Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Yellowstone hotspot

The Yellowstone hotspot is a volcanic hotspot situated primarily beneath Yellowstone National Park in the northwestern United States, driven by a mantle plume originating from the core-mantle boundary approximately 2,900 kilometers (1,800 miles) deep, which rises through the Earth's mantle to cause partial melting and extensive volcanism.^[1] This plume, with a diameter of about 350 kilometers (220 miles) at its base, has remained relatively stationary relative to the deep mantle, while the overlying North American tectonic plate has migrated southwestward at an average rate of 2.3 centimeters (0.9 inches) per year, generating a northeast-trending chain of calderas, rhyolitic volcanic fields, and basaltic provinces spanning roughly 700 kilometers (430 miles) from northern Nevada and southeastern Oregon to Yellowstone.^[1] The hotspot's activity, which began around 17 million years ago near the McDermitt volcanic field, is marked by massive explosive eruptions that produced supervolcanic calderas and widespread ash deposits, alongside ongoing hydrothermal processes that sustain over 10,000 geysers, hot springs, mud pots, and fumaroles—the world's highest concentration of such features.^[2]^[3]^[4] The geological track of the Yellowstone hotspot traces a progression of volcanic centers that grow younger toward the northeast, reflecting the plate's motion over the fixed plume.^[2] Initial hotspot activity around 17–16 million years ago is linked to the immense Columbia River Basalt flood eruptions, which covered over 210,000 square kilometers (81,000 square miles) in Washington, Oregon, and Idaho with more than 174,000 cubic kilometers (42,000 cubic miles) of lava, chemically matching hotspot-derived magmas.^[5] Subsequent rhyolitic volcanism formed a series of calderas along the Snake River Plain in Idaho, including the 6.27-million-year-old Blue Creek caldera and the 4.5–7-million-year-old Heise volcanic field, with buried structures identified through gravity surveys and rock geochemistry.^[2] At its current position under Yellowstone, the hotspot has driven three major explosive eruptions in the Yellowstone Plateau volcanic field over the past 2.1 million years, two of which were supereruptions: the first around 2.1 million years ago forming the Island Park Caldera, the second about 1.3 million years ago creating the Henrys Fork caldera, and the most recent 631,000 years ago producing the Lava Creek Tuff and the modern 45-by-85-kilometer (28-by-53-mile) Yellowstone Caldera.^[6] These events profoundly shaped regional topography through caldera collapse, faulting, and uplift.^[6] Today, the Yellowstone hotspot continues to influence the region through active magmatism, seismicity, and ground deformation, with a large magma reservoir at depths of 5–15 kilometers (3–9 miles) beneath the caldera fueling hydrothermal systems and occasional small earthquakes.^[1] Seismic tomography reveals the plume's tilted structure extending northeastward, supporting models of ongoing mantle upwelling that sustains Yellowstone's iconic geothermal landscape while posing low-probability risks of future large eruptions.^[1] The hotspot's broader impacts include enhanced biodiversity in the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem and historical human interactions with its volcanic terrain, underscoring its role as a dynamic geological feature with global scientific significance.^[7]

Origin and Tectonic Setting

Mantle Plume Hypothesis

The mantle plume hypothesis posits that the Yellowstone hotspot originates from a deep-seated upwelling column of hot, buoyant mantle material rising from the core-mantle boundary to the base of the lithosphere, where it generates partial melting and drives surface volcanism.^[1] This model explains the sustained magmatic activity as the North American plate drifts over the relatively fixed plume, producing a linear volcanic track. The hypothesis was first proposed by W. Jason Morgan in 1971, who suggested that hotspots like Yellowstone represent surface expressions of narrow, deep mantle plumes anchored near the core-mantle boundary, providing motive forces for plate tectonics.^[8] Morgan's framework was rapidly applied to Yellowstone, interpreting its anomalous volcanism as evidence of plume-driven melting beneath the overriding continent.^[9] Subsequent refinements integrated geochemical signatures, such as elevated helium-3/helium-4 ratios, indicating a primitive mantle source consistent with plume origins.^[10] Supporting evidence includes Yellowstone's exceptionally high heat flow, exceeding 2,000 mW/m² on the plateau—30 to 40 times the continental average—attributable to advective heat transport from the plume.^[1] A broad topographic swell, approximately 400 km (about 250 miles) wide and 500 m high, surrounds the Yellowstone Plateau, resulting from dynamic uplift due to the plume's buoyancy.^[10] Additionally, seismic imaging reveals a basaltic lower-crustal magma reservoir at 20–50 km depth, interpreted as iron-rich intrusions from plume-derived melts that have thickened and modified the crust.^[11] Geophysical data further bolster the model, with seismic tomography delineating low-velocity zones indicative of hot, partially molten material extending from the upper mantle to depths of 700–1,000 km beneath Yellowstone.^[12] These anomalies tilt westward, consistent with plume deflection by mantle flow, and connect to shallower melt bodies, forming a continuous magmatic pathway.^[11] Alternative theories, such as edge-driven convection arising from lateral temperature contrasts at lithospheric boundaries, have been proposed to explain Yellowstone's volcanism without invoking a deep plume.^[13] These models suggest upper-mantle instabilities, like propagating convective rolls driven by plate motion, could generate the observed magmatism.^[14] However, the plume hypothesis predominates due to its ability to account for the hotspot's longevity, fixed position relative to other hotspots, deep seismic anomalies, and geochemical primitives not easily explained by shallow convection alone.^[15]

Plate Motion and Hotspot Fixity

The Yellowstone hotspot is widely regarded as fixed relative to the deep mantle, serving as a key reference for reconstructing absolute plate motions of the North American plate. This fixity implies that the observed northeastward progression of volcanism along the hotspot track results from the overriding plate's southwestward motion, providing a benchmark for global tectonic models that integrate hotspot tracks with paleomagnetic and geodetic data.^[1]^[16] The North American plate moves southwestward relative to the stationary hotspot at an average rate of approximately 2.5 cm per year, a velocity that has driven the formation of the linear volcanic track over the past 17 million years. Volcanism initiated around 17 million years ago in northern Nevada and southern Oregon, with the locus of activity migrating northeastward at a comparable rate of about 2.3–2.9 cm per year, as evidenced by the systematic younging of caldera ages toward Yellowstone National Park. This progression aligns with the plate's motion vector, oriented roughly N54°E in recent reconstructions, spanning over 700 km from the initial site to the current position beneath the Yellowstone Plateau.^[1]^[2]^[17]^[18] Geodetic observations from GPS networks confirm this plate velocity, measuring southwestward motion of 2–3 cm per year across the region, with minimal deviation attributable to the hotspot's fixity over geologic timescales. Paleomagnetic studies of volcanic units along the track, such as the Arbon Valley Tuff (10.41 Ma) and Tuff of American Falls (7.58 Ma), further validate the migration rate at 2.27 ± 0.2 cm per year through polarity correlations and age progressions that match the expected plate trajectory.^[10]^[17] The southwestward plate motion has profoundly influenced crustal dynamics in the Snake River Plain, promoting extensional rifting and significant thinning as the overriding lithosphere interacts with the upwelling hotspot. Along the eastern Snake River Plain, crustal thickness decreases from 49 km near the northeast end (beneath young calderas) to 41 km at the southwest end, an 8 km reduction attributed to lower crustal outflow and magmatic loading facilitated by the plate's passage over the plume. This process has resulted in subsidence and rift-like downwarping, accommodating the hotspot's thermal effects without widespread upper crustal extension.^[19]^[20]

Volcanic Track and Features

Nevada–Oregon Calderas

The Yellowstone hotspot track initiated approximately 16.5–17 million years ago (Ma) with the eruption of voluminous flood basalts belonging to the Columbia River Basalt Group, marking the onset of hotspot-related magmatism in the Pacific Northwest.^[21] These basaltic eruptions, totaling over 210,000 km³ in volume, covered vast areas of what is now eastern Oregon, western Idaho, and southeastern Washington, reflecting initial mantle-derived melting as the North American plate overrode the hotspot.^[22] This phase represented the earliest surface expression of the hotspot, transitioning rapidly into more evolved silicic volcanism as the plume interacted with the overriding lithosphere. The southwestern segment of the hotspot track features several major caldera-forming events, including the McDermitt caldera (16.4 Ma), Santa Rosa–Calico volcanic field (15–16 Ma), and Bruneau–Jarbidge caldera complex (12–10 Ma), all situated in present-day northern Nevada and southeastern Oregon. The McDermitt caldera, measuring about 40 × 25 km, formed during the eruption of approximately 1000 km³ of zoned peralkaline to metaluminous rhyolitic tuff, accompanied by significant lithium-rich ore deposits in associated lacustrine sediments.^[23] Similarly, the Santa Rosa–Calico field produced rhyolitic eruptions around 15.9 Ma, contributing to early hotspot silicic output, while the Bruneau–Jarbidge events involved high-temperature rhyolites with estimated volumes exceeding 7000 km³ across the broader field, including major ignimbrite sheets.^[24]^[25] These calderas are linked to the hotspot through aligned ages and geochemistry, with associated mineral deposits such as lithium, antimony, and cesium highlighting their economic significance.^[26] As of 2025, lithium mining proposals in the McDermitt Caldera, such as the Thacker Pass project, have sparked environmental debates over water use and ecosystem impacts.^[27]^[28] The shift from basaltic to rhyolitic volcanism in this region, occurring between 17 and 14 Ma, resulted from basaltic melts intruding and partially melting the overlying Paleozoic and older continental crust, generating large volumes of silicic magma through crustal assimilation and differentiation.^[29] Recent 2025 research utilizing quartz-hosted melt inclusions from pre-caldera rhyolite lavas at McDermitt has revealed pre-eruptive lithium concentrations of 400–1350 ppm, far exceeding typical rhyolitic values (20–70 ppm), indicating that the magmas were inherently lithium-enriched and supporting models of hydrothermal concentration in closed-basin sediments for the observed ore deposits.^[30] These early calderas formed in a paleogeographic setting across the modern Nevada–Oregon border, where tectonic extension in the Basin and Range province facilitated magma ascent; today, many structures are eroded, buried under younger basaltic flows and sediments, or exposed only in erosional windows.^[2]^[31]

Snake River Plain

The Snake River Plain represents the central linear segment of the Yellowstone hotspot track, formed as a northeast-trending extensional rift zone between approximately 12 and 2 million years ago (Ma).^[32] This rift zone extends about 650 kilometers from near Boise, Idaho, to the Yellowstone Plateau, Wyoming, resulting from the interaction of the overriding North American plate with the underlying mantle plume.^[32]^[33] The structure developed through progressive volcanism and associated tectonic extension, with the western portion forming a fault-bounded graben and the eastern portion as a downwarped basin.^[34] Early southwestern volcanism preceded this central rift development, marking the initial stages of hotspot influence.^[35] The Eastern Snake River Plain (ESRP), a key volcanic center within the plain, is characterized by bimodal suites of basalt and rhyolite erupted over millions of years.^[32]^[36] These compositions reflect the partial melting of mantle-derived basaltic magmas and subsequent crustal melting to produce rhyolites, with basalts dominating younger phases and rhyolites associated with earlier, more explosive events.^[37] The rift zone's margins feature normal faults that accommodated extension of 10-20%, forming half-graben and full-graben structures filled with thick sequences of volcanic rocks.^[32] Subsidence along the plain occurred primarily through isostatic adjustment following magma withdrawal from the crust, reaching depths of up to 2 kilometers in places.^[32] This process involved crustal flexure and density changes in the lower crust, contributing to the basin's depressed topography relative to surrounding highlands.^[38] The graben structure, up to 70 kilometers wide in the west, is infilled with Neogene volcanic and sedimentary deposits, creating a low-relief landscape at elevations around 1,500-2,000 meters.^[32]^[39] The plain's hydrology and topography are profoundly shaped by its volcanic fill and structural basin, which once hosted large paleolakes like Lake Idaho from about 9.5 to 1.7 Ma before drainage via Hells Canyon.^[32]^[34] Today, the Snake River follows the axial drainage of the rift, carving deep canyons through basalt flows and influencing regional aquifers with heterogeneous permeability due to interlayered lavas and sediments.^[40] Over its history, the plain has accumulated tens of thousands of cubic kilometers of volcanic material, including basalts and rhyolites.^[32]^[41]

Intermediate Volcanic Fields

The intermediate volcanic fields along the Yellowstone hotspot track, situated between the earlier Snake River Plain calderas and the Yellowstone Plateau, encompass the Twin Falls, Picabo, and Heise fields, which record a progression of silicic volcanism as the North American plate migrated over the hotspot.^[15] The Twin Falls field, active from approximately 11.3 to 9 million years ago (Ma), features multiple caldera collapses associated with explosive rhyolitic eruptions, including the McMullen Creek supereruption at 9.0 Ma and the Grey's Landing supereruption at 8.7 Ma, the latter with a minimum volume exceeding 2,800 km³ of ash-flow tuff.^[42] These events indicate focused eruptive centers buried beneath younger basalts of the Snake River Plain.^[43] The adjacent Picabo field operated from 10.4 to 6.6 Ma, producing voluminous rhyolitic ignimbrites and lavas preserved as thick deposits along the margins of the Snake River Plain, with multiple caldera-forming events reflecting episodic magma accumulation and crustal melting.^[44] Eruption volumes for individual events in this field reached hundreds of cubic kilometers, contributing to the overall silicic output estimated in the thousands of km³ across the field's lifespan.^[17] The Heise volcanic field, active between 6.6 and 4.4 Ma, represents a later stage with at least four nested calderas spanning the width of the Snake River Plain, including the Blacktail Creek (6.62 Ma, ~1,200 km³), Walcott (6.27 Ma, ~750 km³), Conant Creek (5.51 Ma, ~300 km³), and Kilgore (4.45 Ma, ~1,800 km³) structures.^[45] The Conant Creek event, linked to a caldera approximately 18 by 23 km in dimension and erupting ~300 km³ of rhyolite, acted as a volumetric and structural precursor to the subsequent Island Park caldera complex in the Yellowstone Plateau.^[45] Volcanism in these fields was dominantly rhyolitic, characterized by crystal-rich ignimbrites and associated lava domes, accompanied by minor basaltic flows at the margins, which together suggest extensive assimilation and hybridization of crustal materials by hotspot-derived melts.^[44] Geomorphic remnants include partially buried calderas overlain by 1–3 km of post-caldera basalts, as well as erosional exposures of tuff sheets and rhyolitic buttes that punctuate the modern topography of the eastern Snake River Plain.^[43] These fields mark a transitional phase in the hotspot's evolution, with eruption frequency and preserved silicic volumes increasing progressively toward the northeast, culminating in the more intense activity at Yellowstone.^[15]

Yellowstone Plateau

The Yellowstone Plateau, situated primarily in northwest Wyoming, constitutes the modern northeastern endpoint of the Yellowstone hotspot track and encompasses the majority of Yellowstone National Park, covering approximately 17,000 km². This elevated region has undergone substantial uplift of 1–2 km over the past several million years, driven by hotspot-related magmatism that has thickened the crust and elevated the terrain relative to surrounding areas. The plateau's formation reflects ongoing tectonic and volcanic processes, with the North American plate's northeastward motion relative to the fixed hotspot positioning the current magmatic center here.^[15]^[46] At the heart of the plateau lies a complex of three overlapping calderas, representing successive stages of supervolcanic activity: the Island Park caldera (formed ~2.1 million years ago during the Huckleberry Ridge eruption), the Henry's Fork caldera (~1.3 million years ago during the Mesa Falls eruption), and the youngest Yellowstone caldera (~0.64 million years ago during the Lava Creek eruption). These structures collectively span an area of roughly 70 × 40 km, with the Yellowstone caldera itself measuring about 70 × 45 km, marked by prominent ring-fracture zones and collapse features that define the plateau's topography. The overlapping nature of these calderas has created a nested system of depressions and fault scarps, influencing local drainage patterns and geothermal activity across the region.^[6]^[47]^[48] Post-caldera volcanism has significantly reshaped the plateau, with more than 70 rhyolite domes and flows erupting within the complex over the last 100,000 years, primarily filling the Yellowstone caldera and forming broad, viscous lava plateaus up to several tens of cubic kilometers in volume each. These rhyolitic features, often exhibiting steep margins and obsidian-rich carapaces, dominate the central plateau landscape and include notable examples like the Pitchstone Plateau and Mallard Lake flows. Accompanying this activity, basaltic eruptions post-dating the Lava Creek event have produced flows that cover about 10% of Yellowstone National Park's area, primarily along the plateau's margins and contributing to the diverse volcanic terrain visible today.^[49]^[50]^[46] The Yellowstone Plateau's integration with national park boundaries highlights its role as a premier site for volcanic geoscience and ecotourism, where the caldera complex and associated features attract over four million visitors annually to boardwalks, overlooks, and trails that showcase the region's dynamic geology without venturing into hazardous zones. Park management emphasizes education on the plateau's volcanic origins, balancing preservation of these features with public access to viewpoints like Mary Bay and the Grand Canyon of the Yellowstone.^[51]

Eruptive History

Pre-Yellowstone Eruptions

The initial phase of Yellowstone hotspot volcanism in the early Miocene marked the arrival of the mantle plume head beneath the North American lithosphere, manifesting as the massive Columbia River Basalt Group eruptions. These flood basalts erupted between 17 and 14 million years ago (Ma), covering vast areas of Washington, Oregon, and Idaho with approximately 210,000 km³ of tholeiitic basalt lava extruded through fissures.^[22] This voluminous outpouring, one of the largest continental flood basalt events, is directly linked to the thermal and buoyant effects of the plume head impinging on the base of the crust, causing widespread lithospheric melting and decompression.^[52] The eruptions transitioned from high-flux phases, such as the Grande Ronde Basalt at ~16.5 Ma, to waning activity by 14 Ma, reflecting the plume's initial dynamic surge.^[5] Succeeding the basaltic flood events, mid-Miocene caldera-forming rhyolitic volcanism dominated the hotspot track from 15 to 10 Ma, primarily in the Nevada-Oregon region along the incipient Snake River Plain corridor. This period featured explosive eruptions from multiple volcanic centers, including the McDermitt and Owyhee-Humboldt fields, producing ignimbrites and rhyolite lavas with a collective volume estimated at around 25,000 km³, though early pulses (16.7-15.5 Ma) alone accounted for ~5,000 km³ in the Oregon-Nevada border area.^[53] These silicic events formed nested calderas and were characterized by high-silica rhyolites derived from crustal melting induced by plume heat, with eruption styles shifting from plinian columns to pyroclastic flows that blanketed hundreds of kilometers.^[26] Ash-fall deposits from these eruptions, such as the Dinner Creek Tuff (16.0 Ma) and Mascall Tuff (15.77 Ma), are traceable across Oregon, Washington, Idaho, Nevada, and as far as New Mexico, enabling precise stratigraphic correlations between distant basins and linking paleoenvironmental records.^[54] By the Pliocene, volcanic activity along the Snake River Plain had evolved into predominantly bimodal eruptions, combining basaltic and rhyolitic magmas as the hotspot migrated northeastward. This phase, spanning roughly 5.3 to 2.6 Ma, featured eruptive peaks around 12 Ma (late Miocene transition) and 6 Ma, with centers like the Heise volcanic field producing interspersed mafic flows and silicic tuffs amid ongoing crustal extension.^[55] The bimodal nature reflects interaction between plume-derived basalts and remelted continental crust, resulting in smaller-volume events compared to earlier phases, such as the ~1,000 km³ output from key Pliocene rhyolitic domes and flows.^[56] Evidence for declining hotspot intensity emerges from the spatiotemporal pattern of these pre-Yellowstone eruptions, with a progressive reduction in eruption frequency and magnitude after 10 Ma. A 2020 study identifying previously unrecognized supereruptions along the track suggests this waning may stem from interactions with the detaching Farallon slab, which disrupted plume ascent and reduced melt production over time.^[42] Overall, the pre-Yellowstone sequence illustrates an evolving volcanic system, from plume-head dominance to more focused, subsiding activity, setting the stage for later concentration at the Yellowstone Plateau.

Yellowstone Supereruptions

The Yellowstone Plateau has experienced three major supereruptions over the past 2.1 million years, each producing voluminous ignimbrite deposits known as tuffs that form the stratigraphic backbone of the region's volcanic record. These events, characterized by explosive ejection of rhyolitic magma, rapid caldera collapse, and widespread pyroclastic density currents, ejected dense-rock equivalent volumes exceeding 280 km³, qualifying the largest as Volcanic Explosivity Index (VEI) 8 supereruptions. The tuffs—Huckleberry Ridge, Mesa Falls, and Lava Creek—overlie older volcanic units and are interbedded with minor ash-fall layers, providing a chronological framework for the hotspot's evolution at this site.^[6]^[57]^[58] The oldest supereruption, dated to 2.059 ± 0.004 Ma, produced the Huckleberry Ridge Tuff with a volume of approximately 2,500 km³ and VEI 8 intensity, forming the Island Park Caldera—a roughly 75 km wide collapse structure spanning parts of present-day Idaho and Wyoming. Pyroclastic flows from this multi-phase event covered over 15,500 km², depositing thick, welded ignimbrites that followed topographic lows northward into adjacent river valleys, while distal ash-fall layers extended across the western United States and into marine sediments of the Gulf of Mexico, with comparable widespread dispersal implying reach to Pacific Ocean basins. This eruption's stratigraphic signature includes multiple cooling units separated by fallout deposits, reflecting episodic venting over days to weeks.^[6]^[58]^[57]^[59] Approximately 1.3 million years ago (1.285 ± 0.004 Ma), the Mesa Falls Tuff erupted with a smaller volume of 280 km³ and VEI 7 magnitude, collapsing the Henry's Fork Caldera, a 16 km diameter feature nested within the older Island Park structure. Pyroclastic flows extended over 2,700 km², primarily within the modern Snake River Plain region, with ash-fall deposits preserved in lacustrine and terrestrial sequences across the Intermountain West. This event represents a transitional phase in the volcanic field's cycle, with the tuff's rhyolitic composition indicating magma differentiation similar to prior and subsequent eruptions.^[6]^[58]^[57] The most recent supereruption, the Lava Creek Tuff at 0.639 ± 0.002 Ma, ejected about 1,000 km³ of material in a VEI 8 event, forming the extant Yellowstone Caldera (45 x 85 km). Composed of two main members (A and B), the tuff's pyroclastic flows blanketed over 7,500 km², with deposits up to hundreds of meters thick near the vents, while ash plumes dispersed material continent-wide, including over 3 m thick layers in Texas and tens of meters in the Gulf of Mexico, contributing to hemispheric if not global climate cooling through aerosol veiling and ash-induced albedo effects lasting years to decades. The eruption involved rapid evacuation of a shallow magma chamber, triggering piston-like caldera collapse over hours to days.^[6]^[58]^[57]^[59]^[60] Common to these supereruptions, mechanics involved the catastrophic release of overpressured rhyolitic magma from upper crustal chambers, generating Plinian columns followed by collapsing pyroclastic density currents that traveled tens to hundreds of kilometers at speeds exceeding 100 km/h, welding upon emplacement due to high temperatures. Caldera formation occurred via piecemeal collapse as magma withdrawal exceeded 30-50% of chamber volume, with ring-fracture vents feeding the flows. Post-eruption resurgence, driven by magma recharge, domed the caldera floors by hundreds of meters—evident in uplifted blocks like the Sour Creek and Mallard Lake resurgents—over timescales of 10,000 to 100,000 years, restoring much of the collapsed topography.^[60]^[6]^[49]

Post-Supereruption Activity

Following the climactic Lava Creek supereruption approximately 631,000 years ago, which produced the voluminous Lava Creek Tuff, volcanic activity at Yellowstone shifted to a prolonged phase dominated by effusive rhyolitic eruptions within the newly formed caldera.^[61] This post-caldera period featured at least 27 major intracaldera rhyolite lava flows and domes, along with numerous smaller units, collectively comprising over 70 individual features that erupted between about 640,000 and 70,000 years ago.^[61] These rhyolites, primarily high-silica compositions, filled much of the 45-by-85-kilometer caldera depression, with the bulk of activity concentrated in a later pulse from 160,000 to 70,000 years ago that extruded more than 360 cubic kilometers of material.^[62] The flows and domes, such as those forming the Sour Creek and Mallard Lake resurgent domes, exhibit thicknesses up to 300 meters and often display flow banding and obsidian margins indicative of viscous, slow-moving lavas.^[62] The most recent significant magmatic eruption in this sequence was the Pitchstone Plateau rhyolite flow, which issued from a vent near the southwestern margin of the caldera around 70,000 years ago and covered about 60 square kilometers with a volume exceeding 25 cubic kilometers.^[61] This flow, notable for its dark, pitchstone texture rich in glassy perlitic fragments, represents the culmination of intracaldera rhyolitic activity and postdates the major resurgent uplift phases.^[63] Concurrent with these rhyolitic events, basaltic volcanism occurred peripherally, with approximately 40 vents producing small-volume shield volcanoes, cinder cones, and fissure-fed flows outside the caldera boundaries, the youngest of which has been redated to about 35,000 years ago near West Yellowstone.^[64] These basalts, totaling less than 50 cubic kilometers, reflect interaction between hotspot-derived mantle melts and the overlying lithosphere, often mingling with shallower rhyolitic systems.^[61] In addition to effusive magmatism, minor explosive activity has punctuated the Holocene, including at least 20 phreatic eruptions driven by hydrothermal interactions rather than fresh magma input, with craters up to 200 meters in diameter formed in the past 12,000 years.^[50] Examples include the Mary Bay and Indian Pond explosions on Yellowstone Lake, dated to around 13,800 and 10,000 years ago, respectively, which ejected blocks weighing up to 100 tons.^[65] Emerging research suggests that some post-supereruption events, particularly during deglaciation phases, may have been influenced by glacial cycles, as unloading from the retreating Pinedale ice cap (ending ~14,000 years ago) reduced lithostatic pressure, potentially enhancing mantle degassing and facilitating magma ascent or hydrothermal explosivity.^[66] This interplay highlights how external climatic forcings can modulate volcanic triggers in hotspot settings like Yellowstone.^[67]

Geophysics and Magma System

Seismic Activity and Deformation

The Yellowstone hotspot region exhibits high levels of seismic activity, with approximately 1,000 to 3,000 earthquakes occurring annually, most of which are too small to be felt.^[68] These events are primarily clustered in swarms, defined as series of earthquakes concentrated in time and space, often linked to the movement of hydrothermal fluids along fault networks overlying the magma system.^[68] The largest recorded swarm took place in 1985 on the northwest side of the Yellowstone Plateau, involving over 3,000 earthquakes during a three-month period, with hundreds exceeding magnitude 2.0.^[68] Seismicity in the region extends to depths of up to 10 km, as evidenced by the 2010 Madison Plateau swarm, which initiated at approximately 10 km and expanded along a fault structure dipping eastward.^[69] Such deep events are interpreted as being driven by high-pressure aqueous fluids migrating from deeper sources, potentially exsolved from partial melt zones at 4–6 km depth, interacting with preexisting faults in the brittle crust.^[69] Ground deformation at the Yellowstone Caldera, measured using Interferometric Synthetic Aperture Radar (InSAR) and Global Positioning System (GPS) networks, shows cyclic patterns of uplift and subsidence indicative of magma or fluid dynamics beneath the surface. Between mid-2004 and 2006, an episode of rapid uplift occurred across the caldera, with rates reaching up to 7 cm per year at the Sour Creek dome in the northeast, totaling about 25 cm of displacement.^[70] Uplift rates decelerated to 2–5 cm per year by 2008 and reversed to subsidence by mid-2010, coinciding with the 2010 earthquake swarm.^[70] Patterns of seismicity and deformation at Yellowstone exhibit correlations similar to those observed at Long Valley Caldera, where increased earthquake activity often accompanies changes in ground uplift or subsidence, such as the 1985 swarm that aligned with the transition from long-term uplift to subsidence. Recent analyses, including a 2025 study of long-term swarm dynamics, attribute variations in swarm frequency to the interplay of slowly diffusing aqueous fluids and episodic fluid injections from magmatic sources, providing insights into ongoing subsurface processes without indicating imminent eruption.^[71]

Magma Chamber Structure

The magma chamber structure beneath Yellowstone is characterized by a multi-level plumbing system, imaged through integrated geophysical methods that reveal interconnected reservoirs of partial melt from the upper crust to the mantle. Seismic velocity models indicate an upper crustal chamber extending from approximately 4 to 15 km depth, with the top identified at about 3.8 km and a melt-bearing zone from 3–8 km, with a volume of about 10,000 km³ and containing an average of 16–20% melt (up to 28% locally), primarily rhyolitic in composition. This reservoir acts as the primary storage for silicic magmas that fuel Yellowstone's eruptive history.^[11]^[72]^[73]^[74] Deeper in the system, a lower crustal body resides between 20 and 50 km depth, consisting of basaltic magma with partial melt fractions estimated at 1-2%, linking the upper reservoir to underlying mantle sources. Magnetotelluric surveys highlight this body's high electrical conductivity, attributed to interconnected partial melts and fluids that enhance its detectability. This lower body, with a volume of approximately 46,000 km³, serves as a staging area for magma ascent and differentiation.^[11]^[75]^[76] Tomographic inversions reveal mantle contributions from a hotspot plume, manifesting as low-velocity anomalies extending from 50 km to over 600 km depth, indicative of hot, upwelling material with thermal anomalies up to 200°C. These anomalies suggest ongoing plume-driven magma generation that periodically recharges shallower reservoirs. Models of episodic influx from depth explain caldera resurgence, where basaltic injections into the lower crust drive pressure buildup and surface deformation over timescales of thousands of years.^[11]^[77]^[78] The overall structure emerges from the synthesis of multiple datasets, including magnetotellurics for melt connectivity, gravity anomalies for density contrasts, and reflection seismology for interface mapping, which collectively delineate a dynamic system capable of sustaining Yellowstone's long-term volcanism. Recent high-frequency seismic studies (as of 2025) have further refined the structure, imaging a volatile-rich cap at the top of the upper reservoir.^[79]^[80]^[74]^[73]

Current Status and Hydrothermal Features

Ongoing Volcanic Hazards

The probability of a supereruption at Yellowstone, classified as Volcanic Explosivity Index (VEI) 8, is estimated to occur on average every 730,000 years based on the average interval between the three known supereruptions (at 2.1, 1.3, and 0.63 million years ago), with the most recent occurring approximately 640,000 years ago; this suggests the next such event is not imminent and could be around 100,000 years in the future, though volcanic systems do not follow strict schedules.^[81] Supereruptions (VEI 8) have an annual likelihood of about 1 in 730,000; smaller but significant eruptions reaching VEI 6 or higher would be more probable, though exact probabilities for those are higher than for supereruptions.^[81] Overall, the annual probability of any volcanic eruption at Yellowstone remains low, on the order of 0.001%, with lava flows being the most likely form of future activity rather than explosive events.^[82] As of November 2025, Yellowstone's activity remains at background levels per USGS monthly updates, with recent studies (e.g., January 2025 research pinpointing potential future eruption sites hundreds of thousands of years ahead and May 2025 findings on a deeper magma reservoir) indicating no imminent large-scale activity.^[83]^[84]^[85] Potential volcanic hazards from an eruption include lava flows that could advance slowly across the Yellowstone Plateau, pyroclastic surges and flows capable of devastating areas within tens of kilometers of the vent, lahars triggered by melting snow or interaction with water bodies, and widespread ash fallout extending up to 1,000 km or more across the North American continent.^[86] Ash fallout poses the most far-reaching threat, with models of a supereruption indicating deposits potentially reaching several meters thick near the caldera and thinning to centimeters over regional distances, disrupting agriculture, infrastructure, and air travel.^[87] In 2025, the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) maintains a standardized volcano alert system for Yellowstone, featuring levels from Normal/Green (background activity) to Advisory/Yellow, Watch/Orange, and Warning/Red, which guide responses including public notifications and coordination with emergency agencies; evacuation scenarios emphasize preparation for ash accumulations up to 3 meters deep in proximal areas, involving shelter-in-place protocols, road closures, and regional contingency plans developed through the Yellowstone Volcano Observatory.^[88] A VEI 8 supereruption could inject massive sulfur aerosols into the stratosphere, leading to short-term global cooling of up to several degrees Celsius for years to decades from sulfur aerosols, potentially similar to historical large eruptions like Tambora (0.7°C drop) or the hypothesized effects of Toba (~74,000 years ago), though exact impacts for Yellowstone remain uncertain.^[89]^[90] Non-eruptive hazards, such as hydrothermal explosions driven by superheated water flashing to steam, present more immediate risks; for instance, the 1989 explosion at Porkchop Geyser in Norris Geyser Basin ejected rocks over 60 meters high, damaging nearby boardwalks and underscoring the potential for sudden, localized destruction without magmatic involvement.^[91] These events occur several times per century in Yellowstone and can injure visitors or alter thermal features.^[86]

Geysers, Hot Springs, and Fumaroles

The hydrothermal features of the Yellowstone hotspot, including geysers, hot springs, and fumaroles, are surface manifestations of a vast subsurface system powered by heat from a shallow magma body beneath the Yellowstone Caldera. This magma provides an estimated thermal output of 4.5 to 6.0 gigawatts (GW), driving the circulation of groundwater and sustaining over 10,000 thermal features across approximately 120 thermal areas in Yellowstone National Park.^[92]^[93] These features represent the world's highest concentration of geysers, with more than 1,200 geysers recorded as having erupted historically, though only about half (~500) are active at any given time; hot springs number in the thousands and are the most abundant type; and fumaroles consist of steam vents that emit superheated gases.^[94]^[95] A new thermal feature was discovered in Norris Geyser Basin in July 2025, highlighting the system's ongoing dynamism without seismic precursors.^[96] The circulation model for these features relies on meteoric water—primarily rain and snowmelt—that infiltrates permeable rocks and sediments, descending to depths of 1–5 kilometers where it is heated to temperatures of 200–500°C by the underlying magma and hot rocks. This superheated water, often reaching around 300°C in deeper reservoirs, becomes buoyant and ascends rapidly through fractures, faults, and porous zones, sometimes erupting at the surface or condensing to form pools and deposits.^[93]^[15] Iconic examples include Old Faithful geyser in the Upper Geyser Basin, which erupts to heights of 30–60 meters approximately every 90 minutes, expelling 3,700–8,400 gallons of boiling water and steam per eruption due to periodic pressure buildup in its subsurface plumbing.^[93] Fumaroles, such as those in the Norris Geyser Basin, release steam mixed with volcanic gases, while hot springs like those in the Mammoth Terraces deposit colorful travertine from calcium-rich waters.^[97] The evolution of Yellowstone's hydrothermal systems has been influenced by seismic events, notably the magnitude 7.3 Hebgen Lake earthquake on August 17, 1959, which occurred 25 kilometers northwest of the park and altered subsurface pathways. The quake triggered widespread changes, including the activation of over 200 previously dormant geysers and hot springs, such as Steamboat Geyser's major eruptions starting in 1961, while causing others like Old Faithful to temporarily increase in frequency and height before stabilizing.^[98]^[99] These shifts demonstrate the dynamic nature of the system, where fault movements can redirect fluid flow and reactivate features. Hazards associated with these features include scalding from boiling water that can exceed 100°C at the surface, posing burn risks to visitors who venture off boardwalks; toxic gas emissions, primarily hydrogen sulfide (H₂S) producing a rotten-egg smell and carbon dioxide (CO₂) leading to asphyxiation in low-lying areas; and sudden hydrothermal explosions, which eject steam, boiling water, mud, and rock fragments up to hundreds of meters.^[93]^[100]^[101] Such explosions, like the 2024 event in Biscuit Basin that destroyed a boardwalk, occur without magmatic involvement and are among the most frequent volcanic hazards in the park, with craters up to 1.5 kilometers wide documented near Yellowstone Lake.^[102]

Research and Implications

Geochemical and Isotopic Studies

Geochemical studies of the Yellowstone hotspot track reveal a predominantly bimodal volcanic composition, dominated by basaltic and rhyolitic magmas that reflect distinct mantle and crustal sources. Basalts, derived from partial melting of the underlying mantle plume, exhibit primitive characteristics with high magnesium numbers (Mg# > 0.65) and elevated ratios of 3He/4He up to 16 times the atmospheric value (R_A), indicating a deep, undegassed mantle source minimally influenced by crustal assimilation.^[15] In contrast, rhyolites, which comprise over 90% of the erupted volume in the central track, result primarily from anatexis and remelting of the continental crust intruded by plume-derived basaltic melts, leading to silica contents exceeding 70 wt% and enrichment in radiogenic isotopes like 87Sr/86Sr > 0.710.^[103] This duality underscores the hotspot's role in driving hybrid magmatism through plume-crust interaction, with basalts acting as heat engines for crustal melting without significant hybridization in most cases.^[104] Trace element analyses further highlight plume influence on the magma system, particularly through enrichment in incompatible elements such as Zr and Nb, which are elevated by factors of 10–50 relative to mid-ocean ridge basalts (MORB). These patterns, evident in both basalts and derivative rhyolites, suggest derivation from a plume source with garnet-bearing residues, as indicated by high Nb/Yb ratios (>5) and low heavy rare earth elements (HREE).^[105] Oxygen isotopic compositions (δ¹⁸O) in rhyolites show systematic variations, with values ranging from +5‰ to -5‰ (SMOW), where low-δ¹⁸O signatures (< +2‰) in post-caldera lavas demonstrate contamination by meteoric waters during magma recharge and hydrothermal alteration.^[106] Such isotopic disequilibrium, preserved in zircons and phenocrysts, points to open-system processes in shallow crustal reservoirs, where hydrothermal fluids exchange oxygen with the magma, lowering δ¹⁸O without substantially altering major elements.^[107] Recent investigations in 2025 have identified significant lithium enrichment in the early-stage McDermitt rhyolites (ca. 16 Ma), with melt inclusions showing Li concentrations of 400–1350 ppm, far exceeding typical rhyolitic values (20–70 ppm). This enrichment arises from fluxing of Li-rich sediments and clays during crustal anatexis in the nascent hotspot caldera, highlighting the plume's capacity to mobilize critical elements from the lithosphere.^[30] Over the hotspot's 16-million-year evolution, isotopic signatures show a progressive decrease in mantle influence, with Nd and Hf ratios shifting from primitive values (εNd > +5, εHf > +10) in early Columbia River Basalts to more evolved compositions (εNd < 0, εHf < 0) in later Snake River Plain rhyolites, attributed to increasing crustal thickening and contamination as the plume migrated northeastward over variably thickened Precambrian lithosphere.^[103] This temporal trend reflects cumulative crustal reworking, diminishing the relative contribution of plume-derived melts.^[108]

Monitoring Efforts and Recent Discoveries

The Yellowstone Volcano Observatory (YVO), established in 2001 as a partnership among the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS), Yellowstone National Park, and academic institutions, coordinates comprehensive real-time monitoring of the region's volcanic and seismic activity.^[109] This includes a network of over 50 seismometers operated by the University of Utah Seismograph Stations that detect earthquakes and swarms in near real-time, continuous Global Positioning System (GPS) stations measuring ground deformation at millimeter precision, and geochemical sensors tracking volcanic gas emissions such as carbon dioxide and hydrogen sulfide.^[110] A multi-gas monitoring station installed in 2021 at Mud Volcano provides continuous data on gas fluxes, enhancing detection of subsurface changes.^[111] Recent advancements in seismic imaging have refined understandings of the hotspot's structure. In 2025, seismic tomography models revealed that the Yellowstone plume involves lower-mantle upwelling impeded by cold remnant blocks, extending the plume's influence deeper than previously modeled and causing anomalous subsidence patterns up to 2 km in a 100–200 km region along the Snake River Plain.^[112] This builds on a 2020 study identifying two previously unrecognized super-eruptions at 8.7 and 8.9 million years ago, which suggested a potential waning of hotspot intensity based on varying eruption volumes along the track; subsequent magnetotelluric data from 2025 confirmed low rhyolitic magma percentages in the western caldera, supporting a shift toward northeastern activity.^[113]^[114] Satellite-based remote sensing complements ground networks, with Interferometric Synthetic Aperture Radar (InSAR) from missions like Sentinel-1 providing broad-scale deformation maps that capture uplift and subsidence episodes across the caldera at centimeter resolution.^[115] LiDAR surveys, such as the 2022 high-resolution dataset for the northern Yellowstone region, have unveiled hidden fault scarps and landslide features beneath vegetation, aiding precise mapping of caldera margins and associated geological structures.^[116] YVO integrates findings with global hotspot research, drawing parallels to the Hawaiian mantle plume to contextualize plume-crust interactions despite differences in crustal thickness and eruption styles.^[117] Public access to monitoring data is facilitated through USGS online platforms, including interactive maps for earthquake locations and swarm notifications, as well as dashboards displaying current volcano alert levels—typically NORMAL/GREEN—and deformation trends.^[83]^[118]

Environmental and Economic Impacts

The Lava Creek supereruption approximately 631,000 years ago released vast quantities of ash and sulfur aerosols into the atmosphere, leading to global cooling estimated at 3°C in ocean surface temperatures for several years, as evidenced by isotopic analysis of deep-sea sediments. This climatic perturbation disrupted ecosystems and weather patterns across the Northern Hemisphere, with prolonged winter-like conditions affecting vegetation growth and animal migrations. Similar effects from smaller historical eruptions, such as Mount Pinatubo in 1991, confirm that sulfur dioxide emissions from supereruptions can block solar radiation, causing surface temperature drops of up to 0.7°C for years, though Yellowstone-scale events would amplify this impact significantly.^[119]^[120]^[90] The Yellowstone hotspot has shaped diverse habitats through uplift, faulting, and thermal features, influencing vegetation patterns and wildlife in the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem. Rhyolitic areas support low-diversity lodgepole pine forests due to nutrient-poor soils, while non-rhyolitic terrains sustain more varied vegetation such as spruce, fir, and meadows. Hydrothermal systems host specialized ecosystems with thermophilic organisms. Hotspot-related tectonics create basins and ranges that provide habitats for species like elk and bison.^[15] Contemporary geothermal activity in Yellowstone presents both opportunities and challenges for environmental management. The park's hydrothermal systems output an estimated 2 GW of radiant heat flux across active thermal areas, offering substantial potential for sustainable energy development outside protected boundaries, though extraction remains prohibited within the park to preserve natural features. However, elevated arsenic concentrations in thermal waters—reaching 1,500 µg/L at sites like Old Faithful and exceeding EPA drinking water standards by orders of magnitude—pose contamination risks to downstream rivers such as the Firehole and Madison, with annual arsenic fluxes of approximately 180,000 kg potentially bioaccumulating in aquatic life and affecting water quality for irrigation and wildlife.^[121]^[122] Economically, the hotspot's legacy drives significant revenue through tourism and emerging mineral resources. In 2023, 4.5 million visitors to Yellowstone National Park spent $623 million in nearby communities, generating $828 million in total economic output and supporting over 9,000 jobs in gateway areas like West Yellowstone and Gardiner. Additionally, ancient calderas linked to the hotspot's early track, such as McDermitt in Nevada, host lithium deposits estimated at 20–150 million tons of in situ lithium metal in tuffaceous sediments, positioning the region as a key domestic source for battery production amid 2025 projections of growing demand.^[123]^[30] A future supereruption could severely disrupt aviation and agriculture through widespread ash fallout, with modeled deposits of centimeters across the Midwest clogging jet engines and grounding flights continent-wide for weeks, as even millimeters reduce runway traction and visibility. Agricultural impacts would include crop failures and livestock losses from ash burial, with less than an inch sufficient to smother fields and contaminate soils, exacerbating food supply shortages during the ensuing climatic cooling.^[59]^[124]

References

[1]
The source of Yellowstone's heat | U.S. Geological Survey - USGS.gov
Apr 16, 2018 · Yellowstone is a hotspot—an area of anomalously high temperatures and some melting within Earth's upper mantle (the layer between the crust and ...
[2]
Buried calderas on the track of the Yellowstone hotspot - USGS.gov
Nov 14, 2022 · The track of the Yellowstone hotspot is defined by a series of old caldera systems that get older the farther to the southwest you get from Yellowstone.
[3]
Geology and History - USGS.gov
Yellowstone National Park contains more than 10,000 thermal features, including the world's greatest concentration of geysers, hot springs, mudpots, and ...
[4]
Just how long has the Yellowstone Hotspot been around? - USGS.gov
Jan 31, 2021 · The start of the trail is the 17-million-year-old McDermitt volcanic system and similar-age volcanism in northern Nevada and southern Oregon.
[5]
The Yellowstone Hotspot and Columbia River Basalts - USGS.gov
Dec 9, 2019 · Yellowstone is a hotspot volcano. Volcanic hotspots are fed by plumes of hot material rising from deep in the Earth, which can result in the ...
[6]
Summary of Yellowstone Eruption History
### Timeline of Major Eruptions and Caldera Formations in Yellowstone
[7]
The Yellowstone hotspot, Greater Yellowstone ecosystem, and ...
The processes associated with the Yellowstone hotspot are volcanism, faulting, and uplift and are observed in the geology at the surface.
[8]
[PDF] Deep Mantle Convection Plumes and Plate Motions
May 24, 1971 · Morgan (1971; in press) proposed that these hot-spots are surface manifestations of lower mantle convection which provides the motive force for ...
[9]
Strong seismic anisotropy due to upwelling flow at the root of the ...
Mar 1, 2024 · Recent work has suggested that a deep mantle plume, rooted beneath southern California, is the source of Yellowstone volcanism. Seismic ...
[10]
[PDF] Geodynamics of the Yellowstone hotspot and mantle plume
Integration of geophysical and geological data show that the Yellowstone hotspot resulted from a mantle plume interacting with the overriding North America ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[11]
The Yellowstone magmatic system from the mantle plume ... - Science
Apr 23, 2015 · Local earthquake tomography and waveform modeling studies have revealed an upper-crustal magma reservoir between 5 and 16 km depth (3, 12, 13), ...
[12]
Insight into the Yellowstone hotspot and the Juan de Fuca slab
The low-velocity structure deviates variably from a narrow vertical plume conduit extending down to ∼1000 km depth, suggesting that the Yellowstone hotspot may ...
[13]
EDGE-driven convection - MantlePlumes.org
Mar 2, 2004 · Edge Driven Convection (EDC) is an instability that occurs at the boundary between thick stable lithosphere (for example, an Archean craton) and thinner ...
[14]
[PDF] GSA TODAY - Geological Society of America
Dec 12, 2000 · Once such convection is admitted, an alternative, nonplume explanation for Yellowstone is possible, which has propagating convective rolls.
[15]
[PDF] The Yellowstone Hotspot, Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem, and ...
... driven by hotspot heat, whose abundance, character, and uniqueness were the primary reasons for the establishment of Yellowstone as the world's first national.
[16]
Absolute plate motions in a reference frame defined by moving hot spots in the Pacific, Atlantic, and Indian oceans
Summary of each segment:
[17]
39 Ar and paleomagnetic constraints on the age and areal extent of ...
May 8, 2019 · Constraints on North American plate velocity from the Yellowstone hotspot deformation field. : Nature. , v. 369. , p. 53. –. 55. , https://doi.
[18]
[PDF] The track of the Yellowstone hot spot: Volcanism, faulting, and uplift
We favor a mantle-plume explanation for the hot-spot track and associated tec- tonism and note the following problems with competing hypotheses: (I) for a rift ...
[19]
Crustal structure and thickness along the Yellowstone hot spot track
Aug 6, 2025 · The eastern Snake River Plain (ESRP) crust is thickest (47 km) at its NE end beneath the young calderas and thinnest (40 km) at its SW end ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[20]
Crustal deformation of the Yellowstone–Snake River Plain volcano ...
Mar 2, 2007 · The Yellowstone–Snake River Plain tectonomagmatic province resulted from Late Tertiary volcanism in western North America, producing three ...Missing: rifting | Show results with:rifting
[21]
Yellowstone plume trigger for Basin and Range extension, and ...
Apr 1, 2015 · Plume arrival at 17–16 Ma resulted in advective thermal weakening of the lithosphere, mantle traction, delamination, and added buoyancy to the northern and ...<|separator|>
[22]
Rapid eruption of the Columbia River flood basalt and correlation ...
Sep 19, 2018 · U-Pb ages show Earth's youngest flood basalt province erupted in 750 ka starting ~16.65 Ma during Miocene global warming.<|separator|>
[23]
Lithium-Rich Claystone in the McDermitt Caldera, Nevada, USA
The 40 × 25 km McDermitt caldera collapsed during the eruption of ~1000 km3 of a 16.4 Ma, zoned peralkaline to metaluminous tuff; minor caldera magmatism ceased ...
[24]
Uplift, rupture, and rollback of the Farallon slab reflected in volcanic ...
Aug 17, 2017 · A slightly shorter volcanic gap is present the eastern Santa Rosa-Calico field where calc-alkaline volcanic rocks as young as 19 Ma have been ...
[25]
Large-volume, low-δ<sup>18</sup>O rhyolites of the central Snake ...
The Miocene Bruneau-Jarbidge and adjacent volcanic fields of the central Snake River Plain, southwest Idaho, are dominated by high-temperature rhyolitic ...
[26]
Geology and evolution of the McDermitt caldera, northern Nevada ...
Jul 17, 2017 · Silicic volcanism around the McDermitt caldera is some of the oldest of the Yellowstone hotspot, but the caldera is younger than two known ...
[27]
Is the track of the Yellowstone hotspot driven by a deep mantle plume?
... crust to produce flood basalts, whereas basalt melt from the southern part intercepted and melted Paleozoic and older crust to produce rhyolite from 17 to 14 Ma ...
[28]
Lithium from magma to mine in an early Yellowstone hotspot caldera
Apr 16, 2025 · One of the world's largest Li deposits is hosted in lake sediments of the 16.4 Ma McDermitt caldera, which formed during the early stages of ...
[29]
In the Wake of the Yellowstone Hotspot
Hotspots also are known as “mantle plumes.” The traditional theory of hotspots is that they are columns or plumes of hot and molten rock that begin 1,800 miles ...
[30]
[PDF] Tectonic and Magmatic Evolution of the Snake River Plain Volcanic ...
Computer-generated, shaded-relief image of the Snake River Plain region created from the U.S. Geological Survey's digital elevation data. Page 3. Tectonic and ...
[31]
new interpretation of deformation rates in the Snake River Plain and ...
Volcanic deformation in eastern Oregon and the Snake River Plain is accepted by many to have resulted from the interaction of the Yellowstone hotspot or mantle ...Missing: thinning | Show results with:thinning
[32]
The Snake River Plain: A Tale of Two Basins | U.S. Geological Survey
Nov 21, 2022 · The origin and development of the Snake River Plain illustrates the diverse and far-reaching geologic impacts of the Yellowstone Hotspot. That “ ...
[33]
https://academic.oup.com/gji/article/189/1/101/571659
[34]
The Big Buttes of the Eastern Snake River Plain - USGS.gov
Dec 4, 2023 · Volcanism along the hot spot track was bimodal, consisting of both basalt and rhyolite. Rhyolite rocks are generally older and covered by ...
[35]
Bridging basalts and rhyolites in the Yellowstone–Snake River Plain ...
Where 'crustal cannibalisation' is proposed, it has been postulated that the altered rocks may be melted directly by basalts (Bindeman et al., 2008) or by more ...Missing: transition | Show results with:transition
[36]
Recent magmatotectonic activity in the Eastern Snake River Plain ...
Aug 7, 2025 · Density-driven lower crustal flow away from the ESRP is proposed to accommodate subsidence and maintain isostatic equilibrium. ... These maps ...
[37]
Yellowstone and Snake River Plain | Idaho State University
Ignimbrites and tuff deposits marginal to the Snake River Plain record the path of the movement of the North American Plate over the stationary hotspot at ...
[38]
[PDF] Geohydrology of the Regional Aquifer System, Western Snake River ...
The Snake River Plain is an arcuate topographic and structural depression that extends across southern Idaho. Geology and hydrology of eastern and western ...
[39]
Discovery of Ancient Super-eruptions Suggests the Yellowstone ...
Jun 29, 2020 · The Yellowstone hotspot is well known to have produced super-eruptions, such as the colossal Huckleberry Ridge Tuff eruption 2.1 million years ...
[40]
A fixed sublithospheric source for the late Neogene track of the ...
Jan 30, 2014 · Calderas associated with these two silicic volcanic fields are buried under 1 to 3 km of younger basalt, so their locations and eruption record ...2 Geologic Setting · 2.4 Volcanic Field... · 5.3 Heise Volcanic Field...
[41]
Crustal-scale recycling in caldera complexes and rift zones along ...
Picabo, is the third youngest volcanic field of the Yellowstone hotspot track, and the isotopic evolution of the suite of rhyolites we have studied ...
[42]
None
Summary of each segment:
[43]
Geology and History of Yellowstone - USGS.gov
Over the past 2.2 million years, the 17,000 km2 (6,500 mi2) Yellowstone Plateau has been shaped by explosive eruptions and profound collapse of the ground ...
[44]
Where is the volcano? | U.S. Geological Survey - USGS.gov
Aug 8, 2021 · Yellowstone is a caldera, or a volcanic depression caused by the collapse of an underground magma chamber after a massive eruption emptied that ...
[45]
Caldera or crater…what's the difference? | U.S. Geological Survey
Jan 8, 2024 · Yellowstone caldera is gigantic—about 70 by 45 kilometers (43 by 28 miles). In the language of volcanology, a small collapse—perhaps a few ...Missing: dimensions | Show results with:dimensions
[46]
Yellowstone's caldera, resurgent domes, and lava flows—volcanic ...
Apr 11, 2021 · The pink regions are rhyolite flows erupted within Yellowstone Caldera. The caldera is outlined by the green dotted line, while the ...
[47]
[PDF] Preliminary Assessment of Volcanic and Hydrothermal Hazards in ...
Apr 3, 2007 · Future basaltic eruptions could cover several square kilometers with lava up to tens of meters thick.
[48]
[PDF] Geologic Field-Trip Guide to the Volcanic and Hydrothermal ...
... Yellowstone Group; the associated Henrys Fork Caldera is shown with the blue ... The floor of the Henrys Fork Caldera is filled with basaltic lava.
[49]
[PDF] The Case for a Long-Lived and Robust Yellowstone Hotspot
The Yellowstone hotspot is recognized as a whole-mantle plume with a history that extends to at least 56 Ma, as recorded by off- shore volcanism on the Siletzia ...Missing: geodetic | Show results with:geodetic
[50]
39 Ar geochronology of the middle Miocene McDermitt volcanic field ...
Jun 23, 2017 · The middle Miocene McDermitt volcanic field of southeastern Oregon and northern Nevada is a caldera complex that is temporally and spatially ...
[51]
Neogene Fallout Tuffs from the Yellowstone Hotspot in the Columbia ...
Oct 12, 2012 · Ash units are correlated on the basis of the chemical composition of glass and stratigraphic integrity. First, the average analysis of ...
[52]
Volcanic stratigraphy and age model of the Kimama deep borehole ...
Mar 19, 2019 · The Kimama drill core represents the most complete record of mafic volcanism along the Yellowstone–Snake River Plain hotspot track.
[53]
Bimodal volcanism of the High Lava Plains and Northwestern Basin ...
May 25, 2013 · Iron Mountain is analogous to post rhyolite-sweep centers in the eastern Snake River Plain that are associated with younger basaltic ...
[54]
Resurgent Calderas (U.S. National Park Service)
Apr 17, 2023 · These VEI 7 to 8 eruptions generally have multiple phases that may be separated by years or decades. For example, the Huckleberry Ridge Tuff ...
[55]
Revised ages for tuffs of the Yellowstone Plateau volcanic field
The Huckleberry Ridge Tuff is 2.059 ± 0.004 Ma, Mesa Falls Tuff is 1.285 ± 0.004 Ma, and Lava Creek Tuff is 0.639 ± 0.002 Ma.Missing: supereruptions | Show results with:supereruptions
[56]
Modeling ash fall distribution from a Yellowstone supereruption
Aug 27, 2014 · We used the volcanic ash transport and dispersion model Ash3d to estimate the distribution of ashfall that would result from a modern-day Plinian supereruption ...
[57]
Pyroclastic Flows at Yellowstone | U.S. Geological Survey - USGS.gov
Pyroclastic flows from this eruption left thick volcanic deposits known as the Lava Creek Tuff, which can be seen in the south-facing cliffs east of Madison, ...Missing: distance | Show results with:distance
[58]
Questions About Yellowstone Volcanic History - USGS.gov
Of these eruptions, at least 27 were rhyolite lava flows in the caldera, 13 were rhyolite lava flows outside the caldera and 40 were basalt vents outside the ...What Was The Extent Of Ash... · How Many Caldera-Forming... · How Many Giant Eruptions...Missing: Twin | Show results with:Twin
[59]
Yellowstone | U.S. Geological Survey - USGS.gov
The >2450 km3 (588 mi3) Huckleberry Ridge Tuff erupted about 2.1 million years ago, creating an approximately 75 km (47 mi) wide caldera and thick volcanic ...
[60]
Lotta lava! New insights into the timing of Yellowstone's most recent ...
Oct 23, 2023 · New age data for rhyolite lava flows erupted in Yellowstone ... volume of intracaldera rhyolites is on par with that of caldera-forming eruptions.
[61]
Pitchstone Plateau, Yellowstone, rhyolite with sanidine - USGS.gov
Feb 28, 2021 · (Left) Sample of the Pitchstone Plateau rhyolite flow, which erupted about 72,000 years ago, making it is the youngest rhyolite at ...
[62]
Thinking outside the caldera: Understanding basaltic eruptions at ...
Apr 21, 2025 · This explains why Yellowstone caldera is characterized by numerous episodes of rhyolite lava flow activity that correlate in time with basaltic ...Missing: post- | Show results with:post-
[63]
[PDF] Circular 1508: Yellowstone Volcano Observatory 2022 Annual Report
Jan 1, 2023 · Yellowstone Caldera, which comprises nearly one third of the land area in Yellowstone National Park, formed 631,000 years ago during the most ...
[64]
Deglaciation-enhanced mantle CO2 fluxes at Yellowstone imply ...
Feb 20, 2024 · Mantle melt generation in response to glacial unloading has been linked to enhanced magmatic volatile release in Iceland and global eruptive ...
[65]
History and dynamics of the Greater Yellowstone Glacial System ...
Unloading of the ∼1 km-thick plateau ice cap and consequent release of pressure on the magmatic system beneath Yellowstone was not accompanied by volcanism, ...
[66]
Earthquakes - Yellowstone National Park (U.S. National Park Service)
Approximately 700 to 3,000 earthquakes occur each year in the Yellowstone area; most are not felt. They result from the extensive network of faults associated ...
[67]
A fluid‐driven earthquake swarm on the margin of the Yellowstone ...
Sep 3, 2013 · [1] Over the past several decades, the Yellowstone caldera has experienced frequent earthquake swarms and repeated cycles of uplift and ...1 Introduction · 3 Earthquake Detection And... · 4.2 Swarm Structure And...
[68]
An extraordinary episode of Yellowstone caldera uplift, 2004–2010 ...
Dec 3, 2010 · The caldera uplift was lower to the southwest (∼0.5–0.6 cm), and reversed to subsidence toward the northwest caldera boundary. Note that the ...Missing: year | Show results with:year
[69]
Long-term dynamics of earthquake swarms in the Yellowstone caldera
Jul 18, 2025 · The Yellowstone volcanic system is one of the most seismically active in the world. The region's complex interplay between tectonic and magmatic ...
[70]
[PDF] The Yellowstone magmatic system from the mantle plume to the ...
Apr 23, 2015 · In contrast, the southeastern low-velocity zone is relatively small- er and localized, terminating at a depth of 100 km (Fig. 3C).
[71]
How big is the magma chamber under Yellowstone? - USGS.gov
The shallower one is composed of rhyolite (a high-silica rock type) and stretches from 5 km to about 17 km (3 to 10 mi) beneath the surface and is about 90 km ( ...
[72]
(PDF) Crust and upper mantle electrical conductivity beneath the ...
Aug 6, 2025 · The images reveal extensive areas of high conductivity in the upper mantle and lower crust beneath Yellowstone and the SRP. A highly ...
[73]
Teleseismic P‐wave tomogram of the Yellowstone plume
Apr 8, 2005 · This low velocity pond would be consistent with a ∼200° thermal anomaly. Thus, it is possible that the Yellowstone plume originated as a thermal ...
[74]
Dynamics of Episodic Magma Injection and Migration at Yellowstone ...
Jun 24, 2021 · Another low velocity zone is located at depths of 20–50 km, with a melt fraction of 2%, extending to the Moho and also interpreted as basaltic ...
[75]
An Electromagnetic View of How Magma is Stored beneath ...
Jan 13, 2025 · A tool called magnetotellurics to image where and how much magma is presently stored beneath Yellowstone caldera.
[76]
Using custom earthquakes to define the top of Yellowstone's magma ...
Apr 28, 2025 · Seismic reflection data showing the top of the magma reservoir beneath Yellowstone Caldera along a cross section that runs from Canyon Village ...Missing: magnetotellurics gravity
[77]
Magma accumulation at depths of prior rhyolite storage ... - Science
Dec 1, 2022 · The maximum depth extent of the low VS region below the caldera is ~30 km, although the anomaly is more subdued below 10 km, which suggests that ...
[78]
Questions About Future Volcanic Activity at Yellowstone - USGS.gov
The two intervals are thus 0.8 and 0.66 million years, averaging to a 0.73 million-year interval. Again, the last eruption was 0.64 million years ago, implying ...
[79]
So, when will the next eruption at Yellowstone happen? - USGS.gov
Nov 4, 2024 · Based on our current knowledge of Yellowstone's eruptive history, the annual probability of a volcanic eruption is on the order of 0.001%.
[80]
Hazards - Yellowstone - USGS.gov
Ash and tephra fall are the most widespread volcanic hazard. Even lava-flow eruptions could include explosive phases that might produce significant volumes of ...
[81]
Ash and Tephra Hazards from Yellowstone - USGS.gov
Such an eruption would produce ash columns that exceed 10 km (6 mi) and cover much of the United States with some ash. Once entering the stratosphere (higher ...
[82]
[PDF] Protocols for Geologic Hazards Response by the Yellowstone ...
Typically, the two four-stage alert levels rise and fall in parallel, yielding Normal/Green, Advisory/Yellow, Watch/ Orange, and Warning/Red, though the system ...
[83]
What would happen if a "supervolcano" eruption occurred again at ...
Fortunately, the chances of this sort of eruption at Yellowstone are exceedingly small in the next few thousands of years. Learn more: Video: Forecasting ...Missing: probability | Show results with:probability
[84]
The day that Porkchop Geyser exploded | U.S. Geological Survey
Jun 28, 2021 · In 1989, however, Porkchop Geyser blew up right in front of several observers on an otherwise sunny September afternoon.
[85]
[PDF] Heat and Volatile Flux at the Yellowstone Caldera
The Yellowstone Caldera formed 640,000 years ago when >1000 km3 of rhyolitic magma erupted catas- trophically, creating deposits of the Lava Creek Tuff ( ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[86]
Yellowstone's Active Hydrothermal System - USGS.gov
Yellowstone National Park contains more than 10000 thermal features, including the world's greatest concentration of geysers, hot springs, mudpots, ...
[87]
Geysers & Hot Springs - Yellowstone National Park (U.S. National ...
Apr 17, 2025 · In 2011, it was determined that 1,283 geysers have been recorded as erupting in Yellowstone. This is truly incredible, when all of the rest of ...Mammoth Hot Springs Trails · Hydrothermal Systems · Fountain Paint Pot
[88]
Just how many thermal features are there in Yellowstone? - USGS.gov
Sep 2, 2019 · Yellowstone National park hosts more than 10,000 hydrothermal features including hot springs, geysers, fumaroles, and mud pots.
[89]
Yellowstone's active hydrothermal system - What's with the hot water?
Jun 4, 2018 · The recent series of geyser eruptions emphasize the importance, variability, power, and beauty of Yellowstone's hot springs, geysers, fumaroles, ...
[90]
[PDF] Evolution of Seismic Geyser, Yellowstone National Park
The most significant event that has affected the geyser basins of Yellowstone National. Park since its discovery was the Hebgen Lake earthquake ...
[91]
The lasting contributions of Yellowstone National Park naturalist ...
Jan 20, 2025 · White describing changes in hot spring discharge and geyser eruption patterns to the August 17, 1959, M7.3 Hebgen Lake, Montana, earthquake, ...
[92]
Are Yellowstone's gases dangerous? | U.S. Geological Survey
The gases emitted from Yellowstone's hydrothermal areas are composed mostly of water vapor, a harmless gas. However, other gases that are poisonous to people ...Missing: explosions | Show results with:explosions
[93]
Hydrothermal Explosions at Yellowstone - USGS.gov
The largest hydrothermal-explosion crater documented in the world is along the north edge of Yellowstone Lake in an embayment known as Mary Bay. This 1.5-mile ( ...Missing: scalding gas H2S CO2
[94]
Hydrothermal explosions—a worldwide phenomena - USGS.gov
Aug 26, 2024 · The July 23, 2024, hydrothermal explosion at Biscuit Basin was a spectacular and hazardous event, throwing water, rock, and mud for more than ...
[95]
The Yellowstone hotspot in space and time: Nd and Hf isotopes in ...
Nd and Hf isotopic ratios co-vary and span the range of most terrestrial samples, reflecting mixing of mantle and crustal sources. Earliest erupted silicic ...Missing: studies | Show results with:studies
[96]
Coexisting Discrete Bodies of Rhyolite and Punctuated Volcanism ...
Jul 11, 2019 · The geochemical and isotopic evolution of Yellowstone's post ... rhyolite-basalt association of the Yellowstone Plateau Volcanic Field.
[97]
(PDF) The influence of plume head–lithosphere interaction on ...
Aug 7, 2025 · The influence of plume head–lithosphere interaction on magmatism associated with the Yellowstone hotspot track · Abstract and Figures · Citations ...
[98]
Low-δ 18 O Rhyolites from Yellowstone: Magmatic Evolution Based ...
In such an environment, oxygen isotopes are decoupled from trace elements and meteoric water is capable of significantly changing δ18O, but not cations.
[99]
Low-δ 18 O silicic magmas on Earth: a review - ScienceDirect.com
Rhyolite magmas in Yellowstone reveal a cyclic decrease in magmatic oxygen isotope compositions, with low-δ18O lavas occurring after each of the three caldera- ...
[100]
[PDF] and Hf-isotope systematics for the Yellowstone hotspot ... - NSF PAR
Mar 8, 2019 · This observation shows that there is significant lithospheric control on the isotopic compositions of both basalts and rhyolites associated with ...
[101]
Founding the Yellowstone Volcano Observatory - USGS.gov
Apr 13, 2020 · The objectives of YVO included seismic, ground deformation, and geochemical monitoring of Yellowstone to enable timely warnings and information ...
[102]
Volcano Monitoring | U.S. Geological Survey - USGS.gov
Nov 13, 2023 · In order to monitor subtle deformation of the ground, YVO relies most heavily on Global Positioning System (GPS) stations, strainmeters, and ...
[103]
Scientists can now “sniff” Yellowstone gases in real time - USGS.gov
Sep 13, 2021 · The real-time data from the MUD multi-GAS station are available on the YVO monitoring page (https://www.usgs.gov/volcanoes/yellowstone/ ...
[104]
Lens effect of remnant blocks on deep mantle upwelling causing ...
Aug 15, 2025 · Recent seismic tomography models and geological studies potentially reveal an additional type of topographical response to mantle-plume-related ...
[105]
Discovery of two new super-eruptions from the Yellowstone hotspot ...
Jun 1, 2020 · Assuming a caldera of comparable dimensions, it is possible that the ignimbrite volume could exceed 6000 km3, still excluding the substantial ...
[106]
New study reveals insights into Yellowstone Volcanic System's ...
Jan 1, 2025 · This study gave a clear picture of how magma is distributed through the crust at Yellowstone using a method that is most sensitive to the presence of magma.
[107]
Monitoring Deformation in Yellowstone National Park - USGS.gov
GPS is the backbone of deformation monitoring at Yellowstone · InSAR provides large-scale images of ground movement · Leveling preceded GPS and InSAR · Study Area.
[108]
Lidar data shed new light on “hidden” geological hazards near the ...
Nov 27, 2023 · Lidar data have just been released, for the first time, for Paradise Valley and the northern gateway corridor to Yellowstone National Park.
[109]
Yellowstone and Hawaiʻi—how similar are they? - USGS.gov
Feb 24, 2025 · After formation, Yellowstone's calderas tend to fill with viscous rhyolite lava flows and domes that form broad plateaus or steep dome-like ...Missing: post- | Show results with:post-
[110]
Volcano Updates | U.S. Geological Survey - USGS.gov
... eruption is unlikely anytime soon. There have only been 2 major eruptions of the geyser so far during 2025, and the period of frequent activity that started ...Missing: probability | Show results with:probability
[111]
Monitoring Earthquakes in Yellowstone National Park - USGS.gov
Monitoring Earthquakes in Yellowstone National Park · Over 50% of Yellowstone earthquakes occur in swarms · Earthquake Data (from the University of Utah).
[112]
Yellowstone Volcano's Twin Super Eruptions: The Caldera ... - Forbes
Oct 26, 2017 · Beneath Yellowstone lies an active volcano with the ability to change the global climate for years and trigger an extinction event.Missing: distribution | Show results with:distribution
[113]
Lava Creek Tuff Eruption
Nov 25, 2020 · A brief history about the last Yellowstone supervolcano eruption and its impact on the global climate.Geologic Location And... · How Do Volcanic Events Like... · Environmental ImpactsMissing: distribution | Show results with:distribution
[114]
Could a large Yellowstone eruption significantly change the climate?
At the height of the impact, global temperatures dropped by 1.3 degrees Fahrenheit (0.7 degrees Celsius). Learn more: Yellowstone FAQs & Facts · Modeling the ...
[115]
Ancient sedimentary DNA shows more than 5000 years of ... - bioRxiv
Dec 9, 2024 · ... beta diversity. Taxonomic abundance was ... Snake River and these lake systems, facilitating beaver movement into these watersheds.
[116]
[PDF] Mapping Temperature and Radiant Geothermal Heat Flux ...
Yellowstone's active thermal areas, is ~2.0 GW. Although there is a notable difference between the total GHF (summed for all the thermal areas) estimated ...
[117]
Arsenic in Yellowstone's thermal waters | U.S. Geological Survey
Dec 6, 2021 · Yellowstone's thermal waters are more than just hot—they also contain a variety of elements, some of which are potentially toxic!
[118]
Tourism to Yellowstone National Park contributes $828 million to ...
Jun 11, 2025 · A new National Park Service report shows that 4.5 million visitors to Yellowstone National Park in 2023 spent $623 million in communities near the park.
[119]
NOVA | Mystery of the Megavolcano | The Next Big One - PBS
A supereruption would smother many millions of square miles under an inch or more of ash. Less than an inch can disrupt most forms of agriculture, so a single ...Missing: aviation | Show results with:aviation