Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Thermal Oxide Reprocessing Plant

The Thermal Oxide Reprocessing Plant (THORP) was a commercial-scale nuclear fuel reprocessing facility located at the Sellafield site in Cumbria, England, designed to chemically separate uranium and plutonium from spent oxide fuel generated by thermal reactors, including UK advanced gas-cooled reactors and overseas light-water reactors.^[1]^[2] Operational from 1994 to 2018, THORP reprocessed over 9,000 tonnes of spent fuel, one of only two such commercial plants worldwide alongside France's La Hague facility.^[3]^[4] The plant's construction, one of the largest engineering projects of the 1980s, cost approximately £2.8 billion and generated an estimated £9 billion in revenue through contracts with UK and international customers, supporting the nuclear fuel recycling cycle while producing vitrified high-level waste.^[5]^[1]^[6] However, THORP's operations were plagued by technical failures, most notably a 2005 incident where 83,000 liters of highly radioactive dissolver liquor leaked from a fractured pipe in a shielded cell, remaining undetected for eight months due to inadequate monitoring and safety protocols, resulting in regulatory scrutiny, fines, and a permanent reduction in processing capacity.^[7]^[6]^[8] Following the cessation of reprocessing, the facility transitioned to post-operational clean-out and spent fuel storage, with decommissioning costs projected at £3.7 billion amid broader challenges in managing accumulated plutonium stocks and legacy wastes at Sellafield.^[1]^[6]

Background and Development

Conception and Rationale

The Thermal Oxide Reprocessing Plant (THORP) was conceived in the early 1970s by British Nuclear Fuels Limited (BNFL) to address the growing accumulation of spent oxide fuel from the United Kingdom's Advanced Gas-Cooled Reactors (AGRs) and to accommodate similar fuel from foreign Light Water Reactors (LWRs).^[6] BNFL submitted a formal proposal to the UK government in September 1975, leading to a private decision in March 1976 to proceed with the project at the Sellafield site (then known as Windscale).^[6] This initiative followed the UK's established Magnox reprocessing capabilities, which handled metallic uranium fuel but were inadequate for the oxide-based fuels (primarily uranium dioxide, UO₂) emerging from the post-1970s nuclear expansion.^[1]^[9] The core rationale centered on resource recovery and waste minimization through the PUREX aqueous process, which separates approximately 96% of the spent fuel's uranium and plutonium for potential reuse in fresh fuel fabrication, while isolating fission products for vitrification into stable borosilicate glass logs to reduce high-level waste volume by a factor of about 20 compared to direct storage of assemblies.^[9] Economically, THORP was positioned as a commercial venture to generate revenue—projected at £500 million over the first decade—from reprocessing contracts with overseas customers, particularly Japan and Germany, secured between 1978 and 1981, thereby sustaining BNFL's operations and the UK's nuclear supply chain amid domestic fuel demands.^[6] Strategically, it aligned with ambitions for a "plutonium economy," providing separated plutonium to fuel fast-breeder reactors (FBRs), with plans anticipating needs for up to eight such units by 2000 to extend uranium resources and enhance energy security following the 1973 oil crisis.^[6] Development advanced despite public and international scrutiny, culminating in the 1977 Windscale Inquiry (June–November), which, under Mr. Justice Parker, approved the project over environmental and proliferation concerns, followed by parliamentary endorsement via a Special Development Order on May 15, 1978.^[6]^[1] This reflected the UK government's commitment to a closed nuclear fuel cycle, contrasting with contemporaneous U.S. restrictions on reprocessing under President Carter's non-proliferation policy (1977–1981), though UK projections emphasized industrial self-sufficiency over weapons production, building on earlier fissile material recovery for civil and defense purposes.^[6]

Planning and Approvals

The planning process for the Thermal Oxide Reprocessing Plant (THORP) at Sellafield originated with British Nuclear Fuels Limited (BNFL) submitting an application in 1977 for outline permission to construct an oxide fuel reprocessing facility at the Windscale site, amid expectations of growing demand for reprocessing services from advanced gas-cooled reactors and light-water reactors.^[10] This proposal faced immediate scrutiny due to concerns over radioactive discharges, nuclear proliferation risks, and long-term waste storage, prompting the UK government to convene the Windscale Public Inquiry from May 1977 to early 1978.^[6] The inquiry, spanning 340 sessions and involving 312 witnesses, including experts from environmental organizations and international bodies, rigorously assessed safety protocols, economic justifications projected at £300-£500 million in construction costs, and environmental impacts under the Town and Country Planning Act 1971.^[11] The inquiry inspector, Mr. Justice Parker, issued a report in January 1978 recommending approval, concluding that the plant's benefits in fuel resource recovery and revenue generation—estimated to yield £7,000 million over its lifetime from domestic and international contracts—outweighed the manageable risks, provided stringent discharge limits were enforced.^[11] The Secretary of State for the Environment accepted these findings, granting outline planning permission on 13 January 1978, which allowed initial site preparations but required detailed consents for construction and operation.^[11] Environmental opposition persisted, with groups like Cumbria County Council and Friends of the Earth challenging the decision on procedural grounds, though courts upheld the approvals as compliant with statutory requirements. Subsequent delays arose from macroeconomic pressures and a 1981 government review under the Conservative administration, which scrutinized BNFL's financial projections amid global uranium price fluctuations and reduced reprocessing demand forecasts.^[6] Detailed planning permission for construction was secured in 1983 following supplementary environmental assessments, enabling groundworks to commence in 1984 at an escalated cost of approximately £1.8 billion by completion. Operational approval required further hurdles, including a 1993 public inquiry into commissioning discharges and a High Court review of Greenpeace's objections on proliferation and waste grounds; the government confirmed consent on 15 December 1993, affirming that THORP's shear-leach and solvent extraction processes met International Atomic Energy Agency safeguards and UK radiological protection standards.^[12] ^[6] This phased approval structure reflected causal trade-offs between energy security imperatives and risk mitigation, with no evidence of undue political influence overriding empirical safety data from prior Magnox reprocessing operations.^[13]

Construction Timeline

The UK government granted approval for the construction of the Thermal Oxide Reprocessing Plant (THORP) at Sellafield in 1978, following the Windscale Public Inquiry held from 1977 to 1978, which examined the environmental and safety implications of the project.^[1]^[6] Site clearance and initial construction activities commenced in 1981, marking the beginning of what became one of Europe's largest industrial projects at the time, spanning over a third of a mile and involving complex engineering for fuel reprocessing facilities.^[1] Full planning permission was secured in 1983, after which major civil engineering works began in 1984, employing more than 5,000 workers on-site and supporting around 10,000 jobs in the supply chain.^[6]^[1] Key infrastructure milestones included the opening of the receipt and storage pond in 1988, a structure measuring 73 meters long, 23 meters wide, and 8 meters deep, designed to hold irradiated fuel prior to reprocessing.^[1] Construction proceeded to schedule without major reported delays, culminating in the completion of the facility in 1992, after which non-active and active commissioning phases tested systems ahead of operational startup.^[6]^[14] The project adhered to its original timetable outlined approximately six years prior, despite the scale and technical challenges involved.^[15]

Facility Design and Operations

Core Reprocessing Process

The Thermal Oxide Reprocessing Plant (THORP) at Sellafield employs a modified PUREX (plutonium-uranium reduction extraction) hydrometallurgical process to separate reusable fissile materials from spent thermal oxide nuclear fuel, primarily light water reactor (LWR) and advanced gas-cooled reactor (AGR) assemblies containing uranium oxide (UO₂) or mixed oxide (MOX) fuel.^[16]^[17] The process recovers approximately 99% of uranium and 98.75% of plutonium, with the remaining fission products and minor actinides directed to waste vitrification, operating at a design capacity of 1200 metric tonnes of initial heavy metal (tHM) per year.^[16] Key features include the use of salt-free redox reagents like hydroxylamine nitrate (HAN) or acetohydroxamic acid (AHA) to minimize secondary waste volumes and enhance proliferation resistance by limiting plutonium extractability in certain cycles.^[16]^[18] The head-end stage begins with irradiated fuel assemblies transferred from storage ponds to shear cells, where they are mechanically cut into segments of 1–5 inches to expose the fuel matrix while retaining zircaloy or stainless steel cladding hulls as insoluble waste.^[1]^[16] These segments are then dissolved in hot concentrated nitric acid (typically 3M HNO₃, up to 8M for refractory MOX), producing a dissolver product liquor containing uranyl nitrate (UO₂(NO₃)₂), plutonium nitrate (Pu(NO₃)₄), and fission products at uranium concentrations around 250 g/L.^[16] Gadolinium nitrate is added to the dissolver to suppress criticality risks, and nitrogen oxides generated ensure plutonium valence as Pu(IV) for subsequent extraction.^[16] Volatile fission products such as krypton-85 (85% recovered), iodine-129 (98.4% captured in waste form), tritium (100% via voloxidation), and others are vented to an off-gas treatment system involving caustic scrubbing and isotopic dilution for controlled release or storage.^[16] The liquor is clarified via centrifuges to remove undissolved hulls, which are rinsed and compacted for intermediate-level waste storage.^[18]^[16] In the chemical separation phase, the clarified liquor undergoes counter-current solvent extraction using 20–30% tributyl phosphate (TBP) diluted in odorless kerosene or dodecane within pulsed columns or centrifugal contactors, which provide efficient mixing without moving parts to reduce maintenance in shielded cells.^[18]^[16] The organic phase selectively extracts uranium(VI) and plutonium(IV), achieving decontamination factors for plutonium of 8.6×10⁶ to 1.22×10¹⁰ from fission products, while neptunium is partially co-extracted (67%) and technetium follows uranium (later scrubbed via ion exchange or high-acidity stripping).^[16]^[17] Partitioning occurs in a dedicated column where Pu(IV) is reduced to Pu(III) using HAN, transferring plutonium to the aqueous raffinate while uranium remains in the organic phase; this step uses salt-free agents to avoid sodium salts that complicate vitrification.^[16] The plutonium stream undergoes further purification cycles, yielding plutonium nitrate solution concentrated and converted via oxalic acid precipitation to PuO₂ powder.^[17] Uranium is stripped, concentrated as uranyl nitrate, calcined to UO₃, and reduced to UO₂ or further processed to UF₆ for enrichment reuse, with residual technetium limited to 0.03 ppm in the final product.^[16]^[17] High-level waste raffinate from the extraction, comprising fission products and minor actinides, is calcined to reduce volume and incorporated into borosilicate glass logs via the adjacent vitrification plant for long-term storage, generating approximately 450 liters of vitrified waste per tHM processed.^[16]^[17] The process employs remote handling in "dark cells" with secondary containment, fluidic pumps, and pulse jet mixers to ensure reliability and minimize human exposure, with all operations monitored via a distributed control system.^[18] Red oil formation risks from TBP-nitric acid interactions are mitigated by temperature controls below 60°C and steam stripping.^[16] Overall, THORP's design prioritizes efficient recovery while containing radiological hazards, though operational challenges like crud buildup in contactors have required periodic interventions.^[16]^[18]

Infrastructure and Capacity

The Thermal Oxide Reprocessing Plant (THORP) at Sellafield, Cumbria, comprises a single integrated structure over a third of a mile in length, housing the full suite of facilities for spent nuclear fuel receipt, storage, shearing, chemical separation, and product handling under one roof.^[19]^[1] This design minimizes material transfers and enhances containment, featuring shielded "dark cells" with stainless steel liners for secondary containment and remote operations without routine human entry.^[18] Central to the infrastructure are the Receipt and Storage Ponds, each 73 meters long, 23 meters wide, and 8 meters deep, with a water volume equivalent to twenty Olympic-sized swimming pools for cooling and shielding spent fuel assemblies prior to reprocessing.^[1] Upgrades completed in recent years, including high-density 63-can storage racks, expanded pond capacity from 4,000 tonnes to 6,000 tonnes of heavy metal, enabling secure interim storage of fuel from UK advanced gas-cooled reactors and international sources.^[20]^[1] Key equipment includes head-end shear and dissolver units for fuel disassembly and nitric acid dissolution, followed by pulse columns employing the PUREX solvent extraction process for uranium and plutonium separation, supported by fluidic pumps, pulse jet mixers, and centrifuges for clarification.^[18] Waste streams are managed via evaporators, such as Evaporator C and the later-added Evaporator D, while accountancy tanks suspended on load cells ensure precise nuclear material tracking throughout the process.^[18]^[6] All-welded stainless steel piping and vessels facilitate continuous flow with minimal maintenance.^[18] THORP's nominal processing capacity is 1,200 tonnes of heavy metal per year, corresponding to about 5 tonnes of irradiated oxide fuel daily, designed to handle assemblies from light-water and advanced gas-cooled reactors up to 48,000 megawatt-days per tonne burnup.^[6]^[18] Post-2018 decommissioning of active reprocessing, the facility's infrastructure supports long-term fuel storage until the 2070s.^[6]

Safety and Containment Systems

The Thermal Oxide Reprocessing Plant (THORP) at Sellafield incorporates a multi-barrier defense-in-depth strategy for containment, prioritizing physical isolation of radioactive materials to prevent releases under normal operations, anticipated faults, or design-basis accidents. Primary containment encompasses the sealed process vessels, piping, and equipment within individual shielded cells, engineered to withstand internal pressures, corrosion from acidic liquors, and mechanical stresses associated with shearing, dissolution, and solvent extraction processes. These components are fabricated from corrosion-resistant materials such as stainless steel and titanium, with welded joints inspected via non-destructive testing to minimize leak paths.^[18]^[13] Secondary containment surrounds the primary systems with robust structural envelopes, including cells constructed from up to 2 meters of reinforced concrete for biological shielding against gamma and neutron radiation, often lined with stainless steel sumps and trays to capture and direct any escaped fluids via gravity drainage. Sumps feature integrated level sensors, radiation monitors, and sampling ports for routine verification of integrity, enabling detection of anomalies through elevated radioactivity in drainage waters. This layered design ensures that even significant internal leaks, such as the 83 cubic meters of uranium-bearing liquor in 2005, remain confined without breaching tertiary boundaries or affecting the environment.^[21]^[7]^[18] Radiological protection systems emphasize remote operations to limit human exposure, utilizing master-slave manipulators, closed-circuit television, and automated handling in high-radiation zones, achieving average dose rates below 1 µSv/hr in most accessible areas and target limits of 5 mSv annual effective dose per worker. Shielding calculations incorporate empirical data from operational analogs like Magnox reprocessing, with concrete densities optimized for attenuation based on isotope-specific gamma spectra from fission products and actinides. Criticality safety is maintained through geometric controls, neutron poisons in solutions, and real-time monitoring with fission chambers to enforce subcritical mass limits.^[13]^[22] Monitoring integrates continuous process instrumentation, such as flow meters, pressure transducers, and in-line radiometric analyzers, interfaced with safety instrumented systems compliant with UK nuclear regulations for fault detection and automated shutdowns. Post-2005 enhancements included improved sump sampling protocols and vibration monitoring on pipework to address erosion-corrosion mechanisms, validated through probabilistic risk assessments demonstrating containment reliability exceeding 10^-5 per year for radiological releases.^[22]^[23]

Operational Performance

Startup and Initial Runs

Commissioning of the Thermal Oxide Reprocessing Plant (THORP) at Sellafield commenced in late 1991, marking the transition from construction to operational testing.^[18] The facility achieved initial operational status in 1994, with the first batch of spent nuclear fuel undergoing shearing on March 1994.^[6] This process involved cutting irradiated fuel assemblies into smaller pieces to facilitate dissolution in nitric acid, initiating the chemical separation of uranium and plutonium.^[1] Initial runs focused on validating the head-end processes, including fuel shearing and dissolution, using low-burnup fuel to minimize risks during startup.^[18] By early 1994, the plant had successfully processed its first radioactive fuel, demonstrating the viability of the shear-dissolve sequence central to THORP's design.^[18] These early operations proceeded under strict regulatory oversight from the UK's Nuclear Installations Inspectorate, with incremental scaling to ensure containment integrity and process efficiency.^[1] Performance during the startup phase met design expectations for head-end throughput, though full-scale reprocessing ramp-up extended into subsequent years.^[6] By early 1998, THORP had reprocessed over 1,400 tonnes of irradiated fuel, indicating a successful progression from initial trials to steady-state operations. No major anomalies were reported in these formative runs, contrasting with later incidents and underscoring the plant's engineered robustness for oxide fuel handling.^[18]

Throughput and Outputs

The Thermal Oxide Reprocessing Plant (THORP) at Sellafield was designed with a nominal annual throughput capacity of 1200 tonnes of heavy metal (tHM) from spent thermal oxide nuclear fuel, primarily light-water reactor assemblies.^[6] However, operational performance fell short of this target due to technical challenges, including a major leak in 2005 that reduced capacity by approximately 50%, limited evaporator availability, and other maintenance issues; the plant achieved an average annual throughput of about 400 tHM over its active period from 1994 to 2018.^[6]^[24] In total, THORP reprocessed 9331 tHM of spent fuel before ceasing operations in November 2018 upon fulfillment of existing contracts.^[4] The reprocessing process separated uranium (approximately 96% of input mass as reprocessed uranium, or RepU), plutonium (about 1% as plutonium oxide), and the remaining fission products and actinides (roughly 3% as high-level liquid waste, subsequently vitrified for storage).^[6] From the total throughput, THORP produced around 56 tonnes of separated plutonium by shutdown, including both UK-owned and customer-owned stocks, with foreign plutonium holdings peaking at 27.9 tonnes in 2011.^[25]^[6] Recovered uranium was converted to oxide form for potential reuse or storage, though conversion rates were low, with only about 14% of RepU transformed into exportable fuel during normal operations.^[26] High-level waste outputs were managed through vitrification in an adjacent plant, producing glass logs for interim storage, while intermediate- and low-level wastes were generated as secondary streams from process liquors and effluents.^[6]

International Contracts and Fuel Recovery

THORP's international contracts focused on reprocessing spent light water reactor fuel from foreign utilities, with baseload agreements secured before construction for 4,405 tonnes from overseas sources across eight countries: Japan (2,673 tonnes), Germany (969 tonnes), Switzerland (422 tonnes), Italy (143 tonnes), Spain (145 tonnes), Sweden (140 tonnes), Netherlands (53 tonnes), and Canada (2 tonnes).^[6] These contracts, totaling around 7,000 tonnes including UK fuel for the first decade of operations starting in 1995, underpinned the plant's economic justification by promising steady revenue from material recovery and waste management services.^[6] Post-baseload extensions added commitments, such as 787 tonnes from Germany, though 500 tonnes of these were cancelled in 1995 amid German utilities' responses to domestic nuclear policy changes.^[6] By the end of operations on 14 November 2018, THORP had fulfilled remaining contracts, reprocessing fuel from 30 customers in nine countries and totaling 9,331 tonnes overall, with overseas contributions approximating the initial 4,405 tonnes after accounting for completions and minor additions like Dutch and Italian shipments.^[6] ^[3] No new international contracts were awarded after the baseload phase, as European customers shifted toward nuclear phase-outs and Japanese commitments stabilized without expansion.^[27] The contracts generated approximately £9 billion in revenue for the UK, primarily from reprocessing fees that included fuel recovery and waste vitrification.^[28] Fuel recovery under these contracts utilized the PUREX process to separate uranium (typically 95-96% of spent fuel mass as uranyl nitrate, convertible to UF6 or oxide for re-enrichment) and plutonium (about 1% as PuO2 for MOX fuel fabrication) from dissolved fuel assemblies, enabling reuse of over 97% of the original energy content.^[17] Overall, THORP recovered 56 tonnes of plutonium, with overseas-owned stocks peaking at 27.9 tonnes in 2011, returned to customers like Japanese utilities for domestic MOX programs.^[6] High-level waste, reduced to stable vitrified forms, was packaged into 1,840 containers for repatriation, with over half returned by 2021 to Japan (largest recipient, half the total), Switzerland, Germany, Netherlands, and Italy via specialized shipments monitored for safety.^[28] This recovery model allowed customers to close fuel cycles partially, though proliferation concerns and recycling economics limited broader adoption beyond initial agreements.^[6]

Incidents and Safety Assessments

2005 Internal Uranium Leak

In April 2005, the Thermal Oxide Reprocessing Plant (THORP) at Sellafield experienced a significant internal leak of highly radioactive dissolver product liquor within a shielded feed clarification cell. The leak originated from a fatigue failure in nozzle N5 on the Head End accountancy tank (vessel V2207B), caused by excessive vibration from pulse jet agitation of the tank contents, which was aggravated by a 1997 operational modification that removed restraining mechanisms.^[7]^[23] Leakage initiated prior to 28 August 2004, with a probable complete severance of the nozzle occurring around January 2005, accumulating approximately 83,000 liters of liquor containing about 22 tonnes of uranium, 160 kg of plutonium, and fission products dissolved in nitric acid.^[7]^[8] The incident remained undetected for over eight months due to multiple operational shortcomings, including a malfunctioning pneumercator level gauge that failed to trigger alarms reliably, inadequate sampling and monitoring protocols, and operator complacency toward discrepancies in nuclear material accountancy.^[7]^[23] Prior warnings, such as elevated uranium levels in an August 2004 sample (50 g/L) and unaddressed recommendations from a 1998 similar leak incident, were not acted upon effectively, reflecting gaps in maintenance records, alarm management, and safety culture.^[23] Detection occurred on 20 April 2005 during a routine camera inspection prompted by material balance anomalies and sump level indications, leading to immediate notification to the Health and Safety Executive (HSE) that evening.^[7]^[8] The liquor was fully contained within the cell's secondary containment sump, preventing any release to the environment or exposure to workers, with radiation levels remaining below public safety limits.^[7] THORP operations were suspended on 9 May 2005, with recovery of the leaked material completed by 14 June 2005, but full restart delayed until 9 January 2007 due to extensive investigations, equipment modifications, and cleanup efforts estimated at over $500 million.^[8]^[22] The event was rated Level 3 on the International Nuclear Event Scale (INES) for its potential severity despite containment.^[22] HSE's investigation issued two Improvement Notices to British Nuclear Fuels Limited (BNFL, operator at the time), citing non-compliance with safety instructions and inadequate risk controls, resulting in a £500,000 fine and £67,959 in costs on 16 October 2006.^[7] Key recommendations included enhancing leak detection systems, revising design change assessments, improving alarm prioritization, and fostering a more vigilant safety culture to prevent recurrence, emphasizing the need for rigorous adherence to operational limits and better integration of human factors in high-hazard processes.^[7]^[23] This incident underscored vulnerabilities in THORP's aging infrastructure and monitoring, though it did not compromise overall containment integrity.^[8]

Other Operational Anomalies

In March 1994, shortly after THORP's operational startup on March 4, a spillage of nitric acid occurred within the first week, necessitating a plant closure lasting nearly three weeks for remediation and safety assessments.^[6] Erosion of an outlet pipe in the dissolver cell led to a leak of highly radioactive solution into the secondary containment sump in 1998, prompting an internal investigation that issued 28 recommendations on monitoring, sampling, and instrumentation, though implementation was not formally tracked.^[8]^[23] Throughout the Baseload phase from 1994 to 2004, THORP experienced recurrent equipment failures, pipe leaks, blockages, and corrosion, particularly in the high-level waste evaporator (Evaporator C), which contributed to processing only 5,045 tonnes of heavy metal by 2004, falling short of the 7,000-tonne target.^[6] Pipe blockages specifically disrupted advanced gas-cooled reactor (AGR) fuel reprocessing from April 1998 to January 1999, exacerbating delays.^[6] Additional issues included the need to replace corroded dissolver baskets and further instances of pipe leaks and equipment malfunctions, which periodically halted operations and underscored ongoing challenges with material degradation under corrosive chemical environments.^[29] These anomalies highlighted vulnerabilities in remote-handling systems and process reliability, though none resulted in off-site releases.^[21]

Comparative Safety Record

THORP's operational safety record from 1994 to its cessation of reprocessing in 2018 featured no instances of off-site radiological releases attributable to the plant's core processes, with radiological doses to the public estimated at less than 3 µSv annually from direct site contributions, a fraction of natural background radiation levels of approximately 2,400 µSv per year in the UK.^[30] The facility's most significant event was an internal leak on April 19, 2005, involving around 20 tonnes of uranyl nitrate solution from a pipe in the dissolver area, which remained fully contained within the plant, resulting in no detectable radiation exposure to workers or environmental discharge; this incident was rated Level 3 on the International Nuclear Event Scale (INES) due to the volume leaked and detection delays, highlighting instrumentation and monitoring shortcomings but effective secondary containment. ^[31] In comparison to the La Hague reprocessing complex in France, which has processed over 35,000 tonnes of spent fuel since the 1960s, THORP experienced fewer reported worker contamination events, though La Hague's incidents—such as a 1978 HAO building anomaly and a 1984 bituminization fire yielding a collective worker dose of 728 man-rem (7.28 Sv)—were also contained without public impact, with subsequent operational enhancements reducing average annual collective doses to below 100 man-Sv by the 2000s.^[32] ^[33] La Hague recorded an INES Level 1 skin contamination of a subcontractor in 2002 during equipment rinsing, underscoring procedural lapses similar to those at THORP but at a lower severity threshold. Both plants adhere to IAEA safety standards for fuel reprocessing facilities, emphasizing multiple barriers for fission product containment and defense-in-depth principles, with no INES Level 4 or higher events impacting the public across commercial reprocessing operations globally.^[34] Epidemiological data from Sellafield workers, encompassing THORP operations, reveal lower all-cause mortality among radiation-monitored personnel compared to non-radiation workers and the general UK population, despite positive associations between cumulative doses (typically under 100 mSv lifetime for most) and certain ill-defined or secondary site cancers; these findings align with broader nuclear industry trends where occupational exposures correlate with no excess leukemia risk and potential healthy worker effects.^[35] ^[36] Reprocessing facilities like THORP demonstrate radiological safety performance consistent with OECD/NEA assessments of fuel cycle operations, where incident frequencies remain low relative to throughput—e.g., THORP processed over 9,000 tonnes of spent fuel without core process failures leading to barrier breaches—prioritizing chemical process controls alongside radiation protection to mitigate risks from fissile materials and volatile fission products.^[32] ^[1]

Economic and Strategic Contributions

Financial Outcomes

The Thermal Oxide Reprocessing Plant (THORP) at Sellafield was constructed at a cost of approximately £2.8 billion, with financing largely derived from advance payments by overseas customers for future reprocessing services.^[6] This figure represented significant overruns from initial estimates of £300 million in 1977, escalating due to delays and design changes during the build phase from the 1970s to completion in 1992.^[37] Operating revenues totaled an estimated £9 billion over its 25-year lifespan, generated primarily from reprocessing around 9,000 tonnes of spent nuclear fuel, much of it from international contracts with utilities in countries such as Germany, Japan, and Switzerland.^[1]^[38] Despite these revenues, THORP's financial performance fell short of projections, which had anticipated a £500 million profit within the first decade of operation based on a baseload of 7,000 tonnes by 2004 and full capacity utilization of 1,200 tonnes per year.^[25] Actual throughput averaged only 400 tonnes per year, hampered by operational shortfalls, contract cancellations totaling over 1,000 tonnes (about 20% of secured overseas business), and incidents like the 2005 uranium leak, which incurred downtime costs exceeding £100 million and reduced capacity by half.^[6]^[27] British Nuclear Fuels Limited (BNFL), THORP's operator until privatization efforts faltered, reported broader company losses linked to reprocessing inefficiencies, including £337 million in 1999-2000 and £1.9 billion in 2002-2003, partly attributable to THORP's underperformance and waste handling failures.^[39]^[40] Post-2005, under the state-owned Nuclear Decommissioning Authority (NDA), THORP's economics were assessed as marginally competitive in scenarios incorporating overseas fuel income to offset domestic reprocessing costs, estimated at £933-1,384 per kg heavy metal at partial capacity.^[41] However, escalating decommissioning liabilities—projected at £3.7 billion for THORP alone, plus £2-3 billion for plutonium disposition—shifted the net outcome toward public fiscal burden, integrated into Sellafield's overall £91 billion cleanup estimate by 2120.^[6] The plant's closure in 2018 reflected a strategic pivot to direct fuel disposal, underscoring reprocessing's limited long-term viability amid high capital amortization and operational risks.^[4]

Employment and Regional Impact

The Thermal Oxide Reprocessing Plant (THORP) directly employed approximately 800 workers during its operational period from 1994 to 2018, primarily in technical roles related to fuel handling, chemical processing, and waste management.^[42]^[43] These positions offered wages above regional averages, contributing to elevated household incomes in West Cumbria, an area characterized by limited alternative employment opportunities outside agriculture, tourism, and declining mining sectors.^[6] THORP's construction phase, culminating in commissioning on March 28, 1995, generated a temporary surge in jobs, with around 1,000 contractor personnel involved in building and fitting out the facility before its handover to British Nuclear Fuels Limited (BNFL) operators.^[44] This peak contrasted with steady employment declines in West Cumbria over the preceding two decades, where traditional industries shed workers amid national deindustrialization; THORP's development provided a localized counter-cyclical boost, though post-construction redundancies followed as contractors demobilized.^[45] As an integral component of the Sellafield site, THORP amplified indirect economic effects through procurement of goods, services, and subcontractor labor, sustaining supply chain jobs in engineering, logistics, and maintenance across Cumbria.^[3] The nuclear sector at Sellafield, including THORP contributions, generated about 40% of West Cumbria's gross value added and supported roughly 12,000 direct jobs regionally—60% of the UK's nuclear workforce—fostering skills in specialized fields but also creating structural dependency, with three-fifths of local employment tied to site activities by 2018.^[46]^[47] Following THORP's reprocessing halt in November 2018, the Nuclear Decommissioning Authority prioritized redeploying its 800 staff to ongoing Sellafield operations, such as legacy waste retrieval and site restoration, averting mass layoffs but shifting focus from fuel recovery to long-term cleanup with potentially lower skill premiums.^[42]^[48] This transition highlighted THORP's role in maintaining economic stability for West Cumbria's communities, where nuclear-related work has historically buffered against broader UK unemployment rates, though critics note over-reliance risks vulnerability to policy shifts or technological obsolescence.^[45]

Role in Nuclear Independence

The Thermal Oxide Reprocessing Plant (THORP) bolstered the United Kingdom's nuclear independence by facilitating domestic management of spent oxide fuels from Advanced Gas-cooled Reactors (AGRs) and other light-water reactor types, recovering uranium and plutonium for potential reuse rather than relying on indefinite storage or foreign processing. Commissioned in 1994 with a design capacity of 1,200 metric tonnes of heavy metal per year, THORP separated approximately 96% of the original uranium and 0.9-1% plutonium from processed fuel, enabling recycling into new fuel assemblies and extending indigenous fuel resources amid limited domestic uranium deposits. This closed-loop approach reduced the UK's vulnerability to international uranium price volatility, which peaked at over $130 per pound in 2007, by reclaiming fissile materials that could offset up to 25-30% of fresh uranium needs in a fully recycled cycle.^[17]^[1] THORP's operations ensured self-sufficiency in the back-end fuel cycle, as the UK historically avoided exporting spent fuel for reprocessing, instead handling arisings domestically at Sellafield to maintain control over sensitive materials and waste streams. By 2018, when reprocessing ceased, THORP had processed around 9,000 tonnes of spent fuel, including substantial domestic AGR outputs, thereby minimizing high-level waste volumes requiring long-term geological disposal and preserving national expertise in PUREX-based separation technology—one of only a handful of commercial-scale facilities worldwide. UK policy through the 1990s and 2000s framed reprocessing as integral to resource optimization, with THORP supporting energy security by decoupling nuclear generation from sole dependence on imported natural uranium, sourced primarily from Australia, Canada, and Kazakhstan.^[38]^[1]^[49] Strategically, THORP contributed to plutonium stewardship, amassing a civil stockpile exceeding 100 tonnes by shutdown, stored as oxide for potential MOX fuel production or advanced reactors, providing a buffer for future self-reliant nuclear expansion without immediate fissile material imports. This capability aligned with broader fuel cycle strategies emphasizing waste minimization and material recovery, though economic underperformance of downstream MOX fabrication limited full recycling realization. Despite policy pivots toward direct disposal for new reactor designs post-2018, THORP's legacy retained infrastructural and human capital assets critical for reclaiming closed-cycle operations if geopolitical or resource pressures necessitate, distinguishing the UK from nations reliant on once-through cycles.^[6]^[50]^[49]

Environmental and Proliferation Debates

Waste Volume Reduction Advantages

The reprocessing operations at the Thermal Oxide Reprocessing Plant (THORP) substantially reduce the volume of high-level waste (HLW) by chemically separating recoverable uranium and plutonium from spent thermal oxide fuel, isolating fission products and minor actinides for vitrification. This yields a stable glass matrix encased in stainless steel canisters, achieving a volume reduction factor of approximately 40 compared to direct disposal of untreated spent fuel assemblies.^[18] The process involves shearing fuel elements, dissolving them in nitric acid, solvent extraction to recover fissile materials, and evaporation followed by calcination and melting of the residual liquor with glass frit, concentrating the HLW into compact forms suitable for interim storage and eventual geological disposal.^[23] This volume minimization directly addresses repository capacity constraints, as the vitrified HLW occupies far less space than the original fuel—typically, one canister corresponds to the HLW from about 1.2 metric tons of spent fuel, versus the full assembly volume of roughly 0.1 cubic meters per 0.5-ton PWR element.^[17] Over THORP's operational life, which processed an estimated 9,500 tons of spent fuel by 2018, this approach generated hundreds of canisters rather than thousands of fuel assemblies, easing demands on storage infrastructure and reducing the engineered barrier requirements for long-term containment.^[6] Empirical assessments confirm that such reductions lower the heat load and radiotoxicity profile of disposed waste over extended timescales, as the vitrified product immobilizes radionuclides more efficiently than dispersed spent fuel.^[51] Beyond spatial efficiency, the concentrated HLW form enhances geochemical stability in deep repositories, with borosilicate glass proven durable under simulated disposal conditions, minimizing leach rates and potential groundwater contamination risks.^[17] Proponents argue this facilitates compliance with stringent disposal criteria, such as those under the UK's geological disposal program, by optimizing package density and thermal management—vitrified canisters generate manageable decay heat (around 1-2 kW per canister initially) without the dispersed hotspots of intact fuel.^[38] While intermediate- and low-level wastes from reprocessing add to overall site volumes, the HLW reduction remains a core operational benefit, supported by international benchmarks showing factors of 10 or greater in comparable oxide fuel cycles.^[51]

Criticisms and Risk Assessments

The Thermal Oxide Reprocessing Plant (THORP) has faced criticism for operational safety shortcomings, with investigations revealing systemic issues in maintenance, corrosion monitoring, and alarm response that allowed undetected failures to persist. The Health and Safety Executive's (HSE) 2005 probe into an internal leak of 83,000 liters of acidic uranium solution found that operators ignored over 100 alarms over months, attributing the incident to inadequate management of vast alarm volumes, overconfidence in equipment integrity, and insufficient training, despite no off-site radiological release.^[7] These lapses, rated Level 3 on the International Nuclear Event Scale, prompted 55 HSE recommendations for cultural and procedural reforms, highlighting how complex reprocessing processes amplified human error risks beyond initial probabilistic safety assessments (PSAs) developed by British Nuclear Fuels Limited (BNFL) in the 1980s.^[52] Critics, including engineering analyses, argue that such PSAs underestimated corrosion in piping and tank supports, as evidenced by recurrent equipment blockages and spills, including a nitric acid incident shortly after THORP's 1994 startup.^[23] ^[6] Environmental risk assessments have drawn scrutiny for THORP's liquid radioactive discharges to the Irish Sea, which totaled several hundred radioactive waste streams and routinely exceeded targets under the OSPAR Convention for alpha and beta emitters during peak operations.^[6] Non-governmental organizations such as Cumbrians Opposed to a Radioactive Environment (CORE) have quantified daily outflows at around two million gallons of low-level contaminated water, citing bioaccumulation in marine species like swallows and shellfish, with potential pathways to human health via seafood consumption in Ireland and the UK.^[53] ^[54] While UK Environment Agency authorizations permitted these under modeled dose limits—yielding public exposures below 0.01 millisieverts annually—critics contend that cumulative effects from Sellafield's reprocessing, including tritium and carbon-14 spikes, undermine claims of negligible impact, as historical data show discharges breaching international maritime reduction pledges.^[55] ^[56] Official monitoring confirms post-2018 reductions following THORP's wind-down, but assessments like those from the European Parliament have flagged possible elevated leukemia clusters near Sellafield, though causality remains debated due to confounding factors.^[57] Proliferation risks stem from THORP's separation of weapons-usable plutonium—yielding about 56 tons by 2018 from processing over 7,000 tonnes of spent fuel—contributing to the UK's civil stockpile of 139 tons, material far more readily divertible for bombs than intact fuel assemblies.^[6] ^[58] Nonproliferation analysts at the International Panel on Fissile Materials (IPFM) criticize reprocessing as inherently riskier, noting failed downstream uses like the Sellafield MOX Plant increased unsecured stocks, heightening theft or insider diversion threats despite International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) safeguards.^[6] Royal Society reports emphasize that separated plutonium's radiotoxicity and direct usability amplify security burdens, with indefinite storage posing intergenerational proliferation sensitivities absent immobilization strategies.^[59] Risk models acknowledge lower diversion probabilities under Euratom oversight but highlight vulnerabilities from transport logistics and the absence of a closed fuel cycle, as unutilized plutonium accumulated without offsetting reactor demand.^[17]

Proliferation Safeguards in Practice

The Thermal Oxide Reprocessing Plant (THORP) at Sellafield, United Kingdom, has been subject to comprehensive safeguards administered by the European Atomic Energy Community (Euratom) under Article 78(2) of the Euratom Treaty, encompassing nuclear material accountancy, containment, surveillance, and inspections across all operational stages from spent fuel receipt to plutonium dioxide (PuO₂) and uranium product storage.^[60] The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) applies complementary verification measures pursuant to the United Kingdom's voluntary offer under the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT), focusing on designated spent fuel and PuO₂ stores to ensure no diversion of fissile material for weapons purposes.^[61] These safeguards address the plant's capacity to handle up to 1,200 tonnes of heavy metal annually, yielding approximately 12 tonnes of plutonium, by integrating detection goals for significant quantities—such as 8 kilograms of plutonium—with timely verification, typically within one month of potential diversion.^[62]^[63] In operational practice, nuclear material accountancy at THORP relies on key measurement points (KMP) embedded in the process design, including in-line non-destructive assay (NDA) instruments for real-time plutonium tracking in solution and product streams, supplemented by periodic physical inventories and interim verifications to reconcile declared inventories against measured flows.^[60] Containment and surveillance measures include tamper-indicating seals on storage vessels and process tanks, unattended surveillance cameras with authenticated data streams, and signal branching to allow independent safeguards authority access, ensuring continuity of knowledge over high-throughput plutonium movements that could otherwise obscure diversions.^[63] Euratom and IAEA inspectors conduct routine, short-notice, and unannounced inspections, with on-site laboratories enabling rapid sample analysis for isotopic and mass verification, while design information verification (DIV) activities—initiated during THORP's construction around 1990 and continuing through commissioning—confirm process configurations against declared designs to detect undeclared modifications.^[61]^[60] For contracts involving foreign spent fuel, proliferation safeguards extend to bilateral agreements stipulating that separated plutonium remains under safeguards, with options for return to the owner nation or conversion to mixed oxide (MOX) fuel only under verified civil use, as implemented during THORP's active reprocessing phase from 1994 to 2018 without reported diversions.^[64] Practical enhancements, derived from operator-safeguards authority collaboration over THORP's lifecycle, include anomaly resolution protocols for measurement discrepancies and multimedia systems for transparent process mapping, which have supported effective multinational verification despite the inherent challenges of reprocessing, such as process hold-up and radiation-induced measurement uncertainties.^[60]^[63] No verified proliferation incidents attributable to THORP operations have occurred, affirming the regime's track record in containing risks from separated plutonium stocks exceeding 100 tonnes cumulatively produced.^[6]

Closure and Legacy

Shutdown Decision Factors

The Nuclear Decommissioning Authority (NDA) decided in 2012 to cease operations at the Thermal Oxide Reprocessing Plant (THORP) by 2018, following fulfillment of all outstanding contracts, primarily due to a significant downturn in international demand for commercial reprocessing services.^[3]^[4] This shift reflected broader market changes where foreign customers, including utilities from Japan, Germany, and Switzerland, increasingly favored direct storage of spent nuclear fuel over reprocessing, driven by evolving national policies prioritizing geological disposal.^[3]^[38] Economic pressures amplified the decline, as global uranium prices remained relatively low—averaging around $50–60 per pound from 2010 to 2012—reducing the financial incentive to recover uranium and plutonium through reprocessing, which incurred high capital and operational costs estimated at over £1.8 billion for THORP's construction alone.^[42] Abundant natural uranium supplies met projected reactor needs without reliance on recycled material, rendering THORP's model unviable for new contracts, as upgrading the ageing facility for extended use was deemed uneconomical.^[65]^[66] Despite generating approximately £9 billion in revenue from processing 9,331 tonnes of fuel over 24 years, the absence of future demand outweighed these returns, prompting redirection of resources toward site decommissioning.^[3] Operational and safety challenges, while not the primary driver, contributed to the timeline's execution; a major radioactive leak in 2005 necessitated a two-year shutdown and workarounds that delayed contract completion beyond initial targets, underscoring the plant's vulnerability to technical failures in its later years.^[4] The NDA assessed that continuing beyond 2018 would not align with commercial sustainability, especially as THORP's design, optimized for specific oxide fuels from light-water reactors, faced limitations in adapting to diverse or newer fuel types without prohibitive modifications.^[24] This closure marked the end of large-scale commercial reprocessing in the UK, with stored fuels now slated for management until the 2070s pending a national geological repository.^[4]

Post-2018 Status

Reprocessing operations at the Thermal Oxide Reprocessing Plant (THORP) concluded on November 14, 2018, following the completion of existing commercial contracts, marking the end of 24 years of active fuel processing at the facility.^[3]^[4] The decision to cease operations had been announced in 2012 by the Nuclear Decommissioning Authority (NDA), prioritizing decommissioning over costly extensions amid economic assessments showing reprocessing unviable without substantial additional investment.^[67] Post-closure, THORP transitioned to an interim storage role for spent nuclear fuel, utilizing its receipt and storage pond to manage fuel from UK reactors, with operations projected to continue until the 2070s.^[3] This repurposing aligns with Sellafield's broader shift from commercial reprocessing to environmental remediation and waste management under NDA oversight.^[68] The pond receives and stores undissolved fuel elements, supporting the site's mission to safely manage legacy nuclear materials without resuming chemical separation processes.^[69] In September 2024, Sellafield Ltd installed new storage racks in the THORP pond, enhancing capacity to accommodate additional spent fuel inventories and facilitating retrieval and repacking efforts for safer long-term custody.^[20] These modifications address accumulation from prior operations, where approximately 7,000 tonnes of fuel had been reprocessed historically, leaving residual materials requiring secure containment.^[1] Ongoing activities emphasize radiological safety and inventory verification, with no plans for reactivation of reprocessing capabilities.^[25]

Long-Term Implications for Fuel Cycle

The closure of THORP in 2018 concluded commercial reprocessing of spent thermal oxide fuels in the UK, transitioning the nation from a partial closed fuel cycle—wherein uranium and plutonium were recovered for potential recycling—to a predominantly open, once-through cycle for future oxide fuel arisings. During its operational period from 1994 to 2018, THORP reprocessed over 9,000 tonnes of spent fuel, extracting approximately 96% of the uranium and plutonium content while vitrifying the remaining fission products and actinides into high-level waste (HLW) packages that occupy about one-fifth the volume of equivalent untreated spent fuel assemblies.^[1] This approach demonstrably reduced the prospective long-term HLW inventory destined for geological disposal, aligning with principles of resource conservation by enabling material reuse, such as in mixed oxide (MOX) fuel fabrication.^[17] Post-closure, the UK Nuclear Decommissioning Authority (NDA) strategy designates all new spent oxide fuel for direct interim storage and eventual disposal as waste, without separation or recycling, thereby accumulating an estimated additional 10,000–15,000 tonnes of intact fuel assemblies over the coming decades from existing and planned reactors.^[69] ^[70] This open-cycle paradigm simplifies backend operations by obviating the need for aqueous separation facilities, which THORP exemplified with its shear-leach and solvent extraction processes, but it forfeits the actinide partitioning benefits that could mitigate radiotoxicity decay times from hundreds of thousands to tens of thousands of years through transmutation or fast reactor recycling.^[71] Life-cycle analyses of UK practices pre- and post-THORP indicate that while reprocessing incurs higher upfront energy demands and secondary waste streams (e.g., intermediate- and low-level wastes from plant effluents), direct disposal yields marginally lower overall environmental impacts in categories like global warming potential when factoring operational inefficiencies at THORP, which operated below capacity for much of its life.^[71] ^[6] In the broader fuel cycle context, THORP's legacy amplifies challenges in managing separated materials: the UK amassed a civilian plutonium stockpile exceeding 140 tonnes, primarily from THORP and legacy Magnox operations, necessitating decisions on immobilization for disposal or limited MOX reuse to avoid indefinite safeguarded storage.^[6] This stockpile, stored at Sellafield, imposes ongoing security and proliferation-resistant handling costs without a committed fast-spectrum recycling pathway, contrasting with closed-cycle visions that THORP briefly advanced. Long-term, the open-cycle shift extends reliance on uranium mining and enrichment for fresh fuel, diminishing self-sufficiency in fissile materials amid finite global resources, though it aligns with empirical evidence from economic assessments showing reprocessing's net costs—estimated at £9 billion revenue against higher lifecycle expenses—outweighing benefits under current light-water reactor fleets.^[1] ^[49] Future adaptability remains constrained without reprocessing infrastructure, potentially delaying transitions to advanced fuels like those in Generation IV reactors, which could leverage THORP-derived plutonium for higher burn-up and waste minimization.^[50] Overall, THORP's discontinuation underscores a pragmatic recalibration toward waste consolidation in a geological disposal facility (GDF), projected for operational readiness no earlier than the 2040s, prioritizing verifiable containment over recycling's unproven scalability in the UK context.^[70]

References

[1]
What is Thorp? - Case study - GOV.UK
Sep 25, 2024 · Before taking on this new mission, Thorp reprocessed 9,000 tonnes of used nuclear fuel from around the world, generating an estimated £9 billion ...
[2]
The Thermal Oxide Reprocessing Plant at Sellafield - INIS-IAEA
Jan 8, 2025 · The Thermal Oxide Reprocessing Plant (Thorp) at Sellafield in northwest England is a $4 billion integrated plant that takes irradiated fuel ...
[3]
New era at Sellafield as Thorp reprocessing ends - GOV.UK
Nov 14, 2018 · Opened in 1994, Thorp is one of only two commercial nuclear fuel reprocessing plants in the world. It has reprocessed more than 9,000 tonnes ...Missing: facts | Show results with:facts
[4]
Reprocessing ceases at UK's Thorp plant - World Nuclear News
Nov 14, 2018 · Reprocessing operations have ended at the Thermal Oxide Reprocessing Plant (Thorp) at the Sellafield site in the UK after 24 years.
[5]
Thorp: One of the largest construction projects of the eighties
Oct 26, 2018 · Thorp was one of the largest construction projects of its day, ranking alongside the Channel Tunnel and Disneyland Paris in sheer scale and ambition.Missing: facts | Show results with:facts
[6]
[PDF] Endless Trouble: Britain's Thermal Oxide Reprocessing Plant ...
The new facil- ity–The Thermal Oxide Reprocessing Plant (THORP) which would recover plutonium from overseas LWR and UK Advanced Gas Cooled Reactor (AGR) fuel– ...
[7]
[PDF] Report of the investigation into the leak of dissolver product liquor at ...
Dec 13, 2005 · A leak of 83,000 liters of radioactive liquor occurred at THORP, discovered on April 20, 2005, after starting before August 28, 2004, likely ...
[8]
[PDF] Significant Radioactive Leak at Sellafield due to Operational ...
On April 20, 2005, a camera inspection of a feed clarification cell at THORP revealed that 83,000 liters of dissolver solution had leaked from a broken pipe ( ...
[9]
[PDF] Fact sheet: spent fuel reprocessing - UK Radioactive Waste Inventory
Reprocessing is a complex process that is undertaken on an industrial scale at the. Sellafield site in Cumbria. It involves dissolving the spent fuel and ...Missing: facts | Show results with:facts
[10]
[PDF] Reprocessing in the UK – the history, the present and the future
The two reprocessing plants in the UK, Magnox and Thorp, continue to operate in support of UK and overseas recycling commitments. • Over 50,000 tonnes of ...
[11]
House of Commons - Trade and Industry - Ninth Report
[91] For BNFL, with large sunk costs in THORP and fixed overheads to maintain, there is little commercial incentive to release BE from reprocessing contracts.Missing: rationale | Show results with:rationale
[12]
Government gives green light to Thorp nuclear plant - UPI Archives
Dec 15, 1993 · Work on Thorp began in 1984 after the project was initially approved in 1977 following a 100-day public inquiry. Since then it has been the ...
[13]
[PDF] Radiological Protection and Dose Uptake in the Thermal Oxide ...
The application for planning permission was submitted in 1977, and permission to construct the plant was given later that year. Thorp essentially consists of.
[14]
Non-active and active commissioning of the thermal oxide ... - OSTI
Dec 30, 1996 · British Nuclear Fuels plc (BNFL) completed construction of its Thermal Oxide Reprocessing Plant (Thorp) at the Sellafield site, Cumbria, UK ...
[15]
12Mar92 UK: BRITISH NUCLEAR FUELS' £1,850M THORP ...
Mar 12, 1992 · Commissioning of the huge thermal oxide reprocessing plant at Sellafield began this week as the project completed to the time table laid out six years ago.
[16]
[PDF] ML081550505.pdf - Nuclear Regulatory Commission
... PUREX process as carried out in the Thermal Oxide Reprocessing Plant (THORP) in the United Kingdom and the. La Hague plant in France. Appendix A describes in ...
[17]
Processing of Used Nuclear Fuel
Aug 23, 2024 · ... Reprocessing Plant (THORP) at Sellafield was commissioned in 1994. ... To 2006 it had a small (90 t/yr) reprocessing plant operating at Tokai Mura ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[18]
[PDF] The Thermal Oxide Reprocessing Plant at Sellafield - eConference.io
Mar 2, 2006 · Thorp incorporates a range of design and operational principles developed over the 50 year history of the. Sellafield site. These include the ...Missing: rationale | Show results with:rationale
[19]
What is Sellafield? – Cleaning up our nuclear past - NDA blog
Sep 7, 2018 · The Thermal Oxide Reprocessing Plant – or Thorp as it is better known – could recycle oxide fuel from UK and overseas customers, generating ...
[20]
New storage racks increase Thorp pond storage capacity
Sep 26, 2024 · "These racks will increase fuel capacity from 4000 tonnes to 6000 tonnes, meaning we can accommodate all current and future arising, negating ...Missing: infrastructure | Show results with:infrastructure
[21]
[PDF] The human elements of a nuclear accident - IChemE
SAMPLING ARRANGEMENTS As a routine task the secondary containment sumps across the Thorp plant are sampled to detect any leaks by showing that radioactive ...Missing: features | Show results with:features
[22]
Thorp report calls for sustained excellence - World Nuclear News
Feb 26, 2007 · UK safety authorities have completed their analysis of the internal leak of radioactive liquor at Sellafield's Thorp facility.
[23]
[PDF] The 2005 THORP Internal Leak | Engineering X
HSE (Health and Safety. Executive), “Report of the investigation into the leak of dissolver product liquor at the. Thermal Oxide Reprocessing. Plant (THORP), ...
[24]
Sellafield's ageing THORP plant flunks major foreign fuel ...
Nov 6, 2015 · Bringing in much needed revenue to the Nuclear Decommissioning Authority to help towards Sellafield's ever rising clean-up and decommissioning ...Missing: performance | Show results with:performance
[25]
Sellafield's THORP reprocessing plant shut down - IPFM Blog
Nov 18, 2018 · BNFL's claim of a £500 million profit being earned over the first 10-year Baseload period was based on a forecast income of £6 billion and (with ...
[26]
Britain's reprocessing boondoggle - Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists
Aug 19, 2009 · Even when operating normally, THORP's performance has been lackluster; converting only 14 percent of recovered uranium into new fuel for export.Missing: total | Show results with:total<|separator|>
[27]
1,000 tonnes of THORP contracts abandoned since 1994 - IPFM Blog
Aug 6, 2014 · At its opening in 1994, British Nuclear Fuels Ltd (BNFL) confirmed that Sellafield's £2.8 billion (US$4.7 billion) Thermal Oxide Reprocessing ...
[28]
Reprocessing waste packed and ready for return shipment
Dec 10, 2021 · Used nuclear fuel from around the world was sent for reprocessing at Thorp - which stands for Thermal Oxide Reprocessing Plant - generating GBP9 ...Missing: recovery international spent
[29]
21Today. Sellafield's THORP reprocessing plant – A Lame Duck ...
Mar 27, 2015 · For despite an annual design capacity of 800 tonnes compared to THORP's 1200 tonnes, the French UP2 plant still managed to outstrip THORP by ...
[30]
Discharges and Environmental Monitoring Annual Report 2021
Dec 8, 2022 · Doses due to direct radiation from the Sellafield site were estimated as 2.9 µSv to the most exposed members of the public (those who both live ...
[31]
[PDF] The INES scale of nuclear incidents and accidents - ASN
La Hague. Abroad: 2005: detection of a radioactive leak from a pipe bet- ween the dissolver and a tank in the Thorp fuel reprocessing plant in Sellafield ...
[32]
[PDF] The Safety of the Nuclear Fuel Cycle
The purpose of the report is to present an up-to-date analysis of the safety aspects in nuclear fuel cycle facilities thus replacing the previous OECD report ...Missing: comparative | Show results with:comparative
[33]
Safety of French nuclear plant - Nature
In 1984, collective radiation exposure was the highest in the history of the La Hague plant (728.1 men-rem), surpassing the figure of 1981, when a fire in a ...<|separator|>
[34]
La Hague site - Wikipedia
On 5 October 2002, an INES Level 1 incident occurred at La Hague. A sub-contractor working at the plant suffered skin contamination while rinsing equipment in ...
[35]
[PDF] IAEA Safety Standards Safety of Nuclear Fuel Reprocessing Facilities
IAEA safety standards, like SSG-42, are for protecting health and minimizing danger to life and property, and are used by states for nuclear safety.Missing: comparative | Show results with:comparative
[36]
Mortality of workers at the Sellafield plant of British Nuclear Fuels
Oct 4, 1986 · Workers with personal dose records ("radiation" workers) had lower death rates from all causes combined than other workers but the death ...Missing: THORP statistics
[37]
Cancer mortality and morbidity among workers at the Sellafield plant ...
Among radiation workers there were significant positive correlations between accumulated radiation dose and mortality from cancers of ill-defined and secondary ...Missing: THORP statistics
[38]
THORP Closes - Cumbrian Energy Revolution
Nov 15, 2018 · Another raison dêtre for THORP was quickly found, with construction work of the Sellafield MOX Plant beginning a few weeks later in April 1994.Missing: began | Show results with:began
[39]
What is reprocessing? - Nuclear Decommissioning Authority
Oct 23, 2018 · The closure of Thorp will reduce our authorised discharges and eventually reduce the hazard posed by the Sellafield site.Missing: facts | Show results with:facts
[40]
BNFL losses at all-time high | Business | The Guardian
Sep 14, 2000 · British Nuclear Fuels plunged to a £337m loss last year - the worst in the company's history - after a series of controversies including ...
[41]
BNFL Announces £1 Billion Loss - Bellona.org
Jul 9, 2003 · During the previous fiscal year, BNFL reported a whopping £1.9 billion loss, the largest in the company's history. All of this is having ...
[42]
[PDF] The Economics of the Back End of the Nuclear Fuel Cycle
The Thermal Oxide Reprocessing Plant (THORP) was commissioned in 1994 and has treated ... competitive as reprocessing income compensates for THORP costs.<|separator|>
[43]
Sellafield Thorp site to close in 2018 - BBC News
Jun 7, 2012 · The NDA said many of the 800 workers should be found work elsewhere at Sellafield. Prospect National Secretary Mike Graham said they would press ...
[44]
UK nuclear fuel site faces 2018 closure | Business - Chemistry World
According to the BBC, Sellafield employs 800 people at Thorp, most of whom should be redeployed within the site. Topics. Business · Energy · Government ...
[45]
Nuclear industry feels squeeze as 3200 jobs are axed: Delay in ...
Jun 30, 1993 · About 1,000 employees working for contractors who built Thorp - Thermal Oxide Reprocessing Plant - at Sellafield, Cumbria, will leave in the ...
[46]
[PDF] West Cumbria: Socio-economic Study – 2003 Update
Aug 1, 2003 · Employment in the study area has declined steadily over the past two decades, except for the peak attributed to the construction of THORP in the.
[47]
Uncorrected Evidence m12 - Parliament UK
The nuclear sector provides 40% of the region's gross value added, and around 12,000 direct jobs (25% of the total UK nuclear industry). West Cumbria has 60% of ...Missing: THORP | Show results with:THORP
[48]
West Cumbria economy 'reliant' on Sellafield nuclear plant - BBC
Aug 1, 2018 · Three out of every five jobs in west Cumbria depend upon the Sellafield plant, a report has found. Research by analysis company Oxford Economics ...
[49]
Sellafield ends nuclear fuel reprocessing after 58 years
Jul 21, 2022 · The site's commercial Thermal Oxide Reprocessing Plant (Thorp) plant ceased reprocessing in 2018 after 24 years of operation. Sellafield said ...
[50]
[PDF] Written Evidence Submitted by Dr. Robin Taylor (NCL0071) Key ...
Dec 14, 2022 · A strategic, holistic approach to the full nuclear fuel cycle is needed to optimise the benefits of new nuclear energy for the UK. This should ...
[51]
[PDF] Advanced Reprocessing Research and Development Needs ...
This will ensure that future nuclear energy policy decisions on open compared to closed fuel cycles are based on a robust understanding of state-of-the-art.
[52]
[PDF] Spent Fuel Reprocessing Options
o Waste volumes can be reduced by at least a factor of ten, with a concomitant reduction in the number of disposal containers needed. o Radioactive lifetime ...
[53]
HSE publishes Thorp report - Nuclear Engineering International
Mar 7, 2007 · The report outlines 55 recommendations and actions arising from the investigation and discusses lessons for BNGS and the wider nuclear industry.Missing: criticisms | Show results with:criticisms<|control11|><|separator|>
[54]
Irish Sea - Cumbrians Opposed to a Radioactive Environment
Sellafield discharges two million gallons of radioactive water into the Irish Sea every day at high tide. This includes a cocktail of over 30 alpha, beta and ...
[55]
[PDF] A Critique by CORE
Those from the B205 and THORP reprocessing facilities are acknowledged as being the main source of liquid radioactive discharges from Sellafield to the Irish ...Missing: criticisms | Show results with:criticisms
[56]
[PDF] Sellafield Ltd. Annual Review of Environmental Performance 2023/24
Radioactive discharges (aerial and liquid) were well below the permitted limits and were generally lower than those in 2022. Significant reductions in tritium, ...Missing: criticisms | Show results with:criticisms<|separator|>
[57]
Sellafield activity 'will ensure UK breaks nuclear pollution promise'
Feb 17, 2011 · Critics say this would put the government in breach of its commitment to "progressive and substantial reductions of discharges" under the Oslo- ...
[58]
[PDF] possible toxic effects from the nuclear reprocessing plants at ...
Oct 23, 2001 · This document discusses possible toxic effects from nuclear reprocessing plants at Sellafield and Cap de la Hague, including risk assessment of ...
[59]
Britain has 139 tons of plutonium. That's a real problem.
Apr 17, 2020 · The United Kingdom's last plutonium reprocessing plant, B205, located in Sellafield in northern England, will shut down by the end of 2020.Missing: output statistics
[60]
[PDF] Management of Separated Plutonium - Royal Society
Feb 13, 1998 · 3. The existence of plutonium stocks, in whatever form, is of concern on two counts: radiotoxicity and proliferation risk. Whilst not ...
[61]
THORP: The Lessons for Safeguards | INMM Resources
It has a design annual throughput of 1200 tes HM containing up to 12 tes of plutonium. The plant will be subject to comprehensive EURATOM safeguards involving ...
[62]
[PDF] INTERNATIONAL SAFEGUARDS APPLIED TO THORP. - INIS-IAEA
All these plants are safeguarded by the European Safeguards. Directorate, Euratom and under the UK voluntary offer are open toIAEA designation and verification.
[63]
[PDF] The Safeguards at Reprocessing Plants under a Fissile Material ...
Safeguards aim to prevent diversion of fissile material, using IAEA criteria to detect a significant quantity (SQ) diversion, with detection within one month ...
[64]
[PDF] International Safeguards in the Design of Reprocessing Plants
The IAEA undertakes to apply safeguards on such material in accordance with the agreement, which provides for measures to protect sensitive technology and ...
[65]
Thorp - Hansard - UK Parliament
Jul 27, 1993 · Governemnt has confidence in the non-proliferation arrangements that underlie THORP's work for overseas customers. Such arrangements include ...
[66]
Sellafield, former star of the nuclear age, scrubs up for a different future
Dec 15, 2018 · This is the final shear at Sellafield's thermal oxide reprocessing plant (Thorp), which has halted operations after 24 years it has spent ...
[67]
Nuclear reprocessing ends at Sellafield's Thorp plant - News
Nov 15, 2018 · The thermal oxide reprocessing plant (Thorp) at Sellafield, UK, has ceased reprocessing spent nuclear fuel.Missing: closure economic
[68]
End of reprocessing at Thorp signals new era for Sellafield - GOV.UK
Nov 16, 2018 · A flagship of commercial nuclear fuel reprocessing, Thorp operated for 24 years and dealt with spent 'oxide' nuclear fuel from the UK's nuclear ...Missing: facts | Show results with:facts
[69]
[PDF] Nuclear Decommissioning Authority Business Plan 2018 to 2021
The end of reprocessing operations in THORP provides a clear transition point for Sellafield. The site will move from commercial operations to decommissioning ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[70]
End in sight for reprocessing nuclear fuel at Sellafield
Jan 24, 2017 · THORP reprocesses the oxide fuels from EDF's power stations and overseas customers. The decision was taken in 2012 to close THORP in 2018, once ...
[71]
Implications for the back end of the fuel cycle in the UK | EPJ N
This paper presents potential fuel storage scenarios for two options: the current nuclear power replacement strategy, which will see 16 GWe of new capacity ...
[72]
The environmental impacts of reprocessing used nuclear fuels
The Sellafield site hosts two reprocessing plants: the Thermal Oxide Reprocessing Plant (THORP) which dealt with oxide fuels and was shut down at the end of ...