Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Financial inclusion

Financial inclusion refers to the availability and use of affordable and useful financial services, such as payments, savings, credit, and insurance, by individuals and businesses previously excluded from formal financial systems.^[1] These services aim to facilitate economic participation, resilience against shocks, and wealth accumulation, often through innovations like mobile banking and digital platforms that bypass traditional infrastructure barriers.^[2] Global progress has accelerated since the early 2010s, with account ownership rising from 51% of adults in 2011 to 79% by 2024, largely propelled by mobile money adoption in developing economies and fintech expansions.^[3] In low- and middle-income countries, digital payments and savings via accounts increased markedly, with 40% of adults saving formally in 2024—a 16-percentage-point jump since 2021—enabling greater financial autonomy and transaction efficiency.^[3] Empirical evidence links higher inclusion levels to improved employment outcomes and inclusive growth, particularly when paired with education and regulatory support.^[4] However, achievements are tempered by persistent risks, including over-indebtedness among new users of credit, especially in microfinance-heavy contexts where rapid lending growth outpaces borrower financial literacy.^[5] Studies indicate that while inclusion correlates with economic benefits, it can also heighten household debt burdens and systemic financial instability if not managed with robust oversight, as seen in correlations between expanded access and elevated default rates in underserved regions.^[6] Recent data show stalled global inclusion scores in 2025 after prior gains, underscoring challenges like uneven digital infrastructure and regulatory gaps that amplify these vulnerabilities.^[7]

Conceptual Foundations

Definition and Scope

Financial inclusion refers to the delivery of useful and affordable financial products and services that satisfy the needs of individuals and businesses, with a focus on expanding access for underserved groups.^[1] This encompasses formal mechanisms such as transaction accounts that enable users to store money, send and receive payments, and access savings or credit options responsibly.^[1] The concept emphasizes equitable opportunities without extending to remedial measures for exclusion or assumptions about resultant socioeconomic improvements. The scope of financial inclusion centers on key services including secure savings instruments, credit provision for productive purposes, efficient payment systems for remittances and transactions, and basic insurance against risks, often facilitated through banks, mobile money platforms, or other regulated providers.^[1] It distinctly differs from financial literacy, which involves the education and skills needed to navigate and optimize these services, rather than their mere availability.^[8] Metrics commonly used to gauge inclusion, such as the percentage of adults owning a financial account, highlight access levels but have limitations: they often overlook active utilization, product affordability in practice, or the quality and sustainability of service delivery for low-income users.^[9] Empirically, the World Bank's Global Findex Database 2025 reports that 1.3 billion adults—approximately 21% of the global adult population—remained unbanked as of 2024, lacking any formal account despite advances in digital channels like mobile money, which have driven account ownership to 79% worldwide.^[3] In low- and middle-income economies, formal savings via accounts reached 40% of adults in 2024, reflecting digital progress but underscoring persistent gaps in credit and payment access for the excluded.^[3] These indicators provide a baseline for scope but require supplementation with usage data to avoid overstating inclusion.^[10]

Theoretical Underpinnings

The theoretical foundations of financial inclusion emphasize market imperfections in credit allocation, particularly information asymmetries as modeled by Stiglitz and Weiss (1981), where lenders face adverse selection—higher interest rates attract riskier borrowers—and moral hazard, prompting borrowers to undertake unobserved risky actions, leading to credit rationing rather than equilibrium price adjustments. This rationing disproportionately excludes individuals with opaque creditworthiness, such as low-income or informal sector participants lacking collateral, as banks prioritize safer loans to avoid losses from imperfect screening.^[11] The model underscores causal mechanisms rooted in lenders' inability to fully observe borrower types or efforts, distorting supply without demand-side signals fully compensating through higher rates. Transaction costs constitute another core barrier, encompassing fixed expenses in client acquisition, contract enforcement, and risk monitoring that render small-scale lending unprofitable in arm's-length finance, especially for geographically dispersed or low-value clients.^[12] In neoclassical terms, these costs elevate the minimum viable loan size, yielding a supply curve that fails to intersect demand from the financially excluded at prevailing equilibria, absent innovations like fintech that leverage digital verification and automation to compress verification and delivery expenses.^[13] Fintech theoretically mitigates asymmetries by aggregating alternative data (e.g., transaction histories) for proxy assessments, fostering scalable access through reduced unit costs, though reliant on competitive markets for adoption rather than subsidized rollout.^[14] Market-oriented theories prioritize voluntary equilibrium dynamics, positing that financial access expands via entrepreneurial responses to underserved demand, contrasting with development economics' interventionist stance that frames exclusion as a public good failure warranting subsidies or mandates to internalize externalities like poverty traps.^[15] Critiques of the latter highlight overreliance on paternalistic premises—that individuals require coerced inclusion to optimize welfare—potentially disregarding demand-side self-exclusion from perceived risks or cultural mismatches, and favoring policies that preserve agency in favor of organic participation.^[16] Such views align with causal realism, where enduring inclusion hinges on lowering inherent frictions through technological or institutional evolution, not exogenous impositions that may entrench inefficiencies.^[17]

Historical Development

Pre-20th Century Practices

Prior to the 20th century, financial inclusion for low-income and rural populations primarily occurred through informal, community-based mechanisms that operated without centralized banking institutions or state oversight. Rotating savings and credit associations (ROSCAs), one of the earliest documented forms, enabled participants to pool regular contributions and rotate access to the lump sum, providing savings and credit in environments lacking formal alternatives. These systems trace back to at least the 18th century in regions like Shanxi province, China, where they facilitated mutual lending among merchants and farmers during the late imperial period, with records showing widespread adoption for funding trade and household needs.^[18] In West Africa, similar practices known as susu emerged in pre-colonial Ghanaian and Yoruba communities, where groups contributed fixed amounts periodically to a common pot, disbursed sequentially to members for investments or consumption, relying on kinship ties for compliance.^[19] Tontines, formalized in 17th-century Europe by Neapolitan banker Lorenzo de Tonti, represented an annuity-like variant where subscribers received periodic payments, with surviving members inheriting shares of deceased participants' portions; French and British governments issued tontines from the late 1600s to fund public works, offering small investors returns tied to longevity rather than collateral.^[20] Moneylenders provided another prevalent channel, extending short-term credit based on personal reputation and local knowledge rather than standardized contracts or property pledges. In early modern Venice (16th-18th centuries), pawnshops and private lenders served the urban poor by accepting household goods as security, with interest rates reflecting risk assessments derived from community networks, enabling access denied by guild-restricted formal credit.^[21] Across medieval Europe and Asia, itinerant or fixed moneylenders—often from marginalized groups like Jews in Christian lands—filled gaps in agrarian economies, advancing loans for seed, tools, or emergencies at rates averaging 20-40% annually, enforced through repeat business and social ostracism rather than courts.^[22] These arrangements demonstrated self-organizing efficiency, as lenders' superior information on borrowers' solvency—gleaned from ongoing village interactions—reduced adverse selection compared to distant formal institutions.^[23] Early precursors to cooperatives, such as mutual aid societies and friendly societies in 18th-century Britain and continental Europe, further extended inclusion by pooling dues for burial, sickness, or loan funds among artisans and laborers. Originating in medieval guilds that evolved into savings clubs by the 1700s, these groups amassed capital through weekly contributions, disbursing benefits via majority vote, with participation rates high due to enforceable norms of reciprocity.^[24] Empirical accounts from pre-industrial settings indicate these informal systems often achieved lower effective costs and higher repayment for low-income users than sporadic formal options, as trust-based mechanisms minimized defaults—evidenced by sustained group longevity and repeat cycles in Chinese ROSCAs, where social penalties deterred non-payment more reliably than legal recourse.^[25] Such practices underscored market-driven adaptation, predating regulatory frameworks that later marginalized them in favor of chartered banks.

20th Century Foundations

Following World War II, international development efforts increasingly emphasized extending financial services to rural populations in low-income countries to spur economic growth and reduce poverty, with institutions like the World Bank launching agricultural credit programs from the 1960s onward. These initiatives often relied on subsidized interest rates and directed lending to small farmers, aiming to integrate underserved borrowers into formal financial systems. However, empirical evaluations revealed systemic inefficiencies, including default rates exceeding 20-50% in many cases due to moral hazard, weak borrower selection, and political capture of funds by elites rather than the intended poor.^[26]^[27]^[28] In countries like India, state-supported cooperative banks emerged as key vehicles for rural credit expansion in the mid-20th century, but pervasive political interference eroded their viability. Elected officials influenced lending decisions to favor allies, resulting in non-performing assets, mismanagement, and multiple institutional collapses by the 1970s and 1980s, which underscored how governance failures amplified exclusion rather than alleviating it.^[29]^[30] Such outcomes prompted debates on the causal limits of supply-side interventions without addressing underlying incentives for repayment and accountability. A pivotal shift occurred in 1976 when economist Muhammad Yunus founded the Grameen Bank in Bangladesh as an experimental response to predatory informal lending, introducing group-based microcredit without collateral or subsidies. Borrowers formed five-member groups with joint liability, where peer monitoring enforced repayment, achieving initial rates above 95% through social collateral rather than legal enforcement.^[31] While this model demonstrated that group lending could enhance access and reduce defaults in high-risk environments, early empirical observations highlighted critiques of its efficacy, including over-reliance on group dynamics that sometimes masked underlying poverty traps and limited scalable income gains beyond debt cycling.^[32] These 20th-century experiments laid analog groundwork for later financial inclusion strategies by exposing the trade-offs between subsidized scale and sustainable, incentive-aligned access.

21st Century Global Expansion

The global financial inclusion movement gained momentum following the 2008 financial crisis, as international organizations sought to address vulnerabilities exposed among unbanked populations. The Consultative Group to Assist the Poor (CGAP), housed at the World Bank, advanced policy frameworks and evidence-based strategies during this period, including contributions to global standard-setting for inclusive financial systems.^[33] Similarly, United Nations efforts, aligned with Sustainable Development Goal 8 on economic growth, emphasized financial access as a tool for poverty reduction, though implementation varied by institutional capacity.^[34] A pivotal development was the G20's endorsement of the Financial Inclusion Action Plan in 2010, which established the Global Partnership for Financial Inclusion to coordinate cross-border efforts, standardize principles for innovative services, and monitor progress through metrics like account ownership.^[35] This initiative spurred policy proliferation, with over 60 countries adopting national strategies by the mid-2010s. Concurrently, mobile money services scaled rapidly in the 2010s, building on Kenya's M-Pesa model launched in 2007; by 2011, M-Pesa accounted for high-volume, low-value transactions that boosted transaction efficiency and informal sector participation, inspiring replications across Africa and Asia.^[36] These innovations contributed to a surge in digital payments, with mobile money agents enabling remote access without traditional banking infrastructure. World Bank Global Findex data reflect this expansion: adult account ownership at financial institutions or via mobile money rose from 51% in 2011 to 76% by 2021, driven largely by digital channels in low- and middle-income economies.^[37] By 2025, the figure reached 79%, though gains slowed in certain regions amid challenges like regulatory hurdles and uneven digital infrastructure.^[3] However, critics argue that prevailing metrics overemphasize access—such as mere account opening—while underweighting usage quality, financial health outcomes, and risks like over-indebtedness, potentially inflating progress without verifying sustainable benefits.^[38]^[39] This focus on supply-side indicators has prompted calls for refined measures incorporating transaction frequency, resilience to shocks, and net economic impact.^[40]

Causes of Financial Exclusion

Economic and Structural Factors

High fixed costs in financial service provision, including account setup, maintenance, and transaction processing, render serving low-volume or low-balance clients economically unviable for many institutions, as these costs cannot be recouped through fees or interest from small-scale users.^[41] This market-driven dynamic disproportionately excludes the poor, who often lack sufficient transaction volumes to justify participation, leading to a structural bias toward higher-income segments where per-client profitability is greater.^[42] Empirical surveys underscore cost and perceived irrelevance as primary self-reported barriers among the unbanked. The World Bank's Global Findex Database 2021, drawing from nationally representative surveys of over 128,000 adults across 123 economies, identifies lack of sufficient funds and remoteness from financial access points as key reasons cited by the approximately 1.4 billion unbanked adults globally, with these factors particularly acute in low-income contexts where services fail to align with sporadic or minimal financial needs.^[37] In credit markets, structural exclusion arises from the absence of collateral among low-asset populations, which amplifies lender risks through elevated enforcement costs and asymmetric information, fostering adverse selection where only higher-risk borrowers without verifiable assets seek formal loans.^[43] This rationing perpetuates poverty traps, as individuals without initial assets cannot access financing for productive investments, constraining capital accumulation and economic mobility in a self-reinforcing cycle grounded in risk-return trade-offs inherent to decentralized lending.^[42] Economic analyses frame this as an outcome of efficient market screening, prioritizing allocative efficiency over universal access, though it highlights causal linkages between asset scarcity and persistent exclusion absent scalable risk-mitigation mechanisms.^[41]

Regulatory and Institutional Barriers

Regulatory barriers to financial inclusion often stem from stringent entry requirements and compliance mandates that disproportionately burden providers seeking to serve low-income or informal populations. High licensing costs for financial institutions, which can exceed millions in upfront fees and ongoing capital reserves in many jurisdictions, deter new entrants from establishing services in underserved areas where profit margins are thin.^[44] Similarly, Know Your Customer (KYC) requirements, designed to combat money laundering, demand formal identification documents that informal sector workers and rural residents frequently lack, effectively pricing them out of formal accounts; for instance, in select AFI member countries, these rules have impeded the expansion of inclusive financial products by requiring costly verification processes incompatible with low-value transactions.^[45]^[46] Pre-fintech era restrictions on branchless banking further exemplified institutional hurdles, as regulators in numerous developing markets prohibited non-branch delivery models until policy shifts in the late 2000s. In Ghana, for example, pre-2008 rules limited mobile money agents to bank branches, constraining scalability until guidelines explicitly permitted agent networks, which subsequently boosted account ownership from under 5% to over 50% by 2017.^[47]^[48] Such prohibitions, rooted in concerns over supervisory oversight, prioritized traditional infrastructure over innovative distribution, delaying access for remote populations reliant on informal savings mechanisms. Empirical studies link deregulation to expanded access, underscoring overregulation's exclusionary effects. In the United States, the Riegle-Neal Interstate Banking and Branching Efficiency Act of 1994 dismantled state-level barriers, enabling cross-border branching; subsequent research found this increased bank account penetration among low-income households by reducing market power concentration and lowering fees, with one analysis attributing a 10-15% rise in deposit accounts in affected regions.^[49]^[50] In the Central African Economic and Monetary Community, tighter banking regulations correlated with stagnant financial inclusion metrics, as measured by account ownership rates below 20% despite economic growth, suggesting that capital and operational mandates crowd out small-scale providers.^[51] While these regulations aim to mitigate fraud and systemic risks—such as identity theft in digital onboarding or money laundering via unverified agents—evidence indicates that their stringency often exceeds proportionate benefits, fostering de-risking where institutions avoid high-compliance segments altogether. World Bank assessments note that although fraud incidents rise with inclusion efforts, simplified KYC alternatives (e.g., biometric or utility-based verification) have maintained integrity while doubling uptake in pilot programs, implying that baseline rules amplify exclusion more than they curb threats.^[52]^[45] Prioritizing risk-based approaches over uniform mandates could thus align safeguards with inclusion goals without the observed net contraction in service availability.

Behavioral and Cultural Dimensions

In many developing economies, persistent distrust of formal financial institutions stems from historical experiences of economic instability, such as hyperinflation episodes, leading individuals to prefer holding cash or relying on informal savings mechanisms over banking services.^[53] For instance, in countries like Zimbabwe and Argentina, memories of currency devaluation and bank failures have fostered a cultural wariness, with surveys indicating that a significant portion of adults opt to store value outside formal systems to avoid perceived risks of institutional collapse.^[54] This behavioral opt-out is compounded by a general lack of trust as a demand-side barrier, where empirical analyses show unbanked populations citing fears of loss or exploitation as reasons for exclusion, independent of access availability.^[55]^[56] Cultural norms emphasizing self-reliance and informal networks further contribute to financial exclusion by reinforcing preferences for non-institutional alternatives. Studies across Africa reveal that formal financial inclusion efforts often coexist with or even bolster informal intermediation, as individuals favor community-based lending circles or cash transactions due to familiarity and perceived lower risk, with data from 2004–2018 showing informal sector prevalence correlating with sustained cash usage in transactions.^[57] In conservative societies, aversion to debt is particularly pronounced, driven by values prioritizing financial prudence; cross-cultural surveys link higher religiosity and long-term orientation to reduced borrowing, as individuals view indebtedness as morally hazardous or disruptive to familial stability.^[58]^[59] From an evolutionary finance perspective, innate risk aversion—shaped by ancestral environments favoring survival through conservative resource allocation—underpins these patterns, predisposing individuals to shun volatile formal products like credit in favor of tangible assets.^[60] Binary-choice models demonstrate how such aversion emerges as a heuristic to minimize lineage extinction risks, translating in modern contexts to heightened uncertainty avoidance and demand for physical cash, as evidenced by global data linking cultural uncertainty metrics to lower banking adoption during crises.^[61]^[62] This intrinsic caution explains why even accessible financial services see low uptake in risk-sensitive populations, prioritizing immediate security over potential long-term gains.^[63]

Measurement and Metrics

Core Indicators

The core demand-side indicators for financial inclusion stem from the World Bank's Global Findex Database, which assesses adult access and behaviors via nationally representative surveys. Account ownership, the foundational metric, gauges the percentage of adults (aged 15+) with an account at a financial institution, mobile-money provider, or both, capturing entry-level access to transaction, savings, and payment services. Globally, this reached 79% in 2024, reflecting widespread adoption facilitated by digital channels in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), where 84% of adults own a mobile phone.^[3] Complementary Findex metrics track usage depth: formal credit uptake (percentage borrowing from banks or formal lenders in the past year), formal savings (depositing in an account), insurance penetration (holding life or non-life policies), and digital payments (making or receiving payments digitally). These reveal behavioral engagement beyond mere access; for example, 40% of adults in developing economies saved formally in a financial account in 2024, a 16-percentage-point rise since 2021, alongside accelerated digital payment adoption via mobile money. Gender gaps persist, with women's account ownership in developing countries trailing men's by approximately 6 percentage points in recent data, limiting women's participation in credit and insurance.^[3]^[1] Supply-side indicators from the IMF's Financial Access Survey (FAS) quantify institutional provision, including deposit and loan accounts per 1,000 adults, branches and ATMs per 1,000 km² or adults, and mobile money agent outlets. The 2024 FAS reports growth in deposit accounts per 100 adults (over 40% in regions like Sub-Saharan Africa from 2013–2019 baselines) and a shift toward digital infrastructure, with mobile banking expanding amid declines in physical branches post-COVID-19. Women's deposit holdings globally comprise 64% of men's, and loan balances 46%, underscoring disparities in service depth.^[64] These metrics emphasize access and reported behaviors but often miss nuances like account dormancy—where ownership exists without sustained transactions—or quality of service delivery, as basic ownership does not ensure resilient or impactful financial engagement.^[38]

Evaluation Challenges and Limitations

Evaluating financial inclusion metrics faces significant methodological hurdles, including selection bias in survey data where respondents may not represent excluded populations, leading to overestimation of access. Sample surveys, such as those in the Global Findex Database, are prone to recall inaccuracies and social desirability biases, particularly on sensitive topics like financial behaviors, while administrative data excludes non-users entirely, limiting insights into demand-side barriers.^[65]^[65] Causal inference is further complicated by endogeneity, where correlations between financial access and outcomes like poverty reduction may reflect self-selection or reverse causality rather than true impacts, necessitating randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to isolate effects. Observational studies often fail to address these biases adequately, as quasi-experimental designs struggle with unobserved confounders in heterogeneous populations.^[66]^[67] RCTs, though resource-intensive, provide stronger evidence, as seen in evaluations of microcredit programs where self-selection distorts estimates without randomization.^[68] Progress is frequently overstated by metrics emphasizing account ownership over usage quality, ignoring dormant accounts that indicate superficial inclusion. In the 2017 Global Findex data, adjusting for dormancy—where 736 million accounts worldwide saw no activity—reduced effective inclusion from 68% to 55% globally, with developing countries at 48%.^[69]^[69] Indices often aggregate dimensions like access and usage with arbitrary weights, biasing toward supply-side proxies (e.g., branches) while neglecting quality factors such as affordability and consumer protection, which only about 20% of central banks track.^[70]^[70] Critics contend that prominent indices, driven by institutional agendas, prioritize quantifiable targets to demonstrate policy success, potentially downplaying persistent gaps in active engagement and resilience. This supply-focused lens, prevalent in sources like World Bank reports, may reflect broader incentives in development finance to highlight gains amid political pressures for inclusion narratives, though rigorous disaggregation reveals limited depth in outcomes.^[69]^[70]

Intervention Strategies

Private Sector and Market Innovations

Private sector entities have driven financial inclusion through profit-oriented innovations such as mobile money platforms and peer-to-peer (P2P) lending, which leverage technology to lower transaction costs and extend services to underserved populations without relying on subsidies.^[12] For instance, Safaricom's M-PESA, launched in 2007 as a commercial mobile money service in Kenya, enabled users to transfer funds via basic phones, achieving widespread adoption through agent networks and user fees that sustained operations.^[71] Similarly, P2P lending platforms like Prosper and LendingClub have facilitated direct loans between individuals, bypassing traditional banks and reducing intermediation costs by up to 50% in some models through algorithmic matching.^[72] These fintech solutions prioritize viable markets where returns justify investments, often using alternative data for credit scoring to assess thin-file borrowers.^[73] Empirical evidence underscores the efficacy of such market-driven approaches in expanding access. M-PESA's rollout correlated with a 2% reduction in poverty for Kenyan households between 2008 and 2014, lifting approximately 194,000 households above the poverty line, with stronger effects among female-headed households due to improved remittances and entrepreneurship.^[74] Broader fintech adoption, including digital payments and lending, has increased account ownership among the unbanked by enabling low-cost entry, as evidenced by panel data showing enhanced consumption smoothing and reduced inequality in regions with high penetration.^[75] However, causal impacts vary; while fintech boosts inclusion in emerging markets via mobile interfaces, aggregate effects on credit access remain modest in low-penetration areas due to infrastructural gaps.^[76] The scalability of these innovations stems from competitive incentives, where profit motives spur rapid iteration and cost efficiencies—such as blockchain for remittances or AI-driven underwriting—that traditional institutions struggle to match without market pressure.^[77] This bottom-up dynamism has deployed services to millions without public funding, fostering organic growth through network effects and user adoption.^[78] Profit imperatives, however, introduce selectivity, as firms target lower-risk segments with higher repayment probabilities, potentially exacerbating exclusion for the most vulnerable who lack collateral or data trails.^[79] Studies indicate fintech lending expands to subprime borrowers but concentrates in urban or digitally literate groups, with limited penetration among women, youth, and rural poor due to profitability thresholds.^[14] Additionally, aggressive algorithms can fuel over-indebtedness in nascent markets, where weak consumer protections amplify risks absent in regulated banking.^[80]

Government Policies and Mandates

Governments have pursued financial inclusion through mandates requiring banks to allocate a portion of lending to priority sectors, such as agriculture and microenterprises, alongside subsidized credit programs and initiatives for universal bank accounts.^[81] In India, the Pradhan Mantri Jan Dhan Yojana, launched on August 28, 2014, mandated the opening of zero-balance accounts with features like overdraft facilities and insurance to extend banking to underserved populations, resulting in over 500 million accounts by mid-2023.^[82] Similar universal account policies in other developing economies have aimed to reduce unbanked rates by waiving minimum balance requirements and leveraging public distribution systems for direct benefit transfers.^[83] Empirical outcomes reveal mixed efficacy, with rapid account proliferation often undermined by low usage and high dormancy. Under India's scheme, while account ownership surged, inactivity rates exceeded 50% in many cases, particularly among rural women and below-poverty-line households, indicating limited sustained engagement due to factors like geographic barriers and perceived lack of utility.^[84] Subsidized credit directives have similarly expanded loan volumes but at the cost of deteriorating asset quality, as banks prioritize quota fulfillment over rigorous underwriting.^[85] Critics, including those from market-oriented perspectives, argue these interventions distort credit allocation and foster inefficiencies. Directed lending mandates, such as India's 40% priority sector target, correlate with elevated non-performing asset (NPA) rates—often 2-3 times higher than non-priority loans—stemming from political pressures, inadequate borrower assessment, and evergreening practices to mask delinquencies.^[86]^[87] Government subsidies and guarantees exacerbate moral hazard, incentivizing banks and borrowers to undertake riskier activities under the expectation of bailouts or leniency, thereby crowding out unsubsidized private credit that might better align with productive uses.^[88]^[89] This has led to persistent high NPAs in public sector banks, with priority advances contributing disproportionately to systemic vulnerabilities as of 2023.^[90]

International and Philanthropic Efforts

International organizations have played a central role in advancing financial inclusion through policy advocacy, research, and funding for microfinance and digital services. The Consultative Group to Assist the Poor (CGAP), housed at the World Bank, focuses on empowering low-income individuals, particularly women, via affordable financial services, with initiatives like Financial Inclusion 2.0 emphasizing outcome measurement and partnerships with financial providers and central banks.^[91]^[92] The World Bank supports global efforts via the Global Partnership for Financial Inclusion (GPFI), implementing G20 principles to expand account access, reporting that 79% of adults worldwide held financial accounts by 2025, up from 74% in 2021, largely driven by mobile technology.^[93]^[3] The U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) promotes digital financial inclusion through partnerships, such as with Visa to digitize government payments and enhance economic growth in developing regions.^[94] Philanthropic foundations have complemented these efforts by funding innovations in inclusive financial systems. The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation invests in digital financial services for low-income populations, supporting regulatory guides and fintech to broaden usage and affordability of formal services globally.^[95] These initiatives often prioritize scaling microfinance, which expanded rapidly post-2000s, reaching over 140 million borrowers by 2023, with 80% women, through commercialization, technology integration, and access to capital markets.^[96] Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) provide empirical evidence on impacts, revealing limited poverty alleviation. Banerjee et al.'s evaluations across six studies, including in India, found microcredit increased borrowing but yielded no significant effects on consumption, income, or health, challenging assumptions of transformative poverty reduction.^[97]^[98] Such findings underscore causal limitations: while access expands, sustained business growth or wealth accumulation often fails without complementary factors like skills training. Criticisms highlight risks of dependency from prolonged aid inflows, fostering reliance on external subsidies rather than self-sustaining markets, akin to aid fatigue in development finance. One-size-fits-all models, imposing uniform microcredit or digital templates across diverse contexts, frequently underperform due to mismatched local needs, as evidenced by minimal savings or spending shifts post-intervention.^[99]^[100] Despite institutional promotion—often from sources with incentives to emphasize progress—these efforts' net causal impact on exclusion remains modest, prioritizing metrics like account ownership over verifiable welfare gains.^[101]

Digital Financial Inclusion

Enabling Technologies

Mobile money platforms, such as Kenya's M-Pesa introduced in 2007, enable basic financial transactions including peer-to-peer transfers, bill payments, and savings via feature phones, bypassing the need for traditional bank branches in underserved areas.^[102] These systems rely on agent networks for cash-in and cash-out, providing accessible entry points for unbanked populations where formal banking infrastructure is sparse.^[103] By 2025, mobile money operates in nearly 100 countries, supporting low-value transactions that traditional systems deem unprofitable.^[104] Application Programming Interfaces (APIs) facilitate interoperability between disparate financial systems, enabling secure data exchange and service aggregation that reduces fragmentation for users lacking multiple accounts.^[105] In open banking frameworks, APIs allow third-party providers to access transaction data with user consent, fostering integrated products like automated savings or lending overlays on mobile wallets.^[106] This technical standardization lowers development costs for fintechs targeting unbanked segments, as seen in pilots standardizing API protocols for cross-provider compatibility.^[107] Blockchain technology underpins distributed ledger systems that eliminate intermediaries, enabling low-cost, verifiable transactions such as remittances or micro-payments for the unbanked through smart contracts.^[108] Public and private blockchains differ in permission levels, with private variants offering scalability for financial inclusion applications like tokenized assets or conditional aid disbursements.^[109] Empirical pilots, including World Bank initiatives, demonstrate blockchain's role in enhancing traceability and reducing fraud in fund transfers to excluded groups.^[110] Artificial intelligence enhances credit assessment for unbanked individuals by analyzing alternative data sources, including mobile usage patterns, utility payments, and transaction histories, to generate predictive risk scores where conventional records are absent.^[111] In 2025, AI models increasingly incorporate machine learning for real-time scoring, with trends emphasizing fairness monitoring to mitigate biases in datasets from low-income users.^[112] These approaches enable lenders to extend microloans to previously unscorable populations, as validated in studies showing improved default prediction accuracy over traditional methods.^[113] Low-cost digital identity solutions, particularly biometric-linked systems, empirically decrease financial exclusion by streamlining know-your-customer (KYC) processes, with evidence from peer-to-peer studies indicating higher account penetration among verified users in marginalized communities.^[114] These technologies provide reusable, verifiable credentials that integrate with mobile and AI tools, reducing onboarding costs from dollars to cents per user in deployment models.^[115]

Implementation and Adoption

In Kenya, the rollout of M-Pesa since its 2007 launch exemplifies rapid adoption of digital financial services, reaching approximately 70% of households within four years through an extensive agent network that facilitated cash-in and cash-out transactions without requiring formal bank branches.^[116] This success was enabled by high mobile phone penetration, simple USSD-based interfaces accessible via basic feature phones, and regulatory support allowing non-bank telecoms to issue electronic money, which lowered entry barriers for unbanked populations. By 2021, Kenya's mobile money adoption rate stood at around 67% of adults, driven by remittances and peer-to-peer transfers that aligned with informal economic patterns.^[117] However, implementation faces persistent barriers, particularly in rural areas where infrastructure deficits persist; empirical studies show limited internet penetration and electricity access hinder uptake, with rural adoption rates lagging urban ones by 20-30 percentage points in many low-income countries.^[118] Digital literacy gaps exacerbate this, as users require training to navigate apps and recognize phishing risks, leading to underutilization even where accounts are opened—usage rates in rural India, for instance, remain below 40% despite high account penetration.^[119] Agent network density also varies, with sparse coverage in remote regions causing liquidity issues and forcing reliance on costly alternatives.^[120] Digital tools have contributed to narrowing gender gaps in financial access; according to the World Bank's Global Findex 2025, the global gender disparity in account ownership halved between 2017 and 2024, with mobile apps enabling women in sub-Saharan Africa to engage in transactions independently, reducing the gap to 4 percentage points overall though it remains wider at 12 points in the region.^[3] Mobile money's agent-based model particularly aids women by allowing small, frequent deposits without travel to distant banks, fostering trust and habitual use.^[121] Cybersecurity vulnerabilities pose adoption risks, as seen in social engineering attacks on mobile money users in Kenya, where fraudsters impersonate agents to extract PINs, resulting in losses equivalent to 1-2% of transaction volumes annually.^[122] Data breaches in linked systems, such as the 2019 Capital One incident exposing 100 million records including financial data, underscore how third-party integrations can erode user confidence in digital platforms, particularly among low-income adopters wary of irreversible losses.^[123] Regulatory enablers like risk-based authentication and insurance schemes have mitigated some incidents, but uneven enforcement in developing markets sustains hesitation.^[124]

Recent Advances (2020s)

The COVID-19 pandemic catalyzed a surge in digital financial services adoption, particularly through government-to-person payments that necessitated accounts for aid distribution. According to the World Bank's Global Findex Database 2021, account ownership among adults in developing economies rose to 71%, with digital payments expanding amid lockdowns that restricted physical transactions.^[125] In these economies, 39% of adults opened their first financial account specifically to receive COVID-19-related transfers, marking a shift toward resilient digital infrastructure for crisis response.^[126] This acceleration persisted into the mid-2020s, with post-pandemic data indicating sustained growth in mobile money and fintech usage, though uneven across regions due to infrastructure gaps.^[127] Advancements in artificial intelligence have enabled more tailored financial products, leveraging alternative data for credit assessment and risk management to reach underserved populations. AI-driven tools analyze digital trails—such as mobile usage and transaction histories—to offer personalized lending and savings options, bypassing traditional collateral requirements in emerging markets.^[128] For instance, AI models have improved efficiency in microfinance by automating underwriting, reducing costs, and expanding access for low-income clients previously deemed high-risk by conventional metrics.^[129] These innovations, prominent since 2022, integrate with broader well-being indicators, such as linking financial plans to health or livelihood data for holistic advisory services, though scalability remains constrained by data privacy regulations.^[130] Emerging intersections with climate resilience highlight digital tools' role in green financial inclusion, including platforms for sustainable micro-investments and insurance against weather risks. Post-pandemic analyses show digital financial services facilitating eco-friendly practices, such as carbon-tracking payments that support low-emission activities in vulnerable communities.^[131] However, empirical evidence from emerging markets reveals mixed impacts on financial stability: while short-term digital adoption boosts liquidity and inclusion, long-term effects include heightened bank vulnerabilities from rapid fintech integration and untested cyber risks.^[132] Studies across African and Asian economies indicate that unchecked expansion can amplify systemic fragilities, necessitating regulatory safeguards to balance inclusion gains with stability.^[133] Climate shocks further complicate this, as rising disaster frequencies erode client repayment capacities, underscoring the need for adaptive digital models.^[134]

Country Case Studies

India

India's financial inclusion efforts have centered on the Pradhan Mantri Jan Dhan Yojana (PMJDY), launched on August 28, 2014, which has resulted in the opening of over 56 crore bank accounts by August 2025, with deposits totaling ₹2.68 lakh crore.^[135]^[136] This initiative targeted unbanked populations, particularly in rural and semi-urban areas, where 67% of accounts were opened, and emphasized zero-balance accounts with RuPay debit cards and overdraft facilities.^[135] Complementary measures integrated biometric identification via Aadhaar, enabling direct benefit transfers and reducing leakages in subsidy distribution.^[137] Aadhaar-enabled systems, including the Aadhaar-enabled Payment System (AePS), have facilitated biometric authentication for transactions, expanding access for rural users without traditional IDs.^[138] By 2023, AePS reached over 37 crore users, supporting cash withdrawals and remittances at micro-ATMs, while linkage with the Unified Payments Interface (UPI) has driven digital transactions, contributing an estimated 3.4% to annual GDP through cost efficiencies.^[138]^[139] The Reserve Bank of India's Financial Inclusion Index rose to 67 in FY25, reflecting gains in access, usage, and service quality, with account ownership increasing substantially among low-income and rural households.^[140]^[141] Despite these advances, empirical data reveals limitations: approximately 23% of PMJDY accounts, or over 13 crore, were inoperative as of July 2025, with the rate climbing to 26% in public-sector banks by October 2025, indicating subdued transaction activity and potential superficial inclusion.^[142]^[143] In parallel, microfinance institutions, integral to extending credit under inclusion drives, reported gross non-performing assets surging to 16% by March 2025, nearly doubling from prior levels amid over-lending and borrower stress.^[144]^[145] This elevation in delinquencies, reaching ₹55,000 crore in NPAs, underscores risks from joint-liability group lending models prone to contagion defaults.^[146] Critics argue that the rapid account proliferation under PMJDY prioritized quantity over sustained usage, with low average balances—around ₹476 per account after 11 years—suggesting tokenistic rather than transformative inclusion.^[147] High dormancy rates correlate with persistent cash reliance in rural economies, where structural barriers like irregular incomes limit active banking.^[143] Additionally, Aadhaar's mandatory linkages for services, though later deemed voluntary by courts in non-essential cases, raised concerns over privacy and exclusion of those unable to enroll due to biometric failures. Microloan NPAs highlight over-indebtedness risks, exacerbated by aggressive lending without adequate credit assessment, contributing to borrower defaults and sector instability.^[144]

Kenya

M-Pesa, a mobile money service launched by Safaricom on March 6, 2007, revolutionized financial access in Kenya through a market-driven agent network enabling cash-in, cash-out, and peer-to-peer transfers via basic mobile phones.^[148] Initially piloted to address remittance challenges for rural households reliant on urban migrants, it grew rapidly without heavy regulatory mandates, reaching over 17 million subscribers by 2011 and processing transactions equivalent to a significant portion of GDP.^[149] By 2023, mobile money usage, dominated by M-Pesa, encompassed over 86% of Kenyan adults, with monthly transfers averaging values tied to 35% of per capita GDP in early adoption phases.^[150]^[151] Empirical analyses attribute household income gains to M-Pesa's facilitation of efficient remittances and risk-sharing. A panel study from 2008–2010 found that M-Pesa users experienced 2% higher per capita consumption growth and better resilience to income shocks, as transfers reduced the need to forgo consumption during crop failures or health events by 22%.^[152] Remittances via M-Pesa lowered costs and risks compared to informal bus-based methods, enabling faster, safer urban-to-rural flows that boosted rural household liquidity without frequent physical travel.^[153] Subsequent research confirmed expanded economic activity, with M-Pesa access correlating to increased night lights as a proxy for local commerce in rollout areas post-2007.^[154] Despite successes, M-Pesa exhibits urban concentration, with agent outlets disproportionately in cities, limiting rural last-mile access and exacerbating geographic disparities in service density.^[155] Agent operations face liquidity risks, where insufficient cash float delays withdrawals, and security vulnerabilities, including robberies targeting high-volume outlets handling substantial daily floats.^[156]^[157] These issues, while mitigated by market competition, highlight operational fragilities in a cash-reliant ecosystem.

United States

In the United States, financial inclusion operates within a mature banking system characterized by widespread access to traditional institutions, yet persistent challenges remain for the approximately 4.2% of households that were unbanked in 2023, down slightly from 4.5% in 2021, according to the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation's (FDIC) biennial survey.^[158] This equates to about 5.6 million households lacking a checking or savings account, often due to factors such as minimum balance requirements, high fees, or distrust of banks, with higher rates among lower-income, minority, and less-educated groups.^[159] Underbanked households, at 14.2% or roughly 19 million, rely on alternative financial services like payday loans alongside banked status, highlighting gaps in comprehensive access.^[160] Fintech innovations have driven inclusion by targeting these segments with low-barrier digital alternatives, exemplified by neobanks like Chime, which offers fee-free checking, early direct deposit, and no overdraft charges, appealing to underbanked consumers wary of traditional bank costs.^[161] Such platforms have facilitated account opening via mobile apps without physical branches or credit checks, contributing to a decline in unbanked rates through competitive pricing and user-friendly features that bypass legacy barriers.^[162] Overdraft fees, a key deterrent averaging $35 per incident at traditional banks, have fallen significantly due to market-driven changes; fintechs and innovating banks reduced industry-wide overdraft revenues by over 50% from pre-pandemic levels by 2023, saving consumers more than $6 billion annually through options like low-balance alerts and fee caps implemented voluntarily for competitive advantage.^[163] Regulatory debates center on whether government mandates or deregulation better promote inclusion, with proponents of mandates arguing for protections against exploitative fees—such as the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau's (CFPB) 2024 rule capping overdrafts at $5 for large banks to prevent billions in consumer harm—while critics contend these interventions distort markets and hinder innovation that has already lowered fees through competition.^[164] Free-market analyses assert that excessive regulation entrenches incumbents and raises compliance costs, reducing service availability for the unbanked, whereas deregulation fosters fintech entry and product evolution, as evidenced by voluntary fee reductions outpacing mandated timelines.^[165] Empirical trends support the latter, with unbanked rates halving since 2011 amid rising fintech adoption rather than solely through policy edicts, though some scholars highlight a potential trilemma where aggressive inclusion efforts risk stability or efficiency without balanced oversight.^[166]

China

China's approach to financial inclusion emphasizes state-orchestrated digital infrastructure, with the government promoting fintech platforms to extend services nationwide while maintaining regulatory oversight. Alipay, developed by Ant Group, and WeChat Pay, operated by Tencent, dominate the mobile payments ecosystem, capturing over 90% of the market share as of recent analyses.^[167] These platforms facilitate everyday transactions, remittances, and microloans, enabling rapid scaling of access without traditional banking expansion. In the third quarter of 2023, Alipay processed 118.19 trillion RMB in transactions, while WeChat Pay handled 67.81 trillion RMB, underscoring their centrality to the economy.^[168] A key focus has been rural fintech penetration, aligned with national strategies like rural revitalization. Platforms such as Alipay and competitors like JD Finance have deployed agent networks, QR code systems, and partnerships with local cooperatives to serve remote areas lacking physical branches.^[169]^[170] Government mandates, including subsidies for digital infrastructure and requirements for banks to integrate with third-party providers, have accelerated adoption; by the early 2020s, rural digital payment usage approached urban levels, contributing to broader access for farmers in land transfers and supply chain financing.^[171] This state-guided model has yielded empirical gains, with digital financial inclusion correlating to reduced income inequality across provinces and enhanced household resilience in rural settings.^[172]^[173] However, this integration ties financial access to extensive data collection, feeding into the social credit system, where payment histories and transaction behaviors inform government assessments of individual compliance and trustworthiness.^[174] Platforms routinely share user data with authorities under regulatory frameworks, enabling real-time monitoring that prioritizes state stability over privacy.^[175] Criticisms center on vulnerabilities exposed by the peer-to-peer (P2P) lending sector, initially touted for inclusion but leading to systemic risks; by early 2018, approximately 6,000 platforms had intermediated around 800 billion USD in loans, yet abrupt regulatory bans triggered widespread failures, investor losses exceeding hundreds of billions of RMB, and eroded trust in unregulated digital credit.^[176]^[177] These collapses highlighted debt bubbles and moral hazard in state-tolerated rapid expansion, prompting tighter controls that, while curbing excesses, slowed fintech innovation for underserved borrowers.^[178]

Empirical Evidence

Positive Impacts and Successes

A meta-analysis of financial inclusion initiatives across multiple studies found small but statistically significant positive average effects on household consumption, income, assets, and savings, with meta-regression confirming a significant positive impact on consumption smoothing and resilience against shocks.^[179] These effects are attributed to expanded access to formal financial services, enabling better resource allocation and buffering against income volatility, particularly in low-income households.^[180] Empirical studies on mobile money platforms demonstrate poverty reduction through increased per capita consumption and savings mobilization; for instance, adoption in sub-Saharan Africa has been linked to a 1-2% uplift in household consumption levels, contributing to broader economic resilience.^[181] Country-level analyses further indicate that widespread mobile money deployment correlates with GDP growth enhancements of up to 1% annually in adopting markets, driven by improved transaction efficiency and financial deepening.^[182]^[183] In China, digital financial inclusion has facilitated SME financing by alleviating constraints through reduced information asymmetry and expanded credit channels, with panel data from 2011-2020 showing significant positive effects on enterprise innovation and growth via platforms like Ant Financial.^[184] Cross-country evidence from 156 nations over 2004-2019 reinforces that higher financial inclusion indices inversely correlate with poverty headcount ratios, particularly in middle-income groups where digital tools amplify savings and investment opportunities.^[185]

Failures and Mixed Results

Randomized controlled trials of microcredit, a cornerstone of financial inclusion efforts, have yielded null or modest effects on business expansion and income generation. A 2015 analysis of six RCTs spanning seven countries, including India, Ethiopia, and Morocco, found no average impacts on consumption or income, with business profits showing insignificant changes despite access to loans averaging $100–$200 per borrower.^[97] Similarly, an RCT in the Philippines by Karlan and Zinman (2011) detected no business growth from expanded credit access, attributing limited uptake to borrowers' preexisting debt burdens rather than transformative potential. These findings challenge assumptions of automatic entrepreneurship gains, as selection into borrowing often favored households already engaged in viable activities, yielding heterogeneous results with no broad poverty alleviation. Gender gaps in financial inclusion persist despite programmatic expansions, with women holding 780 million fewer accounts than men globally in 2021, a disparity rooted in cultural barriers and lower creditworthiness assessments rather than mere access denial.^[186] In low-income contexts like Kenya, post-2010s mobile money surges narrowed ownership gaps to 6–8 percentage points by 2021, yet usage for transactions and savings remained 10–15% lower for women due to intrahousehold dynamics and risk aversion, indicating that account metrics overestimate functional inclusion.^[187] A 2022 study across 120+ countries confirmed this persistence, with digital credit initiatives sometimes widening gaps by prioritizing male-dominated sectors, as women's borrowing often funneled into consumption rather than investment.^[188] A 2024 meta-analysis synthesizing 100+ studies on financial inclusion interventions reported small average treatment effects—equivalent to 1–3% boosts in income or assets—with high heterogeneity across contexts, where urban or educated subgroups benefited more than rural poor, underscoring null outcomes in mismatched settings.^[189] This variability aligns with RCT evidence from Mexico and Bosnia, where group lending failed to induce self-employment shifts, as borrowers substituted rather than expanded activities, highlighting causal limitations beyond access provision.^[190] Overall, these empirical patterns reveal that financial inclusion yields inconsistent welfare gains, often failing to counter structural constraints like low human capital or market frictions.^[191]

Risks and Criticisms

Financial Stability Concerns

Empirical studies indicate that financial inclusion can undermine financial stability in developing countries by increasing systemic vulnerabilities, such as heightened bank risk-taking and exposure to correlated shocks among newly included populations.^[192] A 2024 analysis of 60 developing economies found that greater financial inclusion, measured by account ownership and credit access, correlates with weakened stability metrics like non-performing loans and z-scores, particularly when inclusion outpaces regulatory oversight.^[193] Similarly, research spanning 26 developing nations from 2004 to 2020 revealed an inverted U-shaped relationship, where initial inclusion benefits stability but excessive expansion erodes it through amplified credit risks and liquidity mismatches.^[194] These findings suggest that broadening access without robust risk management amplifies contagion risks, as low-income borrowers often exhibit higher default correlations during economic downturns.^[195] The 2010 microfinance crisis in India's Andhra Pradesh exemplifies how rapid financial inclusion can precipitate stability threats. By October 2010, microfinance institutions had extended loans to over 6.25 million borrowers in the state, fueling a credit bubble amid aggressive lending practices and multiple borrowing.^[196] State government intervention via an emergency ordinance halted collections and operations, triggering repayment halts and a surge in non-performing assets that rippled to formal banks holding microfinance portfolios, with portfolio-at-risk rates exceeding 40% in affected institutions.^[197] This episode, involving 25.36 million clients statewide, underscored how inclusion-driven lending booms can lead to localized collapses with broader spillover effects, including investor flight and tightened credit conditions.^[198] Critics highlight analogies to the 2008 subprime crisis, where expanded credit access to underserved segments similarly fostered over-indebtedness and asset bubbles, eroding systemic resilience through interconnected exposures.^[199] In financial inclusion contexts, unregulated or lightly supervised entry of new depositors and borrowers can strain deposit insurance mechanisms, as volatile small accounts amplify payout demands during panics, potentially depleting funds designed for traditional banking volumes.^[200] For instance, integrating e-money and mobile banking users into insured systems heightens residual risks from uncollateralized digital flows, challenging insurers' capacity in resource-constrained environments.^[201] Such strains are evident in debates over extending coverage to inclusion-driven products, where moral hazard from perceived safety nets may further incentivize risky intermediation.^[202]

Debt Traps and Over-Indebtedness

Easy access to credit via microfinance and digital platforms has been linked to household over-indebtedness, defined as debt burdens exceeding sustainable repayment capacity, often manifesting as repeated borrowing to service prior loans and creating self-reinforcing debt cycles. Yue et al. (2022) analyzed household data from China and found that digital financial inclusion significantly elevates debt levels and default probabilities, with low-income households particularly vulnerable to these cycles due to income shocks and limited financial literacy, as borrowers fail to anticipate long-term repayment strains.^[203] Similarly, empirical borrower-level analysis in Ghana revealed over-indebtedness rates tied to multiple simultaneous loans, where households juggling credits from various microfinance sources experienced repayment shortfalls averaging 30-50% of income.^[204] High-interest microloans amplify these household risks, as institutions frequently impose annual rates exceeding 25%, incentivizing short-term borrowing for consumption rather than productive investment, which erodes repayment ability amid agricultural or informal income volatility. In Bangladesh, ethnographic studies documented villages where microfinance penetration led to widespread multiple borrowing—households taking 3-5 concurrent loans—fostering a "debt culture" that trapped families in cycles of rollover loans and asset sales, with over-indebtedness affecting up to 40% of borrowers by 2019.^[205] Comparable patterns emerged in Cambodia's indigenous communities, where microloans at 18-36% interest rates resulted in defaults prompting land forfeitures and social distress, underscoring how lax lending standards prioritize inclusion over affordability assessments.^[206] Critics highlight behavioral factors ignored in financial inclusion models, such as time-inconsistency, where households exhibit present bias through hyperbolic discounting—overvaluing immediate gains from loans while underestimating future costs—leading to over-optimistic borrowing decisions despite awareness of risks. This dynamic, rooted in self-control failures rather than market failures alone, contributes to default rates in microcredit portfolios reaching 10-20% in high-penetration areas, as borrowers prioritize short-term needs over debt reduction.^[207] Empirical models incorporating these biases predict sustained over-indebtedness unless countered by commitment devices like savings mandates, revealing that unfettered credit access can entrench poverty for impulsive households rather than alleviate it.

Broader Economic Distortions

Financial inclusion initiatives, often implemented through government mandates and subsidies, can distort broader economic resource allocation by prioritizing access over creditworthiness and productivity. Mandated lending schemes, such as India's Priority Sector Lending (PSL) requirement that directs 40% of commercial bank credit to agriculture, small enterprises, and other designated areas, compel banks to allocate funds to higher-risk borrowers irrespective of return potential, leading to misallocation away from more efficient private sector opportunities.^[208] Empirical analysis of Indian banks reveals that PSL portfolios exhibit elevated non-performing asset (NPA) ratios compared to non-priority lending, with gross NPAs in priority sectors reaching 14.5% in some periods versus 5-7% overall, underscoring reduced credit efficiency as banks prioritize quota compliance over rigorous risk assessment.^[90] Regulatory forbearance exacerbates these distortions by permitting banks to conceal the true scale of impaired loans, thereby sustaining capital flows to unproductive "zombie" firms and delaying reallocation to viable projects. In India, Reserve Bank of India (RBI) measures from 2012-2018 allowed loan restructuring without immediate NPA classification, inflating reported asset quality and masking distressed assets estimated at over 10% of gross advances when including restructured loans.^[209] This opacity, rooted in soft budget constraints, perpetuates inefficient lending patterns, as evidenced by a buildup of NPAs exceeding 11% of total loans by 2018, which hindered overall banking sector productivity and crowded out private capital from entering underserved markets organically.^[210] Subsidies and guarantees tied to inclusion goals further distort incentives by displacing private investment; public funds or low-cost credit guarantees reduce banks' motivation to innovate risk-pricing models, channeling resources into subsidized low-yield activities rather than high-return ventures. Cross-country studies indicate that expanded financial inclusion via such interventions correlates with diminished financial efficiency metrics, such as cost-to-income ratios rising by 2-5% in affected systems, as operational burdens from non-market lending erode profitability and resource optimization.^[211] Advocates of market discipline contend that quotas undermine causal links between credit allocation and economic productivity, arguing for deregulation to enable interest rates and collateral requirements to guide funds toward genuine opportunities, thereby minimizing opportunity costs estimated at 1-2% of GDP in distorted economies.^[208]^[212]

References

[1]
Financial Inclusion Overview - World Bank
Jan 27, 2025 · Financial inclusion means that individuals and businesses have access to and use affordable financial products and services that meet their needs.
[2]
Publication: Financial Inclusion and Inclusive Growth: A Review of ...
This paper provides an overview of financial inclusion around the world and reviews the recent empirical evidence on how the use of financial products
[3]
The Global Findex Database 2025 - World Bank
In 2024, 40% of adults in developing economies saved in a financial account in 2024—a 16-percentage-point increase since 2021 and the fastest rise in more than ...Missing: achievements | Show results with:achievements
[4]
Financial inclusion, education, and employment: empirical evidence ...
Jan 26, 2024 · The results indicate that financial inclusion is beneficial to improving employment levels. The level of education development is proportional to the level of ...
[5]
[PDF] Financial Inclusion and - World Bank Open Knowledge Repository
Empirical Evidence of the Benefits and Risks of Financial Inclusion. This section discusses the empirical evidence of the benefits and risks of using formal ...
[6]
https://academic.oup.com/wbro/article/36/2/197/6017253
[7]
http://www.afp.com/en/infos/progress-global-financial-inclusion-stalls-after-two-years-significant-improvement-according
[8]
Global financial development report 2014 : financial inclusion
Financial inclusion, defined as the proportion of individuals and firms that use financial services, has become a subject of considerable interest among policy ...
[9]
[PDF] The Drive for Financial Inclusion: Lessons of World Bank Group ...
Jun 30, 2021 · 1.1 Financial inclusion is defined by the World Bank Group as meaning that “individuals and businesses have access to useful and affordable ...
[10]
Publication: The Global Findex Database 2025
Jul 16, 2025 · The Global Findex 2025 is a database on digital and financial inclusion, showing how mobile tech helps adults access financial accounts and ...
[11]
Paternalism and pseudo-rationality: An illustration based on ...
Governments enact paternalistic policies like forced savings and default savings. · Such policies cause households to accumulate wealth and smooth consumption.
[12]
[PDF] Fintech and the digital transformation of financial services
Exchanges and brokers address the search and transaction costs of individual issuers and investors, reducing information asymmetries through listing ...
[13]
Financial technology, inclusive finance and bank performance
Third, the positive effects of FinTech are attributable to risk adjustment effects that reduce information asymmetry and transaction costs. This paper ...
[14]
Financial inclusion and fintech: a state-of-the-art systematic literature ...
Jan 27, 2025 · The paper is structured to first outline the theoretical underpinnings of financial inclusion and fintech in Sect. “Theoretical review”.
[15]
Financial Access - World Bank
One of the basic rules of economics is that prices adjust so that at market equilibrium, supply equals demand. ... As for access to financial markets, the Global ...
[16]
[PDF] Financial Inclusion and Stability: Review of Theoretical and ...
At the theoretical level, we thus distinguish between a lack of access (supply-side constraint) and voluntary financial exclusion (demand-side constraints). We ...
[17]
Theories of Financial Inclusion by Peterson K Ozili :: SSRN
Feb 26, 2020 · This article presents several theories of financial inclusion. Financial inclusion is defined as the availability of, and the ease of access ...
[18]
Rotating savings and credit associations (ROSCAs) in prewar China ...
Oct 16, 2023 · This article studies Rotating Savings and Credit Associations (ROSCAs) in late imperial and Republican-era Shanxi province, China, from the eighteenth to the ...
[19]
Situating the West African System of Collectivity: A Study of Susu ...
Mar 22, 2023 · While the origins of ROSCAs are still being debated, there is no doubt about their global presence. In Africa, Ethiopia has traditions of equub, ...
[20]
[PDF] A Short History of Tontines - Scholarship Archive
A tontine is an investment scheme through which shareholders derive some form of profit or benefit while they are living, but the value.
[21]
Credit and Poverty in Early Modern Venice - MIT Press Direct
Mar 7, 2022 · This article integrates our knowledge of pre-industrial credit markets by examining an unusual form of lending in European history.Missing: inclusion | Show results with:inclusion
[22]
Borrowing in a pre-industrial city: financial behaviour and economic ...
In early modern Venice, credit was ubiquitous, with various lenders offering long- and short- term loans. This article traces the structure of the Venetian ...
[23]
Informal finance: A theory of moneylenders - ScienceDirect.com
I present a model that analyzes the coexistence of formal and informal finance in underdeveloped credit markets.
[24]
Rotating savings & credit associations (ROSCAs) - introduction
Their history goes back thousands of years. They were documented in China ... century, with the poor laws and enclosures pushing people off the land ...
[25]
[PDF] Discussion PaPers - Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia
Re- search on this subject has found alternative financial vehicles called rotating savings and credit associations. (ROSCAs), which continue to be used today.
[26]
[PDF] World Bank Document
That evidence shows a significant failure of subsidized credit programs either to achieve an increase of agricultural output cost-effectively or to improve ...
[27]
[PDF] Rural Finance - Documents & Reports - World Bank
credit programs, and subsidized interest rates enterprises and sectors to the financial system, or interest rate ceilings. but in doing so, they have taxed ...
[28]
The World Bank, Agricultural Credit, and the Rise of Neoliberalism in ...
May 13, 2021 · This article examines the development of the World Bank's agricultural credit programming between 1960 and 1990.
[29]
[PDF] Co-operatives and Rural Development in India
Insinuating the government into co-operative management opens the door to political interference. Government contribution to the equity of co-operatives and ...
[30]
[PDF] Reforms in Rural Credit Cooperatives in India - IOSR Journal
The rural credit cooperative sector in India was plagued by numerous problems such as undue government interference, poor governance and management, high ...Missing: 1970s- | Show results with:1970s-
[31]
[PDF] Grameen Bank: Taking Capitalism to the Poor
Nov 8, 2003 · Yunus found 42 people in Jobra in the same poverty trap, and in 1976 he experimented by lending them small amounts of money at reasonable rates.
[32]
[PDF] The Empirics of Microfinance: What do we Know? - FinDev Gateway
Most of the available empirical studies address the general question of whether joint liability group lending improves repayment performance of groups, using ...
[33]
[PDF] CGAP V Completion Report - GLOBAL POLICY ARCHITECTURE
During CGAP V, the Global Policy Architecture (GPA) Initiative aimed to increase understanding of the interdependence of the I-SIP objectives and to mainstream ...
[34]
[PDF] FINANCIAL INCLUSION - Sustainable Development Goals
Financial inclusion is about universal access to affordable, effective, and safe financial services for the unbanked, with progress measured by tools like the ...Missing: 21st | Show results with:21st
[35]
G20 Financial Inclusion Action Plan (FIAP) Progress Report 2010 ...
Mar 5, 2015 · The G20 Financial Inclusion Action Plan (FIAP) Progress Report 2010-2014 takes stock of achievements and the progress of the GPFI over the past five years.
[36]
How mobile money is driving economic growth
Sep 15, 2015 · As of 2011, 70% of the adult population in Kenya had an M-PESA account (Jack and Suri 2011, 2014) and M-PESA has contributed to financial ...
[37]
[PDF] Global Findex Database 2021 - World Bank Documents & Reports
Account ownership around the world increased by 50 percent in the 10 years spanning 2011 to 2021, from 51 percent of adults to 76 percent of adults. From. 2017 ...
[38]
How Useful Is “Usage” in Measuring Financial Inclusion's Impact?
Apr 23, 2019 · 1. Usage of financial services doesn't always equate to positive impact · 2. Usage may be causing us to lose sight of access · 3. Usage isn't the ...Missing: criticisms | Show results with:criticisms
[39]
Financial Inclusion: Is More Really Better?
Apr 6, 2023 · This article discusses the shift of financial inclusion focus from access to usage, and questions if more financial inclusion is necessarily better.
[40]
[PDF] Advancing Financial Inclusion Metrics: Shifting from access to ...
Financial inclusion metrics are shifting from access to economic empowerment, focusing on the impact on livelihoods, and moving beyond supply-side insights to ...
[41]
[PDF] Distinguishing Constraints on Financial Inclusion and Their Impact ...
By contrast, high fixed participation costs are a major obstacle to financial inclusion in Malaysia. These results suggest that understanding the specific.
[42]
Financial Inclusion: What Have We Learned So Far? What Do We ...
Aug 7, 2020 · Section III reviews the main findings of theoretical and empirical research on the impacts of financial inclusion. ... benefits for financial ...
[43]
[PDF] Financial Access, Technical Transformation and Poverty Traps ...
Apr 2, 2020 · Lack of adequate collateral and high enforcement costs broaden the gap between the interest rates offered on savings deposits and the interest ...
[44]
Financial Regulations for Improving Financial Inclusion (brief)
Mar 22, 2016 · Poor regulation is one of the major obstacles to financial inclusion. Others include lack of good infrastructure, weak institutions and poor ...
[45]
[PDF] KYC Innovations, Financial Inclusion and Integrity
Accordingly, it is clear that KYC barriers are a significant impediment to the expansion and inclusiveness of the formal financial sector.
[46]
[PDF] UNLOCKING FINANCIAL INCLUSION
• However, KYC regulatory requirements can become one of the barriers preventing low- income segment, including irregular migrants, to access financial services ...
[47]
[PDF] Regulatory Sandboxes and Financial Inclusion - CGAP
Through the Branch- less Banking Guidelines/Principles, BI removed some of these obstacles and allowed the branchless banking and mo- bile money sector to ...
[48]
[PDF] CREATING ENABLING FINTECH ECOSYSTEMS: THE ROLE OF ...
In 2008, the Bank of Ghana (BOG) issued. Guidelines for Branchless Banking that marked the beginning of a journey in transforming the payments landscape in ...
[49]
Riegle-Neal Interstate Banking and Branching Efficiency Act of 1994
The Riegle-Neal Interstate Banking and Branching Efficiency Act of 1994 removed many of the restrictions on opening bank branches across state lines.<|separator|>
[50]
Why Worry about Financial Exclusion?
The aim of this Commentary is to examine whether financial exclusion in the United States is a problem that needs addressing by policymakers.
[51]
An empirical analysis of the impact of banking regulations on ...
This study examines the impact of financial regulation on sustainable financial inclusion (FI) in the Central African Economic and Monetary Community (CEMAC) ...
[52]
[PDF] Consumer Risks in Fintech - World Bank Documents & Reports
Apr 3, 2021 · This work is a product of the staff of the World Bank with external contributions.
[53]
How 'financial inclusion' can help lift millions of people out of poverty
Sep 9, 2022 · ... example, in countries that have histories of hyperinflation, adults being wary to keep their money in the bank. We also see in some ...
[54]
Banking on trust: Institutional trust and the geography of financial ...
Jul 28, 2025 · Experiences of hyperinflation, banking crises and policy failures have left an indelible mark, with many opting to keep their money 'under the ...Missing: distrust | Show results with:distrust
[55]
[PDF] Financial exclusion - New Philanthropy Capital
Financial exclusion has a range of different causes. On the demand side, these include a lack of trust in financial institutions and low skills.
[56]
[PDF] Distrust of banks among the unbanked and banked
Cultural psychologists might argue that trust/distrust of banks and financial inclusion/exclusion is related to individual and macro-level phenomenon with socio ...<|separator|>
[57]
The impact of formal financial inclusion on informal ... - ResearchGate
May 30, 2025 · This paper examines the effect of formal financial intermediation (inclusion) on informal financial intermediation and the use of cash for ...
[58]
[PDF] Behavioral and Socio-Cultural Drivers of FinTech Indebtedness in ...
Sep 28, 2025 · Religiosity is widely acknowledged as a determinant of financial behavior and debt aversion. Prior studies demonstrate that individuals with ...
[59]
The Influence of Cultural Factors on Financial Decision-Making in ...
Dec 19, 2024 · Conversely, the cautious attitude towards borrowing, as highlighted by many participants, suggests a risk-averse financial culture shaped by ...
[60]
The origin of risk aversion - PMC - PubMed Central - NIH
Here, we propose an evolutionary explanation for the origin of risk aversion. In the context of a simple binary-choice model, we show that risk aversion emerges ...Missing: exclusion | Show results with:exclusion
[61]
An evolutionary explanation for risk aversion - ScienceDirect.com
Constant relative risk aversion can be viewed as an evolutionary-developed heuristic aimed to maximize the probability of having descendants forever.Missing: exclusion | Show results with:exclusion
[62]
National culture and the demand for physical money during the first ...
Nov 9, 2022 · This study found that uncertainty avoidance, as well as social norms regarding gratification, played a major role.
[63]
[PDF] Informal Financial Networks: Theory and Evidence
Our empirical evidence is striking in that it demonstrates the importance of informal financial networks, even in the U.S., a country with very welledeveloped ...
[64]
IMF Releases the 2024 Financial Access Survey Results
Oct 30, 2024 · The FAS stands as the most comprehensive annual supply-side database on financial inclusion, boasting nearly complete global coverage. It covers ...Missing: metrics | Show results with:metrics
[65]
Measurement challenges in Financial Inclusion | IDinsight
We briefly discuss the potential and limitations of four key data sources to assess these indicators: administrative data, sample survey data, Discrete Choice ...
[66]
PROTOCOL: Effects of interventions to improve access to financial ...
Jul 5, 2023 · ... endogeneity problem due to selection biases concerning the intervention. Included studies either have quasi‐experimental study designs or ...
[67]
Financial Inclusion 2.0: Generating New Evidence to Maximize Impact
Apr 4, 2024 · Rigorous impact studies including randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have also showcased diverging conclusions. For instance, a study from ...
[68]
[PDF] Policy Research Working Paper 6593 - World Bank Document
1 Some recent papers using RCTs to study the impact of financial inclusion in developing economies are Banerjee et al. (2010), Brune et al. (2011), Dupas ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[69]
[PDF] Financial Inclusion Hype vs. Reality
Unfortunately, when we examine the Findex data by tracking account dormancy, we see that the percentage of people with dormant accounts has actually grown — ...Missing: criticisms | Show results with:criticisms
[70]
Defining and measuring financial inclusion: A systematic review and ...
Jan 18, 2021 · This study re-examines the construct of financial inclusion, through a literature review and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA).
[71]
[PDF] Mobile Money: The Economics of M-PESA William Jack Tavneet ...
Although M-PESA does not pay interest on deposits, and does not make loans, it can usefully be thought of as providing financial transaction services and that ...
[72]
Top 10 Peer-to-Peer Lending Platforms | FinTech Magazine
Apr 9, 2025 · Discover the top 10 P2P lending platforms offering investors enhanced returns whilst providing borrowers lower rates and revolutionising financial services.
[73]
[PDF] Fintech Lending: Financial Inclusion, Risk Pricing, and Alternative ...
Aug 14, 2024 · For examples, Fintech firms such as the. Lending Club and Prosper are turning to commercial banks and industrial banks to originate their loans.
[74]
Study: Mobile-money services lift Kenyans out of poverty | MIT News
Dec 8, 2016 · A study finds the mobile-money service M-PESA has lifted 194000, or 2 percent, of Kenyan households out of poverty, having greater impact on ...Missing: GDP | Show results with:GDP
[75]
[PDF] FINTECH AND FINANCIAL INCLUSION: A REVIEW OF THE ...
Fintech can promote financial inclusion by enabling account ownership for the unbanked, and can decrease income inequality. 1.7 billion adults are unbanked.
[76]
[PDF] Promise (Un)kept? Fintech and Financial Inclusion
The empirical analysis presented in this paper indicates that fintech has not yet enhanced financial inclusion across all countries—possibly due to deep ...
[77]
[PDF] On fintech and financial inclusion - Bank for International Settlements
The advent of Fintech is often seen as a promising avenue for reducing inequality in access to credit. Bartlett et al. (2018) study this issue, analyzing the ...<|separator|>
[78]
Innovative Fintech. 10 Fintech Innovations - DashDevs
With the introduction of peer-to-peer (P2P) lending in the financial industry, platforms such as Prosper Marketplace or Upstart have transformed the lending ...
[79]
Financial inclusion effects of engaging with the fintech ecosystem
Our findings suggest that the fintech ecosystem does not perform well in addressing financial inclusion inequalities facing young adults, women, the less ...
[80]
https://cepr.org/voxeu/columns/impact-fintech-lending
[81]
[PDF] Priority Sector Lending (PSL) in India: A Comparative study between ...
May 17, 2025 · This study conducts a comparative analysis of Priority Sector Lending (PSL) between public and private sector banks in India from 2019-20 to ...
[82]
PROGRESS AND CURRENT STATUS OF PRADHAN MANTRI JAN ...
Aug 9, 2025 · The study reveals a growth in Jan Dhan accounts opened, with more than 50 crore accounts, which indicates a substantial reduction in the number ...
[83]
Formal account inactivity: a global overview, causes, consequences ...
Apr 24, 2025 · Formal accounts may remain inactive if adults feel that they have no need for an account, or the bank or financial institution is too far away from them.Missing: criticisms | Show results with:criticisms
[84]
The Admirable Success of the Jan-Dhan Yojana
Aug 28, 2017 · The 2017 FII survey observed that not only was there a higher account inactivity rate among women, rural residents, and below- poverty-line ...Missing: empirical results
[85]
[PDF] Challenges and Awareness Levels in Priority Sector Lending - IJNRD
Jun 6, 2024 · related to PSL such as low profitability, high NPAs, quantitative targets, government interference, and transaction costs. Ahmed (2010) found ...
[86]
[PDF] priority sector npas: a comparative study of indian commercial banks
However, for priority sector NPAs, the measured AAGR has increased to higher rates in private banks as compared to government and international banks, ...
[87]
[PDF] A Comparative Analysis of Non-Performing Assets (NPAs) in Public ...
Large corporate default, priority sector lending, frauds, weak internal control and inefficiencies of management and bank officials resulted into high NPAs.
[88]
Moral Hazard and Government Guarantees in the Banking Industry ‡‡
Feb 2, 2015 · This moral hazard problem associated with the introduction of guarantees may lead to the perverse outcome of increasing overall instability in ...Missing: inclusion | Show results with:inclusion
[89]
[PDF] Does Public Debt Matter for Financial Inclusion: Some Cross
Jul 13, 2025 · Theoretically, the orthodox view posits that increased public debt “crowds out” credit available to the private sector and thus impinges on the ...
[90]
Priority and non-priority sector GNPAS in Indian commercial banks
Mar 1, 2024 · Few studies directly compare the performance of priority sector sub-sectors with their non-priority sector counterparts in terms of NPAs.Introduction · Review of literature · Tools for data analysis · Panel regression result
[91]
About Financial Inclusion - CGAP
Savings, insurance, credit, remittances, and social protection payments all have major roles to play in helping people prepare for and adapt to climate change.Missing: scope | Show results with:scope
[92]
Financial Inclusion 2.0 - CGAP
This initiative empowers stakeholders to better understand when and how financial services contribute to meaningful development outcomes.
[93]
Financial Inclusion - World Bank
Financial inclusion means that individuals and businesses have access to useful and affordable financial products and services that meet their needs.
[94]
Visa and USAID are Working Together to Drive Inclusive Digital ...
Oct 24, 2024 · Together, Visa and USAID aim to enable digitization of government systems and payments to promote financial inclusion and economic growth.
[95]
Expanding Inclusive Financial Systems Worldwide - Gates Foundation
Discover how the Gates Foundation helps build inclusive financial systems, supporting digital services for low-income communities globally.Missing: scope | Show results with:scope<|control11|><|separator|>
[96]
Microfinance: Evolution at the crossroads of high tech and high touch
Dec 12, 2023 · Microfinance: Evolution at the crossroads of high tech and high touch. Microfinance reaches 140 million borrowers worldwide (80 percent of ...<|separator|>
[97]
Six Randomized Evaluations of Microcredit: Introduction and Further ...
Article Information. Abstract. Causal evidence on microcredit impacts informs theory, practice, and debates about its effectiveness as a development tool.
[98]
The Miracle of Microfinance? Evidence from a Randomized Evaluation
This paper reports results from the randomized evaluation of a group-lending microcredit program in Hyderabad, India.
[99]
Financial Inclusion: One Size Doesn't Fit All | AIER
Jan 9, 2019 · The authors found that the introduction of cheap (and, in some cases, free) mobile banking services had little impact on people's savings and ...Missing: international fatigue
[100]
(PDF) Financial Inclusion: A Strong Critique - ResearchGate
May 29, 2021 · This article presents some criticisms of financial inclusion. It notes that (i) financial inclusion is an. invitation to live by finance and ...Missing: fatigue fits-
[101]
What do we know about the impact of microfinance? The problems ...
We review all eight randomized control trial studies of microfinance published in peer-reviewed journals. The studies generally show no or minimal impact.
[102]
[PDF] THE ROLE OF DIGITAL MOBILE MONEY IN CATALYZING ...
M-Pesa revolutionized financial inclusion in Kenya by providing widespread access to financial services through mobile phones. It enabled peer-to-peer transfers ...<|separator|>
[103]
Mobile money as a driver of digital financial inclusion - ScienceDirect
This paper showcases that mobile money (MM) services are a reliable driver of financial inclusion. •. We highlight the role played by MM agents in the ...
[104]
Mobile Money: The $1 trillion industry driving the financial inclusion ...
May 29, 2025 · Mobile money has improved its ability to financially include low-income populations and it is now present in almost one hundred countries.
[105]
[PDF] The Role of Data Exchange in Financial Inclusion
Sep 1, 2024 · In the context of financial services, APIs enable the secure exchange of data between banks, fintechs, and other third-party providers, ...
[106]
Open Banking & Financial Inclusion: APIs for the Unbanked - Finfusion
Sep 23, 2025 · Support standards for secure authentication and API interoperability. Consider sandbox programs to accelerate pilots while protecting consumers.
[107]
https://www.ghanaweb.com/GhanaHomePage/business/Experts-push-BoG-on-unified-open-banking-API-infrastructure-2006589
[108]
The Role Of Blockchain Technology In Enhancing Financial Inclusion
Oct 24, 2024 · Blockchain technology has emerged as a transformative force with the potential to greatly improve financial inclusion, especially among underbanked and ...
[109]
Blockchain in Financial Services in Emerging Markets, Part I
This note outlines the mechanisms, origins, and key characteristics of DLT; the difference between 'public' and 'private' DLT; the technology's main advantages, ...
[110]
The World Bank and Blockchain: A New Era of Transparency
Sep 29, 2025 · FundsChain, a blockchain-based platform, enables the World Bank to improve traceability, accountability, and streamline operations when ...
[111]
How AI credit scoring models can boost financial inclusion
Oct 1, 2025 · Fairness: Models are explicitly built to include unbanked and new-to-credit users by using alternative data and are continuously monitored for ...
[112]
7 Alternative Credit Scoring Trends That Will Shape 2026 - RiskSeal
Aug 5, 2025 · The 7 trends are: increased AI, alternative data, financial inclusion, regulatory changes, blockchain, partnerships, and psychometric data.Increased adoption of artificial... · Advanced integration of...
[113]
[PDF] The Use of Alternative Data in Credit Risk Assessment
Intersections of AI governance and alternative data in credit scoring regulation ... 2024 and potentially extending into 2025. Page 38. The Use of Alternative ...
[114]
Digital Inclusion and Financial Inclusion: Evidence from Peer-to ...
May 18, 2024 · Our study suggests that digital inclusion can facilitate financial inclusion, particularly historically marginalized populations with ...
[115]
Expanding Financial Inclusion through Digital Financial Services
Dec 23, 2024 · This paper reviews the evidence demonstrating how digital payments can expand financial inclusion among recipients and encourage the use of additional formal ...
[116]
[PDF] Mobile Money and Economic Activity - World Bank Document
After its launch in 2007, M-PESA was adopted by about 70 percent of all households in Kenya in just four years.
[117]
[PDF] Banking in Africa
For example, Kenya's adoption rate is 67%, while Nigeria's is only 9 ... “Mobile Banking: The Impact of M-Pesa in Kenya,” in S. Edwards, S. Johnson ...
[118]
(PDF) Digital Banking and Financial Inclusion in Rural Economies
Jan 24, 2025 · Despite these advancements, challenges such as limited internet penetration, lack of digital literacy, cybersecurity threats, and trust issues ...
[119]
[PDF] Digital Banking and Financial Inclusion: An Empirical Study of Rural ...
Mitra (2019) found that although account penetration had increased due to government efforts, the actual usage of digital services remained low in rural areas.<|separator|>
[120]
Publication: Liquidity Management for Mobile Money Providers
In Kenya, 20 percent of m-pesa customers report that they cannot withdraw money from an m-pesa agent. ... Global growth is expected to hold steady at 2.7 percent ...
[121]
Digital finance boosting women's financial inclusion in sub-Saharan ...
Mar 7, 2024 · Mobile money services are typically enhanced by local mobile agents, where women can conveniently deposit even small amounts of cash to make ...
[122]
4 Cyber Attacks that Threaten Financial Inclusion | Blog - CGAP
Sep 18, 2018 · 1. Social engineering · 2. Data breaches · 3. System outages and denial of service attacks · 4. Third-party threats · Impact on low-income customers.
[123]
2019 Capital One Cyber Incident | What Happened
On July 19, 2019, we determined that an outside individual gained unauthorized access and obtained certain types of personal information about Capital One ...Missing: verifiable | Show results with:verifiable<|control11|><|separator|>
[124]
Regulation for Inclusive Digital Finance - CGAP
An Enabling Regulatory Framework is Critical for Financial Inclusion · The Four Basic Enablers · E-Money Issuance by Nonbanks · Use of Agents · Risk-Based Customer ...<|separator|>
[125]
COVID-19 Boosted the Adoption of Digital Financial Services
Jul 21, 2022 · The Global Findex Database 2021 reports increases in financial inclusion around the world. · 71% of people in developing countries have a ...
[126]
[PDF] Digital Payments and the COVID-19 Shock - World Bank Document
And the Findex 2021 data reveal that 39 percent of adults in developing economies opened their first financial account for the purpose of receiving a direct ...
[127]
[PDF] The Promise of Fintech: Financial Inclusion in the Post COVID-19 Era
During the. COVID-19 pandemic, technology has created new opportunities for digital financial services to accelerate and enhance financial inclusion, amid ...
[128]
AI's Promise: A New Era for Financial Inclusion | Blog - CGAP
Apr 4, 2025 · AI can reform FSPs' ability to collect data on low-income clients by relying on digital data trails and/or big data instead of costly surveys.
[129]
AI: Rewriting the future of finance and financial inclusion
Jun 25, 2025 · AI enables markets to bypass legacy infrastructure entirely, leapfrogging traditional financial infrastructure and redefining the very essence of what it means ...
[130]
Artificial Intelligence (AI) at the service of financial inclusion - CAF
Mar 26, 2025 · AI is being used to develop innovative solutions that address traditional barriers to financial access, allowing more people and small businesses to ...
[131]
(PDF) Digital Financial Services And Environmental Sustainability
Sep 18, 2025 · The paper draws out the emerging and post pandemic evidence on how DFS can improve environmental sustainability and financial inclusion (green ...
[132]
Impact of digital transformation on financial stability in emerging ...
Oct 7, 2024 · The study found a negative long-term relationship between digital finance and bank stability in Ethiopia, with short-term benefits from mobile ...
[133]
Financial Inclusion and Stability: A Balancing Act | Blog - CGAP
Mar 22, 2024 · Financial inclusion plays a critical role in enabling broader development outcomes, helping people prosper and cope with various shocks by harnessing economic ...
[134]
Is Climate Change Undermining Financial Inclusion? Early ... - CGAP
May 9, 2025 · Climate change is already undermining financial inclusion, and reduced access to finance will make grassroots climate adaptation harder than it already is.Missing: 2020s | Show results with:2020s
[135]
11 Years of PM Jan Dhan Yojana: Banking the Unbanked - PIB
Aug 27, 2025 · Over 56.16 crore bank accounts have been opened under the Pradhan Mantri Jan Dhan Yojana (PMJDY), with total deposits reaching ₹2.67 lakh crore ...
[136]
PMJDY turns 11 with 560 million accounts, ₹2.68 trillion deposits
Aug 28, 2025 · “Over the last 11 years, more than 56 crore Jan Dhan accounts have been opened, garnering a total deposit balance of ₹2.68 trillion. More than ...
[137]
The India Stack is Revolutionizing Access to Finance - IMF F&D
The India Stack is widening access to financial services in an economy where retail transactions are heavily cash based. A digital ID card dramatically lowers ...
[138]
Due Diligence in the Aadhaar-Enabled Payment Systems Ecosystem
Jul 17, 2025 · Owing to its ease of usage, AePS's in 2023 alone, reached more than 37 crore users, establishing its pivotal role in India's financial inclusion ...
[139]
Analyzing UPI and Aadhaar in GDP growth and cost optimization
Oct 9, 2025 · Findings indicate that, on average, UPI contributed an amount equivalent to 3.4% of India's annual GDP, while Aadhaar's impact ranged between ...
[140]
Reserve Bank of India's (RBI) financial inclusion index shows growth ...
Jul 23, 2025 · The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) Financial Inclusion Index rose 4.3% to 67 in FY25, reflecting stronger access, usage, and quality of ...Missing: empirical | Show results with:empirical
[141]
67 and Rising: India's Financial Inclusion Gains Momentum - PIB
Aug 6, 2025 · RBI's Financial Inclusion Index rises to 67 in 2025 indicating Growth for Everyone · 55.98 crore beneficiaries · 6.65 Lakhs accounts opened · 55.98 ...
[142]
23% of 560 million PM Jan Dhan accounts remain inactive, says govt
Aug 18, 2025 · 23% of 560 million PM Jan Dhan accounts remain inactive, says govt. Out of 560.3 million PMJDY accounts at the end of July 31, 2025, 130.4 ...Missing: percentage | Show results with:percentage
[143]
https://www.business-standard.com/finance/news/jan-dhan-inoperative-accounts-psbs-financial-inclusion-rupay-gap-125101500986_1.html
[144]
Microfin in major crisis with near-2x NPA surge; Joint-liability lending ...
Apr 30, 2025 · India's microfinance sector is facing a severe crisis as delinquency rates have surged, with gross NPAs reaching 16% in FY25. This rise has led ...
[145]
Stress in Microfinance - Drishti IAS
May 12, 2025 · India's microfinance institutions (MFIs) are facing a major crisis as gross non-performing assets (NPAs) surged to 16% by March 2025, nearly doubling from 8.8% ...
[146]
Microfinance credit quality dips in FY25; NPAs rise to ₹55,000 crore
Jun 11, 2025 · Microfinance sector sees worsening credit metrics in FY25 with PAR 31-180 and NPAs rising sharply amid disbursal decline and external disruptions.
[147]
Pradhan Mantri Jan Dhan Yojana: Real Welfare or Tokenism?
Sep 19, 2025 · 2,640 million in their accounts at the end of 11 years. Indeed, worth applauding, but does it complete the story of financial inclusion? Perhaps ...
[148]
The M-PESA wonder: How it all begun - Safaricom Newsroom
On 6th March 2007, M-PESA was officially launched. A month later, it had 19,671 mobile active users. In November of that year, the numbers had ballooned to an ...
[149]
Mobile payments go viral : M-PESA in Kenya (English)
It has seen exceptional growth since its introduction by mobile phone operator Safaricom in Kenya ... Document Date. 2010/03/01. Document Type. Working Paper.
[150]
[PDF] How to make mobile money and digital financial services work for ...
In Kenya, over 86 per cent of adults use mobile money for everyday ... In 2023, M-PESA processed transactions equivalent to approxi- mately 59 per ...<|separator|>
[151]
At 18, M-PESA Faces Its Adult Future: Kenya's Mobile Money Giant ...
Mar 11, 2025 · They were wrong." Within three years, 90% of Kenyan adults were using the platform, with monthly transfers equivalent to 35% of GDP per capita.
[152]
[PDF] Risk Sharing and Transactions Costs: Evidence from Kenya's Mobile ...
To study how M-PESA has affected risk sharing in Kenya, we analyze data from a large household panel survey conducted between late 2008 and early 2010. First, ...
[153]
[PDF] Mobile Banking: The Impact of M-Pesa in Kenya
An exception is Jack and Suri's (2010) empirical study that shows that M-Pesa improves the ability of households to smooth risks. We contribute to the ...
[154]
Mobile Money and Economic Activity: Evidence from Kenya - PMC
The paper shows that access to mobile money services increased local economic activity and that these effects increased over time.
[155]
[PDF] M-PESA Transforming the lives of Kenyans
Jul 8, 2025 · Over 12,000 agent outlets countrywide with a heavy bias in urban areas. Agents drive recruitment and service an ever growing subscriber base ...
[156]
[PDF] M-Money Channel Distribution Case – Kenya SAFARICOM M-PESA
from an M-PESA agent and 70% of these users stated this was because the agent lacked funds.16 An agent in Malaha, a small village in Western Kenya ...
[157]
Exploring Financial Risks in Relation to Performance of MPESA ...
Jul 15, 2024 · This research investigates how liquidity, credit, and operational risks affect the financial performance of Mpesa outlets in rural Kenya.
[158]
FDIC National Survey of Unbanked and Underbanked Households
Nov 14, 2024 · 2023 Survey Key Findings · The unbanked rate changed little from 2021 (4.5 percent) · Between 2011—when the unbanked rate was at its highest level ...Data Downloads and Resources · Household Survey Archives · Households
[159]
[PDF] FDIC National Survey of Unbanked and Underbanked Households
This report presents results from the 2023 FDIC National Survey of Unbanked and Underbanked Households. This nationally representative survey has been conducted ...
[160]
FDIC Survey Finds 96 Percent of U.S. Households Were Banked in ...
Nov 12, 2024 · The Underbanked Rate – 14.2 percent of U.S. households (representing 19.0 million households) were underbanked in 2023, meaning these households ...
[161]
What Is Fintech? Definition, Uses, and Impact Explained - Chime
Jun 14, 2024 · Financial inclusion. A hallmark of fintech is that it's more accessible to those traditionally unable to access banking services. For ...
[162]
Fintech: The Engine Accelerating Financial Inclusion - Bailard
Mar 31, 2023 · Nonbanks have emerged as key players in promoting financial inclusion for the unbanked and underbanked in the U.S. Through digital payment ...
[163]
Overdraft/NSF Revenue in 2023 down more than 50% versus pre ...
Apr 24, 2024 · Huntington and KeyBank's revenues fell 64% and 56% since 2019, respectively; Huntington reduced its overdraft fee to $15, among other changes, ...Missing: fintech | Show results with:fintech<|separator|>
[164]
CFPB Closes Overdraft Loophole to Save Americans Billions in Fees
Dec 12, 2024 · The final rule is expected to add up to $5 billion in annual overdraft fee savings to consumers, or $225 per household that pays overdraft fees.Missing: fintech | Show results with:fintech
[165]
Other Reforms to Boost Competition and Innovation in the Financial ...
Feb 4, 2025 · The US financial regulatory framework dampens innovation, protects incumbent firms from competition, and promotes taxpayer-financed bailouts.
[166]
[PDF] The Financial Inclusion Trilemma - Yale Journal on Regulation
Jan 16, 2024 · The challenge of financial inclusion is among the most intractable policy problems in banking. Despite living in the world's wealthiest.Missing: distortions hazard<|separator|>
[167]
▷ Mobile Payments in China: Past and Present ! - LHoFT
90% of the mobile payments sphere in China is dominated by two companies, AliPay (Alibaba) and WeChatPay (Tencent).<|separator|>
[168]
Mobile payments in China: How China became a cashless society
May 29, 2025 · In Q3 2023, Alipay and WeChat Pay recorded transaction volumes of RMB 118.19 trillion and RMB 67.81 trillion, respectively, accounting for over ...
[169]
[PDF] China's Alipay and WeChat Pay: Reaching Rural Users - CGAP
Dec 4, 2017 · financial services-focused parent company of Alipay, is championing financial inclusion for China's development, especially for rural users ...
[170]
Digitally Down to the Countryside: Fintech and Rural Development ...
This paper focuses on the provision of new models of digital finance in rural China by two Internet giants – JD and Alibaba.
[171]
How Does Digital Financial Inclusion Affect Rural Land Transfer ...
Substantial empirical evidence demonstrates that DFI development generates not only local impacts but also significant spatial spillovers. DFI influences ...
[172]
Digital Financial Inclusion and Income Inequality in China
Apr 4, 2025 · We find that a higher level of digital financial inclusion is associated with significantly lower income inequality within provinces.
[173]
Digital financial inclusion and household financial vulnerability
Jul 31, 2024 · Empirical findings from this study robustly indicate that the evolution of digital inclusive finance significantly mitigates the household ...Missing: IDs | Show results with:IDs
[174]
[PDF] CHINA'S SOCIAL CREDIT SYSTEM - Bertelsmann Stiftung
The system intends to monitor, rate and regulate the financial, social, moral and, possibly, political behav- ior of China's citizens – and also the.Missing: payments | Show results with:payments<|control11|><|separator|>
[175]
Information Control and Public Support for China's Social Credit ...
The analysis concludes that public support for China's SCS arises in part because the state obscures the repressive potential of digital surveillance and ...Missing: payments | Show results with:payments
[176]
Government Affiliation and Peer-To-Peer Lending Platforms in China
By early 2018, around 6,000 P2P platforms had been established in China, facilitating loans in the amount of around $800 billion. This tremendous growth has ...
[177]
(PDF) Consequences of China's 2018 Online Lending Regulation ...
Oct 2, 2023 · Swift and unexpected shifts of financial regulations can have profound implications for the general population. This is evidenced by China's ...
[178]
The failure of Chinese peer-to-peer lending platforms: Finance and ...
We investigate the influence of financial and political factors on peer-to-peer (P2P) platform failures in China's online lending market.
[179]
The impact of financial inclusion initiatives: Evidence from meta ...
Aug 26, 2024 · The findings show that financial inclusion outcomes reflect small, positive and statistically significant average effects on consumption, income, asset and ...
[180]
The impact of financial inclusion initiatives - Social Systems Evidence
This study reports a meta-analysis of studies on the impact of financial inclusion. The findings show that financial inclusion outcomes reflect small, positive ...
[181]
The impact of mobile money on long-term poverty - PubMed Central
Our results complement the findings of Suri and Jack (2016) who studied the long-term impact of mobile money on poverty in Kenya. Our analysis is not ...
[182]
Mobile money's impact on economic growth in five African markets
Mar 12, 2025 · These country-level studies reinforce previous findings that digital financial inclusion can drive long-term GDP growth. These findings can be ...
[183]
Mobile money: how digital payments have impacted economic growth
Oct 19, 2023 · It shows that mobile money had a positive and significant impact on GDP growth in the 2013–2022 period. This impact was enhanced by broader and ...Missing: studies | Show results with:studies
[184]
[PDF] Digital financial inclusion, Financial Mismatch and Small and ...
Digital financial inclusion significantly alleviates SME financing constraints by reducing financial mismatch, broadening channels, and reducing information ...
[185]
Financial inclusion and poverty alleviation: an empirical examination
This study analyzes the impact of financial inclusion on poverty reduction in 156 countries belonging to different income groups during the 2004–2019 period.
[186]
[PDF] Gendered Laws and Women's Financial Inclusion
This gender gap of 4 percent in financial access is systematic and persistent (Demirguc-Kunt et al., 2022). Thus, about 740 million women (13 percent of all ...
[187]
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1566014125001384
[188]
Digital credit and the gender gap in financial inclusion: Empirical ...
Jul 17, 2022 · The present study reveals that formal digital credit has largely contributed to a statistically significant increase in the gender gap in financial inclusion.
[189]
The impact of financial inclusion initiatives: Evidence from meta ...
This study reports a meta-analysis of studies on the impact of financial inclusion. The findings show that financial inclusion outcomes reflect small, positive ...
[190]
First generation of microcredit RCTs - Microfinance - VoxDev
Jan 30, 2025 · It is challenging to identify the causal impact of microcredit because of selection biases on both the demand and supply sides (Banerjee et al.
[191]
Understanding the Average Impact of Microcredit
Jul 17, 2019 · The best existing evidence suggests that the average impact of these loans is small and that in the future, it may be beneficial to seek alternative approaches.
[192]
Financial inclusion, competition and financial stability
Jul 15, 2024 · According to their research, there is a positive relationship between financial inclusion and financial stability as measured by the bank Z- ...
[193]
The Impact of Financial Inclusion on Financial Stability - MDPI
More recently, a study by Antwi et al. (2024) examined the impact of competition and financial inclusion on financial stability in 60 developing countries over ...
[194]
Optimal financial inclusion for financial stability: Empirical insight ...
This paper investigates the impact of financial inclusion on financial stability in 26 developing countries from 2004 to 2020.
[195]
Systemic Implications of Financial Inclusion in - IMF eLibrary
Sep 20, 2024 · This study contributes to the literature by analyzing the impact of financial inclusion (FI) on various bank risk dimensions, ...<|separator|>
[196]
[PDF] Andhra Pradesh 2010: Global Implications of the Crisis in Indian ...
4 Srinivasan (2010) estimates the total number of microfinance clients in Andhra Pradesh at 25.36 million (19.11 million SHG members and 6.25 million MfI ...
[197]
India Microcredit Faces Collapse From Defaults - The New York Times
Nov 17, 2010 · Borrowers in an Indian state stopped repaying microloans as politicians accuse the sector of profiteering.
[198]
[PDF] The 2010 Microfinance Crisis in Andhra Pradesh, India and its ...
In 2010 a law by the state government of Andhra Pradesh halted operations of private microfinance organizations in the state, adversely impacting their ...
[199]
[PDF] Financial Inclusion: What Have We Learned So Far? What Do We ...
One could think that, in a model that incorporates the possibility of bank failures, a large enough expansion of credit, while beneficial for GDP and ...
[200]
[PDF] Deposit Insurance Treatment of E-Money - CGAP
This is what we call residual risk. The level of this residual risk and how it can be addressed have utmost importance in a financial inclusion context because ...
[201]
Deposit Insurance: The Last Line of Defense for E-Money? - CGAP
Dec 3, 2019 · The cost of premiums could strain e-money issuers. Additionally, deposit insurance could divert authorities' attention and resources away from ...
[202]
Deposit Insurance, Bank Runs, and Moral Hazard
Sep 9, 2024 · Deposit insurance guarantees that depositors will get their money back should their bank fail. This assurance brings confidence to the market, ...
[203]
The rise of digital finance: Financial inclusion or debt trap?
This study focuses on the impact of digital finance on households. While digital finance has brought financial inclusion, it has also increased the risk of ...
[204]
An Empirical Analysis of Related Factors on the Borrower Level
Aug 5, 2025 · This paper analyses the over-indebtedness of microborrowers in Ghana. It defines over-indebtedness from a customer protection perspective ...
[205]
(PDF) Microfinance and Debt Trap: An Ethnographic Evidence From ...
Jun 18, 2021 · ... debt traps. Our study aims to ... Moreover, it has been observed that microfinance increases debt culture which leads to over indebtedness.
[206]
Debt Traps - Human Rights Watch
Sep 24, 2025 · [246] Research from other countries also has shown microfinance debt leading to suicides. ... high-interest microfinance loans. Establish debt ...
[207]
https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=5329985
[208]
[PDF] The Past & Future of Indian Finance - Harvard Kennedy School
Jun 20, 2023 · During the Indian Financial Crisis (IFC) of 2018-20, banks were com- peting for deposits, causing monetary policy transmission to be subdued.
[209]
[PDF] Regulatory Forbearance, Stressed Banks and Zombie Firms
... hiding of bad loans by banks in India. For the purpose of our analysis, we define Distressed Assets as the sum total of non-performing loans (NPAs) and ...Missing: inclusion | Show results with:inclusion
[210]
Bad loan build-up in India: A reflection of soft budget constraints
This paper analyses the non-performing assets (NPA) crisis in the Indian banking system from the perspective of soft budget constraints.
[211]
Financial inclusion and its impact on financial efficiency and ...
The estimation results indicate that growing financial inclusion negatively affects financial efficiency while favourably influences financial sustainability.
[212]
[PDF] The Unintended Consequences of Regulatory Forbearance
We begin by classifying banks into stressed or 'bad' banks and 'good' banks based on the proportion of non-performing loans in the total gross advances lent out ...Missing: inclusion | Show results with:inclusion