Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Bank fee

A bank fee is a charge imposed by financial institutions on customers for account maintenance, transaction processing, or specific services such as overdrafts or ATM usage.^[1]^[2] Common types include monthly maintenance fees to cover operational costs, out-of-network ATM fees for accessing non-affiliated machines, overdraft fees when banks advance funds beyond available balances, and non-sufficient funds (NSF) fees for declined transactions due to insufficient balances.^[1]^[2] These fees have historically supplemented interest income, with banks relying on them since early U.S. banking practices to offset low-margin deposit services and manage risks like unprofitable accounts.^[3] Bank fees generate substantial revenue, comprising one-third to two-fifths of operating income for major U.S. bank holding companies through payment-related charges, with consumers collectively paying approximately $82 billion annually across payments and fees.^[4]^[5] Empirical analyses indicate that fee incidence correlates with demographic factors, including lower income and certain racial groups facing higher probabilities of incurring account and credit card fees, though banks maintain these charges enable broad access to convenient, insured deposit services that would otherwise be unsustainable.^[6]^[7] Overdraft and NSF fees, often around $35 per occurrence, have drawn scrutiny for exacerbating financial vulnerability among overdrafters, prompting regulatory actions like the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau's (CFPB) efforts to cap or disclose such charges more transparently, though some rules faced repeal by Congress amid arguments that they overlook banks' risk coverage in extending credit.^[1]^[8]^[9] Fees evolved with technological advances in transaction processing, rising through the 2010s before modest declines in overdraft averages post-2021, reflecting a balance between consumer protection mandates and banks' need to price services covering fraud prevention and liquidity provision.^[10]^[3]

Definition and Classification

Core Definition and Purpose

A bank fee, often termed a service charge, constitutes a monetary levy imposed by depository institutions on customers for rendering specific financial services, processing transactions, or managing account-related risks. These charges encompass monthly maintenance fees for sustaining checking or savings accounts, transaction fees for activities like wire transfers or automated teller machine (ATM) withdrawals, and penalty fees such as those for overdrafts or non-sufficient funds (NSF) events. The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) affirms that financial institutions may assess monthly service charges to offset the operational demands of account provision, including record-keeping and regulatory compliance.^[11] Overdraft fees specifically arise when a bank authorizes a payment exceeding available balances, treating it as an implicit short-term loan to the customer.^[12]^[13] The fundamental purpose of bank fees lies in cost recovery and risk pricing, ensuring that the expenses of service delivery—ranging from transaction processing infrastructure to liquidity provision—are borne by end-users rather than subsidized through broader interest margins. Banks face fixed costs for account maintenance and variable costs for transaction handling, which fees directly allocate to offset, particularly for low-volume or unprofitable accounts.^[14] This structure diversifies revenue beyond traditional lending spreads, enabling institutions to maintain profitability amid fluctuating interest rates and to extend more favorable deposit terms to customers.^[15] Penalty-oriented fees, such as NSF or overdraft charges, further incentivize fiscal discipline by penalizing actions that elevate the bank's exposure to losses or credit extension without collateral.^[1] Economically, bank fees enhance institutional stability by generating non-interest income less correlated with credit cycles, allowing greater leverage in fee-based operations compared to loan portfolios vulnerable to defaults.^[16] In aggregate, U.S. consumers paid approximately $82 billion in payments and bank fees in recent years, underscoring their role in underpinning the operational economics of the sector.^[5] This fee mechanism reflects causal principles of pricing: services entailing higher processing burdens or risks command commensurate charges to prevent free-riding and sustain service availability.

Primary Types of Bank Fees

Monthly maintenance fees, also known as service fees, are recurring charges levied by banks to cover the costs of account administration, typically ranging from $5 to $25 per month.^[17] These fees often apply to checking or savings accounts and can be waived if the account holder maintains a minimum balance, such as $1,500, or sets up qualifying direct deposits. Failure to meet waiver conditions results in the fee being deducted directly from the account balance.^[19] Overdraft fees occur when a bank honors a transaction that exceeds available funds, effectively extending short-term credit, with charges averaging around $35 per occurrence as of recent data.^[1] These fees can accumulate rapidly if multiple transactions overdraw the account in a single day, and banks may charge them even for declined transactions in some cases, though regulatory scrutiny has targeted such practices.^[20] Non-sufficient funds (NSF) fees, by contrast, apply to rejected transactions due to insufficient balance, without extending credit, and similarly average $35, distinguishing them from overdrafts by the absence of authorized payment.^[1]^[21] ATM fees encompass charges for using automated teller machines, including out-of-network surcharges from the operator (often $2–$3) plus the account holder's bank's fee (typically $2–$5).^[22] In-network ATMs generally incur no fees, but foreign or non-participating machines trigger both, potentially totaling $5 or more per withdrawal.^[22] Banks may also impose fees for excessive withdrawals beyond a monthly allowance. Wire transfer fees cover the processing of domestic or international electronic funds transfers, with incoming wires often costing $10–$15 and outgoing $20–$50, reflecting the higher operational costs and risks involved.^[23] Foreign transaction fees, typically 1–3% of the amount, apply to debit or credit card purchases in non-local currencies, compensating for exchange rate handling and cross-border processing.^[23] Other notable types include minimum balance fees, which penalize falling below required thresholds (overlapping with maintenance waivers), and early account closure fees, charged if an account is closed within 90–180 days of opening to discourage short-term use.^[22] These structures incentivize stable, higher-balance accounts while generating revenue from transactional or inactive ones.^[23]

Economic Foundations

Rationale for Fee Structures

Bank fee structures primarily serve to recover the direct and indirect costs of providing deposit and payment services, which include account administration, transaction clearing, and infrastructure maintenance. In the United States, checking accounts often generate limited interest revenue due to regulatory caps on deposit rates and the prevalence of non-interest-bearing demand deposits, necessitating fees to offset expenses such as customer verification, fraud monitoring, and compliance with anti-money laundering requirements; these fixed costs can amount to $5–$25 per account monthly on average.^[24] Transaction-specific fees, such as those for automated teller machine withdrawals or wire transfers, allocate marginal processing costs—including network fees, data encryption, and real-time settlement—to the users generating them, ensuring cost-based pricing in line with economic efficiency principles.^[25] A key component involves risk pricing, particularly for services like overdraft protection, where fees compensate for the extension of short-term, unsecured credit amid uncertain repayment. Overdraft fees, averaging $26–$35 per incident in recent years, cover not only administrative recovery efforts but also the opportunity cost of capital and default risks, with banks absorbing losses on approximately 10–20% of overdrawn transactions that go unrecovered.^[26] Economic examinations of overdraft programs reveal that fee revenues, peaking at $37 billion in 2009 before stabilizing around $35 billion by 2010, do not indicate excess profits but rather reflect competitive equilibrium pricing for liquidity services that prevent transaction failures.^[27] Without such structures, banks would face uncompensated exposures, potentially leading to higher overall deposit costs or restricted access for higher-risk customers. Fee designs also incorporate behavioral incentives to mitigate adverse selection and moral hazard, discouraging patterns like chronic low balances or impulsive spending that elevate bank liabilities. High overdraft penalties leverage loss aversion, a documented cognitive bias, to reduce incidence rates; following the 2010 Federal Reserve Regulation E opt-in mandate for debit card overdrafts, participation dropped significantly, correlating with a 26% decline in fee events and lower aggregate losses for institutions.^[28] Minimum balance requirements tied to waived fees similarly promote stable funding sources, aligning customer actions with banks' liquidity needs and reducing the cross-subsidization burden on interest-bearing depositors. This incentive framework supports long-term account viability, as evidenced by lower churn rates among fee-avoidant users who maintain buffers against volatility.^[29]

Incentives and Behavioral Economics

Bank fee structures create incentives for financial institutions to maximize revenue from services that exploit predictable patterns in customer decision-making, as identified in behavioral economics research. Overdraft fees, for instance, generate significant income—estimated at $11 billion annually in the U.S. prior to recent reforms—because banks can process transactions in sequences that maximize overdraft occurrences, such as debiting larger items first, thereby triggering more fees per event.^[30] This practice aligns with banks' profit motives, as fee income from overdrafts and non-sufficient funds often exceeds costs of processing, incentivizing institutions to maintain opt-in defaults for overdraft coverage despite customer opt-out options.^[31] From a behavioral economics perspective, customers frequently underestimate the likelihood and magnitude of fees due to cognitive biases like present bias and limited attention, leading to repeated overdrafts even among those with access to balance alerts. Empirical analysis of U.S. consumer data reveals that lower-income households pay a disproportionate share of these fees; for example, individuals earning under $25,000 annually are 2.5 times more likely to incur overdraft charges than those earning over $100,000, reflecting regressive impacts where fees consume a larger portion of disposable income.^[6] Similarly, studies show that consumers exhibit status quo bias, rarely switching accounts or opting out of fee-prone programs despite alternatives, as the perceived effort outweighs potential savings.^[32] These dynamics highlight a tension between rational pricing incentives and behavioral realities: while fees theoretically signal costs to encourage prudent behavior, such as maintaining buffers against overdrafts, evidence indicates they often function as penalties on errors amplified by optimism bias, where users overestimate their ability to monitor balances. Research using transaction-level data confirms that fee exposure correlates with higher subsequent spending rather than deterrence, suggesting weak learning effects and reinforcing banks' incentives to sustain such structures.^[33] Countervailing measures, like automated alerts or AI-driven interventions, have shown promise in mitigating these biases by prompting real-time adjustments, though adoption remains limited by institutional priorities favoring fee revenue.^[34]

Historical Evolution

Origins in Traditional Banking

In medieval Europe, particularly in Italian city-states like Florence and Venice during the 14th and 15th centuries, early banks charged commissions and brokerage fees for handling bills of exchange, foreign currency transactions, and safe custody of valuables, compensating for operational risks and labor without violating usury prohibitions on interest.^[35] The Medici Bank, operating from 1397 to 1494, exemplifies this practice, levying explicit charges on exchange dealings—often 1-2% commissions plus brokerage and consular fees—to cover costs of international transfers and mitigate default risks in a fragmented payment system reliant on merchant networks.^[35] These fees represented a causal necessity: banks incurred expenses for record-keeping on ledgers, verification of endorsements, and enforcement via papal or consular authorities, directly tying revenue to service provision amid high illiteracy and fraud prevalence.^[35] By the 18th and 19th centuries, as commercial banking expanded in Europe and the United States with the rise of deposit accounts and negotiable instruments, transaction fees standardized to address growing volumes of checks and drafts, shifting from ad-hoc commissions to routine service charges for clearing, ledger maintenance, and interbank exchanges.^[36] In Britain, by 1873, checking accounts dominated payments, with banks imposing fees for processing usance bills—typically payable after 2-3 months—to recover costs of manual reconciliation and specie transport under the gold standard.^[37] U.S. banks, following the National Banking Act of 1863, similarly charged for out-of-town check collections and account ledgers, as non-interest-bearing demand deposits required explicit pricing to offset clerical labor and vault security, with exchange fees often reaching 1-2% on interstate transactions amid decentralized state-chartered systems.^[38] These traditional fees embodied economic realism: banks, as intermediaries holding low-yield or zero-interest deposits, faced asymmetric costs from asymmetric information and verification needs, prompting charges calibrated to transaction complexity rather than volume alone, a structure empirically sustained by clearinghouse data showing fees as primary non-lending revenue before regulatory interest caps eroded margins.^[37] Empirical records from the era, such as Boston Clearinghouse procedures post-1850s, confirm uniform fee schedules for check certification and settlement, preventing free-riding on shared infrastructure while aligning incentives for prudent account management.^[39] Absent such fees, operational insolvency would have prevailed, as evidenced by recurrent 19th-century panics where underpriced services amplified liquidity mismatches.^[40]

Expansion in the Digital and Regulatory Age

The digitization of banking in the 1990s automated transaction processing and balance monitoring, enabling the rapid expansion of overdraft protection programs as a fee-based service offered to account holders for covering insufficient funds.^[41]^[42] These programs, previously manual and limited, became scalable through electronic systems, with banks charging per-item fees that peaked at $11.7 billion in combined overdraft and nonsufficient funds (NSF) revenue across U.S. institutions in 2019.^[41] Post-2008 financial crisis regulations introduced constraints on such practices while imposing new compliance burdens. The Federal Reserve's 2009 amendment to Regulation E mandated affirmative customer opt-in for overdraft fees on ATM and one-time debit card transactions, reducing automatic fee generation and contributing to a subsequent decline in overdraft revenue through 2023.^[43]^[9] The Dodd-Frank Act of 2010, via the creation of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, further targeted opaque fees—such as those in remittances—while doubling regulatory requirements and elevating banks' annual noninterest expenses by over $50 billion to cover compliance.^[44]^[45] In response, banks shifted toward diversified noninterest income streams, including fees for digital-era services like wire transfers, account maintenance, and enhanced online features, amid persistently low interest rates that compressed net interest margins.^[46] Noninterest income, encompassing service charges and fees, grew to comprise 34% of total U.S. bank operating revenue by early 2018 and 39.8% of total income by 2021, reflecting adaptation to regulatory costs and digital transaction volumes.^[46]^[47] By 2024, U.S. consumers paid approximately $82 billion annually in payments and bank fees, underscoring the resilience of fee models in a digital landscape that amplified transaction frequency and automated collection efficiency, even as regulations prompted structural innovations to sustain revenue.^[5]

Regulatory Landscape

Key U.S. Regulations and Reforms

The Truth in Savings Act of 1991, implemented through Regulation DD, mandates that depository institutions disclose key terms of deposit accounts, including all fees such as maintenance, activity, and service charges, to facilitate consumer comparisons and informed decisions.^[48] Institutions must provide these disclosures at account opening, in periodic statements, and in advertisements, specifying minimum balance requirements, interest calculation methods, and any conditions triggering fees, with penalties for inaccurate or misleading information up to $500 per violation.^[49] This regulation applies to checking, savings, and similar accounts but exempts time deposits and certain business accounts.^[50] Under the Electronic Fund Transfer Act of 1978, as amended and codified in Regulation E, financial institutions must obtain affirmative consumer consent—known as an opt-in—before charging overdraft fees for automated teller machine (ATM) withdrawals or one-time debit card transactions that exceed available funds.^[51] This 2010 rule change, effective July 1, 2010, prohibits default overdraft coverage for these transactions to prevent unexpected fees, though it does not apply to check or ACH transactions, nor to non-sufficient funds (NSF) fees for declined transactions.^[52] Institutions must clearly disclose opt-in rights, fee amounts, and reversal options in notices, with ongoing requirements to track consents accurately amid CFPB scrutiny for compliance lapses. Recent reforms targeted overdraft and NSF practices deemed excessive by the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB), established under the 2010 Dodd-Frank Act. In October 2023, the CFPB proposed classifying overdraft services at large banks as credit products subject to lending rules, including APR disclosures, to address an estimated $8 billion in annual fees.^[53] A December 2024 final rule extended this to institutions with over $10 billion in assets, allowing fees capped at $5 or tied to actual costs or benchmarks, projecting $5 billion in consumer savings.^[26] However, Congress repealed the rule in May 2025 via the Congressional Review Act under the incoming Trump administration, citing overreach and potential revenue losses for banks serving unbanked populations.^[54] Similar proposals for NSF fees, which lack federal caps and can reach $35 per declined transaction, advanced scrutiny under Section 5 of the Federal Trade Commission Act for unfair practices but faced industry challenges emphasizing fees' role in covering fraud and operational risks.^[55] These efforts reflect ongoing tensions between consumer protection and banking viability, with FDIC and OCC issuing parallel guidance against deceptive multi-fee layering.^[56]

Global Variations and Harmonization Efforts

Bank fees exhibit significant variations across jurisdictions, primarily driven by differing regulatory frameworks, market structures, and consumer protection priorities. In the United States, overdraft fees averaged around $35 per transaction as of 2023, with banks permitted to charge them on opt-in debit and ATM transactions under the Electronic Fund Transfer Act, though recent Consumer Financial Protection Bureau guidance in September 2024 emphasized prohibiting fees exceeding actual costs for certain services.^[57] In contrast, European Union member states generally impose stricter limits; for instance, the Payment Services Directive (PSD2) and national laws cap overdraft interest rates and require pre-transaction warnings, reducing reliance on flat fees and emphasizing cost transparency.^[58] Australia, following the 2017-2019 Royal Commission into Misconduct in the Banking Sector, saw major banks eliminate or refund billions in improper fees, including advice charges to deceased clients totaling over $10.9 million by AMP in 2022, with total domestic bank fees declining 4 percent to June 2023.^[59]^[60] ATM and non-sufficient funds (NSF) fees also diverge regionally. United Kingdom regulations, reformed by the Financial Conduct Authority in April 2020, replaced tiered overdraft charges with a single annual interest rate equivalent, eliminating additional fees and imposing monthly caps of £20-£30 on unarranged overdrafts to protect vulnerable customers.^[61] In the EU, ATM surcharges for domestic transactions are often prohibited or limited under the Interchange Fees Regulation, while foreign fees can reach 1-3 percent plus fixed amounts, varying by bank networks.^[62] Developing regions like parts of Africa and South America face higher effective fees for basic services due to limited competition and infrastructure, with cross-border wire transfer costs sometimes exceeding 5 percent amid fewer correspondent banking ties.^[63] Interchange fees on card transactions highlight further disparities: the EU caps credit card interchange at 0.3 percent and debit at 0.2 percent since 2015, aiming to curb merchant costs passed to consumers, whereas U.S. averages reached 1.73 percent for credit cards in 2022, reflecting less federal intervention until potential reforms.^[64] Remittance fees, tracked globally by the World Bank, averaged 6.2 percent for a $200 transfer in Q2 2024, with corridors like Australia-to-Pacific islands exceeding 10 percent due to regulatory and operational hurdles.^[65] Harmonization efforts remain fragmented, focusing indirectly on payment systems rather than uniform fee caps, as banking supervision falls under national sovereignty. The G20 Roadmap for Enhancing Cross-border Payments, endorsed in 2020 and targeting 2027 implementation, seeks to reduce costs, enhance transparency, and lower remittance fees below 3 percent by improving interoperability and data standards, with progress monitored by the Financial Stability Board.^[66] Adoption of ISO 20022 messaging standards by major systems, including the U.S. Fedwire in July 2025, promotes richer data exchange to streamline cross-border transactions and potentially compress intermediary fees, though full global uptake lags.^[67] Initiatives like Nexus Global Payments, launched in April 2025 by five central banks, aim for standardized real-time linkages, but direct fee standardization encounters resistance over competitive and regulatory differences.^[68] No binding international treaty governs consumer bank fees, with variations persisting despite bilateral trade pacts occasionally addressing financial service costs.^[69]

Controversies and Debates

Criticisms of Predatory Practices

Critics argue that overdraft and non-sufficient funds (NSF) fees exemplify predatory practices by imposing disproportionately high charges on vulnerable consumers for transactions that banks authorize despite insufficient balances, effectively functioning as high-interest loans without adequate disclosure or proportionality to the underlying risk. In 2019, U.S. bank and credit union customers paid an estimated $15 billion in such fees, with typical charges of around $35 per incident often exceeding the value of the overdrawn transaction itself. Consumer advocates, including the National Consumer Law Center, have described these fees as one of the most abusive forms of lending, as banks historically authorized debit card swipes knowing accounts lacked funds, then levied penalties that compounded financial distress for low-income households.^[70]^[71]^[71] Empirical data underscores the regressive impact, with nearly 80% of combined overdraft and NSF fees borne by fewer than 9% of account holders who incurred more than 10 such fees annually, predominantly affecting those with lower balances and incomes. A Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) analysis revealed that 81% of households frequently charged these fees had incomes below the national median, amplifying cycles of debt through repeated penalties that can lead to account closures and barriers to future banking access. Critics further contend that practices like posting larger debits before smaller ones—known as "high-to-low" ordering—maximized fee generation, a method phased out in many institutions following regulatory scrutiny but emblematic of profit-driven manipulation over consumer protection.^[72]^[21]^[73] Legal challenges have highlighted these issues, with class-action lawsuits against financial institutions alleging deceptive overdraft authorization and fee assessment, resulting in settlements and regulatory fines. For instance, the CFPB's ongoing enforcement has targeted institutions for failing to obtain proper opt-in consent under the 2010 Regulation E amendments, viewing non-compliance as evidence of systemic exploitation rather than mere oversight. Despite voluntary reductions by some banks—bringing 2023 overdraft/NSF revenues to $5.8 billion, down over 50% from pre-pandemic peaks—opponents maintain that remaining fees remain unearned "junk" charges, prompting rules like the CFPB's December 2024 proposal to cap them at levels tied to actual costs, potentially saving consumers up to $5 billion annually.^[55]^[8]^[74]

Counterarguments and Empirical Rebuttals

Proponents of bank fee structures argue that characterizations of fees such as overdrafts and non-sufficient funds (NSF) charges as predatory overlook their role in providing short-term liquidity to consumers lacking access to traditional credit, often at lower effective costs than alternatives like payday loans or merchant penalties for bounced checks.^[75] Empirical analysis indicates that allowing banks to charge market-determined overdraft fees expands credit availability; for instance, national banks exempted from state fee caps increased overdraft fees by 10% while extending overdraft credit limits by 20%, resulting in a 15% decline in returned check rates and savings for consumers on higher merchant NSF fees.^[75] This fee flexibility also enhances financial inclusion by lowering barriers to account ownership. In states with overdraft fee ceilings, exemption for larger banks led to a 30-64% reduction in minimum balance requirements for checking accounts and a 10% increase (4.8 percentage points) in account ownership among low-income households, with no corresponding rise in delinquency or indebtedness.^[75] Such evidence counters claims of exploitation by demonstrating that fee caps can deter banks from serving higher-risk customers, potentially driving them toward costlier unbanked alternatives like check-cashing services.^[75] Regulatory interventions capping related fees, such as the 2011 Durbin Amendment's limits on debit card interchange fees, illustrate how restrictions shift costs without net consumer benefits. Treated banks (assets over $10 billion) lost 25-34% of interchange revenue ($6.5 billion annually) but recovered 123% through higher deposit fees, including a rise in monthly maintenance fees from $4.34 to $7.44 and a drop in free checking accounts from 60% to 20% of offerings.^[76] ^[77] Merchants captured most savings from lower interchange costs, with only limited pass-through to consumers—averaging $0.0076 per gallon at gas stations and negligible broader price reductions—while low-income depositors bore disproportionate fee increases.^[76] Banks did not reduce operating costs like branches or staff; instead, deposit fees rose 3-5%, offsetting about 30% of losses and maintaining service levels without evidence of supracompetitive profits in overdraft programs overall.^[77] ^[27] These patterns suggest fees serve as cost-recovery mechanisms rather than pure rent-seeking, with caps risking reduced service quality or innovation in consumer banking.

Societal and Economic Impacts

Effects on Consumers and Access to Banking

Bank fees, particularly overdraft and maintenance charges, impose a disproportionate financial burden on lower-income households, exacerbating economic vulnerability. Empirical analysis indicates that consumers with incomes below the median are significantly more likely to incur overdraft fees, often multiple times annually, contributing to a cycle of debt accumulation.^[6] For instance, approximately 9% of checking account holders accounted for nearly 80% of total overdraft revenue in examined periods, with these users frequently maintaining negative end-of-day balances, signaling chronic cash flow shortfalls. Black consumers also face elevated rates of paying any bank-related fees compared to other demographics, even after controlling for income and account activity.^[6] Overdraft fees, averaging around $35 per incident as of recent consumer surveys, can compound rapidly for households living paycheck-to-paycheck, leading to reported financial hardships such as inability to cover essentials or reliance on high-cost alternatives.^[78] In 2023, U.S. consumers collectively paid an estimated $7.9 billion in overdraft and nonsufficient funds fees, down from prior years but still reflecting persistent exposure among vulnerable groups, where 35% of low-income households experienced six or more overdraft charges.^[79]^[80] Such fees not only erode limited savings but can result in account closures, damaging credit histories and limiting future banking options.^[73] Regarding access to banking, monthly maintenance fees and minimum balance requirements deter account opening among the unbanked and underbanked populations, who comprised 4.2% and 14.2% of U.S. households respectively in 2023.^[81] These costs, alongside unpredictable penalty fees, rank as primary barriers cited in surveys, pushing individuals toward costlier non-bank services like check-cashing outlets charging 1-4% per transaction.^[82]^[83] Unbanked rates remain markedly higher among low-income adults (22% for those earning under $25,000 annually) and certain minority groups, correlating with fee aversion rather than distrust alone.^[84]^[85] However, overdraft programs can function as short-term, unsecured credit for some users, and empirical evidence suggests that strict fee caps may inadvertently reduce banking access by prompting banks to ration such services, potentially increasing unbanked rates among those needing buffer credit.^[75] Initiatives like Bank On-certified accounts, which minimize or eliminate fees, have demonstrably lowered minimum balance barriers and boosted account ownership in targeted areas.^[86] Overall, while fees hinder inclusion for fee-sensitive populations, their elimination risks shifting costs elsewhere or curtailing available financial tools without addressing underlying cash management challenges.^[87]

Implications for Banks and Financial Stability

Bank fees serve as a significant source of non-interest income for banks, contributing to revenue diversification and buffering against fluctuations in net interest margins, particularly during periods of low interest rates or heightened competition. In environments where lending spreads compress, fee income—encompassing service charges, overdraft penalties, and transaction costs—helps maintain profitability, enabling institutions to build capital buffers and sustain lending activities essential for operational resilience. For instance, empirical analyses indicate that sustained bank profitability correlates with enhanced financial stability by reducing vulnerability to economic downturns and supporting credit provision without excessive reliance on volatile interest-based revenues.^[88]^[89] This revenue stream has proven particularly vital for smaller community banks, which often lack the scale of larger institutions to generate substantial fee volumes but depend on it to offset fixed costs and regulatory compliance expenses. Data from the U.S. banking sector show that non-interest income, including fees, constituted a meaningful portion of total revenue prior to recent regulatory interventions; for example, overdraft and nonsufficient funds (NSF) fees alone generated $11.96 billion across FDIC-insured banks in 2019, supporting balance sheet strength amid varying economic conditions. Reductions in such income, as observed with a 51% decline to $5.83 billion in 2023 following voluntary and regulatory curbs, can strain profitability, potentially limiting banks' capacity to absorb losses and maintain liquidity during stress events.^[90]^[91] Regulatory efforts to cap or restructure fees, such as the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau's (CFPB) December 2024 rule imposing a $5 limit on overdraft fees for large banks or requiring cost-based pricing, introduce risks to financial stability by compressing fee revenues without guaranteed offsets. Critics argue that such measures could erode profits used historically to subsidize broader access to services, including low-cost accounts for underserved customers, and might prompt banks to curtail offerings or raise alternative charges, indirectly heightening systemic fragility if profitability dips lead to reduced capital accumulation.^[8]^[92] Empirical evidence from prior overdraft reforms suggests that while consumer costs decrease, banks may respond by tightening credit standards or innovating less, potentially amplifying credit contraction in downturns and challenging overall sector resilience.^[93]^[94] From a causal standpoint, fee structures incentivize prudent customer behavior, such as avoiding overdrafts, which mitigates operational risks like uncollectible extensions of credit and supports banks' risk management frameworks. However, overregulation that disregards these dynamics could inadvertently weaken banks' incentive alignments, fostering dependency on government-backed interventions rather than market-driven stability mechanisms. Studies on bank business models highlight that greater reliance on fee income, when balanced, enhances adaptability to macroeconomic shifts, underscoring the need for policies that preserve this role without unintended contractions in banking capacity.^[95]^[96]

Recent Developments and Future Trends

Post-Pandemic Shifts and Policy Changes

In response to the economic disruptions caused by the COVID-19 pandemic, major U.S. banks such as Ally Bank temporarily eliminated overdraft fees starting in March 2020, a policy made permanent in June 2021 to provide ongoing customer relief without incurring overdraft charges on transactions up to a grace period.^[97] Similarly, institutions including Capital One, SoFi, and Chime adopted or expanded no-overdraft-fee structures post-2020, while 16 of the top 20 banks by overdraft revenue eliminated extended or sustained overdraft fees, which previously charged additional amounts for unresolved negative balances.^[98] These voluntary adjustments, driven by competitive pressures and reputational considerations, contributed to overdraft and non-sufficient funds (NSF) fee revenue falling by more than 50% from pre-pandemic levels, reaching approximately $7.7 billion in 2023 and yielding over $6 billion in annual consumer savings.^[91] Post-pandemic stabilization saw further refinements, with some banks reducing standard overdraft fees to $10 or $15 per transaction or eliminating NSF fees entirely, amid broader industry shifts toward grace periods and real-time transaction alerts to mitigate fee incidents.^[26] However, these market-led changes faced regulatory scrutiny, culminating in the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) finalizing a rule on December 12, 2024, that classified overdraft services at banks with over $10 billion in assets as lending products subject to Truth in Lending Act disclosures, capping fees at $5 or the institution's documented costs unless offered as structured credit.^[8] The rule, projected to save consumers up to $5 billion annually or $225 per affected household, was set for an October 1, 2025, effective date but encountered immediate legal challenges from banking groups arguing it exceeded CFPB authority under existing statutes.^[8]^[43] Congressional action swiftly nullified the CFPB measure via the Congressional Review Act, with the Senate voting 52-48 on March 27, 2025, to overturn it, followed by President Trump's signing of the resolution on May 15, 2025, restoring banks' flexibility in fee structures without the imposed caps.^[99]^[100] Banking advocates attributed the pre-rule fee reductions primarily to innovation and competition rather than regulatory pressure, cautioning that mandates could limit options for low-balance customers reliant on overdraft coverage to avoid declined transactions.^[101] Globally, post-pandemic bank fee policies showed less uniform shifts, with focus remaining on broader monetary easing and lending adjustments rather than targeted consumer fee reforms, though some jurisdictions like the European Union emphasized enhanced disclosures under existing payment services directives without widespread caps.^[102] By mid-2025, U.S. overdraft fees had leveled off at a national average of $18.66, reflecting a partial stabilization after three years of declines influenced by both voluntary bank actions and aborted regulatory interventions.^[103]

Innovations and Alternatives to Traditional Fees

Neobanks and fintech platforms have disrupted traditional fee structures by operating digitally, eliminating physical branches and reducing overhead costs that necessitate charges like monthly maintenance or ATM fees. These entities generate revenue primarily through interchange fees on debit card transactions, interest on deposits, or premium services rather than punitive consumer fees. For instance, Chime reported over 20 million users by 2024, offering spot-me advances up to $200 without overdraft fees, contrasting with traditional banks' average $35 per overdraft incident.^[104]^[105] Many neobanks and online banks now provide no-fee checking accounts with features like unlimited ATM reimbursements and early direct deposit to minimize reliance on fee income. Ally Bank's Spending Account, for example, charges no overdraft fees and includes CoverDraft for eligible users covering shortfalls up to $250 at no cost, while Capital One 360 Checking waives monthly and overdraft fees entirely. Discover Cashback Debit similarly avoids all such charges, earning revenue via partnerships and card usage. As of 2025, options like Axos Rewards Checking extend this model with up to 1% interest on balances, attracting cost-sensitive consumers and pressuring incumbents.^[105]^[106] Real-time payment systems and automated transfer innovations further serve as alternatives to overdraft fees, enabling instant notifications and linkages to savings or credit lines without penalty charges. Banks like Ally and Self-Help Credit Union offer free overdraft protection transfers from linked accounts, reducing the incidence of fees that Consumer Financial Protection Bureau data shows disproportionately affect low-balance households. Traditional institutions have adopted similar tools post-2021 regulatory scrutiny, with some providing opt-out defaults and balance alerts to prevent overdrafts altogether.^[70]^[107] In cross-border remittances, where traditional bank wires incur 6-7% fees on average, blockchain-based alternatives using stablecoins enable near-instant transfers at fractions of a percent. Platforms leveraging networks like Stellar or TRON facilitate costs under $0.01 per transaction for stablecoin remittances, bypassing intermediary banks and exchange rate markups. By 2025, services such as those from MoneyGram's USDC ramps have integrated crypto rails for global cash-to-crypto conversions, offering settlement in seconds versus days for conventional methods, though volatility risks and regulatory hurdles persist.^[108]^[109]^[110]

References

[1]
Overdraft and Account Fees | FDIC.gov
Common fees include monthly maintenance, ATM, overdraft, and NSF fees. Overdraft fees may be around $35 per transaction. Some banks charge monthly fees that ...
[2]
Banks and Credit Union Deposit Accounts - Financial Regulation
Aug 6, 2024 · What are the types of deposit account fees? ; A service or maintenance fee ; An overdraft fee ; A non-sufficient funds (NSF) ...Missing: definition | Show results with:definition
[3]
The Business of Bank Fees: How Public Alternatives Can Ensure ...
Jun 5, 2024 · Banks, enabled by new forms of computing power and fewer restrictions on permissible behaviors, began attaching fees to otherwise unprofitable ...
[4]
[PDF] Banks' Payments-Driven Revenues
Payment services bring in one-third to two-fifths of the combined operating revenue of the twenty-five largest bank holding companies.
[5]
Payments and bank fees: an $82b balancing act | EY - US
Oct 15, 2024 · The EY-Parthenon US Payments and Bank Fees Consumer Survey¹ found that Americans annually pay an aggregate of nearly $82 billion in payments and ...
[6]
Who Is Paying All These Fees? An Empirical Analysis of Bank ...
This paper examines how bank account and credit card fees are distributed across different demographic groups, looking at whether lower-income consumers are ...
[7]
Banks Provide Financial Safety and Convenience to a Broad Range ...
May 9, 2024 · Banks are legally required to disclose fees upfront. Unlike other industries, banks are heavily regulated and are required to disclose all fees ...
[8]
CFPB Closes Overdraft Loophole to Save Americans Billions in Fees
Dec 12, 2024 · The final rule is expected to add up to $5 billion in annual overdraft fee savings to consumers, or $225 per household that pays overdraft fees.Missing: controversies | Show results with:controversies
[9]
Congress Repeals CFPB's Overdraft Rule
Sep 10, 2025 · Some consumer advocates and the CFPB argued that the rule would protect vulnerable consumers from excessive fees and close a loophole in the law ...
[10]
https://www.statista.com/statistics/325565/average-bank-overdraft-fee-usa/
[11]
Why am I being charged a monthly maintenance fee for my bank or ...
Sep 13, 2024 · Banks and credit unions are allowed to charge you a monthly maintenance fee or service charge for having a savings, checking, or money market account.Missing: definition | Show results with:definition
[12]
Overdraft fees can price people out of banking
Mar 30, 2022 · These fees are charged when the financial institution determines that a customer's checking account does not have the funds to cover an expense.Missing: types | Show results with:types
[13]
SB-1994-01: Daily Fees | Division of Banking
A financial institution's decision to pay an item that overdraws an account creates an extension of credit to that customer. If the item that creates the ...<|separator|>
[14]
service charge - AllBusiness.com
Bank fees are meant to cover the cost of maintaining a depositor's account ... Other service charges include the annual charge for renting a safe ...
[15]
[PDF] The Economic Principles for Establishing Reasonable Regulation of ...
Feb 22, 2011 · The banks use the revenues from these interchange fees to offer more attractive deposit account terms to their customers, including, in some ...
[16]
[PDF] How do banks make money? The fallacies of fee income
Banks primarily make money by charging interest on loans, and also by charging fees for various financial services, including traditional and non-traditional ...
[17]
8 Common Bank Fees and Tips for How to Avoid Charges
Many banks charge fees for maintaining checking or savings accounts. Fees can be charged on a one-time or ongoing basis. Average fee: $5 to $25 a month.Missing: economic rationale
[18]
7 Common Banking Fees And How To Avoid Them - CNBC
7 common banking fees · 1. Monthly maintenance/service fee · 2. Out-of-network ATM fee · 3. Excessive transaction fee · 4. Overdraft fee · 5. Insufficient funds fee.Missing: controversies | Show results with:controversies
[19]
Top checking account fees to watch out for and how to avoid them
Dec 26, 2024 · Monthly service fees are one of the most common types of fees associated with checking accounts. These fees, typically ranging from $5 to $15, ...<|separator|>
[20]
CFPB Issues Guidance to Help Banks Avoid Charging Illegal Junk ...
Oct 26, 2022 · In September 2022, the CFPB took action against Regions Bank for charging surprise overdraft fees known as authorized positive fees. As early as ...
[21]
The CFPB Is Cleaning Up Junk Fees - Center for American Progress
Apr 9, 2024 · This issue brief discusses three recent policies that the CFPB has put forward to 1) rein in exorbitant credit card late fees; 2) impose greater ...
[22]
Comprehensive Guide to Bank Fees: Types, Definitions, and How to ...
Bank fees are charges banks and financial institutions make for account setup, maintenance, and transactions. These include common fees like ATM, NSF, ...
[23]
How Bank Fees Are Squeezing Your Budget: Should You ... - Bankrate
Sep 13, 2025 · Bank fees can impact a consumer's financial wellness. Yet some fees can easily be avoided, either by finding an account that charges lower or ...Missing: rationale | Show results with:rationale
[24]
https://www.bankrate.com/banking/how-bank-fees-are-squeezing-your-budget/
[25]
Overdraft Lending: Very Large Financial Institutions - Federal Register
Dec 30, 2024 · High overdraft fees can make it more difficult for consumers to return their account to a positive balance, contributing to account charge-offs, ...
[26]
[PDF] The Economics and Regulation of Bank Overdraft Protection
Finally, although overdraft fees and revenues have increased during the past decade, there is no evidence to date that banks are earning economic profits or “ ...
[27]
[PDF] Overdrafts: When Markets, Consumers, and Regulators Collide
higher education and financial literacy were less likely to incur overdraft fees (even when controlling for income levels).107 Because the vast majority of ...
[28]
The Economics and Regulation of Bank Overdraft Protection
May 9, 2012 · Bank revenues from overdraft fees rose from $30 billion in 2005 to $37 billion in 2009 before slipping back to $35 billion in 2010 as a result ...
[29]
The Fed - Bank Fees, Aftermarkets, and Consumer Behavior
Jan 9, 2020 · Using a sample of single market banks, I study the relationship between market-level consumer characteristics and bank fee revenue, fees, and ...
[30]
[PDF] V. Lending — Overdraft Payment Programs - FDIC
For example, some vendors have tended to promote programs that encourage generation of fee income by linking the amount or volume of overdraft fees charged to ...
[31]
Who is paying all these fees? An empirical analysis of bank account ...
We find that the probability of paying several types of bank account and credit card fees is correlated with consumers' demographic and income attributes. The ...
[32]
[PDF] Who Is Paying All These Fees? An Empirical Analysis of Bank ...
We use data from a 2021 representative diary survey of US adults to test whether lower-income consumers and Black consumers with bank accounts were more likely ...Missing: revenue | Show results with:revenue
[33]
[PDF] Using AI and Behavioral Finance to Cope with Limited Attention and ...
Our project contributes to the literature on overdraft fees, AI, and behavioral economics. First, to the best of our knowledge, we are the first to document the ...
[34]
[PDF] The Medici Bank - Gwern
quently included charges for commission, brokerage, and consular fees.” The Medici dealt extensively in exchange. The surviving fragments of their account ...
[35]
Fees for financial services and products date to ancient times
Nov 8, 2023 · Historical records from civilizations like the Sumerians, Babylonians, Greeks and Romans show that lenders would charge interest on money lent, ...
[36]
[PDF] The evolution of the check as a means of payment: A historical survey
By the time Walter Bagehot published Lombard Street in 1873, checking accounts were the largest element of the British payment system. Table 1 shows the ...
[37]
ABCs of Banking - Banks and Our Economy - CT.gov
Checking accounts appeared in the mid-19th century, the first of many new bank products and services developed through the state banking system. Today banks ...Missing: charges | Show results with:charges
[38]
1850-1899: A History of America's Banks and The ABA
Wells Fargo was founded, the national banking system was created, the ABA was formed, and the gold standard returned. The first female bank president also ...
[39]
Banking Panics of the Gilded Age | Federal Reserve History
Eight banking panics occurred in the Gilded Age, including those in 1873, 1884, 1890, 1893, 1901, 1907, 1899, and 1908, with some spreading nationally.
[40]
Is the Era of Overdraft Fees Over? - Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
Mar 8, 2023 · Banks launched overdraft services for account holders in the 1990s, selling them as a convenience for customers. In exchange for a fee, banks ...
[41]
[PDF] The Business of Bank Fees - The Roosevelt Institute
Jun 1, 2024 · Bank NSF and overdraft fee revenue decreased in 2020 and 2021 (CFPB 2023b; Greig and Deadman 2022).
[42]
Myths vs. Facts – CFPB's Overdraft Final Rule
Feb 19, 2025 · The 2009 rule requires consumers to affirmatively consent—or “opt in”—to overdraft services before the bank can charge an overdraft fee.
[43]
Wall Street Reform: The Dodd-Frank Act - Obama White House
And it allowed some irresponsible lenders to use hidden fees and fine print to take advantage of consumers. To make sure that a crisis like this never ...
[44]
Bank compliance costs jumped more than $50B a year after Dodd ...
Sep 13, 2019 · The Dodd-Frank Act roughly doubled the number of regulations applied to US banks, which hiked their compliance costs by more than $50 billion per year.Missing: impact | Show results with:impact
[45]
Trends in the Noninterest Income of Banks
Sep 24, 2019 · According to that narrative, the increase in noninterest income is an attempt to preserve revenue. When interest rates are low, banks earn less ...
[46]
United States - Bank Noninterest Income To Total Income
Bank noninterest income to total income (%) in United States was reported at 39.8 % in 2021, according to the World Bank collection of development indicators, ...Missing: percentage | Show results with:percentage
[47]
12 CFR Part 1030 - Truth in Savings (Regulation DD)
Apr 19, 2023 · The regulation requires institutions to disclose information about: · Annual percentage yield (APY) · Interest rates · Minimum-balance requirements
[48]
[PDF] Regulation DD: Truth in Savings - Federal Reserve Board
Examples of fees that are not maintenance or activity fees include: • fees not required to be disclosed under section 230.4(b)(4),. • check-printing fees,. • ...
[49]
12 CFR Part 1030 -- Truth in Savings (Regulation DD) - eCFR
The purpose of this part is to enable consumers to make informed decisions about accounts at depository institutions.
[50]
§ 1005.17 Requirements for overdraft services. | Consumer ...
iv. Negative balance fees. 3. Opt-in methods. The opt-in notice must include the methods by which the consumer may consent to the overdraft service for ATM and ...
[51]
12 CFR 1005.17 -- Requirements for overdraft services. - eCFR
The maximum number of overdraft fees or charges that may be assessed per day, or, if applicable, that there is no limit. (4) Disclosure of opt-in right. An ...
[52]
CFPB Proposes Rule to Close Bank Overdraft Loophole that Costs ...
Jan 17, 2024 · The proposed rule would allow financial institutions to charge a fee in line with their costs or in accordance with an established benchmark.
[53]
CFPB Overdraft and Digital Payment Rules Repealed by Trump ...
May 12, 2025 · President Donald Trump on May 9, 2025, signed into law measures to eliminate two CFPB rules established under the Biden Administration.Missing: reforms 2023-2025
[54]
Understanding NSF Charges: Risks, Disclosures, and Consumer ...
Jun 17, 2025 · The NCUA encourages credit unions to review their overdraft and NSF program practices to ensure compliance with Section 5 of the FTC Act, ...
[55]
Overdraft Protection Programs: Risk Management Practices - OCC.gov
Apr 26, 2023 · The OCC encourages banks to explore offering low-cost accounts, as well as other lower-cost alternatives for covering overdrafts, such as ...
[56]
CFPB Issues New Guidance to Stop Banks from Harvesting ...
Sep 23, 2024 · Under the Electronic Fund Transfer Act, banks cannot charge overdraft fees ... fees for overdraft loans to cover ATM and one-time debit ...Missing: regulations | Show results with:regulations
[57]
https://www.bankingexchange.com/news-feed/item/10113-cfpb-issues-new-guidance-to-stop-banks-from-harvesting-overdraft-fees
[58]
Three Years on from the Royal Commission: Has Australian Banking ...
Jul 8, 2022 · The penalty for this latest breach—AUS$40 million for charging advice fees totalling more than $10.9 million to more than 11,800 deceased ...
[59]
Bank Fees in Australia | Bulletin – January 2024 | RBA
Jan 25, 2024 · Over the year to June 2023, total fees charged by banks fell by around 4 per cent. Fees comprised just 5 per cent of banks' total revenue over the period.
[60]
Changes to overdraft charges | FCA
Jan 22, 2020 · From April 2020, banks can only charge for overdraft users a simple annual interest rate – without additional fees and charges. All users of ...
[61]
Banking Basics: understanding ATM fees in Europe | Tap - WithTap
Dec 10, 2024 · Banks often charge foreign transaction fees for currency conversion, usually ranging from 1% to 3% of the total withdrawal amount when you use ...<|separator|>
[62]
How To Avoid Hidden Fees For International Wire Transfers
May 20, 2025 · Africa and South America: High fees due to fewer correspondent banking relationships. · China, Argentina, and Nigeria: Strict currency controls ...Missing: variations | Show results with:variations
[63]
Interchange fees by country | Credit Card Processing
Oct 25, 2022 · Interchange fees vary widely by country. Europe has capped fees at 0.30%, while the USA has the highest at 1.73%. Canada is at 1.40%, and China ...
[64]
Homepage | Remittance - World Bank
Aug 18, 2025 · This website provides data on the cost of sending and receiving relatively small amounts of money from one country to another.Missing: variations | Show results with:variations
[65]
[PDF] G20 Roadmap for Enhancing Cross-border Payments
Oct 9, 2023 · The G20 roadmap aims to improve cross-border payments by 2027, focusing on speed, cost, accessibility, and transparency, with a 2030 target for ...<|separator|>
[66]
Fed's ISO 'big bang' hits - Payments Dive
Jul 11, 2025 · The Federal Reserve's shift of trillions of dollars in payments to the new ISO 20022 standard Monday will reverberate around the world.
[67]
Cross-Border Payments Accelerate: Who's Ready for the New ...
May 1, 2025 · In April 2025, five major central banks launched Nexus Global Payments, a company designed to operate a standardized, real-time payments ...
[68]
[PDF] ISO 20022 harmonisation requirements for enhancing cross-border ...
ISO 20022 is an international standard for exchanging electronic messages between financial institutions that has the potential to allow more consistent and ...
[69]
Data Spotlight: Consumer experiences with overdraft programs
Dec 12, 2024 · Prior to the Federal Reserve Board's 2009 amendment to Regulation E, many financial institutions automatically covered these transactions for a ...Introduction · Experiences And Preferences... · Approaches People Could Take...
[70]
People hate overdraft fees. Banks are ditching or reducing them - NPR
Jan 11, 2022 · "Overdraft fees are really one of the most abusive forms of lending the banks engage in," says Lauren Saunders with the National Consumer Law ...
[71]
Overdraft/NSF revenue down nearly 50% versus pre-pandemic levels
Dec 12, 2024 · CFPB has previously found that nearly 80% of combined overdraft and NSF fees were shouldered by under 9% of accountholders who had more than 10 ...
[72]
Are Banks the 'Bad Guys'? Overdraft Fees Are Crushing Low-Income ...
May 18, 2022 · Payday lenders have been accused of exploiting poor consumers, but traditional banks exact a similar toll through overdraft fees. Research by ...
[73]
Trends in overdraft/non-sufficient fund (NSF) fee revenue and ...
Overdraft/NSF revenue in 2023 is down more than 50% versus pre-pandemic levels, saving consumers over $6 billion annually. Most NSF fees have been eliminated, ...
[74]
[PDF] Who Pays the Price? Overdraft Fee Ceilings and the Unbanked
First, in the absence of fee caps national banks raised overdraft fees but also expanded overdraft credit. Relative to state banks, national banks increased ...
[75]
[PDF] The Impact of the Durbin Amendment on Banks, Merchants, and ...
We empirically analyze the incidence of the Durbin Amendment on banks, merchants, and consumers to understand the extent to which it achieved its ends. Prior ...
[76]
[PDF] Bank Responses to the Durbin Amendment - Federal Reserve Board
Although the Durbin Amendment was largely motivated by concerns about high inter- change and merchant fees, much of the debate over the amendment has focused on ...
[77]
7 in 10 Americans Find Overdraft Fees Unfair
Mar 3, 2025 · Seven in 10 Americans think a $35 overdraft fee is unfair. And 84% of Americans want the government to encourage banks to cut overdraft fees.
[78]
Responding to Reform: Overdraft in 2023 - Financial Health Network
Oct 8, 2024 · Total overdraft/NSF fees in 2023 are estimated to be $7.9 billion, a 19% decline from 2022's estimate of $9.8 billion – and nearly 50% lower than 2019's figure.
[79]
Overdraft and NSF Fees Still Plaguing Low-Income Americans | Money
Jun 5, 2023 · Of those low-income households, 35% said they were charged for overdrafting six or more times, while 20% said that happened at least 10 times ...<|separator|>
[80]
FDIC Survey Finds 96 Percent of U.S. Households Were Banked in ...
Nov 12, 2024 · The Underbanked Rate – 14.2 percent of U.S. households (representing 19.0 million households) were underbanked in 2023, meaning these households ...
[81]
Unbanked in America: A Review of the Literature
May 26, 2022 · Fees and minimum balance requirements are important factors in the decision to be unbanked. However, several studies show that when fees are ...
[82]
Who Are the Unbanked & Underbanked? - Get It Back - Tax Outreach
Fee-based check cashing services allow workers without bank accounts to cash checks for a 1 to 4 percent fee. Check cashing firms are often convenient for ...
[83]
Report on the Economic Well-Being of U.S. Households in 2024
Jun 12, 2025 · Unbanked rates remained far higher among low-income adults. Twenty-two percent of adults with income below $25,000 were unbanked compared with 1 ...
[84]
Financial Inclusion: Access to Bank Accounts - Congress.gov
Aug 2, 2024 · Because of the way bank fees are structured, consumers with lower balances tend to incur more fees than higher balance consumers. Some bank ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[85]
Has Access to Bank On-Certified Accounts Helped Ease Financial ...
May 14, 2025 · I find evidence that expanded access to Bank On-certified accounts has helped ease minimum balance requirements as barrier to bank account ownership.
[86]
Who's Paying Those Overdraft Fees? - Liberty Street Economics
May 28, 2025 · Takeaways. Our findings add nuance to the claim that overdraft fees are borne disproportionately by low-income and certain minority households.
[87]
Bank Profitability and Financial Stability
Jan 11, 2019 · We analyze how bank profitability impacts financial stability from both theoretical and empirical perspectives.
[88]
(PDF) Bank Profitability and Financial Stability - ResearchGate
Aug 5, 2025 · We analyze how bank profitability impacts financial stability from both theoretical and empirical perspectives.
[89]
Quarterly Banking Profile | FDIC.gov
Aug 26, 2025 · In the first quarter of 2025, FDIC-insured banks reported $70.6 billion in net income and a return on assets of 1.16%. Net interest income ...FDIC Statistics at a Glance · FDIC Quarterly Banking Profile · FDIC QBP Graph Book
[90]
Overdraft/NSF Revenue in 2023 down more than 50% versus pre ...
Apr 24, 2024 · For the full year 2023, combined reported bank overdraft/NSF fee revenue was $5.83 billion, a decrease of 51%, or $6.13 billion, compared to the $11.96 billion ...
[91]
Regulatory Overreach: Impacts on Access to Banking Products and ...
Mar 31, 2025 · To offset the loss of overdraft fee income under the new rule, large banks may need to increase other types of fees on low-balance accounts, ...
[92]
The Impacts of Overdraft Programs on Consumers | Mercatus Center
Profits gained from overdraft protection have been used by banks to expand services and accessibility for customers both rich and poor, and limiting overdraft ...
[93]
Financial Services Highlights Support for Effort to Roll Back Biden ...
Mar 5, 2025 · This rule will force all banks to offer overdraft products at government-imposed prices, hindering innovation, limiting competition, and hampering the industry ...
[94]
[PDF] Bank fees and charges: economic analysis, legal. Financial Stability ...
fees and charges has emerged as one way of shoring up profits. ... “Adapting bank business models: financial stability implications of greater reliance on fee and.
[95]
What Is the Impact of a Low Interest Rate Environment on Bank ...
The authors' analysis indicates that a low interest rate environment is associated with decreased profitability for banks, particularly for small institutions.
[96]
Banks That Have Cut Or Eliminated Overdraft Fees - Bankrate
Jun 24, 2025 · Ally Bank eliminated overdraft fees during the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020 and made the change permanent in June 2021. When transactions would ...
[97]
[PDF] Nationwide Survey of Consumer Overdraft Services Use and ...
16 of the top 20 banks based on overdraft revenue have eliminated. “extended” or “sustained” overdraft fees, charged when the account is not brought back to a ...
[98]
Senate votes to overturn CFPB overdraft rule, in new blow for agency
Mar 27, 2025 · The Senate voted 52-48 on Thursday to overturn a Consumer Financial Protection Bureau rule capping the overdraft fees that banks can charge.
[99]
President Trump Signs Resolution Nullifying CFPB Overdraft Fee Rule
May 15, 2025 · The repealed rule, which was set to take effect on October 1, 2025, would have capped overdraft fees at $5 unless banks could demonstrate actual ...
[100]
Myths vs. Facts: Fact-Checking the CFPB's Overdraft Rule
Dec 19, 2024 · Through competition and innovation, banks have already reduced the amount of overdraft fees consumers pay by 50 percent since the pandemic.Missing: post- | Show results with:post-
[101]
The impact of COVID-19 pandemic on bank lending around the world
We evaluate the influence of the pandemic on global bank lending and identify bank and country characteristics that amplify or weaken the effect of the disease ...
[102]
After Three Years Of Declines, Overdraft Fees Level Off At $18.66 ...
Sep 11, 2025 · The big banks lowering overdraft fees and eliminating NSF fees drove the national headlines, which caused many community financial ...
[103]
What is a Neobank? How fintech is transforming banking - Plaid
Neobanks differentiate themselves from traditional banks by offering services with low or no fees and providing tools to protect financial health, such as ...
[104]
7 Checking Accounts With No Overdraft Fees in 2025 - CNBC
1. Capital One 360 Checking® Account · 2. Ally Bank Spending Account · 3. Discover® Cashback Debit Account · 4. Axos Bank Rewards Checking · 5. Betterment Checking.
[105]
10 Best Free Checking Accounts of 2025 - NerdWallet
Rating 4.8 (119,272) · Free · Finance7 days ago · The best free checking accounts have no monthly fees and earn high ratings from NerdWallet for their features, which may include earning ...
[106]
Banking with No Overdraft Fees, Ever - Ally
No overdraft fees. More overdraft coverage. Use Overdraft Transfer Service and CoverDraft SM service for twice the protection.
[107]
Blockchain in cross-border payments: a complete 2025 guide - BVNK
Oct 17, 2025 · Stablecoin payments typically cost 0.5-2% (versus 2-7% for traditional bank transfers). Actual costs vary based on network fees, processing fees ...
[108]
Crypto Remittances: Faster, Cheaper Global Money Transfers
1. Lower Fees. Stablecoin transfers—especially on low-cost blockchains like TRON or Stellar—can cost less than $0.01 per transaction. · 2. Real-Time Settlement.
[109]
Best Remittance Companies Using Crypto Rails (2025)
Best for cash ↔ USDC access worldwide · Why Use It: MoneyGram connects cash and bank rails to on-chain USDC via its Ramps network and global ...