Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Breakthrough Institute

The Breakthrough Institute is an environmental research institute founded in 2007 by Ted Nordhaus and , headquartered in . It focuses on advancing , an philosophy that seeks to protect nature and improve human well-being by decoupling economic development from environmental impacts through intensive use of technology, such as and advanced agriculture. The organization critiques traditional environmentalism for overemphasizing scarcity and restraint, instead prioritizing innovation-driven abundance to address challenges like and resource limits. Nordhaus, the institute's executive director, and Shellenberger (who departed in 2015) gained prominence with their 2004 essay "The Death of Environmentalism," which argued that mainstream environmental advocacy had stagnated by failing to inspire broad political support or embrace pragmatic solutions. This laid the groundwork for the institute's mission to modernize environmental thought, influencing policy debates on energy transitions and human development. Key publications include the 2007 book Break Through, which expanded on optimistic, growth-oriented , and the 2015 Ecomodernist Manifesto, co-authored by institute affiliates, envisioning a future of intensified , , and technological intensification to spare . The institute conducts research on topics including deployment, , and conservation strategies, while hosting events like the annual Abundance Conference to promote and in high-impact technologies. Its work has supported federal clean energy initiatives, such as the 2009 stimulus investments, and continues to advocate for scaling reliable, low-carbon energy sources amid global decarbonization efforts. Though praised for challenging pessimistic narratives with data on historical environmental improvements, the institute's rejection of and anti-nuclear stances has drawn criticism from conventional environmental groups for underplaying risks of technological reliance.

History

Founding and Early Development

The Breakthrough Institute was established in 2007 by Ted Nordhaus and , two environmental strategists who had previously collaborated on progressive climate advocacy efforts. The institute's creation followed the publication of their book Break Through: From the Death of Environmentalism to the Politics of Possibility on October 4, 2007, which expanded on ideas from their influential 2004 essay "The Death of Environmentalism: Global Warming Politics in a Post-Environmental World." That essay, presented at a 2004 environmental grantmakers conference, argued that the mainstream environmental movement's reliance on apocalyptic framing and technical fixes had failed to mobilize effective political action on issues like , calling instead for a broader vision integrating human prosperity and technological optimism. Headquartered initially in , the institute positioned itself as an environmental research center dedicated to promoting human development and as solutions to ecological challenges, rejecting zero-sum narratives of in favor of policies fostering abundance. Nordhaus and Shellenberger, drawing from their experience co-founding the Apollo Alliance in 2003—a advocating large-scale public investments in clean energy—sought to influence policy through research, fellowships, and public discourse that critiqued constraints on growth and emphasized decoupling economic progress from . Early efforts included developing programs on energy innovation and conservation reform, aiming to shift toward pragmatic, evidence-based strategies informed by historical patterns of technological advancement. In its formative years, the institute gained attention for challenging orthodoxies within environmental circles, such as and emphasis on lifestyle austerity, by highlighting data on and historical emission trends under industrialization. By , following the disaster, early research pivoted toward advocating as essential for low-carbon abundance, marking an initial milestone in applying the institute's framework to specific technologies. Shellenberger departed in 2015 to found Environmental Progress, leaving Nordhaus to lead ongoing operations.

Evolution of Focus and Key Milestones

The Breakthrough Institute's early efforts centered on critiquing the limitations of traditional environmental , which its founders viewed as overly focused on and regulatory constraints rather than innovation and human prosperity. This began informally in 2003 with the co-founding of the Apollo Alliance, aimed at securing $300 billion in federal investment for clean energy over a decade, but gained prominence in 2004 through the essay "The Death of Environmentalism: Politics in a Post-Environmental World," co-authored by Ted Nordhaus and , which argued that environmentalism's emphasis on doom and sacrifice had failed to mobilize effective action on . The institute was formally established in 2007, coinciding with the of the book Break Through: From the Death of Environmentalism to the Politics of Possibility, which expanded on these ideas by calling for a shift toward policies promoting technological breakthroughs and to achieve environmental goals. By the late , the organization's focus broadened to include practical policy influence, such as contributing to the $150 billion clean energy investments in the 2009 American Recovery and Reinvestment Act under President Obama, and launching the fellowship in 2008 to train emerging leaders in innovation-oriented . In 2010, it co-authored the Hartwell Paper, which proposed redirecting climate policy toward accelerating energy innovation rather than emissions caps, and Post-Partisan Power, advocating bipartisan approaches to energy abundance. A pivotal milestone came in 2011 following the disaster, when the institute intensified advocacy for as essential for low-carbon abundance, launching its first Breakthrough Dialogue conference and the Breakthrough Journal to foster debate on these themes. The mid-2010s marked a maturation into , emphasizing humanity's capacity to intensify and harness to spare while advancing . In April 2015, the institute released "An Ecomodernist Manifesto," signed by 18 scholars, which posited that , urbanization, and agricultural intensification could decouple human well-being from , drawing on historical trends of gains. That year also saw the publication of Nature Unbound: Decoupling for Conservation, analyzing data showing improving environmental indicators alongside in developed nations. In 2016, it expanded into food and agriculture, launching a program to promote industrial farming systems for global and reduced land conversion. Subsequent milestones reflected deepening sectoral engagements and global outreach, including the 2012 Coal Killer report highlighting natural gas's role in displacing coal, and annual Dialogues evolving into the Abundance Conference by 2024, held in Washington, D.C., to advance policies for technological plenty. This trajectory underscores a consistent evolution from diagnostic critique to prescriptive advocacy for innovation-driven solutions, grounded in empirical trends like declining resource intensities and rising human freedoms, while challenging zero-sum views of progress and nature.

Recent Initiatives and Expansion

In 2023, the Breakthrough Institute launched the Build Nuclear Now campaign to advocate for accelerated deployment of advanced reactors, including reforms to lift moratoria, streamline regulations, and incentivize on-time completion. This initiative emphasized economic incentives like performance-based payments for reactors meeting construction timelines, aiming to address barriers to expansion in the United States. The campaign built on the organization's longstanding , which intensified after the 2011 incident, and sought to influence -level legislation, such as proposals in for taxpayer-funded programs to attract projects. By 2024, the institute contributed to the emergence of the Abundance movement, a bipartisan effort promoting technological progress and innovation to tackle environmental and developmental challenges, with a focus on building coalitions across political lines. This included co-hosting the inaugural Abundance Conference in Washington, D.C., shifting from the previous Breakthrough Dialogue format in California to enhance policy engagement in the nation's capital. The organization's 2024 annual report highlighted sustained growth in influence, with 30% of funding derived from unrestricted sources supporting expanded research and advocacy in energy, agriculture, and conservation. In agriculture, the institute released a policy roadmap in August 2025 outlining a science-based strategy for U.S. dominance, recommending regulatory overhauls for biotechnology, increased R&D investment to counter climate pressures, and productivity enhancements through precision tools and resilient crops. Earlier, in January 2023, it advanced visions for the Farm Bill emphasizing doubled public R&D funding to sustain yield growth amid pest and weather challenges. These efforts reflect broader organizational expansion since 2019, marked by program diversification and heightened policy impact, as detailed in successive annual reports.

Organizational Structure and Funding

Governance and Operations

The Breakthrough Institute functions as a , with federal 81-4526660, enabling it to receive tax-deductible charitable contributions for its research activities. This status supports its operations as an independent environmental research center dedicated to advancing technological solutions without reliance on government funding. Governance is overseen by a Board of Directors consisting of ten members with expertise spanning , , , , and . Key board members include Rachel Pritzker, founder of the Pritzker Innovation Fund; Tisha Schuller, principal at Adamantine Energy; Tom Riley, head of at ; Matt Winkler, chairman and founder of Asuragen; Ross Koningstein, director emeritus at Google Inc.; Jennifer Hernandez, partner at ; Bill Budinger, founding director of Rodel Foundations; ; Ray Rothrock, partner emeritus at ; and Ted Nordhaus, the institute's founder and executive director. The board provides strategic oversight, though specific details on bylaws, voting procedures, or committee structures are not publicly detailed on the institute's website. Day-to-day leadership falls under an executive team headed by Ted Nordhaus as founder and , Alex Trembath as deputy director, Ann Wang as director of operations, and Thia Bonadies as director of events and special projects. The organizational structure includes approximately 11 program directors—such as , Washington director, and Vijaya Ramachandran, director of and development—and a supporting staff of about 12 analysts, managers, and editors focused on in , , and . Operations are centered at headquarters in Oakland, California, with an additional office in Washington, D.C., to facilitate policy engagement. The institute conducts research, publishes the Breakthrough Journal, and organizes events such as the annual Abundance Conference in Washington, D.C., emphasizing empirical analysis of innovation-driven approaches to environmental challenges over traditional conservation models. Staff activities prioritize identifying scalable technologies, with outputs including policy reports, commentaries, and dialogues aimed at influencing public and governmental priorities toward human development and resource decoupling.

Funding Sources and Financial Transparency

The Breakthrough Institute operates as a 501(c)(3) with EIN 81-4526660, primarily funded through philanthropic grants from foundations and individual donors aligned with its ecomodernist mission of promoting technological solutions to environmental challenges. Major funders include the , (associated with ), (founded by Laura and John Arnold), , and , with specific grants such as $1.7 million from Breakthrough Energy Foundation in 2022 and $1.26 million in 2023. Other contributors encompass donor-advised funds like the East Bay Community Foundation, , and , as well as foundations such as the William and Flora Hewlett Foundation and Bernard and Anne Spitzer Charitable Trust. The institute maintains a policy of accepting contributions only from entities without direct financial interests in its research outcomes, emphasizing unrestricted or program-specific support to preserve independence. In its 2024 , the institute projected total revenue of $6,020,218, with allocations including 37% to innovation ($2.23 million), 30% to general operating support ($1.81 million), and 18% to and initiatives ($1.08 million). Financial data from IRS filings reveal steady growth followed by variability:
YearRevenueExpensesNet Income/(Loss)
2024$7,537,340$5,536,433$2,000,907
2023$4,438,319$6,558,097($2,119,778)
2022$6,739,502$5,383,594$1,355,908
2021$4,564,377$3,775,078$789,299
These figures reflect expansion in staff and programs since , with net assets reaching $5.11 million by despite a 2023 operating loss attributed to increased programmatic spending. Financial transparency is facilitated through public disclosures and annual reports listing major donors (typically those contributing $5,000 or more), though smaller contributions via donor-advised funds are often aggregated without individual attribution. The institute does not publish a comprehensive donor roster on its website, relying instead on periodic reports and IRS-mandated schedules for larger grants (over $5,000), which has drawn some external critiques for partial opacity in tracing all flows. However, the absence of corporate or industry-tied , as per its stated criteria, mitigates concerns over conflicts of interest, with philanthropic sources predominantly from innovation-focused entities supporting over traditional environmental advocacy.

Leadership and Key Personnel

Founders and Core Leaders

The Breakthrough Institute was co-founded in 2003 by Ted Nordhaus and Michael Shellenberger, who sought to challenge prevailing environmental paradigms by emphasizing technological innovation and human development in addressing energy and ecological challenges. Their collaboration began with the establishment of the Apollo Alliance that year, aimed at uniting environmental and labor groups to advocate for a $300 billion, decade-long investment in clean energy infrastructure. This initiative laid the groundwork for the institute's formation, building on their shared critique of traditional environmental strategies, as articulated in their 2004 essay "The Death of Environmentalism: If Environmentalism Fails to Evolve, It Will Fail to Solve the Problems It Was Created to Solve," which ignited widespread debate within policy and advocacy circles. Ted Nordhaus, who holds a in from the , remains the institute's Founder and Executive Director, overseeing its strategic direction and research priorities. Nordhaus has positioned the organization as a proponent of ecomodernist approaches, authoring works such as the 2007 book Break Through: From the Death of Environmentalism to the Politics of Possibility (co-authored with Shellenberger), which argued for from resource constraints through intensified human ingenuity and . Under his leadership, the institute has expanded to include programs on energy innovation, agriculture, and climate adaptation, maintaining a budget approaching $5 million annually with approximately 20 staff as of 2023. Michael Shellenberger, the co-founder, contributed to the institute's early intellectual framework but departed in 2015 to launch Environmental Progress, a nonprofit focused on advocacy and critiques. During his tenure from 2003 to 2015, Shellenberger co-developed key publications and initiatives, including the Breakthrough Generation fellowship program launched in 2008 to cultivate next-generation thinkers on technology-driven environmental solutions. His involvement helped establish the institute's emphasis on pragmatic, innovation-oriented policies over precautionary restraint. Current core leadership includes Alex Trembath as , who manages research operations and contributes to analyses on energy transitions and decarbonization pathways. Supporting executives such as Ann Wang (Director of Operations) and Thia Bonadies (Director of Events & Special Projects) handle administrative and programmatic execution, enabling the institute's output of reports, dialogues, and the Breakthrough Journal. This structure reflects Nordhaus's ongoing centrality, with the team prioritizing empirical assessments of technological scalability over ideological constraints.

Notable Contributors and Staff

Alex Trembath serves as deputy director of the Breakthrough Institute, contributing to research on energy innovation, policy, and technological optimism. In this role, Trembath has co-authored analyses on topics such as the history of U.S. government involvement in and critiques of ineffective strategies. Other key staff include program directors like Seaver Wang, who directs and energy efforts, and Dan Blaustein-Rejto, overseeing food and programs focused on intensification and human . Alex Smith manages editorial operations, guiding publications that advance ecomodernist arguments. The institute maintains a extensive cadre of senior fellows—over 50 academics, scientists, and policy experts—who provide intellectual contributions through affiliations, writings, and advisory input aligned with Breakthrough's emphasis on innovation over constraint in environmental problem-solving. Prominent senior fellows include , Johnstone Family Professor of Psychology at , known for works on and human progress; , principal research scientist at , specializing in technology's economic impacts; , cofounder and president of the , advocating long-term thinking on ecology and civilization; and , economist recognized for growth theory and policy innovation. Additional notables encompass Zeke Hausfather, climate research lead at , contributing data-driven climate assessments; Daniel Sarewitz, professor at , critiquing science-policy interfaces; and Mark Sagoff, philosopher at , examining . These affiliations bolster the institute's output without implying formal employment.

Philosophical Foundations

Critique of Traditional Environmentalism

The Breakthrough Institute's critique of traditional centers on its conceptual and strategic shortcomings, as articulated by co-founders Ted Nordhaus and in their 2004 essay "The Death of Environmentalism: Global Warming in a Post-Environmental World." They argue that the movement frames primarily as a technical pollution problem solvable through expert-driven policies like carbon caps and efficiency standards, rather than as a broader civilizational challenge demanding inspirational narratives and cross-cutting coalitions. This approach, they contend, reduces to a special interest lobby reliant on fear-based messaging and outdated tactics such as campaigns and legislative horse-trading, which fail to mobilize public support or achieve substantive policy wins, as evidenced by the stalled U.S. efforts on ratification and fuel economy standards in the early 2000s. Nordhaus and Shellenberger further fault traditional for lacking a positive of human progress, instead defaulting to apocalyptic warnings without articulating scalable solutions that align with core values like prosperity and security. In their view, the movement's reluctance to engage —such as rejecting or transitions in developing nations—stems from an underlying zero-sum paradigm that assumes human advancement inevitably harms nature, ignoring historical evidence of resource decoupling through , as seen in agricultural yield increases sparing since the mid-20th century. This negativism, they assert, alienates potential allies and perpetuates irrelevance, with the essay's publication sparking widespread debate, including endorsements from outlets like and acknowledging environmentalism's political drift. Extending this analysis in the 2015 Ecomodernist Manifesto, the Institute critiques traditional 's insistence on a collision course between human prosperity and ecological health, rejecting notions of "harmonizing" society with pristine nature in favor of intensifying human activities—like and high-yield farming—to shrink humanity's overall footprint and restore wild lands. More recently, in a 2024 Breakthrough Journal essay, Nordhaus describes the ideology as neo-Malthusian and antithetical to abundance, temperamentally averse to and pragmatic , and institutionally wedded to 1970s-era regulatory frameworks that stifle and technologies essential for emission reductions, such as advanced reactors. These critiques position traditional as temperamentally regressive and structurally unequipped for 21st-century challenges, prioritizing planetary limits over human flourishing despite empirical trends of declining resource intensity per capita since the .

Core Tenets of Ecomodernism

, as articulated by the Breakthrough Institute through the 2015 Ecomodernist Manifesto, posits that human societies can achieve widespread prosperity while restoring and protecting natural ecosystems by leveraging to decouple from . This involves absolute reductions in resource use and land impacts relative to population and economic expansion, evidenced by historical trends such as agricultural yields doubling globally between 1961 and 2010, which halved the land required per capita for food production. Proponents argue that continued advancements in areas like and synthetic fertilizers enable further intensification, sparing from conversion; for instance, U.S. cropland acreage peaked in 1947 and has since declined by 25% despite population growth. A central tenet emphasizes intensification of human activities across sectors including energy, forestry, and fisheries to minimize ecological footprints. The Manifesto advocates for abundant, low-carbon energy sources such as nuclear power and advanced solar technologies to power urbanization, which concentrates human populations and reduces per capita land use—cities now house over 50% of the global population while comprising just 3% of Earth's land surface. This approach rejects romanticized views of agrarian or pre-industrial living, asserting that modernization has already lifted billions from poverty, extended life expectancy from around 30 years in 1800 to over 70 today, and allowed rewilding, as seen in the regrowth of 80% of New England's forests since 1880. Ecomodernists embrace the as an era of human dominance offering opportunities for a "good Anthropocene" through deliberate stewardship rather than restraint or . They prioritize human well-being as interdependent with environmental health, supporting of crops and livestock to boost yields without expanding farmland, and for water security, while critiquing policies that hinder innovation like restrictions on genetically modified organisms. The philosophy underscores pluralism and liberal values—democracy, tolerance, and —as essential for fostering the ingenuity needed to stabilize and , maintaining that knowledge-driven progress, not limits to growth, resolves scarcity.

Programs and Research Initiatives

Energy and Climate Innovation

The Breakthrough Institute's and innovation agenda prioritizes accelerating technological advancements to deliver abundant, affordable clean , enabling global human development while minimizing environmental harm. This approach contrasts with emission restriction strategies by focusing on innovation-driven abundance, arguing that rising energy demand in developing nations—projected to grow for decades—requires scalable, cost-competitive solutions rather than . A core initiative is the Nuclear Energy Innovation program, launched to promote advanced nuclear technologies as providers of reliable, low-carbon baseload power with enhanced safety, , and economic viability. Directed by since at least 2022, the program advocates for policy reforms to bridge innovation gaps, such as prototyping and commercialization. Key outputs include a July 17, 2025, policy proposal for incentivizing on-time and on-budget project completion through streamlined financing and regulatory incentives, aiming to reduce historical cost overruns. On October 2, 2025, critiqued and recommended improvements to the U.S. Department of Energy's pilot program, emphasizing its role in filling the prototyping void essential for U.S. competitiveness in advanced reactors. The Institute also examines complementary technologies, such as and renewables, within a framework that evaluates their potential to achieve cheap decarbonization without compromising reliability. For instance, analyses highlight the need for diversified energy mixes, including transitional fossil fuel use in developing contexts, to avoid while pursuing innovation in . This pragmatic stance extends to carbon markets and policies, critiquing overly prescriptive models in favor of market-driven incentives for technological progress.

Food, Agriculture, and Human Development

The Breakthrough Institute advocates for sustainable intensification in , emphasizing the production of more on existing farmland to minimize habitat conversion and support human prosperity amid rising global demand. This approach posits that historical yield increases—driven by innovations such as hybrid seeds, fertilizers, and genetic modification—have spared billions of hectares of wild land while reducing and rates. For instance, global growth since the mid-20th century has halved the land intensity of crop production per calorie, enabling a 300% rise in output without proportional expansion of cultivated area. In policy terms, the Institute promotes expanded public investment in agricultural (R&D), arguing that doubling U.S. public agricultural R&D spending could avert 250 million cases of by 2050, cut global agricultural by up to 20%, and lower food prices by 10-15%. They have endorsed legislation such as the Advancing on Agricultural Act of 2025, which allocates funds for soil health studies to enhance productivity and resilience without restricting technological tools like pesticides or . The Institute critiques regulatory hurdles to innovations like gene-edited crops, viewing them as essential for adapting to climate variability and sustaining yields; a 2023 commissioned study highlighted that such barriers in have slowed adoption, leading to higher land use compared to biotech-permissive regions. Regarding human development, Breakthrough analyses link agricultural progress to broader welfare gains, including reduced and in developing nations. Their "Future of Food" research series, launched in 2016 and expanded through 2018, documents how —incorporating GPS-guided machinery, drones, and data analytics—has boosted efficiency, with U.S. corn yields rising 50% from 2000 to 2020 via such methods, correlating with lower global undernourishment rates from 23% in 1990 to under 9% by 2022. They oppose policies favoring low-yield systems, which they contend increase land footprints by 20-40% for equivalent output, potentially exacerbating in biodiverse regions like . The Institute's 2025 policy roadmap for U.S. agriculture calls for farmer-centric R&D, including incentives for electric tractors and alternative proteins to decarbonize without yield trade-offs, projecting that sustained innovation could position American farming as a global exporter of high-productivity models, benefiting developing economies through technology transfer. This stance draws on empirical data showing U.S. agriculture's lower environmental footprint per unit output compared to peers, attributing it to R&D investments yielding returns of $20 per public dollar spent. Critics of anti-innovation movements, such as those advocating pesticide bans or tillage mandates, are addressed in their analyses, which warn that such measures could reverse productivity gains and heighten food insecurity.

Advocacy for Technological Progress

The Breakthrough Institute has consistently advocated for accelerating technological innovation as the primary means to achieve environmental protection and human prosperity, arguing that historical patterns of decoupling economic growth from resource consumption demonstrate the feasibility of intensifying human impacts on a smaller environmental footprint through advanced technologies. This stance, rooted in ecomodernist principles, posits that innovations in energy, agriculture, and materials science enable societies to meet rising demands for food, energy, and living standards without proportional ecological degradation. In the energy sector, the Institute promotes public investments in research, development, and demonstration (RD&D) for a broad portfolio of low-carbon technologies, including advanced nuclear reactors, , and next-generation renewables, criticizing emissions-focused policies as insufficient without underlying technological breakthroughs. For instance, since at least 2010, Breakthrough has pushed for increased federal funding in energy innovation, crediting such efforts with enabling cost declines in technologies like and solar photovoltaics, and advocating their extension to to ensure reliable, scalable decarbonization. A 2022 report by the Institute highlighted advanced nuclear's potential to cost-effectively decarbonize the U.S. power sector by providing dispatchable baseload capacity, urging regulatory reforms to expedite deployment. They oppose "technology ," instead endorsing an "all-of-the-above" strategy that avoids favoring intermittent renewables over firm sources like nuclear or , as evidenced in their support for the 2022 Inflation Reduction Act's technology-neutral incentives. On agriculture and food systems, Breakthrough champions genetically modified organisms (GMOs) and precision farming technologies as essential for sustainable intensification, enabling higher yields on less land and reducing pressures on biodiversity. The Institute critiques opposition to such innovations as rooted in precautionary fears that hinder adaptation to climate variability and population growth, drawing on empirical yield gains from GMO adoption in crops like Bt corn and Roundup Ready soybeans since their commercialization in the 1990s. Their advocacy extends to policy recommendations for easing regulatory barriers to gene-edited crops, positioning these tools as complements to, rather than substitutes for, broader innovation in fertilizers and irrigation to achieve global food security without expanding farmland. Broader advocacy includes calls for in materials and to minimize use, such as through carbon and advanced technologies, while rejecting or anti-modern prescriptions in favor of from past technological revolutions like the Haber-Bosch process for . Breakthrough's efforts have influenced discourse by emphasizing measurable outcomes, such as the 80-90% decline in costs driven by cumulative global deployments exceeding 1 terawatt by 2023, to argue that sustained R&D scales solutions faster than voluntary restraint or carbon pricing alone.

Major Publications

Foundational Essays and Books

The essay "The Death of Environmentalism: Global Warming Politics in a Post-Environmental World", co-authored by Michael Shellenberger and Ted Nordhaus and first circulated in draft form in late 2004, critiqued mainstream environmental advocacy for its reliance on fear-based narratives and failure to propose viable political strategies for addressing issues like climate change. Presented at the Environmental Grantmakers Association's annual retreat in November 2004, the 28-page document argued that environmentalism had become ideologically rigid, prioritizing nature preservation over human prosperity and technological innovation, which limited its effectiveness in democratic politics. The essay drew from interviews with over 30 environmental leaders and historical analysis, asserting that apocalyptic framing alienated potential allies and ignored evidence of human adaptability through progress. Expanding on these themes, Shellenberger and Nordhaus published Break Through: From the Death of to the of Possibility in April 2007, a 256-page book that outlined a framework for "post-environmentalism" emphasizing abundance, reduction through growth, and policy reforms like carbon taxes paired with R&D investments. The book, issued by Houghton Mifflin, incorporated empirical data on declines in developed nations—such as a 98% drop in U.S. sulfur dioxide emissions from 1970 to 2005 despite economic expansion—and critiqued zero-growth ideologies as empirically unsupported. It advocated for a " of possibility" that integrates environmental goals with broader values, including job creation via clean energy innovation, and cited historical precedents like the U.S. environmental regulatory successes under the Clean Air Act. These works laid the intellectual groundwork for the Breakthrough Institute, founded in 2007, by shifting focus from limits-to-growth models to evidence-based optimism about human ingenuity environmental impacts from development. Nordhaus and Shellenberger supported their arguments with data from sources like the and EPA, challenging claims of inevitable ecological collapse and highlighting how past technological advances, such as hybrid corn yields rising 600% in the U.S. from 1930 to 2000, enabled resource efficiencies. While the essay provoked backlash from environmental groups for its provocative title and dismissal of traditional tactics, the book received mixed s, with some praising its data-driven realism and others faulting it for underemphasizing urgency.

The Ecomodernist Manifesto

The Ecomodernist Manifesto, published on April 1, 2015, is a 25-page document co-authored by eighteen environmental scholars, scientists, and advocates, including Breakthrough Institute co-founders Ted Nordhaus and , as well as figures such as , Barry Brook, Erle Ellis, Mark Lynas, and Roger Pielke Jr.. It presents as an affirmative , asserting that "a good demands that humans use their growing social, economic, and technological powers to make life better for people, stabilize the climate, and protect the natural world." The manifesto critiques traditional environmentalism's emphasis on and limits to growth, arguing these views underestimate human adaptability and overlook historical evidence of resource abundance through innovation, such as agricultural yields that have halved global farmland use since the 1960s despite . Structured around seven sections, the document traces human emancipation from ecological constraints via technology—from hunter-gatherer dependence on vast lands to modern , where 50% of the global now occupies just 1-3% of Earth's ice-free surface, projected to reach 70% urban by 2050 with further land-sparing potential. It emphasizes decoupling human well-being from environmental impacts through intensive practices: agricultural intensification has enabled 2% of the U.S. to farm productively compared to 50% in 1880, while and could similarly reduce pressures on wild fisheries and freshwater. On energy, it advocates scaling zero-carbon sources like , which has demonstrated the capacity to meet modern demands without emissions or land disruption, contrasting it with less reliable renewables and rejecting fears of by noting rates have halved since the 1970s, with global likely peaking this century. The manifesto envisions a future of rewilding—restoring wilderness and biodiversity through deliberate human intervention—rather than passive preservation, positing that nature conservation is an anthropogenic choice enabled by prosperity, not poverty. It calls for liberal democratic institutions and continued technological optimism to achieve this, warning that anti-modern sentiments in environmentalism risk ecological collapse by discouraging intensification. Affiliated with the Breakthrough Institute's decade-long efforts to reframe ecological politics beyond the 2004 "Death of Environmentalism" critique, the document invited responses to foster debate, positioning ecomodernism as a pathway to universal human development alongside planetary vitality.

Breakthrough Journal and Ongoing Scholarship

The Breakthrough Journal, first published in June 2011, functions as the Breakthrough Institute's flagship periodical, dedicated to advancing environmental discourse through critical essays that contest orthodoxies and promote human ingenuity as central to ecological progress. Its inaugural issue featured contributions reflecting on the institute's intellectual roots, including tributes to thinkers like Daniel Bell, while subsequent editions have explored themes such as climate geopolitics, nuclear innovation, and the decoupling of economic growth from environmental degradation. By 2024, the journal had reached issue No. 20, covering topics including California's energy policies, agricultural reforms influenced by figures like Robert F. Kennedy Jr., and the viability of small modular reactors. In July 2025, the publication rebranded as The Ecomodernist and migrated to , enabling subscription-based access and expanded commentary on pressing issues like permitting for critical minerals and the politics of . This evolution sustains the journal's role in hosting debates that originated in earlier volumes, such as those on "New Conservation" and the integration of land-use intensification with biodiversity preservation. Complementing the journal, the institute's ongoing encompasses commissioned reports, analyses, and briefs that prioritize empirical of technological interventions. Recent outputs include a 2025 report assessing standards in light of expanded low-dose , advocating for risk-informed regulations to facilitate deployment, and studies on agricultural demonstrating yield improvements for farmers through targeted breeding programs. Additional examines decarbonization pathways, such as advanced contributions to reliability, and critiques of solar vulnerabilities amid geopolitical tensions. These works draw on quantitative modeling and historical to argue for accelerated innovation over restraint-based approaches, with findings cited in outlets like Politico and The New York Times as of the institute's 2024 annual report. Through annual reports and topic-specific briefs, the institute tracks verifiable metrics, such as emissions reductions tied to abundance, to substantiate claims of progress via abundance-oriented strategies.

Impact and Achievements

Shifts in Public and Policy Discourse

The Breakthrough Institute's critique of traditional , beginning with the 2004 essay "The Death of Environmentalism" co-authored by cofounders Ted Nordhaus and , challenged alarmist narratives and small-is-beautiful approaches, arguing instead for policies that prioritize human prosperity and technological solutions to achieve environmental goals. This essay, marking its 20th anniversary in 2024, initiated a global reevaluation of strategies, shifting focus from apocalyptic framing to pragmatic in and . By promoting —a advocating the of from ecological harm through intensive land use, , and genetic modification—the institute influenced public debates toward embracing abundance over scarcity. The 2015 Ecomodernist Manifesto, co-authored by 18 scholars including institute leaders, explicitly called for "a good " via human ingenuity, gaining traction in policy circles and countering ideologies with evidence of historical productivity gains in farming and energy. Its dissemination helped normalize discussions of "intensification" to spare , as evidenced by subsequent citations in analyses showing absolute in resource use across developed economies since the 1990s. In policy discourse, the institute's advocacy for "all-of-the-above" strategies—incorporating renewables, , and with carbon management—gained prominence amid U.S. political shifts, such as the post-2021 debates and 2025 Republican emphases on permitting reform for diverse low-carbon technologies. Nordhaus's work, including emphasis on benefits in messaging, contributed to a paradigm where framings highlight job creation and reliability over , as seen in evolving congressional testimonies and reports from 2010 onward. These efforts have empirically broadened elite conversations, with ecomodernist ideas appearing in outlets like and influencing metrics for that prioritize outcomes over intentions. Critics from traditional environmental groups have accused of diluting urgency, yet its rebuttals—grounded in on failed cuts under fear-based policies—have sustained a counter-discourse favoring empirical over ideological purity. By 2022, this manifested in reduced dominance of "tipping points" rhetoric in mainstream analyses, with analyses demonstrating linear climate responses over catastrophes, thereby encouraging investment-focused policies. Overall, these interventions have fostered a more pluralistic landscape, where technological optimism competes with restraint paradigms on evidentiary terms.

Contributions to Specific Policy Areas

The Breakthrough Institute has contributed policy analyses and recommendations emphasizing over emissions restrictions in and climate domains. In policy, the organization published the 2022 "Advancing Nuclear Energy" report, which outlined the scale of public support and capital required for deploying advanced reactors, advocating for streamlined licensing and federal incentives to achieve 200 gigawatts of new capacity by 2050. This work informed discussions on reforming the , proposing risk-informed regulations to accelerate approvals for small modular reactors while maintaining safety standards. Regarding permitting reform, their 2024 analysis of (NEPA) litigation, submitted to U.S. congressional hearings, documented over 1,000 cases and demonstrated that such suits rarely alter environmental outcomes but delay infrastructure projects, supporting legislative efforts to limit judicial overreach in approvals. In , the Institute has advanced recommendations for intensifying production through innovation to enhance and reduce environmental footprints. Their August 2025 policy roadmap for U.S. called for overhauling biotech regulations to expedite gene-edited approvals, protecting funding from cuts, and prioritizing farmer-led R&D to sustain gains amid variability. Earlier, in , they proposed increasing public investments to address stagnating , estimating that sustained funding could double output without expanding , countering constraints from anti-technology restrictions. These contributions critique mandates as inefficient, arguing they raise and incentivize land conversion, and instead favor and for decarbonization. Across human development policies, the Breakthrough Institute has influenced debates on energy access in developing nations, advocating against fossil fuel phase-outs that hinder industrialization. Their analyses promote "all-of-the-above" strategies, including transitions and deployment, to enable while pursuing decarbonization, as detailed in critiques of restrictive that overlooks high-impact innovations like fertilizers and high-yield crops. In 2024 annual reporting, they highlighted integration of with advocacy to reshape subsidies toward mature low-carbon technologies, influencing post-Inflation Reduction Act discussions on reallocating tax credits for competitiveness.

Empirical Outcomes and Verifiable Influences

The Breakthrough Institute's advocacy for increased public investment in agricultural has included campaigns to double federal funding for agricultural innovation, emphasizing productivity gains and land-sparing effects. A 2023 study commissioned by the institute estimated that such a doubling could boost U.S. agricultural by 1.3% annually, potentially increasing and output by 70% over baseline projections through 2050 while reducing pressures. These efforts have informed policy discussions, including visions for the 2023 Farm Bill that prioritize technological intensification over emissions caps. In energy and climate policy, the institute's emphasis on technology-driven approaches over carbon pricing contributed to a paradigm shift toward innovation-focused strategies, influencing the structure of the 2022 Inflation Reduction Act, which allocated over $369 billion to clean energy incentives, manufacturing, and R&D rather than relying primarily on price signals. Founders Ted Nordhaus and Michael Shellenberger's early public endorsement of nuclear energy as a climate mitigation technology, starting around 2007, preceded broader acceptance, with the institute's 2016 nuclear cost analysis becoming the most downloaded paper that year in Energy Policy. Congressional testimonies and letters from institute leaders, such as Nordhaus's 2023 appearance before the House Science Committee, have directly urged inclusion of nuclear provisions in tax credits and environmental reviews. The institute has also built networks of scholars and advocates promoting alternatives to traditional environmental , fostering cross-partisan support for abundance-oriented agendas, as seen in the launch of initiatives like the Abundance movement by 2024. These influences are evidenced by papers shaping federal recovery proposals post-COVID, detailing hundreds of billions in potential investments for energy infrastructure and . However, direct causal links to enacted remain contested, with attribution often inferred from alignment between institute recommendations and subsequent designs.

Criticisms and Counterarguments

Charges of Techno-Optimism and Denialism

Critics, particularly from degrowth and deep ecology perspectives, have charged the Breakthrough Institute with techno-optimism, accusing it of placing undue faith in technological innovation to decouple human progress from environmental degradation without addressing fundamental limits to growth. In a 2015 critique of the Institute's Ecomodernist Manifesto, philosopher Clive Hamilton argued that this approach substitutes "Californian positivity" for realistic climate politics, promoting speculative solutions like nuclear power and carbon capture while dismissing the urgency of immediate emission reductions through available renewables. Hamilton further contended that the Institute evades political roadblocks, such as fossil fuel lobbying, and allies with groups like the American Enterprise Institute, which have historically questioned environmental science consensus. On denialism, detractors have reframed the Institute's positions as "delay" tactics that undermine urgent action by emphasizing adaptation and future tech breakthroughs over aggressive decarbonization. A 2021 analysis labeled this as "new denial," citing the Institute's defense of past claims like as "clean energy" (later contradicted by health studies in the New England Journal of Medicine) and revival of arguments minimizing 's role in disaster intensification, despite counter-evidence from peer-reviewed . Critics also pointed to associations with figures perceived as skeptics, such as the 2015 launch of featuring UK politician , a vocal opponent of stringent policies, which drew rebukes for linking the movement to right-wing denialism. Degrowth proponents have specifically accused the Institute of denying , ignoring evidence of peaks (e.g., oil production plateauing around 2010) and failed historical of GDP from use, with GHG concentrations continuing to rise amid accelerating extinctions. They argue this techno-centric worldview, tied to neoliberal growth imperatives, overlooks technology's own environmental costs, such as the 7 million annual deaths from reported by the in 2014. Such charges portray the Institute's advocacy for intensive , urbanization, and expansion as paradoxically accelerating ecological harm under the guise of progress.

Internal and External Debates

, co-founder of the Breakthrough Institute alongside Ted Nordhaus, departed the organization in 2015 to establish Environmental Progress, citing fundamental disagreements over strategic priorities and policy emphases, including the degree of focus on advocacy and engagement with mainstream environmental groups. Nordhaus later described their visions for the institute's future as "radically different," reflecting broader tensions in approach: Shellenberger's subsequent work increasingly critiqued scalability and aligned with skeptical positions on alarmism, while the institute maintained a systems-oriented ecomodernist framework emphasizing across energy sources. These divergences extended to political orientation, with Nordhaus observing Shellenberger's evolution toward right-leaning critiques, including endorsements of narratives, which contrasted with the institute's commitment to pragmatic optimism decoupled from partisan extremes. Internal discussions at the Breakthrough Institute have also grappled with the balance between technological enthusiasm and policy realism, as seen in hosted events like the 2025 Abundance Dialogue debate on whether abundance-focused strategies equate to , featuring contrasting views from figures such as and Matt Yglesias. The institute's annual Breakthrough Dialogues, including the 2024 commemoration of "The Death of Environmentalism," have served as forums for reflecting on these tensions, excluding estranged founders like Shellenberger to prioritize forward-looking synthesis over personal rifts. Externally, the Breakthrough Institute has faced accusations from traditional environmental advocates of promoting "techno-optimism" that downplays social and regulatory barriers to decarbonization, with critics like those profiled in a 2023 investigation labeling its market-oriented prescriptions—such as all-of-the-above policies—as advancing right-wing agendas despite the institute's nonpartisan funding from foundations like and the . Figures such as have contested the institute's defenses of as a bridge fuel, arguing in 2016 that such positions misrepresent leakage risks and delay stricter emissions controls, though institute responses emphasized empirical data on natural gas's role in displacing . Similarly, debates with skeptics of , including panels at the 2016 American Association of Geographers meeting, have highlighted clashes over whether human intensification of can truly spare nature, with opponents from circles asserting that historical trends show persistent habitat loss despite technological gains. The institute has actively engaged these external critiques through structured debates, such as the 2016 "Debating " event featuring proponents like Mark Lynas, underscoring its philosophy that rigorous disagreement fosters progress over consensus-driven orthodoxy often prevalent in and groups. Critics from left-leaning outlets, including claims of "delay" tactics in understating urgency, frequently originate from institutions with documented ideological skews toward precautionary principles, yet the institute counters with data-driven rebuttals, such as analyses showing renewables' challenges in developing economies. These exchanges, including early controversies over "New Conservation" in the , have influenced broader discourse by challenging apocalyptic framing in favor of adaptive, human-centered solutions.

Rebuttals and Empirical Defenses

Proponents of the Breakthrough Institute's ecomodernist framework rebut charges of environmental denialism by affirming the reality of anthropogenic while contesting apocalyptic narratives as inconsistent with empirical trends in human welfare and ecological indicators. Co-founders Ted Nordhaus and have argued that past environmental successes, such as reductions in urban smog without eliminating oil consumption, mitigation of through scrubber technologies rather than wholesale power plant closures, and partial phase-outs of ozone-depleting substances without bans, demonstrate the efficacy of innovation-driven policies over fear-based restrictions. These examples underscore a causal pattern where targeted technological and regulatory interventions decoupled specific harms from broader economic activity, yielding measurable improvements like a 98% drop in U.S. emissions from 1970 to 2020 alongside GDP growth exceeding 300%. In defense against accusations of naive techno-optimism, scholars emphasize evidence of resource decoupling, where intensification of agriculture and energy production has spared natural habitats. The 2015 Ecomodernist Manifesto, co-authored by Breakthrough affiliates, documents how modern crop breeding, fertilizers, and have enabled food production to expand on just one-quarter of the projected necessary under pre-industrial methods, facilitating a net global forest gain of 7.1% from 1982 to 2016 via agricultural efficiency and . This land-sparing effect is empirically linked to yield increases— productivity rose 200% globally from 1961 to 2019—allowing wildlife recovery in formerly farmed areas, as seen in populations rebounding from near-extinction to over 7,000 by 2020 through habitat restoration enabled by farm consolidation. Breakthrough researchers further defend their positions with data on energy transitions, countering claims of overreliance on unproven technologies by highlighting power's track record: France's fleet, operational since the , has avoided 2 million tons of annual CO2 emissions equivalent compared to baselines, with per-terawatt-hour death rates from at 0.03 versus 24.6 for , based on comprehensive risk assessments including accidents like and . In the U.S., the shift to via correlated with a 15% decline in power sector CO2 emissions from 2005 to 2019 amid 27% GDP growth, illustrating how market-driven innovation can achieve emissions reductions without mandated . These outcomes rebut critiques by demonstrating causal realism: prosperity and are not zero-sum, as historical data show —not abundance—as the primary driver of ecological strain, with absolute rates falling from 42% in 1981 to under 10% by 2019 globally. Critics' portrayals of as dismissive of biophysical limits are addressed through first-principles analysis of , where Institute analyses cite rebounding indicators like a tripling of global cropland productivity since 1960 enabling "" conservation scenarios without risks. Nordhaus has specifically rebutted advocates by noting that relative in developed economies—such as EU material footprint stabilization despite 60% GDP growth from 1990 to 2018—foreshadows absolute via scaling high-density energy sources like advanced and research. Such defenses prioritize verifiable metrics over precautionary pessimism, arguing that underestimating human ingenuity ignores causal evidence from the , which averted mass starvation for billions while expanding protected lands.

References

  1. [1]
    About Landing | The Breakthrough Institute
    The Breakthrough Institute is a global research center that identifies and promotes technological solutions to environmental and human development challenges.Missing: founders | Show results with:founders
  2. [2]
    Ecomodernism - The Breakthrough Institute
    An environmental philosophy that argues that humans can protect nature and improve human wellbeing by decoupling human development from environmental impacts.Two Modernities, Two ...On the Differences Between ...
  3. [3]
    History | The Breakthrough Institute
    Jun 21, 2012 · In 2003, Ted Nordhaus and Michael Shellenberger cofounded the Apollo Alliance to unite major environmental groups and labor unions around a high ...Missing: mission | Show results with:mission
  4. [4]
    The Afterlife Of Environmentalism - The American Prospect
    Sep 18, 2005 · Michael Shellenberger and Ted Nordhaus released “The Death of Environmentalism” in October 2004 at the annual gathering of environmental ...
  5. [5]
    The Death of Environmentalism | The Breakthrough Institute
    Jun 16, 2010 · “Several months ago, two bright U.S. activists set tongues wagging with a testy essay called The Death of Environmentalism. The passionate ...
  6. [6]
    Breakthrough Institute - SourceWatch
    Feb 18, 2020 · Founded in 2003 by Michael Shellenberger and Ted Nordhaus, Breakthrough Institute has had policy programs it has described as covering the ...
  7. [7]
    Michael Shellenberger | The Breakthrough Institute
    Michael Shellenberger co-founded the Breakthrough Institute with Ted Nordhaus in 2003. He left the Breakthrough Institute in 2015 and founded Environmental ...Missing: mission | Show results with:mission
  8. [8]
    An Ecomodernist Manifesto - The Breakthrough Institute
    Apr 15, 2015 · The manifesto offers an affirmative and optimistic vision for a future in which we can have universal human development, freedom, and more nature.
  9. [9]
    Breakthrough Institute pushes Build Nuclear Now campaign
    Jun 15, 2023 · A bill being considered in the Texas legislature would create a taxpayer-funded program to draw advanced nuclear projects to the state.GOP state ...
  10. [10]
    Accelerating Commercialization Through Incentivizing On-Time ...
    Jul 17, 2025 · A novel approach that encourages the construction of new nuclear and incentivizes the on-time and on-budget completion of nuclear projects through a single ...
  11. [11]
    2024 Annual Report - The Breakthrough Institute
    Dec 11, 2024 · Most recently, we have helped launch a growing Abundance movement, to build factions in both parties committed to technological progress, public ...
  12. [12]
    [PDF] 2024 Annual Report - imgix
    In 2024, the Breakthrough Institute continued to grow its presence and influence in ... We are also very fortunate to have received 30% of our total funding as ...
  13. [13]
    Breakthrough Institute unveils policy roadmap for American ag
    Aug 14, 2025 · The Breakthrough Institute's roadmap for a “science-based, pro-growth strategy” includes overhauling biotech regulations, safeguarding ag ...
  14. [14]
    The Breakthrough Institute's Vision for the 2023 Farm Bill
    Jan 11, 2023 · The Breakthrough Institute's Vision for the 2023 Farm Bill. As 2023 ... Productivity growth has, in turn, reduced food prices, reduced ...
  15. [15]
    [PDF] 2022 - annual report - imgix
    The last several years have witnessed a remarkable period of growth and development for the Breakthrough Institute. Since 2019,.
  16. [16]
    Our Funders - The Breakthrough Institute
    Cutting-edge policy research at one of the country's most intellectually challenging think tanks. Fellowship and friendships that last a lifetime.Missing: mission | Show results with:mission
  17. [17]
    The Breakthrough Institute - Nonprofit Explorer - News Apps
    Designated as a 501(c)3 Organizations for any of the following purposes: religious, educational, charitable, scientific, literary, testing for public safety.
  18. [18]
    The Breakthrough Institute - GuideStar Profile
    Mission. The Breakthrough Institute is a research center that identifies and promotes technological solutions to environmental and human development challenges.
  19. [19]
    Our Board - The Breakthrough Institute
    The Breakthrough Institute is an environmental research center based in Oakland, California. Our research focuses on identifying and promoting technological ...Missing: structure | Show results with:structure
  20. [20]
    Meet the Team - The Breakthrough Institute
    Executive Team ; Ted summer 2019 · Ted Nordhaus. Founder and Executive Director ; Alextrembath headshot 720. Alex Trembath. Deputy Director ; IMG 4821 · Ann Wang.
  21. [21]
    Breakthrough Institute - InfluenceWatch
    The Breakthrough Institute is an environmental think tank that promotes technology to make clean energy cheap, using "ecomodernism" to address climate change.
  22. [22]
    Breakthrough is Bay Area's most controversial climate nonprofit
    Jun 12, 2023 · The think tank was founded in 2007 and now operates on a close to $5 million annual budget with about 20 staffers. According to Nordhaus, the ...
  23. [23]
    Alex Trembath | The Breakthrough Institute
    Alex Trembath is Deputy Director of the Breakthrough Institute. He helps manage Breakthrough's research, network-building, and events.Missing: governance | Show results with:governance
  24. [24]
    Senior Fellows - The Breakthrough Institute
    Senior fellows include Andrew McAfee (MIT), Daniel Sarewitz (Arizona State), Mark Sagoff (GMU), and Steven Pinker (Harvard).Missing: notable contributors
  25. [25]
    The death of environmentalism: Global warming politics in a post ...
    Jan 14, 2005 · The death of environmentalism: Global warming politics in a post-environmental world. This essay by Michael Shellenberger and Ted Nordhaus ...Missing: text | Show results with:text
  26. [26]
    Environmentalism Is Antithetical to Abundance
    Oct 10, 2024 · The essay argued that the modern environmental movement was spectacularly ill-suited—temperamentally, ideologically, and institutionally—to lead ...
  27. [27]
    ENGLISH — An ECOMODERNIST MANIFESTO
    Ecomodernists aim for a good Anthropocene by using human powers to improve life, stabilize climate, and protect nature, while decoupling human development from ...Missing: core tenets
  28. [28]
    Energy and Climate - The Breakthrough Institute
    Make clean energy cheap. · Wildfires · Climate Change · Decarbonization · Just Transition · Fossil Fuels · Carbon Markets · Renewable Energy · Geothermal Power ...Advanced Nuclear Power · Does Nuclear Energy Need... · Climate ChangeMissing: initiatives 2020-2025
  29. [29]
    Nuclear Energy Innovation | The Breakthrough Institute
    Advanced nuclear technologies promise clean, reliable power with strong safety profiles and increasing benefits for energy security, climate, and economic…
  30. [30]
    Adam Stein | The Breakthrough Institute
    Adam Stein is the Director of the Nuclear Energy Innovation program at the Breakthrough Institute. His focus ...
  31. [31]
    Articles Tagged with: breakthrough institute -- ANS / Nuclear Newswire
    A new report from the Breakthrough Institute has identified challenges and offers recommendations to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.Missing: program | Show results with:program
  32. [32]
    Making DOE's Nuclear Reactor Pilot Program Work
    Oct 2, 2025 · This pilot program fills the gap in the prototyping stage of the innovation cycle, which is crucial for the U.S. to succeed. Why Prototypes ...
  33. [33]
    Energy for Development - The Breakthrough Institute
    Developed economies are responsible for the vast majority of greenhouse gas emissions in our atmosphere, and still, developing economies are coerced to ...Missing: expansion | Show results with:expansion
  34. [34]
    Raising Agricultural Yields Spares Land - The Breakthrough Institute
    Mar 13, 2024 · A growing number of voices have argued that higher yields may spare very little land from conversion or even increase land use, an outcome termed backfire.
  35. [35]
    Agricultural Research and Development: How to Grow Enough Food ...
    Sep 18, 2022 · The Breakthrough Institute is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit environmental research center based in Berkeley, California, that identifies and promotes ...
  36. [36]
    RELEASE: Breakthrough Institute Endorses Agricultural Soil ...
    August 13, 2025 — The Breakthrough Institute is pleased to support the Advancing Research on Agricultural Soil Health Act.<|separator|>
  37. [37]
    The America Grows Act Is a Step Forward for Agricultural Innovation
    May 25, 2023 · Analysis commissioned by the Breakthrough Institute projects that doubling public U.S. agricultural R&D spending would reduce global ...
  38. [38]
    Agricultural Innovation - The Breakthrough Institute
    SECURE Rule Vacature Creates Opportunity for USDA to Develop Improved Product- and Risk-Based Agricultural Biotechnology Regulations.
  39. [39]
    The Future of Food | The Breakthrough Institute
    Sep 13, 2018 · “The Future of Food” is a Breakthrough research series examining global food consumption, agriculture, and technological innovation.
  40. [40]
    Precision Agriculture: Visualizing… - The Breakthrough Institute
    Precision Agriculture: Visualizing Agricultural Innovation. Dec 7, 2016. Print; Share. Share via Twitter; Share via Facebook; Share via Email. Subscribe.
  41. [41]
    Food and Agriculture - The Breakthrough Institute
    We need a pragmatic vision for our global food system, one that meets rising food demand to ensure a healthy and prosperous population.
  42. [42]
    Agricultural Research Needs a Farmer-First Focus
    Aug 1, 2025 · This essay was based on a Breakthrough-commissioned report prepared by Michelle Klieger, Callie McAdams, and Rachel Owens.
  43. [43]
    MAHA: Making Agriculture Harder for All | The Breakthrough Institute
    Sep 26, 2025 · MAHA's vision for farming won't make America healthier, but it will make agriculture harder for farmers. It will bring more plowing, more ...
  44. [44]
    Technology Policy, Not Emissions Policy - The Breakthrough Institute
    Apr 14, 2025 · Repealing public incentives for promising but less mature sectors would greatly imperil technological progress and U.S. competitiveness without ...
  45. [45]
    Energy Innovation, Back in the Game - The Breakthrough Institute
    Dec 20, 2016 · Since before 2010, when we published Where Good Technologies Come From, Breakthrough has been a leading advocate of public investments in ...
  46. [46]
    Advancing Nuclear Energy | The Breakthrough Institute
    Jul 6, 2022 · Advanced nuclear reactors can play a key role in cost-effective decarbonization of the national power sector, reliably supporting a high- ...
  47. [47]
    Against Technology Tribalism | The Breakthrough Institute
    Jan 31, 2013 · Innovation advocates must appeal to reasonable conservatives and liberals with an all of the above agenda that is focused on making all ...
  48. [48]
    On the Difference Between Techno and Technocratic Optimism
    Jul 31, 2023 · Last year's passage of the IRA in many ways validated the Breakthrough Institute's long standing advocacy of technology and investment-led ...
  49. [49]
    Ecomodernism in Action | The Breakthrough Institute
    Dec 28, 2021 · The Breakthrough Institute was founded 15 years ago in service of an optimistic, technologically focused environmental politics.
  50. [50]
    Breakthrough Journal Is Now The Ecomodernist
    Jul 9, 2025 · The Breakthrough Institute published the Ecomodernist Manifesto, co-authored by 18 researchers, theorists, and advocates, with the goal of inspiring what they ...
  51. [51]
    What Is To Be Done? | The Breakthrough Institute
    Nov 16, 2016 · Our view at Breakthrough remains that macro-economic conditions, technological change, and public investment in innovation and ...
  52. [52]
    The SolarFix Is In - The Breakthrough Institute
    Sep 22, 2025 · “The technofix is in,” wrote the environmental ethicist Clive Hamilton ten years ago, in response to the publication of “An Ecomodernist ...Missing: progress | Show results with:progress
  53. [53]
    [PDF] The Death of Environmentalism - Amazon S3
    Environmentalism is today more about protecting a supposed “thing” – “the environment” – than advancing the worldview articulated by Sierra Club founder John ...
  54. [54]
    'Break Through' The Book | The Breakthrough Institute
    Aug 17, 2010 · At just 191 pages long, Promise and Peril sheds far more light on the politics of race, class, and environment than books on environmental ...Missing: foundational | Show results with:foundational
  55. [55]
    Break Through: From the Death of Environmentalism to the Politics ...
    30-day returnsBreak Through: From the Death of Environmentalism to the Politics ofPossibility [Shellenberger, Michael, Nordhaus, Ted] on Amazon ... Publication date.
  56. [56]
    Break Through: From the Death of Environmentalism to the Politics ...
    Break Through: From the Death of Environmentalism to the Politics of Possibility. Authors, Ted Nordhaus, Michael Shellenberger. Publisher, Houghton Mifflin ...
  57. [57]
    Break Through: From the Death of Environmentalism to the Politics ...
    Jan 13, 2008 · BREAK THROUGH. From the Death of Environmentalism to the Politics of Possibility. By Ted Nordhaus and Michael Shellenberger. 344 pp. Houghton ...
  58. [58]
    Authors - An ECOMODERNIST MANIFESTO
    Ted Nordhaus is chairman and cofounder of the Breakthrough Institute. His book Break Through: From the Death of Environmentalism to the Politics of Possibility, ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  59. [59]
    FROM THE EDITORS | The Breakthrough Institute
    Jun 22, 2011 · The idea for this inaugural issue of the Breakthrough Journal was conceived this past winter, shortly after the death of Daniel Bell, the ...
  60. [60]
    No. 20 / Spring 2024 | The Breakthrough Institute
    Breakthrough Journal exists to modernize environmental thought for the 21st century, challenging conventional wisdom.
  61. [61]
    The Ecomodernist | Breakthrough Institute | Substack
    Building a new environmental paradigm through analyses and essays on politics, nuclear energy, agriculture, critical minerals, permitting reform, and much ...
  62. [62]
    Drawing the Line - The Breakthrough Institute
    Jul 16, 2025 · This paper evaluates the scientific and policy landscape of radiation protection. While extensive research has expanded understanding of the ...
  63. [63]
    2024 Dialogue Death of Environmentalism | The Breakthrough Institute
    2024 marks the 20th anniversary of the publication of The Death of Environmentalism. The essay began a global conversation about the future of environmentalism.
  64. [64]
    An ECOMODERNIST MANIFESTO
    “We offer this statement in the belief that both human prosperity and an ecologically vibrant planet are not only possible, but also inseparable.
  65. [65]
    Green Growth Won't Kill the Planet | The Breakthrough Institute
    Nov 30, 2021 · And if the optimistic instincts of ecomodernism are to hold sway in public discourse and policy making, they need better metrics to make the ...
  66. [66]
    Quiet Climate Policy Is Dead. Long Live All-of-the-Above Energy…
    Sep 19, 2025 · That said, blocking wind, solar, and transmission development on public lands may undermine public support for the Trump Administration's energy ...
  67. [67]
    Episode 46: Ted Nordhaus, Breakthrough Institute - MCJ Collective
    Oct 17, 2024 · Ted's views on the problems with the environmental movement, which led him to founding BTI. BTI mission, vision, work. Ted's views on the nature ...
  68. [68]
    [PDF] The Breakthrough Institute - imgix
    The Breakthrough Institute has been active for over a decade now. From the beginning, we've worked to modernize environmental thought and action for the ...<|separator|>
  69. [69]
    Twilight of Environmental Idols | The Breakthrough Institute
    Sep 26, 2022 · The problem with environmentalism is not simply that it isn't up to the task of building a low-carbon future but that it is actively obstructing that future.
  70. [70]
    There Is No Climate Tipping Point | The Breakthrough Institute
    Apr 17, 2023 · The Breakthrough Institute logo. Our Work. – Hide Our Work submenu. + ... How confusion about tipping points influences climate discourse.
  71. [71]
    BTI's Innovative Vision for NRC Modernization
    Nov 16, 2023 · BTI has pinpointed crucial opportunities to modernize the regulatory framework that will lay the foundation for streamlined and efficient nuclear reactor ...
  72. [72]
    [PDF] Understanding NEPA Litigation | The Breakthrough Institute
    Sep 11, 2024 · Our findings suggest that NEPA litigation at this level rarely changes environmental outcomes or protects environmental justice communities.
  73. [73]
    Understanding NEPA Litigation - The Breakthrough Institute
    Jul 11, 2024 · Our analysis helps fill this knowledge gap, documenting and sorting hundreds of NEPA litigation cases to assess trends, patterns, and impacts.Missing: legislation | Show results with:legislation
  74. [74]
    Biofuel Policy Is Failing Consumers and the Climate
    May 7, 2025 · Biofuels increase food prices; incentivize more agricultural land-use and thus risk deforestation and other environmental problems; and are an inefficient way ...
  75. [75]
    Public Financing for Agricultural Decarbonization and Abundance
    electric tractors, alternative proteins, controlled ...
  76. [76]
    Technology, Not Climate, Will Determine the Future of our Food ...
    Sep 27, 2023 · A 2023 study, commissioned by The Breakthrough Institute, found that roughly doubling U.S. public agricultural R&D would increase agricultural ...
  77. [77]
    How Ted Nordhaus brought realpolitik to climate politics - Vox
    Oct 20, 2022 · The Breakthrough Institute co-founder helped lay the intellectual foundation for a more effective approach to fighting climate change.
  78. [78]
    2019 IMPACT REPORT - imgix
    A decade ago, the Breakthrough Institute was the first prominent environmental NGO to pub- licly embrace nuclear energy as a key climate mitigation technology, ...
  79. [79]
    [PDF] Written Testimony of Ted Nordhaus Founder and Executive Director ...
    Jul 18, 2023 · My name is Ted Nordhaus, and I am the founder and executive director of the Breakthrough Institute. We are an independent global research center.<|separator|>
  80. [80]
    [PDF] 2020 IMPACT REPORT - imgix
    Over those years, Breakthrough built a network of scholars, advocates, and think tanks interested in al- ternatives to carbon pricing, ranging from center-left ...
  81. [81]
    After the Pandemic: Hope and… - The Breakthrough Institute
    Dec 29, 2020 · Over the course of this year, we released a dozen policy papers detailing hundreds of billions of dollars in potential federal COVID recovery ...Missing: successes | Show results with:successes
  82. [82]
    [PDF] A Call to Look Past An Ecomodernist Manifesto: A Degrowth Critique
    Many of the authors are associated with The Breakthrough Institute, a think tank whose mission has been described as “'neoliberal conservation' guided by ...
  83. [83]
    The Technofix Is In: A critique of "An Ecomodernist Manifesto"
    Apr 28, 2015 · For some years the California-based Breakthrough Institute has been vigorously promoting what it claims to be a new “post-environmentalism,” one ...
  84. [84]
    The New Denial Is Delay at the Breakthrough Institute
    Mar 16, 2021 · In 2004, Ted Nordhaus and Michael Shellenberger, the founders of a scrappy Bay Area think tank called the Breakthrough Institute, shot to ...<|separator|>
  85. [85]
    Everyone Warned the Breakthrough Ecomodernists To Avoid Toxic ...
    Sep 29, 2015 · Until now the California-based Breakthrough Institute has faced much criticism for delaying climate action by relying too heavily on 'silver ...
  86. [86]
    Michael and Me | The Breakthrough Institute
    May 1, 2024 · Michael Shellenberger is far better known today as a right-wing political influencer than he ever was during the period we worked together.
  87. [87]
    The End of the World Has Been Postponed
    Eventually, personal and political differences with Nordhaus led Shellenberger to leave Breakthrough and found the pro-nuclear group Environmental Progress in ...
  88. [88]
    The Best Things in Life Are Free (For Everything Else, There's…
    Oct 15, 2025 · Last month, I attended a debate between Oren Cass and Matt Yglesias at Abundance 2025 titled “Is Abundance Just Neoliberalism?
  89. [89]
    Bill McKibben's Misleading New Chemistry
    Mar 25, 2016 · Bill McKibben's Misleading New Chemistry. Separating Fact from Fiction in the Fracking Debate. Mar 25, 2016.
  90. [90]
    Ecomodernism Debated: American… - The Breakthrough Institute
    Ecomodernism will be debated as part of the 2016 American Association of Geographers' Annual Meeting in San Francisco, California.
  91. [91]
    Debating Ecomodernism | The Breakthrough Institute
    Jan 22, 2016 · "Us ecomodernists are very enthusiastic about debate," says Lynas. You can watch the video of the event below or click here for a brief summary.
  92. [92]
    What the 100% Renewables Literature Gets Wrong
    Jul 26, 2023 · Claims that Asia and Africa can easily achieve a clean energy transition at low cost using renewables and storage alone are bunk.
  93. [93]
    Shellenberger & Nordhaus respond to critics - Grist.org
    Sep 28, 2007 · We were able to fight smog without replacing oil. We dealt with acid rain without dismantling our power plants. And we will phase out ozone- ...Missing: responses | Show results with:responses
  94. [94]
    Ecomodernism: A Third Way | The Breakthrough Institute
    Oct 8, 2015 · Obviously I want to highlight this terrific rebuttal to George Monbiot's criticisms of ecomodernism by Ben Heard because, well, I am a proud ...
  95. [95]
    Unbalanced | The Breakthrough Institute
    Mar 1, 2021 · This story offers insight into what a durable social and political consensus for climate action in the United States is likely to require.