Autoimmune hemolytic anemia (AIHA) is a rare acquired disorder characterized by the immune system producing autoantibodies that target and destroy the body's own red blood cells, resulting in accelerated hemolysis and subsequent anemia.[1] This immune-mediated process can lead to a reduced red blood cell lifespan, typically from 120 days to as short as a few hours in severe cases, causing compensatory bone marrow hyperactivity and potential complications such as jaundice and fatigue.[2] AIHA is diagnosed primarily through laboratory confirmation of hemolysis and a positive direct antiglobulin test (DAT), which detects immunoglobulins or complement proteins on red blood cell surfaces.[1]AIHA is classified into subtypes based on the thermal reactivity of the autoantibodies and DAT patterns, with the most common being warm AIHA (approximately 65% of cases), where IgG antibodies bind optimally at body temperature (37°C), and cold agglutinin disease (CAD), involving IgM antibodies active at lower temperatures.[1] Other variants include mixed-type AIHA (both IgG and complement) and paroxysmal cold hemoglobinuria (PCH), a biphasic form often seen in children following infections.[1] Roughly half of cases are secondary, associated with underlying conditions such as lymphoproliferative disorders, autoimmune diseases (e.g., systemic lupus erythematosus), infections, or drug exposures, while the remainder are primary or idiopathic.[1] The incidence is estimated at 1–3 per 100,000 individuals annually, with a higher prevalence in older adults and a slight female predominance.[1]Clinically, AIHA presents with symptoms of anemia, including pallor, weakness, shortness of breath, and tachycardia, alongside signs of hemolysis such as elevated bilirubin, reduced haptoglobin, and reticulocytosis; severe cases may involve intravascular hemolysis with hemoglobinuria.[2] Diagnostic evaluation includes a complete blood count showing low hemoglobin, peripheral blood smear revealing spherocytes or agglutination, and exclusion of non-immune causes of hemolysis.[1] Treatment strategies depend on the subtype and severity: first-line therapy for warm AIHA typically involves corticosteroids like prednisone (1 mg/kg daily), achieving response rates of about 80%, while rituximab is a key second-line option with 79% efficacy.[1] For CAD, rituximab or combination regimens like rituximab-bendamustine are preferred, and approved complement inhibitors (e.g., sutimlimab) are used.[1][3] In secondary AIHA, addressing the underlying cause is essential, and supportive measures such as transfusions must be administered cautiously due to risks of alloimmunization.[2] Overall prognosis varies, with many patients achieving remission, though relapses occur in approximately 60% of cases following first-line steroid therapy.[1]
Introduction and Classification
Definition
Autoimmune hemolytic anemia (AIHA) is a group of acquired disorders characterized by the production of autoantibodies that target and destroy the patient's own red blood cells (RBCs), resulting in hemolytic anemia.[1] In this condition, the immune system mistakenly identifies RBC surface antigens as foreign, leading to immune-mediated hemolysis that exceeds the bone marrow's compensatory capacity.[4] Unlike other forms of anemia, AIHA specifically arises from this aberrant autoimmune response rather than intrinsic RBC defects or external physical damage.[5]The basic process involves autoantibodies binding to RBC antigens, which marks the cells for destruction through two primary mechanisms: complement-mediated lysis, where the complement cascade forms a membrane attack complex that perforates the RBC membrane, or extravascular phagocytosis by macrophages in the spleen and liver that engulf opsonized RBCs.[6] This accelerated hemolysis shortens the normal RBC lifespan of approximately 120 days to as little as a few days in severe cases, causing rapid declines in hemoglobin levels and symptoms of anemia.[7] The distinction from congenital hemolytic anemias, such as sickle cell disease, lies in AIHA's acquired autoimmune etiology without genetic RBC abnormalities, and from mechanical hemolysis, such as that caused by prosthetic heart valves, which involves physical shearing rather than immunological targeting.[8]
Types
Autoimmune hemolytic anemia (AIHA) is primarily classified into subtypes based on the thermal reactivity of the autoantibodies, their immunoglobulin class, and the pattern observed in the direct antiglobulin test (DAT).[9] This serological classification guides diagnosis and management, with the most common forms being warm AIHA, cold AIHA, and mixed-type AIHA.[7] Overall, warm AIHA accounts for approximately 70% of cases, cold AIHA for 20-30%, and mixed-type for 5-10%. Paroxysmal cold hemoglobinuria and atypical AIHA (e.g., DAT-negative cases) each account for less than 10%.[10][11]Warm AIHA (wAIHA) is the most prevalent subtype, comprising 60-70% of AIHA cases, and is characterized by IgG autoantibodies that optimally bind to red blood cells at body temperature (37°C).[9] These antibodies typically lead to predominant extravascular hemolysis in the spleen and liver.[7] The DAT is positive for IgG, often with complement (C3), and wAIHA may occur idiopathically or secondary to underlying conditions.[10]Cold AIHA (cAIHA) encompasses disorders where autoantibodies react more avidly at temperatures below 37°C, representing 20-30% of AIHA cases.[9] It includes cold agglutinin disease (CAD), mediated by IgM autoantibodies with anti-I specificity that bind optimally at 4°C and activate complement, resulting in primarily intravascular hemolysis.[7] CAD is often chronic and associated with lymphoproliferative disorders.[10] Another form is paroxysmal cold hemoglobinuria (PCH), featuring biphasic IgG autoantibodies (Donath-Landsteiner type) that bind in the cold and cause hemolysis upon rewarming to 37°C, leading to acute intravascular hemolysis; PCH is rare, typically post-viral, and most common in children.[9]Mixed-type AIHA, occurring in 5-10% of cases, involves the coexistence of warm IgG and cold IgM autoantibodies, with reactivity at both 37°C and lower temperatures.[7] This subtype often presents with a more aggressive clinical course, combining features of extravascular and intravascular hemolysis, and the DAT is positive for both IgG and C3.[10]Drug-induced AIHA is a distinct subtype triggered by medications, accounting for a variable proportion of cases but separable from idiopathic forms due to its reversible nature upon drug withdrawal.[9] It involves mechanisms such as hapten-drug adsorption (e.g., with penicillin) or immune complex formation, typically with IgG antibodies reacting at 37°C and causing extravascular hemolysis, though intravascular hemolysis can occur.[7] The DAT pattern mirrors wAIHA but is drug-dependent.[10]
Epidemiology
Incidence and Prevalence
Autoimmune hemolytic anemia (AIHA) is a rare disorder with an estimated overall incidence of 1-3 cases per 100,000 persons per year and a prevalence of approximately 17 per 100,000 persons.[12][13] Recent analyses from U.S. databases between 2016 and 2023 report AIHA incidence rates ranging from 1.4 to 6.6 per 100,000 persons annually, while cold agglutinin disease (CAD), a subtype of AIHA, shows rates of 0.6 to 1.2 per 100,000 persons.[14] These figures highlight the condition's low but consistent occurrence, with variations potentially attributable to diagnostic improvements and population demographics.AIHA exhibits a bimodal age distribution, with peak incidences observed in young children under 5 years and in older adults over 60 years.[15] The disorder affects all age groups but is more prevalent among the elderly, where incidence rises steadily with advancing age.[16] Females are disproportionately affected, with a female-to-male ratio of approximately 3:1 across most studies, though this disparity may vary by subtype and age group.[17]Geographic variations in AIHA incidence are noted, with higher reported rates in developed countries, likely due to enhanced diagnostic capabilities and access to healthcare.[18] Emerging trends suggest a potential increase in cases linked to modern immunotherapies, such as immune checkpoint inhibitors used in cancer treatment.[19] Additionally, post-2020 observations include associations between AIHA and COVID-19 infections, as documented in multiple case reports, though causality remains under investigation.[20]
Risk Factors
Autoimmune hemolytic anemia (AIHA) exhibits certain demographic risk factors that influence susceptibility. Females demonstrate a higher predisposition to AIHA compared to males, with a notable female predominance observed among adults, potentially linked to the greater prevalence of associated autoimmune conditions.[16] The incidence of AIHA increases with advancing age, particularly affecting individuals over 60 years, where the risk is substantially elevated for warm AIHA (wAIHA) in the seventh decade compared to earlier ages.[9] Although rarer in children, AIHA can onset in the pediatric population, often presenting distinct clinical patterns compared to adult cases.[21]Comorbid conditions significantly elevate the risk of developing AIHA, particularly in secondary forms. Autoimmune diseases such as systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and rheumatoid arthritis (RA) are strongly associated with AIHA occurrence.[9]Lymphoproliferative disorders, including chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), represent another key risk category.[9] Infections, notably Mycoplasma pneumoniae, Epstein-Barr virus (EBV), and severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), can trigger AIHA, with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) conferring a 20-fold increased incidence.[9]Iatrogenic factors, especially certain medications, pose modifiable risks for AIHA. Over 130 drugs have been implicated in drug-induced immune hemolytic anemia, with common examples including penicillins and cephalosporins.[22] The use of cancer immunotherapies, such as PD-1 inhibitors, has led to a rising incidence of AIHA as these agents become more widespread.[9]Genetic predisposition to AIHA is generally subtle, with no identified monogenic cause. Familial clustering is rare, though occasional cases suggest a heritable component.[23]Environmental triggers, particularly post-viral events, play a prominent role in pediatric AIHA, accounting for approximately 50% of cases in this group.[24]
Etiology
Primary Causes
Primary autoimmune hemolytic anemia (AIHA) refers to cases where hemolysis occurs without an identifiable underlying disease, infection, or drug exposure, accounting for more than 60% of all AIHA instances.[7] In these idiopathic forms, the immune system inexplicably targets autologous red blood cells, leading to their premature destruction. This distinguishes primary AIHA from secondary forms, where an external trigger is evident, and represents the majority of diagnoses in clinical practice.The immune basis of primary AIHA involves dysregulated B-cell activation, resulting in the production of pathogenic autoantibodies against red blood cell antigens. Recent studies highlight T-cell dysregulation as a key contributor, particularly in chronic cases, with reduced regulatory T cells (CD4+ CD25+) and expanded clonal CD8+ T-cell populations promoting autoreactive B-cell responses. Cytokine imbalances further exacerbate this immune dysregulation, sustaining autoantibody production and hemolysis.Among primary AIHA cases, the warm subtype (wAIHA), mediated by IgG autoantibodies active at body temperature, predominates, comprising approximately 60-70% of adult presentations, while cold agglutinin disease (cAIHA) and mixed types are rarer. Primary AIHA often presents with an acute onset, characterized by rapid hemoglobin decline and severe symptoms, yet it generally shows a better response to first-line therapies like corticosteroids compared to secondary forms, with lower one-year mortality rates (17.9% versus 28.4%).[12]Emerging research suggests potential roles for environmental factors in triggering primary AIHA, including molecular mimicry from gut microbiome alterations or infectious antigens that breach immune tolerance in genetically susceptible individuals. These insights underscore the interplay between host immunity and external influences, though definitive causal links remain under investigation.[25]
Secondary Causes
Secondary autoimmune hemolytic anemia (AIHA) accounts for approximately 40-50% of all cases and is more prevalent in elderly patients, where the incidence increases significantly with age.[9][26] Unlike primary AIHA, secondary forms arise from identifiable underlying triggers, often requiring targeted management of the precipitating condition to achieve resolution.Lymphoproliferative disorders represent a major cause, comprising 20-30% of secondary AIHA cases, with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) and non-Hodgkin lymphoma being prominent examples; in CLL, AIHA occurs in 5-10% of patients.[9][26] Autoimmune diseases account for 10-20% of secondary cases, particularly systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), where AIHA complicates up to 14% of pediatric and 3% of adult presentations.[9] Solid tumors, such as thymoma, ovarian carcinoma, and prostate cancer, are less frequent associations but can trigger AIHA through immune dysregulation.[9]Infections frequently underlie secondary AIHA, especially in children and immunocompromised individuals. Viral pathogens like Epstein-Barr virus (EBV), cytomegalovirus (CMV), human immunodeficiency virus (HIV; with a 20-fold increased risk), and hepatitis C virus (HCV) are common triggers, often leading to transient hemolysis.[9] Bacterial infections, notably Mycoplasma pneumoniae, induce cold agglutinin disease in about 3% of cases.[26] Reports of AIHA following SARS-CoV-2 infection emerged during the 2020-2023 pandemic, highlighting post-infectious immune activation as a mechanism.[9]Drug-induced AIHA involves immune-mediated mechanisms, including the hapten type where the drug binds to red blood cell (RBC) membranes, forming an immunogenic complex targeted by antibodies, and autoantibody mimicry where the drug alters immune tolerance, prompting direct anti-RBC autoantibody production.[7] Common culprits include penicillins, cephalosporins (hapten mechanism), fludarabine, and methyldopa (autoantibody induction); hemolysis typically resolves upon drug discontinuation, though persistent direct antiglobulin test positivity may linger.[26][27]Other secondary causes include post-transplant AIHA, occurring in 2-6% of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients due to graft-versus-host disease or immunosuppression, and immunotherapy-related cases from checkpoint inhibitors like nivolumab and pembrolizumab, with incidences of 0.15-0.25% overall but up to 1-5% in certain cancer cohorts.[9][26]
Pathophysiology
Mechanisms of Hemolysis
In autoimmune hemolytic anemia (AIHA), hemolysis primarily occurs through antibody-mediated destruction of red blood cells (RBCs), involving either extravascular or intravascular pathways depending on the autoantibody type and complement involvement.[28] Extravascular hemolysis predominates in warm AIHA (wAIHA), where IgG autoantibodies bind to RBCs at body temperature, marking them for recognition by macrophages in the spleen and liver. These macrophages engage Fcγ receptors to phagocytose the opsonized RBCs, often leading to partial phagocytosis that generates spherocytes—RBCs with reduced surface area and increased osmotic fragility, which are more susceptible to further destruction.[28] This process is localized mainly to the spleen, where resident macrophages efficiently clear IgG-coated cells, contributing to the majority of hemolysis in stable wAIHA cases.[29]Intravascular hemolysis is more characteristic of cold AIHA (cAIHA), such as cold agglutinin disease (CAD), where IgM autoantibodies bind RBCs at lower temperatures, activating the classical complement pathway. This leads to C1q binding, subsequent deposition of C3b for opsonization, and in severe cases, formation of the membrane attack complex (MAC, or C5b-9), which directly lyses RBCs in the circulation.[28] Complement activation enhances phagocytosis in extravascular sites as well, with C3b-coated RBCs cleared by Kupffer cells in the liver, though intravascular lysis predominates during acute exacerbations.[29] In wAIHA, complement plays a secondary role, with weak activation depositing C3 fragments that amplify macrophage-mediated clearance without frequent MAC formation.The net effect of these mechanisms is a markedly shortened RBC survival, from the normal 120 days to as short as a few hours in severe cases.[28] This accelerated destruction triggers compensatory erythropoiesis in the bone marrow, where reticulocyte production increases to maintain hemoglobin levels, though an inadequate bone marrow response can occur, exacerbating anemia. In mixed-type AIHA, combining IgG and IgM reactivity, hemolysis involves both pathways across a broad temperature range (>30°C), leading to combined extravascular and intravascular destruction.[29] Paroxysmal cold hemoglobinuria (PCH), a rare form, features biphasic hemolysis triggered by the Donath-Landsteiner antibody: IgG binds RBCs in the cold periphery, fixes complement, and causes intravascular lysis upon rewarming to 37°C.[28]
Autoantibody Characteristics
In autoimmune hemolytic anemia (AIHA), autoantibodies are classified primarily by their isotype, thermal reactivity, and antigenic specificity, which dictate the type of hemolysis they induce. Warm autoantibodies, typically immunoglobulin G (IgG), predominate in warm AIHA (wAIHA) and target red blood cell (RBC) membrane antigens, most commonly those within the Rh complex such as RhD, RhE, Rhc, and RHe. These IgG autoantibodies exhibit low affinity but bind optimally at body temperature (37°C), facilitating extravascular hemolysis primarily in the spleen.[26][30]Cold autoantibodies, usually immunoglobulin M (IgM), characterize cold agglutinin disease (CAD) and primary cold AIHA (cAIHA), with specificity directed against carbohydrate antigens on RBCs, notably the I/i antigens (anti-I in adults and anti-i in children). These pentameric IgM molecules bind below 30°C, often optimally at 4°C, leading to direct RBC agglutination at peripheral sites in cooler body areas. The thermal amplitude—the highest temperature at which the autoantibody reacts—critically influences clinical severity; amplitudes extending to 30–32°C correlate with more aggressive hemolysis, while lower amplitudes (<20°C) may cause milder, acrocyanotic symptoms.[19][29]In paroxysmal cold hemoglobinuria (PCH), the causative autoantibody is the biphasic Donath-Landsteiner (DL) antibody, an IgG with specificity for the P antigen (globoside) on RBCs. This antibody binds to RBCs in the cold (<30°C), fixing complement without agglutination, but triggers intravascular hemolysis upon rewarming to 37°C as the complement cascade completes. Unlike typical cold IgM, the DL antibody is often polyclonal and transient, frequently post-viral in pediatric cases.[30][26]Mixed-type AIHA involves concurrent warm IgG and cold IgM autoantibodies, resulting in broad reactivity and a direct antiglobulin test (DAT) positive for both IgG and complement (C3d). The cold IgM component here displays an unusually high thermal amplitude (up to 37°C) and high titers (>1:64), exacerbating hemolysis through combined extravascular and intravascular mechanisms.[19][31]AIHA autoantibodies are predominantly polyclonal in primary (idiopathic) forms, reflecting a dysregulated immune response, but become monoclonal in secondary cases associated with lymphoproliferative disorders, such as chronic lymphocytic leukemia or CAD, where they often show kappa light chain restriction. True alloantibodies mimicking autoantibodies are rare but can coexist in up to 20% of wAIHA cases, complicating serological interpretation; however, the autoantibodies themselves remain the primary drivers of hemolysis.[30][26]
Clinical Features
Signs and Symptoms
Autoimmune hemolytic anemia (AIHA) primarily manifests through symptoms of anemia resulting from the destruction of red blood cells, leading to reduced oxygen delivery to tissues. Common symptoms include fatigue, weakness, shortness of breath (dyspnea), pallor, and tachycardia, which become prominent when hemoglobin levels drop significantly, often below 7 g/dL in severe cases.[32][33][34]Signs of hemolysis further characterize the condition, including jaundice due to elevated unconjugated bilirubin from extravascular hemolysis, dark urine indicative of hemoglobinuria in cases of intravascular hemolysis, and mild to moderate splenomegaly observed in active disease.[9][35][33] Splenomegaly arises from sequestration and phagocytosis of antibody-coated red cells in the spleen.[9]In cold agglutinin disease, a subtype of AIHA, exposure to cold temperatures can trigger specific symptoms such as acrocyanosis (bluish discoloration of the extremities) and Raynaud-like phenomena due to agglutination of red cells in peripheral circulation.[34][9][35]The severity of AIHA varies widely, ranging from asymptomatic or mild compensated hemolysis to life-threatening presentations involving acute heart failure, shock, or profound anemia requiring urgent intervention.[34][35][33]Presentation can be acute with sudden onset in approximately half of cases, particularly in warm AIHA, or insidious and chronic, especially among elderly patients where symptoms develop gradually over weeks to months.[9][32][35]
Features in Children
Autoimmune hemolytic anemia (AIHA) in children often presents with an acute onset, particularly in those under 5 years of age, and is frequently triggered by viral infections such as Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) or Mycoplasma pneumoniae.[36][37] In a cohort of 265 pediatric patients, post-infectious AIHA accounted for 10% of cases, highlighting the role of recent infections in initiating hemolysis.[38]Evans syndrome, characterized by concurrent AIHA and immune thrombocytopenia, occurs in approximately 25-50% of pediatric AIHA cases, with one large study reporting a prevalence of 37%.Clinical symptoms in children are broadly similar to those in adults but tend to emphasize pallor and jaundice due to the acute nature of presentation, while hemoglobinuria is rare, occurring primarily in cases of paroxysmal cold hemoglobinuria or cold agglutinin disease.[36]Pallor is reported in up to 92% of affected children, and jaundice in 64-78%, often accompanied by fatigue and tachycardia.[39][40] Notably, about 70% of pediatric AIHA cases are self-limiting, resolving within months without long-term therapy, particularly in post-infectious forms.[36]Pediatric AIHA shows a higher proportion of primary (idiopathic) cases compared to adults, with rates around 37-40% in large cohorts, though secondary forms linked to immunodeficiencies (e.g., common variable immunodeficiency or autoimmune lymphoproliferative syndrome) or systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) are also common, affecting up to 63% of patients.[38][36] In one study, 15% of cases were secondary to primary immunodeficiencies, underscoring the need for screening.Severity varies, with 10-30% of children requiring intensive care unit admission due to profound anemia or complications like cardiac failure.[41][36] Relapse rates are higher in chronic forms, especially with teenage onset, where insidious presentation correlates with partial remission in up to 60% of cases and increased need for second-line therapies.[42] Recent studies from 2023-2024, including a scoping review of observational data, confirm a 3-year mortality rate of 4% and treatment dependence in 28% of pediatric patients, with 39% achieving complete remission.[43][38]
Diagnosis
Laboratory Investigations
The direct antiglobulin test (DAT), also known as the Coombs test, serves as the gold standard for diagnosing autoimmune hemolytic anemia (AIHA) by detecting immunoglobulins or complement proteins bound to the surface of red blood cells (RBCs).[27] It is positive in 95-99% of cases, with anti-IgG reactivity indicating warm AIHA (wAIHA) and anti-C3d reactivity suggesting cold agglutinin disease (CAD) or mixed-type AIHA.[44] In wAIHA, IgG is detected in nearly all cases, often with concurrent C3, while CAD typically shows isolated C3 positivity due to IgM-mediated complement activation.[27] Negative DAT results occur in 5-10% of patients, potentially due to low-affinity antibodies or IgA-mediated hemolysis, necessitating enhanced testing methods like column agglutination or flow cytometry for confirmation.[29]The indirect antiglobulin test (IAT) complements DAT by identifying free autoantibodies in the patient's serum through incubation with reagent RBCs of known antigen specificity.[44] It is particularly useful in CAD for quantifying cold agglutinin titers, where titers exceeding 1:64 at 4°C support the diagnosis, distinguishing primary monoclonal IgM-driven disease from secondary polyclonal forms.[29] In wAIHA, IAT may detect broad-spectrum panagglutinins reacting with most adult RBCs at 37°C, aiding in antibody characterization and transfusion compatibility assessment.[27] While IAT positivity alone does not confirm AIHA without evidence of hemolysis, it helps differentiate alloantibodies from autoantibodies in complex cases.[44]Peripheral blood smear examination reveals characteristic morphological changes that support AIHA classification. In wAIHA, spherocytes predominate due to partial phagocytosis of IgG-coated RBCs by macrophages, often accompanied by polychromasia reflecting reticulocytosis.[27] In CAD, RBC agglutination is evident at room temperature, resolving upon sample warming, with occasional spherocytes if complement-mediated extravascular hemolysis occurs.[44] These findings, while not diagnostic alone, correlate with DAT results and guide subtype differentiation.[27]Reticulocyte count assessment evaluates bone marrow compensatory response to hemolysis, typically showing marked elevation in AIHA. Counts often exceed 10% in active disease, indicating robust erythropoiesis, though reticulocytopenia may occur in up to 20% of cases due to marrow suppression or folate deficiency.[27] Elevated reticulocytes contribute to macrocytosis on smear and underscore the regenerative nature of AIHA, distinguishing it from aplastic or infiltrative anemias.[44]Bone marrow evaluation, via aspiration and biopsy, is reserved for cases with inadequate reticulocytosis, suspected underlying malignancy, or treatment-refractory disease. It commonly demonstrates hypercellular erythropoiesis with erythroid hyperplasia (myeloid:erythroid ratio often <1:3), reflecting compensatory RBC production.[29] Biopsies may reveal fibrosis in over one-third of primary AIHA patients, associated with dyserythropoiesis and poorer prognosis requiring multiple therapies, or infiltrates suggestive of secondary causes like lymphoma.[29] In CAD, marrow often shows clonal B-cell nodules in older patients, prompting further lymphoproliferative workup.[29]
Evidence of Hemolysis
Autoimmune hemolytic anemia (AIHA) is characterized by laboratory findings that confirm active red blood cell (RBC) destruction, distinguishing it from other causes of anemia. These markers include hematological evidence of anemia and biochemical indicators of hemolysis, which collectively demonstrate increased RBC turnover and hemoglobin breakdown products in circulation.[45]Patients with AIHA typically present with anemia, evidenced by hemoglobin levels often below 10 g/dL, particularly in moderate to severe cases, and correspondingly low hematocrit values reflecting reduced RBC mass. The anemia is usually normocytic, with mean corpuscular volume (MCV) in the range of 80-100 fL, but may appear macrocytic (MCV >100 fL) due to reticulocytosis as the bone marrow compensates for RBC loss.[5][1][46]Biochemical markers of hemolysis further support the diagnosis. Unconjugated bilirubin is elevated, commonly exceeding 2 mg/dL, as hemoglobin from destroyed RBCs is metabolized in the reticuloendothelial system, overwhelming hepatic conjugation capacity; levels typically range from 2.7 to 4.9 mg/dL in active disease. In cases of predominant intravascular hemolysis, such as certain cold agglutinin syndromes, urobilinogen may be absent in urine due to direct hemoglobin loss bypassing intestinal reabsorption.[47][32][48]Haptoglobin levels are markedly decreased, often below 30 mg/dL or undetectable, as this acute-phase protein binds free hemoglobin released during hemolysis and is rapidly cleared by the liver; it serves as one of the most sensitive indicators in AIHA and is the last marker to normalize with treatment. Lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) is also elevated, frequently above 500 U/L, due to its release from lysed RBCs, with higher levels correlating with more severe or intravascular hemolysis; aspartate aminotransferase (AST) may similarly rise from the same source, though less specifically.[15][19][49]In instances of significant intravascular hemolysis, hemoglobinuria manifests as a positive urine dipstick test for blood (indicating heme) without intact RBCs on microscopic examination, resulting from free hemoglobin filtration through the kidneys when haptoglobin saturation is exceeded. These findings, alongside a positive direct antiglobulin test, confirm hemolytic activity in AIHA.[48][50]
Differential Diagnosis
The differential diagnosis of autoimmune hemolytic anemia (AIHA) encompasses a broad range of hemolytic and non-hemolytic conditions that present with anemia, jaundice, or fatigue, requiring a systematic approach to distinguish immune-mediated destruction from other etiologies.[45] Key initial steps involve assessing for evidence of hemolysis via elevated lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), low haptoglobin, and increased indirect bilirubin, followed by the direct antiglobulin test (DAT) to identify antibody or complement coating on red blood cells.[1] A positive DAT supports AIHA, while negative results prompt evaluation for non-immune causes or DAT-negative AIHA variants.[51]Non-immune hemolytic anemias must be excluded, as they mimic AIHA through accelerated red blood cell destruction but lack autoantibodies. Glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD) deficiency presents with episodic hemolysis triggered by oxidants, infections, or drugs, featuring bite and blister cells on peripheral smear and normal DAT; diagnosis relies on G6PD enzyme activity assay, particularly after an acute episode resolves.[45] Microangiopathic hemolytic anemias, such as thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP) and hemolytic uremic syndrome (HUS), are characterized by schistocytes on blood smear, thrombocytopenia, and organ involvement (e.g., renal failure in HUS or neurologic symptoms in TTP), with negative DAT and reduced ADAMTS13 activity in TTP; these are distinguished from AIHA by the absence of spherocytes and presence of mechanical fragmentation.[1][45]Other forms of anemia without true hemolysis, such as aplastic anemia and iron deficiency anemia, can present with similar fatigue and pallor but are differentiated by low reticulocyte counts (unlike the elevated reticulocytosis in AIHA unless bone marrow suppression occurs). Aplastic anemia shows pancytopenia and hypocellular bone marrow, while iron deficiency features microcytic hypochromic red cells and low serum ferritin.[1]Secondary mimics include paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria (PNH), a complement-mediated disorder causing intravascular hemolysis, dark urine, and thrombosis; it is identified by flow cytometry demonstrating deficiency of CD55 and CD59 on red blood cells, with negative DAT.[45][9] Drug-induced immune hemolytic anemia (DIIHA) resembles AIHA but is linked to specific agents like cephalosporins or penicillins; distinction involves temporal association with drug exposure, and while most cases have positive DAT, 5-10% are DAT-negative, requiring elution studies or response to drug cessation.[9]Cold exposure-related disorders, such as cryoglobulinemia and paroxysmal cold hemoglobinuria (PCH), can imitate cold agglutinin disease (CAD), a subtype of AIHA exacerbated by low temperatures. Cryoglobulinemia involves cold-precipitating immunoglobulins leading to acrocyanosis or Raynaud-like phenomena, with hemolysis confirmed by cold agglutinin titer and cryoglobulin testing; DAT is often positive for C3d.[1] PCH, more common in children post-viral infection, features biphasic hemolysins detected by the Donath-Landsteiner test and cold-induced symptoms, with DAT typically positive for complement but negative for IgG.[9]Approximately 5-10% of AIHA cases are DAT-negative, often involving paroxysmal cold variants or low-affinity autoantibodies, necessitating advanced testing like monocyte monolayer assays or response to corticosteroids for confirmation after excluding alternatives.[51][9] A diagnostic algorithm begins with DAT, followed by thermal amplitude testing for cold antibodies, peripheral smear review, and targeted assays (e.g., flow cytometry for PNH); imaging such as CT or PET may be warranted to rule out underlying malignancies like lymphoma in secondary AIHA.[1]
Management
First-Line Therapies
The first-line therapy for autoimmune hemolytic anemia (AIHA), particularly warm AIHA (wAIHA), consists primarily of corticosteroids such as prednisone administered at a dose of 1 mg/kg/day.[52] This regimen induces an initial response in 70-80% of patients with wAIHA, typically evidenced by a rise in hemoglobin levels.[53] Treatment is continued at full dose until hemoglobin stabilizes, followed by a gradual taper over several months to minimize relapse risk, though long-term use is avoided due to side effects including osteoporosis and increased susceptibility to infections.[32]Supportive measures are integral to first-line management across AIHA subtypes. Folic acid supplementation at 1 mg daily is recommended for all symptomatic patients to counter the increased folate demand from accelerated erythropoiesis due to hemolysis.[29] In cases of cold AIHA (cAIHA), patients should avoid cold exposure to prevent exacerbation of hemolysis.[53]Red blood cell transfusions may be necessary for severe anemia but carry risks such as alloimmunization; units are selected as the least incompatible based on crossmatch testing to reduce hemolytic reactions.[54]Specific blood management strategies address subtype differences. For cAIHA, transfused blood must be warmed to 37°C using an in-line warmer to inhibit cold agglutinin activity during infusion.[55] Recombinant erythropoietin may be added if bone marrow response is inadequate, helping to stimulate red cell production and accelerate recovery in the context of ongoing hemolysis.[44]Response to first-line therapy is assessed by an increase in hemoglobin of more than 2 g/dL or normalization without ongoing transfusion needs, typically within 3 weeks.[52] Approximately 20-30% of patients do not respond adequately and require escalation to second-line options.[53]
Advanced and Emerging Treatments
For patients with autoimmune hemolytic anemia (AIHA) refractory to first-line therapies, rituximab, a monoclonal anti-CD20 antibody, serves as a key second-line immunosuppressant, achieving overall response rates of 60-80% in both warm AIHA (wAIHA) and cold AIHA (cAIHA) by depleting B cells and reducing autoantibody production.[56] Median time to response is typically 4-6 weeks, with sustained remissions observed in up to 68% of cases at 2 years when used as low-dose therapy.[57] For maintenance in refractory cases, azathioprine (1-2 mg/kg/day) or cyclophosphamide (low-dose oral, 1-2 mg/kg/day) can be added to steroids, inducing responses in 70-80% of patients by further suppressing immune activity, though long-term use requires monitoring for myelosuppression and infections.[58][59]Splenectomy remains a surgical option for steroid- and rituximab-refractory AIHA, offering long-term remission in 40-60% of cases by removing the primary site of autoantibody production and red blood cell destruction, with short-term hematologic improvement in over 70% of patients.[60] However, it carries risks of overwhelming post-splenectomy infection (up to 5-10% lifetime risk) and thrombosis, necessitating lifelong vaccinations and prophylaxis.[61]Emerging therapies target specific pathways in AIHA pathogenesis. Complement inhibitors like sutimlimab, an anti-C1s monoclonal antibody, were approved in 2022 for cold agglutinin disease (CAD, a cAIHA subtype), rapidly increasing hemoglobin by 2-3 g/dL and reducing hemolysis in phase 3 trials (CARDINAL and CADENZA), with sustained efficacy over 1 year but requiring ongoing infusions.[62][63]Eculizumab, an anti-C5 inhibitor, has shown efficacy in refractory wAIHA cases, terminating life-threatening hemolysis within days in isolated reports and achieving transfusion independence in heavily pretreated patients.[64][65]Phagocytosis inhibitors, such as fostamatinib (a spleen tyrosine kinase [SYK] inhibitor), demonstrated hemoglobin increases of 1.5-2 g/dL in phase 2 trials for wAIHA by 2024, with durable responses in 40-50% of participants at 12 weeks, though phase 3 results indicated variable sustained benefit.[66] FcRn inhibitors like nipocalimab reduce circulating IgG autoantibodies by blocking neonatal Fc receptor recycling; phase 2 data from 2022-2025 trials in wAIHA reported hemoglobin responses in 50-60% of patients, with IgG reductions of 60-80% correlating to decreased hemolysis.[67] BTK inhibitors, including ibrutinib, are particularly useful for secondary AIHA in chronic lymphocytic leukemia, yielding overall responses of 70-80% when combined with rituximab, by inhibiting B-cell signaling and autoantibody production.[68][69]Recent 2023-2025 studies on biologics (e.g., rituximab retreatment, complement, and FcRn inhibitors) report sustained response rates of 50-70% at 1-2 years in refractory AIHA, highlighting improved durability over traditional agents but underscoring the need for personalized selection based on subtype and comorbidities.[70][71]
Prognosis and Complications
Clinical Outcomes
Initial response rates to corticosteroids as first-line therapy in warm autoimmune hemolytic anemia (wAIHA) are approximately 80%, with complete or partial responses observed in the majority of patients.[53] However, chronic relapse occurs in about 50% of wAIHA cases following steroid tapering or withdrawal.[72]Spontaneous remission occurs frequently in post-infectious pediatric AIHA subtypes such as paroxysmal cold hemoglobinuria (PCH), often within months, though overall rates vary by type and require treatment in many cases. In adults, long-term remission rates with rituximab therapy range from 20-50%, though sustained complete responses can be challenging, especially in relapsed cases.[73]One-year mortality in AIHA is approximately 17% for primary forms and up to 31% for secondary forms, with overall mortality rates reported as 8-20% in various cohorts, higher in elderly patients due to comorbidities and treatment complications.[74] In severe pediatric cases, mortality can reach 10-30%, particularly in those with Evans syndrome or refractory disease.[75]Follow-up studies indicate that 39% of children with AIHA achieve complete remission at 3 years, based on a large cohort analysis.[38] Median survival is approximately 10 years in primary AIHA, reflecting improved management in recent decades.[74]Clinical outcomes are generally better in primary AIHA and pediatric patients compared to secondary forms or elderly individuals, where underlying diseases and age-related factors worsen prognosis. Recent advancements in targeted therapies, such as complement inhibitors, have improved long-term outcomes as of 2025.[11][76]
Associated Risks
Autoimmune hemolytic anemia (AIHA) carries several hemolysis-related risks, including thrombosis, which occurs in approximately 10-20% of cases due to exposure of phosphatidylserine on erythrocyte-derived microparticles during intravascular hemolysis.[77][78] This prothrombotic state is exacerbated by severe anemia (hemoglobin <6 g/dL) and elevated lactate dehydrogenase levels, increasing the hazard ratio for thrombotic events up to 3.22-fold.[78] Additionally, acute kidney injury can arise from hemoglobinuria following intravascular hemolysis, leading to renal tubular damage and elevated mortality risk (hazard ratio 6.3).[77][79]Severe anemia in AIHA may result in high-output heart failure and tissue hypoxia, particularly when hemoglobin levels drop below 6 g/dL, contributing to up to 24% mortality in affected patients.[77][80] These sequelae stem from increased cardiac demand and reduced oxygen-carrying capacity, worsening outcomes in cases with inadequate reticulocytosis.[77]Treatment of AIHA introduces further complications, such as infections in about 20% of patients, heightened by corticosteroid use and splenectomy due to immunosuppression and asplenia-related sepsis risk.[77] Long-term corticosteroid therapy, often involving cumulative doses exceeding 8 kg, is associated with osteoporosis.[77] Rituximab, a common second-line agent, can cause infusion reactions including fever, chills, and hypotension, alongside risks of reactivation of hepatitis or mycobacterial infections.In secondary AIHA, progression of the underlying condition poses additional risks, such as advancement of associated malignancies like lymphoproliferative disorders, which may manifest or worsen post-AIHA diagnosis in some cases.[12]Pediatric AIHA, particularly Evans syndrome involving concomitant immune thrombocytopenia, elevates bleedingrisk, with a subdistribution hazard ratio of 4.1 for bleeding-related mortality compared to other autoimmune cytopenias.[81]
History
Early Descriptions
The earliest descriptions of what would later be recognized as autoimmune hemolytic anemia (AIHA) emerged in the late 19th century amid growing understanding of hemolytic processes. In 1871, Belgian physicians Charles Vanlair and Voltaire Masius reported a case of microcytemia, characterizing it as a form of anemia resulting from the premature destruction of red blood cells (RBCs), accompanied by jaundice and splenomegaly.[8] This observation marked one of the first clinical delineations of extravascular hemolysis independent of infectious or toxic causes, though the immune-mediated nature remained unrecognized. Subsequent reports built on this foundation; for instance, in 1898, Georges Hayem distinguished hemolytic anemia with jaundice from hepatic disorders, emphasizing urobilinogen in urine as evidence of increased RBC breakdown.[82]By the early 20th century, specific immune mechanisms began to surface through seminal case studies. In 1904, Julius Donath and Karl Landsteiner described a unique biphasic autoantibody in patients with paroxysmal cold hemoglobinuria (PCH), a subtype of AIHA often triggered by syphilisinfection. This antibody, now known as the Donath-Landsteiner antibody, bound to RBCs at cold temperatures (below 4°C) and induced complement-mediated intravascular hemolysis upon rewarming to body temperature, as demonstrated in in vitro experiments with patient serum.[8] Their work, published in the Münchner Medizinische Wochenschrift, provided the first direct evidence of a cold-reacting hemolysin and highlighted associations with post-infectious states. Around the same time, Karl Landsteiner's discovery of ABO blood groups in 1901 laid groundwork for understanding autoantibody specificity, though cold hemolysins were noted independently in serological studies.[8]French clinician Marcel Chauffard advanced the field in 1907–1909 by documenting acquired hemolytic anemia with prominent jaundice, hemoglobinuria, and serum autohemolysins, which he termed "hemolysinic icterus." His cases featured RBC autoagglutination and increased osmotic fragility, observed via newly developed tests, and were linked to acute episodes often following infections.[8] Early 20th-century case series further connected hemolytic anemia to infectious triggers, such as bacterial pneumonias or viral illnesses, with reports of transient hemolysis resolving after infection clearance. In 1938, William Dameshek and Steven O. Schwartz published findings on hemolysins in acute hemolytic anemia, demonstrating their role in spherocyte formation and suggesting an immunologic etiology, which distinguished acquired forms from hereditary ones.[83] This built toward formal recognition of autoimmunity in hemolysis.Prior to the development of the direct antiglobulin (Coombs) test in 1945, diagnosing and managing AIHA posed significant challenges, particularly with transfusions. Unknown autoantibodies often caused pan-reactive cross-matching incompatibilities, leading to delayed or risky blood administration and frequent post-transfusion hemolytic reactions. Clinicians navigated these issues through empirical approaches, such as selecting least-incompatible units based on clinical urgency or observing indirect signs like reticulocytosis and bilirubin elevation, without reliable serological confirmation.[8]
Key Developments
A pivotal advancement in the diagnosis of autoimmune hemolytic anemia (AIHA) occurred in 1945 when Robin Coombs, Arthur Mourant, and Rob Race developed the direct antiglobulin test (DAT), also known as the Coombs test, which detects antibodies or complement proteins bound to red blood cells, enabling precise identification of immune-mediated hemolysis.[8]In the 1950s, corticosteroids emerged as a cornerstone therapy for AIHA, with William Dameshek and colleagues reporting their efficacy in 1951 using adrenocorticotrophic hormone to suppress hemolysis in acquired cases, establishing them as first-line treatment with response rates of 70-85% in warm AIHA.[8] Concurrently, splenectomy became standardized in the 1950s-1960s for steroid-refractory patients, as the spleen was recognized as a primary site of red blood cell destruction, yielding complete remissions in approximately 64% of cases without ongoing steroid needs.[8][84]During the 1970s and 1980s, refinements in autoantibody typing enhanced classification of AIHA subtypes, with improved serologic techniques distinguishing IgG warm-reactive from IgM cold-reactive antibodies and elucidating their antigenic specificities.[8] Research in this era also solidified links between AIHA and underlying lymphoproliferative disorders, particularly chronic lymphocytic leukemia, where up to 10% of patients develop AIHA due to dysregulated B-cell activity.[10]The introduction of rituximab, an anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody approved in 1997 for non-Hodgkin lymphoma, marked a significant therapeutic milestone for AIHA in the 1990s-2000s, with initial reports in 2001 demonstrating its efficacy in refractory cases by depleting B cells and achieving sustained remissions in up to 80% of steroid- and splenectomy-resistant patients.[85]From the 2010s to 2025, complement inhibitors transformed management of complement-mediated AIHA subtypes; eculizumab, a C5 inhibitor, showed promise in clinical trials starting in 2018 for cold agglutinin disease (CAD) by reducing hemolysis and transfusion needs in refractory patients.[86] Sutimlimab, a C1s inhibitor, received FDA approval in 2022 (with expanded indication in 2023) for CAD, rapidly increasing hemoglobin levels and decreasing hemolysis in phase 3 trials.[87] Genetic studies during this period identified associations with HLA class I alleles, such as HLA-B8 and BW6, underscoring a hereditary predisposition to AIHA susceptibility.[10] Additionally, since 2020, multiple reports have linked COVID-19 infection to AIHA onset or exacerbation, potentially via molecular mimicry or cytokine dysregulation triggering autoantibody production.[88] In 2024, phase 3 trial results for pegcetacoplan, a proximal complement inhibitor, demonstrated significant increases in hemoglobin levels and reductions in hemolysis for patients with CAD.[89] By 2025, rilzabrutinib, a BTK inhibitor, received orphan drug designation and was under regulatory review for warm AIHA, addressing unmet needs in steroid-refractory cases.[90]