Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Barabbas

Barabbas was a criminal imprisoned in under Roman authority during the prefecture of around 30 CE, released by Pilate in lieu of of at the crowd's insistence, as attested in the four canonical Gospels of the . The Gospel accounts uniformly depict this event occurring amid a purported custom of granting clemency to one prisoner during , though no independent historical corroboration exists for such a practice. Mark and Luke describe Barabbas as having participated in an insurrection against Roman rule, during which he committed murder, portraying him as a violent revolutionary rather than a mere thief. Matthew labels him a notorious prisoner (symboleon), emphasizing his infamy among contemporaries, while John identifies him as a lestes—a term connoting banditry or brigandage, often associated with anti-Roman guerrilla activity in first-century Judea. His Aramaic name, Bar-Abbas, translates to "son of the father," and certain early manuscripts of Matthew append "Jesus" to it, yielding "Jesus Barabbas," which some scholars interpret as highlighting a deliberate contrast between the two figures presented for release. Beyond these scriptural references, no archaeological, epigraphic, or non-Christian literary evidence confirms Barabbas's existence or fate post-release, rendering him a figure known solely through early Christian tradition. The narrative's consistency across Gospels suggests an early oral or written tradition, yet scholarly debate persists on whether the episode reflects historical events or serves theological purposes, such as underscoring themes of substitutionary justice.

Biblical Description

Accounts Across the Gospels

The Gospel of Mark records that , as governor, observed a custom during the feast of releasing one prisoner selected by the crowd. A man named Barabbas, who had been imprisoned alongside insurrectionists for committing during an uprising, was presented as an option for release opposite of . The chief priests incited the crowd to request Barabbas's freedom and demand Jesus's instead; Pilate, seeking to placate the assembly, released Barabbas, scourged Jesus, and handed him over for execution. Matthew's parallel narrative describes Barabbas as a prisoner held at the time and reiterates the release custom. Pilate's wife intervenes via a warning him of a troubling dream concerning , prompting Pilate to query the crowd on whether to free Barabbas or " who is called Christ." Persuaded by the chief priests and elders, the crowd chooses Barabbas; uniquely, Pilate washes his hands before them, proclaiming his innocence of 's blood, to which the reply by accepting culpability upon themselves and their descendants. Pilate then releases Barabbas and delivers the scourged to . Luke situates the episode after Pilate declares innocent three times and, following Herod Antipas's examination, proposes chastising and releasing him per the implied . The assembled , stirred by the chief priests, rulers, and , unanimously demands the release of Barabbas—who had been jailed for a city involving —and insists on 's . Despite Pilate's further entreaties to release , he accedes to their preference, freeing Barabbas while authorizing 's condemnation and delivery to execution. In , Pilate invokes the release custom after affirming no guilt in , asking the crowd if they wish the "King of the " freed. They refuse, crying out to release Barabbas—a robber ( lestēs)—instead of "this man." The chief priests and their officers, present in the scene, shout in unison against . Unlike the Synoptics, omits explicit prior mention of Barabbas's identity or crimes beyond the lestēs designation and lacks details of phrasing. The accounts share core consistencies, including the crowd's in favor of Barabbas amid proceedings before Pilate, with Jewish authorities such as chief priests actively influencing the demand in the Synoptics and implied in 's crowd composition. Variations appear in Barabbas's descriptors—insurrectionist and murderer (, Luke), notorious prisoner (lestēs in )—and ancillary elements like Matthew's handwashing ritual or Luke's consultation, reflecting distinct emphases in narrative presentation.

Description of Crimes and Release

Barabbas is portrayed in the Gospels as a detained in around 30–33 CE during the festival, facing execution for serious offenses. The Gospel of describes him as a notorious prisoner (Greek: epimēleōs, implying a particularly infamous or distinguished criminal). elaborates that Barabbas was imprisoned alongside others who had committed in the course of an insurrection (, denoting a violent uprising or against authorities). These accounts emphasize his involvement in collective rebellion rather than isolated acts. Luke provides additional details, stating that Barabbas had been cast into specifically for an (stasis) that occurred in the city and for committed during the disturbance. The Gospel of John, while omitting the insurrection and , identifies Barabbas as a robber (lēstēs), a term often connoting or predatory violence, potentially linked to anti- activities in the Greek texts of the period. Collectively, the (Matthew, Mark, Luke) align on and as core crimes, portraying Barabbas as a figure emblematic of to Roman rule, though John's focus on introduces a variant emphasis without contradiction. The mechanism of Barabbas's release stems from a purported custom observed by , the , to pardon one prisoner during as a gesture to the Jewish populace. Pilate, after interrogating and declaring him innocent of the charges leveled by Jewish leaders, presented the crowd with a choice between freeing —whom he mockingly called "King of the Jews"—or Barabbas. Incited by the chief priests and elders, the assembly demanded Barabbas's liberation and , shouting "Crucify him!" despite Pilate's attempts to sway them. Yielding to the uproar to maintain order, Pilate released Barabbas unconditionally and authorized . The biblical narratives contain no further references to Barabbas's actions or fate following his release, leaving his subsequent life unrecorded in canonical texts. This abrupt conclusion underscores the narrative's focus on the substitutionary outcome, with the guilty insurgent spared while the accused innocent faced .

Name and Linguistic Analysis

Etymology

The name Barabbas derives from the bar ʾabbā (בר אבא), literally translating to "son of the father," in which bar functions as the standard for "son of" and ʾabbā denotes "father"—an affectionate term for parentage also attested in usage for invoking God (Mark 14:36). This philological breakdown reflects first-century naming practices among in , where compound forms explicitly linked individuals to paternal lineage. Transliterated into as Βαραββᾶς (Barabbās), the name retains its Aramaic structure in the Gospel accounts (Matthew 27:16–26; Mark 15:7–15; Luke 23:18; John 18:40). Linguistically, ʾabbā could represent either a generic paternal reference or a proper , but the construction prioritizes descent over symbolism, consistent with 's emphasis on familial identifiers. The form aligns with widespread conventions, as in names like Bartholomew ("son of Tolmai") or Bar-Jonah (attributed to the apostle ), indicating Barabbas as "son of "—a verifiable in ancient Jewish from the Second Temple era, rather than an abstract or titular phrase. This etymological pattern underscores a concrete genealogical origin, common in epigraphic and literary evidence from the region.

Textual Variants

In the Gospel of at verses 27:16–17, the predominant reading in Greek manuscripts identifies the prisoner as simply Barabbas, but a minority variant includes the praenomen (Jesus), rendering the name Jesus Barabbas. This fuller form appears in certain manuscripts associated with the Caesarean text-type, as well as in some , , and witnesses, though it is absent from major uncials such as (ℵ), (B), and (A). Early attestation comes from Origen's Commentary on (ca. 248 CE), where he states that "not all manuscripts" contain before Barabbas, but many in his possession—particularly those circulating in —did, and he speculates that scribes omitted it to prevent the perceived impropriety of Pilate offering the crowd a choice between two individuals named Jesus. This variant is not found in the parallel accounts of :7–11, Luke 23:18–19, or 18:40, which uniformly lack any reference to in Barabbas's name. Scholarly evaluation of the variant's originality remains divided, with textual critics weighing internal criteria such as (the harder reading is preferable) against external manuscript support. Proponents of originality, including Stevan L. in his analysis of naming conventions and early traditions, argue that better explains the omission as a scribal or avoidance of theological awkwardness, given the name's potential to evoke a messianic parallel through Iēsous (meaning " saves") combined with Bar-Abbas ("son of the father"). Opponents, aligned with the majority Byzantine and Alexandrian witnesses, view it as a secondary expansion, possibly influenced by oral traditions or liturgical amplification, as reflected in the of the Nestle-Aland 28th edition and United Bible Societies 5th edition, which bracket or omit Jesus. The variant underscores patterns in textual transmission, including deliberate excisions motivated by reverence or clarity, as implies, and highlights the challenges of reconstructing the autograph amid regional traditions like the Caesarean, which preserved non-majority readings into the fourth century. No other significant affect Barabbas's name or role across the Gospels, though minor orthographic differences in Barabbas (e.g., Bar-rhabbān in some Aramaic-influenced texts) occur without altering meaning.

Historical Context in First-Century Judea

Roman Governance and Customs

governed as Roman prefect from 26 to 36 CE under Emperor , a period marked by administrative efforts to enforce imperial authority amid frequent unrest. His role encompassed tax collection, judicial oversight, and suppression of dissent, with serving as the primary punishment for and threats to order, a practice reserved for non-citizens and rebels to publicly deter insurgency. Tensions with Jewish authorities arose repeatedly, as documented by in incidents such as Pilate's nocturnal introduction of military standards bearing 's image into —contravening Jewish —and his diversion of funds to build an aqueduct, which sparked riots quelled by disguised troops resulting in significant casualties. describes Pilate's as characterized by "briberies, insults, robberies, outrages, wanton injustices, constantly repeated executions without , and ceaseless savage cruelty," reflecting a harsh approach that ultimately led to his recall to in 36 CE following complaints over a of . Roman provincial administration granted prefects like Pilate broad discretionary power, including the ius gladii to execute summarily for capital offenses, but clemency was also a tool for maintaining stability through selective releases, often prompted by petitions from local elites or crowds. No extra-biblical sources confirm a fixed annual prisoner amnesty (privilegium paschale), yet parallels exist in gubernatorial practices, such as Albinus's release of certain prisoners "in honor of " circa 62 to alleviate , as recorded by ( 20.215). These acts echoed broader imperial customs of occasional pardons to curry favor or avert disorder, with provincials routinely petitioning governors for judicial interventions, as evidenced by Jewish delegations confronting Pilate over policy grievances. Pilate's operations adhered to Roman legal norms requiring perceived justification for executions to minimize backlash, though his record emphasizes decisive force over leniency; excessive autonomy in provinces risked imperial scrutiny, as Pilate experienced when legate Vitellius investigated Samaritan deaths and ordered his return to Tiberius. This framework of negotiated authority—balancing coercion with responsiveness to petitions—lends contextual plausibility to scenarios where public sentiment influenced decisions on notable prisoners, aligning with the prefect's need to navigate local customs without fully yielding control.

Insurrection and Banditry

In first-century under Roman rule, the Greek term lestai (λῃσταί), translated as bandits or robbers, frequently encompassed not only common thieves but also groups engaged in politically motivated violence against Roman authority and Jewish elites perceived as collaborators. These lestai operated in bands, blending plunder with resistance, often targeting tax collectors, Roman sympathizers, and supply lines, as documented in the works of Flavius Josephus, a Jewish writing under Roman patronage who portrayed such figures negatively to align with his audience. Josephus describes these groups as maintaining their own codes and religious practices, sometimes led by charismatic leaders who justified their actions through appeals to over human rule. A prominent example is (also called Judas the Gaulonite), who around 6 CE incited a revolt against the Roman census conducted by , arguing that submission to Roman taxation constituted slavery incompatible with Jewish . recounts that Judas, alongside Pharisee Saddok, gathered followers and initiated what became known as the "fourth philosophy," a zealous emphasizing God's exclusive kingship and to foreign dominion, which sowed seeds for later widespread unrest despite Judas's death in the uprising. This event exemplifies how lestai activities merged economic predation with ideological rebellion, persisting in sporadic bands through the 20s and 30s CE, as notes increasing in and that disrupted Roman order. Jerusalem experienced heightened tensions during major festivals like Passover, when pilgrim influxes swelled the population and fueled potential for insurrections, prompting Roman prefects such as Pontius Pilate (26–36 CE) to bolster security with troops and swift executions to deter crowds from escalating protests into violence. While outright revolts were less common between the 6 CE census and the 66 CE war, Josephus records multiple disturbances under Pilate, including riots over aqueduct funding and standards-bearing, where lestai-style agitators exploited festival gatherings to challenge Roman symbols of power. Roman responses typically involved crucifixion for captured rebels, distinguishing politically charged lestai from apolitical criminals by their association with stasis (sedition), a category aligning with pre-Zealot revolutionary fervor that anticipated the formalized Zealot factions of the 60s CE.

Assessment of Historicity

Lack of Corroborating Evidence

The figure of Barabbas and the custom of releasing a at find no attestation in non-biblical sources from the first century . Flavius Josephus, a Jewish historian who extensively documented Roman rule in including Pontius Pilate's prefecture (26–36 ) in works such as (ca. 93–94 ), records multiple incidents involving Pilate—such as the introduction of imperial standards into and the funding of an aqueduct with funds—but omits any reference to a or a named Barabbas. Roman historians similarly provide no corroboration. , in his (ca. 116 ), notes that "Christus" was executed under Pilate during the reign of (14–37 ) as the origin of the Christian movement, yet details neither Barabbas nor any associated custom of clemency during Jewish festivals. No extant Roman administrative records, such as prefectural reports or senatorial decrees, mention a standardized prisoner release or the specific events described in the Gospels. Archaeological and epigraphic findings confirm general practices in , including widespread s as a for and the occasional granting of amnesties by governors, but link to no individual named Barabbas or to a festival-specific release mechanism. For instance, the discovery of Yehohanan's in —bearing nail marks in the heel consistent with —demonstrates the method's use in the period but offers no tie to the Barabbas narrative. Consequently, the Gospel accounts remain the sole primary sources for the Barabbas episode, with scholarly consensus dating (the earliest) to circa 65–70 , and Luke to 80–90 , and to 90–100 —decades after the dated to approximately 30 .

Scholarly Arguments for vs. Historical Kernel

Scholars skeptical of the Barabbas episode's , such as Bart Ehrman, argue it represents a Markan literary designed to heighten dramatic contrast between and a violent insurgent, with "Barabbas" (meaning "son of the father" in ) symbolizing a false messianic claimant released in Jesus' stead. This view posits no pre-Markan for the story, as its details align closely with Mark's narrative structure rather than independent attestation, and the purported prisoner-release custom lacks corroboration in Roman records or Jewish sources like or . Proponents of further highlight parallels to the Day of scapegoat ritual in Leviticus 16, where a sinful figure is expelled while an innocent substitute bears punishment, suggesting the episode as a theological construct retrofitted onto Jesus' trial rather than a historical event. Counterarguments for a historical kernel emphasize that the absence of extra-biblical evidence does not preclude , given the fragmentary nature of first-century n records and the unlikelihood of routine provincial amnesties meriting documentation by elites like . Roman governors, including Pilate, occasionally granted to appease crowds during festivals, as evidenced by broader imperial practices of selective prisoner releases to maintain order, which could underpin a distorted memory of an amid tensions. The episode's presence across independent Gospel traditions—, , , and —suggests an early oral core, potentially rooted in eyewitness recollections of unrest involving insurgents like Barabbas, whose crimes align with documented banditry and revolts in around 30 CE. More recent analyses, such as a on Pilate's legal leverage, question the full custom's but allow for a partial kernel: Pilate may have leveraged an existing prisoner's release—possibly tied to a privilegium paschale or concession—to navigate crowd dynamics, with evangelists amplifying details for . These scholars note that while the binary choice and mob orchestration likely exaggerate for rhetorical purposes, archaeological and textual hints of Pilate's crowd management (e.g., via inscriptions and ' accounts of procuratorial pragmatism) support a plausible scenario of releasing a rebel to defuse volatility, preserved imperfectly through communal memory rather than wholesale fabrication.

Theological and Symbolic Interpretations

Contrast with Jesus Christ

In the Gospel narratives, Barabbas and Jesus are juxtaposed during Pontius Pilate's judgment, where a Passover custom allowed the release of one prisoner chosen by the crowd. Barabbas, described as a participant in an insurrection against Roman authority and guilty of murder during the uprising, represented a figure of violent resistance. In contrast, Jesus was accused by Jewish leaders of claiming kingship, a charge Pilate repeatedly investigated and dismissed, affirming Jesus' innocence of any capital crime under Roman law on at least three occasions. Jesus' teachings emphasized a spiritual kingdom "not of this world," rejecting earthly violence or political overthrow. The crowd, influenced by the chief priests and elders, demanded Barabbas' release over , shouting for the latter's despite Pilate's declaration of his harmlessness. This preference underscored a ' non-violent messianic claims in favor of Barabbas' embodiment of armed rebellion, aligning with expectations of a militaristic deliverer among some Jewish factions. Pilate's had also warned him to have nothing to do with due to a troubling dream, further highlighting the perceived in Jesus' treatment compared to Barabbas' acclaim. The substitution culminated in Barabbas' physical liberation while was sentenced to scourging and , a direct inversion of their statuses— the guilty insurgent freed and the declared innocent executed. This outcome reflected the crowd's prioritization of temporal, forceful opposition to over ' emphasis on ethical and spiritual reform, as evidenced by the unified cries of "Crucify him!" for versus acclaim for Barabbas. The accounts portray Pilate washing his hands to symbolize his reluctance, yet yielding to the mob's insistence on Barabbas' freedom.

Typological and Soteriological Meanings

In Christian , Barabbas serves as a prefiguration of sinful liberated through Christ's vicarious , embodying the principle that the guilty are released while the innocent endures on their behalf. As a notorious prisoner guilty of and , Barabbas's freedom directly results from assuming the prepared for him, illustrating substitution where one bears the legal penalty owed to another. This event underscores causal realism in : divine justice demands satisfaction for transgression, achieved not by human merit but by an innocent surrogate fulfilling the law's requirements. The typological parallel extends to Old Testament motifs, such as the lamb slain for Israel's deliverance or the Isaiahic suffering servant who "was numbered with the transgressors" and bore the iniquities of many, prefiguring Christ's role in freeing the condemned. Barabbas, as an archetypal sinner deserving execution, goes free precisely because , without personal guilt, accepts the imputation of sin's consequences, enabling without compromising holiness. This prioritizes scriptural fulfillment—evident in the Gospels' portrayal of the crowd's aligning with prophetic necessity—over mere political or expedient outcomes. Soteriologically, the narrative reveals the mechanism of as , where humanity's collective culpability, represented by Barabbas's crimes, finds discharge through Christ's voluntary endurance of wrath. Early interpreters noted the irony in Barabbas's name, derived from bar-Abbas ("son of the father"), contrasting the false or nominal sonship of the rebel with as the true, obedient who secures for believers not by bloodline but by grace-mediated . Thus, the release affirms that eternal freedom hinges on the sinless one's death satisfying justice, liberating the undeserving from condemnation's bonds.

Controversies

Claims of Promoting Antisemitism

The Barabbas narrative in the Gospels of , , and Luke—and implied in —has faced accusations of promoting through its depiction of a Jewish crowd, incited by religious leaders, selecting the release of a guilty of insurrection, during a revolt, and robbery (Mark 15:7; Luke 23:19) over during the custom. Critics contend this portrayal positions Barabbas as a quintessential "Jewish criminal" embodying violent messianic , contrasted against as an innocent universal , thereby imputing a collective ethnic preference for and rejection of divine . In medieval Christian polemics, such as those in passion plays and Easter sermons from the 12th century onward, the crowd's cry of "Give us Barabbas!" (John 18:40) was dramatized to exemplify —the killing of —extending guilt beyond Gospel-specified leaders (e.g., chief priests and elders in :20) to the populace as a whole. This usage reinforced stereotypes of inherent Jewish perfidy, contributing to rationales for anti-Jewish , including pogroms like those in 1348–1351 amid scapegoating, where passion narratives fueled massacres in over 200 European communities, and recurrent Holy Week riots from the 11th century in places like and . Post-Vatican II scholarship, emerging after the 1965 declaration repudiating collective Jewish guilt, has amplified these concerns by linking the Barabbas episode to centuries of Christian , arguing it perpetuates a of "Jewish rebel" versus Christian innocence that historically obscured executioners' role and exaggerated . For instance, analyses frame the as an intra-Jewish polemic redacted to vilify contemporary Zealot-like figures, with the serving as proxy for unbelieving , thereby embedding ethnic prejudice in scriptural tradition despite textual focus on elite instigation rather than universal complicity.

Responses and Alternative Explanations

Scholars responding to charges of in the Barabbas narrative emphasize the Gospels' depiction of the chief priests actively inciting the crowd, as in , where they "stirred up the crowd" to demand Barabbas's release rather than portraying an organic or inherent ethnic opposition to . This highlights causal influence by religious leaders threatened by Jesus's teachings, not a collective Jewish animus, with parallel accounts in and Luke 23:4-5 underscoring the priests' and elders' role in persuading the assembly. Early Christian interpreters, many of whom were Jewish, viewed the events as prophetic fulfillment, such as the leaders' rejection aligning with 53's suffering servant motif, framing it as spiritual blindness rather than racial defect. Applying modern ethnic frameworks to the account is anachronistic, as the narrative critiques humanity's universal tendency to favor temporal rebellion—Barabbas as insurrectionist and murderer (Mark 15:7)—over divine submission, evident in the crowd's agitated preference amid Passover fervor. Traditional scholarship rebuts deicide interpretations by noting the Gospels' Jewish provenance: Matthew, attributed to a Jewish tax collector, addresses a primarily Jewish audience with appeals to Torah fulfillment (Matthew 5:17), rendering anti-Jewish intent implausible. The story's soteriological thrust implicates all sin, as Barabbas's symbolic pardon through Jesus underscores substitutionary atonement applicable beyond any group (Romans 5:8, interpreted in patristic exegesis). Empirical patterns of Christianity's expansion further undermine ethnic blame narratives: originating among Jews, with thousands converting at (:41, circa 30 ), the faith rapidly incorporated Gentiles without requiring Jewish rejection as prerequisite, spreading to over half the by 300 via non-coercive evangelism. Apologists like Augustine clarified that the leaders' actions stemmed from ignorance of messianic prophecy (), not perpetual culpability, preserving the text's intent as intra-Jewish critique of covenant unfaithfulness rather than perpetual condemnation.

Depictions in Culture and Literature

Literary Works

In medieval mystery plays, such as those in the York cycle performed from the 14th to 16th centuries, Barabbas appears as the notorious prisoner whom the crowd demands Pilate release in place of , emphasizing the dramatic irony of the Passion narrative. A prominent 19th-century literary expansion is Marie Corelli's Barabbas: A Dream of the World's Tragedy (1893), which reimagines the biblical figure's inner life during and after the , portraying him as a witness haunted by remorse and mystical visions of divine judgment. Corelli, a bestselling Victorian author, frames Barabbas' perspective to critique contemporary materialism while retelling events with sensational, esoteric elements designed for popular appeal. The most influential modern treatment is Pär Lagerkvist's Barabbas (1950), which traces the protagonist's post-release existence as a thief, slave, and , grappling with inexplicable guilt over ' substitutionary death and an unfulfilled longing for Christian faith that ultimately eludes him. Lagerkvist, a existentialist writer, uses the figure to explore themes of and human from the divine, marking the novel as his first major international success and contributing to his in 1951.

Art, Film, and Modern Representations

Barabbas features prominently in artistic representations of the biblical choice scene before Pontius Pilate. In Rembrandt van Rijn's etching Christ Presented to the People (1655), Pilate points to the bound Jesus amid a turbulent crowd, with Barabbas depicted as a squat, central bandit figure pivotal to the narrative turn toward crucifixion. The composition contrasts the divine figure of Christ with Barabbas' criminality, emphasizing collective judgment. Later, James Tissot's opaque watercolor Barabbas (1886–1894), held by the Brooklyn Museum, isolates the prisoner in a somber, introspective pose, underscoring his role as the spared insurgent. Cinematic portrayals often amplify the dramatic release amid mob violence. Nicholas Ray's (1961) casts as Barabbas, a Zealot leader orchestrating attacks on Roman forces, shifting focus from mere criminality to revolutionary zeal reflective of mid-20th-century anti-imperial themes. Similarly, Mel Gibson's (2004) depicts Pietro Sarubbi as Barabbas in a raw scene of crowd frenzy demanding his freedom over , heightening symbolic inversion of innocence and guilt through visceral intensity. Modern adaptations extend Barabbas' narrative beyond scripture. The 2012 television film Barabbas, starring , explores his haunted post-release life, drawing from Pär Lagerkvist's novel to probe themes of guilt and while portraying him as a turbulent survivor. These works frequently recast Barabbas as a proto-rebel , aligning with 20th- and 21st-century interpretations of ancient against occupation.

References

  1. [1]
    Topical Bible: Barabbas
    Barabbas is known primarily for being the prisoner released by Pontius Pilate instead of Jesus, in accordance with a Passover tradition. Name and Identity The ...
  2. [2]
    Pilate Released Barabbas. Really?? - The Bart Ehrman Blog
    This Barabbas episode was firmly set in the early Christian memory of Jesus' trial – it is found, with variations, in all four of the Gospels (Matthew 27:15-23; ...
  3. [3]
    Insurrection before Jesus' trail: The historicity of Barabbas - CARM.org
    Apr 22, 2022 · Critics of the Bible claim there was no insurrection near enough to Jesus' trial to explain the existence of the prisoner Barabbas.
  4. [4]
    Who was Barabbas in the Bible? | GotQuestions.org
    Aug 5, 2022 · In some manuscripts of Matthew 27:16–17, Barabbas is referred to as “Jesus Barabbas” (meaning “Jesus, son of Abba [Father]”). If Barabbas was ...
  5. [5]
    Was Barabbas a real person or just a literary device? - CARM.org
    Apr 22, 2022 · There is actually solid evidence that “Barabbas” wasn't symbolic at all and that he really was just the son of a man named Abbas.
  6. [6]
    https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Mark+15%3A6-15&version=ESV
  7. [7]
    https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Matthew+27%3A15-26&version=ESV
  8. [8]
    https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Luke+23%3A13-25&version=ESV
  9. [9]
    https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=John+18%3A39-40&version=ESV
  10. [10]
    https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Matthew+27%3A15-26%3BMark+15%3A6-15%3BLuke+23%3A18-25%3BJohn+18%3A39-40&version=ESV
  11. [11]
    Matthew 27:16 At that time they were holding a notorious prisoner ...
    At that time they had a notorious prisoner, called Jesus Barabbas. Translations from Aramaic. Lamsa Bible They had a well-known prisoner, called Bar-Abbas, who ...
  12. [12]
    Mark 15:7 And a man named Barabbas was imprisoned ... - Bible Hub
    But Pilate little knew the temper of the chief priests and scribes, and their bitter hostility to Christ. The word "Barabbas," better written "Bar-Abbas," means ...Audio · Cross · Study
  13. [13]
    John 18:40 "Not this man," they shouted, "but Barabbas ... - Bible Hub
    Strong's 912: Barabbas. Of Chaldee origin; son of Abba; Bar-abbas, an Israelite. was ἦν (ēn)Audio · Cross · Study
  14. [14]
    https://biblegateway.com/passage/?search=John+18%3A39-40&version=NIV
  15. [15]
    Barabbas - Etymology, Origin & Meaning of the Name
    Biblical name Barabbas, from Greek and Aramaic origin meaning "son of the father" or "son of the master," known as the prisoner freed instead of Jesus.
  16. [16]
    The amazing name Barabbas: meaning and etymology
    May 5, 2014 · The name Barabbas: Summary. Meaning: Son Of The Father; Etymology: From (1) the noun בר (bar), son, ...
  17. [17]
    Barabbas - Search results provided by BiblicalTraining
    BARABBAS bə răb' əs (Βαραββα̂ς, G972, Aram., בַּר אַבָּא, son of the father, or son of Abba). The criminal whom the crowd, in response to Pilate's offer, chose for ...
  18. [18]
    Barabbas | Reasonable Faith
    Jul 12, 2010 · ... Barabbas. The name “Barabbas” is a compound based on the Aramaic words “bar” (son) and “abba” (father). In Greek it takes a final sigma (“s ...Missing: etymology source
  19. [19]
    Full article: The Two Bodies of the King of the Jews
    Jul 3, 2024 · ... Barabbas”), Stevan Davies (“Who Is Called Bar Abbas?”), and others ... “Barabbas.” Journal of Biblical Literature, vol. 64, no. 4, 1945 ...
  20. [20]
    A Guide to the Entire Cast of Characters During Jesus's Final Week
    Apr 10, 2017 · Bar-abbas is an Aramaic patronymic meaning “son of the father,” and an early scribal tradition identifies his name as “Jesus Barabbas”—which ...
  21. [21]
    Was Barabbas' given name Jesus?
    Nov 21, 2012 · The name Barabbas is clearly a patronymic (bar-Abbas or "son of the father") rather than a given name. As it turns out, a handful of manuscripts provide ...
  22. [22]
    Matthew 27:16,17 Was Barabbas Called 'Jesus Barabbas'?
    Feb 16, 2018 · Only in Matthew is there some confusion about the exact form of the name Barabbas, as a small section of the evidence has Jesus Barabbas instead ...
  23. [23]
    Jesus Barabbas, a Nominal Messiah? Text and History in Matthew ...
    Dec 2, 2011 · While agreeing with the view that Jesus Barabbas stood in the original text of Matthew's Gospel, we argue against the tendency of scholars ...Missing: debate | Show results with:debate
  24. [24]
    Was Barabbas called Jesus Barabbas? - Tyndale House
    Apr 14, 2022 · To date there is no other direct manuscript evidence in any other language of Barabbas being called 'Jesus Barabbas', yet there is more evidence ...
  25. [25]
    Was Barabbas named Jesus? - sola evangelii - WordPress.com
    Apr 9, 2020 · If it was a debatable point in Origen's day, then there was an early tradition that Barabbas's name was, in fact, Jesus. Additionally, Origen's ...
  26. [26]
    jbl 104/1 (1985) 57-68 - jesus barabbas and the paschal pardon - jstor
    choice, chose to have Pilate free Barabbas and crucify Jesus. According ... Jesus and Barabbas," 55-56; Davies,. "Who Is Called Bar Abbas?" 260. Winter ...Missing: debate | Show results with:debate
  27. [27]
    Reasoned Eclecticism (Part 1) - Textual Criticism - Biblical Training
    Oct 1, 2017 · Most manuscripts omit Jesus before Barabbas; in fact, the majority of them omit Jesus. This includes the Alexandrian and Western with the early ...
  28. [28]
    Pontius Pilate: An Archaeological Biography
    Oct 11, 2019 · Pontius Pilate ruled as the Roman Prefect of Judea from 26-36 AD. ... Both Philo and Josephus record numerous incidents in which Pilate ...Missing: CE | Show results with:CE<|separator|>
  29. [29]
    How the Romans Used Crucifixion—Including Jesus's—as a ...
    Apr 4, 2015 · Jesus stood accused of sedition, not blasphemy—a civil crime, not a religious one. Rome's punishment was a painful, and visible, death by ...Missing: Judea | Show results with:Judea
  30. [30]
    Josephus Philo Pontius Pilate
    Pilate was one of the emperor's lieutenants, having been appointed governor of Judaea. He, not more with the object of doing honour to Tiberius than with that ...
  31. [31]
    Pontius Pilate (4) - Livius.org
    Apr 21, 2020 · When Pilate, who was a man of inflexible, stubborn and cruel disposition, obstinately refused, they shouted: "Do not cause a revolt! Do not ...
  32. [32]
    Did Roman Authorities Show Clemency? - The Bart Ehrman Blog
    But as to those who had been put into prison on some trifling occasions, he took money of them, and dismissed them; by which means the prisons were indeed ...
  33. [33]
    The Pardoning of Prisoners by Pilate
    of a prisoner was not of Hebrew origin, but was a transference of a Roman ... system of releasing prisoners was employed by any governor of Judea before ...
  34. [34]
    Legal and Social Perspectives on Robbers in First-Century Judea
    Not surprisingly, Josephus, who wrote his histories to please his Roman patrons, presents a very negative view of antiestablishment operators. The average ...Missing: lestai | Show results with:lestai
  35. [35]
    JOSEPHUS AND THE BANDITS - jstor
    Josephus was the mid-first century CE. Josephus mentions the brig and chief Tholomaeus and other groups of bandits in Judaea during the 40s CE only in ...
  36. [36]
    Antiquities of the Jews, Book XVIII - Josephus
    Yet was there one Judas, a Gaulonite; (1) of a city whose name was Gamala; who, taking with him Saddouk, a Pharisee, (2) became zealous to draw them to a revolt ...
  37. [37]
    Social World of Bandits - American Bible Society
    Aug 10, 2010 · By the 30s and 40s of the first century AD, Josephus tells us that the bandits were operating with violent abandon. During his ...
  38. [38]
    Tacitus on the Christians - Livius
    Oct 4, 2020 · Tacitus' story suggests that the Christians were killed in the same summer. An early Christian tradition adds some details, such as the decapitation of Paul ...
  39. [39]
    A Tomb in Jerusalem Reveals the History of Crucifixion and Roman ...
    In 1968, archaeologist Vassilios Tzaferis excavated a Jerusalem tomb that contained the bones of a crucified man named Yehohanan.
  40. [40]
    Why Date the Gospels after 70 CE? - The Bart Ehrman Blog
    New Testament scholars are virtually unified in thinking that the Gospels of the New Testament began to appear after 70 CE.
  41. [41]
    Jesus Outside the Bible | Part 1 | Tacitus - Reasonable Theology
    The ancient Roman historian Tacitus wrote an account that attests to several important details regarding the death of Christ and the rise of Christianity.
  42. [42]
    Did the Gospel Writers Invent Barabbas? Readers' Mailbag
    Jun 12, 2020 · This Barabbas episode was firmly set in the early Christian memory of Jesus' trial – it is found, with variations, in all four of the Gospels.Missing: historicity | Show results with:historicity
  43. [43]
    Barabbas, the Scapegoat Ritual, and the Development of the ...
    Jul 31, 2007 · Stevan L. Davies, “Who is Called Bar Abbas?” NTS 27 (1980–81) 260–62. H. Z. Maccoby, “Jesus and Barabbas,” ...
  44. [44]
    The Barabbas Story: Legend Or Reality? | Is Jesus Alive?
    Oct 13, 2023 · Prisoners Were Never Released on Passover? All four Gospels mention Pilate's custom of releasing prisoners, and contrary to popular belief ...
  45. [45]
    Is Pontius Pilate's Custom of Releasing Prisoners Historical?
    Jun 23, 2022 · The Gospel narrative of Pilate's “custom” of releasing a prisoner guilty of a capital crime to a Jewish crowd in honor of the Passover festival.Missing: clemency | Show results with:clemency
  46. [46]
    Pilate, Barabbas, and the Privilegium Paschale: Law and Leverage ...
    Jan 31, 2025 · Pilate's Passover offer to release 'Barabbas' has long been considered one of the least historically credible details of the Passion narrative.Missing: Judea | Show results with:Judea
  47. [47]
    https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Mark+15%3A7&version=ESV
  48. [48]
    https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Luke+23%3A19&version=ESV
  49. [49]
    https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Luke+23%3A4%2C14%2C22&version=ESV
  50. [50]
    https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=John+18%3A38%3B+19%3A4%2C6&version=ESV
  51. [51]
    https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=John+18%3A36&version=ESV
  52. [52]
    https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Mark+15%3A11&version=ESV
  53. [53]
    https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Matthew+27%3A20-22&version=ESV
  54. [54]
    https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Matthew+27%3A19&version=ESV
  55. [55]
    https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Mark+15%3A15&version=ESV
  56. [56]
    https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=John+19%3A1&version=ESV
  57. [57]
    https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Matthew+27%3A23&version=ESV
  58. [58]
    https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Matthew+27%3A24&version=ESV
  59. [59]
    Barabbas and Me | Desiring God
    Apr 5, 2012 · Luke then reiterates for us Barabbas's guilt in verse 25. ... But in verse 17, the people respond, “Away with [Jesus], and release to us Barabbas.
  60. [60]
    Barabbas, the Man for Whom Christ Died - The SLJ Institute
    Barabbas, though means son of the father, and it may well be that he was a man who had a very interesting and a very significant background with the rabbinic ...
  61. [61]
    https://www.crossway.org/articles/we-are-barabbas/
  62. [62]
    Christ and Barabbas – A Blessed Picture of Substitution
    Sep 23, 2012 · So, now Barabbas, as a type of the sinner, was granted freedom and liberty from prison only through the crucifixion of Christ Jesus, so also ...
  63. [63]
    Christ Crucified Instead of Barabbas (Phil Johnson)
    Apr 1, 2012 · Barabbas is a flesh-and-blood symbol of every redeemed sinner. In a true and literal sense, he could say "Christ died for [my] sins"—and he was ...
  64. [64]
    Who Was Jesus Bar Abba? - JerusalemChannel.tv
    Apr 21, 2016 · The exoneration of Barabbas has been frequently used to lay the blame for the crucifixion of Jesus on the Jews and to justify anti-Semitism, ...<|separator|>
  65. [65]
    Did the Jews Crucify Jesus? - TheTorah.com
    Apr 18, 2024 · In recounting when Pilate condemns Jesus to death following the Jewish crowd's demand that he free Barabbas and crucify Jesus, the Diatessaron ...
  66. [66]
    The New Testament and Anti-Semitism | Catholic Answers Magazine
    Consequently, the New Testament could not be called anti-Jewish without ... anti-Semitism are contrary to both Christianity and to the New Testament.Missing: narrative | Show results with:narrative
  67. [67]
    The Story of Barabbas Is No Mere Prisoner Swap - Christianity Today
    Barabbas represents the way of war, strength, and violent insurrection. Jesus represents the way of peace, innocence, and sacrifice. When Pilate asks the crowd ...
  68. [68]
    Antisemitism in the Bible? Considering Matthew 27 on Holocaust ...
    Jan 25, 2024 · No passage in all the New Testament has been accused of contributing to antisemitism more than Matthew 27:25. But is it really antisemitic? The ...
  69. [69]
    [PDF] Wickedly Devotional Comedy in the York Temptation of Christ1
    ... Barabbas, as the saved and the damned” (89). A wealthier member of the ... The Middle English Mystery Play: A Study in Dramatic Speech and Form. Trans ...
  70. [70]
    https://journals.openedition.org/lisa/1440
  71. [71]
    Barabbas: A Dream of the World's Tragedy | novel by Corelli
    Her first major success was Barabbas: A Dream of the World's Tragedy (1893), in which her treatment of the Crucifixion was designed to appeal to popular taste.
  72. [72]
    Pär Lagerkvist – Facts - NobelPrize.org
    These topics are particularly dealt with in his three novels Dvärgen (1944) (The Dwarf), Barabbas (1950), and Sibyllan (1956) (The Sibyl). ... <https://www.
  73. [73]
    Pär Lagerkvist – Biographical - NobelPrize.org
    Barabbas, the story of a «believer without faith», was his first truly international success. In 1940, Lagerkvist was elected to the Swedish Academy. This ...
  74. [74]
    The culmination of an obsession: Rembrandt's Ecce Homo | Christie's
    Jul 6, 2018 · The work depicts the New Testament scene in which Pontius Pilate asks the people of Jerusalem to decide whether Jesus or Barabbas should be ...Missing: Renaissance | Show results with:Renaissance
  75. [75]
    Barabbas - Brooklyn Museum
    James Tissot, Nantes, France, 1836–1902, Chenecey–Buillon, France. Barabbas, 1886–1894. Opaque watercolor over graphite on gray wove paper.
  76. [76]
    King of Kings (1961) - Bible Films Blog
    Mar 27, 2006 · The rest of the film is taken up with Barabbas and the zealots' fight against Rome. This was the first major Jesus film after the discovery ...
  77. [77]
    He played Barabbas to Jim Caviezel's Christ, and the encounter ...
    Aug 8, 2020 · They're just actors in a scripted scene: Jim Caviezel in the role of Jesus, and Italian actor Pietro Sarubbi in the role of Barabbas (both ...
  78. [78]
    Barabbas (TV Movie 2012) - IMDb
    Rating 5.4/10 (547) Billy Zane stars as Barabbas--the man whose life was spared because of the crucifixion of Jesus Christ. Based on the Nobel Prize in Literature winning novel ...
  79. [79]
    Messianic Ambivalence in Nicholas Ray's “King of Kings” (1961) |
    Oct 1, 2020 · At first, Barabbas seems to possess the martial abilities (and the historical agency) that Christ so strenuously eschews, and the film ...