After Chernobyl
    Apr 26, 2016 · Not only did the percentage of Americans opposing construction of nuclear power plants increase shortly after the Three Mile Island accident, ...
  47. [47]
    Gallup Poll Shows 63% See Nuclear Plant Need - The New York ...
    Apr 12, 1979 · Gallup Poll finds 2 out of 3 Americans feel nuclear power should be cut back until safety regulations are made more stringent; ...
  48. [48]
    Chernobyl Accident 1986 - World Nuclear Association
    Nobody offsite suffered from acute radiation effects although a significant, but uncertain, fraction of the thyroid cancers diagnosed since the accident in ...
  49. [49]
    A reactor physicist explains Chernobyl - American Nuclear Society
    Apr 28, 2022 · ... positive void coefficient. “This is not a safe design ... RBMK's design flaws compounded by mistakes made by the undertrained operators.
  50. [50]
    Chernobyl: the true scale of the accident
    Sep 5, 2005 · The international experts have estimated that radiation could cause up to about 4000 eventual deaths among the higher-exposed Chernobyl ...
  51. [51]
    How the Soviet Union stayed silent during the Chernobyl disaster
    Apr 25, 2016 · When Sweden initially contacted the Soviet Atomic Power Inspection Board, Moscow denied that an accident had occurred. However, as Sweden ...
  52. [52]
    Chernobyl and USSR - Keele University
    Jul 22, 2022 · Chernobyl shattered the foundation upon which glasnost could succeed, and therefore contributed to the fall of the Soviet Union by preventing ...
  53. [53]
    Nuclear Power, No Thanks! The Aftermath of Chernobyl in Italy and ...
    The nuclear power referendum held on 8–9 November 1987 represents one of the rare political victories of the Italian environmental movement.
  54. [54]
    Convention on Assistance in the Case of a Nuclear Accident or ...
    The Convention on Assistance in the Case of a Nuclear Accident or Radiological Emergency, adopted in 1986 following the Chernobyl nuclear plant accident, sets ...
  55. [55]
    Fukushima Daiichi Accident - World Nuclear Association
    Following a major earthquake, a 15-metre tsunami disabled the power supply and cooling of three Fukushima Daiichi reactors, causing a nuclear accident ...
  56. [56]
    The Fukushima-Daiichi Nuclear Power Station Accident: An overview
    UNSCEAR's assessments of the levels and effects of radiation exposure due to the nuclear accident after the 2011 great east-Japan earthquake and tsunami. On 11 ...
  57. [57]
    UNSCEAR 2013 Report Volume I
    This scientific annex on “Levels and effects of radiation exposure due to the nuclear accident after the 2011 great east-Japan earthquake and tsunami” provides ...
  58. [58]
    Anti-nuclear Protesters March In Japan - VOA
    Sep 18, 2011 · Organizers say 60,000 participated, in their largest protest since the mid-March nuclear plant accident at Fukushima, September 19, 2011.
  59. [59]
    Japanese Prime Minister Naoto Kan calls for phase-out of nuclear ...
    Jul 13, 2011 · Kan told lawmakers Tuesday that Japan must scrap a plan that calls for the country to increase its use of nuclear power to 53 percent by 2030, ...Missing: size | Show results with:size
  60. [60]
    Fukushima evacuation has killed more than earthquake and tsunami ...
    Sep 10, 2013 · More people have now died because of the Fukushima evacuation process than were killed in the region by the 2011 Japanese earthquake and tsunami which caused ...
  61. [61]
    Burden of Disease Attributable to Coal-Burning and Other Air ...
    The analyses show that coal combustion is the single largest source of air pollution-related health impact, contributing to some 366,000 premature deaths in ...
  62. [62]
    Upgrades to Backup Safety Systems Part of Fukushima Response
    Feb 1, 2016 · Building on safety features added after the 9/11 terrorist attacks, the industry developed a diverse and flexible coping capability called FLEX ...
  63. [63]
    The history behind Germany's nuclear phase-out | Clean Energy Wire
    Mar 9, 2021 · Anti-nuclear movements started in Germany in the 1970s when local initiatives organised protests against plans to build nuclear power stations.
  64. [64]
    Nuclear Power in Germany
    With a new government in 2009, the phase-out was cancelled, but then reintroduced in 2011. Eight reactors were shut down immediately, and all were scheduled to ...Nuclear power policy · Transmission and supply... · Economic and CO2...Missing: timeline | Show results with:timeline
  65. [65]
    [PDF] anti-nuclear movements in the USA, France and West-Germany
    The anti-nuclear struggles “became a large-scale social movement with a distinct identity only after the devastating consequences of the 1973-1974 energy crisis ...
  66. [66]
    Understanding the German Nuclear Exit | Heinrich Böll Stiftung
    Apr 21, 2023 · On April 15, Germany permanently closed its last 3 nuclear power plants. This is the culmination of a 50 year democratic process: proof that ...
  67. [67]
    Germany's nuclear phaseout explained – DW – 06/15/2017
    Jun 15, 2017 · On June 30, 2011, Berlin ordered the immediate shutdown of eight of the country's 17 reactors. The decision also outlined a timeline for taking ...<|separator|>
  68. [68]
    Germany's Nuclear Energy Phase-Out, Explained - NIRS
    May 8, 2023 · On April 15, 2023 utilities in Germany shut down the country's three last remaining nuclear power plants. These closures mark the successful planned phase-out ...
  69. [69]
    Thousands protest against nuclear power in northern France - RFI
    Oct 1, 2016 · Several thousand people demonstrated against the construction of nuclear reactors near the northern French town of Flamnville on Saturday.Missing: opposition | Show results with:opposition
  70. [70]
    French Sour on Nuclear Power - The World from PRX
    Aug 15, 2013 · Recent polls have found that more than 80 percent of French voters now object to building new nuclear plants, and nearly two-thirds support ...
  71. [71]
    Sizewell C: Hundreds march against nuclear power plant after ... - BBC
    May 15, 2022 · About 200 people turned up to protest against plans for a £20bn nuclear plant on the east coast of England. A final decision on Sizewell C ...
  72. [72]
    Nuclear power is not the answer - CND
    CND calls for an end to the production of nuclear energy – a technology that is dangerous, expensive, and won't solve the climate crisis.
  73. [73]
    Switzerland moves to lift nuclear ban
    Aug 20, 2025 · The Swiss government is proposing an end to its ban on new nuclear plants, with parliament and a referendum set to decide the future of ...
  74. [74]
    Mass occupation of proposed Wyhl nuclear power plant site in ...
    Anti-nuclear protest in Germany began to use more direct (and often violent) confrontation after their success at Wyhl because the Germany government determined ...
  75. [75]
    Anti-nuclear bomb Germany changing its mind - Engelsberg Ideas
    Nov 15, 2022 · Throughout the early 1980s a large and highly politicised anti-nuclear movement began to develop out of the earlier movement. Germany's Green ...
  76. [76]
    The Source of Germany's Nuclear Aversion
    Nov 30, 2022 · The main sentiment, at least among anti-nuclear activists, was disappointment, given that the process was still expected to take a decade.
  77. [77]
    Fukushima triggered Germany's nuclear phaseout – DW – 03/10/2021
    Mar 10, 2021 · As Germany fast approaches its goals of phasing out nuclear energy by the end of 2022 and coal by 2038, renewable energy must be expanded fast.
  78. [78]
    Q&A - Germany's nuclear exit: One year after | Clean Energy Wire
    Apr 16, 2024 · The three last remaining nuclear power plants in Germany were taken offline on 15 April 2023. The Atomausstieg's finalstep marked the end of a ...
  79. [79]
    So Much for German Efficiency: A Warning for Green Policy ...
    Aug 22, 2024 · Ironically, the closure of Germany's entire nuclear fleet, which was finalized in 2023, is likely to keep its coal plants active for some time, ...
  80. [80]
    War in Ukraine: Tracking the impacts on German energy and climate ...
    Due to the energy crisis caused by Russia's war in Ukraine, Germany temporarily reopened decommissioned and soon-to-be decommissioned coal power plants last ...
  81. [81]
    [PDF] 10 years after Fukushima: consequences of the nuclear phase-out ...
    Nuclear in the electricity mix halved from 22% to 11%, while the share of renewables increased from 17% to 45%. Agora Energiewende (2021). 3. Power mix 2010.
  82. [82]
    Germany - Energy - International Trade Administration
    Aug 1, 2025 · After the Russian invasion of Ukraine and the ensuing energy crisis, Germany quickly diversified its gas supply and installed LNG terminals ...
  83. [83]
    How expensive is an energy transition? A lesson from the German ...
    Dec 18, 2017 · The total cost, then, of the expansion of RE in the second stage can be estimated to be in the range of €90–130 billion (3–4 ct/kWh × 140–160 ...<|separator|>
  84. [84]
    Will nuclear energy make a comeback in Germany? - DW
    Jan 28, 2024 · The last reactor in Germany was finally shut down in March 2023. Is shutting down nuclear energy a mistake?
  85. [85]
    Why Germany ditched nuclear before coal – and why it won't go back
    Apr 23, 2024 · Even in 2022, at the height of the recent energy crisis, a survey found that 52% opposed constructing new reactors, though 78% supported a ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  86. [86]
    Nuclear Power in France
    In April 2017 the EDF board decided to give notice of Fessenheim shutdown within six months prior to full commissioning of Flamanville 3. However, that notice ...Missing: petition signatures
  87. [87]
    Anti-Nuclear Activist Circulations in 1970s Europe - EHNE
    Mar 1, 2024 · The effect was highly mobilizing at a grassroots level, as is shown, among other examples, by the huge gathering to protest Superphénix at Creys ...
  88. [88]
    Fessenheim Nuclear Power Plant - Wikipedia
    The group Stop Fessenheim have collected over 63,000 signatures through an online petition calling for Fessenheim's closure, and, on April 18, began a 366-day ...
  89. [89]
    Navigating French post-nuclear trajectories - ScienceDirect.com
    The closure of Fessenheim was the result of a political promise made by presidential candidate François Hollande in 2012. The announcement of its closure led to ...Missing: petition | Show results with:petition
  90. [90]
    France delays EPR2 reactors to 2038
    Mar 21, 2025 · President Emmanuel Macron decided to delay the commissioning of EPR2 reactors to 2038 – a postponement of three years.
  91. [91]
    French nuclear waste project sparks protest - France 24
    Sep 20, 2025 · Organisers said 2,000 people had taken to the street in Bure to protest the plan by the National Agency for Radioactive Waste Management (ANDRA) ...
  92. [92]
    why French officials did not make Corsica a nuclear test site in 1960
    Oct 2, 2025 · But Corsican anti-nuclear action in 1960 did not demand disarmament. These protests also illuminate a longer trajectory in French nuclear ...
  93. [93]
    What are the CO2 emissions of nuclear power?
    Feb 16, 2022 · By way of comparison, in 2020, the emissions of France, Denmark, Spain, Holland and Germany were, respectively, 45, 102, 144, 290 and 300 g CO2 ...
  94. [94]
    Life cycle assessment of nuclear power in France: EDF case study
    The French electricity mix is dominated by nuclear power, representing 69% of the power generation in 2021, and further development of nuclear power for ...
  95. [95]
    The French are growing support to nuclear energy - Sfen in English
    Sep 27, 2022 · 75% of French people say they are in favor of nuclear power, according to the latest Ifop poll conducted for the JDD. ... 60/MWh of existing ...
  96. [96]
    Legacies: Trajectories of Activism and Activists since the 1980s
    Measured by the number of nuclear facilities cancelled, anti-nuclear protest appears to have been moderately successful in Germany while failing in France.
  97. [97]
    Revealed: ministers' doubts over nuclear plant at Torness - The Ferret
    Aug 12, 2024 · There were demonstrations and an occupation of the site in 1978, and in May 1979 more than 10,000 people joined a weekend protest there. Despite ...
  98. [98]
    Inside the Torness nuclear power protests, 50 years later - The Herald
    Jun 26, 2025 · Anti-nuclear activists waged a futile battle to prevent the station from being built, with thousands of campaigners famously occupying the ...
  99. [99]
    [PDF] Torness: From Folly to Fiasco, 1983 - No2NuclearPower
    Controversy surrounds the Torness nuclear power station being built, just 30 miles from Edinburgh. Scene of num- erous direct actions, Torness is a monumental ...
  100. [100]
    Sizewell - Keele University
    This blog will investigate the origins of the current anti-nuclear protests at Sizewell by exploring its history as a location of nuclear resistance.
  101. [101]
    Protesters raise environmental fears as wait continues for Sizewell C ...
    Jun 7, 2025 · The peaceful protest ended with the 300-strong crowd walking to the Sizewell complex and tying ribbons with messages, emphasising people's ...
  102. [102]
    Nuclear Protests – TASC - Together Against Sizewell C
    Jan 28, 2025 · TASC campaigns to rigorously oppose the construction of Sizewell C's two nuclear reactors in the Suffolk Coast and Heaths AONB.
  103. [103]
    Stop Sizewell C - Take Action
    EDF's Sizewell C twin reactor project will have a devastating impact on Suffolk. Help us Stop Sizewell C - the wrong project, wrong place.
  104. [104]
    Hinkley Point power station blockaded by anti-nuclear protesters
    Oct 3, 2011 · More than 200 people are blockading a nuclear power station in protest at plans to build new reactors at the site.
  105. [105]
    Activists hail nuclear plant protest | The Independent
    Oct 3, 2011 · Members of several anti-nuclear groups who are part of the Stop New Nuclear alliance barred access to Hinkley Point power station in Somerset in ...
  106. [106]
    Events Reports - Stop Hinkley
    More than 150 people marched through Bridgwater on Saturday 1 October 2011 to protest against EDF Energy's plan to construct Hinkley Point "C" nuclear power ...
  107. [107]
    Biggest expansion of nuclear power for 70 years to create jobs ...
    Jan 11, 2024 · Roadmap sets out how UK will increase nuclear generation by up to 4 times to 24GW by 2050.
  108. [108]
    Nuclear Power in the United Kingdom
    Government plans call for up to 24 GWe of new nuclear capacity by 2050 to provide about 25% of electricity. The UK has implemented a thorough assessment ...
  109. [109]
    Hinkley Point C / UK Nuclear Station Could Be Delayed To 2031 ...
    The UK's flagship Hinkley Point C nuclear power station has been delayed until 2029 at the earliest, with the cost potentially increasing to as much as £46bn ( ...
  110. [110]
    Sizewell C cost 'has doubled since 2020 and could near £40bn'
    Jan 14, 2025 · A rise in construction charges over recent years, combined with cost overruns and delays at EDF's Hinkley Point C nuclear project in Somerset ...
  111. [111]
    How Britain squandered its nuclear lead, surrendered energy ...
    Sep 14, 2025 · It is a historic act of negligence that has cost Britain dearly in carbon emissions, in energy security, in technological leadership and in the ...
  112. [112]
    Nuclear Power in Sweden
    Sep 16, 2025 · In the 1970s, it was the Centre Party in Sweden that started the anti-nuclear debate culminating in the 1980 referendum canvassing three options ...Missing: protests | Show results with:protests
  113. [113]
    Sweden Reverses Nuclear Phase-out Policy
    Nov 10, 2009 · The debate among the major Swedish political parties over the nuclear issues was fierce throughout the 1970s. The political discourse ...
  114. [114]
    Nuclear Energy Renaissance: Powering Sweden's Climate Policy
    Apr 15, 2024 · Sweden aims for 10 new reactors by 2045, but high costs and longer construction times may limit emission reductions, and it won't be a panacea.
  115. [115]
    Nuclear Power in Switzerland
    Feb 24, 2025 · It failed by about 54:46, with voters expressing confidence in both operators and the safety authority, despite a major anti-nuclear campaign. ...
  116. [116]
    Legislative changes proposed to remove Swiss new reactor ban
    Aug 15, 2025 · Switzerland's Federal Council has presented draft legislation that would remove the country's ban on the construction of new nuclear power, ...
  117. [117]
    Nuclear Power in Italy
    Sep 18, 2024 · Italy's phaseout of nuclear energy following a 1987 referendum has led to major costs for the whole economy. Due to the high reliance on oil ...
  118. [118]
    Italy inches towards reversing a nuclear energy ban | Reuters
    Sep 7, 2024 · Italy plans to draft, by early 2025, rules to allow the use of new nuclear power technologies, the energy minister said on Saturday.
  119. [119]
    Italy to reintroduce nuclear power via SMRs
    Mar 5, 2025 · Italy's current government led by Giorgia Meloni in 2024 announced intention to adopt legislation to return to nuclear power using SMRs. The ...
  120. [120]
    Over 2,000 protesters occupy the Seabrook Nuclear Power Plant ...
    Jan 26, 2023 · The demonstrators, known as the Clamshell Alliance, opposed the construction of the $2 billion Seabrook Nuclear Power Plant. Work on the ...
  121. [121]
    Abalone Alliance campaigns against Diablo Canyon Nuclear Plant ...
    On August 6, AA activists organized a protest blockade at the gates of the reactor site as well as a 1,500-person rally at a nearby site, which resulted in the ...
  122. [122]
    Our History Timeline - Mothers for Peace
    More than 10,000 people rallied in a two-week non-violent blockade of Diablo Canyon organized by Abalone Alliance, and more than 1,900 were arrested. Sept ...
  123. [123]
    The Nuclear Freeze and Its Impact | Arms Control Association
    In the fall of 1983, as anti-nuclear protests swept across the United States and Western Europe, he told his startled secretary of state, George Shultz, “If ...
  124. [124]
    canada: anti-nuclear demonstration in saskatoon (1960) - British Pathe
    One hundred and fifty men, women and children marched through the streets of Saskatoon, Canada, Nov 14, in a mass plea for nuclear disarmament.
  125. [125]
    Canadians campaign against nuclear testing on Amchitka Island ...
    The direct action campaign against nuclear testing in Amchitka Island began with an organization called the Society for Pollution and Environmental Control ...
  126. [126]
    https://www.dianuke.org/chalk-river-protests-canadas-indigenous-communities-struggle-against-proposed-nuclear-dump/
  127. [127]
    Environmental groups, three opposition parties, First Nations ...
    Nov 18, 2020 · The Bloc Québécois, the NDP and the Green Party all oppose the government's “small” modular nuclear reactor plan. A Special Chiefs Assembly of ...Missing: movements | Show results with:movements
  128. [128]
    Chalk River protests: Canada's indigenous communities struggle ...
    Jul 23, 2024 · Indigenous communities protest a nuclear dump on unceded territory, citing inadequate consultation, concerns about water contamination, and the ...
  129. [129]
    The Diablo Canyon Blockade 1981 - FoundSF
    The Abalone Alliance announced in February 1979 that it would blockade the Diablo Canyon nuclear power plant as soon as it was granted a license to operate.
  130. [130]
    Shoreham Action Is One of Largest Held Worldwide - The New York ...
    More than 600 protesters were arrested here today after 15,000 demonstrators gathered on the town beach to protest ...<|separator|>
  131. [131]
    A look back at the Shoreham nuclear plant protest, 40 years later
    Protestors demonstrating against the Shoreham nuclear power plant on June 3, 1979. It was the largest demonstration in Long Island history, and more than ...
  132. [132]
    U.S. anti-nuclear activists and community members force closure of ...
    By 1986 74 percent of Long Island residents opposed the plant. Local residents continued to attend meetings and distribute fliers against the Shoreham Plant.
  133. [133]
    [PDF] Entergy's Political Spending and the Battle over the Indian Point ...
    Political support for closing. Indian Point gained traction after the terrorist attacks of. September 11, 2001 raised fears that the plant could be the next ...
  134. [134]
    Western Shoshone step up resistance to Yucca project
    May 14, 2019 · For decades, anti-nuclear protesters have demonstrated on Mother's Day near the entrance to what used to be called the Nevada Test Site.
  135. [135]
    1988-1999: The Yucca Mountain Project Pushes Forward
    1988: On March 12, more than 1,200 people are arrested near the Nevada Test Site as part of a demonstration against nuclear testing. In December, the DOE Office ...
  136. [136]
    https://world-nuclear.org/information-library/country-profiles/countries-a-f/canada-nuclear-power
  137. [137]
    Why Does Nuclear Power Plant Construction Cost So Much? | IFP
    May 1, 2023 · Starting in the late 1970s plants began to be canceled in large numbers, which accelerated following the accident at Three Mile Island. No ...
  138. [138]
    Nuclear Power in Canada
    The first commercial Candu reactors began operation in Pickering, Ontario, in 1971. Eighteen of Canada's 19 commercial reactors are located in Ontario (Point ...Missing: 1970s | Show results with:1970s
  139. [139]
    Safety | Canadian Nuclear Association
    Canada's nuclear safety record is unmatched by any other industry globally. Operational safety. Canada's nuclear reactors are safe for workers, the public ...<|separator|>
  140. [140]
    Uranium and nuclear power facts - Natural Resources Canada
    In 2022, 80% of Canada's uranium production was exported for use in nuclear power generation throughout the world. Learn more about uranium and nuclear power.
  141. [141]
    Risky Business: Nuclear Power and Public Protest in Canada
    Aug 9, 2025 · ... protests against civilian nuclear energy. During the 1970s–1990s, activists performed three distinct forms of protest (sabotage, counter ...
  142. [142]
    Nuclear power plants - Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission
    May 5, 2025 · Canada has five nuclear power plants with 22 reactors, producing 15% of electricity. All use CANDU reactors, and the CNSC regulates all stages ...
  143. [143]
    Opposition to potential nuclear waste storage site in northwestern ...
    Oct 4, 2024 · The organization tasked with managing the storage of Canada's nuclear waste in the country's first deep geological repository is facing growing opposition in ...
  144. [144]
    First Nations and allies resist proposed radioactive waste repository
    Jun 28, 2024 · First Nations leaders organized a rally in Anemki Wequedong (Thunder Bay) to protest a proposed nuclear waste repository in northwestern Ontario.
  145. [145]
    Canada Invests in the Next Generation of Canadian-Made, Clean ...
    Mar 5, 2025 · The Government of Canada is acting now to modernize Canadian-owned CANDU technology, which will provide a viable, cost-effective design.
  146. [146]
    Small Modular Reactors (SMR's) in Canada - WISE International
    Aug 29, 2024 · Canada recently released a report suggesting that SMRs will be in almost all provinces by 2035, although most provincial electrical utilities ...Introduction: Candus Versus... · Smrs Complicate Radioactive... · Smr Wastes Not Considered In...
  147. [147]
    Japan and the Bomb: a History of the Japanese Anti-Nuclear ...
    The Japanese anti-nuclear movement has been characterized by the same kinds of political divisions as other popular movements, while it also reflects some ...
  148. [148]
    (PDF) Anti-Nuclear Protest in Post-Fukushima Tokyo: Power ...
    Aug 6, 2025 · These two new books investigate how social movement organizations and policy advocacy networks sought to change not just Japan's energy policy.
  149. [149]
    [PDF] The Case of the Japanese Anti-Nuclear Movement after Fukushima
    Aug 30, 2013 · One of them has a long history with the anti-nuclear movement and the other has long been involved with establishing green policies. One of.
  150. [150]
    India has long suppressed antinuclear activism. Still, activists persist.
    Dec 17, 2021 · Nearly 9,000 people have been charged with sedition for protesting against the Kudankulam nuclear power plant. Some cases persist today, even ...
  151. [151]
    Anti-Nuclear Movement in India: Protests in Kudankulam and Jaitapur
    Nov 20, 2021 · The cases of Kudankulam and Jaitapur exemplify ground-level Indian anti-nuclear movements led by local collectives of fisher folks, farmers and ...<|separator|>
  152. [152]
    Protesting Policy and Practice in South Korea's Nuclear Energy ...
    Early protests were successful in undermining nuclear waste site proposals and plans for the construction of a small number of nuclear power plants.
  153. [153]
    Taiwan's nuclear phase-out faces public opinion shift
    Sep 25, 2025 · In August 2025, Taiwan's nationwide referendum on extending operations at Maanshan Nuclear Power Plant failed despite receiving 74.2 per ...
  154. [154]
    Anti-Nuclear Groups Rally in Taipei Against Plan To Revive Ma ...
    Aug 16, 2025 · For the referendum to pass, more than 25% of Taiwan's 5 million eligible voters must cast ballots, with “yes” votes outnumbering “no” votes. Ma- ...<|separator|>
  155. [155]
    Australians campaign against nuclear power and uranium mining ...
    The campaign was not successful in shutting down the 3 already-running uranium mines, but did prevent any further mines or nuclear projects from being started.
  156. [156]
    Uranium Mining in Australia: Legislation History, Protests, and ...
    Apr 14, 2025 · The protests were successful in halting the development of the Jabiluka mine, despite it having received prior approvals. This era left an ...<|separator|>
  157. [157]
    Nuclear testing in the Pacific | NZ History
    New Zealand was involved in ongoing protest over French nuclear testing from the 1966, when France began testing nuclear weapons in French Polynesia. Mururoa ( ...Missing: Bikini | Show results with:Bikini
  158. [158]
    The secret history of our nuclear-free policy - E-Tangata
    Nov 5, 2023 · The Nuclear Free and Independent Pacific movement connected the New Zealand protests into a Pacific-wide struggle. David Lange, then leader of ...
  159. [159]
    Introduction: Resistance and Survival – The Nuclear Era in the Pacific
    Jan 7, 2024 · Between 1946 and 1958, the United States conducted 67 atomic and hydrogen bomb tests at Bikini and Enewetak atolls in the Marshall Islands. In ...
  160. [160]
    The last voyage of the Rainbow Warrior - ABC News
    Nov 12, 2024 · An unusual mission. Giff Johnson, a newspaper editor in the Marshall Islands, was a passionate advocate against nuclear testing in the Pacific.
  161. [161]
    A history of Pacific nuclear testing and the successful campaign to ...
    Early opposition and protests against US testing in the Pacific. The people of the Marshall Islands actively opposed US nuclear testing during the 1940s and 50s ...
  162. [162]
    The Nobel Peace Prize 2024 - Press release - NobelPrize.org
    Oct 11, 2024 · This grassroots movement of atomic bomb survivors from Hiroshima and Nagasaki, also known as Hibakusha, is receiving the Peace Prize for its ...Missing: protests | Show results with:protests
  163. [163]
    Nuclear Power in Japan
    Aug 5, 2025 · Its first commercial nuclear power reactor began operating in mid-1966, and nuclear energy has been a national strategic priority since 1973.Electricity sector · Nuclear power industry · Energy policy · Particular plants: under...Missing: movement | Show results with:movement
  164. [164]
    A New Wave Against the Rock: New social movements in Japan ...
    Jul 1, 2016 · One month after the nuclear accident on April 10, 2011, an antinuclear demonstration of 15,000 people took place in Kōenji in Tokyo's inner-west ...
  165. [165]
    Japanese anti-nuclear movement and protest music | OUPblog
    Mar 16, 2016 · Nonetheless, the post-3.11 anti-nuclear movement did leave a legacy. While most Japanese were positive about nuclear power before the Fukushima ...
  166. [166]
    Risks associated with evacuation and disaster-related death after a ...
    Nov 14, 2024 · A critical lesson from the FDNPP accident is the significant risk to life posed by evacuation actions taken to avoid radiation exposure.
  167. [167]
    Restarting Japan's Nuclear Plants Post-Fukushima Disaster
    In the three years following the Fukushima Daiichi Disaster, Japan spent approximately $270 billion on fossil fuel imports , around 58% more than it had in the ...
  168. [168]
    How Energy Choices After Fukushima Impacted Human Health and ...
    Jun 17, 2019 · We found that the drastic cuts in nuclear power in Japan and Germany led to increased CO2 emissions in the first three years after Fukushima due to higher ...
  169. [169]
    Nuclear reactor restarts in Japan have reduced LNG imports ... - EIA
    Feb 8, 2024 · As of December 2022, 11 gigawatts (GW) of Japan's nuclear capacity have returned to service, which reduced liquefied natural gas (LNG) imports for electricity ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  170. [170]
    https://viacampesina.org/en/2025/02/fukushima-japan-nouminren-family-farm-movement-protests-reopening-of-nuclear-power-plants-pledges-to-protect-territories/
  171. [171]
    Nuclear 'bribery' backlash in Japan over restart plan for world's ...
    Oct 15, 2025 · Critics call Tepco's US$654 million offer to residents living near the Kashiwazaki-Kariwa plant a cynical attempt to buy public consent.
  172. [172]
    Japan: Nouminren Protests Reopening of Nuclear Power Plants ...
    Feb 13, 2025 · The protestors voiced their opposition to Japan's 7th Basic Energy Plan, which calls for existing nuclear power plants to be fully utilized, and ...
  173. [173]
    Thousands of Anti-Nuclear Protesters Face Police in India, 200 ...
    Mar 20, 2012 · Over 200 protesters have been arrested including key anti-nuclear organizers. Police initiated "operation Koodankulam" arresting protesters ...
  174. [174]
    Nuclear Power Plants | AERB - Atomic Energy Regulatory Board
    India has 22 operating reactors, with an installed capacity of 6780 MWe. Among these eighteen reactors are Pressurised Heavy Water Reactors (PHWRs) and four ...
  175. [175]
    https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7547319/
  176. [176]
    Nuclear Share of Electricity Generation in 2024 - (https://pris.iaea.org).
    Nuclear Share of Electricity Generation ; INDIA, 6920, 20, 49909.89, 3.3 ; IRAN, ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF, 915, 1, 6438.94, 1.7.
  177. [177]
    Talk renewables, walk coal: The paradox of India's energy transition
    Oct 10, 2020 · Coal accounted for 72% of India's electricity generation and was the source of 65% of its carbon dioxide emissions (Central Electricity ...
  178. [178]
    Earthquake in South Korea renews anti-nuclear power stance
    Sep 22, 2016 · "The earthquake is a message from God warning us of the danger of nuclear power plants," he said. There are more than 18 nuclear reactors in the ...
  179. [179]
    Weekly Funeral Procession Protest at the Wolsong Nuclear Power ...
    Residents protest due to health risks, corruption, a 5.8 earthquake, and fear of radiation and chronic pollution diseases, demanding relocation.
  180. [180]
    Construction of two Korean reactors put on hold - World Nuclear News
    Jul 14, 2017 · Korea Hydro & Nuclear Power (KHNP) has decided to temporarily suspend construction of units 5 and 6 at the Shin Kori nuclear power plant in south-eastern Korea.Missing: despite | Show results with:despite
  181. [181]
    Full article: The rise and fall of nuclear phase-out in South Korea
    South Korea's nuclear energy policy has experienced sharp reversals over the past decade, shifting from a planned nuclear phase-out to renewed promotion.
  182. [182]
    Nuclear Power in South Korea
    In mid-July the KHNP board decided to suspend construction of the two units for three months, pending public debate and government decision, despite vigorous ...Energy policy · Nuclear power industry · Waste management · Technology & R&D
  183. [183]
    Lungmen Nuclear Power Plant (“Nuke 4”) stopped, Taiwan - Ej Atlas
    Oct 14, 2021 · The 4th Nuclear Power Plant (2600 MW) is stalled since 2014 because of opposition before and after the Fukushima accident.
  184. [184]
    Clashes as anti-nuclear protests hit Taiwan - BBC News
    Apr 28, 2014 · Police have clashed with protesters demanding construction on Taiwan's fourth nuclear plant be stopped. Police used water cannon early on ...
  185. [185]
    Political discord places Lungmen on hold - World Nuclear News
    Apr 28, 2014 · The government of Taiwan has announced that unit 1 of the Lungmen nuclear power plant will be mothballed once pre-operational safety checks ...
  186. [186]
    Taiwan's Final Step Toward a Nuclear-Free Homeland Faces New ...
    May 5, 2025 · The 2021 referendum, which sought to revive the mothballed Lungmen Nuclear Power Plant (NPP 4), was narrowly defeated, with 53% voting ...
  187. [187]
    Taiwan shuts down its last nuclear power plant, jeopardizing its ...
    Aug 27, 2025 · There were also plans for a fourth nuclear power plant, Lungmen (known as NFP), with a capacity of 2.7 GW and ABWR boiling water reactors ...
  188. [188]
    Bikini Atoll Nuclear Test Site - UNESCO World Heritage Centre
    After the displacement of the local inhabitants, 23 nuclear tests were carried out from 1946 to 1958,. The cumulative force of the tests in all of the Marshall ...
  189. [189]
    how the largest ever US nuclear weapons test built a nation of ...
    Feb 28, 2025 · 71 years ago, on Bikini Atoll in the Marshall Islands, a nuclear bomb with the codename “Castle Bravo”, exploded with an energy of 15 megatons.<|separator|>
  190. [190]
    British nuclear weapons testing in Australia | ARPANSA
    Nuclear testing at Maralinga concluded in 1963 and the site was closed in 1967. As part of the site closure, the British Government conducted a clean-up of the ...
  191. [191]
    The lesser known history of the Maralinga nuclear tests - ABC News
    Mar 23, 2020 · The proper clean-up between 1995 and 2000 cost more than $100 million, of which Australia paid $75 million. It has left an artificial mesa in ...
  192. [192]
    Maralinga - The Australian Museum
    Maralinga was the site of British nuclear tests in the 1950s and 60s, causing radiation exposure and health issues for local Aboriginal people. The land was ...
  193. [193]
    The bombing of the Rainbow Warrior - Greenpeace Aotearoa
    But peaceful protest has prevailed. 10 July 1985. The Greenpeace ship the Rainbow Warrior is moored in Auckland, New Zealand – ready to confront French ...
  194. [194]
    Treaty of Rarotonga | United Nations Platform for Nuclear-Weapon ...
    The Treaty of Rarotonga, the South Pacific Nuclear Free Zone Treaty, opened for signature on 6 August 1985 and entered into force on 11 December 1986.
  195. [195]
    [PDF] Call to Pacific Leaders on Fukushima Waste Dumping
    Jun 20, 2023 · Communities throughout the Pacific have voiced their deep opposition to nuclear waste dumping as it compounds the trauma and suffering of ...
  196. [196]
    AUKUS submarine base protests in Australia highlight challenges ...
    Mar 20, 2024 · Fierce resistance mounted by Australian unions against plans for a new submarine base shows the challenge facing the high-stakes defence ...
  197. [197]
    Australian Submarine Agency lobbies Fremantle locals amid protest ...
    Sep 18, 2025 · The event drew protesters opposed to the AUKUS pact and a local defence hub being used to maintain nuclear submarines. The Australian Submarine ...Missing: Zealand 2020s
  198. [198]
    Groups to protest against new submarine base in Port Kembla ...
    Sep 25, 2025 · Forty local organisations are set to protest against the planned establishment of a new base for the Royal Australian Navy's (RAN) future ...
  199. [199]
    How the KGB Silenced Dissent During the Soviet Era - History.com
    Mar 29, 2022 · As the Soviet Union's primary secret intelligence agency during the Cold War, the KGB gained notoriety for its widespread global espionage.
  200. [200]
    How The Chernobyl Nuclear Disaster Shaped Russia And Ukraine's ...
    May 1, 2021 · In 1986, celebrations across the Soviet Union were overshadowed by what had happened just days before: the Chernobyl nuclear disaster.
  201. [201]
    Chornobyl 20 Years After: Liquidators Recall Disaster, Speak Of Life ...
    Apr 20, 2006 · Russian liquidator groups estimate that in total around 600,000 people took part in the clean-up operation. They say the number could be even ...
  202. [202]
    RUSSIA: CHERNOBYL DISASTER PROTESTS - YouTube
    Jul 21, 2015 · (25 Oct 2000) Russian/Nat XFA Nearly 100 "liquidators" of the Chernobyl nuclear catastrophe in 1986 marched on Red Square in Moscow on ...
  203. [203]
    How Kazakhstan Fought Back Against Soviet Nuclear Tests
    Feb 14, 2022 · Kazakhstan's massive anti-nuclear movement, Nevada-Semipalatinsk, was born. For two years, people rallied against nuclear tests, and the ...
  204. [204]
    Russian Police Break Up Antinuclear Protest - RFE/RL
    Apr 26, 2006 · April 26, 2006 -- Moscow police today broke up a protest arranged by the environmental group Greenpeace to mark the 20th anniversary of the ...
  205. [205]
    Why Is the Anti-Nuclear Movement Today So Weak? - Posle Media
    the War Resisters ...Missing: ideologies industrialism
  206. [206]
    Filipinos protest against Bataan Nuclear Power Plant and U.S. ...
    The activists initial goal was to stop the construction and operation of the Bataan Nuclear Power Plant. Eventually, the campaign goal was expanded.
  207. [207]
    How battle vs Bataan nuke plant was won - News - Inquirer.net
    Oct 24, 2021 · NFPC activists helped prohibit nuclear weapons in any part of Philippine territory through a provision in the 1987 Constitution. This ban was ...
  208. [208]
    The great peace demonstration of 1981
    Forty years ago, the Netherlands found itself in the grip of Hollanditis, a Dutch anti-nuclear movement that galvanized the whole world. On 21 November 1981 ...Missing: protests | Show results with:protests
  209. [209]
    Nationwide anti-nuclear campaign in The Netherlands
    May 30, 2025 · On May 17th WISE Netherlands held a nationwide campaign against nuclear power in fifteen cities. The campaign focused on the skyrocketing costs ...
  210. [210]
    DEATH OF THE SOVIET UNION: A green revolution brought the ...
    Dec 8, 2021 · The anti-nuclear protests of the 1980s weren't the first environmentally motivated dissent within the Soviet Union. Several scientists in the ...
  211. [211]
    Chernobyl cover-up a catalyst for 'glasnost' - NBC News
    Apr 24, 2006 · For the Soviet Union, Chernobyl was a catalyst that forced the government into an unprecedented show of openness that paved the way for reforms ...<|separator|>
  212. [212]
    Russian environmental groups protest arrival of more nuclear waste
    Mar 23, 2009 · A series of protests against the continued import from Europe to Russia of depleted uranium hexafluoride, or uranium tails, culminated in Moscow ...
  213. [213]
    Finally arrived – DW – 11/09/2010
    Nov 9, 2010 · After nearly two days of blocking a nuclear waste storage site, thousands of protestors have been cleared from the area by police.
  214. [214]
    Anti-nuclear Movement in Russia
    The anti-nuclear movement in Russia includes protests, camps, and organizations like the Russian Socio-Ecological Union, with activities such as the 'Nuclear ...
  215. [215]
    Philippines: The 70s nuclear relic that may open at last - BBC
    Mar 29, 2023 · Finished in 1986, the Bataan plant in the Philippines has never produced a kilowatt of electricity.
  216. [216]
    Nuclear Disarmament Activism in Asia and the Pacific, 1971-1996
    Jun 15, 2009 · The antinuclear movement maintained a lively presence in the Pacific, largely in response to nuclear testing in that region.<|separator|>
  217. [217]
    "The fate of the long-mothballed Bataan Nuclear Power Plant (BNPP ...
    Sep 16, 2025 · The Philippines experienced 8- to 12- hour rolling blackouts and power rationing from 1989 to 1993. · No photo description available.
  218. [218]
    Blackouts, ballooning bills hammer Filipinos as energy crisis grips ...
    Jun 18, 2024 · The Philippines is grappling with skyrocketing electricity bills and blackouts amid a worsening energy crisis, as analysts blame policy missteps, outdated ...
  219. [219]
    Activists hold silent protest in an International Nuclear Forum ...
    Nov 13, 2024 · Activists hold silent protest in an International Nuclear Forum, highlight true costs of nuclear energy. Greenpeace Philippines. November 13, ...Missing: return 2020s
  220. [220]
    Protest - anti-nuclear posters - www.laka.org
    The closure of Dodewaard was the main focus in the haydays of the Dutch antinuclear movement in the early 80s. Thousands of peoples blocked the reactor and ...
  221. [221]
    Anti-nuclear energy action groups block access to Borssele ... - Alamy
    Mar 16, 1980 · Anti-nuclear energy action groups block access to Borssele nuclear power plant; Mobile Unit climbs over fence, March 16, 1980, blockades, ...<|separator|>
  222. [222]
    Melt-down experiment go-ahead - Nature
    A total of 150 demonstrators, members of the Dutch anti-nuclear group "Break the. Netherlands Atomic Chain" padlocked all seven gates at the plant ...
  223. [223]
    Most U.S. nuclear power plants were built between 1970 and 1990
    Apr 27, 2017 · From 1979 through 1988, 67 planned builds were canceled. However, because of the long times required for permitting and building new nuclear ...
  224. [224]
    COSTS OF NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS — WHAT WENT WRONG?
    Some plants completed in the late 1980s have cost as much as $5 billion, 30 times what they cost 15 years earlier. Inflation, of course, has played a role, but ...<|separator|>
  225. [225]
    [PDF] Factors Impacting Nuclear Energy Share in U.S. Energy Markets
    Aug 31, 2020 · Capital costs increased significantly after 1979 when the Three Mile Island accident happened. The capital costs were below 4,000$2020/kWe ...
  226. [226]
    Sources of Cost Overrun in Nuclear Power Plant Construction Call ...
    Nov 18, 2020 · Following the 1979 Three Mile Island accident, a long hiatus of nuclear construction began. Rising construction costs and project delays have ...<|separator|>
  227. [227]
    Time Essay: The Irrational Fight Against Nuclear Power
    Sep 25, 1978 · Antinuclear activists have slowed construction of power plants from Seabrook, NH, to Diablo Canyon, Calif. Angry people in Texas, New Mexico and Washington ...
  228. [228]
    Nuclear Will Break Records In 2025, But Major Challenges Remain ...
    Jan 16, 2025 · New plants have seen delays of about eight years and have been about 2.5 times over the original cost. “There is a major issue of performance of ...
  229. [229]
    Nuclear legacy costs far outweigh Germany's environmental ...
    Jul 23, 2025 · In 2024, Germany spent about 1.1 billion euros on nuclear waste management, after the country shuttered its last commercial nuclear power plants ...
  230. [230]
    Estimating the cost of Germany's nuclear phaseout - emLab, UCSB
    We estimate that the annual cost of the phase-out to German producers and consumers is $12 billion, 70% of which is from increased mortality risk from stronger ...
  231. [231]
    Why the War on Nuclear Threatens Us All - Environmental Progress
    Mar 28, 2017 · Energy efficiency and solar would obviate the need for both coal and nuclear. Construction on the plants went forward, but was repeatedly halted ...
  232. [232]
    [PDF] Environmental impact of 2011 Germany's nuclear shutdown
    Jan 29, 2024 · The study found a negative environmental impact from the 2011 nuclear shutdown, with increased fossil fuel use and decreased nitrogen oxide  ...
  233. [233]
    Economics of nuclear power: The France-Germany divide explained
    May 16, 2024 · France's investment in nuclear technology contributes to a stable, low-carbon energy supply, enhancing both energy security and economic growth.
  234. [234]
    The Divergent Paths of France and Germany: Nuclear Power vs ...
    Jul 5, 2024 · By embracing nuclear power, France has significantly reduced its greenhouse gas emissions ... emissions, undermining Germany's climate goals and ...
  235. [235]
    A nuclear plant's closure was hailed as a green win. Then emissions ...
    Mar 20, 2024 · But there has been a sting in the tail – since the closure, New York's greenhouse gas emissions have gone up.
  236. [236]
    Nuclear power generation phase-outs redistribute US air quality and ...
    Apr 10, 2023 · We explore how nuclear shut-downs in the United States could affect air pollution, climate and health with existing and alternative grid infrastructure.<|separator|>
  237. [237]
    [PDF] Nuclear Retirement Effects on CO2 Emissions - The Brattle Group
    The simulations reveal that a nuclear shutdown would have substantial impacts on emissions in adjacent and remote states, which has implications for attaining ...
  238. [238]
    Effects of nuclear power plant shutdowns on electricity consumption ...
    Results indicate that Japan generated 4.3 million metric tons (or 0.3%, with a 95% confidence interval) of additional CO2 emissions in 2011 following the ...
  239. [239]
    Nuclear Shutdowns Have Already Harmed the Planet
    Nov 1, 2022 · Every year, avoidable nuclear power plant shutdowns release CO2 emissions equivalent to 37 African countries.
  240. [240]
    Study: Shutting down nuclear power could increase air pollution
    Apr 10, 2023 · An MIT study shows that if U.S. nuclear power plants are retired, the burning of coal, oil, and natural gas to fill the energy gap could ...
  241. [241]
    Executive summary – Nuclear Power and Secure Energy Transitions
    In the IEA's Net Zero Emissions by 2050 Scenario (NZE), energy sector emissions fall by about 40% from 2020 to 2030, and then decline to zero on a net basis by ...Executive Summary · Nuclear Power Construction... · Achieving Net Zero Globally...Missing: counterfactual | Show results with:counterfactual
  242. [242]
    IEA: steep decline in nuclear power would threaten energy security ...
    May 28, 2019 · Without policy changes, advanced economies could lose 25% of their nuclear capacity by 2025 and as much as two-thirds of it by 2040, according ...Missing: warnings | Show results with:warnings
  243. [243]
    The Impact of Russia's Invasion of Ukraine on Germany's Energy ...
    The surge in energy prices following the military invasion directly impacted Germany, which had made the decision to phase out nuclear power by the end of 2022 ...
  244. [244]
    THE IMPACT OF THE RUSSIAN UKRAINIAN WAR ON GERMANY'S ...
    Oct 14, 2025 · The Russian-Ukrainian war disrupted Germany's energy landscape, impacting its Energiewende climate policy. Reduced Russian gas supplies ...
  245. [245]
    Why Japan Still Can't Quit Fossil Fuels | OilPrice.com
    Sep 1, 2025 · The result was a spike in imports of LNG, oil, and coal, and in carbon emissions. In recent years, particularly following the 2022-2023 energy ...
  246. [246]
    First new U.S. nuclear reactor since 2016 is now in operation - EIA
    Aug 1, 2023 · The total cost of the project is now estimated at more than $30 billion. Both Vogtle Units 3 and 4 use a new reactor design, the Westinghouse ...
  247. [247]
    https://milerd.com/blogs/news/nuclear-power-is-safe-debunking-myths-and-highlighting-benefits
  248. [248]
    The Path to a New Era for Nuclear Energy - IEA
    Jan 16, 2025 · This report reviews the status of nuclear energy around the world and explores risks related to policies, construction and financing.Financing nuclear projects · Outlook for nuclear investment · Executive SummaryMissing: counterfactual reduction
  249. [249]
    https://www.nrc.gov/docs/ML2013/ML20132G246.pdf
  250. [250]
    [PDF] Safety margins of operating reactors
    • Core damage frequency (d 1E – 5/Reactor-Year (R-Y)). • Probability ... should not exceed 1.0E-07 per reactor year. 70. Page 73. Annex III.
  251. [251]
    [PDF] 5b 32L - Nuclear Regulatory Commission
    core-melt accidents per year reflects these NRC revisions. In each case ... per reactor year as the derived mean frequency for a potential core damage.
  252. [252]
    Are We Approaching the End of the Linear No-Threshold Era?
    Dec 1, 2018 · There is considerable evidence for radiation hormesis and against the LNT model, including studies of atomic bomb survivors, background ...
  253. [253]
    Facilitating the End of the Linear No-Threshold Model Era - PubMed
    Aug 1, 2024 · This editorial examines the persistence of the LNT model despite evidence favoring radiation hormesis and proposes a solution.
  254. [254]
    5 Fast Facts about Spent Nuclear Fuel | Department of Energy
    Oct 3, 2022 · Spent fuel is solid, made of uranium oxide pellets. The US generates 2,000 metric tons yearly, stored at 70+ sites, and can be recycled.
  255. [255]
    Nuclear Waste Disposal | U.S. GAO - Government Accountability Office
    The nation has over 90,000 metric tons of spent nuclear fuel from commercial nuclear power plants.
  256. [256]
    Coal Combustion Residuals (CCR) Basics | US EPA
    Aug 27, 2025 · According to the American Coal Ash Association's Coal Combustion Product Production & Use Survey Report, nearly 130 million tons of coal ash ...
  257. [257]
    France sets out long-term nuclear recycling plans
    Mar 8, 2024 · In the French model, the reusable materials which make up some 96% of used fuel are separated at La Hague.Missing: rate | Show results with:rate
  258. [258]
    Radioactive Waste – Myths and Realities - World Nuclear Association
    Feb 13, 2025 · 4. Nuclear waste is hazardous for tens of thousands of years. This clearly is unprecedented and poses a huge threat to our future generations.
  259. [259]
    [PDF] Waste Isolation Pilot Plant Annual Site Environmental Report for 2022
    Sep 29, 2023 · indicated that there have been no releases of radionuclides from the WIPP facility that may adversely impact the public. Results of the ...
  260. [260]
    Yucca Mountain safety review complete - World Nuclear News
    Jan 30, 2015 · The US Nuclear Regulatory Commission has published the final two volumes of its safety evaluation report for the proposed Yucca Mountain ...Missing: assessment | Show results with:assessment
  261. [261]
    Nuclear power and the environment - U.S. Energy Information ... - EIA
    Nuclear power reactors do not produce direct carbon dioxide emissions. Unlike fossil fuel-fired power plants, nuclear reactors do not produce air pollution or ...
  262. [262]
    Quantifying mining requirement and waste for energy sustainability
    May 2, 2025 · Nuclear power is responsible for the least amount of waste per energy generation due to its high capacity factor and longevity of power plants.
  263. [263]
    [PDF] Climate Change Targets: The Role of Nuclear Energy
    The IPCC found that, on average, the pathways for the 1.5°C scenario require nuclear energy to reach 1 160 gigawatts of electricity by 2050, up from 394 ...
  264. [264]
    Why we must embrace nuclear energy to fight climate change
    Jan 17, 2024 · Globally, nuclear energy is also playing a key role in the transition to net zero. Fears about nuclear are slowly giving way to fact-based ...
  265. [265]
    Where the world nuclear revival is happening
    Aug 6, 2025 · The low-emissions power source is experiencing a "steady comeback", according to the World Economic Forum report, Fostering Effective Energy ...
  266. [266]
    Nearly 50-year-old law hamstrings nuclear energy in California
    Oct 9, 2025 · Nuclear energy has been stymied by Californian law for nearly five decades, hurting the state's ability to hit its own climate goals and ...
  267. [267]
    Unmasking the Claims of the Antinuclear Movement: Climate, Health ...
    In contrast, the shutdown of nuclear power plants has led to thousands of premature deaths due to increased air pollution from burning fossil fuels instead, ...Missing: prolongation | Show results with:prolongation
  268. [268]
    Nuclear Power in a Clean Energy System – Analysis - IEA
    May 27, 2019 · Nuclear plants can help to limit the impacts from seasonal fluctuations in output from renewables and bolster energy security by reducing ...
  269. [269]
    https://www.iaea.org/newscenter/news/nuclear-power-10-years-after-fukushima-the-long-road-back
  270. [270]
    At COP28, Countries Launch Declaration to Triple Nuclear Energy ...
    Dec 1, 2023 · Core elements of the declaration include working together to advance a goal of tripling nuclear energy capacity globally by 2050 and inviting ...
  271. [271]
    https://www.world-nuclear-news.org/articles/poll-finds-global-public-support-for-nuclear-remains-high
  272. [272]
    Nuclear Energy and Public Opinion
    Jul 24, 2025 · The 2023 PACE index showed that the majority of countries surveyed were net supporters of nuclear energy's use.
  273. [273]
    Poll finds global public support for nuclear remains high
    Jun 13, 2025 · The newly published report shows that "22 of the 31 countries surveyed have net support (support exceeding opposition) for nuclear energy's use.
  274. [274]
    Public Attitudes toward Clean Energy 2023 - Nuclear
    Dec 21, 2023 · 17 of the 20 countries surveyed have net support (support exceeding opposition) for nuclear energy's use.
  275. [275]
    Three Mile Island's possible nuclear power restart draws protest
    Aug 12, 2024 · The event, organized by Stilp and Three Mile Island Alert, was the first in what is expected to be a series of demonstrations against the ...
  276. [276]
    Anti-nuclear activists call for broader environmental review on ...
    May 16, 2025 · A host of organizations are challenging regulator's findings that reviving the reactor would not bring significant harm to the environment.
  277. [277]
    Germany extends nuclear power amid energy crisis - BBC
    Oct 17, 2022 · German Chancellor Olaf Scholz has ordered the country's three remaining nuclear power stations to keep operating until mid-April.
  278. [278]
    Belgian government seeks to reverse nuclear phase-out policy
    Feb 4, 2025 · Belgium finalised plans in December 2023 to extend the lifetimes of Doel 4 and Tihange 3 by 10 years, providing capacity of 2 GWe from the ...<|separator|>
  279. [279]
    Germany's nuclear shutdown mistake: rising prices, increased ...
    Mar 12, 2025 · Within six months eight reactors ceased operations; the were progressively phased out until the final three were shut down in April 2023. In ...Missing: timeline | Show results with:timeline<|separator|>
  280. [280]
    IAEA Raises Nuclear Power Projections for Fifth Consecutive Year
    Sep 15, 2025 · In the high case projection, nuclear electrical generating capacity is projected to increase to 992 GW(e) by 2050. In the low case projection, ...Missing: 2023-2025 | Show results with:2023-2025
  281. [281]
    [PDF] International Conference on Small Modular Reactors and their ...
    Oct 23, 2024 · International Conference on Resilience of Nuclear Installations against External Events from a. Safety Perspective (CN-337). 20 – 24 October ...Missing: anti- protests
  282. [282]
    World Nuclear Performance Report 2025
    Sep 1, 2025 · In 2024 the global average capacity factor was 83%, up from 82% in 2023, continuing the trend of high global capacity factors seen since 2000.
  283. [283]
    [PDF] Civil Nuclear: Roadmap to 2050 - GOV.UK
    The purpose of this Roadmap is to send an unambiguous signal to the nuclear sector and investors, setting out how we expect UK nuclear deployment to happen, a ...
  284. [284]
    The New Nuclear Age: Why the World Is Rethinking Atomic Power
    Sep 25, 2025 · Innovations in fission like small modular reactors (SMRs) are shaping what the revival of traditional nuclear fission could look like.