Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Daniel Dennett

Daniel Clement Dennett III (March 28, 1942 – April 19, 2024) was an American , cognitive scientist, and author renowned for applying evolutionary theory to explain mental phenomena, , and without invoking or dualistic elements. Born in to a father, Dennett earned his B.A. from in 1963 and Ph.D. from in 1965, before joining as the Austin B. Fletcher Professor of and co-director of the Center for Cognitive Studies, positions he held until his retirement. His work emphasized causal realism in understanding the mind as a product of physical processes, critiquing Cartesian and as illusory or misdescribed features of brain function, as detailed in seminal texts like (1991) and (1987). Dennett's (1995) argued for the algorithmic power of as a universal acid dissolving traditional barriers between biology, mind, and culture, earning the philosopher widespread acclaim alongside controversy for reducing complex human traits to mechanistic evolution. A vocal proponent of grounded in empirical science rather than , he co-participated in key discussions among skeptics, viewing as a byproduct of cognitive adaptations best analyzed through evolutionary lenses in works like Breaking the Spell (2006). Dennett received honors including the 2017 Mind & Brain Prize for his integrative approach bridging and , though his compatibilist defense of as evolved decision-making capacity drew debates over and .

Early Life and Education

Childhood and Family Influences

Daniel Clement Dennett III was born on March 28, 1942, in , , to Daniel C. Dennett Jr. and Ruth Marjorie (née Blanchard) Dennett. His father, a Harvard in Islamic history and professor at the , worked covertly as an during , posing as a at the American Embassy in . His mother, an English major with a master's from the who taught at the American Community School in , later became a book editor; both parents descended from medical families but pursued humanities careers. Dennett had two older sisters, and the family emphasized intellectual pursuits, with expectations that he would attend Harvard and enter academia. Dennett spent his early childhood in , , where he learned rudimentary and kept a pet named , immersing him in a multicultural environment shaped by his father's diplomatic and scholarly roles. At age five, in 1947, his father died in a plane crash during a mission to , prompting Dennett, his mother, and sisters to relocate to , where he grew up amid lingering family memories of his "legendary" father. This peripatetic start, combining life with abrupt loss, fostered early fascinations with building models and mechanical tinkering from around age five, contrasting the family's orientation. Family dynamics instilled a commitment to rigorous and clear expression; his mother's influence extended to writing style and appreciation for like Rachmaninoff, while the paternal legacy of historical and intelligence work underscored analytical inquiry into complex systems. Dennett later reflected that the household assumption of an academic path, rooted in his parents' choices against more practical medical professions, oriented him toward philosophical and scientific over vocational trades.

Formal Education and Early Influences

Dennett completed his secondary education at , graduating in 1959 after spending his final two years there. He began undergraduate studies at for one year, benefiting from in and English. Transferring to , he earned a B.A. in in 1963, completing a senior thesis titled "Quine and Ordinary Language" under the supervision of Dagfinn Føllesdal. Dennett then attended the as a graduate student from 1963 to 1965, initially pursuing a B.Phil. but switching to a D.Phil. program. His doctoral thesis, titled Content and Consciousness and focused on , was supervised by . During his early education, Dennett encountered key philosophical influences that shaped his analytical approach. At Wesleyan, mentor Henry Kyburg introduced him to rigorous philosophical argumentation. His discovery of W.V.O. Quine's works, such as From a Logical Point of View and , occurred in 1959 and profoundly impacted his thinking on language, logic, and , leading to his Harvard thesis on Quine. At Harvard, exposure to Roderick Firth and further oriented him toward and . At , Ryle's and emphasized behavioral analysis over Cartesian , influencing Dennett's emerging views on mind and . He also engaged deeply with Ludwig Wittgenstein's , which reinforced his skepticism toward private languages and subjective mental states. These encounters, grounded in mid-20th-century analytic traditions, provided the foundational tools for Dennett's later materialist critiques of and folk psychology.

Professional Career

Academic Positions and Institutions

Dennett began his academic career shortly after completing his D.Phil. at the in 1965, serving as Lecturer at Oxford College of Technology from 1964 to 1965. He then joined the , as of from 1965 to 1970, advancing to Associate Professor there from 1970 to 1971. In 1971, Dennett moved to as Associate Professor of Philosophy, a position he held until 1975, during which he also served as Visiting Assistant Professor in Tufts' Summer Session in 1968 and Visiting Associate Professor at in fall 1975. He was promoted to full at Tufts in 1975, a role he maintained until his retirement, later holding the titles of of Arts and Sciences from 1985 to 2000, University Professor from 2000 onward, and Austin B. Fletcher of Philosophy from 2000 onward. From 1976 to 1982, he chaired Tufts' Department of Philosophy. Dennett co-founded and directed the Center for Cognitive Studies at Tufts starting in 1985, serving in that leadership role until his death. He also held visiting positions at institutions including the as Visiting Professor in spring 1975 and, later in his career, at , Harvard, and others. Additionally, he was an External Professor at the .

Key Collaborations and Projects

Dennett served as director of the Tufts University Center for Cognitive Studies from its founding in 1985, fostering interdisciplinary research on topics including consciousness, intentional systems, and the philosophy of mind through collaborations with cognitive scientists and philosophers such as Ray Jackendoff. The center facilitated projects integrating empirical data from neuroscience and psychology with philosophical analysis, emphasizing naturalistic explanations of mental phenomena over dualistic or qualia-based accounts. In 1981, Dennett co-edited The Mind's I: Fantasies and Reflections on Self & Soul with , compiling essays, stories, and philosophical reflections to probe the nature of , selfhood, and without invoking essences. The volume, published by , drew on diverse sources to argue for a computational and evolutionary understanding of mind, influencing subsequent debates in . From the early 1990s, Dennett contributed to MIT's project, a multi-year effort to construct a capable of developing cognitive abilities through sensorimotor interactions with its environment, testing hypotheses about and the . Led by , the initiative aimed to demonstrate that human-like intelligence could emerge incrementally via adaptive behaviors rather than top-down symbolic programming, though the project concluded without achieving full humanoid functionality by the late 1990s.

Core Philosophical Positions

Philosophy of Mind and Consciousness

Dennett's philosophy of mind is grounded in , asserting that all mental phenomena, including and , emerge from physical processes in the without requiring non-physical substances or dualistic entities. He aligns this view with , where mental states are defined by their causal roles in information processing and behavior, realizable in various physical substrates, much like software on different hardware. This framework draws from computational theories and , emphasizing that the mind's capacities evolved to solve adaptive problems in prediction and control. A cornerstone of Dennett's approach is the , detailed in his 1987 book The Intentional Stance, which posits that effective prediction of complex systems' behavior often relies on interpreting them as if they possess beliefs, desires, and rational goals, rather than exhaustively analyzing their physical mechanisms (the physical stance) or internal designs (the design stance). This stance succeeds pragmatically for entities like chess computers or human agents, where lower-level explanations become computationally infeasible, and it underscores intentionality as an interpretive tool rather than an intrinsic metaphysical property. In addressing consciousness specifically, Dennett challenges the intuitive model of a unified "stream" or central "Cartesian theater" where experiences are serially presented to an inner observer, arguing it misrepresents distributed brain activity. In Consciousness Explained (1991), he advances the multiple drafts model, proposing that the brain continuously produces competing, parallel narratives or "drafts" of content from sensory inputs and internal states, with no privileged final version; instead, consciousness consists in the functional prominence or "fame" achieved by certain drafts through competitive processes, akin to editorial selection in a decentralized newsroom. This model accounts for phenomena like change blindness and temporal illusions, such as the color-phi effect, by distributing awareness across spatiotemporal gradients rather than localizing it. Dennett employs as the methodological foundation for studying empirically, treating subjects' verbal reports of their experiences as neutral data to be gathered and analyzed from a third-person , without privileging first-person or assuming the reports capture veridical inner realities. This approach, elaborated in works like his 2003 paper "Who's on First? Heterophenomenology Explained," bridges objective and subjective descriptions by bracketing metaphysical commitments, allowing to describe the "phenomenological world" as believed by subjects while remaining agnostic about unobservable . Critiquing —the posited ineffable, private of subjective experience—Dennett argues in his 1988 essay "Quining Qualia" that the concept, as traditionally formulated, generates paradoxes like indistinguishable inverted spectra or philosophical , and fails under scrutiny because it demands that are both omnipresent and undetectable. He "quines" by showing they reduce to confusions in folk psychology, replaceable by functional dispositions (e.g., judgments about experiences) and behavioral capacities, without loss of ; for instance, what seems "ineffably red" is adequately captured by discriminatory abilities and reports, not intrinsic essences.

Free Will and Compatibilism

Dennett defends , the philosophical position that is compatible with , rejecting both libertarian conceptions requiring and hard determinism's denial of . In his 1984 Elbow Room: The Varieties of Worth Wanting, he contends that traditional formulations of the free will debate rely on flawed intuitions about "could have done otherwise," which he argues conflate historical possibilities with hypothetical ones under identical circumstances. Instead, Dennett proposes that the free will worth preserving—for underwriting , self-control, and deliberation—involves agents who can respond flexibly to reasons, evade perfect predictability, and engage in self-definition through reflection, all within a deterministic causal chain. Building on this, Dennett's 2003 work Freedom Evolves integrates to explain how arises naturalistically. He describes early organisms gaining "elbow room" by avoiding deterministic predictability through simple avoidance behaviors, which favors for survival; over time, this evolves into complex human capacities for anticipation, planning, and moral competence. For Dennett, human manifests as enhanced competence in navigating causal environments, where individuals act as "rational" agents whose decisions align with evolved cognitive architectures, without needing or acausal interventions. This view preserves : agents are held responsible not for originating causes de novo but for traceable lapses in their deliberative processes, akin to blaming a chess player for a blunder rather than the board's physics. Dennett critiques libertarian free will as either illusory—demanding uncaused causes incompatible with physics—or redundant, failing to add value beyond compatibilist . He emphasizes empirical grounding, drawing on and behavioral studies showing as hierarchically structured processes that yield predictable yet evadable patterns, supporting his claim that enhances rather than undermines freedom by enabling reliable causation. This compatibilist framework, Dennett argues, aligns with , allowing free will to "evolve" alongside natural laws without contradiction.

Evolutionary Theory and Adaptationism

Dennett regarded Darwinian as a blind, algorithmic process that generates biological complexity and apparent design without foresight or purpose. In his 1995 book : Evolution and the Meanings of Life, he characterized as substrate-neutral, meaning it operates indifferently on genetic, cultural, or even artificial substrates, iteratively exploring "design space" through variation, , and differential reproduction. This view positioned as a universal explanatory tool, capable of dissolving anthropocentric intuitions about purpose by demonstrating how mindless mechanisms suffice for adaptive outcomes. Central to Dennett's evolutionary stance was a defense of , which he described as the core of , essential for hypothesizing functions of traits shaped by selection pressures. He advocated "greedy reductionism," urging researchers to prioritize adaptationist explanations as the default, testable via to uncover historical selective advantages, while acknowledging supplementary roles for drift or constraints. Dennett contended that critics overstated non-adaptive factors, arguing that even apparently incidental traits like spandrels often trace back to selected features, rendering heuristically indispensable for progress in fields from to . Dennett's position sparked debate with paleontologist , who in 1997 labeled him a "Darwinian fundamentalist" for allegedly dismissing and overattributing traits to selection at the expense of developmental or historical contingencies. In response, Dennett rejected the caricature of "strict" , clarifying his endorsement of a sophisticated version that treats adaptations as presumptive but falsifiable hypotheses, not dogmatic absolutes, and critiqued Gould's model for underappreciating selection's pervasive role in constraining architectural possibilities. Empirical advances in and comparative biology since the , such as identifying adaptive signatures in gene sequences, have lent support to adaptationist inquiries Dennett championed, though debates persist on the proportion of neutral versus selected variation.

Religion, Atheism, and Moral Realism

Dennett was a vocal proponent of , rejecting explanations in favor of a thoroughgoing scientific naturalism that he argued renders religious claims untenable. He participated in the movement, appearing alongside , , and in a 2007 discussion dubbed the "Four Horsemen," where he emphasized the incompatibility of with theistic posits. Dennett contended that the mind and its products, including religious , arise from evolutionary processes without need for , dismissing faith-based epistemologies as unreliable modes of inquiry. Central to Dennett's critique of was his book Breaking the Spell: Religion as a Natural Phenomenon, in which he urged scholars to abandon deference to religious doctrines and instead investigate them as evolved cultural adaptations. He analogized religious ideas to memes—self-replicating that propagate through and selection, akin to genes in biological —explaining phenomena like holy books and rituals as persistent cultural artifacts shaped by human rather than transcendent truth. Dennett argued that this naturalistic approach demystifies religion's hold, revealing it as a byproduct of cognitive biases and , such as the tendency to attribute to natural events, without invoking agents whose approval adherents seek. Regarding ethics, Dennett defended a naturalistic , asserting that moral truths exist as objective patterns in the , emergent from evolutionary history and flourishing, rather than from commands or . He maintained that a Darwinian framework is compatible with robust moral judgments, such as deeming a profound , because ethics aligns with real features of and cooperative societies, informed by reason and rather than toward values. This stance rejected both theistic and nihilistic implications of some evolutionary debunking arguments, positioning as a practical, evidence-based stance grounded in the causal realities of biological and .

Artificial Intelligence and the Intentional Stance

Dennett formulated the as a pragmatic strategy for predicting behavior by treating entities as rational agents endowed with beliefs and desires, applicable when it outperforms the physical stance (based on laws of physics and chemistry) or the design stance (based on functional architecture). Introduced in his book The Intentional Stance, this approach posits not as an intrinsic property but as a useful for systems whose defies lower-level explanations. Applied to , the enables effective analysis of computational systems where attributing mental states yields superior forecasts. Dennett cited chess-playing computers as a prime example: rather than tracing billions of algorithmic calculations or hardware operations, observers predict moves by assuming the program "desires" victory and "believes" certain positions advantageous, mirroring human strategic reasoning. This method succeeded with systems like IBM's , which defeated world champion in 1997, as intentional attributions captured emergent strategic patterns beyond exhaustive physical or design breakdowns. Dennett's framework implies that AI exhibits derived intentionality through functional simulation, not original semantic content, aligning with his rejection of qualia or "intrinsic" minds in machines. He maintained that advanced , lacking evolutionary grounding in survival pressures, approximates but does not achieve genuine comprehension, rendering intentional ascriptions instrumental rather than ontological. In later reflections, Dennett highlighted risks when exploits the intentional stance for deception. He warned of "counterfeit people"— constructs mimicking conversation to manipulate users—first articulated in a 2023 Atlantic , arguing such entities vandalize social trust by eliciting unearned intentional interpretations. Dennett proposed legal penalties for their deployment, emphasizing that while the stance aids development, unregulated fakes threaten democratic and , as anyone can now generate passable impersonators without .

Memetics, Realism, and Critiques of Postmodernism

Dennett extended ' 1976 concept of the as a of cultural , treating memes as self-propagating that evolve through variation, selection, and retention in human minds and societies, analogous to genetic . In his 1990 paper "Memes and the Exploitation of Imagination," he argued that memes leverage human cognitive vulnerabilities, such as imagination and , to replicate and persist, shaping behaviors from to artistic traditions. This framework posits culture as a Darwinian process operating on non-biological replicators, with memes competing for "mind space" and influencing phenotypes like tool use or social norms without requiring intentional design. Dennett applied to in works like Breaking the Spell (2006), portraying doctrines as viral memes that exploit emotional and communal instincts for longevity, often at the expense of empirical scrutiny. Dennett's realism centered on "real patterns," a middle-ground ontology that affirms the objective existence of higher-level phenomena—such as mental states or intentional behaviors—as abstract, predictive regularities emergent from physical processes, rather than illusory or fundamental essences. In his 1991 essay "Real Patterns," published in The Journal of Philosophy, he contended that beliefs and desires are real to the extent they form compressible, law-like descriptions of behavioral data, bridging with without invoking or . This stance rejects eliminativism's denial of propositional attitudes while critiquing naive for positing unobservable intrinsic properties; instead, reality is hierarchical, with validity determined by explanatory power and predictive success, as in where adaptations are real insofar as they reliably correlate with outcomes. Dennett integrated this into a broader naturalistic worldview, emphasizing causal chains traceable to micro-level physics yet manifesting at macro-scales through algorithmic processes like . Dennett's commitment to fueled sharp critiques of , which he viewed as eroding distinctions between warranted and subjective narrative by promoting interpretive over -based truth. In a 1998 response titled "Postmodernism and Truth," he warned that such doctrines spawn practical harms, including diminished trust in scientific institutions and tolerance for unfalsifiable claims across and . He lambasted postmodern influences for rendering toward objective facts intellectually fashionable, stating in a 2017 interview that "what the postmodernists did was truly evil" by enabling cynicism about and fostering environments where ideological narratives supplant verifiable patterns. Dennett contrasted this with memetic and evolutionary , arguing that demands discerning true replicators from false via empirical testing, not deconstructive irony; he attributed 's appeal to memes exploiting anti-authoritarian impulses but ultimately undermining causal understanding of human progress.

Criticisms and Intellectual Debates

Challenges to Consciousness Explanations

Philosophers such as have argued that Dennett's functionalist account, exemplified in his from (1991), effectively denies the existence of consciousness by reducing it to third-person observable processes while dismissing first-person subjective experience as illusory or non-ontological. contends that conscious states inherently possess ontological subjectivity, existing only from the first-person point of view, and that Dennett's verificationist approach—prioritizing what can objectively measure—commits a by inferring that unmeasurable subjective features do not exist. David Chalmers has similarly critiqued Dennett's type-A , which equates with functional capacities like reportability and discrimination, as failing to address the "hard problem" of why these functions are accompanied by phenomenal experience. In Chalmers' view, Dennett dissolves the hard problem by denying its distinctiveness from easier functional problems, but this begs the question through "third-person absolutism," ignoring the between physical processes and the "what it is like" aspect of , such as the raw feel of visual fields. Chalmers argues that Dennett's claim—"subtract the functions and nothing is left"—lacks empirical support and misframes experience as merely introspectable judgments rather than intrinsic facts. Galen Strawson has labeled Dennett a "consciousness denier" for his illusionist stance, which posits that beliefs in or unified subjective experience are user illusions generated by brain processes, without corresponding intrinsic phenomenal properties. Strawson maintains that this view implausibly requires denying the manifest reality of concrete, non-illusory experience, as reveals states that are irreducibly first-personal and not mere reports or fictions. Thomas Nagel has challenged Dennett's evolutionary in explaining , arguing that portraying it as an illusion undermines the and subjectivity essential to understanding phenomena like echolocation, where descriptions cannot capture the subjective without invoking non-illusory . Nagel asserts that Dennett's approach, while adept at , leaves unexplained how physical systems produce the intrinsic "thereness" of , reverting to a form of eliminativism that conflicts with evident facts of .

Disputes Over Free Will and Qualia

Dennett's compatibilist account of , detailed in Freedom Evolves (2003), frames it as an evolved biological capacity for agents to anticipate consequences, make reliable predictions, and exercise self-control within deterministic physical laws, thereby enabling without requiring libertarian . Incompatibilists, including neuroscientist and philosopher , contend that this view merely relabels as "," ignoring the intuitive demand for an uncaused source of volition; Harris describes as a semantic maneuver that obscures how thoughts and intentions arise from prior causes beyond the agent's ultimate control. Philosopher Galen Strawson similarly argues that Dennett's framework fails to satisfy the basic condition for genuine —self- from the ground up—since even evolved competencies trace back to non-chosen factors, rendering or incoherent regardless of practical competencies. Dennett's rejection of traditional qualia—subjective, ineffable properties of experience—as incoherent or illusory features, advanced in "Quining Qualia" (1988) and Consciousness Explained (1991), posits that what are called qualia amount to nothing more than functional reports or judgments about sensory states, eliminable upon closer scrutiny without loss of explanatory power. David Chalmers counters that Dennett's heterophenomenology addresses only "easy problems" like behavioral reports and neural correlates, evading the "hard problem" of why any physical process accompanies phenomenal experience at all; Chalmers maintains qualia are real and irreducible, necessitating extensions beyond physicalism to explain their necessity. John Searle charges Dennett with denying the existence of consciousness itself by collapsing first-person ontology into third-person descriptions, insisting that intrinsic, causally efficacious subjective states cannot be dismissed as mere illusions without contradicting everyday evidence of felt experience. These critiques highlight a persistent divide: Dennett's functional reductionism prioritizes causal mechanisms over introspective intuitions, while opponents view it as explanatorily incomplete for the reality of mindedness.

Responses to Evolutionary and Religious Critiques

Dennett countered evolutionary critiques, particularly those from , by defending as a rigorous methodological tool rather than a dogmatic creed. In response to Gould's 1997 characterization of Dennett's views in (1995) as "ultra-Darwinian fundamentalism," Dennett argued that Gould constructed a strawman of "strict" , attributing to it absurd positions Dennett did not hold, such as denying all non-selective evolutionary processes. He acknowledged the role of drift, , and other mechanisms but insisted that natural selection's explanatory power—via "" traits for their contributions—remains indispensable for causal understanding of biological design, dismissing Gould's hypothesis as underappreciating how selection opportunistically exploits architectural byproducts. Dennett further rebutted Gould's punctuated equilibrium by maintaining that fossil stasis reflects stabilizing selection on adaptive peaks, not a diminishment of gradualism, and that phyletic change occurs at variable rates without constant speed assumptions. In essays like "Dr. Pangloss Knows Best," he warned against anti-adaptationist excesses that hinder hypothesis-testing, proposing adaptationism as a trade-off: hypothesize functions first, then falsify, rather than assuming non-adaptive origins prematurely. Regarding religious critiques, Dennett addressed arguments like Alvin Plantinga's (EAAN), which posits that evolutionary reliability undermines confidence in unguided cognition producing true beliefs about abstract realities like . In their 2009 exchange and the volume Science and Religion: Are They Compatible?, Dennett rejected the EAAN as question-begging, contending that favors veridical perceptions for survival, yielding reliable enough cognition under , whereas offers no probabilistic edge and introduces superfluous supernatural causes. In Breaking the Spell: Religion as a Natural (2006), Dennett responded to objections that scientific scrutiny disrespects by likening religions to evolved cultural replicators—memes persisting via psychological susceptibilities like detection—amenable to empirical study without special exemption. He rebutted critics like , who decried his approach as scientistic prejudice, by clarifying that his "spell" refers to unexamined taboos against inquiry, not itself, and urged believers to confront evidence of religion's adaptive origins in folk rather than shielding doctrines as immune to falsification. Dennett maintained that this demystification liberates from foundations, grounding in evolved contracts testable by reason, countering claims of atheistic moral void with historical examples of secular humanism's viability.

Accusations of Instrumentalism and Reductionism

Critics have accused Daniel Dennett of , particularly in his development of the , which posits mental states like beliefs and desires as interpretive tools for predicting behavior rather than as ontologically real entities corresponding to internal brain states. Philosopher William Bechtel argued that Dennett's approach treats intentional attributions, such as ascribing beliefs, primarily as instrumental strategies for explanation and prediction, imposing constraints on believers' internal constitutions without committing to the literal existence of those states. This view echoes broader concerns that Dennett's framework undermines about the mind, reducing to a pragmatic akin to in scientific theories, where success in prediction does not imply truth about unobservables. Hilary Putnam leveled specific criticisms against Dennett's on grounds of , contending that it fails to ground genuine semantic content or reference, treating mental states as mere predictive devices without deeper causal or representational reality. Such accusations portray Dennett's philosophy as anti-realist, where the utility of folk-psychological concepts masks an underlying about their to actual cognitive processes, potentially leading to a form of error theory about . Detractors, including those in of mind, have recurrently framed this as a retreat from robust , arguing that Dennett's emphasis on predictive efficacy prioritizes instrumental success over metaphysical commitment. On , Dennett has faced charges of overly aggressive or "greedy" in his accounts of and , where complex mental phenomena are dismantled into subpersonal neural processes, effectively eliminating subjective experience as traditionally understood. Critics contend that Dennett's and denial of as ineffable, intrinsic properties reduce to behavioral and functional descriptions, sidestepping the between physical states and phenomenal feels. Philosophers like have highlighted this as a form of eliminative , accusing Dennett of redefining narrowly to exclude the "hard problem" of why physical processes give rise to subjective experience, thereby dissolving rather than solving it. Further accusations link Dennett to , a radical stance that posits folk-psychological concepts like pain or belief as flawed and doomed to replacement by neuroscience, with Dennett's critiques of —arguing they lack essential properties like —exemplifying this by treating them as illusory or theoretically inadequate. and , among others, have implicitly or explicitly charged Dennett's materialist framework with that fails to accommodate first-person phenomenology, reducing to third-person and thereby committing the error of explaining away irreducible aspects of . These critiques portray Dennett's approach as dogmatic in its insistence on physicalist cranes over any "skyhooks" of non-reducible mentality, potentially overlooking emergent properties not capturable by lower-level descriptions.

Recognition and Legacy

Awards, Honors, and Academic Impact

Dennett received several prestigious awards recognizing his interdisciplinary contributions to , , and evolutionary theory. In 2000, appointed him University Professor, its highest distinction for faculty, alongside the Austin B. Fletcher Professor of chair. He was awarded the Jean Nicod Prize in cognitive philosophy in 2001 by the French Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique. In 2004, the named him Humanist of the Year for advancing secular thought and rationality. Dennett became a Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of in 2009, honored for integrating philosophical analysis with empirical findings in cognitive and evolutionary biology. Further accolades followed in the , including the Mind & Brain Prize in from the for his work on and . In 2012, he received the from the Praemium Erasmianum Foundation, Europe's preeminent award for humanities and social sciences, shared with others for exploring the cultural implications of natural sciences. Additional honors encompassed the SINe Medal in 2016 from the Society for the Neural Basis of something (contextually tied to advancements) and recognition through for Inquiry's Award in 2019 for public intellectual contributions, though specifics on the latter remain tied to skeptic and rationalist circles. Dennett's academic impact extended through his long tenure as co-director of Tufts University's Center for Cognitive Studies, where he mentored researchers bridging , , and from the 1970s until his emeritus status. His publications amassed over 119,000 citations on by 2024, reflecting broad influence across , , and . Key works like (1991) and (1995) provoked debates that reshaped discussions on , , and , often cited in peer-reviewed journals despite polarizing critics who viewed his heterophenomenological approach as reductive. Dennett's emphasis on empirical compatibility in philosophical inquiry influenced subsequent generations, evident in interdisciplinary programs and responses from figures in , though his rejection of drew targeted rebuttals from proponents of non-physicalist accounts of mind.

Posthumous Developments and Influence

Dennett died on April 19, 2024, at age 82 from at Medical Center. The American Philosophical Association issued an official memoriam, noting his presidency of the organization from 2001 to 2002 and his enduring contributions to and . similarly mourned him as a "towering figure" in philosophy and advocate for , emphasizing his role in challenging religious dogma through rational inquiry. Memorial events and reflections followed swiftly, including a July 2024 session at the featuring a eulogy by , who praised Dennett's naturalistic approach to despite their disagreements on and hard problems of mind. , where Dennett served as co-director of the Center for Cognitive Studies, published appreciations of his mentorship, with former students crediting his emphasis on empirical rigor and interdisciplinary thinking for shaping their careers. Philosophy Now dedicated space in its 162nd issue to his life, portraying him as a philosophical heir to Quine and Ryle, whose heterophenomenological method integrated behavioral evidence with . Dennett's influence persists in ongoing debates, particularly in consciousness studies and . A May 2024 Donders Institute reflection highlighted his as foundational to theories, influencing and computational models of awareness. In AI discourse, tributes like Gary Marcus's noted Dennett's framework as prescient for evaluating , amid 2024-2025 advancements in large models. A July 2025 analysis extended his impact to leadership, arguing his rejection of fostered pragmatic decision-making in and , with his works cited in discussions of evolutionary algorithms and . No new publications have appeared posthumously, but Dennett's final book, I've Been Thinking (2023), continues to circulate as a reflective capstone, detailing his intellectual evolution and adventures. His archival lectures and essays, preserved by Tufts and online repositories, sustain engagement, with underscoring his as a bulwark against supernaturalist revivals in popular . Critics and admirers alike reference his critiques of and compatibilist in 2025 forums, affirming his role in bridging with public intellectualism.

Major Works and Publications

Seminal Books and Essays

Dennett's early monograph Content and Consciousness (1969) laid foundational groundwork for his by distinguishing between neural events and their intentional content, proposing a heterophenomenological to treat subjects' self-reports as without assuming their veridicality. This approach rejected Cartesian in favor of a functionalist analysis, influencing subsequent debates on and . In Brainstorms: Philosophical Essays on Mind and Psychology (1978), Dennett compiled essays such as "Intentional Systems" and "Where Am I?", which advanced his theory of as a stance for predicting behavior rather than a metaphysical commitment to inner representations. The collection integrated with , arguing that mental states are realized by brain processes amenable to scientific explanation, and it critiqued traditional notions of and through thought experiments like brain transplants. The Intentional Stance (1987) systematized this predictive framework, positing three levels of interpretation—physical, design, and —for understanding systems from thermostats to humans, emphasizing its pragmatic utility over ontological truth. Dennett applied it to artifacts and animals, challenging anthropocentric views of mind by showing how even simple mechanisms exhibit "beliefs" under intentional description. Consciousness Explained (1991) presented Dennett's "multiple drafts" model, portraying consciousness as distributed brain processes without a central theater or Cartesian theater, thereby dissolving mysteries of qualia and subjectivity through empirical neuroscience and evolutionary reasoning. Critics noted its polemical style against dualist intuitions, but it established Dennett as a leading physicalist in philosophy of mind. Darwin's Dangerous Idea: Evolution and the Meanings of Life (1995), a finalist, extended Darwinian as a "universal acid" eroding traditional boundaries in , , and ethics, including critiques of and defenses of algorithmic explanations for complexity. Dennett argued that evolution by provides a mechanistic account of purpose and meaning, influencing fields beyond philosophy into and . Later seminal works like Freedom Evolves (2003) reconciled with by viewing as evolved capacities for avoidance and , and Breaking the Spell: Religion as a Natural Phenomenon (2006) urged scientific scrutiny of religious beliefs as adaptive byproducts, drawing on to explain their persistence. These texts underscored Dennett's commitment to naturalistic explanations across domains.

Later Writings and Reflections

In Intuition Pumps and Other Tools for Thinking (2013), Dennett compiled seventy-seven thought experiments designed to enhance critical reasoning on topics including , , and , drawing from his decades of philosophical practice to distinguish effective "intuition pumps"—hypotheticals that illuminate rather than mislead—from "deepities," superficially profound but empty statements. The book emphasizes pragmatic tools for dissecting complex ideas, such as his earlier "" applied to AI and human cognition, while critiquing overly abstract philosophical methods lacking empirical grounding. Dennett's From Bacteria to Bach and Back: The Evolution of Minds () extended his evolutionary framework to explain the emergence of human cognition, arguing that arises through gradual, competence-without-comprehension processes in biological and , without invoking non-physical "magic" or as fundamental mysteries. He integrated insights from , , and computational models to trace how simple bacterial responses evolve into Bach-like cultural artifacts, reinforcing his rejection of in favor of spaces shaped by Darwinian selection and memes. The work counters romanticized views of mind by highlighting "user-illusions" in and , where apparent masks underlying algorithmic competences. His final book, I've Been Thinking (2023), served as a interweaving personal anecdotes with retrospective clarifications of his core ideas on intentional systems, , and , underscoring how evolutionary theory resolves puzzles in without supernatural intervention. Dennett reflected on thought experiments like his "" refinements and critiqued religious faith as a civilizational due to its insulation from , while advocating rational as essential for human progress. Published months before his death on April 19, 2024, it encapsulated his lifelong commitment to demystifying as a distributed, evolved phenomenon, urging readers to adopt similar habits of evidence-based .

References

  1. [1]
    [PDF] Curriculum Vitae DANIEL C. DENNETT PERSONAL:
    Apr 30, 2019 · DANIEL C. DENNETT. PERSONAL: Born, March 28, 1942. Married to Susan Bell Dennett; two children. EDUCATION: B.A., Harvard University, 1963. D ...
  2. [2]
    Remembering Daniel C. Dennett, University and Fletcher Professor ...
    Apr 19, 2024 · He published 21 books, such as Darwin's Dangerous Idea ... From the last decade alone, his awards included the Mind & Brain Prize ...
  3. [3]
    Daniel C. Dennett | Edge.org
    Daniel C. Dennett is the Austin B. Fletcher Professor of Philosophy, and Co-Director of the Center for Cognitive Studies at Tufts University.Missing: biography | Show results with:biography
  4. [4]
    Daniel C. Dennett (1942—2024) - Science
    Jun 20, 2024 · Born in Boston on 28 March 1942 to a diplomat and a professor, Dennett spent his childhood years in Beirut. He graduated with a BA in philosophy ...Missing: biography | Show results with:biography
  5. [5]
    Dennett, Daniel C. 1942- (Daniel Clement Dennett)
    Born March 28, 1942, in Boston, MA; son of Daniel Clement, Jr. (a historian and diplomat) and Ruth Marjorie (an editor and teacher) Dennett.Missing: family | Show results with:family
  6. [6]
    Daniel Dennett: Autobiography (Part 1) | Issue 68 - Philosophy Now
    In the first of a two-part mini-epic, Daniel C. Dennett contemplates a life of the mind – his own. Part 1: The pre-professional years.
  7. [7]
    Daniel Dennett, philosophical giant who championed “naturalism ...
    Apr 19, 2024 · Dennett spent his early childhood there until his father was killed in a plane crash while on a mission to Ethiopia. Dennett, his mother ...<|separator|>
  8. [8]
    Daniel Dennett's Science of the Soul | The New Yorker
    Mar 20, 2017 · Dennett's full name is Daniel Clement Dennett III. He was born in Boston in 1942. His father, Daniel C. Dennett, Jr., was a professor of ...
  9. [9]
    Daniel Dennett (1942-2024) - Daily Nous
    Apr 19, 2024 · He also held visiting positions at Oxford, Harvard, Pittsburgh, and other institutions during his time at Tufts University.
  10. [10]
    In memoriam: Daniel C. Dennett | Santa Fe Institute
    Apr 25, 2024 · At the time of his passing, Dennett held the position of External Professor at the Santa Fe Institute. He had recently left Santa Fe, having ...
  11. [11]
    Remembering Daniel C. Dennett, University and Fletcher Professor ...
    Apr 19, 2024 · He also served as director of the Tufts Center for Cognitive Studies since its inception in 1985 and co-founded the Curricula Software Studio in ...
  12. [12]
    In Memoriam: Daniel Dennett - CIFAR
    Apr 25, 2024 · Daniel Dennett is remembered as a world-renowned philosopher for his writings on consciousness and AI. Dennett was an Advisor in CIFAR's Brain, Mind & ...
  13. [13]
    The semantic engineer | Books | The Guardian
    Apr 17, 2004 · "I'm a Yankee optimist, that's right." Daniel Dennett. Born: March 28, 1942, Boston. Education: Philips Exeter Academy; Wesleyan University; ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  14. [14]
    The Mind's I: Fantasies And Reflections On Self & Soul - Amazon.com
    30-day returnsAn autobiographical essay, a love letter to the French language, a series of musings on life, loss, and death, a sweet bouquet of stirring poetry--but most of ...Missing: collaboration | Show results with:collaboration
  15. [15]
    The practical requirements for making a conscious robot - Journals
    A team at MIT, of which I am a part, is now embarking on a longterm project to design and build a humanoid robot, Cog, whose cognitive talents will include ...
  16. [16]
    The secret of consciousness, with Daniel C. Dennett
    Mar 12, 2014 · It was in Beirut that Dennett spent his early childhood, until his father's plane was shot down while on a mission in Ethiopia.Missing: influences | Show results with:influences
  17. [17]
    What is the intentional stance?
    Abstract: The intentional stance is the strategy of prediction and explanation that attributes beliefs, desires, and other "intentional".
  18. [18]
    [PDF] Who's On First? - Heterophenomenology Explained - ResearchGate
    Much ofthe problem seems to have been caused by some misdirection in my apologia for heterophenomenology (Dennett, 1982; 1991), advertised as an ... Dennett, ...
  19. [19]
    [PDF] Quining Qualia
    It comes from The Philosophical Lexicon (Dennett 1978c, 8th edn., 1987), a satirical dictionary of eponyms: "quine, v. To deny resolutely the existence or ...
  20. [20]
    Elbow Room: The Varieties of Free Will Worth Wanting
    In Elbow Room, Dennett argues that the varieties of free will worth wanting—those that underwrite moral and artistic responsibility—are not threatened by ...
  21. [21]
    Elbow Room - MIT Press
    Putting sociobiology in its rightful place, he concludes that we can have free will and science too. Elbow Room begins by showing how we can be "moved by ...
  22. [22]
    Elbow Room: The Varieties of Free Will Worth Wanting - Google Books
    In Elbow Room, Dennett shows how the classical formulations of the problem in philosophy depend on misuses of imagination.<|separator|>
  23. [23]
    Evolution Explains It All for You - The New York Times
    Mar 2, 2003 · In ''Freedom Evolves,'' he wants to show how evolution can get us ''all the way from senseless atoms to freely chosen actions.''
  24. [24]
    Summary of Freedom Evolves - EvPhil Blog - Evolutionary Philosophy
    Jun 26, 2021 · Summary of Freedom Evolves · p. 122 If you make yourself really small, you can externalize virtually everything. [See Footnote 6] · p. 122 ...
  25. [25]
    Freedom Evolves | Summary, Quotes, FAQ, Audio - SoBrief
    Rating 4.3 (178) Jan 24, 2025 · Freedom Evolves explores free will and determinism, arguing that free will can exist in a deterministic universe.
  26. [26]
    Elbow Room: The Varieties of Free Will Worth Wanting - PhilPapers
    Essays discuss reason, self-control, self-definition, time, cause and effect, accidents, and responsibility, and explain why people want free will.<|control11|><|separator|>
  27. [27]
    [PDF] Daniel Dennett's Compatibilism - The Information Philosopher
    Dennett gives six excellent reasons why this is the kind of free will that libertarians say they want. He says,. 1. “First...The intelligent selection, ...Missing: key | Show results with:key
  28. [28]
    [PDF] Compatibilism Evolves? On Some Varieties of Dennett Worth Wanting
    For example, when pressed on whether or not free will requires the ability to do otherwise in exactly the same circumstances, Compatibilist Dennett can emerge ...
  29. [29]
    [PDF] Review of Freedom Evolves by Daniel Dennett (2003) - PhilArchive
    Review of Freedom Evolves by Daniel Dennett (2003). Michael Starks. ABSTRACT ... Dennett says (p98) that his view is compatibilism, i.e., that free will ...
  30. [30]
    The Scope of Natural Selection - Boston Review
    Dennett's central claim, in his book, is that because natural selection doesn't care what material it works on—because it's “substrate neutral”—it can be lifted ...
  31. [31]
    Darwin's Dangerous Idea by Daniel Dennett - Nat Eliason
    Feb 7, 2020 · Darwin's dangerous idea is that Design can emerge from mere Order via an algorithmic process that makes no use of pre-existing Mind.
  32. [32]
    Daniel Dennett's View of Adaptationism - Sandwalk
    Feb 18, 2011 · Adaptationist reasoning is not optional, it is the heart and soul of evolutionary biology. Although it may be supplemented, and its flaws repaired.
  33. [33]
    Dennett's Strange Idea - Boston Review
    The bad guys in Dennett's book are those intellectual reactionaries who have convinced others that Darwinism can be safely bottled up within biology. Panicked ...
  34. [34]
    'Darwinian Fundamentalism': An Exchange | Stephen Jay Gould ...
    Aug 14, 1997 · Dennett devoted the longest chapter of his recent book, Darwin's Dangerous Idea, to what I described as “an excoriating caricature of my ideas.
  35. [35]
    Dennett's Response to Gould's NYRB pieces - Sundeep Dougal
    I do not espouse the preposterous views Gould attributes to this mythic creed. Gould labors to create a caricature of the "strict" adaptationist, a type ...
  36. [36]
    How to Live a Happy Life, From a Leading Atheist
    Aug 27, 2023 · For Dennett, an éminence grise of American philosophy who is nonetheless perhaps best known as one of the “four horsemen” of modern atheism ...
  37. [37]
    Leading Atheist Philosopher Daniel Dennett (1942–2024)
    Daniel Dennett, who died recently at the age of eighty-two, used such analytic rigor to argue that naturalism is true and supernaturalism is false.
  38. [38]
    Daniel Dennett obituary: 'New atheism' philosopher who sparked ...
    May 17, 2024 · Cognitive scientist who boldly explored free will, the human mind and AI, and rejected the existence of God.
  39. [39]
    Our Brains, Our Selves: Daniel Dennett | Tufts Now
    Sep 2, 2020 · He's also been a professor of philosophy at Tufts since 1971, a University Professor since 2000, and longtime co-director of the university's ...Missing: positions institutions
  40. [40]
    Dan Dennett and the New Atheism - The Philosophers' Magazine
    Julian Baggini interviews Daniel Dennett, the least apocalyptic of new atheism's "four horseman". (First published March 2010).
  41. [41]
    Daniel Dennett and Jesus Christ - Theos Think Tank
    Jul 4, 2013 · Nick Spencer interviewed the American philosopher and prominent atheist Professor Daniel Dennett for Third Way magazine last month.<|separator|>
  42. [42]
    Morality: The Final Delusion? | Issue 82 - Philosophy Now
    Dennett says that racism is “a great moral evil” (BTS, p.203) and that he feels “a moral imperative to spread the word of evolution” (BTS, p.268). Dawkins, ...<|separator|>
  43. [43]
    EVOLUTIONARY ETHICS - ScienceDirect.com
    Daniel Dennett emphasizes that ethics must somehow be based on an appreciation of human nature—on a sense of what human nature is or might be like and what a ...
  44. [44]
    The Intentional Stance - MIT Press
    Daniel Dennett in this first full-scale presentation of a theory of intentionality that he has been developing for almost twenty years.
  45. [45]
    [PDF] The AI-Stance: Crossing the Terra Incognita of Human-Machine ...
    Dennett suggests that the intentional stance can be appropriate to computers (e.g., chess-playing computers) because this stance equips us with successful ...
  46. [46]
    [PDF] dennett.intentional.systems.1971.pdf - CSULB
    adopt the Intentional stance toward the computer, and accept its checkmates. One can switch stances at will without involving one- self in any ...
  47. [47]
    The Problem With Counterfeit People - The Atlantic
    May 16, 2023 · Companies using AI to generate fake people are committing an immoral act of vandalism, and should be held liable. By Daniel C. Dennett.
  48. [48]
    Memes 101: How Cultural Evolution Works - Big Think
    Feb 17, 2017 · Dennett explains how these behaviors are the product of our cultural evolution. Memes are cultural replicators that spread like viruses, and ...
  49. [49]
    Daniel C. Dennett, Memes and the exploitation of imagination
    Dennett, Daniel C. (1990). Memes and the exploitation of imagination. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 48 (2):127-135.
  50. [50]
    [PDF] DANIEL DENNETT, MEMES AND RELIGION Reasons for the ...
    Dennett again explained his ideas on memes and the theory of memes, by applying it to the study of reli- gion from the perspective of evolutionary biology. His ...
  51. [51]
    [PDF] Real Patterns Daniel C. Dennett The Journal of Philosophy, Vol. 88 ...
    Aug 28, 2007 · The pessimistic assessment is that more needs to be said to convince philosophers that a mild and intermediate sort of realism is a positively ...
  52. [52]
    'As real as it ever gets': Dennett's conception of the mind | Aeon Essays
    Dec 13, 2024 · Dennett was important because his work signalled a sea change in the concerns and methods employed by philosophers of mind.
  53. [53]
    Daniel C. Dennett, Postmodernism and Truth - PhilPapers
    Abstract. The relativism spawned by postmodern ideals has had devastating practical consequences in numerous areas of the world.
  54. [54]
    Dennett on Politics, Philosophy, and Post-Modernism - Daily Nous
    Feb 13, 2017 · I think what the postmodernists did was truly evil. They are responsible for the intellectual fad that made it respectable to be cynical about ...
  55. [55]
    Daniel Dennett on the postmodernists | Stephen Hicks, Ph.D.
    Jan 24, 2018 · I think what the postmodernists did was truly evil. They are responsible for the intellectual fad that made it respectable to be cynical about truth and facts.Missing: critiques | Show results with:critiques
  56. [56]
    'The Mystery of Consciousness': An Exchange | Daniel C. Dennett ...
    Dec 21, 1995 · John Searle replies: · Dennett denies the existence of consciousness. · He is mistaken in thinking that the issue about the existence of ...
  57. [57]
    Moving Forward on the Problem of Consciousness - David Chalmers
    Thus Dennett imagines a vitalist arguing about the hard problem of "life", or a neuroscientist arguing about the hard problem of "perception". Similarly ...
  58. [58]
    The Consciousness Deniers | Galen Strawson
    Mar 13, 2018 · The Consciousness Deniers. Galen Strawson. One of the strangest things the Deniers say is that although it seems that there is conscious ...Missing: critique | Show results with:critique
  59. [59]
    Is Consciousness an Illusion? | Thomas Nagel
    Mar 9, 2017 · Dennett identifies two unsolved problems along this path: the origin of life at its beginning and the origin of human culture much more recently ...
  60. [60]
    [PDF] A Review of Freedom Evolves by Daniel Dennett (2003 ... - PhilArchive
    ``People say again and again that philosophy doesn´t really progress, that we are still occupied with the same philosophical problems as were the Greeks.<|separator|>
  61. [61]
    Reflections on FREE WILL - Sam Harris
    Jan 26, 2014 · This concern for varieties of indeterminism is misplaced, argue the compatibilists: free will is a phenomenon that requires neither determinism ...Missing: key | Show results with:key
  62. [62]
    Free Will - Galen Strawson - The Information Philosopher
    The conviction that fully explicit self-conscious awareness of one's situation can be a sufficient foundation of strong free will is extremely powerful.
  63. [63]
    Facing up to the hard question of consciousness - Journals
    Jul 30, 2018 · The hard question is not the hard problem. David Chalmers ('Facing up to the hard problem of consciousness' [1]) focused the attention of people ...Abstract · The hard question is not the... · Why the hard question is...
  64. [64]
    What are Dennett's criticisms of 'punctuated equilibrium'? - Quora
    May 28, 2021 · In criticizing phyletic gradualists, Gould presumes that all gradualists hold that evolution occurs at a constant rate (dubbed “constant ...<|separator|>
  65. [65]
    [PDF] Dr. Pang loss knows best :~ theori~s" - Tufts University
    my defense of adaptationism closes with a warning to the adaptationist (and indirectly to the ethologist): The trade- off I propose to biologists is "not a ...
  66. [66]
    Are They Compatible? (Point/Counterpoint) by Dennett, Daniel C ...
    Dennett vigorously rejects this argument, provoking a reply from Plantinga, another response from Dennett, and final statements from both sides. As philosophers ...
  67. [67]
    Science and Religion: Are They Compatible? - PhilPapers
    Dennett vigorously rejects this argument, provoking a reply from Plantinga, another response from Dennett, and final statements from both sides. As ...
  68. [68]
    'Breaking the Spell' | Freeman Dyson, Daniel C. Dennett, Nicholas ...
    Aug 10, 2006 · To the Editors: Freeman Dyson imposes a curious meaning on the word "prejudice" in his review of my book Breaking the Spell .
  69. [69]
    Responses to the Review of 'Breaking the Spell' - The New York Times
    Mar 5, 2006 · In this week's Book Review, philosopher Daniel Dennett writes to protest Leon Wieseltier's strongly critical review of his book "Breaking the ...
  70. [70]
    Cui Bono? A Review of Breaking the Spell: Religion as a Natural ...
    Dennett wants to engage religious readers in these arguments. He believes that you can accept an evolutionary framework and still be religious. But he also ...
  71. [71]
    Realism, Instrumentalism, and the Intentional Stance* - Bechtel - 1985
    One of Dennett's principal arguments for an instrumentalistic construal of intentional attributions (e.g., attributions of belief, etc.)
  72. [72]
    Putnam and Dennett on Instrumentalism and the Intentional Stance ...
    Oct 12, 2023 · The present paper considers criticism brought against Dennett's work on grounds of a form of instrumentalism in the intentional stance.
  73. [73]
    Instrumentalism, semantics and the intentional stance - Academia.edu
    The claim that Daniel Dennett's philosophy of mind amounts to an anti-realist instrumentalism regarding mental states and processes is a recurrent criticism ...
  74. [74]
    Dennett's instrumentalism - Cambridge University Press & Assessment
    Abstract: The intentional stance is the strategy of prediction and explanation that attributes beliefs, desires, and other "intentional".<|separator|>
  75. [75]
    A Reductionist Theory of Consciousness - SpringerLink
    Daniel Dennett is a self-declared materialist and reductionist. My intention in this chapter and the next is to offer a summary and critique of his views.<|separator|>
  76. [76]
    Daniel Dennett's Philosophy: Consciousness and Evolution
    Apr 24, 2024 · His ideas challenged conventional thinking about consciousness, free will, and the nature of reality, leaving a profound impact on both academic ...
  77. [77]
    Eliminative Materialism - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
    May 8, 2003 · For example, Daniel Dennett (1978) has argued that our concept of pain is fundamentally flawed because it includes essential properties, like ...
  78. [78]
    Phenomenology in Absentia: Dennett's Philosophy of Mind.
    Daniel Dennett's philosophical abolition of mind is examined with reference to its methodology, intent, philosophic origins, and internal consistency.
  79. [79]
    Tufts University Professor Daniel Dennett selected as 2009 Fellow ...
    Dec 17, 2009 · Daniel Dennett of Tufts University's School of Arts and Sciences has been selected as an AAAS Fellow for transformational contributions to ...
  80. [80]
    Daniel Dennett - Stichting Praemium Erasmianum
    Dennett received the Erasmus Prize within the framework of the theme 'The cultural significance of the natural sciences'. Daniel Dennett addresses the most ...
  81. [81]
    ‪Daniel C. Dennett‬ - ‪Google Scholar‬
    Co-Director, Center for Cognitive Studies, Professor, Philosophy Dept, Tufts University. Verified email at tufts.edu - Homepage<|separator|>
  82. [82]
    Daniel DENNETT | Center for Cognitive Studies | Research profile
    Daniel Dennett, Philosophy and sailing go together beautifully in my experience. First, and most important to me, philosophers' mistakes hardly matter.
  83. [83]
    In Memoriam: Daniel Dennett - American Philosophical Association
    Apr 19, 2024 · Dennett served as president of the Eastern Division in 2000–2001. He was professor emeritus of philosophy at Tufts University, where he had been ...Missing: positions | Show results with:positions
  84. [84]
    Humanists UK mourns Daniel Dennett, 1942-2024
    Apr 23, 2024 · Humanists UK is saddened to learn of the death of Daniel Dennett, a towering figure in the field of philosophy and a celebrated advocate for humanist values.
  85. [85]
    David Chalmers: A Philosophical Eulogy for Daniel Dennett - YouTube
    Jul 25, 2024 · Remarks by David Chalmers in a memorial session for Daniel Dennett ... 2024. Filmed by Van Royko and Marie-Philippe Gilbert for EyeSteelFilm.
  86. [86]
    The Sign of a Great Mentor: An Appreciation of Daniel Dennett
    May 14, 2024 · First years entering Tufts could take a philosophy class with him, and he would try to explain philosophy from the very beginning in the very ...<|separator|>
  87. [87]
    Daniel C. Dennett (1942-2024) | Issue 162 - Philosophy Now
    His father, who earned a PhD in Islamic studies from Harvard University, was based there as an American intelligence agent during Dennett's early childhood, ...
  88. [88]
    Exploring consciousness: Daniel Dennett's legacy | Donders Wonders
    May 27, 2024 · Let's explore the insights of Daniel Dennett on this intriguing subject and reflect on some ideas that shaped our study of the mind until today. Multiple Drafts ...
  89. [89]
    Daniel Dennett, 1942-2024 - Marcus on AI - Substack
    Apr 19, 2024 · Dan was a deep thinker about what it is to be human. Quite early on, he arrived at what many would see as shocking conclusions about consciousness.Missing: background | Show results with:background
  90. [90]
    The Lasting Impact Of Daniel Dennett In Philosophy And Leadership
    Jul 25, 2025 · He called Dennett his “major philosophical influence.” Clark continues, “He was the first philosopher's voice that I had some affinity with.
  91. [91]
    Daniel C. Dennett: Tribute to a Philosophical Giant | Psychology Today
    Apr 21, 2024 · Daniel C. Dennett passed away this week. He was one of the first contemporary philosophers to take naturalism really seriously.
  92. [92]
    The Philosophical Atheist: Daniel Dennett's Legacy - LinkedIn
    May 8, 2024 · Born in Boston, Massachusetts in 1942, Dennett's early life was shaped by his father's work as a counter-intelligence agent during World War II.
  93. [93]
    Daniel C. Dennett | Penguin Random House
    His first book, Content and Consciousness, published in 1969, followed by Brainstorms (1978), Elbow Room (1984), The Intentional Stance (1987), Consciousness ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  94. [94]
    Daniel Dennett: The Best 5 Books to Read - Philosophy Break
    from philosophy of mind ...
  95. [95]
    Brainstorms: Philosophical Essays on Mind and Psycholog…
    Rating 4.0 (649) This collection of 17 essays by the author offers a comprehensive theory of mind, encompassing traditional issues of consciousness and free will.
  96. [96]
    Intuition Pumps And Other Tools for Thinking - Amazon.com
    A collection of 77 thought experiments by Daniel C. Dennett, aimed at helping readers think more clearly about complex subjects such as evolution, meaning, mind ...
  97. [97]
    Intuition Pumps and Other Tools for Thinking - Daniel C. Dennett
    May 5, 2014 · Intuition Pumps and Other Tools for Thinking offers seventy-seven of Dennett's most successful imagination-extenders and focus-holders.
  98. [98]
    From Bacteria to Bach and Back: The Evolution of Minds - Goodreads
    Rating 3.8 (3,676) Feb 7, 2017 · In From Bacteria to Bach and Back, Daniel C. Dennett builds on recent discoveries from biology and computer science to show, step by step ...
  99. [99]
    From bacteria to Bach and back : the evolution of minds
    Nov 7, 2022 · Dennett, D. C. (Daniel Clement), author. Publication date: 2017. Topics: Consciousness. Publisher: New York : W.W. Norton & Company. Collection ...<|separator|>
  100. [100]
    I've Been Thinking by Daniel C. Dennett | Goodreads
    Rating 3.7 (481) Oct 3, 2023 · What distinguishes human minds from the minds of animals? Dennett's answers have profoundly shaped our age of philosophical thought. In I've ...Missing: summary | Show results with:summary
  101. [101]
    I've Been Thinking by Daniel C Dennett review - The Guardian
    Oct 1, 2023 · Dennett draws the moral: “Right there, I submit, lies one of the greatest dangers to civilisation… religious faith gives people a gold-plated ...
  102. [102]
    I've Been Thinking by Daniel C. Dennett | Book review | The TLS
    Oct 20, 2023 · Daniel Dennett died on April 19, 2024. Early in his memoir Daniel Dennett tells us he's been lucky. Lucky to have survived two serious ...