Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Basin and range topography

Basin and Range topography refers to a distinctive physiographic landscape characterized by numerous parallel, north-trending mountain ranges separated by broad, flat, sediment-filled valleys or basins, primarily resulting from extensional tectonic forces that stretch and thin the Earth's crust.^[1] This topography is most prominently developed in the Basin and Range Province, a vast region spanning approximately 500,000 square kilometers across the western United States, extending from eastern California through Nevada and Utah to western Colorado, and southward into northern Mexico.^[2] The formation of Basin and Range topography began around 30 million years ago during the Oligocene epoch, driven by east-west directed extensional stresses associated with the tectonic reconfiguration of the North American plate following the subduction of the Farallon plate.^[3] These stresses caused the brittle upper crust to fracture along normal faults, uplifting fault-bounded blocks into steep mountain ranges while adjacent blocks subsided to form deep basins, with crustal extension locally reaching up to 100% in some areas.^[2] Over time, erosion from the uplifted ranges has deposited vast quantities of sediment—such as alluvium, gravels, and sands—into the basins, creating features like alluvial fans, bajadas (coalescing fans), playas (dry lake beds), and salt flats, while ongoing tectonic activity continues to modify the landscape.^[1] Key characteristics include the linear, evenly spaced arrangement of ranges (typically 10–30 kilometers wide and 50–100 kilometers long) and basins, a generally arid climate that limits vegetation and enhances exposure of geological features, and elevations ranging from below sea level in the southern Salton Trough to over 3,000 meters in northern ranges.^[2] The province is subdivided into sections such as the Great Basin (encompassing much of Nevada and western Utah), the Sonoran Desert in the south, and the Mexican Highland, each exhibiting variations in elevation, precipitation, and associated landforms like inselbergs (isolated hills) and ephemeral lakes.^[2] This tectonic regime not only shapes the surface but also influences seismicity, groundwater storage in basins, and biodiversity adapted to the extreme topographic and climatic gradients.^[1]

Definition and Overview

Geological Definition

Basin and range topography is a geological landscape characterized by parallel, alternating bands of elevated mountain ranges (horsts) and intervening depressed valleys (grabens), formed primarily through the extensional stretching of the continental crust accompanied by normal faulting. This structure results in abrupt topographic relief, with ranges typically rising steeply along fault scarps and basins accumulating sediments from surrounding highlands. The pattern emerges from the brittle fracturing of the upper crust under tensile stress, creating a series of fault-bounded blocks that tilt and displace vertically.^[4] The distinctive basin and range physiography was recognized by early geologists such as Clarence Edward Dutton during field surveys of the western United States in 1873 as part of the U.S. Army's geographical explorations, which laid the groundwork for understanding this landscape; the term "Basin and Range Province" was formally defined and mapped by Nevin M. Fenneman in 1931. Dutton's observations, elaborated in his 1880 report on the High Plateaus of Utah, highlighted the region's unique fault-controlled morphology in contrast to earlier erosion-based interpretations.^[5]^[6]^[7] At its core, basin and range topography stems from extensional tectonics, where divergent forces pull apart the lithosphere, leading to crustal thinning, upwelling of asthenospheric material, and the initiation of normal faults without significant folding. This process differs markedly from compressional regimes, which involve plate convergence and crustal shortening to form thrust faults and folded orogenic belts, or strike-slip settings dominated by horizontal shearing along transform faults; in extensional basins and ranges, gravitational collapse of faulted blocks drives subsidence, amplifying the topographic contrast.^[8]^[6]

Key Characteristics

Basin and range topography features a distinctive pattern of parallel, north-south trending mountain ranges separated by intervening valleys, creating a landscape of abrupt elevational contrasts. The mountain ranges are typically 10 to 30 kilometers wide and extend 15 to 80 kilometers in length, while the basins between them are broader, often 20 to 100 kilometers wide and similarly elongated.^[9]^[10] Elevations differ markedly, with ranges rising 1 to 2 kilometers above adjacent basin floors, contributing to the province's rugged, fragmented appearance.^[10] The basins are filled with thick sequences of unconsolidated to semi-consolidated sediments derived from erosion of the surrounding ranges, accumulating to depths of several kilometers in places. These deposits include coarse-grained alluvial fans and debris flows at the basin margins, transitioning to finer sands, silts, and clays in the central areas, along with playa and lacustrine sediments in low-lying zones.^[11]^[12] For example, some basins contain over 9 kilometers of sediment fill, reflecting prolonged tectonic subsidence and sedimentation.^[11] Hydrologically, basin and range landscapes are dominated by internal drainage systems within endorheic basins, where surface and groundwater collect without outlet to the sea, leading to evaporation and salt accumulation. This results in features such as playas and expansive salt flats, exemplified by the Bonneville Salt Flats in Utah, which cover over 100 square kilometers and form from evaporated remnants of ancient Lake Bonneville.^[2]^[1] Seismic activity remains ongoing due to active normal faulting, producing low-to-moderate magnitude earthquakes that reflect continued crustal extension. Fault slip rates average 0.1 to 1 millimeter per year, consistent with the slow but persistent deformation across the province.^[13]

Tectonic Processes

Crustal Extension Mechanisms

Basin and range topography arises primarily from crustal extension driven by divergent plate motions at continental rift zones or back-arc spreading associated with subduction rollback, resulting in horizontal stretching of the lithosphere by 50-100% in affected regions.^[14] This extension is often linked to the transition from compressional to extensional tectonics following subduction, where the retreat of a subducting slab induces upper-plate stretching, as observed in the post-Laramide phase of the North American Cordillera.^[15] Extension and thinning vary regionally, with higher values (up to 100%) in the south and lower (20-50%) in the north.^[6] The process involves significant lithospheric thinning, reducing crustal thickness from an initial ~50 km to ~30 km, with regional variations down to ~25 km in highly extended areas, which facilitates the upwelling of asthenospheric mantle material and associated magmatism.^[16]^[17]^[18] Asthenospheric upwelling occurs as the buoyant hot mantle rises to replace the thinned lithosphere, leading to elevated heat flow and partial melting that produces volcanic rocks, such as basalts, during active extension phases.^[19] This thinning is a key response to the extensional stresses, altering the thermal structure and weakening the lower crust. Following thinning, an isostatic response drives the topographic expression of basin and range features, with buoyancy changes causing uplift of elevated ranges and subsidence of intervening basins.^[11] The replacement of denser lithospheric material by lighter asthenosphere results in regional uplift, while localized loading from sediments in basins promotes further subsidence, establishing the characteristic alternating topography.^[9] The extension is quantified by the extensional strain, defined as \epsilon = \frac{\Delta L}{L_0}, where \Delta L is the change in length and L_0 is the original length, with typical strain rates in active regions ranging from $10^{-15} to $10^{-14} s^{-1}.^[20] These rates reflect the slow, ongoing deformation accommodated largely by normal faulting at the surface.

Role of Normal Faulting

Normal faults are dip-slip structures in which the hanging wall block slides downward relative to the footwall block along a dipping plane, primarily in response to crustal extension.^[14] These faults typically exhibit dips ranging from 45° to 70°, allowing efficient accommodation of horizontal stretching in the brittle upper crust.^[21] In basin and range topography, such faults dominate the structural framework, facilitating the development of the characteristic alternating pattern of uplifted ranges and subsided basins. In extensional settings like the Basin and Range Province, normal faults often form complex arrays characterized by listric geometry, where fault planes are concave-upward and progressively flatten with depth.^[22] These listric faults sole into a low-angle detachment surface at depths of approximately 10-15 km, creating a coherent system that distributes deformation across multiple structures.^[23] The detachment acts as a basal shear zone, enabling the upper crust to extend without excessive fracturing, and reflects the transition to ductile behavior in deeper, warmer rocks. The total crustal extension in these provinces is accommodated by the cumulative heave—the horizontal component of slip—along the array of normal faults, with estimates often ranging from 20 to 50 km in mature extensional domains.^[6] This heave contributes to significant crustal thinning, as the summed displacements restore the original, undeformed configuration of the terrain. Associated surface and subsurface features include steep fault scarps marking recent activity, asymmetric half-grabens that trap sediments in the down-dropped hanging walls, and rollover anticlines formed by ductile bending of strata over the curved fault planes.^[22] These elements collectively define the topographic relief and sedimentary architecture of basin and range landscapes.

Types of Faulting

Symmetrical Faulting: Horsts and Grabens

Symmetrical faulting in basin and range topography is characterized by paired normal faults that dip away from a central fault block, producing uplifted horsts that form mountain ranges and subsided grabens that create intervening basins.^[24] This configuration results from the fragmentation of the crustal slab under extensional stress, where horsts represent relatively elevated blocks bounded by faults on both sides, and grabens are the down-dropped blocks between them.^[25] The geometry of these structures typically features planar or steeply dipping normal faults, often at angles of 60–70 degrees, with approximately equal vertical displacement (throw) on opposing sides of the horst or graben, yielding symmetric cross-sectional profiles.^[26] In the Basin and Range Province, these features trend predominantly north-south and are spaced approximately 24–32 km apart, contributing to the alternating pattern of linear ranges and valleys.^[24] Formation occurs through pure shear extension, a process of uniform crustal thinning where the lithosphere stretches symmetrically without significant shear, leading to minimal block tilting and the development of blocky, rectangular topographic forms.^[27] This contrasts with asymmetric styles by preserving near-horizontal orientations in the fault blocks, with rotations typically less than 10 degrees, as the extension is distributed across multiple parallel faults rather than concentrated on a single plane.^[25] Representative scales in the Basin and Range include horst widths of 10–30 km and graben depths up to 2–3 km, reflecting cumulative extension of 1–2 km per structure over millions of years at rates of 0.3–1.5 cm per year.^[24] These dimensions underscore the role of symmetrical faulting in creating the distinctive, repetitive landscape of elevated ranges separated by sediment-filled basins.^[26]

Asymmetric Faulting: Tilted Blocks

Asymmetric faulting in basin and range topography involves a single dominant normal fault, often accompanied by smaller opposing antithetic faults, which produces tilted fault blocks within half-graben structures.^[24] These half-grabens form asymmetric basins where the hanging wall of the primary fault subsides more extensively than the footwall uplifts, leading to pronounced rotational tilting of the crustal blocks.^[28] The geometry of these structures is characterized by listric faults that curve concave-upward, transitioning from steep surface dips (typically 60°–70°) to shallower angles (as low as 20°–30°) at depth, which facilitates the rotation of the hanging wall block toward the fault plane.^[29] This curvature results in block tilts averaging 15°–20° across much of the Basin and Range Province, though rotations can reach 30°–45° or more in areas of intense extension, creating steep scarps on the footwall side and gentler dip slopes on the hanging wall.^[29] The overall profile of the basin is markedly asymmetric, with the dominant fault controlling most of the displacement while antithetic faults help accommodate minor adjustments on the opposite side.^[28] Formation occurs through simple shear extension, where the hanging wall "rolls over" the listric fault plane in a rotational manner, driven by crustal thinning and gravitational forces on the normal faults.^[28] This process produces rollover anticlines within the hanging wall and progressive steepening of bedding dips as extension advances, contrasting with planar fault models by allowing for greater accommodation of extension without requiring symmetric pairs of faults.^[29] The dynamics emphasize pivot-like motion around a fulcrum near the fault's surface trace, leading to deeper basin sedimentation on the tilted hanging wall side.^[28] These structures pose elevated seismic risks due to concentrated strain on the master listric faults, which can generate larger-magnitude earthquakes compared to distributed faulting in symmetric systems.^[30] This asymmetry amplifies differential stresses and seismicity along the primary fault plane, as evidenced by events like the 1959 Hebgen Lake earthquake that caused significant block tilting and subsidence.^[28]

Formation and Evolution

Stages of Development

The development of basin and range topography unfolds through a sequence of tectonic stages driven by progressive crustal extension, typically spanning 10-30 million years in active systems. This evolution begins with initial lithospheric weakening and fault initiation, progresses to widespread deformation and basin formation, and culminates in landscape stabilization as extension wanes.^[11]^[31] In the early stage of incipient rifting, extension is minor, generally less than 10%, accommodated by widely spaced, high-angle normal faults that dissect the crust into isolated blocks. This phase involves low strain rates, with proto-basins forming as shallow depressions between uplifted blocks, often without significant sedimentation or magmatism. In the Basin and Range Province, this corresponds to late Eocene to Oligocene extension, linked to synorogenic collapse following prior compression, where faults are spaced tens of kilometers apart and total strain remains diffuse.^[32]^[33]^[6] During the middle stage, fault multiplication and linkage accelerate extension to 20-50%, creating a denser network of normal faults that evolve into interconnected systems, including tilted blocks and horsts. Basin sedimentation commences as synrift deposits accumulate in deepening depressions, recording increased subsidence and erosion from adjacent ranges. This phase, prominent in the Oligocene to early Miocene across the Basin and Range, features widespread calc-alkaline volcanism during the ignimbrite flare-up, enhancing crustal weakening.^[32]^[34] The mature stage is characterized by detachment-dominated extension, where low-angle normal faults facilitate large-scale range uplift and profound basin deepening, often exceeding 50% total strain in highly extended domains. Volcanic activity intensifies with bimodal magmatism, contributing to core complex exhumation and further thinning of the lithosphere. In the Basin and Range, this middle to late Miocene phase represents the peak of deformation, with rapid slip rates on detachments and net extensions of 100-200 km locally, over a duration of 10-30 million years for the overall extensional episode.^[32]^[34] In the decline phase, extension slows markedly, transitioning to erosion-dominated topography as fault activity diminishes and basins become relict features filled with thick sedimentary sequences. This waning stage, from the latest Miocene to present in the Basin and Range, involves reduced strain rates and a shift toward isostatic rebound, preserving the characteristic alternating ranges and valleys while limiting further major deformation.^[34]^[31]

Influencing Factors

The development of basin and range topography is modulated by lithospheric strength, which determines the style of faulting and deformation distribution. In regions with a weaker lower crust, characterized by high temperatures and low viscosity (typically 10¹⁹–10²⁰ Pa s), extensional deformation often occurs via detachment faulting, where normal faults sole out into ductile shear zones, allowing the upper crust to decouple from the underlying mantle lithosphere.^[35] This decoupling facilitates localized extension and the exhumation of metamorphic core complexes, as seen in parts of the Basin and Range Province. Conversely, a stronger lithosphere, lacking significant rheological contrasts, promotes distributed faulting across broad zones (up to ~1000 km wide), with normal and reverse faults transitioning into diffuse shear at depth without penetrating the Moho, maintaining a flat crustal base despite ongoing extension.^[36] Magmatic processes further influence basin and range evolution by altering crustal buoyancy and thickness through intrusive activity. Intrusion of basaltic magmas, often linked to mantle plumes like the Yellowstone hotspot, introduces hot, low-density material that reduces overall lithospheric density via thermal expansion and partial melting, thereby enhancing isostatic uplift and weakening the crust to promote extension.^[37] In the Basin and Range Province, synextensional magmatism has added significant volume, equivalent to a 5-km-thick layer in some areas (representing 10–20% of initial crustal thickness of ~35–40 km), counteracting thinning from extension and contributing to elevated topography averaging 1.5 km above sea level in the northern province.^[38] These intrusions, including NNW-trending dikes 4–7 km wide and up to 15 km deep, were particularly active from 17–15 Ma, triggering widespread deformation.^[37] Climatic conditions play a key role in preserving or eroding fault-generated topography, affecting the longevity of scarps and overall landscape morphology. In arid environments typical of the Basin and Range (annual rainfall <200 mm/year), low vegetation cover and infrequent high-intensity storms limit chemical weathering and promote mechanical preservation of fault scarps through minimal diffusive erosion, allowing steep, angular profiles to persist.^[39] This contrasts with humid settings, where enhanced moisture facilitates chemical weathering and hillslope diffusion, smoothing fault scarps and reducing relief through gradual erosion depths of 250–1100 m.^[40] Erosion rates in arid Basin and Range basins average ~2 m per 10,000 years, insufficient to outpace tectonic uplift rates of up to 20 m per 10,000 years, thus maintaining distinct basin-range contrasts.^[39] Pre-existing structures inherited from prior compressional phases significantly control the orientation and segmentation of extensional faults in basin and range systems. Reactivation of older compressional belts, such as Proterozoic orogenic fabrics, guides new normal faults to align parallel to these weaknesses (e.g., NE–SW trends at 45–70°), facilitating nucleation and linkage while imposing en echelon patterns in rift interaction zones.^[41] In analog models simulating such inheritance, the orientation of pre-existing discontinuities accelerates or decelerates fault propagation, influencing secondary structures like bending-moment faults and the shape of accommodation space in extensional basins.^[42] This structural control from compressional legacies, common in the Basin and Range's tectonic history, results in zigzag fault arrays and localized strain perturbations rather than uniform extension.^[41]

Global Examples

Basin and Range Province

The Basin and Range Province encompasses a vast region in the western United States and northwestern Mexico, extending from southeastern Oregon southward through Nevada, western Utah, eastern California, southern Idaho, and into northern Chihuahua. This area covers approximately 500,000 km² and is defined by its characteristic pattern of north-south trending mountain ranges separated by broad valleys.^[11]^[6] Crustal extension in the province initiated around 17 million years ago during the Miocene epoch, driven by tectonic forces that thinned and stretched the continental lithosphere.^[11]^[43] Key topographic features include pronounced crustal extension exceeding 100% in central Nevada, where normal faulting has produced numerous horsts and grabens, as well as tilted fault blocks.^[44] The Death Valley basin exemplifies extreme subsidence, with its floor at Badwater Basin reaching 86 meters below sea level, the lowest point in North America.^[45] To the west, the Sierra Nevada range forms a prominent eastern escarpment and boundary, contrasting with the extended terrain to the east.^[6] The geological history of the province is tied to the cessation of Farallon plate subduction beneath North America around 30 million years ago, which allowed for the development of the dextral San Andreas transform fault system and subsequent eastward migration of extension.^[6] This process led to widespread normal faulting and magmatism, with extension rates varying regionally but persisting to the present day. Modern GPS measurements indicate ongoing east-west extension at approximately 10 mm per year across the central province.^[46]^[47] Economically, the province hosts significant mineral resources, particularly gold and copper deposits concentrated in fault-controlled veins and porphyry systems associated with extensional tectonics and igneous activity.^[48]^[49] These resources have supported major mining operations, such as those in the Carlin Trend for gold and porphyry copper districts in Arizona and Nevada.^[48]

Aegean Sea Plate

The Aegean Sea Plate, situated in the eastern Mediterranean and spanning regions of Greece and western Turkey, has undergone significant extensional tectonics since the late Oligocene to early Miocene (approximately 25-20 million years ago), primarily driven by the rollback of the subducting African slab beneath the Hellenic arc.^[50] This back-arc extension has resulted in a characteristic basin and range topography, featuring alternating horsts and grabens that are largely submerged due to the marine setting. The plate's boundaries are defined by the Hellenic Trench to the south, the North Anatolian Fault to the northeast, and diffuse shear zones to the north and west, creating a broad zone of deformation approximately 500 km wide.^[50] Key geomorphic features include submerged grabens such as the North Aegean Trough, a major rift basin extending over 200 km from the Gulf of Saros to the Sporades Basin, accommodating dextral transtension and normal faulting.^[51] In contrast, uplifted horst blocks form prominent island chains, notably the Cyclades archipelago, where metamorphic core complexes like those on Naxos and Mykonos expose mid-crustal rocks exhumed along low-angle detachments.^[52] Current extension rates across the region vary spatially but typically range from 5 to 10 mm/year, as measured by GPS, with higher rates in the south near the volcanic arc and lower in the north.^[53] This ongoing rifting has thinned the continental crust from an initial ~40 km to 20–25 km in places, influencing both marine bathymetry and island topography.^[54] The geological evolution of this extensional regime is closely tied to the Hellenic subduction system, where southward retreat of the slab since the early Miocene has induced lithospheric stretching and associated volcanism.^[55] Rift-related magmatism, sourced from slab dehydration and asthenospheric upwelling, has produced the South Aegean Volcanic Arc, including the prominent Santorini caldera, which formed through explosive eruptions linked to extensional stresses since the Pliocene.^[56] This volcanic activity not only shapes submarine topography but also interacts with faulting, as caldera collapses coincide with increased seismicity along normal faults. Seismicity in the Aegean Sea Plate remains high due to active normal and strike-slip faulting, with thousands of earthquakes annually, many exceeding magnitude 5. The region experiences frequent moderate to large events along extensional structures, exemplified by the 1956 Amorgos earthquake sequence (magnitudes ~7.5-7.8, with significant aftershocks near Amorgos), which caused widespread damage and highlighted the hazards of this dynamic setting.^[57]^[58]

Other Notable Regions

The East African Rift represents a prime example of continental rifting manifesting as basin and range topography, characterized by elongated rift valleys such as Lake Tanganyika, which formed through normal faulting and crustal extension beginning around 9-12 million years ago in its central basin. This region features broad volcanic plateaus, including the Ethiopian Highlands, resulting from plume-related magmatism that has contributed to uplift and the development of fault-bounded basins up to 1-4 km deep relative to surrounding plateaus.^[59] The rift's diverse ecosystems, encompassing savannas, forests, and soda lakes, serve as biodiversity hotspots, supporting unique endemic species adapted to the varied topographic and climatic gradients induced by extensional tectonics.^[60] In Siberia, the Baikal Rift Zone exemplifies an asymmetric continental rift, dominated by a deep graben hosting Lake Baikal, the world's deepest freshwater lake at over 1,600 meters.^[61] Rifting initiated around 25-30 million years ago during the Oligocene-Miocene, with ongoing extension rates of 4-5 mm per year primarily accommodated along border faults, leading to crustal thinning of approximately 10-20 km across the rift.^[62] The asymmetry arises from listric faulting dipping toward the lake, creating a narrow, steep western shoulder and a broader eastern platform, with volcanic activity concentrated in the southern segments.^[63] Owens Valley in eastern California illustrates a smaller-scale manifestation of basin and range extension within the western United States, forming a narrow graben bounded by the Sierra Nevada to the west and the White-Inyo Range to the east.^[64] The 1872 Owens Valley earthquake (Mw 7.4-7.6) produced prominent fault scarps up to 7 meters high along the Owens Valley fault zone, highlighting active normal and strike-slip faulting that offsets Quaternary deposits.^[65] This faulting links to deeper detachment structures beneath the Sierra Nevada, where low-angle normal faults facilitated Miocene extension, contributing to the valley's topographic relief of over 2,000 meters.^[66] These regions showcase variations in basin and range development, with extension amounts ranging from ~20% in the Baikal Rift to 50-100% in northern segments of the East African Rift, influenced by whether the setting is a pure continental rift or a back-arc environment.^[67]^[68] Continental rifts like those in East Africa and Baikal emphasize plume-driven or far-field stresses with slower, asymmetric extension, whereas back-arc settings often exhibit faster rates tied to subduction dynamics, though Owens Valley bridges intraplate extension with arc-proximal influences.^[69]

Mapping and Analysis

Methods for Detecting Extension

Geological mapping serves as a foundational surface-based method for detecting extension in basin and range topography by identifying fault scarps, offset markers, and stratigraphic tilting, which collectively allow estimation of fault throw and cumulative displacement. Fault scarps, often visible as sharp escarpments on piedmonts or mountain fronts, indicate recent tectonic activity; for instance, in the Wasatch Range, piedmont scarps in alluvium and moraine reach heights of up to 37.5 feet (approximately 11 meters) on average, with some post-Bonneville Lake displacements up to 150 feet (46 meters).^[4] Offset markers, such as displaced shorelines or alluvium, provide quantitative evidence of vertical separation; in the Wasatch Range, Bonneville shorelines show offsets of 37 feet near Traverse spur and 90 feet near Ogden Reservoir, enabling reconstruction of displacement history.^[4] Stratigraphic tilting, where sedimentary layers dip away from fault blocks, further reveals extension; easterly dips of 29°–70° in the Wasatch Range, combined with westward-tilted grade plains exceeding 10°, indicate block rotation and faulting.^[4] These features typically yield throw estimates of 2–3 meters per seismic event on faults like the Wasatch, though cumulative throws can reach hundreds of meters over Quaternary time scales.^[70] Geodetic methods, including Global Positioning System (GPS) and Interferometric Synthetic Aperture Radar (InSAR), quantify present-day extension by measuring surface strain rates with high precision over regional baselines. GPS networks, such as the Basin and Range Geodetic Network (BARGEN), track continuous horizontal velocities, revealing relative motions like 11.4 ± 0.3 mm/year between the Sierra Nevada-Great Valley microplate and the Colorado Plateau in a N47°W direction.^[71] InSAR complements GPS by providing dense spatial coverage of line-of-sight deformation; integration of the two techniques corrects orbital errors, achieving resolutions of 0.35 mm/year root-mean-square misfit across the eastern California shear zone within the Basin and Range.^[72] These methods detect diffuse extension rates of 20 ± 1 nanostrain/year in the eastern Great Basin and right-lateral shear up to 57 ± 9 nanostrain/year in the western Great Basin, often over 100–300 km baselines, highlighting ongoing tectonic activity.^[71] For example, InSAR-GPS data across the Hunter Mountain fault show elastic strain accumulation at 4.9 ± 0.8 mm/year with a locking depth of 2 ± 0.4 km.^[72] Paleomagnetic analysis detects extension through vertical-axis block rotations by measuring deviations in remanent magnetization directions from expected paleofield orientations in dated rocks. Oriented samples from volcanic flows or dikes are demagnetized using alternating fields or thermal methods to isolate characteristic remanent magnetization (ChRM), which is then compared to reference paleopoles via principal component analysis.^[73] In the northern Basin and Range, mid-Miocene dikes in the north Nevada rift exhibit counterclockwise rotations averaging -19° ± 7° relative to stable North America, indicating ~25° change in extension direction since the Miocene.^[73] Similar techniques in extensional rifts reveal rotations of 10°–28° anticlockwise over Miocene to Pliocene time scales, with field tests like fold and baked contacts ensuring reliability.^[74] These rotations, often 10°–30° in magnitude, quantify distributed extension accommodating up to 20%–30% crustal strain in rotated blocks.^[73] Restoration techniques, particularly cross-section balancing, reconstruct pre-extension geometry to estimate total finite strain by retrodeforming fault offsets and untilting strata. Geologic maps at scales of 1:24,000–1:62,500 are used to construct regional cross sections, assuming initial fault dips of ~60° and restoring the Paleogene unconformity to horizontal at ~3 km elevation.^[75] In the central Basin and Range at ~39°N, such restorations yield 230 ± 42 km of cumulative extension (46% ± 8% strain), with pre-extensional crustal thicknesses of 54 ± 6 km.^[75] High-strain domains, like the Sevier Desert to Antelope Valley, show ~66% ± 16% extension, while lower-strain areas reach only 11%.^[75] Uncertainties from polyphase faulting and dip variations (±4%–±19%) are addressed by iterative balancing, providing a holistic view of extension magnitude without relying on subsurface data.^[75]

Geophysical Techniques

Seismic reflection profiling plays a crucial role in imaging the deep structures of basin and range topography, particularly detachment faults that accommodate crustal extension. These profiles have identified low-angle normal faults at depths of 10-20 km, often displaying listric geometries where fault planes curve and flatten toward the base of the brittle crust. In the western Basin and Range province, such data reveal detachment surfaces at approximately 15 km depth, with overlying sedimentary basin fill exhibiting wedge-shaped thickening toward the hanging walls of these faults.^[76]^[77] Gravity surveys detect crustal thinning in extended terrains through negative Bouguer anomalies, which arise from the mass deficit of reduced crustal thickness and low-density basin sediments. In highly extended zones of the Basin and Range, these anomalies typically range from -100 to -200 mGal, contrasting with less negative values in unextended regions. For instance, regional surveys in west-central Nevada document Bouguer anomalies around -160 mGal, correlating with crustal thicknesses reduced by up to 20% due to extension.^[78]^[17] Magnetotelluric methods map electrical conductivity variations to infer mantle upwelling and lithospheric thinning associated with basin and range extension. These surveys detect conductive anomalies in the upper mantle, often linked to hydration or partial melting, at depths of 40-80 km beneath extended areas. In the northwestern United States, low resistivities (below 10 Ωm) indicate upwelling of fertile, hydrated mantle material during Cenozoic extension, facilitating strain localization and crustal weakening.^[79]^[80] Integrating seismic reflection, gravity, and magnetotelluric data enables quantitative modeling of extension, including the beta factor (β), defined as the ratio of final width to initial width (β = final width / initial width). In the Basin and Range province, β values commonly range from 1.5 to 3, reflecting moderate to significant horizontal stretching and vertical thinning. This combined approach constrains three-dimensional models of fault geometries, crustal architecture, and mantle dynamics, as demonstrated in studies of core complexes where β exceeds 3 in highly extended subprovinces.^[81]^[82]

References

[1]
Glad You Asked: How was Utah's topography formed?
Steep, narrow, north-trending mountain ranges separated by wide, flat, sediment-filled valleys characterize the topography of the Basin and Range Province. The ...Missing: definition | Show results with:definition
[2]
Basin and Range Province (U.S. National Park Service)
Apr 15, 2020 · Along the trending faults, mountains were pushed up, and valleys carved below creating a distinctive alternating pattern of ranges and valleys.
[3]
Basin & Range: Structural Evolution - IRIS
The basins (valleys) and ranges (mountains) are being created by ongoing tension in the region, pulling in an east-west direction.Missing: definition characteristics
[4]
[PDF] STUDIES OF BASIN-RANGE STRUCTURE
Dec 17, 2024 · A different diagnosis of the formation would not affect the discussion of the features ascribed to faulting, Tl1e anticline is recognized by ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[5]
[PDF] Open-File Report 84-037 Reston, Virginia 1984
or those of Powell's other principal assistant, Captain Clarence Dutton ... Gilbert's theory of the. Basin and Range was the first theory of how mountains were ...
[6]
Recognition of crustal extension in the Basin and Range Province
Aug 14, 2024 · Spurr thought the ranges and basins were originally defined by Mesozoic folding but then were so modified by erosion that the ranges “owe their ...
[7]
Geology - Death Valley National Park (U.S. National Park Service)
At that time, compression was replaced by extensional forces. This "pulling apart" of Earth's crust allowed large blocks of land to slowly slide past one ...Missing: lithosphere | Show results with:lithosphere
[8]
[PDF] Development of mountainous topography in the Basin Ranges, USA
The most striking feature within the Basin and Range that incorporates the three-dimensional effects of both province, however, is the parallelism of the ...Missing: key | Show results with:key
[9]
HA 730-C Basin and Range aquifers text
Most of the mountain ranges protrude 3,000 to 6,000 feet above the level of the surrounding basins and extend in a northerly or northwesterly direction for 10 ...
[10]
Stretching of the Basin and Range and Lifting of the Colorado Plateau
Feb 7, 2023 · This sediment is called 'basin fill.' One valley in Arizona is filled with 30,000 feet of sediment. Basin and Range deformation continues to ...<|separator|>
[11]
[PDF] THE GEOLOGY OF CEDAR VALLEY, IRON COUNTY, UTAH, AND ...
The basin-fill sediment grades from coarse alluvial-fan deposits near the basin margins to finer grained alluvial and playa deposits in the basin center.
[12]
[PDF] Western States Seismic Policy Council Proceedings Volume Basin ...
10,000 years, and slip rates from 0.1-1 millimeter. (0.004-0.04 in)/year ... For afew thousand years during groups of events, the average slip rate ...
[13]
Cenozoic crustal extension | Idaho State University
The Basin and Range Province is characterized by active extension, ranging from a total of 50% or less to 200% extension of the pre-Basin and Range land area ( ...Missing: percentage | Show results with:percentage
[14]
[PDF] eastern basin and range crustal extension: a view from - Geosciences |
The mechanism of steady middle-to-lower crustal strain accumulation and its relationship with the interseismic elastic strain field and distributed upper ...
[15]
[PDF] PDF - University of Nevada, Reno
Estimates ranging from. 30% to 100% can be made if one assumes that the current 20 to 35 km Basin and. Range crust was thinned from a crust as thick as the 40 ...
[16]
[PDF] Crustal structure of the northwestern Basin and Range Province and ...
Feb 23, 2007 · We document 20% crustal thinning associated with Basin and Range extension from a crustal thickness of. 37 km under northeastern California ...
[17]
Extension of the Basin and Range Province - Phillip Gans
Widespread extension during the Miocene may be attributed instead to the combined effects of (1) renewed magmatic activity in the upper mantle and associated ...
[18]
[PDF] Contemporary strain rates in the northern Basin and Range province ...
Mar 21, 2003 · Using such a model, we estimate an extension rate of at least 40 nstr yr 1 over a distance of about 50 km or less (Figure 16). This strain ...
[19]
[PDF] 1 FINAL TECHNICAL REPORT U.S. Geological Survey National ...
Fault mapping indicates a complex fault geometry characterized by an en echelon pattern of discontinuous segments of 45–70° east-dipping normal faults that ...
[20]
Listric Normal Faults: An Illustrated Summary1 - GeoScienceWorld
Mar 2, 2017 · Deformation of progradational sedimentary sequences on passive margins may be dominated by half grabens, reverse drag, and rollover related to ...
[21]
[PDF] IMPLICATIONS FOR THE REGIONAL CHARACTER OF BASIN ...
The Basin and Range Province is characterized regionally by a relatively thin and attenuated crust and lithosphere, located above an anomalously shallow ...
[22]
Basin and range structure: A system of horsts and grabens produced ...
Basin and Range structure can be interpreted as a system of horsts and grabens produced by the fragmentation of a crustal slab above a plastically extending ...Missing: symmetrical | Show results with:symmetrical
[23]
Crustal Deformation and Earthquakes – Introduction to Earth Science
In the Basin and Range Province, the dip of a normal fault tends to decrease with depth, i.e., the fault angle becomes shallower and more horizontal as it goes ...
[24]
A system of horsts and grabens produced by deep-seated extension
Basin and Range structure can be interpreted as a system of horsts and ... Recent detailed studies, including geophysical work, suggest that the horst and graben ...Missing: symmetrical | Show results with:symmetrical
[25]
Mode of lithospheric extension: Conceptual models from analogue ...
Jul 9, 2003 · ... extension and the pure shear mode for a nearly oceanization stage. ... Wernicke, B., Low-angle normal faults in the Basin and Range ...
[26]
None
### Summary of Tilt-Block/Half-Graben Basins (Leeder & Gawthorpe, 1987)
[27]
[PDF] Regional tilt patterns of late Cenozoic basin-range fault blocks ...
Tilting of ranges averages about 15° to 20° in Nevada and Utah and indicates extension of about 20% to 30% for the entire Great Basin region, using the model ...
[28]
[PDF] and Induced Seismicity - USGS Publications Warehouse
Seismicity and elastic deformation associated with Basin and Range fault- ing in northern Utah. 2. Upper crustal structure of the Salt Lake Valley and the ...
[29]
[PDF] Studies of Geology and Hydrology in the Basin and Range Province ...
Basin and range extension began about 30 m.y. ago. (Price and Henry, 1984), but basin formation did not occur until several million years later. Isotopic ages ...
[30]
Extensional regimes
where S is displacement, throw or heave, N is the cumu- lative number of fault offsets and a is a constant. The exponent D describes the fractal dimension ...
[31]
[PDF] Basin and Range Province Extension: Geometry & Magnitude
Aug 15, 2018 · The primary mechanism for crustal thickening here was growth of the Cordilleran arc system, which was fueled by underthrusting of conti ...
[32]
https://www.cambridge.org/us/files/6413/6697/4329/9366_Structural_Geology_chapter_17.pdf
[33]
None
Summary of each segment:
[34]
Major intracontinental strike-slip faults and contrasts in lithospheric ...
Aug 1, 2010 · Dynamic topography produced by lower crustal flow against rheological strength ... lithosphere: A mechanical model for Basin-and-Range structure.
[35]
Yellowstone plume trigger for Basin and Range extension, and ...
Apr 1, 2015 · The thicker, lower-density cratonic crust south of the 0.706 line was unfavorable to the rise of basaltic magmas (Glazner and Ussler, 1989) ...Geologic Setting · Magmatic Stress · Geodynamic Model
[36]
(PDF) The Basin and Range Province - ResearchGate
This province is a classic example of the Miocene to Holocene development of mountains and basins by relative uplift and depression on bounding normal faults ( ...
[37]
[PDF] Studies of geology and hydrology in the Basin and Range Province ...
In this study, the regions are characterized and evaluated with respect to the extent of potential host rocks in the subsurface at repository target depths,.Missing: key | Show results with:key
[38]
Tectonic and climatic controls on rift escarpments: Erosion and ...
Mar 23, 2007 · In contrast, the morphology of the type 2 fault scarp was smoothed by a more humid climate, but a high effective elastic thickness (≥15 km) ...<|separator|>
[39]
[PDF] Geomorphic expressions of active rifting reflect the role of structural ...
Sep 30, 2024 · Inherited structures can influ- ence the development of rifts and their associated basins by controlling the linkage of fault segments (Brune et ...<|separator|>
[40]
The role of pre-existing discontinuities in the development of ...
We found that development of normal faults and related structures depends on the orientation of pre-existing faults. ... fault interacts with structures inherited ...
[41]
The 36–18 Ma southern Great Basin, USA, ignimbrite province and ...
Apr 1, 2013 · ... Basin and Range province, which has been created by block faulting during still-ongoing east-west crustal extension. However, tributaries to ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[42]
Basaltic volcanism in the Southern Basin and Range: no role for a ...
The Colorado River Trough (CRT), in the Southern Basin and Range, is a corridor of high extension ( ⩾ 100%) associated with basaltic volcanism that took ...Missing: percent | Show results with:percent
[43]
Highest and Lowest Elevations | U.S. Geological Survey - USGS.gov
Lowest Point, County or subdivision, Elevation feet. Alabama, Cheaha ... Death Valley, Inyo, CA, -282. 1National Geodetic Survey. 2Corps of Engineers. 3 ...
[44]
Geologic context of geodetic data across a Basin and Range normal ...
Apr 16, 2004 · [4] The northern Basin and Range province is a ∼800 km wide region of continental extension between the Sierra Nevada and the Colorado Plateau ( ...Missing: percent | Show results with:percent
[45]
Steady contemporary deformation of the central Basin and Range ...
Jun 4, 2014 · We use data from western U.S. GPS networks to estimate the rate, pattern, and style of tectonic deformation of the central Basin and Range ...
[46]
[PDF] Mineral Resource Areas of the Basin and Range
Mineral deposits within the Basin and Range Province in New Mexico are predominantly in vein systems containing base and precious metals. They are generally ...
[47]
Porphyry Copper Potential of the United States Southern Basin and ...
Sep 4, 2019 · Most of the southern Basin and Range Province porphyry copper deposits are capped by a weathered, oxidized supergene zone 1 to 300 m thick (John ...
[48]
[PDF] EFFECTS OF SLAB ROLLBACK ACCELERATION ON AEGEAN ...
Aug 16, 2017 · Abstract. Aegean extension is a process driven by slab rollback that, since 45 Ma, shows a two- stage evolution.
[49]
The geodynamics of the Aegean and Anatolia: introduction
Coverage ranges from the Levantine region in the east to SW Bulgaria in the west, with emphasis on the Aegean extensional province and the adjacent western part ...
[50]
[PDF] Evolution of the North Anatolian Fault from a diffuse to a localized ...
Extension of the North Anatolian Fault into the North Aegean Trough: evidence for transtension, strain partitioning, and analogues for Sea of. Marmara basin ...
[51]
Late Miocene high-angle faulting in the Cyclades: offshore–onshore ...
Feb 21, 2025 · High-angle normal faults define regularly spaced horsts and grabens, suggesting a wide rifting-type of extension. Dextral strike-slip faults ...
[52]
A detailed study of active crustal deformation in the Aegean and ...
Aug 6, 2025 · The rate of extension reduces from east to west from 30 mm/yr to 5 mm/yr, while the rate of compression reduces from 17 mm/yr to 5 mm/yr.
[53]
Lithospheric structure of the Aegean obtained from P and S receiver ...
Dec 27, 2006 · We do not observe a NE-SW trend associated with the North Aegean Trough as suggested by the gravity map of Tirel et al. [2004]. Indeed, our ...
[54]
The Aegean Sea | Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society ...
The formation of the Aegean Sea by extensional tectonics is related to the subduction of the Mediterranean floor below the Hellenic arc. We then make a ...
[55]
Tectonism and Its Relation to Magmatism Around Santorini Volcano ...
Aug 9, 2019 · Santorini is located on the extended continental crust of the Aegean microplate and is one of the most active volcanoes of the Hellenic arc, but ...
[56]
The large 1956 earthquake in the South Aegean: Macroseismic field ...
New field observations of the seismic intensity distribution of the large (Ms = 7.4) South Aegean (Amorgos) earthquake of 9 July 1956 are presented.
[57]
Active tectonics of the Alpine—Himalayan belt: the Aegean Sea and ...
New fault plane solutions, Landsat photographs, and seismic refraction records show that rapid extension is now taking place in the northern and eastern parts ...
[58]
[PDF] Tectonic development of the western branch of the East African rift ...
The broad flanks of the Western rift have been uplifted 1-4 km above the surrounding topography of the East African Plateau, and metamorphic basement lies ...
[59]
The East African Rift System: Tectonics, Climate and Biodiversity
The rise of the East African Rift has generally been interpreted as having a negative impact on African rain forest biodiversity leading to precipitation ...<|separator|>
[60]
[PDF] Results of 1992 seismic reflection experiment in Lake Baikal
Oct 12, 1993 · Lake Baikal, at more than 600 km long and 1632 m deep, covers the central third of the Baikal Rift (Figure 1). It is the world's.
[61]
Structure and evolution of the Baikal rift: A synthesis - AGU Journals
Nov 21, 2006 · As we will show later, the birth of the Baikal rift is ∼20 Ma younger than the initiation of the Indo-Eurasian collision. However, its ...
[62]
[PDF] Significant Crustal Thinning beneath the Baikal Rift Zone
Oct 30, 2004 · The total horizontal extension across the rift is believed to be between 10 and 20 km [Zorin and. Cordell, 1991], which implies an average ...
[63]
Structural evolution of the east Sierra Valley system (Owens Valley ...
Apr 22, 2013 · The recent history of the ESVS is characterized by oblique extension partitioned between NNW-striking normal and strike-slip faults oriented at ...
[64]
M 7.4 - The 1872 Owens Valley, California Earthquake
Faulting occurred on the Owens Valley fault along a line a few km east of the Sierra Nevada escarpment. The faulting near Lone Pine involved both dip-slip ...Missing: detachment | Show results with:detachment
[65]
The role of low-angle normal faulting in active tectonics of the ...
Mar 9, 2017 · The Owens Valley of eastern California is an extensional graben. The mechanics of extension have traditionally been explained by means of ...<|separator|>
[66]
[PDF] The East African rift system
The East African rift system is a series of several thousand kilometers long aligned successions of adjacent individual tectonic basins (rift valleys), ...
[67]
[PDF] Asthenospheric flow and origin of volcanism in the Baikal Rift area
Crustal extension across Lake Baikal is currently 4±1 mm/yr, with more extension occurring to the South [21] (Fig.
[68]
Recommended Setbacks From Active Normal Faults, Proceedings ...
Historic normal-fault ruptures in the Basin-Range Province. - ... Basin-Range faults ... values, a "typical" faulting event geometry on the Wasatch Fault can be.
[69]
(PDF) Contemporary strain rates in the northern Basin and Range ...
Contemporary strain rates in the northern Basin and Range Province from GPS data ... 10 mm yr. 1. and do not appear to vary. appreciably to the east of ...
[70]
Interferometric synthetic aperture radar–GPS integration ...
Sep 28, 2010 · We propose a method to remove orbital phase errors from the InSAR data by integrating InSAR and continuous GPS time series. ... Basin and Range ...
[71]
[PDF] Paleomagnetic evidence for counterclockwise block rotation in the ...
A rigorous solution to the magnitude of change, if any, in least principal stress direction in the northern Basin and Range province since mid-Miocene time may ...
[72]
Paleomagnetic evidence for vertical‐axis rotations of crustal blocks ...
May 28, 2015 · A clockwise rotation of the Goodenough Bay Block requires that extension rates on the Mai'iu Fault increase toward the northwest, which agrees ...
[73]
[PDF] Geometry and magnitude of extension in the Basin and Range ...
Aug 15, 2018 · The Basin and Range Province is a clas sic locality of continental extension, and it is ideal for analyzing factors that control the.
[74]
Chapter 11: Geophysics of the western Basin and Range province
Jan 1, 1989 · ... faults that penetrate to a depth of about 15 km, seismic reflection data suggest that listric faults and low-angle detachment surfaces are ...
[75]
Seismic Reflection Profiles and Subsurface Geology of the Area ...
Mar 25, 2018 · (2017), imaging a complex normal fault system, consisting of WSW dipping master faults and antithetic (i.e., ENE dipping) normal faults, both ...
[76]
Gravity measurements between Hazen and Austin, Nevada: A study ...
Regionally, the Bouguer anomaly is about −160 mgal from Hazen eastward ... Basin and Range Province, the rate of distension in the Province is about 1 ...
[77]
Crust and upper mantle electrical conductivity beneath the ...
May 1, 2012 · Instead, low mantle resistivities (10 Ωm and below), which we infer to result from 1%–3% partial melt, are found 40–80 km beneath the eastern ...
[78]
Deep electrical resistivity structure of the northwestern U.S. derived ...
Sep 15, 2014 · This column suggests a dynamic process of moderately hydrated and fertile deeper upper mantle upwelling during extension, intersection of ...
[79]
Orthogonal folding of extensional detachments: Structure and origin ...
May 25, 2002 · The total amount of extension across the core complex is about 109–116 km, corresponding to a stretching factor (β) of 3.5–3.9, estimated using ...
[80]
Mode of crustal extension determined by rheological layering
For example, total Cenozoic strain estimates (β factors) of up to 2 have been proposed for parts of the Basin and Range in the western U.S.A., which has not ...Missing: typical | Show results with:typical