Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Automated guideway transit

Automated guideway transit (AGT) is a fixed-guideway transit system that operates with automated, driverless individual vehicles or multi-car trains on exclusive rights-of-way, providing electric-powered service either on a fixed schedule or in response to passenger-activated call buttons. These systems, also known as people movers, group rapid transit, or personal rapid transit, feature guided electric vehicles—ranging from small units carrying 4 to 100 passengers to larger configurations—traveling at speeds of 25 to 100 km/h along dedicated tracks that may be elevated, at-grade, or underground. AGT systems emerged in the 1970s as part of efforts to modernize urban transportation through , with the first operational agency established in 1975 at in , featuring a network. Early development was driven by U.S. federal programs, such as the Urban Mass Transportation Administration's AGT Supporting Technology initiative launched in 1975, which invested in subsystems like vehicle controls, communications, and safety features to enable short headways as low as 15 seconds and high availability rates exceeding 99%. By the 1980s, international deployments expanded the technology, including France's VAL system in (opened 1983) and Canada's in (opened 1985), demonstrating scalability from airport shuttles to urban networks spanning over 20 kilometers. Prominent examples include the , which serves 1.4 million unlinked passenger trips annually as of 2023 across approximately 14 km with 67 vehicles; Miami-Dade County's , handling about 7.3 million trips in FY2024 over an urban loop; and Detroit's , a system recording 1.075 million trips in 2024. Other systems, such as Jacksonville's automated guideway and Seattle's , illustrate applications in both central business districts and environments, often using rubber-tired vehicles for quiet operation and flexibility. These installations highlight AGT's role in high-density circulation, with systems like Vancouver's achieving 149 million annual boardings as of 2024. Key benefits of include reduced labor costs through crewless operation (under 0.2 man-hours per vehicle-hour), enhanced via automated controls and braking up to 0.37 g, and improved with frequent and smaller, on-demand vehicles that minimize wait times. However, challenges persist, such as higher initial capital costs compared to due to specialized guideways and control systems, alongside dependency on subsidies for sustained profitability in some urban settings. As of 2025, continues to evolve, incorporating advanced technologies and integration with broader networks, including adaptations for autonomous vehicles on existing guideways, amid a global market projected to reach $9 billion by 2030.

Definition and Fundamentals

Definition and Scope

Automated guideway transit (AGT) is defined as a fixed-guideway transportation system that operates using automated, driverless vehicles or multi-car trains along dedicated infrastructure, providing guidance and support without human intervention on board. These systems typically employ electric-powered vehicles that run on exclusive guideways, which can be elevated, at-grade, or underground, ensuring separation from other traffic. AGT encompasses various traction variants, including rubber-tired vehicles for smoother operation on or guideways, steel-wheeled systems on rail-like tracks, and technologies that use for reduced friction, though the latter remains largely experimental in AGT applications. AGT is distinguished from manually operated transit, which relies on human drivers and often shares rights-of-way with street traffic or operates at mixed grades, whereas AGT mandates full and complete for safety and efficiency. Similarly, while some heavy metros incorporate driverless , AGT differs in its focus on medium-to-low capacity systems rather than the high-volume, high-speed profiles of heavy , which prioritize large-scale corridors with capacities exceeding 20,000 passengers per hour per direction. This boundary emphasizes AGT's role in targeted, automated mobility solutions rather than broad-spectrum mass transit. The scope of includes several subtypes tailored to specific demands, such as people movers for short-distance circulation in enclosed environments like , automated () for medium-capacity urban routes using innovative virtual or physical guidance, and (PRT) for on-demand, small-group travel along networked paths. All subtypes adhere to fixed paths without on-street running, promoting predictable routing and collision avoidance through infrastructure-embedded guidance. At its core, operates on predefined routes where vehicles are controlled by centralized or distributed systems, allowing for variable headways from seconds in PRT configurations to minutes in larger setups, all while passengers board at designated stations without assistance. This driverless enables continuous monitoring by remote staff, enhancing reliability and reducing labor costs compared to crewed alternatives.

Key Characteristics

Automated guideway transit (AGT) systems are defined by their full , enabling high reliability through centralized and redundant mechanisms that minimize and ensure consistent operation. These systems achieve mean times between failures of up to 150 hours and service availability rates exceeding 99.9% in operational examples. allows for reduced headways as low as 15 seconds in group configurations, facilitating efficient passenger flow without human operators. Capacities typically range from 1,000 to 20,000 passengers per hour per direction, depending on vehicle size and configuration, making AGT suitable for intermediate-demand corridors. Key advantages of include significantly lower labor costs due to the absence of onboard drivers, with operational staffing often limited to monitoring and personnel—for instance, as few as six staff managing eight vehicles in a system. Energy efficiency is enhanced by electric propulsion and features like in modern designs, reducing overall consumption compared to manually operated modes. is bolstered by controls that prevent collisions and ensure responses, resulting in fewer accidents than conventional systems. Initial infrastructure costs for AGT can be 20-50% lower per mile than traditional heavy rail for intermediate-capacity applications, owing to lighter guideways and simplified stations. Despite these benefits, systems exhibit disadvantages such as heavy dependency on continuous , where electrical outages can halt operations entirely without immediate backups. They are also vulnerable to single-point failures in the guideway, particularly in single-lane configurations, potentially shutting down the entire line until repairs are completed. systems adhere to standardization through frameworks like the (IEC) 62267, which defines Grades of Automation (GoA), with GoA4 representing full unattended operation without onboard staff. In the United States, the (APTA) aligns with these levels to ensure and safety in automated urban guided transit.

Historical Development

Origins and Early Concepts

The conceptual foundations of automated guideway transit (AGT) emerged in the and 1960s, drawing heavily from advancements in automotive and technologies amid post-World War II urban expansion. Early innovators explored small, driverless vehicles on dedicated tracks to alleviate traffic burdens, influenced by experiments in automatic control systems from industries like and ground-effect vehicles. A notable precursor was Disney's WEDway PeopleMover, introduced at in 1967 as an elevated, continuously moving transport system powered by linear induction motors, demonstrating practical for passenger conveyance in controlled environments. These ideas were motivated by escalating urban challenges, including suburban sprawl and highway gridlock, which strained traditional mass transit in mid-density corridors where demand was dispersed and inflexible. By the mid-1960s, cities faced declining public transit ridership—down nearly 4 billion passengers from 1940 to 1966—due to automobile dominance and sprawling development patterns that increased trip lengths and reduced densities. The U.S. of Housing and Urban Development () report, Tomorrow's Transportation: New Systems for the Urban Future, highlighted automated systems like (PRT) as solutions for low- to medium-density areas, capable of serving 1,000–10,000 passengers per hour with minimal waiting and privacy, targeting cross-haul trips and activity centers underserved by buses or subways. Initial U.S. government involvement accelerated in the 1970s through the Urban Mass Transportation Administration (UMTA), which provided funding for prototypes to test feasibility in real-world settings. Established under the in 1968, UMTA issued grants starting in 1970, including $1 million for airport studies and test tracks, followed by multimillion-dollar capital investments for demonstrations that evaluated technical and economic viability. These efforts built on the 1966 Reuss-Tydings Amendments to the Urban Mass Transportation Act, which spurred research into innovative guideway systems to modernize urban mobility. Key early visionaries included engineers like Donn Fichter, who in 1953 conceived the Veyar system of lightweight automated cars for urban integration, and William Alden, whose 1960 staRRcar introduced dual-mode operation blending street and guideway travel. Swiss firm Von Roll contributed significantly to airport applications, developing monorail-based people movers in the late 1960s and 1970s that evolved into automated systems like the Mark III, operational at sites such as by the 1990s, emphasizing reliable, low-speed intraterminal transport. These contributions prioritized fixed-guide to enhance and in high-traffic hubs.

Major Milestones in the 20th Century

The 1970s saw the emergence of the first operational automated guideway transit (AGT) systems, primarily in the United States, driven by federal research initiatives under the Urban Mass Transportation Administration (UMTA). In 1971, unveiled the world's first fully automated , a Westinghouse-developed system connecting the central terminal to three airside buildings and reducing passenger transit times across the expansive facility. This installation marked a pioneering application of driverless technology in an environment, handling up to 3,000 passengers per hour per direction with minimal staffing. Four years later, in 1975, the (PRT) system in became the first large-scale operational AGT in the U.S., funded by a $20 million UMTA grant as a demonstration project to alleviate university and urban congestion. Spanning 8.7 miles with 5 stations, it transported over 100 million passengers by the system's 50th anniversary, validating on-demand, small-vehicle despite initial delays and cost overruns. The 1980s witnessed international expansions of into urban mass transit, with and leading deployments beyond airport settings. 's Kobe Port Liner, operational since February 1981, was the world's first driverless urban line, linking Sannomiya Station to over 4.5 miles with rubber-tired vehicles carrying up to 20,000 passengers daily. Developed by Kobe New Transit, it demonstrated reliable medium-capacity automation in a dense port environment. In , the Lille VAL () system opened in April 1983 as 's first fully automated metro, spanning 13 km (8.1 miles) on Line 1 and integrating central with rubber-tired s on a dedicated guideway. This Matra-engineered emphasized through automatic and became a model for urban integration (Line 2 opened in 1989). Canada's , launched in December 1985, extended to a major metropolitan network, using linear induction motors () for on a 13.3-mile (21.4 km) elevated guideway that supported and grew to carry millions annually. The , providing efficient acceleration without onboard engines, represented a key shift toward scalable, energy-efficient in larger systems. By the , deployments focused on airport enhancements and urban extensions, amid maturing standards. In , Toronto's RT, opened in March 1985 as an intermediate-capacity system using Bombardier ICTS vehicles, underwent proposed extensions in the mid-1990s to reach Sheppard Avenue, though funding constraints limited implementation; these plans highlighted efforts to integrate AGT with existing subway networks for suburban connectivity. At Paris's airports, the VAL shuttle commenced service in October 1991, providing a 4-mile driverless link from Antony station to terminals and serving as a seamless extension of the system with 8,000 daily passengers. This Siemens-Matra collaboration underscored AGT's role in high-volume airport circulation, using proven VAL for reliability. Technological advancements in the era included widespread adoption of , as seen in Vancouver's , which enabled precise control and reduced maintenance compared to rotary motors, influencing subsequent designs globally. However, U.S. progress slowed after the 1979 energy crisis, as federal funding priorities shifted toward and conventional bus/rail investments, curtailing new demonstrations despite earlier UMTA support exceeding $100 million for 1970s projects. This led to a relative U.S. lag, with international systems driving further innovations.

Classification of Systems

Small-Scale and People Mover Systems

Small-scale automated guideway transit () systems, often referred to as or automated people movers (APMs), are compact, driverless transit solutions designed for short-distance, low-to-medium capacity routes typically under 5 km in length. These systems generally operate at capacities of 2,000 to 5,000 passengers per hour per direction (pphpd), utilizing looped or shuttle configurations to serve enclosed or semi-enclosed environments efficiently. Representative examples include the historical Von Roll cable-propelled systems, which were deployed in early applications, and modern models, which feature rubber-tired vehicles for smooth operation in urban circulators. Recent expansions, such as the 2024 upgrade at International with new vehicles, highlight continued adoption in settings. In terms of design, these systems employ simpler elevated guideways, often constructed with or beams and rubber-tired for reduced and vibration, distinguishing them from larger-scale counterparts. Stations are minimal, featuring platform edge doors for safety and quick boarding, with a primary emphasis on reliability rather than high speeds, limiting maximum velocities typically to 20-50 km/h to prioritize passenger comfort and system uptime in controlled settings. This focus enables operational availability exceeding 99.5% in closed environments, minimizing disruptions through redundant and maintenance protocols. These systems find their niche in intra-facility transport applications such as , convention centers, and theme parks, where they facilitate seamless movement over short distances without the need for extensive . For instance, deployments connect terminals to or , enhancing in high-density but low-speed scenarios. The evolution of small-scale people mover systems traces back to 1970s airport trials, where initial cable-based prototypes demonstrated feasibility for automated shuttling, evolving into standardized modular designs by the and for faster deployment and . Advances in communication-based train control (CBTC) have further refined these modules, allowing plug-and-play integration in diverse sites while maintaining high reliability standards.

Large-Scale Mass Transit Systems

Large-scale mass transit systems in automated guideway transit (AGT) are engineered for high-volume and regional passenger flows, distinguishing them from smaller-scale applications through extensive and elevated throughput. These systems typically feature guideway lengths exceeding 10 km, supporting linear routes with multiple branches to accommodate complex topologies and connect distant nodes efficiently. Passenger capacities range from 10,000 to 30,000 passengers per hour per direction (pphpd), enabling them to handle peak demands in densely populated areas while maintaining for reliability. Key design features emphasize scalability and , including sophisticated signaling systems like moving-block controls that facilitate safe train merging on branched sections and permit operating speeds of 40 to 80 km/h for faster traversal of longer routes. Vehicles in these systems, such as Alstom's series, incorporate rubber-tired propulsion for smooth operation and reduced noise, while infrastructure allows seamless connectivity with pedestrian access points and bus feeder lines to form networks. This enhances and reduces transfer times in high-density urban corridors. Operationally, these systems operate in group mode, where driverless trains run on fixed schedules with platform-edge doors to ensure secure boarding and alighting, minimizing dwell times and enhancing safety in crowded stations. In high-density environments, can reduce operational costs compared to traditional by eliminating driver expenses, though construction costs are typically higher due to specialized infrastructure. Adoption of large-scale AGT mass transit has been prominent in , particularly in seismically active regions where elevated guideways and resilient designs mitigate earthquake risks. The line, launched in 1995, spans 14.7 km from Shimbashi to , serving as a vital link to waterfront developments with capacities supporting up to 12,000 pphpd through six-car trains. Its rubber-tired configuration and automated controls exemplify how AGT adapts to challenging terrains and natural hazards, influencing similar implementations across earthquake-prone urban areas in the region.

Personal Rapid Transit Systems

Personal Rapid Transit (PRT) systems represent a specialized subtype of automated guideway transit () designed for , point-to-point passenger service using small, driverless vehicles on dedicated . These systems feature a network of off-line stations that allow vehicles to bypass stops without halting, enabling direct routing from origin to destination. Vehicles typically accommodate 2 to 6 passengers, with operations managed by a central that dynamically assigns routes based on demand. Maximum speeds reach up to 60 km/h, supporting efficient short- to medium-distance travel in or environments. A key differentiation of PRT from other AGT variants lies in its provision of non-stop service, which minimizes wait times—often to under one minute—and eliminates the need for transfers, offering a taxi-like experience on fixed guideways. This contrasts with fixed-route people movers or scheduled mass transit by prioritizing individualized travel paths over shared, linear journeys. Prominent examples include the 2getthere system, deployed in settings like , UAE, and the Vectus PRT, implemented in , , both emphasizing modular, scalable networks for low- to medium-demand corridors. The system at , launched in 2011, exemplifies early operational success, connecting terminal areas with seamless, emission-free transport. Technical enablers for PRT include slot-switched guideways, which facilitate vehicle merging and bypassing at junctions without interference, ensuring smooth even at close headways of 2 to 5 seconds. Propulsion relies on electric motors, with as low as 0.08 kWh per passenger-kilometer, providing approximately 50% efficiency gains over buses due to vehicles and optimized loads. These systems operate on grade-separated tracks to avoid conflicts with other traffic, enhancing safety and reliability through automated collision avoidance and precise positioning. Despite these advantages, PRT networks face limitations from higher infrastructure complexity, including the need for extensive elevated guideways, multiple off-line stations, and switching mechanisms, which elevate costs compared to simpler configurations. Early pilots, such as the Heathrow deployment covering 3.8 km of guideway with 21 pods, highlighted these challenges, including integration with existing airport layouts and achieving regulatory approval for fully automated operations. While effective for niche applications, scaling PRT to dense urban grids remains constrained by land-use demands and upfront investments. No major new PRT deployments have occurred as of 2025, with focus remaining on existing systems like the Morgantown PRT celebrating its 50th anniversary.

Technical Components

Guideways and Infrastructure

Automated guideway transit (AGT) systems rely on dedicated fixed guideways to support driverless vehicles, providing exclusive rights-of-way that ensure safe, efficient operation separate from other traffic. These guideways form the backbone of the , accommodating various configurations to suit environmental and operational needs while minimizing interference with surrounding land uses. Guideways in AGT systems typically include elevated structures, at-grade alignments, or underground tunnels, with elevated designs being the most common to avoid ground-level obstructions. Materials such as or are used for , with trusses favored in seismic zones for their and ability to absorb energy during earthquakes. For instance, and combinations have been employed in installations like the proposed Minneapolis-St. Paul system to balance strength and weight. Design considerations for guideways emphasize compatibility with dimensions and , with typical widths ranging from 2 to 4 meters to accommodate standard widths of about 3 meters. is limited to minimum radii of 30 to 100 meters to maintain stable guidance and comfort, enabling flexible routing in constrained spaces. Integration with landscapes often involves elevated structures over existing or enclosed designs to reduce visual impact and noise, as seen in systems that retrofit above roadways for minimal land disruption. Construction methods prioritize prefabrication to accelerate deployment, using modular segments such as 18-meter or spans produced off-site and assembled on location via clamping or . This approach allows rapid erection. Costs for guideway vary by type and location, influenced by factors like elevation height, materials, and site preparation. For example, automated (APM) systems average around $11 million per kilometer (2005 USD), while personal rapid transit (PRT) variants can be lower at $4 to $7 million per kilometer due to lighter structures. Maintenance of AGT guideways focuses on durability and minimal disruption, incorporating features like emergency walkways along spans for access and modular components that enable segment replacement without full system shutdowns. Designs often include corrosion protection, vibration damping, and drainage to prevent debris accumulation, supporting rates above 99% through routine inspections and targeted repairs.

Vehicles and Propulsion

Automated guideway transit (AGT) vehicles are typically designed as bi-directional, driverless cars measuring 10 to 20 meters in length, enabling flexible operation on dedicated guideways without the need for turning loops or sidings. These vehicles often feature rubber tires for low-noise operation on or guideways, which reduces and environmental impact in urban settings, or on rail tracks for higher speeds and lower . Passenger capacities range from 50 to 200 per , depending on and application, with interiors optimized for standing and seating to accommodate varying demand levels. Propulsion in systems primarily relies on linear induction motors (LIMs), which generate through electromagnetic interaction between the vehicle's primary coils and a reaction rail along the guideway, eliminating the need for mechanical adhesion and allowing operation on steep grades up to 15%. Alternatives include rotary electric motors coupled to wheels for simpler systems or () for high-speed variants, though LIMs dominate due to their non-contact efficiency and precise control. Power is supplied via third-rail systems at 600 to 750 V or overhead in some configurations, providing consistent energy to the onboard units while minimizing infrastructure complexity. recovers 20-30% of by reversing the to act as a , feeding power back to the supply system and enhancing overall efficiency in frequent stop-start operations. Articulation and coupling mechanisms allow to be linked into multi-car trains, with flexible joints enabling navigation of curves with radii as small as 30 meters while maintaining stability and passenger comfort. These features scale capacity dynamically, from single units for low-demand routes to coupled sets for peak hours, without compromising integrity.

Automation and Safety Systems

Automated guideway transit (AGT) systems primarily operate at Grade of 4 (GoA4), enabling unattended train operation without onboard staff through (CBTC) systems that provide continuous, high-resolution positioning and automatic supervision of movements. CBTC facilitates precise by utilizing radio communications between and central systems, eliminating the need for circuits and supporting dynamic adjustments to train speeds and routes. algorithms in these systems rely on virtual blocking, where safe distances between are calculated as distance = speed × time + safety margin, allowing for reduced headways as short as 60 seconds while maintaining collision prevention. Sensors for guidance and positioning in include for obstacle detection, GPS for global localization, and inductive loops embedded in the guideway for precise lateral and longitudinal alignment, achieving positioning accuracy of ±10 cm to ensure safe navigation on dedicated tracks. Collision avoidance is enforced via automatic protection (ATP), a core CBTC subsystem that monitors positions and speeds in , automatically initiating braking if safe separation is violated. Safety protocols emphasize , particularly in braking systems, where multiple independent mechanisms—such as electromechanical and pneumatic brakes—ensure an stop within 50 m from operational speeds up to 80 km/h. Cybersecurity standards like are applied to protect control networks from unauthorized , mandating secure-by-design architectures for industrial automation in environments. Evacuation procedures involve automated immobilization followed by remote guidance for passengers to nearest points, with onboard audio-visual alerts and overrides for responders. Reliability metrics for automation exceed (MTBF) of 100,000 hours for critical control components, supported by fault-tolerant designs that isolate single failures through modular and automatic without service interruption. These features collectively enable GoA4 operations with rates above 99.9%, prioritizing passenger safety in driverless environments.

Deployments and Case Studies

Airport and Terminal Applications

Automated guideway transit (AGT) systems play a crucial role in environments by shuttling passengers between gates, concourses, and terminals, thereby minimizing extensive walking distances in expansive hubs. These small-scale networks, typically spanning 2-5 km, enable efficient intra-terminal and inter-terminal connectivity while maintaining airside security. Prominent examples include the at (DFW), which commenced operations in 2005 and features a dual-loop guideway approximately 16 km in total length, and the at Hartsfield-Jackson (ATL), operational since 1980 with upgrades in the 2010s along a 4.8 km underground loop. These implementations deliver reliable performance tailored to high-volume demands, often operating nearly continuously to support 24/7 passenger flows at facilities like . Integration with broader infrastructure, including proximity to baggage handling systems, enhances overall efficiency by aligning passenger and luggage movements. At , transports about 150,000 passengers and employees daily, equating to roughly 55 million annually, while ATL's serves over 200,000 passengers per day on average. System capacities are calibrated for peak loads, with the providing up to 10,000 passengers per hour per direction following its fleet modernization. Design features of airport AGT emphasize and within secure zones, featuring low average operating speeds of 15-25 km/h to manage frequent stops at multiple stations and ensure smooth passenger boarding. Vehicles like those in DFW's Skylink achieve top speeds up to 60 km/h but prioritize controlled for comfort. A key challenge involves strict compliance with airside protocols, such as enclosed guideways, integration, and restricted access to prevent breaches in post-security areas. The deployment of in airports yields substantial operational impacts, including reduced passenger walking times compared to escalators or foot travel alone, which supports faster connections in busy hubs. At facilities like and , these systems handle millions of trips yearly, contributing to smoother terminal circulation and lower congestion. Energy efficiency is a notable , with electric enabling low consumption rates that align with sustainable airport goals.

Urban Circulator Systems

Urban circulator systems represent a of automated guideway (AGT) designed for short-haul mobility within dense downtown areas, campuses, or activity centers, facilitating seamless connections between key districts such as financial hubs, office complexes, and tourist attractions. These systems typically operate on elevated guideways to avoid street-level conflicts, providing efficient, driverless transport for passengers seeking alternatives to walking long distances or using vehicles in compact urban environments. By integrating with broader public networks, they enhance overall and support pedestrian-friendly . The primary function of urban circulator AGT systems is to link disparate urban nodes, reducing travel times and encouraging use of for intra-city trips under 5 kilometers. For instance, the Miami Metromover, operational since April 17, 1986, spans 7.1 kilometers across three interconnected loops serving 21 stations in downtown , connecting areas like the Financial District, , and to landmarks including the and Bayside Marketplace; it carries over 7 million passengers annually based on fiscal year 2025 data through June. Similarly, the , a 4.67-kilometer elevated loop launched on July 31, 1987, serves 13 stations in Detroit's , linking government offices, the , and entertainment venues to promote connectivity within the city's core. These examples illustrate how circulators address localized mobility needs without extending to regional scales. Operationally, urban circulator systems emphasize reliability through bidirectional loop configurations and automated controls, allowing flexible routing without dedicated turning infrastructure. In Miami, the Metromover's loops operate daily from 5:30 a.m. to 10 p.m. with headways as low as 3 minutes during peaks, integrating fares seamlessly as a free service that connects directly to the Metrorail system for broader transit access. The Detroit People Mover follows a similar model, running seven days a week with trains every 5-8 minutes on its single-track loop, free since 2024 to boost usage, and capable of handling peak demands up to 3,000 passengers per hour per direction during events like sports games or festivals. Such designs ensure consistent service while accommodating surge capacities through vehicle dispatching algorithms. Integration into the urban fabric is a hallmark of these systems, with elevated tracks constructed to minimize ground-level disruptions and preserve street aesthetics in pedestrian-heavy zones. The Metromover's guideway, for example, weaves above roadways and integrates stations into existing buildings, reducing construction impacts on traffic while providing level boarding for accessibility compliance. Detroit's similarly elevates its 2.9-mile loop to avoid interference with downtown roadways, incorporating low-floor vehicles and ramps at stations to facilitate wheelchair access and comply with federal standards for automated guideway transit. These features promote , enabling easy transfers for diverse users including the elderly and those with disabilities. Outcomes of urban circulator AGT deployments vary, with successes in promoting modal shifts from cars but challenges in achieving projected ridership in some cases. In , the has supported a notable reduction in short-trip vehicle usage, contributing to congestion relief through integration with bus and networks, as evidenced by economic analyses showing transit-induced shifts away from single-occupancy vehicles. Conversely, Detroit's averages around 3,000 daily riders as of 2024, below initial expectations due to factors like limited density and competition from ride-hailing, though recent fare elimination has driven a 80% ridership increase since 2022. Overall, these systems demonstrate potential for via reduced emissions from diverted car trips, though sustained high utilization depends on urban growth and multimodal connectivity.

Regional and Interurban Networks

Regional and automated guideway transit () systems extend beyond urban cores to connect suburbs, commuter corridors, and inter-city links, typically spanning 20 km or more to serve high-volume daily commuters with grade-separated for reliable operations. These networks leverage for frequent service and capacities comparable to light metro systems, facilitating regional mobility while minimizing labor costs. Examples include multi-line configurations that integrate with broader transit ecosystems, though they require dedicated rights-of-way to achieve operational speeds up to 80 km/h and avoid surface conflicts. The , operational since 1986 as a legacy of , exemplifies a mature regional network, now encompassing approximately 80 km across three lines serving Metro Vancouver's suburbs and urban centers. With daily ridership exceeding 300,000 passengers in recent years, it supports commuter flows from and to , operating at speeds up to 80 km/h on elevated and underground guideways. The system's expansion has driven significant economic impacts, including a 37% within 500 meters of stations between 1991 and 2001—outpacing the regional average of 24%—and spurred over $5 billion in planned or completed investments near stations by 1989. In , the shuttle, launched in 1991, provides a dedicated 7.3 km interurban link from to the Antony station on Line B, enabling seamless integration with the heavy rail network for airport-to-city travel in about 8 minutes at speeds up to 60 km/h. Following the June 2024 opening of Metro Line 14 to , ridership has declined by approximately 70% as of late 2024, with passengers shifting to the integrated metro service; uptime remains high exceeding 99%. The future of is under review by following the Line 14 extension, with potential discontinuation as ridership shifts to the metro. Its grade-separated design addresses urban density challenges, though limited length highlights the need for extensions—like the 2024 Metro Line 14 connection—to enhance regional connectivity. The Line 3 Scarborough RT, opened in 1985 as a 6.4 km elevated line connecting on the Bloor-Danforth to City Centre, illustrated 's role in suburban commuter service but also its lifecycle vulnerabilities. Designed for 25-year vehicle life, it operated beyond expectations until decommissioning in July 2023 due to aging , including loose bolts and derailments from deferred . This case underscores challenges in sustaining regional AGT networks, such as the high costs of grade-separated retrofits and integration with heavy rail, where failures can disrupt broader commuter flows until replacements like or extensions are implemented.

Challenges, Innovations, and Future Prospects

Operational and Economic Challenges

Automated guideway transit (AGT) systems face significant operational challenges that can affect service reliability and performance. Sensor failures and other components contribute to , with historical data from early deployments indicating annual rates around 98%, implying approximately 2% primarily due to diagnostic and events in vehicle systems. Exposed guideways are particularly vulnerable to conditions, such as winter icing on rails leading to traction loss and switch jamming, which can disrupt operations and require additional energy for de-icing or heating. remains limited in low-density urban or suburban areas, where fixed investments yield insufficient ridership to justify expansion beyond or settings, as larger networks demand high passenger volumes for efficient vehicle dispatching. Economic barriers further complicate AGT adoption, with high upfront for guideway construction and ranging from $20 million to $50 million per kilometer for elevated systems, depending on installation conditions like at-grade versus aerial configurations. is challenging due to long payback periods often exceeding 15 years, driven by substantial initial outlays and reliance on fare revenues that may not cover operations in non-peak scenarios. typically depends on public-private partnerships, where governments subsidize 50-80% of costs, but involvement is deterred by risk allocation and uncertain demand projections. Regulatory hurdles include stringent certification processes for full automation, such as approvals from the (FRA) in the United States, which require extensive safety validations for driverless operations on fixed guideways. Labor displacement concerns arise from reducing the need for onboard operators and staff, prompting opposition and calls for retraining programs to workforce impacts in public sectors. To address these issues, mitigation strategies focus on approaches using (IoT) sensors to monitor equipment in real-time, enabling early detection of potential failures and reducing unplanned without relying on .

Recent Advancements and Global Renaissance

The 21st-century renaissance of automated guideway transit (AGT) has been marked by significant network expansions and new deployments, particularly in urban settings seeking efficient, driverless mass transit solutions. In , , the system, a prominent AGT network, has undergone substantial growth through the SkyTrain Expansion Program, including the Broadway Subway Project on the and the Surrey Langley extension on the Expo Line, with construction ongoing as of 2025 and expected openings in 2029 to boost capacity by up to 50% during peak hours on the . Similarly, China's adoption of (ART) systems, which use LiDAR-guided, rail-less bi-articulated buses, exemplifies rapid scaling; the ART line, operational since 2019, has plans for extensions and integrations with broader urban networks proposed since 2023, supporting high-capacity, flexible routing in densely populated areas. Technological advancements have further propelled AGT's revival, focusing on , , and . Battery-electric vehicles are being considered for modernization, such as at , where the (PRT) system—operational since the 1970s with a 67-vehicle fleet—is exploring battery-powered upgrades to reduce emissions and maintenance costs as part of a 2025 anniversary initiative. AI-enhanced routing algorithms are optimizing operations in AGT and related people-mover systems, enabling dynamic scheduling and path adjustments that can improve overall efficiency by analyzing real-time data on passenger demand and traffic patterns. For , sensors have become integral for obstacle detection along guideways, providing real-time 3D mapping and intrusion alerts in rail transit environments, as demonstrated in systems combining with video analytics to cover detection areas up to 500 meters. Global market trends underscore Asia's dominance in AGT development, accounting for approximately 50% of new projects due to urbanization pressures and infrastructure investments. The sector's value is projected to reach $5.5 billion by 2025, driven by a compound annual growth rate of around 9% in the Asia-Pacific region, with key examples including ' (MHI) upgrades to Japan's system—delivering the final 2020 Series trainset in November 2024, featuring enhanced ventilation, wheelchair accessibility, and energy-efficient designs for the 13 km route. In , MHI's 2024 order for the LRT East Line incorporates fully automated AGT components, spanning 7.65 km with lithium-ion battery backups for resilient, low-emission operations to ease border congestion; construction is ongoing with an expected opening in the second half of 2029. Looking ahead, AGT systems are poised for integration with broader autonomous mobility ecosystems, including autonomous vehicles (AVs) that leverage protected guideways for safer, shared infrastructure without exclusive tracks. Emerging links with low-altitude electric vertical takeoff and landing (eVTOL) aircraft could create multimodal networks, enhancing connectivity in smart cities. Post-2020 pilots, such as those funded by the U.S. Federal Transit Administration (FTA), have tested automation adaptations for guideway-based transit, including demonstrations of Level 4 autonomy in controlled environments to inform scalable deployments.

References

  1. [1]
    Part 37--Transportation Services for Individuals with Disabilities | FTA
    Automated guideway transit system or AGT means a fixed-guideway transit system which operates with automated (driverless) individual vehicles or multi-car ...
  2. [2]
    Fact Book Glossary - American Public Transportation Association
    Apr 23, 2019 · Automated Guideway Transit (also called personal rapid transit, group rapid transit, or people mover) is an electric railway (single or ...
  3. [3]
    [PDF] AUTOMATED GUIDEWAY TRANSIT TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT
    Automated guideway transit systems are types of urban transpor- tation systems and concepts that use automatically controlled, driverless vehicles on fixed, ...
  4. [4]
    History of the National Transit Database and Transit in the United ...
    1975 – First automated guideway transit agency, at West Virginia University, is established (Morgantown, WV). 1976 – The federal mass transit assistance ...Missing: definition | Show results with:definition
  5. [5]
    [PDF] The Case for Automated- Guideway Transit
    AUTOMATED-GUIDEWAY TRANSIT (AGT) is a class of transit systems characterized by fleets of driverless transit vehicles operating under computer control on ...
  6. [6]
    [PDF] FACT BOOK - American Public Transportation Association
    Apr 1, 2024 · MONORAIL AND AUTOMATED GUIDEWAY TRANSIT. County of Miami-Dade. Miami, FL. 8,863.8. 5,742.0. 8,325.8. 5,393.5. Morgantown Personal Rapid Transit.
  7. [7]
    [PDF] AUTOMATED GUIDEWAY TRANSIT (AGT) SYSTEMS | Access Board
    (a) Automated Guideway Transit (AGT) vehicles and systems, sometimes called. "people movers," operated in airports and other areas w here AGT vehicles travel at ...
  8. [8]
    [PDF] Automated Guideway Transit - Princeton University
    Automated guideway transit systems have two distinguishing features: . The?” have their own roadwa~w which are usually called ex- clwnve guideways ...
  9. [9]
    [PDF] A Comparison of Some New Light Rail and Automated-Guideway ...
    Several proprietary automated-guideway transit (AGT) systems have been developed and de- ployed, often claiming superior service and reduced operating costs, ...
  10. [10]
    CRRC ART Introduction
    General Introduction. Autonomous-rail Rapid Transit (ART) is a novel type of rail transit system with medium-low transport capacity invented by CRRC Zhuzhou ...Missing: definition | Show results with:definition
  11. [11]
    The supply side of the automated people mover market
    Intermediate capacity transit systems provide capacities in the range from 5,000 to 20,000 pphpd. ... Automated Guideway Transit Systems - A. Compendium of AGT ...
  12. [12]
    [PDF] Automated Guideway Transit - UNT Digital Library
    Jun 30, 1975 · with Automated Guideway Transit. Next is a review of current R & D programs, with emphasis on those sponsored by the Urban Mass.
  13. [13]
    [PDF] Driven, Attended, and Fully Automated Transit: Qualitative Comparison
    Automated Guideway Transit. • Fully Automated No ... safety hazard is virtually eliminated through fail-safe checks ... than manual ones because they utilize either ...
  14. [14]
    [PDF] Summary details of the ATS Test Tracks
    Comparison between these results leads to the conclusion that on average; PRT infrastructure can be provided for a third the cost per mile of equivalent APM ...
  15. [15]
    Chapter 4 - APM System Characteristics | Guidebook for Planning ...
    APMs can include technologies that are also called automated guideway transit ... Because a single point failure along the guideway will shut down the single ...
  16. [16]
    [PDF] Implications of Increasing Grade of Automation
    GOA 0: Manual operation with no automatic train protection. ▫ Safety and efficiency of train movements are fully under the control of the. Train Operator.
  17. [17]
    Goodyear, Disneyland Unveil People Mover (Chicago Tribune
    Anaheim, Cal., June 28-- An elevated, automated transportation system designed to carry large numbers passengers in continuous motion was introduced today ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  18. [18]
    Some Lessons from the History of Personal Rapid Transit (PRT)
    Aug 4, 1996 · In 1960 William Alden, a graduate of the Harvard Business School, invented a system of small electric vehicles that could be driven from one's ...
  19. [19]
    [PDF] 1968 - Tomorrow's Transportation: New Systems For The Urban Future
    The report identifies research and development whh-h offers promising prospects for transportation improve- ment.I in our cities in the near future. It suggests ...
  20. [20]
    Technical Page - Von Roll/Adtranz
    The Von Roll Monorail was the logical next step in the evolution of this type of monorail. More than 20 of these monorails are in operation worldwide, ...
  21. [21]
    Celebrating 50 Years | Tampa International Airport
    When the new TPA opened in 1971, more than 60,000 people came to tour the revolutionary airport design and ride the world's first automated people movers.
  22. [22]
    About the PRT | PRT (Personal Rapid Transit) 50th Anniversary
    Jan 7, 2025 · Since its opening in 1975, the PRT has provided over 100 million passenger trips, significantly reducing vehicle congestion on Morgantown's ...Missing: Tampa Airport
  23. [23]
    [PDF] Automated Guideway Transit - Princeton University
    Mar 11, 1975 · Private automobiles enabled large sections of the population to move to the fringes of cities where thinl~' populated areas could not be served ...
  24. [24]
    VAL – Automated People Mover - Siemens Mobility
    Discover some of the important milestones, starting in 1983 in the French city of Lille with the original VAL (Véhicule automatique léger) platform for Line 1.
  25. [25]
    Lille VAL - Railway Technology
    Jan 12, 2000 · Date Opened. 1983, Line 2: 2000. Route Length ... The VAL concept is of rubber-tyred vehicles using a segregated fully automated guideway.Missing: history | Show results with:history
  26. [26]
    Vancouver SkyTrain - Railway Technology
    May 18, 2000 · Date Opened. 1986 ... Although usually associated with MAGLEV operation, linear induction motors provide propulsion for SkyTrain units.
  27. [27]
    British Columbia Rapid Transit Company | TransLink
    SkyTrain first opened on Dec. 11, 1985 for eight days of free service prior to officially starting revenue service in January 1986 as a showcase of Expo '86, ...
  28. [28]
    The Scarborough Rapid Transit Extension (1990s proposal)
    Jun 25, 2015 · With the election of the Conservative government under Mike Harris in June 1995, plans for the eastern extension of the Scarborough RT dropped ...
  29. [29]
    Paris, France Airport VAL - nycsubway.org
    The OrlyVal system was opened in October 1991. It is equipped with two-car trains built by Matra (now owned by Siemens), running between Orly West and Orly ...
  30. [30]
    [PDF] Automated People-Movers - Transportation Research Board
    Excluding large automated guideway transit such as the Vancouver. SkyTrain ... These higher-order APMs are called personal rapid transit, or PRT. Their ...Missing: subtypes | Show results with:subtypes
  31. [31]
    Innovia people mover and monorail: Efficient solutions for urban and ...
    Jeddah's Innovia APM system moves people from the check-in area to the boarding area in only 85 seconds with a capacity of 4,000 passengers per hour. Since 2020 ...
  32. [32]
    [PDF] Characteristics of Urban Transportation Systems - ROSA P
    CHARACTERISTICS OF INDIVIDUAL AUTOMATED GUIDEWAY TRANSIT. SYSTEMS. SERVICE AND ... Von Roll Transport. Systems. AEG-Westinghouse. 1981. Airport. 3 Dual-lane ...
  33. [33]
    Subpart H -- Automated Guideway Transit Systems - Access Board
    These guidelines define AGT systems as automated (driverless) systems comprised of individual or multi-car trains. This section is intended to address those AGT ...
  34. [34]
    APM Automated People Mover passenger transport systems | zatran
    Automated People Mover (APM) systems are fully automated, guided and rubber-tired passenger transport systems normally operated on elevated guideways and/or in ...
  35. [35]
    [PDF] East Birmingham to North Solihull Automated Shuttle Feasibility Study
    Nov 7, 2023 · UK Central Hub is a large-scale project and investment opportunity ... 10,000 – 30,000 pphpd. Page 80. East Birmingham to North Solihull ...
  36. [36]
    [PDF] FTA Low-Speed Urban Maglev Research Program
    Figure 5-1 provides the relative component cost for dual guideway elevated systems at the 12,000 pphpd capacity, with 1 km station spacing. The station.
  37. [37]
    [PDF] Transit Capacity and Quality of Service Manual (Part C)
    AUTOMATED GUIDEWAY TRANSIT CAPACITY ... allowance for merging trains of 45 seconds and rounding up should permit headways.
  38. [38]
    APM & Monorail signalling: Fully automated and driverless operation
    The 54 seven-car driveless innovia monorail trains are equipped with Cityflo 650 automatic train control and will connect the 17 stations in just 50 minutes; ...Missing: lengths | Show results with:lengths
  39. [39]
    MHI Receives Automated Guideway Transit (AGT) System Order for ...
    Feb 29, 2024 · MHI to handle entire AGT system, including signals, communication systems, power distribution systems, guideway work, platform screen doors, ...
  40. [40]
    Why AGTs are the future of sustainable city transport | Spectra by MHI
    Dec 7, 2021 · AI and Internet of Things-connectivity will boost the energy efficiency of AGTs further by recording passenger demand levels at different times ...
  41. [41]
    (PDF) Light Rail or Automatic Guided Transit - ResearchGate
    Apr 20, 2020 · ... AGT operating costs decrease in relation with the LRT operating costs. for a same supplied capacity. When a city has a lack of land ...
  42. [42]
    Company Overview｜About Us｜Yurikamome line - ゆりかもめ
    Tokyo Waterfront New Transit Waterfront Line. Section, Shimbashi to Toyosu. Total Length, 14.7km ... Capacity, 306～338 people（6-carriage train）. Operation Method ...
  43. [43]
    Tokyo's New Waterfront Transit System
    Yurikamome—Tokyo's new waterfront transit system, is a medium-capacity, automated guideway transit (AGT) system connecting the centre of Tokyo with a new ...
  44. [44]
    Yurikamome: Tokyo's Automated Transportation System ... - JapanGov
    Yurikamome is an automated guideway transit (AGT) system that connects central Tokyo with the Rinkai waterfront area, built on reclaimed land in Tokyo Bay.
  45. [45]
    Assessment of Personal Rapid Transit System Configurations ...
    PRT is based on small electric vehicles with a capacity of two to six persons that operate on demand and are centrally organized on dedicated infrastructure, ...
  46. [46]
    [PDF] An Analysis of Personal Rapid Transit - eScholarship
    Personal rapid transit (PRT) is a concept in which a fleet of automated vehicles operate on a network of grade-separated guideways, accessible on-demand at ...
  47. [47]
    in comparison - Ultra Global PRT
    The system has an average energy usage of only 0.55 MJ per passenger km, typically providing at least a 50% benefit over buses and trains, and a 70% savings in ...Missing: enablers slot- switched
  48. [48]
    How can Personal Rapid Transit (PRT) become a game changer in ...
    May 23, 2023 · Disadvantages of Personal Rapid Transit (PRT) systems · 1. Limited Capacity: · 2. High Infrastructure Cost: · 3. Scalability Challenges: · 4.Missing: early pilots
  49. [49]
    [PDF] PERSONAL RAPID TRANSIT (PRT) ANOTHER OPTION FOR ...
    Some of the early PRT guideways and stations were indeed complex and undoubtedly impracticable, at least economically, if not (in some cases) technically.
  50. [50]
    Chapter 4 - APM System Characteristics | Guidebook for Planning ...
    ... transit sys- tems that operate on fixed guideways in exclusive rights of way. APMs can include technologies that are also called automated guideway transit ...
  51. [51]
    [PDF] HOW to DESIGN a PRT GUIDEWAY | J. Edward Anderson
    Jan 2, 2010 · 4. The minimum-weight, minimum-size guideway is a steel truss. a. Robotic welding is required for acceptable cost.
  52. [52]
    [PDF] Potential Viability of Automated Rapid Transit at the Minneapolis-St ...
    • Length of guideway: 2.4 miles (3.8 km). • Direction of guideway: two-way. • Guideway type: steel and concrete. • Traction type: rubber tires. • Alignment ...
  53. [53]
    [PDF] AGT: New TOD Solution for Urban Transportation Issues
    AGT has the following features: - The minimum curve radius of 30 m enables a horizontally flexible track design. - The high hill-climbing ability enables a ...
  54. [54]
    Linear Induction Motors in Transportation Systems - MDPI
    A traction Linear Induction Motor (LIM) has been deployed worldwide in numerous transit systems and in driverless, elevated guideway systems requiring all ...
  55. [55]
    What Is Regenerative Braking and How Does it Work? - Mazda USA
    Does regenerative braking save gas? The U.S. Department of Energy estimates regenerative braking energy recovery at 5-9% for hybrids and 22% for electric ...
  56. [56]
    [PDF] Train headway optimisation using virtual blocks
    The purpose of this paper is to present the train traffic control process based on virtual blocks and to conduct a preliminary assessment of the effect of this ...
  57. [57]
    Understanding Automatic Train Protection (ATP) and Its Benefits
    Collision Avoidance​​ By automatically controlling train speeds and maintaining safe separation distances, ATP significantly reduces the likelihood of accidents ...
  58. [58]
    [PDF] EVACUATION AND RESCUE IN AUTOMATED GUIDEWAY TRANS IT
    Evacuation and rescue of passengers from disabled transit vehicles is a problem common to all fixed guideway transit systems. Automated Guideway Transit (AGT).
  59. [59]
    [PDF] Automated Guideway Transit Service Availability Workshop - ROSA P
    ... Automated Guideway Transit. Technology improvement funded by the Urban Mass ... benefits can be quite cheaply achieved. At one time somebody's idea of ...Missing: challenges | Show results with:challenges
  60. [60]
    Skylink Maintenance FAQs - DFW Airport
    Each Skylink vehicle weighs 30,000 lbs empty and about 45,840 lbs with a full passenger load; Each loop is 5 miles in length. One inner loop and one outer ...
  61. [61]
    ATL Fact Sheet - The official website of Hartsfield-Jackson Atlanta ...
    The Plane Trains operate approximately every two minutes. On average, the trains carry more than 200,000 passengers per day. Parking – Domestic Terminal ...
  62. [62]
    [PDF] FY 2025 Adopted Budget
    Sep 30, 2024 · The Skylink system carries approximately 150,000 passengers and employees each day (55 million annually) between DFW's five terminals. Skylink ...
  63. [63]
    - The official website of Hartsfield-Jackson Atlanta International Airport
    May 7, 2025 · The fleet expansion will increase transport capacity from 10,000 to 12,000 passengers per hour in each direction. Most importantly to ...Missing: length km pphpd
  64. [64]
    Tracks of Time: Skylink at 20 - DFW Airport
    May 21, 2025 · That's where Skylink comes in – Dallas Fort Worth International Airport's (DFW) high-speed Automated People Mover (APM), which has been helping ...Missing: Guideway Hartsfield- Jackson ATL
  65. [65]
    The Automated People Mover's Role in Airport Security - TRID
    The Automated People Mover's Role in Airport Security. Much has been done recently to distance motor vehicles from special sites for security purposes.
  66. [66]
    [PDF] Automated Transit Applications
    highway, or activity centers. Examples include down- town, airport, and major activity center circulators, or shuttles between two or more interesting points ...
  67. [67]
    Metromover
    ### Miami Metromover Facts
  68. [68]
    [PDF] RIDERSHIP TECHNICAL REPORT - Miami-Dade County
    Jun 2, 2025 · (2) Metrorail fares resumed on June 1, 2021, following a 14-month period of fare-free rides as a result of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. The NextFare ...Missing: length | Show results with:length
  69. [69]
    About — Detroit People Mover
    The DTC provides service to its customers according to a seven-day schedule, which is free to ride since 2024. A fleet of fully automated vehicles, which are ...Missing: length | Show results with:length
  70. [70]
    [PDF] 10. Automated Guideway Transit Capacity Determination
    AUTOMATED GUIDEWAY TRANSIT SYSTEM (AGT)—A transportation system in which automated, driverless vehicles operate on fixed guideways with exclusive right-of-way.
  71. [71]
    [PDF] Economic and Community Benefits of Urban Fixed‐Route Transit in ...
    Congestion relief effect – The congestion relief to highway users resulting from the modal shift of transit users from motor vehicles. To the extent that ...
  72. [72]
    The Detroit People Mover and the Promise of Non-Essential Transit
    Nov 13, 2024 · In the last few years, the Detroit Transportation Corporation has leaned into the novelty of the People Mover in an effort to boost ridership.
  73. [73]
    Sage Reference - Automated Guideway Transit
    An automated guideway transit (AGT) system, also known as a people mover, is a fully automated transportation system in which driverless ...<|separator|>
  74. [74]
    SkyTrain | The Canadian Encyclopedia
    Mar 10, 2016 · It uses mostly Advanced Light Rapid Transit (ALRT) technology, an automated rail system that operates mainly on a raised guideway, although some ...Millennium Line · Design · Recent Debates<|separator|>
  75. [75]
    [PDF] VANCOUVER SKYTRAIN - Infrastructure Case Study - UBC Blogs
    Expo Line. Phase I Original Expo Line, 1981 - 1986. Length: 21.4km. Started Construction: 1981. In Service: 1986. Cost: $854.3m (1986).
  76. [76]
    [PDF] A CASE STUDY OF VANCOUVER'S LIGHT RAIL LINE Kristin Olson ...
    All told, a study commissioned three years after the opening of the line in 1989 found that more than $5 billion worth of investment had been planned or already ...
  77. [77]
    [PDF] Paris_RA2024 - Transports en commun - 7 pages - 04.09 copie
    Sep 5, 2025 · Orlyval : 7,3 km de lignes. 3 gares nominales. 16 lignes. 249 km de lignes* (+22,1 km en 2024) ... Source : RATP. En millions de voyages. 2023.<|separator|>
  78. [78]
    Orly | RATPDev
    The Orly shuttle aims for regular, reliable service, increased ridership, and flexible timetables matching trains, with 21% ridership increase in 2017.Missing: length km 2024
  79. [79]
    Focus on the extension of Line 14 | Network modernisation - RATP
    Line 14 thus becomes the longest metro line in Île-de-France, with a total length of 30 kilometers and 21 stations! By 2025, 1 million trips will be made on ...Missing: ridership | Show results with:ridership
  80. [80]
    The Rise and Fall of the Scarborough RT - Transit Toronto - Content
    Oct 23, 2025 · The SCARBOROUGH RT, from when it opened on March 24, 1985, and throughout its nearly forty-year existence, was a six-station 6.4 kilometre-long rapid transit ...
  81. [81]
    TTC staff recommend closing Line 3 Scarborough RT in 2023 due to ...
    Feb 4, 2021 · Toronto Transit Commission staff are recommending the closure of Line 3 Scarborough RT in 2023 due to increasing infrastructure failures.
  82. [82]
    The Scarborough RT was supposed to be replaced years ago. Here ...
    Jul 25, 2023 · The SRT vehicles were only designed to run for 25 years and should have been retired more than a decade ago.<|separator|>
  83. [83]
    SkyTrain Expansion Program | TransLink
    The SkyTrain Expansion Program is a series of infrastructure investments that will make our network ready for the addition of the province-built Broadway ...SkyTrain Fleet Expansion · Infrastructure Upgrades · Storage and Maintenance...
  84. [84]
    China's Autonomous Rail Rapid Transit: A Glimpse Into the Future of ...
    Dec 11, 2024 · The ART system is a rail-less train that operates on virtual tracks guided by advanced sensors, LiDAR technology, and AI-driven algorithms.
  85. [85]
    https://www.starconference.org.uk/star/2008/Kristin_Olson.pdf
  86. [86]
    How AI is Transforming Commute Transportation in 2025 and Beyond
    From optimizing routes to predicting demand, AI is playing an increasingly vital role in making transportation systems smarter, more efficient, and more rider ...
  87. [87]
    [PDF] Guideway Instrusion Detection Systems for Rail Transit APTA Rail ...
    Aug 6, 2017 · Radar;. ▫ Video Analytics;. ▫ LIDAR (Laser Imaging Detection and Ranging). • No single technology found to be perfect: ▫ If detection area ...
  88. [88]
    Automated Guideway Transit (AGT) Market's Evolutionary Trends ...
    Rating 4.8 (1,980) Oct 3, 2025 · The Automated Guideway Transit (AGT) market is poised for substantial expansion, with an estimated market size of $5500 million in 2025.
  89. [89]
    Automated Guideway Transit (AGT) Market Size, Future Growth and ...
    The Asia Pacific AGT market is projected to grow at a CAGR of 9.2% from 2025 to 2033, reflecting the region's strong growth prospects. North America and ...
  90. [90]
    [PDF] Roadmap to Automated Mobility Systems: Informing the Planning of ...
    Low-speed automated vehicles (LSAVs), particularly shuttles, are among the most common examples, with pilots completed or ongoing in the United States ( ...
  91. [91]
    FTA-Managed Transit Bus Automation Demonstration Projects
    Aug 7, 2024 · FTA funds demonstrations and pilots to conduct applied, practical research for transit bus automation and to bring transit agencies, researchers, and ...Missing: post- guideway