Barbara Fried
Barbara H. Fried is an American legal scholar serving as the William W. and Gertrude H. Saunders Professor Emerita of Law at Stanford Law School.[1] Her academic work centers on the intersections of law, economics, and philosophy, with particular emphasis on distributive justice, tax policy, property theory, and political theory.[1] Fried has authored influential scholarship, including the book The Progressive Assault on Laissez Faire: Robert Hale and the First Law and Economics Movement, a path-breaking intellectual biography of legal realist Robert Hale published by Harvard University Press.[2] She joined Stanford in 1987 after practicing as an associate at the New York firm Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison and has taught courses such as contracts, tax, modern American legal thought, and seminars on law and moral theory.[1] A three-time recipient of Stanford Law School's John Bingham Hurlbut Award for Excellence in Teaching, Fried's pedagogical contributions include leading the Legal Studies Workshop.[1] Beyond academia, she co-founded Mind the Gap, a Silicon Valley-based donor network that facilitated substantial contributions to Democratic candidates and progressive causes, amassing influence through a roster of over 2,500 donors.[3] Fried is the mother of Sam Bankman-Fried, the founder of the cryptocurrency exchange FTX, whose 2022 bankruptcy and 2023 conviction for wire fraud and money laundering involved the misappropriation of billions in customer funds. Post-FTX collapse, Fried and her husband, fellow Stanford professor Joseph Bankman, faced lawsuits from the reorganized FTX entity seeking recovery of millions in allegedly ill-gotten gains, including political donations exceeding $100 million directed through family advice and entities like Mind the Gap, which received $1 million from FTX.[4][5] Prosecutors highlighted these contributions as part of a broader scheme using stolen assets for political influence, though Fried has not been criminally charged.[6][7] These events elevated scrutiny on her role in channeling tech-sector funds toward left-leaning advocacy, amid questions of donor intent and fund origins.[8]Early Life and Education
Childhood and Family Background
Barbara Fried was raised in New York.[9] Her mother, Adrienne Fried Block (1921–2009), was a musicologist known for her work on American women composers, including Amy Beach; she earned a bachelor's degree in music from Hunter College in 1958 while raising two young daughters, followed by an M.A. from Hunter in 1967 and a Ph.D. in musicology from the City University of New York in 1979.[10][11] Block's academic career emphasized recovering the contributions of female musicians, as detailed in her 1980 book Amy Beach, Passionate Victorian. Fried's upbringing occurred in this scholarly milieu, though specific details about her father or siblings remain undocumented in public records. The family maintained Jewish cultural ties, consistent with broader ancestral patterns.Academic Training
Barbara Fried earned an A.B. in English and American Literature, magna cum laude, from Harvard College in 1977.[12] She continued her studies at Harvard University, obtaining an M.A. in English and American Literature in 1980.[12] Fried then pursued legal education at Harvard Law School, where she received a J.D. magna cum laude in 1983.[12] This sequence of degrees reflects her initial focus on literary studies before transitioning to law, providing the foundational training for her subsequent career at the intersection of legal theory, philosophy, and economics.[12]Academic Career
Positions at Stanford Law School
Barbara Fried joined the Stanford Law School faculty in 1987 as an assistant professor of law, following a brief period as an associate at the New York City firm Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison.[12] [13] In 1993, she was promoted to full professor of law and appointed Deane Johnson Faculty Scholar, a position she held until 2003.[12] That year, she received an endowed chair as the William W. and Gertrude H. Saunders Professor of Law, recognizing her contributions to legal theory, distributive justice, and related fields at the intersection of law, economics, and philosophy.[12] [13] Fried held this professorship for nearly two decades, during which she taught courses on contracts, property, taxation, and ethical theory, and twice served as a visiting professor at New York University School of Law.[13] She retired from teaching in 2022, transitioning to emerita status, which conferred no regular duties but allowed continued affiliation with the institution.[14] [15] As of her emeritus appointment, Fried remained listed among Stanford Law School's emeriti faculty, maintaining her scholarly profile in areas such as legal history and moral philosophy.[13]Research Contributions and Philosophical Views
Barbara H. Fried's research primarily explores the intersections of law, economics, and moral philosophy, with a focus on distributive justice as applied to tax policy, property theory, and political obligations.[13] Her work challenges traditional assumptions in these fields, often drawing on historical legal thought to critique contemporary doctrines. For instance, in her 1998 book The Progressive Assault on Laissez Faire: Robert Hale and the First Law and Economics Movement, Fried provides an intellectual biography of Robert Hale, a key figure in early 20th-century legal realism, arguing that Hale's analysis anticipated modern law and economics by emphasizing the coercive role of property rights in distributional outcomes rather than viewing markets as neutral.[13] This text revives Hale's contributions, portraying legal realism not merely as jurisprudential skepticism but as a substantive critique of laissez-faire ideology through economic reasoning.[16] Fried has critiqued foundational moral theories, particularly nonconsequentialist approaches that marginalize decision-making under uncertainty. In her 2019 article "Facing Up to Risk" published in the Journal of Legal Analysis, she traces the historical exclusion of probabilistic risk assessment from mainstream moral philosophy since the 18th century, attributing it to a preference for deontological principles over empirical evaluation of outcomes, and connects this oversight to legal doctrines in contracts and torts that undervalue future harms.[17] She argues that legal realism, exemplified by Hale, better integrates risk by prioritizing causal impacts over abstract rights. Philosophically, Fried advocates moving beyond blame-based frameworks in both criminal justice and economic policy, as outlined in her 2013 Boston Review essay "Beyond Blame," where she contends that an overemphasis on personal responsibility obscures systemic factors in moral and legal accountability, favoring instead outcome-oriented evaluations akin to consequentialism.[18] In taxation scholarship, Fried has examined proportionality and uniformity as principles of justice. Her 2003 article "Proportionate Taxation as a Fair Division of the Social Surplus: The Strange Career of an Idea" in Economics and Philosophy dissects libertarian defenses of flat taxes, rejecting them as failing to equitably allocate the benefits and burdens of collective goods, and traces the idea's inconsistent application in legal history. She opposes uniform taxation solely on justice grounds, asserting in related works that it ignores differential capacities to contribute to social surplus without compensatory mechanisms.[19] Fried's analyses of contractualism, such as in her 2016 SSRN paper "Can Contractualism Be Saved?", question T.M. Scanlon's framework for accommodating utilitarian concerns like risk aversion, suggesting it struggles with aggregating individual reasons under uncertainty.[20] Overall, her views align with legal realism's empirical pragmatism, prioritizing causal realism in distributional ethics over formalist or deontological constraints.[16]Teaching and Retirement
Barbara Fried joined the faculty of Stanford Law School in 1987 as a tenure-track professor following a stint as an associate attorney at the New York City firm Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison.[21] She held the position of William W. and Gertrude H. Saunders Professor of Law, specializing in areas at the intersection of law, economics, and philosophy.[22] Throughout her tenure, Fried taught a range of courses including contracts, federal income taxation, legal theory, tax policy, distributive justice, property, contract theory, and modern American legal thought.[23] She regularly offered the Legal Studies Workshop, an interdisciplinary seminar for law students exploring socio-legal topics.[1] In recognition of her instructional contributions, Fried received the John Bingham Hurlbut Award for Excellence in Teaching in 2006.[24] Fried retired from teaching in September 2022, a decision she described as long-planned and unrelated to contemporaneous events involving her family.[25][14] She holds emerita status at Stanford Law School.[26]Political Activism and Donations
Founding of Mind the Gap
Barbara Fried co-founded Mind the Gap in mid-2018 alongside Paul Brest, a Stanford Law School professor emeritus and former president of the William and Flora Hewlett Foundation, and Graham Gottlieb.[27][28][29] The initiative emerged in response to perceived disparities in political spending following the 2010 Citizens United Supreme Court decision, which enabled unlimited super PAC contributions, aiming to mobilize Silicon Valley donors previously disengaged from electoral politics.[28][30] Mind the Gap operates primarily as a donor advisory network rather than a traditional super PAC, providing data-driven recommendations to high-net-worth individuals on targeted contributions to Democratic-aligned candidates, committees, and causes to enhance electoral competitiveness.[28][30] Fried, leveraging her expertise in legal and ethical frameworks from her Stanford career, emphasized strategic allocation over broad giving, with the group directing funds to races where incremental dollars could sway outcomes.[3][28] By late 2018, it had assembled a network exceeding 800 donors, facilitating millions in contributions during the midterm cycle.[28] The founding reflected Fried's shift toward applied political engagement, building on her academic focus on distributive justice to address what she viewed as underinvestment by tech-sector philanthropists in Democratic infrastructure.[31] While not formally registered as a PAC until later filings, Mind the Gap's super PAC arm (FEC ID C00683649) enabled independent expenditures, though its core function remained advisory to bridge fundraising gaps with Republican counterparts.[32][33]Personal and Directed Political Contributions
Barbara Fried has made modest personal contributions to Democratic candidates. Federal Election Commission records show she donated $1,000 to Josh Harder, a Democratic congressional candidate in California, on August 24, 2017.[34] She also contributed $1,000 to Ted Strickland's Democratic Senate campaign in Ohio on June 15, 2016.[35] These direct gifts reflect her support for Democratic causes but are limited in scale compared to her advisory role in larger-scale giving. In her capacity as co-founder of the pro-Democratic donor network Mind the Gap, Fried has directed pooled contributions from Silicon Valley donors toward strategic Democratic campaigns, focusing on competitive congressional races to influence House control.[30] The group, which she helped establish around 2017, coordinates funding to super PACs and candidates, emphasizing data-driven targeting of winnable seats; for instance, it supported efforts to flip Republican-held districts in the 2018 midterms.[31] Mind the Gap's activities have channeled millions from high-net-worth individuals into Democratic priorities, though exact allocations directed by Fried personally are not publicly itemized due to the network's structure. Fried also advised her son, Sam Bankman-Fried, on allocating his substantial political donations, which totaled around $40 million ahead of the 2022 midterms, primarily to Democratic-aligned groups and candidates.[36] Emails reviewed in legal proceedings reveal her directing specific transfers, such as a request for $92,000 from Bankman-Fried's associates to fund Mind the Gap activities.[37] Wall Street Journal reporting indicates she, along with family members, guided portions of over $100 million in family-influenced donations to politicians, including recommendations on recipients and tax considerations.[4] FTX bankruptcy filings allege her central role in these decisions, claiming she shaped Bankman-Fried's giving strategy to advance Democratic objectives, though she has denied involvement in any unlawful activities.[38]Strategic Advising on Campaigns
Barbara Fried provided strategic guidance to Democratic donors and campaigns primarily through her leadership of Mind the Gap, a Silicon Valley-based donor advisory network she founded in 2018.[30] The group, comprising over 2,500 donors, utilized data-driven models from firms like Civis Analytics to recommend contributions that maximized electoral impact, focusing on underfunded races where Democratic victories were feasible but not over-resourced.[30] [39] Mind the Gap emphasized late-cycle, synchronized donations to overwhelm Republican counter-funding, routing over $20 million to Democratic candidates and groups in the 2018 and 2020 cycles.[30] In practice, Fried's advising targeted specific congressional races, such as those of Xochitl Torres Small in New Mexico and Lauren Underwood in Illinois during the 2018 midterms, where the group directed at least $500,000 per candidate, contributing to 10 wins out of 20 targeted seats.[30] The strategy prioritized evidence-based allocation over donor preferences, advising against contributions to heavily favored or hopeless races to avoid inefficiencies.[30] Fried operated the network pro bono from her Stanford position, maintaining its secrecy to evade Republican monitoring and fundraising responses.[30] [31] A notable example of her strategic input occurred in late 2019, when Fried authored a memo urging donors to allocate 90% of 2020 election funds to the Voter Registration Project (operating as Everybody Votes), a 501(c)(3) charity, asserting it was 4 to 10 times more cost-effective at generating net Democratic votes than direct campaign donations.[40] The memo highlighted the charity's targeting of demographics likely to favor Democrats while stressing operational secrecy to prevent scrutiny.[40] Consequently, the organization raised $190 million, including $5 million from the Sherwood Foundation (linked to Warren Buffett) and $10.4 million from a Soros family foundation.[40] Critics, such as the Capital Research Center, have contended that this approach effectively funneled partisan benefits through a tax-exempt entity barred from electoral intervention, though the charity claimed non-partisan operations.[40] [41] Fried also extended advising to family-directed political spending, recommending targets for her son Sam Bankman-Fried's contributions exceeding $100 million to Democratic causes and PACs in 2022, focusing on congressional races and advocacy groups aligned with effective altruism principles.[38] This included guidance on structuring donations to super PACs and nonprofits, amid later allegations of campaign finance irregularities.[38] Her involvement drew attention during FTX-related probes, where prosecutors noted Mind the Gap's reliance on potentially unreported funds, though no charges have been filed against her.[38]Involvement in FTX and Sam Bankman-Fried Controversies
Family Ties and Financial Benefits
Barbara Fried is the mother of Sam Bankman-Fried, the founder of the cryptocurrency exchange FTX, and is married to Joseph Bankman, a Stanford Law School professor and Sam Bankman-Fried's father.[5] The couple resided in Palo Alto, California, and both held academic positions at Stanford, where they maintained close involvement in their son's professional endeavors, including providing legal and strategic advice on FTX operations.[42] Fried's philosophical background in utilitarian ethics influenced family discussions on effective altruism, a framework that underpinned Sam Bankman-Fried's business and philanthropic strategies.[42] In the wake of FTX's 2022 collapse, the company's bankruptcy estate alleged that Fried and her husband benefited financially from transfers originating from customer funds misused by Sam Bankman-Fried.[5] Specifically, in 2022, Sam Bankman-Fried gifted the couple $10 million in cash, which the lawsuit claimed was derived from FTX assets despite the parents' purported awareness of the exchange's precarious finances.[43] Additionally, they received title to a $16.4 million luxury residential property in Old Fort Bay, Bahamas—near FTX's headquarters—purchased with $16.4 million transferred from an Alameda Research affiliate account on November 12, 2022, shortly after liquidity issues surfaced.[5] Other alleged perks included stays in $1,200-per-night hotel suites and a paid cameo appearance in a Super Bowl advertisement featuring FTX branding.[44] The September 2023 lawsuit by FTX Digital Markets Ltd. sought to claw back over $100 million in total transfers to the parents, asserting that Fried and Bankman had exploited family influence to extract personal gains while advising on regulatory and tax matters for FTX and Alameda.[43] Fried's role in directing political donations through her organization Mind the Gap was cited as evidence of her active participation in channeling FTX-linked funds to Democratic causes, potentially complicating the legitimacy of the transfers.[36] However, in March 2025, FTX dismissed the claims against Fried without prejudice as part of a settlement or strategic decision amid ongoing bankruptcy proceedings, though the estate retained rights to refile.[45] Fried has maintained that the gifts were legitimate compensation for prior unpaid consulting work provided to her son.[42]Alleged Role in Obscuring Donations
In September 2023, the FTX bankruptcy estate initiated a civil lawsuit against Barbara Fried and her husband Joseph Bankman in Delaware federal court, seeking to recover over $26 million in allegedly misappropriated funds, including claims that Fried advised on strategies to obscure the origins of political donations sourced from FTX and Alameda Research customer deposits.[5] The filing asserts that Fried, as Sam Bankman-Fried's primary political advisor, coached him and FTX engineering director Nishad Singh to circumvent Federal Election Commission disclosure rules by employing straw donors and falsifying contributor identities.[46][47] A key example cited involves an April 2021 $1 million contribution to Fried's nonprofit political action group, Mind the Gap, which originated from Alameda Research funds; the suit alleges Fried directed this to be routed through Singh to mask Bankman-Fried's involvement, emailing: “We’d have a slight preference for that on our end, now that my connection to Sam is publicly known... We don’t want to create the impression that funding MTG is a family affair.”[46][47] Fried reportedly encouraged similar tactics, such as attributing donations to Singh or Alameda CEO Caroline Ellison, to evade limits on individual contributions and public scrutiny of Bankman-Fried's role in the 2022 midterm election cycle, where FTX-linked entities funneled over $100 million to Democratic causes.[46] The lawsuit portrays these actions as knowing assistance in fiduciary breaches, with Fried leveraging her expertise in political fundraising—through Mind the Gap, which mobilized 2,500 donors for progressive candidates—while ignoring indicators that the funds were illicitly obtained from FTX customers.[47][46] No criminal charges have resulted from these specific allegations against Fried, who has publicly defended her son amid his separate federal fraud conviction but has not directly addressed the donation-obscuring claims in available statements.[5] The suit remains ongoing as part of FTX's broader clawback efforts.[5]Legal Actions and Clawback Efforts
On September 19, 2023, the official liquidators of the bankrupt FTX estate filed a civil lawsuit in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware against Barbara Fried and her husband, Joseph Bankman, seeking to recover approximately $26 million in alleged misappropriated funds transferred from FTX and its affiliate Alameda Research.[48] [49] The complaint specifically targeted a $10 million cash gift originating from Alameda funds, provided to the couple in late 2022, and a $16.4 million luxury residential property in the Bahamas conveyed by FTX Trading Ltd., asserting these transfers constituted fraudulent conveyances under bankruptcy law since they occurred when the companies were insolvent and benefited insiders.[50] [51] The suit further alleged that Fried and Bankman leveraged their parental influence over Sam Bankman-Fried to facilitate these transfers, including discussions documented in correspondence about routing funds through political donations and personal enrichments, though it did not assert direct control over company operations.[48] [36] No criminal charges were filed against Fried in connection with these matters, distinguishing the action as a bankruptcy clawback effort rather than prosecutorial pursuit.[50] In response, on January 16, 2024, Fried and Bankman filed a motion to dismiss the complaint, contending they were not "insiders" under bankruptcy statutes with the ability to direct corporate payments and that the transfers represented legitimate gifts from their son rather than recoverable fraudulent conveyances.[50] Fried separately denied any role in directing FTX political donations to her advocacy group, Mind the Gap, stating she lacked knowledge of the funding sources for such contributions.[50] As of October 2025, the case remains unresolved, with FTX's restructuring plan approved in late 2024 enabling continued pursuit of clawbacks amid creditor repayments exceeding initial claims, though specific outcomes for the parents' suit are pending judicial ruling.[52][53]Public Defenses and Recent Claims
In November 2022, amid the FTX collapse, Barbara Fried published an essay critiquing the emphasis on personal blame in public discourse, arguing that it has undermined effective responses to systemic issues in criminal justice, economic policy, and beyond.[54] She contended that "the philosophy of personal responsibility has ruined criminal justice and economic policy" by prioritizing fault-finding over solutions, stating, "Fixing problems is costly. But as we have learned from the past 40 years, so is not fixing them. In the long run, most of us stand to gain by changing the discourse from blame-mongering to problem-solving."[55] This perspective implicitly questioned the rush to hold individuals accountable for the FTX crisis, which her son Sam Bankman-Fried had founded and led. In October 2025, Fried issued a 64-page report defending her son's actions, asserting that FTX maintained solvency "with billions to spare" in excess liquidity prior to its November 2022 downfall.[56] [57] She attributed the exchange's rapid failure to a customer bank run ignited by misinformation campaigns from rivals, notably Binance, rather than internal mismanagement or fraud, and portrayed Bankman-Fried as prioritizing customer recovery by relinquishing control despite the risks. These assertions diverge from the evidence presented in Bankman-Fried's 2023 federal trial, where he was convicted on seven counts of fraud and conspiracy for diverting over $8 billion in customer deposits to his hedge fund Alameda Research for undisclosed ventures, political donations, and luxury expenditures.[58] Fried has maintained that external narratives, including those amplified during the bankruptcy proceedings, exaggerated her family's involvement in FTX's operations, emphasizing in public discussions that observers should not uncritically accept parental accounts without scrutiny.[59] Her defenses align with broader efforts by Bankman-Fried's supporters to challenge the severity of his 25-year prison sentence imposed in March 2024, which he and his advocates have described as based on a "false narrative" given the near-full recovery of customer funds through bankruptcy distributions.[60]Personal Life
Marriage and Immediate Family
Barbara Fried has maintained a long-term partnership with Joseph Bankman, a Stanford Law School professor specializing in tax law and clinical psychology, since meeting him in 1988 while both were faculty members at the university. The couple elected not to legally marry, in deference to gay friends and colleagues denied the right to wed prior to the legalization of same-sex marriage.[61] Fried and Bankman have two sons: Samuel Benjamin Bankman-Fried (born March 1992), founder of the cryptocurrency exchange FTX, and Gabriel Bankman-Fried, an effective altruist and software developer.[42] The family resided in a modest campus-adjacent home in Palo Alto, California, emphasizing public schooling and intellectual pursuits over material displays.[42]Children and Their Careers
Barbara Fried and her husband, Joseph Bankman, have two sons: Samuel Bankman-Fried and Gabriel Bankman-Fried.[42] Samuel Bankman-Fried graduated from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology with degrees in physics and mathematics.[62] After college, he worked as a quantitative trader at Jane Street Group, a high-frequency trading firm.[63] In 2017, he founded Alameda Research, a cryptocurrency trading firm, and in 2019 launched FTX, a major cryptocurrency exchange that grew rapidly before filing for bankruptcy in November 2022 amid allegations of customer fund misuse.[64] Bankman-Fried was convicted in November 2023 on seven counts including wire fraud and conspiracy, and sentenced to 25 years in federal prison in March 2024.[65] Gabriel Bankman-Fried, the younger son, graduated from Brown University in 2017.[66] He initially worked at Jane Street Capital, following a path similar to his brother's early career.[66] From 2019 to 2021, he served as a legislative correspondent for U.S. Representative Sean Casten (D-IL), handling constituent correspondence and policy research.[67] In 2020, he co-founded Guarding Against Pandemics, a nonprofit advocacy group aimed at strengthening global preparedness for biological pandemics through policy and funding initiatives; he resigned from the organization in November 2022 shortly after FTX's collapse.[66][68]Published Works
Scholarly Articles and Books
Barbara H. Fried, a professor emerita at Stanford Law School, has produced scholarship primarily at the intersection of legal theory, philosophy, and economics, with a focus on distributive justice, nonconsequentialist ethics, and the historical development of law and economics movements.[13] Her work critiques foundational assumptions in moral and legal philosophy, particularly how nonconsequentialist frameworks handle scarcity and risk, and traces intellectual histories challenging laissez-faire economics.[69] Fried's first major book, The Progressive Assault on Laissez Faire: Robert Hale and the First Law and Economics Movement (Harvard University Press, 1998), examines the contributions of legal realist Robert Hale to early 20th-century critiques of classical economics. The monograph argues that Hale's analysis of power imbalances in market transactions anticipated modern law and economics by integrating legal realism with economic reasoning, predating the Chicago School's dominance.[13] It draws on archival sources to highlight Hale's influence on progressive reforms, positioning him as a precursor to postwar institutional economics.[22] In 2020, Fried published Facing Up to Scarcity: The Logic and Limits of Nonconsequentialist Thought (Oxford University Press), a collection of essays refining her critiques of deontological moral theories such as Kantianism and Rawlsianism. The book contends that these frameworks struggle to reconcile prohibitions on intentional harm with the inevitability of scarcity-driven trade-offs, using examples like the trolley problem to illustrate logical inconsistencies in nonconsequentialist reasoning.[70] Fried employs first-principles analysis to argue for a more pragmatic integration of consequentialist elements, without fully abandoning deontological intuitions.[69] Among her articles, "Facing Up to Risk" (Journal of Legal Analysis, 2019) extends these themes to risk allocation in tort law and insurance, questioning how nonconsequentialist principles fare against empirical data on human behavior and probabilistic harm.[17] Earlier, "Begging the Question with Style: Anarchy, State, and Utopia at Thirty Years" (Social Philosophy and Policy, 2005) critiques Robert Nozick's libertarian arguments, asserting that they presuppose contested empirical claims about entitlement without sufficient causal grounding.[71] Fried's tax law scholarship from the 1980s and 1990s, including pieces on progressive taxation and equity, laid groundwork for her later philosophical turn, emphasizing empirical distributive outcomes over abstract ideals.[72] These works have been cited in debates on moral philosophy and legal realism, though Fried has noted limitations in overly stylized hypotheticals like trolley dilemmas for real-world policy.[73]Short Stories and Other Writings
Barbara Fried began publishing fiction and poetry in the early 2010s, alongside her primary career in legal academia.[74] Her short stories, often exploring personal and familial themes, have appeared in literary journals such as Subtropics, Guernica, Bellevue Literary Review, Los Angeles Review, and Word Riot.[74] Several of her works received awards or nominations, including finalist placements and selections in anthologies.[75] Notable short stories include:- "The Half-Life of Nat Glickstein", published in Subtropics (Issue 15, Winter 2013), selected as a Distinguished Story in The Best American Short Stories 2014.[75]
- "It Goes Without Saying", published in Bellevue Literary Review (Spring 2013), a finalist in the journal's 2013 Fiction Contest and a Pushcart Prize nominee.[75][76]
- "After Henry", published in Los Angeles Review (Spring 2017), winner of the 2016 LAR Flash Fiction Award.[75][77]
- "What Remains", included in the Fish Anthology (2017), winner of Fish Publishing's 2017 International Short Memoir Contest.[75]
- "Really", published in Word Riot.[75][78]
- "A Song of Longing" and "Elegy for Daniel", both in Guernica (April 15, 2012).[75]
- "What Makes That a Joke?", published in Communion (Issue 1, Spring 2014).[75]