Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Attentional control

Attentional control is a core cognitive ability that enables individuals to voluntarily direct and maintain focus on goal-relevant information while suppressing distractions and irrelevant stimuli.^[1] This domain-general process, often synonymous with executive attention or cognitive control, underpins higher-order functions such as working memory, fluid intelligence, and adaptive decision-making in complex environments.^[2] It operates through top-down mechanisms that prioritize task demands over bottom-up sensory inputs, allowing for flexible goal pursuit despite interference from habitual responses or external noise.^[3] Key components of attentional control include inhibition, which suppresses prepotent or irrelevant responses, and shifting, which facilitates transitions between tasks or mental sets.^[3] These elements interact with broader attentional networks—alerting (vigilance enhancement), orienting (spatial selection), and executive control (conflict resolution)—to minimize uncertainty and support goal-directed behavior.^[2] Neural substrates, primarily involving the prefrontal cortex and anterior cingulate, mediate these processes, with deficits linked to disorders like anxiety, ADHD, and schizophrenia.^[1] A prominent framework is Attentional Control Theory (ACT), proposed by Eysenck et al. in 2007, which posits that trait anxiety impairs attentional control by disrupting the balance between goal-directed and stimulus-driven systems, leading to heightened threat sensitivity and reduced processing efficiency.^[3] Although performance may be preserved through compensatory effort, efficiency suffers, particularly in tasks requiring sustained focus.^[3] Measurement often relies on tasks like the Stroop test, antisaccade, or operation span, which assess resistance to distraction and predict real-world outcomes such as academic achievement and emotional regulation.^[1] Research continues to explore its adaptive aspects, including how it automates control to optimize cognitive resources in dynamic contexts.^[4]

Definitions and Overview

Core Concepts

Attentional control refers to the executive ability to voluntarily select relevant stimuli for processing while suppressing irrelevant distractions, enabling goal-directed behavior in complex environments. This capacity encompasses both top-down processes, which are goal-driven and involve prior intentions or task demands to direct focus, and bottom-up processes, which are stimulus-driven and triggered by salient environmental cues such as sudden changes or novel features.^[5] As a core component of executive functions, attentional control is closely linked to working memory, which maintains task-relevant information, and inhibitory control, which suppresses competing responses to facilitate adaptive cognition.^[6] Attentional control is distinct from related attentional processes, such as sustained attention, which involves maintaining vigilance or focus on a task over extended periods without necessarily resolving conflicts, and divided attention, which entails simultaneously allocating resources to multiple tasks or stimuli, often leading to performance trade-offs.^[7] Unlike these, attentional control emphasizes the flexible regulation of focus to prioritize goal-relevant information amid interference, positioning it as a foundational executive function rather than a mere endurance or multitasking skill. Within attentional control, key components are outlined by Posner's attentional network framework, including orienting, which involves shifting spatial or feature-based attention to specific locations or objects; alerting, which achieves and sustains a state of readiness for incoming stimuli; and executive control, which detects and resolves conflicts between competing responses to support decision-making. These networks operate interactively to modulate attention based on contextual demands, with executive control particularly critical for overriding automatic biases in favor of intentional actions.^[8] Individual differences in attentional control significantly contribute to variations in fluid intelligence, the capacity for abstract reasoning and novel problem-solving, by enabling efficient prioritization of relevant mental representations amid cognitive demands.^[9] A 2024 review in Psychological Review proposes that attentional control, defined as the ability to align prioritized processing with current goals, accounts for much of the variance in fluid intelligence performance, highlighting its role in cognitive flexibility.

Historical Background

The concept of attentional control traces its roots to the late 19th century, with William James providing one of the earliest psychological descriptions in his seminal work. In The Principles of Psychology, James characterized attention as "the taking possession by the mind, in clear and vivid form, of one out of what seem several simultaneously possible objects or trains of thought," emphasizing its role in selective mental focus amid competing stimuli.^[10] This foundational view positioned attention not merely as a passive reception of sensory input but as an active process of prioritization, influencing subsequent research on cognitive selectivity. Mid-20th-century advancements built on James's ideas by formalizing mechanisms of selective attention through experimental paradigms. Donald Broadbent's 1958 filter model introduced a bottleneck theory, proposing that attention operates as a limited-capacity filter that processes sensory information based on physical characteristics like pitch or location, allowing only select inputs to reach higher cognitive levels while others are attenuated.^[11] Ulric Neisser's 1967 synthesis in Cognitive Psychology further integrated these concepts, portraying attention as part of a broader perceptual framework where exploratory processes actively shape and are shaped by environmental interactions, moving beyond strict filtering to emphasize dynamic perceptual exploration.^[12] The 1980s and 1990s marked a shift toward dissecting attention into distinct networks, incorporating spatial and executive dimensions. Michael Posner's 1980 cueing paradigm demonstrated how attentional orienting could be experimentally manipulated, revealing endogenous (voluntary) and exogenous (reflexive) networks that facilitate rapid shifts in focus without eye movements, laying groundwork for understanding orienting as a core attentional function.^[13] Concurrently, the emergence of executive attention in cognitive psychology, as articulated by Posner and Petersen in 1990, highlighted a frontal network for conflict resolution and goal maintenance, integrating alerting, orienting, and executive control as interdependent systems.^[14] Entering the 21st century, attentional control research integrated with cognitive neuroscience, particularly post-2000, emphasizing prefrontal cortex (PFC) functions in top-down regulation. Studies linked the dorsolateral PFC to executive oversight, enabling sustained focus and inhibition of distractions through biased competition among stimuli.^[15] Recent developments underscore dynamic interactions between top-down (goal-driven) and bottom-up (stimulus-driven) processes; a 2025 review in Biological Psychology proposes a unified framework where attentional selection arises from overlapping priorities across short-, medium-, and long-term timescales, reconciling earlier dichotomies into a singular, adaptive system.^[16]

Theoretical Frameworks

Early Filter Models

Early theories of attentional control emerged in the mid-20th century to explain how individuals selectively process sensory information amid overload, conceptualizing attention as a bottleneck mechanism that filters inputs at early perceptual stages. Donald Broadbent's filter theory, proposed in 1958, posited attention as a single-channel system operating like a selective filter at an early sensory level, allowing only physically distinct stimuli—such as differences in pitch, location, or intensity—to pass through while attenuating others.^[17] This model was supported by dichotic listening experiments, where participants shadowed one auditory message while ignoring another presented simultaneously to the opposite ear; recall of unattended messages was limited to basic physical features but not semantic content, indicating early filtering before meaning analysis.^[17] Anne Treisman's attenuation model, introduced in 1964, refined Broadbent's strict filter by suggesting that unattended stimuli are not completely blocked but weakened or attenuated, enabling partial processing if their activation exceeds a threshold.^[18] In this framework, a two-stage process occurs: an early attenuation based on physical cues reduces signal strength, followed by "dictionary" units that analyze attenuated inputs for semantic meaning, particularly if they match highly familiar or personally relevant words. Evidence came from the cocktail party effect, where individuals detect their own name in an unattended auditory stream during selective listening tasks, implying that semantic processing can occur for attenuated but salient stimuli.^[18] The Deutsch and Deutsch late selection model of 1963, further elaborated by Donald Norman in 1968, challenged early filter approaches by proposing that all sensory inputs undergo full perceptual and semantic analysis before attention selects relevant information for response at a later stage.^[19]^[20] This view was informed by shadowing experiments showing occasional intrusion of unattended message content into awareness, suggesting parallel processing of meaning rather than early exclusion. In Norman's extension, attention modulates pertinence based on task goals after initial analysis, allowing top-down influences to prioritize outputs.^[20] Despite their influence, early filter models faced limitations in explaining phenomena involving top-down modulation or flexible semantic access, as they emphasized passive, bottom-up selection without accommodating goal-directed control or variable processing depths. These shortcomings prompted the development of hybrid theories integrating early and late selection elements to better capture attention's dynamic nature.

Modern Executive Control Models

Modern executive control models conceptualize attentional control as a dynamic, top-down process that actively maintains goals, resolves conflicts, and integrates multiple influences to guide behavior. These frameworks shift from earlier passive filtering mechanisms by highlighting the role of executive functions in adapting attention to complex, goal-directed demands. One seminal contribution is Michael Posner's attentional networks theory, which posits three interrelated but dissociable systems: alerting, which sustains vigilance and arousal to prepare for stimuli; orienting, which directs attention to specific locations or features; and executive control, which monitors conflicts and inhibits irrelevant information to support goal pursuit. This model, originally outlined in 1990, has been empirically validated through the Attention Network Test (ANT), a task that independently measures the efficiency of each network by assessing reaction times to cued targets under varying conflict conditions, revealing distinct attentional efficiencies across individuals.^[21] Building on this, Randall Engle's working memory capacity (WMC) model frames attentional control as a core executive function tied to individual differences in the ability to maintain task goals against distractions and interference. In this view, high-WMC individuals excel at resisting proactive interference from irrelevant stimuli and sustaining focus, a capacity that correlates strongly with fluid intelligence and complex cognition.^[22] Engle's framework, developed through the 1990s and refined in subsequent decades, is supported by tasks like the operation span, where participants solve math problems while memorizing word lists; performance on this measure predicts attentional control in high-interference scenarios, such as the Stroop task, underscoring WMC's role in executive attention rather than mere storage limits.^[23] Recent integrative approaches further refine these ideas. The tripartite framework, proposed in a 2025 review, synthesizes attentional control as the outcome of interacting processes: capture by salient or rewarded stimuli, active suppression of distractors, and maintenance of goal-relevant priorities through biased competition.^[24] This model addresses nuances like value-modulated capture, where previously rewarded features involuntarily draw attention only if they enter conscious awareness, as demonstrated in experiments showing reduced capture for subliminal value cues during visual search tasks.^[25] Complementing this, a 2025 unified perspective reconciles top-down and bottom-up influences by proposing a single attentional system that computes overlapping priorities across short, medium, and long timescales, allowing flexible selection without rigid early-versus-late dichotomies.^[16] This framework resolves debates from early filter models by emphasizing how executive control dynamically weights sensory saliency with task goals, enabling adaptive resolution of perceptual competition in real-world scenarios.

Neural Mechanisms

Key Brain Regions

Attentional control relies on a distributed network of brain regions that coordinate executive functions, conflict resolution, and sensory selection. The prefrontal cortex (PFC) plays a pivotal role in maintaining goals and exerting top-down regulation over attention. Specifically, the dorsolateral PFC (DLPFC) is crucial for executive control and working memory processes that sustain attentional focus on task-relevant information, as evidenced by fMRI studies showing increased DLPFC activation during conflict resolution in the Stroop task, where participants must inhibit automatic reading responses to name ink colors.^[26]^[27] The ventrolateral PFC (VLPFC), in turn, supports inhibitory processes by suppressing irrelevant stimuli and facilitating response inhibition, contributing to selective attention through mechanisms that bias processing away from distractions.^[26]^[28] The anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) is integral to monitoring cognitive conflicts and adapting control strategies dynamically. It detects discrepancies between expected and actual outcomes, signaling the need for enhanced attentional effort, particularly in tasks involving response competition such as the Eriksen flanker paradigm, where fMRI and EEG data reveal ACC activation proportional to flanker interference levels.^[29]^[30] This region integrates error signals to recruit prefrontal resources, enabling adjustments in attentional allocation to resolve conflicts and prevent performance errors.^[31] Parietal lobe structures are essential for orienting and alerting components of attention, particularly in spatial domains. The intraparietal sulcus (IPS) facilitates voluntary shifts of spatial attention by directing sensory resources to relevant locations, as demonstrated in Posner cueing experiments where valid cues enhance target detection, with lesion studies confirming the IPS's critical role in maintaining spatial selectivity.^[32]^[33] The superior parietal lobule contributes to the alerting network, sustaining vigilance and rapid reorienting, supported by neuroimaging evidence from cueing tasks showing its activation during exogenous attentional capture.^[33] Subcortical structures, including the basal ganglia and thalamus, provide gating mechanisms that modulate attentional shifts and sustain focus through interconnected loops. The basal ganglia, via direct and indirect pathways, filter irrelevant information and select task-appropriate responses, interfacing with cortical regions to refine attentional priorities in dynamic environments.^[34]^[35] Thalamocortical loops, involving reciprocal projections between the thalamus and cortex, regulate the flow of sensory inputs to support sustained attention, with the thalamus acting as a relay that amplifies relevant signals while suppressing noise, as shown in studies of sensory gating during attentional tasks.^[34]^[35]

Neurochemical Basis

Norepinephrine (NE), primarily synthesized and released from the locus coeruleus (LC) in the brainstem, plays a critical role in the alerting network of attentional control by modulating arousal and vigilance.^[36] LC-NE projections facilitate rapid shifts in attention by enhancing the gain of sensory signals, thereby promoting sustained focus on relevant stimuli during tasks requiring high alertness.^[37] This neuromodulator improves attentional selectivity through mechanisms that increase the signal-to-noise ratio in cortical circuits, suppressing irrelevant neural activity while amplifying task-related inputs.^[38] Pharmacological enhancement of NE transmission, such as via the selective norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor atomoxetine, bolsters these processes by elevating extracellular NE levels in prefrontal regions, leading to improved response inhibition and attentional stability.^[39] Dopamine (DA) is essential for executive aspects of attentional control, particularly in goal-directed selection and maintenance of focus, with projections from midbrain areas like the ventral tegmental area influencing prefrontal cortex (PFC) function.^[40] DA modulates working memory and cognitive flexibility through D1 and D2 receptors in the PFC, where optimal receptor stimulation supports the persistent activity needed for attentional set-shifting and interference resolution.^[40] Reward anticipation further engages DA systems to bias attention toward motivationally salient cues, enhancing performance in tasks involving sustained effort.^[41] The relationship between DA levels and attentional efficacy follows an inverted-U shaped curve, akin to the Yerkes-Dodson law, where moderate DA signaling optimizes executive control, while deviations impair it by either under- or over-activating PFC networks. Acetylcholine (ACh), originating from cholinergic neurons in the basal forebrain, supports orienting and top-down attentional selectivity by refining sensory processing and facilitating cue-driven shifts in focus.^[42] Basal forebrain projections to sensory cortices sharpen neural tuning curves, reducing broad responsiveness to irrelevant stimuli and enhancing contrast detection in visual and auditory tasks.^[43] This effect arises through dual actions at muscarinic and nicotinic receptors: muscarinic activation promotes gamma oscillations for perceptual binding, while nicotinic stimulation boosts excitatory-inhibitory balance to sustain attentional gain during orienting.^[44] In visual attention paradigms, ACh release dynamically gates top-down signals from the PFC, enabling precise deployment of spatial attention to behaviorally relevant locations.^[45] Serotonin (5-HT) contributes to inhibitory control in attentional processes, helping to suppress distracting inputs and regulate attention under emotional or uncertain conditions through widespread projections from raphe nuclei.^[46] This neuromodulator balances behavioral flexibility by modulating response inhibition, allowing adaptive disengagement from outdated attentional sets in favor of new priorities.^[47] The 5-HT2A receptor subtype, enriched in PFC layers, plays a key role in this flexibility by influencing synaptic plasticity and network dynamics that support attentional switching.^[47] Recent studies indicate that 5-HT2A receptor activation facilitates learning from negative feedback in reversal tasks, promoting cognitive adaptability, while antagonism impairs these processes.^[48] Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) like fluoxetine subtly improve inhibitory aspects of attention by sustaining 5-HT tone.^[49]

Developmental Aspects

Early Development

Attentional control in infancy is initially dominated by reflexive orienting, where exogenous cues automatically capture attention, as infants rely on bottom-up sensory stimuli to direct gaze and exploration.^[50] Endogenous control, involving voluntary shifts of attention, begins to emerge around 3-4 months of age, marking a transition toward more goal-directed processing; this is evident in visual preference tasks where infants increasingly sustain focus on novel or socially relevant stimuli over reflexive distractions.^[51] By 9 months, joint attention develops through gaze following, enabling infants to share focus with caregivers on objects or events, which supports social learning and further refines attentional selectivity.^[52] During toddlerhood, from ages 2 to 5 years, inhibitory control sees rapid gains, allowing children to suppress prepotent responses and maintain focus amid competing stimuli, though they remain highly distractible due to immature disengagement mechanisms.^[53] Tasks such as the gap-overlap paradigm demonstrate this, with toddlers showing slower saccadic disengagement in overlap conditions compared to adults, reflecting ongoing refinement in attentional shifting and interference resolution.^[54] In childhood, spanning 6 to 12 years, the executive attention network matures, enhancing abilities in conflict monitoring and resolution as prefrontal cortex myelination progresses, supporting more efficient top-down regulation.^[55] Improved performance on tasks like the Dimensional Change Card Sort emerges around age 7, where children better resolve dimensional conflicts by flexibly switching rules, indicating strengthened cognitive flexibility within attentional control.^[56] Genetic factors contribute substantially to attentional control development, with high heritability estimates ranging 60-90% based on twin studies of executive attention networks, highlighting the role of polygenic influences in individual differences.^[57] Environmental enrichment, including cognitive stimulation in early home and educational settings, accelerates these gains, as shown in recent longitudinal studies tracking improved inhibitory and sustained attention trajectories through preschool.^[58]

Lifespan Changes

Attentional control reaches its peak efficiency during adulthood, typically between ages 27 and 36, when cognitive control processes, including selective attention and inhibitory mechanisms, operate with maximal precision and minimal interference from distractors.^[59] Individual differences in attentional control stabilize in this period, with higher levels associated with better career outcomes, such as sustained employment and professional advancement, due to enhanced focus and decision-making under demands.^[60] Changes remain minimal until midlife, allowing for stable performance in complex tasks requiring divided or sustained attention across professional and daily activities.^[61] In aging, beyond 65 years, attentional control undergoes a gradual decline, particularly in executive components like inhibitory control and conflict resolution, leading to slower orienting responses and heightened susceptibility to distractions.^[62] This manifests in tasks such as the Useful Field of View test, which reveals age-related reductions in the spatial extent of effective visual attention, correlating with everyday challenges like driving safety.^[63] Neuroimaging studies indicate compensatory mechanisms, including increased recruitment of posterior parietal regions to offset diminished frontal efficiency, though this does not fully mitigate performance decrements.^[64] Several factors modulate these lifespan changes in attentional control. Regular physical exercise, such as aerobic activities, helps preserve executive attention by enhancing prefrontal cortex function and reducing age-related atrophy, with meta-analyses showing sustained benefits in older adults who maintain active lifestyles.^[65] Cognitive reserve, built through higher education and intellectual engagement, delays the onset of attentional declines by providing neural redundancy, as evidenced in longitudinal studies where educated individuals exhibit slower deterioration in sustained attention tasks despite advancing age.^[66] Recent 2025 research on the sustained attention paradox further highlights how age exacerbates lapses in vigilance.^[67] Sex differences in attentional control across adulthood and aging are generally minimal, with no broad disparities in overall efficiency.^[68]

Assessment Methods

Behavioral Tasks

Behavioral tasks provide standardized methods to assess attentional control by measuring participants' ability to focus, inhibit distractions, and resolve conflicts in controlled experimental settings. These paradigms quantify aspects of executive function, such as inhibitory control and vigilance, through reaction times (RTs), error rates, and interference effects, offering reliable indicators of attentional efficiency across diverse populations.^[69] The Stroop task, originally developed by John Ridley Stroop, evaluates inhibitory control by presenting color words printed in incongruent ink colors, requiring participants to name the ink color while suppressing the automatic tendency to read the word. The interference effect, calculated as the RT difference between incongruent and congruent trials, serves as a key metric of executive attentional control, with larger differences indicating greater susceptibility to interference. This task has been widely adopted due to its sensitivity to cognitive demands on selective attention and response inhibition.^[70] The Attention Network Test (ANT), introduced by Jin Fan and colleagues under Michael Posner's framework, simultaneously probes three attentional networks—alerting (achieving and maintaining alertness), orienting (directing attention to sensory events), and executive control (resolving conflicts)—using cued flanker stimuli where participants identify a central arrow's direction amid distractors. Efficiency scores are derived from RT differences based on cue types (e.g., validity effects for orienting) and flanker congruence for executive control, providing composite measures that isolate network-specific contributions to attentional control. The ANT's design allows for efficient assessment in both clinical and research contexts.^[71] In the Flanker task, pioneered by Barbara and Charles Eriksen, participants respond to a central target arrow flanked by congruent or incongruent arrows, testing conflict resolution and selective attention by measuring the interference from surrounding distractors. The congruency effect, reflected in slower RTs and higher error rates on incongruent trials, quantifies the engagement of executive control mechanisms. Electrophysiological markers, such as the N2 and P3 event-related potential components, further indicate the neural mobilization of attentional control during conflict processing.^[72]^[73] The Sustained Attention to Response Task (SART) assesses vigilance by requiring rapid responses to frequent go stimuli (e.g., digits 1–9 except 3) while withholding responses to rare no-go targets (digit 3), thereby detecting lapses in sustained attentional control through errors of commission and response time variability. Developed by Ian Robertson and team, the task reveals mind-wandering and attentional drifts over extended periods, with higher error rates signaling diminished control. These tasks demonstrate high validity and reliability in measuring attentional control, with test-retest correlations often exceeding 0.70 across repeated administrations, supporting their use as stable behavioral markers. Adaptations enhance applicability: for children, simplified versions like the day-night Stroop variant reduce verbal demands while preserving interference measurement; for elderly participants, slower pacing and larger stimuli accommodate age-related processing declines, maintaining sensitivity to attentional deficits.^[69]^[74]^[75]

Neuroimaging Techniques

Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) has been instrumental in mapping the neural substrates of attentional control by detecting blood-oxygen-level-dependent (BOLD) signals that indicate regional brain activity. Studies using fMRI during tasks requiring attentional control consistently show activation in the prefrontal cortex (PFC) and anterior cingulate cortex (ACC), regions critical for executive functions such as conflict monitoring and response inhibition.^[15] For instance, BOLD responses in the dorsolateral PFC and ACC increase during conditions of high attentional demand, reflecting the recruitment of these areas to resolve interference or maintain focus.^[26] The technique's high spatial resolution, typically on the order of millimeters, enables precise localization and mapping of distributed networks, including frontoparietal circuits that underpin sustained attention and cognitive flexibility.^[76] Electroencephalography (EEG) and event-related potentials (ERPs) provide complementary insights into the temporal dynamics of attentional control, offering millisecond-level resolution that surpasses fMRI. The P300 component, a positive deflection around 300 ms post-stimulus, is modulated during attentional orienting and target detection, with larger amplitudes indicating enhanced resource allocation to relevant stimuli.^[77] Similarly, alpha-band (8-14 Hz) suppression over posterior regions signifies active attentional engagement and suppression of irrelevant information, as seen in tasks requiring selective focus where desynchronization correlates with improved performance.^[78] These measures reveal rapid shifts in attentional states, such as the inhibition of distractors through increased alpha power in task-irrelevant areas, supporting models of top-down control.^[79] Functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) offers a portable, non-invasive alternative for studying attentional control, particularly in naturalistic or developmental settings where motion artifacts limit other methods. By measuring changes in prefrontal oxygenation via near-infrared light absorption, fNIRS detects hemodynamic responses akin to fMRI's BOLD signal but with greater tolerance to head movement.^[80] In children, fNIRS studies show increased oxyhemoglobin in the PFC during inhibitory control tasks, linking prefrontal activation to emerging attentional abilities from preschool age onward.^[81] This portability facilitates longitudinal research, revealing age-related maturation in prefrontal oxygenation patterns that correlate with improved attentional selectivity.^[82] Diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) assesses the structural integrity of white matter tracts supporting attentional networks, using metrics like fractional anisotropy to quantify fiber coherence. Reduced white matter integrity in frontoparietal and cingulum bundles has been associated with diminished attentional control efficiency, as these pathways facilitate rapid communication between executive regions.^[83] Recent studies highlight individual differences, where higher fractional anisotropy in attentional tracts predicts better performance on control tasks. DTI thus complements functional techniques by revealing how anatomical constraints influence attentional efficiency.^[84] Despite these advances, neuroimaging techniques for attentional control have notable limitations. fMRI's temporal resolution is constrained by the slow hemodynamic response (peaking at 4-6 seconds), which blurs the capture of fast attentional processes like orienting.^[85] Multimodal integration, such as pairing fMRI with tasks like the Attention Network Test, helps mitigate this by aligning spatial maps with behavioral indices of network-specific control.^[86]

Clinical Implications

Associations with Disorders

Attentional control deficits are a core feature of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), particularly in inhibitory control and executive attention networks, as outlined in the DSM-5 diagnostic criteria which emphasize inattention and impulsivity symptoms.^[87] Studies using the Attention Network Test (ANT) reveal impairments in executive control, with relatively preserved or hyperactive alerting networks in subtypes like inattentive ADHD, leading to difficulties in sustaining focus and resisting distractions.^[88] These deficits affect individuals with ADHD, contributing to functional impairments in daily tasks and academic performance.^[89] In anxiety disorders, attentional control is often biased toward threat-related stimuli, resulting in reduced disengagement from negative cues as measured by the dot-probe task.^[90] This bias is prominent in generalized anxiety disorder (GAD), where executive overload under cognitive load exacerbates attentional capture by worries, impairing flexible shifting and inhibitory processes.^[91] Meta-analyses confirm that such attentional biases correlate with symptom severity across anxiety disorders, including social anxiety and specific phobias, though the effect sizes vary by task and stimulus type.^[92] Posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) involves attentional biases toward trauma-related threats and deficits in attentional control, which sustain hypervigilance and intrusive memories.^[93] A 2024 systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials highlights how these biases contribute to core PTSD symptoms, with attentional control impairments evident in both behavioral and neuroimaging measures during threat processing tasks.^[94] Positive findings link poorer disengagement from threats to increased re-experiencing and avoidance symptoms. Schizophrenia is associated with broad impairments across attentional networks, including significant deficits in executive control and orienting, as demonstrated by the ANT in patient cohorts.^[95] Positive symptoms, such as hallucinations and delusions, further disrupt orienting by increasing distractibility and interference from irrelevant stimuli, while alerting networks show milder or inconsistent deficits.^[96] These attentional control issues correlate with overall cognitive decline and functional outcomes in the disorder. In autism spectrum disorder (ASD), attentional control exhibits a pattern of intact alerting but pronounced deficits in executive control, affecting inhibitory and shifting abilities in social and nonsocial contexts.^[97] Behavioral tasks reveal challenges in overriding prepotent responses and flexible attention allocation, which may underlie social communication difficulties, though alerting responses to sensory cues remain relatively preserved compared to neurotypical individuals.^[98]

Therapeutic Interventions

Therapeutic interventions for attentional control target underlying cognitive, neural, and neurochemical mechanisms to enhance focus, reduce distractibility, and improve executive function in clinical populations such as those with ADHD, anxiety, and PTSD. These approaches include behavioral training, pharmacological treatments, neurofeedback, and cognitive remediation programs, each supported by empirical evidence demonstrating targeted improvements in attentional processes.^[93] Cognitive behavioral training, particularly attention bias modification (ABM), aims to retrain maladaptive attentional biases toward threat stimuli in individuals with anxiety and PTSD. ABM typically involves repeated exposure to tasks that encourage disengagement from negative cues, such as modified dot-probe paradigms. A 2024 systematic review and meta-analysis of 8 randomized controlled trials found that attention control training yields large effects on PTSD symptoms (Hedges' g = 1.21) and attentional bias variability (g = 0.97), outperforming attentional bias modification (ABM), though ABM and attention control training showed similar effects on attentional bias (g = 0.07).^[93]^[94] These interventions are most effective when delivered in multiple sessions over weeks, promoting sustained shifts in attentional deployment.^[94] Pharmacotherapy represents a cornerstone for enhancing attentional control, especially in ADHD, by modulating key neurotransmitters. Stimulants like methylphenidate increase dopamine and norepinephrine availability in prefrontal circuits, thereby bolstering sustained attention and inhibitory control. A network meta-analysis of 133 trials involving over 10,000 participants demonstrated that methylphenidate reduces ADHD core symptoms, including inattention, with a moderate effect size (standardized mean difference = 0.56) and improvements in executive function tasks like the Stroop test.^[99] Non-stimulant options, such as guanfacine, act as alpha-2 adrenergic receptor agonists to strengthen prefrontal cortex signaling without elevating catecholamine levels broadly. Clinical trials confirm guanfacine's efficacy in alleviating ADHD symptoms, including attentional deficits, with response rates up to 60% in children and adolescents, particularly for hyperactivity and impulsivity components.^[100] Neurofeedback employs real-time EEG monitoring to train self-regulation of brain activity, focusing on prefrontal rhythms associated with executive control. In ADHD, protocols often target theta/beta ratios or slow cortical potentials to enhance prefrontal modulation and reduce symptoms. A 2025 systematic review and meta-analysis of 17 randomized controlled trials reported that EEG-based neurofeedback significantly improves inhibitory control (SMD = 0.36), a component of executive function, with benefits observed in ADHD children.^[101] This approach facilitates attentional control by providing immediate feedback on cortical activation, leading to normalized PFC activity patterns observed via pre-post EEG changes.^[102] Cognitive remediation programs, such as Cogmed, deliver computerized exercises to expand working memory capacity, which underpins attentional control. These adaptive training regimens involve visuospatial and verbal n-back tasks, typically completed 5 days per week for 5 weeks. A 2025 systematic review and meta-analysis of 11 randomized controlled trials in adults indicated that Cogmed yields small short-term improvements in verbal and visuospatial working memory, with limited evidence for sustained benefits.^[103] Recent validations in high-stakes environments, including military cohorts, demonstrate improvements in operational performance, such as faster response times in simulated multitasking scenarios, underscoring applicability beyond clinical settings.^[104] Across these interventions, efficacy is commonly evaluated through pre-post assessments on standardized tasks like the Continuous Performance Test, revealing consistent short-term gains in attentional accuracy and speed. However, long-term transfer to real-world functioning remains debated, with meta-analyses highlighting variability due to individual differences and maintenance protocols.^[105]

Sensory-Specific Processes

Visual Attention Control

Visual attention control involves distinct mechanisms for directing and maintaining focus within the visual field, often categorized by the nature of attentional cues. Exogenous cues, such as abrupt onsets or sudden changes in luminance, trigger reflexive, bottom-up shifts of attention that are involuntary and transient, typically lasting around 100-300 milliseconds.^[106] In contrast, endogenous cues, like central arrows or symbolic indicators, elicit voluntary, top-down shifts that are slower to engage but more sustained, allowing strategic allocation based on task goals.^[106] The Posner cueing paradigm, a foundational method for studying these processes, measures attentional effects through reaction times on valid trials (where the cue correctly predicts the target location, yielding faster responses by 20-50 milliseconds) versus invalid trials (where the cue misleads, causing delays of similar magnitude due to reorienting costs). Spatial aspects of visual attention control are often modeled by the spotlight metaphor, which posits attention as a beam that enhances processing within a limited region of the visual field while suppressing surrounding areas.^[107] This model includes a narrow spotlight for precise focusing on small areas, as well as a zoomable variant that adjusts the beam's size to trade off resolution for broader coverage, evidenced by faster detection in small displays but slower in larger ones during visual search tasks. For divided attention, evidence supports multiple spotlights, where individuals can simultaneously attend to non-contiguous locations, as shown in functional imaging studies revealing separate zones of enhanced activity in visual cortex during dual-location monitoring, though efficiency decreases with increasing separation or number of foci.^[108] Visual search tasks further demonstrate these dynamics, with shallower reaction time slopes for singleton targets (parallel search within a single spotlight) compared to conjunction targets requiring serial scanning across multiple potential spots.^[108] Feature-based control complements spatial mechanisms by using top-down attentional templates—mental representations of target features like color or form—to guide selection amid visual clutter.^[107] In Treisman's feature integration theory, basic features (e.g., orientation or hue) are processed in parallel across the visual field, enabling rapid singleton detection where a unique item "pops out" without focused attention, as reaction times remain flat regardless of distractor number.^[107] However, detecting conjunctions of features (e.g., a red vertical line among red horizontals and green verticals) demands serial integration via attentional templates, resulting in linearly increasing search times with set size, as attention must bind features at each location.^[107] These templates prioritize relevant features, reducing interference from irrelevant ones in complex arrays. Recent research highlights how value associations modulate visual attention capture, even for neutral stimuli in arrays. A 2025 study found that previously rewarded colors elicit faster orienting in search tasks, with capture effects strongest when high-value distractors appear, increasing invalid trial costs by up to 30 milliseconds, though this value-modulated attentional capture (VMAC) diminishes without task relevance.^[25] Critically, such priority effects require conscious awareness of the value contingencies, as unaware participants show no reliable capture despite equivalent learning exposure.^[25] Individual differences in visual attention control significantly predict variation in visual working memory (WM) capacity, with stronger control linked to higher storage limits. Individuals with superior endogenous control, as measured by smaller validity effects in cueing tasks, maintain more items in WM (up to 4-5 versus 2-3 for low-control individuals) by better resisting distractor interference during encoding. This relationship underscores attentional control as a core contributor to WM, where lapses in focus lead to greater intrusions and reduced capacity in high-load visual tasks.^[109]

Auditory Attention Control

Auditory stream segregation refers to the perceptual process by which the auditory system organizes complex sound mixtures into distinct streams or objects by binding related features such as pitch and timing.^[110] This binding is influenced by Gestalt principles, including proximity in time and similarity in acoustic attributes, which facilitate grouping of sounds into coherent percepts while separating competing streams.^[111] For instance, rapid alternation of high- and low-frequency tones often results in the perception of two separate streams rather than a single integrated melody when the frequency difference exceeds a critical bandwidth, as demonstrated in foundational experiments.^[110] However, this segregation can be disrupted by informational masking, where distractor sounds create perceptual uncertainty by resembling or overlapping with target features, rather than through simple energetic overlap, leading to impaired detection in noisy environments.^[112] The cocktail party effect exemplifies selective attention in multi-talker scenarios, allowing listeners to focus on a specific voice amid background noise, such as involuntarily shifting attention upon hearing one's own name in an unattended conversation.^[113] This phenomenon was first systematically explored through dichotic shadowing tasks, where participants repeated one auditory message while ignoring another, revealing that semantic content from the unattended stream could still penetrate awareness under certain conditions.^[113] Such findings support late selection theories of attention, positing that initial processing occurs in parallel before attentional filtering at higher semantic levels, contrasting with earlier models emphasizing pre-attentive physical filtering.^[114] Temporal orienting in audition involves using rhythmic cues to predict the timing of upcoming events, enhancing detection and response accuracy at cued intervals.^[115] This process relies on neural entrainment, where ongoing delta (1-4 Hz) and theta (4-8 Hz) oscillations synchronize with the rhythm, modulating sensory excitability to align with expected stimuli.^[116] Aging impairs this ability, with older adults showing reduced benefits from temporal cues due to diminished expectation formation and weaker entrainment, as evidenced by slower reaction times and lower accuracy in cueing tasks.^[117] Auditory alertness encompasses phasic arousal states induced by warning tones, which transiently heighten vigilance and speed up responses to subsequent stimuli.^[118] In dichotic listening paradigms, this alertness interacts with hemispheric lateralization, often producing a right ear advantage for verbal material due to stronger contralateral projections from the right ear to the language-dominant left hemisphere. This asymmetry reflects efficient processing pathways, with directed attention amplifying the advantage by enhancing left-hemisphere activation.^[119] Recent research in 2025 has highlighted individual differences in auditory attentional control, particularly in the dynamic suppression of distractions, with neuroimaging showing that stronger inhibitory networks predict better maintenance of focus amid varying noise levels. These studies reveal that variations in neural dynamics, such as alpha-band suppression, underlie why some individuals excel at filtering irrelevant sounds in real-world listening scenarios.^[120]

Applications in Daily Life

Cognitive Performance Enhancement

Attentional control training has demonstrated practical benefits in military and operational settings, where laboratory-based tasks effectively predict performance in high-stakes drills. A 2025 study published in Frontiers in Psychology found that measures from attentional control tasks, such as the Attention Network Test and flanker tasks, correlated significantly with outcomes in augmented reality simulations of combat-relevant activities, including navigation and threat detection under stress, enabling better selection of personnel for demanding roles.^[121] Furthermore, targeted training programs, including vigilance exercises, have been shown to reduce error rates in sustained monitoring tasks by up to 20%, enhancing operational reliability in scenarios like air traffic control or sentry duties.^[122] In sports and athletics, dual-task training protocols improve attentional control by simulating pressure-filled environments, allowing athletes to maintain focus amid distractions. Systematic reviews indicate that such training, which combines physical skills with cognitive demands like decision-making, leads to better performance in dynamic sports such as soccer or basketball, with improvements in reaction times and error reduction during competitions.^[123] The quiet eye technique, involving prolonged fixation on critical targets before action, exemplifies this approach; quiet eye training has been shown to improve putting accuracy under pressure by enhancing visuomotor integration and reducing anxiety-induced gaze disruptions.^[124] Attention control is closely linked to multitasking efficiency in workplace settings, where individuals with stronger control experience fewer switch costs and higher overall productivity. Research highlights that attentional control accounts for substantial variance in real-world task performance, such as in aviation simulations.^[125] Computerized interventions, including adaptive programs targeting inhibition and shifting, have boosted executive functions like working memory and cognitive flexibility, resulting in measurable gains in task completion rates for professionals in fields like finance and healthcare.^[126] Meta-analyses of attentional control training reveal small-to-medium effect sizes (Cohen's d ≈ 0.3–0.5) on fluid intelligence, particularly through enhancements in reasoning and problem-solving under cognitive load, supporting its role in professional enhancement.^[127] Sustained attention, a core component of attentional control, plays a pivotal role in long-term performance by facilitating consistent monitoring and adaptation, as evidenced by a 2025 bioRxiv preprint showing its stronger correlation with long-term memory consolidation than with short-term working memory in prolonged tasks.^[128] However, limitations persist, as transfer effects to novel, untrained tasks remain variable, with some studies reporting only 10–20% generalization due to task-specific adaptations rather than broad cognitive gains.^[129]

Educational Strategies

Educational strategies aimed at enhancing attentional control in school settings primarily involve targeted interventions that promote sustained attention, selective focus, and executive function regulation. These approaches draw from cognitive, behavioral, and neuroscientific research, often integrated into classroom routines or after-school programs to support academic performance and reduce distractions. Key methods include cognitive training programs, physical activity, mindfulness practices, and gamified interventions, each with varying levels of empirical support.^[130] Cognitive attention training programs, such as computer-based exercises, target sustained and selective attention through adaptive tasks that require inhibiting distractions and maintaining focus. For instance, the Tali Train program, delivered via tablets, has demonstrated improvements in visual sustained attention in children with attentional difficulties compared to passive controls, with small-to-moderate effect sizes after approximately 25 sessions.^[130] Similarly, AKL-T01 (EndeavorRx), an FDA-cleared adaptive game-like digital therapeutic, has enhanced continuous performance test scores and attentional functioning in children and adolescents with ADHD.^[131] However, systematic reviews highlight mixed evidence, with only about 50% of studies showing near-transfer effects to untrained tasks, underscoring the need for active control groups in evaluations.^[130] Physical activity interventions offer a non-digital strategy to improve attentional control by leveraging exercise-induced neuroplasticity, particularly in prefrontal regions associated with executive functions. School-based programs incorporating coordinated activities, such as yoga or team sports, have yielded promising results; for example, 14 weeks of coordinative bilateral exercises increased concentration scores by up to 25% in elementary students, as measured by attention network tests. Yoga sessions, integrated into daily schedules for 8–12 weeks, reduced omission errors on sustained attention tasks (p < 0.01), with benefits persisting post-intervention. These approaches are particularly effective in diverse classrooms, as they require minimal resources and promote overall engagement, though long-term transfer to academic outcomes remains preliminary.^[130] Mindfulness and meditation training foster attentional control by teaching students to regulate internal distractions through breath-focused or body-scan practices. Adapted mindfulness programs for schools have improved sustained attention in adolescents, reducing errors on continuous performance tests and enhancing selective attention to relevant stimuli. Evidence from reviews indicates consistent benefits for selective attention, making these strategies suitable for brief classroom breaks to mitigate mind-wandering during lessons.^[130] Action video game training represents an engaging, gamified method to strengthen attentional control, emphasizing rapid target detection and distractor suppression. Seminal work demonstrates that 10–50 hours of play enhances top-down attention, with non-gamers improving multiple object tracking by 20–30% and reducing attentional blink durations. In educational contexts, such training has boosted reading speeds in dyslexic children by 15% after 12 hours, suggesting applications in literacy support. School pilots integrating commercial games like Medal of Honor report better spatial attention and cognitive flexibility, though concerns about screen time necessitate balanced implementation.^[132]^[133] Organizational and self-management strategies complement direct training by embedding attentional control into daily routines. The Homework, Organization, and Planning Skills (HOPS) program, a 16-session intervention, teaches time management and material organization, leading to significant GPA improvements and enhancements in organizational skills linked to better attention in middle schoolers with attention challenges. Self-monitoring techniques, where students track on-task behavior, enhance engagement during classwork, as evidenced by direct observation data. These behavioral tools are highly feasible in educational settings, promoting independence and transfer to academic tasks.^[134]

References

[1]
Attention Control: A Cornerstone of Higher-Order Cognition - Alexander P. Burgoyne, Randall W. Engle, 2020
### Summary of Attention Control as a Cornerstone of Higher-Order Cognition
[2]
Cognitive Control and Attentional Functions - PMC - PubMed Central
We propose that the attentional functions of alerting, orienting, and executive control and the interactions among them contribute to cognitive control.
[3]
https://doi.org/10.1037/1528-3542.7.2.336
[4]
An Adaptive View of Attentional Control - PMC - NIH
Adaptive attentional control automates attention control to maximize benefits while minimizing distraction, which is a result of adaptive principles.
[5]
Unraveling Causal Mechanisms of Top-Down and Bottom-Up ...
In this review, we explore this dichotomy between the neural bases of top-down and bottom-up attention control, with a special emphasis on insights gained from ...
[6]
The Relationship Between Working Memory Capacity and Executive ...
Attentional control has been conceptualized as executive functioning by neuropsychologists and as working memory capacity by experimental psychologists.
[7]
Sustained Attention - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
Sustained attention is the ability to maintain focus on a stimulus over an extended period, continuously allocating attention to a task over time.
[8]
Research on attention networks as a model for the ... - PubMed - NIH
Attention research investigates how voluntary control and subjective experience arise from and regulate our behavior. In recent years, attention has been one of ...Missing: PDF | Show results with:PDF
[9]
The meaning of attention control - PubMed
Attention control has been proposed as an ability construct that explains individual differences in fluid intelligence.
[10]
Classics in the History of Psychology -- James (1890) Chapter 11
Every one knows what attention is. It is the taking possession by the mind, in clear and vivid form, of one out of what seem several simultaneously possible ...
[11]
[PDF] Perception and - Communication Cache
Page 1. Perception and. Communication. D.E.Broadbent. Applied Psychology Unit of the Medical Research Council, Cambridge. Page 2. Perception and. Communication.
[12]
[PDF] COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY - Antilogicalism
First published in 1967, this seminal volume by Ulric Neisser was the first attempt at a comprehensive and accessible survey of cognitive psychology; as.
[13]
[PDF] Orienting of attention - Psychological and Brain Sciences
The choice spatial task involves a report about whether the stimulus was higher or lower than the cue. As in the simple RT task, the cue provides no information ...Missing: networks | Show results with:networks
[14]
The prefrontal cortex and the executive control of attention - PMC
We review two studies aimed at understanding the role of prefrontal cortex (PFC) in the control of attention. The first study examined which attentional ...
[15]
A unified perspective on top-down and bottom-up processes
Knudsen identifies four core processes of attentional control: working memory, top-down control, competitive selection, and bottom-up filtering (Knudsen, 2007).
[16]
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0001691825005578
[17]
Testing the efficiency and independence of attentional networks
The Attention Network Test (ANT) is designed to evaluate alerting, orienting, and executive attention within a single 30-min testing session.
[18]
Working Memory Capacity as Executive Attention - Sage Journals
Studies show that individual differences in WM capacity are reflected in performance on antisaccade, Stroop, and dichotic-listening tasks.
[19]
[PDF] EXECUTIVE ATTENTION, WORKING MEMORY CAPACITY, AND A ...
This paper is about the nature of working memory capacity (WMC), and it will address the nature of WMC limitations, their effects on higher order.
[20]
Attentional Capture and Control - Annual Reviews
Jan 17, 2025 · The current review presents an integrated tripartite framework for understanding attentional control, emphasizing the interaction and ...
[21]
Value-modulated attentional capture depends on awareness
Jul 16, 2025 · Value-driven attentional priority is context specific. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 22, 750–756. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-014-0724-0.
[22]
The role of prefrontal cortex in cognitive control and executive function
Aug 18, 2021 · Concepts of cognitive control (CC) and executive function (EF) are defined in terms of their relationships with goal-directed behavior versus habits.
[23]
Dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and Stroop performance: Tackling the ...
Neuroscience research has identified the involvement of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) in cognitive control.
[24]
Cognitive control and right ventrolateral prefrontal cortex: reflexive ...
We report a functional MRI meta-analysis of two prominent theories of right VLPFC function: stopping of motor responses and reflexive orienting to abrupt ...
[25]
Anterior Cingulate Cortex, Conflict Monitoring, and Levels of ...
The present study was designed to investigate which levels of processing are being monitored by the ACC for the presence of conflict.
[26]
Anterior Cingulate and Posterior Parietal Cortices Are Sensitive to ...
The conflict-monitoring hypothesis posits that anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) monitors conflict in information processing and recruits dorsolateral ...
[27]
Anterior Cingulate Conflict Monitoring and Adjustments in Control
Aug 6, 2025 · We demonstrate that ACC conflict-related activity predicts both greater prefrontal cortex activity and adjustments in behavior.
[28]
Lesion evidence for the critical role of the intraparietal sulcus in ...
May 14, 2011 · Our findings demonstrate that the human superior parietal cortex critically contributes to spatially selective attention.Introduction · Materials and methods · Results · Discussion
[29]
The Neural Systems for Directing Attention to Spatial Locations and ...
We developed a temporal analog of the spatial orienting of attention task (Posner, 1980). In this task the subjects respond as quickly as possible to visual ...Experimental Task · Pet Data · Fmri Data
[30]
Prefrontal Cortex Regulates Sensory Filtering through a Basal ...
Aug 7, 2019 · A prefrontal-basal ganglia-thalamus pathway controls inhibition in sensory thalamus. This pathway enables sensory selection by suppressing distracting inputs.
[31]
Contributions of Basal Ganglia Circuits to Perception, Attention, and ...
This depends on the integrative relationship between cortex, BG, and thalamus, which allows contributions to sensory gating, predictive processing, selective ...
[32]
Locus Ceruleus Norepinephrine Release: A Central Regulator of ...
Aug 26, 2016 · Norepinephrine (NE) is synthesized in the Locus Coeruleus (LC) of the brainstem, from where it is released by axonal varicosities throughout ...
[33]
The Locus Coeruleus- Norepinephrine System in Stress and Arousal
Several lines of evidence indicate that LC activation is sufficient to initiate and maintain states of arousal, and LC activity is positively correlated with ...
[34]
Locus coeruleus norepinephrine contributes to visual-spatial ...
Jul 3, 2024 · Article. Locus coeruleus norepinephrine contributes to visual-spatial attention by selectively enhancing perceptual sensitivity.
[35]
Atomoxetine Increases Extracellular Levels of Norepinephrine and ...
Apr 12, 2002 · Atomoxetine (formerly called tomoxetine or LY139603) has been shown to alleviate symptoms in Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD).
[36]
The Neuropsychopharmacology of Fronto-Executive Function
We review the modulatory effects of the catecholamine neurotransmitters noradrenaline and dopamine on prefrontal cortical function.
[37]
Neuromodulation of Attention - Neuron - ScienceDirect.com
Feb 21, 2018 · The effects of these neuromodulators follow the classic Yerkes-Dodson (inverted U-curve) dose-response relationship (Yerkes and Dodson, 1908).
[38]
Mechanisms underlying the basal forebrain enhancement of top ...
Dec 5, 2013 · The cholinergic system, which originates in the basal forebrain (BF), has been shown to be important for enhancing bottom-up sensory input to ...<|separator|>
[39]
Acetylcholine as a neuromodulator: cholinergic signaling shapes ...
Acetylcholine in the brain alters neuronal excitability, influences synaptic transmission, induces synaptic plasticity and coordinates the firing of groups ...
[40]
Acetylcholine Release in Prefrontal Cortex Promotes Gamma ...
Mar 22, 2017 · We demonstrate that cue-evoked acetylcholine release, through distinct actions at both nicotinic and muscarinic receptors, triggers a procession of neural ...
[41]
Cell class-specific modulation of attentional signals by acetylcholine ...
Sep 16, 2019 · We show that acetylcholine promotes attentional signals in frontal cortex by differentially activating 2 cholinergic receptor types in different cell groups.
[42]
The Role of Serotonin (5-HT) in Behavioral Control - PubMed Central
It has been suggested that DA biases behavior towards habitual responding, with 5-HT offsetting this phenomenon and directing the balance toward more flexible, ...
[43]
Review The 5-HT 2A serotonin receptor in executive function
This review aims to describe the current state of knowledge on the role of 5-HT 2A R signalling in components of executive function.Missing: seminal papers
[44]
5-HT 2A and 5-HT 2C receptor antagonism differentially modulate ...
Apr 10, 2024 · These results provide novel insights into the mechanisms of 5-HT and the involvement of different 5-HT receptors in cognitive flexibility.
[45]
The multifaceted effects of fluoxetine treatment on cognitive functions
In vivo studies have delineated the role of fluoxetine in modulating synaptic serotonin (5-HT) levels, revealing a modest yet persistent surge in extracellular ...
[46]
The Infant Orienting With Attention task: Assessing the neural basis ...
Infant visual attention develops rapidly over the first year of life, significantly altering the way infants respond to peripheral visual events.
[47]
The development of visual attention in early infancy: Insights from a ...
Jan 3, 2022 · These findings underline that the period between 2 and 3.5 months is critical for the rise of endogenous control. The succession of ...
[48]
Direct and Observed Joint Attention Modulate 9-Month-Old Infants ...
Sharing joint visual attention to an object with another person biases infants to encode qualitatively different object properties.
[49]
The Role of Inhibitory Control in Behavioral and Physiological ...
Inhibitory control begins to emerge towards the end of the first postnatal year and undergoes rapid development across the toddler period and into the preschool ...Missing: distractibility | Show results with:distractibility
[50]
Visual attention and inhibitory control in children, teenagers and ...
Nov 13, 2021 · In this study, using Gap, Step, Overlap and Antisaccade tasks, we analyzed the oculomotor behavior of 82 children, teenagers and adults with ...Missing: distractibility | Show results with:distractibility
[51]
Neural substrates of early executive function development
Diamond's chapter discussed the normal maturation of the prefrontal cortex (PFC) by integrating evidence of developments in cognitive functioning, anatomy and ...
[52]
Dimensional Change Card Sort performance associated with age ...
The present investigation therefore tested whether DCCS performance is associated with age-related differences in the functional connectivity of lateral ...
[53]
Assessing the heritability of attentional networks - BMC Neuroscience
Sep 14, 2001 · These results suggest that genetic variation contributes to normal individual differences in higher order executive attention involving dopamine ...Abstract · Discussion · Materials And Methods<|separator|>
[54]
Econeurobiology and brain development in children: key factors ...
Research has consistently shown that environmental enrichment at different developmental stages positively influences brain plasticity, leading to improvements ...
[55]
Attention and Focus Abilities Peak Between Ages 27 and 36
Sep 2, 2025 · Inverted U-Shape: Cognitive control brain activity peaks in early adulthood, then declines with age. Peak Interval: Ages 27–36 represent the ...
[56]
Childhood Self-Control and Unemployment Throughout the Life Span
The capacity for self-control may underlie successful labor-force entry and job retention, particularly in times of economic uncertainty.
[57]
Spatiotemporal predictions guide attention throughout the adult ...
Nov 21, 2024 · While many studies have emphasized the substantial decline in attention control over the lifespan, our study highlights a remarkable sparing of ...
[58]
The effects of typical ageing on cognitive control: recent advances ...
Jul 28, 2023 · In this article on typical ageing, we review recent behavioural and neural findings related to the decline in cognitive control among older adults.
[59]
Perceptual and cognitive neural correlates of the useful field of view ...
Jan 1, 2015 · The Useful Field of View Test (UFOV) is often used as a behavioral assessment of age-related decline in visual perception and cognition.
[60]
Compensatory Neural Responses to Cognitive Fatigue in Young ...
For example, posterior-anterior shift in aging (PASA) reflects that impaired posterior sensory processing is associated with increased compensatory activity in ...
[61]
Investigating the role of cognitive reserve in cognitive aging
Aug 25, 2021 · We found that people with a higher level of education had a higher level of cognitive function in older age, even when age, sex, cognitive ...
[62]
The Sustained Attention Paradox: A Critical Commentary on ... - NIH
Apr 7, 2025 · Research has shown that even during normal wakefulness, microsleeps and attention lapses increase with time on task, reflecting the brain's ...
[63]
Age, Sex, and Inhibitory Control: Identifying a Specific Impairment in ...
Jul 7, 2021 · It has been posited from an evolutionary perspective that women may be more effective at inhibition than men due to greater pressures to prevent ...
[64]
On the reliability of behavioral measures of cognitive control: retest ...
Dec 18, 2021 · This study examined the reliability (retest and split-half) of four common behavioral measures of cognitive control.Missing: elderly | Show results with:elderly
[65]
The Utility of Stroop Task Switching as a Marker for Early Stage ...
Past studies have suggested attentional control tasks such as the Stroop task and the task switching paradigm may be sensitive to the early detection of ...
[66]
Testing the behavioral interaction and integration of attentional ...
The revised attention network test (ANT-R). We designed the ANT-R based on the original ANT (Fan et al., 2002) in order to optimize the attentional contrasts ...
[67]
Conflict resolution in the Eriksen flanker task - PubMed
Mar 28, 2019 · In the Eriksen flanker task as well as in the Simon task irrelevant activation produces a response conflict that has to be resolved by mental control ...
[68]
Eriksen Flanker Task - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
The task assesses several cognitive processes, including selective attention, executive control, conflict monitoring, and response inhibition. 1 2 6. During ...Introduction to the Eriksen... · Variations, Adaptations, and...
[69]
Evaluation of the reliability and validity of computerized tests of ...
Here, we evaluated the reliability and validity of computerized attention tasks as provided with the PEBL package.
[70]
A review of the day–night task: The Stroop paradigm and ...
The day–night task is a widely used measurement of interference control in young children between ages 3 and 7.
[71]
fMRI evidence for both generalized and specialized components of ...
Together, the present results support the conclusion that attentional control is the combination of a generalized network that works in concert with sub-regions ...Missing: PFC seminal
[72]
Event-related modulation of alpha rhythm explains the auditory ...
In 17 studies using EEG, results indicated an overlap in cortical regions of P300 and alpha amplitude decrease, as well as a similar time windows of their ...
[73]
Alpha-band EEG suppression as a neural marker of sustained ...
These results indicate that conditioned threat stimuli trigger an increase in attentional engagement as subjects monitor the environment for the predicted ...
[74]
Evaluating the Evidence for the Functional Inhibition Account of ...
Aug 1, 2023 · The functional inhibition account states that alpha-band (8–14 Hz) power implements attentional control by selectively inhibiting task-irrelevant neural ...Missing: key | Show results with:key
[75]
Functional near-infrared spectroscopy in pediatric clinical research
Mar 3, 2023 · Functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) has matured into a highly versatile tool to study brain function in infants and young children.
[76]
The functional near infrared spectroscopy applications in children ...
Jun 17, 2025 · This review provides a comprehensive synthesis of the application of functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) in pediatric developmental disorders.
[77]
Prefrontal cortex intrinsic functional connectivity and executive ...
One study using fNIRS with elementary school-aged children (7–8 years old) and early adolescents (11–12 years old) found changes in the topological organization ...
[78]
Attention Performance Correlated With White Matter Structural Brain ...
Jan 31, 2022 · The diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) tractography was used to construct the WM structural networks. The graph theory analysis was applied to ...
[79]
[PDF] Individual Variation in White Matter Microstructure Is Related to ...
Past studies have investigated how individual differences in affective functioning are related to the microstructure of the unci- nate fasciculus using ...
[80]
Attention Performance Measured by Attention Network Test Is ...
Oct 10, 2016 · The average accuracy of ANT performance was high (0.97 ± 0.02) and no one was excluded from the study, indicating that all participants ...
[81]
Limitations of temporal resolution in functional MRI - PubMed - NIH
The temporal resolution is limited by a blurred intrinsic hemodynamic response and a finite signal-to-noise ratio.Missing: attentional control ANT
[82]
Attentional Processes in Children With Attentional Problems or ...
Attention Network Test studies on adults using fMRI have revealed activation related to inhibition in the right ACC, bilateral precentral gyrus, intraparietal ...
[83]
What is ADHD? - Psychiatry.org
An estimated 8.4% of children and 2.5% of adults have ADHD (Danielson, 2018; Simon, et al., 2009). ADHD is often first identified in school-aged children when ...ADHD in Adults · What Is Autism Spectrum · Disruptive, Impulse-Control...
[84]
Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder and Attention Networks - PMC
The review will then identify major components of neural systems potentially relevant to ADHD, including attention networks, reward/feedback-based processing ...Introduction · Prefrontal Cortex · Dopaminergic Studies
[85]
Prevalence of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder in adults
Based on a random effect meta-analysis, the pooled prevalence of ADHD in adults was 3.10% (95%CI 2.60–3.60%), with significant heterogeneity across the studies ...
[86]
Mechanisms of Attentional Biases towards Threat in the Anxiety ...
Supraliminal attentional biases have been demonstrated in the Stroop task, dot probe task, spatial cueing task, and visual search task (see Bar-Haim et al ...
[87]
The effects of cognitive load on attention control in subclinical ...
It appears that high cognitive load reveals attention control deficits in high anxiety but only in the presence of threat distractors.
[88]
Anxiety-Linked Attentional Bias: Is It Reliable? - Annual Reviews
May 7, 2019 · We discuss the appropriate uses of existing attentional bias assessment tasks and propose strategies for enhancing classification of individuals ...
[89]
Attentional bias modification and attention control training in PTSD
Apr 16, 2024 · Our findings indicated that ACT was a more effective treatment condition. This study highlights the therapeutic value of ACT.
[90]
Attentional bias modification and attention control training in PTSD
Eight RCTs comparing the effect of ABM to ACT were included in the review, and six studies were meta-analyzed. Meta-analysis favored ACT in improving PTSD ...
[91]
Selective impairment of attentional networks of orienting ... - PubMed
Results: Schizophrenic patients showed a large and highly significant deficit in the executive network and a smaller but significant deficit in the orienting ...
[92]
Selective impairment of attentional networks of orienting and ...
Schizophrenic patients showed a large and highly significant deficit in the executive network and a smaller but significant deficit in the orienting network ...
[93]
Attention in Children With Autism Spectrum Disorder and the Effects ...
However, weaker executive attention correlated with a lower IQ in children with ASD, and a weaker alerting attention correlated with a higher social impairment.
[94]
Attentional and electrophysiological associations with executive ...
Jul 10, 2025 · Difficulties in executive functioning (EF) have been consistently reported in autistic individuals, but less is known about the attentional ...
[95]
Unravelling the effects of methylphenidate on the dopaminergic and ...
In a recent network meta-analysis, MPH, as compared to placebo, was shown to decrease the core ADHD symptoms in children, adolescents and adults with a moderate ...
[96]
The Role of Alpha-2 Agonists for Attention Deficit Hyperactivity ...
May 22, 2023 · Clinical trials have demonstrated that guanfacine, a preferential α2A-adrenoceptor agonist, is an effective treatment for ADHD treatment in ...
[97]
Neurofeedback training for executive function in ADHD children
Aug 1, 2025 · Additive effects of EEG neurofeedback on medications for ADHD: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Article Open access 27 November 2022 ...Missing: prefrontal | Show results with:prefrontal
[98]
(PDF) Neurofeedback training for executive function in ADHD children
Sep 9, 2025 · Conclusions: This meta-analysis of EEG-NF in children with ADHD highlights improvement in the inattention dimension of ADHD symptoms. Future ...
[99]
Cogmed cognitive training for working memory: a systematic review ...
Aug 16, 2025 · This systematic review aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of Cogmed Working Memory Training (CWMT), a commercial program designed to improve WM.Missing: attention ADHD military
[100]
Research - Cogmed
Cogmed is a personalized digital training program, designed to improve the brain systems responsible for attention and working memory.Missing: military | Show results with:military
[101]
A Review of Working Memory Training in the Management of ...
Jul 20, 2021 · In this study, we review the role of working memory deficits in ADHD, the evidence surrounding working memory training strategies in the management of the ...
[102]
Measuring attention using the Posner cuing paradigm - Frontiers
May 16, 2013 · By manipulating the spatial validity between the location of the cue and the location of the target, the Posner cuing task provides a measure of ...
[103]
Multiple Spotlights of Attentional Selection in Human Visual Cortex
Spatially directed attention strongly enhances visual perceptual processing. The metaphor of the “spotlight” has long been used to describe spatial ...
[104]
Individual differences in working memory capacity and attentional ...
The results revealed that participants with low-WM capacity were less effective to exhibit voluntary attention control processes and they were also slower in ...
[105]
[PDF] Individual Differences in Visual Working Memory Capacity
Individual Differences in Visual Working Memory Capacity: Contributions of Attentional Control to Storage · 56 Citations · 50 References.
[106]
Auditory Scene Analysis: The Perceptual Organization of Sound
Auditory Scene Analysis addresses the problem of hearing complex auditory environments, using a series of creative analogies to describe the process requir.
[107]
A Gestalt inference model for auditory scene segregation - PMC
Jan 22, 2019 · These Gestalt principles suggest a theory of how different attributes of the soundscape are extracted then bound together into separate groups ...Missing: seminal | Show results with:seminal
[108]
Computational Models of Auditory Scene Analysis: A Review
Tone clouds have been used in information masking designs measuring the effect of auditory stream segregation on detecting tone repetition within a protected ...Missing: seminal | Show results with:seminal
[109]
Some Experiments on the Recognition of Speech, with One and with ...
This paper describes a number of objective experiments on recognition, concerning particularly the relation between the messages received by the two ears.
[110]
The cocktail-party problem: early processing and selection of speech
The difficulties associated with understanding speech in multiple-talker situations often are associated with the term “cocktail-party problem” (or “cocktail- ...
[111]
Rhythm implicitly affects temporal orienting of attention ... - PubMed
Jan 28, 2013 · Here we present two experiments investigating the implicit orienting of attention over time by entrainment to an auditory rhythmic stimulus.Missing: cues delta theta paper
[112]
Musical Training Facilitates Exogenous Temporal Attention via Delta ...
May 3, 2023 · We demonstrate that musical rhythm training improves exogenous temporal attention, which was associated with more consistent timing of neural activity.Missing: seminal | Show results with:seminal
[113]
Age-Related Changes in Orienting Attention in Time - PubMed Central
These results provide novel evidence that older adults do not use temporal cues to orient attention in time and support an expectation deficit in normal aging.Missing: seminal | Show results with:seminal
[114]
Tonic and Phasic Alertness Training: A Novel Behavioral Therapy to ...
In contrast to tonic alertness, phasic alertness is the rapid change in attention due to a brief event and is the basis for operations such as orienting and ...
[115]
Hemispheric asymmetry of the right ear advantage in dichotic listening
In summary, asymmetries have been observed at all levels of the auditory system. The present paper focuses particularly on perceptual asymmetries in linguistic ...Missing: phasic arousal alertness seminal
[116]
Brain dynamics of the interplay between auditory selective attention ...
Jul 1, 2025 · Here we investigate how auditory working memory—in a delayed-matching-to-sample task—and selective attention interact using a recently ...
[117]
Examining cognition in action: laboratory-based attentional control ...
May 4, 2025 · The results indicate that laboratory-based attentional control tasks can serve as useful indicators of performance in military operationally-relevant drills.
[118]
[PDF] Attention Control Measures Improve the Prediction of Performance ...
ABSTRACT. Military selection tests leave room for improvement when predicting work‐relevant outcomes. We tested whether measures of attention control ...
[119]
The effects of cognitive-motor dual-task training on athletes ...
Feb 7, 2024 · This systematic review shows that athletes typically show a degradation of performance in CMDT situations as opposed to ST when evaluated transversally.Abstract · Introduction · Methods · Discussion
[120]
The effect of quiet eye training on golf putting performance ... - Nature
Mar 2, 2024 · Quiet eye training can improve the golf putting performance in pressure situations. After quiet eye training, the state anxiety decreased.Methods · Results · Comparison Of Gaze BehaviorMissing: technique | Show results with:technique<|separator|>
[121]
The role of attention control in complex real-world tasks - PMC
Classification, Notes. Operation span (Turner & Engle, 1989), Interwoven ... Participants interacted with an automated system of varying reliability and performed ...
[122]
Effects and Moderators of Computer-Based Training on Children's ...
Several studies have found that computer-based training resulted in improved executive functions (EFs) in adults. However, it remains controversial whether ...Missing: productivity | Show results with:productivity
[123]
Improving fluid intelligence with training on working memory - PubMed
We conclude that short-term cognitive training on the order of weeks can result in beneficial effects in important cognitive functions as measured by laboratory ...
[124]
Sustained attention is more closely related to long-term memory ...
Mar 13, 2025 · Individual differences in sustained attention, although correlated with attention control and working memory, are more closely related to LTM.
[125]
Attention control training and transfer effects on cognitive tasks
Jul 29, 2024 · According to the “unity and diversity” theory, inhibition, working memory, and shifting are three distinct and related executive functions, and ...
[126]
Popular Interventions for Sustained Attention in Children: Review
In this paper, we review the evidence for three common intervention approaches (cognitive attention training, physical activity, and meditation training) for ...
[127]
Interventions for sustained attention in children/adolescents
Mar 23, 2022 · In this systematic review, we critically evaluate the evidence behind three popular sustained attention training approaches - cognitive attention training, ...
[128]
Enhancing Attentional Control: Lessons from Action Video Games
Oct 9, 2019 · Here we review the impact of video game play, in particular action video game play, on attentional control. We also examine the underlying neural bases of ...
[129]
[PDF] Learning, Attentional Control, and Action Video Games
By facilitating the identification of task-relevant information and the suppression of irrelevant, potentially dis- tracting sources of information, ...
[130]
School-Based Interventions for Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity ... - MDPI
This review synthesizes findings from studies on academic accommodations, organizational training (e.g., HOPS), self-management strategies, mental health ...